11-1-25 The Weekend Hour 2: Don’t Nuke the Fillibuster

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Too night. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA
director of talk show host Michael Brown. Brownie, no, Brownie,
You're doing a heck of a job the Weekend with
Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
Broadcasting life from Denver, Colorado. You've tuned into the Weekend
with Michael Brown, and I really appreciate you doing so.
A couple of the rules of engagement are you gotta follow.
You've got to follow me on x formerly Twitter, that's
at Michael Brown USA. You can also follow me on
Facebook and Instagram too, Just any of those would be great.
And then be sure don't forget the text line on
your message app. You already should already have this number

(00:30):
plugged in three three one zero three three three one
zero three. Keyword is Micha or Michael. Tell me anything
or ask me anything. And then on your podcast app
whatever you use to download podcasts, search for the Situation
with Michael Brown, the Situation with Michael Brown. Once you
find that, get that subscribe button, leave a five star
review and they will download all five days of the

(00:53):
weekday program that we do in Denver, plus this weekend program,
so you get all the Michael Brown that you need.
We're at the Wall Street Journal Today. The headline is
Trump's demands throw wrench into shutdown talks, and the subhead
says lawmakers are facing heightened urgency to resolve the impasse
as food eight is imperiled, airports are snarl and the

(01:15):
Affordable Care Act enrollment begins. Many people are suggesting, including
Donald Trump, at times, this is where the president and I,
for I can't think of too many things over the
past nine to ten months, whatever it's been now, a'mot
eleven months or yest, we're getting close to that. I

(01:37):
always kind of disagree with some of the ways that
he does things, But in terms of the policy, I'm
not sure there's really anything that I've disagreed with so far.
But I truly, honestly haven't thought about it, but I
thought about it in this particular sense. So let's talk
about the filibuster for a second. You know what the
filibuster is. You got to fill a buster. If I

(01:59):
ll ibust r. It's an old world, old old word
that basically means to just keep the argument going, keep
the debate going, you stop anybody else from getting a
word in edge wise, and technically it means that at
least when This rule was adopted by the United States

(02:21):
Senate back in the eighteen hundreds, back before we had radio, television,
sort of electronic communications, that somebody could filibuster a debate,
and that meant that they could stand up, start speaking,
and they could just talk and talk and talk, and

(02:41):
as long as they could avoid going to the bathroom,
as long as someone would bring them, you know, something
to munch on, something to drink, and maybe they would
wear a diaper, whatever it might take. As long as
they kept talking, they could not vote on a bill,
because the debate would remain open in the Senate until

(03:03):
everybody had had their say. So you might have a
group of people line up and try to filibuster a bill.
It's not how it works today, not at all. In fact,
it shows you just one more example of how lazy
the United States Senate really has become. So now, if
you want a filibuster, you don't have to you don't

(03:25):
have to have a colostomy bag, you don't have to
have a tube inserted so that you can urinate, and
you don't have to have somebody bring you food all
the time. You don't have to take as much caffeine
or as much amphetamines or speed or whatever it is.
You know, to try to stay at speed balls as
long as you know, try to stay awake for as
long as you can, to keep talking. You don't have

(03:46):
to do any of that. All you have to do
is walk down to the clerk, hand them a card
and say that the card. I don't know technically what
it says on it, but what it means is I'm
filibustering this bill, which means that the debate just goes
on ad infinitum and you can never get to a

(04:10):
vote because the debate remains indefinitely open. Even though if
you were to, if you were to have access to
what's going on on the Senate floor at this moment,
there's not a damn person there. Nobody's speaking. I don't

(04:31):
know whether literally, at this moment, they're even in session,
but even if they were in session, nobody's speaking, nobody's
doing anything. In fact, let's see, it's one ten in
the afternoon. They're out shopping, maybe they're out having a cocktail.
Maybe they're getting ready to go to a nice dinner somewhere.
Maybe they're you know, they're they're they're making love to

