10-8-25 - 7am - Chicago ICE Free Zones

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, wait, you called the ANTIFA guy at goober. Who
are goobers us for that? Jackwager? Oh, I'm right if
you want to know, because I I caught myself doing
that because I was about to say a word that

(00:20):
I couldn't say on the air, and the only thing
I could think of rapidly enough in my called cat'll
brain was goober.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
Well, there are different classifications of goober. There are the
good goobers, the listeners of the situation with Michael Rohan
featuring Dragon red Beard, and there are just the goobers
that are a holes which can be And.

Speaker 1 (00:42):
That's the word I was about to say. I was
about to say the full word a hole on air,
and I caught myself and like, no, a goober a goober.

Speaker 2 (00:54):
So, yes, there are good and there are bad goobers.
This guy is just a bad and I since clearly deeply.

Speaker 1 (01:03):
I've told my family, I'm sorry. I've told my coworkers,
I'm sorry. I've told everyone I'm sorry. But I will
not withdraw from the race. I'm so sorry. I don't
want to gloss over this thing with Mayor Johnson. Brandon Johnson,
let's go Brandon in Chicago and the supremacy Clause of

(01:26):
the US Constitution. So let's let's do a little con
law for just a moment. The supremacy clause of the Constitution.
You can find it an Article six clause two. I
think that should go. I need all of mine. I
think that's right, Article six clause two. Anyway, the supremacy

(01:47):
clause establishes that the US Constitution, federal laws made in
pursuit of the US Constitution treaties under its authority, are
the supreme law of the land. So that means that
when there's a conflict between federal and state law, federal

(02:08):
law is going to prevail, and state judges, including federal
judges obviously, but state judges are required to uphold it
regardless of any state law or state constitutions that might
be contradictory. If you truly understand federalism, you should be

(02:28):
asking yourself immediately, Well, Michael, I thought that, and I've
heard you, you know, joke about quoting Joe Biden about
how we are the United States of America and that
this country is comprised of fifty states and that is
the primary source of power other than we the people,

(02:50):
who are the primary source of power, you would be correct,
except for the supremacy clause, so that where laws that
are past pursuant to the Constitution, or more particularly here
where there is an area of jurisprudence that is designated

(03:12):
exclusively within the purview of the national government, the federal
government immigration law, the supremacy clause tax on it takes
hold and says that when it comes to immigration law,
you can do whatever you want. In fact, this is
why it really does. It truly bugs me that even Trump,

(03:41):
now he don't get me wrong, he's thinking about it,
but I'm tired of him thinking about it. He needs
to actually do something. But sanctuary laws, I believe, are
sanctuary states sanctuary cities are in direct conflict with the
US Constitution because anything regarding immigration as within the sole
purview of the federal government. Immigration is one of those

(04:05):
powers reserved to the federal government. It's one of the
enumerated powers. So if you designate your place city of Denver,
state of Colorado as a sanctuary city or a sanctuary state, respectively,
basically what you're saying is we're not going to enforce

(04:27):
federal immigration law and we're not going to allow federal
immigration law to be enforced within our jurisdiction, and I
think that's just blatantly unconstitutional. Now, how you deal with that?
Obviously you could sue, You could cut off funding, which
I think Trump's talked about, and I just wish he
would do and I wish he would do it because

(04:50):
that will their heads will explode. Jared Polus's head would
explode if Donald Trump said I'm cutting off all federal
funding because you're violating the supremacy Clause and you're not.
He may have to narrow it down, tailor it to
specific areas that have somehow have some nexus to immigration,

(05:10):
but I would go for the I'd go for the
whole hog. I'd say, just you know, if you're declaring
yourself somehow to be an insurrection by saying that you're
going to be a sanctuary state, so you're an insurrectionist.
You're the fascist, not us. You're you're the one that's
violating the Constitution. So we're just going to cut off
your federal funding until you come back into compliance. Now,

(05:34):
I know, don't get me wrong, there are all sorts
of arguments to be made about, well, you know, maybe
the sanctuary status status doesn't apply to a particular area
or a particular funding mechanism, or whatever. That may be true.
But the broader argument is, this is a rogue state.

