4-1-25 - 8am - Judge Beryl Howell

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael, the third term argument is ridiculous. Trump is not
eligible to become president for a third term, even if
he was vice president. You must still be eligible to
become president because he's already been president twice in two terms.
Is not eligible to be vice president. So therefore the

(00:20):
third term argument should come to an end.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
It was just trolling the media. Oh, absolutely trolling in
the media. And I think that's the best argument at
all for against the third term. Very good, very good.
So let's go back to Barrel Hell, because this is
insight into how bad not just the DC federal district courts,

(00:49):
but the DC appellate courts are. They're just part of
the swamp. They're they're buying for the swamp. So here's
Barrel Hell. She's been running rough shot over these J
sixer defendants for years now, and suddenly she claims that
she's being subjected to add hominin attacks against her by

(01:12):
the Trump Department of Justice because last week, or actually
the week before last, DOJ asked how to recuse herself
from providing from providing from presiding over this lawsuit that
was brought by the law firm Perkins Cooey, the infamous

(01:34):
law firm that was responsible for me for things like
the Steele dossier. Perkins Cooy is suing the president over
an executive voter dated back in March sometime that accused
the firm of dishonest and dangerous activity. And then Trump
took the next step and they stripped Perkins Cooy employees

(01:57):
of their security clearances and all the government contracts. Now,
I have no problem with the security clearances being revoked.
You can do that anytime for any reason, or you
can do any time for no reason. In my opinion,
there's no vested property interest so to speak, in a
security clearance the government contracts. That might be a little

(02:19):
tenuous because now you're interfering in contracts, and unless you
got a really good legal or national security reason, I
think that might be questionable. But set that aside for
a moment. So anyway, this lawsuit by Perkins Cooy against
the government ended up where am Beryl How's docket. Now.

(02:42):
She is the same judge that oversaw Robert Mueller's investigation
into that fantasy Trump Russia collusion effort. She was the
chief judge at the time and in a really long, lengthy,
convoluted decision back in twenty eighteen, Judge Hall determined that

(03:05):
Mueller's appointment was legal, it did not violate the Constitution,
which is a finding indirect contradiction of what Judge Allen Cannon.
Don't all these names sound familiar, exactly the opposite of
what Judge Cannon concluded on the very same question last year.

(03:28):
Hal should have stepped aside. Judge Beryl Howe should have
stepped out of the Perkins Cooi lawsuit because she is
unquestionably conflicted. Why because Perkins Cooi acted as the money
laundering machine to conceal the role of the Democrat consulting
shop Fusion GPS. It's almost as if this stuff never

(03:54):
goes away. Here we are what now soon to be
three months into Trump's second term. Russia, Russia, Russia seems
so long ago, But yet here we are again, and
the same actors, the same law firms, the same judge,

(04:15):
same judge does are doing the same bull crap all
over again. So, just again, to make sure you understand,
I think the Judge Hell is conflicted since the Perkins
Cooey lawsuit is now in her court and the Perkins
Coohi firm is the same firm that acted as the

(04:37):
money laundering outfit to conceal the role of the Democrats
using Fusion GPS as the source for their Steele dossier.
And by the way, who also hired Christopher Steele, that
FBI informant and a foreign lobbyist at the time, all

(04:58):
for the Hillary Clinton camp and for the DNC. All
why so they could produce that stupid dossier pedal it
around Washington before and after the twenty sixteen election. Here
we are nine years later, but instead of stepping aside
as she should have done, she immediately gutted most of
the president's executive order. She even went further. She instructed

(05:23):
top Trump officials, including the Attorney General herself, to notify
government agencies to quote, suspend, and resind any implementation of
three key parts of the President's directing. So the Trump
administration is like, okay, we've had enough. In fact, the

(05:43):
week before the Perkins Coolie case landed on her desk,
Judge Howe Beryl Howell, saying Judge, we're talking about here,
issued a scathing thirty six page order related to Trump's
firing of a member of the National Labor Relations Board,
in which hal said that that move was unlawful and illegal.

(06:07):
In that ruly, she suggested the president considered himself a
king and that he quote scenes intent on pushing the
bounds of his office and exercising his power in the
manner violative of clear statutory law. To test how much
these courts will accept the notion of a presidency that
is supreme. She's clearly biased. So what the DOJ do? Well?

