June 17, 2025 • 32 mins
We really do have the leader of the free world back. Trump commands the world stage right now.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Regarding Tucker Carlson's concerns about a forever war, the first
thing that comes into my mind is that President Trump's
only going to be in office for the next three years.
What happens after that, we might have other players in
the political arena, arena like Bolton types that just want
(00:22):
a forever war because of the military industrial complex.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
Thanks, well, you run that risk.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
Even if Trump had a chance to had a second term,
no'll guarantee that he would win. He always run that
risk because as long as the military industrial complex exists,
there will be those who will try to push us
into that.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
I just think Trump has.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
The person you know, And in fact, that's a good
segue into I was just getting ready to say that
Trump just has that personality that generals push him one
direction when he's wanting to go another direction. He's going
to basically just change generals. He's going to get Oh,
(01:06):
he'll listen to the general, so there's no question in
my mind he'll take their advice. But a general that
won't do what he tells him to do once they've
all had their input, that general's out of here as
well as he should be. General should be free to
give their advice openly and as powerfully and persuasively as
(01:28):
they can. But once the commander in chief makes the decision,
your job is to salute and go insolent. X. You
can see it on X. But Trump is at the
G seven somewhere up in Canada. I don't know where
he is somewhere in Canada, and whether it's BC, I
don't know. But they do the group photo, and the
(01:50):
group photo is you know, they have a little diet
they're all going to stand on and it's got you know,
g you know, it's got the twenty twenty five G
seven uh Kenakski or wherever it is in Canada, and
it's got this this gorgeous range of mountains behind in
the background. Is it in Alberta? That's an Alberta. That's interesting.
(02:14):
I's go see where that is. Uh And they they're
all kind of meandering toward to get up on the
dais for the photo. And Trump's in total command. But
what he does, which is fascinating to me because we
quickly forget, is he walks in. He knows where to stand.
(02:38):
He's engaged in other engaged in conversation with the other
world leaders. He's carrying on a conversation. He stands where
he's supposed to. He doesn't fall off, he doesn't trip,
he doesn't wander off, he doesn't turn around and stare
at the mountains and like, oh wow, that's that's really pretty.
He's in, he's focused. He even buttons his own jacket.
(03:02):
And of course he's complete opposite of Joe Biden. But
he did something else because whenever they arrive, they have,
you know, the the host who happens to be Carney,
the new Prime Minister of Canada, who, by the way,
is a globalist. He's a he's a globalist and.
Speaker 4 (03:25):
Worked for.
Speaker 3 (03:28):
Maybe the World Bank or somebody, or maybe the Bank
of England, I forget, but somebody. Anyway, he's a globalist.
He's he's a staunch liberal in the Canadian sense of liberalism, meaningless,
he's a socialist, not classic liberalism. But Trump in that
(03:51):
in that opening interview, where Carney is, you know, welcoming
the delegates, the presidents and prime ministers and everybody, they
have a short little press conference, Trump goes off script
and takes total control of the interview to the point
(04:12):
that you'll hear in a minute Carnie has to step
in and say, oh, you know what, we're gonna be
late for the meeting. We all stop the meetings or
start the meeting. Stop this press conference. Well, he really
wanted to stop the press conference because this conference showed
that we really do have the leader of the free
world back that Donald Trump, despite all of this pagandello's,
(04:36):
despite everything that you may dislike about him, he commands
the world stage right now. So at this press conference,
Trump made sure that every second counted. He didn't wonder
off looking at stuff. He dropped major revelations on trade,
(04:56):
foreign policy, and for that matter, the future of mass
de importations in this country. But the biggest truth Bama
of all was that he called out Obama and Trudeau
directly for pushing Russia away and triggering what's beginning to
be a global realignment. I've told you before about my attempts,
(05:22):
as part of my assignment being a delegate to NATO
to keep or not to keep, but to bring Russia in,
even as I didn't care. Just get them into NATO,
either as a voting delegate or a non voting delegate,
but bring them into our sphere of influence. Bring you know,
bring our enemy, our so called enemy, bring them into NATO,
(05:46):
and we fought and fought and fought primarily the French,
I think the rest of the country is, particularly when
we were having the knockdown, drag out debates about it.
The French were my biggest logger head. The Brits, the Germans,
the others. I actually think they were on our side.
They just didn't want to speak up. They're kind of
(06:08):
like the Saudis right now with the Israeli Iranian conflict.
The it was, I don't know how to describe it,
other than the idea that the G seven should have
been the G eight and that Russia should have been
(06:30):
there as part of our trading partners is something that
I've actually believed in. So before that, before the working
sessions even began, Trump and Carney stopped in front of
the reporters a brief press stop, first up the Canadian
(06:53):
trade deal. Asking about the ongoing trade negotiations with Canada,
Trump pointed to a very seek difference in strategy between
himself and Carney. The issue, he says, wasn't hostility, it
was philosophy. He made it clear that he prefers a
direct approach and Carney. He said, you know, really favors,
(07:14):
you know, kind of a more intricate, complex model. And
then when a reporter asked whether a deal to be
finalized in the matter of days or week, Trump offered
an answer, but it was measured. It was a pretty
interesting interchange.
Speaker 4 (07:32):
What is holding up a deal with Canada or set
someone holding up I think we have different concepts.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
I have a tariff concept and Mark has a different concept,
which is something that some people like. But we're gonna
see if we can get to the bottom of it today.
I'm a tariff person. I've always been a terrific as simple,
it's easy, it is precise, and it just goes very quickly.
And I think Marc has a more complex idea but
(08:02):
also very good.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
So we're going to look at.
Speaker 5 (08:04):
Both and we're going to ask you what we're going
to come out with.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Something helse.
