Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I feel like Joe Biden's revelation of prostate cancer is
the news stutter. In other words, we're supposed to stop
talking about his broken brain and no one knew who
was really running the country because now he's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
But Joe was.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Trying to tell us about that in twenty two about
I don't remember. It might have been in Delaware when
he was reciting the lie about the oil smear.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
You might be referring to this, and.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Guess what the first frost, You know, what was happening.
How to put on a windshield wipers to get literally
the oils to look off the window. That's why I
have so damn any other people I grew up had cancer,
and why camp for the longest time Feller had the
highest cancer rate in the nation. I guarantee you I
(00:56):
will be totally transparent in terms of my health, all
aspects of my health. That's why I have so damn
any other people I grew up have cancer.
Speaker 3 (01:07):
M July twenty, twenty twenty two. Biden says, that's why
I and so damn many other people I grew up
with have cancer. Now I want to make abundantly clear
first and foremost that my sympathy goes out to Joe Biden,
as it would with anyone who's diagnosed with metastatic prostate
(01:30):
cancer metastasized into the bones. That's a very painful cancer. Well,
any cancer that's metastasized into your bones is you're going
to be painful. Sometimes they do bone marrow transplants, they'll
do I mean, but and chemo is is hit and miss,
because once it's metastasized, you don't know where it's going.
(01:54):
But how long have they known about about this? It
doesn't appear overnight. It festers in rare but dangerous case,
this prostate cancer bypasses the usual slow growth, and it
does indeed strike quickly, especially the older that you get. Now,
(02:16):
if Biden was not screened regularly, or he had an
aggressive subtype that evades PSA detection. You know, my doctors
have often said, you know, for example, I'm due for
a colonoscopy, and I've asked my doctor, you know, because
I've heard stories that and not from doctor Google, but
(02:37):
I've just you know, in reading about different things. You know,
when you get older, you start reading about stuff, and
so I've asked both my regular PCP and my anti
aging doctor, should I do a regular colonoscopy or you know,
should I do one of these other screening tests, and
there are actually some other screening tests you can do now,
(02:58):
but no, they both recommend it. Go ahead and get
the colonoscopy. My concern was that sometimes they see the
polyps and they remove the polyps, and the pops. In
removing the polyps, polyps can act like a The polyps
have actually cancered some of the bad stuff in your
in your colon, and those polyps form and keep them
(03:19):
from spreading into your body. So it does make some
logical sense, maybe not medical sense, but it makes logical
sense that if a doctor goes in and removes those polyps,
you can have some of those cancerous or dangerous cells
escape and now they're they're in your gut, and that
could lead to cancer down the road. But both of
(03:41):
my doctors have said, no, that's highly unlikely. We've seen
those studies too. We don't really see a lot of causation.
We still think the colonoscopy is still or you know,
any kind of screen but you should go get your colonoscopy.
So I'm not to schedule and get a day off,
Take a day off and go get a colinoscoby. So
(04:03):
the point is that there are some aggressive subtypes they
can have a PSA detection. My PSA has always been like,
you know, zero point nine or one point one or something,
and it's never been elevated. So it's it's never it's
never changed, never been out of that range. But how
can we imagine that our president was not screened properly
(04:28):
because again, it's one of the easiest cancers to diagnose.
The PSA blood test itself shows the rate of cancer
cell growth. Even with the most aggressive form, it's a
five to seven year journey without treatment before it becomes metastatic, meaning,
as several people have said on x and one of
(04:50):
those people being uh doctor Stephen Quay, who points out
that it would be malpractice for this patient, Joe Biden,
to show up and be first diagnosed with metastatic disease
in May of twenty twenty five. He believes that it's
(05:10):
very highly likely that he was carrying a diagnosis of
prostate cancer throughout his White House tenure, and that Americans
were simply uninformed about it, or they weren't told about
They not just uninformed but oh, use the word cover up.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
A quick question, timeline wise, was.
Speaker 5 (05:35):
This announcement about the prostate cancer after her.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Audio was released?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
You know? Good and will it was?
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Oh, I know, quite honestly, I had no idea. I didn't.
I didn't pay attention to anything all weekend long. Oh
yeah really did no?
Speaker 3 (05:54):
No? Well, yeah, because the her came out on Friday,
gotcha her? Her came out. I spent two hours on
it on Saturday, okay, and I want to talk a
little bit about it again today, and then boom, yesterday
we get the announcement about, oh, He's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
Because as I was scrolling through my social feedia and
social media feeds late last night before bed, I'm looking
at oh, her audio is out, Oh Biden's got cancer.
So I didn't know what the timeline was here. But oh,
that seems interesting.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
It seems odd, interesting, odd, you say, Tomatow, I say
to Mono. Interesting odd. So we're the American people uninformed.
There's something else here that makes you wonder in light
of everything that we know. So what's the name of Jake?
Speaker 4 (06:52):
Never?
Speaker 3 (06:52):
I never can't remember the Jake name it because I'm
not going to go buy it Jake Tapper's book, The
Jake Tapper.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
And if I covered it up, if I very like, if.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
I forget what it's got original sin, Yeah, I think
that's it original Sin. No, that's my book, and that's
not a cover up, that's an exple's. And then there's
another book that came out maybe a month or two ago.
So so the books are starting to come out, but
(07:25):
no one's talking about something else. That's another factor in
all of this that I find interesting. But let's go
back to just focus on the cancer for a moment.
Should the cancer been caught earlier? I'm not a doctor,
why I'm not yours doctor, but I don't even play
a doctor on the radio. But yes, it should have
(07:48):
been caught earlier. That's why I use the term malpractice.
Localized prostate cancer is often curable, but once it escapes
the polyp or the capsule or however you know it's
howe of it's contained and spreads you, you shift from
cure to containment. And a miss or a delayed diagnosis
(08:11):
is a critical failure point. So is it rare for
this to happen? So here's some stats about ten to
fifteen percent of prostate cancers are diagnosed first at stage four.
