11-4-25 - 9am - Steele 'BS', Arctic Frost & Whoopi

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Only four more shows left until Michael Danger Brown and
Dragon Redbeard get kicked across the hall and do the
pregame show for me.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
Andy Connell, who.

Speaker 3 (00:15):
The blonde lady, that blonde chick, blond lady across the hall. Well,
we'll be the blonde lady. We're proceeding.

Speaker 4 (00:22):
Oh okay, Well that's too bad. Well, at least we
do show prep for that. You know, we can do
that make her life simple.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
Well, she already listens to this show, so I.

Speaker 4 (00:37):
Know it's hilarious and and and not out of disrespect
to anybody on anywhere, I just don't listen to talk
radio and just don't listen.

Speaker 2 (00:48):
To me neither.

Speaker 4 (00:49):
I know. So a former remember the Director of National Intelligence,
Tulci Gabbard's all is at something called the something Let's
see some school of policy and government seminar, and John Brennan,

(01:13):
the former Director CIA, is present, and the guy goes
through all his bona fides to try to explain that
I have legitimacy in asking this question because I was there,
I participated, I know what was going on, and I
know what was fake. Well, well, you know he's established

(01:36):
the bonafides. Now let's get to the answer.

Speaker 2 (01:40):
Vacation was for supporting the dossier.

Speaker 4 (01:44):
The second one, oh yeah, he goes ballistic bsbsbs. Then
he starts touching his face, which, if you understand body language,
is a clear sign of deception. And then he starts

(02:05):
squirming in his seat, moving around as that former DNI
officer is laying out his question, and of course, in
classic lying leftist fashion, he refuses to address the question,
resorts to name calling, call you know, just the moderators,
desperately trying to shut down the questioner. Then he gets

(02:28):
questioned by one of the attendees in a DC subway
station and he's asked to provide a clear answer about
the Steel dossier question. Brennan again refuses to directly answer,
and then he simply shuts down as he pretends to
check the emails on his phone, doesn't look just walks away.

(02:48):
He gets caught again, and this time he starts assaulting
somebody what appears to be a cocktail hour for this
same seminar that he was asked that he was at. Here,
he's asked about the Biden laptop, noting that it had
all the harrormarks. Remember he said it had all the
hallmarks of a Russian intelligence operation, and we know that

(03:11):
claim was a lie and it was a clear effort
to influence the twenty twenty election in favor of Joe Biden.
We know that is one hundred percent certainty today. The
simple truth is this that John Brennan, this guy who
screams bull crap sub uses the word, working with Jim

(03:33):
Comy on orders from Barack Obama. We now know they
led the efforts to try to rig the twenty sixteen
election and that failed. He then tried and participated in
an effort to rig the twenty twenty election, which, in
the minds of some people, succeeded. I'll leave that for
you to decide whether he gets succeeded or not. And

(03:56):
now he's actually in the verge of face some harsh
consequences for all of those and some other actions designed
to destroy this republic. It is actually wonderful for me
to see that piece of pos garbage Shuman just beginning

(04:18):
to panic in public because the American justice system is
beginning to close in around him. The dar at All
character on Homeland. If you haven't seen Homeland, it's really
worth watching. That series was largely based on Brennan himself.
He ended up serving time in federal prison for his crimes,

(04:41):
and that might well turn out to have been a
bit of unwitning foreshadowing by the show's writers at the time.
Wouldn't that be glorious to be wonderful? But we've got
to remember that all of that takes time, and for
someone to have that kind of visceral reaction to something,

(05:06):
you know, they've been cut, absolutely been cut. Now let's
take that and just think about what you just heard,
and let's think about Operation Arctic Frost. What is obvious
from the limited information that I'm going to give you

(05:28):
are the allegations that led to the opening of Arctic
Frost and the allegations at the end of the indictment
of Trump in the in the DC District Court, a
significant portion of which that indictment was later thrown out
on this by the Supreme Court on grounds of presidential
immunity for acts that were within his scope during doing

(05:51):
his official duties. But that indictment named only Trump as
a defendant. We forget that there were six individuals referred
to as unindicted co conspirators who were not charged. Could
that be the first clue as to what this was

(06:11):
all about. From the very start, you have seven co conspirators,
but only one was running to be the next president.
November fifteenth, twenty twenty two, Trump announced his intention to
seek the nomination in the twenty twenty four election cycle. Now,

(06:33):
months before that announcement, political appointees in the Department of
Justice and the anti Trump leadership officials inside the FBI
had already started the process to undermine even the possibility
that Trump could even seek the presidency Again, they didn't.
They wanted to stop him from even seeking the presidency.

