Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Did morning from South Dakota.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Does this mean I'm gonna have to re record our
rules of engagement.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
I'm gonna have to get the Gain kids together. Everyone
have a great day.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
H'm Michael and Dragon. Good morning. And I have to
say I'm thrilled about this because I listen to you
in the morning and then as soon as you sign off,
use my iHeart presets to flip over to ros Kaminski.
Now I can just stay in one place, have a
good day.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
And we did this just for you, just for you,
and so that you could sleep in and so I
could sleep in. And I'm also thinking about four hours,
three hours inst the four hours, because I'm looking at
that clock.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
And thinking, hmmm, you don't must be done. It almost
be done. Arctic Frost.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
That's the investigation that was undertaken by Merrick Garland, former
Attorney General, at the direction of supposedly President Biden but
who knows in the White House and Jack Smith, the
over zealous prosecutor that went after Trump on the documents
(01:12):
January sixth and has a record of like you know,
zero to ten in having his convictions upheld. Virtually every
conviction he's ever gotten has been overturned. The guy's just well,
he's a lawyer, is supposed to zealously represent his client,
(01:32):
but not over zealously.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
You're not supposed to break the rules.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
You're not supposed to just, you know, through vengeance go
after somebody. And Jack Smith has a reputation for doing that.
So this investigation of January six resulted in now they
want to make sure you understand that they didn't wire
tap like Senator Cruz's telephone, his cell phone. They just
(01:59):
collected the metadata. They also went to Verizon and AT
and T. I'm not sure about T Mobile. I need
to ask T Mobile about that, because they did. I
want to bitch at them about it. But they went
to AT and T, Verizon and AT and T rebuffed
them and said no, and they just dropped it, which
(02:20):
shows that they really were just fishing.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
That's bad enough.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
But in all of that smoke going on about January sixth,
which to this day I can't believe is still a topic,
you would have thought by now that an independent Council,
someone in the DOJ, somebody that Congress, some thought you
would have done an investigation. And we've gotten to the
heart of what really occurred on that day, but we don't.
(02:50):
They still refer to it.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
I don't.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
I refer to as January sixth. I refuse to call
it an insurrection because if we ever have to have
an insurrection against the tyrannical government, I don't want those
y'all who's involved, because clearly they don't know how to
take over a government. They clearly don't know how to
destroy a government. And not that that's what they were
trying to do, but if that's what If that's what
Democrats alleged they were trying to do, Boy were they
(03:14):
a bunch of Keystone cops. But I want to bring
up something that probably hasn't been in your mind for
well four years or more. Carling young I'm sorry, Carling Younger.
Do that ring a bell? Of course it doesn't. She
(03:34):
happens to be the person that found the pipe bomb
at the Democrat National Committee headquarters.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
A grand jury, at least according to recent.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Reports that I've read, is going to be impaneled early
next year in the Southern District of Florida to consider
a grand conspiracy case against the people that were accused
of using government power in a decade long crusade aimed
specifically to destroy Donald Trump, and I might add parenthetically,
(04:07):
I think to destroy the make America Great Again movement.
The origin of the conspiracy dates all the way back
to the days of the Russia Gate scandal. But if equally,
and I think probably even greater importance, are those events
of January six.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
Soon to be five years ago. Now.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
While Russia Gate did, without any question, in my mind,
inflict horrible damage on the first Trump presidency, it really
kept him from doing everything that he wanted to do,
and even worse, it was corrosive to our politics. It
was corrosive to the very foundational principles that govern this country.
(04:51):
It is clear I think that the purpose of January
sixth was to put Trump in prison and then use
that label insurrection, which is why I don't use it
as a way to prohibit him from ever again occupying
public office. This means you've got to go back in
(05:11):
the history of ancient history books. Remember when Joe Biden
went into the Rose Garden and it was almost as
if Barack Obama was standing there with Brock's right hand
up Joe Biden's back, holding him up like a puppet,
and getting Biden to maul those words.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
It was.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Announced as a speech where he was going he had
decided not to run for the presidency, and I very
distinctly remember that day listening to that speech and thinking,
oh my gosh, he's going to pull fact. We just
Tam and I are watching a series on Hulu or
Netflix or something called The Diplomat, and there's a scene
(05:57):
in The Diplomat where the British Prime minim in the
US President are going to announce they've come up with
this announcement they're going to make, and the US President
says what she says, and then the British Prime Minister
goes off script and completely blows the whole thing. I'm watching.
I'm watching that and I'm thinking back to this announcement
(06:20):
that Biden is making about he's not going to run again,
because the first ninety percent of the speech is all
about the reasons why he should run again, and I'm thinking,
holy cow, he's going to be He's going to be
ballsy and announced. He doesn't care that Obama's standing next
to him. He's going to be ballsy to announced he's
going to run for president anyway.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
But he doesn't.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
He gets to the last paragraph and announces and so therefore,
I will now seek the presidency.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
And that was because.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama brincahoots, because they were determined
to make her the first female pres and she had,
i think, promised to fulfill Obama's third term to finish
the fundamental transformation of America. And Obama chose Hillary because
(07:16):
she was a reliable stooge, whereas Biden was just a stooge.
He was totally unreliable, and Obama knew that. But the
problem was on Fifth Avenue in New York, in Midtown Manhattan,
a guy comes down and escalator with this gorgeous woman
(07:37):
on his arm and announces that he's gonna run for
the nomination to be the next president of the United
States and the Republican Party. And it's Donald J. Trump,
and everybody just laughs and no, he can't win, he
can't win, blah blah blah, it's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
Well, in behold, he wins.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
And from that, I think from the escalator moment, they
knew they had to stop him. And of course Jeb,
who's still a good friend of mine, was the anointed one.
Jeb completely failed. So now they feel like, oh, we're okay,
Hillary's going to make it. Hillary doesn't make it, And
(08:18):
in fact, she's got the Jabbet Center in New York
completely reserved, all the fireworks and everything.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
She doesn't come out for a day. She remains in hiding.
She's in shock. So that's what starts.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
I mean, that is the tipping point for where the
Democrat Party became unhinged and they were determined to truly,
and I mean this in every sense of the word,
destroy Donald Trump, put him in jail, assassinating, whatever it takes,
by any means necessary, get rid of Donald Trump. January sixth.