(06:34):
Citing Beryl Howell's involvement in the Mueller probe, citing her
questionable handling up Jack Smith's investigation, including the suggestion that
Trump was a flight risk? Can you imagine that Trump's
a flight risk? All to justify a non disclosure order
related to Jack Smith's successful demand for the president's Twitter account,

(06:59):
all the data from his at her account, and her
anti Trump statements made in an out of court, all
of which added up to the Department of Justice saying,
in emotion, what now ten days ago? For how to
recuse herself? You need to step down. Here's here's what

(07:20):
the Department of Justice wrote, as demonstrated through comments in
this proceeding, other judicial proceedings, and in public observers might
reasonably have concerns about the court's impartiality in this matter,
recusal is warranted to ensure these proceedings fair and free

(07:43):
from concerns about impartiality. So what did she do? She
did what you would expect a former Democrat Senate staffer
which is she which she is, and Obama appointee which
she is. It prompted a well, are you freaking serious?

(08:08):
I never in my life. I can't believe you're treating
me like this. You know, when she was confronted, she
started backing away from her comments, She started backing away
from her actions. Why she's trying to portray them as
this kind of benign judicial observations than rather what are

(08:28):
clearly partisan and at some point vicious attacks that they represent.
So the Department of Justice did a phenomenal job, in
my opinion. They detailed in their motion a line by
line accounting of her open hostility toward Trump, and not

(08:53):
just Trump, but those deplorables that support Trump. Howe argued
that that was uncalled for, that it represented innuendough, an
attack on the messenger, an attempt to impugne the integrity
of the federal judicial system, as if, as if she

(09:15):
and her cohorts are not the ones responsible for the
public's all time low polling numbers of the judiciary. She
gave a keynote speech at a dinner in twenty twenty three.
It was mc by former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, remember her,

(09:38):
who called Hall a mentor, And it was tended by
a bunch of anti Trump people, including Sally Yates remember her,
Andrew Wiseman. Well, the speech was supposed to have an
a political, non partisan theme according to the judge herself,

(09:59):
but he to the president, why why would she take
shots of the president at a dinner? Well, because of
the audience. She knew her audience, and she was trying
to gratify all the anti Trumpers and the Trump haters

(10:20):
in the audience, including herself, by claiming that all of
these claims against me have been twisted and mischaracterized by
the Department of Justice. But it is how it is
Judge Beryl Howe, not the Trump administration that is now

(10:40):
mischaracterizing her comments and her conduct in court. She's one
of the chief instigators leading this now decades long, well
we'll be a decade in a year, decade long legal
and judicial assault against the president, as lawyers, as associates,
his campaign aids, even his vote, she should be removed

(11:02):
from the case in any case related to the president. Frankly,
I think she had to step down from the bench,
but I have any control over that. Her speech I
just must jumped.

Speaker 3 (11:15):
Just parts of the speech have crossed professional paths and
friendship paths with each other in years past, and so
many dear friends from the Eastern District of New York.
You're tonight from Loretta Karen Kirbi Heller, Jenny Abrigan, Andrew Weisman.
I too saved him for last.

Speaker 2 (11:37):
For the same hmmm. All of those people she just
mentioned have purposely, openly did everything they could and continue
to do everything they can do to bring down this
president using the judicial system. And here she is just

(11:58):
gleefully recounting them as all of her friends.

Speaker 3 (12:02):
And friendship paths with each other in years past, and
so many dear friends from the Eastern District of New York.
Here tonight from Loretta Karen Kirbi Heller, Jeddie Abergan, Andrew Weissman.
I too saved him for last.

Speaker 2 (12:18):
Lives, but I saved him for the last lines. Is
so special? And then, uh, where's my audio?

Speaker 3 (12:30):
We are having a very surprising and downright troubling moment
in this country when the very importance of facts is
dismissed or ignored, that's a very risky business for all
of us and our democracy. The historian Heather Cox Richardson,
whose book I've been reading, explains in her new book,

(12:55):
which is a bestseller so many of you may have
already read it, Democracy Awakening, that varying facts with false
history telling is one of the keys to the rise
of authoritarianism, as she bluntly puts it, big lies or
springboards for authoritarians. She cautions in her book's opening line

(13:18):
to very first line, America is at a crossroads, teetering
on the brink of authoritarianism, and she echoes us thought
in her closing line that we are at a time
of testing, and how it comes out resting, as it
always has, is in our own hands. In between those

(13:40):
two points in the first line and the last, her
book focuses on historical facts to set the record straight
about recreated and imagined conspiratorial retellings of our country's history
recent and long ago. My DC judicial colleagues and I

(14:03):
regularly see the impact of big lies at the Oh you.

