Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States
of America and to the Republic for witches, sands, one
nation under God, individible with liberty and justice for all.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Amen. Let's see if you get the reference.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
I don't think that it's well, you know what, what
was that about?
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Your guess is as good as mine? Okay, all right?
And was that your only choice?
Speaker 4 (00:45):
There were a couple others, but those were people who
have already left one for today. So I try and
get as many new voices as I can if there
are if I have another talk back, why do we
discourage anyone?
Speaker 2 (00:59):
I'm I'm just a little I couldn't decide.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
It's like, you know, you can hear the national anthem,
but you're not actually where the national anthem is being played,
so you don't really stop or put your hand over
your heart, or salute or stand up. I really couldn't
decide whether, you know, I looked around see if there
any like spy cameras in here. I really couldn't decide
whether not to stand up or not, because I felt
(01:23):
an obligation to immediately stand up and start residing along
with him. But I I couldn't find a flag to it.
Speaker 4 (01:30):
It's no physical flag from where they are.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
Yeah, yeah, maybe we should do that. We could put
like flags up on the drywall. We could do that
flags on the drywall. I don't think it's a secret,
and if it is, you're just not paying attention that
all these international organizations like the World Economic Forum, they
(01:53):
really do see the implementation of a global social credit
score system that is based on your carbon use as
their endgame. There was a text message that fits this
pretty well that said, this is from twelve forty seven.
(02:17):
Don't you just love the little energy reports that excel
sends out to try and make you feel guilty for
the amount of energy you use? Yeah, because I'm always
curious because my understanding is that when it says like
your neighbors usage, that doesn't mean your next door neighbors.
I don't know how they do it, whether it's I
(02:38):
don't think it's geographically, because I kind of you know,
I've actually had what's your luxury built?
Speaker 2 (02:45):
You know?
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Now, I know you got two rug rats in your house? Well,
I got three rug rats in my house, but they
just happened to be K nine. And then, like I
told you earlier about my internet of things about my
water usage and you know, water leaks and stuff. It
also shows my peers usage on a daily basis of water,
you know, some sort of aggregate number. And I'm always like,
(03:09):
but who are my peers?
Speaker 2 (03:12):
How do you? How do you know who they are?
With your ego? You don't think you have any peers?
Speaker 3 (03:17):
Well, I don't have. I am peerless. I truly am peerless, peerless, fearless,
and nearless gearless too.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
So. But that is.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
A social credit score based upon your carbon use. Now,
if you don't believe me, go look at the World
Economic Federation's Agenda twenty thirty literature.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
It's all it's all spelled out right there.
Speaker 3 (03:50):
Well, let's think about the Chinese Communist Party for a minute,
because they have maintained a credit score system for decades now.
But the globals don't view that as a threat to
human freedom. What they look at the Chinese Communist Party.
Just think about that. They look at the Chinese Communist
Party and they see that social score system not as
(04:14):
a threat, but as an opportunity for them and for
the elites to control human behavior using the alarmism of
climate change or you know, you know, pea coil, you know, renewables,
you know, decarbonization, whatever it might be. All that justifies
their motive. And if you're thinking that the implementation of
(04:38):
that kind of a system is you know, years off,
that's decades. It's not going to happen in my lifetime.
That's way off in the future somewhere, and that somehow
we can prevent it from happening. I think we have
to all reconsider that, because I think that not only
is it coming, but I think it's coming far faster
than we really realize. Matter of fact, the tech foundation
(05:04):
for it is already here. It was reported last week
that the Chinese firm Ali Pay Ali Pay it's a
subsidiary of Ali Baba, is now implementing a byte quote
biometric pl one scanner, which uses vein and palm print
(05:26):
data for processing payments. Well, you're going to use the
veins on my wrist my palm print to process payments.
I I don't have Let me draw five. You may
(05:48):
think it's distinction without a difference, but I think that
it is a distinction with a difference. So of course
I'm screwed anyway, Because the White House Data Center and
the CIA and the NSA have all of my biometrics anyway.
But you know how you use your face ID on
your phone. I don't have a problem with that, primarily
(06:12):
because that resides on my phone, and I'm the one
that chooses which apps I want to use face ID
as a oh what do they call it? Not as
a two factor as a pass key. It's the words passkey,
(06:33):
and that's what I was looking for. I don't mind
using that as a pass key on certain apps, particularly
my financial information. I'd rather use my face face ID
rather than a fingerprint, although I do use fingerprints for
some things. Particularly I use face ID for my financial
apps because well, if I'm dead and someone wants to
(06:57):
use it to hack my phone, well what do I
care that point? But to use my palm or my
veins for payments means that I'm now using those biometrics externally.
So here's the story about the pl one. It quote
(07:21):
enables individuals to make purchases simply by presenting their hand,
no phone, no card, no pen required. Well, I'd say
that's probably even better for those who wish to control
all of us. Because this quote touch free alternity for
payment reflects a growing industry shift toward friction FRICTIONALSS, friction
(07:44):
less biometric transactions, no friction whatsoever. So the question then becomes, well,
how rapidly is this growing industry shift progressing around the world. Well,
the story goes on to glowingly report that major players
are already on board. I just got a notification that
(08:09):
an Amazon package was delivered. Oh well two packages today already,
fat X and Amazon. Well guess what. Amazon has integrated
palm authentication across US retail and healthcare facilities. Now I've
not run into it anywhere yet, but I'll probably refuse it.
(08:29):
I maybe it's just because, you know, maybe because I
used Dad jokes apparently, but I already have a difficult
time already using like Apple pay at places they accept that,
you know, contactless pay. I can do it, but it
seems to be more than a hassle than just to
(08:49):
you know, swipe my chip, not the one in my brain,
the one on my phone or on my credit card.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
KP.