(06:55):
There are three documents now released to you and me
released to the public that set forth what the FBI
says was was the was their predicate, the predication for
opening a full investigation. One in March twenty two, twenty
twenty two, FBI electronic communication. Will you call it an

(07:19):
email requesting authorization from FBI leadership to open a full investigation.
They wanted to call it Arctic Frost. The second document
an FBI letterhead memo from then FBI Director Christopher Ray
to the Attorney General Merrick Garland, asking for Garland's approval

(07:41):
to open based on that previous email to open this
full investigation called Arctic Frost. And then you had the
third document again, an FBI electric electronic communication dated April thirteen.
Now I remember this start in March twenty two. By
April thirteen they have an FBI electronic communication formally noting

(08:06):
the approval to open Arctic Frost as a full investigation.
Now I keep saying full investigation. What does that mean?
It means the agents are authorized to use any lawful
means available to them to develop the evidence of the
now truly suspected criminal activity, including administrative warrants, grand jury subpoenas,

(08:27):
search warrants, everything that you could possibly imagine a real
cop doing in the field trying to prove his case. Now,
last April, Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee,
sent a letter to Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, and
to the FBI Director Cash Bettel. He wanted them delivered

(08:49):
to the committee all all DOG and DJ and FBI
records in the Arctic Frost investigation. One attached to that
letter was that February twenty second email Sam prior to
this is prior to the investigation being approved. It went

(09:09):
from the FBI Washington Field office to FBI Headquarters. Thank
you for the update on Blank, and thank you. It's
good to get out of the call. On another note,
I am working to get DOJ, DOJ and FBI headquarters
to gain approval to open a case on a Trump
campaign for conspiring to defraud the US government via the

(09:33):
elector scheme. This case will be worked by Blank, and
I've assigned Blank. Before I left, I asked Jamie if
she would be up for working the case with Michelle
when she gets to fifteen. When she gets to a
GS fifteen level, which she was agreeable to. Her background
as an assistant US attorney will be particularly helpful. I

(09:54):
don't expect the case will be up and running for
a couple of weeks. However, Jamie and BB required to
participate in some limited meetings with prosecutors. They're waiting for
her to get her promotion before she gets to be
a part of the investigation. We'll still look to you
and Jamie to determine the appropriate time for her to
move over now. The author of that email is an important, malignant,

(10:16):
malign actor in this entire investigation. From Time Magazine in
August of twenty twenty two, shortly after this guy sent
the email and shortly after he subsequently retired. Time magazine

(10:36):
says Republican lawmakers have expressed alarm at Grassley's allegations that
thebal This is the Guy displayed political partisnership on social
media in his handling of cases. On Long As four,
Senator John Kennedy, a republic from Louisiana, asked Christopher Ray
if he was aware of numerous social media posts that
theeball allegedly made that criticized the Trump administration. Ray said

(10:59):
he had seen quote descriptions of that effect. Ray added
that when he read letters describing thee Balt's alleged social
media posts, he says he didn't found it treaply, deeply
troubling all. According to Time Magazine, Ray says, this about
this investigator, what you're describing is not representative of the
FBI that I see up close every day in this country.

(11:22):
I feel very strongly, and I have communicated consistently since
I started as director, that our folks need to make
sure that they're not just doing the right thing, they're
doing it in the right way, and that the avoid
even the appearance of bias or lack of objectivity. Well,
it doesn't take a lot of time or effort to

(11:43):
search out the social media posts made by that FBI
employee that led to those senators' complaints in the summer
of twenty twenty two, because he was already under scrutiny
at that time for reasons that are completely unrelated to
his being the ostensible leader, I would say, in the
FBI that was pursuing this Arctic frost investigation. His partisan

(12:05):
political comments on social media expressing an extreme anti Trump
hostility first came the light as part of his of
the examination of his role in guess what hiding the
investigation of Hunter Biden as all those whistleblowers were testifying

(12:25):
to Congress. So now that same guy is now involved
in initiating the Arctic frost investigation. But that was unknown
because the existence of Arctic frost was unknown and being
kept a secret. Now it is generally not the case
that an FBI assistant Special Agent in charge ever gets

