10-6-25 - 7am - Political Violence and Chicago Police Not Responding

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning from South Dakota.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
The new Taylor Swept album is out, but I probably
won't be buying it, as the last quote unquote album
I ever bought was on eight track.

Speaker 1 (00:09):
Everyone have a great day eight track. If you've been here.

Speaker 3 (00:19):
On this program or with me long enough, you understand
that I don't and had not, built listener rapport by
caring about what people think about what the truth is,
or what topics I cover or how I cover them,

(00:41):
or whatever I do what interests me. As I've said before,
and so in that sense, I'm not concerned if there's
some outraged person that takes offense to what I have
to say, or runs off to some other outlet to say,
how you know, I'm whatever isn't or phobic or whatever

(01:04):
you know, pejority term you want to use.

Speaker 1 (01:06):
I just don't care. Just don't care.

Speaker 3 (01:12):
And I'm not trying to stoke political fires with my words.
I'm simply telling you here's what I observe as I
go through my life. Here's what I observe based on
my experience. Here's my perspective based upon my experiences about
what's going on, you know, at the Colorado State Capital
or in the capitol in your community, in your state,

(01:33):
or what's going on inside the Beltway wherever it might be.
One incident here or there, or some vague rationale as
to why you know some lunatic killer must support politics
isn't enough to overwhelm the clear facts that the Marxist
slash leftist whatever you want to call them, I'm I

(01:56):
just Marxist, that's just the easiest word, are overwhelming the
strongest advocates for political violence. They are absolutely the strongest
advocates for political violence, not only here but elsewhere elsewhere
in the world. Left wing politics are so terrible that

(02:18):
they must be enforced by the business end of a
gun once the public figures out there they're a scam
made to control of them. And that is verifiable through
a sample size of lifetimes. Radical leftist policy enforcement killed
more people in the twentieth century than all of its
wars combined, which is truly startling, because the human race

(02:42):
had never at any point dreamed of more creative, creative
ways of killing men on moss on battlefields as they
have between nineteen fourteen and nineteen forty five. I hope
I've driven home. I feel about the evil responses of
so many Western leftists over the death, say of Charlie Kirk,

(03:07):
or the deaths of just individuals they are subjects. Is
just normals normal? I shouldn't use that, use that word
of just street crime. And while I realize that not
every Democrat feels the same way, a ton of their
friends are more than happy to watch their enemies die
when they cannot defeat them in a peaceful debate. All

(03:27):
these young left wingers, the type who like to call
themselves the Democrat socialists, are far more accepting of political
violence as justified than any other demographic. Just and you
think I'm just just in case you think I'm making
things up out of thin air poles or polls though,

(03:49):
and you know I actually prefer hard data to make
my case. The shooting death of Charlie Kirk, this goes
back to last month, sparked a national debate about political violence.

(04:10):
You gov did pulling, They've done pulling regularly to find
out what Americans thinking. Some Americans are more worried about
political violence than others. Just six percent of Americans say
political violence that This is again from you Gov, and
this is dated back in mid September. Six percent of

(04:32):
Americans say political violence is not much of a problem,
five percent not a problem, one percent, well eighty seven
percent say it is a problem, with a majority fifty
nine percent of adults saying political violence is a very
big problem, with twenty eight percent calling it somewhat of
a problem. Americans sixty five and older more likely to

(04:54):
say political violence is a very big problem than our
adults under thirty sixty nine to fifty percent, and Republicans
are more likely the Democrats to say political violence is
a very big problem by a margin of sixty seven
to fifty eight percent. Even among groups where fewer people
say political violence is a big problem, though very few
people say it's not a problem, those groups just have

(05:15):
more people saying it's somewhat of a problem or who
aren't sure.

Speaker 1 (05:21):
It is a problem.

