Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Ryan, if only you could convince Kim Kardashian that
this case in Rapho County needs to be changed. We
know that Governor Poles agrees with what Kim thinks. That
chance that will happen, but it's worth a try.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Could definitely be and we know that she whispered in
his ears some sweet nothings that Comrade Kyle, in fact
of nine News even asked him about. And Jared Polis
has this way of talking in circles if you've ever
heard him in an interview with Ross Kominski. And for
the record, that is the only iHeart host that he
will agree to go on with. And when I inquired
(00:38):
about that before, because at the very beginning, so when
Jared Poulos was first elected governor back in twenty eighteen,
that just predated my start date here at iHeart Denver.
I would arrive on that Sunday after Thanksgiving later that month,
the day after the election, however, on a show then
known as Kapalis and Kayfer, Jared Pouls appeared with the
(00:59):
two of them and Dan had a pretty warm, engaging conversation.
Never again did Jared Polis go on with Dan. When
I asked why then, his Polis's handlers. Basically, well, he
goes on with Ross and that's enough. That is the
explanation we literally got. And as Alexa points out too,
(01:20):
and this text that she sent me, and this is
from X Jared Polis complaining about Trump's tariffs. This is
just like, have you no awareness, my man, of where
you are, where we are, where we live in Colorado.
What's happening here with the cost of housing, whether you're
renting or trying to buy a home, the cost of
(01:40):
property taxes in this state after the Gallagher Amendment was
rescinded by the voters and then not replaced by anything
else until there was some patchwork legislation that was put
through at the eleventh hour looking for a short term
remedy there.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
But it hasn't been fixed long term. It really hasn't.
But he says this.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Arafs increase the prices of many materials used in products,
including groceries and items that can't.
Speaker 3 (02:04):
Be produced in Colorado.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
This hurts consumers and encourages companies to build factories in
other countries to avoid these tariffs. What has Jared Polis
done to help bring down prices cost of living here
in Colorado, go ahead and give me a list. This
from government is the problem, mister T two on X
mutual follow of mine on that platform. Okay, he says
(02:29):
to Jared poulis next to the Jared Polis egg ban,
the Jared Polis bag ban, bag tax, the Jared Polis
gas tax, and all the other Jared Polis taxes, fees
and regulations on these as my counterpart, Leland Conway used
to point out, and he is now with Coco and
San Diego Governor mcpheeme is what Leland would call Jared
(02:50):
Polis here.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
We can't forget the delivery fee. Also, yeah, that's stupid.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
What a twenty three cent thing on Amazon?
Speaker 4 (02:56):
Right, we've gone up. It was twenty seven and I
think it's twenty eight now, is it now?
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Yeah, that's neat. Yep, thanks Governor Paulus.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
Doesn't matter what you're having to delivered to your home.
It's twenty something since more went.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
Back home in Michigan.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
And you know that's not a red state, that's a
redish is a purple state. Got a Democrat governor for
the last two terms, hopefully Republican one next time around.
Trump won it twice, but not all three times I
go there to Meyer and I go through the grocery
checkout land here's all these plastic bags, and I'm looking
at him like I could harvest these hed take them
(03:29):
home and sell them on the black market here in Colorado.
Why would you ban those who does that hurt the
working class, blue collar Coloraden's who now have to buy bring.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
Their own bat.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
I mean, it's a horrible inconvenience that I'm along with
other things along the aid ban, let's have cage free
eggs and the increase that goes along with that. I mean,
this guy, he has no room to talk, absolutely none.
And now my conversation with James Rosen, Newsback's chief Washington correspondent.
He recently got a promotion on the topic of Title
(04:05):
nine and the Trump administration pursuing a lawsuit against the
state of California.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
California Department of Education is taking federal money, which is
accompanied by a promise when they applied for those grants
to follow federal law as defined as including executive orders.
And so it is a really really clear, open and
shut that California is in violation of federal law while
(04:31):
taking federal money which has strings attached to it, So sorry, California,
you kind of have it both ways.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
She's awesome.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
Assistant Attorney General Harmey Dylan in a sit down exclusive
interview with our next guest, James Rosen, joining us here.
You can follow him on exit James Rosen TV. James,
welcome back. Thank you for your time.
Speaker 6 (04:50):
I know you're busy, Ran always a pleasure to be
with you.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Here sit down with Harmey Dylan.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
What really stood out to you about what she told
you with regard to this California case? But we know
that it's not necessarily limited to only California.
Speaker 6 (05:05):
Right, So. Harmei Dillon is the Assistant Attorney General of
the United States for the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division.
She is the top civil rights officer in the federal government,
and she is a very well known conservative activist lawyer
who's been working on religious freedom cases and similar cases
in her own private practice as an activist for a
(05:27):
long time. And she's really kind of trying to reorient
the office of the Civil Rights Division at the Department
of Justice to reconsider and to refashion what civil rights
means and which kinds of groups should be eligible for
civil rights protection this case which was filed last Wednesday,
(05:47):
and Newsmax and This Reporter were the first to get
our hands on the court filing of US v. The
California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federal which
is a very long title that sounds maybe like a
group out of Star Trek, But the California Interscholastic Federation
(06:07):
holds stages a wide array of sports competitions for young
boys and girls, young athletes, and they were the ones
who held the competition in May in Clovis, California, the
High School Track and Field State Championships where a transgender
student took home the gold in the girls' high jump
and triple jump I think it was. And the Department
(06:31):
of Justice, citing Title nine, the nineteen seventy two law
that banned any sex based discrimination on the part of
education institutions or any activities that received federal education funding,
and also citing President Trump's executive order of February on
this subject coruct basically on last Wednesday, filed suit against
(06:52):
those two California agencies in US District Court in the
Central District of California, alleging that those two agencies have
been violating the civil rights of girls across California by
allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls' sports. They cited
those track and field championships where the transgender student took
(07:12):
home two gold medals as a flagrant violation of Title
nine and the executive order. And what's really interesting if
you looked at the lawsuit, which again Newsmax was the
first to report, it appeared that DOJ felt that they
had found a smoking gun against these two California agencies.
And that was that three days before those track and
(07:35):
field statewide championships in Clovis, California, where the transgender student
took home the gold, three days before that, Interscholastic Federation,
which holds these things, announced a change to its rules.
They called it a new pilot entry program. And what
it meant that was, if any quote unquote biological female
found herself doing well enough to place among the top three,
(07:58):
but also found herself displaced from the top three by
a transgender student, then that biological female would also be
entitled to receive a medal. And as DOJ put it
more or less in the lawsuit, this showed this rules
change and their use of the term biological female showed
that the Interscholastic Federation understood very well that male athletes
(08:20):
have a biological advantage over girl athletes, and the fact
that they were changing the rules just before that competition
was held showed that they understood the impropriety of their actions. California,
for their part, stood attorney Assistant Attorney General Dylan and
her boss, Attorney General Pam Bondi back in June as
(08:40):
a kind of preemptive move alleging that the demands by
the DOJ for the State of California to come into
compliance with Title nine as interpreted by the Trump administration
or themselves unconstitutional and a violation of the equal protection
rights of transgender students. So we will see this as
the subject of court action for some time.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
Heading for a showdown.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
He is the chief Washington correspondent and White House correspondent
for Newsmax. As you heard him say, breaking this story
and having an exclusive interview sit down with Harmey Dylan.
Here's another portion of that conversation.
Speaker 5 (09:14):
There are still a few billion that haven't been drawn
down yet, so we have the money, so transferring that
money is dependent on California being in compliance to federal law, so.