That's when it is in the bones like this is. Now,
if you're over the age of eight mail over the
age of eighty, especially those with inconsistent screening, it's even
(08:35):
more common you have consistent screenings, it's not that common.
But again, for a president of the because here's something
that's different. Now, I just want to remember, this is
something that's different. We're talking about a president of the
United States. So for a president of the United States
to be diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer is, in doctor
(08:56):
Cray's opinion, nothing short of malpractice.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
So today's treatment in twenty twenty five for metastatic prostate
cancer is not the same kind of medicine that was
practiced by you know, your your grandfather or Tamer's dad,
or what he may have done when he was practicing.
Because today it's a high tech procedure, high tech playbook,
(09:33):
hormone suppression, precision radiation, smart drugs, immunotherapy, and the very
first step usually shuts down testosterone because testosterone feels prostate
cancer I've told you I've been on testosterony replacement therapy
for more than a decade, and that's one of the
(09:55):
other reasons that they still want me to get the colonoscopy,
even though my PSA rem you know, zero point nine
or one point one or whatever it is, never gets
with outside that range. So because of my testosterone levels,
and I I keep my I do I keep my
testosterone levels. Hell, Hell, I keep them high for energy
(10:16):
and for well for other reasons too. And you control
that through drugs or injections called androgen deprivation therapy. And
then there's a second line agent, drugs like arbitraone, and
there's another one in insolent insulumentide or something like that,
(10:41):
that blocks the cancer's ability to rewire itself and then
keeps it from growing. But it's costly. It's not just
costly financially, it's costly physically too. You end up with fatigue,
hot flashes, weakened bones. There's obviously because of the testosterone,
there's a drop in sexual function. It can affect the liver.
(11:03):
It's another reason why even because I'm on testosterony replacement therapy,
it's another reason why both of my doctors regularly checked
all of my liver functions, and they keep my blood
pressure even though you know, my blood pressure is under
control and I could probably do without, you know, one
of my blood pressure medications, but I prefer to stay
on it because I don't see any other side effects
(11:25):
and they're like, yeah, you might as well. And so
I've got really really good blood pressure. So it's a
trade off. All of this is a trade off, you know,
and it's a trade off that we all make as
we get older. Now do we want these treatments not
want these treatments? And I think it. You know, all
of those questions depend upon your quality of life and
(11:47):
my quality of life other than having to work with
dragon and you know, get up at o dark thirty
in the morning, which actually I'm just kind of used
to me. Now that's fine. My quality life is is great.
But you know, the trade off extra years of life,
but you're gonna have closer medical supervision. You're going to
make all these adjustments. You know, as you continued age,
(12:08):
you're gonna still make all these judgments. But still even
with all of those tools, all of those medications, all
of those protocols, many men lived for years after a diagnosis,
they remain active, engaged, and they still remain in the fight.
But there's an uncomfortable question at all of this. It's
the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room. If early
(12:31):
signs were dismissed, or early signs downplayed, or early signs
covered up in order to maintain a campaign image, then yes,
treatment could have been compromised because every week, every month
with aggressive variance matters, and if you delay biopsy, imaging,
(12:56):
or therapy in order to protect the political up, that
comes at a steep biological price. And of course that's
all speculation, but doctor Clay concludes that the highest probability
is that the diagnosis has been known for many years,
but there was a calculated decision not to announce it.
(13:18):
There was a calculated decision not to treat it.
Speaker 4 (13:21):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
And I think finally there was this hope that after
the reelection the treatment could be done when it was
still localized, but there was an unfortunate turn of events.
But there's another point that I think to a degree
(13:48):
fulfills or supports or emphasizes the cover up. So that
SoundBite you heard, as I said, was July was it?
May it? Which is lot July twenty twenty twenty two?
July twenty, twenty twenty two. Let's go to July eighth,
(14:10):
twenty twenty four. All right. Memorandum for Kreem Jean Pierre,
White House Press Secretary from doctor Kevin O'Connor, physician to
the President on White House Stationary physician to the President
the White House. I wanted to share with you background
on white Doctor Kevin Canard visited the White House to
(14:35):
protect patient privacy for the thousands of patients of the
White House Medical Union and the physicians who treat them,
we do not disclode We normally we do not disclose
the names of the specialists we work with. However, in
the interests of accuracy, I have obtained permission from the
President and doctor Canard to confirm the details I am sharing.
(14:55):
Doctor Canard has been the neurology consulting to the White
House Medical Unit since twenty twelve. He was chosen to
be this consultant for his breadth of experience and expertise
across the specialty of neurology, Prior to his movement disorders
and fellowship at Emory, he had practiced as a general
(15:18):
neurologist for six years. He is the longest serving neurologist
at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and in the
military healthcare system. He's been a member of the faculty
at the Uniform Services University's Medical School since nineteen ninety one.
His core faculty of the Neurology Residency program. And it
just goes on to describe all of his academics, all
(15:40):
of his credentials. Doctor Gnnard is a top neurological specialist.
So doctor Connor continues in his letter of July eighth,
twenty twenty four to the Press Secretary, as I have
written in each of these presidents medical reports. As part
of the President's annual physical he sees a team as
(16:02):
specialists that have included optometry, dentistry, orthopedics, orthopedics, orthopedics for
the spine, physical therapy, neurology, sleep medicine, cardiology, radiology, and dermatology.
Doctor Cannard was one of the neurological specialists that examined
(16:23):
President Biden for each of his annual physicals. His findings
have been made public each time I've released the results
of the president's annual physical, President Biden has not seen
a neurologist outside of his annual physical. He then writes
this in the letter. The results of this year's exam
(16:46):
were detailed in my February twenty eight letter quote. An
extremely detailed neurological exam was again reassuring that there were
no findings which would be consistent with any cerebella or
other central neurological disorder such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's,
(17:07):
or ascending lateral sclerosis. Nor are there any signs of
any cervical myelopathy. The assist exam did again support of
finding a peripheral neuropathy in both feet. It's kind of
interesting because the gate the way he walks would say otherwise,
but I'm not the doctor. No motor weakness was detected.