(08:58):
If the idea, if the conspiracy, which is what the
grand jury in Florida is looking at, if the conspiracy
was to put Trump in prison by labeling his actions
as an insurrection, which is a violation of federal law,
they could put him in prison. And if you're convicted
of insurrection, part of that statue prohibits you from ever
(09:21):
again occupying any public office. So that's the scheme, and
it almost succeeded, which I think is why it's imperative
to expose every little thing that we find out as
we get closer to this grand jury proceeding every little
detail about that day's events, so as we get closer
(09:43):
to the five year anniversary just coming January sixth, the
window of opportunity to bring charges against me the perpetrators
before the statue limitation kicks in and prohibits us, prevents
us from prosecuting anybody. Deadline is getting closer and closer
and closer. There are two factors that were absolutely essential
(10:10):
to making certain that the intended chaos at the Capitol
that day occurred. The delayed deployment of the National Guard
number one and number two. The discovery of two pipe bombs,
one outside the DNC, one outside the RNC.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
Isn't it interesting?
Speaker 3 (10:31):
Hown't you ever question how convenient it was that both
devices were found right before the RNC and right after
the DNC The Joint Session of Congress convened at one
pm to debate the outcome of the twenty twenty election
and to certify Joe Biden as the winner. The news
(10:51):
that these bombs were found just blocks from the Capitol
prompted the first wave of evacuations of the nearby congressional
buildings that afternoon. Now, once you think about that, to
discovery the pipe bombs creates a reason for the US
(11:12):
Capitol Police to evacuate all of the congressional buildings near
the RNC and the DNC. If you're told to evacuate
a building because pipe bombs have been found near your buildings,
that creates an air of panic, and that gives the
(11:34):
cabal the initial tool they need about the narrative they're
going to now report about what happens later on. At
a press conference a few days later, law enforcement says
that those devices were viable and deadly, and that felony
(11:56):
murder charges are apparently still awaiting the people responsible.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
So what they do?
Speaker 3 (12:04):
The FBI got to remember, it's James Camy, Christopher Ray.
They released a photo of a person in a hoodie.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
No, it wasn't John Fetterman.
Speaker 3 (12:15):
They released a picture of a guy in a hoodie
or person in a hoodie I should say, carrying a backpack,
wearing a face mask. Then they published a grainy video
showing that same suspect meandering around Capitol Hill between seven
thirty and eight thirty that night on January five, the
time that the FBI believed the devices were planted. You know,
(12:35):
it's interesting that the FBI just last week, just last week,
no news coverage about that. I can find no significant
news coverage about it. Issued another plea for help identifying
the individual in the video, and they've upfilled the reward
to identify that individual to half a million dollars five
hundred thousand dollars. So Ever, since the pipe bomb story started,
(12:59):
the narrative has been unraveling and it raises questions. How,
for example, did bomb sniffing canines miss a pipe bomb
outside the DNC on at least two occasions when the
dogs went by. Why did Kamala Harris at the time
(13:19):
she was the sitting vice president, I mean, I'm sorry,
she was the sitting US senator and the incoming vice president.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Why did she leave.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
The capital and go to the DNC headquarters that afternoon
where a pipe bomb hadn't been discovered? And then how
did cops from multiple agencies and dozens of pedestrians failed
to notice the device that was purportedly sitting between two
benches outside the main entrance of the DNC for more
(13:49):
than seventeen hours. I've been in that entrance. Yeah, I've
been in the DNC. I had to get umigated afterwards,
but I've been in there. So much the attention focused
on the DNC device, and the circumstances of the discovery
at the Republican National Committee are even more suspicious. There
(14:10):
are documents recently released by the Select Subcommittee on January
sixth that ought to be a great interest to Congress
in the FBI, and they relate to the woman who
found the bomb, and I say found at the RNC,
Carlin Younger. She's been described as the lucky neighbor. She's
(14:33):
been described as a hero by the cabal in the
weeks following January sixth, But then suddenly you don't hear
anything else about her. She's completely disappeared off the radar now.
At the time, back in January sixth, twenty twenty one,
she was employed by something called first Net. That's an
(14:56):
agency within the Department of Commerce that manages the stupid
broadband network for first responders during major events or disasters
first Net. Her ties to first Net alone raised suspicions.
I'll explain that in just a minute, she had two
known contacts with the FBI. She emailed the FBI tip
(15:20):
line on January eighth, the day after the bureau issued
a bulletin with a photo of the suspect to identify
herself as the individual who discovered the bomb at the RNC.
She then sat down with the FBI for an interview
January eleven, twenty twenty one. Both times she said she
(15:46):
was working remotely from her apartment, and then she took
a break between twelve o'clock or so to eat lunch
into her laundry. Now, in interviews the Conductor that were
conducted just hours after she met with the FBI, she
repeated that line about doing lunch and laundry. But here's
what's odd about our behavior. All subsequent interviews were given
(16:11):
strictly to news outlets in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
She grew up in Madison.
Speaker 3 (16:19):
She attended college in Medisine. They actually honored her on
February one, claiming that her swift action prevented injuries and
deaths on that terrible day. By the surveillance footage that
corroborates the laundry oriented story, she left the apartment at
exactly means caring what appears to be a laundry bag,
(16:43):
entered the alley between the RNC and the Capitol Hill
Club to use a nearby.
Speaker 5 (16:49):
Laundry mich go with those few more hours of extra sleep.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Are you going to have a better face for radio?
Speaker 4 (16:58):
Enjoyette and hang on to your earboss.
Speaker 6 (17:05):
When I first saw the pictures of the supposed pipe bomber,
the first thing that crossed my mind was Oprah Winfree.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
The bag lady, Oprah Winfree.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
So we're telling a story about this woman younger, she's
the one that discovered.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
The pipe bombs. Now, the video from.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
January sixth, twenty twenty one corroborates the story about her
going to lunch and a laundromat at twelve three pm.