Speaker 3 (08:57):
Morgan is gearing up for national deployment this year, this year,
not next year, not the year after this year. So
the people that support this both that as many as
three billion humans around.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
The world will be using this system.
Speaker 3 (09:19):
Before we get to twenty twenty six, in other words,
sometime this year. Now, once you have that many people
and that number of corporations and that size and that
breadth of corporate influence like Amazon, that reaches a tipping
point where universal acceptance, universal use, and I would also
(09:45):
argue universal abuse becomes inevitable.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Inevitable.
Speaker 3 (09:51):
Now, if you think that the data you know this
gathered through the use of this technology won't be the
used by governments and essentially every national earth, including this government,
I think you reside in some sort of alternate universe.
Now does that mean I think Trump's out to do
(10:12):
this to us? No, I don't think so, and I
think he would probably oppose it. But he has kind
of leaned in toward crypto and he kind of leaned
in toward digital, you know, coins, digital monetary systems. So
not that he's all in, but I think he'd certainly
(10:32):
be open to it. So what would happen once that
technology gets universally adopted? What would happen? I think there
are a few things that naturally will occur. The scoring
system will be rigged, for example, to force you to
(10:54):
drive electric vehicles, whether you want to or not, Or
if you don't think it'll be that dramatic, how about
it will be used to force you to drive vehicles
that meet certain mileage standards or certain sizes, or that
have certain amenities on them, trackability, whatever, I mean, any
(11:16):
number of things. And if you insist on driving an
internal combustion engine, well then you can forget about doing
any pleasure traveling unless you're gonna be wealthy enough as
you could buy the carbon credits that would need to
be used to offset your driving that's other than to
and from work. Or you might be able to limit
(11:39):
people to a certain number of miles, So we're going
to allocate a certain number of miles. You know, they've
already talked about taxing you on the miles you drive,
as opposed to a gas tax, because they're trying to
you know, e these don't use gasoline. They do use
natural gas, because as we know in Colorado, most of
our electricity is produced by natural gas. Instead of having
(12:04):
the fights with the spouse over the thermostat, well you'll
just be penalized for setting your home thermostat below say, oh,
I don't know, seventy eight or eighty degrees in the summer,
or you know above sixty five or sixty seven degrees
in the wintertime, or like me, you know, I just
three dogs in the house, well, two dogs and a
(12:25):
wiener dog, every dog, every cat in the case of dragging,
every rabbit or you know mouse that he keeps whatever
he might keeps for a pet, or you know, maybe
he would be considered a pet by missus. Redbeard that
will come with a carbon rating two. So what's the
carbon rating of a one hundred and fifty pound lienburger?
(12:50):
What's the carbon footprint of a I don't know, twelve
pound or whatever it is wiener dog?
Speaker 2 (12:55):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (12:57):
So since I've been batching it for the past week,
I've been eating a lot of stuff that I want
to eat. Went to the steakhouse the other night, had
a really good file at Well, beef's gonna come with
a higher carbon score than a impossible meat A toe
a toef, a veggie burger.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Just take your pick.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
I don't care which one you choose, but just thinking it,
the scenarios are endless. And if you don't understand how
bad this is in communist China, really dig into how
the social score system works. There and then imagine that
in our lives.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
We do think.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
You know, when when we changed insurance companies, the auto
insurance company offered us one of those discounts if we
would just put the app on our phone too, and
and the agent kind of got upset with me, and
I said, well, I don't like my I don't want
my driving tracked. And she was quick to add, oh,
(14:03):
You're not gonna be punished, because I was like, you know,
I drive on the Interstate a lot. And while I've
been a good boy and not speeding much. While I've
been a good boy and not speeding, there are times
when some nut job pulls over. It changes lanes without signaling,
or as two closed, or as weaving in and out,
(14:24):
or or for example, the other day, I was in
very slow traffic aause somebody was what's it called again?
Speaker 2 (14:30):
Dragon? I never can remember. When the motorcycles go between.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
Traffic, there's filtering and splitting. Filtering is when you're stopped
and then they can go between you. Splitting is when
you are moving, which is illegal.
Speaker 3 (14:42):
Okay, well they were splitting them, which was illegal, and
traffic was moving. I would guess at maybe twenty twenty
five miles an hour over here on twenty five and
a motorcycle went whizzing between me and a car next
We weren't exactly right next to each other, but a
car slightly behind me and the next lane over to
my left, a motorcycle went whizzing by as loud as
(15:03):
could possibly be, scared the you know what out of me,
and I hit my brake because I couldn't. I was
looking like, what the hell is this? So I slam
on my brakes, and I said, so that you know,
this happens a lot where you know, you slam on
your brakes because you're not speeding, you're not driving erradically,
but somebody else does something. Oh no, no, no, you won't
(15:24):
be penalized that you are given a discount for. You know,
if you don't do it, then you'll get a discount.
Trying to get feed me the positive side as opposed
to the negative side.
Speaker 4 (15:35):
How would they know that you didn't do something in
that situation.
Speaker 3 (15:38):
Well, the point is they would know I would do something,
so I would not be penalized. I just wouldn't necessarily
qualify for a discount. See, so if you never do it,
then you would get a discount.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
Now.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
She even went on to tell me the agent did that.
She uses that app and she's mad because I forget
whether it was a percentage score or a grade score,
but like, I don't know whether it's like you get
an ABCD or F or you get a one hundred
percent or ninety percent or whatever. But she was rated
at something that turned out to be like a B
(16:15):
minus or something, and she was really pissed off about
it because she thinks she's a better driver than that.
And I'm like, well, so she's not. So she as
an agent for the carrier, it's not getting as a
big of a discount is she thinks she ought to
be getting. And I'm just like, you know what, that
just sounds like more trouble than it's worth. No, I
don't want it because I'm already happy with the rate
(16:35):
that I'm getting in the premium i'm paying and if
it's going to save me, because I was like, how
much of a discount, Well, if you're perfect, you can
get a thirty almost a third discount something, Well I
would go for that, But what's the likelihood of me
getting that kind of discount?