Speaker 6 (09:27):
You don't need to seek an injunction necessarily.
Speaker 5 (09:30):
I think we hold the cards in that regard.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
We hold the cards in that regard.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Now, James, you had mentioned this kind of preemptive strike,
and there are twenty three states total, I believe that
have joined a coalition in a lawsuit against the US
District filed in the US District Court against the Trump administration,
to which California AG Rob Bonta said during a news conference, quote,
Congress holds the power of the purse, not the President
(09:56):
Trump and parenthetical US Education Secretary Linda ban Man have
no right to hold these funds back. So it seems
to be a standoff here based on constitutional interpretation of
the executive branch holding the purse strings, as Harmony Dillon
claims there and the Attorney General for California's point that no,
it's Congress that appropriated these funds and the president the
(10:17):
executive branch has.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
No right to intercede. Where do you see it going
from here?
Speaker 6 (10:22):
The clip you played of Assistant Attorney General Dylan saying
we hold the cards in this regard and citing several billion,
So this all goes to the point that this is
not an academic matter, no pun intended. The state of
California receives up to forty four billion dollars a year
in federal education funds. If they lose this litigation, the
(10:45):
Golden State can continue to allow transgender athletes to compete
in biological girls' sports, but they just won't be able
to receive their forty four billion dollars a year, and
that's going to be a huge hit to what is
in terms of the fifty States, one of the largest
economies in the country. I had asked Tottorney General Dylan
if she was going to seek an injunction against California
receiving any of the forty four billion while this litigation
(11:07):
is underway, and she noted that the three billion has
yet to be drawn down. So when the State of
California tells us that it's Congress that controls the purse strings,
that's true for the appropriation process, But then there is
the disbursement process. After the funds have been appropriated by
the Congress and the appropriation's law has been signed by
the President, those funds have to go out the door,
(11:29):
and three billions she was telling us of the forty
four billion haven't yet, and she is going to withhold
those funds while this litigation is underway. You mentioned a
number of states that have joined with California. I did
ask Attorney General Assistant Attorney General Dylan if she sees
other lawsuits like this coming.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Up soon, and she said yes.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
And one place we might expect to see it is
main because you might remember that extraordinary confrontation at the
White House, I believe in February when President Trump had
a number of the nation's governors to visit early in
this two point zero term, and the governor of May
and a woman who's a Democrat, basically made it clear
in a confrontation with him that that her state was
(12:10):
not going to abide by the executive order on banning
transgender athletes. So there are more lawsuits coming. And as
we say, there's real money at stake here when you're
talking about forty four billion for California and education funds.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
And locally here in Colorado, they have enjoined that lawsuit
as well. Attorney General Phil Wiser eighty million dollars in
withheld education funding is Colorado's part in this. Chief White
House Correspondent for Newsmax James Rosen joining us. James, I
got to get your take on this other topic as well.
It is big in the news today, and that is
the auto pen scandal for President Biden. Here's Representative James Comer,
(12:47):
Republican Kentucky on who was really calling the shots and
pulling the strings for Joe Biden behind the scenes with
this auto pen.
Speaker 7 (12:54):
There was a select few. And when I say a
select few, Jason, I'm talking about I can count them
on one hand that we're calling the shots. There's no
evidence thus far that's emerged that Joe Biden knew anything
about who was using the autopen or the process involved
in authorizing the use of the oulipin.
Speaker 3 (13:15):
We're going to continue.
Speaker 7 (13:16):
We've got more names to bring in for depositions.
Speaker 3 (13:19):
Obviously, we're going.
Speaker 7 (13:20):
To get to the ron claims and maybe I or
maybe there'll be people in the Bidens family, immediate family
that'll be implicated this. We're going to bring them all
in and we're going to get the truth to the
American people. And if Joe Biden's name was forged on
these executive orders and these pardons, then those executive orders
and pardons are going to face a tough future in
(13:41):
a court of law.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
This is reporting from New York Times, this is Alex
Thompson axios. So this is not a conservative agenda by
any means or stretch of the imagination. James, But you
covered the Biden White House front and center, and you
had your ups and downs with KJP and that entire process.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
But what are your thoughts on this?
Speaker 2 (13:56):
It would seem to be if, as alleged, this is
what happened with the auto pen and the pardons, etc.
Who would be the biggest political scandal in the White
House for over the last fifty years.
Speaker 6 (14:06):
So two important developments have occurred in all of this
in recent days. One was that President Trump, through the
White House Council's Office, made it clear that he was
waiving executive privilege for anyone who might be inclined to
invoke it, any former Biden White House officials who might
want to invoke executive privilege to avoid answering questions from
(14:26):
the Department of Justice or the House Oversight Committee in
their respective probes into President Biden's decline in office and
who knew what and when. The other extraordinary development was
that after that happened, a doctor Kevin O'Connor, President Biden's
personal physician, who used published letters to attest annually to
the fitness of mister Biden for office, backed out of
(14:47):
an agreement he had with the House Overside Committee for
a voluntary appearance for a transcribed interview and said, I'll
only come in if you subpoena me. So the panel
subpoena the doctor O'Connor, and when he finally appeared for
his testimony last week, he instead asserted the Fifth Amendment
privilege against in crimp's self incrimination and refused to answer
questions even such as was it your estimation that mister
(15:08):
Biden was fit for office? So now we saw President
Biden responding to those Former President Biden responding to those
developments by giving an interview to The New York Times,
which ran over the weekend, had been conducted last Thursday.
It was all of ten minutes long. This is something
he famously refused to do when he was in office,
was to give an interview to the New York Times,
(15:29):
And the purpose of this interview was to declare that
quote I made every decision relating to his grants of
clemency presidential clemency near the end of his term. He
said the only reason the auto pen was used because
there were so many signatures required more than a thousand.
But he also conceded that he didn't review every last
name amongst those fifteen hundred or so pardons. So some
(15:51):
analysts regard that the president the former president, took this
extraordinary step of talking with the New York Times. We
all recall that due to his decline in office, President
Biden was shielded from the news media like no other
chief executive in modern times. He took this extraordinary step,
some analysts believe, to try to provide some cover to
(16:11):
individuals who were working for him, who would enjoy less
immunity from in legal proceedings arising from official acts undertaken
during the president's term. The former president would enjoy that
kind of immunity they would not, So perhaps he felt
by stepping out and speaking out and taking responsibility for
these pardons, he might be helping out his former aids.
(16:35):
As these investigations continue to unfold.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Nobody is his equal on Capitol Hill. In my view,
you can follow him on acts at James Rosen TV,
the chief White House correspondent for Newsmax, again breaking that
story as it pertains to California and Title nine with
Assistant Attorney General Harmey Dylan and that exclusive sit down
interview as well. James, great work as always, Thank you
so much for your time and for joining me here today.
Speaker 6 (16:57):
You're a good man. Ryan.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Thank you, Ryan truleyhi in for Michael Brown here on
the situation without him today, dragging alongside. Looking forward to
more of your texts on the other side of this
time out, be sure to send those along. At thirty
three one h three still to come. John caldera Independence
Institute at the top of the hour eight o'clock on
the potential formation of a third party by Elon Musk
(17:20):
and why that's not such a good idea even here
in Colorado where a lot of unaffiliates may be looking
for a third option. And coming up next will reheat
this story about Amy Padden in the eighteenth.
Speaker 8 (17:33):
Good Morning, Michael and Dragon. That delivery fee that fullis
put on to Coloradden's It's now up to twenty nine cents.
And I think I looked it up at one point
because I noticed it kept going up, and I think
every year I can't remember how the wording was. It's
just supposed to keep going up.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
And what does it serve?
