7-21-25 - 8am - 2016 Russian Interference

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael. Between all of the things that Governor Paulus is doing,
Colorado is becoming more and more uncompetitive between states. So
all of this is going to lead to the mass
migration of people out of Colorado that came to Colorado for.

Speaker 2 (00:16):
The opportunities that we used to offer.

Speaker 1 (00:19):
It's just one more reason why we have to push
our income tax lower and our regulations lower. Uncompetitiveness, Yes,
totally agree.

Speaker 3 (00:32):
The question excuse me. The question then becomes, how do
we go about doing that? Because obviously we can't do
that without a change in the Pollet Bureau. That's that's
what has to happen. I want I want to go

(00:55):
for I talked a little bit about this on Saturday,
but I want to talk about it again because it's
highly significant and it's going to be a test of
not just what we do as a nation, but how
far is the nation really willing to go to garner

(01:21):
the accountability that I think we need. And I do
believe that we need to have accountability. The Director of
National Intelligence, the D and I, if I may, the
D and I Tulci Gabbert. As I said Saturday, I
think this is makes it very clear to me why

(01:46):
there was such huge opposition to the appointment of Tulsi
Gabbert to be the d and I.

Speaker 4 (01:54):
Do you even know what the Director of National Intelligence is?

Speaker 3 (01:59):
It's it's one of those things that I questioned at
the time that we started doing it.

Speaker 4 (02:07):
Now I really had.

Speaker 3 (02:08):
No involvement in this, so I my opinion was in fact,
I'm making sure I was ever asked my opinion about
the creation of the DNI. But you go back to
pre nine to eleven, there was this firewall between the
CIA and the FBI, and there are a lot of

(02:31):
people that will speculate, some legitimately and some conspiratorially, and
some rationally and some irrationally that had that firewall not existed,
but had we had some mechanism by which they could
have shared information not violating what their mission statements are,
not violating federal statutes, but said, hey, listen, we've come

(02:54):
across this information that you know, we got legitimately, but
it's not actionable for us because it involves something going
on domestically in the United States. So here, FBI, do
with it what you want. And I'm talking about the
hijackers of nine to eleven. Some argue that that firewall

(03:15):
prevented the CIA and the FBI from talking to each other,
and so therefore they slipped through the cracks and we
ended up with the attacks on September eleven. That's just
that's you can you can run with that however you
want to. I'm not, because it's not important to what
we're talking about here. So the solution that Congress and

(03:41):
the Bush administration came up with was, let's create another bureaucracy.

Speaker 4 (03:48):
I always laughed at it.

Speaker 3 (03:49):
It's like the solution, pardon me, it's getting worse dragon it.
The solution always seemed to be, let's create a new bureaucracy.
And in this case, let's create the Directorate of National Intelligence,
and let's appoint a Director of National Intelligence whose job

(04:11):
is to oversee the intelligence activities of all of the
intel community, the NSA, the d IA, the FBI, the CIA,
every little organization, even DHS, every little cabinet department that
has some sort of intel group. We need to have

(04:32):
someplace where we can collate and we can coordinate, and
we can decon you know, we can deconflict you know,
intel activity. And that person will then be in charge
of actually overseeing the development of the Presidential Daily Brief,
the PDB, so that they can, you know, every day

(04:52):
brief people like the president and then people like me.
So we created the Director of National Intelligence gets nominated,
a former Democrat, a former member of Congress, a member
of the US military gets and a former Democrat nominee

(05:13):
for president or candidate for president. She gets nominated, and
everybody's hair starts blowing up. And I always thought it
was just because she had crossed the line, she had
committed the.

Speaker 4 (05:31):
Mortal sin of.

Speaker 3 (05:33):
Going from I don't know if she's actually a registered
Republican or not, but she certainly came out in favor
of supporting Donald Trump. She dropped a bombshell Friday, revealing
newly declassified documents that she says proves and I quote,
a treasonous conspiracy directed by President Obama. Her word's not mine,

(06:00):
but that is exactly what she said. In fact, let's
go to let's go to the audio.

Speaker 5 (06:10):
Today and yesterday the Director.

Speaker 2 (06:12):
Of the Intelligence.

Speaker 4 (06:17):
No, here we go, this is the right one. I'm sorry,
I Apolo Jock.

