Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael. It's called playing small ball, right. We need to
get to the point where we can win back the
small things in order to win back the big things.
We keep swaying for the fences we're always going to miss.
Get back to the fundamentals, and that means winning elections
at the local level, your county commissioner, your local officials,
(00:22):
your city council, and then we'll have a base to
work forward.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
You know, I should remind you too, Kathleen, if you
have an opportunity, because I know you were probably at
the gym or something, but if you missed the first
hour of yesterday's program, you might want to go listen
to that. Speaking of small ball, Yes, I was on
a tirade yesterday morning, so you got to go listen
(00:50):
to that. Share it with Caldera.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
Two.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
What you're going to hear next is unfortunately not a
bad Saturday Night Life skit, which I know is the
only kind of skit that Saturday Night Life does anymore.
But I digress, and you may not want to believe
what you're about to hear. But the person that you're
about to hear, who is wearing a wig that was
(01:20):
bought at the Salvation army painted on eyebrows barely speaks
the King's English is Shri Thanadar. He's a legal immigrant
from India who, somehow, beyond my comprehension, represents the thirteenth
(01:44):
Congressional District of Michigan. And as you will hear, mister Thanadar,
who does possess a rudimentary grasp of the English language,
which I guess makes him probably as qualified as maybe Tim.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
Walls or Joe Biden, the whold higher office.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
He made news by introducing articles of impeachment targeting the
Secretary of War Pete Hegesath.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Secretary of Defense Pete Hexseth is uniquely unqualified for his role.
Every day it becomes clearer that he's engaging in unlawful,
illegal activity. That is why today I am preparing two
articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete hexsett one
(02:30):
for murder and conspiracy to murder and another for reckless
and unlawful mishandling of classified information. Recently, Pete Hexseth has
been under increased scrutiny for his direct orders to kill
everybody on a small civilian boat off the coast of Venezuela.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
Isn't amazing how Trump has managed to get Democrats to
defend drugs smugglers and so called civilian boats in open
international waters. This guy fell right for it, book line
and Sinker.
Speaker 4 (03:12):
Which had no indication of being hostile. And we now
know that Pete Hexit not only carried out these strikes
but ordered those under his command to kill everybody and
leave no survivors, an illegal act under our own laws
(03:33):
of war. Even when two of those onboard clung to
life on the side of the boat, he ordered them
to strike again to make sure they were dead. This
was not an act of war. Congress has not declared
war on Venezuela X.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
What does does he have intel that we don't know?
Does he have?
Speaker 2 (04:00):
These are they were Venezuelans. They could have been I
don't know, Epidorians, They could have been Mexican, they could
have been Colombian, they could have been Brazilian.
Speaker 4 (04:11):
F and the administration gave the excuse of fighting narco
terrorism but provided no evidence for their claim.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
So let's be clear.
Speaker 4 (04:23):
These are extra judicial, unlawful killings.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
This was murder.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
In addition, he is also actively endangering the lives of
our brave service members. Earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
I just remind you this is Tre s Hri I
thanad or thh A n E d a RNA's Sonia's
official congressional website. He's very good at reading the teleprompter.
But I'm sitting here and I'm watching and I'm listening
to this again for like the emptying time, and I'm thinking,
how do these people get elected? It's like when I
(05:04):
talk about the View, and it's not so much that
the ladies of the View ladies I use loosely that
the ladies of the View are weird. It's are dumb,
which they are in both instances. I don't worry so
much about them as I do the people that watch them.
(05:26):
And as I watch and listen to this guy, congress
Mennish Lenador, I wonder to myself, how does this guy
get elected? Who are the people that had a choice,
and this was the choice they made?
Speaker 3 (05:42):
What were they thinking?
Speaker 5 (05:45):
It never ceases to amaze me how these various congressional
districts managed to send their village idiot instead of the
best embraced among them.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
Well was it? William F.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Bugley famously said something to the effect that he'd rather
be gathered governed by five hundred and thirty five people
randomly selected from the Boston telephone directory than he would
from the people that are currently there. Yeah, it might
be true. And then before I go back to finish
mister Shandahar's kandahars mister Shandahar's little video, I want to
(06:23):
address gouber number fifty five seventy four, Mike Tree. This
is a national problem. Our elections are corrupt due to
machines mail in ballots. No idea required, need paper ballots
with security or watermark. It's a big problem in Colorado.
They let us win a few to keep people like
(06:45):
you not requesting the gold standard. You must be new here,
because not only do I want the gold standard paper ballots,
single day voting, in person voting, and only absentee voting
upon written request, so that your mem that's in a
(07:05):
nursing home can vote, or if you really are in
canda hor because you're own business, you can vote absentee.
Either than that, No everybody votes on election day, none
of these election weeks or an election month.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
And I want paper ballots.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
I want to have to actually either punch, you know,
so I get a hanging chad, or I want to
fill out a paper ballot. I want to do something
other than the stupid machines. You really must be new
here if you've never heard me say anything like that before.
And I'll give you I'll catch you some slack because
maybe you didn't listen to me over on the on
the little station, but on the big station, you got
(07:43):
to recognize I am absolutely one hundred percent in favor
of an election day seven am to seven pm or
I don't care, seven am to nine pm.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
I don't care. And I'm tired of.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Waiting for you know, four or five days, four or
five weeks to get results. And I'm tired of people
showing up with that an id. Oh what's your name,
Michael Brown? Oh, yeah, there you are. Okay, here's a ballot.
