10-6-25 - 6am - The Shutdown & Broken Windows Theory and Antifa vs ICE

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Day six of a shutdown.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
How's everybody do surviving just well, day six of a shutdown?

Speaker 3 (00:10):
What it's somebody put it on repeat?

Speaker 1 (00:13):
Not me, somebody, somebody who else is in that room
with you? Put it on repeat.

Speaker 3 (00:19):
I'm not the only person that works in this room.

Speaker 4 (00:25):
True, I'm not sure who else does work in that room.
But let's get started right off the bat. This occurred
before I got in the car this morning. It occurred
a couple of days ago as I start, you know,
I'm doing the Saturday program and then we're having dinner

(00:45):
with friends and we're talking about stuff, and I realized
that things in this country are uh, I don't know
what phrase to use, spiraling out of control FAFO.

Speaker 1 (01:00):
What we wanted.

Speaker 4 (01:00):
And this is just the backlash that we're getting as
we start to change things.

Speaker 1 (01:05):
Because anytime, you know, anytime.

Speaker 4 (01:07):
Whether it's in your household, your work, your business, your school,
whatever kind of entity that it might be, when something's
been going along one way and you know, a new
boss comes into town, for example, and the boo the
new boss is like, we're on the wrong path. You know,

(01:30):
a CEO gets hired to turn around a company and
they come into the company and they realize, my gosh,
nothing in here is working or everything's back assword. We
need to change this, we need to change that, And
so the boss sits down. And any good CEO would
do this. A good CEO would first look at Okay,
who's surrounding me, and you try to get to know them, understand, like,

(01:55):
you know, bring them in. I bring them into individually
because I don't want them you know they will, but
I'd like to minimize them talking among themselves. So I'd
bring dragging in, and I'd bring you know, Taper in
and jojo in and Brenda in, and myself in and
everybody you know and that you know whoever the f

(02:18):
I don't even.

Speaker 1 (02:19):
Know the EVP of sales is.

Speaker 4 (02:21):
Now that I bring all those people in, I'd say, Okay,
one at a time, not one as a group, but individually,
I bring them in. What do you think works around here?
And what do you think doesn't work around here?

Speaker 1 (02:33):
Now? Tell me why? Why why do you think? You know?

Speaker 4 (02:36):
I mean, develop some rapport and get them to really
kind of spill their guts about what's working and what's
not working, and not that you're trying to get them
to throw anybody into the bus. But okay, well, if
you tell me that this isn't working, that is dependent
upon let's say A, A is not working, but A
is dependent upon X Y and Z and x y

(02:59):
and Z are you know those are vice presidents of
other divisions or other parts of components of the business. Well,
so why is X, y and Z not working? Well,
you know because X is never here and you know
why is having an affair with such and such and
Z is was just brought in because that's the uh
you know, that was somebody's you know, daughter or cousin

(03:21):
or something and.

Speaker 1 (03:22):
Or they they got a lot of problems at home.

Speaker 4 (03:26):
You start finding out everything about everything going on that
is the culture of the company, the organization, the entity,
and then you start analyzing, okay, well then I need
to maybe this person has all the requisite skills, knowledge,
the ability that the KSAs, all of the things that

(03:47):
they need to really get the job done, but they
don't have the proper tools or they're actually doing what
they need to do, but nobody ever seens it, sees
it getting done because somebody over here is screwing it
up really badly. So it doesn't work very well. You
know Dragon and I often you know, have nasty things

(04:07):
to say about iHeart because because the company has downsized
a lot, so there aren't a lot of people to
get things done for you.

Speaker 5 (04:14):
You know.

Speaker 4 (04:14):
I just give you an example. I spent probably what
ten minutes dragging when I first got here, trying to
fix them a microphone, because other people come in here
and they screw around the microphone. And according to you,
at least anyway I'm Friday, you just boom, it dropped
down on the console, and then somebody just tried to
hal ass put it back together. And of course there's
no engineer to call. There's nobody to fix it. And
by the way, there were two broken microphones that sat

(04:36):
over here for three or four days. I think I
finally put them out there on the desk. I don't
know whether anybody's taking them and fixed them or not.

Speaker 3 (04:42):
Now they just disappeared after that.

Speaker 1 (04:44):
Oh, they just disappeared because I knew that.

Speaker 3 (04:47):
Wait, we can hope that someone in engineering took them.

Speaker 4 (04:50):
But you know what, well, if somebody stole them, they
stole some broke some broken microphone.

