10-7-25 - 6am - Rules for Radicals

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning for South Dakota. Seven days of a government
shutdown makes one week. Everyone have a great day.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
Really, really, he didn't have to worry about it.

Speaker 1 (00:14):
He's retired.

Speaker 3 (00:16):
You didn't get the double entendre. Now seven days makes
one week? Am I missing something here?

Speaker 1 (00:29):
Government shutdown has been seven days? Right? It makes one week?
W e e k or w e ak?

Speaker 3 (00:36):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (00:36):
Oh yeah. I don't think he went that route. He
could have, but I didn't like that.

Speaker 4 (00:45):
May not that we know him, but knowing him, I
think that's precisely what he was trying to do.

Speaker 1 (00:52):
Too much time, it's got way too much.

Speaker 4 (00:54):
Time on his hand. Spent all night long, what time
they came in. I spent all night long trying to
figure out how can I make some or he heard
it somewhere else, he stole it. Probably stole it from
somewhere else, because I can't imagine by retired, living in
the hills, you know, the Black Hills somewhere, could possibly
come up with something that stupid this early in the morning.

Speaker 2 (01:17):
Okay, I I'm just concerned. If you're retired, what the
hell are you doing up so early? Consistently consistently you're
on vacation. Bro sleep in at least go till six,
you know, seven or eight.

Speaker 1 (01:30):
Well, let's don't let's.

Speaker 4 (01:30):
Don't go down that path too far, because he may
still be in bed listening to us.

Speaker 1 (01:37):
That's true.

Speaker 4 (01:37):
He's got a battery powered transistor radio built in Japan,
and you know, nineteen fifty three sitting next on the
bedside table. You know, an oil lamp there because you
know where else the Dakotas, they don't have electricity your
bathrooms yet. It's too damn cold to go out and
take a whiz yet. So he's just laying in bed,
all covered up, scared to get out of the bed
because you know, I don't want to walk out to
the outhhouse, you know, because again it's the Dakota's you know,

(01:59):
it's over there. It's not cosmopolitan like Denver.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
It's not modern civilization.

Speaker 4 (02:07):
Right, no seg here. But let's talk for a minute
about yesterday. We talked for a little bit about the
The really horrible text message is that the candidate, the
Democratic candidate for Attorney General in Virginia, J. Jones, had

(02:30):
posted about wanting to put two bullets in the head
of the then speaker of the Virginia House of delegates.
I did more reading about that last night or yesterday,
not last night.

Speaker 2 (02:44):
Did it get any better for him?

Speaker 1 (02:45):
What?

Speaker 2 (02:46):
Did it get any better for him?

Speaker 4 (02:47):
He got a lot better for him. He got so
much better, And he got so much better for the
Democrats too, because I.

Speaker 2 (02:52):
Was trying yesterday when you told me about the stories
that well, maybe you know, big context context, maybe you
know the conversation before or after kind of laid the
ground where let's just.

Speaker 4 (03:01):
Say that we now have a much longer history of
this kind of rhetoric from from this dirt bag.

Speaker 3 (03:07):
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, but.

Speaker 4 (03:12):
It's not even Look the guy is. The guy's a
dirt bag. The guy the Democrats ought to be calling
for him to withdraw from the race. They are probably
scared to because they know they're pretty much guilty of
the same thing. Not quite as graphic as what that is.
I mean, when you go back and you read what
he talked about, he really did talk about, you know,

(03:33):
if it leaves the children fatherless or parent less, that's okay,
and they're going to be raised by you know, weirdos anyway,
So maybe I'll just shoot the kids too. I mean,
I'm paraphrasing, but that really is how bad it is.
But let's go back. You know, I said yesterday that
the assassination of Charlie Kirk was kind of a seminal

(03:54):
moment in an American history, certainly in American political history.
Since that time, the left has been calling for his civility.
They want us to lower the temperature of political discourse.
Those are the words they use, lower the temperature. I mean,
it's kind of like, you know, climate change with all
of the people in the Church of the climate activists,
which are pretty predominantly Democrat, But in this case, the

(04:18):
all the congregants in the Church of lowering the temperature.
Would you please tell me what does that mean? What
does it mean to lower the temperature? Remember it was
Gavin Newsom that remarked about Charlie Kirk's passion and commitment
to debate as reclined, praiseed Clerk Kirk for showing up