(17:29):
Did you watch him walk? He exhibited no tremor either
at rest or with activity. He demonstrates excellent fine motor dexterity.
Really oh, but a subtle difference in heat or cold
sensation could be elicited, as it was last year. This
heat cold sensation deficit was detected a couple of inches
(17:52):
higher on his ankle calf this year, which is not unexpected.
There may in fact be day to day subjective variation
of these findings, as during last year's exam, this area
of since sensation deficit was actually found to be smaller
than the year before. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
So he saw a neurologist and he also had a
(18:14):
radiological exam radiological for that's rays, uh, plenoscopy. But what
was radiological exam? See, we just took this letter when
it was released as them trying to say there's no
neurological disorder, although we have records that the neurologists kept
(18:38):
showing up at the White House all the time.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
Good money, Michael and Dragon, this is your favorite Jude goober.
As you know, I have prost take cancer and that
it just didn't happen over night, and I kind of
any I could have missed it.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
So now I got five years or less to that.
Speaker 6 (19:00):
How can the President of the United States not get
screened or bust their cancer? We can just happen, all right,
have a good day.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
And we continue to wish you well. Some of the
text messages I think don't take your conspiracy theories too far.
Speaker 5 (19:26):
And we're always down for a good conspiracy theory around here,
but let's probably be a little bit more skeptical on
conspiracy theories on this one.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
Yeah, the timing of this one, the timing can totally
go after that.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
The timing is the thing to go after. For example,
I'll keep the scuba number confidential only because I'm not
trying to embarrass anybody. But we all know that Biden
doesn't have cancer. This is an attempt to cover up
just how bad his dementia really is. They don't want
the people to know just how bad he was. God
knows the Democrats would never lie. Exclamation points. Well, I
(20:05):
think he does have cancer, and I actually think he's
probably had cancer for quite some time. Just as when
you go back to the July twenty four thou dost
protest too much from doctor Cannard, the White House physician,
(20:25):
talking about the specialists coming in from Walter Reid for neurology,
and also they're they're explaining same in that very same
letter that he had also had rated. You know, he
had been been seen by a radiologist, which could be
for any number of things. But everything starts to fall
into place. I sincerely believe that he has the cancer.
(20:48):
I think they've known of the cancer for quite some time,
perhaps even back when he spoke and made that comment
where everybody thought it was a you know, oh look
he's made a gaff again. I'm not sure it was
a gaff. I think it's one of those situations where
you're just talking and you let the truth slip.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Out and guess what the first frost, you know what
was happening. It had to put on your windshild wipers
to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's
why I have so damn any other people I grew
up had cancer, and why Camp For the longest time,
Teller had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Speaker 3 (21:27):
Now he has had some sort of melanoma, he's had
some of the you know, the spots removed of the
skin cancer. He could have been referring to that, but
he could and I don't know the timeline on that,
so I can't confirm or deny that. But I believe
that he probably had been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Perhaps
(21:52):
they were trying to treat it it was much more
aggressive than they knew. It got out of hand or
they made a decision not to treat it, or you
have the third option, and that is nobody checked him.
And and to doctor Quay's point, for the President of
(22:15):
the United States, maybe maybe not for me, maybe not
for you, maybe not for our friend that currently has
prostate cancer, but for the president of the United States
who gets amazing medical care.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Amazing.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
I think about what I pay for my concierge medicine,
for both my PCP and my anti aging doctor, and
the types of scans that I get sometimes duplicated between
the two doctors. And I'll tell them that, and I'll say, like,
you know, I had this gun scanned done by doctor
so and so doctor X, do you really want to
(22:49):
do it, because doctor why has already done it. Yes,
I want to do it. You're paying for it anyway.
I mean, you know, it's part of your fees that
you pay, so let's do it. And uh, well, well
it'll be a redundant check. And I'm like, Okay, that's
fine with me because my objective is to stay as
healthy and vibrant as long as I can. And I'm
(23:10):
just a plead. I'm just a surf and this giant
sea of taxpayers that are being steamrolled by the federal government.
The President of the United States is not that person.
He gets the finest quality healthcare. And when I say that,
that includes regular checkups. And you know, the President in
(23:31):
the middle of the night has a headache and tells
doctor Jill Biden he wants to not be profen or
he wants to tailand all or sed of medicine or something.
H She probably you know, notates that somehow the White
House physician knows that the President took so might be
profile last night. I mean, it's it's like everything is
(23:52):
constantly checked, and there's constantly a physician wherever he goes
every time. You know, I'm I met the White House
doctor several times on Air Force One. He'd be out,
you know, just walking around or studying or you know,
I'd see him reading some medical journal or whatever, and
I walk on. I walked up one time, introduced myself
(24:12):
and let's coming out. I got to know him. So
it's just it's the conspiracy is probably the malpractice, the
cover up, and of course the timing, because we have
all of these things starting to occur, and I do
believe that this is a serious cover up. It's actually
(24:38):
probably the most dangerous cover up in the history of
the presidency. As I said Saturday, I think this cover
up now. You have to remember Saturday, when I'm doing
the show from noon to three Eastern time, tend to
tend to one here in Colorado. I did not yet
know about this cancer diagnosis. And I said on Saturday
(24:59):
that I believe that the cover up about his mental
state was worse than Watergate. And then boom, after I
finished the show on Saturday, we learn on Sunday that
oh my gosh, he has prostate cancer that's aggressive, that
(25:20):
is metastasized to the bone. And so I would revise
and I would revise my comments. You know, I would
reclaim my time, just like the bunch of dumbass congressmen.
