Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Agencies enforcing these immigration raids sparked these protests in Los Angeles.
And then the mayor of La Karen Bass, denounces the
enforcement campaign. She goes to X to do it. She
accuses Trump of sowing terror and defiantly stating that we
will not stand for this. And then, of course we
know that Newsom steps and the governor and he claims
(00:22):
that the rage we're tearing families apart, called the immigration
arrests chaotic, reckless, crudal, and then of course you get
the usual standard operating procedure. All the progressive groups denounce
the raids, and they're even harsh in their denouncements. The
American Civil Liberties Union called the enforcement plan oppressive and
(00:44):
vile paramilitary operations. The National Day Labor Organizing Network refer
to the arrest as kidnappings. Now, you and I know
that that language is absurd, But you and I know
that I think one of the difficulties that we have
(01:07):
on the right is the failure to put ourselves in
the shoes of the idiots on the left who consume
this bull crap and take it to be gospel.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
If if you are a.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
Day laborer and you are aware of the National Day
Laborer Organizing Network, and they're telling you that ICE is
out there kidnapping people. Why would they say that, and
how do you think that would be perceived by someone
who is already in this country illegally. They think they're
(01:44):
being kidnapped. And then the limousine liberals attached onto that
latch onto that and they start spreading that word, and
then that starts filtering out to I would just call
the everyday average American that's busy trying to go to
and from work, put their kids through school, make sure
they don't get fired from their job or laid off,
(02:06):
trying to sell whatever they're trying to sell, a cruise
around town, trying to do their sales job, whatever it
is that they are doing. Or smart, you know, really
not that they're not smart, but really, really, you know,
smart people that are busy every day doing brain surgery
or delivering babies, or in a trial, you know, in
a in a trial in a courtroom somewhere, representing somebody
(02:29):
in a complex civil manner. They they're tired, they're busy,
and they get they get drive by consumption of the
news and they hear, oh, yes, we'll do something about
kidnaps you. They go home and they're having dinner with
their wife and their spouse with a boyfriend or girlfriend
or their dog or whatever, and they're like, did you
hear anything about kidnappings in California? And the person sitting
(02:49):
next to him says, yeah, I heard something about kidnapping.
And they don't understand any of the details, but sublimely,
in their mind they hear kidnappings or that it's chaotic,
gets reckless, or that it's all Trump's fault. And then people,
even people who support Trump, start to start to think
to themselves, oh, maybe we're overreaching here.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
So then the word of the camp, uh this campaign.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
The word starts to spread, and then the protests evolve
into riots, and then you start getting social media, and
you cannot you cannot discount the effect that social media has.
Maybe you're not actively engaged in X or Facebook or
(03:36):
TikTok or anything else, but I guarantee amn to you
that generations that are a Rod's age or younger, that's
where they well, cry friend goes is where I get
most of my news now too, but I do it
in a very curated way. Then social media feeds where
(03:57):
all of those people are getting their news are filled
with scenes that are reminiscent of the violent unrestles of
the summer of twenty twenty, the Black Lives Matter movement
baluting the crowds. They're all surrounding burning vehicles, rocks being
thrown at law enforcement cars, American flags, set of fire,
and the one on one freeway shut down completely once again.
(04:20):
Now that kind of violence should receive swift and widespread condemnation,
as it has from the right, but as it should
from the left. But instead, all these prominent democrats largely
remain silent on the Mayhem, reserving their outrage for Trump's decision.
(04:41):
You know, it's fascinating. So the real serious problem is,
if you want to stack these problems up, first and
foremost is the influx of ten or twenty million illegal
aliens in this country over the past four years. Then
(05:02):
they come in and it's not just you know, those
who are trying to seek a better life, those who
just want to work and send remittancens back to their
families in their home countries. Blah blah blah blah blah.
Oh soft soft care care care. They're just human beings,
which they are. But you know, what, you didn't come
here the right way, so get the hell out. Then
(05:25):
it's the cartels, and it's the dirt bags who are
wanted criminals in their home country, so they come here
and you know they perpetuate and commit the same crimes here.
So you would think that Democrats would not remain silent
on this mayhem and not reserve all their outrage for
(05:49):
just Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to simply
restore order, but to focus on the underlying problem. But
the problem with the problem is they don't see the
problem as a problem. They support it, but they'll never
admit that. Instead, they'll put in language about oh, your kidnap,
(06:12):
you're kidnapping. In fact, the language they will put it
in is hilarious, except for this, the fact that it
is absolutely absurd.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
Mayor Bass, may Bass.
