11-6-25 - 9am - Digital ID and SCOTUS Tariffs

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
So Michael, you're moving to nine to twelve five days
a week, and ten to one on the sixth day.
More money, because it's the big bloat torch and you're
not really going to be getting home until two two
thirty in the afternoon six days a week.

Speaker 2 (00:17):
Now, let me get this right.

Speaker 3 (00:18):
Your wife retired, so she has the house all alone
and a bigger checking account. Insert Napoleon Dynamite lucky.

Speaker 4 (00:31):
I like how they think that we're getting a race
if we move over to the other station. Wait, yeah, wait, yeah,
wait what what?

Speaker 2 (00:45):
I don't know what m oh I knows what I
was told, but I also know where I worked. It's
so all believab when I see it.

Speaker 4 (00:55):
It's true.

Speaker 2 (00:57):
Now you pointed out that we have what we've got
five hours left over here, and then I look on
the text.

Speaker 4 (01:03):
Line this time slot, yes, and this time slot yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:06):
Why we may we may just have five hours left too.

Speaker 4 (01:08):
We don't know, yeah, dude, yeah, true.

Speaker 2 (01:13):
I mean they may come to their senses sometime between
now and Monday morning.

Speaker 4 (01:16):
It's close enough to Christmas, it's about that time.

Speaker 2 (01:18):
Yeah. Yeah. Uh zero nine nine zero wants to know, Mike,
why don't the ads mentioned the Kowai station number do
we have do we do?

Speaker 4 (01:27):
We have station numbers ninety four one FM, So do they?

Speaker 2 (01:33):
Here's what I We had a meeting yesterday. We had
a big meeting, you know. I the offices that they
have for well, not those offices, but where our poor
program director sits. His office is not big enough for
a meeting. It's not big enough at all for a meeting.

Speaker 4 (01:53):
True, two people could not sit at his desk.

Speaker 2 (01:55):
There are there are three chairs in there, his chair
behind his L shaped desk, and then two chairs on
the front side of his desk pushed underneath. So I'd
beat you there, and I pull a chair over to
where you ended up standing. And then before you got there,
Temper had to go to the bathroom. So then I
had to stand up and move so he could get

(02:17):
out to go to the bathroom. So that's why I thought, well,
this is stupid, So I moved the chair over to
against There must be a five.

Speaker 4 (02:25):
There's a little filing cabin, yeah, file cameras.

Speaker 2 (02:27):
Something back there. So I got back in that corner
as far as I could to give you room to
put your fat ass in the chair. But then you
would be I would be behind you.

Speaker 4 (02:37):
We'd be touching each other, and we don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:39):
We would not. That was not gonna happen because I
had made sure, I'd already gotten the tape measure out
and measured that. You know, no, I will not be
touching him.

Speaker 4 (02:48):
We barely tolerate each other being in separate rooms.

Speaker 2 (02:51):
Separated by glass, which I think would be bulletproof. Move
over there, but you would not sit in that chair.
He refused to sit in that chair because I was
going to be behind your back.

Speaker 4 (03:02):
And I have to almill practically touch you. That's not
I've already got.

Speaker 2 (03:05):
I already have your back, but you wouldn't let me
sit behind your back. And then the meeting went was
interminably long. He wouldn't shut up. He's so excited about this,
and we're just like, we're moving across the hole.

Speaker 4 (03:24):
Have we changed nothing?

Speaker 2 (03:26):
We emphasized that what you think a thousand times that
one out many times, many many times. Now are you sure?
In fact, we even brought up taxpayer relief shots and
it was like, yes, absolutely, that's all we want.

Speaker 4 (03:39):
The textpay release shots will be Friday, the last hour
of the show.

Speaker 2 (03:42):
Friday at eleven A.

Speaker 4 (03:44):
Fridays just like it is here, but it's just a
few hours later, yes, last hour on Friday.

Speaker 2 (03:49):
So we need to get everyone now because I've had
some text messages and we know that when you make
a change that some people are happy about it, some
people are unhappy about it. If you go over during
one of the breaks this morning, I know that a
Rod had put something up on Instagram. So I was

(04:09):
over just looking at some of the comments, and it
was I hate Michael Brown.