Speaker 4 (08:10):
Is achievable within days, within weeks? Is there that kind
of runway? Yeah, it will.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Both parties have to agree.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Again, sure, yeah it's achievable. Both parties have to agree,
but yeah, it's clear. But then the same press conference
takes an unexpected turn. Now remember they're all standing waiting
to go into the meeting. Trump's there with the Secretary
of State, Susie Wilde's chief of staff is there, the
Treasury Secretary of Bessins all standing there. Carney's there introducing him.
(08:39):
But Trump went off, as I said, went off script
and exposed the truth without any prompting. He pivoted from
trade and toward one of the most consequential foreign policy
decisions in recent memory, and that was the expulsion from
what was the G eight, the expulsion of Russia. Standing
(09:03):
beside Carney, whose own predecessor Trudeau, played a role in
that decision, Trump suggested that the west attempt to isolate
Moscow is probably what led to the catastrophic consequences that
we're dealing with today, and he called them out directly.
It was a moment that was just pure Trump.
Speaker 4 (09:23):
The G seven used to be the G eight. Barack
Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have
Russia in.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
And I would say that there was a mistake, because
I think you wouldn't have a war right now if
you had Russia in, and you wouldn't have a war
right now if Trump were president.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Four years ago.
Speaker 4 (09:40):
But didn't work out that way.
Speaker 6 (09:42):
But it used to be the G eight and now
it's I guess what's that nine years ago, eight years
ago it switched over the they threw Russia out, in
which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though
I wasn't in politics, and I was very loud about it.
I was a mistake in that you spent so much
time talking about right that he's no longer at the table.
Speaker 4 (10:02):
So it makes life more complicated, but you wouldn't have
had the work.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
And other than that, I think we're going.
Speaker 4 (10:09):
To accomplish a lot and I expect to and I
think our primary focus would be trade and trade with Canada,
and I'm sure we can work something out.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
Yeah, he has, he has. I was gonna see he's
he has no filter. But that's not correct because I
think he knew precisely what he was doing. He had
the world media in front of him and he wanted
to point out that correctly. So by the way, we
were once the G eight and this country that we're
(10:41):
now in along with Macron uh, they really pushed to
get Russia out and we now see what the consequences are.
And now the guy that we seem to want to
talk about all the time is not even at the table.
And why would you not have the guy that, whether
he's your enemy or your you would want to have
(11:01):
at the table when we're talking about something that is
not necessarily militarily related but is related to us economically. Now,
before reporters could even kind of let that soak in,
Trump dropped another geopolitical bombshell, this time about the Iranians,
(11:26):
and he once again did not hold back because for
the first time publicly this was yesterday, So for the
first time publicly, Trump confirmed that the Iranians had signaled
interest in trying to de escalate the tensions. You know,
the general rule of negotiations is the person who first
(11:47):
throws out a number is the loser, because if you're
good at negotiations, you now know what their number is.
And Trump kind of in a way points them.
Speaker 7 (11:59):
Out heard any signals or seen any messages from intermediaries
that Iran wishes to de escalate the conflict?
Speaker 1 (12:06):
Yeah, what if what have you heard?
Speaker 7 (12:08):
What if you heard from the Iranians?
Speaker 8 (12:10):
They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before.
Speaker 3 (12:15):
Oh, they'd like to talk, but frankly they should have
done that before. Uh I gave you sixty days to talk.
You drag your feet you uh, you played us. You
didn't do anything. You dragged them out. So yeah, you
should have talked, but you didn't.
Speaker 7 (12:32):
Have you heard any signals or seen any messages from
intermediaries that Iran wishes to de escalate the conflict?
Speaker 1 (12:39):
Yeah, what if?
Speaker 9 (12:40):
What have you heard?
Speaker 7 (12:41):
What if you heard from the Iranians?
Speaker 8 (12:43):
They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
If I had sixty days and they had sixty days,
and on the sixty.
Speaker 8 (12:50):
First day, I said, we don't have a deal. They
have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties,
But I say, Iran is not winning this, and they
should talk, and they should talk immediately before it's too late.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
They should talk and talk immediately before it's too late.
He knows how to use the media to send the signal,
and he sent the signal right in front of the
entire world, because right now the world's media is focused
on the G seven and then the conversation, because the
(13:27):
Carney's just standing there like a buffoon. He has no clue.
He clearly is the little man in the room. The
big man in the room is Donald Trump. And so
now the conversation turns back to American domestic politics, and
Trump did something that I actually.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I kind of love.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
He declared war on blue sanctuary cities that are protecting
illegal aliens, criminal illegal aliens. He gets pressed about his
latest director to Ice, and Trump confirmed that he's structing
just to focus on sanctuary cities. Those Democrats run jurisdictions
never we're looking at you. That he accuses of shielding
(14:07):
violent criminals for political gain, And he defended the move.
But he didn't stop with his defense. He kept moving,
and then he ended on a concrete vow. It's pretty fascinating.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
Immigration.
Speaker 9 (14:24):
Why are you wander lights atardy democratic inner cities.
Speaker 7 (14:27):
Let's find that.
Speaker 8 (14:28):
I don't know what you're saying.
Speaker 9 (14:29):
You did a post last night where you said you
want to really target democrat.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
I wanted them to focus on the cities because the
cities are where you really have what you called sanctuary cities,
and that's where the people are. I look at New York,
I look at Chicago.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
I mean, you got a.
Speaker 4 (14:42):
Really bad governor in Chicago and a bad mayor, but
the governor is probably the worst of the country in
printz Care. But I look at how that city has
been overrun by criminals.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
And uh, you know New York and LA.
Speaker 8 (14:55):
Look at La La. Those people weren't from La.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
They weren't from California.
Speaker 8 (15:00):
Most of those people, many of those people, And yeah,
that's that's the focus.
Speaker 4 (15:05):
Biden allowed twenty one million people to come into our country.
Of that, vast numbers of those people were murderers, killers,
people from gangs, people from jails, the empty day jails out.