Oh it drives me crazy. Back back to Shri than Thanadar, Thanadar.
Speaker 4 (08:19):
This has to end now. That is why today I
am calling for the impeachment of Pete Hexit for the
crime of murder and conspiracy to murder, for the reckless
and unlawful mishandling of classified information, and for the fragrant
(08:42):
violation of numerous military laws at flagrant love. The United
States of America and will always fight to uphold our constitution.
Pet Exit must be brought to justice.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
Thank you, You're welcome, Thank you. Now think about that.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
That dude's the best the Democrat Party has to offer
to carry an impeachment effort forward, even though it's against
a cabinet secretary and not about the president. Don't make
any mistake about this. This is a Democrat Party effort.
It's not just some congressman out on his own. There
is no way that than de Har was allowed to
introduce those painfully stupid impeachment resolutions without the approval of
(09:26):
the minority leader Haken Jeffries. These things don't just materially
materialize by accident in Congress, especially when the goosstepping Democrats
are concerned. That means that the Democrat Party, intentionally and
with mals the forethought, decided it wanted to put that
(09:47):
guy out there for national public consumption, which then begs
the question why why do you think the Democrats believe
that it is a positive thing for them to put
this apparently functional idiot forward as a national poster child.
Speaker 3 (10:02):
For their party.
Speaker 2 (10:04):
They've done the same with you know, Luminarias like Somali
immigrants elon Omar, you know, the one that married your brother,
or Rashida to Lei, who also represents Michigan's Palestinian population,
over the interests of this country. Why what's in it
for the Democrat Party? What's in it for the Democrat Party?
Have you thought about that?
Speaker 6 (10:25):
Hey, your grandpa first talk back here.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
Just heard your piece.
Speaker 6 (10:29):
About the voting. I don't know if you thought we
should go back to paper files and tax machines too. Otherwise,
it just sounds like you want to lower voter turnout
or we need to make it a national holiday, federally
recognized so that everyone has a chance.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
All right, thanks a lot. Let's makes me nervous.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
I find it's hilarious that people always fall back to
that position that, oh, you're trying to lower voter turnout.
My first response to that is, so what if I am?
I really don't care whether you choose to exercise your
right to vote or not. That's I'm not trying to
(11:08):
force anyone to vote, and I'm not trying to prevent
anyone from.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
Legally exercising their right to vote.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
But it is a freaking civic duty to vote. And
if you can't get off your fat ass between the
hours of seven am and seven pm and go vote.
And if there's some legitimate reason why you can do that,
then request a legitimate absentee ballot. Your argument is completely fault.
Speaker 7 (11:41):
I wonder if that talkbacker would prefer like American IDOL voting,
where you just get out your phone and you text in,
you know, seven or eleven times from each number.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Yeah, would you prefer that? And by the way, the
law requires your employer. Now, I understand there are certain
ramifications for this, but uh, there are a thousand lawyers
within arm's length of me that would be more than
willing to represent you. If you went to your employer
(12:12):
and said, hey, listen, the only time I have to
vote is at noon during my lunch break, and the
line's kind of long, and I might be a little
late getting back from lunch. And the employer says, well, no,
you can't do it. Then you do that. Yeah, You've
got a cause of action against your employer. There's a
little free legal advice for you right there. So everything
(12:34):
that you keep arguing about there is a legitimate retort
to a legitimate counter argument too. And you're just fat ass,
lazy and just want to, Oh, I just want to
vote by computer?
Speaker 3 (12:47):
Hmm, how many?
Speaker 4 (12:50):
You know?
Speaker 3 (12:50):
I could just see? Let me do that.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Hang on, hang on, say I'm curious about something, But dude,
how many data breaches have occurred in the United States
in twenty twenty five? Doom bump bump, bump, bump, bum bum.
(13:17):
As of mid December twenty twenty five, reports indicate more
than twelve thousand confirmed data breaches worldwide, with US experiencing
a significant share of mid rising cybersecurity threats.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
Here are the key stats.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
The Identity Theft Resource Center documented one thousand, seven hundred
and thirty two data compromises. Now remember these are data compromises,
so for one data compromise, there might be a million
people involved. So if you want to if you think
that I'm a luddite and that I'm an anti computer,
anti technology, you barked up the wrong.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Tree, bucko, Absolutely the wrong tree.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
You want to go look at the new msport I've
got out there and look the technology in that car,
and I'm how I'm adept at that. You want to
come into this studio and look at all the technology
that I used to do this program? Yeah, bite my butt.
Just absolutely bite my butt, bucko, because you sound to
me like you want to use computerized voting because you
(14:20):
want the scam to continue. You don't want, you don't
want to you want you want to take the risk.
I'm not well need to take the risks.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
You mean I need to put pants on to go vote?
Speaker 4 (14:31):
Now?
Speaker 2 (14:31):
Oh gosh, dragging the inhumanity, I'm so sorry. And then
you got to drag your formally fat ass out to
a polling station.