Speaker 4 (04:14):
I love Michael Brown. You're gonna look at the comment section.
Never look at the comment section.

Speaker 2 (04:19):
Well, because I get because the person who said I
hate Michael Brown, I liked their comment, because I'll throw
them off because they'll be like, oh, somebody like somebody
liked my comment, and they'll say they'll look down see
who liked their commentary, Oh he liked my comment. And
then we'll see if they delete their comment or it's

(04:39):
so much.

Speaker 4 (04:40):
The thing is because that we had that text here
asking why don't we say the numbers for the station,
there's no real need to.

Speaker 2 (04:46):
Which is what I wanted to get to. Are we
certain about this.

Speaker 4 (04:51):
About what exactly.

Speaker 2 (04:52):
On streaming or podcasting?

Speaker 4 (04:55):
Yeah, and even if you tell your device, like play
eight to fifty or play KOA on iHeart Radio. You
don't need to say eight to fifty. You don't need
to say ninety four one. Even when you're talking to Alexa,
Hey Alexa, play KOA on iHeart Radio. You don't need
to say anything else. That's all you need.

Speaker 2 (05:13):
It's all you need is KOA.

Speaker 4 (05:14):
It's one of the big the three letter three call
letter stations.

Speaker 2 (05:19):
It's you know how many three call letter stations are
left in the country.

Speaker 4 (05:23):
I don't know, less than a half a dozen, I think, Yeah.

Speaker 2 (05:25):
It's very very few. Kf I KOA I gotta lose track,
I don't know. Yeah, yeah, I don't know. So that's
all you need.

Speaker 4 (05:36):
If you if you're talking to your device, why I
do say play KOA.

Speaker 2 (05:41):
Yeah now sat KOA is a preset on your device also,
of course. Yeah, yeah, so we'll do that. Delete k
W as your as your Preset'm.

Speaker 4 (05:53):
Not sure if the bosses really want us to sit
there and say delete kge W because this is still
a station known by the same company. We're just going
across the hall. But yeah, you don't want to listen.

Speaker 2 (06:03):
Going across the hall. We must be going across the
interstate to the western Slope or to LA or somewhere.
It may just need thirty feet. But it's like zip
code over there. It's a different zip code over there, exactly.
The demographics over there a little different then the podcast.

(06:25):
If you already subscribe to the podcast, it will continue
to be fed to you. That doesn't the RSS feed
does not change, so you will still get the situation
with Michael Brown. You'll just get the three hours on
KOA and so the four hours on khow so that
doesn't change.

Speaker 4 (06:44):
We did get somebody email asking to make sure that
the website Michael says go here gets changed over and
that well, uh, the only other problem that they mentioned,
which we have no control over whatsoever because it's the
corporate back end stuff that they want to make sure
that the text line number changes. Again, we have no

(07:07):
control over that whatsoever. Chances are it may be Koa's
text line.

Speaker 2 (07:13):
I'll email today and make sure she can get that done.
They can get it done.

Speaker 4 (07:16):
OI can get it. Well, we'll try, but no promises.

Speaker 2 (07:19):
Well, it will get done eventually, no promises will be
done by Monday. Well, kind of like the bathrooms are repaired,
and now we find out the bathrooms really aren't repaired.

Speaker 4 (07:28):
Twelve weeks. Twelve twelve weeks, that's what it is, just
saying yes.

Speaker 2 (07:32):
And so I can go number one on number four,
but I can't.

Speaker 4 (07:37):
I have to use the little boy urinal correct and
I still would not go number two on the fourth
floor here. I'm concerned about the flushing capabilities of those toilets.

Speaker 2 (07:47):
By the way, if you don't believe us about the
perpetual flush, Dragon has it up on his Instagram, so
you can go watch the.

Speaker 4 (07:54):
Your morning's inn. It flushed for well over a minute.

