Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jimmy Crag's corn, and he don't care about all of
the tariff income we're making for these couring countries.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, because it's hard to afford corn.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
To be sag a burger in for Michael Brown this Monday. Wow,
we are already to our number four and we've got.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Several things to dive into in any moment. They keep
teasing you on the news.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Any moment, any moment Trump to make major statement on Russia.
It's been any moment for hours. Hopefully he will and
we will talk about it. President Trump though yesterday speaking
to reporters and he had this to say. And patriots
that he's talking about are not American patriots.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
The patriot missiles.
Speaker 4 (00:50):
I haven't agreed in the number yet, but they're gonna
have some because they do need protection. But the European
Union is paying for it. We're not paying any big pot,
but we will send it at a big for us, and
we will send them patriots, which they desperately need. Because
Putin really surprised a lot of people.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
He talks nice and that he bums everybody in the evening.
Speaker 5 (01:12):
But here's a little bit of a problem there.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
I don't like it. President Trump is pissed at Putin.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
I think that's abundantly clear, and he's doing the right
thing by continuing to support Ukraine. Now in this case,
if this is how it is, European Union is putting
up the dough, the United States is putting up the weapons. Great,
go for it, all the better if we're not paying
(01:39):
for it. But we're still providing those materials, the missiles
we need to support Ukraine. And President Trump is doing
the right thing here. I was a little concerned early
on in his administration when he was trying to play
a little nicer with Russia.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
But look, this is the president that.
Speaker 3 (02:00):
Was contrary to what the left claimed throughout his first
term that he was Putin's patsy and he was doing
Putin's bidding.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
This is the guy that put missiles in Poland, remember
that when Putin was all.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Upset because the United States had the audacity to advance
more of our defense capabilities in Eastern Europe. This was
a president who was consistently tough on Russia throughout his
presidency the first term. These things are continuing now at
(02:36):
this moment, with Trump showing he is still strong in
regards to Russia. But here is the important thing is
that the United States does have an obligation going back decades.
They didn't pursue nuclear weapons, keeping new clear weapons in
(03:01):
Ukraine because we had a guarantee of protection. That's one thing,
goes back decades. Another thing, Russia is a significant adversary,
and it's much better if they are weighed down by
this war as they have been, than if.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
They aren't for our own interests. But then also.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
The fact is that this war, remember when it started,
it was supposed to end it a matter of months.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
Russia was supposed to just roll in their tanks and succeed.
They have not. They have failed in that respect.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
And the fact that the war is droning on is
not actually a bad sign. It's a good sign. It's
a good sign that Ukraine has been able to fend
off against the Russians. And this is why President Trump
is willing to provide more military support to Ukraine, because
(03:53):
he knows it's better for Ukraine to be fighting back
and keep the war going. In that respect, on Chili
can reach a deal, strike a deal between Zelenski and Putin,
than it is to let Russia just roll right on
through and take over the country. The implications of this
of Ukraine falling to Russia are dramatic. There's a reason
(04:16):
why Sweden and Finland both at least officially neutral throughout
even the Cold War, or they decided, hey, we want
in a NATO, and why they've joined NATO. They're no
longer neutral because they know what it means when a
guy like Putin, who has ambitions to bring back the
(04:40):
Tsarist Russian Empire to be the twenty first century Peter
the Great. What happens when a guy like him advances.
They know the consequences, the potential future that they could
see in store. And that's why Europe is been very
strong in this one great thing. And I think this
(05:02):
is probably a reason why Trump has felt more comfortable
providing support to Ukraine is that the President of the
United States, Donald Trump, has done something amazing. Not only
did he get Europe to pitch in more for NATO
and their own defense in his first term, he's expanding
that with an agreement for five percent. This is remarkable.
(05:24):
President Trump is doing remarkable things.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Dragon.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
We see now President Trump finally meeting with the NATO
Secretary General.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Can we dip in to a.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Little of this on the news as it's happening live count.
Speaker 5 (05:38):
Reliance and a fantastic job. And we had a tremendous meeting.
I guess it's about a month now, month ago, and
I think Mark will tell you that it was really
perhaps more important the date of November fifth, that was
the election day. Maybe that was the most important because
we've made tremendous progress together and one of the Russia
(06:02):
and Ukraine. I would like to see it end. It
wasn't my war, it was Biden's war. It's not my war.
I'm trying to get you out of it, and we
want to see it end. And I'm disappointed in President
of Putin because I thought we would have had a
deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there.
So based on that, we're going to be doing secondary
(06:23):
tariffs if we don't have a deal in fifty days.
It's very simple, and they'll be at one hundred percent.
And that's the way it is. That can be more simple,
it's just the way it is. I hope we don't
have to do it, but regardless, we are going to be.
We make the greatest military equipment in the world, whether
it's missiles, you saw that recently in around the way
(06:46):
those planes are blew in. They hit every single fourteen
bombs at every target. Then you had the helicopter shoot
a total of thirty bombs or thirty missiles, and they
hit every single markers right, every single piece, every single target.
And it was I guess on a tale of zero
(07:07):
to ten. They say it was about a fifteen. That's
how successful it was. That's how leif was a word
they like to use nowadays, but it was. It was
an amazing, well organized attack that people in this country
wanted to do for twenty four years. You know, when
we hit the pilots in last week, they were saying, sir,
(07:28):
we've been practicing this for twenty four years, meaning people,
not them, but.
Speaker 6 (07:32):
Other people that are a little older now, but they too,
and you are the one that let us do it.
But we've been practicing it three to four times a
year for twenty two twenty.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
Again, we are listening to President Trump live with the
Secretary General of NATO and he just said that he
will put into effect one hundred percent tariff secondary tariffs
on Russia if there is not a deal reached within
fifty days. I'm all for sanctions. I'm all for putting
(08:05):
the squeeze, but I'm going to be consistent. I'm not
for tariffs of one hundred percent odd goods for Russia.
I don't think that's the great retaliation or the right
way to go about the incentives.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
But that's what he's saying. Let's listen us more.
