5-3-25 The Weekend Hour 1: Ashley Babbit’s Widower Finally Gets Compensated

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
To night. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA
director of talk show host Michael Brown. Brownie, no, Brownie,
You're doing a heck of a job. The Weekend with
Michael Brown. Hey broadcasting live from Denver, Colorado. It's the
Weekend of Michael Brown. Really happy to have you joining
the program today. I always appreciate you tuning in, whether
you tune in during the weekday or on the weekend. Now,
you know a couple of rules of engagement. If you

(00:21):
want to engage with the program. The easiest way to
do it while we're on live, or but you can
do at anytime, is to send me a text message
that on your message at the number is three three
one zero three three three one zero three. Just use
a keyword Mike or Michael. Or if you want to
on social media, the best place to engage in social
media is on X formally Twitter, and that's at Michael

(00:44):
Brown USA, at Michael Brown USA. So give me a
follow right now. Go do that. So the Department of
Justice on I Forget Now Wednesday or Thursday confirmed finally
a settlement quote in principle that they've reached in the
thirty million dollars wrongful death lawsuit that was filed on

(01:04):
behalf of the estate of Ashley Babbitt. Remember Ashley Babbitt,
the young soldier that was killed by a female soldier
that was killed by a cop inside the capitol on
that day that democracy almost died January sixth, twenty twenty one. Yeah, finally.
Now terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. I

(01:26):
don't know what the specific terms are, but there was
a hearing this week in front of Judge Anna Rays.
Both sides during this hearing indicated that it could be
at least a month before the final agreement is before
the agreement is finalized and then made public, which is
not uncommon in these They do this they go into
the courtroom to announce that, Hey, we judge, we've got

(01:49):
the framework for a settlement agreement. So we would ask
you to put everything on hold, you know, stop the schedule,
stop the discovery, stop the motions, and everything else. Give us.
In this case, they asked for thirty days or more
to finalize the agreement. So that's pretty normal. Everything's going
to be worked out. So what Let's go back a

(02:09):
little bit. In January of last year, twenty twenty four,
Judicial Watch a great organization. If you're not aware of it,
just go online and check it out. Judicial Watch. They
represented Ashley's widower, Aaron, and they filed a complaint under
the Federal Torque Claims Act, and they accused the government

(02:31):
of causing personal injury and death caused by the negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions of one or more employees
of the federal government. So you remember what happened around
I don't know two thirty three o'clock in the afternoon
on January sixth, Michael Byrd, the Capitol Police lieutenant, shot

(02:55):
Ashley in the shoulder. She and other protesters were remember
they were packed in this small air outside the Speaker's
lobby where two protesters had smashed in windows. According to
the lawsuit quote, Ashley was ambushed when she was shot
by Lieutenant Michael Byrd. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled,

(03:15):
you killed her. She was thirty five years old at
the time. She was completely unarmed, and if you recall,
she was just always just bumfuzzles me because every cop
that you know, every cop that I know, every cop
that I've ever represented or dealt with, or had any

(03:39):
occasion to talk to about this knows that before you
fire your service weapon, that you want to make certain
that the subject that you're trying to kill is in
your line of sight and that there's nobody else around,
or if there's somebody else around, then you either have
to you know, you got to make a split second decision,

(04:00):
a nanosecond decision. Do I fire and if there's somebody
standing next to or behind the person that I'm trying
to stop, do I run the risk that I might
hit them? Or do I pause and run the risk
that I might get killed. Well, in this case, there
were armed cops right behind Ashley Babbitt, So if she

(04:27):
were presenting a threat to Captain Bird, they would have
or could have seen it, and they could have disarmed her.
They could have arrested her, they could have taken her
to the ground. There's a number of things that they
could have done, but they didn't do anything. Now somewhat
in their defense, I'm only what I'm really trying to

