June 16, 2025 • 33 mins
We have, over time, allowed the marxists to infiltrate the Democratic Party.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I heard as you were just talking about. I am
not at all surprised seeing that these people receive grants
for college, they receive easily accepted into job corps, various
things that many of us don't get from.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
American point, not only do we not get them, but
you've got to start with the predicate that they're not
entitled to them. Many of the things that you just
listed Americans are and I loosely use the term entitled
(00:44):
only because I would I would submit that those are
government programs designed for American citizens, whether we agree with
them or not. I'm not going to argue that point
right now because that would take me the rest of
the day. But all these different programs for educational purposes,
training purposes, health purposes, medical purposes, all of the social
(01:12):
safety net, social welfare, whatever kind of however you want
to describe them, programs that you and I pay for
every single day. And remember, even though you and I
pay for them, what we pay is not enough to
cover the cost of them, which is why the national
debt continues to increase because every year those programs cost X,
(01:38):
but we only have B dollars to pay for them,
so we have to borrow enough to get to Z
to cover the full cost of them. So that creates
a budget deficit. That budget deficit then gets added to
the national debt and that keeps increasing and that devalues
(01:58):
the dollar. That cause as interest rates to not go
down but to actually increase. And it's just a it's
a horrible fiscal well, it's an unsustainable fiscal situation that
we're in. And so you bring along I didn't intend
to talk about this, but now that you got me
wound up about it, then we get Musk coming along
(02:21):
and Doge starts trying to identify those things that we
can eliminate, but we don't eliminate them. We do some
of it, but not nearly enough. But get back to
the point that.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
Just that.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
So let's just call the social safety net, which I'm
going to use as a catch all phrase for all
of the entitlement programs, which would be Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
all of the educational grants and subsidies, all of the
healthcare subsidies, all every thing, the training programs, all Nay,
(03:02):
it just goes on and on and on. Now you
are working and paying taxes to cover that. Even though
the taxes you pay are not enough to cover it.
So what happens is at federal, state, and even at
local levels, we start reprioritizing and spending money on all
(03:24):
the wrong things. So we don't spend money. You know,
I did a I forget what I talked about this
on the weekday program or the weekend program, but I
did a really quick dive, not very deep, into the
bag fee and the bag fee in the year twenty
twenty two, if I've got just remember me off the
top of my head, generated by my estimates, somewhere around
(03:46):
let's just say it was life somewhere around forty five
million dollars. Now that's supposed to be used for transportation.
But because we have our priorities screwed up in Colorado,
we didn't use that forty five million dollars best I
can tell, on fixing potholes or expansion joints, or repaving
or doing any of the things that we really do
(04:08):
need to be doing in Colorado. Instead, we spend it
on what bike lanes or speed bumps, or you know,
narrowing residential streets, you know, instead of four lanes, reducing
them down to three lanes or two lanes, and just
making traffic worse. And that's just one example that happens
(04:31):
in terms of transportation, but it also happens happens in
terms of everything else that we would expense, expect state
or local government to be doing because there's not enough money.
You take it to the federal level, Well, there's always
enough money, because they can always just print more. They
can just issue more treasury bonds, borrow more, which weakens
(04:53):
your dollar, makes your dollar worth worth even less, and
then boom, we spend it on stupid stuff that becomes
feeding the stray cat, and the cat learns it can
keep coming back for more and more and more, and
nobody's going to do anything. And then that leads to
what I talk about. Those people that I see that
(05:14):
are loitering in their neighborhood seemingly no you know, visible
means of support. You know, they they're just why work?
Why work over time that degrades the value and the
worth of work. I guess I'm just enough of a
(05:36):
Judeo Christian Puritan, whatever you want to call it work ethic,
that I believe that work intrinsically has value. If you're
not working, Yeah, you know what I read these stories
all the time about retirees, and you know, on Cora
(05:57):
and some of the other sites that I go to
find little odd odds and end stories, there was a
story just this past weekend about, you know, why do
people retire not do anything? And some guy was telling
a story about, you know, two sixty five year olds.
One retired and decided all he wanted to do was
just golf and read just not pretty much, just not
(06:19):
do anything. He was dead by the age of sixty seven.
The other guy, who is now like in his mid
to late seventies, is still working part time and doing
volunteer work and everything else. Because your mind and your body,
both spiritually, physically, mentally, all needs to keep moving. And
(06:42):
as long as you're moving, well, the body's going to
continued age. You can't stop that, but you can stave
off that aging process, and that gives you a sense
of self worth. If all you're doing is sitting in
your big, fat, ugly recliner all day long and watching
(07:02):
you know, the Hallmark movies and really not doing anything productive,
the mind's going to deteriorate, the body's going to deteriorate.
And take that those same principles, but take them out
of the retirement you know, old fart segment of society
and apply it to you know, an eighteen to forty
(07:23):
five year old. Well, the same thing's going to happen,
except they're more likely to turn to drugs and crime, trafficking,
any number of things which degrades society. So work has
an amazing value to humanity. In addition to just the
(07:45):
personal benefits, think about the benefits of those hard working
individuals that have invented things, or innovated things, or come
up with new products or services that we all consume
that make our lives even better. It's horrible in terms
of how government government destroys all of that. And then
(08:11):
you add into it the whole concept of illegal immigration,
and it just compounds itself and pretty soon we'll look
like the United Kingdom and we'll look like friends United Kingdom.
Where I mean they never had a strong of a
free speech like a First Amendment like we have. But
what little free speech they had is deteriorating. Why is
(08:35):
it deteriorating because radical islamis all of that. Migration as
they call it, into their country has resulted in politicians
capitulating to the demands of those ne'er do wells that
don't do anything except just claim victimhood and want some
sort of protection from the state, and so the state
(08:57):
does it for them, protects them from any sort of critique.
