11-22-24 - 6am - Resisting Mass Deportation and Jussie Smollett

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Michael's kind of interesting.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
I see a couple of connections between two divergent stories
from yesterday. One people moving from Texas to Colorado and autism.
I've known several people in law enforcement, fire service, and
teachers that have moved to work in those industries in

(00:22):
Colorado because the educational system in Colorado provides better services
for autism.

Speaker 3 (00:34):
So people are moving from Texas to Colorado, primarily in
first responder positions, because we do better treatment at boltistic
kids than Texas does.

Speaker 1 (00:49):
That's the way I understand that.

Speaker 3 (00:50):
Talk back, Okay, all right, Well send me some data
on that and I'll take a gander at it. I'll
take a gander at it. So last night, I'm uh
or not last night, I guess it was yesterday afternoon sometime.
I'm I'm doing you know, my pretty standard uh show prep,

(01:13):
and I'm putting around, and you know, I'm I'm on
X and then I'm over on different websites and I'm
going through my uh saved websites that I look at,
you know, the the my favorites.

Speaker 1 (01:24):
And pornhub huh, you know porn hub.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
And porn Hub. Yeah, And and I'm checking to see
how my account's doing on my only fans page to
see if I really need to come into work today
or not. And obviously I'm not doing too well, so
I sighed, but I probably should come into work, right.
You know, we need we need a tip jar dragon,
like on the website. We need a tip jar where.

(01:47):
And I don't mean like you know, quit picking your
nose on air. That not that kind of tip. I mean,
like you know, moolah, you know, wamp them, wamp them
money where people can leave us tips. You know, why
why didn't we know, let's be innovative.

Speaker 4 (02:04):
That's why they buy the merch from. Michael says, go
here dot com and that that little section there Michael's merch.

Speaker 3 (02:11):
I think you suck to Dominic about that, because you know,
I thought I was going to retire on the merch.
Ask me how much I've seen from the merch.

Speaker 1 (02:21):
It goes into a holding account. So who knows?

Speaker 3 (02:24):
What is that? What Dominic told you?

Speaker 4 (02:27):
It's just sitting there waiting.

Speaker 3 (02:30):
Dom tells you it goes into.

Speaker 1 (02:31):
A holy account. Request.

Speaker 3 (02:33):
Yes, that holding account is in his pocket. That is
where that is. Yeah, that's where it is.

Speaker 1 (02:38):
It's safe and sound, I'm sure.

Speaker 3 (02:40):
Oh, whatever. So I'm I'm puttsing around and I come
across a tweet, a post whatever you call it now
from our favorite reporter in Denver, Kyle Clark, And well,
here's here's the post quite the statement from Denver mayor

(03:01):
at Mike Johnston Colorado that Denver police and citizens would
physically block a mass deportation by federal forces. And there's
a link to a Denver Right story. So I immediately
click on the Denver Right story to go over and
read it. And I noticed that, oh, there's an interview here.

(03:21):
Let's listen to the interview. So I rapidly, you know,
at four time speed, listen to the fifteen minute interview
posted over at Denveright dot com. And there's nothing in there.
I come in this morning once again I'm telling Dragon
about the story. And because because Dragon comes in and

(03:44):
I'm I'm you know, well, here you can take a
listen to what I'm doing. I'm literally doing this this morning.
You're building trust with the police department.

Speaker 1 (03:52):
Denver Writ's Kyle Harris recently sat down with him.

Speaker 4 (03:55):
What are you doing for every day with downtowning focused
right now is on the and the most expensive ballot
is really focused.

Speaker 3 (04:05):
So I'm going through this what turns out to be
about a seventeen minute interview about three four seconds at
a time. See if I can just find some keywords,
some subjects that would where I could play for you
today on air. The mayor of Denver, Colorado, Mike Johnston,

(04:25):
saying this because it's not in the audio recording, but
it is in the story. It's in a subhead. Johnston
is proud of how the city has handled immigration. By
the way, we just recently had another gang member rape
and kill somebody in Denver. But hey, nothing to see there.

