11-12-25 - 11am - UN Head Wants Crack Down on Free Speech

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
The previous goober that called up needed a little correction.

Speaker 1 (00:04):
He said to us goobers. He meant, we goobers, and
I do drink black coffee and get off my lawn.

Speaker 3 (00:11):
Good morning, Michael.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
What about goober from the Andy Griffith Show. There certainly
wasn't anything offensive about that.

Speaker 2 (00:22):
He was a nice guy. Gohmer and Gouber were both
nice guys. A man could Jim Nabors sing, Oh, Gilmer
Pyle could sing?

Speaker 1 (00:30):
Remember Yesterdy.

Speaker 2 (00:31):
We talked about milem Brazil where COP thirty is having
their big international conference and all the muckety MUCKs are
down there. Well, they've really stepped into it now, or
at least the head of the United Nations has you
have to somehow mentally, would I listen to some of

(00:54):
the stupid stuff that they say, You've got to utilize,
all the corporate speak, all the kind of misleading euphemisms.
They're in the dictionary of the globalist left, or in
the hymnal or the Bible of the Congregants or the
Church of the Climate Activists. Well, the lead preacher, the
lead pastor for the Church of the Climate Activists this

(01:15):
week anyway, it changes from me to week.

Speaker 1 (01:18):
They just they go through pastors all the time.

Speaker 2 (01:21):
Is the chairman of the United Nations as who has
also committed socialist by the way, Antonio Gaterras, and he
kicked off the COP thirty conference in Berlin on Monday
by telling all of the attendees, now, remember most of
the people attending the stupid conference in Berlin, which is
really one of the crap whole cities of the entire world,

(01:44):
raw sewage being dumped into the streets. But they're there
to tell people, Hey, you can't have a better life
because we got to lower the temperature of the world.
He started his speech telling all of those leftist muckety
muncks that the only way to I despise this phrase,

(02:08):
the only way to save democracy is to destroy the
democratic processes and establish an authoritarian crackdown on free speech,
which is the foundation of a small r.

Speaker 1 (02:26):
Republican form of government.

Speaker 2 (02:29):
We cannot have anything other than a tyrannical government if
we're ever if we're always unable to criticize the government,
which is why the First Amendment is the First Amendment.
Among other reasons, freedom of religion, the right to associate
everything that's in the First Amendment. But no, no, no, no,
he wants to save democracy. No, what he really wants

(02:51):
to do is he wants to instill democracy. You know,
somebody asks me and it comes up every once in
a while on the text line about why do these
people do this? It's really simple if you understand history.
Those who push for Marxism or Leninism or communism, what
any of the isms always think that they're going to

(03:11):
be in control when they finally reach their Marxist utopia.

Speaker 1 (03:17):
Just ask the.

Speaker 2 (03:18):
People that helped lead the Cultural Revolution under Chairman Maw
how'd that work out? How they worked out for Chae
Guevera helping Castro install his communist regime in Cuba, how
that worked out for linin installing They always get replaced
because everybody is always paranoid of everybody else. You just

(03:39):
let a revolution. Nobody trusts anybody, so you got a
clean house and wipe them all out, kill millions of people,
I mean literally ten millions and millions of people so
that you can establish control. One way to do that
is to crack down and freedom of speech. So these
little souls Googles urged all the big tech firms, which

(04:03):
I assume means that Google and all of their subsidiary
or Alphabet and all of their subsidiaries Google and YouTube
and everybody.

Speaker 1 (04:10):
I assume they're.

Speaker 2 (04:11):
Actually talking to Elon Musk at X, although I think
he would disagree with this. He's talking a little Mark
Zucky over at Facebook and Instagram. He's probably talking to
the people at TikTok. But he wants them to accept
quote accept responsibility for the damage that their platforms cause.

Speaker 1 (04:33):
Yeah, do the platforms cause some damage.