I would reclaim my time and ask to revise and
extend my comments for the record. That all of this
now is probably the most dangerous cover up in the
(25:43):
history of the presidency and is much worse than Watergate.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
You know what that was.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
That's probably back in twenty nineteen or twenty twenty, when
he was actually campaigning before he was president.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that was during the campaign. So
it was twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
Yeah, well it could have been to twenty nineteen, twenty
twenty sometimes in that timeframe. And don't forget that last summer,
doctor O'Connor swore to the American people that Joe Biden
was quote completely fit for the presidency. There were no issues,
there was nothing to see. And then suddenly we learned
that he has advanced metastasized prostate cancer. But wait, because
(26:29):
advanced prostate cancer takes maybe sometimes ten years to develop
to the stage where Biden's current diagnosis is. Prostate cancer
is also easy to find. Simple blood tests, a prostate
exam will give you near one accurate results. So you're
telling me that the best doctors and the best testing
(26:50):
on earth did not find Biden's cancer in all those
years of testing. Was every medical report a lie? Did
they not even do the test? Was that the problem
was the family refusing to have him examined. Did he
not really get a full physical examination? It's all bs it.
(27:11):
I think they knew, I think they lied. I think
they hit it and they did it for power. And
I'm gonna say something stupid here because nothing will ever happen.
And that is that people need to be held accountable
for it because it's actually evil. It is truly evil,
you know I it's I'm to the point where I
(27:36):
you know what, you had that feeling that you just
dodged a death inflicting bullet. It's a feeling of deja vu.
It's a feeling of a sudden lifting of anxiety, or
(27:57):
it's a feeling of that fleeting where you realized, oh,
something bad could have just happened and it didn't. Or
you think back on some time when something bad could
have happened, or maybe something did happen but it wasn't
nearly as bad as it could have been. That's the
feeling I have about this presidency. The feeding I have
(28:19):
is that, particularly when we go back and we discuss
and think about the her report and the audio, which
we'll cover some today too, that who was running the country.
What if Putin had? I said to a friend yesterday,
what if Putin had We were talking about all these stories,
(28:40):
and I said, what if Putin decided that it wasn't
just Ukraine. He wanted all of Eastern Europe. He wanted
to get the Balkans back. He wanted to pull him back,
and so he had. He had lined everybody up, he'd
lined all his troops up all across the Eastern Front,
and then on that day and February had decided not
(29:01):
to move just on Ukraine, but to move on Poland.
Who was making the decisions on that day? And remember
Biden at one point said, you know, we maybe facing
a minor incursion. Three years later as a minor incursion,
it's it's it's trench warfare where hundreds of thousands of
(29:24):
people are dying. And I think we bought dodge the bullet.
And I imagine Vladimir Putin himself is hearing all of
these stories, thinking about everything in hindsight, and in his
twenty twenty vision, is thinking to himself, hell's bills. I
should have taken Poland. I should have gone after the Balkans.
I should have gone after you know, Moldova. I should
(29:46):
have gone after all of them. That's how dangerous this is.
Speaker 7 (29:51):
I want the president to be treated like my brother was.
They found his prosit cancer during COVID and to treat
him for a year. Now he is a Glutien score
of nine and that's to his prim and his Oh
good enough for him, good enough for Biden.
Speaker 6 (30:11):
Ooh oh.
Speaker 3 (30:13):
I don't get me wrong, ma'am. I fully understand your
feelings about that goober number eighty seven thirty four, Michael.
Holding somebody accountable for this is going to take a
miracle exactly. We all know what kind of people they are.
The American people have now heard, so have now heard,
so hopefully they will step up.
Speaker 7 (30:33):
No, I.
Speaker 3 (30:36):
Don't get me wrong. I'm in a great mood this morning,
slept well, had a good weekend, but I'm not very
optimistic about the country. Hopefully Sleepy Joe will just fall
asleep one day, we'll send them off the military honors
and be done. The United States of American knows who
is running the country when Sleepy Joe is sick. Really,
(30:58):
I mean, I want to know the names. I know
that Barack Obama I don't know. But is my firm
belief that Barack Obama was calling the shots and those
shots were being delivered through his staff that were holdovers
in the Biden administration. But you also have doctor Jill Biden,
(31:19):
you have Hunter Biden, you have James Biden, you have
Ashley Biden. You have the entire Biden Plan ninety one
seventy seven. Michael, Now we will be led to believe
this is a special and rare cancel cancer that is
more aggressive than a cancer that would have been detected
in the normal labs. What do we believe now? More gaslighting?
(31:41):
I don't think they're going to. I mean, as this
story develops, and I don't know that it will develop
any further. This may have been a one shot thing.
I mean, if, for example, truly if this is the
case that he's had it for quite a while, which
I mean, everything I've read from every doctor I can find,
(32:04):
every oncologist that I can read about, has commented one
way or another that this is highly unlikely that this
was just discovered, and that if it was just discovered,
that is genuinely medical malpractice. Because a metastatic prostate cancer
(32:25):
develops over years. It just it just doesn't show up
in your lymph nodes and your bones and your liver
and everywhere else one day. And that's why colonoscopies, PSA tests,
that's why physical exams bend over, that's why every man
knows we go through all of these things.
Speaker 2 (32:48):
What I don't believe that.
Speaker 3 (32:53):
It's it's going to be some special or rare cancer,
because I think the family will shut down now. They've
they've shifted the story although the book hasn't been you know,
the Tapper and Johnson book has not been released until
I think the twenty maybe it's maybe it's tomorrow, sometime
this week. I think maybe Tuesday. That will stir up
(33:18):
all of those stories again. But the family has a
reason now to shut down and isolate. Now. I don't know,
because I find both of them, the President and doctor
Jill Biden, to be real kind of DC creatures, the
(33:39):
weird kind of DC creatures that totally seek the spotlight
and the limelight all the time. But the way this
was handled, everything that we don't know up to yesterday,
indicates to me that it was designed to knock the
other stories, take the wind out of stories, get some
(34:01):
sympathy for something they've known for quite a while, and
shut down because remember, if the really if the release
of the Taper Johnson book is tomorrow, Uh, it's gonna
be pretty hard in these quarters. But some quarters to
really discuss the President's neurological problems, Willy's suffering from
I feel like Joe Biden's revelation of prostate cancer is
the news stutter. In other words, we're supposed to stop
talking about his broken brain and no one knew who
was really running the country because now he's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
But Joe was.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Trying to tell us about that in twenty two about
I don't remember. It might have been in Delaware when
he was reciting the lie about the oil smear.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
You might be referring to this, and.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Guess what the first frost, You know, what was happening.