(05:54):
This is a rogue municipality that has said they are
above the US Constitution and they don't have to cooperate,
follow or agree to or adhere to in federal immigration
law that violates the supremacy clause it The principle is

(06:14):
this the Constitution. Federal laws and treaties override any state
law or constitution in the event of a conflict, and
state judges are bound to apply the federal law even
if it contradicts state laws or state constitutions. It supports
the doctrine of federal preemption, for example, meaning that federal

(06:37):
law can actually invalidate a state law that directly conflicts
with it, and courts use the supremacy clause to resolve
which law to apply if federal and state laws present
contradictory requirements, contradictory objectives, or are just plain in contradiction themselves.

(06:57):
Why do we have the supremacy clause because it was
added to address the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation,
where the lack of federal supremacy led to all these
inconsistent and conflicting state policies. So it's been a fundamental
part of our legal jurisdiction and constitutional system since the beginning.

(07:19):
It was meant to ensure legal unity, national consistency, and
the Supreme Court regularly, almost without exception, applies the supremacy
Clause in rulings that declare conflicting state laws void. I

(07:41):
don't have any cases in front of me, but I'm
trying to think of there was an old nineteen trying
to think about my law con law class, there was
an old nineteen fifty eight case of Cooper or something,
which is one of the first cases I remember. I
don't even know what the case was about, but Cooper
versus somebody, nineteen fifty eight. So the supremacy clause functions

(08:05):
as a legal backbone for federal primacy over state law,
and so that works to ensure a consistent legal framework
across the United States. And then you add on top
of that that one of the enumerated powers reserved to
the federal government is immigration. Then anything that they do
outside that is in violation of the supremacy clause, and

(08:27):
I think can be struck down. And I want them
to go after. I want them to go after Mayor Johnson.
Let's go through his press conference where he makes the announcement.

Speaker 3 (08:39):
I'm calling for a full investigation into this incident and
into all of the brutality that we have seen over
the past week.

Speaker 1 (08:47):
They are he'll tell you the rest to day. He
get through a SoundBite. The brutality. Oh, let's go back
to the first hour. You mean the brutality that you
saw when an ice agent, uh, you know, got attacked
or there was a rock thrown at him, or they
pushed or shoved or did whatever, and that Ice agent

(09:10):
turned around and drop kicked him to the to the
ground and then put him in uh plastic cuffs or
handcuffed him or dragged his ass over to the curb,
and then they put him in some sort of you know,
a paddy wagon and drove him off. Is that what
you're talking about, Mayor, Because that's what the Chicago PD

(09:32):
should be doing to the gang bangers in the South
Side that are running around killing and shooting people every weekend.
It's called law enforcement. Sometimes law enforcement kind of like
you ever seen you ever seen a emergency surgery where
somebody's got a gunshot wound. They got multiple gunshot wounds.
There's blood and guts everywhere. It's pretty ugly. Do you

(09:55):
know what it's necessary? And you know what, it's the reality.
And again, I live in the real world, not the
fantasy world that you live in.

Speaker 3 (10:04):
Taking police resources that should be in our neighborhoods.

Speaker 1 (10:09):
Taking police resources. Wait a minute, you don't need to
worry about if if you don't have enough cops to
help enforce the law, you have a president that is
more than willing to activate the National Guard and send
the National Guard in to assist you. That's the stage

(10:30):
we've reached in this country. This is a result to
defund the defund the cops. You don't have enough cops
to do the job that they're supposed to do.

Speaker 3 (10:39):
Surbans Chicagoan's and diverting them to the to do with
the chaos that they are causing.

Speaker 1 (10:45):
We chicken and egg. Who's causing the chaos? You got
a crime problem, you got an illegal immigration problem, so
that is a federal issue. So the Feds come in
to try to enforce federal law and you claim that
that's the chaos. No, the chaos is that you allowed
this to get out of control and the chaos is

(11:05):
that you want to allow the Chicago PD to respond. Now,
I know they've come out and they've said they've denied
the thing that we've actually heard without our own ears,
and that we've read the transcript of where they were
told not to assist, not to respond. So you can
try to spend it as much as you want, but
we heard what we heard. Now, whether that was authorized

(11:27):
or not, you can debate that. But what I heard
was a dispatcher saying, and the transcript showing that you
are not to respond, not to engage, and not to assist.

Speaker 3 (11:38):
You need ICE out of our city so that we
can continue to focus on the strategies that have been.

Speaker 4 (11:44):
Working to drive violent crime down.