Speaker 5 (04:54):
Yeah, so just.

Speaker 4 (04:57):
Certain things don't get done done, and so it makes
it difficult for use a quality product. And so if
you're the CEO and you're looking at say a country,
and the country is kind of going to hell in
a hand basket and certain things aren't going you start
trying to figure out what do I need to change,
what do I need to do, how do I do it?
What's the approach? Blah blah blah, And you start and
you start making those changes. And sometimes you have to

(05:19):
do it yourself, Like you got to fix your own
damn microphone so it doesn't fall off in your lap
during your program. Drives me crazy. I mean, it's just
a little crap like that. But little crap like that
is the broken windows theory. You let the little things
go and then pretty soon I mean, you know, actually,
let's use this microphone as an example. So the microphone, too,

(05:41):
is essential, is an essential component of this program. Without
the microphone, I can't broadcast my voice. If I can't
broadcast my voice, you can't listen to the program. So
this is is an integral small thing. When you think
about all the components in these two rooms, all of
the boards, all of the components, the electronics, the wires,

(06:03):
the cables, everything else. This microphone is simply the starting point.
And if you don't take care of the little thing,
then other things start to fall apart. And as they
continue to fall apart everybody it reaches its own momentum
where nobody just gives a rat's ask anymore, and so
nothing happens. Blinds are still broken, Blinds will remain broken.

(06:25):
I'm totally given up on ever having new blinds in
this place. So you know, when the sun finally gets down,
as winner moves over here, whether I'll be able to
close the blinds and see what I'm doing here or not.
Who knows. Nobody cares. Nothing will happen. The thing's true
with the country, except we're seeing the little things in reverse.
The little things are the big things, and so it's

(06:46):
the broken windows theory in reverse. So all these big
things are happening, and what we need to realize is
that is the result of trying to change things. And
as we try to change things. The wild animal that's
cornered over here, that's both injured, not getting what they
want and used to be the you know, the main

(07:07):
they were the main predator. They're no longer the predator.
In fact, we're the predator. Now and we're expecting change.
We voted for change, and we wanted change, and we're
getting change now. It may not always be in the
wake that or in the u I just looked at

(07:27):
my nose, aw the word wake, wake up, Mike. It
may not be in the form, the time, the manner,
whatever that we expect or that we want. But nonetheless
we ask for change. So in the broad category of change,
we're getting what we asked for change. We should expect

(07:48):
that after decades and decades of the radical left in
this country continuing to get what they want. When you
start trying to fix the broken windows, when you start
trying to take care of the little things at the
same time CHARLESO trying to take care of some of
the big things, there's naturally, naturally push pushback, So you
get a thing like a government shut down, which, by

(08:09):
the way, I don't know, hasn't affected you, hasn't affected
me yet. But then I'm not I'm not traveling until
this weekend, so I don't know how you know, will
flights be delayed?

Speaker 1 (08:19):
I don't know. I say all of that because.

Speaker 4 (08:27):
And I think that the assassination of Charlie Kirk might
be one of those tipping points, or at least in
my mind, it's kind of the height of the absurdity
of the radical left in this country. And when that happened,

(08:47):
Democrat lawmakers and the pundits on television and radio for
that matter, found themselves in kind of a quandary. On
the one hand, most of them actually loathed Charlie Kirk.
They loathed and Charlie Kirk is just the example. And

(09:08):
I'm not trying to minimize his death, but for his death,
he wouldn't have been a flashpoint. He would have been
one of those sore spots with the radical left that
continue to be effective, continue to do the things that
he was doing to change and alter the course of
the country in his little part of the world, which

(09:31):
turns out wasn't quite so little college campuses. If we
only had a Charlie Kirk, say in high schools, in
junior highs, he'd be even more radical. But once they
get to college and they start going through college and university,
then they start getting, you know, indoctrinated by the Marxists

(09:52):
that have overtaken higher education. So all of those people
loathe Charlie Kirk. And on the one hand, those that
loathed him. On the other many felt that maybe they
should try to hold the line by, you know, let's

(10:14):
just condemn the shooting, but let's condemn the shooting butt
And that was what was always going on. The New
York Times Ezracline was among those who dipped his toe
into that water. He wrote a piece within the day
titled Charlie Kirk was practicing politics the right way. Well,

(10:35):
that's interesting because As Reclined doesn't seem to practice politics
in the same way that Charlie Kirk was. And unfortunately,
Klein then found himself the subject of a backlash from
other people on the left who thought that by praising
Kirk's invitation to non violent debate that somehow As Reclined
was legitimizing Kirk's views. Because they don't know how to debate,

(10:59):
they can't debate, they can't have policy disagreements. So the
violence that you see in the streets, all the violence
that you hear about, it's when it gets amplified. Let's
be objective here, That violence gets amplified amazingly and just

(11:19):
in your face day in and day out. Now, part
of that is because we're trying to stop the violence.