The day that I can't critique things that I disagree
with is the day that we might recognize that the
First Amendment has died. You and I should be able
to critique without fear of retaliation or for that matter,
(09:19):
violence or anything else. We at to recognize that that's
one of the inherent reasons that the founders put in
the First Amendment, not even the count the Second Amendment
and all the other amendments that protect those basic natural
rights that we have. I just have a popery of
things I wanted to get in that just kind of
(09:40):
accumulated over the weekend. You know how much I love
Sheriff Grady well Sheriff Grady was in the news. This
was I don't see the source, it's one of the
local news stations down in his county, but he's upset.
Speaker 4 (09:58):
Jason Bath is from fort forty three, from Davenport. This
is our human trafficking and prostitution folks. He's charged with
offering to comment. This is this is uh this Jason Bathist.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Okay. When he walks in, you think, I.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
Wish you could see the photo of him. This is
a trans woman, a guy trying to look like a woman.
This is by far one of the ugliest human beings
I think I've ever seen. And of course it's all
self inflicted, so I feel quite free to criticize it.
(10:41):
It's not like he was born ugly. It's that he's
made himself ugly. And of course now he's involved in
human trafficking and Sheriff Gray, by the way, I didn't
see it's it's the Fox affiliate.
Speaker 4 (10:52):
It's from Port forty three, from Davenport. This is our
human trafficking and prostitution, folks. He's charged with offering to
commit this is this is uh this Jason Bathist.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (11:08):
When he walks in, you think, well, I have set
up a deal with an ugly woman, and I think
you would all agree that this guy's an ugly woman. Kay,
this is what you really get when a makeup comes off.
This is Jason Bathist. Now I want you to think
about this minute.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (11:28):
You decide that you're going to hook up with a woman.
She comes in and she's already uglier than a mud fence, right,
and then as you start to engage, you find out, hey.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
This dude, that is a dude, and look what he
really looks like.
Speaker 4 (11:46):
Yeah, he looks like he should have been in a
scarface movie someplace.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
I don't know. This is what's happening.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
People think they're getting this, and many times they're getting
a really bad guy.
Speaker 3 (11:58):
So this is the before and after.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
You know, when you find him in the bar at night,
you know, you try to drink them pretty and you
wake up the next morning and you see this.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
Yeah, that's what we call rolex ugly.
Speaker 4 (12:13):
Rolex ugly is you wake up the next morning and
they're laying on your arm and your rolex is there,
and you just chew your arm off and leave the rolex.
You just got to get out of there. You don't
care about the rolex. But that's the kind of picture.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
So that's that's Jeff great, he just calling it like
it is. We need more people willing to do that
because the under the underlying crime is human trafficking. They
just completed a nine day undercover investigation into human trafficking
(12:50):
two hundred and fifty five suspects arrested during the operation.
Fifteen percent of the suspects we're in the country illegally,
according to the sheriff, So two hundred and fifty five arrested,
fifteen percent in the country illegally. Extrapolate that out to
the entire country, you'll see just how much human traffic
(13:13):
and sex trafficking is going on in the country. Yet,
and I know it's happening right here in Denver, Colorado.
I don't know it from any sort of personal experience.
I just know that if it's happening in Florida, if
it's happening in California, or Texas, or Hell's Bells, even
Oklahoma or Kansas, it's happening in Colorado. Yet nobody seems
(13:39):
to want to cover it or talk about it. Nobody
seems to want to point out that, oh, we've really
kind of gone down the hell hole. And we've gone
down the hell hole. Why because we have, over time
have allowed the Marxists to end trait the Democrat Party
(14:02):
and the Democrat Party just a short twenty years ago,
twenty just two decades ago, this was the Democrat Party.
By the way, if you don't recognize the voice which
I'm really disappointed in If you don't Nancy Pelosi attacking
(14:25):
my old boss, you'll never believe.
Speaker 5 (14:28):
Why broken borders, that's an oxymoron something. We can't tolerate
borders of their nature, our definition as a nation and
our protection as a country. Broken borders, that doesn't they
(14:48):
don't exist. We can't tolerate them. So let's stay say
from the start that we all in this body. And
I know I can speak very firmly for the Democrats.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Wow, I can speak firmly for the Democrats.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Court strong border control, and it must be part and
the first part of any comprehensive immigration reform. We have
is our obligation as elected officials to keep the American
people safe, and our borders are our first line of defense,
(15:24):
one of our early lines of defense. To do that,
Democrats support also enforcing laws, current laws against those who
came here illegally and those who hire illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Now think about that. Democrats support enforcing the laws. Has
he might talked to Gavin Newsom or Kathy Hochel or JB.
Pritzker about enforcing those immigration laws or Mike Johnston or
Jared Polis. They actually advocate the breaking of laws in fact,
they've declared themselves either sanctuary states or sactuary cities, which
(16:01):
means we're not going to enforce immigration laws and we're
not going to cooperate with FEDS in the enforcement immigration laws. Oh,
how far this is what progressivism is?
Speaker 6 (16:11):
This?
Speaker 2 (16:11):
This is just over the span of twenty years, you've
gone from Nancy Pelosi saying this to Nancy Pelosi actually
advocating for sanctuary cities and states breaking the law and
allowing the influx of illegal aliens into the country just
willy nilly.
Speaker 5 (16:30):
Yet the Bush administration has refused to do just this.
Imagine that for all of this talk about illegal immigration
to the United States and going after those workers who
are working here illegally, and we should, but we also
must have employer sanctions.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Where are these people working?
Speaker 5 (16:53):
Why are we not enforcing the law against employers who
hire illegal, illegal, undocumented people here? The Bush administration has
prosecuted only three employer sanctioned cases in the last fiscal year.
Only three cases. When, yes, when are we going to
(17:17):
take this issue seriously, mister speaker, We all know what
we must do. Democrats have long called for strong border security,
effective law enforcement, and for comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
Michael.
Speaker 7 (17:32):
If Trump would raise the transfer fees for money going
out of the country to forty to forty five percent,
he would see fifty to sixty percent of the illegals
leave this country because it would no longer be affordable
for them to live here and send money back.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
Love the show, Well, the only thing I heard him
say was love the show? Did he say something else?
Anything else?