(04:51):
their spouse, who knows what they're doing. But they're not filipbustering,
except they are, and they are because they told the
Senate clerk that they were. So there's no pressure anymore.
The only pressure to end debate would be the consequences
of not passing any particular legislation. And I've not talked

(05:15):
a word about the Continuing Resolution. I haven't talked about
the funding at all. I'm talking about the process because
I'm afraid that most Americans, particularly younger generations, don't understand
because they didn't even have what was the Sesame Street.
I think it was Sesame Street, but whatever, it was

(05:35):
about how a bill becomes a bill. I remember that
little guy wrapped up as a school house rock exactly, Michael,
That's what it is. And he would walk around here.
He was rolled up pieces of paper, had a little
bow tie around his midsection, and he talked about how
a bill becomes a bill. Most people don't understand that.

(05:56):
So let's talk specifically about this Continuing Resolution. The Continuing
Resolution gets passed with bipartisan support in the House of Representatives,
which means that both Republicans and Democrats voted both for
and against it. Some Republicans voted against it, some Democrats

(06:19):
voted against it, some Republicans voted for it, some Democrats
voted for it, but enough of Democrats joined with Republicans
to get a majority to pass the bill to continue.
I'm going to refer to it as the cr You've
heard that, ad infinitum. So they passed the r and
it goes to the Senate. The Senate decides they're going

(06:42):
to the Senate. Democrats decide they're going to filibuster it,
and they're going to filibuster it, which means the debate
goes on and on and on. Although when I say
the debate goes on and on and on, there's no
actual debate going on. Oh, they're having a little caucus meetings.
They're going to office to office the debate. They're negotiating,
they're trying to make deals, they're trying to cut deals,

(07:02):
they're doing everything you can possibly imagine. But they're not debating. Nonetheless,
they're filibustering, which means technically, or at least according to
the rules of the Senate, they're still debating, and they
can't get to a vote until you do something according
to the rules of the Senate, which is called invoking cloture.

(07:26):
You invoke cloture CLO t U R, which simply means
you got to have a fancy term if you're a senator,
which simply means you're going to stop the debate. And
once you stop the debate, which takes a super majority
to invoke cloture, which means you have to have sixty votes.
Then to pass the bill, once you've stopped the debate,

(07:48):
you only need a simple majority. You only need you
could have a fifty to fifty tie, in which case
the Republican Vice President JD. Vance would come in and
break the tie and you would get fifty one vot
votes and the bill would pass, or you would get
fifty one senators, you might get all fifty three Republican

(08:08):
senators to vote, but all you need would at that
point would be a simple majority. But to get to
that simple majority vote, you have to have a sixty
supermajority vote to invoke cloture or stop the debate. Now,
there's something called the nuclear option. The nuclear option is

(08:29):
where the Senate Democrats decided several congresses ago, when Harry
Reid was the Senator, he got rid of the filibuster
rule for judicial nominees, and that allowed someone to be
appointed to the US Supreme Court or an appellate court

(08:52):
or a federal district court with a simple majority of
Senators because you didn't need to worry about a filibuster,
because even the filibuster could be finished with fifty one votes,
just a simple majority. That backfired on them because Reid

(09:14):
adopted that nuclear option. Then Trump wins the presidency instead
of Hillary Clinton. And that's why we have a majority
on the Supreme Court, and that's why we're starting to
clean up and get more federal district judges that are
true constitutionalists as opposed to the progressive liberals that the
Democrats want to put on. Well, Donald Trump keeps going nuclear.

(09:40):
He keeps saying let's use the nuclear option, to which
I say, stop, shut up, and say, hell, don't do this.

Speaker 1 (09:50):
First.

Speaker 2 (09:50):
He was his demand on Thursday. And I'll get to
what that nuclear was right after this. Welcome back to
the Beekening with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me.
I appreciate you tuning in. So as I said, President
Trump keeps going nuclear, nuclear, this, nuclear, that nuclear everything. First,

(10:19):
it was his demand on Thursday that the Pentagon has
to resume nuclear testing. The clear strikes as nuclear tests out, it's.

