All Episodes

April 1, 2025 • 33 mins
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You know the president he's talking about that got the
third term, that would be President Barack Obama, because you know,
he was flowing all the strings for Sleepy Joe poopy bands.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
You know, actually I can see that argument. You're exactly right.
I was just thinking of someone actually getting elected, stupid me.
We talk not a lot, but we talked intersperse here
and there about the globalists. And you know, whether it's

(00:32):
the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, the European Union,
in any of these kind of globalist organizations that really
do they sincerely believe in a new world order, to
quote George H. W. Bush, a new world order in

(00:54):
which we have a global government that decides for or
every country, irrespective and regardless of cultural differences, language differences,
GDP differences. I mean, countries are as unique as individuals.

(01:15):
But they believe that we ought to have you know,
we'd be better off. Tam and I were watching what
were watching last night? Well maybe it was nineteen twenty three,
but anyway, they were talking in the narrative as they
were showing these scenes. They were talking about, you know

(01:36):
that there have been five mass extinctions throughout the history
of mankind, and you know, in nineteen twenty three, much
like in twenty twenty five, we think in terms of
mass extinctions, except the globalists believe that part of the

(01:57):
reason we need another mass extinction, and maybe maybe COVID
was a trial run for that, was that there are
too many people, and the more people you have, the
harder it is to control. I was fascinated by the
fact that in that interview that Elon Musk did with
Brett bear he was asked a question I should maybe

(02:19):
I'll find the sound bite in a minute, if it's
in our group. Brett Behar asked Elon Musk, what not
just doge, but just what you know globally speaking keeps
you awake at night? And I was fascinated by not
only the answer, but the amount of time that it

(02:42):
took Musk to come up with the answer. So he
asked the question, and normally they would have cut this,
they would have edited out the sum I don't know,
fifteen seconds, which on television radio is a long time.
If I thought, well, I can't stop talking for fifteen seconds.

(03:03):
If I do, or there's not something going over the
broadcast system, all these alarms go off and h you know,
people getting notified up and down the chain of command,
and then Dragon is going to get a phone call
from his boss, and you know what the hell is
going on? So I got to keep moving. But on

(03:24):
television that day, they zoomed in and they watched musk
as you could see the wheels turning, and you know
what his answer was, declining birth rates. Declining birth rates,
and how mankind humanity is slowly dissipating and disappearing from

(03:49):
the planet. Now, if you understand what declining, you may
think to yourself, well, you know, so what if there's
declining birth rates, The counting birth rates mean that over
whatever given period of time it takes it, it exponentially

(04:14):
starts to decrease your population. And as your population continues
to decrease as opposed to grow, so does your economy.
It's almost a parallel line, so you actually start becoming poor.
There may be much like a bell curve. There may
be a period where fewer people mean that those people

(04:35):
are richer, but then you have less of a cross
section of demographics. Because this is why all work is
noble and all work is worthwhile. You still need someone
to even though it never happens here, we could use
somebody to clean the studio. We do need someone to

(04:59):
take out the track. Gosh, we do need someone to
although they don't exist in Colorado. We do need someone
to repair the potholes. We do need someone to fix
the smoke alarm that's not working. We do need someone
to do all sorts of things. In addition to the
scientists and the doctors and the physicists, and the lawyers,
and the plumbers and the electricians and the tradesmen. We

(05:21):
need all of those in order to have the standard
of living that you and I have. I talk about
all of that in terms of the globalists who really
do want to fundamentally transform, to go back to Obama,
who really do want to fundamentally transform the way the
world operates. They don't like nation states, they don't like

(05:46):
why do you think the European Union, the EU was
created in the first place. It was because they wanted
to diminish the sovereignty of the member states so that England,
once the great Empire, you know, the sun never sat
on the British Empire. They really want it to be
subservient to Brussels, the home of the EU. The same

(06:11):
is true for France, Germany, even the smaller Eastern European
Old Bloc countries. They want a one world government. Why
do you think George Soros wants to destroy the United
States so that he can impose his vision of a
one world government. I say all of that to go

(06:36):
to France because France is one of the world's oldest democracies. Yes,
it's a republic, but it's a democracy in the sense
I'm going to use the term democracy here in the
term in terms of self governance, going all the way
back to the French Revolution of seventeen eighty nine. It

