11-8-25 The Weekend Hour 3: DOJ goes after former CIA Director Brennan. Cracks in the dam?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
To night, Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA
director of talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
Brownie, No, Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job
the Weekend with Michael Brown.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
Broadcasting Life in Denver, Colorado. You've tuned into the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Glad to have you joining the program today.
One of the rules of engagement for this program is
if you want to send me a text message to
tell me anything or ask me anything, the number is
three three one zero three three three one zero three,
keyword Micha or Michael, and then go follow me on
x at Michael Brown USA, or if you prefer Facebook

(00:31):
or Instagram, you can do that too. So earlier this
week during the weekday program, I gave kudos to the
Department of Justice and in particular the Attorney General Pam Bondy,
for finally convening a grand jury in the Southern District
of the Free State of Florida to investigate the alleged

(00:53):
crimes of former CIA director John Brennan. And during that
I highlighted a few things that I was kind of
speculating about. I was getting frustrated with the seemingly plotting
progress made on that front by the Attorney General, but

(01:15):
in her defense, I think we now have grand juries
going after John Brennan, former CIA director, James Comey, former
FBI director, and John Bolton, former National Security Advisor ambassador
to the United Nations. And those are just the ones
that we know about. It's entirely possible that there are

(01:38):
similar grand jury efforts being undertaken that target some of
the myriad other deep state snakes who helped execute the
four year long cudetais against the Trump one point zero presidency.
The reality, the reality of our justice system is that
the wheels of justice really do and he turns slowly,

(02:02):
but once they are activated, they tend to grind exceedingly fine.
It's slow, but it's not as slow as it takes
sometimes to get to the point where we are today.
But it's very fine in the sense that they they're
now subject to the rules of civil procedure, the rules
of criminal procedure, the rules of evidence. They're subject to

(02:24):
all the procedural things they have to do. And I'm
fine with that. I'm totally fine with watching those wheels
grind against Bretaan, comby In and Bolton into little chunks
of whatever, and I I don't even care if they
spend time in prison. I just want some accountability. Now,

(02:48):
prison may be the only way to hold them accountable,
but certainly it would in their careers to be found
guilty on any of these charges. She just kind of
like clockwork by the end of the day. By the
end of the week, subpoenas were flying out faster than

(03:09):
air traffic controllers who aren't getting paid could keep up with.
Because we learned of two more major grand jury investigation
taking place in other jurisdictions, but also related to bringing
the bad actors within the Department of Justice over the
past the entire ten years, bringing them to justice. Now,

(03:32):
I'm gonna explain something. First, I wasn't speculating, and it
wasn't any sort of insider knowledge, but it was based
on some other factors, my idea that maybe some of
these were coming pattern recognition related to information that was
already in the public domain, a recognition as a lawyer

(03:56):
myself that the wheels of justice do turn slowly when
they are properly applied by truly diligent law enforcement officials
and prosecutors. And then, third, and probably most importantly, is
I have a presumption, an honest presumption. That's the director
of the FBI, Cash Betel, and the Attorney General Pam

(04:18):
BONDI have been operating in good faith, and they actually
deserve a few more months of grace and getting their
arms around what are truly very highly complex and pressure
jobs that they hold. You also want to take consideration

(04:39):
another factor if you're going to go after some of
these people who are powerful, who are interconnected in inside
the Beltway, interconnected into the swamp with Lord knows what
kind of connections they have withes even still within the

(05:01):
FBI and the Department of Justice, or for that matter,
within the CIA itself, or all the other Intel agencies,
or for that matter, even forign intel agencies. I can
just speak from personal experience that once you've operated inside
that system, I have, and I don't say this to brag,

(05:23):
but my so called rolodex, which is actually just my
iPhone now, the contacts are amazing. The intertwining of just
being under Secretary of Full Land Security with all the
Intel agencies, the Pentagon, the White House, all of the

(05:47):
satellite agencies and departments around the White House. Even some
twenty years later, those connections are still there you still
know those people. Occasionally I still communicate with them, and
I recognize that if you're in that position, as Pambondi
and Cash Patel are, that you too know that the
intertwining of relationships that developed, whether you spend one year