Speaker 2 (14:08):
Do, so you're already pre judging things that come before
your court where the Department of Justice might be the planet,
or might even be the defendant in case of the
Perkins Cooi lawsuit, where the Department of Justice and Trump
are a defendant. You're already seeing, and you're telling this

(14:29):
audience you're already seeing the big lies. And yet we're
supposed to believe this woman is going to be impartial
in her judicial decision making.

Speaker 3 (14:40):
Is seeing of hundreds hundreds of individuals who have been
convicted for offense conduct on January sixth, twenty twenty one,
when they disrupted the certification of the twenty twenty presidential
election at the US Capitol.

Speaker 4 (14:56):
As district court judges, we are all.

Speaker 3 (14:59):
About the fact and enforcing the procedural and evidentiary rules
to make sure authentic, reliable, and tested facts are brought
forward to resolve a case with serious consequences.

Speaker 2 (15:14):
For non compliance, she needs to go the legitimacy of
the courts. Going back to Chief Justice Roberts putting out
that statement. I shouldn't even say putting out the statement
because there is no press release, but his comment to

(15:38):
news organizations that he knew would quote him and spread
that word. Yet he doesn't. You can't. You can only
find secondary sources Politico, Newsweek, the networks. And still you
go to the US Supreme Court website, there is no
statement by the Chief Justice anywhere on there. And yet

(16:03):
you have all of these judges issuing all these nationwide injunctions.
And I don't I don't want to beat that dead
horse anymore. But still think about one singular judge who
has jurisdiction over those parties in front of him, claiming

(16:23):
that some deportation rule is unlawful, saying, okay, well, I
want to apply it to all the other judges in
all the other ninety four districts around the country, even
though those parties are not in front of me. I'm
going to almost in essence, usurp all of the other
judges' authority to decide what they think the law is

(16:47):
and issue a nationwide injunction and say you just can't
do that in essence, which is maybe a point I
haven't made strongly enough in essence, saying to all other
federal district court trial judges, you can't decide for yourself
because I got the first case and I issued a

(17:08):
nationwide injunction, and so now I've determined that you just
need to stop your cases. Oh wait a minute, I'm
an independent Senate confirmed trial judge, and I have different
parties in front of me that I have jurisdiction over
that you don't have jurisdiction over. I think I'll decide

(17:30):
for myself whether or not this is lawful or unlawful.
No wonder. We're losing trust in the judicial system. Congress
needs to act, and the Court needs to act. The
Supreme Court needs to act, and Judge Barrow, you need

(17:50):
to step down, Michael.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
Did you know that the stone for which Yellowstone is
named is a precious stone called barrel?

Speaker 2 (18:09):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (18:11):
And you know I have coworkers and people I know
who actually believe that Trump will attempt to never leave office.

Speaker 2 (18:21):
It's bunkers, they're out there. Well, let me go to
a story. I was going to do third in this segment,
but let me do that story first instead, because it
kind of fits in with that. You know, there's the

(18:42):
whole walk away movement hashtag walk away. You can find
it on x well. People who work with their hands, tradespeople,
salt of the earth, people really hesitate to throw away
their freedom, standard of living, in favor of slavery and

(19:04):
poverty that's imposed through communism or Marxism. What Marxists do
is they call that resistance false consciousness. False consciousness. I
want you to think about that. When classical economic Marxism fails,

(19:24):
leftists tend to replace it with cultural Marxism. So they replace,
you know, the economic Marxism, they replace it with things
like political correctness, critical race theory. DEI, well, you know
all the stupid crap that we deal with, not just
around the world or in this country, but we deal
with right here in Colorado. The concept of false consciousness

(19:49):
really is enduring. It's it's hard once it gets kind
of embedded to get rid of it. Well, I came
across this, I think incredibly entertaining video. It's it's employed
to rescue this dumbass white woman who demands that we

(20:11):
trust black women. But then she becomes very flumixed when
reminded that, you know, millions of black women actually voted
for Donald Trump, and she has a really difficult time
dealing with it. Now, what you won't see, but you'll
hear moments of silence. He's there's a woman standing off

(20:37):
as the hashtag walk away individual is doing the interview.
She turns to a friend of hers that's standing several
feet away, trying to like help me here. I don't
know how to answer these questions. What do I say?
Because I've now been trapped and she's been trapped because

(21:01):
of this false consciousness. Take a listen to this.

