6-14-25 The Weekend Hour 2: No Kings Just Another Anarchist Movement Disguised As Protests

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
To Night, Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA director,
talk show host Michael Brown. Rownie, no brownie, you're doing
ahead of a job.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
The Weekend with Michael Brown. To Night, Michael Brown joins
me here, the former FEMA director talk.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
Show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (00:14):
Rownie, no brownie, you're doing ahead of a job The
Weekend with Michael Brown. Hey, So Weekend with Michael Brown.
Thanks for tuning in. Glad to have you with me.
A couple of rules of the rules of engagement for
the program. If you want to send me a message,
you can do at anytime you're listening live, delay, podcast, whatever.
The text line number is three three one zero three
three three one zero three. Just use the keyword Micha

(00:37):
or Michael somewhere in the message and I'll and I'll
get it. Do me a favor and go follow me
on x formerly Twitter. It's at Michael Brown USA at
Michael Brown USA. And then I'll just mention again because
I've had several text messages about people, some of you
having a hard time finding the program. Well, the easiest
way to find the program is go to Michael says

(00:57):
go here dot com. Michael says go here, dot Org.
When you hit that page, there's a tab that says
how to listen. Click on it, and there's an interactive
map kind of like No Kings, except I'll show you
all the affiliates around the country and when they air
or re air the program. And if all of that fails,
you can always go to your iHeart app and search

(01:18):
for Freedom ninety three seven. Freedom ninety three seven. That's
the home station I use out of Denver to broadcast
the program. So before this program started, Michael, my producer
in LA, was talking to me about We were talking
about the protests in general, and he mentioned a phrase

(01:40):
that threw me off, and so while he was yammering
on with me about something, I started digging around see
what I could find out about it. Well, the term
no kings probably sounds too well. Listen about ourselves for
a moment. No kings, as I said at the beginning

(02:01):
of the program, kind of reminds me of the American Revolution,
of the Declaration of Independence. We declared ourselves independent from
the tyranny of King George. We don't believe in kings,
we don't believe in a monarchy. The closest we've ever
come to a monarchy is when you know the say

(02:24):
the Kennedys or the two Bushes, or for that matter,
the two Atoms John John Quincy Adams, we just don't
like monarchs. I mean, I think there's some advantages to
monarch but it just doesn't fit with my DNA. It
just doesn't. It just doesn't resonate. Well, that's to us,

(02:50):
But what about two antifa or to those anarchists among
us who would add absolutely think differently about no kings
because the phrase no Gods, no masters is actually a

(03:12):
slogan loaded with militant history because it gets modified to
no God's no kings. And it turns out that that's
actually an established anarchist mantra that dates back to nineteenth
century labor radicalism, and it connotes total rejection. This is pure,

(03:37):
unadulterated anarchy. It connotes total rejection of authority, religious authority,
civil authority, institutional authority, all of the things that when
you think about American modern society that keeps our social
compact together. We have a respect for authority at the

(03:58):
same time that we put in place ways for us
to reject control and limit authority. We believe in freedom
of religion, not freedom from religion. We believe in freedom
of religion, and we believe that religion provides a kind
of a moral code. You know, when you look through

(04:20):
if you ever in college took comparative religious studies, you
understand that there are some basic tenets that run through
most religions, and it's pretty much summed up in that
if you believe that there is a greater power, that
kind of and that there is a life after this life,

(04:42):
that kind of changes the way you behave. Plus, you know,
the Gospels tell us that it's pretty much an instruction
on how to live a good moral life. We believe
in civil in civility. It's kind of hard to imagine
that when you look around at society today or social media.
We believe in civility. We also believe in civil order

(05:05):
in that we have, for example, in this country, we
have the whole concept of federalism, federal state and local authorities,
federal state and local governments, and that federal government is
of limited power, enumerated powers. And we believe that the
best government is that which is closest to the people.
And we believe in institutional authority. We believe that our institutions,

(05:30):
and the legitimacy that we place in those institutions allows
us to operate as a civil society that has guard rails,
and those guardrails allow us to flourish because we each
get to pursue our individual liberty, our individual freedom, or
individual hopes, all of the individuality. I mean everything about us,

