Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, Michael, I got up early just to say good
morning and avoid the cackle.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Mike Dragon goog winning.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I got nothing for you. I just wanted to make
sure I didn't hear any cackles. Sorry, at least the
second talk back was being genuinely honest. I just did
it so. I mean, you can tell she was still groggy.
She's probably still laying in bed. She hadn't even met
(00:32):
her coffee or diet coke yet. She's still you know,
the TV's not on that the cats, you know, the
cat and dog are both like clawing at her like
calls get to bed and eat, and she's like, no,
just gotta, I gotta leave it talk about and just
make sure I don't think of that damn cackle. Now.
The first guy was just a lying, SOB I just
wanted to say good morning. And yes, he says saying
(00:56):
but I just want to say good morning and make
sure we don't hear the cackle.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
He doesn't want to say good morning to us though,
That's what I mean.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
He was lying. You don't want to say good morning.
I just want to avoid the cackle, right, That's all
they wanted. Mark your mark, your your date book, your
calendar seven alarm, Uh, dragon, and I have a I
think it's a major announcement, don't you.
Speaker 4 (01:23):
It's not quite life change. It will well some of
us might be life changing, it's true. Yeah, but it's.
Speaker 5 (01:35):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
Just tune in at nine thirty. So at the at
the end of the nine thirty break.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
We'll have a we got something to tell you.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
We guess something to tell you. Yeah, we got something
to tell you. Uh. That's the hardest thing now is
to tease that and not talk about it.
Speaker 2 (01:55):
Oh. Here we can say that some people may like it.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Some people are gonna like it. Some people we're not
gonna like it. And we understand that. And it is
it is the nature. It is what it is, and
it's and it does involve this jury pool. It involves
the twelve listeners and the alternate. So you're you're just
going to you know, you're just going to have to
(02:20):
do what you're supposed to do. That's that's all amounts
to do. You're just gonna have to do it.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
It shouldn't be that difficult, shouldn't.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
Except that you know that they'll have to when it well,
I can't I can't say that yet because that might
give away too much.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Well, we're asking them to do something.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
Yeah, they're gonna have to. They will have to do
something right, and they might even have to you know,
like you know, change.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
On that push a couple of buttons.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
Yeah, you might have push a button or two. But
we get will we'll put explicit instructions. We'll we'll tell
you how to do it, will lead you through it
because we know you're a bunch of income poops and
and we'll we'll we'll lead you by the nose.
Speaker 4 (03:10):
Well, we'll need something from you too, Yes, just a couple,
not many, but we'll we'll we'll need something.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yes, I would say one or two new things. Everything
else stays the same. Yeah, yeah, but yeah, yeah, yes,
the I'm sorry, what I did I interrupt the talent?
Excuse me?
Speaker 4 (03:34):
What proper teases? I just wanted to throw that out
there one more time. Nine thirty, just after nine thirty,
nine thirty Mountains Denver time, nine thirty. We're gonna, we're
gonna tell you something.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Nine we are what are we gonna tell them something?
Speaker 3 (03:51):
Something?
Speaker 2 (03:52):
For those in the podcast, just skip if you're a few.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
Hours, skip all this because actually for the well, I
won't say that either. But if you're a podcast listener,
don't worry about anything we're telling you.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
Yeah right, yeah, yeah, yeah, the podcast will yeah.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Yeah, we could do. The really sad part about what
we're doing right now is we're so childish and immature.
We could do this for the.
Speaker 4 (04:23):
Entire hour probably nine thirty yeah, nine thirty nine, thirty
nine thirty nine thirty out in time is it mine?
Thirty nine thirty Well, it'll probably be closer to like
nineteen thirty five thirty three five, dependent on you know. Yeah, yeah,
right right now, because we'll probably tease it and have
a little bit of fun right then too.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Do we have any do we have any dancing girls
coming in? I wish hull I hadn't thought about that.
I mean maybe, well, to be fair, we should need
we need like what was that what was that group
of guys that that they were kind of like the
male version the rock.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
At the Chippendale Chippendale Yeah Chippendale' Yeah.
Speaker 4 (05:02):
But we are luck we'll get the Chris Farley one
and elsewhere.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
We'll get thee.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
I forgot to leave spaced out. It's amazing as you
get older, the things that you realize are really not
important to you don't really need to waste a neuron
or a brain cells or remember that, and so you
park it somewhere where it's like in a it's in
a storage closet in your brain that you never go
look for. And then somebody says and you realize, oh
my god, I've got that over there in the storage compartment.
(05:31):
Oh my god, and then the visual comes out and
you did not need to think about that this early
in the morning.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Where we don't have the rockets or somebody else might.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Yes, yes, Jimmy Christmas, we have some really big news.
We got some really big news. I've got some really
big news that I like to get to also, but
we do have big news at nine thirty. The big
news out of congressome Tuesday came from James Comer. Now,
I want to be honest here, I think James Comber does.
(06:04):
He's one of these guys that you look at. You
probably have an employee like this, or you worked with
somebody liked it, or you've worked with somebody like this.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
That doesn't real far. What what did I do? I'm
just promoting nine thirty.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
What are you doing?
Speaker 4 (06:17):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I'm talking about James Comber and how he's one of
those guys.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
That really that's his big news is nine thirty Come.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
On, no, no, no, I'm talking about James Comber what
he did yesterday for that big news yesterday.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
That's not a big news as nine thirty nine thirty, of.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
Course not because this just involves Joe Biden the autopim
that's old news, true, Yeah, but it's new news because
of what James Comber did. And I was just gonna
make a pithy, little derogatory common about James Comber because
he reminds me of and I, as I was about
to say, you may work with someone like this or
(06:55):
know someone like this, kind of like I work with
and know someone like this looking at me because they
they do a really good job at what they're supposed
to do, but there's just something about them that's just
kind of obnoxious and off putting. Oh kind of like
you just kind of like you. That's that's what it is.