(04:47):
Here's the story. According to Denveright, a key part of
the city's strategy has been to help people navigate the world,
I'm sorry, navigate the work authorization system allowing or new
immigrants to work legally. But Trump has said he plans
to take away work authorization from people who illegally enter

(05:09):
the country. Blocking new immigrants from the right to work
could quote cripple the American economy close quote, Johnston said.
Without work authorization, Johnston said people would have to rely
on public support to get by. Now before iguent any
further in the story, yes, people get that get temporary

(05:33):
protected status, which is ostensibly a very limited group of
people from Cuba, Venezuela, and Haiti. But then on other
stories I read that they've actually expanded and provided a
new app which apparently isn't working very well, that allows

(05:54):
you to avoid a face to face encounter whatsoever with anybody,
and in I guess, just randomly, I don't know what
the algorithm does, but grants temporary protecting status to other
illegal aliens that allows them to get work permits. So now,
if all of these people are getting work permits, then
why are we spending all this money to house them,

(06:16):
to feed them, to clothe them, to provide medical services.
Why are we doing any of that? I mean, this
is just this whole immigration thing gets stupider and stupider
and stupider by the day. Now, let's go back to
the story. If quoting from Denveright, if Trump does block

(06:40):
people's right to work, Johnston plans to explore the possibilities
for creating both city and state work authorizations beyond the
federal program. Whether that's possible is legally uncertain. I would
say that based on federal law, particularly in the area
of immigration and superseding state and local laws. That's the

(07:03):
hill that you're just you don't want to fight that battle, Mayor,
because you're gonna lose it, and you're gonna lose that
battle having spent thousands, if not millions of dollars in
legal fees for something that any first year law student
that has studied constitutional law at all is going to
tell you, Hey, immigration is a policy that's within the

(07:24):
purview of the federal government. For example, that's why you
get money from NGOs. They get money from the federal
taxpayers to help you support the programs that you provide
all these services to these illegal aliens. Now, if you
want to go out and raise your own money, well
go do that, because well, I guess technically I do
work in Denver, and if I do work in Denver,

(07:47):
even though I think I get withheld, I don't know
twenty five one hundred bucks whatever it is every year
in Denver income taxes, which I never go back and
try to refund because it's just not worth my time.
I will come and get it after that. But then
the story continues. Johnston said, quote, it's far more expensive

(08:07):
and far worse for our communities to have people out
on the streets begging for money or looking for public support.
They're hard working and they want to be able to
pay for themselves. What a kroc of malarkey. Now, I'm
not saying that every individual wants to go out there
and find a job and pay for themselves and make

(08:29):
their own way. And I'm not saying that every individual
out there doesn't want to do that. I'm sure there's
a mixture of some people who come here who do
want to work, and then there's a whole bunch of
people that come here that don't want to work. There's
no incentive to work because you're being handed everything. Then
there's a subhead. What if Trump asks Denver police to

(08:51):
participate in immigration enforcement? Johnston said, quote absolutely not, we
won't do it. Story continues that the vast majority of
law enforcement is local, Johnston is doubtful. They write that
federal forces would raid Colorado to round up immigrants even

(09:13):
if Trump tried to mount a national crackdown. Johnson is
then quoted in the Denver Right story as saying this,
I do not believe that our governor is going to
let them use our Colorado National Guard at the state level,
unless they were planning on bringing national guards mobilized from
Texas or Alabama to come invade Colorado. I don't know

(09:36):
where they would find the forces to begin.

Speaker 1 (09:39):
To do that.

Speaker 3 (09:41):
Well, what he doesn't understand is that the president can
mobilize the national Guard and take them under federal jurisdiction
and then deploy them to do whatever damn well pleases.
Why do you think you have national Guard that we're
all operating in Iraq, or operating in Afghanistan, or operating

(10:03):
in Syria because they've been federalized. My god, thiss Mayor
is a dumbass, he continues quote. And that seems to
me like a very very bad idea from start to finish,
that no reasonable American would support. Well, may Or, I

(10:24):
consider myself to be a very reasonable American, and I
would support it. And in fact, I think that there
is a moral, if not legal, obligation that if Customs
and Border Patrol, Immigrations and Customs enforcement, or a federalized
national Guard decides to as you use the word, invade Colorado,

(10:47):
if they decide to move into Colorado to seek out
criminal illegal aliens, or for that matter, I don't care,
just illegal aliens and to port them.