(04:39):
and talking with anybody just that was willing to engage.
Over at the Atlantic Magazine, you know, three liberal places
so far. Sally Jenkins is over there talking about how
Kirk's growth of his organization and his own personal growth
and then the loss that is death represented so that
they're all more than willing to you the assassination of

(05:01):
Charlie Kirk to talk about. Really, what they're really talking
about is they're trying to buy They're they're almost like
the old Catholics of trying to buy indulgences. Let me
talk about how bad the assassination was, and talk about
how great it was that what he was doing. Now,
what they're what they're espousing are not just careless words

(05:24):
and what their spouse, but what they're espousing is actually
trying to see ya, truly trying to see ya. So
while they call for dialogue in one breath, these leading
Democrats over here refused to demand something fundamental of that
candidate in Virginia, and that is that Jay Jones ought

(05:46):
to withdraw from the race. They two two two forks
of that. They ought to demand that he withdraw from
the race. And quite frankly, the honorable thing for him
would be to withdraw the race. And the more I
think about those resurface text messages, particularly the ones from
twenty twenty two, he was openly fantasizing with someone that

(06:12):
he knew was of the opposite political party, was of
his opposition, did not agree with him and actually begged
him to stop doing it, and upon which when she
said please stop doing it, he laughed. He loled in
a response, and then just kept on going. And now
he's like, oh, you know, that was a horrible thing

(06:32):
to do. No, FeSi Sherlock. Really, when you fantasize about
murdering your political opponent, then House Speaker Todd Gilbert, and
even the deaths of their children, the spouse and the children,
you've got a step too far. And they're not just
careless words. They're violent, they're sadistic. They would be rejected

(06:56):
by any decent moral compass. Several people yesterday, have you
ever joked about killing someone? And then I did something
kind of odd. I went through my text messages and
just search for the word kill. I didn't even find that,

(07:18):
didn't even find that. I did find a reference to
several years ago, to my gran grandson getting his first ELK,
But I didn't talk about him killing his first out.
It was about him getting his first olt. But set
all of that aside for a moment and think instead
about the refusal to condemn violence from the left. While

(07:41):
they're quick to denounce any Republican misstep that reveals a
dangerous double standard. Yes, there had been ill advised remarks
on the right. A lot of people said some really
stupid stuff. I'll give you some examples in a minute.
So Republicans this dangerous double st standard. But it's so

(08:04):
chillingly explicit or sadistic in the cruelty, especially toward children.
I thought we left the children alone until they reached
the age of majority, or at least until they maybe
got to sixteen or seventeen, or they had inserted themselves
into the political discourse. I see occasionally now a lot

(08:24):
of conversation on social media platforms about Baron Trump. Oh,
how handsome he is. He could have anybody he wants.
He's going to be a really good catch. I wonder
what he eats, wonder what he does, How tall is
he won of what his sex life is like, on
and on and on and on. Now it's more of
a tabloid curiosity than it is anything directly about him.

(08:45):
It's just kind of they're all I mean, it's the
mystery of Baron Trump. But it's not that he has
inserted himself into politics. He's been dragged into politics because
of his father, and he has you know, he's the

(09:05):
one that convinced his dad to go on the Joe
Rogan experience, and he's the one that convinced his dad that, Hey,
you need to restart reaching out to TikTok, and you
ought to talk to this guy named Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 1 (09:16):
Blah blah blah blah.

Speaker 4 (09:19):
But Jay Jones's toxic messages and the Marxist refusal to
act exposes what happens when political activism is used to
satisfy ego focused needs rather than to pursue justice. It
epitomizes what has become a toxic culture. And that phrase,

(09:42):
the toxic culture is kind of what I was trying
to talk about yesterday in terms of how violent our
society has become, and that violence, I think is an
offshoot or a natural outgrowth of the toxic culture, because
that toxic culture is one that celebrates emotion over facts,

(10:06):
division over unity, and violence over democracy. That is, get
ready for it, We're doing it again, Cloud Piven. That
is rules for radicals. So if you're a conservative or
a conservative slash libertarian, then you really should be demanding accountability, transparency.