(06:12):
or like I did almost six years, or like Brennan
and Kmy and the others have their entire freaking lifetimes,
that intertwining is very, very substantial. It's a tightly woven
piece of cloth. And so if you're going to go
after if you're going to pull in that little string
that's slew somewhere on the shirt or on the suit jacket,

(06:34):
you know it's going to start unraveling like crazy. So
you've got to be very very careful that whatever you
present to a grand jury, whatever you decide that you're
going to prosecute, that you have the proverbial ducks all
in a row. And I know I've been frustrated with
Patel and Bondiat multiple points, but it's important to keep
in mind that both have repeatedly advised us to be

(06:58):
patient and that it was important to do things the
right way if we really want to see any of
those deep state rats really brought to genuine American justice,
and I've always been willing to give them the benefit
of the doubt. I've never served on a federal grand jury,
never served on a jury at all, been witnesses in cases,

(07:21):
I've been litigant in cases, and I've been in front
of federal grand juries before, testifying about issues going on
about corruption. So I'm and again, having practiced law for
better part of my life, I'm well aware of how
plotting the progress of these endeavors can be.

Speaker 4 (07:44):
Now.

Speaker 3 (07:44):
Cashpentel, the director of the FBI, has repeatedly told us
to be patient in almost all those public statements and
in a lot of the interviews that he's conducted since
us assuming the rains at the FBI, and his record
to public service indicates that he is by and large

(08:05):
genuinely a straight shooter who is on the right side
of history, and I think deserves a presumption of grace
absent proof to the contrary. Now, I will just say
I'm always open to proof to the contrary, and I'm
certainly willing to look at it. I'm not searching it out,
I'm watching for it. Bondi's record not quite so clear,

(08:30):
but President Trump has surrounded her with deputies like Janeine
pierro Ed Martin Todd Blanche. Their very own records are
really strong in that regard. So while we've got movement here,
I caution you that the movement's exciting. The movement indicates
that progress is being made. Let the wheels grind. It's

(08:52):
the Weekend with Michael Brown. Text line open three to
three WEDNESDAYERO three keyword Michael Michael olome on x at
Michael Brown US be right back. Hey, welcome back to
the Weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me.
Appreciate you tuning in. Be great if you would subscribe

(09:13):
to the podcast. On your podcast app, search for the
Situation with Michael Brown. The Situation with Michael Brown. Once
you find that, hit that subscribe button, please leave a
five star review. As we were making the changeover for
the local program here in Denver, we were looking at
our podcast stats and they were really good and we've

(09:33):
got some good reviews and I appreciate you doing that,
so help us add to that because that helps the
distribution of the podcast even more people, so that even
more Yahoos can listen to this Yahoo. So going there
and subscribe and leave a five star review in what
I would describe as a bomb as a real bombshell.

(09:55):
Brett bear Over at Fox News broke the report during
his evening program that the federal grand jury that was
working in the Southern District of Florida is not just
going after John Brennan, but appears to be conducting the
widely rumored grand conspiracy investigation that's looking into the origins
of the twenty sixteen Crossfire Hurricane conspiracy. Now, remember that

(10:20):
particular investigation, Crossfire Hurricane served as the beginning for the
long running effort inside the Department of Justice and the
CIA to do one simple, but I believe very treasonous activity,

(10:40):
and that was to take down a sitting president.

Speaker 5 (10:44):
Tonight, just in the past few minutes, Fox News Digital
is now reporting a federal grand jury has subpoenaed former
CIA director John Brennan, former FBI officials Peter Struck and
Lisa Page, as well as others. It is part of
the Justice Department's investigation into the origins of the Trump
Russia probe. Sources say the Trio were served with federal

(11:05):
subpoenas today. Law enforcement sources also say up to thirty
subpoenas will be issued in the coming days related to
this investigation. We'll follow that tonight too. New Jersey teenagers
are facing charges up.

Speaker 4 (11:18):
To thirty that's a lot now.