Speaker 2 (04:38):
I can argue to the cows coom home that in
many ways they probably do cause damage. But does that
mean that because something you know, automobiles cause damage, guns
cause damage, alcohol causes damage. Listening to me probably causes damage.
But does that mean that I want to ban or
outlaw it. No, You've got to have some trade off
in everything in life, or otherwise you're never going to

(05:01):
live a life. But then that's what they want. They
don't want you to live a life, They want you
to live another their dictatorship. Anyway, they are he gu terrorists.
The President of the UN says these big tech firms
have to accept responsibility for the damage their platforms cause,
and he wants them to do that by invoking digital

(05:23):
censorship regimes, and those regimes need to be designed to
silence any voice that might express skepticism about any approved
narrative of.

Speaker 1 (05:35):
The far left.

Speaker 2 (05:37):
Now, the narratives in question at top thirty just happened
to be climate a arimism, the efficacy of the MRINA vaccines,
or rigged or stolen elections by far left candidates and parties,
or does that matter, any other project that's going to
be used by the globalist left to supplant actual republican

(05:57):
forms of government with authoritarian or told hotalitarian forms of government.
Then we see evolving in real time in places like
the United Kingdom of all places, a home with a
Magna Carta resil, Australia, and.

Speaker 1 (06:10):
Even in Canada.

Speaker 2 (06:13):
In the course of what you're about to hear, over
just a simple two minute clip, you will see him
deploy the very essence of their own disinformation campaign.

Speaker 4 (06:24):
Next, Oh good, I finally found you. I kept looking
for aok I couldn't find Aokay. The occurred to me
this morning. I'm breaking it backward. It's KOI So I
finally Now I got two days worth of episodes.

Speaker 2 (06:40):
I got to catch up on.

Speaker 4 (06:42):
Now that I know it's KOI not aokay, but I
guess being a goober, I don't know my forward to my.

Speaker 3 (06:48):
Backward, and that's K zero A.

Speaker 1 (06:51):
Thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (06:52):
And what we can probably do is we can probably
find him a therapist helping him with his dyslexia, so,
you know, because we're a full service program. So if
you have dyslexia and you need help with kate oa,
we're happy to do that. Oh yes, and let me
remind you. The text line is three three one zero three.
Say it again with me, Let's do it together. One

(07:13):
two three three three one zero three. Keyword micro Michael.
You know, not a single person out there said zero.
I hope that everybody out there is as passive aggressive
as we are.

Speaker 1 (07:27):
And when I said zero, they went, oh.

Speaker 3 (07:30):
Not a single person said zero, not a single life. No,
but they know I'm right.

Speaker 2 (07:39):
So the so gutis is going after all the tech companies,
and he wants some sort of regime that if you
express skepticism and I, you know, I'm skeptical about everything, well,
he wants to silence those voices. It has to do

(08:01):
not just with climate, but any of the narratives like
the whole thing about mRNA, vaccines, stolen elections, just anything
that the globalist left wants you to shut up about.
They want in escence to go back to the Biden
regime and have them start centering you. Here he is telling.

Speaker 1 (08:26):
You about it.

Speaker 5 (08:27):
The spread of hatred and lies online is causing grave
harm to our world. These information vis information and aide
speech are fueling prejudice and violence, exacerbating divisions and conflicts,
demonizing minorities, and compromising the integrity of elections. Threats to

(08:53):
information integrity are not new, but they are proliferating and
expanding with nprecedented feed on digital platforms and supercharge by
AI technologies, science effects, human rights, public health, climtection, and
an attack and Lenny. Information integrity is targeted, so is democracy,

(09:17):
which depends on a shared, efect based perception of reality.

Speaker 2 (09:22):
Let's pause it right there and we'll come back to
it after the break. But think about what he's telling you.
Only they have the truth, Michael, I was thinking that exactly.
This guy, when it comes to Gaza and humanitarian aid,
is a proven liar.

Speaker 1 (09:42):
We have the receipts.