(10:30):
You ought to be demanding the restoration of respect for
the rule of law, for our basic constitutional principles, and
if political leaders refuse to call out the kind of
dangerous behavior that Jay Jones represents, eventually that kind of activity,
that kind of toxic culture, that of conversation, that kind

(10:52):
of messaging will normalize violence on every side, both sides,
left and right. They'll put everybody at risk, will put
our safety and liberty at risk to every conservative in Virginia.
In fact, quite far you're across the country. When men

(11:12):
like Jay Jones are allowed to seek the highest law
enforcement office, we really kind of glanced over that yesterday.
He's seeking to become the Commonwealth of Virginia's chief law
enforcement officer and is jokingly seriously half asked Lee, I

(11:34):
don't know how you want to describe it, but he
is nonetheless engaged in activity that if some thug was
doing it, you would consider it to be a direct
assault on your safety, your values, and the future of
the republic. But because he's doing it, and because he's
a black man, and because he's a Democrat, well it's

(11:54):
just like we've said everything we need to say, We're
not going to say anything else, and we're just gonna
let it, just going to let it lie.

Speaker 1 (12:02):
That's absolutely the wrong thing to do.

Speaker 4 (12:11):
These these messages, these messages point out that we we're
already reaching the point where the violence in Portland, or
the violence that we see in Denver, the violence we

(12:33):
see in Chicago, we you know, Dragon and I we
kind of laugh about the Chicago wee can't crime report.
But what we don't stop and realize is that's a
real neighborhood, that's a real city. Those are real people
and twenty two twenty two individuals I think it was

(12:55):
twenty two from last weekend got shot and I think
five died. Wasn't that the right number? Something like that?
Twenty two and five, I think we matter twenty four
and five, twenty four and five, So twenty are you
even worth twenty four and five? That's what's really going
on in an American city today, and in so far
as Portland, Portland is just the ongoing vandalism and damages,

(13:18):
and then we see that ICE agents are being attacked.
I watched the video yesterday of the Portland Police chief
in essence, now I know there I can make the
argument on the other side too, that he was simply
trying to advise them of their rights. About what they
can and cannot do. But in versely, you could also

(13:39):
make the argument that he was advising the ICE protesters
about how far you can go you can do this,
and if you go beyond that, you're technically violating the law.
But I'm not going to do anything about it. Go
back to Jay Jones quote. Like all people, I've sent
text messages that I regret, I believe that violent rhetoric

(14:01):
has no place in our politics. Yet hmm, seriously, Congresswoman
Abigail Spangberger, she's the one that's running for Virginia governor,
She's the Democrat, said that this. After learning of these
comments earlier today, I spoke frankly with Jay about my

(14:21):
disgust with what he had said and texted. I made
clear to Jay that he must fully take responsibility for
his words. I will always condemn violent language in our politics.
But you're going to let him continue to run to
be the chief law enforcement officer. No Democrat official has

(14:43):
called for him to drop out of the race. That
serves us into character. Jay Jones does not have the
character to be the top law enforcement officer in Virginia.
The American standard, since our very very beginning has been
equal justice under the law. How can you possibly elect someone,

(15:10):
How can you possibly allow someone continue to run or
to be entrusted with delivering nonpartisan, blind justice given what
he revealed in the text messages. Making the text exchange
even more disturbing, is that Poonier, the one he sent

(15:31):
the text messages to, repeatedly ask him to stop fantasizing
about the murder of his political enemies and the death
of their children, and he would not do so. He
simply would not do so. At one point, the source said,
according to some people that I was reading yesterday, he

(15:56):
suggested he wished Gilbert's wife could watch her her own
child die in her arms so that the then speaker
might reconsider his political views. That's domestic terrorism.

Speaker 1 (16:11):
Now.

Speaker 4 (16:11):
That prompted the delegate, the Republican delegate he was talking to,
to just simply hang the phone up and discuss. So
Scott even even worse now, I said, there's you know,
Republicans had done it too. Back in twenty twenty one,
Congressman Paul Goser posted a short anime video on Twitter

(16:33):
showing his face superimposed on a cartoon character that was
slashing aoc with the sword and attacking a figure with
President Biden's face. Last year, Donald Trump said about Liz Cheney,
I'll take it out of context, so you just hear
what people say. He said, Let's put her with a rifle,

(16:53):
standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay, let's
go back to go Sar. Now Jones's remark, Jay Jones,
the Attorney General, was clearly sadistic, even toward the children
and the spouse. As stupid and as offensive as Ghostar's