Speaker 3 (11:23):
Fox later quoted sources who claim that the grand jury
will be issuing subpoenas to those thirty individuals in the
coming days. I don't know what all it means, but
I want to give you a little comparing contrast for

(11:44):
a moment when I say that I want these wheels
to grind steadily but not too rapidly. Do you remember
the guy I forget? In fact, I think he worked
for the Department of Justice that was charged with assaulting.
I think an ICE officer, or maybe it was a
DC cop.

Speaker 4 (12:05):
I don't remember. It doesn't matter which.

Speaker 3 (12:06):
It's just a law enforcement individual because he threw a
subway sandwich at them. Do you remember that At the
time that I occurred, that that occurred, I thought, Okay,
now we're overreaching. I don't think you should throw sandwiches
at cops. I don't care whether it's a six foot
or twelve foot subway. I don't care. You don't throw

(12:27):
sandwiches at cops. But I also think that indicting him
and trying to charge him with some sort of assault
with a deadly weapon or an assault with a sub
I don't know. I just think it was improper, and
of course it was rejected. He was acquitted on the charges.

(12:49):
So I just want this team to be cognizant of
you already have a high hurdle because you're going after
people who are very alone in the intel community. You
are very well connected. You have a grand jury that's
going to want to see the receipts, They're gonna want
to see the evidence. And I know many people like

(13:12):
to use the old trope about you know you can.
It's really easy to indict a ham sandwich, but it's
not so easy to indict somebody for throwing a ham sandwich,
like we've learned with that guy that threw it at
a cop. So work your way through these cases methodically
and make sure you have the evidence ready to go.

(13:35):
Body and her team have also convened a grand jury
in Virginia now that's investigating x FBI director for Christopher Ray,
and that's related to allegations of hiding documents, substruction of justice,
and line the Congress well under oath that investigation now
of the Western District of Virginia is ran by a

(13:57):
former top Durham investigator. A key document that Ray hid
and tried to destroy is the Durham of Pendix, the
central document in the Grand Conspiracy case. It's underway in Florida.

Speaker 4 (14:14):
I want you to.

Speaker 3 (14:16):
I want you to understand that that bothers me. If
the person who is running that investigation is a former
top Durham investigator for Durham and Ray is accused of
trying to hide and destroy the Durham appendings, that gives

(14:38):
me pause. It's the Hillary plan to tie President Trump
to Russian intelligence to try to distract her email scandal
to help her in the twenty sixteen election, and then,
according to two people familiar with that investigation, the Western
District of Virginia is leading the inquiry related to the

(14:58):
alleged destruction of Miss Henley of documents connected with the
Durham Special Council investigation. The investigation is looking at multiple
potential subjects from the top leadership of the FBI between
twenty twenty and twenty twenty four, at the time that
Ray was director. The investigation appears to be intersecting as

(15:20):
well with the recent declassification of part of the written
report by John Durham who examined investigators who handled sensitive
political investigations around Trump and Clinton in twenty sixteen. Now,
the people that are reporting this, which you can find

(15:42):
over on x, obviously have some excellent contacts inside the
Department of Justice and maybe even the FBI, and I
hope they are way ahead of public events and all
this stuff, and I hope they stayed that way for
months ahead. And finally, Steve Bannon says that the Department

(16:03):
of Justice investigations are not limited to government officials who
were part of the election rigging and coup efforts. In fact,
he says.

Speaker 2 (16:13):
This, John Brennan is one of the key figures in
what really is a massive and sprawling investigation as envisioned
down in South Florida. And the reason it's down there,
and that's new that that we're reporting today that the
US Attorney in South Florida is leading this investigation is
because that's where the mar Lago search was. And so
what they're trying to do here is knit together what

(16:33):
they see as an ongoing conspiracy to violate Donald Trump's
civil rights that began with the Russia investigation and continued
on from Obama administration to Biden administration and then somehow
includes the Jack Smith investigations. It's this unifiled, unified field
theory of persecuting Donald Trump. And John Brennan, of course,
was a central figure in the preparation of that twenty

(16:56):
seventeen assessment into Russian election interference. And whe's the FBI's
Crossfire Hurricane investigation vision of that. How this all shakes out, Katie,
is anyone's guest, because you know, we've not seen any
evidence connecting any of these things, let alone any wrongdoing.
And in point of fact, as you well know, John Durham,
the special counsel appointed in the Trump administration, looked exhaustively,

(17:17):
particularly at the Russian Interference assessment and at the FBI's
Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and found no criminal wrongdoing by John Brennan.