Speaker 3 (05:25):
Party registration for Republicans is through the roof, and I'll
talk more about the changes in party registration in the
seven SLEC battleground of proxy states later on, But twenty
eight to twenty nine states with updated party registration figures

(05:46):
are more Republican by registration than they were in November
of last year, including every Hairs state that registers by party,
which is a total of twelve states. Well I'm gonna
talk to you about now, is how four of those
blue states responded to the murder of Charlie Kirk and
the subsequent online and onscreen celebration from the Gaulish American left,

(06:11):
from the Marxist and our society. Let's just start out
with the two small East Coast states, Rhode Island. There
are almost as many unaffiliated or minor party registrants in
Rhode Island as there are Democrats and Republicans. A wide
gap of twenty one points in registration separates the Democrats

(06:33):
from the Republicans, which is closing ground every single month.
In July, with stats posting in August, Republicans gained eight
hundred and ninety nine net registrations on the Democrats, but
were aided by a small voter roll maintenance purge that
did impact the dominant party the most at the cost

(06:53):
of sight deal over one thousand registrations. If you look
at the Change Rhode Island Voter Registration Index tracker in
October of twenty five, two hundred and sixty six Democrat

(07:15):
registered Democrats. But you go back to June two hundred
and sixty eight, they lost a couple of thousand, and
this is a small state. The registration advantage has gone
from twenty one and a half percent for Democrats back
in June to only twenty one percent for Democrats in October.

(07:43):
So it's been up four hundred and ninety nine in July,
up eight ninety nine in August, up five or five
in September, up seven hundred and eighty nine in October.
So while that August number is the highest of the
past four updates as a technicality because the voter roll
purge that they did last month, the Republican Party ate

(08:06):
up seven hundred and eighty nine registrations and did so
while adding three hundred and eighty one Republican registrations, while
Democrat losses were the highest down four hundred and eight
of any month without a purge in the sample size
in any working class Rhode Island. The response to Kirk's
death was greatly unappreciated and is reflected in that update.

(08:30):
The state looks like it might sneak inside ten points
in the next presidential election and have Rhode Island maybe
up to Rhode Island. I know, small state, but again
a fantastic trend line so for all the Democrat violence
going on out there, what we're seeing is that, of

(08:54):
course the mainstream media is not going to tell you about,
the dominant cabal is not going to tell you about,
is that in these small states, the trend line is
going toward Republicans. Take Delaware, for example, in another tiny
state and a state that has not backed a Republican
presidential nominee since way back in nineteen eighty eight, Delaware

(09:14):
has seen both parties drop registrations every month this summer,
with the Republicans, though netting gains each time thanks to
steadier and more consistent Democrat defections to nonpartisan status. Democrats
are abandoning their own party and registering unaffiliated. This month,

(09:42):
the Republicans nearly held dead even, but Democrats did manage
to lose a sky high eight hundred and fourteen net
registrations in Delaware. So while again a trend line, Democrats
down back in June up sixteen point nine percent, October
only up sixteen point six percent. The net change has

(10:05):
been the following four Republicans in July up to ninety nine.
August Republican is up three twenty seven. September Republicans up
to sixty October Republicans eight a whopping eight eleven. Now
none of that's because of purges or voter roll maintenance.
The Republican net gain in the role was eight hundred

(10:26):
and eleven new voters last month, two and a half
times higher than previous net high increases in the sample.
So the changes in two small East Coast states worth
four and three electoral votes respectively. I know, seems small,

(10:47):
but of the most significant post maintenance monthly moves in
a year marked by a steady drift away from Democrats,
that's the trend line. While Democrats are out there screaming
about how awful we are, interestingly, people seem to be

(11:09):
abandoning the Democrat Party, albeit in those two states, not
in grand numbers, but in terms of a trend line,
either unaffiliated or toward Republicans. The Democrat party brand is
becoming more closely associated with the violence that we see
all the time, and they're completely either oblivious to it,

(11:30):
or in my opinion, or actually embracing it. And I
do believe they're actually embracing it because they don't have
policy alternatives. The only alternative they have is the same
Marxist bullcrap. They've been feming us for decades now. Now
continuing that kind of analysis to two larger states, one