She re emerged returned to her apartment by about twelve
oh four. That marked her first full trip to and
from the alley where the laundromat was located. During what
(18:00):
she said, she'd began her first load of laundry, but
she told two different stories about why she went back
to the laundry room again around twelve forty twenty minutes
before the start of the proceedings at the Capitol just
a few blocks away. She told reporters she returned the
laundry room to put her first load of clothes into
the dryer. Listened to these three things quote. When I
(18:24):
went downstairs to put the first load into the dryer.
That's when something caught my eye, she told Channel three
thousand in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
In Madison.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Number two, The Milwaukee Journal reported quote on her way
from switching her clothes from the washer to the dryer,
she saw something on the ground close quote third. She
told WISN again in Wisconsin. I was doing a now
infamous load of laundry, just changing it over from the
(18:55):
washer to the dryer. She also offered a perfect, at
least maybe according to law enforcement officers, a perfect description
of the device. Although she only saw for a few seconds,
she only saw the device for a few seconds, shit
she was able to describe it in detail.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
I was doing a now it's missload of laundry, just
changing it over from the washer to the dryer. When
I went downstairs to put the first load into the dryer,
that's when something caught my eye. And I'm a big recycler,
so it really caught my eye because I thought someone
had just missed the recycling can. It looked kind of metalish,
and I was going to put it back in. My
first reaction was this has got to be trash, until
(19:36):
I kind of leaned closer and saw that in fact,
it was something that looked like a bomb, and the
first thing I saw was wires, and the next thing
was six inches of pipe capped on both ends. And
then I had to lean closer, and that's when I
see this dial and it hands a hand on twenty,
and then I see the number and I lean closer
and I lean to listen. I'm like, is that twenty seconds?
Is it?
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Ticky?
Speaker 4 (19:55):
You're on that edge of I don't want to bother anybody,
right like, I don't to make sure this is real.
You don't want to go down as a person who
evacuates the city block for a hoax. But at the
same time, there was just enough of that gut instinct
that said, this isn't a place that you put a hoax.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
I have to have somebody check this out.
Speaker 4 (20:13):
It was actually a scene from Terminator that came to
mind where one character tells another not to disturb the pipe,
and I'm like, okay, so I can't move it, and
what if somebody else finds it? And that's when the
adrenaline hit. And the police response after that was pretty immediate.
I mean I was barely in my apartment a few
minutes before I started to see the K nine unit
sniffing around. This is a neighborhood, right, there are all
generations that live here, and this bomb was placed in
(20:36):
a way that really could have hurt people. I Mean,
the thing I keep coming back to is just how
lucky I was and nobody else, like a child who
plays in the alleys found it, or a sanitation worker
who was just doing their job and it went off
at the wrong time. I'm just so grateful that nobody
got hurt. I mostly just say I got really lucky.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
Hmm.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Interesting what you just heard is not what she had
told the investigators about why she went back to the
laundry room.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Quote. This is from the FBI's three to oh two.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
That's the you know, those are the forms I used
to take notes of interviews. Quote on her way back
to the laundry room with a second load of laundry
at approximately twelve forty am, which is incorrect, observed a
suspicious device next to the exterior gate. Now, the closed
caption TV footage appears to contradict what she told authorities
(21:33):
about her return trip because the video shows that she
exits her apartment empty handed at twelve thirty in the afternoon.
The same trip she described to the FBI as beginning
with a second load in hand. She didn't have a
second load. She heared the alley at twelve thirty four,
and then minutes later, twelve thirty eight, she re emerges
(21:53):
running toward the front of the Capitol Hill Club, apparently
just having discovered the bomb. So why is can you
tell a different story to reporters within hours of her
interview with the FBI? Says one thing to the FBI,
and then just hours later, because you know, the local
Meetia's got the local kid, local connection tells an entirely
different story. If you look at the sub headline for
(22:16):
the January twelve Madison magazine piece, it notes that after
the FBI interview Madison native Carlin Younger about discovering the
pipe bomb, she did reporter Doug mo. Younger told the
reporter that she went back out to put her clothes
in the dryer. Now, look, you might write that office
(22:39):
fog of war oversight. She was distraught, she was nervous,
she was upset, she didn't know what to do. But
when you watch the interviews, doesn't indicate anything like that,
nor does this suggest the severity of the situation. In
when she found herself. She said in that interview, I
saw the timer. It was on twenty I lean I
(23:00):
heard it ticking. Is it twenty seconds?
Speaker 1 (23:03):
You know?
Speaker 3 (23:03):
If I saw what looked like a pipe bomb, and
I'm not even really sure, I'd lean oversee if I
could hear it ticking or not. But that's what she did.
But here's a distraught woman, befuddled by being at the
center of this momentous and potentially deadly incident. Strange behavior.
(23:26):
But her laundry story is not the only inconsistency in
her account of what happened. Her interaction with the FBI
did more than just describe her role in discovering the device.
She then tried to blame a suspicious woman, intimating that
at one point the woman was a Trump supporter. Huh
(23:46):
where did that come from? In her January eighth online
tip to the FBI, she claims she was quote passed
by a woman in front of the Capitol Hill Club
who stared at me suspiciously in such way that now
makes me think maybe she had some knowledge of what
was in the alleyway. Did she describe the woman in detail? Caucasian,
(24:10):
middle aged forty five fifty five short stature, five four
five six heavier set, one two hundred and twenty pounds long,
dark hair, without a mask. She was wearing a dark
or black jacket in jeans. But the description of that
brief encounter changed a few days later. She told investigators
then on January eleven, and she had not seen anybody
(24:32):
suspicious on January sixth, but she did tell the FBI,
but she noticed an unknown woman in front of the
Capitol Hill Club who looked like she was from out
of town and looking at her in a way she
considered strange. The woman appeared to be approximately forty to
fifty years old, five seven heavier set, wearing jeans, a
motorcycle type jacket, and was not wearing a mask.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Suddenly, the description of.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Shorter stature was gone, and coincidentally replaced with the exact
height of the hoodie clad suspect. Oh that's interesting. You
now know that she's five foot seven inches. How do
you know that? She claimed the woman had the same
excited energy as some of the other protesters. The story's
(25:20):
beginning to merge, is beginning to change ever so slightly
to fit what I would say is being fed to her.