Speaker 1 (17:26):
Or any other major figure.

Speaker 2 (17:27):
But here the Justice Department is trying to take another
crack at this, as we had, I.

Speaker 3 (17:31):
Think, And what do they have to say in regards
to that, Well, hang tight, you'll hear it on the
other side. I'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (17:45):
Tonight. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA director
talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (17:49):
Rownie, no, Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job.

Speaker 1 (17:51):
The Weekend with Michael Brown.

Speaker 3 (17:54):
Welcome back to the Weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to
have you with me. I appreciate you tuning in. Text
lines always open. D one zero three is the number. Keyword,
Mike or Michael, tell me anything, ask me anything. Be
here and follow me on X at Michael Brown USA
at Michael Brown USA. So we're walking through these new
subpoenas that have been issued, particularly it came out Friday,

(18:17):
and what they might really mean. Well, over at Steve
Bannon's war room, they're talking to a couple of people
and Bannon says that the Department of Justices investigation is
not limited to government officials who were part of that
election rigging and coup effort. And we were just walking
through the clip in which they were doing the setup.

(18:37):
So let's start with that clip that it just run
through so you can hear what they have to say.

Speaker 2 (18:43):
The key figures and what really is a massive and
sprawling investigation as envisioned down in South Florida, and the
reason it's down there and that's new, that that's we're
reporting today that the US Attorney in South Florida is
leading this investigation is because that's where the mar Lago
search was. And so what they're trying to do here
is knit together what they see as an ongoing conspiracy

(19:05):
to violate Donald Trump's civil rights that began with the
Russia investigation and continued on from Obama administration to Biden
administration and then somehow includes the Jack Smith investigations. It's
this unifiled, unified field theory of persecuting Donald Trump. And
John Brennan, of course, was a central figure in the
preparation of that twenty seventeen assessment into Russian election interference,

(19:28):
and of course the FBI has crossed Fire Hurricane Investigation
fision to that. How this all shakes out, Katie, is
anyone's guest, because we've not seen any evidence connecting any
of these things, let alone any wrongdoing. And in point
of fact, as you well know, John Durham, the Special
Council appointed in the Trump administration, looked exhaustively, particularly at
the Russian Interference assessment and at the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation,

(19:52):
and found no criminal wrongdoing by John Brennan.

Speaker 1 (19:55):
Or any other major figure.

Speaker 2 (19:56):
But here the Justice Department is trying to take another crack.

Speaker 1 (19:59):
At this as we had.

Speaker 6 (20:00):
I think what Ken has just postulated is maybe the
most reasonable theory I have heard about how the Justice
Department could prosecute this. And what I mean by reasonable
is that by all accounts, John Brennan left government more
than eight nine years ago, most of the crimes with
which one could conceivably think of John Brennan even being

(20:21):
remotely charged with would be time barred. The only way
that the Department of Justice could potentially get around that
is to charge this overarching conspiracy where the last thing
done in furtherance of that conspiracy happened in relatively recent memory.

Speaker 1 (20:37):
Otherwise, if you were to just look at the facts of.

Speaker 7 (20:41):
Yes, lady, just watch War Room, we explained that nine
months ago. You're just getting an msbc's audience going to
understand they ain't been paying attention.

Speaker 1 (20:50):
Better start paying attention.

Speaker 7 (20:53):
People in MSNBC are going to be indicted, no doubt,
going to be indicted part of the conspiracy.

Speaker 1 (21:01):
But to make sure you put in high.

Speaker 7 (21:02):
Relief those that have been running these operations against President
Trump and the MAGA movement and the country, and the
country been at this too powerful for too long.