Speaker 5 (08:20):
Having any payment made. We're not buying it, but we
will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it.
Our last meeting of a month ago is very successful
in that they agreed to five percent, which is more
than a trillion dollars a year. So they have a
lot of money, and these are wealthy nations. They have
a lot of money, and they want to do it.
They feel very strongly about it. And then we feel
(08:42):
strongly about it. To go in for a lot of
money and we just we don't want to do it anymore.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
We can, but we.
Speaker 5 (08:49):
Make the best that we're going to be sending the
best to NATO and in some cases to maybe at
Mark suggestion, if we go to Germany where they're going
to send early on missiles and they'll be replaced and
NATO is going to take care of it's going to
be coordinated by NATO, and they're going to work.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
Very much with Matt Whitaker.
Speaker 5 (09:08):
Who's right here, is a great ambassador, and Matt's going
to be coordinator. You better do a good job, Matt.
I will, but Matt's going to coordinate. He's a very
talented guy. He's going to coordinate everything. So in a nutshell,
we're going to make top of the line weapons and
they'll be sent to NATO.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
NATO makes us to.
Speaker 5 (09:26):
Have certain of them sent to other countries where we
can get a little additional speed where the country will
release something and it will be mostly in the form
of a replacement. And I'd like to have Mark and
again just a highly respected, pretty young guy. Pretty young
guy for having had the career that he's had because
he had it. He had an amazing career before going
(09:49):
to NATO.
Speaker 3 (09:50):
So once again President Trump has been speaking at the
White House. He is saying that what the new method
of providing additional weapons will be is he is going
to the NATO will receive weapons that are meant for Ukraine,
and they will either go to Ukraine direct from NATO
or through other countries. However they can get it more quickly.
(10:14):
The Secretary General Mark Rutt is speaking. Now, let's listen
to just a little of him before we dip out.
Speaker 7 (10:19):
Building all the tremendous success of the NATO summit to
five percent, but also the decision to keep Ukraine strong
and the decision to increase our defense in the show production.
So based on that, this that was you have stepping up.
This is again Europeans stepping up. So I've been in
contact with many countries. I can tell you at this
(10:40):
moment Germany massively, but also Finland and Denmark and Sweden
and Norvating, Katio, Benemence, Canada. They all want to be
part of this, and this is only the first wave.
There will be more. So what we will do is
work through the nature systems to make sure that we
know what Ukrainians need. So if you can make pangages
so of course, in a way we discussed it this
(11:01):
morning the street heaxset at the Pentagon. In the wages.
Of course, the US will if talkball was necessary to
defend discountry, that's absolutely clear. But I still mean that
Ukraine can gets his hands on really massive numbers of
minisy equipment, both for air defense but also missiles, ammunition,
(11:23):
et cetera, et cetera. So if I was Vladimir Putting
today and are you speaking about what you were planning
to do with fifty days and this announcement, I would
reconsider whether I should not take negotiations about Ukraine more
seriously than I was doing at the moment.
Speaker 2 (11:37):
If I was flatda be putting a good friend once again.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Mark Rudd he is the former Dutch Prime Minister. He's
Secretary General of Natal affirming Europe's leadership rawl and commitment
here and working in candem with President Trump and the
United States the indicating that they'd met at the Pentagon
earlier today with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
Speaker 2 (12:02):
I love this.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
This is something only Trump could do, getting Europe to
do its part even more now, Europe has done a lot.
In fact, cumulatively, if you add up the amount of
money spent on Ukraine, Europe has spent more than the
United States. But that's collectively here. There are certain countries
(12:24):
like Germany and some others that have needed to take
more of a leadership role have been but not quite enough.
And here is President Trump really getting more of a
commitment in terms of funding, getting more of a commitment
for NATO nations members to pitch in to five percent
of their budgets being towards defense, which had not been
(12:45):
done before. And if Ukraine is sort of the means
to get Europe to play ball in this way, we
should all be in favor of that. Kudos to President
Trump for showing leadership on the world state in this
way and.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
In most other ways.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
I say most because again tariffs and trade, I see
that as a problem, but we talked about that a
lot earlier in the program.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
When we look at what he's doing.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
With Europe and Ukraine, or we see the Middle East
with the Abraham Accords and with Israel and Iran, and
on and on peace India and Pakistan, both nuclear countries
that were at loggerheads, and the Trump administration helped tamp
that down, took leadership role. Thank god for Donald Trump
(13:41):
as President of the United States, really making a point
of bringing about peace. All of his policies in the
Middle East are oriented toward what can we do to
advance the Abraham Accords, the historic peace deal that Trump
brought in his administration in the first administration brought in
(14:01):
because they came in recognizing something that the Obama team
was as weak as can be andfeckless with that.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
Iranian nuclear deal.
Speaker 3 (14:11):
But one thing the Iranian Nuclear deal did was it
started to bring Israel and Golf Arab countries, Muslim countries
that were previously very much about Israel's destruction to having
back channel conversations and they were talking about Iran and
the threat of Iran, and what was happening in the
(14:32):
United States wasn't showing leadership.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
What can we do? And Trump came into office and said.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
We're going to do something about this. We see this change, well,
let's play into it. Let's bring about more peace, bring
a peace deal into the Middle East that more countries
can add on to join into the Abraham Accords and
use the thread of Iran as that common bond or
common point of connection, rather that they're already seeing that
(15:00):
Israel and Arab countries were already seeing. Saudi Arabia is
having back channel conversations, which is significant because Saudi Arabia
does not have formal relations with Israel. I've interviewed represented
it from the Saudi government the Kingdom before multiple occasions
in the past, who was like, yeah, we don't have
relations with Israel.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
We don't what they don't, but they've been engaging with
them behind the scenes.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
And it's something the Trump administration took advantage of because
countries like the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, which both
signed on to the Abraham Accords, would not have done
so without the blessing in essence of Saudi Arabia saying
go ahead, it's okay, if not the encouragement the Trump
(15:47):
administration saw that. Heck, remember his first international speech as
President of the United States was in Riod, Saudi Arabia,
and he talked about fighting against terrorism and his other objectives,
and that said a lot. That's the kind of leadership
that we are seeing in terms of trying to bring
about peace.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Donald J.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
Trump deserves, has earned the Nobel Peace Prize time and
time again.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
He won't get it. They're two weak need They won't because.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
God forbid that Donald Trump, of all people, gets the
Nobel Peace Prize. But Barack Obama got it for doing
Diddley squat literally Didley squat just speaking words. That's a weird, wild,
(16:42):
crazy world when that's what's going on. Yeah, it's, oh
my goodness. So where do we go from here? With
Ukraine and Europe. We'll see. I don't think the terrif
(17:05):
idea is going to pan out that that's a good thing.