Speaker 8 (18:00):
In that?
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Talk about a rod? And I can't believe you actually
played that one because it was a compliment. You're spot
out of me. Yeah, you were not paying attention. However,
I do have a question. I'm curious how you because
the remittances, remittances, remittance this that they pay, I'd never
(18:25):
calculated or checked into what that dollar amount is and
I so I maybe if you've got some of that
data somewhere, send me some links to it, because I'd
like to dig into that and find out because I
don't disagree with your your assumption that it might cause
them to like, Okay, well I can't afford it, I'm
(18:47):
out of here. I'd like to like to find out
more about that. Last Thursday, the House Committee on Oversight
and Government Reform he'll hearing. So they invited the governors
from New York, Illinois, and See Minnesota. There were a
(19:08):
couple of others there. I'll think about it as I
go through my notes. Anyway, the hearing was part of
the investigation launched in January by James Colmweather, Republican from Kentucky,
because he wanted to focus on the risks that are
imposed that are posed by the sanctuary cities and the
risks that they're causing to Ice and Immigrations enforcement in
(19:32):
their duties trying to enforce immigration laws. We see that
in the stupid no Kings and the riots going on
in Los Angeles in other parts of the country. Well,
could I get a Michael pond On there?
Speaker 9 (19:49):
We go their store the rule of law, it's growing
more and more absurd every day. In recent weeks, we
witnessed a Democrat senator who traveled to a foreign country
for a w check on a foreign MS thirteen gang
member and now indicted human smuggler that ended with a
photo op and Margarita's on the rocks. The fervor among
(20:11):
Democrats that take the side of illegal alien criminals grew
so strong that even had to deny written request from
members of this very committee to go on a taxpayer
funded junket to visit with this same MS thirteen gang member.
Earlier this year, I launched an investigation into the radical
pro illegal immigration policies of sanctuary jurisdictions. At an oversight
(20:34):
committee hearing with some of our country's worst sanctuary city
mayors earlier this year, the public was able to clearly
see how they cared more about illegal aliens than their
own citizens. They have pledged not to cooperate with federal
law enforcement officials, not even to hand over criminals in
their custody, who were originally arrested by their own local
law enforcement officials for crimes.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
Now, that to me is the most blatant example of
how unlawful a sanctuary city is. So someone's driving drunk,
they get arrested, they get thrown the drunk tank, and
in the course of the arrest and the incarceration, you know,
(21:18):
waiting you know, to get a court appointed a lawyer
and waiting for the first appearance in front of a judge.
Blah blah blah. So the illegal alien is sitting in
the City and County of Denver jail, waiting for his
first appearance, and in the course of that time period
might be twenty four hours, might be seventy two hours,
(21:40):
just depends on how heavy the docket is. Eventually the
Denver Police Department discovers that, oh, you're in the country
illegally and you've committed a crime. They might also, not necessarily,
but they might also discover that they are, oh, I
don't know, wanted or been previously convicted for.
Speaker 6 (22:02):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
I'm looking at some of the examples they had in
the hearing room. Carjacking, firearm in marijuana possession. Well, that
wouldn't be a crime. And in fact, I'm not sure
he knew any of those are crimes in Colorado. But
let's assume the carjacking, firearm in marijuana possession are crimes
in Colorado. Or slash victim with a machete, aggravated criminal
(22:23):
sexual abuse of a minor. I mean, come on, cops, seriously,
You've got someone in your jail who has either been
convicted of or as an outstanding warrant, and you know
this because you've booked them into your jail for aggravated
criminal sexual abuse of a minor, and you won't call
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement you take your badge off, give
(22:49):
your badge to say, you know, take the badge to
the mayor and say, Mayor, I cannot in good conscience
not inform Ice that I have someone who's who either
has a warrant or has been convicted of child sexual
abuse in our jail, and you will let me call
Ice so you can be deported. I can't work for you.
Cops ought to have those kinds of guts, because pretty
(23:12):
soon that's going to get the attention of the local media,
and pretty soon Mike Johnson's no longer going to be mayor.
Speaker 9 (23:21):
The absurdity does not stop there. Several of those local
officials pointed the finger to laws and policies that their
state governments put in place. I invited these governors here
today because as the chief executives of their states, they
willfully ignore federal law, shield illegal aliens, and passed the
cost of free services onto their hard working taxpayers. It's
(23:45):
hard to figure out whose side these governors are on.
They shield criminals while their own citizens pay the price.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
Bingo, I mean, he's exactly right. At least. Stefani, a
Republican congressman from New York, tears into her own Governor,
Kathy Hokeel over sanctuary city executive art.
Speaker 10 (24:04):
The horrific crimes that are committed on your watch. You
signed this executive order on your first day in office.
You sign it again and again this January. We deserve
a governor who stands up for law abiding New Yorkers,
doesn't put illegals first, but actually puts New Yorkers first.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
I appreciate.
Speaker 5 (24:21):
Rather than going after the viral moment, I suggest you no.
Speaker 10 (24:24):
No, no, I'm standing up for New Yorkers zone. Rather
than addressing the illegals in New York, you are prioritizing
your far left sanctuary state policies, which you put in
place with executive orders, instead of advocating victims all.
Speaker 3 (24:38):
Your faces, who is rebate with us?
Speaker 8 (24:40):
You did not.
Speaker 10 (24:40):
They were released because of sanctuary state policies in New
York State. No amount of work.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Notice the cross talk. Honestly, who do you believe? Alista Phonic?
Speaker 5 (24:53):
No?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
You you actually released these and she has behind her
the photos of the criminals who were we least and
the proclamation declaring that you know you're going to release
these and not not these particular, but in general, and
that we're not going to cooperate with Ice. Yet Keel
just sits there. Oh, you're just going for a viral moment.
(25:14):
Stephanic's like, no, no, I'm you actually did this. We've
got the receipts, and you just continue to deny it. Now,
why do you think she continues to deny it because
she knows that she can because the cabal's not going
to The cabal's on her side. The cabal doesn't want
these enforced Oh this is you know, these poor poor criminals.