But then the surveillance video there is there. It contradicts
her allegations about a suspicious woman. At no point, whether
(25:41):
walking to or from the alley where the laundromat was located,
with the CCTV in full operation the entire time, she
never passed anyone matching either description that she provided in
any of the interviews. During her first trip at Newton,
nobody was in front of the Capitol Hill Club. On
(26:02):
her way back to the apartment, she did pass one
person in front of the building, but at that point
she was no longer walking toward the alley. That individual
was standing with his or her back to younger facing
the building and made no movement that in any way
is turning around to look at her. Then, at twelve
thirty four, she passed the Capitol Hill Club again on
(26:23):
her way back to the alley, just moments before discovering
the device, and again, according to CCTV, nobody matching her
description was in front of the building.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Instead.
Speaker 3 (26:33):
Security footage shows her passing an individual, maybe a woman,
as she ran to just the corner just before the building.
That person a baseball cap, scarf, long camel colored trench coat,
not a darker black jacket. Not a motorcycle type jacket.
It doesn't fit at all what she was describing. Then
(26:56):
another individual enters her line of sight during that same seats,
approaching the building while pushing it peer pushing what looks
like a dolly like a cart. Open the front door
and just walk straight in. Now Younger appears to be
the only individual with direct knowledge of the events who
disputes the FBI's timeline as to when the RNC device
(27:20):
was planned. She wrote in her tip that she said
to the FBI, I can confirm that the device must
have been placed between twelve and twelve forty It was
not present when I went down to the area to
the start the laundry approximately twelve pm.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
Well, that's there's one hell of an assessment.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
It flies directly in the face of the nearly five
year claim by law enforcement that both exposives were placed
the night before, on January five. So why would she
make such a definitive statement about when she believed the
device was planted? And then, further, why does she fail
(27:59):
to tell investigations during the same interview on January eleventh
about that, After all, the only person who had been
in that specific area between noon and twelve forty was her.
Now I'll get another question, why Younger's bombshell disclosure has
(28:19):
been concealed for years, or whether the FBI ever followed
up with her, ever talked to her about the discrepancies,
every discrepancy, the empty handed second load, the vanishing, suspicious woman,
the timeline that narrows squarely around her own movements undermines
the only eyewitness account on which the FBI's case depends. Now,
(28:45):
whether by error, embellishment, design, the story of the RNC
bomb begins and ends with this one witness, and what
follows didn't just challenge her credibility, Think it destroys it,
beginning with the single most important detailer story, the timer
(29:05):
on the device that she claimed was set to coincide
exactly with the start of the Joint Session of Congress
on January sixth. Yeah, and speaking of timer, it's time
to take a break. It raises serious questions. Hmmm, pipe
bomb real fake? Who planted it? This woman? I think
(29:30):
is a misdirection. My quick question, did he use your
deep state government friends to get write in.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
The competition so you could have this better spot take.
Speaker 3 (29:43):
Wondering an advice of counsel. I refused to answer that
question based on my constitutional rights not to implicate myself.
So there's that my deep state connections. He's sitting back
there oblivious to what's going on. No idea. Now, I'm
(30:06):
referring to the RNs. Somebody said on the text line,
you keep saying RNC. Don't you mean the DNC. No,
I'm referring to the r n C. This is the
witness of the.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
R n C.
Speaker 5 (30:14):
Yeah, we quickly forget that there were two, two on each.
Everybody talks about the DNC one.
Speaker 3 (30:20):
Nobody talks about the RNC. And the RNC is based
on this woman's testimony, which clearly has a lot of
problems with it. Probably the most significant problem is the
myth of this twenty minute timer on the bomb at
the RNC. Of all the details, I think that's the
(30:46):
most important part of the narrative related to the pipe bombs,
particularly the one at the RNC, because that pipe bomb,
according to her, was set to detonate at one PM.
Why is that critical? That's the exact that time that
Congress convened to debate the outcome of the twenty twenty
election and certified Joe Biden as the winner, and in
(31:06):
at least one interview, she acknowledged that the timer was
in perfect sync with the start of those proceedings. Quote,
I couldn't think that there might be some connection here.
There has to be. The timing was too coincidental close quote.
In fact, her timely discovery I put in their quotes.
(31:27):
That's what set off a chain of events on January sixth.
It is her testimony to the FBI that caused the
initial evacuation of the buildings. It's her testimony that I
shouldn't say testimony, is her well, yeah, testimony to the FBI.
I guess if you're lying to the SBI, you're gonna
(31:48):
be in trouble with that during this investigation.
Speaker 5 (31:55):
Real quick, I do have photos and videos up at
Michael says, go here dot com if you want to
take a look those pipe bombs and the it looks
like an egg timer. Well, in fact, so I don't
know how you can set something. I mean, I suppose
if it's if it's twelve thirty and you can can
pass it in the thirty minute marking, Oh this is
exactly one o'clock.
Speaker 3 (32:16):
Maybe, well, based on your your interruption of my narrative here.
Let's just take the break early now, because my notes
say this. Next, the FBI determined that only the dial
face of the kitchen timer and the underlying components were
attached to both the RNC and the DNC devices in
(32:38):
the timers original condition. It was not modified for use
in these devices whatsoever. It is precisely what you just described.
Step one, you gotta turn it clockwise full rotation past
fifty five. Step two you turn it back counterclockwise to
the number of minutes required. Now, this is exactly what
(33:00):
you describe. And I assume the pictures you put up
kitchen timer that cannot be set to go off precisely
at one pm. You might be closed, but you can't
be precisely. And her testimony is and the FBI's public
narrative is that it was set to go off precisely
(33:21):
at one pm. Isn't that convenient?
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Now?
Speaker 3 (33:26):
FBI device examiners recovered in both devices appear to have
been removed from their housing units, modified to produce a
timed improvised switch, But the main housing units that once
enclosed the system and the fixed error is attached to them,
are not included either. One of the assemblies. The photos
(33:48):
taken at the scene indicate broken timers, broken timers. Yes,
something offerious that we still don't know the full extent
of took place on January five and January sixth. And
who is this person and why isn't the current FBI
(34:09):
set her down to find out the truth
Did morning from South Dakota.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Does this mean I'm gonna have to re record our
rules of engagement.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
I'm gonna have to get the Gain kids together. Everyone
have a great day.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
H'm Michael and Dragon. Good morning. And I have to
say I'm thrilled about this because I listen to you
in the morning and then as soon as you sign off,
use my iHeart presets to flip over to ros Kaminski.