(12:49):
involved at the start of even attempting to get an
investigation open. Those efforts in that regard normally percolate upwards
with squatting agents with analysts that are in the field
uncovering information that they believe warrants further examination, and then
they put together the request for supervisors, including then the

(13:13):
assistant Special Agent in charge, to then authorize an opening investigation. Now,
I will say that might be what happened here, but
given what we know about this agent's overt anti Trump animus,
I think it's pretty easy to draw the conclusion that
he was the person that was initiating the effort. You know,

(13:34):
it didn't start in the field. It didn't start with evidence.
It actually started with we just want to get him,
so that's naming the person the criminal. Then you go
try to find the crime. That's what was going on
in Arctic frost. They had pre designated Trump. Remember you

(13:59):
got Trump and six other co conspirators that had been
approved to be under investigation. But it didn't start in
the field. It started with a guy at headquarters that
was already had was that we now know was hiding
the Hunter laptop, feeding the disinformation about the hunterd laptop,

(14:22):
and at the same time, was domb enough talk about
a dumbass, was dumb enough to go out there and
start posting on social media how much he hated Donald Trump.
There are all these documents you can find online all
the requests opened, the full investigation both all of the documents.

(14:45):
The initial documents simply referred to documents as fraudulent in faults,
but that doesn't make those documents fraudulent in faults. Now,
while you certainly want law enforcement to be pursuing suspected
criminal activity, the author of the documents that Grassley has
released employed the very slipery tactic of creating the appearance

(15:08):
of criminal activity by hanging the conclusions fraudulent or faults
in front of what were otherwise, on their face, at
least non criminal acts. The first FBI document that we
find as part of this process, is seeking to open
investigation had already come to the conclusion that fraud was

(15:31):
behind all of the efforts of the Trump campaign, the
Trump campaign officials, Trump himself, Trump DOJ officials, and other
officials the Republican Party seeking to simply find out the
truth about what happened in the twenty twenty election. So
then you have to ask where did the information about

(15:52):
the allegations in the original request open come from? That
eventually got to Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, because at
that point an official investigation has not yet been authorized.
So how did the people requesting the investigation come up
with the allegations that they set forth. Other than situations

(16:16):
where you know, say a witness walks in the door
and says, hey, let me tell you what I know.
The FBI relies on intelligence analysts to do what is
referred to as open source research. They actually just start
reading newspaper artist because they start watching television, They go
to websites, they start monitoring social media. They start doing
all of that sort of stuff just to see what
they can find. They literally sit at their computers and

(16:38):
comb through online sources of information. Yeah, that is how
CNN and The New York Times became sources for the
predicate to pursue criminal investigations. So go back to Brennan
and why he's so upset because he gets confronted with
the lie about the Steele dossier. How did the Steele dossia?

(17:00):
You get to the New York Times? Oh that's right,
James call me. Took that and leaked it to his
friend and said, hey, can you get this New York
Times for me? Holy cow, this is unraveling And I
know homies first, but why are we going after Brennan?
Why haven't we gone after Brendan yet? Do that, and

(17:23):
then I'll tell him that.

Speaker 5 (17:33):
Heard about the announcement you made about the changes for
both of you coming up. Are you non op or
pre op trans and do you think your voices will
change much after your transition. It'll be interesting to follow you,

(17:54):
guys and see what happens.

Speaker 4 (17:57):
That's a very good question. I can't speak for because
of hip hop requirements, but I'll just i'll you know,
I'll freely disclose. I've started my treatments already, so I'm I'm,
I'm I'm still pre apt, but I've started the different
blockers and the hormones and doing all of that. So
I'm i'm, I'M. I feel comfortable, and you know, I'm

(18:18):
i'm I'm going back to advanced hair getting my hair done,
and I'm I'm pretty excited about it. I'm not I'm
letting my feminine radio side show.

Speaker 3 (18:28):
I'm almost fully transitioning because I've been over there for years. So, yeah,
you're right, you don't have much left to do exactly. Yeah,
you just need to go ahead and whack it off.
You might as well just do that now and get
it done.

Speaker 2 (18:37):
They ain't shaving my legs. Are you gonna wash your legs? Almost? Definitely?