Speaker 8 (17:51):
Just more money out of our pockets.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
These are facts, And yeah, this they got the bag fee,
the Amazon delivery fee that gets tacked on there.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
This is annoying, just very annoying, and you have to
do this.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
Texter's point on that Talkbacker says, bagfee started.
Speaker 3 (18:11):
Twenty nine cents, then twenty eight cents, then twenty nine cents.
Now it's back to twenty eight cents. What's going on there?
What's the fluctuation? What's that all about?
Speaker 4 (18:17):
Pretty sure it started at twenty seven, then eight, and
I believe people who's now saying it's twenty nine. I
honestly haven't looked because it's just been annoying.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
Tax and fee and to death.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
And my buddy Derek Kletchka, if you're looking for some
black Angus beef, by the way, this is a he
doesn't pay me to say this, but it's the best
leuchka and I've getten. I'm getting some emails for referrals
and if you want to get the best beef you're
ever going to eat.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
In fact, Kelly Coucera.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
Who is one of our associate producers, Shelby saying, for
the Tom Martino showing day, I'll laugh, you know, and
love there's that always that made me tuckos with the
Leuctrica beef and there's no comparison. So email me Ryan,
I'm showing at iHeartMedia dot com and I will gladly
connect you with Derek. But he sent me a text
(19:04):
along these lines says, Hey, aren't all these fees just
tariffs at the local level. Well, yeah, they are as
a matter of fact. And who do they affect the most?
The average consumer, the nine to five, the blue collar
working class individual that can't afford these things that put
them over the top, that are living paycheck to paycheck,
(19:24):
that are looking to meet their bills every single month
and make the rent that's just gotten is so much higher.
I mean, good luck finding a place around these parts
and Metro Denver. That's you know, anything below what fifteen
sixteen hundred dollars a month right look at Dragon Space. Yeah,
and that's on the low end.
Speaker 4 (19:42):
That's the low end, one bedroom studio stuff.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Hey, kid me at that crap. That's where we are though.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
Yeah, we'll get some more texts here, but for those
of you just tuning in and a lot of you
are heading near eight o'clock start time. This story coming
out of the eighteen district. It's incredible to me. Danielle
Jorinsky's going to be joining us during the nine o'clock hour,
final hour of this program, and she of course is
on the euro City Council, and she is starting up
an effort to recall Amy Padden, the district attorney so
(20:13):
called in the eighteenth and originally there was the case
and we've been talking about this to a large degree
in which Caitlin Weaver tragically her life cuts short by
just a series of egregious events. One fifteen year old
illegal alien in this country illegally shouldn't be here in
the first place, his family here illegally shouldn't be here
(20:35):
in the first place, operating a vehicle his mother's without
her knowledge. His dragon puts it, stole it, fieved it
commandeered the vehicle with children in it. Not sure where
this is going. We haven't gotten an explanation on that either.
Were those his siblings, his cousins in the backseat who
were going to baseball practice?
Speaker 3 (20:53):
Is that?
Speaker 4 (20:53):
Seriously, I have no idea. I'm just trying to be
funny here on that.
Speaker 3 (20:56):
I don't know who knows. I haven't got an explanation
for that.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
Anyway, you and your buddy stole a car when you
were fifteen years old, you were up to nothing nefarious.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
He's motoring down ninety miles an hour and a forty
five mile per hour zone obliterates the vehicle that Caitlyn
Weaver is operating. She perishes in the accident, and he
was not licensed to drive. Obviously he's an illegal alien.
He's not of age, he didn't own the car, didn't
have permission to operate the car, and violating speed to
(21:31):
an egregious degree kills the young woman. And after all
of that, Amy Padden, because she cares illegal aliens, no
human is illegal in Colorado, a sanctuary state, or apparently
in Aurora, the area that she is supposed and elected
to serve, the constituents of which are American citizens, Colorado citizens,
(21:55):
Aurora citizens, Arapahoe County citizens. But no, rather than do that, well,
we don't want this illegal alien, despite all of these
violations of the law, to be deported, so so that
he's not marked for deportation. Red flag call attention to
it from ICE We're just going to give this young
man probation rather than any kind of sentence. Now ask yourself,
(22:20):
if this fifteen year old was not an illegal alien,
but simply a resident that did all these things, would
that same quote unquote punishment have been meted out handed down?
Speaker 3 (22:33):
Guarantee you no.
Speaker 2 (22:34):
But this is the concern and the priority of the
Soros funded leftist that is Amy Padden.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
But that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Because of this story that just came out, that's in
the news, that's made a national Here we go again, Colorado.
Are you proud? Are you proud yet? Is the Pride building?
Are you beaming with it? Marshall Zellinger nine News.
Speaker 9 (22:53):
The person accused of trying to grab a fifth grader
from a Cherry Creek school playground last year is incompetent
to stay trial, and for the fourth time in seven years,
that person will see the charges dropped because of incompetency,
though they're being transferred to a mental health facility. Kids
at black Forest Hills Elementary School yelled stranger danger. Solomon
(23:15):
Gallaghan is accused of trying to grab a fifth grader
at recess in April twenty twenty four, Almost one year ago,
Gallaghan was found incompetent to stand trial. Nine News investigates
looked into Gallaghan's criminal history and found felony charges dropped
twice in twenty twenty one and again in twenty eighteen
because Gallaghan was found incompetent to stand trial. A spokesman
for the Arapaho County District Attorney's Office, which will be
(23:37):
dropping the charges, tells us Gallagan is not being released
to the public, but is being released to a mental
health facility.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
And how long will Gallagan be held there until they
run out of beds or space and a new patient
comes in and they just churn this maniac back onto
the streets of Aurora free to try to kidnap another child.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
This person is not of sound mind.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Who knows what would have happened had he actually apprehended
said child. God forbid. But that's not Amy Padden's concern.
And don't let them use this watery language. The eighteenth
District Attorney's office, it's Amy Padden, say your name. She
needs to be recalled and Daniel Jurinsky is working on
that collecting signatures. If you live in the eighteenth District,
(24:19):
I will connect you to her and you could sign
that petition for the recall, because this is just out
of hand. These are just two egregious cases, but they
both made national news. Let's go to some texts here
as well. Three three one zero three, Ryan, I worked
on the Tracy Baker recall of Arapo County Clerk and
Recorder in two thousand and three. That was the last
(24:40):
official I remember being successfully recalled. We need that again
with Amy Patten here here Ryan George Brockler said that
the defense may have doctor shopped and found a shrink
to say the guy was incompetent, but couldn't have been
the prosecution who did the doctor shopping. Well, I mean,
you know, turn about his fair play and too can
play at that game. Yes, if the state so originally
deemed this individual to be competent to stand trial, he
(25:03):
had the defense said, oh, let me work on this
and we'll find one that says he's incompetent.
Speaker 3 (25:08):
Well, there's always the CounterPunch measure.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
If you're the district attorney and the prosecutor in this
case and you want to see justice done, and you
want to protect the children on playgrounds in elementary schools,
in your district. Then by god, yeah, you go on
and say no, no, no, we're gonna challenge that, we're gonna
fight this in the courts, and we think this guy
is competent to stand trial.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
We're gonna press these charges.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
We're gonna convict this individual in the pursuit of law
and order and criminal justice. But no, Amy've Patten takes
the path of least resistance. I just throws her hands
up and goes, well, too bad, So sad can't convict
he's not competent, and again there is no measure. We'll
get to some George Brockler cuts from his interview with
(25:49):
Dan Kaplis yesterday. This guy's got experience in this district,
the eighteenth as the da George Brockley himself, he's now
in the twenty third, lucky for those of you in
the twenty third, not lucky for those of us myself.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
Included the eighteenth.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
He's been through this song and dance, this ruse, this
democrat kind of reshaping of the language and Orwellian terms,
and you don't really define these words, and therefore you
don't have to adhere to standards about how they're applied
or how they're meet it out in terms of justice
and punishment, because that's not what they're interested in at all.