Speaker 3 (14:39):
And actually stand in line. Now what I fang fascinating.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
I don't mean anything about who that particular caller was,
but I bet if he's a Broncos fan, he probably
stoodn't line to get on the light rail, then drive
down and go to the stadium, stood in line to
get through you know, the gate to get into a seat,
and then walked all the way up to a seat,
and then all of that, and then came back and
called for an uber and had to wait thirty minutes
for an uber and then finally got back home, you know,
(15:04):
two hours after the game was over.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
But he doesn't want to go stand in line to vote, Well.
Speaker 2 (15:08):
You know what, then don't vote, because my guess is,
if that's your mentality. You're voting for the wrong side anyway,
So I don't want you to vote. How about that?
I'd see you see because I don't care whether you
vote or not.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
Wow wow wow wow wow wow wow.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
So if you're by the way, if you're the one
that left the point about the gold standard when it
comes to voting, I just describe to you what the
gold standard is. You get off your ass, you go
to your polling place, you show an ID, they give
you a ballot. I don't care whether it's paper or electronic.
But somehow you show an ID. If it's paper, I
(15:48):
don't care whether you have to take your little pen
and market you know, like you do your mail in
ballots today. You use a pen to mark your mail
in ballots. And remember it even has instructions. Don't put
an X, don't draw outside the lines. You gotta draw
inside the lines. You gotta do all of that, and
but you gotta do it in person, so we know
it's really you.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Voting a pickle.
Speaker 7 (16:11):
Well, the colin never mentioned wanting to vote by computer
from text message.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
What does he want to do? Vote by ablas? I mean,
what are we gonna do?
Speaker 2 (16:22):
Oh my god, this is why we can't have nice
things in this country because of people that vote for uh,
what's his name Thanadar, or people that vote for Omar
or vote for Ashida talib or vote for AOC, or
vote for Joe Biden, or or or that want to
just oh, let's just let's just have Jenna Griswold just
(16:45):
have computer belts and we'll just do everything by computer,
because there's never been a data breach in the history
computer since they you know it, since the computer was invented.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
None, what's deliver boo.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
Anyway, back to the point I was trying to make
to begin with, before I got derailed by a talkback.
See why I talk back to important talk back? Look
because he you know what, he kind of gives me.
You know, I got a lunch meeting when I get
done here. Now I'm all fired up for the lunch meeting.
Speaker 7 (17:11):
I do feel a little bad since he did say
that was his first talkback he's ever left. And why
that part harping on him a little bit?
Speaker 3 (17:19):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (17:21):
I mean, come on, come on, would you do you
think he'll get the reference? Emily Latila? Never mind, never mind,
just continue to vote the way you do. Yeah, just
never mind, never mind. Now let's go back to Kandahar.
(17:42):
I keep calling Gandahar Canadar. Why would why do you
think the Democrats believe that that was a positive thing
for them to put out, that put that functional idiot forward,
And my question was what's in it for the Democrat Party?
My view is that it all points to one of
the rare failures by the founders who drafted the Constitution.
(18:04):
Anybody who has taken him past the civics class knows
that the Constitution requires presidents to be native born citizens.
That requirement exists to ensure that anybody who holds the
presidency shares the common values of this country and will
therefore work to protect the interest of the United States
(18:27):
over any other nation on the face of this planet.
But unfortunately, the founders did not choose to invoke the
same requirement from members of Congress or the Senate. And
so now we see the Democrat Party gradually beginning to
fill the seats on their side of the aisle with
(18:47):
foreign born immigrants, and they proudly boast that they are
there to advocate for the interests of their real home
country over the interests of this country. Trend that's been
fed in recent years by the obviously open, open border
policies of both Barack Obama and Joe Biden. So the
Democrats now consciously choose to put these foreign born disloyal
(19:11):
members of Congress out front, and they do it with
increasing frequency because it's obviously an effort to normalize their
disloyalty in the public consciousness. It's the same kind of
mass brainwashing that the woke Democrats and their media supporters
engaged in via the you know, all of the well
(19:35):
COVID for example, mass formation, psychosis, just oh my gosh, everybody,
everybody normalizing the abnormal.
Speaker 3 (19:46):
This is what we see going on here.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
And I don't think any member of Congress today is
more abnormal than Tree Thanadar. So you can probably expect
to see him out front speaking for all sorts of
deal depraved Democrats in the future, because that's who the
Democrat Party is, and should we be surprised by that.
Speaking of Democrats, there are now email communications from the
(20:12):
FBI that were sent to the former Biden government's Department
of Justice warning the Department of Justice that it lacked
probable cause to execute.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
A certain search warrant. The search warrant was.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Executed on August eighth, twenty twenty two. You remember that
search warrant. It was I mean, it was going to
be close to a shootout at the OK Corral, because
on one side you had tactically armed FBI agents and on
(20:51):
the other side you had heavily armed Secret Service agents. Yes,
I'm talking about the raid of mar Lago Trump's home
in Florida on August eight, twenty twenty two. Reports indicate
that the Attorney General Pam Bondi and the FBI Director
(21:12):
Cash matel as soon as today sometime are expected to
provide Biden era emails to the Senate and the House
Judiciary committees ahead of a deposition that's supposed to occur
tomorrow Wednesday of former Council Jack Smith. Now, the details
apparently detail the FBI's legal objections to the raid, although
(21:34):
the Biden Department of Justice prosecutors decided to proceed regardless. Now,
weaponization of the Department of Justice. Where do I keep
hearing that phrase? Oh, yeah, that's what Trump's supposed to
be doing by lawfully going after people that, based on
(21:56):
probable cause, have committed crimes. But the even the FBI said,
wait a minute, there's no probable cause here for a
search war, which I find fascinating because once again you
probably didn't hear me because I was over on the
other station, but I kept saying, wait a minute, you're
looking for documents. You know what the documents are. You
(22:20):
have been negotiating for the documents, and it's really the
National Archives, because the documents that you seek are so
called presidential documents, and so there is a question of
whether or not they are classified or unclassified, and there's
also a legal question of whether they belong to the
(22:42):
National Archives or they're personal to the form at the time,
the formal president, former President Donald Trump. And you've been
in conversations with his legal team, the legal team for
the National Archives and the Department of Justice, meaning that oh,
there is no reasonable suspicion, there is no probable cause.