Speaker 5 (06:20):
Today and yesterday the Director of the Intelligence Community, Tulsi Gabbard,
has said that she is referring for prosecution former American
officials she accused of treasona's conspiracy a year's long coup
against President Trump because they assessed Russia had tried to
influence the election. This is weeks after the CIA director

(06:43):
issued a report critiquing the trade craft that went into
that twenty sixteen assessment. Is there any legal basis for
any kind of prosecution here? Today and yesterday.

Speaker 6 (06:57):
She's talking to well, Talsea is doing. It's a little
sleight of hand, but it's worth focusing on. She is
saying that the Intelligence Committee el.

Speaker 3 (07:08):
Second, well, I figure out what's playing here that I
don't want playing right now?

Speaker 4 (07:13):
Who's doing this? Who's doing it?

Speaker 3 (07:17):
Yeah, this is what happens when you feel like crap
and you're not paying attention. Oh, it's still Jim Hines talking.
So here she is talking to Congressman Jim Hines, asking
about Margaret Brennan on Face of the Nation yesterday, said oh, listen,
treesonless actions against President Obama?

Speaker 6 (07:38):
What say you now what Tulsi is doing. It's a
little sleight of hand, but it's worth focusing on. She
is saying that the Intelligence Committee early on said that
the Russians could not use cyber tools to mess with
the voting infrastructure, the machines that tally our votes. And

(07:59):
that was true then and it is true now. Though
the Russians tried to break into a couple of states,
you know, election technical infrastructure, they didn't do it, but
it is well known and well established. The Russians packed
into the DNC and undertook any number of other influence operations,
including buying reams of Facebook ads to discredit Hillary Clinton.

(08:21):
That is not in contention, right, And what is horrifying
about this whole lie out of Gabbard is number one,
it puts people at risk and right now, you know,
the mouth breathers on MAGA online are just going out
of their minds based on a lie. And number two,
the intelligence community is full of very very good people
who do their jobs every single day, and now they're

(08:42):
watching their leader do something that each and every one
of them knows is dishonest and it is a really
really bad thing for the safety and security of the
American people.

Speaker 3 (08:52):
When that Dino, now is that true? Because what did
she actually say here? She is on Fox.

Speaker 7 (09:01):
In my role as the Director of National Intelligence, I
oversee eighteen different intelligence community elements, and in the months
leading up to the November twenty sixteen election, the intelligence
community agreed that there was no intelligence that reflected that
Russia was trying to hack the election.

Speaker 3 (09:22):
Up to the election, all the agencies agreed, there's no
intel that shows that Russian Russia is interfering. Did they
buy some ads what they buy six centred bucks with
their ads on Facebook or something? No, that's not election interference.
I get about six hundred ads, you know, made up

(09:42):
some bs about Joe Biden or Donald Trump.

Speaker 4 (09:46):
It's not election interference.

Speaker 5 (09:48):
In favor of either candidate.

Speaker 7 (09:50):
The evidence showed, the intelligence showed that again Russia did
not have either the intent nor the capability to be
able to impact the outcome of the United States election.
So it was very striking when we look back again
at the documents that I declassified and released, that shows
there was a shift in early December. The first week

(10:12):
of December, again, another document was produced by the Intelligence
Commuity of President's Daily Brief.

Speaker 3 (10:19):
Now and emphasize what she's saying here, which I think
the cabal is trying to ignore, is they produced one
presidential Daily Brief, Comy Clapper, Susan Rice. They all looked
at it before they took it to Obama and said,
oh no, no, no, no, no, no no, because they
knew that wasn't the plan. The plan was they needed

(10:41):
Russian interference. They needed to show that. So they literally
just rewrote the PbD to fit their narraty, not based
on actionable intelligence, to fit in narraty.

Speaker 7 (10:55):
Was consistent with every other assessment that was done previously.

Speaker 5 (10:58):
Leading up to the election.

Speaker 7 (11:00):
Our show did not this is after the election, now,
did not attempt to affetch the outcome of the American election.

Speaker 5 (11:10):
That was never.

Speaker 7 (11:11):
Published hours before would have gone into President Obama's President's
Daily Brief. It was pulled by a senior level intelligence
official saying that they had to pull it because they
had received new guidance the very next new.