So yeah, there should have been a CounterPunch from the
(26:22):
prosecution and pursuing this to the ends of the earth.
Did you see the video. There is video evidence of
this maniac trying to steal, kidnap, thieve, take an eleven
year old fifth grader off an elementary school playground, and
we're going to let this individual walk free. That's what's
going to happen here where there's not enough capacity in
(26:44):
said mental hospital for this person to be committed. He's
going to walk right out of there and be free
to do this again. Are you nuts? No, you're not,
Michael Dragon Ryan. Here's the list of things Polus has
made cheaper one cheaper woolf food two three, four six.
You can't go on from there. Yeah, well, wolf food
(27:05):
in the form of our ranchers providing livestock for the
wolves to devour. So yeah, we'll take this time out
come back with those George Brockler cuts rounding out this
second hour the situation without Michael Brown Ryan Shooling filling
in back after this crime.
Speaker 10 (27:20):
Take a look at your EXCEL bill and the Energy
Assistance pro because they can't even put energy assistance program
on the entire bill anyway, it's tied to inflation and
that is.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Higher as well.
Speaker 10 (27:33):
By the way, all your listeners can call and they
can opt out. You are be a charge for both
electricity and gas. So it's the one bill we can
all opt out of and gut it.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
Well, that's helpful information. You've got to understand. There are
people like Loreina Garcia. All right, these are borderline commis,
if not full blown like Zoron Mamdani. Don't mess with
the Zoron COMI that might become or New York City.
Speaker 7 (28:01):
Now.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
I used to use that pejorative as like a joke.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
It's like a punchline, like kelicachera doesn't eat bacon and
I'm like, oh, what are.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
You a communist?
Speaker 2 (28:08):
You know?
Speaker 3 (28:09):
And hahaha. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:10):
I grew up gen X in the eighties where that
was an insult and you didn't want to be called
a commy. You're like, no, no, no, no, no, I'm
not like a Soviet you know, the you.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Know, comrade and whatever, and it.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
Over time people have really leaned into this Marxism. I
experienced it firsthand as a college student at Central Michigan
University where one of the ways you could analyze, let's
say something in the mainstream media was through the lens
of Marxist theory and the proletariat versus the bourgeoisie. And
(28:44):
I was sitting there going, what are we doing that for?
I mean, live in America? Right, capitalism, yay? Right freedom, democracy, constitution, republic, liberties,
individual rights. No, what's good for the collective? We don't
want anymore rich people. There shouldn't be any billionaires, and
no more poor people. Are all going to be just
the same, the guaranteed outcomes crowd. Here's some sour news
(29:07):
for you, Jack, from a guy who descends from those
who fled a communist dictatorship in Yugoslavia that went to ruin.
Communism in its pure form has failed everywhere it's been tried.
It has ended in squalor and despair and cannibalism.
Speaker 3 (29:23):
And I'm not exaggerating.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
No, these things happen Venezuela, Cuba, the Soviet Union. The
one place where I guess you could say it worked
is China, But that is a real amalgam of a
communist dictatorship and taking advantages of most Favored nation status
and trying to through the Nixonian sphere bring them into
the world economy into the twentieth and now the twenty
(29:46):
first century. Give them cuts and brakes and ways to
work around the margins. Not have them adhere to any
kind of labor laws, not play on a level playing
field whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (29:56):
Continue to spew pollution into the air.
Speaker 2 (29:59):
You don't see Grita Tugberg or John Kerry protesting outside
of Beijing. Why not China by far the most egregious
polluter on the planet. We all share the same air,
we all share the same water in the planet, right
And if you're that concerned about the environment, and I am,
i am to.
Speaker 3 (30:19):
A reasonable logical degree.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
But my whole point is, if you're gonna be protesting
these you're going right to China. But they don't. And
then ask yourselves why they don't protest China.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
There you go.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
Here's George Brockler on this case that we're talking about
in the eighteenth Judicial District and where even this individual's
own family members want him locked up somewhere not fit
for society.
Speaker 11 (30:44):
Let me ask you, what is the mechanism for getting
to the truth here? Is this a case where the
DA can just bury this if the DA wants to, yes,
and here's how, and by the way, I want to
revote in the possibility, especially because half these prosecutor are
people either hire or promoted and Kilner led and stuff.
I just want to leave open the possibility that, even
(31:04):
though they've made a decision that I can't figure out
or explain at the moment, that they're trying to use
some civil system to make sure this guy gets locked
up in a state hospital. Whether it's through the criminal
process or probate process, I don't know. And maybe that's
the case, But think about how this works now. The
Democrats on the legislature have not only rigged the competency statue,
(31:25):
but they've also previously rigged our sealing statutes when it
comes to cases. So the minute the DA dismisses a case,
they're required to dismiss, it automatically gets sealed, which means
the minute it gets sealed, if you were to ask them, hey,
I want to talk to you about the decision you
made in this case, they would have to by Lassay,
(31:45):
what case?
Speaker 2 (31:46):
What case? I don't know what you're talking about. Don't
look at me, what me?
Speaker 3 (31:50):
Worry again?
Speaker 2 (31:52):
His niece, his sister, both saying, look, it took this
kidnapping attempt on an elementary school playground for this all
to get noticed and make it into the news and
the eighteenth Judicial District.
Speaker 3 (32:03):
While they're in retreat, they're.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Backpedaling all of a sudden that they think this was
going to go over well, like, oh, well, that's okay.
He gets put in a mental hospital for a couple
months of these strolls right out. He's a sex offender registered.
He's been charged with several felonies. Those charges have been
dismissed because he was not quote unquote mentally competent to
stand trial. But the DA's office, Amy Padden, told the
Post in a statement, quote, we have not yet filed
(32:25):
the formal motion to dismiss We have until the end
of the.
Speaker 3 (32:27):
Month to do so.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
The defendant is being civilly committed into mental health treatment. However,
we are legally prohibited from discussing the details surrounding his
competency beyond saying that he's been found mentally incompetent to proceed.
When a defendant is founding competent to proceed, we are
legally obligated to dismiss charges. Our hands are tied based
on the findings of competency. However, they are not being
(32:48):
released to the public. They okay here that they this
individual identifies as trans went through We're not playing that
game here. You play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
You try to kidnap a kid. I'm not inhering to
your pa.
Speaker 3 (33:00):
Take a hike. Beat it.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
He They is multiple people not doing that either. Just
from a grammatical standpoint, I'm not calling an individual person.
They them not gonna do it. You don't get that
in this instance. However, to claim that this person was
not being released to the public, yes, they will be.