(07:18):
So you know James Comer, by the way, if you
don't know, as the chairman of the House Oversight Committee,
they published a report that declared hundreds of executive orders,
and I'm guessing they say hundreds but I think thousands
of presidential pardons were actually executed by White House staffers
using the infamous auto pen, and they now claim and
(07:42):
we can we can argue about this till the cows
come home. And the problem with being trained as a
lawyer is that I can make the argument on both sides,
and I think they're equally both good arguments. The pardons,
(08:03):
the executive orders they claim the House or Sight Committee
does are now Nolan void because of everything they've discovered,
in fact in a tweet. I still, you know, I
think we should go back to tweet because a post,
I mean, what are we talking about, Fince post?
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Yeah, post is just boring, But what post is boring?
It's it's not gonna be boring at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:29):
Maybe what we should do at nine thirty is just
tweet it out and go home early.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
How about that might time in randomly and just say
nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:36):
And I'm going to be so sick of that by
nine thirty that I'll just.
Speaker 4 (08:42):
What good news is I won't have to mention nine
thirty after nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
True, that's true. So if I can just make it
to nine thirty, I'll be good.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Yeah, because something happens at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I just want to bang my head. It's the sad
part is I'm gonna bang my head, not just be
as a you bpus because of the other things that
we were talking about before the show started, about.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
Or not even ten minutes into the show, and I've
already got you bang your head, yes, and nine thirty,
and you got me banging.
Speaker 3 (09:15):
My head because it's something that that the people that
listen to this program, the twelve jurors and the one
ultimate we have well, but understand my frustration when if
at nine thirty, I do explain the frustration.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
When nine thirty comes around.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
Yeah, when nine thirty comes around, say you know what,
this is really beginning to not irritate me, but it's
just like, oh my god, I'm gona have to both
this until nine thirty, are I yep? Okay?
Speaker 5 (09:49):
All right?
Speaker 4 (09:49):
I mean we can talk about nine thirty at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
So here's what I'm going to do. You will come
to hate just nine thirty. Those are three syllables, So
you'll come to hate nine thirty those between now and
nine thirty as much as I already do. I was
told that I could tease nine thirty. So I thought, well,
(10:14):
you know, every you know our top of the hour
bottom they are. I'll be sure remind everybody to ten
at nine thirty because we have a big ass announcement
to make it nine thirty. But no, mister twelve year
old back there just can't let it go because he
knows he's getting ice cream at nine thirty. He can't,
(10:34):
he can't wait. So the House Oversight Committee yesterday posted
a tweet and it says we are deeming Biden's executive
actions in all caps noel and void, and they put
out a report and we'll get to the report in
just a minute. But WHOA talk about gutsy. They have
declared now they can they can declare that they've they've
(10:58):
they have decided as the committee, which by the way,
would be divided along partisan lines, but the majority of
the House Oversight Committee has deemed that all of the
executive orders and the pardon signed by Joe Biden, with
the exception probably of Hunter Biden, because we know that
Hunter Biden's pardon was actually signed by Joe Biden. They
(11:19):
found a time when he was awake, and they in
fact Hunter may have even handed to him and said here,
dad's dad, here's my pardon. Please sign this. But this
is a step that a lot of people wanted to
see Comer and Congress take since the auto pen's usage
was first revealed to the public back on February first.
(11:41):
And I know many of you have become frustrated with
Congressional Republicans who never seem to get anything really done.
And what bugs me about this story is I'm glad
they have made the announcement, and I'm glad that they've
made this determination. However, I question whether or not they
(12:04):
can actually do anything about it. That's the real issue.
But getting to this point in just eight months is
in fact for Republicans for Congress to do anything, is
an extremely fast timeline because of all the procedural hurdles
that any Congressional committee faces in doing its work. Now,
(12:26):
I'll get to the text of the report in just
a minute, But immediately following the publication of the report,
the Chairman, James Comer sent a letter over to the
Attorney General, Pam Bondi quote, requesting the United States Department
of Justice conduct a comprehensive review of all executive actions
taken during the Biden presidency and scrutinized key Biden aids,
(12:49):
doctor Kevin O'Connor, an Ae Thomasini, and Anthony Bernall, who
have all, by the way, interestingly pleaded the Fifth Amendment
during the investigation. Now, in criminal court, juries are instructed
that you are not to read anything into a witness
invoking the Fifth Amendment. You're not to impute guilt to them,
(13:12):
You're not to do anything. It's just that they are
exercising their constitutional right not to testify against themselves or
not to testify. I to have split it out and
read the exact language, but it's that you don't have
to testify or incriminate yourself. Jurors, however, are instructed not
to read anything into that. It's just a factual letter.
(13:36):
Here's the cover letter that Comer sent to the Attorney
General the Biden outopen presidency. Now I find that funny,
but I also find it childish, which is probably my
Which is probably why I find it funny. Is that
(13:58):
now what we're going to ref to the four years
of Biden as the Biden autopen presidency. Okay, that's fine.
Seems a little childish to me, but so be it.
I really just don't give her adsass the Biden quote,
the Biden autopen presidency will go down as one of
the biggest political scandals in US history. Now, if they
if they prove what I think they can prove, then yes,
(14:21):
it will be a huge It will be a huge scandal.
I want you to differ each differentiate in your mind
the proof of what happened versus what can you do
about it? Okay, because presidents and even if you prove
that something happened in a particular way, it may not
(14:45):
be sufficient proof to show that Biden was truly totally incapacitated.
It may just prove that Biden was just didn't care
just to sleep, had just sort of like the There
are days when I finally get to the fourth hour
of the program and I'm kind of I've been really
(15:05):
hyped up on some stories, and I get to the
fourth hour of the program, and if in a dip
wad back there, if Jackwagon back there wants to just start,
you know, nine thirty nine thirty nine, this would be
a day where I would just sit back and just
let him do it, because I just don't care. I
think Biden may have been at that point from the
day he was inaugurated. Oh, he is probably excited. They
probably couldn't wait to take his you know, his first
(15:26):
trip as president on Air Force one and where the
cool flight jacket they give him and all of that. Yeah,
I get all of that, but separate what they have
found or able to prove, versus what they can do
about what they've proven. So go back to the letter.
Excuse me. The Biden out'll pim presidents. He will go
down as one of the biggest political scandals in US history.