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Not very likely.
Speaker 3 (16:55):
These social credit scores are designed to control your life
and choices such as those I just outlined about cars
or thermostats.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
Or what you eat.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
There will be a lot more aspects of your daily
lives which eventually will impact virtually everything that you do.
It will determine every aspect of your life. What kind
of clothes do you buy, what kind of cloth do
you use? What schools are your chill kids allowed to attend.
I don't think it's just likely. I think it's inevitable
(17:30):
because it all sounds silly to you. Well, let's go
back fifteen years ago and see if something sounded silly.
Speaker 5 (17:37):
This The palm reading payment technology has been at Whole
Foods for at least several months.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Yeah, you must be the one that left the text message.
I was just reading that.
Speaker 4 (17:48):
It's like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, what we've got
googer listeners out there that can afford to go to
Whole Foods.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
I couldn't tell you last time I was a Whole
Food on you guys for being Tama goes to Whole
Foods occasionally. She likes to get their so called fresh fish,
which is probably just as frozen as any other fish. Yeah,
it's all the same. But for whatever reason, she feels
like she gets a better quality fish. But I have
to ask her if she Now.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
I'm again, I'm just happy that there are some of
our listeners out there that can afford to go to
Whole Foods and just congratulations.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
No, you're just you're just jealous as what you really are,
just you just ticked off that they're doing that. So
let's go back to the social credit score system for
a moment. So in in China, there was a horrible
Now the video was from I think twenty seventeen, but
(18:51):
it showed an individual on the side of a road.
I'm not sure what province was in, but they were
by the side of the road and the video was
gruesome because this male appeared to be I don't know,
a thirty ish or so, hard to tell, was laying
(19:13):
on the side of the road with his abdomen slid
open and his guts just hanging out, and people around
him were panic stricken. They were running, they were trying
to get medical help. He had been subjected to organ harvesting.
(19:34):
It was and since has changed that organ harvesting was
done and it's done without anty. They just they just uh,
they just take you and cut you open and take
whatever they need and sucks to be you. You just
you just expire. Well, it used to be criminals or
the Wigers or someone whose social score is so oh
(20:01):
that it just you know, you're you're worthless to the state,
You're worthless to the party. So we need uh there
there's a there's a party member, there's a general, there's
some you know, mayor whatever. There's some party operative somewhere
that needs a heart or needs a liver, needs a kidney,
(20:21):
whatever it is, so we'll just go out and just
grab one. No, there's no organ donor system. They just
grab whatever they need. And the story that went along
with this video from twenty seventeen was a warning to
that since then they've gone from taking organs from criminals
(20:44):
and social score low social score people or the Wigers
or some other you know, disfavored ethnic group to just anybody,
to anyone. And it was a warning to Americans that
you know, you need to be careful traveling, particularly in
(21:04):
some of the more rural or less urban areas, say,
you know, than Shanghai or Beijing. But that is now
happening to just randomly anybody, but always part of it
is in addition to the social in addition to just
randomly happening, is happening in particular to people have low
social scores, And that seems absurd, doesn't it. Well, fifteen
(21:27):
years ago, did you ever think that the Democrats and
the cabal but I repeat myself, would start a coordinated
campaign to normalize say, men and women's restrooms, or men
you know, participating in women's sports, or pedophilia.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
Or anything.
Speaker 3 (21:48):
You know, kids at the ages of three, four or
five of beginning transitioning or changing their pronouns or changing
their names and not being able to tell their parents
any with fifteen years ago, did you even believe that
we would be at that stage. Well, that's the stage
that we're at. So why do you doubt me about
(22:08):
the social credit score? Because that genie is out of
the bottle. And to the talk back if you can
use your poem, I'm see now I've got to go
to Whole Foods because I want to see it. Is
it just a scanner and you just lay your your
(22:29):
palm on the scanner?
Speaker 4 (22:31):
Yeah, like you see in the Mission Impossible movies.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
You just.
Speaker 3 (22:35):
Yeah, and and I think it was on the text line.
Let me, let me look, Oh yeah, it's in Sweden.
They have microchips in their hands for payment to use
public transportation. So this is not some you know, science
fiction happening only in China if Amazon's doing it here.
(22:58):
By the way, Amazon does own Whole Foods, so I'm
not surprised that Amazon has it. Whole Foods has it,
Sweden has it. It's going to start occurring everywhere. And
how long before if let's just say it doesn't have
to be government, but how long before corporations start deciding that,
(23:24):
you know, there's one price for somebody with a good
that I'm sure this could be legally challenged, but there's
one price for someone who has a good social score,
and there's a price for somebody else that has a
bad social score.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
Or you may not even be able to get into the.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
Retail store because you have a poor, lousy social score.
That's private action, that's not government action. I'm not saying
that government couldn't stop you couldn't take actions to prevent
that from occurring. But do you really trust the United
States Congress to pass a law or let's take it
(24:01):
to the let's take it to today. If at a
point out JP Morgan wants to start doing this. Amazon's
doing it. Do you think if Trumps signed an executive
order that said it is not the policy of the
United States, and that he believes it is illegal and
he will not allow it in the country, how long
do you think it would take even Bezos to challenge
(24:25):
that in federal court as supposedly as close of a
relationship as they have. It happened in a New York minute.
So no, don't sit here and think that what I'm
talking about is science fiction and that it's not going
to happen.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
This is part of the new world.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
That we live in, and this is the kind of
thing that will ultimately lead to government abuse because once
the government gets their finger on it in any way,
no put intend of there getting their finger on it
in any way.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Real id uh clear?
Speaker 3 (25:03):
Look at Clear, you go to the airport, I have Clear.