Speaker 3 (06:31):
We had Tom Homan on the show earlier this week
and the Borders are and he told us that the
original ICE raids were to pick up individuals. He said
they had lengthy criminal records.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
He detailed some of them.
Speaker 3 (06:43):
So my response, my question to you is a two
part of one. Is he presented any evidence to you
that indeed they picked up individuals with with violent criminal records.
Speaker 1 (06:52):
And secondly, one he owes Karen Bass nothing. In my
humble opinion, Tom Homan doesn't oh Karen Bass one iota
of information about who he's picking up, because if just
let's let's play this game out. If you're going to
claim to be a sanctuary city in a sanctuary state,
and you're going to tell your law enforcement officers that
(07:14):
you cannot, shall not, and will not cooperate with federal
law enforcement, then that you don't You don't owe mayor
Bass one efan word about who are who you're picking
up because she's protecting them, she wants them there. Don't
forget that they want these criminals here. Do you understand
(07:36):
why they want these criminals here? Because that's how you
destroy your nation. You don't believe me. Look across the Atlantic.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
Are you concerned at all that there there are people
out there who say, well, the city of Los Angeles
is harboring dangerous individuals.
Speaker 2 (07:53):
You know, Oh, you think it's funny, sweetheart, you think
it's funny.
Speaker 4 (07:58):
No, I think that that that is thick. Are there
dangerous individuals that are here in Los Angeles?
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Are we harboring them?
Speaker 5 (08:05):
No?
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Yes, you are, you are.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
You have told you've told the LAPD that they cannot
cooperate with Ice. Now, if one of these dirt bags
happens to commit a crime, I'm going to make an
assumption that the LAPD would actually investigate the crime. And what,
regardless of their immigration status, are going to you know,
they commit a murder or rape, a battery, assault and battery,
whatever they might do, the un armed robbery, you know,
(08:31):
the smash and grab crowds that went through the Apple
store and you know the subway was being boarded up
last night. I assume you would arrest those criminals. But
maybe that's a false assumption on my part.
Speaker 4 (08:43):
I think that the idea that what is going on
here is chaos and we need federal intervention is just
not accurate.
Speaker 2 (08:53):
Well, that contradicts what your police chief said.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
It doesn't paint an accurate picture of what's going on
here at all. What is going to help would be
an end to the raids for a city.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
Oh so what would help? See, the solution is easy.
Don't enforce the law, just become let us just be
a sanction. You know what, if you want to be
a sanctuary city, I you know, I would say power
to you. In fact, let's just give you sanctuary city status.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
In fact, let's give the.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
Whole evan state of Colorado and California sanctuary state status
and and all federal resources. Just cut it off. Just
shut it off. No federal money, no, no money to
n g os, nothing, just shut it off. What'd you
think about that, Polus? What do you think about that? Newsom?
(09:47):
Because I'm tired, I'm tired of funding it. So if
you want to be a sanctuary state, and you know what,
and I live in Colorado, and I know it's going
to be rough on me because they're going to turn
this state into even more of a hell hold than
it already is. But sometimes, you know what, some things
have to get worse before they can get better. So
just just let California and Colorado and for that matter, Illinois,
(10:07):
Massachusetts and all the other you know, sanctuary jurisdictions just
just let them go.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Just let them go down the crapper I don't care anymore.
Just let them go.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Let these let these Marxists suffer through their own revolutions.
Speaker 4 (10:21):
Not to know when, where, how or why raids take place,
You can imagine that.
Speaker 1 (10:28):
Not to know how when or why raids would take place?
Why would you why would you disclose that? You see
the idiocracy of what this woman says. But never forget
I know whoever that talkback was. I know you're sitting
out there saying, oh, I already know all this stuff.
I'm not talking to you. I'm talking to the people
who are going to be talking to people who are
(10:50):
going to hear what she says is going to be
spread all over the news and giving them some tools
by which to counter this obsity that they are espousing.
Speaker 4 (11:03):
The entire population of immigrants is very unsettling.
Speaker 5 (11:07):
I also have to tell.
Speaker 4 (11:08):
You an example of people who went to their annual appointments.