Now I can just stay in one place, have a
good day.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
And we did this just for you, just for you,
and so that you could sleep in and so I
could sleep in. And I'm also thinking about four hours,
three hours inst the four hours, because I'm looking at
that clock.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
And thinking, hmmm, you don't must be done. It almost
be done. Arctic Frost.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
That's the investigation that was undertaken by Merrick Garland, former
Attorney General, at the direction of supposedly President Biden but
who knows in the White House and Jack Smith, the
over zealous prosecutor that went after Trump on the documents
(01:12):
January sixth and has a record of like you know,
zero to ten in having his convictions upheld. Virtually every
conviction he's ever gotten has been overturned. The guy's just well,
he's a lawyer, is supposed to zealously represent his client,
(01:32):
but not over zealously.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
You're not supposed to break the rules.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
You're not supposed to just, you know, through vengeance go
after somebody. And Jack Smith has a reputation for doing that.
So this investigation of January six resulted in now they
want to make sure you understand that they didn't wire
tap like Senator Cruz's telephone, his cell phone. They just
(01:59):
collected the metadata. They also went to Verizon and AT
and T. I'm not sure about T Mobile. I need
to ask T Mobile about that, because they did. I
want to bitch at them about it. But they went
to AT and T, Verizon and AT and T rebuffed
them and said no, and they just dropped it, which
(02:20):
shows that they really were just fishing.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
That's bad enough.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
But in all of that smoke going on about January sixth,
which to this day I can't believe is still a topic,
you would have thought by now that an independent Council,
someone in the DOJ, somebody that Congress, some thought you
would have done an investigation. And we've gotten to the
heart of what really occurred on that day, but we don't.
(02:50):
They still refer to it.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
I don't.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
I refer to as January sixth. I refuse to call
it an insurrection because if we ever have to have
an insurrection against the tyrannical government, I don't want those
y'all who's involved, because clearly they don't know how to
take over a government. They clearly don't know how to
destroy a government. And not that that's what they were
trying to do, but if that's what If that's what
Democrats alleged they were trying to do, Boy were they
(03:14):
a bunch of Keystone cops. But I want to bring
up something that probably hasn't been in your mind for
well four years or more. Carling young I'm sorry, Carling Younger.
Do that ring a bell? Of course it doesn't. She
(03:34):
happens to be the person that found the pipe bomb
at the Democrat National Committee headquarters.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
A grand jury, at least according to recent.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Reports that I've read, is going to be impaneled early
next year in the Southern District of Florida to consider
a grand conspiracy case against the people that were accused
of using government power in a decade long crusade aimed
specifically to destroy Donald Trump, and I might add parenthetically,
(04:07):
I think to destroy the make America Great Again movement.
The origin of the conspiracy dates all the way back
to the days of the Russia Gate scandal. But if equally,
and I think probably even greater importance, are those events
of January six.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
Soon to be five years ago. Now.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
While Russia Gate did, without any question, in my mind,
inflict horrible damage on the first Trump presidency, it really
kept him from doing everything that he wanted to do,
and even worse, it was corrosive to our politics. It
was corrosive to the very foundational principles that govern this country.
(04:51):
It is clear I think that the purpose of January
sixth was to put Trump in prison and then use
that label insurrection, which is why I don't use it
as a way to prohibit him from ever again occupying
public office. This means you've got to go back in
(05:11):
the history of ancient history books. Remember when Joe Biden
went into the Rose Garden and it was almost as
if Barack Obama was standing there with Brock's right hand
up Joe Biden's back, holding him up like a puppet,
and getting Biden to maul those words.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
It was.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Announced as a speech where he was going he had
decided not to run for the presidency, and I very
distinctly remember that day listening to that speech and thinking,
oh my gosh, he's going to pull fact. We just
Tam and I are watching a series on Hulu or
Netflix or something called The Diplomat, and there's a scene
(05:57):
in The Diplomat where the British Prime minim in the
US President are going to announce they've come up with
this announcement they're going to make, and the US President
says what she says, and then the British Prime Minister
goes off script and completely blows the whole thing. I'm watching.
I'm watching that and I'm thinking back to this announcement
(06:20):
that Biden is making about he's not going to run again,
because the first ninety percent of the speech is all
about the reasons why he should run again, and I'm thinking,
holy cow, he's going to be He's going to be
ballsy and announced. He doesn't care that Obama's standing next
to him. He's going to be ballsy to announced he's
going to run for president anyway.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
But he doesn't.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
He gets to the last paragraph and announces and so therefore,
I will now seek the presidency.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
And that was because.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama brincahoots, because they were determined
to make her the first female pres and she had,
i think, promised to fulfill Obama's third term to finish
the fundamental transformation of America. And Obama chose Hillary because
(07:16):
she was a reliable stooge, whereas Biden was just a stooge.
He was totally unreliable, and Obama knew that. But the
problem was on Fifth Avenue in New York, in Midtown Manhattan,
a guy comes down and escalator with this gorgeous woman
(07:37):
on his arm and announces that he's gonna run for
the nomination to be the next president of the United
States and the Republican Party. And it's Donald J. Trump,
and everybody just laughs and no, he can't win, he
can't win, blah blah blah, it's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
Well, in behold, he wins.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
And from that, I think from the escalator moment, they
knew they had to stop him. And of course Jeb,
who's still a good friend of mine, was the anointed one.
Jeb completely failed. So now they feel like, oh, we're okay,
Hillary's going to make it. Hillary doesn't make it, And
(08:18):
in fact, she's got the Jabbet Center in New York
completely reserved, all the fireworks and everything.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
She doesn't come out for a day. She remains in hiding.
She's in shock. So that's what starts.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
I mean, that is the tipping point for where the
Democrat Party became unhinged and they were determined to truly,
and I mean this in every sense of the word,
destroy Donald Trump, put him in jail, assassinating, whatever it takes,
by any means necessary, get rid of Donald Trump. January sixth.