I decided to do Clear and Global Entry to have both,
so I'd have options depending on you know, which line
is shorter. I can go through Clear or I can
go through the TSA pre check, uh, which both of
them get you into TSA pre check. But government's already
kind of doing it. How long before it expands even further.
(25:28):
I bring it to your attention because to think that
it's not going to occur is just living in some
sort of fantasy land that is not reality. You may hate,
for example, the militant dumbasses, the Marxist deliberal establishment that
(25:52):
they you know, they shower fortunes upon that the preferred
class of people, But trust me, you don't hate them
as much as they hate you. Procter and Gamble probably
makes just about everything you can imagine in the grocery store,
and other prominent corporations are now funding a racial justice group.
(26:19):
Now the leader of this group just happens to be
a former Obama White House official. Well there's a shock, right.
They lashed out this week at what he called. Guy's
name is David Johns. He lashed out at what he
called the white mediocrity and started urging a woke army
(26:41):
of black youth to wage war with whiteness. This guy
led Obama's White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
He made the remark at an event last.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
Week to promote a boycott against Target for rolling back
its DEI programs. Now, Target was long at the vanguard
of ramming that crap down customer's throats. Now when it
started to cost them billions of dollars, so Target suits
in the C suite decided to start backing off. Well,
(27:17):
then that led to a chain reaction because that led
to threats from the Marxist that the media spun dishonestly.
The company should have stuck to retail rather than waiting
into the cultural wars. The purpose of the Target boycott,
according to this guy, is to force the company to
reinvest two billion dollars in black owned businesses and deposit
(27:41):
two hundred and fifty million dollars in black owned banks.
Speaker 2 (27:45):
I don't know, but as a lawyer, doesn't sound like extortion.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
We're going to boycott you unless you put two billion
dollars in black owned businesses. I didn't know that Target
was in the business of investing in other businesses. I
thought Target was in the business of selling us crap
whatever Target sells, and then taking that money and reinvesting
(28:09):
it or paying it out to shareholders as dividends, and
then growing the business so they could sell more crap.
I didn't think they were in the business of investing
in other businesses, particularly a narrowly defined black owned business.
Sounds like extortion. I guess is that the modern civil
rights movement extortion. So Procter and Gamble contributed five hundred
(28:34):
and fifteen thousand dollars to John's National Blank Blank John's
National might as well be blank John's National Black Justice
Coalition two years ago, which is more than double the
two hundred and five thousand dollars from the Soros Tide
Foundation and the Tide's advocacy group. But the familiar racist
(28:57):
outfit has an even more generous manufactor.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
You yes, you listen to this.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
The Department of Health and Human Services under Biden awarded
the National Black Justice Coalition at one point two million
dollars dollar contract to go through twenty twenty six as
part of the government's Let's Stop HIV Together campaign. Now
I don't know whether d HHS is still funding the coalition,
(29:32):
but the Johns organization said last month that his organization
was proud to be a grantee of that HIV program
and John's. Remember that's the Obama official denounces Trump as
a fascist trying to rob us of our wealth, by
which he means not the uh. What was his organization
(29:54):
called the House, White House Initiative on Education Excellence for
African Americalkins, and now he's running this national Just Black
Black Justice advocacy organization. He said, we don't need nothing
from white people. We don't need nothing from white people.
(30:16):
How about it? Listen how to speak English? So he
kind of personifies what the public was stampeded by the
media into supporting between two thousand and eight and twenty twelve.
But we didn't endorse that in November twenty twenty four.
So let's hope that Johns is right about Trump denying
him our wealth, your wealth. Who knows, maybe even well,
(30:37):
Procter and Gamble will think of better use of sports money,
or maybe not, Maybe Procter and Gamble will be one
that will go, hmmm, palm reading, or you can take
biometrics and maybe a social score to shop at Target,
or he plays it sells B and G products.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Michael.
Speaker 5 (30:56):
I get the same kind of notices about how much
GM using from City of Fort Collins and they always
irk me. Oh, look they have a smiley face next
to their usage, and mine's like a half frownie. Oh
the half frownie face.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
I'll screw you.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
City Fort Collins are us as much damn water as.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
I want not only screw you, but how childie. Oh
look mommy, I got a star. Aren't I a good boy?
You know I've often said that I think Colorad has
become worse than California. Well, I think it's I think
it's a neck and neck horse race. You know, the
Kentucky Derby's coming up. So maybe maybe maybe we're gonna
win by a nose. Who knows.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
But Bill Belushian has tweeted out.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
That a California Democrat state senator by the name of
Lolis Smallwood Quavis has introduced Senate Bill five sixty. This
bill would decriminalize welfare fraud below an amount of twenty
five thousand dollars, and it would prohibit prosecution for attempted
(32:03):
welfare fraud and would prohibit someone from being charged with
perjury if they, you know, lie about what they were
trying to do. So what's next when you have a
when you have Democrats Marxists as the single party ruling
(32:24):
a state like California or Colorado, you drive out businesses,
you decrear life shoplifting, and then you do this. It
deleted a provision for criminal penalties for any attempt at
welfare fraud below nine hundred and fifty dollars and increase
the You can commit welfare fraud up to twenty five
(32:45):
grand and not be prosecuted for it. She says, that's
just being humane and not criminalizing poverty. I don't think
it's hard to see where this is headed. Well, why
why why do we have any criminal statutes at all?
Why don't we just you know, because we're spending too
much money on cops. There's you know, people's due process
(33:09):
rights are apparently being violated left and right everywhere you turn.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
And California's gonna lead the way.
Speaker 3 (33:14):
So Colorado legislature, the pollop Bureau, you're still in session.
So as long as we're in neck and neck with California,
why don't you match this? Why don't you delete or
decriminalized welfare fraud below say fifty grand? Yeah, been driving
you and I can know welfare fraud. We can just
commit fraud not worry about it.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States
of America and to the Republic for witches, sands, one
nation under God, individible with liberty and justice for all.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Amen. Let's see if you get the reference.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
I don't think that it's well, you know what, what
was that about?