(25:37):
We can't just snatch them off the street. If we
can't snatch a criminal off the street because they happen
to have undocumented illegal alien status in this country, then
why are we snatching American citizens off the streets? Buy
(26:00):
those very same cops or refuse to do it because
they're illegal aliens. But if you're a citizen and you're
wanted for murder, rape, or you know, molestation of a child,
oh they'll come and snatch you off the street in
a New York minute. Have you ever thought about it
that way? Because when you think about it that way,
you realize just how surreal everything is. I chuse the
(26:23):
word surreal because I was face timing with my granddaughter
yesterday and she was playing with the filters on face
time and I said, that makes you look surreal. And
she said, crampy, what does surreal mean? Of course I
didn't answer. I said, you need to go figure it
out yourself and then you'll understand why I say you
look surreal. Well, this to me is surreal. It's surreal, absurd,
(26:48):
it's illogical, and it's quite frankly, an American Congressman Tom
Emmer was he's a Republican from Minnesota, points out that
not only the actually obstructing immigration enforcement authorities, but they're
actually endangering those who are trying to enforce the laws.
Speaker 8 (27:09):
ICE agents are brave Americans who get up every morning,
leave their families, and put their lives in harms way
to protect our country. Sir, you at the very least
an apology to these dedicated public servants, I will say, Sir,
inflammatory rhetorics such as yours and the oven other governors
on this panel is responsible for putting a target on
(27:31):
the back of every ICE agent who is risking their
life to protect our communities. Minnesota is all too familiar,
by the way, with the chaos that ensues when you
refuse to work with law enforcement to enforce the law.
In May twenty twenty, eluding acts of violence and arson
occurred on your watch in Minneapolis after you refuse to
bring in the National Guard. Governor, your agenda is clear,
(27:54):
free healthcare, free college, and driver's licenses for illegals, while
handcuffing law enforcements when they're trying to protect our citizens
and their communities.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
And what are the consequences? So after you put a
target on their back, you make them targets of the violence.
You end up causing them to put masks on to
protect themselves, the ICE agents because they don't want their
families endangered. And then they get criticized for, oh, guestapo
(28:25):
type tactics because you won't show your face. Well, we
have an example from over the weekend. I forget the
locale where it occurred, but the ICE agents in a
particular city, let's just say it was Chicago or Los Angeles.
They were because they have to come from all over
the country to conduct these raids, they at government rates,
(28:46):
stayed in They were staying like in a comfort in
or a you know, a courtyard, marriot or something. And
it was soon discovered that they were there, and what well,
the rioters start surrounding the hotel, and of course they're
not the only one staying in the hotel. So now
innocent Americans are subject to the potential violence from these
(29:11):
agitators because ICE is just trying to get a good
night's sleep. They go to ICE agents' homes, stand in
the driveway shouting obscenities, yelling and screaming at them, and
so of course they don't want to get doxed any
more than the cops want to get doxed. That's what
these sanctuary cities allow to occur. And why I know
(29:36):
Trump's trying to cut off funding for them, and I
think he needs He'll fight it in the court, and
I think he'll eventually win. It's lawlessness. We're funding lawlessness.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
Good morning, Michael and a Rod.
Speaker 3 (29:50):
Hey Michael.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
Nancy Pelosi was lying back then. The Democrats for all
time as far as I know, but specifically since nineteen
eighty six, have been in favor of illegal immigration to
bolster their voter roles. She was lying in just like
Biden was lying all along during his term that the
borders were secure. Don't believe them, not at all.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
How good to you? Guys, I'll disagree with you on
this one because I do believe that they sincerely believed that.
If you don't believe Nancy Pelos, let's go even further back.
Let's go back to Bill Clinton. Let's go back to
January twenty fourth, nineteen ninety five. So now we're going
(30:33):
to go back in a decade even further Bill Clinton
State of the Union Address, January twenty fourth, nineteen ninety five. Well,
I need some.
Speaker 7 (30:45):
Audio and the budget I will present to you.
Speaker 8 (30:49):
We will try to do more to speed the deportation
of illegal aliens who arrested for crimes.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Senator Biden, Yes or no?
Speaker 5 (30:56):
Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law?
Speaker 2 (30:59):
No?
Speaker 5 (31:00):
I think we got to have tough conditions.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
Tell people to come out of the shadows.
Speaker 5 (31:03):
If they've committed a crime, deport them, no questions asked.
Speaker 4 (31:07):
Undocumented workers broke our immigration lawsuit, and I believe that
they must be held account of off especially those who
may be dangerous.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
And actually did deport. He actually did deport, and Bill
Clinton actually did seek and receive additional funding for border security.
So I do believe the Democrats at one time saw
this as a political issue that the right side for
them to be on was for control of illegal immigration
(31:38):
border security. But that morphed because the radicals in the
party and the radical donor group that supports the Democrat Party,
they're the ones that shifted, and so they dragged them along.
They dragged the Clintons and the Obamas and everybody else
with them. It's hard to believe in twenty twenty five
(32:07):
that Democrats really believe that. You know, an exception would
be John Fetterman. John Fetterman, which I didn't get to today,
but Federermoan is out this weekend about the parade, actually
blasting his own party. If we can't celebrate the United
States military and all that they've done to protect this
(32:28):
nation is to protect the world from evil, then our
party's really missing something. Now, Feederman is not going to
leave the Democrat Party. He is he is a stereotypical
liberal Democrat. But and I can live with that because
we can have arguments all day long over the size
(32:48):
and function of government. But that's not where his party
is today. His party today is a party of Marxism.
It's a party of the state is the King. Ironically,
the state is the end all and Bill worship the state,
depend upon the state. They've gone four blown, full full
(33:10):
blown Marxism, and I think I think Senator Warner Virginia
John Fetterman may have those two. That's about as far
as I can go in terms of the Democrats. Uh
in Colorado need the one of ours. Bennett and Higeloop.