(11:53):
somewhat larger and the other more so, I think it
will give even greater clarity into how larger population bases
have moved away from the Democrat Party after associating with them,
after associating them with this political violence going on. And
of course the one that I wanted to look at
was New Mexico because New Mexico is in many ways

(12:13):
a lot like Colorado, just geographically, and because there is
while it's not the front Range, You've got Albuquerque, you
got BURNLEYO County in Santa Fe, which is kind of
like their Boulder Denver axes. And then you have the
rest of the state. Now, I've always seen a tightening

(12:37):
in New Mexico. Harris won New Mexico by six percent.
I think there's a tightening based on party registration movement
and the unmistakable shift of minority voters toward Trump. Republican
state wide efforts are severely hampered by the white liberal
basist Hana Fe County and BURNLEYO County. You got those

(12:59):
are the Democrat hubs, which holds Metro Albuquerque and Santa Fe.
Santa Fe's actually Santa Fe County technically now after they
did voter roll maintenance, the state continued a shift toward
the Republican Party, and by a substantial amount. It is
twenty two thousand, six hundred and twenty two registrations more

(13:21):
favorable to the Republicans than it was in November when
Harris's margin was.

Speaker 1 (13:28):
About fifty five thousand votes.

Speaker 3 (13:31):
Twenty two thousand registrations more fable than the Republicans than
it was in November when she won by fifty five
thousand votes. At that rate, the twenty twenty eight presidential
election in New Mexico might end up being one of
the closest races in the country. Just give you again

(13:51):
the same examples June twenty five to October twenty five.
Democrat advantage in June twenty five was up ten percent,
held steady until October. It's down now to only nine
point six percent, with Republicans gaining two hundred and sixty
two registrations in July six hundred eleven, in August four
hundred and ninety four, in September fourteen hundred and fifteen,

(14:15):
in October now Democrats moved up a little bit in
recent months too, but Republicans continued a net advantage, particularly
after the Kirk shooting. Democrat registration then stalled out, and
that's when the Republicans gained that astonishing fourteen hundred net gain.

(14:38):
Actually it was fourteen hundred and twenty seven with a
net gain of fourteen fifteen. That number fourteen hundred and
one thousy four hundred and fifteen registrants is more than
double this summer's previous high set in the July to
August reporting cycle, and includes a net gain of Republicans

(14:59):
up to three h hundred ninety in Bernoleo County. If
those gains there continue, put New Mexico on your dark
horse flip list for twenty twenty eight. This is why
Democrats are in such disarray. New Mexico, a solidly blue state,

(15:21):
is beginning to see the changes, and it's the violence
they see. The violence go to New Jersey. The most
significant state in this grouping is is another that shifted
like New Mexico in twenty twenty four, and that is
New Jersey, which Harris won by the tightest Democrat margin,

(15:41):
up five point nine percent. That's the tightest Democrat margins
in nineteen ninety two. The total shift in New Jersey
is Republicans are up fifty six hundred ninety nine since
the election, which is really remarkable since the Democrats posted
a major net game back in June, which posted the
July stats.

Speaker 1 (16:03):
In June. I'm sorry in July.

Speaker 3 (16:08):
In July, Democrats were up forty one thousand, and then
it dropped off dramatically. Republicans were then in August up
more than four thousand, September up more than three thousand,
and in October, just a month ago, the Republican the

(16:29):
registration index change for that month October of twenty twenty five,
Republicans were up six thousand, seven hundred and forty seven. Now,
just as a reminder, New Jersey voted six hundred and
fifty three two hundred and fifty right of its Democrat
voter registration advantage last year, which is a similar tendency

(16:53):
shared with Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, of course, as you know,
it was carried by Trump. So if New Jersey many
registrations and get down to the Democrat plus maybe seven
hundred thousand range in time for the twenty twenty eight election,
New Jersey could flip or get dangerously close, forcing Democrats
to do what in just terms of raw retail politics,
they have to reallocate resources to defend what they consider

(17:18):
fourteen slam dunk eleectoral votes.

Speaker 1 (17:23):
Data doesn't lie people do. Now.