It's not the right cudgel to use, but it's good
to see President Trump get tough here, tougher and showing
strength and resolve.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Against Russian pootin aggression. What do you think? Free?
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Three? One zero three is the text line put Mike
or Michael in the beginning there, I'm Jimmy singing berger
in for Michael right here on six point thirty KF.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Good morning from South Dakota. We have boys week this
week with the grandsons. I'm not gonna go into a
big detail on what our itinerary is today, but we're
going to Hot Spring, South Dakota and for dinner, Yes
in South Dakota, dinner is at noon. We're going to
Dairy Queen and we're gonna have burgers, fries, drinks and
(17:58):
a Sunday for seven dollars. Everyone have a great day.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
I love it. That just makes me happy.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Occasionally it's great to get a talkback that just talks
about your fun day with family. Now there's a little
bit of a connection though that you wouldn't know about,
but thank you, Michael, and I was figuring there probably was.
We're talking about they were the worst for you. Fad
fast food list came out last week and Dairy Queen
was on at number four, and I had no idea
(18:26):
how ice cream is better for you than I think
it was like Taco Bell, Wendy's and Sonic, because like,
how is that possible? So then talkbacks and texts came
in saying that you know what they serve real food.
They did unquote real food. I had no idea. I
had never gotten quote unquote real food at Dairy Queen before.
So a whole bunch of people texted in wow, left
(18:46):
talkback saying, hey.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
The burgers are delicious at Dry Queen. There you go.
You know, I don't know if I've had a burger there, right,
but I've had food there real Okay, Yeah, I have
had food there.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Now, it was a number of years back. I remember
being like, wait, Dry Queen's food, but it was out
of state, and then eventually they started coming into Colorado
at least that's my recollection.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Fascinating.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
All right, Well, we got a guy named, by the way,
Jimmy Sangenberger filling in for Michael Brown. If you're just
joining us today right here on six point thirty k
how we have an attorney general who's running to be
governor of.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Colorado, but he's still attorney general.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I like, this is disappointing because it is pure politics.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
I like Phil Wiser personally.
Speaker 3 (19:33):
I've got along with him over the years since he
ran for office for the Attorney General's office in twenty
eighteen or whatever it was, yeah, twenty eighteen. I've liked
him personally, got along with him. But this is this
is not a policy disagreement. This is pure politics.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Now.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
If you recall back on the third of this month,
I filled in for Michael and not only did we
do a recitation of the Declaration of Independence, but we
talked about Wanda James, the sitting regent for the University
of Colorado in Denver, who's also a purveyor of pot.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
She's got pot chop.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
Her claim to fame is that she's the first black woman,
black person to own a legal marijuana dispensary. And that's
such a big deal to her, so much so that
when the Colorado School of Public Health launched their campaign
called Tea on THHC to educate the public about marijuana
(20:39):
and particularly about the potential risks of high potency THC,
which is very strong now, much stronger than twenty thirty
years ago, to put it mildly, And they had this
campaign which have this campaign which was mandated by the
state legislature, by the way, funded through marijuana taxes. And
(21:00):
when they launched the campaign, they happened to put out
medical illustrations that were of black children in utero and
older and white children in utero and older that show, okay,
here are potential risks in different stages of development. And
the focus was on children and on pregnant mothers. Well,
(21:21):
Wanda James threw a big fit and said, oh my gosh,
this is racist, these images of black kids.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
Never mind the fact that there were images of white
kids too.
Speaker 3 (21:31):
Never Mind the fact that Aniesiam Health, which partnered with
the Colorado School of Public Health, which is predominantly at
not entirely, but predominantly at the University of Colorado. There
are two other universities that are part of it, but
at CU that Aniesiam Health clearly was delving into an
extensive amount of research showing that it is not a
good idea to whitewash medical illustrations. You want to have
(21:53):
more diversity in medical illustrations so that people can relate
to them, seeing themselves in them as opposed to not.
But Wanda James didn't care about that because the bottom
line is she called it racist, but she really was
getting it something visceral much more so, which is this
campaign hurts her bottom line. It educates people about dangers
(22:18):
of pot, plain and simple, and she can't have that,
which is why she also attempted.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
To discredit.
Speaker 3 (22:27):
The science, attacked the scientists, and tried to get the
funding pulled all together.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
Went to the governor's office said hey, guys, I want
you to get rid of this.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
They did, They at least they put in the funding
request and said let's eliminate it.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Just a couple of days after she did her outreach
and spoke.
Speaker 3 (22:43):
With the head of the cannabis the chief cannabis pot
advisor for polists like, really shady business going on here,
really shady business. Well, the CU Board of Regents took
it on, did an investigation and sent wind to James.
(23:04):
The bottom line, as Elliott Hood Democrat put it on
the CU board at large is this The.
Speaker 8 (23:15):
Bottom line is, regardless of your personal feelings or interests,
there was simply no justifiable reason to publicly and continuously
smear this research program, attempt to discredit the research of
our scientists, and advocate to pull their funding. That is
especially true today when university research programs face significant funding uncertainty,
(23:36):
and overt hostility from certain corners of the government. Our
scientists need our support.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Now more than ever. They do not need their.
Speaker 8 (23:44):
Elected leaders casting unfounded doubt on the integrity of their work.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
But that is exactly what Wanda James did, without a doubt.