Speaker 1 (10:29):
Talking about what are you talking about?

Speaker 3 (10:32):
Literally resuming underground nuclear destination tests.

Speaker 2 (10:36):
And you'll find out versa.

Speaker 1 (10:37):
But we're going to do some testing again.

Speaker 2 (10:39):
Other countries doing if.

Speaker 1 (10:40):
They're going to do it, we're gonna do it.

Speaker 2 (10:42):
Okay, if you contact find what you feel perceived, I'm
not going to say.

Speaker 3 (10:44):
I mean, I know exactly what we're doing where we're
doing it, but other countries are doing it.

Speaker 1 (10:48):
And then if other countries doing we don't.

Speaker 2 (10:51):
And truthfully, if other countries are doing it, then we
should be doing it too. And we have done in
so long. We really need to know do those warheads
and do our systems still work? But beyond that, Trump's
now declaring that the Senate must abolish the filibuster by
doing the nuclear option. In a post on a social

(11:14):
media site truth Social, Trump announced in all caps, of course,
the choice is clear, initiate the nuclear option, get rid
of the Philipbuster. Are Republican senators seeking to duck and
cover if you get the joke, to duck and cover
in the face of Trump's kind of demands that they

(11:38):
invoke the nuclear option? Now, I don't think so. Rather,
in what's really an unusual turn of events, they're actually
defying the president. Senate majority of leader John Thune issued
a statement Friday morning indicating that he is he's not
altered his views about amending the filibuster. Senator John Curtis

(11:58):
over at Utah he posted on Next yesterday morning that
the filibuster quote forces us to find common ground, adding
power changes hands, but principles should not. I'm a firm
no on eliminating it. So the votes to abolish the
filibuster don't exist, no matter how much Trump himself is

(12:20):
going to complain and bitch and moan about that particular procedure. Now,
there is an incongruity of interest between the White House
and the Senate now that he's basically precluded from running
for a third term. Well not even basically now that
he is precluded from running for a third term. Trump

(12:41):
has a different set of priorities than some of his
allies in the Senate, in the House. He wants to rule,
he wants things his way, and I totally get that.
He's a man on a mission. He's got a short leash,
he's got a limited amount of time to do it.
And he's got to get done what he can get done. Now,

(13:03):
the polls indicate that the Republicans, the Republican Party, continues
to take on more water than Democrats over this stupid shutdown.
I think that's because the cabal is doing everything they
possibly can to convince you that is the Democrat's fault.
I mean, that is the Republican's fault when it is

(13:25):
objectively to me the fault of the Democrats. Let me
explain why. First, remember everything I told you about the
clean CR that was passed by the House that included Democrats.
Democrats joined in Republicans to create the majority in the
House to pass that clean CR. The dollar amount now,

(13:49):
listen closely, the dollar amount of the CR that the
House passed and is now in front of the Senate
is the same spending level that the Biden budget was.
Not a dime more, not a dime less. Now, some

(14:09):
of the priorities may have changed, but the amount of
spending has not changed. So we're still going to go
in the hole just as much as if Biden was
still president. So apos and all of them for continuing
to do this. But the point that I don't want
you to miss is Republicans and Democrats alike voted for
that original cr that is now stalled over in the Senate.