Speaker 3 (17:28):
I'm going to leave out the massive games in California
posted last month because I think those represent seven months
worth of movement rather than just a flash sentiment after
the Kirk shooting. We'll get revised numbers of those eventually.
What we see going on here is this violence is
having an effect, and in many of those screen states,

(17:51):
it's to republic the advantage. We know who's committing the violence.

Speaker 4 (17:55):
Michael, We've had this discussion before.

Speaker 1 (17:57):
What happens that TROMP.

Speaker 3 (17:58):
Just disregards that judge said have out sending that regard
for I mean, he's the president.

Speaker 1 (18:06):
She's just some kind of judge.

Speaker 5 (18:07):
I mean, I wouldn't even.

Speaker 4 (18:09):
Listen to that.

Speaker 1 (18:09):
He's the commander of chief.

Speaker 4 (18:11):
Please answer this.

Speaker 3 (18:12):
One, dragging Remind me I'll do that later because it
doesn't fit with the flow of what I'm going to
do right now. So US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement ICE,
we're subjected to a coordinate and violent attack in the
Chicago suburb of Broadview during the first weekend of October.

Speaker 5 (18:38):
Real quick, before you get to that, I want to
give you the Chicago shooting death numbers from just this
past weekend. Five deaths, twenty four shot.

Speaker 3 (18:47):
So we're we're pretty much on par on par that's normal,
all right. So this mob attacks and it became controversial
up to you.

Speaker 1 (19:01):
I don't under why.

Speaker 3 (19:03):
Because of reports of the Chicago Police Department was explicitly
ordered not to respond to immigrations and customs enforcements, please
for assistance. As the crowds became increasing, the hostile and
violent toward the federal agents. Some of the stories that
I've read indicate that the mob was beginning to surround

(19:24):
and actually overtake the ICE agents. So on Saturday morning,
approximately thirty armed ICE agents were ambushed by anti ICE
demonstratorshod been protesting the other Broadview ICE processing center for
several days. According to both DHS and Dispatch records, a

(19:47):
convoy of at least ten vehicles rammed and boxed in
the federal agents, and at one point an armed woman
previes identified by law enforcement, attempted to run down the
Ice officers with her car. Agents responded with defensive gunfire,
resulting in her injury FAFO. The attackers that are now

(20:12):
bullied by days of unrest drew an even larger crowd,
some of whom were reportedly armed, and they had actually
posted calls for violence against ICE online, watts, app, x, TikTok,
every social media platform you can imagine. Now, there are

(20:33):
about a dozen people arrested during the events, but DHS
officials stated that pressure from mounting crowds is what forced
ICE agents to abandon their vehicles and withdraw because the
situation was beginning to escalate despite repeated radio calls for
help from boxed in ICE and Border Patrol agents. There

(20:56):
are internal communications and dispatch They show that Chicago Police
Department officers were ordered by the department's Chief of Patrol
not to respond radio traffic. Written instructions reviewed by multiple
outlets instructed all units that quote the Chief of Patrol,

(21:19):
no units will respond to this.

Speaker 1 (21:23):
Now.

Speaker 3 (21:23):
There were some officer who tried to assist, but they
were told to pull back and to wait blocks away
until they.

Speaker 1 (21:28):
Got further instructions.

Speaker 3 (21:31):
According to sources within the Chicago Police Department, this policy
was because or was due too, I should say, the
department being overwhelmed by unrest and marauding groups in the area,
which made it impossible impossible to provide support to federal
agents in real time. Fox News reports that law enforcement

(21:53):
unions at the national and state level have since condemned
the order, calling it a violation of the fundamental duty
of law enforcement.

Speaker 5 (22:01):
Real quick, since you mentioned Fox News here, I wanted
to find the story and put it up to Michael says,
go here dot com so people can follow along at
their leisure when they listen to the podcast. When I
just did a quick google of Chicago police told not
to respond. The top four stories that popped up fox News,
Fox News, Fox News, and Sky News Australia. ABC Hello, CNN, Hello, CBS,

(22:34):
NBC Where are you at?