George Brockler just stated that if this goes through proby
(33:22):
or not the criminal process, where there's a defined sentence,
it's for however long they have capacity in those beds
to hold this person. And once they run out, and
once he's been like they're the longest amount of time,
they have no choice but to cycle in a new
person and kick out an old one. He is not
held there by a sentence of any kind, and he's
free to go right back out into your community. In
(33:44):
the eighteenth District and try to kidnap another kid, Maybe
your kid. Danielle Jorinsky coming up at nine. John Caldera
Independence Institute Next
Hey, Ryan, if only you could convince Kim Kardashian that
this case in Rapho County needs to be changed. We
know that Governor Poles agrees with what Kim thinks. That
chance that will happen, but it's worth a try.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Could definitely be and we know that she whispered in
his ears some sweet nothings that Comrade Kyle, in fact
of nine News even asked him about. And Jared Polis
has this way of talking in circles if you've ever
heard him in an interview with Ross Kominski. And for
the record, that is the only iHeart host that he
will agree to go on with. And when I inquired
(00:38):
about that before, because at the very beginning, so when
Jared Poulos was first elected governor back in twenty eighteen,
that just predated my start date here at iHeart Denver.
I would arrive on that Sunday after Thanksgiving later that month,
the day after the election, however, on a show then
known as Kapalis and Kayfer, Jared Pouls appeared with the
(00:59):
two of them and Dan had a pretty warm, engaging conversation.
Never again did Jared Polis go on with Dan. When
I asked why then, his Polis's handlers. Basically, well, he
goes on with Ross and that's enough. That is the
explanation we literally got. And as Alexa points out too,
(01:20):
and this text that she sent me, and this is
from X Jared Polis complaining about Trump's tariffs. This is
just like, have you no awareness, my man, of where
you are, where we are, where we live in Colorado.
What's happening here with the cost of housing, whether you're
renting or trying to buy a home, the cost of
(01:40):
property taxes in this state after the Gallagher Amendment was
rescinded by the voters and then not replaced by anything
else until there was some patchwork legislation that was put
through at the eleventh hour looking for a short term
remedy there.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
But it hasn't been fixed long term. It really hasn't.
But he says this.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Arafs increase the prices of many materials used in products,
including groceries and items that can't.
Speaker 3 (02:04):
Be produced in Colorado.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
This hurts consumers and encourages companies to build factories in
other countries to avoid these tariffs. What has Jared Polis
done to help bring down prices cost of living here
in Colorado, go ahead and give me a list. This
from government is the problem, mister T two on X
mutual follow of mine on that platform. Okay, he says
(02:29):
to Jared poulis next to the Jared Polis egg ban,
the Jared Polis bag ban, bag tax, the Jared Polis
gas tax, and all the other Jared Polis taxes, fees
and regulations on these as my counterpart, Leland Conway used
to point out, and he is now with Coco and
San Diego Governor mcpheeme is what Leland would call Jared
(02:50):
Polis here.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
We can't forget the delivery fee. Also, yeah, that's stupid.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
What a twenty three cent thing on Amazon?
Speaker 4 (02:56):
Right, we've gone up. It was twenty seven and I
think it's twenty eight now, is it now?
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Yeah, that's neat. Yep, thanks Governor Paulus.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
Doesn't matter what you're having to delivered to your home.
It's twenty something since more went.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
Back home in Michigan.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
And you know that's not a red state, that's a
redish is a purple state. Got a Democrat governor for
the last two terms, hopefully Republican one next time around.
Trump won it twice, but not all three times I
go there to Meyer and I go through the grocery
checkout land here's all these plastic bags, and I'm looking
at him like I could harvest these hed take them
(03:29):
home and sell them on the black market here in Colorado.
Why would you ban those who does that hurt the
working class, blue collar Coloraden's who now have to buy bring.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
Their own bat.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
I mean, it's a horrible inconvenience that I'm along with
other things along the aid ban, let's have cage free
eggs and the increase that goes along with that. I mean,
this guy, he has no room to talk, absolutely none.
And now my conversation with James Rosen, Newsback's chief Washington correspondent.
He recently got a promotion on the topic of Title
(04:05):
nine and the Trump administration pursuing a lawsuit against the
state of California.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
California Department of Education is taking federal money, which is
accompanied by a promise when they applied for those grants
to follow federal law as defined as including executive orders.
And so it is a really really clear, open and
shut that California is in violation of federal law while
(04:31):
taking federal money which has strings attached to it, So sorry, California,
you kind of have it both ways.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
She's awesome.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
Assistant Attorney General Harmey Dylan in a sit down exclusive
interview with our next guest, James Rosen, joining us here.
You can follow him on exit James Rosen TV. James,
welcome back. Thank you for your time.
Speaker 6 (04:50):
I know you're busy, Ran always a pleasure to be
with you.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Here sit down with Harmey Dylan.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
What really stood out to you about what she told
you with regard to this California case? But we know
that it's not necessarily limited to only California.
Speaker 6 (05:05):
Right, So. Harmei Dillon is the Assistant Attorney General of
the United States for the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division.
She is the top civil rights officer in the federal government,
and she is a very well known conservative activist lawyer
who's been working on religious freedom cases and similar cases
in her own private practice as an activist for a
(05:27):
long time. And she's really kind of trying to reorient
the office of the Civil Rights Division at the Department
of Justice to reconsider and to refashion what civil rights
means and which kinds of groups should be eligible for
civil rights protection this case which was filed last Wednesday,
(05:47):
and Newsmax and This Reporter were the first to get
our hands on the court filing of US v. The
California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federal which
is a very long title that sounds maybe like a
group out of Star Trek, But the California Interscholastic Federation
(06:07):
holds stages a wide array of sports competitions for young
boys and girls, young athletes, and they were the ones
who held the competition in May in Clovis, California, the
High School Track and Field State Championships where a transgender
student took home the gold in the girls' high jump
and triple jump I think it was. And the Department
(06:31):
of Justice, citing Title nine, the nineteen seventy two law
that banned any sex based discrimination on the part of
education institutions or any activities that received federal education funding,
and also citing President Trump's executive order of February on
this subject coruct basically on last Wednesday, filed suit against
(06:52):
those two California agencies in US District Court in the
Central District of California, alleging that those two agencies have
been violating the civil rights of girls across California by
allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls' sports. They cited
those track and field championships where the transgender student took
(07:12):
home two gold medals as a flagrant violation of Title
nine and the executive order. And what's really interesting if
you looked at the lawsuit, which again Newsmax was the
first to report, it appeared that DOJ felt that they
had found a smoking gun against these two California agencies.
And that was that three days before those track and
(07:35):
field statewide championships in Clovis, California, where the transgender student
took home the gold, three days before that, Interscholastic Federation,
which holds these things, announced a change to its rules.
They called it a new pilot entry program. And what
it meant that was, if any quote unquote biological female
found herself doing well enough to place among the top three,
(07:58):
but also found herself displaced from the top three by
a transgender student, then that biological female would also be
entitled to receive a medal. And as DOJ put it
more or less in the lawsuit, this showed this rules
change and their use of the term biological female showed
that the Interscholastic Federation understood very well that male athletes
(08:20):
have a biological advantage over girl athletes, and the fact
that they were changing the rules just before that competition
was held showed that they understood the impropriety of their actions. California,
for their part, stood attorney Assistant Attorney General Dylan and
her boss, Attorney General Pam Bondi back in June as
(08:40):
a kind of preemptive move alleging that the demands by
the DOJ for the State of California to come into
compliance with Title nine as interpreted by the Trump administration
or themselves unconstitutional and a violation of the equal protection
rights of transgender students. So we will see this as
the subject of court action for some time.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
Heading for a showdown.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
He is the chief Washington correspondent and White House correspondent
for Newsmax. As you heard him say, breaking this story
and having an exclusive interview sit down with Harmey Dylan.
Here's another portion of that conversation.
Speaker 5 (09:14):
There are still a few billion that haven't been drawn
down yet, so we have the money, so transferring that
money is dependent on California being in compliance to federal law, so.
Speaker 6 (09:27):
You don't need to seek an injunction necessarily.