Speaker 5 (10:57):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (10:58):
I think that's a very good idea, and I would
support that, as you say, from start to finish. Yes,
And I think a lot of people in this audience
would too. I don't think you read the room properly.
I don't think you're paying I think you're so blinded
by your progressive Marxist policies that you really don't have
a clue what's going on out there in the real world. Now,

(11:21):
this is quoting denveright, not the mayor Denver, Wright says.
The mayor also takes heart that the people of Denver,
not just the administration, would likely resist a mass deportation
effort from federal forces. Then they go back to quoting
the mayor. Johnston said, and I quote more than us

(11:44):
having Denver Police Department stationed at the county line to
keep them out. Pause insert life track here, Denver Police Department.
Remember yesterday we had the breaking news. I mean, I'm
still trying, I truly am still trying to get my

(12:05):
head around this, but we had the story yesterday. In fact,
he does mention this in the interview, that they have
this program where they send cops to certain areas and
then they have another area that they study at the
same time during the same time period where they don't
send cops, which is another high crime area, and the
place where they send the cops crime tends to go down,

(12:28):
where the place where they don't send the cops crime
remains the same or goes up. Wow, I got to
tell you this guy is some sort of genius. This
guy is the Einstein Meyers. But back to the quote,
more than us having Denver Police Department stationed at the
county line to keep them out, you would have fifty

(12:50):
thousand Denver ights there. It's like the Tieneman Square moment
with the rose and the gun. Right. You know, every
time you finish a declarative sentence with the question mark
and the word right, are you looking for validation? Are
you looking for the interviewer to agree with you? Do

(13:10):
you realize how stupid of a statement you just made
and you're trying to cover it up by right right?
It's like the Tienman Square moment with the rose in
the gun right. He continues, you'd have every one of
those Highland moms who came out for the migrants, and
you do not want to mess with them. Now, I

(13:33):
want to draw a picture in your mind for you
for just a moment. Now, I'm not saying that this
is an extreme that you might call this a Jackson
Pollock painting of what I want to picture in your mind.
I want to picture in your mind some armored personnel
carriers they're called APC's, and the APCs go rolling down

(13:56):
Federal Boulevard and the APC's open up an out jump
men in in their in their combat fatigues. There. They've
got full body armor on, they're they're carrying hand grenades.
Some they all have automatic weapons. They all have a
side arm they might have night vision goggles depending on

(14:19):
the time of day. They well, they might have night
vision goggles anyway, but they might be up on their helmet. Uh.
And they are they're jumping out, and there's a bunch
of hourrah going on, and they they and they all
are ordered to, you know, line up, and they all
get in line and they start marching down Federal Boulevard.
How many of these so called island moms are going

(14:43):
to come out in their little pink bunny slippers, in
their bathrobe, their hair up and curls, and they got
the what do you say, they got a rolling pin dragons?
They go, yeah, they got a rolling pin. Maybe they
got a fly swater, you know, you know, spank the
kids with.

Speaker 4 (14:59):
Well, they've got one slipper on their foot and the
other slipper in their hand ready to give a good whack.

Speaker 3 (15:04):
Well, and I disagree with all of that because I
think these are Highland moms. I think they come out
in uh a lingerie, you know, a really nice lingerie.
They've got slippers. You know, they're not bunny slippers, if
they're they're really nice Gucci's slippers. And they have a
really nice glass of Chardenay in one hand.

Speaker 4 (15:24):
You've been watching your porn Hub collection far too much,
your show prep from yesterday.

Speaker 3 (15:29):
And they they've got a glass of Chardenay and they're
just like boys. What do you think you're doing now? Interestingly,
not all the boys or boys, because in our military
we put women in combat, so there might be some
women in there, so we need some We need some
you know, meta male, We need some low tea mails

(15:53):
in that line with the women also, And and they'll
have a glass of Salvion Blanc and and they'll have
their robes on, you like a Hugh Hefter like robe,
and they'll have some slippers and they'll and they'll be
like boys, boys, come on, back off. We don't want
to have any tussle. We don't want to have any

(16:13):
tussles here. I heard the word tussle somewhere in the
SoundBite I was looking for you yesterday. Tussle. We don't
have any tussles here. Now that the paper continues, Johnston
does not assume all of Trump's campaign promises will pan out.
He hopes Congress and the Supreme Court will create some
checks and balances, even as all the branches of the
federal government under republic and control. Man, this guy's this

(16:35):
guy is a uh just totally brilliant. Uh Now, so
he wants to he thinks that And by the way,
isn't that an insurrection? And would they be blocking Federal
Boulevard or colfax and and you know, and actually some

(16:56):
of the women on Kofax might figure out, Hey, I
just discovered the way to make a little extra cut,
you know, a few extra dollars while I'm out here.
So you got all that going on? Is that not
what we refer to as an insurrection?