(05:52):
and I'm talking about you and me right now, because
them is entirely different. When we act as individuals, each
pursuing our own goals and objectives, our own means of
sustaining our own lives, that invisible hand of the market
begins to work and suddenly we're buying, selling, trading and

(06:16):
inventing and innovating and doing everything, and it creates this
wonderful society that we live in. But the no God's
No Kings, or the original no God's No Masters is
a slogan that is not an accident. It turns out

(06:37):
it's actually a signal to militant groups that their participation
is not just welcome, but is affirmed by their ideology.
The irony is impossible to ignure because it is impossible
to ignore. Because think about this, If Donald Trump were
truly a king, as many of these people really do believe,

(07:00):
And as their own slogan suggests, those demonstrators would not
be gathering in public, they would not be organizing, they
would not be waving signs, they would not be shouting
slogans because in most monarchies look for example, look look
right now in in Tehran, unless the moles have escaped,

(07:24):
which is rumored to be true, you can't do that.
Descent is punished. Descent is suppressed. It's not elevated, it's
not platformed, it's not put out there for everybody to see.
It actually gets suppressed. And that's what Donald Trump would

(07:47):
be doing. We're not trying to suppress protests. We're not
trying to suppressed descent. We are trying to keep things lawful.
We don't want riots, we don't want bricks being thrown
to people, we don't want the highways blocked. But if
you want to protest, I'm all for your protesting. The
very fact that no King's protests can and are being

(08:10):
organized and are being broadcast so widely disproves the central
conceit of what's really behind them. In the days leading
up to the June fourteenth protests, in the days leading
up to today, you had flyers websites, they were all distributed.

(08:35):
How have you thought about that? What was their distribution mechanism?
It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Be sure and subscribe
to the podcast on your podcast app, search for the
Situation with Michael Brown. The Situation with Michael Brown. You
hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review so
we can kind of get up in the algorithm and

(08:57):
get the podcast spread out even further. But go subscribe
to that right now, the Situation with Michael Brown. How
did this distribution mechanism occur? That's next. Well, thankfully you've
stumbled into the Weekend with Michael Brown. Just don't stumble
back out the door. Stay, stay right where you are,

(09:18):
don't go away. So we're broadcasting live on Saturday, June fourteenth.
It's No King's Day. I I assume that maybe you're
listening on your headphones while you're out protesting. But if
you're not, and you're wondering, how did everybody find out

(09:38):
about this? Well, one, when you think about the coordination
that it takes to get people to talk about this, now,
it didn't take any coordination from any outsider for me
to talk about it because This is, as I often explain,
this is my job. My job obvious to go out

(10:00):
there and dig around and find out what's going on.
But when you're when you're in news, a newsroom, for example,
you're looking for stories. And the way most modern newsrooms operate,
they of course they've got stringers and they've got people
out running around. They some might even have a freelancer, freelancers,

(10:21):
but most local news stations, television broadcast stations, they have
you know, news desk, editors, assignment desks, and they get
this just constant influx of press releases, emails, phone calls,

(10:43):
everything that you can possibly imagine to try to get
their attention. And then once that's done I shouldn't say once,
but simultaneously while that's being done, they're also trying to
get the attention of the useful idiots to show up.
How do they do that, Well, suddenly flyers emerge online,

(11:05):
and they emerge online on those websites as advertisements or
even direct emails because they have email lists, and they
also know which websites that most radical leftist Marxists go to,
and all that gets distributed by anonymous Antifa linked accounts
social media websites all urging all of these yahoos out

(11:30):
there to go engage in illegal behavior. If you if
you can find a flyer online, you'll usually find them
printed in it printed both in English and Spanish. They're
usually available as a download for as a as a PDF,
as a portable document file so that you can actually

(11:50):
print it out and you know, distribute it yourself. I mean,
it's it's it's a brilliant political operation. And then they
actually call for active resistance to law enforcement, you know,
citing previous riots in LA. Those are models to actually emulate.
And these are not trust me, these are not random provocations.