(06:58):
was reaffirmed as the fifth Republican in nineteen fifty eight
under Charles de gaul and since then France has held
regular competitive elections for both its presidency and their Congress,
which they call the National Assembly, and the entire world
has regarded France as a liberal democratic nation, free spate,

(07:22):
free speech, and independent judiciary and regular elections. I briefly
touched on this yesterday, but my brief conversation about it
yesterday caused me to go back and really read a
lot yesterday afternoon and evening about what's really going on,

(07:43):
because I really just touched the surface yesterday. I think
the reputation of France, is one of the world's oldest democracies,
is in peril, as our many throughout Western civilization. That
French court decision and to prevent Marine Lapin, who's the

(08:03):
presidential front runner, from competing in the next presidential election,
is in hindsight and the more I read about it,
it is truly an extraordinary attack on democracy. I think
the French ruling elite, much like the ruling elite in
this country, are as terrified as as terrified of her,

(08:28):
as the ruly elite in this country are terrified of
Donald Trump. And they're scared because they know that it's
over the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the
u n IPCC, the International Climate Group. All they're doing

(08:53):
is they're just trying to cling on to power as
long as they can because they know there's this populous
movement that is just just dripping all over the world.
And so now the French elites are desperate, they're scared
because they know it's over. Emanuel mccrone's popularity rating right now,

(09:17):
is it only thirty one percent? Now? This ruling comes
two weeks after the Romanian government prevented its presidential front
runner from competing in its elections. It comes at a
moment when the Brazilian courts appear poised to incarcerate former

(09:38):
President Balsonaro, who is also a presidential candidate. And of
course we know in this country, for four years or more,
Democrats have attempted to incarcerate or otherwise at least prevent
Donald Trump from running for reelection or for that matter,
from even existing as a freeze. Now, Leapenn may indeed

(10:04):
be guilty of the charges brought against her. She's accused
of and I'm going to put air quotes around the word,
she's accused of embezzlement, but nobody suggested that she actually
took money. Now, in this stupid lawyer brain of mine,
embezzlement means that I unlawfully took money that did not

(10:27):
belong to me from say iHeart. Somehow I got access
to Iheart's checking account or a credit card and used
it all for personal expenses. I embezzled from the company. Well,
here she's been accused of embezzlement, found guilty of embezzlement,

(10:48):
but there is no evidence that she ever took any money. Rather,
what she accused of it boils down to this. From
the best I can tell, she's accused of having used
her in the EU Parliament, where she was a member
between two thousand and four and twenty seventeen. She's accused
of using her staff for political purposes. Huh. If that's

(11:16):
the case, every member of Congress, and every member of
the Trump administration and every administration preceding it, they're all
guilty then of embezzlement. You don't think that I wasn't
used for political purposes. You don't think that when I

(11:36):
my favorite one was always meeting hicken Looper. We wanted
to give the city in County of Denver a grant
to buy some fire trucks. And of course we you know,
whenever we did those things, what do we want? We
wanted the photo wop. Look, the Bush administration was handing
out some money. So but hicken Looper was like, oh,
I really want to do this. And I remember someday

(11:58):
on my staff actually called called somebody on hick and
Loopers staff and said, do you want the money or not?
Because if you're not going to hold a press conference
with the secretary, then you know what we're not. We're
just not gonna give you the money. We're just we're
just not gonna come out, so you're not gonna you're
not gonna needy credit for it. We're not gonna take
any credit for it. We'll just give it to somebody
else that actually wants the money. And of course Hiking

(12:20):
Looper capitulated because he wanted the money. Well, what was
the White House using me for? For political purposes? They
wanted Colorado to see that. Oh, somebody from Colorado who's
the Undersecretary of Homeland Security is in Colorado giving us
some money that's being used for a political purpose. It's

(12:43):
not unlawful, it's not embezzlement. But France's current Prime Minister,
Franz waalbe Roue interestingly faced similar allegations. Who was let
off the hook. Prosecutors accused the French prime minister of

(13:06):
misusing parliamentary allowances designated for staffing by instead employing assistants
who allegedly performed work for the party rather than for
their assigned parliamentary duties. Now, that practice, the best I
can tell, mirrors exactly the charges that were brought against