Speaker 4 (21:07):
What does this mean to you? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (21:09):
By the way, yeah, I failed to mention that they're
they're at are they're at a protest. They're carrying pre
printed signs. Uh, much like Black Lives Matter, black background,
white block letters that say trust black women. Okay, what

(21:34):
about trust black men? Well about trust white women trust?
White men trust. I don't know Asian women trust, Asian
men trust Native American men. Native American women trust, but
you know, just do you trust people? So here she is,

(21:54):
he walks up.

Speaker 4 (21:56):
And what does this mean to you?

Speaker 5 (21:58):
Yeah?

Speaker 6 (21:58):
Black women are probably the least respected in America. Their
voices aren't heard, their issues aren't paid attention to. Any
White women look beyond their own personal interests, and they
leave black women out of conversation. And I think America
needs to change about that.

Speaker 2 (22:14):
Beca's not much just that alone, I mean, just the
stupidity of that that somehow okay, Black women are the
least respected, Their voices aren't paid much to. White women
tend to look beyond their personal interests, and they leave
they leave black women out of the conversation. How do

(22:39):
they do that?

Speaker 6 (22:40):
You know, Black women are probably the least respected in America.
Their voices aren't heard, their issues aren't paid attention to any.
White women look beyond their own personal interests, and they
leave Black women out of conversation. And I think America
needs to.

Speaker 4 (22:54):
Change about that. What are we not trusting them to
do right now?

Speaker 6 (22:58):
How to care for our country? How to care for
each other, how to stand up and fight for things
that aren't right?

Speaker 2 (23:06):
Have anything about how condescending that is. We can't trust
black women at all? Uh, we can't trust them to
stand up for each other, how to stand up and
fight for things that aren't right. Uh? You just we're
not trusting black.

Speaker 4 (23:24):
Women, trusting them to do right now?

Speaker 6 (23:27):
How to care for our country, how to care for
each other, how to stand up and fight for things
that aren't right.

Speaker 7 (23:35):
Millions of black women voted for Trump. Should we trust them.

Speaker 8 (23:43):
I'll say, And.

Speaker 2 (23:48):
I don't think that's true.

Speaker 6 (23:50):
Millions of black women voted for Trump way too.

Speaker 4 (23:52):
Many, way too many.

Speaker 7 (23:54):
It is should we trust them? I don't know, maybe
not trust black women, And then that's not true. I
do trust black women who vote for Kamala Harris.

Speaker 6 (24:08):
I think he wants to know if I trust the
black women who voted for Trump.

Speaker 5 (24:15):
I think they voted against their own interests. So it's
really hard to put the idea of trust together with
someone who is continuing to vote against themselves.

Speaker 3 (24:24):
Right.

Speaker 2 (24:25):
So it sounds like, so, don't trust black women.

Speaker 4 (24:28):
They don't have very good judgment.

Speaker 5 (24:31):
Yeah, I'm not sure that it's not having good judgment.
I don't think they necessarily connect the dots, and I.

Speaker 4 (24:37):
Do think they're stupid.

Speaker 5 (24:38):
No, they're not stupid, but I think it's an I.

Speaker 7 (24:41):
No, I'm just asking because but it is hard to
trust people who are stupid and have bad judgment. Right,
and black women who vote for Trump are stupid and
not bad judgment.

Speaker 4 (24:50):
We did not say that.

Speaker 5 (24:52):
I don't think they don't connect. They don't connect the dots,
and so they're looking at only certain things and thinking
that's important and not connecting the.

Speaker 7 (25:00):
It sounds like those black women need to be educated
by white women like you.

Speaker 4 (25:05):
Yeah, not true.