Speaker 2 (07:59):
Oh it finally stop. But right, yes, oh okay, because
when I when I looked at it, I don't how
long I watched it, but it didn't seem to me
like it was slowing down whatsoever. Uh So, anyway, that klz,
you know, that's coming up faster when we think of it,
you know, it seems like a long time ago we

(08:20):
started talking about this. They've been talking about it for
a long time, unbeknownst to us.

Speaker 4 (08:26):
That's creepy.

Speaker 2 (08:27):
It's very creepy. Because this was not just a local decision.
There was also a corporate decision, and two of the
corporate guys that were in on that decision. I happen
to know both of them. One of them I know
very well. Actually one of my actually considered to be
a friend. The other one I just know in passing
and we've had conversations together before. But then it freaks

(08:48):
me out to think that for a year, they've been
listening to you and me, they've been listening to you
and me for a year, and they still want to
go do this.

Speaker 4 (08:55):
Yeah, what did we say? That makes me a little nervous.
It's like, I'm not sure if everything I said was kind.

Speaker 2 (09:03):
Yeah, they're just setting us up for failure, right, but
we pretty well know failure anyway. Yeah, pretty much. We're
just a couple of losers that can't get work anywhere
else and just do this for the hell of it.
Have you ever used like I used one one time?

(09:26):
I don't know why I did.

Speaker 4 (09:28):
Oh, it was a firm. There's a firm. There's Klarna.

Speaker 2 (09:35):
I think PayPal is actually doing this now too. After
pay and then well, Affirm is the one that I'm
I want to focus on for a moment. It was founded,
I don't know, a decade ago by the PayPal co founder,
Max Levchin, but when he first started a firm, it

(09:56):
was only used on high purchases by a small handful
of merchants. So if you're a small merchant, you've got
somebody that wants to buy a high dollar item. They
don't want to put it on their credit card. They
don't want to you know, pay interest or whatever. It
was one of these buy now, pay later services. Now,
when I was growing up, my mom would put stuff

(10:17):
on layoway. Did your mother have put stuff on layaway?

Speaker 1 (10:20):
Oh?

Speaker 4 (10:20):
Yeah, of course, and I did Christmas almost every year.

Speaker 2 (10:22):
Yeah, you go in and just say like, I want
to buy that, I want to put it on layaway,
and then every week or every month or something, you
go into that store and you would put a little
more cash down, no more cash now. And then when
if you timed it out right, Christmas came, you got
it picked up, it was already paid for, get your
Christmas paid for, and you did not go in debt
deferred gratification. So, prior to the lockdowns, that buy now,

(10:51):
pay later service, particularly a firm, was pretty much obscured.
Now you actually see them advertising on television. I think
I've seen Klarna and some of the others advertise on TV.
Well after the lockdowns in twenty twenty, when our money
became even weaker, Suddenly they got partnerships with Apple pay Amazon.

(11:13):
There was a Super Bowl ad and an IPO, an
initial public offering that brought a firm and the entire
buy now, Pay Later scheme to public and to a public.
Thatt is already in debt. What I say in my
American financing spots that Americans owed more than a trillion

(11:33):
dollars in credit card debt. Well, those who have now
gone off the well are still paying their minimum amount
on their credit card debt, are now still buying stuff
and not using defer gratification, and now they're using a firm.
Because if you pay within the timeline that you select,
if it's a short enough timeline, you don't pay any interest.
If you do pay over, I don't know what it is,

(11:55):
six months or twelve, I don't know, but you do
end up paying some interest, but you get your item now.
It's crazy. The first year that they went public, a
firm saw more than a four hundred percent increase in
people using buy now, pay later services. But the problem

(12:17):
was they weren't buying like some big ass gift you know,
like to get to get the kind of gift that
missus Redbeer deserves for Christmas, I might need to use
a firm because I just don't have enough cash to
pay for what she deserves putting up with him. But
now people are using it to buy essentials, groceries, gas,

(12:38):
even paying their utilities. Now I haven't looked at my
most recent Excel bill, but I got to say that
if Excel offers me the option to pay my monthly
electric bill over time, there's really something wrong with this.
And then starting last year, guess what a firm did.
They started rolling out a new requirement for bio metric ID.