How to put on a windshield wipers to get literally
the oils to look off the window. That's why I
have so damn any other people I grew up had cancer,
and why camp for the longest time Feller had the
highest cancer rate in the nation. I guarantee you I
(00:56):
will be totally transparent in terms of my health, all
aspects of my health. That's why I have so damn
any other people I grew up have cancer.
Speaker 3 (01:07):
M July twenty, twenty twenty two. Biden says, that's why
I and so damn many other people I grew up
with have cancer. Now I want to make abundantly clear
first and foremost that my sympathy goes out to Joe Biden,
as it would with anyone who's diagnosed with metastatic prostate
(01:30):
cancer metastasized into the bones. That's a very painful cancer. Well,
any cancer that's metastasized into your bones is you're going
to be painful. Sometimes they do bone marrow transplants, they'll
do I mean, but and chemo is is hit and miss,
because once it's metastasized, you don't know where it's going.
(01:54):
But how long have they known about about this? It
doesn't appear overnight. It festers in rare but dangerous case,
this prostate cancer bypasses the usual slow growth, and it
does indeed strike quickly, especially the older that you get. Now,
(02:16):
if Biden was not screened regularly, or he had an
aggressive subtype that evades PSA detection. You know, my doctors
have often said, you know, for example, I'm due for
a colonoscopy, and I've asked my doctor, you know, because
I've heard stories that and not from doctor Google, but
(02:37):
I've just you know, in reading about different things. You know,
when you get older, you start reading about stuff, and
so I've asked both my regular PCP and my anti
aging doctor, should I do a regular colonoscopy or you know,
should I do one of these other screening tests, and
there are actually some other screening tests you can do now,
(02:58):
but no, they both recommend it. Go ahead and get
the colonoscopy. My concern was that sometimes they see the
polyps and they remove the polyps, and the pops. In
removing the polyps, polyps can act like a The polyps
have actually cancered some of the bad stuff in your
in your colon, and those polyps form and keep them
(03:19):
from spreading into your body. So it does make some
logical sense, maybe not medical sense, but it makes logical
sense that if a doctor goes in and removes those polyps,
you can have some of those cancerous or dangerous cells
escape and now they're they're in your gut, and that
could lead to cancer down the road. But both of
(03:41):
my doctors have said, no, that's highly unlikely. We've seen
those studies too. We don't really see a lot of causation.
We still think the colonoscopy is still or you know,
any kind of screen but you should go get your colonoscopy.
So I'm not to schedule and get a day off,
Take a day off and go get a colinoscoby. So
(04:03):
the point is that there are some aggressive subtypes they
can have a PSA detection. My PSA has always been like,
you know, zero point nine or one point one or something,
and it's never been elevated. So it's it's never it's
never changed, never been out of that range. But how
can we imagine that our president was not screened properly
(04:28):
because again, it's one of the easiest cancers to diagnose.
The PSA blood test itself shows the rate of cancer
cell growth. Even with the most aggressive form, it's a
five to seven year journey without treatment before it becomes metastatic, meaning,
as several people have said on x and one of
(04:50):
those people being uh doctor Stephen Quay, who points out
that it would be malpractice for this patient, Joe Biden,
to show up and be first diagnosed with metastatic disease
in May of twenty twenty five. He believes that it's
(05:10):
very highly likely that he was carrying a diagnosis of
prostate cancer throughout his White House tenure, and that Americans
were simply uninformed about it, or they weren't told about
They not just uninformed but oh, use the word cover up.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
A quick question, timeline wise, was.
Speaker 5 (05:35):
This announcement about the prostate cancer after her.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Audio was released?
Speaker 3 (05:45):
You know? Good and will it was?
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Oh, I know, quite honestly, I had no idea. I didn't.
I didn't pay attention to anything all weekend long. Oh
yeah really did no?
Speaker 3 (05:54):
No? Well, yeah, because the her came out on Friday,
gotcha her? Her came out. I spent two hours on
it on Saturday, okay, and I want to talk a
little bit about it again today, and then boom, yesterday
we get the announcement about, oh, He's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
Because as I was scrolling through my social feedia and
social media feeds late last night before bed, I'm looking
at oh, her audio is out, Oh Biden's got cancer.
So I didn't know what the timeline was here. But oh,
that seems interesting.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
It seems odd, interesting, odd, you say, Tomatow, I say
to Mono. Interesting odd. So we're the American people uninformed.
There's something else here that makes you wonder in light
of everything that we know. So what's the name of Jake?
Speaker 4 (06:52):
Never?
Speaker 3 (06:52):
I never can't remember the Jake name it because I'm
not going to go buy it Jake Tapper's book, The
Jake Tapper.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
And if I covered it up, if I very like, if.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
I forget what it's got original sin, Yeah, I think
that's it original Sin. No, that's my book, and that's
not a cover up, that's an exple's. And then there's
another book that came out maybe a month or two ago.
So so the books are starting to come out, but
(07:25):
no one's talking about something else. That's another factor in
all of this that I find interesting. But let's go
back to just focus on the cancer for a moment.
Should the cancer been caught earlier? I'm not a doctor,
why I'm not yours doctor, but I don't even play
a doctor on the radio. But yes, it should have
(07:48):
been caught earlier. That's why I use the term malpractice.
Localized prostate cancer is often curable, but once it escapes
the polyp or the capsule or however you know it's
howe of it's contained and spreads you, you shift from
cure to containment. And a miss or a delayed diagnosis
(08:11):
is a critical failure point. So is it rare for
this to happen? So here's some stats about ten to
fifteen percent of prostate cancers are diagnosed first at stage four.