Speaker 8 (15:18):
Into the US.
Speaker 4 (15:19):
Most of those people are in the cities, all blue cities,
all Democrat run cities, and they think they're going to
use them to vote.
Speaker 8 (15:27):
It's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
I'm gonna happen.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
So just as the press corps is like, oh wow,
he's making headlines here, we got a lot to write about.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
The Prime Minister Carney steps in.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
And why because if you understand anything about body language,
you understand anything about groups, how groups operate. The momentum
in this press conference had unmistakably moved toward Trump, and
Carnie knew it. Carnie knew that he was just this
little man standing. He was just now the usher. He
was the guy who was just gonna show Donald Trump
(16:04):
to his seat at the table. So Carney steps in.
He's got kind of a chess or cat smile on
his face, like, yeah, I kind of know I blew this,
and uh, I know that I'm just the I'm just
the Prime Minister of Canada.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
If you don't mind, uh, just I'm going to exercise
my role, if you will, as G seventh Hare said.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
If I don't know why I find that funny, I'm
going to exercise my role of the chair of the
G seven.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
And since we have a few more minutes with the
President and his team, uh, and then we actually have
to start the meeting to address some of these big issues.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
So that's it. So now his staff has to step in.
That's it. That's it.
Speaker 3 (16:58):
That would have gone on a typical Trump that would
have gone on for an hour. He would he would
have asked questions as long as the national as long
as the international media kept asking him questions. It is
an example of how America's strength is back, and these
(17:19):
world leaders know it, and they know they're going to
have to deal with him. So anytime that you think
back on all of those visuals we saw of Joe
Biden wandering off, you know, during the D Day celebrations,
not knowing where to stand, freezing up, falling asleep at meetings,
(17:39):
doing all of those things. Here's a guy that just
turned seventy nine years old. What was that two days
ago or whenever it was, he turned seventy nine years old.
Complete control, complete command, and he knows what his role is.
He's the freaking president of the United States of America.
He's the commander in chief. He's the leader of the
free world. And while all these other people are leaders
(18:04):
of their countries, their secondary countries.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
And he knows that his role is to command and
to lead, and he's doing that.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
That's why when I go back to the whole discussion
about what's going in on in Iran, Yeah, he's not
for a forever war. He's for precisely what he means.
You're not going to get new what we're becoming if
we don't allow Trump and for that matter, Congress to
(18:40):
reverse these stupid Marxist trends, especially with regard to illegal immigration,
and do it quickly. Let's go to Germany, for example,
a city whose name I cannot pronounce, Bartide bark Thied
has reversed a plan that they had they were going
to demolish this residential commmplex that house senior citizens, and
(19:04):
instead they've decided they're going, oh, we're going to refurbish it,
and we're going to refurbish it so they can house
illegal aliens in it. Now, before they made the deciity,
I shouldn't say before, because I don't know that for
a fact, but they if they they vacated all the
senior citizens out of this residential complex because the city
(19:26):
claimed that the building was uninhabitable and that they didn't
have the money to refurbish it. So they kick all
the senior citizens out. May your place is not safe
to live anymore. We've declared it uninhabitable. We're going to
demolish it. Oh, they did an inspection after they kicked
the senior citizens out, and then they find oh, there
(19:48):
are only five units that require some minor renovations and
the rest of the building is fine. So now we're
going to use it instead to house u what they
call asylum seekers, illegal aliens. Now, the mayor of this
town defended the decision, and she says, quote, the costs
for the removal of some mold and other renovation measures
(20:12):
are manageable, and that the city was preparing for potential
we're preparing for potential increases in illegal immigration. And so
now she claims that the use of the complex is
just temporary, although pressed by reporters, she couldn't give any
sort of specific time frame.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
It has one hundred and four units.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
They need forty to accommodate these future illegal aliens seeking asylum.
So one hundred and four places, one hundred and four units,
I'm going to assume just one, let's just say one
senior citizen. So they kick out one hundred and four
senior citizens, claiming that, oh, the building is now uninhabitable. Oh,
(21:01):
we've inspected it. Now we've kicked you out. We need
to repair five of them, and now we're going to
move illegal aliens in. But you only need forty spaces.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
Now.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
Obviously it's drawing some criticism. A council member in the
town for the what I would consider to be notionally
sent a right Christian Democrat Union party that was the
party that used to be led by Angela Merkel, dismissed
the opposition's concerns as politically motivated, stating, I sign I
(21:37):
sometimes wonder if it's election campaign again, should we accommodate
the refugees in tents. The apartments are well habitable. Wow,
that's the notionally right wing party in Germany. But he
goes on the ad that this avoids addressing the fact
that German seniors were evicted on the basis that they
(22:00):
were supposedly not well habitable. Now, as far as the
former senior citizens, not the former senior citizens, the former
residents that are senior citizens, they're kind of disappointed having
been forced to leave the homes they've been living in
for quite some time, in fact, up to twenty years.
Freedom Miller, for example, says, I feel very comfortable here
(22:22):
and I've lived here for twenty years. Another resident, Dagmar Perdubuski, added,
the apartment is really well designed. Everything can be reached
from here, and there's also a lot of nature. I
would like to stay here, but the cities move forward.
Speaker 1 (22:37):
And they're going to kick them out.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
Germany, I think, is probably the number one destination for
so called asylum seekers in Europe, and the number of
illegal aliens that arrive is rapidly changing Germany's demographics. As
many as one third of young adults in Germany now
come from foreign countries. Remember the numbers that we talked
(23:04):
about earlier in this on this program about the number
of native citizens versus people coming from foreign countries and
the work ethic of both Germany's. The entirety of Europe
is changing right before our very eyes, and not necessarily
for the better. But Germany hasn't reached and doesn't have
(23:28):
the kind of leadership that we have that recognizes that
you cannot maintain a nation's sovereignty and a nation's culture
if you allowed this infestation of foreigners to continue unabated.