Speaker 3 (22:38):
I should go back during the break and look at
the ABC News or News Call program and go see
if I can scroll back far enough to see if
I can find or maybe I can do it word
starts and.

Speaker 5 (22:49):
See normally I would see more options to choose from. Yeah,
I mean, granted, this is just the top stories, but
three of the four News and the other fourth is
Sky News Australia.

Speaker 3 (23:06):
Let's stop and think about what Fox News is reporting.
Law enforcement unions the Fraternal Order of Police, both nationally
and of the state, have condemned that order, calling it
a violation of the fundamental duty of law enforcement. You're
in the Foxho in this case, it happens to be Broadview, Illinois.

(23:30):
You're in the Foxho. You've got another battalion, different division,
maybe it's even a different army. Mebe let's just say
it's a different country. You're in a foxhole in Germany,
and you're American troops in a foxhole in Germany. Yet
there are French troops, French troops that are nearby, but

(23:53):
the French president says, no, don't go help those Americans.
You'd be outraged, absolutely outraged, when cops can't depend upon
their fellow law enforcement officers to come and help them.

(24:13):
Then I'd say we are seeing the complete breakdown at
the state level, at the municipal level of law enforcement.
They're now picking and choosing what laws they will enforce,
and who they will and who they will not help.
I thought it was supposed to be without regard to

(24:36):
any sort of racial, demographic, social, political, any characteristic. You
want to tie to it whatsoever you have US citizens? Yeah,
they might be law enforcement. And the fact that the
fact that they are law enforcement makes this story even
more despicable because you have commanders who are probably answering

(25:01):
to a mayor in a city council who are telling
them you don't lift a finger. What if they started
shooting at ICE? What if they were pinned down by gunfire.

Speaker 5 (25:16):
Let's fine, nobody's shot at ICE. Oh wait a minute,
Dallas had some problems.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
Yeah, they had some problems. This is.

Speaker 3 (25:26):
This goes way beyond Chicago. This goes to the legitimacy
of law enforcement in every community, in every state, in
the entire country. You've now seen that your sanctuary city policies, Denver,

(25:48):
I'm looking at you. You now see what sanctuary city
policies do. I don't care what you think about ICE.
I don't care whether you think they're overreacting, underreacting, not
being strong enough, not.

Speaker 1 (26:04):
Being strong enough.

Speaker 3 (26:05):
They're pinned down by a mob and cops won't come
to the rescue of their fellow officers. What makes you
believe they're going to come to your rescue? What makes
you believe? Oh, well, Michaels, because I'm not an ICE agent.
Oh okay, he just made my point. So now we
have discriminatory law enforcement. We now have selective law enforcement.

(26:29):
That says, yeah, if if you're of the right skin color,
or you're in the right job, or you're in the
right profession, or you're in the right part of town,
or you're doing the right kind of protest, because maybe
if you're Antifa and you're being attacked by ICE, maybe
they'll send in to protect you from Ice.

Speaker 1 (26:49):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (26:51):
It's insanity, utterly insane.

Speaker 1 (26:58):
When I call them.

Speaker 3 (27:00):
Marxist, that's spelled capital m rxist. They are Marxist. And
the mayor Chicago is a Marxist if not a communist,
and he is enforcing selective law enforcement, you should be
a little bit scared, but you should be mostly absolutely offended.

(27:27):
I don't normally call for outrage. I don't have to
call for outrage. People are outraged on their own. I
don't have to ask you to be outraged. If you're
not outraged about this, then you're not paying attention and
you don't understand that this is the tip of the spear.
This is the canary in the coal mine. This is
exactly what's going to happen. Is this spreads across the country. Now,
let's go back to the very beginning of this damn

(27:49):
program when I'm talking about the violence, and the violence
is occurring because Trump is doing something that we ask
him to do. We want illegal aliens removed from this country. Now,
if that means that you have to go raid an
apartment complex in the middle of the night, because that's

(28:11):
the safest place and time to safest time to do
it is in the middle of the night, and there
are trend of a rogue with Venezuelan gangs in there,
then yes, I support those actions. It is dangerous work.
And if you need to send in the National Guard
because you can't get the help of the local police.