Speaker 3 (11:27):
Guidance, not new intel, new guidance. There's a huge difference.
I don't know how to emphasize it any stronger. But
it's not based on new intelligence, it's based on new guidance. Well,
who'd that guidance come from? Came from Obama through Susan Rice,
his National security advisor, back down to Coomy and Clapper. Hey, listen,

(11:52):
don't give that to Obama. No, We've got to have
plausible deniability, So you go back and rewrite that sucker day.

Speaker 7 (12:00):
This meeting was called a National Security Council meeting, bring
all together all of the senior leaders of President Obama's cabinet,
and the topic that was put forward was a sensitive matter.
The task that came out of that meeting was coming
from President Obama directing the intelligence community, then Obama's OD

(12:21):
and I Director Clapper, to produce a document to produce
an intelligence assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow
affected the outcome of the election that had already occurred,
electing Donald Trump to the presidency. This document that they
published in January of twenty seventeen was the foundational groundwork

(12:45):
that they continued to reference over and over and over
again to enact this year's long coup against President Trump.

Speaker 3 (12:52):
She took too long to explain, Hey, they had they
were going to do a PDB and it showed that
Russia was not actively engaged in trying to influence the election.
And then they decided, oh, but that's not what Obama wants.
Susan Rice, the White House staff has told us we
want to show that, so let's go back and rewrite it.

(13:13):
Let's just make up stuff. So how do we make
up stuff? Oh, well, that Clinton campaign and the DNC
are going to hire what's his name, Chris Anyway for
the Steele DOSSI it was a Chris Steele. I forget
what his name was, but anyway, to create the Steele dossier.
And then we'll put that in the PDB so that

(13:33):
we can then do two things. We can take that
and leak it to the New York Times and the
Washington Post so we can say, see, look, they're even
they're reporting it. And then they can take it to
Trump and say to Trump, look, we've got evidence that
you were in a Moscow hotel room and you had
some prostitution, you were.

Speaker 4 (13:51):
Urinating on them.

Speaker 3 (13:54):
That's what she should have said, and you know, thirty
seconds or less, but you know, she wanted to lay
it out there as well as you could.

Speaker 4 (14:02):
So what does she do?

Speaker 3 (14:04):
She declassified hundreds of pages of emails and government documents.
And here's the timeline from the weeks between Trump's twenty
sixteen election victory and his inauguration, which showed that Obama
and his top intel team actually set up the Russian
collusion scandal that plagued.

Speaker 4 (14:26):
His first term.

Speaker 3 (14:28):
The timeline goes like this, December eighth, in what would
have been the PDB, the brief then d and I.
Her equivalent then was James Clapper. He wrote, quote, we
assessed that Russia and criminal actors did not impact recent

(14:48):
election results. He told the truth. The brief did highlight
one instance in Illinois where Moscow tried but failed to
hack into an election system. About that date, Gabbard said,
before it could reach the president, it was abruptly pulled

(15:09):
based on new guidance, as I emphasized that key intelligent
intelligence assessment. The original PDB was never published, she says.
So then the next day, December nine, Obama meets with
heads of his intel agencies. In that meeting was the

(15:30):
FBI director James Comey, the CIA director John Brennan, the
Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, Susan Rice's director of
National Security, and a few others now emails that have
been produced from that following that meeting show that they
were directed to quote produce an assessment per the President's

(15:52):
requests that would highlight the tactics that Russia tried to
use in twenty sixteen. Now the Cabal, for some reason
seems to gloss over that they were directed to produce
an assessment per the president's request. In other words, let's
don't do it based on intel, Let's do it on
what the president wants. December nine, again, same day, that's

(16:19):
the day they began leaking to the media to try
to push out the story that they had concocted in
that meeting with Obama, and they were successful. The Washington
Post wrote this, the CIA has concluded in a secret assessment.

Speaker 4 (16:35):
That's bullcrap.

Speaker 3 (16:37):
The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia
intervened in the twenty sixteen election to help Donald Trump
win the presidency. So now, two weeks before Trump took
office on January sixth, the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper,
finally published that brief that had been paused back on

(16:59):
December eight, almost a full month later, but this time
it concluded quote Putin and the Russian government aspired to
help President elect Trump's election chances when possible by discrediting
Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to Trump.

Speaker 4 (17:20):
And what happened next.

Speaker 3 (17:22):
You could say, it's history, and I hesitate to do
it because I don't trust you an inch, But I'm
asking you to do a favor for me.