Just wanted to throw that in as an example of
you know, we talked about Trump wants to clean up
(23:50):
the sanctuary cities. No, they're full Europe the full sanctuary.
The EU is a full sanctuary place. Everybody just come
on in and it will fundamentally alter not just the
country itself, mental fundamentally altered geopolitics.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
Switching real quickly.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
There's a world renowned infectious disease epidemiologist named Martin Culdorf.
He was fired from Harvard Medical School last year because
he refused to take the COVID nineteen shot. Some people
refer to it as a vaccine. Guess where he is
now Bobby Kennedy, Junior has appointed him to the Centers
(24:37):
for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC's Advisory Committee for
Immunization Practices, the ASIP Committee. That's the committee that provides
advisory information about vaccines. Member Kennedy last week just fired
every single member the entire Advisory Committee membership fired last week.
(25:02):
The first appointee is Professor or doctor Culdorf, who cited
infection acquired immunity as the reason for declining the vaccine.
Infection acquired immunity, so he's got some sort of autoimmune disease.
So he gets fired from Harvard, and he lost his
(25:23):
position also at a Harvard affiliated hospital during the early
days of the COVID pandemic, and then he got officially
terminated as a faculty member in March of last year.
Oh he also happens to be a co author of
the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for sensible pandemic response
measures and has garnered nearly one million signatures from scientists
(25:44):
and doctors worldwide. In making the announcement for the new
ASIP members, Kennedy described his selections as quote a major
step towards restoring public trust in vaccines. They have each
commit to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making
(26:06):
any new vaccine recommendations. He went on to say that
the committee will review safety and efficacy data for the
current schedule as well.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Wait a minute, that implies and.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
In further digging, you find out that they didn't do that,
They had not been doing that. You would think that
every once in a while, you know, on some sort
of rotating basis, you would take all the vaccines that
are on the current schedule and you review them for
current safety guidelines and efficacy data. Are the vaccines still
(26:41):
as effective as they claim they were when we put
them on the schedule.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
They've not been doing that. They will now start doing that.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
You know, there's a story I just wrote are just
as a promo for tomorrow that high Craft Hines I
sorta say, hindes Craft.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I think it's Craft Hines announced.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Voluntarily that they're going to remove all the artificial dies
from their food products by the end of twenty twenty seven.
The point about that is simply, this leadership just proves
that leadership all it takes. And in this case, they
are actually when I say they the Trump administration are
(27:22):
actually digging into the bureaucracy and saying we're going to
completely up in the way we're doing things, and we're
going to start doing things at least at HHS and
CDC on the basis of science, safety, and efficacy. Let's
go back to twenty twenty one. Doctor Kildorf posted on
(27:42):
x formly Twitter that quote thinking that everyone must be
vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should
be vaccinated. COVID vaccines are important for older, high risk
people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do
not need it, nor do children and any what went
(28:07):
on to City Journal and started being critical of Harvard's
handling of the pandemic, writing that the institution had abandoned
open debate in medical freedom, writing that quote, the beauty
of our immune system is that those who recover from
an infection are protected if and when they are re exposed.
Speaker 1 (28:27):
This has been known since.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
The Athenian plague of four thirty BC, but it is
no longer known at Harvard.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
I love that statement.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
We've known this since the plague of four thirty BC,
but Harvard doesn't know it. Oh so, supposedly the most
elite institution of higher education in the entire country doesn't
understand the implications of the Athenian plague of four thirty
BC or that of naturally acquired immunity. Yeah, put him
(29:04):
on that vaccine committee. That's who I want reviewing vaccines.
I'll be right back. The racism is not coming where
you think it's coming from.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
Chicago.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
Mayor Johnson, a self vowed communist, announced yesterday.
Speaker 9 (29:22):
Our way will bring to black residents in reclaiming ownership
of our own communities. That is the spirit of Juneteenth,
you all. It is about reflecting on our past. Other
cultures are taught to never forget. We need to be
reminded as blacks here in Chicago and America, remembering our
(29:43):
past and working towards a more just future. Investing in
black is not a criminal act.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
Well, the way you're gonna do it, I think is
probably illegal and in violation of the Civil Rights Act.
But hey, because you're black, I guess you can get
by with it.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
Right.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
By the way, when you talk about other civilizations learn
to never forget, Well, that's true here because we have
done so many things to make your fact. In fact,
have you ever thought about the fact that you are
the mayor of what's either the second or the third
(30:21):
largest city in the United States of America and you're
a black man. How's that possible if this country is
still racist? How is that possible for still slave owners
in this country? And by the way, those Jews that
you're actually speaking of when you talk about never forget,
there still aren't countries, religions, groups out there that are
(30:45):
vowing to destroy black people, to utterly white black people
from the face of the earth. Nobody's out there doing that. Oh,
there might be a remnant of the KKK somewhere, but
there are a bunch of yahoos that we all to
just vilithi anyway, Samir Johnson, you're truly it is.
Speaker 9 (31:02):
It will bring to Black residents in reclaiming ownership of
our own communities. That is the spirit of Juneteenth, you all.
It is about reflecting on our past. Other cultures are
taught to never forget. We need to be reminded as
black's here in Chicago and America remembering our past and
(31:24):
working towards a more just future. Investing in black is
not a criminal act. Sins as a kid says, you
need a witness, So I'm gonna say it again, investing
in black is not a criminal act.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
Well, it is if you're maybe not criminal, but certainly
violation of every civil rights law that I can think of.
When you're handing out race based grants the black residents
as slavery reparations. I think in that case, you know
what you actually might be violating the law, mayor sad
(32:10):
part is, nobody's gonna do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (32:25):
That's pretty much all I got, Ladies and gentlemen. Elvis
I loved Flaveelda
Hey, Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Regarding Tucker Carlson's concerns about a forever war, the first
thing that comes into my mind is that President Trump's
only going to be in office for the next three years.