Speaker 2 (09:44):
I would not accept any of these globalists.

Speaker 1 (09:48):
Telling me what to do.

Speaker 2 (09:50):
All I can say is arm yourself heavily. And I
would say you need to be of how they truly
think and what they truly believe, because these are they're
all fellow travelers, they're all true believers, and they do

(10:11):
sincerely believe that the solution to all of the world's
problems is some sort of global world order that will
be run out of I mean, here's what I think.

Speaker 1 (10:21):
It's freaking hilarious.

Speaker 2 (10:23):
They think it will be run out of you know,
the the East River in Manhattan, and that the United
Nations will be the center of the universe, and that
every decision worldwide would be done by that. Do you
really think for a New York minute, no pun intended,
do you really think that for a New York minute
or New York second that Xi Jinping in Beijing he

(10:46):
may want global order, but it's not gonna be these guys.
Do you think Vladimir Putin? Of course, he's being beginning
to realize. I think that he's never going to have
you know, world dominition, domination, But do you think he's
going to allow that to be run out of the
United Nations and not be run out of Moscow? They

(11:08):
don't realize that among all these globalist elites, they never
think to the next level. They never think to the
next step. It's only about what can they do while
they're in power to impose that control on you, and
they do so. And what really here takes me about
the top thirty event is they're doing it in now.

(11:29):
I don't consider Brazil to be a third world country.
I've been to Brazil many times in business, and while
Rio is a wonderful place to visit and the beaches
are beautiful, it is a business financial center, which is
not a place I'd want to live. And some of
the places like Berlin are really craphole cities. They make

(11:51):
a place like, you know, the downtown San Francisco looked
like gleaming you know, gleaming Metropolis or downtown dever leaming,
pure clean, no crime whenever metropolis it is not. And
that's where they choose to go and to lecture those
people about how we're going to do all of these

(12:12):
things to make your life better, but your life is
going to remain crappy. That's the very definition of equity.
So everybody gets you know, if you're down here on
the bottom rong you're going to stay on the bottom rung.
Those of you that are on Wrong three or four,
you're going to take a few steps down. And if
you happen to be halfway up the ladder, really sucks
to be you, because you're going to be pushed all
the way down to wrong one or two.

Speaker 1 (12:35):
Now, the people at the top.

Speaker 2 (12:36):
Of the ladder, they sincerely believe that they're going to
remain at the top of the ladder. So it's really
easy if you're a billionaire to claim, if you know
you're Warren Buffalo, I'm getting away all my money, and
I'm gonna encourage everybody else to give away all their money,
and my heirs aren't going to get anything from me. Well,
that's fine to be a philanthropers can go give away
your money. I don't care if you you know, I

(12:56):
don't care what anybody does with any of their money,
just don't use it or criminal enterprise. But what they
don't realize is that to meet their Marxist socialist, communist goals,
then only the oligarchs will survive. But they have to
survive through the revolution in order to remain at the

(13:18):
top of that ladder. And then the question becomes if
everybody's on the wrong one or two of the ladder,
who's in the middle should produce all the goods and
services that the people at the top of the ladder
are going to.

Speaker 1 (13:32):
Consume that they need.

Speaker 2 (13:34):
Who's going to build their gulf streams, who's going who's
going to harvest their caviat Who's going to take sure,
you know, as they like to say to you know
about illegal aliens.

Speaker 1 (13:44):
Who's going to mow your lawn, Who's going to trim
your rose bushes? This guy's just totally full of it.

Speaker 5 (13:50):
The spreads of hatred and lies online is causing.

Speaker 1 (13:55):
Grave harm to all worlds.

Speaker 5 (13:59):
Easy information, these information and aid speech are fueling prejudice
and violence.

Speaker 2 (14:07):
This is so Orwellian because if I wanted to be
a true ale, I could say exactly the same words
and apply it to the radical left who wants to
tell me how to live my life. That's what drives
me crazy about this because it flows both directions.