(14:35):
We need I think it's five or seven, well, we
technically need seven, not counting the ones who have already
crossed over, which we technically need seven Democrats to get
to sixty. A couple of them have already come to
the Republican side, Senator Feederman of Pennsylvania, and I think

(14:56):
the Senators from New Mexico and another one, so we
need a couple more. It is the Democrats that are
holding up and now demanding even more. So I want
you to think about let's just say that that we
capitulate to the Democrats, that doesn't mean that the shutdown

(15:17):
is over because if they if the Senate changes the
continuing Resolution and adds all of the Democrat demands to it,
that has to go back to the House for the
House to approve it, or it goes to a conference
committee for the two sides, the House and the Senate,

(15:37):
to work out their differences, and then they have to
vote on what the conference called a conference report. What
that committee, that joint committee of the House and Senate
negotiators come up with, So that means you still have
two more votes before it could ever get to the
President's desk, So that means the shutdown will continue. Absolutely,

(15:58):
we continue. So if the shutdown's going to end, all
it takes is for a couple of more Democrats to
tell Chuck Schumer, we're tired of you playing politics, We're
tired of the issue about it. I'll get to the
judges in a minute, and they're ruling on the snap benefits,
but it's clearly the Democrats who are holding it up.

(16:21):
And if we capitulate to the Democrats, that doesn't end
the shutdown because they change the very language of the
continuing Resolution, which then has to agree to by the
House via the Conference Committee, the joint committee between the
House and the Senate. This is an insane way to govern,
an absolutely insane way to govern. Now, Republicans are obviously

(16:46):
worried about a future Democrat administration passing sweeping legislation that
would fundamentally alter the American economy, fundamentally alter the political system,
and would actually fundamentally transform the United States of America
if we got rid of the filibuster. Which is why
I happen to disagree with Trump on this nuclear option.

(17:08):
I want the Senate to require sixty votes to invoke cloture.
Here's why. On the House side, you have four hundred
and thirty five members of Congress. Sometimes those four hundred,
there's four hundred and thirty five of them, and you've
seen some of them. They look like they're out of
South Park. They look like that all the Simpsons. And

(17:31):
sometimes they get really stupid stuff passed that goes over
to the Senate, and the Senate kills it. Sometimes they
kill it just by permanently filibustering it and it just
never gets passed. But what if they pass something that
everybody agreed upon? What happens? Then easy answer to you.

Speaker 1 (17:50):
Next Brown joins me here, the former FEMA director of
talk show host Michael Brown. Brownie, No, Brownie, You're doing
a heck of a job the weekend with Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (18:08):
Hey speaking with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me.
I appreciate you tuning in. Be sure and follow me
on x formally Twitter at Michael Brown USA. We're talking
about Trump wanting to nuke the filibuster and I'm opposed
to that, and one of the reasons that I'm opposed
to it, and I'll explain the the finesse that I

(18:30):
want to put on it in just a second is
when the House goes nuts and passes something that's crazy.
Our system was designed to be slow and methodical. It's
why one reason why we are a republic and not
a democracy, which always just devolves into mob rule, no

(18:53):
minority rights, no you know, thoughtful process, just throw everything.
We'll just have everybody go to the town square and
raise their hand all in favor, SAYI all the pose,
same side motion carries and we're just gonna, you know,
destroy radio or we're gonna, you know, destroy your life.
We're gonna change this rule or that rule. And the
next day they came back and do exactly the same

(19:14):
same thing to do it the opposite direction. And you
never you never have any stability in our system. You
never have any stability in the rule of law by
which governs the way we interact with one another, or
or even contractually interact with one another. So the filibuster,
which many people claim is undemocratic, I actually think is

(19:37):
actually very democratic. I know it's more than a majority,
but that's the way of protecting the minority, that's a
way of keeping the Senate from falling into the trap
of everybody's all emotional about something. I'll give you an example,
the Patriot Act. I we could spend weeks picking apart

(20:03):
the Patriot Act. But why did it pass? It passed
because one nobody in the Senate philibustered it, and two
when it came up to a vote, everybody's passions were
a mile high. Everybody's emotions were on edge. Every member
of Congress felt like we needed to be seen doing something.