(13:02):
So once again the old fashion problem reaction solution scheme
is getting used because it's being used under the guise
of safety and fraud prevent prevention. By now pay later
is going to soon require. I bet they all require
this pretty soon, some sort of biometric ID, and then

(13:23):
Visa will be following close behind. Visa launched a payment
pass key last year. Now I haven't found it. Maybe
it's been offered to me and I've just rejected it.
I don't know. Which allows you to voluntarily make purchases
with your phones built in biometrics. Now I've got Apple Pay,

(13:44):
I've got my Apple cards set up on Apple Pay.
I've got a couple of credit cards, but I rarely,
if ever use it, and I don't know why. Some
people say it's more convenience. Some people say it's more secure.
I guess I'm just in the old boomer habit of
using a credit card.

Speaker 4 (14:00):
Just like using my front pocket instead of my back pocket,
because my phone's in the front, my wallet's in the back.
If I already got my phone out Apple pay, done,
but you.

Speaker 2 (14:09):
Still have with Apple Make sure I got this ride
with Apple Pay. You pull up the cards you're going
to use, but you still have to use your face ID.

Speaker 4 (14:17):
Right, I just double clicked the side button and it,
you know, already opens up the wallet. Cards ready there
holding near the reader.

Speaker 2 (14:23):
Done but you But all you have to do is
double click to use it.

Speaker 4 (14:28):
Double click the side and make you know'll do the
whole face ID on me too.

Speaker 2 (14:32):
Face ID double click at the same time.

Speaker 4 (14:33):
No, no, no, just double click the side and you
know then face ID then it opens up my wallet.

Speaker 2 (14:39):
Okay, but then do you have more than one card there?

Speaker 4 (14:43):
Yes? But you can set up primary card.

Speaker 2 (14:44):
Primary cards, right right, Okay, So.

Speaker 4 (14:46):
I got to set that that card and you can
scroll through those two.

Speaker 2 (14:49):
So if you're going to Taco Bell, how do you
do the face ID and still put the phone over
by the reader.

Speaker 4 (14:55):
I don't do it through this mainly for like the
gas stations and uh king supers.

Speaker 2 (15:01):
Yeah okay, because it's just right there in front.

Speaker 4 (15:02):
It's just right there in front of me, and I've
already got yeah.

Speaker 2 (15:04):
Okay, all right, Well again, I think it's the problem
reaction solution. The in fact Visa, according to some reports
in the Wall Street Journal and other places, wants to
make biometric first a requirement by twenty twenty six. In
other words, the old tap and pay, which we finally

(15:26):
got from Europe over here where you can just tap
your card. We finally got that, and now the international
banking cartels made it clear that this is where we
are headed. It's the only way the crypto AI control
grid can function.

Speaker 4 (15:43):
Now.

Speaker 2 (15:43):
I know a lot of people will see it as
a major upgrade for tyranny and maybe an affront to
human free will. But I think a lot of people
are perfectly content with an authoritarian state. That probably scares
me more than Mandani. You know, Zoefram himself are the
people who are cheering and screaming for all of this

(16:04):
control over every aspect of our lives. And the twenty
twenty lockdowns I think was the beginning of that really
rapid progress, the twenty twenty lockdowns. According to James Corbett

(16:27):
over the Corbett Report, tyranny and authoritarianism doesn't always look
like what we think it looks like. They can go
to the nineteen eighty four jack booted thugs with the
boot on the face of tyranny, or they can go
to all this Huxley Break New World drugging people with SOMA,
making them love their servitude kind of tyranny, and either

(16:48):
one is bad. But at the very least, when you
have the nineteen eighty four, you know, police state, big
brother kind of police state, at the very least people
know there is a tyrant and they know that the
boot is on their face. He writes, I think there
probably is a point at which you've invested your identity
so much in a certain political propaganda line that it

(17:12):
would be very difficult for you to come back from it,
which is why I think the COVID conversation basically disappeared
so quickly, I would add parenthetically. And that's why I
keep bringing it up, because so many people probably understood
intuitively that we had been had, but no one wants
to talk about. There was an FAA waiver that got

(17:36):
issued last March that made it legal for government agencies
and local police to do something.