(04:48):
do is point out that Captain Bird wildly shot into
a crowd in my opinion, and hit Ashley Babbitt, and
or he deliberately took aim at her and shot at her.
But if you recall that video. They're in the stairwell
and the crowd is pushing upwards, and she's kind of trapped,
and she's kind of being pushed upwards too, and they're

(05:09):
being pushed toward a As you reach the top of
the stairs, there is a door. And then as you're
looking at the door where Ashley would be standing, to
the left of that door, there are windows, and you
can see through the windows that on the other side
of the windows, perpendicular to those windows is a door

(05:30):
that goes into the Speaker's office. So, Captain Bird, I
just want you to think about this. If you were
Captain Bird, but you weren't a cop, and you were,
let's say, in your home in that situation, and you
could close your door and lock your door, and the

(05:50):
people that were in a other in a stairwell or
on a patio or something and trying to break into
your house, but they had not yet broken into your house,
would you have been justified in opening the door, stepping
out and wildly shooting, And perhaps you shot somebody that

(06:11):
was standing out in the yard that had seen the
commotion and stopped to see what was going on, Because
that's in essence what he did, and I think in
that situation it would be a pretty close case in
so far as whether it was self defense or not.
But that's it was clearly not self defense here, because

(06:33):
you had cops in the stairwell, you had him behind
not only the door that was keeping the crowd at bay,
but you had him inside the door that led into
the Speaker's office. And absent any facts that I'd not
been able to find anywhere in the lawsuit, there was
no reason why he couldn't have closed the door and
escaped and left and gone somewhere else. But instead he

(06:53):
chose to open the door, stick his arm out, and
fire into the crowd. That was on January sixth, Now
the Speaker's lobby. Protesters had smashed some of those windows,
but no one had gone through the windows. The lawsuit

(07:15):
seat says Ashley was ambushed when she was shot by
Lieutenant Michael Byrd. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, you
killed her. Now. The Department of Justice under Sleepy Joe Biden,
announced in April of twenty one that it had closed
an investigation into the killing. Biden's Department of Justice determined

(07:38):
that Bird did not violate Ashley's civil rights and in
a press release that they sent out in April of
twenty one, So just a mere three four months after
the event. It's pretty fast investigation, isn't it. The press
release said this, as this requirement has been in turn

(08:00):
violating her civil rights. As this requirement has been interpreted
by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence,
or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of
intent required. And then what happened, Well, it kind of
got even worse. It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Text

(08:22):
the word Michael Michael three three wednes zero three. If
you like what we do on the weekend or you'd
like to listen to the podcast, that's real easy to
do on your podcast app. Search for the Situation with
Michael Brown The Situation with Michael Brown. Once you find mapp,
you hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review,
and they'll give you all five days a weekday program
plus the weekend program. More about this Biden investigation next. Hey,

(08:55):
so we came with Michael Brown. Thanks for tuning in.
I appreciate you joining the program. Be sure and follow
me on x formerly Twitter at Michael Brown USA and
the text line three three one zero three keyword Micha
or Michael. So they said under the Biden administration, the
Department of Justice cleared Michael Bird, Captain Bird. And then

(09:21):
he gets promoted. He gets promoted despite a long record
of personal and professional misconduct. He's the guy you or
may not remember this story, but you remember prior to
January sixth, twenty twenty one, when there was I mean
it was a national news story. I forget whether it's

(09:44):
a tourist or a Capital employee, but somebody walked into
a Capital visitors center bathroom. Now, if you're not familiar,
they've and you and I paid for it. They spent
hundreds of millions of dollars to build a visitor center
on the east side of the of the US Capital
so that you come in through this you know, giant entryway,

(10:06):
and you you know, there's all sorts of you know,
like museum like displays, and then of course you know,
you get uh, you get badged or you get your
little pass and then you go through a tunnel and
then you come out into the rotunda. And so it's
a way to funnel all of the visitors in through
one way. It's it's enhanced security. It's a TSA like protocol.