(12:11):
These are premeditated directives. Now, the fact that all of
this material all over the country, all fifty seven states,
according to Barack Obama, are all circulated in conjunction, in collaboration,
and in coordination with the no Kings branding, all of

(12:34):
that indicates to me that the movement, if you want
to call this a movement, that the identity was being
intentionally co opted or more plausibly designed to accommodate co
optation from the very beginning. And that gets back to
this original anarchist about no Gods, no Masters, Indivisible, that

(13:01):
non government organization. In fact, somebody has sent me an
email I need to I'll reread it and maybe share
it on air. But this group Indivisible keeps trying to
maintain the fiction that they're nonviolent, even their official press releases.
And you know, oftentimes you'll get a media kit. I

(13:22):
get media kits all the time. I rarely read them.
But the media kit for Indivisible says that one of
their core principles behind the All Kings events is a
commitment to nonviolent action. Really, well, their disavowal of violence

(13:42):
really begins to fall apart if you start to scrutinize it,
because a group that's truly committed not to nonviolence, you
don't go out and conscript anarchist terminology, you don't coordinate
with ANTIFA aligned activists, and you don't release rally planning
materials into the same ecosystem where the molotov throwers congregate.

(14:09):
So the central question, then, I think, is whether these
Democrat non government organizations communions can claim innocence once everything
gets put in motion, all the way back from the planning.
You know, you think about the coordination between the American
Federation of teachers, between indivisible patriotic millionaires, all of them

(14:36):
coordinating all behind the scenes. Let's get a website up,
Let's get the flyers ready, Let's get all the ads
placed on the websites. Let's get the emails out. Somebody
do the public relations aspect to the marketing aspect. I mean,
this is a well run business, a well organized it's
a well organized political business, is what this is. So

(14:59):
I want you to think about they do all of
that behind the scenes, knowing that at some point they
want and intend for it to turn violent. So when
the protests start and then the anarchists start to do
their things, and suddenly the molotov cocktails get being thrown,

(15:24):
or the bricks get delivered, or they start breaking down
the cinder blocks, or they start, as I saw video yesterday,
they start taking the barricades outside a ice detention center
and start throwing the barricades in front of workers, just workers,
you know, clerks and stenographers and you know database analysts

(15:47):
and software engineers. They all start to leave and go home,
and they start throwing the barricades in front trying to
keep them, you know, locked in. When that happens, are
all of those original groups. Are they to be given
a pass from the violence. Can they claim innocence when

(16:10):
the violence begins? Now, the defenders, of course will say yes,
because they'll say, look, we had we had safety marshals
out there, We had the people out there, you know,
trying to shut down the people that were causing trouble.
We actually hired you know, cops to come in. We
we actually we had paid security. We even did we
even have taught them how to de escalate situations. But

(16:35):
as one person wrote, that's like handing out fire extinguishers
had a controlled burn that you secretly hope turns into
a wildfire. So when you step back, you realize all
of those so called precautions they take, they're not safeguards,
they're just legal fictions. It's cover. It's nothing but cover. Now,

(17:00):
the prosecutors, if properly motivated, could reasonably argue that the
sponsors knowingly facilitated an environment conduce you to political violence,
because they could tie together in a recal type of action.
The coordination, the funding, the slogan selection, the cohabitation with
the Antifa aligned networks, all that points to what a

(17:25):
combined unified enterprise, an organization you know, you got the
master organization up here, which may be the American Federation
of Teachers, it could be the Patriotic Millionaires. My guess
would be it would be the Patriotic Millionaires and then
all of the different verticals that then come together in

(17:49):
these protests. And I'll tell you from a lawyer why
I think that would apply racketeering law. I'll explain that next.
It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Hang type, be right
back tonight. Michael Brown joins me here, the.

Speaker 1 (18:08):
Former FEMA director of talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (18:11):
Brownie, No, Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job
the Weekend with Michael Brown. Hey, it's the Weekend with
Michael Brown. Thanks for tuning in. Glad to have you
with me. Do me a favor and go follow me
on next. Go do that right now at Michael Brown USA,
at Michael Brown USA. So, as I was saying, let me,
let me play lawyer for a moment, because I think

(18:31):
there's precedent for create for treating the no Kings protests
and quite frankly, the collaboration between the American Federation of Teachers,
Patriotic Millionaires, all the NGOs that are funded by the
Open Society Foundation. The George Soros organizations as a RICO offense,