(20:24):
The American people demand that we do something, and we were.
We were like, how did this happen? Don't ever let
it happen again, which is crazy because things always happened again.
So what did they do? They passed the Patriot Act. Now,
if somebody had had the cajones, if somebody had the
guts to stand up in that heated moment and say no,
I want to debate this and I don't want to

(20:48):
filibuster it, it would have slowed it down. May have
still passed, but it would have given both the House
and the Senate time to reconsider some of the stupid,
dumbass provisions that were in it. Now, they didn't do it.
So my example that I'm using you can rip apart
to the date. I understand that, but it could have

(21:12):
done that and hear what's happening. Well, the House passed
a clean cr the Senate, all they had to do
is vote yes, and the Democrats joined the Republicans, and
the government would be open, Spending levels would be the same.
Nobody would be screaming about snap or air traffic controllers

(21:33):
or anything else. It would just be a stop gap
measure to keep things going. But the Democrats were playing politics,
so they invoked the filibuster. Now you may see yourself. Well, Michael,
that's an argument against this filibuster. I would agree, except
for this. It gave us time, which is so important.

(21:56):
It gave us and quite frankly, the new media I'm
talking about the substacks and the people on x and
the people on conservative websites all gave us. Everybody, even
the liberals, even gave liberals time. Oh what's going on.
Let's analyze this and see what's in it. And now

(22:18):
because of this time where the filibuster has been invoked,
we've been able to find out everything that's in this
Some of it's pretty bad, some of it's pretty good,
and now they're debating it. But the Democrats have decided, oh,
we're going to use it as a way to extrapolate more.
We're going to hold the Republicans ransom in hopes that

(22:39):
politically we can gain an advantage. And they think they
can gain an advantage because they've got the Cabal on
their side. I'm telling you that we live in a
time where the Cabal's influence is beginning to wane. Ask
me how many times I know I'm different and you

(23:00):
probably are too. How many times have you watched the
network news over the past week. I can tell you
I haven't watched it one time. In fact, I'm not
quite sure when I last watched the NBC Nightly News,
the CBS Evening News, or the ABC World News tonight.
I couldn't tell you the last time I watched it,

(23:20):
because that's not where I get my news. I get
my news from highly specifically curated places that I believe
will give me some that will give me a biased
conservative libertarian point of view, and some that will give
me a very middle of the road objective point of view,
and some that will give me some of the wildless
crazy stuff on the left side of the political spectrum

(23:43):
so that I can see everything. If I just watch
the news, or if I just watch MSNBC, then all
I think about is, oh, Republicans are trying to starve babies,
They're trying to starve children, They're taking food away from people.
And then I go on TikTok and see people saying, oh, well,
I'm just gonna go steal the groceries anyway, And I'm

(24:03):
thinking to myself, Okay, they'll be cool. Go try that.
Let me watch that. Let's see how far we get
in the devolution of society for people stand up and
say stop this. Stop it. And here's my other theory.
This impasse will end sometime next week. It will not

(24:24):
be before Tuesday, November four, because we have an election
on November four in which a couple of very important
gubernatorial races are going to be decided, in which a
couple of special congressional districts will be decided, in which
there will be a lot of ballot issues decided. And
so Democrats want to see, oh, how are those going
to you know, how much strength do we have, how

(24:46):
popular are we right now? And I think they're going
to get mixed messages. I think they could lose in
New Jersey. I'm not sure they'll lose in Virginia, but
they're going to get a message. And once they get
that message, and they won't care and they'll just move on.
The other thing that's happening is what's out in front

(25:06):
of us well as I broadcast today, it's Saturday, November one.
We're just a few weeks away from the busiest travel
season of the year. Now, planes aren't going to fall
out of the sky because air traffic controllers, if there
aren't enough of them, they'll never let those planes get

(25:28):
in the sky, so they'll space them out further. They'll
do ground stops that'll force the airlines to do cancelations.
People will start getting backed up in the TSA lines,
and for people like me that paid extra to get
through Global Entry or TSA pre check, are clear, those
lines are going to get longer and longer, and it
won't be any advantage to it. The airport concourses and