Speaker 4 (18:45):
Every welsfall. Now when I take a show, I can't
help but think about That's like, get that stupid picture
out of my head.

Speaker 3 (18:50):
It gets even weirder because yesterday Benjamin Albright was filling
in for Ross Kaminski, and we found out that Benjamin
alright and turns the water off while in the shower
to lather up. Yeah, why because apparently the soap needs

(19:12):
to marinate.

Speaker 2 (19:15):
Oh, make that makes sense.

Speaker 4 (19:17):
So it is Benjamin European and he doesn't use a
wash cloth.

Speaker 2 (19:22):
It's like from Kentucky or something.

Speaker 4 (19:24):
So he is European. He's from a foreign country. Yeah, Kentucky,
you're right. I didn't realize that because you know, in
Europe they don't.

Speaker 2 (19:30):
Have wash clarkingsas Arkansas.

Speaker 4 (19:33):
Yeah, Arkansas. Well that's that's the third world is just
as bad. Yeah, Kentucky at least has got you know, Derby,
that's about it. You say Kentucky or Tennessee. I don't
know he's from one of those. But seriously, Dick, is
you need to ask next time you see him, right,
you know, Benjamin, if you're listening, I want to know,
do you not use a washcloth? You lather up on

(19:55):
the wash cloth yourself. You get rid of the old
dead skin cells, and you know, you get some really
good you know, foo food smelling, you know, lathered up
and you know you smell.

Speaker 2 (20:04):
You know it's gonna be foo foo smell.

Speaker 4 (20:05):
Of course it's foo foo stuff. It's been. Who else
do we start making fun of?

Speaker 6 (20:10):
Boy?

Speaker 4 (20:11):
We gotta make fun of logan.

Speaker 3 (20:13):
But logan is so uh institutionalized is probably the wrong words.

Speaker 4 (20:18):
Then why the hell do you you think in fact,
because he hit such an institution, you think that's why
I won't go after him. That's exactly why I will
go after him.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
But he's a good guy.

Speaker 3 (20:31):
I think Benjamin's a good guy. I I don't. It's
fine we make fun of him and outfits.

Speaker 4 (20:37):
Don't tell any of the other. But even the blonde
chick I think is you know I actually kind of
like her. You can tell you a funny story about
the blonde chick. Sure, I told this air when she
first came to she was I think they've actually already
hired her. I'm not sure, but I think they've actually
hired her. This is not temper, This is pre temper.

(21:00):
I want to make sure everybody knows this. It wasn't tampering.
It wasn't Foster. It wasn't either one of those. It wasn't.
It was actually it was nobody that's currently in the
building and it's and it wasn't Foster. So it's nobody
that was in the building that used to be my
program director. So they called me and and and they said, hey, listen,
go go listen to this girl out of Kentucky and

(21:20):
see what you think. Okay, well, so yeah, well we
hired her. Okay, well, congratulations, that's good. We want you
to and we can't pay for it, of course they
can't pay for it, but we want you to take
it to lunch or dinner. Okay. Why, Well, we'd like

(21:41):
for Dura program a certain way, and so we'd like
for you to deliver that message for how to do
her program. So Mandy I go over to Oh Ted
Ted's Montana grill. We sit down for lunch, and you know,
we kind of already sort of kind of know each

(22:01):
other because you know, we've read about each other. And
I said down, and I said, before we order do anything,
let me explain to you why I'm here and what
I'm not going to do. I'm here to tell you
how to do your show, and I'm here to tell
you I'm not going to tell you how to do
your show.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
True.

Speaker 4 (22:16):
I mean he was insanity, utter insanity. And by the way,
I think I paid for that lunch. You tell that
blonde check that she owes me lunch. I'm pissed off
now I think about it. It was actually I was
actually laughing about Now I'm pissed off about it.

Speaker 3 (22:33):
On Monday, You're able to tell her exactly that she'll
come in right after you.

Speaker 4 (22:37):
Yeah, but then she'll say something on there and I
don't want to put up if I don't want to listen
to that crap. Uh.

Speaker 3 (22:43):
This from the text line, Michael, we know the KOA lineup?
What's the k HOW lineup? After your jump?

Speaker 4 (22:50):
We don't know.

Speaker 3 (22:51):
It's a rotating cast of characters whom you've heard on
the station before.

Speaker 4 (22:56):
Oh, is it? Is that what they're gonna do? I
thought they were going to bring in some outsiders so audition.
Are they not going to do that?