(15:47):
As Americans saw President Biden's decline with their own eyes,
Biden's inner circle sought to deceive the public, cover up
his decline, and took unauthorized, unauthorized executive actions with the
that are now invalid. That's where I have the question,
the legal question. Unauthorized executive actions are I think, by
(16:13):
the very nature of themselves invalid. But I don't apply
that same standard to a pardon. And I say that
because the power of the pardon is exclusively and without
any reservation or without any limitation, reserved to the president,
(16:34):
and all they need to all Democrats would need, or
any staffer would need it would be for one person
to testify. I'm exaggerating here, but it would muddy the waters.
One person to testify that the President told us that
when it came to pardons that he authorized them all
(16:54):
as long as you know certain prerequisites were met from
the Pardon Office and the DOJ had reviewed them, or
that somebody on the Chief of Staff's office had reviewed
them or whatever. So if they had done one or two,
then they were authorized to use the auto pen to
execute pardons. Quote. Our report reveals how AIDS colluded to
(17:21):
mislead the public and the extraordinary measures they took to
sustain the appearance of presidential authority as Biden's capacity to
function independently diminished. Executive actions performed by Biden White House
staff and signed by Auto Pin are noll and void.
We are calling on the Department of Justice to conduct
the thorough review of these executive actions and scrutinize Key
(17:44):
Biden age who took the fifth to hide their participation
in the cover up.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
And then it says, good morning, ladies, Dragon, I hope
you feel better after your little tenth for transum yesterday
in morning. You know the joke on you because I
just fast forwarded on the podcast. I don't have to
listen to your chas stuff. Congratulations to the ass that
(18:13):
was an awesome game last night. I doubt we'll ever
get a hat check out of this production.
Speaker 4 (18:20):
You look a little puzzled. You've you've completely blocked it
from your mind. Nine thirty the Kamala cackle because we didn't.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
Get any talkbacks part of the show. Well again, I mean,
I'm honestly not kidding that when I walk out of
this studio, that program is history. I don't I and
it's it's so extemporaneous, and it's so like if you
asked me to go back and rebuild yesterday's program. I
(18:53):
I had a very difficult time doing it, and I
walk out because I'm already thinking about the next day's program.
I really don't. I don't. I don't dwell on it.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
You think about nine thirty, you were thinking about nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
I was thinking about nine thirty, of course, But I
think this is the absolute text of the year. Uh,
now gonna go forwhere did it go?
Speaker 4 (19:20):
Do do?
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 3 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 4 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 3 (19:20):
Dude? This comes from Goober number sixteen forty one, and
I just want to say to sixteen forty one, this
is why we absolutely have a love hate relationship with
you guys, Mike nine thirty.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
Good.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
That means I can turn this program off until nine
twenty nine.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Great, when do you want to turn the radio on? What? When?
When do you want to turn the radio on.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
At nine twenty nine? Okay, so you can hear the
nine thirty announcement back to So here's the last few
sentences of the letter that James Comer sent to Pam
Bondi yesterday. We are calling on the Department of Justice
to conduct the thorough review of these executive actions and
scrutinize Key Biden Age who took the fifth to hide
(20:10):
their participation in the cover up. The DC Board of
Medicine must also review the actions taken by President Biden's
physician to hide his Biden's true condition. We have provided
Americans with transparency about the Biden autopim presidency, and now
there must be accountability. Now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking.
(20:37):
The Attorney General is just going to scan poop can
that letter, And she well might do that. And I
remain still somewhat ambivalent about Bondi's real agenda in her
current office. Is she really a roadblock or is there
(20:58):
such a paucity of an indictment in the absence of
Purp Walks just a factive life at the Department of Justice,
and I'm willing to give her that leeway because I
know that one it could be. Let me just back
up first. You never take something to court. If you're
(21:18):
going to indict someone and you're going to charge them
with the crime, you have so thoroughly vetted the evidence
and the witnesses that you feel secure with your team
of your US attorneys and your special prosecutors that you
can get a conviction that doesn't happen overnight. That takes time,
(21:43):
so I understand. And if you walk in, you have
all of the pre existing cases that the Biden Department
of Justice had, which you have to review determine whether
you're going to move forward with those, and the ones
that you are going to move forward with, you then
have to revet them because you have to a certain degree.
You have not all but some new lawyers that will
(22:04):
be litigating those cases. And then you have all of
the other stuff like this this being dumped on them
that you have to that prepare and then take to trial.
All of that takes time, So I'm willing to give
her leeway because I know from personal experience, and when
(22:24):
you walk in it's overwhelming because you have everything that
unless you're a second term presidency, but for your first
term presidency like Bush was in two thousand and one,
it's overwhelming because there's so much that you have to
clean up, figure out what was going on, pick up,
(22:46):
do all the new stuff that you want to get done.
So those that first year two years is just drinking
from a fire hose. So I'm willing to give Pambondi
leeway in that regard. And it is hard to know
what the right answer is here. President Trump's kind of
sorry track record in the past about hiring the right
(23:08):
person to fill the attorney general's role doesn't really inspire confidence.
But on the other hand, there's little question that Trump
two point oh has done one heck of a job
picking most of his other cabinet members far better than
Trump one point oh did, So we got that going
for us. All of that said, there's no question that
(23:30):
Bondi's plate really is loaded up with huge issues that
she's got to address and an overwhelming number of criminals
from the Biden and Obama areas eras that she needs
to bring to justice, and of course the stupid Senate.
I'm so sick of the US Senate. Thune's doing an
okay job. I hear people praising Thune all the time,
(23:51):
but I think he's just doing an okay job because
they haven't made her life any easier, because there are
dozens of Trump's US Attorney nominees that are being held
up for no good reason whatsoever, and some senators have
you know, they've put the little flag down. They've they've
thrown the flag down on some of the nominees so
they can't move forward with them. So while I agree
(24:15):
that Bonnie's performance in office thus far has been somewhat underwhelming,
I still give it the benefit of the doubt, for
you know, another couple of months before I think heads
probably should start exploding. And make no mistake about it,
that time is coming if we don't see real results
out of her office pretty soon. And that's a long route.
(24:38):
That's kind of a long winded way of saying that
I really don't expect Bondi to simply poop can Comy's letter.