(25:50):
terminals are going to get jammed up. The lines to
get to the airport are going to get jammed up,
and people are gonna get pissed off. And who's fault
is that going to be? Democrats, as Republicans are smart
if snap benefits get cut, if they can get their
messaging right, whose fault is that Democrats? Because all Republicans,

(26:13):
even Ran Paul, every Republican is ready to vote for
this CR. It is only Democrats voting against it. It
is only Democrats who are keeping the government shut. And
that's very simply how you explain this. But if the
filibuster didn't exist and it took a simple majority, remember

(26:37):
what we did to the Supreme Court and other judicial nominations.
We will inevitably, I hope not in the near future,
but we will inevitably go back into minority status as Republicans.
Then the Democrats will use it against us. It will
become a political tool, not a legislative tool. And as

(27:01):
long as the seventeenth Amendment remains in place, nothing's going
to change. If the fellow us will always be a
political tool and not a legislative tool. Now, the seventeenth Amendment,
which required senators to be elected to represent the states,
so that state legislators, every state legislature elected to US senators.

(27:26):
What do you think now in my state of Colorado,
because I'm represented by two really liberal, progressive if not
Marxist Democrat senators, they wouldn't do it. They would the
state legislature here, controlled by the Democrats, would be telling
my two senators, hey, keep holding the line, don't give up,
don't give up. But in Texas and other places, they

(27:46):
would be telling their senators go vote for it. Or
they might even be telling even in my state, even
in a blue state like Colorado, they may say, hey, listen,
we're going to get pressure because states. Remember, member states
are the ones that administer the SNAP program. So the
states are the ones are going to get blamed if
there's no money there, not the fads, the states. So

(28:08):
the state legislature in Colorado may actually say to our
two Democrat senators, look, go ahead and vote for this.
We'll fight about the money and the other stuff later.
It's just crazy, absolutely crazy, And I understand Trump's impatience.
I understand why Trump wants the nuclear option put in there.
Trump may well increase the pressure on Republicans in coming

(28:30):
weeks as as Americans become more and more restive and
frustrated over the shutdown. Because I said, flight delays are
bound to increase, the SNAP program benefits are probably going
to expire, even though I know a judges ordered them
to be paid I have. They'll run that to the
Supreme Court pretty quickly. So people are beginning to panic
a little bit. I say, let them penny, lets them

(28:54):
see just exactly how the Democrats are holding all of
these programs that they voted for. Michael Obamaca. Now one
Republican ever voted for Obamacare. So let them see exactly
what kind of crap they brought to this country. I'll
be right back. Hey, welcome back to the Weekend with

(29:21):
Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me. Text lines
open three to three one zero three, keyword micro Michael,
go follow me on X at Michael Brown USA. I
want you to imagine for a moment, what if the
federal government were to apply diversity Equity Inclusion DEI principles
say to the animal world, animal farm like animals. It

(29:44):
might look like this. Just imagine this. There is a
controversial plan of foot right now to kill, to kill, kill,
murder a half million barred owls to save the spotted
owls in the Pacific North Northwest. It got it the

(30:04):
green light after the US Senate rejected a resolution to
stop this plan. This is. The apparent problem is that
barred owls are more effective hunters than closely related to
spotted owls. I never knew this before. I'd never heard
of a barred owl versus a spotted owl. I think
spotted owl, of course, I think about the Northwest. The

(30:26):
Senate this week voted seventy two to twenty five to
reject a bipartisan resolution launched in July which have which
would have nullified the Biden era ol killing plan. Now,
if Democrats don't mind chopping up, you know, a bunch
of eagles with coursively subsidized wind turbines. Why what makes

(30:49):
you think they would care a rat's ass about shrinking
from killing a few thousand, few hundred thousand What am
I saying? Five hundred thousand, nearly half a million owls?
Because as with all things big government taxpayers, you and
I will be the victims. Oh, the owls will suffer too,