(10:30):
It's really kind of stupid in my opinion. But nonetheless, uh,
and what's really stupid is how much money we spent
on it. But one of those tourists has to pee
real badly or I don't know, maybe number two. I
don't know, but they got to go to the bathroom.
It'd be but they've been waiting in line forever drinking
too much diaco, and they and they walk into the bathroom,

(10:53):
go into a stall, and holy crap, there's a gun.
So they report the gun to the you know, they
stepped back out, you know, find it, you know, a
Capitol police officer somewhere, and say, oh, there's a gun
in there on the toilet. So you know, they immediately
you know, block everything off and go in and oh, well,

(11:16):
guess what it was Captain Bird's service weapon. I guess
he had to take a whiz real badly or I
don't know, maybe number two, but whatever, he took his
for whatever reason, took his gun out of his holster
and set it on the toilet or on the floor.

(11:37):
I'm not sure where it was and got up and
finished his business and walked out and left his gun. Wow.
And he got promoted. Yes, and that's the guy that
shot Ashley Babbitt. But that's not the only thing. There's
a lot of other stuff that only one place that
I know, maybe other places did, the only one place

(11:58):
that I know of reported it. And it was all
because Congressman Barry Laudermic Laudermilk back in twenty twenty four
wrote a letter to the Department of Justice about Captain
Bird and they were conducting a review a hearing, and
his Captain Bird record was uncovered during this House Administration

(12:22):
Oversight Subcommittee investigation into just the General Capitol Police disciplinary process.
And in the letter, the chairman, Barry Laudermick, he's a
Republican from Georgia, wrote this this subcommittee. His debt is
dedicated to ensuring that the US Capitol Police has autonomy

(12:44):
from political pressures so it can make operational and personnel decisions. However,
based on the information obtained by the subcommittee regarding the
US Capitol Police as handling a Capital Bird following January sixth,
twenty twenty one, and his significant disciplinary history, I have
concerns the congressman wrote about the Capitol Police's decision to

(13:06):
promote him to the rank of captain, and then they
go on to describe five incidents, actually more than that,
because some of these contain more than one incident, but
five categories one. In two thousand and four, there was
an incident where Captain Bird, who was off duty, shot

(13:27):
his weapon at a stolen vehicle as it was driving
away from him out of his neighborhood. You and I
do that, we're probably going to get charged with menacing
or unlawfully discharging a weapon or shooting with you know,
and if we'd hit somebody, perhaps manslaughter because at that

(13:48):
point you're not justified in shooting somebody. In fact, don't
even hit with him in his car. It was just
a stolen car. Now how he knew that, I don't know,
but that's what he did. Twenty fifteen, a fellow officer
filed a conduct Unbecoming an Officer complaint after Captain Bird,
again off duty, confronted this other cop while the cop

(14:12):
was working at a high school football game in an
incident that apparently had a bunch of racial overtones. The
third he got a thirty three day suspension in twenty nineteen.
This is what for his leaving the gun in the
Capitol Hill bathroom in the visitor center, a thirty three

(14:34):
day suspension. Fairly relax, I guess he also was he
failed to pass He failed to pass a routine background
check just after January sixth, when he was trying to
purchase a shotgun for home protection after the United States Capitol.
The police was working to provide Bird a department issued shotgun. Instead,

(14:59):
he failed the training Wait a minute, I'm sorry, now,
I don't shoot my shotgun a lot. I used to hunt,
you know, pheasant and quail all the time, but I
haven't lately. But I'm not quite sure how you fail
a training program in the use of a shotgun. Maybe
it's different for a cop. I don't know. And then lastly,

(15:21):
there were three three referrals to the Capitol Police Office
of Professional Responsibility for records that they could never find.
What was the disciplinary complaint against Captain Bird. This is
one of those cops where I think most good cops

(15:42):
would say, we don't want this guy to be a cop.
But the Biden Department of Justice found no wrongdoing, no
wrongdoing whatsoever. Now, Bird's name was initially concealed by the
cabal and the Capitol Police for months because of the
anger over Ashley's killing. During a really I would call