Speaker 1 (21:17):
They're about to get their come up and.

Speaker 7 (21:21):
Gonna They're gonna be hiring attorneys and they're gonna be
spending millions of dollars and all of their life is
going to be focused on this.

Speaker 1 (21:27):
Keep themselves out of prison.

Speaker 7 (21:29):
Bolton's going to prison, Comy's going to prison, Brennan's going
to prison, Weisman's going to prison, McCabe's going to prison.
I can go down the drum list that got my
cheat sheet. Sorry, guys, Trump came back. You never thought
that would happen. You tried everything, bankrupting uh, put him

(21:53):
in all these false charges, all these false felonies, to
put him into prison for three hundred years, and then
finally to try to assassinate him, to attempt to assassinate
None of it work.

Speaker 3 (22:08):
And so I'm not a big fan of Steve Bannon
and I don't necessarily believe that they're going to go
to prison. But sometimes that come up and is not
necessarily prison. It may result in a conviction in which
a judge in a jury does not impose a sentence,

(22:30):
but they will have to do what Trump's done, and
that is defend themselves. And again I'm not asking for
just malicious prosecution. I'm not advocating that whatsoever. But I
am advocating that if you want to convene a grand jury,
because you do believe and MSNBC is right about one thing,

(22:50):
to tie everything together and to avoid the statute limitations,
you have to have one final act that still is
not barred by the statute limitation in order to move
the case forward. That's probably fairly easy to find because
everything would have continued up until and perhaps even after
the election of Donald Trump a year ago. So Bannon

(23:14):
is right that they are certainly going to have to
expend money, time, resources, the energy, the emotional told everything
that they did to Trump is not going to happen here,
and if it is, if there is a reasonable legal
basis for doing so, regardless of now, I would like
to see a result in an indictment, but I'm not

(23:36):
out here begging and hoping and praying for jail time.
I just want the accountability and if that means a conviction,
and you are because you're the former director of the CIA,
you only get probation, you know what. I'm actually okay
with that. I'm sure some of you would disagree, and
you want to see hard time. You want them to
see You want to see them, you know, in Rikers Island,

(23:59):
although it's not a federal you'd like to see them
on Riker's Island. Well, I really don't care if they
do or not, because I understand that they're going to
go through just crap, and that is they've got to
find the money, the resources, They got to spend the
time and the energy defending themselves, just like Donald Trump did.

(24:22):
And that sends a signal to everybody else who wants
to try to play these kinds of games in DC
we have. You know, it's kind of interesting. I was
just looking at my ex account during the break and
somebody accuses me of simply being a tool for the Uniparty. Well,
you can accuse me of whatever. I'm a use. I'm
accustomed being accused of a lot of things. Actually, just

(24:43):
go bite me. But you know what I am not.
I am not a tool for the Uniparty. And I
call balls and strikes on this program ideal in the
real world, and this is a great example of that.
I believe that if they're going to pursue indictments, there
is something there something. If it causes them to have
to defend themselves, I'm all for that. If it results

(25:07):
in an indictment and a conviction, I'm all for that.
If it results in jail or probation, I don't care.
I just want the accountability because if and I'll tell
you what you could throw up against me in just
a second, if you are found guilty, you will then

(25:30):
have paid the price because you will never work again
for all the crimes that you committed, even if you
did not serve jail time. The only thing that makes
me concerned about all of this voter reactions, because go
back to the very beginning of the program when we
talked about Virginia and New Jersey. If Virginia is more

(25:53):
than willing to elect an attorney general who literally, in
text messages, called for the killing of the former speaker
of the Virginia House of Delegates, and when try someone
of another party, of the Republican Party, tried to convince
him to back off, shouldn't be saying those things? Don't

(26:16):
you want to take that back? And said he doubled down? Oh,
and only would I kill him? But I think we
all to take two bullets and kills two children only
until their children die? Will will they ever suffer any consequences?
Know what it feels like to be, you know, be
put in this position that disqualifies him, in my opinion,
from any rational person, and in course I used the
word rational, from any rational person ever voting for that