And also I do expect her to tell him basically, thanks,
take a number and we'll get to you when we can.
The Gilversite Committee released an eight minute and fifty three
(24:59):
second with its report, and it's a devastating indictment of
Biden's pretend presidency and senior staff. I want you to
hear the entire thing, but not at one setting you.
It's it's too early in the morning for you to
eat both breakfast, lunge and dinner.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
So we'll go through it bit by bit. What it's
not nine thirty yet, Well.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
We could just play this till nine thirty. Here is
such a you are on days when you turn into
the ass, you turn into the biggest ass in the building.
You must lead back at three hundred and fifty pounds,
because that's about how big your ass is right.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Now, Sorry, not sorry, nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (25:40):
I'm sure you understand this. I've got to put a
little cherry on top of this. The White House chief
of staff, other than say a president's spouse, is probably
the most powerful person in the West Wing. A good
White House chief of staff, like I think Susie wilds Is,
controls the flow of information into the Oval Office. They
(26:01):
control access to the Oval Office. Otherwise you have a
really scattered presidency. And you notice that whenever Trump travels.
This wasn't always true with Bush. He would have a
chief of staff. He might have, you know, Josh Bolton
or Joe Hagen, one of the deputies, but not always
(26:22):
Andy Card Trump two point zero. Every time I've seen
Trump on a major event or a major trip, it's
always been Susie Wiles. She's one tough woman. That is
keeping that Oval Office operating like a well oiled machine,
which you have to admit with a guy like Trump
(26:43):
is an amazing accomplishment. Ron Klain, Hmmm, we had a
discussion at the senior level about whether or not the
president should have a cognitive examination. That's walking right up
to the concept of the turns. That's amendment. But yet
they didn't do it. Michael didn't.
Speaker 4 (27:05):
Jimmy bufflet's say it's nine thirty somewhere.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
Yeah, of course he did. James Comer and the House
Oversight Committee, Well, let's just go. Let's let's go to
the tape. Here he is with Benny Johnson really quickly.
Speaker 6 (27:23):
Here we have actually that New York Times article that
says specifically that Jeff Science replied all and says I.
Speaker 2 (27:32):
Approve of the pardons. Well, huh, that's not in the constitution.
Speaker 6 (27:35):
Brother, So does this mean that doctor Fowden, this is
specifically about the Fauci pardon, the the ream of pardons
that were rolled out, but the Fauci pardon. So you
are saying declaratively and that we will stand up in
court and stand up in any trial before any court
in the land, including the Supreme Court, that doctor Fauci's
pardon is null and void.
Speaker 3 (27:53):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (27:56):
Yes, I mean, look, at the end of the day,
you have to have a formal process for the autopen
and you know they're trying to say, well, some of
these were approved verbally, some of these we had a memo.
There's emails from from the UH Biden Department of Justice,
the Merrick Garland Department Justice UH to the the Biden
(28:19):
inner circle saying you need to be careful using the
autopen so much on legal documents.
Speaker 3 (28:25):
And then there are other emails.
Speaker 7 (28:27):
Was the President even aware that this is a particular
person was pardoned?
Speaker 3 (28:32):
And I mean, so his own Department of.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
Justice is concerned that number one.
Speaker 7 (28:37):
There's excessive unauthorized use of the autopen and number two
that that the president ied states has no clue who's
being pardoned. By his unnamed staffers. That are that are
you know, using the outopendi and when when Donald Trump
says it was the autopen presidency, what we saw in
(28:59):
the last last three months, from the time of the debate,
the disastrous debate when Joe Biden had to drop out
until the moment of the transfer of power from Biden
to Trump, that that would be a pretty accurate statement
that it was the autopen presidency.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Now, it's not his decision to make. I mean, he's
he's I understand, he's adamant that he can't take it
to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court, will you know? So, yeah,
the pardon of Nolan void, I'm not that certain about it.
But I think rather than focus on the pardons, what
we ought to be focusing on is did we and
(29:41):
there may not be any crime here, there may not
be any legal remedy here, but there is a huge
political issue here, and that is or did we live
through the second iteration of Woodrow Wilson where Edith Wilson
was running the presidency and here it was Joe Biden
(30:05):
and the staff running the presidency.
Speaker 7 (30:07):
Was the president even mentally fit to make those decisions?
And that's when we brought doctor o'connory in and doctor
O'Connor when the first question we asked, were you ever
told to lie about Joe Biden? Joe the White House position,
the White House position, and he pled the Fifth Amendment,
so it.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
Was into that you referred to him and then two
other aides, Anthony Bernalla and Anty Thomassini, all of whom
pleded the Fifth to the Justice Department. What are you
expecting them to look into?
Speaker 7 (30:32):
We believe there was a cover up of Joe Biden's
mental fitness. The fact that Joe Biden met with Ian SAMs,
his White House folkesperson, two times in two years, the
fact that he met with Near Attendon, who was his
executive secretary, once every month or whatever.
Speaker 3 (30:48):
I mean, it's shocking.
Speaker 7 (30:50):
Every other president, President Obama, President Bush In, President Trump,
they meet with these staffers multiple times per week. And
Joe Biden was clearly shield and I think you wrote
very well and very accurately in your book that he
was shielded from people, He was shielded from Pete Boujik,
he was shielded from his inner staff. So the question
(31:10):
that I think the Department of Justice needs to ask
these people that led the.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
Fifth Was there an organized coverup?
Speaker 6 (31:16):
Did not?
Speaker 7 (31:16):
Why did you not give the president a cognitive test
when even mainstream media outts were demanding that Joe Biden
take a cognitive test?
Speaker 3 (31:25):
So the reports out, Well, we'll put a link to
the report up. It's that oversight dot house dot.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
Gov, or it's it, Michael says, go here dot com
nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
Bingo, and you can read it for yourself. I just
want you to realize that I think there is a
something that needs to be investigated, and I do believe
that we need to understand what really went on so that, well,
you know, we can keep it from happening again. But
I'm not convinced yet that there is a legal remedy
(31:58):
such as overturning the faulcy heard. That's going to be
up to the court. Good luck with that.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Nine thirty
Hi, Michael, I got up early just to say good
morning and avoid the cackle.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Mike Dragon goog winning.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I got nothing for you. I just wanted to make
sure I didn't hear any cackles. Sorry, at least the
second talk back was being genuinely honest. I just did
it so. I mean, you can tell she was still groggy.