That is what she did. In fact, here she did
it in the meeting to say to her.
Speaker 5 (24:00):
This was a two million dollar state funded campaign which.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
See you's name all over it, targeting the black community
with tire tropes, recycled drunk junk science.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Of course, I spoke as a regent.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Uh huh right, Well, a lot more to it is
you could hear from Elliott Hood. Well, enter Phil Wiser,
who's friends with Wanda James, and he put this tweet
out last night.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
Two parts, well at least two parts.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
The First Amendment protects the right to free expression, Neither
a White House executive order nor a public university policy
can override this fundamental right. I am concerned that the
CU Board of Regent's action sanctioning Regent Wanda James did
(24:58):
just that. The CU Board of Regent's policy, as applied
to the speech of elected regions, must be consistent with
the protection of the right to free expression. If CU
region policy to Jay can be applied in a way
that silence is a regent's voice, then the policy is on.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
Shaky legal ground. This is the Attorney General of the
State of Colorado saying this.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
In response to a bipartisan censure of Wanda James. By
the way, she can't go to the buff's box at
games because she's also been sanctioned. Oh and if you're
familiar with Chay Anderson disgrace former Denver Public Schools board
member Race Hustler himself, Wanda James is one of his mentors.
(25:51):
Wiser continued to protect the right of free expression and
the fair treatment of CEU Region James. The Board of
Regents would do well to reconsider its action against her.
Leaving this action in place not only raises questions of fairness,
it undermines CD one's representation on the board. A lesson
from this episode is that conflicts should be addressed through
(26:13):
a commitment to de escalating rhetoric, elevating listening, and working
to find a mutual understanding. I have never read something
more full of bs from Phil Wiser, and I am
disappointed in our attorney general, which I know some people
listening with everybody.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
He's a Democrat. How can you be disappointed?
Speaker 3 (26:33):
I expect better from him than this on a political
issue like this, I just do. Maybe I'm misguided, Maybe
I'm judged by you know what we're factoring in the
fact that I think the guy is that he's a
good man personally. I like a lot about him personally.
Maybe that's influencing me to be disappointed. But we can
(26:53):
agree this is bes. She escalated it, she went public.
She said I want to get of all the funding.
She said it's junk science. She was interfering with academic freedom.
Phil Wiser, Dude, you used to be a professor, a
law professor at CU. Imagine if you came out with
a report and you had some conclusion, and why did
(27:16):
James in a CEU reached board meeting called it junk law?
Or a junk legal interpretation. Would that be okay? Because
free expression nonsense. This woman engaged in activity that was
clearly self dealing, self motivated, self interested, as she always is.
(27:43):
Not only is she a partisan hack who always likes
to bring a political spin, but everything she does is
oriented toward advancing her own interests.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Yes, that's what politicians do.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
But if you looked in a book, into the dictionary
rather and you found a definician for politician or brazen politician,
you'd find Wanda James high above the list. I mean,
is just this is just nonsense, and we got to
(28:16):
run to a break. But I have to just share
the way in which Wanda framed this Today is not
about a censure.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It is about censorship and retaliation, censorship and retaliation. It's
all retaliation. The head of the Board of Regents is
Cali Renaisson. She is a Boulder Democrat. She helped initiate
this investigation. She voted to center Wanda James. Elliott Hood
(28:45):
at large CU Region voted to center. Wanda James laid
out the case brilliantly in like ten to fifteen minutes.
At this meeting.
Speaker 3 (28:55):
Elana Spiegel, another Democrat, voted to censure Wanda James.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Really, this is the game you're playing, Phil Wiser.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Well, I just might have a column about this on
Wednesday's issue of the Denver Gazette. I'm Jimmy sangen Berger
filling in for Michael Brown. We'll keep it here right
here on six point thirty k ol final segment up ahead. Hey,
good morning boys, Jimmy sang and Berger.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Dragon, good to hear you guys. I know you guys
need some like.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
Real talkbacks, but all I got on me for a
Monday morning is have we heard Black Magic Woman yet
this morning?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Thanks?
Speaker 1 (29:33):
Have a great day.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
It did in the first hour. You gotta listen early,
especially when Jimmy sangen Berger takes over the bumpers and
also forgets the usual closing song and asks I'm dragging
to plug in something else.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
Oh well.
Speaker 3 (29:49):
This is Southern Avenue, by the way, which I saw
a Blues from the Top festival a few weeks back,
and they are fantastic. Rumboogie is the name of the
song the band Southern Avenue. A couple final things on
my website. I haven't said this all. Show what in
the world, Dragon, you're supposed to remove you have one
job among the other jobs Monday. Sorry Jimmy Sangenberger dot com.
(30:09):
Remember there's no AI or you in Sangenburger. It's all ease.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
All the time. Once you know that Sangenburger is easy easy. Indeed, well,
we are out of time.
Speaker 3 (30:24):
I do want to say that a man who once
ran for sheriff in Archiletta County this from the Colorado
Public Radio's website, has been charged with ARSON for allegedly
throwing a Molotov cocktail into the Archiletta County Clerk's office
and in particular, targeted a room it appears where the
county's dominion voting machines are stored. There are indications Bryant
(30:46):
subscribes to conspiracy theories that dominion equipment has been used
to steal elections. This is amping up from the rhetoric.
It's similar some of the stuff that the left is
saying about ICE. The consequences could be very dangerous, especially
as ICE agents get docksed. This is also why, going
back earlier in the show, why the Department of Justice
(31:08):
can't simply go out there and name people that were
investigated over Jeff related to Jeffrey Epstein, because let's say
they do that and there's no actual there there, or
they cleared them, but you have conspiracy theorists online who say, well,
I know the DOJ cleared them, but they didn't. Really
that was Biden, that was this, That was that, So
(31:28):
let's make up stuff.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
About them you don't know.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
You can't just have DOJ recklessly jump in and do
something like that.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Gosh, I wish we had a fifth hour Dragon. We
need more time. I'm Jimmy Sangenberger.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
Have a great rest of the day, and, as I
always say, may God bless America.