Speaker 1 (11:30):
And the more that.

Speaker 4 (11:30):
We try to deport illegal aliens, or that we try
to destroy Antifa or Black Lives Matter or any other
radical terrorists domestic terrorist organization that is trying to convert
this country from a democratic republic, constitutional republic into some
sort of Marxist socialist utopia. Of course there's going to
be pushedback, and the only way they know to push

(11:52):
back is through violence. And I sincerely believe that many
many Democrats sit back and condemn the violence. You know,
they'll put out press release and not talking about it's bad,
but in the dead to night, they actually welcome the

(12:13):
violence because their adherence to the Cloud Pivots strategy, their
adherence to Elenski's rules for radicals, and so they know
the violence will result in us at some point asking
to quell the violence. Stop it, you know, don't let
it happen anymore. Back to Ezra clined for a moment,

(12:38):
so when he got pushed back for daring to say that, hey,
you know, look, Charlie Kirkshaw, we can have civilized debate,
he was invited onto the New York Times podcast The
Democrat Left's most sacred figure, the Memoriris Tamisi Coates to
carry out a public struggle session. Uncline now, giving Coats

(13:00):
all the difference of The New York Times believes as do.
Coach and Klin tried to have the quote difficult conversation
about why Coach had reacted negatively to Klein's initial peace.
Now coachs said that since Kirk's murder he had he had,
with his usual degree of research, watched a bunch of
clips of the right wing speaker, and then he didn't

(13:21):
like what he saw. In fact, he concluded that Kirk
was anti Blake, anti black, anti gay, anti trans, anti everything, or,
as Coax elegantly summed it up, well, that dude was
just wrong. But yet, the most important moment in an
otherwise interminable conversation between these two was when Ezra Klein
tried to explain what he was thinking when he wrote

(13:43):
his initial condemnation of Kirk's murder. Coach gave a very
telling reply, couldn't you have just stayed silent? Why did
you have to say anything? Think about that for a
moment rather, I mean, Ezra Klein came out and said
that violence is not acceptable, and Coach's reply The New

(14:07):
York Times podcast Guy His reply was, was silence not
an option? Think about what that actually means. Why did
you have to condemn the assassination of a thirty one
year old who had made a name for himself and
had actually changed hearts and minds on college campuses, woken

(14:28):
people up to what was happening and got them mobilized
to become active in our political system. Bingo, that was it.
So the same people had been telling Americans for the
past decade that silence in the face of violence, and
somehow complicity was now saying that silence is violence, actually preaching,

(14:49):
in other words, that silence should in fact be an
option after political assassination. Think about that silence should be
the option after the political stat Oh, somebody got shot
for saying what they spoke, so let's just shut up.
That is that is the American left in one sentence,
was silence not an option? H I don't think it

(15:16):
should be necessary to rehearse the litany of all the
left wing violence that discard America for the past decades,
but we ought to repeat some of it. I heard
about it on the way in about Portland.

Speaker 1 (15:34):
Now.

Speaker 4 (15:35):
I have a friend who used to he didn't well, actually,
I used to have a client in Portland, but this
has been twenty years ago. Had a client in Portland,
so I traveled to Portland, I don't know, two or
three times a month. I never saw the violence twenty
years ago. But then I have a friend who lived
in Washington State, not far from Portland, who would go

(15:56):
into Portland for quite a bit on weekends to you know,
go on dates or do stuff. And then stopped because
it just became too much. And then I started seeing
people that would try to convince me on Instagram or
x or some other social media platform about hey, look

(16:18):
I'm walking around Portant, Look how nice it is. Well,
I can walk around some places of Denver and show
you how nice it is, just as say, do better
Denver can walk around some places of Denver and show
you how crappy it is. It's nothing is all one
thing and all another. But what is true is this.

(16:41):
Take Denver for example. There's probably some areas in Denver,
like where I'm sitting right now, that are relatively safe,
relatively clean, mostly absence of homeless.