Speaker 1 (11:48):
Wait a minute, you need ICE out of your city
so you can focus on driving crime down. But you're
not doing that. You're not focusing on driving crime down.
But we're talking about two separate issues, and you're conflating them.
We're talking about ICE enforcing federal immigration law, which you

(12:09):
don't have any authority to do. Now, you do have
the authority to assist if you wanted, if you wanted
to help, if you actually cared about enforcing federal law.
You would be telling the Chicago PD. Yes, if you
if if somebody, if you catch somebody on the South
Side that's engaged in in in gang bang uh uh

(12:29):
gangland activity, and there they can't produce an ID, they
can't show citizenship. Yeah, you can call lies, but you
won't even letting do that.

Speaker 3 (12:38):
These actions tell us simple truth. If we allow this
administration to take away due process for.

Speaker 1 (12:45):
Anyone, I'm just if you could see me, I'm just
shrugging my shoulders. Who's being denied due process? Someone's violating
the law, they get detained or arrested, They get they
get their butts huled before an immigration judge. A judge
may or may not issue a deportation order. If they do,

(13:07):
they get deported. It's do process. You lie like a sucka.
You know what, You just lie, lie, lie. You know why,
because you're the fascist.

Speaker 3 (13:17):
We will allow them to take away due process for everyone.
They told us that this was about the worst of
the worst. In reality, they are going after anyone who
objects to families being ripped apart and community members being disappeared.

Speaker 1 (13:33):
I the language is I mean or well, would be
so proud, so proud?

Speaker 3 (13:39):
Lies?

Speaker 4 (13:41):
And people die. We cannot allow this to continue.

Speaker 1 (13:46):
He's talking about people dying in Chicago. He last weekend
it was twenty four.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
Shall I go over my two months worth of data
just for the weekends.

Speaker 1 (13:58):
Yeah, just once, you give us, give us this a
quick sample, real quickly. Oh yes, Oh, he's got it
on the wall. You feel you actually you keep a
hard copy of it.

Speaker 2 (14:10):
Monday October sixth five dead, twenty four shot, Monday September
twenty ninth four dead, twelve shot. September twenty second, four dead,
twenty two shot, September fifteenth to dead, nineteen shots, September eighth,
seven dead, twelve shots, September one eight dead, fifty eighth shot.
August twenty fifth, sixth dead, twenty seven shot, August eighteenth,
two dead, twenty three shot, August eleventh, four dead, thirty shot.

(14:33):
And that's only just these to the past two months.

Speaker 3 (14:37):
And yet we hear the mayor being ripped apart, and
community members being disappeared, Ice lies, and people die. We
cannot allow this to continue. Did yous take action more
drastic than what we have taken before, because what we
are seeing is a more radical attempt to undermine our democracy.

Speaker 1 (15:00):
I love the inversion of the language, a more radical
attempt to destroy our democracy. What you're doing is the
very essence of radicalism and destroying the constitutional order. You
see how we're constantly being indoctrinated by the cabal. Do

(15:21):
you understand how what you hear that? If you don't,
if you don't consume what you hear with any sort
of critical thinking, you too could be end up being
a useful idiot. And I don't have room. I don't
have time for useful idiots.

Speaker 3 (15:41):
Today we are signing an executive order aimed at women women.

Speaker 1 (15:48):
I thought we opposed executive orders. I thought those were
somehow the destruction of democracy.

Speaker 3 (15:53):
Meaning in this out of controlled administration.

Speaker 1 (15:57):
So a mayor of Chicago is going to sign an
executive order to rein in and out of control President Wow,
I love it.

Speaker 3 (16:06):
The order establishes ice free zones. That means that city
property and unwilling private businesses will no longer serve as
staging grounds for these raids.

Speaker 1 (16:23):
And the seals all crack. Do you think those seals
have any clue what they're clapping about. All they heard
was we're not going to cooperate with Ice.

Speaker 2 (16:35):
Curious about that clapping because only like one person started
it and then everybody joined in. So if that one
person that was probably paid to clap with everybody else
would have clapped, it.

Speaker 1 (16:45):
Was probably the Chief of staff. QF staff knew Chief
Staff's the one that wrote the speech, so he knew
what he had made a note to himself.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
Clare he applause signs tonight's show. Yes, Yes, clap yes.