(08:58):
If the idea, if the conspiracy, which is what the
grand jury in Florida is looking at, if the conspiracy
was to put Trump in prison by labeling his actions
as an insurrection, which is a violation of federal law,
they could put him in prison. And if you're convicted
of insurrection, part of that statue prohibits you from ever
(09:21):
again occupying any public office. So that's the scheme, and
it almost succeeded, which I think is why it's imperative
to expose every little thing that we find out as
we get closer to this grand jury proceeding every little
detail about that day's events, so as we get closer
(09:43):
to the five year anniversary just coming January sixth, the
window of opportunity to bring charges against me the perpetrators
before the statue limitation kicks in and prohibits us, prevents
us from prosecuting anybody. Deadline is getting closer and closer
and closer. There are two factors that were absolutely essential
(10:10):
to making certain that the intended chaos at the Capitol
that day occurred. The delayed deployment of the National Guard
number one and number two. The discovery of two pipe bombs,
one outside the DNC, one outside the RNC.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
Isn't it interesting?
Speaker 3 (10:31):
Hown't you ever question how convenient it was that both
devices were found right before the RNC and right after
the DNC The Joint Session of Congress convened at one
pm to debate the outcome of the twenty twenty election
and to certify Joe Biden as the winner. The news
(10:51):
that these bombs were found just blocks from the Capitol
prompted the first wave of evacuations of the nearby congressional
buildings that afternoon. Now, once you think about that, to
discovery the pipe bombs creates a reason for the US
(11:12):
Capitol Police to evacuate all of the congressional buildings near
the RNC and the DNC. If you're told to evacuate
a building because pipe bombs have been found near your buildings,
that creates an air of panic, and that gives the
(11:34):
cabal the initial tool they need about the narrative they're
going to now report about what happens later on. At
a press conference a few days later, law enforcement says
that those devices were viable and deadly, and that felony
(11:56):
murder charges are apparently still awaiting the people responsible.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
So what they do?
Speaker 3 (12:04):
The FBI got to remember, it's James Camy, Christopher Ray.
They released a photo of a person in a hoodie.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
No, it wasn't John Fetterman.
Speaker 3 (12:15):
They released a picture of a guy in a hoodie
or person in a hoodie I should say, carrying a backpack,
wearing a face mask. Then they published a grainy video
showing that same suspect meandering around Capitol Hill between seven
thirty and eight thirty that night on January five, the
time that the FBI believed the devices were planted. You know,
(12:35):
it's interesting that the FBI just last week, just last week,
no news coverage about that. I can find no significant
news coverage about it. Issued another plea for help identifying
the individual in the video, and they've upfilled the reward
to identify that individual to half a million dollars five
hundred thousand dollars. So Ever, since the pipe bomb story started,
(12:59):
the narrative has been unraveling and it raises questions. How,
for example, did bomb sniffing canines miss a pipe bomb
outside the DNC on at least two occasions when the
dogs went by. Why did Kamala Harris at the time
(13:19):
she was the sitting vice president, I mean, I'm sorry,
she was the sitting US senator and the incoming vice president.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Why did she leave.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
The capital and go to the DNC headquarters that afternoon
where a pipe bomb hadn't been discovered? And then how
did cops from multiple agencies and dozens of pedestrians failed
to notice the device that was purportedly sitting between two
benches outside the main entrance of the DNC for more
(13:49):
than seventeen hours. I've been in that entrance. Yeah, I've
been in the DNC. I had to get umigated afterwards,
but I've been in there. So much the attention focused
on the DNC device, and the circumstances of the discovery
at the Republican National Committee are even more suspicious. There
(14:10):
are documents recently released by the Select Subcommittee on January
sixth that ought to be a great interest to Congress
in the FBI, and they relate to the woman who
found the bomb, and I say found at the RNC,
Carlin Younger. She's been described as the lucky neighbor. She's
(14:33):
been described as a hero by the cabal in the
weeks following January sixth, But then suddenly you don't hear
anything else about her. She's completely disappeared off the radar now.
At the time, back in January sixth, twenty twenty one,
she was employed by something called first Net. That's an
(14:56):
agency within the Department of Commerce that manages the stupid
broadband network for first responders during major events or disasters
first Net. Her ties to first Net alone raised suspicions.
I'll explain that in just a minute, she had two
known contacts with the FBI. She emailed the FBI tip
(15:20):
line on January eighth, the day after the bureau issued
a bulletin with a photo of the suspect to identify
herself as the individual who discovered the bomb at the RNC.
She then sat down with the FBI for an interview
January eleven, twenty twenty one. Both times she said she
(15:46):
was working remotely from her apartment, and then she took
a break between twelve o'clock or so to eat lunch
into her laundry. Now, in interviews the Conductor that were
conducted just hours after she met with the FBI, she
repeated that line about doing lunch and laundry. But here's
what's odd about our behavior. All subsequent interviews were given
(16:11):
strictly to news outlets in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
She grew up in Madison.
Speaker 3 (16:19):
She attended college in Medisine. They actually honored her on
February one, claiming that her swift action prevented injuries and
deaths on that terrible day. By the surveillance footage that
corroborates the laundry oriented story, she left the apartment at
exactly means caring what appears to be a laundry bag,
(16:43):
entered the alley between the RNC and the Capitol Hill
Club to use a nearby.
Speaker 5 (16:49):
Laundry mich go with those few more hours of extra sleep.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Are you going to have a better face for radio?
Speaker 4 (16:58):
Enjoyette and hang on to your earboss.
Speaker 6 (17:05):
When I first saw the pictures of the supposed pipe bomber,
the first thing that crossed my mind was Oprah Winfree.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
The bag lady, Oprah Winfree.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
So we're telling a story about this woman younger, she's
the one that discovered.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
The pipe bombs. Now, the video from.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
January sixth, twenty twenty one corroborates the story about her
going to lunch and a laundromat at twelve three pm.
She re emerged returned to her apartment by about twelve
oh four. That marked her first full trip to and
from the alley where the laundromat was located. During what
(18:00):
she said, she'd began her first load of laundry, but
she told two different stories about why she went back
to the laundry room again around twelve forty twenty minutes
before the start of the proceedings at the Capitol just
a few blocks away. She told reporters she returned the
laundry room to put her first load of clothes into
the dryer. Listened to these three things quote. When I
(18:24):
went downstairs to put the first load into the dryer.