Speaker 5 (14:28):
Exacerbating divisions and conflicts, demonizing minorities, and compromising the integrity
of elections. Threats to information integrity are not new, but
they are proliferating and expanding with unprecedented speed on digital
platforms and supercharged by AI technologies. Science, facts, human rights,

(14:53):
public health, climate action are under attack, and when information
integrity is targeted, so is democracy, which depends on a
shared fact based perception of reality.

Speaker 2 (15:08):
A shared fact based perception of reality. Listen carefully to
the words a shared fact based perception of reality.

Speaker 1 (15:20):
Okay, whose reality? Whose facts?

Speaker 5 (15:26):
False narratives, distortions and lies breathing, I.

Speaker 2 (15:29):
Mean false narratives like the world's burning up and we're
all gonna die.

Speaker 1 (15:33):
Storms are getting worse, all floods and droughts. Focus, they're
all coming.

Speaker 5 (15:39):
For uscism This belief and disengagements. They endermind social coision,
putting the sustainable development goals further out of reach.

Speaker 1 (15:51):
Or pack algorithms push.

Speaker 5 (15:53):
People into information bubbles and reinforced prejudices, including racism, misorgery,
and discrimination of all kinds. Women, refugees, migrants, and minorities
are common targets. Lives are at stake when lives are
spread about vaccines and other medical issues. United nations own

(16:16):
operations and missions are compromised as our staff deal with
the tsunami, falsehoods and absurd conspiracy theories with immense action.
First to the big tech companies take responsibility, acknowledge the
damage your products are inflicting on people and communities, and

(16:38):
you have the power to mitigate harm to people and
societies around the world.

Speaker 1 (16:43):
Now just stop for a moment.

Speaker 2 (16:45):
I think kids spend too much screen time, probably are
horned by it.

Speaker 1 (16:50):
Kids that you know they're using an AI platform and.

Speaker 2 (16:55):
Chat GPT or somebody helps them go commit suicide as
in that one case. Yes, as any tool can any
tool can be used for good or for used for harm.
What he's calling on is for them, the tech companies
to be responsible for the misuse of their product. Now, granted,

(17:16):
sometimes a product isn't effective, and so the manufacture of
a product needs to be held accountable for any liable
any damage is caused by that defective product.

Speaker 1 (17:27):
So if you if you can prove a causal.

Speaker 2 (17:29):
Link between a tech platform and a child's suicide, then
there probably is liability there, there's causation and there's probably liability.

Speaker 1 (17:39):
But what he's really doing is he's trying to.

Speaker 2 (17:41):
Convince you that they should substitute and they should make
The tech companies should all make the decisions about what
is the narrative, what is the perceived facts for your
perceived truth, and I'll determine that.

Speaker 1 (17:59):
I determine it.

Speaker 5 (18:00):
You have the power to change business models. That's profits
from these information and hates the climate crisis is a
cause of particular concern ordinated these information campaigns are seeking
to undermine climate action.

Speaker 1 (18:15):
Yes, I certainly am.

Speaker 2 (18:18):
Do you know what's missing from the in fact in
a shift which is probably likely has a lot to
do with pressure from the United States and the Energy
Secretary Chris Wright. The base modeling scenario in the International
Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook for twenty twenty five that's

(18:39):
just been released.

Speaker 1 (18:41):
Guess what.

Speaker 2 (18:43):
It eliminates a controversial projection for peak oil demand coming
no later than twenty thirty. It's kind of a surprise
for me anyway. But i EA's revised forecasts of global
demand rising through twenty fifty brings it right in line
with those projections made by OPAC and Exxon Mobile. Now,

(19:05):
both of those entities, OPAQ and Exxon Mobile depend on
a really forward looking and accurate forward looking of what
are our supplies because that's our product. That's how we
return a value to the shareholders. That's how OPAK returns
value to the Kingdom, so in a really astonishing reversal

(19:27):
buying agencies Who's chief faith Fatigue Burral. He has invested
so much personal capital in pushing this peak oil projection
in the face of all this rising criticism. He's been
doing it for the past two years now. That was
the year in which he and the IE rolled out
It's improbable projection not only for demand for.