Speaker 1 (16:53):
But occasionally, at the corner.

Speaker 4 (16:56):
Of Bellevue in twenty five I'll see a little homeless
encampment and I know for a fact because I've ventured
to go look at it during the day. Behind the
McDonald's over here is the homeless encampment that is hidden
behind an embankment between the retaining wall that divides the
property where the McDonald's and Taco Bell and everything else
is from the highway, so that there is a you know,

(17:19):
there's this little safety zone there, and they made it
into a little homeless city down there. Quite nasty, very
very nasty. So all of this violence takes place and
it gets amplified. We need to take that amplification with
a little bit of skepticism because of course, the violence

(17:43):
now is being amplified by the left because they want
us to eventually reject the violence. When hm, the violence
that I see is actually being perpetrated by the left
on those who are trying to make the change that.

Speaker 1 (18:03):
We voted for. You get it.

Speaker 4 (18:08):
Who's really the source of the violence? A very coarsely
is ice the source of the violence? Or people resist
the ice the source of the violence.

Speaker 3 (18:21):
Good morning, Michael, and to ragged beautiful weather.

Speaker 1 (18:24):
There's no traffic on the roads. It's gonna be a
beautiful week. I just do know what have a great.

Speaker 2 (18:30):
Day, Sirs pointed out our officers' eyes we have. I mean,
this is a whole gamut of things, you.

Speaker 6 (18:39):
Know, Paul, it is a good thing I'm not running
Portland because that would end tonight. I'm trying to remember
that line from Tombstone. I'm coming and Hell's coming with me.
Why would anyone tolerate rocks, bottle rockets, lasers being used
towards cops. I mean, it is incomprehensible to me.

Speaker 7 (18:56):
And this is where the Trump administration is on very
firm ground. And these are federal officers and federal facilities
that are being obstructed from enforcing federal law.

Speaker 3 (19:05):
Consequently, not only is.

Speaker 7 (19:07):
He fully within his powers to send in other federal
officers that is, other three letter agency agents HSI, etc.
But even the National Guard because federal law is being obstructed.
And then the other piece to is tray. As you
and I both know, is that the local police are
just mia on these issues. When you see these riots

(19:29):
going on. Finally out in Chicago, you got the state
police there, but they have intel about what's going on.
They know what's coming at them. Many of these groups
are quite public. Here in New York. The NYPD is
very adept at penning protesters in so that they get
to exercise their First Amendment rights, but that we don't
get a riot as they do. So you don't see
the local police doing that. And you have to imagine

(19:52):
that those orders from the reporting we hear are coming
from the mayor's offices. The mayors in these towns, these
blue blue cities just have their cops standing down and
as a result, ice officers are getting less protection than
the average citizen.

Speaker 4 (20:09):
Why would Portland tolerate rocks, bottle rockets, lasers being used
against cops. Let's go through some of the history of
this violence. There was the emergence early in the past
decade of these little groupies that became known as antifa,

(20:30):
the anti fascists. In fact, these so called anti fascists
started from the very get go, behaving like nothing so
much as the fascists they everywhere searched for. They became
what they supposedly were looking for, well, hunting fort literal
Nazis in places like Portland, they got away. They got

(20:53):
absolutely away with attacking federal buildings on a nightly basis,
shooting up businesses which at the claim were fascist. Oh
so that business is fascist, Let's go burn it down.
Let's go throw a Molotov cocktail through the window, just
you know, let's go throw a cinder block through it.
And then of course attacking and hospitalizing journalists Andy no

(21:15):
think about him, who were simply reporting on those activities.
One of the main targets of antifa activists over the
past decade has indeed been federal buildings and almost any
federal agency. Those activists dressed head to toe in black,
covered their faces with masks, long before the COVID nineteen

(21:38):
virus made masking apparently popular among some people. I saw
a stupid cartoon. I read the cartoons every morning, and
there was some stupid cartoon I forget. I think it
was non sequitor. This shows a line going into heaven
and there's you know, there's Saint Peter, you know, checking

(21:59):
off the news, and there's two lines and there are
a bunch of people waiting in line while this other
group went through. The group that's waiting in line are
the people that, according to this cartoon, which I didn't
find funny at all, are the people that refused to
get vaccinated. And so the people that are cutting in
front of the line seeing Saint Peter first are those