That's when it is in the bones like this is. Now,
if you're over the age of eight mail over the
age of eighty, especially those with inconsistent screening, it's even
(08:35):
more common you have consistent screenings, it's not that common.
But again, for a president of the because here's something
that's different. Now, I just want to remember, this is
something that's different. We're talking about a president of the
United States. So for a president of the United States
to be diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer is, in doctor
(08:56):
Cray's opinion, nothing short of malpractice.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
So today's treatment in twenty twenty five for metastatic prostate
cancer is not the same kind of medicine that was
practiced by you know, your your grandfather or Tamer's dad,
or what he may have done when he was practicing.
Because today it's a high tech procedure, high tech playbook,
(09:33):
hormone suppression, precision radiation, smart drugs, immunotherapy, and the very
first step usually shuts down testosterone because testosterone feels prostate
cancer I've told you I've been on testosterony replacement therapy
for more than a decade, and that's one of the
(09:55):
other reasons that they still want me to get the colonoscopy,
even though my PSA rem you know, zero point nine
or one point one or whatever it is, never gets
with outside that range. So because of my testosterone levels,
and I I keep my I do I keep my
testosterone levels. Hell, Hell, I keep them high for energy
(10:16):
and for well for other reasons too. And you control
that through drugs or injections called androgen deprivation therapy. And
then there's a second line agent, drugs like arbitraone, and
there's another one in insolent insulumentide or something like that,
(10:41):
that blocks the cancer's ability to rewire itself and then
keeps it from growing. But it's costly. It's not just
costly financially, it's costly physically too. You end up with fatigue,
hot flashes, weakened bones. There's obviously because of the testosterone,
there's a drop in sexual function. It can affect the liver.
(11:03):
It's another reason why even because I'm on testosterony replacement therapy,
it's another reason why both of my doctors regularly checked
all of my liver functions, and they keep my blood
pressure even though you know, my blood pressure is under
control and I could probably do without, you know, one
of my blood pressure medications, but I prefer to stay
on it because I don't see any other side effects
(11:25):
and they're like, yeah, you might as well. And so
I've got really really good blood pressure. So it's a
trade off. All of this is a trade off, you know,
and it's a trade off that we all make as
we get older. Now do we want these treatments not
want these treatments? And I think it. You know, all
of those questions depend upon your quality of life and
(11:47):
my quality of life other than having to work with
dragon and you know, get up at o dark thirty
in the morning, which actually I'm just kind of used
to me. Now that's fine. My quality life is is great.
But you know, the trade off extra years of life,
but you're gonna have closer medical supervision. You're going to
make all these adjustments. You know, as you continued age,
(12:08):
you're gonna still make all these judgments. But still even
with all of those tools, all of those medications, all
of those protocols, many men lived for years after a diagnosis,
they remain active, engaged, and they still remain in the fight.
But there's an uncomfortable question at all of this. It's
the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room. If early
(12:31):
signs were dismissed, or early signs downplayed, or early signs
covered up in order to maintain a campaign image, then yes,
treatment could have been compromised because every week, every month
with aggressive variance matters, and if you delay biopsy, imaging,
(12:56):
or therapy in order to protect the political up, that
comes at a steep biological price. And of course that's
all speculation, but doctor Clay concludes that the highest probability
is that the diagnosis has been known for many years,
but there was a calculated decision not to announce it.
(13:18):
There was a calculated decision not to treat it.
Speaker 4 (13:21):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
And I think finally there was this hope that after
the reelection the treatment could be done when it was
still localized, but there was an unfortunate turn of events.
But there's another point that I think to a degree
(13:48):
fulfills or supports or emphasizes the cover up. So that
SoundBite you heard, as I said, was July was it?
May it? Which is lot July twenty twenty twenty two?
July twenty, twenty twenty two. Let's go to July eighth,
(14:10):
twenty twenty four. All right. Memorandum for Kreem Jean Pierre,
White House Press Secretary from doctor Kevin O'Connor, physician to
the President on White House Stationary physician to the President
the White House. I wanted to share with you background
on white Doctor Kevin Canard visited the White House to
(14:35):
protect patient privacy for the thousands of patients of the
White House Medical Union and the physicians who treat them,
we do not disclode We normally we do not disclose
the names of the specialists we work with. However, in
the interests of accuracy, I have obtained permission from the
President and doctor Canard to confirm the details I am sharing.
(14:55):
Doctor Canard has been the neurology consulting to the White
House Medical Unit since twenty twelve. He was chosen to
be this consultant for his breadth of experience and expertise
across the specialty of neurology, Prior to his movement disorders
and fellowship at Emory, he had practiced as a general
(15:18):
neurologist for six years. He is the longest serving neurologist
at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and in the
military healthcare system. He's been a member of the faculty
at the Uniform Services University's Medical School since nineteen ninety one.
His core faculty of the Neurology Residency program. And it
just goes on to describe all of his academics, all
(15:40):
of his credentials. Doctor Gnnard is a top neurological specialist.
So doctor Connor continues in his letter of July eighth,
twenty twenty four to the Press Secretary, as I have
written in each of these presidents medical reports. As part
of the President's annual physical he sees a team as
(16:02):
specialists that have included optometry, dentistry, orthopedics, orthopedics, orthopedics for
the spine, physical therapy, neurology, sleep medicine, cardiology, radiology, and dermatology.
Doctor Cannard was one of the neurological specialists that examined
(16:23):
President Biden for each of his annual physicals. His findings
have been made public each time I've released the results
of the president's annual physical, President Biden has not seen
a neurologist outside of his annual physical. He then writes
this in the letter. The results of this year's exam
(16:46):
were detailed in my February twenty eight letter quote. An
extremely detailed neurological exam was again reassuring that there were
no findings which would be consistent with any cerebella or
other central neurological disorder such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's,
(17:07):
or ascending lateral sclerosis. Nor are there any signs of
any cervical myelopathy. The assist exam did again support of
finding a peripheral neuropathy in both feet. It's kind of
interesting because the gate the way he walks would say otherwise,
but I'm not the doctor. No motor weakness was detected.