Speaker 1 (19:48):
Oil, but also for colon natural gas.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
All is part of its twenty twenty three World Economic
Forum agenda, he said at the time, based on only
based only on today's policy settings by governments worldwide, even
without any new climate policies, demand for each of the
three fossil fuels is set to hit a peak in
the coming years. This is the first time that a

(20:11):
peak in demand is visible for each fuel this decade.
Earlier than many people anticipated. Yeah, I would say, yeah,
it was earlier than many peace people anticipated. It was,
in fact earlier than anybody other than the most optimistic
boosters of the fading energy transition to all the Green
New Deal bull crap narrative have dreamed of the fact.

(20:33):
The fact that the new peak oil projection followed closely
on the heels of the IEA's mission from four years ago,
their mission shift to serve as another of that I
guess army of boosters. They're now abanding current policies. They're
abandoning their modeling scenarios, which had been the base of

(20:55):
all their assumptions. So this is not I don't think
of coincidence. It's led directly to the criticism which followed
that you've been lying to us about peak oil. Now
last July, the Energy Secretary made it clear in an
interview that he would consider pulling the United States and
our funding for the IEA. We do but almost twenty

(21:18):
percent of the agency's budget, unless the governing board moved
to restore their original mission of simply providing accurate, reality
based data about the world's energy picture. So Wright said this,
we'll do one of two things. Will reform the way
the IEA operates, or we will withdraw. My strong preference

(21:43):
is to reform it. You know, we've had not in
this studio but studio next. We've had Chris Wright in
talk about it before he became Energy Secretary, and he
laughed about the concept of peak oil. That we continue
to discover more and more and more. And of course
this francking gets more and more technologically advanced, it pushes
that window.

Speaker 1 (21:59):
Out further further from they're further Now.

Speaker 2 (22:00):
I'm not saying that affectually we wouldn't run out of oil,
but not in our lifetimes, certainly not by twenty thirty,
which is merely a five years away.

Speaker 1 (22:08):
If I recall correctly.

Speaker 3 (22:09):
He even said we had a plurality of hundreds of
years ago under us in Colorado.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
Right here, just color alone, in this little square, we
have hundreds of years of energy. His preference for reform
as opposed to just kind of pulling out from it
doesn't get enough attention because he's basically saying, look, we
just want reliable data. We don't want all of the

(22:38):
bull crap that comes in because of all the congregants
in the Church of the climate activists trying to get
you to preach from one hymnal from one Bible about
green energy. We want everything, and we want what is good.
Whatever will provide a baseline of power is what we're
looking for.

Speaker 1 (22:59):
So I think it.

Speaker 2 (23:00):
I think the IEA, the International Energy Agency, has actually
given a positive nod to rising energy security priorities.

Speaker 1 (23:11):
Now, I don't care.

Speaker 2 (23:12):
If you want to look at that and say, well,
that's because of all the energy demand of artificial intelligence
in their data centers. I don't care if it's just
a reality that, oh, you know, the grift is over
and we now recognize, you know, I'm still waiting for
hurricane season to be over so I can talk about how, oh,
we were told at the beginning of hurricane season that
it was going to be the worst ever because of

(23:34):
climate change. The worst one just went out into the
Atlantic and didn't do anything. Well, ye, Jamaica, not the
little of Jamaica. But you know, it's always the end
of the end of civilization when it comes to hurricane season.
The head of the IEA back in twenty twenty three,

(23:58):
with energy security front and center for many governments, quote
their responses need to consider the senergies and the trade
offs they can rise with other policy goals on affordability, access, competitiveness,
and climate change. Now, when you think about what he
said at that time, there was an array of oil

(24:21):
industry executives who spoke at the March twenty twenty three
Sarah Week conference in Houston, and that week they clearly
signaled their company's intention to move away from the previously
adopted ESG environmental, social and governance focused investments, which had
done what done nothing but hurt their profitability. So now

(24:43):
they plan to refocus their capital budgets on their core
oil and gas business ventures to meet what they believe
is going to be continuing rise and demand for their product.