(17:16):
statement was, he was not literally wishing the death of AOC,
and the media took the Trump quote out of context.
Trump was speaking rhetorically and criticizing Cheney for lacking empathy
for what would it would be like to be in
a war. The full quote is this, she's a radical warhawk.
Let's put her with a rifle, standing there with nine

(17:37):
barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's see how she feels
about it, you know, when the guns are trained on
her face. So yeah, we say stupid things on the
right too, but then the cabal takes them out of context.
But the cabal here doesn't take things out of context.
Instead they circle the wagon, the wagons. No democrat, no

(18:00):
major newspaper, Raulet. No media outlet has called for Jones
with golf from the race. You what they did with Gosar.
They censured him, stripped him of his committee assignments. Well.
The Democrats and the media unanimously condemned both Gossar and Trump.
Democrats call for the death of their enemies. Back in

(18:24):
back in twenty seventeen, Missouri state Senator Chappelle and the
Doll wrote, I hope Trump is assassinated turned the temperature down.
A good start would be with golf from the race,
Ay seven, and I'm marked safe from the government shut down.

Speaker 1 (18:44):
My ears still hurt.

Speaker 4 (18:46):
And are bleeding from listening to the dumb assery.

Speaker 1 (18:50):
But I'm a goober and I'm a glutton for punishment.

Speaker 3 (18:54):
Yea.

Speaker 2 (18:54):
I am curious, though, is it the dumb assary from
the Democrats or is it the dumb assory from this show.

Speaker 1 (19:04):
I think the answer is yes.

Speaker 4 (19:06):
Okay, I think yeah, It's not A and B at
C all of the above both. It's like taking our
ethics exam. The answer is always all of the above. Now, look,
Jones is not going to drop out of the race,
as Dragon pointed out during the break because Dragon, interestingly,

(19:28):
Dragon and I'm not. I thought maybe I mentioned his
race yesterday, but I don't. I'm not sure I did.

Speaker 2 (19:33):
I don't recall I yesterday when you were talking about
the story. I just found something relatively quickly posted a
link to Michael says go here because I wanted to
make sure it had the screen capture of some of
those text messages in the article, and that's all I
really looked for. Posted Michael says go here dot com,
and moved on. So you're talking about it this morning,
So I'm trying to find the new screen grabs of

(19:55):
the new text messages that have been exposed to really
expose how this guy's personality really is, because he's done
it on multiple occasions and can't shut up about it apparently.
So I've just scrolling scroll. Ah, there's a picture of him. Oh,
he's one of the protected classes because.

Speaker 4 (20:13):
You had no You had no idea he's a black man,
no idea. And of course then your next question ken me.
I tell hi much your next question.

Speaker 2 (20:21):
It's a good looking black guy. I wonder if he's gay. Nope,
married with two kids, but still.

Speaker 1 (20:27):
A protected class.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
Yes, absolutely, So that's why they haven't abandoned him yet
and and and they're not going to abandon him for
pure political reasons.

Speaker 4 (20:36):
They may abandon him when they start to see an
effect on the gubernatorial race. Spang Berger continues to her
trend line is downward when some seers trend lines is upward.
And the fact continues, and there's any correlation or causation
between those trend lines merging and the Virginia's one of

(21:00):
those weird states where you know, they'll go along with
the Terry mccaulliff for a while and then suddenly they
end up with you know, Glenn Youngkin as governor. They're
they're sometimes red, sometimes blue, they're sometimes purple. They they're
just they're they're truly kind of that weird old kind
of state. And I think predominantly because it's a schizophrenic state,

(21:22):
Southern Virginia. You kind of get beyond Richmond. In south
it's not so heavily influenced by the Beltway. From Richmond north.
You have commuters all the way from Richmond that work
inside the Beltway. So you get into the northern Virginia
counties along Arlington, Alexandria of that area, and that's all
of the government contractors you got the Pentagon, you got

(21:42):
everything in northern Virginia. So it's just it is a
schizophrenic state. But the fact that not a single Democrat
is urging this guy to withdraw from the race, I
think is correlated to something else. Fifty five percent of