She's probably still laying in bed. She hadn't even met
(00:32):
her coffee or diet coke yet. She's still you know,
the TV's not on that the cats, you know, the
cat and dog are both like clawing at her like
calls get to bed and eat, and she's like, no,
just gotta, I gotta leave it talk about and just
make sure I don't think of that damn cackle. Now.
The first guy was just a lying, SOB I just
wanted to say good morning. And yes, he says saying
(00:56):
but I just want to say good morning and make
sure we don't hear the cackle.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
He doesn't want to say good morning to us though,
That's what I mean.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
He was lying. You don't want to say good morning.
I just want to avoid the cackle, right, That's all
they wanted. Mark your mark, your your date book, your
calendar seven alarm, Uh, dragon, and I have a I
think it's a major announcement, don't you.
Speaker 4 (01:23):
It's not quite life change. It will well some of
us might be life changing, it's true. Yeah, but it's.
Speaker 5 (01:35):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
Just tune in at nine thirty. So at the at
the end of the nine thirty break.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
We'll have a we got something to tell you.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
We guess something to tell you. Yeah, we got something
to tell you. Uh. That's the hardest thing now is
to tease that and not talk about it.
Speaker 2 (01:55):
Oh. Here we can say that some people may like it.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Some people are gonna like it. Some people we're not
gonna like it. And we understand that. And it is
it is the nature. It is what it is, and
it's and it does involve this jury pool. It involves
the twelve listeners and the alternate. So you're you're just
going to you know, you're just going to have to
(02:20):
do what you're supposed to do. That's that's all amounts
to do. You're just gonna have to do it.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
It shouldn't be that difficult, shouldn't.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
Except that you know that they'll have to when it well,
I can't I can't say that yet because that might
give away too much.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Well, we're asking them to do something.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
Yeah, they're gonna have to. They will have to do
something right, and they might even have to you know,
like you know, change.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
On that push a couple of buttons.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
Yeah, you might have push a button or two. But
we get will we'll put explicit instructions. We'll we'll tell
you how to do it, will lead you through it
because we know you're a bunch of income poops and
and we'll we'll we'll lead you by the nose.
Speaker 4 (03:10):
Well, we'll need something from you too, Yes, just a couple,
not many, but we'll we'll we'll need something.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yes, I would say one or two new things. Everything
else stays the same. Yeah, yeah, but yeah, yeah, yes,
the I'm sorry, what I did I interrupt the talent?
Excuse me?
Speaker 4 (03:34):
What proper teases? I just wanted to throw that out
there one more time. Nine thirty, just after nine thirty,
nine thirty Mountains Denver time, nine thirty. We're gonna, we're
gonna tell you something.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Nine we are what are we gonna tell them something?
Speaker 3 (03:51):
Something?
Speaker 2 (03:52):
For those in the podcast, just skip if you're a few.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
Hours, skip all this because actually for the well, I
won't say that either. But if you're a podcast listener,
don't worry about anything we're telling you.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
Yeah right, yeah, yeah, yeah, the podcast will yeah.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Yeah, we could do. The really sad part about what
we're doing right now is we're so childish and immature.
We could do this for the.
Speaker 4 (04:23):
Entire hour probably nine thirty yeah, nine thirty nine, thirty
nine thirty nine thirty out in time is it mine?
Thirty nine thirty Well, it'll probably be closer to like
nineteen thirty five thirty three five, dependent on you know. Yeah, yeah,
right right now, because we'll probably tease it and have
a little bit of fun right then too.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Do we have any do we have any dancing girls
coming in? I wish hull I hadn't thought about that.
I mean maybe, well, to be fair, we should need
we need like what was that what was that group
of guys that that they were kind of like the
male version the rock.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
At the Chippendale Chippendale Yeah Chippendale' Yeah.
Speaker 4 (05:02):
But we are luck we'll get the Chris Farley one
and elsewhere.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
We'll get thee.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
I forgot to leave spaced out. It's amazing as you
get older, the things that you realize are really not
important to you don't really need to waste a neuron
or a brain cells or remember that, and so you
park it somewhere where it's like in a it's in
a storage closet in your brain that you never go
look for. And then somebody says and you realize, oh
my god, I've got that over there in the storage compartment.
(05:31):
Oh my god, and then the visual comes out and
you did not need to think about that this early
in the morning.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Where we don't have the rockets or somebody else might.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Yes, yes, Jimmy Christmas, we have some really big news.
We got some really big news. I've got some really
big news that I like to get to also, but
we do have big news at nine thirty. The big
news out of congressome Tuesday came from James Comer. Now,
I want to be honest here, I think James Comber does.
(06:04):
He's one of these guys that you look at. You
probably have an employee like this, or you worked with
somebody liked it, or you've worked with somebody like this.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
That doesn't real far. What what did I do? I'm
just promoting nine thirty.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
What are you doing?
Speaker 4 (06:17):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I'm talking about James Comber and how he's one of
those guys.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
That really that's his big news is nine thirty Come.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
On, no, no, no, I'm talking about James Comber what
he did yesterday for that big news yesterday.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
That's not a big news as nine thirty nine thirty, of.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
Course not because this just involves Joe Biden the autopim
that's old news, true, Yeah, but it's new news because
of what James Comber did. And I was just gonna
make a pithy, little derogatory common about James Comber because
he reminds me of and I, as I was about
to say, you may work with someone like this or
(06:55):
know someone like this, kind of like I work with
and know someone like this looking at me because they
they do a really good job at what they're supposed
to do, but there's just something about them that's just
kind of obnoxious and off putting. Oh kind of like
you just kind of like you. That's that's what it is.