Speaker 3 (17:02):
Our school parking lots are not for ICE to lould
their weapons. They are for Chicagoans who drop their kids
off to learn. Our libraries are not for ICE to
prepare for a raid. They're for Chicagoans to read and relax.
Our parks are not for ICE to set up checkpoints.

Speaker 1 (17:22):
They're for people to sell drugs. It's what they're for.

Speaker 3 (17:28):
They are for Chicagoans to play and enjoy.

Speaker 1 (17:31):
Oh, you want to go to the parking play hed
a little kid? Listen, Candy want to go to the
park and play? Martial found like such a bleeding her liberal.

(17:53):
Oh our children, our children.

Speaker 3 (17:56):
We can't have them ice floading their weapons for our children.

Speaker 2 (18:02):
Yet South Chicago murder.

Speaker 5 (18:05):
There's murders and shootings every day.

Speaker 1 (18:07):
He doesn't talk about that though, No somebody.

Speaker 4 (18:11):
Please think got the children?

Speaker 1 (18:15):
Back to the press conference.

Speaker 2 (18:16):
Really just just for click quick clarifications about my numbers.
Just weekend, Yeah, that's just weekend Saturday Sunday shooting deaths
and shootings.

Speaker 1 (18:26):
Yeah. The Chicago weekend crime report brought to you by
Dragon red Beard. You're welcome back to the press conference.

Speaker 3 (18:39):
Are not for ICE to prepare for a raid. They're
for Chicagoans to read and relax. Our parks are not
for ICE to set up checkpoints. They are for Chicagoans
to play and enjoy.

Speaker 1 (18:53):
Did you think about that one for a moment.

Speaker 4 (18:55):
Somebody please think got the children.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
Ice knows that, oh, we have a particular neighborhood and
that we know, based on our analysis and our databases,
that there are a lot of illegal aliens in this
neighborhood and that they will go to the park on
the weekend or anytime. So why not go to the
park and check? You go where those who committed the

(19:24):
crimes are. If you're looking for a murderer and you
have evidence, you have information for you to believe, probably
cause that that murderer is somewhere around forty six ninety
five South Monaco Street, Denver, Colorado. AIGHTL two three seven.
That's where you go. Look. And so when the Denver

(19:46):
Police Department rolls up in front of this building and they,
you know, block the parking lot, do we really think
that Jojo or Brenda or Temporary Basin going to go
out and screen with them and say.

Speaker 4 (20:00):
Get off our parking lot.

Speaker 1 (20:01):
There's private property. Well they might, but they're going to
get shoved aside now and I'm talking about private property.
This building is private property. So now let's say that
they think that there's been a crime committed and that
the suspect is somewhere around Cheeseman Park or City Park

(20:23):
or you know any other I don't care, can't field someplace.
That's where you go. You go where they are. So
mayor you're dumber on a box of rocks, But I'm
not surprised.

Speaker 3 (20:36):
I have an establishments can partner with us to make
it clear that private property is private property, and I
cannot enter establishments without a valid warrant. Private entities they
voluntarily choose to display signage to designate their property as
part of a citywide network of community spaces that stand
together and affirming the safety, dignity, and belong of all

(21:00):
of our residents.

Speaker 1 (21:02):
Now, think about what he just said about private property
and warrants. The cops pull up to this building, they
may or may not have a warrant, They may just
you know, first of all, there's it is a it
is a public facility, even though it's on private property.
We have a public area that anybody can walk into.

(21:24):
There's nobody down there, which bugs me. There's nobody down there,
so people can just walk in and during business hours
you can take the elevator up to the fourth floor.
So you take the elevator up to the fourth floor.
You don't have a warrant, and you asked to see
the May we see the boss or you? Michael b

(21:45):
is Michael Brown here. I don't think there's anybody in
this building, even my producer, who would say, well, I'm
not gonna tell you, do you have a warrant? They're
gonna wrap me up in a New York minute. Yeah,
he's here where you need him. Yeah, let me take
it right to his desk. Yeah. In fact, yeah, in fact,

(22:08):
in fact, his desk in the studio right there together.
So I'm sure we're gonna catch him unless he's unless
he's in the bathroom. In that case, we've got to
go to the first floor. Yeah that's right. Yeah, so
we'll go back down, but we'll show you where it
is too. Now, if they want to search, they need
a warrant. But again, let's say they get a warrant

(22:29):
to search, they may not even use the warrant if
they simply ask, hey, may we come in and you
say yes. Now, I would never allow cops to come
in my home without a warrant because I want to
know what they're searching for. Cause I'm not committed any crime.
Tamar hasn't committed any crimes nobody that we've had in
our house, because well we don't allow anybody in our house.