(22:02):
people who are self identified as left of center on
the political spectrum have told posters it would be at
least somewhat justified to murder Donald Trump. Forty eight percent
said the same thing about Elon Musk. Twenty five percent
of people who describe themselves as very liberal and seventeen

(22:23):
percent of people who described themselves as just liberal say
that it is sometimes justified your resort to violence in
order to achieve a political goal. Now, if you describe
yourself as conservative or as very conservative, it's six and
three percent, respectively. I'm appalled by those numbers. Six percent

(22:49):
of those who say they're conservative say, yeah, sometimes violence
is necessary to achieve your goal, your political goal. We
have a political framework in which to achieve our goals.
They're called campaigns and elections. It's called lobbying, it's called
you know, petitioning your government. It's doing all those First
Amendment activities, and three percent who are very conservative. I

(23:14):
guess those are the right wing nut jobs said the
same thing. Now that's a five to one difference between
Democrats and Republicans. Then you look at age, and the
age is what bothers me, because younger and more liberal
Americans are more likely to disagree about political violence is

(23:35):
never justified. In other words, the younger you are, huh,
the more you think political violence is justified. Ages eighteen
to twenty nine, almost twenty percent. It's nineteen point some percent.
Let's just round it up to twenty twenty percent of
those ages eighteen to twenty nine think that political violence

(23:58):
is justified. Ages thirty to forty four fourteen percent, Ages
forty five to sixty four eight percent over sixty five,
the old boomers, the old hippies, eh three percent. Wow,
let's see, that's thirty three forty one. Forty forty four

(24:20):
percent between the ages of eighteen to sixty five think
that political violence is justified or technically, to answer the
poll question specifically, yes, violence can sometimes be justified. Among liberals.
If you're eighteen to forty four and you describe yourself

(24:41):
as a liberal, more than twenty five percent of you
twenty six percent of you think that political violence is justified.
Now the good news, you know I'm looking. I'm looking
for the good news. The good news is among self
described liberals, if you're forty five years or older, then
only twelve percent of you I think that violence is
political violence is sometimes justified. Moderates eighteen to forty four

(25:07):
twelve percent, forty five and older six percent. So among
moderates only eighteen less than a fifth of moderates think
that political violence is sometimes justified. Conservatives eighteen to forty
four year olds seven percent, forty five and older four percent,
So among conservatives a mere eleven percent. And I find

(25:31):
that astonishing. Eleven percent of conservatives think that political violence
is sometimes justified. I know it's a broad category. When
is political violence justified, I'm not sure that it ever
is unless you're threatening the very existence of this republic.

(25:58):
And that's what the revolutionaries founding fathers did. They saw
the tyranny and revolted against it and used violence by
engaging in a war. But I think there's a huge
difference between an actual war to preserve your country and

(26:19):
political violence because you oppose an individual or an issue
or a candidate. I think it's a very I think
it's a very significant distinction. I oppose I saw this
stupid story the Mayor of Loveland last night. Bear with
me while I tie this together. The Mayor of Loveland

(26:40):
last night, because there were heavy rains your house, dragon
thunder woke me up last night. Yes, Wow, it was
a nice storm. Went oh, I went nice. Back to sleep.
The pitter pattern of the rain on the rooftop is wonderful.
The Mayor of Loveland heavy rains, saw people in pitched
tents on city hall property, so she took it upon

(27:04):
herself to unlock the doors and let the homeless move
into city Hall to escape the rain. Now you may
think that was compassionate. I think it was stupid. They
had tents, they were intense. I've been camping in downpours.
I've been camping in a stupid blizzard. Got caught up
in the Indian Peaks of wilderness and a blizzard. I

(27:26):
know it happens. Happened, and that happened to me. I
didn't call nine one one, of course, that was back
in the dark. They just didn't have a cell phone.

Speaker 2 (27:35):
But it's curious to see what's going to happen. Come
in a few weeks, maybe next month when it snows.

Speaker 1 (27:42):
I got it again.

Speaker 4 (27:43):
I guess City Hall will now become the new shelter
of last resort.

Speaker 1 (27:48):
I don't know.