Speaker 5 (17:12):
And is that not.

Speaker 3 (17:15):
I mean, you want to you want to engage in
battle with the United States Army, the United States Marine,
the Navy seals. I don't know. Maybe we got a
couple of F sixteens flying over to I don't know,
the La Fachi helicopters bring over the women blowing the
chardonnay out of their hands. Mike Johnson, the idiot mayor

(17:38):
of the.

Speaker 5 (17:38):
Binning Michael and Dragon. What is up with that new
Jaguar commercial. Of the six people that are in it,
two of them have reddish turnament tops that look pretty
much the same, but their outfits are the same color.
Another two are wearing yellow outfits of the same color,
and then the last two one has a darker red

(18:00):
outfit and one has the light pink outfits. Yet the
last line is copying nothing. These people look very similar
to me.

Speaker 3 (18:11):
Yeah, I saw all the hooplaw yesterday about the Jaguar
Jaguar commercial. Can I just tell you, I just I
just don't care. I think it's another example I say
I don't care, Then I'll tell you why I don't care.
It's just another example of the whether it's automobile industry

(18:33):
or any other industry, wanting to go after a different demographic.
And I don't think the demographic is necessarily an age demographic,
like the coveted you know, twenty five fifty four, which
is what you know everybody in media wants. We all
went to twenty five to fifty four, and I always

(18:55):
found that fascinating because I really want the eighteen to eight.
That's that's the demographic dot that I go after.

Speaker 4 (19:03):
Uh and we actually everybody that spends money, yeah, and
and and spends money.

Speaker 3 (19:09):
And what I find interesting is there is there there's
trillions of dollars, trillions of dollars in wealth, and people
who have either built up equity or have paid off
their mortgages or whatever, but they have equity in their homes.
Which is why I'm more than happy to do the
American financing spots so that you can tap into some

(19:31):
of that wealth. But the people who have wealth in
this country are the baby boomers. And I don't think
that Jaguar is a Now some people would be offended
by this, But if you're going to be offended, then

(19:52):
you're listening to the wrong program, because that's what I
tend to do. I don't like jaguars that they have,
They have a bad reputation, they have cleaned up their act.
They're they're probably a lot better performing and engineered car
than they were in the past. But it's just not
my cup of tea. But so so I'm just not

(20:16):
you're not gonna grab me to buy a car based
on that. So that tells me that Jaguar is a
woke corporation that's going after again, not an age demographic,
but a woke demographic, a demographic that's attracted to shiny objects,
a demographic that is attracted to Oh look, there's a

(20:38):
guy wearing pom poms on his around his ankles, so
they're red pom bombs. See I have seen the commercial,
so there. Oh look, So I think I think I'll
go buy a I think I'll go buy a Jaguar.
I have no idea what a Jaguar is is.

Speaker 1 (20:51):
Is it?

Speaker 3 (20:51):
Can you actually get one and keep it as a pet?
Is that what it is? Because that'd be kind of cool,
wouldn't it. Have a Jaguar at home, take your Jaguar
to the dog bark. Yeah, they'll draw some attention. So
now I've spent way more time on it than I
expected to because I.

Speaker 1 (21:05):
Just don't they can afford it. They'll just put it
on a credit card.

Speaker 3 (21:08):
Yeah, and they'll just put on the credit card. I
just don't care about it. I want to talk about
Jesse Smollette for a moment because I tweeted or posted again.
I can't get rid of the word tweeted. I tweeted
yesterday something to the effects. I could go look it
up and read it to you, but I but again,
I don't care. Unpopular opinion. I agree with the Illinois

(21:32):
Supreme Court. Your anger should not be directed toward Jesse Smollett.
Jesse Smollett still did the things that he did, and
we still know what he did, and we still know
that what he did was a crime, and then it
costs resources, and the Chicago PD was spent too much time,

(21:54):
you know, investigating that. And in fact, the Chicago PD
knew almost instantaneously that was probably a hoax. Because what
black person gets attacked has a noose put around their neck,
a so called noose, and then doesn't take it off.
Studies show that people who are victims of hate crimes

(22:18):
or who have some sort of artifacts about a hate
crime that psychologically, one of the very first things they
do is they rid themselves of that artifact because it
is so repulsive to them. And a noose. I mean,
if we've got a noose at a NASCAR or what
suppose he looks like a noose and everybody goes ballistical