(07:18):
So you know James Comer, by the way, if you
don't know, as the chairman of the House Oversight Committee,
they published a report that declared hundreds of executive orders,
and I'm guessing they say hundreds but I think thousands
of presidential pardons were actually executed by White House staffers
using the infamous auto pen, and they now claim and
(07:42):
we can we can argue about this till the cows
come home. And the problem with being trained as a
lawyer is that I can make the argument on both sides,
and I think they're equally both good arguments. The pardons,
(08:03):
the executive orders they claim the House or Sight Committee
does are now Nolan void because of everything they've discovered,
in fact in a tweet. I still, you know, I
think we should go back to tweet because a post,
I mean, what are we talking about, Fince post?
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Yeah, post is just boring, But what post is boring?
It's it's not gonna be boring at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:29):
Maybe what we should do at nine thirty is just
tweet it out and go home early.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
How about that might time in randomly and just say
nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:36):
And I'm going to be so sick of that by
nine thirty that I'll just.
Speaker 4 (08:42):
What good news is I won't have to mention nine
thirty after nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
True, that's true. So if I can just make it
to nine thirty, I'll be good.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Yeah, because something happens at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I just want to bang my head. It's the sad
part is I'm gonna bang my head, not just be
as a you bpus because of the other things that
we were talking about before the show started, about.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
Or not even ten minutes into the show, and I've
already got you bang your head, yes, and nine thirty,
and you got me banging.
Speaker 3 (09:15):
My head because it's something that that the people that
listen to this program, the twelve jurors and the one
ultimate we have well, but understand my frustration when if
at nine thirty, I do explain the frustration.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
When nine thirty comes around.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
Yeah, when nine thirty comes around, say you know what,
this is really beginning to not irritate me, but it's
just like, oh my god, I'm gona have to both
this until nine thirty, are I yep? Okay?
Speaker 5 (09:49):
All right?
Speaker 4 (09:49):
I mean we can talk about nine thirty at nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
So here's what I'm going to do. You will come
to hate just nine thirty. Those are three syllables, So
you'll come to hate nine thirty those between now and
nine thirty as much as I already do. I was
told that I could tease nine thirty. So I thought, well,
(10:14):
you know, every you know our top of the hour
bottom they are. I'll be sure remind everybody to ten
at nine thirty because we have a big ass announcement
to make it nine thirty. But no, mister twelve year
old back there just can't let it go because he
knows he's getting ice cream at nine thirty. He can't,
(10:34):
he can't wait. So the House Oversight Committee yesterday posted
a tweet and it says we are deeming Biden's executive
actions in all caps noel and void, and they put
out a report and we'll get to the report in
just a minute. But WHOA talk about gutsy. They have
declared now they can they can declare that they've they've
(10:58):
they have decided as the committee, which by the way,
would be divided along partisan lines, but the majority of
the House Oversight Committee has deemed that all of the
executive orders and the pardon signed by Joe Biden, with
the exception probably of Hunter Biden, because we know that
Hunter Biden's pardon was actually signed by Joe Biden. They
(11:19):
found a time when he was awake, and they in
fact Hunter may have even handed to him and said here,
dad's dad, here's my pardon. Please sign this. But this
is a step that a lot of people wanted to
see Comer and Congress take since the auto pen's usage
was first revealed to the public back on February first.
(11:41):
And I know many of you have become frustrated with
Congressional Republicans who never seem to get anything really done.
And what bugs me about this story is I'm glad
they have made the announcement, and I'm glad that they've
made this determination. However, I question whether or not they
(12:04):
can actually do anything about it. That's the real issue.
But getting to this point in just eight months is
in fact for Republicans for Congress to do anything, is
an extremely fast timeline because of all the procedural hurdles
that any Congressional committee faces in doing its work. Now,
(12:26):
I'll get to the text of the report in just
a minute, But immediately following the publication of the report,
the Chairman, James Comer sent a letter over to the
Attorney General, Pam Bondi quote, requesting the United States Department
of Justice conduct a comprehensive review of all executive actions
taken during the Biden presidency and scrutinized key Biden aids,
(12:49):
doctor Kevin O'Connor, an Ae Thomasini, and Anthony Bernall, who
have all, by the way, interestingly pleaded the Fifth Amendment
during the investigation. Now, in criminal court, juries are instructed
that you are not to read anything into a witness
invoking the Fifth Amendment. You're not to impute guilt to them,
(13:12):
You're not to do anything. It's just that they are
exercising their constitutional right not to testify against themselves or
not to testify. I to have split it out and
read the exact language, but it's that you don't have
to testify or incriminate yourself. Jurors, however, are instructed not
to read anything into that. It's just a factual letter.
(13:36):
Here's the cover letter that Comer sent to the Attorney
General the Biden outopen presidency. Now I find that funny,
but I also find it childish, which is probably my
Which is probably why I find it funny. Is that
(13:58):
now what we're going to ref to the four years
of Biden as the Biden autopen presidency. Okay, that's fine.
Seems a little childish to me, but so be it.
I really just don't give her adsass the Biden quote,
the Biden autopen presidency will go down as one of
the biggest political scandals in US history. Now, if they
if they prove what I think they can prove, then yes,
(14:21):
it will be a huge It will be a huge scandal.
I want you to differ each differentiate in your mind
the proof of what happened versus what can you do
about it? Okay, because presidents and even if you prove
that something happened in a particular way, it may not
(14:45):
be sufficient proof to show that Biden was truly totally incapacitated.
It may just prove that Biden was just didn't care
just to sleep, had just sort of like the There
are days when I finally get to the fourth hour
of the program and I'm kind of I've been really
(15:05):
hyped up on some stories, and I get to the
fourth hour of the program, and if in a dip
wad back there, if Jackwagon back there wants to just start,
you know, nine thirty nine thirty nine, this would be
a day where I would just sit back and just
let him do it, because I just don't care. I
think Biden may have been at that point from the
day he was inaugurated. Oh, he is probably excited. They
probably couldn't wait to take his you know, his first
(15:26):
trip as president on Air Force one and where the
cool flight jacket they give him and all of that. Yeah,
I get all of that, but separate what they have
found or able to prove, versus what they can do
about what they've proven. So go back to the letter.
Excuse me. The Biden out'll pim presidents. He will go
down as one of the biggest political scandals in US history.