What happens after that, we might have other players in
the political arena, arena like Bolton types that just want
(00:22):
a forever war because of the military industrial complex.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
Thanks, well, you run that risk.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
Even if Trump had a chance to had a second term,
no'll guarantee that he would win. He always run that
risk because as long as the military industrial complex exists,
there will be those who will try to push us
into that.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
I just think Trump has.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
The person you know, And in fact, that's a good
segue into I was just getting ready to say that
Trump just has that personality that generals push him one
direction when he's wanting to go another direction. He's going
to basically just change generals. He's going to get Oh,
(01:06):
he'll listen to the general, so there's no question in
my mind he'll take their advice. But a general that
won't do what he tells him to do once they've
all had their input, that general's out of here as
well as he should be. General should be free to
give their advice openly and as powerfully and persuasively as
(01:28):
they can. But once the commander in chief makes the decision,
your job is to salute and go insolent. X. You
can see it on X. But Trump is at the
G seven somewhere up in Canada. I don't know where
he is somewhere in Canada, and whether it's BC, I
don't know. But they do the group photo, and the
(01:50):
group photo is you know, they have a little diet
they're all going to stand on and it's got you know,
g you know, it's got the twenty twenty five G
seven uh Kenakski or wherever it is in Canada, and
it's got this this gorgeous range of mountains behind in
the background. Is it in Alberta? That's an Alberta. That's interesting.
(02:14):
I's go see where that is. Uh And they they're
all kind of meandering toward to get up on the
dais for the photo. And Trump's in total command. But
what he does, which is fascinating to me because we
quickly forget, is he walks in. He knows where to stand.
(02:38):
He's engaged in other engaged in conversation with the other
world leaders. He's carrying on a conversation. He stands where
he's supposed to. He doesn't fall off, he doesn't trip,
he doesn't wander off, he doesn't turn around and stare
at the mountains and like, oh wow, that's that's really pretty.
He's in, he's focused. He even buttons his own jacket.
(03:02):
And of course he's complete opposite of Joe Biden. But
he did something else because whenever they arrive, they have,
you know, the the host who happens to be Carney,
the new Prime Minister of Canada, who, by the way,
is a globalist. He's a he's a globalist and.
Speaker 4 (03:25):
Worked for.
Speaker 3 (03:28):
Maybe the World Bank or somebody, or maybe the Bank
of England, I forget, but somebody. Anyway, he's a globalist.
He's he's a staunch liberal in the Canadian sense of liberalism, meaningless,
he's a socialist, not classic liberalism. But Trump in that
(03:51):
in that opening interview, where Carney is, you know, welcoming
the delegates, the presidents and prime ministers and everybody, they
have a short little press conference, Trump goes off script
and takes total control of the interview to the point
(04:12):
that you'll hear in a minute Carnie has to step
in and say, oh, you know what, we're gonna be
late for the meeting. We all stop the meetings or
start the meeting. Stop this press conference. Well, he really
wanted to stop the press conference because this conference showed
that we really do have the leader of the free
world back that Donald Trump, despite all of this pagandello's,
(04:36):
despite everything that you may dislike about him, he commands
the world stage right now. So at this press conference,
Trump made sure that every second counted. He didn't wonder
off looking at stuff. He dropped major revelations on trade,
(04:56):
foreign policy, and for that matter, the future of mass
de importations in this country. But the biggest truth Bama
of all was that he called out Obama and Trudeau
directly for pushing Russia away and triggering what's beginning to
be a global realignment. I've told you before about my attempts,
(05:22):
as part of my assignment being a delegate to NATO
to keep or not to keep, but to bring Russia in,
even as I didn't care. Just get them into NATO,
either as a voting delegate or a non voting delegate,
but bring them into our sphere of influence. Bring you know,
bring our enemy, our so called enemy, bring them into NATO,
(05:46):
and we fought and fought and fought primarily the French,
I think the rest of the country is, particularly when
we were having the knockdown, drag out debates about it.
The French were my biggest logger head. The Brits, the Germans,
the others. I actually think they were on our side.
They just didn't want to speak up. They're kind of
(06:08):
like the Saudis right now with the Israeli Iranian conflict.
The it was, I don't know how to describe it,
other than the idea that the G seven should have
been the G eight and that Russia should have been
(06:30):
there as part of our trading partners is something that
I've actually believed in. So before that, before the working
sessions even began, Trump and Carney stopped in front of
the reporters a brief press stop, first up the Canadian
(06:53):
trade deal. Asking about the ongoing trade negotiations with Canada,
Trump pointed to a very seek difference in strategy between
himself and Carney. The issue, he says, wasn't hostility, it
was philosophy. He made it clear that he prefers a
direct approach and Carney. He said, you know, really favors,
(07:14):
you know, kind of a more intricate, complex model. And
then when a reporter asked whether a deal to be
finalized in the matter of days or week, Trump offered
an answer, but it was measured. It was a pretty
interesting interchange.
Speaker 4 (07:32):
What is holding up a deal with Canada or set
someone holding up I think we have different concepts.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
I have a tariff concept and Mark has a different concept,
which is something that some people like. But we're gonna
see if we can get to the bottom of it today.
I'm a tariff person. I've always been a terrific as simple,
it's easy, it is precise, and it just goes very quickly.
And I think Marc has a more complex idea but
(08:02):
also very good.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
So we're going to look at.
Speaker 5 (08:04):
Both and we're going to ask you what we're going
to come out with.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Something helse.