(13:28):
Marie Lapin, but by Rue, in contrast to Leapin, was
acquitted to the charges almost exactly the same facts. But
one is a favored party, one is a disfavored party. Yeah,
what's happening here is happening all over the world. The

(13:52):
other detail that I found fascinating was this the court
ordered le Penn's sentence to begin right now, before she
even had a chance to appeal. Now, what's the purpose
of that. That's what prevents her from running for president.
There's absolutely no ground that I could find for applying

(14:16):
the sentence before the appellate court has ruled. I think
obviously it should backfire. I don't think the Macron will
finish his mandate. In fact, I think Macron will probably
be forced to resign now. When asked about the chances

(14:38):
of the Penn winning her case, most people will tell
you she's got at least a fifty to fifty chance.
So the reason for the attack on the Pin is
that the elites fear that she's going to pull France
out of the European Union. She is taking on the
globalists to control the EU, and she's saying and the

(15:00):
French people seem to support it. They've seen Brexit. Remember
all the dire predictions about oh my gosh, if the
UK pulls out of the EU, they'll lose all of
their trade, not just with the United States, but with
all the countries on the continent. None of that happened.

(15:21):
They flourished and in fact, they got back all of
their sovereignty that they had given up to the EU. Well,
now France is watching that, and that gives rise to
the Penn's National Party because she's looking at it and
she's saying and the French people are looking at it
and saying, wait, the British did it, We want to

(15:42):
do it too. So now the EU is going to
crack down. Keep in mind that France in two thousand
and five said no to the European Constitutional Treaty. But
since then NATO and the rest of the European elite
had been scared of the French because France is at
the heart of Europe. It's not Germany, it's up Belgium.

(16:03):
If France closed their borders to Germany or Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, Spain,
or even to the English Channel, in less than one week,
northern ew York comes to a complete stop. And that's
what they're really scared about. All this is coming from
NATO is coming from European elites. It used to come

(16:23):
from American elites when the Democrats were in power before
Trump's election, but now the European elite and NATO and
the European version of the blog is getting more violent
because Trump is draining the swamp in Washington and the
people in Europe are seeing it and they're like, wait
a minute. We're sick and tired of all of the

(16:44):
censorship industrial complex that we have in France, that we
have all over the world. We went this freedom back,
we went our individual freedom and our individual liberty back.
So I think we're at the precipice of a new
populous movement. But at the same time, the globalists are
going to fight back. I still think we'll win, but

(17:06):
I think it's still be an ugly bath.

Speaker 3 (17:09):
Hey Mike, I can't wait to see Elon go after
these corrupt politicians, the insider trading, the back door deals.
Democrats and Republicans. Just put the information out there and
let the public decide.

Speaker 2 (17:24):
Which is the great thing about transparency, which is why
I did that bit earlier in the program about Polis,
you know, talking out on both sides of his mouth.
Somebody had a great text line. Oh my gosh, it
was hilarious. Where was it?

Speaker 1 (17:40):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (17:42):
Do do do do?

Speaker 1 (17:42):
Do?

Speaker 2 (17:43):
Do?

Speaker 4 (17:43):
Do?

Speaker 2 (17:43):
Do? Do? Do? Do? You here? Goove it over? Five
six seven eight. You need credit for this. You know.
The two things that I like best about Polis his
face and how awesome of a goober number is that?
Five six seven Oh I didn't even catch that. That
is a great goober number. Wow, lucky you. By the way,

(18:04):
let me remind people because I picked up mail this
morning and there's a there's a there's a letter from
we got mail, Yeah, we got mailed, And of course
I stole a couple of magazines. Well, I picked up
a Washington Examiner and a fifty two to eighty magazine
for people who have not worked here for at least

(18:24):
five years. So I thought it was safe to take
those and read those myself. So I took those. But
the letter from Idaho from a listener, had a little
note attached about a goober wanna be I wish I
had a goober number. Everybody has a goober number. If

(18:48):
you listen to this program, it's the last four digits
of whatever device you use to send me a text
message to three three one zero three. So in your
message app you would type in three three one zero three,
you would use a keyword Mike or Michael or Mike

(19:10):
or Michael shu, and then you would tell me anything
or ask me anything. And then when that pops up
in our on my tech screen, I see, for example,
that Google number five six, seven eight, the two things
I like best about Polisara's face, You've got a Google number.