Speaker 7 (25:08):
Not They just need a good white woman to come
in and tell them what's up.

Speaker 6 (25:11):
You're putting words in our mouths again, and you're trading it.

Speaker 4 (25:14):
I'm sorry, I don't mean to do that.

Speaker 5 (25:15):
This idea that white people are going to be the
white saves kisses me off.

Speaker 7 (25:19):
But if white women like you don't educate them, how
are they ever going to learn to vote the way
that they're supposed to vote?

Speaker 5 (25:26):
You know, as a white woman, I'm happy to help
educate and talk to people, but is that my job
to go convince somebody else?

Speaker 7 (25:33):
I hope you're able to get through to some of
those untrustworthy, stupid black women.

Speaker 4 (25:37):
Good luck.

Speaker 2 (25:42):
Let me just run it through. I want you to
enjoy it without commentary.

Speaker 4 (25:46):
What does this site mean to you?

Speaker 6 (25:47):
You know, black women are probably the least respected in America.
Their voices aren't heard, their issues aren't paid attention to.
Any White women look beyond their own personal interests.

Speaker 2 (25:59):
And I'm sorry I can't. I promised to run it through.
But again, to set the picture, hear a bunch of ugly, overweight,
stupid white women. That's just what they look like. They

(26:19):
got their little nitty caps on and their ill fitting
T shirts and just white trash standing around with a
sign that says trust black women. And they're to lecture
that black women can't take care of themselves, they don't

(26:41):
know what to do, they vote against their interests, and
somehow we the no, No, we're not white saviors, not
at all. Oh don't know, don't accuse us of that.
We're here to help them. We're here to help black women.
You know, I'd like to take them like, is it
that this guy asking me questions? I'd like for Condi

(27:05):
Rice to go ask them those questions, see what their
answer is.

Speaker 4 (27:09):
Then what does this sight mean to you?

Speaker 6 (27:11):
You know, Black women are probably the least respected in America.
Their voices aren't heard, their issues aren't paid attention to.
Any White women look beyond their own personal interests, and
they leave black women out of conversation. And I think
America needs to change about that.

Speaker 4 (27:26):
What are we not trusting them to do right now?

Speaker 6 (27:29):
How to care for our country, how to care for
each other, how to stand up and fight for things
that aren't right?

Speaker 7 (27:38):
Millions of black women voted for Trump.

Speaker 4 (27:40):
Should we trust them? And through? I don't think that's true?

Speaker 6 (27:53):
Millions of black women voted for Trump, way too.

Speaker 4 (27:55):
Many, way too many. It is way should we trust them?
I don't know. Maybe not trust black women. Then that's
not true.

Speaker 6 (28:04):
I do trust black women.

Speaker 4 (28:06):
Who vote for Kamala Harris. I think he mustn't know.

Speaker 6 (28:16):
If I trust the black women who voted for Trump, I.

Speaker 5 (28:18):
Think they voted against their own interests. So it's really
hard to put the idea of trust together with someone
who is continuing to vote against themselves.

Speaker 4 (28:27):
Right, So it sounds like they don't have very good judgment.

Speaker 5 (28:32):
Yeah, I'm not sure that it's it's not having good judgment.
I don't think they necessarily connect the dots, and I.

Speaker 4 (28:38):
Do think they're stupid.

Speaker 5 (28:39):
No, they're not stupid, but I think it's an eye.

Speaker 7 (28:42):
No, I'm just asking because but it is hard to
trust people who are stupid and not bad judgment. Right,
and black women who vote for Trump are stupid not
bad judgment.

Speaker 6 (28:51):
We did not say that.

Speaker 5 (28:52):
I don't think they don't connect. They don't connect the dots,
and so they're looking at only certain things and thinking
that's important connecting the dots.

Speaker 7 (29:01):
It sounds like those black women need to be educated
by white women like you.

Speaker 2 (29:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (29:06):
Not true, not, they just need a good white woman
to come in and tell them what's up.

Speaker 6 (29:11):
You're putting words in our mouths again, and you're training it.

Speaker 4 (29:14):
I'm sorry, I don't mean to do that.

Speaker 5 (29:15):
This idea that white people are going to be the
white saves kisses me off.