Speaker 5 (09:30):
I think we hold the cards in that regard.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
We hold the cards in that regard.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Now, James, you had mentioned this kind of preemptive strike,
and there are twenty three states total, I believe that
have joined a coalition in a lawsuit against the US
District filed in the US District Court against the Trump administration,
to which California AG Rob Bonta said during a news conference, quote,
Congress holds the power of the purse, not the President
(09:56):
Trump and parenthetical US Education Secretary Linda ban Man have
no right to hold these funds back. So it seems
to be a standoff here based on constitutional interpretation of
the executive branch holding the purse strings, as Harmony Dillon
claims there and the Attorney General for California's point that no,
it's Congress that appropriated these funds and the president the
(10:17):
executive branch has.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
No right to intercede. Where do you see it going
from here?
Speaker 6 (10:22):
The clip you played of Assistant Attorney General Dylan saying
we hold the cards in this regard and citing several billion,
So this all goes to the point that this is
not an academic matter, no pun intended. The state of
California receives up to forty four billion dollars a year
in federal education funds. If they lose this litigation, the
(10:45):
Golden State can continue to allow transgender athletes to compete
in biological girls' sports, but they just won't be able
to receive their forty four billion dollars a year, and
that's going to be a huge hit to what is
in terms of the fifty States, one of the largest
economies in the country. I had asked Tottorney General Dylan
if she was going to seek an injunction against California
receiving any of the forty four billion while this litigation
(11:07):
is underway, and she noted that the three billion has
yet to be drawn down. So when the State of
California tells us that it's Congress that controls the purse strings,
that's true for the appropriation process, But then there is
the disbursement process. After the funds have been appropriated by
the Congress and the appropriation's law has been signed by
the President, those funds have to go out the door,
(11:29):
and three billions she was telling us of the forty
four billion haven't yet, and she is going to withhold
those funds while this litigation is underway. You mentioned a
number of states that have joined with California. I did
ask Attorney General Assistant Attorney General Dylan if she sees
other lawsuits like this coming.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Up soon, and she said yes.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
And one place we might expect to see it is
main because you might remember that extraordinary confrontation at the
White House, I believe in February when President Trump had
a number of the nation's governors to visit early in
this two point zero term, and the governor of May
and a woman who's a Democrat, basically made it clear
in a confrontation with him that that her state was
(12:10):
not going to abide by the executive order on banning
transgender athletes. So there are more lawsuits coming. And as
we say, there's real money at stake here when you're
talking about forty four billion for California and education funds.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
And locally here in Colorado, they have enjoined that lawsuit
as well. Attorney General Phil Wiser eighty million dollars in
withheld education funding is Colorado's part in this. Chief White
House Correspondent for Newsmax James Rosen joining us. James, I
got to get your take on this other topic as well.
It is big in the news today, and that is
the auto pen scandal for President Biden. Here's Representative James Comer,
(12:47):
Republican Kentucky on who was really calling the shots and
pulling the strings for Joe Biden behind the scenes with
this auto pen.
Speaker 7 (12:54):
There was a select few. And when I say a
select few, Jason, I'm talking about I can count them
on one hand that we're calling the shots. There's no
evidence thus far that's emerged that Joe Biden knew anything
about who was using the autopen or the process involved
in authorizing the use of the oulipin.
Speaker 3 (13:15):
We're going to continue.
Speaker 7 (13:16):
We've got more names to bring in for depositions.
Speaker 3 (13:19):
Obviously, we're going.
Speaker 7 (13:20):
To get to the ron claims and maybe I or
maybe there'll be people in the Bidens family, immediate family
that'll be implicated this. We're going to bring them all
in and we're going to get the truth to the
American people. And if Joe Biden's name was forged on
these executive orders and these pardons, then those executive orders
and pardons are going to face a tough future in
(13:41):
a court of law.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
This is reporting from New York Times, this is Alex
Thompson axios. So this is not a conservative agenda by
any means or stretch of the imagination. James, But you
covered the Biden White House front and center, and you
had your ups and downs with KJP and that entire process.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
But what are your thoughts on this?
Speaker 2 (13:56):
It would seem to be if, as alleged, this is
what happened with the auto pen and the pardons, etc.
Who would be the biggest political scandal in the White
House for over the last fifty years.
Speaker 6 (14:06):
So two important developments have occurred in all of this
in recent days. One was that President Trump, through the
White House Council's Office, made it clear that he was
waiving executive privilege for anyone who might be inclined to
invoke it, any former Biden White House officials who might
want to invoke executive privilege to avoid answering questions from
(14:26):
the Department of Justice or the House Oversight Committee in
their respective probes into President Biden's decline in office and
who knew what and when. The other extraordinary development was
that after that happened, a doctor Kevin O'Connor, President Biden's
personal physician, who used published letters to attest annually to
the fitness of mister Biden for office, backed out of
(14:47):
an agreement he had with the House Overside Committee for
a voluntary appearance for a transcribed interview and said, I'll
only come in if you subpoena me. So the panel
subpoena the doctor O'Connor, and when he finally appeared for
his testimony last week, he instead asserted the Fifth Amendment
privilege against in crimp's self incrimination and refused to answer
questions even such as was it your estimation that mister
(15:08):
Biden was fit for office? So now we saw President
Biden responding to those Former President Biden responding to those
developments by giving an interview to The New York Times,
which ran over the weekend, had been conducted last Thursday.
It was all of ten minutes long. This is something
he famously refused to do when he was in office,
was to give an interview to the New York Times,
(15:29):
And the purpose of this interview was to declare that
quote I made every decision relating to his grants of
clemency presidential clemency near the end of his term. He
said the only reason the auto pen was used because
there were so many signatures required more than a thousand.
But he also conceded that he didn't review every last
name amongst those fifteen hundred or so pardons. So some
(15:51):
analysts regard that the president the former president, took this
extraordinary step of talking with the New York Times. We
all recall that due to his decline in office, President
Biden was shielded from the news media like no other
chief executive in modern times. He took this extraordinary step,
some analysts believe, to try to provide some cover to
(16:11):
individuals who were working for him, who would enjoy less
immunity from in legal proceedings arising from official acts undertaken
during the president's term. The former president would enjoy that
kind of immunity they would not, So perhaps he felt
by stepping out and speaking out and taking responsibility for
these pardons, he might be helping out his former aids.
(16:35):
As these investigations continue to unfold.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Nobody is his equal on Capitol Hill. In my view,
you can follow him on acts at James Rosen TV,
the chief White House correspondent for Newsmax, again breaking that
story as it pertains to California and Title nine with
Assistant Attorney General Harmey Dylan and that exclusive sit down
interview as well. James, great work as always, Thank you
so much for your time and for joining me here today.
Speaker 6 (16:57):
You're a good man. Ryan.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Thank you, Ryan truleyhi in for Michael Brown here on
the situation without him today, dragging alongside. Looking forward to
more of your texts on the other side of this
time out, be sure to send those along. At thirty
three one h three still to come. John caldera Independence
Institute at the top of the hour eight o'clock on
the potential formation of a third party by Elon Musk
(17:20):
and why that's not such a good idea even here
in Colorado where a lot of unaffiliates may be looking
for a third option. And coming up next will reheat
this story about Amy Padden in the eighteenth.
Speaker 8 (17:33):
Good Morning, Michael and Dragon. That delivery fee that fullis
put on to Coloradden's It's now up to twenty nine cents.
And I think I looked it up at one point
because I noticed it kept going up, and I think
every year I can't remember how the wording was. It's
just supposed to keep going up.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
And what does it serve?