That's when something caught my eye, she told Channel three
thousand in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
In Madison.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Number two, The Milwaukee Journal reported quote on her way
from switching her clothes from the washer to the dryer,
she saw something on the ground close quote third. She
told WISN again in Wisconsin. I was doing a now
infamous load of laundry, just changing it over from the
(18:55):
washer to the dryer. She also offered a perfect, at
least maybe according to law enforcement officers, a perfect description
of the device. Although she only saw for a few seconds,
she only saw the device for a few seconds, shit
she was able to describe it in detail.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
I was doing a now it's missload of laundry, just
changing it over from the washer to the dryer. When
I went downstairs to put the first load into the dryer,
that's when something caught my eye. And I'm a big recycler,
so it really caught my eye because I thought someone
had just missed the recycling can. It looked kind of metalish,
and I was going to put it back in. My
first reaction was this has got to be trash, until
(19:36):
I kind of leaned closer and saw that in fact,
it was something that looked like a bomb, and the
first thing I saw was wires, and the next thing
was six inches of pipe capped on both ends. And
then I had to lean closer, and that's when I
see this dial and it hands a hand on twenty,
and then I see the number and I lean closer
and I lean to listen. I'm like, is that twenty seconds?
Is it?
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Ticky?
Speaker 4 (19:55):
You're on that edge of I don't want to bother anybody,
right like, I don't to make sure this is real.
You don't want to go down as a person who
evacuates the city block for a hoax. But at the
same time, there was just enough of that gut instinct
that said, this isn't a place that you put a hoax.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
I have to have somebody check this out.
Speaker 4 (20:13):
It was actually a scene from Terminator that came to
mind where one character tells another not to disturb the pipe,
and I'm like, okay, so I can't move it, and
what if somebody else finds it? And that's when the
adrenaline hit. And the police response after that was pretty immediate.
I mean I was barely in my apartment a few
minutes before I started to see the K nine unit
sniffing around. This is a neighborhood, right, there are all
generations that live here, and this bomb was placed in
(20:36):
a way that really could have hurt people. I Mean,
the thing I keep coming back to is just how
lucky I was and nobody else, like a child who
plays in the alleys found it, or a sanitation worker
who was just doing their job and it went off
at the wrong time. I'm just so grateful that nobody
got hurt. I mostly just say I got really lucky.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
Hmm.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Interesting what you just heard is not what she had
told the investigators about why she went back to the
laundry room.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Quote. This is from the FBI's three to oh two.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
That's the you know, those are the forms I used
to take notes of interviews. Quote on her way back
to the laundry room with a second load of laundry
at approximately twelve forty am, which is incorrect, observed a
suspicious device next to the exterior gate. Now, the closed
caption TV footage appears to contradict what she told authorities
(21:33):
about her return trip because the video shows that she
exits her apartment empty handed at twelve thirty in the afternoon.
The same trip she described to the FBI as beginning
with a second load in hand. She didn't have a
second load. She heared the alley at twelve thirty four,
and then minutes later, twelve thirty eight, she re emerges
(21:53):
running toward the front of the Capitol Hill Club, apparently
just having discovered the bomb. So why is can you
tell a different story to reporters within hours of her
interview with the FBI? Says one thing to the FBI,
and then just hours later, because you know, the local
Meetia's got the local kid, local connection tells an entirely
different story. If you look at the sub headline for
(22:16):
the January twelve Madison magazine piece, it notes that after
the FBI interview Madison native Carlin Younger about discovering the
pipe bomb, she did reporter Doug mo. Younger told the
reporter that she went back out to put her clothes
in the dryer. Now, look, you might write that office
(22:39):
fog of war oversight. She was distraught, she was nervous,
she was upset, she didn't know what to do. But
when you watch the interviews, doesn't indicate anything like that,
nor does this suggest the severity of the situation. In
when she found herself. She said in that interview, I
saw the timer. It was on twenty I lean I
(23:00):
heard it ticking. Is it twenty seconds?
Speaker 1 (23:03):
You know?
Speaker 3 (23:03):
If I saw what looked like a pipe bomb, and
I'm not even really sure, I'd lean oversee if I
could hear it ticking or not. But that's what she did.
But here's a distraught woman, befuddled by being at the
center of this momentous and potentially deadly incident. Strange behavior.
(23:26):
But her laundry story is not the only inconsistency in
her account of what happened. Her interaction with the FBI
did more than just describe her role in discovering the device.
She then tried to blame a suspicious woman, intimating that
at one point the woman was a Trump supporter. Huh
(23:46):
where did that come from? In her January eighth online
tip to the FBI, she claims she was quote passed
by a woman in front of the Capitol Hill Club
who stared at me suspiciously in such way that now
makes me think maybe she had some knowledge of what
was in the alleyway. Did she describe the woman in detail? Caucasian,
(24:10):
middle aged forty five fifty five short stature, five four
five six heavier set, one two hundred and twenty pounds long,
dark hair, without a mask. She was wearing a dark
or black jacket in jeans. But the description of that
brief encounter changed a few days later. She told investigators
then on January eleven, and she had not seen anybody
(24:32):
suspicious on January sixth, but she did tell the FBI,
but she noticed an unknown woman in front of the
Capitol Hill Club who looked like she was from out
of town and looking at her in a way she
considered strange. The woman appeared to be approximately forty to
fifty years old, five seven heavier set, wearing jeans, a
motorcycle type jacket, and was not wearing a mask.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Suddenly, the description of.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Shorter stature was gone, and coincidentally replaced with the exact
height of the hoodie clad suspect. Oh that's interesting. You
now know that she's five foot seven inches. How do
you know that? She claimed the woman had the same
excited energy as some of the other protesters. The story's
(25:20):
beginning to merge, is beginning to change ever so slightly
to fit what I would say is being fed to her.