(22:50):
But if anybody in our house, I wouldn't allow them
to commit a crime. So I dodn't want to see
I'd want to see a warrant. I don't even let them.
I mean, this has been like twenty years ago, but
I had a cop come to my door. They were
asking some questions about something, and it was interesting because
they said it was like a Boulder County share Deputy

(23:12):
shaff May I come in? And I said, no, you
may not, because I'm not going to give them that
entree into my castle, into my private property. I said, no,
we can talk right here on the porch. And then
they asked me the questions and they said, okay, thank you.
That was helpful, and they drove off. Could I have

(23:34):
let them in? Would they have done anything? Probably not,
But I'm not going to take that risk. So all
of this warrant, just screaming about a warrant is completely
ignoring all the subtleties about warrants.

Speaker 3 (23:50):
By extending this protection beyond city owned land, the order
builds a broad civic shield.

Speaker 1 (23:56):
Wait a minute, By extending my order beyond my jurisdiction
underwe authority, do you do that, Mayor? That would be
like Trump signing an executive order that tells the United
Kingdom you have to do X, Y Z or that
we're going to, you know, do some sort of law

(24:16):
enforcement or something in a foreign country. You don't have any
jurisdiction beyond your jurisdiction, mayor, man. That seems kind of
fascist to me.

Speaker 3 (24:26):
Well, that limits the reach of harmful enforcement practices. It
strengthens neighborhoods solidarity, and it reaffirms Chicago's rule as a
welcoming city.

Speaker 1 (24:37):
The fact is we're going to keep all We're going
to keep all federal law enforcement out of our city,
and that's going to make us more welcoming. Yeah to
illegal aliens. Yeah, of course you are, mayor. This guy's
a total, total dumb ass. Let me just finish that.
I want to move on to a Q and A section.

Speaker 3 (24:58):
Cannot allow them to remp throughout our city or no
checks or balances.

Speaker 4 (25:03):
Nobody is above the law.

Speaker 1 (25:05):
Oh there you go. I knew you'd use it somewhere.
Nobody's above the law. Don't forget that. Nobody's above the law.

Speaker 4 (25:13):
If we break the law, you should be held accountable.

Speaker 3 (25:17):
If Congress will not check this administration, then Chicago will.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
Oh you're gonna check you as a mayor of a
city one of the lowest jurisdictions in terms of our federalism,
you're going to check the president of the United States.
Good luck with that. And by the way, let me
know when you can do it, because I want to
watch now when ask because after this press conference or

(25:43):
after this announcement, he held a press conference and somebody asked,
when ask which legal body would determine appropriate charges for
federal agents that run a foul of his ice freeze zones.
He could not name a single charging agency. You know why,

(26:07):
because there is none. So he's created an ice free zone.
They love they love no go zones, don't they. They're
just like islawmis. They're just like radical is lawmus. I
mean they're turning Chicago into dearborn or deerborn is just
spreading its dumb assy all across the country. No go zones,
ice free zones. I hereby declare, uh, let's see what

(26:32):
we needed something free zone? Dragon, We need like this
studio needs to be a some sort of free zone.
I'd say, idiot, but that that yeah, that include us. This,
This is a this is a high quality free zone
that's probably pretty active.

Speaker 5 (26:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (26:51):
Yeah, we're a high quality free zone. So, may Or,
who's going to enforce your ice free zones?

Speaker 5 (26:59):
You said earlier or that federal agents who violate your
executive order would be committing a criminal offense. Well, I
want to hear more about that. Do you think that
they should be charged with the crime? How would enforcement
on that work?

Speaker 3 (27:11):
They should be charged with a crime because it is
a crime by who, by the entity that they're violating,
the City of Chicago. To crime. Here's the thing. Anyone
who commits a crime should be charged. I mean, isn't
that the basic of what they ostensibly referred to as

(27:33):
law and order? How do you expect people to respect
your ability to carry.

Speaker 4 (27:38):
Out law and order if you don't follow it yourself.

Speaker 5 (27:42):
So do you want the state's attorney to charge them?