Speaker 7 (29:19):
But if white women like you don't educate them, how
are they ever going to learn to to vote the
way that they're supposed to.

Speaker 5 (29:26):
Vote As a white woman. I'm happy to help educate
and talk to people, but is that my job to
go convince somebody else?

Speaker 7 (29:33):
I hope you're able to get through to some of
those untrustworthy, stupid black women.

Speaker 4 (29:38):
Good luck.

Speaker 2 (29:40):
I think one of the greatest lines in that whole
SoundBite is so it's it's it's my job to help
black women. This is the white woman talking. It's my
job to help teach you know, black women, you know
pretty much how to think and how to make the
right decisions for themselves. Oh so it's the job of

(30:00):
white women to teach them and educate them about why
they should vote for Kamala Harris. Oh no, that's not
what we're saying. Well, yeah, that's kind of exactly what
you did say.

Speaker 8 (30:11):
Also, if you missed any of it, you can go
to Michael says go here dot com. Plus you can
see the fantastic look on her face on all this. Dude,
isn't the look wonderful glorious? It's just like, oh that hurt?

Speaker 2 (30:24):
What do I say? Now? Yes, sounds like you all
live in a yellow submarine. All the goobers are bored
and they have the dream.

Speaker 8 (30:36):
I'm so bored I could just scream anyway, y'all, keep
up the work.

Speaker 2 (30:50):
Just keep up the work, dragon, keep up the work.

Speaker 8 (30:53):
There are days I left my job for sure.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
So Britain, we've talked a little bit about France, Let's
talk a little bit about Britain. Britain has really become
a dead society that they're lenient towards those that represent
preferred demographies, but compensates with stern treatment for those that

(31:19):
do not enrich the multicultural tapestry that they think society
ought to live by. In fact, in the UK, doctors
can get away with rape. Quote, a doctor found by
a tribunal to have raped a young woman at his
home avoided being struck off, meaning either taken off to

(31:44):
jail or medical licensee vote over what the panel described
as a one off attack. Oh see, you're ape a
woman one time, no harm, no foul. Now you do
it a second time, we might have to slap your wrist. Uh.
Doctor Aloyer foy Yama, need I say more? Then, a

(32:12):
consultant at Blackpool Victoria Hospital instead had his medical license
suspended for twelve months for attacking the woman found guilty
of rape. The sentence was, we're gonna take your medical
license away for twelve months. Now, either they think he
did it or they don't think he did it. If

(32:36):
they think he did it, a twelve month suspended medical
license is worse than a just even a slap on
the risk for rape. Again, back to the story, the
General Medical Counsel, which regulates the register of doctor's licensed
to practice in the United Kingdom, had asked an independent

(32:57):
panel run by the Medical Practitioner's Tribunal Service to permanently
erase doctor Foya Mau's license. However, they determined that that
would be racist, nativist and islamophobic. And besides, the woman
that he raped wasn't a patient, therefore he had not

(33:20):
quote abused his position of trust as a doctor. Now
the boom comes down harder in that same country Britain.
If you're a toddler and you're transphonba or homophobic, oh
I'm not kidding. A toddler was kicked out of nursery

(33:41):
after being accused of being trans, transphobic or homophobic. It
has been revealed that data from the Department of Education
showed a young child has been suspended from a state
school for quote abuse against sexual orientation and gender identity.
According to London Telegraph, the child was reportedly aged either
three or four, and have been suspended during the twenty

(34:02):
two twenty three ected to make year. Figures also reportedly
show that ninety four students at state primary schools had
been suspended or in some cases permanently excluded, for transphobia
and homophobia in twenty two through twenty twenty three. Now
three of them were in year two, where the maximum
age is seven years old. One child was nursery age.

(34:27):
You know, I guess social engineering can never be nipped.
You know you can never nip fuck crime in the
bud too soon. Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at Sex Matters,
said that this is not an isolated case, highlighting thirteen,
four or five year olds who have been suspended or
permanently excluded for the same reason. Have you ever been

(34:49):
around four or five year olds. They're brutal, they're mean,
They you know, they love to play. They're like dogs,
you know that dogs you know, start kind of you know, wrestling,
running around, chasing each other, and pre sooner starts to escalate,
and it escalates more and more. Gets you the same way,
except this is transphobia. Homophobia. Really, give me a break.