(23:07):
And all you have to do is, if you really
think that Donald Trump has classified documents, you don't need
a search warrant. All you need to do is execute
a subpoena, go to court, tell the judge exactly everything
you've been negotiating, identify the documents. You can do it
(23:29):
in a classified filing, a classified pleading in front of
a judge that can see classified documents, and you can
say these are the documents that we are the believer there,
and we would ask the court to issue a subpoena
forcing the former president to turn over those documents to us,
and then the president can counter, he can move to
(23:50):
quash that subpoena. Everybody gets their due process. But that's
not what they did, not at all. Instead, they decided
to make it an inflection point. They decided to politicize
it because the raid indeed became a very significant inflection
(24:10):
point just prior just before the twenty twenty four election,
and it led to two federal indictments against Donald Trump.
So Jack Smith then took over the FBI classified document's
case just a couple of months after that Marlogo raid,
and that ramped up the Democrat law fare against the
(24:34):
Republican nominee. Both of those indictments were ultimately dismissed. So
Smith is now said to be deposed tomorrow in a
closed door session by the House Judiciary Committee, and congressional
investigators are probing into the Biden Department of Justices prosecutions
of Trump and Smith's actions in the Arctic cross scandal.
(24:58):
Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House to Do Sherry Committee,
says this, the Committee on the Judiciary is continuing to
conduct oversight of the operations of the Office of Special
Counsel that you led, specifically your team's prosecutions of President
Donald Trump and his co defendants. This is a letter
he wrote to about the subpoena to Smith's lawyer, Peter Kowski,
(25:18):
a lawyer that represents Smith, who indicated he would supply
he would he would comply with a subpoena. So what's
going on here? Oh, it's the the chickens are coming
home to roost. What we knew was lawfair, and what
we knew was an attempt to influence the election. We
(25:41):
now start to find once again, once you start digging
into the deep state, you start to find that, oh, yeah,
they really were engaged in lawfair, and by engaging in lawfair,
you were attempting to influence an election. I challenge you
to point out where it is that you think that
(26:03):
Donald Trump, as president forty seven is doing the same
thing with the DOJ.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
I don't think so, But that's what everybody wants to argue,
when in fact, just the opposite happens to be true.
It's fascinating to me how now this isn't going to
get much coverage in the cabal because obviously they don't
want you.
Speaker 3 (26:25):
To know about it.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
But when you lack that kind of documentation that shows
that you could have done it in a less intrusive
and obtrusive way by simply requesting a subpoena, everybody gets
due process, and instead you chose to send in armed
(26:47):
FBI agents to the home of a former president that
is guarded by armed Secret Service agents. I really am shocked,
and I don't anybody get hurt, but I am kind
of disappointed that shots weren't fired, because that would have
shown the American public just how absurd all of that was. Oh,
(27:09):
apparently Southcomb has just announced another series of strikes in
the Eastern Pacific on three vessels identified as being used
by drug traffickers. There apparently destroyed three vessels and eight
male narco terrorists. Let's see over on ex Southcomb writes
(27:30):
this intelligence confirmed that the vessels were transiting along known
narco traffic routes in the Eastern Pacific were engaged in
narco trafficking.
Speaker 3 (27:39):
The total of eight.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Male narco terrorists were killed during these actions, three in
the first vessel, two in the second, and three in
the third. Authorized by oh they tried to impeach Pete
Hegsath authorized by Secretary War Pete Hegsath part of, obviously
the broader operation by the Trump administration trying to disrupt
the known drug traffic arrousts in the Caribbean and along
(28:01):
the Pacific coast of Central and South America. So this
latest operation now brings the number of narco traffickers killed
in the ongoing strikes to about ninety. I think the
Venezuelan cartales, including Cartel day loss so Less, believed to
be the country's dictator Nicholas run by Maduro, those have
been the primary targets. I think this might be the
(28:21):
first time that we've done other cartels and on the
other side of South America. Previous strike on September two,
that's the one where Admiral Bradley got dragged into it
and he said, no, I'm the one that gave the orders.
But wait a minute. The Congressman keeps telling us that
Pete Hagesath gave the orders. So who are you going
(28:44):
to believe? The Congressman that really is just, you know,
a naturalized citizen. That's the mistake the founders made when
it came to Congressman, Senate, or are you going to
believe Admiral Bradley.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
I think that all used to believe Admiral Bradley.