Speaker 1 (28:33):
Department, then you need to send in the National.

Speaker 3 (28:35):
Guard, because now you have federal law enforcement officers that
are being pinned down. And I know this has become
a flashpoint for these ongoing large scale protests against immigration enforcement.
And I know that Trump is escalating the raids and
the removals of illegal aliens in these sanctuary jurisdictions. Well, yes,

(28:57):
because we ask him to Let me take a break,
I'll be right back.

Speaker 6 (29:05):
Michael, you're pretty wound up. The vaunted Denver Post has
relief for you. According to the expert reporting at the
Denver Post, you can visit a national park on September
twenty seventh, better fire up that flux capacitor.

Speaker 3 (29:25):
On Saturday nine to four am, Chicago Marxist Chicago Mayor
Johnson said this, Listen closely to the language.

Speaker 1 (29:38):
Tell me who's.

Speaker 3 (29:39):
Inciting and encouraging and trying to shift the blame about violence.

Speaker 2 (29:44):
I want to start with the raid because for so
long the American people have felt safe in their homes
from a lot of the things that are going around
in the streets, whether it's the immigration rays or the
greens in la or whatever. But this is coming to
the front doorsteps of people in your community, in your

(30:06):
city who are American citizens, who no evidence has been
shown that they are a part of Trinda Ragua or
even any of the other folks that were in that
building a part of that. Talk a little bit about
what it is like for the people in that apartment
building to feel so under siege.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
Wow, talk about denying the premise of the question.

Speaker 4 (30:28):
Well, the tensions are certainly high in the city of Chicago.
What the President is doing is absolutely dangerous and unconstitutional.
But our position is clear. We're going to remain resolved
and firm in our position to protect the rights of
all of our residents. What you are describing is something
that we have been warning about for some time that

(30:50):
there are a number of people, including the President of
the United States of America, that have decided to declare
war on poor people.

Speaker 1 (30:57):
And on word declared war. He's declared war.

Speaker 4 (31:02):
Keep people across the country, and this raid that you
are describing was on the South side of Chicago, where
black folks live, and it is evident that this is
not about safety, it's not about deportation. This is about
the president of the United States of America and his
kind that are.

Speaker 1 (31:22):
Looking at his kind his kind.

Speaker 4 (31:26):
Into stoke and foment chaos and fear within our streets
of the cities across America. But we're going to remain
firm and we're going to fight back against this tyranny.

Speaker 1 (31:37):
It's war.

Speaker 3 (31:38):
He claims that it is war, and then it's not
about deportation. So Trump's just out doing this for the
fun of it. Trump's just out doing this because well,
there's nothing else to do today. So it's a day
ending why so let's send troops into Chicago. Notice how
they are subtly trying to get you to shift your

(31:58):
thinking from this is immigration and for this is what
immigration enforcement looks like. Now, there are many fastest immigration
enforcement Why don't they show us the families that are
packing up and taking advantage of the free airfare, well
free to them to leave the country voluntarily. Why don't

(32:20):
they focus on those who are packing up their belongings
and getting a U haul trailer and driving back out
across the border. Why don't we look into now, when
you're doing these kinds of raids, is somebody going to
get caught up? Because you know you've got it. You've
got an apartment. There might be I don't know, ten
people in that apartment, and so you go in and

(32:43):
you arrest everybody because you know there's four or five
trend to a rog with people, and you get the
mat and you get them into into a into a
bus or a squad car or something, and you start
sorting out who's who, and then those who are truly
American citizens you let go. Well, that's the consequence of
living in an apartment of trenda ragua. You know, if

(33:04):
dragons wanted for robbery and dragons, you know, living in
my basement and they raid my house, I'm probably gonna
get the tough for a little bit until they figure out, oh,
that's the guy with the red beard, that's the guy
who can't grow a beard. This is this is immigration enforcement.
They don't want you to think that the language is

(33:26):
so important to pay attention