(18:58):
a racketeer, influence corrupt organization. It's a nineteen seventy law
that makes this coordination between everybody illegal. It's an enterprise.
It's a group of individuals or organizations that associate together

(19:19):
for a common purpose, which actually could include a legitimate business.
It could even be a political group. The enterprise can
be any number of groups. But when you prove that
they have engaged in at least two acts of racketeering activity,

(19:40):
those are the predicate offenses. And the predicate offenses could be,
for example, inciting violence or federal and state crimes. You know,
in this case, you look at what they did with ICE.
You know, they're organized to what try to obstruct ICE
from enforcing immigration law. And they need to have a

(20:02):
specific relationship with the enterprise, such as they pay for distribution,
they pay for websites, they pay for this, they pay
for that, whatever, somehow they're involved in it. Now, technically
there may be some hurdles to it because you have
to show that somehow they get some sort of monetary

(20:25):
I think you because I never really did RICO criminal
law but I think you have to prove that they
had some ill gotten gains in order to apply it
for the eco statue to apply. But it certainly seems
to be that there's a conspiracy involved at the least
because in racketeering law, when a legitimate enterprise is you know,

(20:46):
in American Federation teachers, whether you like them or not,
and I don't like them, they are nonetheless a legitimate enterprise.
They're a lawful union. But when they're used to facilitate
unlawful activities, you cannot be exonerated simply because you had
a lawful pretext. Oh well, we put the mark, we

(21:07):
put the protest marshals together, or we hired the cops
because we really wanted to ensure the safety of the protest.
When that's just your cover. Because if a political protest
is actually being used to recruit, to agitate and ultimately riot,
the fact that it was scheduled to be nonviolent doesn't

(21:29):
absolve those who created the conditions for it to escalate
and become violent. The fact that the protests were dispersed
across hundreds of cities, I think that actually underscores the
planning capacity and the intent to try to create some
flash points that were to exceed the control of the organizers,
and that would then feed on one another if violence

(21:53):
were to occur. When the reports I'm getting so far
these seemed to be kind of pooh, kind of faltering.
But the day's early. Once it turns violent, even if
that occurs later in the day, well, all the groups
get informed. They communicate among one another. So a flashpoint

(22:19):
in Leda can feed a flashpoint in Houston, which can
feed a flashpoint in Denver, which can feed a flashpoint
in Chicago, which can feed a flashpoint in Seattle, which
can feed a flashpoint in Boston, and it begins to spread.
That's when you step back and you understand the planning

(22:39):
across all these hundreds of cities, these little towns everywhere.
You should soon understand that this is what makes the
No Kings protests such an instructive case about how anarchists
and Marxism is being used to upend our societ. It

(23:02):
shows how the political elites, particularly on the left side
of the political spectrum, can manufact They can create descent
that's descent in form, while they retain control in function
and the masses they're just participants in a morality play

(23:24):
the NGOs, they provide the money, the radicals provide the spark,
and the media the cabal steps in, and the cabal
that's the fog of ambiguity through which blame can be
endlessly diffused, so that nobody ever gets touched. All the
organizers are arm's length. But that's why I want to

(23:47):
dispel the fog. That's why I want to cut through
all the bs. So we should stop pretending that slogan's
like no kings, this somehow that operates in a vacuum.
It resonates with the organizers precisely because it carries such
historical weight, and that weight is being exploited here and

(24:12):
weaponized by factions, some of which really do want legitimacy,
and most of which really do want disruption, and most
of which truly do want to let's go back couple
almost a decade or more, those groups who do want
to fundamentally transform this country. And that's what we're facing

(24:35):
right now. That's the battle that's going on in this
country right now. And what I would hope that I
can accomplish and get all of you to think about,
is whenever you see all of these little things going on.
This is not conspiracy. Don't think I'm wearing a tinfoil
hat here. What I'm trying to describe for you is

(24:56):
that while everything may seem disjointed and unrel related, everything
is connected. It's precisely how Marxism works. Oh, they've got
the cover, They've got the media that will never show
you any connection. Which is why the alternative media, conservative