Speaker 4 (27:49):
I think it was stupid. That was a political decision,
and I think it was stupid. But I don't think
there's any way you could justify violence against the mayor
of Levelan for doing something stupid. Congressman do stupid things
all the thing. It does not justify violence. I think
the income tax ought to be repealed doesn't justify violence.
But while there's certainly a lot of people in this country,

(28:12):
particularly of a certain age and a political ideology, to
believe that violence can sometimes be justified when it comes
to political issues, I don't think it's ever justified when
it comes to the survival of the Constitution and the republic.

Speaker 1 (28:29):
We're no longer talking about violence.

Speaker 4 (28:31):
We're actually talking about taking up arms to protect the
Constitution and to protect the survival of the republic. But
that's not because I'm pissed off because oh, you're wearing
a MAGA hat or you're wearing an Antifa hat, but
you're not doing anything. No, and if you're engaged in violence,

(28:54):
and a cop is trying to enforce the law and
has to be violent to stop you. That's not political violence.
That's law enforcement violence. And it's not justified. We actually condon't.
We actually say yes, you should go do that. In fact,
we celebrate that on Fridays with taxpayer relief shots. When

(29:17):
someone points a gun and threatens the life of a
cop boom, or when someone I don't know why this
one sticks in my head, but when you're taking a
hammer to your girlfriend during a domestic dispute and you
won't stop and the cops make you drt dead right there,
that's justified.

Speaker 5 (29:33):
Mike or Michael, you math whiz. If it's seven percent
of people from eighteen to forty four, whatever the age was,
that approve of violence, and then there's four percent from
forty five on up that approved the violence. That doesn't
mean eleven percent of the people approve the violence. It's

(29:55):
an average somewhere in between. There.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
You don't add them up.

Speaker 4 (30:02):
The normalization of political violence gets exacerbated by all this
political and cultural polarization. And there's another factor that I
think that we don't take into consideration enough, and that's
emotional individualism. We're all, we're a country of individuals, and
we all have the right to pursue happiness, and we

(30:24):
all have these individual God given rights, but we emotionalize
all of it, and we suddenly, particularly people who don't
have any sense of any being greater than themselves, then
start looking to other sources of meaning, and that meaning
becomes this extraordinary, just overwhelming individualization that really becomes, in

(30:55):
this perverted way, collectivism. Because they all gather together, they
all gathered together, and they all start pursuing the same goals.
Then you have the erosion of religious moral restraints, and
of course the partisanarities of things being an existential threat.
I tried to be a little careful when I talked

(31:15):
about existential threats, because I do believe that there are
some existential threats. But that polling that indicates with the
share of just over thirty percent of young people in
twenty twenty five, that shows that increasing polarization and just
the general acceptance of violence as a political tool, and.

Speaker 1 (31:33):
The parts of the left.

Speaker 4 (31:38):
Over time attitudes about political violence show that increasing polarization itself,
with young liberals showing measurable support for political violence in principle,
then dragon made me think, and Fox News has that
the New Jersey aguberlatory election is just four weeks away.

(32:02):
It's four weeks from today, Tuesday's election election day. The
same is true in Virginia where they have early voting,
which is one more reason why I oppose early voting,
because if you've already voted for Jay Jones and you
find this rhetoric and these text message abhor him and
don't believe that he has the character to be the

(32:24):
next Attorney General of Virginia, Yeah, you voted for him
for any number of reasons. Because he's a black guy,
because he's a black guy with two, you know, cute
little kids. Because he said all the right things. But
oh he said some really bad things. But now you
but now you're screwed. Your vote has been taken in, tabulated, anonymized,
and now there's no way to take that vote back

(32:47):
same day voting. Everybody votes on election day, no more
mail in ballots.

Speaker 1 (32:54):
Stop it.

Speaker 4 (32:55):
And Jay Jones is an absolutely, I think wonderful example
of why you should didn't have it because as SUI
long and he repeat, he tells you, there is always something,
and with Jay Jones, it's that he is of not
the right character to be the chief law enforcement of
the Commonwealth of Virginia. So for all of you in

(33:16):
Virginia who have voted for Jay Jones because you thought
he was well, he was a very handsome, young black
man with a couple of you know, good looking kids,
and he said all the right things yeah, and he
said all the wrong things too.

Speaker 1 (33:27):
And now what are you going to do.

Speaker 4 (33:29):
You're going to elect a guy that believes that Republicans
ought to be killed and their children ought to be killed,
and let the mother watch so if they die in
her arms, Christmas and Democrats, here are a bunch of weasels.