(19:31):
We understand how difficult your lives are, and we understand
how because I mean, you know, dialing in numbers difficult
for any of you.

Speaker 3 (19:44):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (19:45):
Many of you complain about hearing things that I have
no idea what you're talking about. Uh. People, you know
I use big words sometimes, like democracy, and people get So.
I know that you struggle, and so we try to
be as a compensatory as we can to help you
in your struggle. And the fact that you've tuned into

(20:08):
the program means that you really do want to change,
You really do want to solve your problem. So we're
here just trying to help you solve your problem. Now
we get solve all of them. Some of your problems
are so embedded in you we just can't do anything,
particularly those of you have been listening for as long
as I've been on radio. You're just you're totally screwed.

(20:28):
So we've just given up on you. So, you know,
there's been this man hunt for all of these that
participate in you know, all these y'all, who's these insurrectionists
that participated on January sixth, and then that kind of
sped up when Biden got elected in early twenty twenty one,

(20:49):
and then the Biden Department of Justice took an unprecedented
approach in the handling of those political protesters. This gets
glossed over too much, and I'm gonna explain why in
a minute, but they started demanding pre trial detention, even

(21:12):
for those that were charged with nonviolent offenses like you know,
obstruction or conspiracy. They didn't involve any violence at all
or trespassing. The grandmother who walked in the open door,
looked around, had never been in the US Capitol before,
walked in because there were there was the US Capitol

(21:34):
Police holding the door open for her. She walks in.
She walks down the giant hallway, walks into the rotunda.
Oh look at this, wow, turns around, walks out. Okay,
pre trial detention for you. They even opened a special
prison in the nation's capital. So as you were being

(21:58):
transported to the gulag in DC after being denied release
falling arrest in your home state, then judges in Washington,
they were hearing these cases, started getting flooded with Department
of Justice requests to keep the January sixth ers, these
political prisoners, almost all of whom had no criminal record,

(22:23):
keep them behind bars awaiting trial. So the judges don't
misread what I'm about to say, because you could misread
it as saying the judges were trying to be fair. No,
that's not what I mean at all. But because these
judges were faced with I've got a criminal defendant in

(22:45):
front of me who's charged with a conspiracy, no no
violence involved, but just a conspiracy. Or I've got a
defendant in front of me that's been charged with trespass,
and DJ is asking me to hold them in pre
trialed attention without bail. Huh. So in steps a woman

(23:09):
by the name of Beryl Holle. She's the chief judge
for the DC District or wise I should say, to
be more accurate, she was the chief judge of the
DC District Court at the time. In another unprecedented move
in February of twenty twenty one, Judge Hall established what
And let me just tell you some background about Judge

(23:32):
Beryl Holle. She is one of the most liberal just
judges on the DC District Court bench. She's been around
for centuries and she is staunch anti Republican, horrible individual.
Nets she has no business, in my opinion, being on

(23:54):
the court. But she she established what became known as
the Crestsman factors. William Cressman was a member of the
Proud Boys from Kansas, and Judge Hall claimed that the

(24:16):
undeniably traumatic events of January sixth, So you know AOC
who was across the street opposite to where the capital
insurrection was taking place. She was over in her house

(24:36):
office building, but she was traumatized by it. So that traumatization,
that so called trauma, became the basis for her Cressman factor,
And it was the traumatic nature of how they describe

(25:01):
January six that she used to establish a standard that
required the courts to ditch the standard practice of evaluating
pre trial detention on an individual basis. In other words,
we look at every defendant, do they have a criminal
history ties? To the community, what's the nature of the crime,

(25:26):
what's the likelihood of them showing up? Do they have
any other anything else in their background? And in almost
all instances, the answers would have been, no, there's no
reason to hold them without bail for pre trial detention.
Let them go back to Kansas, Colorado, wherever, and they'll

(25:47):
show up. But no, they lumped all of the January
sixth defendants together and said they're all going to be
held without pre trial detention. And then she laid out
Judge Beryl Howell did the differentiating factors that weren't pretrialed
attention of certain defendants facing criminal liability for their participation