Speaker 1 (17:48):
Drag.

Speaker 5 (17:49):
It's not going to go number two on the fourth floor, dragon,
don't go number two on any floor, use toilet, My god, dragon,
such an animal.

Speaker 4 (18:06):
You can't tell me what to do. You're not my
real mom. Man.

Speaker 2 (18:12):
Man, By the way, we got a new rule of
engagement that just came across the transom and it's it's
pretty darn good and it's less than it's less than
fifty seconds. Yeah, yeah, it's pretty good. Pretty good. So
in fact, we'll just say, let me look here.

Speaker 4 (18:29):
I'm titling that one flamethrower.

Speaker 2 (18:32):
Flamethrower, Yeah, flamethrower that came to us from Richard. So
the rest of you shouldn't be Richard's and get your
rules of engagement in.

Speaker 4 (18:44):
Now.

Speaker 2 (18:45):
This is I shouldn't even say this because a lot
of you procrastinators will put it off, but we'd like
to have you know, a really nice deep bank of
these to choose from, because remember, we have to train
that audience over there. Yes, now, I know that most
of you are gonna follow me over there, which is
good because we've got the payroll all set up. We

(19:09):
went to ADP, We got it all set up to
make sure you continue to get paid. But we'll cancel
those checks in a New York minute if you don't so.

Speaker 4 (19:17):
And trust me, you want to do the rules of
engagement over Michael, because you're going to keep it under
a minute. Michael's gonna take eight or nine minutes if
he has to do the rules of engagements. That's why
this whole thing started with you guys doing the rule
engagement because you're better at it than he is.

Speaker 2 (19:36):
Was that necessary? Yes, okay, all right, biometric consent a
new digital ID, but nobody cares. I'm telling you a
story today that nobody cares because we all just go
along with it and we're all really happy to right.

Speaker 4 (19:57):
And the FAA.

Speaker 2 (20:00):
Way Waiver was issued last March that made it legal
for government agencies and local popo to operate drones beyond
a visual line of sight over large crowds of people
in the United States and since then accompanied by the
name of Skadio. Skydoskydio is now deploying their quad copter

(20:27):
drones in just about every major US city. The drones
they've got thermal imaging cameras. They are operated without a
human user. They were developed and deployed by Israel starting
back in October twenty twenty three to track, trace, and
go after tens of thousands of Palestinians so called Palestinians

(20:51):
or Gosins or Amas or whatever. So the very same
drones used by the Department of Wards to prevail our enemies,
the same drones used by Israel to go after Hamas
or whomever, are now being launched every day in most
major US cities to track and trace every individual. And

(21:12):
then you have, on top of that the new financial
system now ready to be born out of the ashes
of the old, and all that will be required in
order to buy and sell will be your consent to
the biometric digital ID. A digital ID can be used
as a locator necessary for both AI or government run AI.

(21:37):
The second is the digital ID is well, you know
you got a Nazi concentration camp ID by developed by
A hollerth and back then idn So it's part of
this AI war that we're living in. And while AI
has made my job somewhat easier, probably made an other

(21:59):
job easier, it's also leading to the readily acceptable idea
of just giving up more of your biometrics so that
they can what track you further? Yeah, I think so.
Moving on Trump, the tariff man is he likes to

(22:21):
call himself. Everybody went ballistic yesterday because of the US
Supreme Courts oral argument about how to interpret a law
from nineteen seventy seven. It's called the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act IPA iee PA. On April tecond, the Liberation Day,

(22:44):
Remember that the Trump administration declared a national emergency, and
when they did, they imposed a ten percent baseline or
global tariff on imports from nearly every country. And the
problem is they cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act

(23:04):
as the legal basis for doing so. Now that law
empowers potus to quote, investigate, regulate, direct, and compel any
property in which any foreign country has an interest. The
words tariffs or duty does not appear anywhere in that law.