Speaker 1 (24:54):
Follow the money. We're always told to follow the money.

Speaker 2 (24:57):
So US giants, Axon, Mobile, Chevron Oxy they were early
adopters of this revised strategic direction, and then all the
major European sellers like Shell and BP, they all followed suit.
So we got two conflicting things going on at the
same time. We've got the United Nations at COP thirty
down in Brazil, continuing to push there in their narrative,

(25:20):
while over here in this country you've got the IEA,
which is fine, as I say, twenty percent by US,
who is now saying to themselves, oh, look, maybe we
were wrong about that, and maybe peak oil is. They
haven't gone so far as to say there is no
such thing as peak oil, but at least now they're
pushing it out further, further and further. What else is
getting pushed out further and further and further oh, all

(25:40):
of the goals to meet the mission standards. Oh, first
it was twenty twenty five. They know it's twenty thirty.
Then it's twenty fifty, and now it's like, well, sometime
in the future, we're going to do all of this.
The IEA's change in their modeling direction and the abandonment
of their peak oil dreams, I think is a clear
concession to the reality. And if you want to look

(26:03):
at anything that the Trump administration has done, I think
one of the best things is the nomination the confirmation
of Chris Wright as Energy Secretary, and I would say
also is leads out and over an EPA and just
getting rid of all the green new energy ball craft
that they were pushing down on us and saying to
the IEA, you want twenty percent of your funding to

(26:24):
go away, then stop lying to us and give us
reliable data based not on models, but on real observable data.
And you who can provide that that people who have
the biggest vested interest in accurate data. And I know,
maybe you hate excellon Mobile, maybe you hate Chevron, maybe
you hate Shell MVP, but they have a fiduciary obligation

(26:47):
to their shareholders to make certain that all their forecasts
are as accurate as possible, and that they are leaning
forward into those forecasts because that's how they make their
profits and that's how they pay their share holders. You
want to believe them, or you want to believe the
I E. A. I think the I E is They
have stood up and taken notice.

Speaker 1 (27:09):
You again.

Speaker 6 (27:10):
This show exceeds admission standards every day, and.

Speaker 1 (27:13):
We're damn proud of.

Speaker 5 (27:16):
How you doing.

Speaker 1 (27:17):
Michael Brown.

Speaker 6 (27:17):
I just searched your commercial for your Grease trip. That's
actually what I'm busting in for today.

Speaker 1 (27:21):
I'm so excited.

Speaker 6 (27:22):
Is this your first trip with Cruising Tour?

Speaker 4 (27:24):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (27:25):
I thought you could say this is my first trip tour.

Speaker 1 (27:28):
This is my first trip.

Speaker 2 (27:29):
I finally get to get out of town and I'm
going to go see the world for the first time
my entire life.

Speaker 1 (27:33):
Big fat liar. I'm asking and Tour maybe having has.

Speaker 6 (27:37):
Been on two trips with Cruise and Tour already, is
this your first one? Yes, you are going to absolutely
love this trip.

Speaker 1 (27:46):
You're not going on We're going to Europe on the.

Speaker 6 (27:50):
Mandy Connell trip next at about about the same time.
But our second trip that we did with the Crusian
tour we've done ten with them now was to Greece,
and it's one of the few destinations. And don't get
me wrong, I have enjoyed all of them, I've loved them,
but it's one of the few destinations that I will.

Speaker 1 (28:04):
Go back to because it's just.