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Your guess is as good as mine? Okay, all right?
And was that your only choice?
Speaker 4 (00:45):
There were a couple others, but those were people who
have already left one for today. So I try and
get as many new voices as I can if there
are if I have another talk back, why do we
discourage anyone?
Speaker 2 (00:59):
I'm I'm just a little I couldn't decide.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
It's like, you know, you can hear the national anthem,
but you're not actually where the national anthem is being played,
so you don't really stop or put your hand over
your heart, or salute or stand up. I really couldn't
decide whether, you know, I looked around see if there
any like spy cameras in here. I really couldn't decide
whether not to stand up or not, because I felt
(01:23):
an obligation to immediately stand up and start residing along
with him. But I I couldn't find a flag to it.
Speaker 4 (01:30):
It's no physical flag from where they are.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
Yeah, yeah, maybe we should do that. We could put
like flags up on the drywall. We could do that
flags on the drywall. I don't think it's a secret,
and if it is, you're just not paying attention that
all these international organizations like the World Economic Forum, they
(01:53):
really do see the implementation of a global social credit
score system that is based on your carbon use as
their endgame. There was a text message that fits this
pretty well that said, this is from twelve forty seven.
(02:17):
Don't you just love the little energy reports that excel
sends out to try and make you feel guilty for
the amount of energy you use? Yeah, because I'm always
curious because my understanding is that when it says like
your neighbors usage, that doesn't mean your next door neighbors.
I don't know how they do it, whether it's I
(02:38):
don't think it's geographically, because I kind of you know,
I've actually had what's your luxury built?
Speaker 2 (02:45):
You know?
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Now, I know you got two rug rats in your house? Well,
I got three rug rats in my house, but they
just happened to be K nine. And then, like I
told you earlier about my internet of things about my
water usage and you know, water leaks and stuff. It
also shows my peers usage on a daily basis of water,
you know, some sort of aggregate number. And I'm always like,
(03:09):
but who are my peers?
Speaker 2 (03:12):
How do you? How do you know who they are?
With your ego? You don't think you have any peers?
Speaker 3 (03:17):
Well, I don't have. I am peerless. I truly am peerless, peerless, fearless,
and nearless gearless too.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
So. But that is.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
A social credit score based upon your carbon use. Now,
if you don't believe me, go look at the World
Economic Federation's Agenda twenty thirty literature.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
It's all it's all spelled out right there.
Speaker 3 (03:50):
Well, let's think about the Chinese Communist Party for a minute,
because they have maintained a credit score system for decades now.
But the globals don't view that as a threat to
human freedom. What they look at the Chinese Communist Party.
Just think about that. They look at the Chinese Communist
Party and they see that social score system not as
(04:14):
a threat, but as an opportunity for them and for
the elites to control human behavior using the alarmism of
climate change or you know, you know, pea coil, you know, renewables,
you know, decarbonization, whatever it might be. All that justifies
their motive. And if you're thinking that the implementation of
(04:38):
that kind of a system is you know, years off,
that's decades. It's not going to happen in my lifetime.
That's way off in the future somewhere, and that somehow
we can prevent it from happening. I think we have
to all reconsider that, because I think that not only
is it coming, but I think it's coming far faster
than we really realize. Matter of fact, the tech foundation
(05:04):
for it is already here. It was reported last week
that the Chinese firm Ali Pay Ali Pay it's a
subsidiary of Ali Baba, is now implementing a byte quote
biometric pl one scanner, which uses vein and palm print
(05:26):
data for processing payments. Well, you're going to use the
veins on my wrist my palm print to process payments.
I I don't have Let me draw five. You may
(05:48):
think it's distinction without a difference, but I think that
it is a distinction with a difference. So of course
I'm screwed anyway, Because the White House Data Center and
the CIA and the NSA have all of my biometrics anyway.
But you know how you use your face ID on
your phone. I don't have a problem with that, primarily
(06:12):
because that resides on my phone, and I'm the one
that chooses which apps I want to use face ID
as a oh what do they call it? Not as
a two factor as a pass key. It's the words passkey,
(06:33):
and that's what I was looking for. I don't mind
using that as a pass key on certain apps, particularly
my financial information. I'd rather use my face face ID
rather than a fingerprint, although I do use fingerprints for
some things. Particularly I use face ID for my financial
apps because well, if I'm dead and someone wants to
(06:57):
use it to hack my phone, well what do I
care that point? But to use my palm or my
veins for payments means that I'm now using those biometrics externally.
So here's the story about the pl one. It quote
(07:21):
enables individuals to make purchases simply by presenting their hand,
no phone, no card, no pen required. Well, I'd say
that's probably even better for those who wish to control
all of us. Because this quote touch free alternity for
payment reflects a growing industry shift toward friction FRICTIONALSS, friction
(07:44):
less biometric transactions, no friction whatsoever. So the question then becomes, well,
how rapidly is this growing industry shift progressing around the world. Well,
the story goes on to glowingly report that major players
are already on board. I just got a notification that
(08:09):
an Amazon package was delivered. Oh well two packages today already,
fat X and Amazon. Well guess what. Amazon has integrated
palm authentication across US retail and healthcare facilities. Now I've
not run into it anywhere yet, but I'll probably refuse it.
(08:29):
I maybe it's just because, you know, maybe because I
used Dad jokes apparently, but I already have a difficult
time already using like Apple pay at places they accept that,
you know, contactless pay. I can do it, but it
seems to be more than a hassle than just to
(08:49):
you know, swipe my chip, not the one in my brain,
the one on my phone or on my credit card.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
KP.
Speaker 3 (08:57):
Morgan is gearing up for national deployment this year, this year,
not next year, not the year after this year. So
the people that support this both that as many as
three billion humans around.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
The world will be using this system.