Jimmy Crag's corn, and he don't care about all of
the tariff income we're making for these couring countries.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, because it's hard to afford corn.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
To be sag a burger in for Michael Brown this Monday. Wow,
we are already to our number four and we've got.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Several things to dive into in any moment. They keep
teasing you on the news.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Any moment, any moment Trump to make major statement on Russia.
It's been any moment for hours. Hopefully he will and
we will talk about it. President Trump though yesterday speaking
to reporters and he had this to say. And patriots
that he's talking about are not American patriots.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
The patriot missiles.
Speaker 4 (00:50):
I haven't agreed in the number yet, but they're gonna
have some because they do need protection. But the European
Union is paying for it. We're not paying any big pot,
but we will send it at a big for us, and
we will send them patriots, which they desperately need. Because
Putin really surprised a lot of people.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
He talks nice and that he bums everybody in the evening.
Speaker 5 (01:12):
But here's a little bit of a problem there.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
I don't like it. President Trump is pissed at Putin.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
I think that's abundantly clear, and he's doing the right
thing by continuing to support Ukraine. Now in this case,
if this is how it is, European Union is putting
up the dough, the United States is putting up the weapons. Great,
go for it, all the better if we're not paying
(01:39):
for it. But we're still providing those materials, the missiles
we need to support Ukraine. And President Trump is doing
the right thing here. I was a little concerned early
on in his administration when he was trying to play
a little nicer with Russia.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
But look, this is the president that.
Speaker 3 (02:00):
Was contrary to what the left claimed throughout his first
term that he was Putin's patsy and he was doing
Putin's bidding.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
This is the guy that put missiles in Poland, remember
that when Putin was all.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Upset because the United States had the audacity to advance
more of our defense capabilities in Eastern Europe. This was
a president who was consistently tough on Russia throughout his
presidency the first term. These things are continuing now at
(02:36):
this moment, with Trump showing he is still strong in
regards to Russia. But here is the important thing is
that the United States does have an obligation going back decades.
They didn't pursue nuclear weapons, keeping new clear weapons in
(03:01):
Ukraine because we had a guarantee of protection. That's one thing,
goes back decades. Another thing, Russia is a significant adversary,
and it's much better if they are weighed down by
this war as they have been, than if.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
They aren't for our own interests. But then also.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
The fact is that this war, remember when it started,
it was supposed to end it a matter of months.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
Russia was supposed to just roll in their tanks and succeed.
They have not. They have failed in that respect.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
And the fact that the war is droning on is
not actually a bad sign. It's a good sign. It's
a good sign that Ukraine has been able to fend
off against the Russians. And this is why President Trump
is willing to provide more military support to Ukraine, because
(03:53):
he knows it's better for Ukraine to be fighting back
and keep the war going. In that respect, on Chili
can reach a deal, strike a deal between Zelenski and Putin,
than it is to let Russia just roll right on
through and take over the country. The implications of this
of Ukraine falling to Russia are dramatic. There's a reason
(04:16):
why Sweden and Finland both at least officially neutral throughout
even the Cold War, or they decided, hey, we want
in a NATO, and why they've joined NATO. They're no
longer neutral because they know what it means when a
guy like Putin, who has ambitions to bring back the
(04:40):
Tsarist Russian Empire to be the twenty first century Peter
the Great. What happens when a guy like him advances.
They know the consequences, the potential future that they could
see in store. And that's why Europe is been very
strong in this one great thing. And I think this
(05:02):
is probably a reason why Trump has felt more comfortable
providing support to Ukraine is that the President of the
United States, Donald Trump, has done something amazing. Not only
did he get Europe to pitch in more for NATO
and their own defense in his first term, he's expanding
that with an agreement for five percent. This is remarkable.
(05:24):
President Trump is doing remarkable things.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Dragon.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
We see now President Trump finally meeting with the NATO
Secretary General.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Can we dip in to a.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Little of this on the news as it's happening live count.
Speaker 5 (05:38):
Reliance and a fantastic job. And we had a tremendous meeting.
I guess it's about a month now, month ago, and
I think Mark will tell you that it was really
perhaps more important the date of November fifth, that was
the election day. Maybe that was the most important because
we've made tremendous progress together and one of the Russia
(06:02):
and Ukraine. I would like to see it end. It
wasn't my war, it was Biden's war. It's not my war.
I'm trying to get you out of it, and we
want to see it end. And I'm disappointed in President
of Putin because I thought we would have had a
deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there.
So based on that, we're going to be doing secondary
(06:23):
tariffs if we don't have a deal in fifty days.
It's very simple, and they'll be at one hundred percent.
And that's the way it is. That can be more simple,
it's just the way it is. I hope we don't
have to do it, but regardless, we are going to be.
We make the greatest military equipment in the world, whether
it's missiles, you saw that recently in around the way
(06:46):
those planes are blew in. They hit every single fourteen
bombs at every target. Then you had the helicopter shoot
a total of thirty bombs or thirty missiles, and they
hit every single markers right, every single piece, every single target.
And it was I guess on a tale of zero
(07:07):
to ten. They say it was about a fifteen. That's
how successful it was. That's how leif was a word
they like to use nowadays, but it was. It was
an amazing, well organized attack that people in this country
wanted to do for twenty four years. You know, when
we hit the pilots in last week, they were saying, sir,
(07:28):
we've been practicing this for twenty four years, meaning people,
not them, but.
Speaker 6 (07:32):
Other people that are a little older now, but they too,
and you are the one that let us do it.
But we've been practicing it three to four times a
year for twenty two twenty.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
Again, we are listening to President Trump live with the
Secretary General of NATO and he just said that he
will put into effect one hundred percent tariff secondary tariffs
on Russia if there is not a deal reached within
fifty days. I'm all for sanctions. I'm all for putting
(08:05):
the squeeze, but I'm going to be consistent. I'm not
for tariffs of one hundred percent odd goods for Russia.
I don't think that's the great retaliation or the right
way to go about the incentives.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
But that's what he's saying. Let's listen us more.