You know, they're here legally, they have papers, they're supposed
to check in with the immigration office once a year.
Even they've been detained.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
So I don't think.
Speaker 4 (11:21):
That there is a crisis here that is happening at all,
except for one manufacturer.
Speaker 1 (11:26):
Well, because there is no more asylum and we've revoked
Title forty two and we're doing all and we are
sending those people back. Yeah, maybe they shouldn't learn to
rely on Democrats.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
But she talks about.
Speaker 1 (11:43):
We're coming after people who are just here, just showing
up for their appointments. Let's go to ABC Eyewitness News,
Los Angeles. Who is ICE arresting?
Speaker 5 (11:53):
Dozens arrested, but who are they? One person no n
is custody is forty nine year old Kum Chawan Fom
The Fed say the vehicle.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Oh interesting, everybody thought it was going to be Hispanic.
Well it's Uh Kung Chung Kan, Klung Chong Fahn, whatever
his name is. Doesn't sound very Hispanic to me.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Vietnamese national's criminal history include second degree murder. We confirm
that through both court records I had eight gunshots and
our own archives. Eyewitness News was there in nineteen ninety
four when police said Kum committed the crime in the
San Marino home.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
Three cars pulled up in front of this home.
Speaker 5 (12:36):
Eight to twelve teenage gang members emerged from the cars,
and at least three of them began firing randomly at
people attending the party. ACE also gave us the name
and rap sheet of forty four year old Armando or
Daz of Mexico. We confirmed his criminal history does in
fact include rape, sexual battery, and petty theft.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Congratulations to ABC seven Eyewitness News in Los Angeles for
countering Karen Bass's claim that well, you know what these
are just these are just people trying to make a
life better for themselves. Okay, well go back to Vietnam,
go back to Mexico and do it there. And I
mean that literally. I these these are criminals, and I
(13:19):
do believe that they ought to spend time in prison.
But I don't want to spend time in prison in
the United States. I want to spend prison time in
their home countries. So what Trump ought to be doing
in terms of like negotiating with the tariffs and trade
and everything else, And what Marco Rubio I'll be saying
is you, look, you want our foreign aid to continue.
(13:39):
Then when we find these convicted criminals in our country
and they're in our country illegally and they've committed right, murder, robberies, whatever,
we're gonna send them back to you and you're going
to house them, You're going to take care of them. Yeah, oh,
you don't want to do that. Stop the check writing.
Stop the check writing. We're in this war that is
(14:04):
a battle for the minds, not necessarily this audience. I
think this audience knows where I stand, and I think
I know where you stand. But again, in your sphere
of influence, they're an awful lot of people out there.
I mean, I'd like to claim that everybody that is
within the range of this broadcast signal and on the
(14:27):
iHeart app that there are you know that I've got
a rush Limbaugh size of audience, But I do not.
But I've got you, and you've got all of your
sphere of influence, and you ought to be using it.
And if you're not using it, then quite frankly, you're
(14:47):
kind of part of the problem.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
Bass continues with Mayor of ask, let's talk about now
we have National Guard, thousands of National Guard members there,
marines also in the area simularly going to be walking
this Los Angeles today.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
No, no, no, that is not why.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
See, this is the subtle kind of misinformation that gets
spread that everybody just takes for granted. The marines are
not there to wander the streets of Los Angeles. The
marines are there to protect federal employees and federal property.
You can't wonder the streets of Los Angeles and protect
(15:27):
federal property. You got to be where the federal property is.
You know, these marines are kind of acting like embassy guards.
They're standing outside the embassy, so to speak, to protect
it from the looters and the rioters.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Have we not.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
Forgotten I think we have forgotten Portland locking cops inside
their precinct building setting in a fire. Oh not just Portland, Minneapolis.
Same thing in Minneapolis. So we know what their standard
operating procedure is. So sending in seven hundred marines not
(16:02):
to wander the streets of California of Los Angeles but
instead to protect federal property is an absolute right of
the president to do so. But set that aside for
a moment. The misinformation is as bad as what's actually happening.
Speaker 3 (16:23):
Our remembers there marines also in the area, stimuli to
be walking the streets of Los Angeles today, safeguarding federal buildings.
Unclear what else their mission might be.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
What you like, unclear what their mission might be. It's
pretty clear what their mission is.
Speaker 3 (16:41):
Reaction to that, yeah.