(15:47):
As Americans saw President Biden's decline with their own eyes,
Biden's inner circle sought to deceive the public, cover up
his decline, and took unauthorized, unauthorized executive actions with the
that are now invalid. That's where I have the question,
the legal question. Unauthorized executive actions are I think, by
(16:13):
the very nature of themselves invalid. But I don't apply
that same standard to a pardon. And I say that
because the power of the pardon is exclusively and without
any reservation or without any limitation, reserved to the president,
(16:34):
and all they need to all Democrats would need, or
any staffer would need it would be for one person
to testify. I'm exaggerating here, but it would muddy the waters.
One person to testify that the President told us that
when it came to pardons that he authorized them all
(16:54):
as long as you know certain prerequisites were met from
the Pardon Office and the DOJ had reviewed them, or
that somebody on the Chief of Staff's office had reviewed
them or whatever. So if they had done one or two,
then they were authorized to use the auto pen to
execute pardons. Quote. Our report reveals how AIDS colluded to
(17:21):
mislead the public and the extraordinary measures they took to
sustain the appearance of presidential authority as Biden's capacity to
function independently diminished. Executive actions performed by Biden White House
staff and signed by Auto Pin are noll and void.
We are calling on the Department of Justice to conduct
the thorough review of these executive actions and scrutinize Key
(17:44):
Biden age who took the fifth to hide their participation
in the cover up.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
And then it says, good morning, ladies, Dragon, I hope
you feel better after your little tenth for transum yesterday
in morning. You know the joke on you because I
just fast forwarded on the podcast. I don't have to
listen to your chas stuff. Congratulations to the ass that
(18:13):
was an awesome game last night. I doubt we'll ever
get a hat check out of this production.
Speaker 4 (18:20):
You look a little puzzled. You've you've completely blocked it
from your mind. Nine thirty the Kamala cackle because we didn't.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
Get any talkbacks part of the show. Well again, I mean,
I'm honestly not kidding that when I walk out of
this studio, that program is history. I don't I and
it's it's so extemporaneous, and it's so like if you
asked me to go back and rebuild yesterday's program. I
(18:53):
I had a very difficult time doing it, and I
walk out because I'm already thinking about the next day's program.
I really don't. I don't. I don't dwell on it.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
You think about nine thirty, you were thinking about nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
I was thinking about nine thirty, of course, But I
think this is the absolute text of the year. Uh,
now gonna go forwhere did it go?
Speaker 4 (19:20):
Do do?
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 3 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 4 (19:20):
Do?
Speaker 3 (19:20):
Dude? This comes from Goober number sixteen forty one, and
I just want to say to sixteen forty one, this
is why we absolutely have a love hate relationship with
you guys, Mike nine thirty.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
Good.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
That means I can turn this program off until nine
twenty nine.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Great, when do you want to turn the radio on? What? When?
When do you want to turn the radio on.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
At nine twenty nine? Okay, so you can hear the
nine thirty announcement back to So here's the last few
sentences of the letter that James Comer sent to Pam
Bondi yesterday. We are calling on the Department of Justice
to conduct the thorough review of these executive actions and
scrutinize Key Biden Age who took the fifth to hide
(20:10):
their participation in the cover up. The DC Board of
Medicine must also review the actions taken by President Biden's
physician to hide his Biden's true condition. We have provided
Americans with transparency about the Biden autopim presidency, and now
there must be accountability. Now you're probably thinking what I'm thinking.
(20:37):
The Attorney General is just going to scan poop can
that letter, And she well might do that. And I
remain still somewhat ambivalent about Bondi's real agenda in her
current office. Is she really a roadblock or is there
(20:58):
such a paucity of an indictment in the absence of
Purp Walks just a factive life at the Department of Justice,
and I'm willing to give her that leeway because I
know that one it could be. Let me just back
up first. You never take something to court. If you're
(21:18):
going to indict someone and you're going to charge them
with the crime, you have so thoroughly vetted the evidence
and the witnesses that you feel secure with your team
of your US attorneys and your special prosecutors that you
can get a conviction that doesn't happen overnight. That takes time,
(21:43):
so I understand. And if you walk in, you have
all of the pre existing cases that the Biden Department
of Justice had, which you have to review determine whether
you're going to move forward with those, and the ones
that you are going to move forward with, you then
have to revet them because you have to a certain degree.
You have not all but some new lawyers that will
(22:04):
be litigating those cases. And then you have all of
the other stuff like this this being dumped on them
that you have to that prepare and then take to trial.
All of that takes time, So I'm willing to give
her leeway because I know from personal experience, and when
(22:24):
you walk in it's overwhelming because you have everything that
unless you're a second term presidency, but for your first
term presidency like Bush was in two thousand and one,
it's overwhelming because there's so much that you have to
clean up, figure out what was going on, pick up,
(22:46):
do all the new stuff that you want to get done.
So those that first year two years is just drinking
from a fire hose. So I'm willing to give Pambondi
leeway in that regard. And it is hard to know
what the right answer is here. President Trump's kind of
sorry track record in the past about hiring the right
(23:08):
person to fill the attorney general's role doesn't really inspire confidence.
But on the other hand, there's little question that Trump
two point oh has done one heck of a job
picking most of his other cabinet members far better than
Trump one point oh did, So we got that going
for us. All of that said, there's no question that
(23:30):
Bondi's plate really is loaded up with huge issues that
she's got to address and an overwhelming number of criminals
from the Biden and Obama areas eras that she needs
to bring to justice, and of course the stupid Senate.
I'm so sick of the US Senate. Thune's doing an
okay job. I hear people praising Thune all the time,
(23:51):
but I think he's just doing an okay job because
they haven't made her life any easier, because there are
dozens of Trump's US Attorney nominees that are being held
up for no good reason whatsoever, and some senators have
you know, they've put the little flag down. They've they've
thrown the flag down on some of the nominees so
they can't move forward with them. So while I agree
(24:15):
that Bonnie's performance in office thus far has been somewhat underwhelming,
I still give it the benefit of the doubt, for
you know, another couple of months before I think heads
probably should start exploding. And make no mistake about it,
that time is coming if we don't see real results
out of her office pretty soon. And that's a long route.
(24:38):
That's kind of a long winded way of saying that
I really don't expect Bondi to simply poop can Comy's letter.