(17:29):
Did you watch him walk? He exhibited no tremor either
at rest or with activity. He demonstrates excellent fine motor dexterity.
Really oh, but a subtle difference in heat or cold
sensation could be elicited, as it was last year. This
heat cold sensation deficit was detected a couple of inches
(17:52):
higher on his ankle calf this year, which is not unexpected.
There may in fact be day to day subjective variation
of these findings, as during last year's exam, this area
of since sensation deficit was actually found to be smaller
than the year before. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
So he saw a neurologist and he also had a
(18:14):
radiological exam radiological for that's rays, uh, plenoscopy. But what
was radiological exam? See, we just took this letter when
it was released as them trying to say there's no
neurological disorder, although we have records that the neurologists kept
(18:38):
showing up at the White House all the time.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
Good money, Michael and Dragon, this is your favorite Jude goober.
As you know, I have prost take cancer and that
it just didn't happen over night, and I kind of
any I could have missed it.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
So now I got five years or less to that.
Speaker 6 (19:00):
How can the President of the United States not get
screened or bust their cancer? We can just happen, all right,
have a good day.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
And we continue to wish you well. Some of the
text messages I think don't take your conspiracy theories too far.
Speaker 5 (19:26):
And we're always down for a good conspiracy theory around here,
but let's probably be a little bit more skeptical on
conspiracy theories on this one.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
Yeah, the timing of this one, the timing can totally
go after that.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
The timing is the thing to go after. For example,
I'll keep the scuba number confidential only because I'm not
trying to embarrass anybody. But we all know that Biden
doesn't have cancer. This is an attempt to cover up
just how bad his dementia really is. They don't want
the people to know just how bad he was. God
knows the Democrats would never lie. Exclamation points. Well, I
(20:05):
think he does have cancer, and I actually think he's
probably had cancer for quite some time. Just as when
you go back to the July twenty four thou dost
protest too much from doctor Cannard, the White House physician,
(20:25):
talking about the specialists coming in from Walter Reid for neurology,
and also they're they're explaining same in that very same
letter that he had also had rated. You know, he
had been been seen by a radiologist, which could be
for any number of things. But everything starts to fall
into place. I sincerely believe that he has the cancer.
(20:48):
I think they've known of the cancer for quite some time,
perhaps even back when he spoke and made that comment
where everybody thought it was a you know, oh look
he's made a gaff again. I'm not sure it was
a gaff. I think it's one of those situations where
you're just talking and you let the truth slip.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Out and guess what the first frost, you know what
was happening. It had to put on your windshild wipers
to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's
why I have so damn any other people I grew
up had cancer, and why Camp For the longest time,
Teller had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Speaker 3 (21:27):
Now he has had some sort of melanoma, he's had
some of the you know, the spots removed of the
skin cancer. He could have been referring to that, but
he could and I don't know the timeline on that,
so I can't confirm or deny that. But I believe
that he probably had been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Perhaps
(21:52):
they were trying to treat it it was much more
aggressive than they knew. It got out of hand or
they made a decision not to treat it, or you
have the third option, and that is nobody checked him.
And and to doctor Quay's point, for the President of
(22:15):
the United States, maybe maybe not for me, maybe not
for you, maybe not for our friend that currently has
prostate cancer, but for the president of the United States
who gets amazing medical care.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Amazing.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
I think about what I pay for my concierge medicine,
for both my PCP and my anti aging doctor, and
the types of scans that I get sometimes duplicated between
the two doctors. And I'll tell them that, and I'll say, like,
you know, I had this gun scanned done by doctor
so and so doctor X, do you really want to
(22:49):
do it, because doctor why has already done it. Yes,
I want to do it. You're paying for it anyway.
I mean, you know, it's part of your fees that
you pay, so let's do it. And uh, well, well
it'll be a redundant check. And I'm like, Okay, that's
fine with me because my objective is to stay as
healthy and vibrant as long as I can. And I'm
(23:10):
just a plead. I'm just a surf and this giant
sea of taxpayers that are being steamrolled by the federal government.
The President of the United States is not that person.
He gets the finest quality healthcare. And when I say that,
that includes regular checkups. And you know, the President in
(23:31):
the middle of the night has a headache and tells
doctor Jill Biden he wants to not be profen or
he wants to tailand all or sed of medicine or something.
H She probably you know, notates that somehow the White
House physician knows that the President took so might be
profile last night. I mean, it's it's like everything is
(23:52):
constantly checked, and there's constantly a physician wherever he goes
every time. You know, I'm I met the White House
doctor several times on Air Force One. He'd be out,
you know, just walking around or studying or you know,
I'd see him reading some medical journal or whatever, and
I walk on. I walked up one time, introduced myself
(24:12):
and let's coming out. I got to know him. So
it's just it's the conspiracy is probably the malpractice, the
cover up, and of course the timing, because we have
all of these things starting to occur, and I do
believe that this is a serious cover up. It's actually
(24:38):
probably the most dangerous cover up in the history of
the presidency. As I said Saturday, I think this cover
up now. You have to remember Saturday, when I'm doing
the show from noon to three Eastern time, tend to
tend to one here in Colorado. I did not yet
know about this cancer diagnosis. And I said on Saturday
(24:59):
that I believe that the cover up about his mental
state was worse than Watergate. And then boom, after I
finished the show on Saturday, we learn on Sunday that
oh my gosh, he has prostate cancer that's aggressive, that
(25:20):
is metastasized to the bone. And so I would revise
and I would revise my comments. You know, I would
reclaim my time, just like the bunch of dumbass congressmen.