(16:04):
it a softball interview with Lester Holt in August of
twenty twenty one, Captain Bird refilled himself for the first time,
and of course, during that interview he portrayed himself as
the victim, not the perpetrator. And then his name was
held from the public for more than seven months because,
according to Bird, he kept getting vile threats. Now lester

(16:29):
Holt at least did note the names of officers involved
in fatal shootings are often immediately released. Bird said during
that interview, they talked about killing me, cutting off my head,
very vicious, cruel things. But then, when prompted by lester Holt,
Bird claimed that some of the threats were racist in nature.
Now I don't know, never mind that he's a black

(16:52):
cop that shot and killed a white woman. I thought
it was usually, you know, the other way around. Bird
had the audacity tell lester Holt in that interview quote,
I believe I show I showed the utmost courage on
January sixth, I want to choke when I say that

(17:13):
it was later learning response to these Freedom of Information
Act requests from Judicial Watch that Bird and his pet
had been housed in a VIP suite at Joint Base
Andrews and Maryland for more than six months from about
August to twenty one through February twenty two. It cost
the taxpayers about thirty thousand dollars. Bird got a thirty

(17:37):
six thousand dollars retention bonus in August of twenty one,
all because they were just trying to protect him. Wow. Uh,
as Reverend Wright might say, the chickens are coming home
to roost. Good for Ashley Babbitt's widower, good for Ashley
Babbitt's family, and good for Ashley Babbitt. Justice is starting

(18:01):
to be served. What's the date again? Oh yeah, it's
twenty twenty five. So Michael So meeging with Michael Brown.
Text the word Michael Michael to three three one zero three.
I'll be right back tonight. Michael Brown joins me here,

(18:22):
the former FEMA director of talk show host Michael Brown. Brownie, No, Brownie,
You're doing a heck of a job The Weekend with
Michael Brown. Hey, So, Weekend with Michael Brown. I appreciate
you tuning in. Don't forget the text line, the numbers
three three, one zero three keyword Michael, Michael, be sure
and go follow me on except Michael Brown USA. So
the reason I want to spend so much, First of all,

(18:42):
I'm spending time on this particular story because I personally
and I have no relationship it's the Babbitts with her husband,
her family, or anybody else. I do have relationships with
law enforcement, and I do obviously have. I mean, I
got relationships on Capitol Hill. And I'm just an American citizen.

(19:05):
I'm just a plain, old, simple American citizen. And what
happened on January sixth was not insurrection. By God, If
that was an insurrection, and we, as conservatives want to
take over the government, we need a whole new group
of people, because that's not how you take over the government.

(19:25):
That wasn't even a good riot. I mean it was,
it was a pretty crappy riot. You had to have
you had to have these agents provocateur inside the group
of people that were storming the Capitol in order to
get them to really, like, you know, go on in.
Was what was that I forget the guy's name, the
one guy that everybody kept ignoring that they wouldn't prosecute,

(19:46):
but they just kept you know, you gotta go in,
go in, go in, just egging everybody on. You know,
Jimmy Christmas. Can you imagine George Washington trying to get
the revolutionaries. Come on, come on, guys, we're going to
cross the Delaware. Come on, get in the boat. Come on, boy,
get in the boat. Get in the boat. I mean that, uh,
January sixth is such a joke, an insurrection. So anyway,

(20:08):
that's the reason I focus on this because the cabal,
the left, the Marxists in our midst have focused on
this incessantly, and it's all about you know, you think
about all of those people that Trump pardoned, that rotted
in that nasty, horrific DC jail. I mean, I've seen jails,

(20:33):
not all over the world, but I've seen jails in
a few places around the world, and it's probably one
of the worst I've ever seen in my entire life.
And yet we just let people languish there for charges
that in virtually any other jurisdiction for doing exactly the

(20:54):
same thing. Trespassing, Oh my god, trespassing. We gotta throw
you in jail. With that any bond that would not happen,
I don't think in ninety nine percent of the other
jurisdictions across the country. But it happens in DC. Why
because they got to send a message. It was all
about sending a message. And it just pisses me off.