Speaker 4 (08:10):
Is achievable within days, within weeks? Is there that kind
of runway? Yeah, it will.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Both parties have to agree.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Again, sure, yeah it's achievable. Both parties have to agree,
but yeah, it's clear. But then the same press conference
takes an unexpected turn. Now remember they're all standing waiting
to go into the meeting. Trump's there with the Secretary
of State, Susie Wilde's chief of staff is there, the
Treasury Secretary of Bessins all standing there. Carney's there introducing him.
(08:39):
But Trump went off, as I said, went off script
and exposed the truth without any prompting. He pivoted from
trade and toward one of the most consequential foreign policy
decisions in recent memory, and that was the expulsion from
what was the G eight, the expulsion of Russia. Standing
(09:03):
beside Carney, whose own predecessor Trudeau, played a role in
that decision, Trump suggested that the west attempt to isolate
Moscow is probably what led to the catastrophic consequences that
we're dealing with today, and he called them out directly.
It was a moment that was just pure Trump.
Speaker 4 (09:23):
The G seven used to be the G eight. Barack
Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have
Russia in.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
And I would say that there was a mistake, because
I think you wouldn't have a war right now if
you had Russia in, and you wouldn't have a war
right now if Trump were president.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Four years ago.
Speaker 4 (09:40):
But didn't work out that way.
Speaker 6 (09:42):
But it used to be the G eight and now
it's I guess what's that nine years ago, eight years
ago it switched over the they threw Russia out, in
which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though
I wasn't in politics, and I was very loud about it.
I was a mistake in that you spent so much
time talking about right that he's no longer at the table.
Speaker 4 (10:02):
So it makes life more complicated, but you wouldn't have
had the work.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
And other than that, I think we're going.
Speaker 4 (10:09):
To accomplish a lot and I expect to and I
think our primary focus would be trade and trade with Canada,
and I'm sure we can work something out.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
Yeah, he has, he has. I was gonna see he's
he has no filter. But that's not correct because I
think he knew precisely what he was doing. He had
the world media in front of him and he wanted
to point out that correctly. So by the way, we
were once the G eight and this country that we're
(10:41):
now in along with Macron uh, they really pushed to
get Russia out and we now see what the consequences are.
And now the guy that we seem to want to
talk about all the time is not even at the table.
And why would you not have the guy that, whether
he's your enemy or your you would want to have
(11:01):
at the table when we're talking about something that is
not necessarily militarily related but is related to us economically. Now,
before reporters could even kind of let that soak in,
Trump dropped another geopolitical bombshell, this time about the Iranians,
(11:26):
and he once again did not hold back because for
the first time publicly this was yesterday, So for the
first time publicly, Trump confirmed that the Iranians had signaled
interest in trying to de escalate the tensions. You know,
the general rule of negotiations is the person who first
(11:47):
throws out a number is the loser, because if you're
good at negotiations, you now know what their number is.
And Trump kind of in a way points them.
Speaker 7 (11:59):
Out heard any signals or seen any messages from intermediaries
that Iran wishes to de escalate the conflict?
Speaker 1 (12:06):
Yeah, what if what have you heard?
Speaker 7 (12:08):
What if you heard from the Iranians?
Speaker 8 (12:10):
They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before.
Speaker 3 (12:15):
Oh, they'd like to talk, but frankly they should have
done that before. Uh I gave you sixty days to talk.
You drag your feet you uh, you played us. You
didn't do anything. You dragged them out. So yeah, you
should have talked, but you didn't.
Speaker 7 (12:32):
Have you heard any signals or seen any messages from
intermediaries that Iran wishes to de escalate the conflict?
Speaker 1 (12:39):
Yeah, what if?
Speaker 9 (12:40):
What have you heard?
Speaker 7 (12:41):
What if you heard from the Iranians?
Speaker 8 (12:43):
They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
If I had sixty days and they had sixty days,
and on the sixty.
Speaker 8 (12:50):
First day, I said, we don't have a deal. They
have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties,
But I say, Iran is not winning this, and they
should talk, and they should talk immediately before it's too late.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
They should talk and talk immediately before it's too late.
He knows how to use the media to send the signal,
and he sent the signal right in front of the
entire world, because right now the world's media is focused
on the G seven and then the conversation, because the
(13:27):
Carney's just standing there like a buffoon. He has no clue.
He clearly is the little man in the room. The
big man in the room is Donald Trump. And so
now the conversation turns back to American domestic politics, and
Trump did something that I actually.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I kind of love.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
He declared war on blue sanctuary cities that are protecting
illegal aliens, criminal illegal aliens. He gets pressed about his
latest director to Ice, and Trump confirmed that he's structing
just to focus on sanctuary cities. Those Democrats run jurisdictions
never we're looking at you. That he accuses of shielding
(14:07):
violent criminals for political gain, And he defended the move.
But he didn't stop with his defense. He kept moving,
and then he ended on a concrete vow. It's pretty fascinating.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
Immigration.
Speaker 9 (14:24):
Why are you wander lights atardy democratic inner cities.
Speaker 7 (14:27):
Let's find that.
Speaker 8 (14:28):
I don't know what you're saying.
Speaker 9 (14:29):
You did a post last night where you said you
want to really target democrat.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
I wanted them to focus on the cities because the
cities are where you really have what you called sanctuary cities,
and that's where the people are. I look at New York,
I look at Chicago.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
I mean, you got a.
Speaker 4 (14:42):
Really bad governor in Chicago and a bad mayor, but
the governor is probably the worst of the country in
printz Care. But I look at how that city has
been overrun by criminals.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
And uh, you know New York and LA.
Speaker 8 (14:55):
Look at La La. Those people weren't from La.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
They weren't from California.
Speaker 8 (15:00):
Most of those people, many of those people, And yeah,
that's that's the focus.
Speaker 4 (15:05):
Biden allowed twenty one million people to come into our country.
Of that, vast numbers of those people were murderers, killers,
people from gangs, people from jails, the empty day jails out.
Speaker 8 (15:18):
Into the US.