Speaker 8 (17:51):
Just more money out of our pockets.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
These are facts, And yeah, this they got the bag fee,
the Amazon delivery fee that gets tacked on there.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
This is annoying, just very annoying, and you have to
do this.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
Texter's point on that Talkbacker says, bagfee started.
Speaker 3 (18:11):
Twenty nine cents, then twenty eight cents, then twenty nine cents.
Now it's back to twenty eight cents. What's going on there?
What's the fluctuation? What's that all about?
Speaker 4 (18:17):
Pretty sure it started at twenty seven, then eight, and
I believe people who's now saying it's twenty nine. I
honestly haven't looked because it's just been annoying.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
Tax and fee and to death.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
And my buddy Derek Kletchka, if you're looking for some
black Angus beef, by the way, this is a he
doesn't pay me to say this, but it's the best
leuchka and I've getten. I'm getting some emails for referrals
and if you want to get the best beef you're
ever going to eat.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
In fact, Kelly Coucera.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
Who is one of our associate producers, Shelby saying, for
the Tom Martino showing day, I'll laugh, you know, and
love there's that always that made me tuckos with the
Leuctrica beef and there's no comparison. So email me Ryan,
I'm showing at iHeartMedia dot com and I will gladly
connect you with Derek. But he sent me a text
(19:04):
along these lines says, Hey, aren't all these fees just
tariffs at the local level. Well, yeah, they are as
a matter of fact. And who do they affect the most?
The average consumer, the nine to five, the blue collar
working class individual that can't afford these things that put
them over the top, that are living paycheck to paycheck,
(19:24):
that are looking to meet their bills every single month
and make the rent that's just gotten is so much higher.
I mean, good luck finding a place around these parts
and Metro Denver. That's you know, anything below what fifteen
sixteen hundred dollars a month right look at Dragon Space. Yeah,
and that's on the low end.
Speaker 4 (19:42):
That's the low end, one bedroom studio stuff.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Hey, kid me at that crap. That's where we are though.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
Yeah, we'll get some more texts here, but for those
of you just tuning in and a lot of you
are heading near eight o'clock start time. This story coming
out of the eighteen district. It's incredible to me. Danielle
Jorinsky's going to be joining us during the nine o'clock hour,
final hour of this program, and she of course is
on the euro City Council, and she is starting up
an effort to recall Amy Padden, the district attorney so
(20:13):
called in the eighteenth and originally there was the case
and we've been talking about this to a large degree
in which Caitlin Weaver tragically her life cuts short by
just a series of egregious events. One fifteen year old
illegal alien in this country illegally shouldn't be here in
the first place, his family here illegally shouldn't be here
(20:35):
in the first place, operating a vehicle his mother's without
her knowledge. His dragon puts it, stole it, fieved it
commandeered the vehicle with children in it. Not sure where
this is going. We haven't gotten an explanation on that either.
Were those his siblings, his cousins in the backseat who
were going to baseball practice?
Speaker 3 (20:53):
Is that?
Speaker 4 (20:53):
Seriously, I have no idea. I'm just trying to be
funny here on that.
Speaker 3 (20:56):
I don't know who knows. I haven't got an explanation
for that.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
Anyway, you and your buddy stole a car when you
were fifteen years old, you were up to nothing nefarious.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
He's motoring down ninety miles an hour and a forty
five mile per hour zone obliterates the vehicle that Caitlyn
Weaver is operating. She perishes in the accident, and he
was not licensed to drive. Obviously he's an illegal alien.
He's not of age, he didn't own the car, didn't
have permission to operate the car, and violating speed to
(21:31):
an egregious degree kills the young woman. And after all
of that, Amy Padden, because she cares illegal aliens, no
human is illegal in Colorado, a sanctuary state, or apparently
in Aurora, the area that she is supposed and elected
to serve, the constituents of which are American citizens, Colorado citizens,
(21:55):
Aurora citizens, Arapahoe County citizens. But no, rather than do that, well,
we don't want this illegal alien, despite all of these
violations of the law, to be deported, so so that
he's not marked for deportation. Red flag call attention to
it from ICE We're just going to give this young
man probation rather than any kind of sentence. Now ask yourself,
(22:20):
if this fifteen year old was not an illegal alien,
but simply a resident that did all these things, would
that same quote unquote punishment have been meted out handed down?
Speaker 3 (22:33):
Guarantee you no.
Speaker 2 (22:34):
But this is the concern and the priority of the
Soros funded leftist that is Amy Padden.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
But that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Because of this story that just came out, that's in
the news, that's made a national Here we go again, Colorado.
Are you proud? Are you proud yet? Is the Pride building?
Are you beaming with it? Marshall Zellinger nine News.
Speaker 9 (22:53):
The person accused of trying to grab a fifth grader
from a Cherry Creek school playground last year is incompetent
to stay trial, and for the fourth time in seven years,
that person will see the charges dropped because of incompetency,
though they're being transferred to a mental health facility. Kids
at black Forest Hills Elementary School yelled stranger danger. Solomon
(23:15):
Gallaghan is accused of trying to grab a fifth grader
at recess in April twenty twenty four, Almost one year ago,
Gallaghan was found incompetent to stand trial. Nine News investigates
looked into Gallaghan's criminal history and found felony charges dropped
twice in twenty twenty one and again in twenty eighteen
because Gallaghan was found incompetent to stand trial. A spokesman
for the Arapaho County District Attorney's Office, which will be
(23:37):
dropping the charges, tells us Gallagan is not being released
to the public, but is being released to a mental
health facility.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
And how long will Gallagan be held there until they
run out of beds or space and a new patient
comes in and they just churn this maniac back onto
the streets of Aurora free to try to kidnap another child.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
This person is not of sound mind.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Who knows what would have happened had he actually apprehended
said child. God forbid. But that's not Amy Padden's concern.
And don't let them use this watery language. The eighteenth
District Attorney's office, it's Amy Padden, say your name. She
needs to be recalled and Daniel Jurinsky is working on
that collecting signatures. If you live in the eighteenth District,
(24:19):
I will connect you to her and you could sign
that petition for the recall, because this is just out
of hand. These are just two egregious cases, but they
both made national news. Let's go to some texts here
as well. Three three one zero three, Ryan, I worked
on the Tracy Baker recall of Arapo County Clerk and
Recorder in two thousand and three. That was the last
(24:40):
official I remember being successfully recalled. We need that again
with Amy Patten here here Ryan George Brockler said that
the defense may have doctor shopped and found a shrink
to say the guy was incompetent, but couldn't have been
the prosecution who did the doctor shopping. Well, I mean,
you know, turn about his fair play and too can
play at that game. Yes, if the state so originally
deemed this individual to be competent to stand trial, he
(25:03):
had the defense said, oh, let me work on this
and we'll find one that says he's incompetent.
Speaker 3 (25:08):
Well, there's always the CounterPunch measure.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
If you're the district attorney and the prosecutor in this
case and you want to see justice done, and you
want to protect the children on playgrounds in elementary schools,
in your district. Then by god, yeah, you go on
and say no, no, no, we're gonna challenge that, we're gonna
fight this in the courts, and we think this guy
is competent to stand trial.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
We're gonna press these charges.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
We're gonna convict this individual in the pursuit of law
and order and criminal justice. But no, Amy've Patten takes
the path of least resistance. I just throws her hands
up and goes, well, too bad, So sad can't convict
he's not competent, and again there is no measure. We'll
get to some George Brockler cuts from his interview with
(25:49):
Dan Kaplis yesterday. This guy's got experience in this district,
the eighteenth as the da George Brockley himself, he's now
in the twenty third, lucky for those of you in
the twenty third, not lucky for those of us myself.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
Included the eighteenth.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
He's been through this song and dance, this ruse, this
democrat kind of reshaping of the language and Orwellian terms,
and you don't really define these words, and therefore you
don't have to adhere to standards about how they're applied
or how they're meet it out in terms of justice
and punishment, because that's not what they're interested in at all.