Speaker 3 (09:19):
Before we get to twenty twenty six, in other words,
sometime this year. Now, once you have that many people
and that number of corporations and that size and that
breadth of corporate influence like Amazon, that reaches a tipping
point where universal acceptance, universal use, and I would also
(09:45):
argue universal abuse becomes inevitable.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Inevitable.
Speaker 3 (09:51):
Now, if you think that the data you know this
gathered through the use of this technology won't be the
used by governments and essentially every national earth, including this government,
I think you reside in some sort of alternate universe.
Now does that mean I think Trump's out to do
(10:12):
this to us? No, I don't think so, and I
think he would probably oppose it. But he has kind
of leaned in toward crypto and he kind of leaned
in toward digital, you know, coins, digital monetary systems. So
not that he's all in, but I think he'd certainly
(10:32):
be open to it. So what would happen once that
technology gets universally adopted? What would happen? I think there
are a few things that naturally will occur. The scoring
system will be rigged, for example, to force you to
(10:54):
drive electric vehicles, whether you want to or not, Or
if you don't think it'll be that dramatic, how about
it will be used to force you to drive vehicles
that meet certain mileage standards or certain sizes, or that
have certain amenities on them, trackability, whatever, I mean, any
(11:16):
number of things. And if you insist on driving an
internal combustion engine, well then you can forget about doing
any pleasure traveling unless you're gonna be wealthy enough as
you could buy the carbon credits that would need to
be used to offset your driving that's other than to
and from work. Or you might be able to limit
(11:39):
people to a certain number of miles, So we're going
to allocate a certain number of miles. You know, they've
already talked about taxing you on the miles you drive,
as opposed to a gas tax, because they're trying to
you know, e these don't use gasoline. They do use
natural gas, because as we know in Colorado, most of
our electricity is produced by natural gas. Instead of having
(12:04):
the fights with the spouse over the thermostat, well you'll
just be penalized for setting your home thermostat below say, oh,
I don't know, seventy eight or eighty degrees in the summer,
or you know above sixty five or sixty seven degrees
in the wintertime, or like me, you know, I just
three dogs in the house, well, two dogs and a
(12:25):
wiener dog, every dog, every cat in the case of dragging,
every rabbit or you know mouse that he keeps whatever
he might keeps for a pet, or you know, maybe
he would be considered a pet by missus. Redbeard that
will come with a carbon rating two. So what's the
carbon rating of a one hundred and fifty pound lienburger?
(12:50):
What's the carbon footprint of a I don't know, twelve
pound or whatever it is wiener dog?
Speaker 2 (12:55):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (12:57):
So since I've been batching it for the past week,
I've been eating a lot of stuff that I want
to eat. Went to the steakhouse the other night, had
a really good file at Well, beef's gonna come with
a higher carbon score than a impossible meat A toe
a toef, a veggie burger.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Just take your pick.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
I don't care which one you choose, but just thinking it,
the scenarios are endless. And if you don't understand how
bad this is in communist China, really dig into how
the social score system works. There and then imagine that
in our lives.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
We do think.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
You know, when when we changed insurance companies, the auto
insurance company offered us one of those discounts if we
would just put the app on our phone too, and
and the agent kind of got upset with me, and
I said, well, I don't like my I don't want
my driving tracked. And she was quick to add, oh,
(14:03):
You're not gonna be punished, because I was like, you know,
I drive on the Interstate a lot. And while I've
been a good boy and not speeding much. While I've
been a good boy and not speeding, there are times
when some nut job pulls over. It changes lanes without signaling,
or as two closed, or as weaving in and out,
(14:24):
or or for example, the other day, I was in
very slow traffic aause somebody was what's it called again?
Speaker 2 (14:30):
Dragon? I never can remember. When the motorcycles go between.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
Traffic, there's filtering and splitting. Filtering is when you're stopped
and then they can go between you. Splitting is when
you are moving, which is illegal.
Speaker 3 (14:42):
Okay, well they were splitting them, which was illegal, and
traffic was moving. I would guess at maybe twenty twenty
five miles an hour over here on twenty five and
a motorcycle went whizzing between me and a car next
We weren't exactly right next to each other, but a
car slightly behind me and the next lane over to
my left, a motorcycle went whizzing by as loud as
(15:03):
could possibly be, scared the you know what out of me,
and I hit my brake because I couldn't. I was
looking like, what the hell is this? So I slam
on my brakes, and I said, so that you know,
this happens a lot where you know, you slam on
your brakes because you're not speeding, you're not driving erradically,
but somebody else does something. Oh no, no, no, you won't
(15:24):
be penalized that you are given a discount for. You know,
if you don't do it, then you'll get a discount.
Trying to get feed me the positive side as opposed
to the negative side.
Speaker 4 (15:35):
How would they know that you didn't do something in
that situation.
Speaker 3 (15:38):
Well, the point is they would know I would do something,
so I would not be penalized. I just wouldn't necessarily
qualify for a discount. See, so if you never do it,
then you would get a discount.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
Now.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
She even went on to tell me the agent did that.
She uses that app and she's mad because I forget
whether it was a percentage score or a grade score,
but like, I don't know whether it's like you get
an ABCD or F or you get a one hundred
percent or ninety percent or whatever. But she was rated
at something that turned out to be like a B
(16:15):
minus or something, and she was really pissed off about
it because she thinks she's a better driver than that.
And I'm like, well, so she's not. So she as
an agent for the carrier, it's not getting as a
big of a discount is she thinks she ought to
be getting. And I'm just like, you know what, that
just sounds like more trouble than it's worth. No, I
don't want it because I'm already happy with the rate
(16:35):
that I'm getting in the premium i'm paying and if
it's going to save me, because I was like, how
much of a discount, Well, if you're perfect, you can
get a thirty almost a third discount something, Well I
would go for that, But what's the likelihood of me
getting that kind of discount?