And also I do expect her to tell him basically, thanks,
take a number and we'll get to you when we can.
The Gilversite Committee released an eight minute and fifty three
(24:59):
second with its report, and it's a devastating indictment of
Biden's pretend presidency and senior staff. I want you to
hear the entire thing, but not at one setting you.
It's it's too early in the morning for you to
eat both breakfast, lunge and dinner.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
So we'll go through it bit by bit. What it's
not nine thirty yet, Well.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
We could just play this till nine thirty. Here is
such a you are on days when you turn into
the ass, you turn into the biggest ass in the building.
You must lead back at three hundred and fifty pounds,
because that's about how big your ass is right.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Now, Sorry, not sorry, nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (25:40):
I'm sure you understand this. I've got to put a
little cherry on top of this. The White House chief
of staff, other than say a president's spouse, is probably
the most powerful person in the West Wing. A good
White House chief of staff, like I think Susie wilds Is,
controls the flow of information into the Oval Office. They
(26:01):
control access to the Oval Office. Otherwise you have a
really scattered presidency. And you notice that whenever Trump travels.
This wasn't always true with Bush. He would have a
chief of staff. He might have, you know, Josh Bolton
or Joe Hagen, one of the deputies, but not always
(26:22):
Andy Card Trump two point zero. Every time I've seen
Trump on a major event or a major trip, it's
always been Susie Wiles. She's one tough woman. That is
keeping that Oval Office operating like a well oiled machine,
which you have to admit with a guy like Trump
(26:43):
is an amazing accomplishment. Ron Klain, Hmmm, we had a
discussion at the senior level about whether or not the
president should have a cognitive examination. That's walking right up
to the concept of the turns. That's amendment. But yet
they didn't do it. Michael didn't.
Speaker 4 (27:05):
Jimmy bufflet's say it's nine thirty somewhere.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
Yeah, of course he did. James Comer and the House
Oversight Committee, Well, let's just go. Let's let's go to
the tape. Here he is with Benny Johnson really quickly.
Speaker 6 (27:23):
Here we have actually that New York Times article that
says specifically that Jeff Science replied all and says I.
Speaker 2 (27:32):
Approve of the pardons. Well, huh, that's not in the constitution.
Speaker 6 (27:35):
Brother, So does this mean that doctor Fowden, this is
specifically about the Fauci pardon, the the ream of pardons
that were rolled out, but the Fauci pardon. So you
are saying declaratively and that we will stand up in
court and stand up in any trial before any court
in the land, including the Supreme Court, that doctor Fauci's
pardon is null and void.
Speaker 3 (27:53):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (27:56):
Yes, I mean, look, at the end of the day,
you have to have a formal process for the autopen
and you know they're trying to say, well, some of
these were approved verbally, some of these we had a memo.
There's emails from from the UH Biden Department of Justice,
the Merrick Garland Department Justice UH to the the Biden
(28:19):
inner circle saying you need to be careful using the
autopen so much on legal documents.
Speaker 3 (28:25):
And then there are other emails.
Speaker 7 (28:27):
Was the President even aware that this is a particular
person was pardoned?
Speaker 3 (28:32):
And I mean, so his own Department of.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
Justice is concerned that number one.
Speaker 7 (28:37):
There's excessive unauthorized use of the autopen and number two
that that the president ied states has no clue who's
being pardoned. By his unnamed staffers. That are that are
you know, using the outopendi and when when Donald Trump
says it was the autopen presidency, what we saw in
(28:59):
the last last three months, from the time of the debate,
the disastrous debate when Joe Biden had to drop out
until the moment of the transfer of power from Biden
to Trump, that that would be a pretty accurate statement
that it was the autopen presidency.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Now, it's not his decision to make. I mean, he's
he's I understand, he's adamant that he can't take it
to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court, will you know? So, yeah,
the pardon of Nolan void, I'm not that certain about it.
But I think rather than focus on the pardons, what
we ought to be focusing on is did we and
(29:41):
there may not be any crime here, there may not
be any legal remedy here, but there is a huge
political issue here, and that is or did we live
through the second iteration of Woodrow Wilson where Edith Wilson
was running the presidency and here it was Joe Biden
(30:05):
and the staff running the presidency.
Speaker 7 (30:07):
Was the president even mentally fit to make those decisions?
And that's when we brought doctor o'connory in and doctor
O'Connor when the first question we asked, were you ever
told to lie about Joe Biden? Joe the White House position,
the White House position, and he pled the Fifth Amendment,
so it.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
Was into that you referred to him and then two
other aides, Anthony Bernalla and Anty Thomassini, all of whom
pleded the Fifth to the Justice Department. What are you
expecting them to look into?
Speaker 7 (30:32):
We believe there was a cover up of Joe Biden's
mental fitness. The fact that Joe Biden met with Ian SAMs,
his White House folkesperson, two times in two years, the
fact that he met with Near Attendon, who was his
executive secretary, once every month or whatever.
Speaker 3 (30:48):
I mean, it's shocking.
Speaker 7 (30:50):
Every other president, President Obama, President Bush In, President Trump,
they meet with these staffers multiple times per week. And
Joe Biden was clearly shield and I think you wrote
very well and very accurately in your book that he
was shielded from people, He was shielded from Pete Boujik,
he was shielded from his inner staff. So the question
(31:10):
that I think the Department of Justice needs to ask
these people that led the.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
Fifth Was there an organized coverup?
Speaker 6 (31:16):
Did not?
Speaker 7 (31:16):
Why did you not give the president a cognitive test
when even mainstream media outts were demanding that Joe Biden
take a cognitive test?
Speaker 3 (31:25):
So the reports out, Well, we'll put a link to
the report up. It's that oversight dot house dot.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
Gov, or it's it, Michael says, go here dot com
nine thirty.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
Bingo, and you can read it for yourself. I just
want you to realize that I think there is a
something that needs to be investigated, and I do believe
that we need to understand what really went on so that, well,
you know, we can keep it from happening again. But
I'm not convinced yet that there is a legal remedy
(31:58):
such as overturning the faulcy heard. That's going to be
up to the court. Good luck with that.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Nine thirty
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.