Speaker 4 (16:44):
Well, my reaction is is that it is completely unnecessary.
What are they going to do. The one hundred National
Guard soldiers that are downtown Los Angeles are guarding one
federal building, so there is no need.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
And what.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
They shouldn't be, So we should open that federal building up.
You know, imagine, Imagine you're a federal worker. Imagine you're
working for the Department of ag You're working for You're
working for the Department of Commerce. Your clerk in the
Department of Commerce, working in the federal building in downtown LA.
(17:23):
You want to go to work? Do you you want
to park in the garage? We've seen April nineteen, nineteen
ninety five. We know what some people do to federal buildings.
We see what they've done to police precincts in Minneapolis
and Portland.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
You want to go to work?
Speaker 1 (17:44):
My gosh, this is a war on This is a
war for your mind, and maybe not yours in particular,
but maybe your spouse or your crazy uncle or your
aunt or your brother in law, or whoever it might be.
Speaker 6 (18:02):
Michaels, California is the canary and the coal mine of
the growth of Marxism in America. We got a big
problem because the canary's going crazy right now.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
You know, let me, let me swerve into something else
based on your talk about because the chaos in LA
is both an insurrection and a foreign invasion. It's the
combination of the two. And you don't have to believe me.
Democracy now, you see, this is the kind of crap
(18:42):
that I put up with just to try to produce
a quality program. I go watch things like democracy Nowhere
where a Yahoo But the name of Ron gosh Haz
coach Az, I'm not sure geoche Z. He is a
Los Angeles public school teacher. He's teaching regrets. He's also
(19:07):
a community organizer with a Marxist union, the Union del Barrio,
and he just happens to be a riot organizer. He's
he's he's got the triple crown. There, a teacher, a
Marxist union member, and a riot organizer. So how I
(19:28):
forget this woman's name. The you'll recognize the voice if
you ever pay attention to democracy now. But he's interviewing
him and he says, well you'll hear in a second.
But he says, we have every right, every historic right
to defend our communities by any ways that we can,
(19:49):
and we're going to continue to do so. Now what
that means is they have a right to defend illegal
alien communities from law enforcement while they those illegal aliens
displace us from our country. And that this guy just
(20:10):
happens to be a public school teacher should illustrate how
far out of control the situation has gotten, not just
in California, because I guarandamn to you, I can find
the same thing in Colorado too.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
Ah. I don't know why I try to do these
things on let me today.
Speaker 7 (20:32):
This weekend was marked with absolute and total violence, brutal
repression and attacks, coordinated attacks against our community.
Speaker 2 (20:41):
Did you hear that now?
Speaker 1 (20:45):
I know you know that that's bull crap. But he's
on Democracy Now, so he's speaking to his audience, and
his audience is lapping this up like my Leenburger's after
a long walk and they're thirsty.
Speaker 2 (21:05):
They love this.
Speaker 1 (21:07):
He's speaking their language. Oh my gosh, this guy is
a hero. And of course the Democracy Now host is
listening to this with a smile on her face because
she's advancing the clause.
Speaker 7 (21:27):
Yeah, good morning, thank you for having me today. This
weekend was marked with absolute and total violence, brutal repression
and attacks, coordinated attacks against our community.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
ICE agents have.
Speaker 7 (21:38):
Been around all over southern California, kidnapping people, tearing apart families.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
I just found that interesting because I thought this was
all isolated. I thought that we you know, it was
just happening one small area, but he says all over California.
They're doing it all over California.
Speaker 7 (21:54):
And we see this as an attack against our people.
And so that's why you see young people the community
coming out and resisting this repression. We are just hired,
sick and tired of these attacks that are dividing and
separating our families. And so that's why when we have
these protests, they have been peaceful. But when the repression
comes from the state, whether it's the sheriffs, the LAPD
(22:17):
or on Saturday, for example, in Paramount, California, it was
a border patrol. It was brutal violence. They show thousands
of rounds of tear gas, of flash bangrenades, of all
kinds of repressive instruments used against the community. But what
they didn't think was going to happen was that the
people would resist and would fight back. And that's exactly
what happened in Paramount and in Compton, California. But for
(22:39):
eight and a half hours, the people combated.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
For eight and a half hours, the people combined. I
don't know whether interpretation you have of combated or of
fighting back, but might seem to be the very definition
of a riot the very least resisting arrest or interference
with you know, obstruction of justice, interference with law enforcement activities.