Speaker 5 (08:20):
Having any payment made. We're not buying it, but we
will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it.
Our last meeting of a month ago is very successful
in that they agreed to five percent, which is more
than a trillion dollars a year. So they have a
lot of money, and these are wealthy nations. They have
a lot of money, and they want to do it.
They feel very strongly about it. And then we feel
(08:42):
strongly about it. To go in for a lot of
money and we just we don't want to do it anymore.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
We can, but we.
Speaker 5 (08:49):
Make the best that we're going to be sending the
best to NATO and in some cases to maybe at
Mark suggestion, if we go to Germany where they're going
to send early on missiles and they'll be replaced and
NATO is going to take care of it's going to
be coordinated by NATO, and they're going to work.
Speaker 7 (09:07):
Very much with Matt Whitaker.
Speaker 5 (09:08):
Who's right here, is a great ambassador, and Matt's going
to be coordinator. You better do a good job, Matt.
I will, but Matt's going to coordinate. He's a very
talented guy. He's going to coordinate everything. So in a nutshell,
we're going to make top of the line weapons and
they'll be sent to NATO.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
NATO makes us to.
Speaker 5 (09:26):
Have certain of them sent to other countries where we
can get a little additional speed where the country will
release something and it will be mostly in the form
of a replacement. And I'd like to have Mark and
again just a highly respected, pretty young guy. Pretty young
guy for having had the career that he's had because
he had it. He had an amazing career before going
(09:49):
to NATO.
Speaker 3 (09:50):
So once again President Trump has been speaking at the
White House. He is saying that what the new method
of providing additional weapons will be is he is going
to the NATO will receive weapons that are meant for Ukraine,
and they will either go to Ukraine direct from NATO
or through other countries. However they can get it more quickly.
(10:14):
The Secretary General Mark Rutt is speaking. Now, let's listen
to just a little of him before we dip out.
Speaker 7 (10:19):
Building all the tremendous success of the NATO summit to
five percent, but also the decision to keep Ukraine strong
and the decision to increase our defense in the show production.
So based on that, this that was you have stepping up.
This is again Europeans stepping up. So I've been in
contact with many countries. I can tell you at this
(10:40):
moment Germany massively, but also Finland and Denmark and Sweden
and Norvating, Katio, Benemence, Canada. They all want to be
part of this, and this is only the first wave.
There will be more. So what we will do is
work through the nature systems to make sure that we
know what Ukrainians need. So if you can make pangages
so of course, in a way we discussed it this
(11:01):
morning the street heaxset at the Pentagon. In the wages.
Of course, the US will if talkball was necessary to
defend discountry, that's absolutely clear. But I still mean that
Ukraine can gets his hands on really massive numbers of
minisy equipment, both for air defense but also missiles, ammunition,
(11:23):
et cetera, et cetera. So if I was Vladimir Putting
today and are you speaking about what you were planning
to do with fifty days and this announcement, I would
reconsider whether I should not take negotiations about Ukraine more
seriously than I was doing at the moment.
Speaker 2 (11:37):
If I was flatda be putting a good friend once again.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Mark Rudd he is the former Dutch Prime Minister. He's
Secretary General of Natal affirming Europe's leadership rawl and commitment
here and working in candem with President Trump and the
United States the indicating that they'd met at the Pentagon
earlier today with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
Speaker 2 (12:02):
I love this.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
This is something only Trump could do, getting Europe to
do its part even more now, Europe has done a lot.
In fact, cumulatively, if you add up the amount of
money spent on Ukraine, Europe has spent more than the
United States. But that's collectively here. There are certain countries
(12:24):
like Germany and some others that have needed to take
more of a leadership role have been but not quite enough.
And here is President Trump really getting more of a
commitment in terms of funding, getting more of a commitment
for NATO nations members to pitch in to five percent
of their budgets being towards defense, which had not been
(12:45):
done before. And if Ukraine is sort of the means
to get Europe to play ball in this way, we
should all be in favor of that. Kudos to President
Trump for showing leadership on the world state in this
way and.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
In most other ways.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
I say most because again tariffs and trade, I see
that as a problem, but we talked about that a
lot earlier in the program.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
When we look at what he's doing.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
With Europe and Ukraine, or we see the Middle East
with the Abraham Accords and with Israel and Iran, and
on and on peace India and Pakistan, both nuclear countries
that were at loggerheads, and the Trump administration helped tamp
that down, took leadership role. Thank god for Donald Trump
(13:41):
as President of the United States, really making a point
of bringing about peace. All of his policies in the
Middle East are oriented toward what can we do to
advance the Abraham Accords, the historic peace deal that Trump
brought in his administration in the first administration brought in
(14:01):
because they came in recognizing something that the Obama team
was as weak as can be andfeckless with that.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
Iranian nuclear deal.
Speaker 3 (14:11):
But one thing the Iranian Nuclear deal did was it
started to bring Israel and Golf Arab countries, Muslim countries
that were previously very much about Israel's destruction to having
back channel conversations and they were talking about Iran and
the threat of Iran, and what was happening in the
(14:32):
United States wasn't showing leadership.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
What can we do? And Trump came into office and said.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
We're going to do something about this. We see this change, well,
let's play into it. Let's bring about more peace, bring
a peace deal into the Middle East that more countries
can add on to join into the Abraham Accords and
use the thread of Iran as that common bond or
common point of connection, rather that they're already seeing that
(15:00):
Israel and Arab countries were already seeing. Saudi Arabia is
having back channel conversations, which is significant because Saudi Arabia
does not have formal relations with Israel. I've interviewed represented
it from the Saudi government the Kingdom before multiple occasions
in the past, who was like, yeah, we don't have
relations with Israel.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
We don't what they don't, but they've been engaging with
them behind the scenes.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
And it's something the Trump administration took advantage of because
countries like the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, which both
signed on to the Abraham Accords, would not have done
so without the blessing in essence of Saudi Arabia saying
go ahead, it's okay, if not the encouragement the Trump
(15:47):
administration saw that. Heck, remember his first international speech as
President of the United States was in Riod, Saudi Arabia,
and he talked about fighting against terrorism and his other objectives,
and that said a lot. That's the kind of leadership
that we are seeing in terms of trying to bring
about peace.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Donald J.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
Trump deserves, has earned the Nobel Peace Prize time and
time again.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
He won't get it. They're two weak need They won't because.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
God forbid that Donald Trump, of all people, gets the
Nobel Peace Prize. But Barack Obama got it for doing
Diddley squat literally Didley squat just speaking words. That's a weird, wild,
(16:42):
crazy world when that's what's going on. Yeah, it's, oh
my goodness. So where do we go from here? With
Ukraine and Europe. We'll see. I don't think the terrif
(17:05):
idea is going to pan out that that's a good thing.