(21:18):
And then Ashley Babbitt and it's something that we watched
on television. I mean, you can still I'm sure you
can still find it on YouTube unless they've tried to
censor it, but you can still watch the entire incident unfold.
And it just infuriates me. And you think about I mean,
it's twenty twenty five and we're just now getting at

(21:40):
least the framework of a settlement in which you and
I as taxpayers. This is something I want to make
sure you understand that this settlement will be paid for
out of the United States Treasury. Now, the US Capitol
Police may or may not have any sort of insurance
coverage that may pay for part of these settlement monies,

(22:02):
but even if it does, you're still paying the premium
as a taxpayer for that insurance policy. And now that
liability is I'm sure they will deny liability in the
settlement but now that the insurance company looks and says, well,
we had to pay out, and you know, and it
could have been if this was a typical lawsuit where

(22:24):
somebody had sued a local comp for violating their civil
rights and they were suing let's just say the city
in County of Denver where I'm sitting, the insurance company
would be driving that litigation, not the city and County
of Denver, because the insurance company and the insurance defense
lawyers are the ones that have to make the logistical, legal,

(22:44):
all of the procedural decisions because they're the ones whore
can be paying out. So they know all the details
about what happened on January sixth. So once this settlement
is a is reached, whether it's thirty thousand dollars, three
hundred million dollars, thirty million dollars, three million dollars, whatever
the number is, is immaterial. The insurance company will know what

(23:05):
they paid out. And even if there is a clause
in the settlement that says, you know, the US Capital
Police and the US government and you know, buying through
the Department of Justice denies any and all liability, and
it's just agreeing to this settlement in order to just
you know, save the cost of litigation. The insurance company
still knows that there was liability, and so what will

(23:28):
they do. They'll either refuse to renew the policy or
they'll renew the policy at a higher premium, which you
and I will pay for. Now, that's all assuming that
there is an insurance policy. So either way, you and
I are paying for this. We're paying for the wrongful
actions and the violation of Ashley Babbitt's civil rights because

(23:49):
of a cop that should not even have been a cop.
In my opinion, yeah, I firmly believe you. If you
know any cops, I want you to go ask convince,
if you know of a bad cop on your force,
would you rather get rid of that cop or are
you willing to let that bad cop stay on your force?

(24:11):
Ninety nine point nine percent of the cops will tell
you they want that bad cop off the force because
it makes their job more difficult. It may it it
he increases the potential for liability. Nobody wants to be
a CoP's partner because they know he's a nut job,
or that he's a whack of doodle, or he's not
very well trained or he's got anger issues, whatever it

(24:32):
might be. Cops don't like bad cops, and if a
good cop does like a bad cop, then they're probably
not a good cop. So yes, this story really gets
me wound up. So Biden's Department of Justice refuses to
do anything, covers everything up. So then that the House,
the House Oversight Committee or a House administration committee starts

(24:56):
to do this investigation and they uncover all of these things,
and then youjudicial watch, God bless you, Judicial Watch. On
behalf of Ashley Babbitt's husband files the wrongful death lawsuit
for Ashley Babbitt's the state, and after all of this litigation,
we finally reached the point where, oh, you know, it'skind
of like, we didn't need a bunch of new laws

(25:18):
to stop the border invasion. We just needed a new
president well justice. We didn't need a judge or anybody
else to deliver justice in Ashley Babbitt's case. We just
needed an attorney general who saw right from wrong and
understood that, hey, this is something that is just ultimately

(25:39):
wrong and for which we are liable and for which
we need to do just compensation. That's the difference between
Democrats and Republicans. Now, Trump has been very vocal has
remained a strong supporter of Babbitt. He actually had used

(26:00):
that's her name quite a bit during campaign rallies and
even during interviews. According to reports, Trump called Mickey Witthoff,
that's Ashley Babbitt's mother on January nine, twenty twenty five,
and asked her to tell the January six ers that quote,
I love them to keep their chins up, because he