(23:25):
So the Trump administration points to a president set by
Richard Nixon. Because Nixon in nineteen seventy one ADMITI trate
dispute with Japan over currency values imposted a ten percent
duty on all imports coming into the US from Japan.
But that was nineteen seventy one. I EEPA was enacted
in nineteen seventy seven, and it was enacted in nineteen

(23:47):
seventy seven precisely to cut back presidential power which Congress
at the time really believed had been abused by presidents
under all the preceding law, mainly the Trading with the
Enemy Act, which dated all the way back to nineteen seven,
and which had been passed to regulate commerce with enemy
powers during World War One. So the Trump administration's legal

(24:09):
case that the IEEPA the International Emergency Economics Powers Act.
Their legal case argues that that law grants presidents effectively
unlimited power to impose terrifts tariffs regardless of existing trade

(24:29):
treaties and without ratification or approval by Congress, and I
think that's weak. Already, two lower federal courts have rejected
those arguments. So here's what happened in the oral arguments
yesterday in the Supring Court. A lot of the justices
obviously seem skeptical. Amy Comy Barrett, Trump appointee, asked this question.

(24:51):
Quote and so is it your contention that every country
needed to be tariffed because of threats to our defense
and our and Dusty stal Base, I mean, Spain, France.
Pretty legitimate question. Justice gor Such, another Trump appointee whom
I very much admire, Warren quote of a one way

(25:14):
ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion assumption of power
in the executive branch and away from the people's elected representatives.
Gor Such, I think is telescoping, much as Amy Combie Barrett.
Amy Combie Barrett is telescoping that. I don't think this
is what the law intended. And Gore Such is telescoping that. Oh,

(25:38):
I think the way you're interpreting this law violates the
separation of powers, and you're accumulating too much power in
the presidency. So I think the skepticism legitimately arises from
the fact that Trump is the first president to invoke
the i ee PA to imposed tariffs. If you go

(26:00):
back to Trump's executive order, the emergency that was required
to trigger this law is the problem of chronic us
trade deficits were just in it. We're in a trade
deficit with like everybody, and as Trump likes to say,
they've been stealing from us for years, taking away our jobs,
taking away our manufacturing, selling his cheap crap and return
blobb And he's right about that. But his diagnosis, while

(26:24):
controversy on legal terms, does tap into, I think a
political bipartisan belief. I think it's I think this is
truly bipartisan, that our long run prosperity and security had
been undermined by all these decades of de industrialization, by
all the decades of the unfair trade practices by partners

(26:44):
like China, and of course the obvious offshoring and manufacturing
under deals like NAFTA and the World and the WTO.
But but even if you describe decades of de industrialization,
even if they are described appropriately as a national emergency,

(27:05):
that doesn't follow that imposing a ten percent tariff on
all imports and potting on additional misname reciprocal tariffs on
specific countries that obviously were improvised at the last minute
on the basis of some bizarre formula that we still
to this day don't know that somehow that adds up
to a rational strategy for reshoring critical American industries. But

(27:28):
that's the political issue, that's not the legal issue. Because
it is one thing to argue that our manufacturing and
our defense base must be protected against the dubbing of
Chinese steel or autos it should be. It's another thing
to argue that national security and our own reindustrialization require

(27:50):
tariffs on Canadian dairy or Brazilian coffee. Indeed, when you
look at the Republican majority in the US Senate, they've
already pushed back as they voted to end the national
emergency that Trump used to impose those tariffs on Brazil,
and they passed a resolution against the levies on Canada.
But here's the bottom line. Both moves are symbolic unless

(28:15):
the Republican House follows suit. So, just in simple terms
of public policy, the best outcome, I think would be
for the court to rule that the president's authority to
impose tariffs under IEEPA, if it exists at all, should
be limited to specific strategic industries or to specific foreign

(28:38):
countries based on a legitimate national security concern.

Speaker 4 (28:42):
Got it.