It's not the right cudgel to use, but it's good
to see President Trump get tough here, tougher and showing
strength and resolve.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Against Russian pootin aggression. What do you think? Free?
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Three? One zero three is the text line put Mike
or Michael in the beginning there, I'm Jimmy singing berger
in for Michael right here on six point thirty KF.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Good morning from South Dakota. We have boys week this
week with the grandsons. I'm not gonna go into a
big detail on what our itinerary is today, but we're
going to Hot Spring, South Dakota and for dinner, Yes
in South Dakota, dinner is at noon. We're going to
Dairy Queen and we're gonna have burgers, fries, drinks and
(17:58):
a Sunday for seven dollars. Everyone have a great day.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
I love it. That just makes me happy.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Occasionally it's great to get a talkback that just talks
about your fun day with family. Now there's a little
bit of a connection though that you wouldn't know about,
but thank you, Michael, and I was figuring there probably was.
We're talking about they were the worst for you. Fad
fast food list came out last week and Dairy Queen
was on at number four, and I had no idea
(18:26):
how ice cream is better for you than I think
it was like Taco Bell, Wendy's and Sonic, because like,
how is that possible? So then talkbacks and texts came
in saying that you know what they serve real food.
They did unquote real food. I had no idea. I
had never gotten quote unquote real food at Dairy Queen before.
So a whole bunch of people texted in wow, left
(18:46):
talkback saying, hey.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
The burgers are delicious at Dry Queen. There you go.
You know, I don't know if I've had a burger there, right,
but I've had food there real Okay, Yeah, I have
had food there.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Now, it was a number of years back. I remember
being like, wait, Dry Queen's food, but it was out
of state, and then eventually they started coming into Colorado
at least that's my recollection.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Fascinating.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
All right, Well, we got a guy named, by the way,
Jimmy Sangenberger filling in for Michael Brown. If you're just
joining us today right here on six point thirty k
how we have an attorney general who's running to be
governor of.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Colorado, but he's still attorney general.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I like, this is disappointing because it is pure politics.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
I like Phil Wiser personally.
Speaker 3 (19:33):
I've got along with him over the years since he
ran for office for the Attorney General's office in twenty
eighteen or whatever it was, yeah, twenty eighteen. I've liked
him personally, got along with him. But this is this
is not a policy disagreement. This is pure politics.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Now.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
If you recall back on the third of this month,
I filled in for Michael and not only did we
do a recitation of the Declaration of Independence, but we
talked about Wanda James, the sitting regent for the University
of Colorado in Denver, who's also a purveyor of pot.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
She's got pot chop.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
Her claim to fame is that she's the first black woman,
black person to own a legal marijuana dispensary. And that's
such a big deal to her, so much so that
when the Colorado School of Public Health launched their campaign
called Tea on THHC to educate the public about marijuana
(20:39):
and particularly about the potential risks of high potency THC,
which is very strong now, much stronger than twenty thirty
years ago, to put it mildly, And they had this
campaign which have this campaign which was mandated by the
state legislature, by the way, funded through marijuana taxes. And
(21:00):
when they launched the campaign, they happened to put out
medical illustrations that were of black children in utero and
older and white children in utero and older that show, okay,
here are potential risks in different stages of development. And
the focus was on children and on pregnant mothers. Well,
(21:21):
Wanda James threw a big fit and said, oh my gosh,
this is racist, these images of black kids.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
Never mind the fact that there were images of white
kids too.
Speaker 3 (21:31):
Never Mind the fact that Aniesiam Health, which partnered with
the Colorado School of Public Health, which is predominantly at
not entirely, but predominantly at the University of Colorado. There
are two other universities that are part of it, but
at CU that Aniesiam Health clearly was delving into an
extensive amount of research showing that it is not a
good idea to whitewash medical illustrations. You want to have
(21:53):
more diversity in medical illustrations so that people can relate
to them, seeing themselves in them as opposed to not.
But Wanda James didn't care about that because the bottom
line is she called it racist, but she really was
getting it something visceral much more so, which is this
campaign hurts her bottom line. It educates people about dangers
(22:18):
of pot, plain and simple, and she can't have that,
which is why she also attempted.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
To discredit.
Speaker 3 (22:27):
The science, attacked the scientists, and tried to get the
funding pulled all together.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
Went to the governor's office said hey, guys, I want
you to get rid of this.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
They did, They at least they put in the funding
request and said let's eliminate it.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Just a couple of days after she did her outreach
and spoke.
Speaker 3 (22:43):
With the head of the cannabis the chief cannabis pot
advisor for polists like, really shady business going on here,
really shady business. Well, the CU Board of Regents took
it on, did an investigation and sent wind to James.
(23:04):
The bottom line, as Elliott Hood Democrat put it on
the CU board at large is this The.
Speaker 8 (23:15):
Bottom line is, regardless of your personal feelings or interests,
there was simply no justifiable reason to publicly and continuously
smear this research program, attempt to discredit the research of
our scientists, and advocate to pull their funding. That is
especially true today when university research programs face significant funding uncertainty,
(23:36):
and overt hostility from certain corners of the government. Our
scientists need our support.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Now more than ever. They do not need their.
Speaker 8 (23:44):
Elected leaders casting unfounded doubt on the integrity of their work.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
But that is exactly what Wanda James did, without a doubt.