Speaker 8 (17:34):
No, you just interrupted my cold setup here. No, no,
you shush.

Speaker 4 (17:39):
Oh boy, I'll.

Speaker 2 (17:40):
Die happy if I were to see Obama in handcuffs.

Speaker 4 (17:45):
I'm sorry.

Speaker 8 (17:46):
Don't you even know how your own show works? To
bump music, I needed to play it for a little bit,
so we got the goods set up there. Then I've
got a delicious talk pack that goes with the bumper music.
Plus I've got Johnny Cash with a very low voice
going in there, which it makes fun of you and your.

Speaker 2 (18:01):
Low voice going on right, Noka, your short throat. He's
sling blading. That's for and tried and mash potato.

Speaker 8 (18:07):
But no, you won't even let me do all that
kind of stuff. You're just gonna go ahead and start talking.
Go ahead, okay, now start all over. Just do it again.
It's nute again, lute again. No, would you do me
a favor?

Speaker 2 (18:19):
No?

Speaker 3 (18:19):
Would you verify for those goobers out there that think
I'm faking it, trying to figure out a way just
to get off for the rest of the week.

Speaker 4 (18:28):
No, I plan to be here tomorrow.

Speaker 2 (18:30):
Oh, you look like crap too.

Speaker 8 (18:32):
Oh I do well, no more so than usual.

Speaker 4 (18:37):
Okay, okay, you look okay.

Speaker 3 (18:39):
I thought you meant like I really look like I'm sick,
because I feel fine. I just had a horrible sore
throat and I can't I just keep coughing. But other
than that, I feel fine. In fact, i'd like to
have some breakfast right now.

Speaker 8 (18:50):
And I can attest sure enough that as soon as
Michael opened his mouth this morning to say any words,
are like, oh god, oh boy, there's that. So we're
gonna have to do with that today.

Speaker 4 (19:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (19:00):
And then he backed off too. He backed off, which
I don't blame you for doing. No, I don't plan
to take off the rest that week at all. I
plan to be here. I planned too as soon as
I finished here. If I can't get in to see
my PCP and get start getting some antibodies or whatever,
then I'm going straight urgent care.

Speaker 8 (19:18):
Besides, he has to show up to work tomorrow because
one of the other guys on the other stations is off,
so he's got to fill in. And I don't think
we have any other fillings available to take care of
Michael's position.

Speaker 2 (19:31):
Oh there's always Caldera, Yeah.

Speaker 4 (19:33):
There's always here. You know, you can get cal there
to do anything.

Speaker 2 (19:36):
You just got to wake him up earlier.

Speaker 4 (19:37):
Right, that's the sad part about him.

Speaker 3 (19:39):
I wonder if when he fills in for me, because
I know he does it from home, does he actually
have a bad or do you think he has like
a microphone stand and he's got to share a microphone
and it comes over and he's just propped up on
some pillows. He's got a little tray there with some
clissants and a cup of coffee or actually probably just
a bottle of the key.

Speaker 8 (19:57):
But the best part of Caldre is when he had
invites his son to come on, we did a whole
chance of such a fantastic chance. Is such a good amazing,
It is amazing considering the parentage of the absolutely amazing. Anyway,
back back to the Russia, Russia, Russia.

Speaker 9 (20:16):
The Russians offered help, which we know they did. The
campaign accepted help, which we know they did. The Russian
then delivered help, which we know they did. There is
circumstantial evidence of collusion that the case is more than that,
and I can't go into the particulars, but there is
more than circumstantial evidence.

Speaker 10 (20:31):
Now, so you've said on more than one occasion that
you've seen ample evidence of the Trump campaign's Russia collusion.
Last March, you said you had more than circumstantial evidence
of treasonous collusion with Russia.

Speaker 9 (20:43):
I certainly certainly said that there's ample evidence of collusion.

Speaker 5 (20:47):
Can you agree that there has been no evidence of collusion, coordination,
or conspiracy that has been presented thus far between the
Trump campaign and Russia.

Speaker 4 (20:56):
No, I don't agree with that at all.

Speaker 9 (20:57):
I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion conspiracy.

Speaker 4 (21:01):
But we do know this.

Speaker 9 (21:02):
The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help, the Russians
gave help, and the President made full use of that help.

Speaker 4 (21:09):
And that is pretty damning.