Speaker 4 (15:19):
Most of those people are in the cities, all blue cities,
all Democrat run cities, and they think they're going to
use them to vote.
Speaker 8 (15:27):
It's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
I'm gonna happen.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
So just as the press corps is like, oh wow,
he's making headlines here, we got a lot to write about.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
The Prime Minister Carney steps in.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
And why because if you understand anything about body language,
you understand anything about groups, how groups operate. The momentum
in this press conference had unmistakably moved toward Trump, and
Carnie knew it. Carnie knew that he was just this
little man standing. He was just now the usher. He
was the guy who was just gonna show Donald Trump
(16:04):
to his seat at the table. So Carney steps in.
He's got kind of a chess or cat smile on
his face, like, yeah, I kind of know I blew this,
and uh, I know that I'm just the I'm just
the Prime Minister of Canada.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
If you don't mind, uh, just I'm going to exercise
my role, if you will, as G seventh Hare said.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
If I don't know why I find that funny, I'm
going to exercise my role of the chair of the
G seven.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
And since we have a few more minutes with the
President and his team, uh, and then we actually have
to start the meeting to address some of these big issues.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
So that's it. So now his staff has to step in.
That's it. That's it.
Speaker 3 (16:58):
That would have gone on a typical Trump that would
have gone on for an hour. He would he would
have asked questions as long as the national as long
as the international media kept asking him questions. It is
an example of how America's strength is back, and these
(17:19):
world leaders know it, and they know they're going to
have to deal with him. So anytime that you think
back on all of those visuals we saw of Joe
Biden wandering off, you know, during the D Day celebrations,
not knowing where to stand, freezing up, falling asleep at meetings,
(17:39):
doing all of those things. Here's a guy that just
turned seventy nine years old. What was that two days
ago or whenever it was, he turned seventy nine years old.
Complete control, complete command, and he knows what his role is.
He's the freaking president of the United States of America.
He's the commander in chief. He's the leader of the
free world. And while all these other people are leaders
(18:04):
of their countries, their secondary countries.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
And he knows that his role is to command and
to lead, and he's doing that.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
That's why when I go back to the whole discussion
about what's going in on in Iran, Yeah, he's not
for a forever war. He's for precisely what he means.
You're not going to get new what we're becoming if
we don't allow Trump and for that matter, Congress to
(18:40):
reverse these stupid Marxist trends, especially with regard to illegal immigration,
and do it quickly. Let's go to Germany, for example,
a city whose name I cannot pronounce, Bartide bark Thied
has reversed a plan that they had they were going
to demolish this residential commmplex that house senior citizens, and
(19:04):
instead they've decided they're going, oh, we're going to refurbish it,
and we're going to refurbish it so they can house
illegal aliens in it. Now, before they made the deciity,
I shouldn't say before, because I don't know that for
a fact, but they if they they vacated all the
senior citizens out of this residential complex because the city
(19:26):
claimed that the building was uninhabitable and that they didn't
have the money to refurbish it. So they kick all
the senior citizens out. May your place is not safe
to live anymore. We've declared it uninhabitable. We're going to
demolish it. Oh, they did an inspection after they kicked
the senior citizens out, and then they find oh, there
(19:48):
are only five units that require some minor renovations and
the rest of the building is fine. So now we're
going to use it instead to house u what they
call asylum seekers, illegal aliens. Now, the mayor of this
town defended the decision, and she says, quote, the costs
for the removal of some mold and other renovation measures
(20:12):
are manageable, and that the city was preparing for potential
we're preparing for potential increases in illegal immigration. And so
now she claims that the use of the complex is
just temporary, although pressed by reporters, she couldn't give any
sort of specific time frame.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
It has one hundred and four units.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
They need forty to accommodate these future illegal aliens seeking asylum.
So one hundred and four places, one hundred and four units,
I'm going to assume just one, let's just say one
senior citizen. So they kick out one hundred and four
senior citizens, claiming that, oh, the building is now uninhabitable. Oh,
(21:01):
we've inspected it. Now we've kicked you out. We need
to repair five of them, and now we're going to
move illegal aliens in. But you only need forty spaces.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
Now.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
Obviously it's drawing some criticism. A council member in the
town for the what I would consider to be notionally
sent a right Christian Democrat Union party that was the
party that used to be led by Angela Merkel, dismissed
the opposition's concerns as politically motivated, stating, I sign I
(21:37):
sometimes wonder if it's election campaign again, should we accommodate
the refugees in tents. The apartments are well habitable. Wow,
that's the notionally right wing party in Germany. But he
goes on the ad that this avoids addressing the fact
that German seniors were evicted on the basis that they
(22:00):
were supposedly not well habitable. Now, as far as the
former senior citizens, not the former senior citizens, the former
residents that are senior citizens, they're kind of disappointed having
been forced to leave the homes they've been living in
for quite some time, in fact, up to twenty years.
Freedom Miller, for example, says, I feel very comfortable here
(22:22):
and I've lived here for twenty years. Another resident, Dagmar Perdubuski, added,
the apartment is really well designed. Everything can be reached
from here, and there's also a lot of nature. I
would like to stay here, but the cities move forward.
Speaker 1 (22:37):
And they're going to kick them out.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
Germany, I think, is probably the number one destination for
so called asylum seekers in Europe, and the number of
illegal aliens that arrive is rapidly changing Germany's demographics. As
many as one third of young adults in Germany now
come from foreign countries. Remember the numbers that we talked
(23:04):
about earlier in this on this program about the number
of native citizens versus people coming from foreign countries and
the work ethic of both Germany's. The entirety of Europe
is changing right before our very eyes, and not necessarily
for the better. But Germany hasn't reached and doesn't have
(23:28):
the kind of leadership that we have that recognizes that
you cannot maintain a nation's sovereignty and a nation's culture
if you allowed this infestation of foreigners to continue unabated.