That is what she did. In fact, here she did
it in the meeting to say to her.
Speaker 5 (24:00):
This was a two million dollar state funded campaign which.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
See you's name all over it, targeting the black community
with tire tropes, recycled drunk junk science.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Of course, I spoke as a regent.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Uh huh right, Well, a lot more to it is
you could hear from Elliott Hood. Well, enter Phil Wiser,
who's friends with Wanda James, and he put this tweet
out last night.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
Two parts, well at least two parts.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
The First Amendment protects the right to free expression, Neither
a White House executive order nor a public university policy
can override this fundamental right. I am concerned that the
CU Board of Regent's action sanctioning Regent Wanda James did
(24:58):
just that. The CU Board of Regent's policy, as applied
to the speech of elected regions, must be consistent with
the protection of the right to free expression. If CU
region policy to Jay can be applied in a way
that silence is a regent's voice, then the policy is on.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
Shaky legal ground. This is the Attorney General of the
State of Colorado saying this.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
In response to a bipartisan censure of Wanda James. By
the way, she can't go to the buff's box at
games because she's also been sanctioned. Oh and if you're
familiar with Chay Anderson disgrace former Denver Public Schools board
member Race Hustler himself, Wanda James is one of his mentors.
(25:51):
Wiser continued to protect the right of free expression and
the fair treatment of CEU Region James. The Board of
Regents would do well to reconsider its action against her.
Leaving this action in place not only raises questions of fairness,
it undermines CD one's representation on the board. A lesson
from this episode is that conflicts should be addressed through
(26:13):
a commitment to de escalating rhetoric, elevating listening, and working
to find a mutual understanding. I have never read something
more full of bs from Phil Wiser, and I am
disappointed in our attorney general, which I know some people
listening with everybody.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
He's a Democrat. How can you be disappointed?
Speaker 3 (26:33):
I expect better from him than this on a political
issue like this, I just do. Maybe I'm misguided, Maybe
I'm judged by you know what we're factoring in the
fact that I think the guy is that he's a
good man personally. I like a lot about him personally.
Maybe that's influencing me to be disappointed. But we can
(26:53):
agree this is bes. She escalated it, she went public.
She said I want to get of all the funding.
She said it's junk science. She was interfering with academic freedom.
Phil Wiser, Dude, you used to be a professor, a
law professor at CU. Imagine if you came out with
a report and you had some conclusion, and why did
(27:16):
James in a CEU reached board meeting called it junk law?
Or a junk legal interpretation. Would that be okay? Because
free expression nonsense. This woman engaged in activity that was
clearly self dealing, self motivated, self interested, as she always is.
(27:43):
Not only is she a partisan hack who always likes
to bring a political spin, but everything she does is
oriented toward advancing her own interests.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Yes, that's what politicians do.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
But if you looked in a book, into the dictionary
rather and you found a definician for politician or brazen politician,
you'd find Wanda James high above the list. I mean,
is just this is just nonsense, and we got to
(28:16):
run to a break. But I have to just share
the way in which Wanda framed this Today is not
about a censure.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
It is about censorship and retaliation, censorship and retaliation. It's
all retaliation. The head of the Board of Regents is
Cali Renaisson. She is a Boulder Democrat. She helped initiate
this investigation. She voted to center Wanda James. Elliott Hood
(28:45):
at large CU Region voted to center. Wanda James laid
out the case brilliantly in like ten to fifteen minutes.
At this meeting.
Speaker 3 (28:55):
Elana Spiegel, another Democrat, voted to censure Wanda James.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Really, this is the game you're playing, Phil Wiser.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Well, I just might have a column about this on
Wednesday's issue of the Denver Gazette. I'm Jimmy sangen Berger
filling in for Michael Brown. We'll keep it here right
here on six point thirty k ol final segment up ahead. Hey,
good morning boys, Jimmy sang and Berger.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Dragon, good to hear you guys. I know you guys
need some like.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
Real talkbacks, but all I got on me for a
Monday morning is have we heard Black Magic Woman yet
this morning?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Thanks?
Speaker 1 (29:33):
Have a great day.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
It did in the first hour. You gotta listen early,
especially when Jimmy sangen Berger takes over the bumpers and
also forgets the usual closing song and asks I'm dragging
to plug in something else.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
Oh well.
Speaker 3 (29:49):
This is Southern Avenue, by the way, which I saw
a Blues from the Top festival a few weeks back,
and they are fantastic. Rumboogie is the name of the
song the band Southern Avenue. A couple final things on
my website. I haven't said this all. Show what in
the world, Dragon, you're supposed to remove you have one
job among the other jobs Monday. Sorry Jimmy Sangenberger dot com.
(30:09):
Remember there's no AI or you in Sangenburger. It's all ease.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
All the time. Once you know that Sangenburger is easy easy. Indeed, well,
we are out of time.
Speaker 3 (30:24):
I do want to say that a man who once
ran for sheriff in Archiletta County this from the Colorado
Public Radio's website, has been charged with ARSON for allegedly
throwing a Molotov cocktail into the Archiletta County Clerk's office
and in particular, targeted a room it appears where the
county's dominion voting machines are stored. There are indications Bryant
(30:46):
subscribes to conspiracy theories that dominion equipment has been used
to steal elections. This is amping up from the rhetoric.
It's similar some of the stuff that the left is
saying about ICE. The consequences could be very dangerous, especially
as ICE agents get docksed. This is also why, going
back earlier in the show, why the Department of Justice
(31:08):
can't simply go out there and name people that were
investigated over Jeff related to Jeffrey Epstein, because let's say
they do that and there's no actual there there, or
they cleared them, but you have conspiracy theorists online who say, well,
I know the DOJ cleared them, but they didn't. Really
that was Biden, that was this, That was that, So
(31:28):
let's make up stuff.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
About them you don't know.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
You can't just have DOJ recklessly jump in and do
something like that.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Gosh, I wish we had a fifth hour Dragon. We
need more time. I'm Jimmy Sangenberger.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
Have a great rest of the day, and, as I
always say, may God bless America.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.