Speaker 3 (21:11):
Now, before I get back to the timeline, let me
jump ahead for just a moment. I don't believe that
there's a New York chance in Hill that Barack Obama
is going to be arrested. I just don't think it's
going to happen. And as much as I would kind
of like to see it happen, I'm not sure that's

(21:33):
the best thing for the country. However, However, I really
really really would like to see shifty Adam Schift Schiff,
who you just heard there, continue to push the Russian hoax. Lie, lie,
lie about it. I'd like to see him arrested. I'd

(21:54):
like to see Brennan and Clapper and Susan Rice arrested
because they were never elected president and I don't think
the country's ready to physically arrest a president.

Speaker 4 (22:09):
Now.

Speaker 3 (22:10):
I find it hilarious because still up on Drudge right now.
I saw this yesterday online. I just chuckled. I literally
just chuckled. There is and Trump posted it. Hey, I
don't know whether it was I frankly don't remember whether
he originally posted it or he was reposting it on
X from somebody else. But somebody had made an artificial

(22:33):
intelligence an AI video of when Obama and Trump were
meeting in the White House, you know, when Trump was
taking office the first term. And it the AI isn't
too bad. I mean, it's obvious, it's obviously AI. But
it shows Obama being arrested and being hauled out of

(22:55):
the Oval office. You know what the Trump The Drudge
headline is, Trump posts deranged AI video of Obama being arrested. Deranged.
You know, people on the left oh, I said, you know,
I'm so sorry. People on the left truly have no

(23:18):
sense of humor whatsoever. When there's something as serious as this,
comic relief is actually something we need because this is
pretty serious feces. I think it's very serious, and I
do want to see some accountability. So we went through

(23:38):
December ninth up to January sixth. We got the Washington Post,
New York Times and others reporting on the Steele dossier,
which was provided to the cabal by the cabal. You know,
they all, you know, they're all in this little magic
eight ball and they're like, oh, hang, oh look look

(23:59):
here you report this, and then we'll say, oh look
there's evidence.

Speaker 4 (24:04):
Oh good grief. So what happened next to history?

Speaker 3 (24:08):
Bob Muller, the former director of the FBI, gets appointed
by his protege James Comey as special counsel. Then you
get impeachments, you get years of bull crap hanging over
Trump's first term. Now, Gabbard reacted to the finding. As
you heard her, she's talking to Maria Barbaromo in that SoundBite,

(24:30):
going so far as to tell Fox News that this
treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama after President Trump
had already gotten elected. Now it is worth noting that
as president elect, this brief would have also gone to
Donald Trump. That reinforces why Obama would not have wanted

(24:51):
it to go out in its original form. He had
to hide the evidence from the incoming president. That's why
the timeline is so important. And do I think that
Obama look Susan Rice goes back and writes an email
to herself. Why would you write an email to yourself

(25:13):
to cover your ass? That's exactly what you write an
email to yourself. You want a document, you want something
that you want some contemporaneous notes to say, Hey, I
just came out of a meeting in the Oval, and
we're going to do an assessment of the Russian involvement
in the twenty sixteen election. And we've been told by
Barack Obama, who've been told by Potus to do it

(25:34):
by the book. Which book would that be, mister president?

Speaker 2 (25:39):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (25:40):
Your book that you're in cahoots with Hillary Clinton? You know,
I have no basis in fact for this whatsoever. This
is one one hundred, one thousand percent speculation. Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama are so stupid that I actually think

(26:00):
that Hillary Clinton, although she denies it that she probably
tolled Tolbarock. Yeah, we got this dossy a coming. Yeah, Yeah,
it's gonna be dynamite. You're gonna love it. We're gonna
make sure that you know, he gets over to the
Intel agencies and yeah, just just just brock, just hang tyg.
We're gonna take care of things.

Speaker 4 (26:19):
Now.

Speaker 3 (26:19):
Trump's reacted, sort of. He hasn't said anything directly. He
just posted that meme on social truth, including the AI
generated video Obama being arrested. By the way, if you
can find it online, Dragon, if you can find it online,
it's funny.

Speaker 8 (26:34):
I'm working on it right now to take I can't
embed truth posts oh to our site, so I'm trying
to find another source for it so.

Speaker 2 (26:42):
I can get up there. Michael says, go here.