(33:31):
We're both Marxist ordinaire.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
That's pretty much all I got, laden, gentlemen, Elva.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
I loved the elder
I heard as you were just talking about. I am
not at all surprised seeing that these people receive grants
for college, they receive easily accepted into job corps, various
things that many of us don't get from.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
American point, not only do we not get them, but
you've got to start with the predicate that they're not
entitled to them. Many of the things that you just
listed Americans are and I loosely use the term entitled
(00:44):
only because I would I would submit that those are
government programs designed for American citizens, whether we agree with
them or not. I'm not going to argue that point
right now because that would take me the rest of
the day. But all these different programs for educational purposes,
training purposes, health purposes, medical purposes, all of the social
(01:12):
safety net, social welfare, whatever kind of however you want
to describe them, programs that you and I pay for
every single day. And remember, even though you and I
pay for them, what we pay is not enough to
cover the cost of them, which is why the national
debt continues to increase because every year those programs cost X,
(01:38):
but we only have B dollars to pay for them,
so we have to borrow enough to get to Z
to cover the full cost of them. So that creates
a budget deficit. That budget deficit then gets added to
the national debt and that keeps increasing and that devalues
(01:58):
the dollar. That cause as interest rates to not go
down but to actually increase. And it's just a it's
a horrible fiscal well, it's an unsustainable fiscal situation that
we're in. And so you bring along I didn't intend
to talk about this, but now that you got me
wound up about it, then we get Musk coming along
(02:21):
and Doge starts trying to identify those things that we
can eliminate, but we don't eliminate them. We do some
of it, but not nearly enough. But get back to
the point that.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
Just that.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
So let's just call the social safety net, which I'm
going to use as a catch all phrase for all
of the entitlement programs, which would be Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
all of the educational grants and subsidies, all of the
healthcare subsidies, all every thing, the training programs, all Nay,
(03:02):
it just goes on and on and on. Now you
are working and paying taxes to cover that. Even though
the taxes you pay are not enough to cover it.
So what happens is at federal, state, and even at
local levels, we start reprioritizing and spending money on all
(03:24):
the wrong things. So we don't spend money. You know,
I did a I forget what I talked about this
on the weekday program or the weekend program, but I
did a really quick dive, not very deep, into the
bag fee and the bag fee in the year twenty
twenty two, if I've got just remember me off the
top of my head, generated by my estimates, somewhere around
(03:46):
let's just say it was life somewhere around forty five
million dollars. Now that's supposed to be used for transportation.
But because we have our priorities screwed up in Colorado,
we didn't use that forty five million dollars best I
can tell, on fixing potholes or expansion joints, or repaving
or doing any of the things that we really do
(04:08):
need to be doing in Colorado. Instead, we spend it
on what bike lanes or speed bumps, or you know,
narrowing residential streets, you know, instead of four lanes, reducing
them down to three lanes or two lanes, and just
making traffic worse. And that's just one example that happens
(04:31):
in terms of transportation, but it also happens happens in
terms of everything else that we would expense, expect state
or local government to be doing because there's not enough money.
You take it to the federal level, Well, there's always
enough money, because they can always just print more. They
can just issue more treasury bonds, borrow more, which weakens
(04:53):
your dollar, makes your dollar worth worth even less, and
then boom, we spend it on stupid stuff that becomes
feeding the stray cat, and the cat learns it can
keep coming back for more and more and more, and
nobody's going to do anything. And then that leads to
what I talk about. Those people that I see that
(05:14):
are loitering in their neighborhood seemingly no you know, visible
means of support. You know, they they're just why work?
Why work over time that degrades the value and the
worth of work. I guess I'm just enough of a
(05:36):
Judeo Christian Puritan, whatever you want to call it work ethic,
that I believe that work intrinsically has value. If you're
not working, Yeah, you know what I read these stories
all the time about retirees, and you know, on Cora
(05:57):
and some of the other sites that I go to
find little odd odds and end stories, there was a
story just this past weekend about, you know, why do
people retire not do anything? And some guy was telling
a story about, you know, two sixty five year olds.
One retired and decided all he wanted to do was
just golf and read just not pretty much, just not
(06:19):
do anything. He was dead by the age of sixty seven.
The other guy, who is now like in his mid
to late seventies, is still working part time and doing
volunteer work and everything else. Because your mind and your body,
both spiritually, physically, mentally, all needs to keep moving. And
(06:42):
as long as you're moving, well, the body's going to
continued age. You can't stop that, but you can stave
off that aging process, and that gives you a sense
of self worth. If all you're doing is sitting in
your big, fat, ugly recliner all day long and watching
(07:02):
you know, the Hallmark movies and really not doing anything productive,
the mind's going to deteriorate, the body's going to deteriorate.
And take that those same principles, but take them out
of the retirement you know, old fart segment of society
and apply it to you know, an eighteen to forty
(07:23):
five year old. Well, the same thing's going to happen,
except they're more likely to turn to drugs and crime, trafficking,
any number of things which degrades society. So work has
an amazing value to humanity. In addition to just the
(07:45):
personal benefits, think about the benefits of those hard working
individuals that have invented things, or innovated things, or come
up with new products or services that we all consume
that make our lives even better. It's horrible in terms
of how government government destroys all of that. And then
(08:11):
you add into it the whole concept of illegal immigration,
and it just compounds itself and pretty soon we'll look
like the United Kingdom and we'll look like friends United Kingdom.
Where I mean they never had a strong of a
free speech like a First Amendment like we have. But
what little free speech they had is deteriorating. Why is
(08:35):
it deteriorating because radical islamis all of that. Migration as
they call it, into their country has resulted in politicians
capitulating to the demands of those ne'er do wells that
don't do anything except just claim victimhood and want some
sort of protection from the state, and so the state
(08:57):
does it for them, protects them from any sort of critique.