(25:18):
talk radio, conservative websites like the gentleman who does investigations
for a website, they just sent me the email. That's
why all of that alternative media that exists is so important,
because the cabal is never going to tie these dots
and connect these knots together for you and the Democrat Party,

(25:41):
I think is the most interesting aspect of all of
this because while some would claim that the Democrats are
being manipulated by these mngos, I would make the argument
that the Democrat Party is actually complicit with the mngos.
And that goes back to all the stories done in
the past, all the discoveries made by those the Department

(26:05):
of Government Efficiency about how money's just being laundered, laundered
to these different organizations. It goes through USAID, where it
goes through the Department of Commerce, the Department of aiguor
any number of organisms, any number of federal organizations or bureaucracies,
even the Department of Education, and then gets funneled out
to other organizations that then pay themselves a hefty salary

(26:26):
so they can spend their time while you and I
are actually engaged in productive work, they're engaged in activism,
and the really irritating, an infuriating part to me. We're
paying for it, We're paying for it. And then the Democrats,

(26:49):
trying to pretend like they're not involved, try to put
the consequences and dump everything in Donald Trump's labor for
that matter, just the Republican lab forget Donald Trump, although
he is right now, he is the king, he's at
the pinnacle because he's the president. So they don't all
these organizers, including the Democrats. You think about Maxine Waters,

(27:14):
You think about all the Democrats' soundbites that I've played
throughout the entire week, of Democrats out there who were
actually back when LA was really on fire, all advocating,
remember Maxine Waters, get up in their faces wherever you find,
wherever you find me supporters, disrupt their dinners, just reget
in their faces, and she's not the only one. They're

(27:35):
all doing it. So they don't merely tolerate the chaos
that follows the events. They anticipate it, and they want it.
They're objective. They're not trying to prevent violence trying to
They're trying to provoke violence, but just enough that the
media can assign responsibility to us. Trump doesn't want chaos

(27:59):
in the streets. The professional activists do. The Democrats strate,
toist do, and the donor class foundations who orchestrate all
of this bull crap and then step back and oh
my gosh, we're so shocked by this. I don't want
you to be fooled by it. The blame doesn't lie
with the president. It lies with those who lit the

(28:20):
match and now pretend to hold a fire extinguisher. That's
what's really going on. So when you think about the
No King's protests, they're actually a cover for Antifa like mobilization.
It is just simply another signal of the real battle

(28:41):
that's going on in this country. Oh yeah, I know,
we have you know, I could come in here. I
could fill three hours of this program with nothing but
every segment about a particular political battle. But instead I
want to take all of those political battles, set them
aside for a moment, because they're the ones that are
simply used as distractions. The real battle is for the soul,

(29:06):
is for the country, is for our way of life,
our form of government, and the anarchists are hell bent
on destroying it. It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. You're
going to send me a text message, tell me anything,
ask me anything on your message at the numbers three
three ones zero three. Key word is Mike or Michael.
Go follow me on X right now at Michael Brown USA.

(29:28):
I'll be right back. Hey, welcome back to the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Thanks for tuning in. I'm glad to
have you with me. So all the pro illegal immigration
riots in California all the other states has now sparked
an actual ongoing investigation because the involvement of these paid

(29:49):
agitators that I've been describing, Well, now guess what it's
actually being discovered on Capitol Hill on Demand. It's always
are us crowds on Demand. It's a California based advocacy
group that actually provides crowds for protests. They've gotten a

(30:13):
whole bunch of numerous high budget requests to get involved
with the demonstrations in La, in La and all these
other cities, but they apparently declined to participate. They refused
to intervene in the riots in La and said this
that they did not want to get close to any
form of illegal activity, including violence, vandalism, or blocking off

(30:34):
roads without a permit. Close quote. So now law enforcement's
trying to find out who's responsible for organizing the attacks.
But don't let me gloss over too much about crowds
on demand. Imagine that I mean it in kind of
a perverted way I want to say, which I will say.
It just proves that in America, if if you're not

(30:58):
making a you're not thinking hard enough or outside the box.
Crowds on demand. So you tell an NGO, yo, you
need a crowd. I can produce a crowd for you.
It's gonna cost you. I'll just pull some numbers out
of my butt. It's gonna cost you twenty five dollars
a person. And then you pay that person five dollars

(31:23):
and you pocket the twenty dollars minus whatever expenses you have.
And you need you need five hundred people, you do
the math five hundred times twenty bucks minus your whatever
your expenses are, plus paying them, you know, five dollars
to show up crowds on demand. See, we need to

(31:44):
start our own. So law enforcement's trying to determine who's
responsible for organizing those attacks. Customs and Border Patrol has
warned that anybody that does not uphold the law is
going to be held accountable. They've said, quote, we're not
here to negotiate with criminals. Break the law, attack our agents.
You're going to get arrested, prosecution, held accountable, no exceptions.