(26:12):
in the mob. She told the other judges in the
Federal District Court determine whether the defendant was part of
a group that planned in advance to go to the Capitol,
whether they injured or they very technical here injured or
interfered with the police that day, or used words or

(26:38):
movements during the riot that in her mind represented egregious misconduct.
Now you know what h I suppose if you walked
through a door that was being you know, normally guarded

(27:01):
by the US Capitol police, but they saw you approaching,
and so they had to hold the door. They didn't
have to, but they chose to hold the door open
for you. I suppose, in a perverted way, you could say, oh,
you interfered with their duties because they should have kept
the door closed. But for some reason, the grandmother looked

(27:22):
so intimidating, looked so frightening, like she she had the
pen pulled from the grenade, holding in her hand, sticking
out in front of them, demanding that you opened the
damn door. I'm gonna let the grenade go. Oh no,
that's not what it all happened. But that was all
considered egregious misconduct. Over the course of all these prosecutions,

(27:46):
Judge Hall herself sentenced more than three dozen January six
ers to hard time in federal prison, but not before
enduring some of her tongue lashings. She braided a man
from Tennessee in twenty twenty two who's convicted of a
single misdemeanor for engaging in political violence that shook the

(28:10):
entire country. Now that's kind of interesting because I watched
what was happening on January sixth, and I didn't run
downstairs and hide in the basement. Like there was a
tornado coming. I didn't go open the safe and pull
out some weapons. I didn't suddenly order you know, extra

(28:30):
food from you know these survival companies. I didn't do anything.
I just kind of sat sipping and die at Coga
and watched it on television and thought, wow, this is
kind of interesting. We got it kind of a riot
going on. But now here's what I'm watching about. Judge.
How now I'll tell you more about this after the break.

(28:51):
She now insists that she's the victim of ad hominem attacks,
of personal attacks. Kiss will you pool? It'll be be
is somebody saying something nasty about you? Damn right there
are And I think it's hilarious.

Speaker 4 (29:09):
Okay, Michael, follow me here. I'm not talking about murder.
But what if for a potential third term, Trump was
vice president and the president was removed from his position,
Then could Trump be president a third time asking for
a friend.

Speaker 2 (29:30):
If he's duly elected as vice president and the twenty
fifth Amendment is in voked for whatever reason, or the
president dies, he would assume the presidency. But I think
there is a question of if it's like early in

(29:51):
the new president's term, could he serve say three and
a half years or you know, three years and nine,
and then if he serves more than two years as
a successor president to a dying or disabled or whatever president,

(30:15):
then he's prohibited from serving another four years after that.
So technically you could get a not a third term.
You could get a third period of being president, but

(30:35):
a term is four years. He could not get the
four years, I guess, unless which would be very weird.
The new president gets sworn in at noon on January twenty,
twenty twenty eight, and then suddenly dies at you know,
three o'clock that afternoon. You would get essentially four years,

(30:56):
but you couldn't get anything after that. The clause specifically
states that no person was held the office of president
or acted as president for more than two years of
a term to which some other person was elected, that

(31:17):
person shall not be able to hold another term another
four years. So you might be able to get two
years or three years, but that but then that's it.
But think of the Now, that's the that's the constitution.
But now think about the political reality. Now, Yes, in
World War two, the idea was you don't want to

(31:40):
change horses in midstream, so you know, FDR Coumvince Is
people to elect him for a third and fourth term.
But do you really believe in this day and age
that Trump could legitimately win a third term. Let's say
the didn't exist, the prohibion didn't exist. I don't think

(32:03):
that he can. I think that you watch every single president,
I don't care whether it's Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan. Presidents
after I would say about six years become old news
and people start what even inter party intra party start

(32:28):
winning change. They become lame ducks. You know that you're
looking at that You're looking at that couch in your
living room, and you've had it for whatever period of
couch life the couch life is and you're sick of it.

(32:49):
You love the couch, but you're really sick of it.
It's one of the most comfortable, greatest pieces of furniture
you've ever owned, but you're sick of it's been around.
You just want change. That's hum in nature. We just
want changed. It's like me in this studio, I just
want blind. I just want somebody to come in and
clean it. Just clean it once. Okay, let me finish, Beryl.

(33:13):
How when we get back and I gotta move on
to other stuff. I gotta where is that dam whi
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.