(26:36):
individual to be the attorney general. Yet they did interestingly,
and I'll say this one more time, if he had
done those things and then applied for a job in
the Attorney General's office to be these you know, like
a deputy Attorney General or the Attorney General for the
criminal Division, he would have been disqualified. If he'd applied

(27:01):
for a job in a prosecutor's office, he should have
been disqualified, would have been disqualified. So to tie it
back to Brennan, Peter Struck, Lisa Page at all, Yes,
they will pay a price. The question is whether or
not they will pay the price. Patience is a virtue,

(27:25):
something I'm not very good at. So the subpoenas are
breaking out all over and I'm actually, frankly in a
really sad way, but also glad. I'm looking forward to
watching the justice system slowly grind all the remaining lifespans
of these deep state creatures into the dustment of history.

(27:52):
I want accountability, and we know, beyond any shadow of
a doubt that the links of this grand conspiracy chain,
I believe, run all the way up to the Oval
Office occupied in twenty sixteen by Brack Hussein Obama. What
an amazing time to be watching politics and our culture.

(28:15):
I'll be right back, Hey, welcome back to the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Glad have you with me. I appreciate
you tuning in, as I'd like to remind you every weekend.
I appreciate this audience. I appreciate you tuning in, appreciate
you listening on the weekend, and I also appreciate you
doing all the things I ask you to do, Engaging

(28:36):
on social media, downloading the podcast, listening to the weekday program,
all of that. I sincerely appreciate the effort that you
put out, so I try to do the best I
can to make it entertaining for you. Now, Sidney Sweeney
is back in the news because the news keeps making

(28:58):
the news about Sydney. It's hilarious. I hadn't thought about
her since the whole genes ad. I just didn't cross
my mind the last time I thought about her was
I was in a shopping mall in Denver and I
enter by a side door, and I'm walking down the

(29:18):
hallway and I see an American Eagle store and I
see the Sydney Sweeney jeans about, you know, the ad
for her genes, about how she's got really great genes.

Speaker 4 (29:29):
And then I.

Speaker 3 (29:31):
Noticed the people having their own kids get pictures, and
kids were taking selfies and everything in front of it,
and I kind of laughed about it and thought, well,
there's American culture for you right there. And then Gentlemen's
Cordy coming, Gentleman's Quarterly of all people come around and
bring it right back into the news again. Now GQ,

(29:54):
which is the way you really talk about if you're cool,
you really talk about Gentlemen's Cordy.

Speaker 4 (29:59):
That's just GQ.

Speaker 3 (30:01):
Now, that is ostensibly geared toward gentlemen who look at, oh,
I don't know, as Sydney Sweeney, and they read the interviews.
You know why just I buy a Playboy because I
read the interviews. I don't look at the fake pictures.

Speaker 4 (30:14):
Now.

Speaker 3 (30:15):
Women have always and I think will continue to work
for GQ. But in the clone samples, so people like
Michael use it for the clone samples. Okay, I got that.
I never thought about that. I guess I never subscribed
to gqu's I never thought about doing that. But Catherine

(30:36):
Stoffel works for GQ, and women have always worked there,
probably always will and that's fine. But I don't think
that this reporter, or I would say, let's put it positively,
she seems to not understand what gentlemen want.

Speaker 4 (30:52):
And like inside.

Speaker 3 (30:55):
American women right now, I think there are two wolves
and Sweeney is one of them, and this reporter is
the other.

Speaker 1 (31:02):
The Wolke left.

Speaker 3 (31:03):
Wants to paint Sweeney, who is an beautiful, entrepreneurial actress,
that she must be the gateway to white supremacist America.
In the interview, Sweeney says that the response to her
American Eagle Great Genes ad was surreal, and I'm sure
that before her it probably was, and I think probably

(31:28):
she thinks that it was surreal because the king of
culture in America, Donald Trump, commented about it. But that
wasn't enough for Catherine Stolefel, the reporter over a GQ.
She wanted to scalp. I'm literally in jeans and a
T shirt like every day of my life. Sweeney said, well,

(31:48):
same here, I am too, not T shirt but just
a white untuck, white shirt.