(22:22):
who apparently caught COVID because other people refuse to get masked.
That was one of the editorial cartoons I looked at
this morning. It's twenty to twenty five, we're getting close
to twenty twenty six, and they're still trying to push
that narrative anyway back to the masks. You'd have to

(22:44):
scour the newspapers for the websites over the past decade
to find full throated condemnation of antifa from Democrat politicians
and pundits, because most of them either ignored Antifa's growth,
they tried to minimize it, or if they were even
questioned about it, said that actually, it's a good thing

(23:06):
to be an anti fascist, which, come to think of it,
it is. I'm anti fascist, but I haven't been out
burning down buildings or trying to destroy businesses. But that
completely ignores the fact that Antifa are the ones that
are actually behaving like fascists. That's what we see in

(23:27):
the streets of these cities this morning, and we saw
all weekend. You compare that lack of combination with the
words that prominent Democrats have used just in the past
few weeks to describe one of the main targets of ANTIFA,
immigrations and customs enforcement. Tim Waltz describes ice, Obviously, we've

(23:49):
heard a bazillion times, they're the gestoppo. The Democrat mayor
of Boston, Michelle wou describes them as neo Nazis and
the oh were so moderate as he wants you to believe.
Governor of California Gavin Newsom describes them as the secret police, Gestapo,
Neil Nazis, secret police. Gee, wh how they get their

(24:12):
people riled up?

Speaker 3 (24:13):
Yeah, they would straight up disappear people, is the way
I understand.

Speaker 4 (24:15):
That's right, And they are disappearing them. They're disappearing them
right now into detention facilities and sometimes for their particular acts.
If they're a US citizen, they're disappearing them into a
federal jail.

Speaker 1 (24:31):
Now.

Speaker 4 (24:32):
I didn't say local because the locals aren't doing anything.
They're not doing anything at all. So politicians, you reserve
their strongest language for government agencies and their most milk
toast comments for the vandals that are parading the streets
at night. You might think, and you might reason reasonably

(24:54):
conclude that they have an extremist problem. And as we
started to ask for and get the change that we
voted for, it's coming into even plain sight. The language
that the Democrat left has been using against mainstream Republican
voters spiraled out of all reasonable control. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris,

(25:16):
Nancy Pelosi, almost every other major Democrat SAMs or, with
the exception of perhaps John Fetterman, repeatedly insists that Donald
Trump is what doctor finish the sentence, Donald Trump was
what he is, a what he is an existential threat
to democracy, and that his victory last November in a

(25:41):
free and fair election is going to herald in a
new Nazi era in America. If you did any sort
of reasonable analysis whatsoever, that would be described as.

Speaker 1 (25:52):
Deranged, truly deranged.

Speaker 4 (25:56):
But the problem is that's been the mainstream Democrat Party
and the organs that support the Democrat Party, like MSNBC
and obviously the New York Times that I mentioned last segment.
That's just their DNA in the way they described Trump
and us as the voters, and that's just.

Speaker 1 (26:17):
The way it is. Industry mains.

Speaker 4 (26:18):
So even after Trump himself suffered not one but two
very near miss missed assassination attempts against his life. So
perhaps some of the Democrats and their party mouthpieces who
paired the Nazi line, seriously, I think they actually believe it. Others,
perhaps more often, probably use those slurs because well, that's

(26:39):
the strongest rhetoric army, you know, rhetorical armory they that
they can actually deploy and put out there. So back
to Kirk's assassination last month, and this story is really
not about Kirk's assassination at all. It's just that I
think that's a flashpoint. The further we get away from
it and we're able to get away from the emotion

(27:00):
of it, it's truly a flashpoint. So last month, Gavin
Newsom's press office was having a perfectly normal Friday night
by posting a message on x saying, in all capital letters,
trying to, you know, either troll or emulate I'm not
sure which one. Donald Trump in all caps, Stephen Miller

(27:22):
is a fascist. Stephen Miller is one of the deputy
chiefs of staff. Now, all that, despite the fact that
that that rhetoric obviously used against Charlie Kirk for years,
appears to have persuaded the young man who took the
shot that, in his own words, he had had enough

(27:44):
of Kirk's hatred and some hate can't be negotiated out.
I think that one individual, that assassin of Charlie Kirk,
really epitomizes what they believe on the left, That they
believe that all of us are full of hate and

(28:05):
that the hate can't be negotiated out. So now you
take that and you recognize that the goons of Antifa,
whose ideology Kirk's assassin evidently aligned with, they've been spatting
that line for years, that the only good fascist is
a dead one. The helpful proviso for them is they
get decide. They get to decide who the fascists are.