Speaker 1 (27:45):
I'm saying that they should be held accountable.

Speaker 4 (27:47):
You said earlier that in other words, Oh.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
I hadn't thought beyond that. It really sounds like he's
making stuff up there. Oh uh, I mean this sounds
about right?

Speaker 1 (27:59):
Yeah, this uh Jewish, I don't know that we thought
through that. So we've said that you're criminals and that
you're violating our so called executive order ICE free Zone. Okay, well,
Mayor I have a question for you. Who's the charging agency?
Who would be the person that would charge ICE or

(28:21):
the agents themselves with a crime? Who is that?

Speaker 5 (28:24):
You said earlier that federal agents who violate your executive
order would be committing a criminal offense. Well, I want
to hear more about that. Do you think that they
should be charged with the crime? How would enforcement on
that work?

Speaker 3 (28:36):
They should be charged with a crime because it is
a crime.

Speaker 1 (28:40):
Okay, who's going to charge them? That's all. That's all
the reporters asking, which is a very legitimate question. Okay,
who's going to charge an ICE agent with the crime? Who? Bye?
Bye uh?

Speaker 4 (28:56):
By the entity that they're violating.

Speaker 1 (28:59):
Yeah, the inditing that they're violating. Okay, well that's the
city of Chicago. But city of Chicago, it's a crime.
Here's the thing.

Speaker 3 (29:11):
Anyone who commits a crime should be charged. I mean,
isn't that the basic.

Speaker 2 (29:16):
Rule line right there? You what, that's my favorite line
right there. Anybody who commits a crime should be charged.

Speaker 4 (29:22):
Okay, Okay, then that's what we're doing.

Speaker 1 (29:24):
Yes, so we're trying to enforce we're enforcing our criminal
code just as we're allowed to in the subremacy clause.
How about you go focus on the crimes they're being
committed in your sitting and once you go arrest them.
This is the dumb assery. This goes back to what
last night, when I was thinking about today's program, I

(29:45):
thought about I should take a break on time.

Speaker 3 (29:48):
I dare you to declare that radio station a truck
or free zone.

Speaker 1 (29:55):
We're armed and ready for you. I hereby declare this
a trucker free. No, actually no, and I take that back.
It's not a trucker free zone. It's you trucker free zone.
That's yeah, that's what we're doing. And and and you want,
you wanna, you wanna test our will come on in,
come on, here we go, bring it, just bring it on.

(30:18):
I'll just put dragon in front. Let dragon handle it.
So so Mayor Johnson somehow believes that everybody, you know,
nobody's above the law. Everybody has to be, you know,
treated the same. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
What he completely fails to recognize is that that's what

(30:43):
ICE is doing. Ice is enforcing the law. Go back
to the very beginning of the program. This is this,
This is what I was thinking yesterday about today's first
couple of segments. I wanted to put in perspective what
we're being fed by the cabal and by idiots like
Brandon Johnson. Let say that, oh my gosh, ICE is

(31:06):
out of control. They're the gestape. Well they're the Nazis.
Blah blah blah blah. No they're not. They're doing their job.
This is what we ask for, and sometimes what you
ask for is not the prettiest thing in the world.
If we want murderers and rapists and burglars and you know,
crazy people off the street, sometimes that's not going to

(31:26):
be the prettiest sight to see. You know. We think
about any number of taxpayer relief shots where some idiot
points a gun at a cop and there's five cops
trying to rest him. So five cops stop start shooting
because every cop doesn't know what is he. I mean,
for me, I don't know. I've got a fire back.
So you got twenty rounds or twenty five rounds into

(31:48):
one guy, Well, sucks to be him. You shouldn't have
pointed the gun. Sucks to be you. You shouldn't have
come to the country illegally. And now these people truly
want us to ignore the law. What telling us that
nobody's above the law in the same breath they're telling
you to ignore the law.

Speaker 2 (32:09):
I like this text message from fifty four to thirty one.
The mayor of Chicago proves the old saying it's better
to keep your mouth shut and let people think you're
a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

Speaker 1 (32:19):
Bingo, No, I think that may be Mark Twain. I'm
not sure that's it. Jim Oh. I'm sorry. Oh, I
thought it was Mark Twain listening to the program. Jim Oh,
it's Jim. Okay, it's Jim. Don't be suckered into this propaganda.
Stand your ground, just like we will against the trucker