Speaker 7 (23:05):
In the streets against the border patrol. And after eight
and a half hours of battle, and it was a
battle because there were people throwing back t your gas,
people throwing anything that they could to defend themselves into.
Speaker 1 (23:16):
Oh but counted in the terms of self defense. But
don't miss out what he just confessed on television. They
were throwing you know, bricks and rocks and anything they
could find. Now he claims in self defense.
Speaker 2 (23:29):
But hmm.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
What I find funny too, is democracy now is showing
lapd riot squads simply slowly marching down the street trying
to disperse a crowd.
Speaker 7 (23:45):
Basically law enforcement defend the workers that were being surrounded
by over one hundred Border Patrol agents. After eight and
a half hours, the border patrol the sheriffs.
Speaker 2 (23:57):
Had to retreat.
Speaker 7 (23:58):
They had to retreat because of the fear, resistance of
the community and the hundreds of workers that were in
the factories around them were able to escape. They were
able to go to their cars and go home. That
was only thanks to the resistance that allow them to
go home. That night, and so that is one clear
sign that if we organize ourselves.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
I'm sorry, I have to pause. I forgot they are there.
The station is flashing a protester holding up a very
well produced poster education no deport no deportation on can't
(24:37):
speak Spanish, and of course it has the Union label
in the lower left hand corner. So I guess we
owe illegal aliens and education resist.
Speaker 7 (24:52):
We can defend our communities from iceed hair, from the
border patrol, or from any federal agency that wishes to
separate our families. And so because of that, while that
was happening, while that resistance was happening, we saw President
Trump give the order of the National Guard. And so
for us as indigenous people to these lands, to this continent,
this is nothing new. The military going after us is
(25:15):
nothing new. The United States and this part of the
country is a result of a military invasion of Mexico.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
And so we catch that this is in essence an
invasion of Mexico.
Speaker 7 (25:27):
Give the order of the National Guard, and so for
us as indigenous people to these lands, to this continent,
this is nothing new. The military going after us is
nothing new. The United States and this part of the
country is a result of a military invasion of Mexico,
and so we know what's coming. It's more repression. But
what they have to know that that they're also going
to face more resistance from the community. We don't want
(25:50):
to be violent, and we don't advocate for violence, but
when they use brutal violence against our people, and kidnapping
mothers and fathers from children is violent. When they do
things like that, we have every right, every historic right
to defend our communities by any ways that we can,
and we're going to continue to do So.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
There you have it. What else do you need to know?
Speaker 1 (26:14):
They have a right to defend illegal alien communities from
law enforcement while they displace us from this country.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
A public school teacher.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
The Democrat Party, from city council members to presidential candidates,
has actively facilitated these riots. Some would call that treason,
and some would claim that needs to be treated as such.
Or Democrats, they argue, will succeed in destroying this country
so that they can rule over the ruins of this country.
(26:46):
Is it treason or not. I'll leave that to you.
But one organization in particular has emerged as a key player,
and that's the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights CHURLISHI r
L a coalition for humane immigrant rights. It's an NGO,
a nonprofit is based in LA and it has throughout
(27:08):
its history pushed for radical positions on immigration. Go back
seven years ago, it spearheaded the Campaign to Abolish ICE.
Its written mission statement is to build power, transform public opinion,
and change policies in order to achieve full human, civil
(27:29):
and labor rights. You might describe that as a well
funded political operation designed for the open borders Marxism. And
if you're a taxpayer, you might want to question the
source of that funding. According to a twenty twenty three audit,
(27:52):
you can find it online you dig far enough. This organization,
CHARLOT the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights got thirty four
million dollars from the government, ninety six percent from the
state of California state funding of thirty two and a
half million dollars in twenty twenty three. And that's a
(28:14):
dramatic increase from twenty twenty two when they only got
eleven point four million dollars. Now they leave the LA
Rapid Response Network, that's a hotline. They launched it back
in January. They wanted to collect tips about ICE activity
so they could dispatch activists to intervene while ICE was
(28:36):
trying to conduct a raid. And Mayor Bass has herself
admitted that the city relies on this organization's network so
that the city and County of Los Angeles can monitor
federal law enforcement activities.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Wow, what a web they weave.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
And of course we know that protests kicked in the
high gear because David Horeda, the president of the SCIU,
the Service Employees International Union, was arrested for obstructing ICE
officers for violating the law. Now he hasn't been convicted yet,
but I'm going to make an assumption that there was
probable cause for his arrest. He must have done something
(29:22):
to obstruct an ICE officer. Now why is it important?