Speaker 6 (28:06):
The mix of ancient culture and beauty and incredible food.
It's just it is. Greece is magical and if people
are not signed up to go with you, they are
going to regret it because you're gonna come back and
you're gonna be like, holy crap, everybody should have gone
on this trip, but you're not going. I'm going on
this trip. No, no, I'm going to euro up at about

(28:27):
the same time on the Mandy Connell Adventure Mandy Connells
trip dot com.

Speaker 1 (28:30):
Just so you're not going to be on the same
side of the planet at the same time.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
I keep I'm just in this negative mood today, the
negative my god, you're on the same side of the
planet at the same time, and the absolutely gonna break god,
I don't die. I've never understood that phrase with a

(28:56):
brand new mood.

Speaker 6 (28:57):
You should you should be complaining about being hung but
you're such a nitpicker that you're complaining about the new
road that it's scratchy.

Speaker 3 (29:06):
I'm sorry you're learning about this now his personality.

Speaker 6 (29:10):
Okay, let me just say to the Michael Brown listeners,
even though Michael's going, you too should sign up.

Speaker 3 (29:17):
Okay, exactly where.

Speaker 6 (29:21):
Cruison Tour is absolutely amazing. You're going to be blown away.

Speaker 2 (29:25):
I talk in the spots about how my audience and
I have fun together on air, so let's go have
some fun together on this trip.

Speaker 6 (29:33):
The cruising tour takes care of everything's first class. It
is like the easiest best vacation. And I love working
with them. I will continue working with them until they
don't want to work with me anymore because their trips
are amazing.

Speaker 1 (29:45):
Are you starting to reach that point?

Speaker 6 (29:47):
And no, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (29:48):
You never know, Michael.

Speaker 6 (29:49):
I mean, you'd like to think people still like you,
but we both know sometimes things go in a different direction.

Speaker 1 (29:56):
That's all. People don't like me. I'm shocked.

Speaker 6 (29:58):
Well, I mean, Michael, just do my affirmation. I'm not
for everyone. I'm not for everyone, and it's okay.

Speaker 2 (30:05):
It is absolutely okay. What I don't get is the
with with the change, how some people just you know,
because we we affectionately call our audience goobers, right, and
they've all acclimated to it, and they love and they
think it's funny and anything bought merchandise has goobers on it.
But somebody today went ballistic and they're filing a complaint

(30:26):
with the FCC about the fact that I call the
audience boubers.

Speaker 6 (30:30):
Wait until they find out about Mandy Lorian's And you know,
I named Ross's audience the dirty leggers. Yeah, but they
didn't name themselves. My audience named themselves.

Speaker 2 (30:41):
I tried to avoid the whole dirty legs syndrome that's
my head now every time I take a shower, Well,
I just rolled my legs even more.

Speaker 6 (30:49):
So exactly because you're like, I'm not being like Crome.

Speaker 1 (30:51):
No, I'm not gonna do that. I'm not gonna do it.
What you got today, I.

Speaker 6 (30:54):
Got weather Wednesday, I got Bell and Pollock coming in
for an hour of ask the attorneys. And I find
this fascinating. I love hearing about people's problems, like I
love hearing about the weird stuff, the weird legal.

Speaker 1 (31:05):
Questions that people call in with.

Speaker 6 (31:06):
I find it fascinating I've always thought it was interesting
to find out about other people's problems.

Speaker 2 (31:11):
I always enjoyed when when a new client would come
in and the gatekeeper would try to find out, you know,
what's your kate, what are you thinking about? And they
would never tell the gatekeeper the truth. And they come
in and they sit down, and then suddenly you get
the truth about what it's like. You had to learn
to keep a poker face, right, so you didn't You
weren't looking at the potential new client like you gotta
be a hurting me, and you're also calculating. Oh and

(31:35):
my retainer just tripled.

Speaker 1 (31:37):
Yeah, all right, let's wrap this up, Michael, wrap it up.
I'm done.