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Not very likely.
Speaker 3 (16:55):
These social credit scores are designed to control your life
and choices such as those I just outlined about cars
or thermostats.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
Or what you eat.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
There will be a lot more aspects of your daily
lives which eventually will impact virtually everything that you do.
It will determine every aspect of your life. What kind
of clothes do you buy, what kind of cloth do
you use? What schools are your chill kids allowed to attend.
I don't think it's just likely. I think it's inevitable
(17:30):
because it all sounds silly to you. Well, let's go
back fifteen years ago and see if something sounded silly.
Speaker 5 (17:37):
This The palm reading payment technology has been at Whole
Foods for at least several months.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Yeah, you must be the one that left the text message.
I was just reading that.
Speaker 4 (17:48):
It's like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, what we've got
googer listeners out there that can afford to go to
Whole Foods.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
I couldn't tell you last time I was a Whole
Food on you guys for being Tama goes to Whole
Foods occasionally. She likes to get their so called fresh fish,
which is probably just as frozen as any other fish. Yeah,
it's all the same. But for whatever reason, she feels
like she gets a better quality fish. But I have
to ask her if she Now.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
I'm again, I'm just happy that there are some of
our listeners out there that can afford to go to
Whole Foods and just congratulations.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
No, you're just you're just jealous as what you really are,
just you just ticked off that they're doing that. So
let's go back to the social credit score system for
a moment. So in in China, there was a horrible
Now the video was from I think twenty seventeen, but
(18:51):
it showed an individual on the side of a road.
I'm not sure what province was in, but they were
by the side of the road and the video was
gruesome because this male appeared to be I don't know,
a thirty ish or so, hard to tell, was laying
(19:13):
on the side of the road with his abdomen slid
open and his guts just hanging out, and people around
him were panic stricken. They were running, they were trying
to get medical help. He had been subjected to organ harvesting.
(19:34):
It was and since has changed that organ harvesting was
done and it's done without anty. They just they just uh,
they just take you and cut you open and take
whatever they need and sucks to be you. You just
you just expire. Well, it used to be criminals or
the Wigers or someone whose social score is so oh
(20:01):
that it just you know, you're you're worthless to the state,
You're worthless to the party. So we need uh there
there's a there's a party member, there's a general, there's
some you know, mayor whatever. There's some party operative somewhere
that needs a heart or needs a liver, needs a kidney,
(20:21):
whatever it is, so we'll just go out and just
grab one. No, there's no organ donor system. They just
grab whatever they need. And the story that went along
with this video from twenty seventeen was a warning to
that since then they've gone from taking organs from criminals
(20:44):
and social score low social score people or the Wigers
or some other you know, disfavored ethnic group to just anybody,
to anyone. And it was a warning to Americans that
you know, you need to be careful traveling, particularly in
(21:04):
some of the more rural or less urban areas, say,
you know, than Shanghai or Beijing. But that is now
happening to just randomly anybody, but always part of it
is in addition to the social in addition to just
randomly happening, is happening in particular to people have low
social scores, And that seems absurd, doesn't it. Well, fifteen
(21:27):
years ago, did you ever think that the Democrats and
the cabal but I repeat myself, would start a coordinated
campaign to normalize say, men and women's restrooms, or men
you know, participating in women's sports, or pedophilia.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
Or anything.
Speaker 3 (21:48):
You know, kids at the ages of three, four or
five of beginning transitioning or changing their pronouns or changing
their names and not being able to tell their parents
any with fifteen years ago, did you even believe that
we would be at that stage. Well, that's the stage
that we're at. So why do you doubt me about
(22:08):
the social credit score? Because that genie is out of
the bottle. And to the talk back if you can
use your poem, I'm see now I've got to go
to Whole Foods because I want to see it. Is
it just a scanner and you just lay your your
(22:29):
palm on the scanner?
Speaker 4 (22:31):
Yeah, like you see in the Mission Impossible movies.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
You just.
Speaker 3 (22:35):
Yeah, and and I think it was on the text line.
Let me, let me look, Oh yeah, it's in Sweden.
They have microchips in their hands for payment to use
public transportation. So this is not some you know, science
fiction happening only in China if Amazon's doing it here.
(22:58):
By the way, Amazon does own Whole Foods, so I'm
not surprised that Amazon has it. Whole Foods has it,
Sweden has it. It's going to start occurring everywhere. And
how long before if let's just say it doesn't have
to be government, but how long before corporations start deciding that,
(23:24):
you know, there's one price for somebody with a good
that I'm sure this could be legally challenged, but there's
one price for someone who has a good social score,
and there's a price for somebody else that has a
bad social score.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
Or you may not even be able to get into the.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
Retail store because you have a poor, lousy social score.
That's private action, that's not government action. I'm not saying
that government couldn't stop you couldn't take actions to prevent
that from occurring. But do you really trust the United
States Congress to pass a law or let's take it
(24:01):
to the let's take it to today. If at a
point out JP Morgan wants to start doing this. Amazon's
doing it. Do you think if Trumps signed an executive
order that said it is not the policy of the
United States, and that he believes it is illegal and
he will not allow it in the country, how long
do you think it would take even Bezos to challenge
(24:25):
that in federal court as supposedly as close of a
relationship as they have. It happened in a New York minute.
So no, don't sit here and think that what I'm
talking about is science fiction and that it's not going
to happen.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
This is part of the new world.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
That we live in, and this is the kind of
thing that will ultimately lead to government abuse because once
the government gets their finger on it in any way,
no put intend of there getting their finger on it
in any way.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Real id uh clear?
Speaker 3 (25:03):
Look at Clear, you go to the airport, I have Clear.