(26:23):
knew what he was going to do. And on January twentieth,
the day he was inaugurated, Trump issued a blanket pardon
with the exception of thirteen January six ers for the
individuals that were charged in that estopole like investigation and prosecution.
It was conducted by the Biden Department of Justice. Over

(26:47):
on Newsmax, Greg Kelly was interviewing Trump and Trump told
Kelly that he would look into both the progress of
the lawsuit and the actions of Michael Bird. In fact,
he said during that interview, I'm a big fan of
Ashley Babbitt, and Ashley Babbitt was a really good person
who was a big Magafan Trump fan, and she was

(27:09):
innocently standing there. They even say trying to sort of
hold back the crowd, and a man did something to
her that was unthinkable when he shot her, and I
think it's a disgrace. So here we are. There'll be
another hearing in the matter sept for May twelve, and
the judge will get an update, a status update on

(27:30):
the settlement agreement. And just to caution you, the terms
of that agreement may never be disclosed unless the Department
of Justice chooses to do so. Normally, these are kept
confidential and rightfully so, except in this case. Wait a minute,

(27:51):
it's the Department of Justice, and he was a public employee.
And I assume in thee I assume in the course
of the litigation that the Department of Justice recognized that
if they really took this thing to trial, and I
believe this from the bottom of my heart, that the

(28:12):
Department of Justice, that Pam Bondi and her aides looked
at this case and they got briefing from the litigators
that were trying the case and said, where are we
what does it look like? Tell us all the pros
and the cons. And I bet the cons far outweighed
the pros. And they looked at it and said, you
know what, we take that to a jury, they're going

(28:34):
to find liability and it's going to be much more
that we have to pay than if we agree to
settle the case. And I think that's why the case
is being settled, and rightfully so. So once again, I
don't care. I don't care what you think about tariffs.
I don't care what you think about the border. I
don't care what you think about, you know, Ukraine, or

(28:56):
the Iranians, or Hamas or anything else for that matter.
For right now, what I want you to think about
right now is that the Trump Justice Department is actually
delivering justice. It's the weekend with Michael Brown. The text
line numbers three three is one zero three three three
one zero three. Hey word Mike or Michael, go follow

(29:16):
me on except Michael Brown USA. Right back, Hey, It's
the weekend with Michael Brown. Thanks for tuning in. Text
line number three three, one zero three, keyword Michael, Michael
will go follow me on except Michael Brown USA. The

(29:37):
the Canadians had an election this past week, and they
may have thought they were voting to kind of poke
Trump in the eye, and obviously this punishment for ribbing
them about, you know, becoming the fifty first state, uh,
you know, or annexing them, or the tariffs or whatever.
But what they ended up doing, now, I find it

(30:00):
fascinating because a lot of people would blame Trump for
this that if Trump had kept his mouth shut, then Paulavert,
who was the uh Conservative running to be prime minister,
could have beat this globalist by the name of Mark Carney,
who actually won. But he won, he only won a minority.
He's only a minority government. So he's Mark Carney, the

(30:22):
Prime minister elect is going to have to go out
to all these other radical groups and form a you know,
get a coalition together this is the bad thing about
a parliamentary system, and get all these you know, other
black old groups together with him to form a majority government.
But to just show you how what they really did

(30:44):
was just stomp on the gas of liberal craziness as
they were already going off the edge of the cliff
into moral collapse kind of like we were. Here's an example.
A Quebec superior court judge ruled that limiting the legal
affiliation of children to one or two parents is unconstitutional. Huh. Now,

(31:08):
with globalist social engineering Marxist in charge like that, I
guess the constitution just says whatever they want to say
at any given moment, and I guess that's what they
mean by living constitution. Now, the ruling is not about
step parents. What it applies to is a situation where
a family is multiple adults involved in a relationship before