Speaker 3 (26:44):
Now, I would play it, except it's got the YMCA
music playing in the background, which makes it even funnier.
So the TLDR the top top line don't read as this.
US intel agencies first found no Russian impact on twenty
sixteen election after Obama holds a meeting with his National

(27:05):
security a team, the PDB and the Intel Community assessment.
The Ica gets revised in order to say that Moscow
was actually directly helping Donald Trump, and that triggered three
years of investigation that dogged Donald Trump and kept him
from doing all the things that he wanted to do.

(27:27):
So what's next. The question is what's next? And I
think what's next is, as Gabbard said, there must be indictments.
Those responsible, no matter how powerful, they all must be
held accountable, and she has sent all the documents over
the Department of Justice. Now, realistically, I know there may
be many, many people that want to see Barack Obama arrested. Well,

(27:51):
let your breath out, because it ain't going to happen.
But Brennan Clapper, Susan Rice James, yeah, I bet Pam
BONDI is just giggling waiting to do that.

Speaker 8 (28:08):
Why isn't Barack Obama going to be arrested? They already arrested.

Speaker 2 (28:12):
Trump President has been said check me.

Speaker 3 (28:18):
Yeah, I would argue checkmate. And I know people want it.
I'd like to see it, but I'm going to say
something that probably will piss many of you off. I
want to stop the insanity. The people who really are

(28:44):
if there are degrees of guilt, those who are most
guilty are those who said, hey, listen, let's don't give
this to the president. Let's go back and revise it.
I think in terms of you arrest Obama, now you
have to prove remember, this would be a crime. It

(29:07):
would be if they charge treason, it would be treason.
Otherwise it might be some form of fraud.

Speaker 4 (29:15):
How the hell.

Speaker 3 (29:16):
Are you ever going to prove that he actually ordered it?
Do we have Nixon tapes in the Oval office?

Speaker 9 (29:25):
No.

Speaker 3 (29:26):
The only thing we have is an email from Susan
Rice that said he said do it by the book.
So unless one of them, you know, turns states witness
and says, oh yeah, we just all at the direction
of Barack Obama, you're just wasting your time. I'm just
trying to be realistic. It's real easy to think because,

(29:53):
as I've said during Obama's term, I don't know how
long you've been listening to me, but I've said, you know,
he's He's one president that I may have casually met
when he was a senator, but I never dealt with
him in any substantive way whatsoever. Yet I truly hate
and despise the man because I think he is the
one that put us on this whore.

Speaker 4 (30:15):
I mean, he.

Speaker 3 (30:17):
Pushed the accelerator to the floor in terms of Marxism
and progressivism, and I despise him for that fundamentally transforming
this country. But I'm also a realist, and as long
as we can hold those others accountable and see some
of them frog marched into federal prison, I'm fine with that.

(30:37):
I'm fine with that because I think otherwise you run
the risk, you run a very serious risk of arresting
a president, having him charged with let's say, treason, and
then found not guilty. That will make him even stronger
than ever. Do you know anything about Julius Caesar? Do

(31:00):
you know anything about that? You got to kill the king. Now,
I'm not advocating killing Barack Obama, but I'm saying, if
you're going in for the kill shot, you're gonna make
certain that you're going to put him out of business.
And I am absolutely convinced they cannot do it beyond
a reasonable doubt. And where are you gonna try him?

(31:23):
Martha's Vineyard? That jury? You're gonna try him in DC?
That jury?

Speaker 4 (31:28):
Huh?

Speaker 3 (31:29):
Come on, Hawaii, you're gonna try him that jury? Or
even California come on, give me a break. It ain't
gonna happen. So you can get all you know, you
can get all. You don't even need to go. Yeah,
I know that you. You don't even need to go
to Rocky Mountain, mensicalne because I know exactly what's going
on between your legs. Right now, you're so excited about
oh my gosh, we might actually get even arrested.

Speaker 4 (31:49):
No no, no, no, no, no, just calm down.

Speaker 3 (31:53):
You really you may want it, but you're not gonna
get what you think you're gonna get. And then after
towards you're going to deal with a guy who's going
to be able to stand up and say I beat
the system. Instead hold those others in caound because we
have evidence for them.

Speaker 4 (32:12):
You don't have evidence.

Speaker 3 (32:13):
Beyond the reasonable doubt for Barack Obama. Try to burst
your bubble, but I live in the real world.