I would reclaim my time and ask to revise and
extend my comments for the record. That all of this
now is probably the most dangerous cover up in the
(25:43):
history of the presidency and is much worse than Watergate.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
You know what that was.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
That's probably back in twenty nineteen or twenty twenty, when
he was actually campaigning before he was president.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that was during the campaign. So
it was twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
Yeah, well it could have been to twenty nineteen, twenty
twenty sometimes in that timeframe. And don't forget that last summer,
doctor O'Connor swore to the American people that Joe Biden
was quote completely fit for the presidency. There were no issues,
there was nothing to see. And then suddenly we learned
that he has advanced metastasized prostate cancer. But wait, because
(26:29):
advanced prostate cancer takes maybe sometimes ten years to develop
to the stage where Biden's current diagnosis is. Prostate cancer
is also easy to find. Simple blood tests, a prostate
exam will give you near one accurate results. So you're
telling me that the best doctors and the best testing
(26:50):
on earth did not find Biden's cancer in all those
years of testing. Was every medical report a lie? Did
they not even do the test? Was that the problem
was the family refusing to have him examined. Did he
not really get a full physical examination? It's all bs it.
(27:11):
I think they knew, I think they lied. I think
they hit it and they did it for power. And
I'm gonna say something stupid here because nothing will ever happen.
And that is that people need to be held accountable
for it because it's actually evil. It is truly evil,
you know I it's I'm to the point where I
(27:36):
you know what, you had that feeling that you just
dodged a death inflicting bullet. It's a feeling of deja vu.
It's a feeling of a sudden lifting of anxiety, or
(27:57):
it's a feeling of that fleeting where you realized, oh,
something bad could have just happened and it didn't. Or
you think back on some time when something bad could
have happened, or maybe something did happen but it wasn't
nearly as bad as it could have been. That's the
feeling I have about this presidency. The feeding I have
(28:19):
is that, particularly when we go back and we discuss
and think about the her report and the audio, which
we'll cover some today too, that who was running the country.
What if Putin had? I said to a friend yesterday,
what if Putin had We were talking about all these stories,
(28:40):
and I said, what if Putin decided that it wasn't
just Ukraine. He wanted all of Eastern Europe. He wanted
to get the Balkans back. He wanted to pull him back,
and so he had. He had lined everybody up, he'd
lined all his troops up all across the Eastern Front,
and then on that day and February had decided not
(29:01):
to move just on Ukraine, but to move on Poland.
Who was making the decisions on that day? And remember
Biden at one point said, you know, we maybe facing
a minor incursion. Three years later as a minor incursion,
it's it's it's trench warfare where hundreds of thousands of
(29:24):
people are dying. And I think we bought dodge the bullet.
And I imagine Vladimir Putin himself is hearing all of
these stories, thinking about everything in hindsight, and in his
twenty twenty vision, is thinking to himself, hell's bills. I
should have taken Poland. I should have gone after the Balkans.
I should have gone after you know, Moldova. I should
(29:46):
have gone after all of them. That's how dangerous this is.
Speaker 7 (29:51):
I want the president to be treated like my brother was.
They found his prosit cancer during COVID and to treat
him for a year. Now he is a Glutien score
of nine and that's to his prim and his Oh
good enough for him, good enough for Biden.
Speaker 6 (30:11):
Ooh oh.
Speaker 3 (30:13):
I don't get me wrong, ma'am. I fully understand your
feelings about that goober number eighty seven thirty four, Michael.
Holding somebody accountable for this is going to take a
miracle exactly. We all know what kind of people they are.
The American people have now heard, so have now heard,
so hopefully they will step up.
Speaker 7 (30:33):
No, I.
Speaker 3 (30:36):
Don't get me wrong. I'm in a great mood this morning,
slept well, had a good weekend, but I'm not very
optimistic about the country. Hopefully Sleepy Joe will just fall
asleep one day, we'll send them off the military honors
and be done. The United States of American knows who
is running the country when Sleepy Joe is sick. Really,
(30:58):
I mean, I want to know the names. I know
that Barack Obama I don't know. But is my firm
belief that Barack Obama was calling the shots and those
shots were being delivered through his staff that were holdovers
in the Biden administration. But you also have doctor Jill Biden,
(31:19):
you have Hunter Biden, you have James Biden, you have
Ashley Biden. You have the entire Biden Plan ninety one
seventy seven. Michael, Now we will be led to believe
this is a special and rare cancel cancer that is
more aggressive than a cancer that would have been detected
in the normal labs. What do we believe now? More gaslighting?
(31:41):
I don't think they're going to. I mean, as this
story develops, and I don't know that it will develop
any further. This may have been a one shot thing.
I mean, if, for example, truly if this is the
case that he's had it for quite a while, which
I mean, everything I've read from every doctor I can find,
(32:04):
every oncologist that I can read about, has commented one
way or another that this is highly unlikely that this
was just discovered, and that if it was just discovered,
that is genuinely medical malpractice. Because a metastatic prostate cancer
(32:25):
develops over years. It just it just doesn't show up
in your lymph nodes and your bones and your liver
and everywhere else one day. And that's why colonoscopies, PSA tests,
that's why physical exams bend over, that's why every man
knows we go through all of these things.
Speaker 2 (32:48):
What I don't believe that.
Speaker 3 (32:53):
It's it's going to be some special or rare cancer,
because I think the family will shut down now. They've
they've shifted the story although the book hasn't been you know,
the Tapper and Johnson book has not been released until
I think the twenty maybe it's maybe it's tomorrow, sometime
this week. I think maybe Tuesday. That will stir up
(33:18):
all of those stories again. But the family has a
reason now to shut down and isolate. Now. I don't know,
because I find both of them, the President and doctor
Jill Biden, to be real kind of DC creatures, the
(33:39):
weird kind of DC creatures that totally seek the spotlight
and the limelight all the time. But the way this
was handled, everything that we don't know up to yesterday,
indicates to me that it was designed to knock the
other stories, take the wind out of stories, get some
(34:01):
sympathy for something they've known for quite a while, and
shut down because remember, if the really if the release
of the Taper Johnson book is tomorrow, Uh, it's gonna
be pretty hard in these quarters. But some quarters to
really discuss the President's neurological problems, Willy's suffering from
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!