But then the surveillance video there is there. It contradicts
her allegations about a suspicious woman. At no point, whether
(25:41):
walking to or from the alley where the laundromat was located,
with the CCTV in full operation the entire time, she
never passed anyone matching either description that she provided in
any of the interviews. During her first trip at Newton,
nobody was in front of the Capitol Hill Club. On
(26:02):
her way back to the apartment, she did pass one
person in front of the building, but at that point
she was no longer walking toward the alley. That individual
was standing with his or her back to younger facing
the building and made no movement that in any way
is turning around to look at her. Then, at twelve
thirty four, she passed the Capitol Hill Club again on
(26:23):
her way back to the alley, just moments before discovering
the device, and again, according to CCTV, nobody matching her
description was in front of the building.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Instead.
Speaker 3 (26:33):
Security footage shows her passing an individual, maybe a woman,
as she ran to just the corner just before the building.
That person a baseball cap, scarf, long camel colored trench coat,
not a darker black jacket. Not a motorcycle type jacket.
It doesn't fit at all what she was describing. Then
(26:56):
another individual enters her line of sight during that same seats,
approaching the building while pushing it peer pushing what looks
like a dolly like a cart. Open the front door
and just walk straight in. Now Younger appears to be
the only individual with direct knowledge of the events who
disputes the FBI's timeline as to when the RNC device
(27:20):
was planned. She wrote in her tip that she said
to the FBI, I can confirm that the device must
have been placed between twelve and twelve forty It was
not present when I went down to the area to
the start the laundry approximately twelve pm.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
Well, that's there's one hell of an assessment.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
It flies directly in the face of the nearly five
year claim by law enforcement that both exposives were placed
the night before, on January five. So why would she
make such a definitive statement about when she believed the
device was planted? And then, further, why does she fail
(27:59):
to tell investigations during the same interview on January eleventh
about that, After all, the only person who had been
in that specific area between noon and twelve forty was her.
Now I'll get another question, why Younger's bombshell disclosure has
(28:19):
been concealed for years, or whether the FBI ever followed
up with her, ever talked to her about the discrepancies,
every discrepancy, the empty handed second load, the vanishing, suspicious woman,
the timeline that narrows squarely around her own movements undermines
the only eyewitness account on which the FBI's case depends. Now,
(28:45):
whether by error, embellishment, design, the story of the RNC
bomb begins and ends with this one witness, and what
follows didn't just challenge her credibility, Think it destroys it,
beginning with the single most important detailer story, the timer
(29:05):
on the device that she claimed was set to coincide
exactly with the start of the Joint Session of Congress
on January sixth. Yeah, and speaking of timer, it's time
to take a break. It raises serious questions. Hmmm, pipe
bomb real fake? Who planted it? This woman? I think
(29:30):
is a misdirection. My quick question, did he use your
deep state government friends to get write in.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
The competition so you could have this better spot take.
Speaker 3 (29:43):
Wondering an advice of counsel. I refused to answer that
question based on my constitutional rights not to implicate myself.
So there's that my deep state connections. He's sitting back
there oblivious to what's going on. No idea. Now, I'm
(30:06):
referring to the RNs. Somebody said on the text line,
you keep saying RNC. Don't you mean the DNC. No,
I'm referring to the r n C. This is the
witness of the.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
R n C.
Speaker 5 (30:14):
Yeah, we quickly forget that there were two, two on each.
Everybody talks about the DNC one.
Speaker 3 (30:20):
Nobody talks about the RNC. And the RNC is based
on this woman's testimony, which clearly has a lot of
problems with it. Probably the most significant problem is the
myth of this twenty minute timer on the bomb at
the RNC. Of all the details, I think that's the
(30:46):
most important part of the narrative related to the pipe bombs,
particularly the one at the RNC, because that pipe bomb,
according to her, was set to detonate at one PM.
Why is that critical? That's the exact that time that
Congress convened to debate the outcome of the twenty twenty
election and certified Joe Biden as the winner, and in
(31:06):
at least one interview, she acknowledged that the timer was
in perfect sync with the start of those proceedings. Quote,
I couldn't think that there might be some connection here.
There has to be. The timing was too coincidental close quote.
In fact, her timely discovery I put in their quotes.
(31:27):
That's what set off a chain of events on January sixth.
It is her testimony to the FBI that caused the
initial evacuation of the buildings. It's her testimony that I
shouldn't say testimony, is her well, yeah, testimony to the FBI.
I guess if you're lying to the SBI, you're gonna
(31:48):
be in trouble with that during this investigation.
Speaker 5 (31:55):
Real quick, I do have photos and videos up at
Michael says, go here dot com if you want to
take a look those pipe bombs and the it looks
like an egg timer. Well, in fact, so I don't
know how you can set something. I mean, I suppose
if it's if it's twelve thirty and you can can
pass it in the thirty minute marking, Oh this is
exactly one o'clock.
Speaker 3 (32:16):
Maybe, well, based on your your interruption of my narrative here.
Let's just take the break early now, because my notes
say this. Next, the FBI determined that only the dial
face of the kitchen timer and the underlying components were
attached to both the RNC and the DNC devices in
(32:38):
the timers original condition. It was not modified for use
in these devices whatsoever. It is precisely what you just described.
Step one, you gotta turn it clockwise full rotation past
fifty five. Step two you turn it back counterclockwise to
the number of minutes required. Now, this is exactly what
(33:00):
you describe. And I assume the pictures you put up
kitchen timer that cannot be set to go off precisely
at one pm. You might be closed, but you can't
be precisely. And her testimony is and the FBI's public
narrative is that it was set to go off precisely
(33:21):
at one pm. Isn't that convenient?
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Now?
Speaker 3 (33:26):
FBI device examiners recovered in both devices appear to have
been removed from their housing units, modified to produce a
timed improvised switch, But the main housing units that once
enclosed the system and the fixed error is attached to them,
are not included either. One of the assemblies. The photos
(33:48):
taken at the scene indicate broken timers, broken timers. Yes,
something offerious that we still don't know the full extent
of took place on January five and January sixth. And
who is this person and why isn't the current FBI
(34:09):
set her down to find out the truth
Popular Podcasts
Spooky Podcasts from iHeartRadio
Whether you’re a scaredy-cat or a brave bat, this collection of episodes from iHeartPodcasts will put you in the Halloween spirit. Binge stories, frights, and more that may keep you up at night!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.