The day that I can't critique things that I disagree
with is the day that we might recognize that the
First Amendment has died. You and I should be able
to critique without fear of retaliation or for that matter,
(09:19):
violence or anything else. We at to recognize that that's
one of the inherent reasons that the founders put in
the First Amendment, not even the count the Second Amendment
and all the other amendments that protect those basic natural
rights that we have. I just have a popery of
things I wanted to get in that just kind of
(09:40):
accumulated over the weekend. You know how much I love
Sheriff Grady well Sheriff Grady was in the news. This
was I don't see the source, it's one of the
local news stations down in his county, but he's upset.
Speaker 4 (09:58):
Jason Bath is from fort forty three, from Davenport. This
is our human trafficking and prostitution folks. He's charged with
offering to comment. This is this is uh this Jason Bathist.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Okay. When he walks in, you think, I.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
Wish you could see the photo of him. This is
a trans woman, a guy trying to look like a woman.
This is by far one of the ugliest human beings
I think I've ever seen. And of course it's all
self inflicted, so I feel quite free to criticize it.
(10:41):
It's not like he was born ugly. It's that he's
made himself ugly. And of course now he's involved in
human trafficking and Sheriff Gray, by the way, I didn't
see it's it's the Fox affiliate.
Speaker 4 (10:52):
It's from Port forty three, from Davenport. This is our
human trafficking and prostitution, folks. He's charged with offering to
commit this is this is uh this Jason Bathist.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (11:08):
When he walks in, you think, well, I have set
up a deal with an ugly woman, and I think
you would all agree that this guy's an ugly woman. Kay,
this is what you really get when a makeup comes off.
This is Jason Bathist. Now I want you to think
about this minute.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (11:28):
You decide that you're going to hook up with a woman.
She comes in and she's already uglier than a mud fence, right,
and then as you start to engage, you find out, hey.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
This dude, that is a dude, and look what he
really looks like.
Speaker 4 (11:46):
Yeah, he looks like he should have been in a
scarface movie someplace.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
I don't know. This is what's happening.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
People think they're getting this, and many times they're getting
a really bad guy.
Speaker 3 (11:58):
So this is the before and after.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
You know, when you find him in the bar at night,
you know, you try to drink them pretty and you
wake up the next morning and you see this.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
Yeah, that's what we call rolex ugly.
Speaker 4 (12:13):
Rolex ugly is you wake up the next morning and
they're laying on your arm and your rolex is there,
and you just chew your arm off and leave the rolex.
You just got to get out of there. You don't
care about the rolex. But that's the kind of picture.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
So that's that's Jeff great, he just calling it like
it is. We need more people willing to do that
because the under the underlying crime is human trafficking. They
just completed a nine day undercover investigation into human trafficking
(12:50):
two hundred and fifty five suspects arrested during the operation.
Fifteen percent of the suspects we're in the country illegally,
according to the sheriff, So two hundred and fifty five arrested,
fifteen percent in the country illegally. Extrapolate that out to
the entire country, you'll see just how much human traffic
(13:13):
and sex trafficking is going on in the country. Yet,
and I know it's happening right here in Denver, Colorado.
I don't know it from any sort of personal experience.
I just know that if it's happening in Florida, if
it's happening in California, or Texas, or Hell's Bells, even
Oklahoma or Kansas, it's happening in Colorado. Yet nobody seems
(13:39):
to want to cover it or talk about it. Nobody
seems to want to point out that, oh, we've really
kind of gone down the hell hole. And we've gone
down the hell hole. Why because we have, over time
have allowed the Marxists to end trait the Democrat Party
(14:02):
and the Democrat Party just a short twenty years ago,
twenty just two decades ago, this was the Democrat Party.
By the way, if you don't recognize the voice which
I'm really disappointed in If you don't Nancy Pelosi attacking
(14:25):
my old boss, you'll never believe.
Speaker 5 (14:28):
Why broken borders, that's an oxymoron something. We can't tolerate
borders of their nature, our definition as a nation and
our protection as a country. Broken borders, that doesn't they
(14:48):
don't exist. We can't tolerate them. So let's stay say
from the start that we all in this body. And
I know I can speak very firmly for the Democrats.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Wow, I can speak firmly for the Democrats.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Court strong border control, and it must be part and
the first part of any comprehensive immigration reform. We have
is our obligation as elected officials to keep the American
people safe, and our borders are our first line of defense,
(15:24):
one of our early lines of defense. To do that,
Democrats support also enforcing laws, current laws against those who
came here illegally and those who hire illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Now think about that. Democrats support enforcing the laws. Has
he might talked to Gavin Newsom or Kathy Hochel or JB.
Pritzker about enforcing those immigration laws or Mike Johnston or
Jared Polis. They actually advocate the breaking of laws in fact,
they've declared themselves either sanctuary states or sactuary cities, which
(16:01):
means we're not going to enforce immigration laws and we're
not going to cooperate with FEDS in the enforcement immigration laws. Oh,
how far this is what progressivism is?
Speaker 6 (16:11):
This?
Speaker 2 (16:11):
This is just over the span of twenty years, you've
gone from Nancy Pelosi saying this to Nancy Pelosi actually
advocating for sanctuary cities and states breaking the law and
allowing the influx of illegal aliens into the country just
willy nilly.
Speaker 5 (16:30):
Yet the Bush administration has refused to do just this.
Imagine that for all of this talk about illegal immigration
to the United States and going after those workers who
are working here illegally, and we should, but we also
must have employer sanctions.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Where are these people working?
Speaker 5 (16:53):
Why are we not enforcing the law against employers who
hire illegal, illegal, undocumented people here? The Bush administration has
prosecuted only three employer sanctioned cases in the last fiscal year.
Only three cases. When, yes, when are we going to
(17:17):
take this issue seriously, mister speaker, We all know what
we must do. Democrats have long called for strong border security,
effective law enforcement, and for comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
Michael.
Speaker 7 (17:32):
If Trump would raise the transfer fees for money going
out of the country to forty to forty five percent,
he would see fifty to sixty percent of the illegals
leave this country because it would no longer be affordable
for them to live here and send money back.
Speaker 2 (17:52):
Love the show, Well, the only thing I heard him
say was love the show? Did he say something else?
Anything else?
Speaker 8 (18:00):
In that?