(22:39):
and they immediately take it down. You think a black
guy's going to walk around in his own apartment with
a noose around and then claim that he forgot about it. No,
it's all bull crap. So Jesse similette is in the
layman's mind, including my side of the brain. It's not
a lawyer brain. He's guilty of the crimes that he

(23:00):
was charged with. Here's who you should really be mad about.
You should be mad at Kim Fox and the State
of Illinois, and not the Supreme Court. The Illinois Supreme
Court did exactly the right thing. The Constitution of the
United States of America. Excuse me, I got a frog

(23:24):
of mind, I got a jaguar in my throat. No
person shall be subject, for the same offense to be
twice put in jeopardy of life or limb. The double
jeopardy clause prohibits the government from repeatedly trying to convince
to convict someone for the same crime, and it also

(23:45):
protects the finality of a judgment. So once that judgment
is entered, you can't be tried for that crime again.
But here's what happened. Kim Fox, the SORO supported district
attorney outgoing district attorney, and he cooked count entered into
a plea agreement. A I'm going to use the Latin

(24:07):
phrase no loo contendre. No low contendery means that Jesse
Smilette did not contest the veracity or the validity of
the charges. He just pleaded no contest. It's treated and
the judge will say, you're pleading no contest, But for
purposes of this plea agreement, I'm treating that as a

(24:29):
guilty plea. So he pled guilty even though he said
no low contend or, as lawyer said, he pled guilty
to the charges. In exchange for that guilty plea, he
forfeited his ten thousand dollars bond and agreed to what
was it, fifty days or five days or x number
of days in jail, whatever that was doesn't make any difference.

(24:54):
So now he's a convicted criminal. Later and I forget
whether it's a special prosecutor or the attorney general decide that.
Wait a minute, I don't like that plea deal. I'm
going to come in and I'm going to charge him
on the same set of facts for the same crimes

(25:17):
plus some additional crimes. But the additional crimes are based
on the same set of facts. You can't do that.
It's unconstitutional, it's double jeopardy. It's in the Fifth Amendment
to the US Constitution. So the Illinois Supreme Court very
carefully said, without regard to anything that occurred at the

(25:43):
trial level, without commenting at all about the facts of
the case, we are solely and technically overturning this conviction
because you tried him for the same crime twice. And
that is expressly Every first year law student knows this.

(26:06):
So if you want to be pissed off about the
Jesse Smolet case, don't be pissed off at the Illinois
Supreme Court. They did exactly what we expect them to do.
They took the actual wording of the US Constitution, applied
it to these facts, and said, you can't do that.
The people you ought to really be pissed off at

(26:26):
is the Cook County and the State of Illinois Attorney
General's office. They knew better, but yet they did it,
and in fact, if you want to put on a
tenfoil hat, you might even say that they did it,
knowing that eventually you will be overturned. Because there's not
a prosecutor in the country that doesn't know that you

(26:46):
can't try someone twice for the same offense. It's I mean,
it is literally. It's literally. Whether it's in constitutional law
class or it's in your criminal law or criminal procedure class,
it is one of the very first things that you learn.
It's a basic tenet of the rule of law in
this country. So everybody's all appleplectick, and everybody's in fact.

(27:09):
People at mere on X last night when I said
this may be an unpopular opinion, but these are the facts,
some people just came right at me. But he's still guilty,
and he's still blah blah. No, he's no longer guilty.
The conviction was overturned, but the court said, we're not
commenting or ruling on any of the factual issues in

(27:32):
this case. We're only ruling on the procedure and you
can't try someone twice for the same offense. Double Jeopardy
attached the moment that Kim Fox entered into that sweetheart
plea deal. She knew it, and the Attorney General knew it,
or the special prosecutor knew it. They all knew it
and they did it anyway. So don't be pissed off

(27:54):
at the Illinois Supreme Court and don't feed me this.
I had somebody on X say, well, you know in
Illinois they got they bought off that Supreme Court. No
they did not. Well maybe they had, but in this
case it had nothing to do with that whatsoever. This
is what drives me crazy about the lack of critical
thinking in this country. Just because you're pissed off of

(28:15):
Jesse small Att. Look, I'm pissed off of Jesse small Ott.
I think he's a dirt bag. I think the Chicago
PD had a hell of a lot more important things
to do than to deal with a hate hoax. And
whether you think hate hoaxes are good or bad or
you're indifferent to them, hate hoaxes mean that the next
time if something really did, like something like this really