(28:29):
So someone who's out advocating free speech, free and open
debate says, I disagree with your choices, but respect your
right to make those choices. I just think they're wrong,
and I'm willing to debate you about those choices, or
I'm willing to debate you about policy choices. We decided

(28:49):
that's the fascist, not the guy on the rooftop that says,
catch this fascist on his AMMO. Wow, that's that's really
where we are today.

Speaker 1 (29:02):
Now.

Speaker 4 (29:03):
The Democrat left, they had already broken. The taboo on
attacking federal agents. They normalize that way back in twenty
twenty seems like, I mean, it really does. To me,
seems like a long time ago. It's funny, how like,
you know, I'm getting ready to I'm getting ready to
take my granddaughter to nine to eleven next weekend, I
mean to the memorial, the museum, And to me, that

(29:24):
seems like yesterday. But the George Floyd riots of twenty
twenty seemed like decades ago, a long long time ago.
That's when the cops were in the crosshairs of the left.
But even that was nothing compared with the demonization of
federal agents that are working for ICE. Holy days after

(29:47):
Kirk's assassination, another youngman got into the roof of a
building and fire. Joshua John, also in his twenties, scaled
a building in Dallas to shoot at an ICE facility there,
And just like Kirk's assassin, he had ornament his bullets
with slogans. And while Kirk's assassin had inscribed ANTIFA slogans
such as hey Fascist catch on his bullets, John adorned

(30:09):
his with anti ICE slogans, and Yon fired at ICE officers,
but managed, in a really kind of cruel and ironic twist,
to kill one detainee and wound two others before he
turned the gun on themselves. They always turned the guns
on themselves. One killed a foreign immigrant, an illegal alien,
in the name of anti fascism, which is certainly another

(30:31):
vindication for those who have pointed out that antietha are
not who they say they are. So where I mean
at this stage, what Democrats have a predictable retort? Guess
what it is?

Speaker 2 (30:47):
Why can't the mainstream media, the liberal media said Democrat Party,
not Democratic Party. They're so smart and so above everybody.
Why can't they get it right?

Speaker 1 (31:00):
Playing them? And again dragon, Why.

Speaker 2 (31:05):
Can't the mainstream media, the liberal media say Democrat Party,
Democratic Party. They're so smart and so above everybody. Why
can't they get it right?

Speaker 1 (31:15):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (31:16):
What's interesting about that is I get chastised a lot
for referring to it as the Democrat Party and not
the Democratic Party. That pisces off Democrats because they know
precisely what I'm doing. Temmy Duckworth, If you think that
I'm just making stuff up.

Speaker 7 (31:35):
What are local authorities telling you about what they think
happened here?

Speaker 5 (31:39):
Well, they lie right. The Trump administration lies. We have
a president who's a known liar, and they have been
They've been lying about the situation all along. And in fact,
they even shot tear grenades. Hear christ grenades I think
at a reporter who was simply driving by with her
window open. And so we're urging people were urging our

(32:01):
protesters remain calm, peaceful protests, exercise for First Amendment rights.
But video tape everything. Everybody has a phone tape everything,
so we actually have real evidence of what is happening.
We know that Trump administration lies consistently, and what I
am hearing is that for the large part, people are
being very quiet, are being very respectful, but Ice is

(32:22):
being very aggressive. Remember that they are zip tying children.
They are raiding apartment blocks in the middle of the night,
separating children from their families, pulling people out onto the
streets naked. They are using gestapo tactics in Chicago. And
this is what Trump wants to do, right, he wants
to intimidate the people of Chicago. That's not going to happen,
and we're going to document everything and make sure. Just

(32:44):
as a judge in Portland said that these requirements these.

Speaker 4 (32:49):
Oh, where to begin. How many felons get dragged out,
nagged because they have an arrest warrant and they pick
them up at two o'clock in the morning. How many
children get separated from their families because mom and dad
were dealing drugs, and of course there's a social worker
there to take care of the kids and you know,

(33:10):
take them somewhere. It happens all the time. It happens
all the time. And just because you're enforcing the law
does not mean you're using gestapo tactics. But this is
a bastardization of the language in order to make you

(33:31):
repel and revolt against law enforcement, to the point that,
as you've probably heard by now, law ice asks for
help because they're being surrounded by crowds that are attacking them,
and Chicago Police Department is told to stand down to

(33:53):
not help