Michael. It's called playing small ball, right. We need to
get to the point where we can win back the
small things in order to win back the big things.
We keep swaying for the fences we're always going to miss.
Get back to the fundamentals, and that means winning elections
at the local level, your county commissioner, your local officials,
(00:22):
your city council, and then we'll have a base to
work forward.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
You know, I should remind you too, Kathleen, if you
have an opportunity, because I know you were probably at
the gym or something, but if you missed the first
hour of yesterday's program, you might want to go listen
to that. Speaking of small ball, Yes, I was on
a tirade yesterday morning, so you got to go listen
(00:50):
to that. Share it with Caldera.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
Two.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
What you're going to hear next is unfortunately not a
bad Saturday Night Life skit, which I know is the
only kind of skit that Saturday Night Life does anymore.
But I digress, and you may not want to believe
what you're about to hear. But the person that you're
about to hear, who is wearing a wig that was
(01:20):
bought at the Salvation army painted on eyebrows barely speaks
the King's English is Shri Thanadar. He's a legal immigrant
from India who, somehow, beyond my comprehension, represents the thirteenth
(01:44):
Congressional District of Michigan. And as you will hear, mister Thanadar,
who does possess a rudimentary grasp of the English language,
which I guess makes him probably as qualified as maybe Tim.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
Walls or Joe Biden, the whold higher office.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
He made news by introducing articles of impeachment targeting the
Secretary of War Pete Hegesath.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Secretary of Defense Pete Hexseth is uniquely unqualified for his role.
Every day it becomes clearer that he's engaging in unlawful,
illegal activity. That is why today I am preparing two
articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete hexsett one
(02:30):
for murder and conspiracy to murder and another for reckless
and unlawful mishandling of classified information. Recently, Pete Hexseth has
been under increased scrutiny for his direct orders to kill
everybody on a small civilian boat off the coast of Venezuela.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
Isn't amazing how Trump has managed to get Democrats to
defend drugs smugglers and so called civilian boats in open
international waters. This guy fell right for it, book line
and Sinker.
Speaker 4 (03:12):
Which had no indication of being hostile. And we now
know that Pete Hexit not only carried out these strikes
but ordered those under his command to kill everybody and
leave no survivors, an illegal act under our own laws
(03:33):
of war. Even when two of those onboard clung to
life on the side of the boat, he ordered them
to strike again to make sure they were dead. This
was not an act of war. Congress has not declared
war on Venezuela X.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
What does does he have intel that we don't know?
Does he have?
Speaker 2 (04:00):
These are they were Venezuelans. They could have been I
don't know, Epidorians, They could have been Mexican, they could
have been Colombian, they could have been Brazilian.
Speaker 4 (04:11):
F and the administration gave the excuse of fighting narco
terrorism but provided no evidence for their claim.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
So let's be clear.
Speaker 4 (04:23):
These are extra judicial, unlawful killings.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
This was murder.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
In addition, he is also actively endangering the lives of
our brave service members. Earlier this year.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
I just remind you this is Tre s Hri I
thanad or thh A n E d a RNA's Sonia's
official congressional website. He's very good at reading the teleprompter.
But I'm sitting here and I'm watching and I'm listening
to this again for like the emptying time, and I'm thinking,
how do these people get elected? It's like when I
(05:04):
talk about the View, and it's not so much that
the ladies of the View ladies I use loosely that
the ladies of the View are weird. It's are dumb,
which they are in both instances. I don't worry so
much about them as I do the people that watch them.
(05:26):
And as I watch and listen to this guy, congress
Mennish Lenador, I wonder to myself, how does this guy
get elected? Who are the people that had a choice,
and this was the choice they made?
Speaker 3 (05:42):
What were they thinking?
Speaker 5 (05:45):
It never ceases to amaze me how these various congressional
districts managed to send their village idiot instead of the
best embraced among them.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
Well was it? William F.
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Bugley famously said something to the effect that he'd rather
be gathered governed by five hundred and thirty five people
randomly selected from the Boston telephone directory than he would
from the people that are currently there. Yeah, it might
be true. And then before I go back to finish
mister Shandahar's kandahars mister Shandahar's little video, I want to
(06:23):
address gouber number fifty five seventy four, Mike Tree. This
is a national problem. Our elections are corrupt due to
machines mail in ballots. No idea required, need paper ballots
with security or watermark. It's a big problem in Colorado.
They let us win a few to keep people like
(06:45):
you not requesting the gold standard. You must be new here,
because not only do I want the gold standard paper ballots,
single day voting, in person voting, and only absentee voting
upon written request, so that your mem that's in a
(07:05):
nursing home can vote, or if you really are in
canda hor because you're own business, you can vote absentee.
Either than that, No everybody votes on election day, none
of these election weeks or an election month.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
And I want paper ballots.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
I want to have to actually either punch, you know,
so I get a hanging chad, or I want to
fill out a paper ballot. I want to do something
other than the stupid machines. You really must be new
here if you've never heard me say anything like that before.
And I'll give you I'll catch you some slack because
maybe you didn't listen to me over on the on
the little station, but on the big station, you got
(07:43):
to recognize I am absolutely one hundred percent in favor
of an election day seven am to seven pm or
I don't care, seven am to nine pm.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
I don't care. And I'm tired of.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Waiting for you know, four or five days, four or
five weeks to get results. And I'm tired of people
showing up with that an id. Oh what's your name,
Michael Brown? Oh, yeah, there you are. Okay, here's a ballot.