Speaker 4 (31:53):
Button down.

Speaker 3 (31:55):
Jeans are unconventional, uncontroversial. Jeans are off or awesome. Says
the reporter. I like your genes. Sweeney responds, you look
great in your genes.

Speaker 4 (32:08):
And it goes.

Speaker 3 (32:09):
But then it's back and forth, this back and forth,
and it's kind of nauseating. And then the reporter says,
but I think I know how you're going to answer this,
but I'm going to ask anyway. I mean, the President
tweeted about the genes ad Now Sweeney's face, she's been giggling,
but it's beginning to kind of drop. Her animated eyes

(32:30):
are going stone cold, the smile beginning to disappear, the
laughter has left her eyes, and Sweeney says, yeah, it
was surreal, and it would be totally human. I would
be thankful that somebody had my back in public, and conveniently,
some very powerful people had my back in public. And
now the reporter sees the opening. I wondered if you

(32:53):
felt that way. Hmm pause. I don't think that it's not,
Sweeney says, it's not like I didn't have that feeling,
but I wasn't thinking of it like that, of any
of it. I kind of just put my phone away.
I was filming every day. I'm filming you for you,

(33:15):
so I'm working like sixteen hour days. I don't really
bring my phone on set. I work and then I
go home and I go to sleep. So I didn't
really see a lot of it. But Stowful, the reporter continues, Well,
You've made a really good case with keeping your thoughts
in your life separate from that work. But the risk
is that you know, there's a chance that somebody will
get some idea about what you think about certain issues.
In other words, if you don't respond, if you don't

(33:37):
say anything, then people are going to impugne to you
or impewe to you things that you may not be thinking.
And so she's trying to get Sweeney confessed that I
really thought this was all about white supremacy. And it
is at that point if you watch this interview, that
you can see in Sweeney's eye that she truly hates

(33:57):
the person to whom she's committed an hour of her
life for a stupid interview.

Speaker 4 (34:03):
Hmm. She says, what ordering a drone strike in her mind,
I'm gonna bomb the hell out of you and stuffel
insurgent says, well, do you worry about that? And Sweeney
just says no. That tells me more.

Speaker 3 (34:21):
About Sidney Sweeney than any gene ad or anything else.
But the reporter doesn't stop. This is the cabal in action.
If you have not watched this interview, I encourage you
to go find the Sidney Sweeney stoufful Ad on stuf
Will just like the frozen food stuff the stuffel Ad

(34:43):
and watch it because she's really pissed at this point,
and so Will thinks she's got a gotcha moment. The
criticism of the content was that basically, in this political climate,
like white people shouldn't joke about genetic superiority like that
was kind of the criticism broadly speak. And since you
were talking about this, I just wanted to give you
an opportunity to talk about that like supremacy specifically, and

(35:08):
Sweeney says, I think that when I have an issue
that I want to speak about, people will hear. And
that's why I think Sidney Sweeney is what you and
I have been begging for from Hollywood stars for decades.
Someone who looks good someone who works hard, shows up

(35:32):
on time, stays sober, keeps their opinions basically to themselves,
and it makes gobs of money for themselves in the
studio by making movies and pretending to be somebody else.

Speaker 4 (35:44):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (35:46):
Now the reporter is a great example of what we're
sick of, and that's the dying media class that she represents.
So one of them is today's Internet main character, and
the other will be a main character in most of
our media lives for probably the next twenty years. So,

(36:06):
Sidney Sweeney, I'd just like to welcome you back to
the real world. I'd like to welcome you back into
the reality of You don't need to capitulate to them.
You don't need to cow tell to them. You can
stand on your own two legs and just say, you
know what, if there's something I want people to know
what I think about something, I'll tell them. And I
don't need some little pissannt reporter like you asking me

(36:28):
about it. So, Sidney Sweeney, whom I really had no
idea about until the gene ad, Yeah, you're my girl.

Speaker 4 (36:36):
Go for it.

Speaker 1 (36:37):
The girl go for it.