(31:33):
the child's conception. In other words, I don't know a
bunch of swingers. You know, you know one woman has
got you know, five or six lovers. I imagine whatever
you want to imagine. I'll lead. I'll leave that up
to you. That is, you know, whether it's a thrupple,
a quadruples, whether you know YadA, YadA, YadA whatever. Presumably

(31:55):
an entire orgy's worth of copulating degenerates will qualify as
that child Gold's parents. Doesn't matter about DNA, they don't
have to do a paternity test or anything else, but
they'll get all the welfare benefits for having dependent children.
So I guess this is whatever it takes to desecrate
and destroy the fundamental unit of civilization, the family, in

(32:17):
accordance with the wishes obviously of Karl Marx, because that
was one of the objectives of Marx is make the
government of family, make the nuclear family irrelevant example number two.
More than fifteen thousand Canadians are euthanized annually. Some are

(32:38):
even asking to die because they can't access the proper
healthcare in Canada's socialized healthcare system, or they asked to
be euthanized out of loneliness as much as they do
out of illness. There's one Canadian doctor that is admitted
to killing more than four hundred people. Story says. A

(33:00):
medical association has even urged doctors to suggest euthanasia to
their qualified patients. Indeed, the push for euthanasia can apparently
become quite aggressive at times, including just before cancer surgeries.
Oh well, we're gonna do this surgery on YouTube, take
out the polyps in your prostate. But you know what

(33:24):
if you thought about just dying, you know, because instead
of doing this surgery, we could just euthanize you, or,
as the paragraph said earlier, out of loneliness. That's really sad.
But then again, I'm not sure that anybody should be
surprised by what Canadians discovered just past abortion on the

(33:48):
slippery slope of moral decay made advocates the euthanasia group
may consider it for the best that Canada is actually
euthanizing itself by subjecting itself to what's equivalent to demographic obliteration,

(34:09):
literally demographic obliteration. The Canadian government has a website. You
can find it at Canada dot ca, a forward slash
immigration refugees. Immigration is a defining feature of Canada. It
has contributed and continues to contribute to Canada's economy and

(34:31):
society and longstanding meaningful ways. With the exception of indigenous
peoples who have called these lands home since time immemorial,
everyone who lives in Canada is an immigrant or the
descendant of an immigrant. In the same way that immigration
is created the Canada that we all enjoy today. Immigration
is central to our future. I wonder if people in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Germany, Portugal, France,

(34:59):
where they're now beginning to realize, oh, we took this
just a step too far and we need to start
backing off, if they would agree with what the Canadian
government is saying, always find it fascinating. Then we can
look across the pond see what's going on over there.
As I say often, you know, just like I'd point out,

(35:19):
we can look to California, New York, Illinois and kind
of see what's happening, you know, elsewhere in the country.
We can also look to Europe, and we can look
to Southeast Asia. We can look to the Chinese Communist
Party social score system there and see what they're trying
to do here. Well, the same is true with immigration.
That's why, according to the Canadian government, this is why

(35:39):
they write Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship. Canada launched an Immigration
system for Canada's Future in close collaboration with other government departments.
We undertook extensive engagement to explore how Canada's immigration policies
and programs can support a shared vision for our country future. Now,

(36:02):
don't you find it interesting that they want to kill
their own citizens off by euthanizing them, because well, I've
been waiting to get the surgery, you know, my cancer
surgery for six months, and while I'm waiting, it's now
metastasized and I'm dying, So go ahead and kill me anyway,
or there's nobody to come and talk to me. I'm

(36:25):
living alone. I'm dying of loneliness, so go ahead and
kill me anyway. So, yeah, they'll do that, They'll go
euthanize their own citizens, and I guess, in a kind
of perverted form of a great replacement theory, we'll kill
our citizens and just import people from third world craphole

(36:45):
countries so we can look to our north now not
just to the east, but to the north, to see
the direction that we might be headed. And so weekend
with Michael Brown text the word micro Michael to three
three wednes zero three, be right back and went