Oh it drives me crazy. Back back to Shri than Thanadar, Thanadar.
Speaker 4 (08:19):
This has to end now. That is why today I
am calling for the impeachment of Pete Hexit for the
crime of murder and conspiracy to murder, for the reckless
and unlawful mishandling of classified information, and for the fragrant
(08:42):
violation of numerous military laws at flagrant love. The United
States of America and will always fight to uphold our constitution.
Pet Exit must be brought to justice.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
Thank you, You're welcome, Thank you. Now think about that.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
That dude's the best the Democrat Party has to offer
to carry an impeachment effort forward, even though it's against
a cabinet secretary and not about the president. Don't make
any mistake about this. This is a Democrat Party effort.
It's not just some congressman out on his own. There
is no way that than de Har was allowed to
introduce those painfully stupid impeachment resolutions without the approval of
(09:26):
the minority leader Haken Jeffries. These things don't just materially
materialize by accident in Congress, especially when the goosstepping Democrats
are concerned. That means that the Democrat Party, intentionally and
with mals the forethought, decided it wanted to put that
(09:47):
guy out there for national public consumption, which then begs
the question why why do you think the Democrats believe
that it is a positive thing for them to put
this apparently functional idiot forward as a national poster child.
Speaker 3 (10:02):
For their party.
Speaker 2 (10:04):
They've done the same with you know, Luminarias like Somali
immigrants elon Omar, you know, the one that married your brother,
or Rashida to Lei, who also represents Michigan's Palestinian population,
over the interests of this country. Why what's in it
for the Democrat Party? What's in it for the Democrat Party?
Have you thought about that?
Speaker 6 (10:25):
Hey, your grandpa first talk back here.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
Just heard your piece.
Speaker 6 (10:29):
About the voting. I don't know if you thought we
should go back to paper files and tax machines too. Otherwise,
it just sounds like you want to lower voter turnout
or we need to make it a national holiday, federally
recognized so that everyone has a chance.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
All right, thanks a lot. Let's makes me nervous.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
I find it's hilarious that people always fall back to
that position that, oh, you're trying to lower voter turnout.
My first response to that is, so what if I am?
I really don't care whether you choose to exercise your
right to vote or not. That's I'm not trying to
(11:08):
force anyone to vote, and I'm not trying to prevent
anyone from.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
Legally exercising their right to vote.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
But it is a freaking civic duty to vote. And
if you can't get off your fat ass between the
hours of seven am and seven pm and go vote.
And if there's some legitimate reason why you can do that,
then request a legitimate absentee ballot. Your argument is completely fault.
Speaker 7 (11:41):
I wonder if that talkbacker would prefer like American IDOL voting,
where you just get out your phone and you text in,
you know, seven or eleven times from each number.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Yeah, would you prefer that? And by the way, the
law requires your employer. Now, I understand there are certain
ramifications for this, but uh, there are a thousand lawyers
within arm's length of me that would be more than
willing to represent you. If you went to your employer
(12:12):
and said, hey, listen, the only time I have to
vote is at noon during my lunch break, and the
line's kind of long, and I might be a little
late getting back from lunch. And the employer says, well, no,
you can't do it. Then you do that. Yeah, You've
got a cause of action against your employer. There's a
little free legal advice for you right there. So everything
(12:34):
that you keep arguing about there is a legitimate retort
to a legitimate counter argument too. And you're just fat ass,
lazy and just want to, Oh, I just want to
vote by computer?
Speaker 3 (12:47):
Hmm, how many?
Speaker 4 (12:50):
You know?
Speaker 3 (12:50):
I could just see? Let me do that.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Hang on, hang on, say I'm curious about something, But dude,
how many data breaches have occurred in the United States
in twenty twenty five? Doom bump bump, bump, bump, bum bum.
(13:17):
As of mid December twenty twenty five, reports indicate more
than twelve thousand confirmed data breaches worldwide, with US experiencing
a significant share of mid rising cybersecurity threats.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
Here are the key stats.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
The Identity Theft Resource Center documented one thousand, seven hundred
and thirty two data compromises. Now remember these are data compromises,
so for one data compromise, there might be a million
people involved. So if you want to if you think
that I'm a luddite and that I'm an anti computer,
anti technology, you barked up the wrong.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Tree, bucko, Absolutely the wrong tree.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
You want to go look at the new msport I've
got out there and look the technology in that car,
and I'm how I'm adept at that. You want to
come into this studio and look at all the technology
that I used to do this program? Yeah, bite my butt.
Just absolutely bite my butt, bucko, because you sound to
me like you want to use computerized voting because you
(14:20):
want the scam to continue. You don't want, you don't
want to you want you want to take the risk.
I'm not well need to take the risks.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
You mean I need to put pants on to go vote?
Speaker 4 (14:31):
Now?
Speaker 2 (14:31):
Oh gosh, dragging the inhumanity, I'm so sorry. And then
you got to drag your formally fat ass out to
a polling station.