So yeah, there should have been a CounterPunch from the
(26:22):
prosecution and pursuing this to the ends of the earth.
Did you see the video. There is video evidence of
this maniac trying to steal, kidnap, thieve, take an eleven
year old fifth grader off an elementary school playground, and
we're going to let this individual walk free. That's what's
going to happen here where there's not enough capacity in
(26:44):
said mental hospital for this person to be committed. He's
going to walk right out of there and be free
to do this again. Are you nuts? No, you're not,
Michael Dragon Ryan. Here's the list of things Polus has
made cheaper one cheaper woolf food two three, four six.
You can't go on from there. Yeah, well, wolf food
(27:05):
in the form of our ranchers providing livestock for the
wolves to devour. So yeah, we'll take this time out
come back with those George Brockler cuts rounding out this
second hour the situation without Michael Brown Ryan Shooling filling
in back after this crime.
Speaker 10 (27:20):
Take a look at your EXCEL bill and the Energy
Assistance pro because they can't even put energy assistance program
on the entire bill anyway, it's tied to inflation and
that is.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Higher as well.
Speaker 10 (27:33):
By the way, all your listeners can call and they
can opt out. You are be a charge for both
electricity and gas. So it's the one bill we can
all opt out of and gut it.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
Well, that's helpful information. You've got to understand. There are
people like Loreina Garcia. All right, these are borderline commis,
if not full blown like Zoron Mamdani. Don't mess with
the Zoron COMI that might become or New York City.
Speaker 7 (28:01):
Now.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
I used to use that pejorative as like a joke.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
It's like a punchline, like kelicachera doesn't eat bacon and
I'm like, oh, what are.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
You a communist?
Speaker 2 (28:08):
You know?
Speaker 3 (28:09):
And hahaha. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:10):
I grew up gen X in the eighties where that
was an insult and you didn't want to be called
a commy. You're like, no, no, no, no, no, I'm
not like a Soviet you know, the you.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Know, comrade and whatever, and it.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
Over time people have really leaned into this Marxism. I
experienced it firsthand as a college student at Central Michigan
University where one of the ways you could analyze, let's
say something in the mainstream media was through the lens
of Marxist theory and the proletariat versus the bourgeoisie. And
(28:44):
I was sitting there going, what are we doing that for?
I mean, live in America? Right, capitalism, yay? Right freedom, democracy, constitution, republic, liberties,
individual rights. No, what's good for the collective? We don't
want anymore rich people. There shouldn't be any billionaires, and
no more poor people. Are all going to be just
the same, the guaranteed outcomes crowd. Here's some sour news
(29:07):
for you, Jack, from a guy who descends from those
who fled a communist dictatorship in Yugoslavia that went to ruin.
Communism in its pure form has failed everywhere it's been tried.
It has ended in squalor and despair and cannibalism.
Speaker 3 (29:23):
And I'm not exaggerating.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
No, these things happen Venezuela, Cuba, the Soviet Union. The
one place where I guess you could say it worked
is China, But that is a real amalgam of a
communist dictatorship and taking advantages of most Favored nation status
and trying to through the Nixonian sphere bring them into
the world economy into the twentieth and now the twenty
(29:46):
first century. Give them cuts and brakes and ways to
work around the margins. Not have them adhere to any
kind of labor laws, not play on a level playing
field whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (29:56):
Continue to spew pollution into the air.
Speaker 2 (29:59):
You don't see Grita Tugberg or John Kerry protesting outside
of Beijing. Why not China by far the most egregious
polluter on the planet. We all share the same air,
we all share the same water in the planet, right
And if you're that concerned about the environment, and I am,
i am to.
Speaker 3 (30:19):
A reasonable logical degree.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
But my whole point is, if you're gonna be protesting
these you're going right to China. But they don't. And
then ask yourselves why they don't protest China.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
There you go.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
Here's George Brockler on this case that we're talking about
in the eighteenth Judicial District and where even this individual's
own family members want him locked up somewhere not fit
for society.
Speaker 11 (30:44):
Let me ask you, what is the mechanism for getting
to the truth here? Is this a case where the
DA can just bury this if the DA wants to, yes,
and here's how, and by the way, I want to
revote in the possibility, especially because half these prosecutor are
people either hire or promoted and Kilner led and stuff.
I just want to leave open the possibility that, even
(31:04):
though they've made a decision that I can't figure out
or explain at the moment, that they're trying to use
some civil system to make sure this guy gets locked
up in a state hospital. Whether it's through the criminal
process or probate process, I don't know. And maybe that's
the case, But think about how this works now. The
Democrats on the legislature have not only rigged the competency statue,
(31:25):
but they've also previously rigged our sealing statutes when it
comes to cases. So the minute the DA dismisses a case,
they're required to dismiss, it automatically gets sealed, which means
the minute it gets sealed, if you were to ask them, hey,
I want to talk to you about the decision you
made in this case, they would have to by Lassay,
(31:45):
what case?
Speaker 2 (31:46):
What case? I don't know what you're talking about. Don't
look at me, what me?
Speaker 3 (31:50):
Worry again?
Speaker 2 (31:52):
His niece, his sister, both saying, look, it took this
kidnapping attempt on an elementary school playground for this all
to get noticed and make it into the news and
the eighteenth Judicial District.
Speaker 3 (32:03):
While they're in retreat, they're.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Backpedaling all of a sudden that they think this was
going to go over well, like, oh, well, that's okay.
He gets put in a mental hospital for a couple
months of these strolls right out. He's a sex offender registered.
He's been charged with several felonies. Those charges have been
dismissed because he was not quote unquote mentally competent to
stand trial. But the DA's office, Amy Padden, told the
Post in a statement, quote, we have not yet filed
(32:25):
the formal motion to dismiss We have until the end
of the.
Speaker 3 (32:27):
Month to do so.
Speaker 2 (32:28):
The defendant is being civilly committed into mental health treatment. However,
we are legally prohibited from discussing the details surrounding his
competency beyond saying that he's been found mentally incompetent to proceed.
When a defendant is founding competent to proceed, we are
legally obligated to dismiss charges. Our hands are tied based
on the findings of competency. However, they are not being
(32:48):
released to the public. They okay here that they this
individual identifies as trans went through We're not playing that
game here. You play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.
You try to kidnap a kid. I'm not inhering to
your pa.
Speaker 3 (33:00):
Take a hike. Beat it.
Speaker 2 (33:02):
He They is multiple people not doing that either. Just
from a grammatical standpoint, I'm not calling an individual person.
They them not gonna do it. You don't get that
in this instance. However, to claim that this person was
not being released to the public, yes, they will be.
George Brockler just stated that if this goes through proby
(33:22):
or not the criminal process, where there's a defined sentence,
it's for however long they have capacity in those beds
to hold this person. And once they run out, and
once he's been like they're the longest amount of time,
they have no choice but to cycle in a new
person and kick out an old one. He is not
held there by a sentence of any kind, and he's
free to go right back out into your community. In
(33:44):
the eighteenth District and try to kidnap another kid, Maybe
your kid. Danielle Jorinsky coming up at nine. John Caldera
Independence Institute Next
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.