Speaker 3 (23:02):
One of them is an outsider, but you've heard him before, okay,
and the other the other bald guy. One of the girls. Yeah,
and that other con man. Okay, well ask me if
I care exactly. I mean, I know you guys care,

(23:24):
but we'll be gone.

Speaker 2 (23:25):
We don't care.

Speaker 4 (23:26):
Let me tell you guys shouldn't care except maybe from
six to nine. So we get that. For a little
bit of time you can care, but after that you
don't care.

Speaker 2 (23:34):
Right at nine o'clock, you're gonna come, come, come see us.

Speaker 4 (23:36):
And if you don't, your paychecks get deducted. We're actually
gonna give you sis. It's koa. We're gonna get all
the listeners a little bumping salary. But if you don't
show up at nine o'clock and you stay over here
at nine o'clock, then we're going to reduce that salary.
So just before warned.

Speaker 3 (23:52):
See and then here's another text message from sixty one
sixty six Mike or Michael. We turn the water off
to lather up, then back on to rents. When I
was on a submarine, we had to save water. Well,
I get that, so it must because it may be
a military thing or an armed forces thing. Because there
were a couple of other people on the text line
over there that were saying almost the exact same thing
that in the service, they would turn the water off.

Speaker 6 (24:14):
Two SuDS up, and then you run the risk, yeah,
that if you're upstairs where I shower, then the hot
water that's remaining in the pipes, you hope is still
there and you don't suddenly hit cold water until it
gets warmed up again.

Speaker 3 (24:29):
My big problem is that you're not going to be
able to turn the water temperature back to where it was, exactly.

Speaker 2 (24:35):
Where it was.

Speaker 3 (24:36):
So we all know that those those dials on the
on the shower faucet one degree of difference in this
this third degree burn is twenty degree difference in the
water temperature.

Speaker 2 (24:47):
So you can't just turn it off and turn it
back on.

Speaker 4 (24:51):
No, all right, Well find out some of the quirks
about them so I can make fun of them. Sure, fortunate,
I don't have any quirks, so I don't worry about it.
And by the way, remember you and I have an NDA.
You signed the NDA under penalties of perjury and the

(25:12):
cost of violating our NDA. I don't think you can
afford that, so i'd be careful what you say to
anybody else.

Speaker 2 (25:18):
I ain't sign nothing.

Speaker 4 (25:21):
I've got a copy of it on my It's in
my cloud. I've got it on my hard drive. I've
got it. I've got it.

Speaker 3 (25:27):
Picture it didn't happen. I don't believe it. Hmm, picture
it didn't happen. I don't believe it. I'll send you
a picture of it, you know, I'll put it up
on the website. You're nda with me. You don't even
know how to add anything to the website, but barely
even know how to load the podcast until you conned
it off on the weekend guy over there. And it's

(25:49):
been several months since you had to do it, so
you probably could maybe maybe could do it now if
you had to, but it'd be wrong.

Speaker 4 (25:57):
What's the podcast? What's a podcast? By the way, when
can I get in the rotation? Like iheart's now doing
the what's his name? Color?

Speaker 2 (26:10):
Yeah? The little national ones.

Speaker 4 (26:11):
That get the guy from what was the name of
They go to White Castle? What was that movie? That's who?
That is?

Speaker 2 (26:19):
Lone Gunman, Loan, Last Stand, Loan.

Speaker 4 (26:22):
Studies somebody that it was something somebody go to white Castle.

Speaker 2 (26:25):
Oh, I don't know, I don't know what it was.

Speaker 4 (26:30):
The Ohio Education Department offers tomorrow's education today. Let's put
it that way. It's a it's a look into the future,
assuming that there is a future, and that in the future, UH,
demographic displacement is going to lead to America's conquest by Islamis.