Speaker 3 (14:39):
And actually stand in line. Now what I fang fascinating.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
I don't mean anything about who that particular caller was,
but I bet if he's a Broncos fan, he probably
stoodn't line to get on the light rail, then drive
down and go to the stadium, stood in line to
get through you know, the gate to get into a seat,
and then walked all the way up to a seat,
and then all of that, and then came back and
called for an uber and had to wait thirty minutes
for an uber and then finally got back home, you know,
(15:04):
two hours after the game was over.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
But he doesn't want to go stand in line to vote, Well.
Speaker 2 (15:08):
You know what, then don't vote, because my guess is,
if that's your mentality. You're voting for the wrong side anyway,
So I don't want you to vote. How about that?
I'd see you see because I don't care whether you
vote or not.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
Wow wow wow wow wow wow wow.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
So if you're by the way, if you're the one
that left the point about the gold standard when it
comes to voting, I just describe to you what the
gold standard is. You get off your ass, you go
to your polling place, you show an ID, they give
you a ballot. I don't care whether it's paper or electronic.
But somehow you show an ID. If it's paper, I
(15:48):
don't care whether you have to take your little pen
and market you know, like you do your mail in
ballots today. You use a pen to mark your mail
in ballots. And remember it even has instructions. Don't put
an X, don't draw outside the lines. You gotta draw
inside the lines. You gotta do all of that, and
but you gotta do it in person, so we know
it's really you.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Voting a pickle.
Speaker 7 (16:11):
Well, the colin never mentioned wanting to vote by computer
from text message.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
What does he want to do? Vote by ablas? I mean,
what are we gonna do?
Speaker 2 (16:22):
Oh my god, this is why we can't have nice
things in this country because of people that vote for uh,
what's his name Thanadar, or people that vote for Omar
or vote for Ashida talib or vote for AOC, or
vote for Joe Biden, or or or that want to
just oh, let's just let's just have Jenna Griswold just
(16:45):
have computer belts and we'll just do everything by computer,
because there's never been a data breach in the history
computer since they you know it, since the computer was invented.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
None, what's deliver boo.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
Anyway, back to the point I was trying to make
to begin with, before I got derailed by a talkback.
See why I talk back to important talk back? Look
because he you know what, he kind of gives me.
You know, I got a lunch meeting when I get
done here. Now I'm all fired up for the lunch meeting.
Speaker 7 (17:11):
I do feel a little bad since he did say
that was his first talkback he's ever left. And why
that part harping on him a little bit?
Speaker 3 (17:19):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (17:21):
I mean, come on, come on, would you do you
think he'll get the reference? Emily Latila? Never mind, never mind,
just continue to vote the way you do. Yeah, just
never mind, never mind. Now let's go back to Kandahar.
(17:42):
I keep calling Gandahar Canadar. Why would why do you
think the Democrats believe that that was a positive thing
for them to put out, that put that functional idiot forward,
And my question was what's in it for the Democrat Party?
My view is that it all points to one of
the rare failures by the founders who drafted the Constitution.
(18:04):
Anybody who has taken him past the civics class knows
that the Constitution requires presidents to be native born citizens.
That requirement exists to ensure that anybody who holds the
presidency shares the common values of this country and will
therefore work to protect the interest of the United States
(18:27):
over any other nation on the face of this planet.
But unfortunately, the founders did not choose to invoke the
same requirement from members of Congress or the Senate. And
so now we see the Democrat Party gradually beginning to
fill the seats on their side of the aisle with
(18:47):
foreign born immigrants, and they proudly boast that they are
there to advocate for the interests of their real home
country over the interests of this country. Trend that's been
fed in recent years by the obviously open, open border
policies of both Barack Obama and Joe Biden. So the
Democrats now consciously choose to put these foreign born disloyal
(19:11):
members of Congress out front, and they do it with
increasing frequency because it's obviously an effort to normalize their
disloyalty in the public consciousness. It's the same kind of
mass brainwashing that the woke Democrats and their media supporters
engaged in via the you know, all of the well
(19:35):
COVID for example, mass formation, psychosis, just oh my gosh, everybody,
everybody normalizing the abnormal.
Speaker 3 (19:46):
This is what we see going on here.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
And I don't think any member of Congress today is
more abnormal than Tree Thanadar. So you can probably expect
to see him out front speaking for all sorts of
deal depraved Democrats in the future, because that's who the
Democrat Party is, and should we be surprised by that.
Speaking of Democrats, there are now email communications from the
(20:12):
FBI that were sent to the former Biden government's Department
of Justice warning the Department of Justice that it lacked
probable cause to execute.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
A certain search warrant. The search warrant was.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Executed on August eighth, twenty twenty two. You remember that
search warrant. It was I mean, it was going to
be close to a shootout at the OK Corral, because
on one side you had tactically armed FBI agents and on
(20:51):
the other side you had heavily armed Secret Service agents. Yes,
I'm talking about the raid of mar Lago Trump's home
in Florida on August eight, twenty twenty two. Reports indicate
that the Attorney General Pam Bondi and the FBI Director
(21:12):
Cash matel as soon as today sometime are expected to
provide Biden era emails to the Senate and the House
Judiciary committees ahead of a deposition that's supposed to occur
tomorrow Wednesday of former Council Jack Smith. Now, the details
apparently detail the FBI's legal objections to the raid, although
(21:34):
the Biden Department of Justice prosecutors decided to proceed regardless. Now,
weaponization of the Department of Justice. Where do I keep
hearing that phrase? Oh, yeah, that's what Trump's supposed to
be doing by lawfully going after people that, based on
(21:56):
probable cause, have committed crimes. But the even the FBI said,
wait a minute, there's no probable cause here for a
search war, which I find fascinating because once again you
probably didn't hear me because I was over on the
other station, but I kept saying, wait a minute, you're
looking for documents. You know what the documents are. You
(22:20):
have been negotiating for the documents, and it's really the
National Archives, because the documents that you seek are so
called presidential documents, and so there is a question of
whether or not they are classified or unclassified, and there's
also a legal question of whether they belong to the
(22:42):
National Archives or they're personal to the form at the time,
the formal president, former President Donald Trump. And you've been
in conversations with his legal team, the legal team for
the National Archives and the Department of Justice, meaning that oh,
there is no reasonable suspicion, there is no probable cause.