Just wanted to throw that in as an example of
you know, we talked about Trump wants to clean up
(23:50):
the sanctuary cities. No, they're full Europe the full sanctuary.
The EU is a full sanctuary place. Everybody just come
on in and it will fundamentally alter not just the
country itself, mental fundamentally altered geopolitics.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
Switching real quickly.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
There's a world renowned infectious disease epidemiologist named Martin Culdorf.
He was fired from Harvard Medical School last year because
he refused to take the COVID nineteen shot. Some people
refer to it as a vaccine. Guess where he is
now Bobby Kennedy, Junior has appointed him to the Centers
(24:37):
for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC's Advisory Committee for
Immunization Practices, the ASIP Committee. That's the committee that provides
advisory information about vaccines. Member Kennedy last week just fired
every single member the entire Advisory Committee membership fired last week.
(25:02):
The first appointee is Professor or doctor Culdorf, who cited
infection acquired immunity as the reason for declining the vaccine.
Infection acquired immunity, so he's got some sort of autoimmune disease.
So he gets fired from Harvard, and he lost his
(25:23):
position also at a Harvard affiliated hospital during the early
days of the COVID pandemic, and then he got officially
terminated as a faculty member in March of last year.
Oh he also happens to be a co author of
the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for sensible pandemic response
measures and has garnered nearly one million signatures from scientists
(25:44):
and doctors worldwide. In making the announcement for the new
ASIP members, Kennedy described his selections as quote a major
step towards restoring public trust in vaccines. They have each
commit to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making
(26:06):
any new vaccine recommendations. He went on to say that
the committee will review safety and efficacy data for the
current schedule as well.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Wait a minute, that implies and.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
In further digging, you find out that they didn't do that,
They had not been doing that. You would think that
every once in a while, you know, on some sort
of rotating basis, you would take all the vaccines that
are on the current schedule and you review them for
current safety guidelines and efficacy data. Are the vaccines still
(26:41):
as effective as they claim they were when we put
them on the schedule.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
They've not been doing that. They will now start doing that.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
You know, there's a story I just wrote are just
as a promo for tomorrow that high Craft Hines I
sorta say, hindes Craft.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I think it's Craft Hines announced.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Voluntarily that they're going to remove all the artificial dies
from their food products by the end of twenty twenty seven.
The point about that is simply, this leadership just proves
that leadership all it takes. And in this case, they
are actually when I say they the Trump administration are
(27:22):
actually digging into the bureaucracy and saying we're going to
completely up in the way we're doing things, and we're
going to start doing things at least at HHS and
CDC on the basis of science, safety, and efficacy. Let's
go back to twenty twenty one. Doctor Kildorf posted on
(27:42):
x formly Twitter that quote thinking that everyone must be
vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should
be vaccinated. COVID vaccines are important for older, high risk
people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do
not need it, nor do children and any what went
(28:07):
on to City Journal and started being critical of Harvard's
handling of the pandemic, writing that the institution had abandoned
open debate in medical freedom, writing that quote, the beauty
of our immune system is that those who recover from
an infection are protected if and when they are re exposed.
Speaker 1 (28:27):
This has been known since.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
The Athenian plague of four thirty BC, but it is
no longer known at Harvard.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
I love that statement.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
We've known this since the plague of four thirty BC,
but Harvard doesn't know it. Oh so, supposedly the most
elite institution of higher education in the entire country doesn't
understand the implications of the Athenian plague of four thirty
BC or that of naturally acquired immunity. Yeah, put him
(29:04):
on that vaccine committee. That's who I want reviewing vaccines.
I'll be right back. The racism is not coming where
you think it's coming from.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
Chicago.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
Mayor Johnson, a self vowed communist, announced yesterday.
Speaker 9 (29:22):
Our way will bring to black residents in reclaiming ownership
of our own communities. That is the spirit of Juneteenth,
you all. It is about reflecting on our past. Other
cultures are taught to never forget. We need to be
reminded as blacks here in Chicago and America, remembering our
(29:43):
past and working towards a more just future. Investing in
black is not a criminal act.
Speaker 3 (29:51):
Well, the way you're gonna do it, I think is
probably illegal and in violation of the Civil Rights Act.
But hey, because you're black, I guess you can get
by with it.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
Right.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
By the way, when you talk about other civilizations learn
to never forget, Well, that's true here because we have
done so many things to make your fact. In fact,
have you ever thought about the fact that you are
the mayor of what's either the second or the third
(30:21):
largest city in the United States of America and you're
a black man. How's that possible if this country is
still racist? How is that possible for still slave owners
in this country? And by the way, those Jews that
you're actually speaking of when you talk about never forget,
there still aren't countries, religions, groups out there that are
(30:45):
vowing to destroy black people, to utterly white black people
from the face of the earth. Nobody's out there doing that. Oh,
there might be a remnant of the KKK somewhere, but
there are a bunch of yahoos that we all to
just vilithi anyway, Samir Johnson, you're truly it is.
Speaker 9 (31:02):
It will bring to Black residents in reclaiming ownership of
our own communities. That is the spirit of Juneteenth, you all.
It is about reflecting on our past. Other cultures are
taught to never forget. We need to be reminded as
black's here in Chicago and America remembering our past and
(31:24):
working towards a more just future. Investing in black is
not a criminal act. Sins as a kid says, you
need a witness, So I'm gonna say it again, investing
in black is not a criminal act.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
Well, it is if you're maybe not criminal, but certainly
violation of every civil rights law that I can think of.
When you're handing out race based grants the black residents
as slavery reparations. I think in that case, you know
what you actually might be violating the law, mayor sad
(32:10):
part is, nobody's gonna do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (32:25):
That's pretty much all I got, Ladies and gentlemen. Elvis
I loved Flaveelda
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.