Speaker 2 (28:43):
That would be my preference for a court decision. Kind
of leaves most of them intact. Take some of them away.
But what if some of them get taken away. That's
where we lose sight of the entire issue. Because even
if the Trump administration loses outright, court says no, you
can't do this at all, and so all of those
are rolled back. Guess what, and this is what bugs

(29:07):
the crap out of me, is that the cabal won't
tell you this. He could still impose tariffs based on
other laws which have more qualification than safeguards. He could use,
for example, the Trade Acts of nineteen seventy four, which
fights against unfair foreign trade practices. He could use the
Trade Expansion Act of nineteen sixty two, which deals with

(29:29):
national security threats. So as the world economy kind of
fragments into rival military industrial blocks, terariffs will have to
be a part of the arsenal of every great power.
So Trump might lose this battle, but don't worry, he
can still win the war. I think they just picked

(29:50):
the wrong law to choose to impose the tariffs. And
I know they were probably all scrambling to find something,
but nobody really really dug around and said, oh wait
a minute, maybe we we should do it here, Maybe
we should do particular tariffs under the Trade Act in
nineteen seventy four, which deals with unfair foreign trade practices,
and some of the others, like against China. We ought

(30:12):
to use a Trade Expansion Act of nineteen sixty two,
which specifically allows for national security threats. So all is
not lost, despite what everybody on cable news has been
trying to tell you for the past forty eight hours.

Speaker 4 (30:26):
Now that Michael's hours are cut, he'll be now yodeling
at this on the street corners with his ten cup
for extra money.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
What do you mean now I do that? Now, that's
not going to change.

Speaker 4 (30:40):
I don't think I've ever heard you yodel. Hey, I
don't think you ever will either. Yeah. I probably don't
want Yeah, you don't want to hear that?

Speaker 2 (30:47):
Uh gubitter two three eight Michael, Every time I hear
that promo where you say you love us, I throw
up a little bit in my mouth. Please take it down. Oh,
trust us, we throw up a little bit too, because
you know, that's not how we believe. We don't believe
that whatever. We don't feel that way whatsoever. We can't
stand you, guys. But we have a really nice production.

Speaker 4 (31:06):
Guy who's incredibly busy. He not only just does production,
but he also works with the Broncos, and the Broncos
are doing really well right now, so he's really busy,
really really busy.

Speaker 2 (31:18):
Yeah he's not like he's working for the Rockies where
it's like, okay, I like Jesse just you know, sleeps
through half the game. So yeah, Hej's really really busy.
And he probably heard that and thought, oh, that's really
nice for Michael to say that.

Speaker 4 (31:30):
Right, because I don't think he's a p one over
here that listens to Yeah, I do not.

Speaker 2 (31:34):
In fact, I would bet you all the next year's
salary that AJ is not a p one listening on
this station at all. So that's that's how that got
put in there. And just so you know, just like you,
we throw up a little bit.

Speaker 4 (31:47):
Every time we hear it too, but we also think
it's funny because you know, it's right so wrong.

Speaker 2 (31:53):
Because it is so wrong.

Speaker 4 (31:54):
And then goober number forty four or sixty seven, we're
not discrediting AJ's work. What's no, no, no, no, he
does fantastic word trust what he does. Right.

Speaker 2 (32:02):
In fact, we listened to it. You know, the show
opens remaining the same, but he's got you know, the KOA,
he's got everything fixed. It sounds really good. We're really
happy with that. Everything, all of that, all my branding
stuff will stay the same. But then forty four sixty
seven rights, Michael. You guys, some people still have an
antenna radio in their cars, and we need to know
the numbers. Eight fifty AM or ninety four point one FM.

(32:27):
Now that's during the weekday. Now during the weekend seven
sixty AM, ninety three point seven FM for the weekend program.
That's freedom. But I'm thinking, uh oh, no, I've got
I mean, I've got I've got radio on both my cars.

(32:48):
I think it shows. I think it shows the call
letters too.

Speaker 4 (32:52):
Well, it depends how old your car is too. I mean,
if you're like me and driving around in two thousand
and seven, no, I just it just pops up with
the numbers. Numbers. Okay, eight fifty AM, ninety four point
one of them, all right, that's it.