(23:07):
And all you have to do is, if you really
think that Donald Trump has classified documents, you don't need
a search warrant. All you need to do is execute
a subpoena, go to court, tell the judge exactly everything
you've been negotiating, identify the documents. You can do it
(23:29):
in a classified filing, a classified pleading in front of
a judge that can see classified documents, and you can
say these are the documents that we are the believer there,
and we would ask the court to issue a subpoena
forcing the former president to turn over those documents to us,
and then the president can counter, he can move to
(23:50):
quash that subpoena. Everybody gets their due process. But that's
not what they did, not at all. Instead, they decided
to make it an inflection point. They decided to politicize
it because the raid indeed became a very significant inflection
(24:10):
point just prior just before the twenty twenty four election,
and it led to two federal indictments against Donald Trump.
So Jack Smith then took over the FBI classified document's
case just a couple of months after that Marlogo raid,
and that ramped up the Democrat law fare against the
(24:34):
Republican nominee. Both of those indictments were ultimately dismissed. So
Smith is now said to be deposed tomorrow in a
closed door session by the House Judiciary Committee, and congressional
investigators are probing into the Biden Department of Justices prosecutions
of Trump and Smith's actions in the Arctic cross scandal.
(24:58):
Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House to Do Sherry Committee,
says this, the Committee on the Judiciary is continuing to
conduct oversight of the operations of the Office of Special
Counsel that you led, specifically your team's prosecutions of President
Donald Trump and his co defendants. This is a letter
he wrote to about the subpoena to Smith's lawyer, Peter Kowski,
(25:18):
a lawyer that represents Smith, who indicated he would supply
he would he would comply with a subpoena. So what's
going on here? Oh, it's the the chickens are coming
home to roost. What we knew was lawfair, and what
we knew was an attempt to influence the election. We
(25:41):
now start to find once again, once you start digging
into the deep state, you start to find that, oh, yeah,
they really were engaged in lawfair, and by engaging in lawfair,
you were attempting to influence an election. I challenge you
to point out where it is that you think that
(26:03):
Donald Trump, as president forty seven is doing the same
thing with the DOJ.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
I don't think so, But that's what everybody wants to argue,
when in fact, just the opposite happens to be true.
It's fascinating to me how now this isn't going to
get much coverage in the cabal because obviously they don't
want you.
Speaker 3 (26:25):
To know about it.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
But when you lack that kind of documentation that shows
that you could have done it in a less intrusive
and obtrusive way by simply requesting a subpoena, everybody gets
due process, and instead you chose to send in armed
(26:47):
FBI agents to the home of a former president that
is guarded by armed Secret Service agents. I really am shocked,
and I don't anybody get hurt, but I am kind
of disappointed that shots weren't fired, because that would have
shown the American public just how absurd all of that was. Oh,
(27:09):
apparently Southcomb has just announced another series of strikes in
the Eastern Pacific on three vessels identified as being used
by drug traffickers. There apparently destroyed three vessels and eight
male narco terrorists. Let's see over on ex Southcomb writes
(27:30):
this intelligence confirmed that the vessels were transiting along known
narco traffic routes in the Eastern Pacific were engaged in
narco trafficking.
Speaker 3 (27:39):
The total of eight.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Male narco terrorists were killed during these actions, three in
the first vessel, two in the second, and three in
the third. Authorized by oh they tried to impeach Pete
Hegsath authorized by Secretary War Pete Hegsath part of, obviously
the broader operation by the Trump administration trying to disrupt
the known drug traffic arrousts in the Caribbean and along
(28:01):
the Pacific coast of Central and South America. So this
latest operation now brings the number of narco traffickers killed
in the ongoing strikes to about ninety. I think the
Venezuelan cartales, including Cartel day loss so Less, believed to
be the country's dictator Nicholas run by Maduro, those have
been the primary targets. I think this might be the
(28:21):
first time that we've done other cartels and on the
other side of South America. Previous strike on September two,
that's the one where Admiral Bradley got dragged into it
and he said, no, I'm the one that gave the orders.
But wait a minute. The Congressman keeps telling us that
Pete Hagesath gave the orders. So who are you going
(28:44):
to believe? The Congressman that really is just, you know,
a naturalized citizen. That's the mistake the founders made when
it came to Congressman, Senate, or are you going to
believe Admiral Bradley.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
I think that all used to believe Admiral Bradley.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!