Speaker 1 (32:05):
Now.

Speaker 2 (32:05):
Senator Josh Holly from Missouri, whose chairman of the Judiciary
Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism. He has now come out
and said that the committee's been sending letters to the
organizations suspected of being involved in the riots. They went
all the records from November five, the election last year forward,
and if you fail to comply, you're going to face

(32:27):
further action, including subpoenas and perhaps being held in contempt
of Congress. He says, let me be clear, bank rolling
civil unrest is not protected speech. It is aiding and
abetting criminal criminal conduct. Accordingly, he writes, you must immediately

(32:48):
cease and desist any further involvement in the organization, funding,
or promotion of these unlawful activities. Now, he and Kevin Kidek,
who is a Republican congress in California, have raised particular
concerns about something called the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights.
I talked about this on my weekday program this week.

(33:08):
It's the The acronym is CHURLA chi r LA, the
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, And they're now investigating CHURLA
for its role in organizing and funding the pro illegal
immigrant disorder. Now, whether Turley provided financial or logistical support
to the protesters, including those allegedly involved in the violence

(33:31):
or the illegal activity, is currently under investigation. Now, Congressman
Kylie has actually questioned Turlo's funding. He has noted that
the nonprofit behind the LA riots donated almost five hundred
thousand dollars half a million bucks to support Gavin Newsom's campaign.

(33:58):
After that, guess what, remember when we get we kept
hearing about quid pro quos. I think this is a
quid pro quo. You donate half a million dollars to
Gavin Newsom's campaign and then suddenly you get thirty four
million dollars in state funding. That's got to be a

(34:19):
coincidence right now, what you think about California. Just think
about California for a moment. They're broke in the hole,
all their unfunded liabilities, budget debts, the stupid train they're
trying trying to build they can't build. I mean, poor
old California. Just we could pick on well, Colorado too,

(34:39):
but we could really pick on California all day long.
Thirty four If if you're a slub like me and
you're just working for a living and you're trying to
just you know, pay the bills and do whatever you
can to just you know, buy groceries and feed the kids,
feed the spouse, do whatever, you you know, pay the

(35:02):
car what blah blah blah. There's thirty four million dollars
that California does not have that they spend to give
to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights. It's the perfect
money laundering scheme. Because do you think that the Democrats
that control Sacramento are going to do anything about it?

(35:24):
Of course not. And if you think this is isolated
to California, stop and think about the American Federation of
Teachers and all the first you think about the teachers
that fund that union. Not all teachers that fund the
union support those union activities. So a teacher that we

(35:46):
all agree are probably underpaid, they're having union dues forcibly
taken out of their paycheck. And then the American Federation
of Teachers turns around and funds things in coordination with
Patriots for Patriot Millionaires and all the George Soros Open
Society Foundation organizations, and they use that money that ultimately

(36:10):
came from the teacher's paychecks to organize you know, No
King's Day.

Speaker 1 (36:17):
Wow.

Speaker 2 (36:18):
You see, if we really had journalists in this country,
I mean true journalism. Now, I'm not talking about the
Washington Post, the New York Times, the LA Times, the
Denver Compost. I'm not talking about any of those. I'm
talking about the days when journalists actually went out and investigated,
and they didn't care who they hurt in terms of

(36:41):
exposing them for wrongdoing. They just reported, you know, just
the facts, ma'am, Just the facts. Wouldn't that be wonderful?
I'll continue to day dream is the Weekend with Michael Brown?
The text lines always opened three three one zero three
keyword Mike or Michael, go follow me on X right
now at Michael Brown USA. We'll be right back