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Talk about a rod? And I can't believe you actually
played that one because it was a compliment. You're spot
out of me. Yeah, you were not paying attention. However,
I do have a question. I'm curious how you because
the remittances, remittances, remittance this that they pay, I'd never
(18:25):
calculated or checked into what that dollar amount is and
I so I maybe if you've got some of that
data somewhere, send me some links to it, because I'd
like to dig into that and find out because I
don't disagree with your your assumption that it might cause
them to like, Okay, well I can't afford it, I'm
(18:47):
out of here. I'd like to like to find out
more about that. Last Thursday, the House Committee on Oversight
and Government Reform he'll hearing. So they invited the governors
from New York, Illinois, and See Minnesota. There were a
(19:08):
couple of others there. I'll think about it as I
go through my notes. Anyway, the hearing was part of
the investigation launched in January by James Colmweather, Republican from Kentucky,
because he wanted to focus on the risks that are
imposed that are posed by the sanctuary cities and the
risks that they're causing to Ice and Immigrations enforcement in
(19:32):
their duties trying to enforce immigration laws. We see that
in the stupid no Kings and the riots going on
in Los Angeles in other parts of the country. Well,
could I get a Michael pond On there?
Speaker 9 (19:49):
We go their store the rule of law, it's growing
more and more absurd every day. In recent weeks, we
witnessed a Democrat senator who traveled to a foreign country
for a w check on a foreign MS thirteen gang
member and now indicted human smuggler that ended with a
photo op and Margarita's on the rocks. The fervor among
(20:11):
Democrats that take the side of illegal alien criminals grew
so strong that even had to deny written request from
members of this very committee to go on a taxpayer
funded junket to visit with this same MS thirteen gang member.
Earlier this year, I launched an investigation into the radical
pro illegal immigration policies of sanctuary jurisdictions. At an oversight
(20:34):
committee hearing with some of our country's worst sanctuary city
mayors earlier this year, the public was able to clearly
see how they cared more about illegal aliens than their
own citizens. They have pledged not to cooperate with federal
law enforcement officials, not even to hand over criminals in
their custody, who were originally arrested by their own local
law enforcement officials for crimes.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
Now, that to me is the most blatant example of
how unlawful a sanctuary city is. So someone's driving drunk,
they get arrested, they get thrown the drunk tank, and
in the course of the arrest and the incarceration, you know,
(21:18):
waiting you know, to get a court appointed a lawyer
and waiting for the first appearance in front of a judge.
Blah blah blah. So the illegal alien is sitting in
the City and County of Denver jail, waiting for his
first appearance, and in the course of that time period
might be twenty four hours, might be seventy two hours,
(21:40):
just depends on how heavy the docket is. Eventually the
Denver Police Department discovers that, oh, you're in the country
illegally and you've committed a crime. They might also, not necessarily,
but they might also discover that they are, oh, I
don't know, wanted or been previously convicted for.
Speaker 6 (22:02):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
I'm looking at some of the examples they had in
the hearing room. Carjacking, firearm in marijuana possession. Well, that
wouldn't be a crime. And in fact, I'm not sure
he knew any of those are crimes in Colorado. But
let's assume the carjacking, firearm in marijuana possession are crimes
in Colorado. Or slash victim with a machete, aggravated criminal
(22:23):
sexual abuse of a minor. I mean, come on, cops, seriously,
You've got someone in your jail who has either been
convicted of or as an outstanding warrant, and you know
this because you've booked them into your jail for aggravated
criminal sexual abuse of a minor, and you won't call
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement you take your badge off, give
(22:49):
your badge to say, you know, take the badge to
the mayor and say, Mayor, I cannot in good conscience
not inform Ice that I have someone who's who either
has a warrant or has been convicted of child sexual
abuse in our jail, and you will let me call
Ice so you can be deported. I can't work for you.
Cops ought to have those kinds of guts, because pretty
(23:12):
soon that's going to get the attention of the local media,
and pretty soon Mike Johnson's no longer going to be mayor.
Speaker 9 (23:21):
The absurdity does not stop there. Several of those local
officials pointed the finger to laws and policies that their
state governments put in place. I invited these governors here
today because as the chief executives of their states, they
willfully ignore federal law, shield illegal aliens, and passed the
cost of free services onto their hard working taxpayers. It's
(23:45):
hard to figure out whose side these governors are on.
They shield criminals while their own citizens pay the price.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
Bingo, I mean, he's exactly right. At least. Stefani, a
Republican congressman from New York, tears into her own Governor,
Kathy Hokeel over sanctuary city executive art.
Speaker 10 (24:04):
The horrific crimes that are committed on your watch. You
signed this executive order on your first day in office.
You sign it again and again this January. We deserve
a governor who stands up for law abiding New Yorkers,
doesn't put illegals first, but actually puts New Yorkers first.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
I appreciate.
Speaker 5 (24:21):
Rather than going after the viral moment, I suggest you no.
Speaker 10 (24:24):
No, no, I'm standing up for New Yorkers zone. Rather
than addressing the illegals in New York, you are prioritizing
your far left sanctuary state policies, which you put in
place with executive orders, instead of advocating victims all.
Speaker 3 (24:38):
Your faces, who is rebate with us?
Speaker 8 (24:40):
You did not.
Speaker 10 (24:40):
They were released because of sanctuary state policies in New
York State. No amount of work.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Notice the cross talk. Honestly, who do you believe? Alista Phonic?
Speaker 5 (24:53):
No?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
You you actually released these and she has behind her
the photos of the criminals who were we least and
the proclamation declaring that you know you're going to release
these and not not these particular, but in general, and
that we're not going to cooperate with Ice. Yet Keel
just sits there. Oh, you're just going for a viral moment.
(25:14):
Stephanic's like, no, no, I'm you actually did this. We've
got the receipts, and you just continue to deny it. Now,
why do you think she continues to deny it because
she knows that she can because the cabal's not going
to The cabal's on her side. The cabal doesn't want
these enforced Oh this is you know, these poor poor criminals.