Because Hereda is a major political player in California. His
union has seven hundred and fifty thousand workers and is
a major donor to Democrat the Democrat Party. Now, through
a spokesperson, they claim that he was merely observing I
(29:43):
was just watching. Now a video released by the US
Attorney shows him actually blocking an ICE vehicle. So TURLA,
they the rapid Response network springs into action and they
organized a rally to protest his arrest, and demonstrators wave
signs from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which is
(30:06):
a communist group, and of course they chanted all that,
you know, you gotta have a slogan, right, you gotta
have a chance, no justice, no peace, stand up, fight back.
And the executive director of TURLO refers to Hereta as
her brother, so you know they got close ties. And
of course then Mayor Bass goes on to x and
(30:26):
she posts that we will not stand for this, and
that this refers not to street violence but to ice
enforcing federal law. In Spanish, she was more direct. We
are not going to permit these actions, she wrote in Spanish.
And Bass has a long standing relationship with Turler. Just
last year she congratulated the organization for buying a new building,
(30:52):
probably paid for by taxpayers, to continue advancing justice and
full inclusion for all immigrants. And then she actually she
actually issued a press release bragging about her ability ability
to secure federal funding.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
For TURLA.
Speaker 1 (31:12):
Thirty seven percent of the some fourteen million dollars goes
to legal services. Now, whether California ought to be fitting
that bill, well, I guess that's an open question. For Californians.
If that were happening in Colorado, which I'm sure it
is in many instances, I'd be absolutely opposed to it.
But far more dubious. What about the other sixty three
(31:34):
percent of expenditures? So they get some, you know, forty
million dollars thirty seven percent to legal services? Where does
the other sixty seven percent go? Funding on legal services?
And the other sixty three percent is broken down this way,
About twenty one percent is spent on overhead management, fundraising,
(31:54):
the typical stuff that a nonprofit would do, but the
rest of it goes to According to the audit, these
are the categories organizing, civic engagement, community education and outreach,
policy and advocacy. In other words, the balance of their
moneys does activism overtly political activism? And although it operates
(32:20):
as a nonprofit as a five O one C three
for which you are prohibited from engaging in prohibited prohibited
political activities, nonetheless they do. They register and support for
bills in Sacramento. They send representatives to testify on behalf
and against legislation. They endorse Democratic candidates up and down
(32:42):
the ballot, including Kamala Harris, Gavin newsom Adam Schiff. So
they're not the ones throwing the rocks. But what they
do is they build the infrastructure to mobilize the protesters
on a moment's notice and then amplify all their rhetoric
contention so that they everything boils over and blows up
(33:03):
into a riot. They're useful idiots that recruit and use
useful idiots. They fuel the chaos.
Speaker 2 (33:15):
Now.
Speaker 1 (33:15):
I know protesters may have joined the demonstration demonstrations at
a sincere personal conviction, but it's really hard not to
believe that the majority of them, in fact, the vast,
if not ninety nine percent of them, are being used.
Speaker 2 (33:32):
They're being mobilized, they're being radicalized by a.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Network of nonprofits that depend on your tax dollars to
wasge these ideological battles. This is probably why Doege was
so vehemently opposed by the bureaucracy, because the bureaucracy, being
predominantly democrat, is fearful of losing their funding.
Speaker 2 (34:01):
So the net result is.
Speaker 1 (34:06):
We're not just well I can't say that for me,
but in California at least, they're not just tolerating the
civil unrest, the riots, the demonstrations, they're actually subsidizing it.
And I'm sure that we can find exactly the same
thing in any number of other states, including Colorado. This
(34:26):
is the battle that's been engaged, and Trump's doing what
we voted for, and we can't lose sight of that.
We have to remember that despite all of the misinformation,
all of the mind games, all of the shape shifting
that's going on in terms of the media. I know
(34:50):
some of you claim you already know all of that. Great,
then your job is to make sure that people that
don't know that do know that, and to watch for
it when it starts to happen or continues to happen,
I should say, in this state,