(31:09):
beside your pocketbook. The United States Fision Wildlife Services barred
owl management strategy. Aren't you glad to know that we've
got a barred owl management strategy comes with a roughly
blank price tag and would involve wildlife agents shooting the

(31:30):
barred owls. So they want to get rid of the
bar owls because they're more effective hunters than the spotted owls.
And we got to protect the spotted owls. And those
damn bar owls are out there getting you know, they're
getting the field mice much more effectively than the spotted owls,
and it's really starting to piss off the spotted owls.
So you notice I said a blank price tag. So

(31:53):
in a time when we're arguing over a government shutdown,
you want to spend a billion dollars a billion dollars
on this barred owl management strategy, including sending agents out
to shoot the barred owls al genocide. Will just mark

(32:18):
this as the al genocide segment to give the spotted
owls better odds. The Feds have already killed about forty
five hundred barred owls along the West coast since two
thousand and nine. Now they haven't rechieved they haven't achieved
their goal of equity, which is a purpose of diversity,
equity inclusion. Yet everybody's just equal, everybody's the same. Well,

(32:41):
they haven't quite accomplished that yet. So let's go to
Senator Kennedy who explains it to us.

Speaker 3 (32:48):
The Department of Interior is mad at the barn owl
because the barn owl is a better hunter. The barn
owl is just a better hunter. That's just the way
it is, you know, just just like the Senate President
president is better looking than me. Accept that that's the
way God made us. God just made the bard owl

(33:08):
a better hunter. And the Department of Interior is all
up in arms. They say this is threatening the spotted
at Now, the spotted owl isn't on the danger species list,
but they say this isn't fair.

Speaker 2 (33:25):
The barn owl is a.

Speaker 3 (33:27):
Better hunter than the spotted owl, and that's causing the
spotted owl's population of decrease. So the Department of Enter
of Interior and its infinite wisdom has come up with
Dei for ols. They come up with quotas for owls.
The bard owl, because Nature, God, whatever you believe in,

(33:50):
made them better hunters now has to give up its rights,
has to give up its life because the spot of
out is not as good of a hunter.

Speaker 2 (34:07):
Now. Now, by the way, Sooner to Kennedy is brilliant
when it comes to these kinds of comparisons. Now, imagine
the same Dei principles which the left fully embraces. Imagine
those fully implemented against the human population. You've heard of

(34:30):
the final solution. If you haven't, ghos, study your history
in the Final Solution to inequity. I think democrats, even
Caucasian Democrats, would take the place of the bard owls,
because we've imbued so many people with the idea falsely, incorrectly, horribly,

(34:57):
I think, in humanely. I think, very very racially, have
declared that all the problems in this country are because
of Caucasian Americans. They say, although I'm a halfway decent hunter,
I'm not very good. I'm probably good at pheasant and quail,

(35:20):
not very good at large animals. But they claim that
because I happen to have or be Caucasian, that everything
else is everybody else, It's all my fault that everybody else,
that somebody that works in the same building I do
is not quite as successful as I am. Well, that's
because I happen to be a white guy. I guess

(35:41):
that's exactly how they apply Dei principles, and now we
see it in the animal kingdom. So when you think
about cultural Marxism, when you think about critical race theory,
when you think about DEI or environmentalism, you realize that,
oh when you stay back and you just take the
very same principles and just apply them to the animal kingdom, Suddenly,

(36:06):
if you don't understand just exactly how insane DEI is,
then I want you to remember the bard owl and
the spotted owl, because the spotted owl somehow has to
gain an advantage, but only gain the advantage at the
expense of the bard owl, who, through no fault of
his own, or maybe through his own ingenuity over time,

(36:28):
through evolution, through just you know, the evolution of the species,
has become a better hunter than the spotted owl. But
the United States Senate and the federal government thinks they
can equal everything out. Oh yeah, it's like socialism. That
won't work, just like socialism has never worked. I'll be
right back