(26:52):
It's unbelievable. This is according to The Western Journal. Young
children at a non public charter school sanctioned by the
Ohio Department of Education are taught to memorize sections of
the Quran. The Islamic Center of Mason Learning Academy. Well,
there you go in the story. The Islamic Center of
Mason Learning Academy both on its website that it is

(27:15):
officially affiliated with the State of Ohio Department of Education. Now,
when you're going to do a doctrination, if you want
to make sure the indoctrination takes hold, you got to
start that at a really young age. So this entity,
the Islamic Center of Mason Learning Academy, has thirty eight
students in preschool, kindergarten, first grade, and second grade for

(27:36):
the current school year. The web page for school largely
emphasizes the Quran reading classes. What do the need of
the books for when everything you need to know is
in the Qur'an. They're about one hundred thousand Muslims living
in central Ohio, about sixty percent of them are Somalis,

(27:59):
according to a report from Station WOSU. Now, I was
just guessing here, just you know, just guessing, like Minneapolis,
assimilation is probably not taught or encouraged. In fact, I
would bet assimilation is one of the reasons why you

(28:20):
have to memorize parts of the Koran, because they don't
want you to assimilate. So I don't know whether they
get funding or not from the Ohio Department of Education,
but that's not really good. And then when we get back,
we got a little story from Whoopy Whoopy Goldberg.

Speaker 2 (28:38):
It's Harold and Kumar go to Waae Castle. Come on, man,
come on.

Speaker 4 (28:46):
When it's that insignificant, that little neuron that was storing
that information, we unlocked the door and let it out.
But yeah, Harold and Kumar, which I remember the movie
and thinking it was just like, yeah, whatever, Whoopy Goldberg
has apologized on air. Yes, they were talking about Trump's

(29:08):
sixty minute interview and Sonny Houston was mocking Trump for
saying that he had no idea who this chain pin
sees Zou was before deciding to pardon him. Now, if
you don't know who that is. Zoo is the convicted
founder of Banance, which is the world's largest crypto exchange
by volume. Houston screeches, how come you Trump don't know

(29:33):
who this guy is? And Goldberg says because he used
an auto pin Well, the producers stepped in at that point.
The views Whoopy Goldberg was handed a note live on
air yesterday asking her to clarify his statement she made
about Donald Trump, leading Goldberg to angrily tear the message
up in protest. The note, which The Daily Mail has

(29:57):
learned came from producers on the show, was handed to
Goldberg by co host Sonny Houston during an exchange about
presidents using an autopendesign documents. I think that just maybe
the the C suite at ABC News probably learned a
lesson after Trump sued them for what was it, fifteen

(30:18):
sixteen million dollars over defamatory lies respued about him by
Little George Slapadopolis or whatever he caused George Stephanopolis. I
don't know, but it's kind of funny listen to to
Woop he lose it because let me before you hear it,
it's it's in, It's in. Democrats speak, so let me

(30:42):
translate for you, then you'll understand what it is. In
democrats speak or liberal language. A joke is when a
dumbass elicits approval from other dumbasses in the audience by
saying something malicious and untrue about a non un dumb
ass like Donald Trump. Nuance would be democrats speak for

(31:06):
what Brendham said earlier, Bull you know what, So now
you can understand the joke.

Speaker 2 (31:14):
And that the.

Speaker 4 (31:17):
Oh they're the seals are clapping.

Speaker 2 (31:20):
The other in the same thing is that when people
are going to to to go to their their.

Speaker 5 (31:31):
Meetings with the judge, the meetings that are they're supposed
to go to.

Speaker 2 (31:36):
When they're listening to what the hell what.

Speaker 4 (31:40):
She's been there? Sonny Howston is shaking the note and
handing it to Whoopy and Whopy kidders that what the
hell is this?

Speaker 2 (31:48):
We don't know if Penn used, if Trump used an
autopent apart.

Speaker 4 (31:53):
She actually reads the note to go to.

Speaker 6 (31:56):
When they're listening to what the hell What I Love
Sonny houses notes.

Speaker 5 (32:01):
We don't know if pen used, if Trump used an
autopen apart it was a joke.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
We don't know if Trump used an autopen our lime.
But we do know that he didn't know who that
crypto guy was. Well, I'm sorry. You know the hardest
thing about this job now.

Speaker 4 (32:20):
Is telling the truth one that's right?

Speaker 2 (32:25):
What getting your facts right?

Speaker 4 (32:27):
Yes, it's no longer the view. It's the view talking
about things they know nothing about, or only things they
do know about, which means they're talking about nothing. It's
kind of a Seinfeld done.

Speaker 2 (32:39):
Over again now. Is no one understands nuance there?

Speaker 5 (32:48):
You know, when you hear a joke, when somebody's fooling around,
when they're not saying something specific, especially on this show.

Speaker 4 (32:56):
Whatever