(28:36):
did happen, what are we all gonna think. We're gonna think, oh,
it's just another hate hoax like Jesse Smilett. So he
hurt the integrity of the judicial system, and Kim Fox
and the DA in the prosecutor's office gave all das
everywhere a bad name because they entered into a sweetheart
pea deal. And then somebody else came along and said, Oh,

(28:57):
I think I don't think that was strict enough. I'm
going to indicte you and try you again. How would
you like to be in that position, whether you whether
you're guilty or innocent, How would you like to be
found guilty or you even agreed to pleat guilty or
even no contest. And then the state says, yeah, but
you know what, We're going to come after you again
and then again and again and again. Oh it drives me,

(29:24):
Baddy that people cannot and look here all emotional about it,
but people can't separate their emotions from the facts. They
can't separate their emotions from what the law says. And
they and everybody just glombs on and thinks, Oh, it's Illinois,
so it's it was all corrupt. It may or may

(29:46):
not have been corrupt, But don't blame the Illinois Supreme Court.
Anytime I find a court that is willing to follow
the constitution and actually enforce the constitution, I stand up
and seeing the Hellelujah.

Speaker 4 (30:00):
The first rule of owning a Jaguar is to always
buy two, one to drive and one for the shop.

Speaker 3 (30:09):
I wonder real quickly, as I don't know much time here,
I want to go to remember. Guess we talked about
on a thought experiment about a link between vaccines and autism,
and then we had the talk back this morning about
the story regarding thirty two thousand people moving from Texas
to here, and the talkback left the messenger left to

(30:32):
talk back that said there may be because of the
services provided for autistic kids. Well, I got an email
which I think is from the same person who happens
to be a licensed psychologist listens to us down in Texas.
I don't want to give away any so I don't
want to use any names or anything here, but listen
to this email. Thing is fascinating. So I had a

(30:53):
child of the firefighter who is frustrated with autism services
in the local Texas public schools. Firefighters or a brotherhood.
They're well connected and talking among themselves across the country.
That's true. This guy did his research and his buddies
in Colorado were saying, Hey, I got to give autism
and these are all the services that I get in Colorado.
So this firefighter found a job in Colorado and moved

(31:14):
his family there. I've also known a police officer who
was considering the same, but I never found out if
he actually made the move. Likewise, I know an educator.
So it may only be three of the thirty two
thousand and these cap but these cases actually occurred prior
to COVID. Another thing I thought about the whole moving
to Colorado from Texas issue is what one of your

(31:34):
talk back suggested yesterday. That is that liberals, who are
probably those who moved from California to Texas, decided they
couldn't take any more in Texas and left our state.
And of course they came to California Junior California like,
which is really not California like anymore. We're just California
times two Colorado. And then another thing I just sort

(31:57):
of wondered, since Texas and California have the highest number
of people moving to Colorado on par with a number
of illegal immigrants moving to Colorado, I wonder how many
of those illegal immigrants actually had legal resident family members
who live in Texas and California chose to move to
Colorado's they can all live together. It's just the thought.
And then he writes this about I may not have

(32:18):
time to finish this, but now this is a psychologist,
a licensed psychologist, got PhD down in Texas listening to us.
Let me just start this because this goes back to
the to the autism thought experiment from yesterday. This is
fascinating to me on the autism issue. I appreciate you

(32:39):
bringing up and pointing to websites where they have vetted
research and public data. I've worked with people with autism
for decades now, and I've tried to be reasonable about
the vaccine thing. There's a lot of theories about how
people with developmental disabilities have been found also to have
compromised immune systems because some of the things we think

(33:00):
occur history in utero have an impact on both the
immune system and the parts of the brain that impact
learning and social interaction. And while some large studies show
that there is no correlation between vaccines, vaccines and autism,
they're not willing to do the research or hide it

(33:21):
to drill down into the data about families at risk
for autism and whether they should take vaccines in a
different manner. For example, when you have a compromised immune
system or propensity for autism or any autoimmune response in
your family, something, it might be smarter to take vaccines
out at a time and not over challenge the immune

(33:44):
system with multiple vaccines all at one time. And but
he goes on to point out that he has five children,
they've all been vaccinated to That's the point I was
trying to make yesterday. Thank you. It's always nice to
have a little confirmation