(25:37):
We can't just snatch them off the street. If we
can't snatch a criminal off the street because they happen
to have undocumented illegal alien status in this country, then
why are we snatching American citizens off the streets? Buy
(26:00):
those very same cops or refuse to do it because
they're illegal aliens. But if you're a citizen and you're
wanted for murder, rape, or you know, molestation of a child,
oh they'll come and snatch you off the street in
a New York minute. Have you ever thought about it
that way? Because when you think about it that way,
you realize just how surreal everything is. I chuse the
(26:23):
word surreal because I was face timing with my granddaughter
yesterday and she was playing with the filters on face
time and I said, that makes you look surreal. And
she said, crampy, what does surreal mean? Of course I
didn't answer. I said, you need to go figure it
out yourself and then you'll understand why I say you
look surreal. Well, this to me is surreal. It's surreal, absurd,
(26:48):
it's illogical, and it's quite frankly, an American Congressman Tom
Emmer was he's a Republican from Minnesota, points out that
not only the actually obstructing immigration enforcement authorities, but they're
actually endangering those who are trying to enforce the laws.
Speaker 8 (27:09):
ICE agents are brave Americans who get up every morning,
leave their families, and put their lives in harms way
to protect our country. Sir, you at the very least
an apology to these dedicated public servants, I will say, Sir,
inflammatory rhetorics such as yours and the oven other governors
on this panel is responsible for putting a target on
(27:31):
the back of every ICE agent who is risking their
life to protect our communities. Minnesota is all too familiar,
by the way, with the chaos that ensues when you
refuse to work with law enforcement to enforce the law.
In May twenty twenty, eluding acts of violence and arson
occurred on your watch in Minneapolis after you refuse to
bring in the National Guard. Governor, your agenda is clear,
(27:54):
free healthcare, free college, and driver's licenses for illegals, while
handcuffing law enforcements when they're trying to protect our citizens
and their communities.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
And what are the consequences? So after you put a
target on their back, you make them targets of the violence.
You end up causing them to put masks on to
protect themselves, the ICE agents because they don't want their
families endangered. And then they get criticized for, oh, guestapo
(28:25):
type tactics because you won't show your face. Well, we
have an example from over the weekend. I forget the
locale where it occurred, but the ICE agents in a
particular city, let's just say it was Chicago or Los Angeles.
They were because they have to come from all over
the country to conduct these raids, they at government rates,
(28:46):
stayed in They were staying like in a comfort in
or a you know, a courtyard, marriot or something. And
it was soon discovered that they were there, and what well,
the rioters start surrounding the hotel, and of course they're
not the only one staying in the hotel. So now
innocent Americans are subject to the potential violence from these
(29:11):
agitators because ICE is just trying to get a good
night's sleep. They go to ICE agents' homes, stand in
the driveway shouting obscenities, yelling and screaming at them, and
so of course they don't want to get doxed any
more than the cops want to get doxed. That's what
these sanctuary cities allow to occur. And why I know
(29:36):
Trump's trying to cut off funding for them, and I
think he needs He'll fight it in the court, and
I think he'll eventually win. It's lawlessness. We're funding lawlessness.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
Good morning, Michael and a Rod.
Speaker 3 (29:50):
Hey Michael.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
Nancy Pelosi was lying back then. The Democrats for all
time as far as I know, but specifically since nineteen
eighty six, have been in favor of illegal immigration to
bolster their voter roles. She was lying in just like
Biden was lying all along during his term that the
borders were secure. Don't believe them, not at all.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
How good to you? Guys, I'll disagree with you on
this one because I do believe that they sincerely believed that.
If you don't believe Nancy Pelos, let's go even further back.
Let's go back to Bill Clinton. Let's go back to
January twenty fourth, nineteen ninety five. So now we're going
(30:33):
to go back in a decade even further Bill Clinton
State of the Union Address, January twenty fourth, nineteen ninety five. Well,
I need some.
Speaker 7 (30:45):
Audio and the budget I will present to you.
Speaker 8 (30:49):
We will try to do more to speed the deportation
of illegal aliens who arrested for crimes.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Senator Biden, Yes or no?
Speaker 5 (30:56):
Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law?
Speaker 2 (30:59):
No?
Speaker 5 (31:00):
I think we got to have tough conditions.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
Tell people to come out of the shadows.
Speaker 5 (31:03):
If they've committed a crime, deport them, no questions asked.
Speaker 4 (31:07):
Undocumented workers broke our immigration lawsuit, and I believe that
they must be held account of off especially those who
may be dangerous.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
And actually did deport. He actually did deport, and Bill
Clinton actually did seek and receive additional funding for border security.
So I do believe the Democrats at one time saw
this as a political issue that the right side for
them to be on was for control of illegal immigration
(31:38):
border security. But that morphed because the radicals in the
party and the radical donor group that supports the Democrat Party,
they're the ones that shifted, and so they dragged them along.
They dragged the Clintons and the Obamas and everybody else
with them. It's hard to believe in twenty twenty five
(32:07):
that Democrats really believe that. You know, an exception would
be John Fetterman. John Fetterman, which I didn't get to today,
but Federermoan is out this weekend about the parade, actually
blasting his own party. If we can't celebrate the United
States military and all that they've done to protect this
(32:28):
nation is to protect the world from evil, then our
party's really missing something. Now, Feederman is not going to
leave the Democrat Party. He is he is a stereotypical
liberal Democrat. But and I can live with that because
we can have arguments all day long over the size
(32:48):
and function of government. But that's not where his party
is today. His party today is a party of Marxism.
It's a party of the state is the King. Ironically,
the state is the end all and Bill worship the state,
depend upon the state. They've gone four blown, full full
(33:10):
blown Marxism, and I think I think Senator Warner Virginia
John Fetterman may have those two. That's about as far
as I can go in terms of the Democrats. Uh
in Colorado need the one of ours. Bennett and Higeloop.
(33:31):
We're both Marxist ordinaire.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
That's pretty much all I got, laden, gentlemen, Elva.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
I loved the elder
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.