I decided to do Clear and Global Entry to have both,
so I'd have options depending on you know, which line
is shorter. I can go through Clear or I can
go through the TSA pre check, uh, which both of
them get you into TSA pre check. But government's already
kind of doing it. How long before it expands even further.
(25:28):
I bring it to your attention because to think that
it's not going to occur is just living in some
sort of fantasy land that is not reality. You may hate,
for example, the militant dumbasses, the Marxist deliberal establishment that
(25:52):
they you know, they shower fortunes upon that the preferred
class of people, But trust me, you don't hate them
as much as they hate you. Procter and Gamble probably
makes just about everything you can imagine in the grocery store,
and other prominent corporations are now funding a racial justice group.
(26:19):
Now the leader of this group just happens to be
a former Obama White House official. Well there's a shock, right.
They lashed out this week at what he called. Guy's
name is David Johns. He lashed out at what he
called the white mediocrity and started urging a woke army
(26:41):
of black youth to wage war with whiteness. This guy
led Obama's White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
He made the remark at an event last.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
Week to promote a boycott against Target for rolling back
its DEI programs. Now, Target was long at the vanguard
of ramming that crap down customer's throats. Now when it
started to cost them billions of dollars, so Target suits
in the C suite decided to start backing off. Well,
(27:17):
then that led to a chain reaction because that led
to threats from the Marxist that the media spun dishonestly.
The company should have stuck to retail rather than waiting
into the cultural wars. The purpose of the Target boycott,
according to this guy, is to force the company to
reinvest two billion dollars in black owned businesses and deposit
(27:41):
two hundred and fifty million dollars in black owned banks.
Speaker 2 (27:45):
I don't know, but as a lawyer, doesn't sound like extortion.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
We're going to boycott you unless you put two billion
dollars in black owned businesses. I didn't know that Target
was in the business of investing in other businesses. I
thought Target was in the business of selling us crap
whatever Target sells, and then taking that money and reinvesting
(28:09):
it or paying it out to shareholders as dividends, and
then growing the business so they could sell more crap.
I didn't think they were in the business of investing
in other businesses, particularly a narrowly defined black owned business.
Sounds like extortion. I guess is that the modern civil
rights movement extortion. So Procter and Gamble contributed five hundred
(28:34):
and fifteen thousand dollars to John's National Blank Blank John's
National might as well be blank John's National Black Justice
Coalition two years ago, which is more than double the
two hundred and five thousand dollars from the Soros Tide
Foundation and the Tide's advocacy group. But the familiar racist
(28:57):
outfit has an even more generous manufactor.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
You yes, you listen to this.
Speaker 3 (29:09):
The Department of Health and Human Services under Biden awarded
the National Black Justice Coalition at one point two million
dollars dollar contract to go through twenty twenty six as
part of the government's Let's Stop HIV Together campaign. Now
I don't know whether d HHS is still funding the coalition,
(29:32):
but the Johns organization said last month that his organization
was proud to be a grantee of that HIV program
and John's. Remember that's the Obama official denounces Trump as
a fascist trying to rob us of our wealth, by
which he means not the uh. What was his organization
(29:54):
called the House, White House Initiative on Education Excellence for
African Americalkins, and now he's running this national Just Black
Black Justice advocacy organization. He said, we don't need nothing
from white people. We don't need nothing from white people.
(30:16):
How about it? Listen how to speak English? So he
kind of personifies what the public was stampeded by the
media into supporting between two thousand and eight and twenty twelve.
But we didn't endorse that in November twenty twenty four.
So let's hope that Johns is right about Trump denying
him our wealth, your wealth. Who knows, maybe even well,
(30:37):
Procter and Gamble will think of better use of sports money,
or maybe not, Maybe Procter and Gamble will be one
that will go, hmmm, palm reading, or you can take
biometrics and maybe a social score to shop at Target,
or he plays it sells B and G products.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Michael.
Speaker 5 (30:56):
I get the same kind of notices about how much
GM using from City of Fort Collins and they always
irk me. Oh, look they have a smiley face next
to their usage, and mine's like a half frownie. Oh
the half frownie face.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
I'll screw you.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
City Fort Collins are us as much damn water as.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
I want not only screw you, but how childie. Oh
look mommy, I got a star. Aren't I a good boy?
You know I've often said that I think Colorad has
become worse than California. Well, I think it's I think
it's a neck and neck horse race. You know, the
Kentucky Derby's coming up. So maybe maybe maybe we're gonna
win by a nose. Who knows.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
But Bill Belushian has tweeted out.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
That a California Democrat state senator by the name of
Lolis Smallwood Quavis has introduced Senate Bill five sixty. This
bill would decriminalize welfare fraud below an amount of twenty
five thousand dollars, and it would prohibit prosecution for attempted
(32:03):
welfare fraud and would prohibit someone from being charged with
perjury if they, you know, lie about what they were
trying to do. So what's next when you have a
when you have Democrats Marxists as the single party ruling
(32:24):
a state like California or Colorado, you drive out businesses,
you decrear life shoplifting, and then you do this. It
deleted a provision for criminal penalties for any attempt at
welfare fraud below nine hundred and fifty dollars and increase
the You can commit welfare fraud up to twenty five
(32:45):
grand and not be prosecuted for it. She says, that's
just being humane and not criminalizing poverty. I don't think
it's hard to see where this is headed. Well, why
why why do we have any criminal statutes at all?
Why don't we just you know, because we're spending too
much money on cops. There's you know, people's due process
(33:09):
rights are apparently being violated left and right everywhere you turn.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
And California's gonna lead the way.
Speaker 3 (33:14):
So Colorado legislature, the pollop Bureau, you're still in session.
So as long as we're in neck and neck with California,
why don't you match this? Why don't you delete or
decriminalized welfare fraud below say fifty grand? Yeah, been driving
you and I can know welfare fraud. We can just
commit fraud not worry about it.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!