Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Door with Michael gown, don't.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Turn it down. That's opinion, stores to lie. I'm all
in for a while.
Speaker 3 (00:08):
Ride a grouse, cut the.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Mic in hand, Come about us on across the land?
Which way start right now? You may lean and let's
break it down.
Speaker 4 (00:29):
You're listening to the Situation with Michael Brown on six
point thirty kh ow. Here are the rules of engagement.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Text the word Mike to three three one oh three.
Download the free to you iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Be sure to favorite two shows, The Situation with Michael
Brown and The Weekend with Michael Brown. Touch the little
red microphone button and leave a talkback message if you like.
You can follow Mike on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram, as
well as stream the program live. Download the listen to
a compilation of different talkbacks, and see the various stories
(01:05):
and photos that Dragon posts.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
If you can visit Michael Cells Girls dot com.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
What was that against?
Speaker 2 (01:12):
Sweetheart? Michael cellsgirlsal dot com. It's fantastic, check it out.
It's all yours Michael and Dragon. Michael.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
If you go out to Walmart, you're gonna see Big
Bird and Cookie Monster on a whole bunch of book
bags and lunchboxes. And then if you go to toy Aisle,
you're going to see a bunch of other Sesame Street
characters for sale. And TBS is getting a licensing fee
for each and every one of those things. So I
really don't think they need an extra ten percent from
the federal government.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
See, it's just jerks. It's jerks like that. They don't
understand that. Think about the poor children that need to
connect what they get at Walmart with what they see
on television, and then you know that's pretty much extent
of their education anyway, right there, Just Walmart and PBS
(02:04):
and give an American citizen. The second coming of President
Trump Trump two point zero has brought a obviously a
very really invigorated commander in chief, and he's asserting I think,
legitimate executive authority. Some would argue broad authority, others would
(02:28):
argue overly broad authority over the executive branch, and that
in turn is re igniting a debate over how much
power the president has over his own subordinates, including the
US attorneys. I do I fight, although this is a
little different. It seems like every time we get a
(02:49):
new president and he asks for or gets or without
even asking, gets the resignation of all the US attorneys
across the country. There's always this perfect there's always this
big hullabaloo about, oh my god, he's firing in all
the US attorneys. He's trying to control the judiciary. He's
trying to control the executive branch. He's trying to control
you know, lawyers, he's trying to control. Yes, those US
(03:14):
attorneys are appointed by the President with the advice and
consent of the United States Senate. By the way, Judge
jen Perira Piro from Fox News used to be a
prosecutor and a judge up in Westchester County in New York.
She's she was confirmed I think Friday evening sometime as
(03:37):
the new US attorney for the District of Columbia, which
I find fascinating because if if you wanted to be
a US attorney, there are a couple of jurisdictions that
you would probably want to be in if you really
want to have the opportunities, opportunity to really have some
big cases. And one would be obviously any of the
(03:59):
ones in the District of New York, but also maybe
in Cook County, Illinois, maybe Los Angeles, Texas, and the
District of Columbia because that gives you jurisdiction over the
federal government. Yes, anyway. At present, the current battle is
(04:26):
focused on one US attorney in particular. On way back
in March twenty four, the President named Elena Habbah, his
former personal attorney, the interim US attorney for the District
of New Jersey. But here's the catch. Interim US attorneys
can only serve for one hundred twenty days. Now. On
(04:48):
July one, the President nominated Habba for Senate confirmation as
New Jersey's US attorney. If confirmed, Habbah could have served
permanently at the pleasure of the President. Neither of her
home state senators, both Democrats, support her. I wonder why
(05:10):
they don't support her. Could it be because, well, this
is her appearing on Fox News in which they're discussing
the potential arrest of a mayor for, you know, busting
into an ice detention facility.
Speaker 5 (05:30):
So, Alena, you heard their descriptions of what happened. They
said that the mayor was outside the fence and that
he was taken away by twenty armed individuals, and that
they were all intimidated by federal officials on this property.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
What do you say, I'm going to say the truth
and correct them. I'm sorry that you're trying to politic this.
Let me they're very clear, You're right. Congress people have
the right to investigate, and re allowed them. In number one.
Number two, the mayor was actually inside the facility, was warned,
was asked to leave several times more than once, refused
to leave, was put under arrest inside the facility, walked
(06:10):
out when he was told he was under arrest, and
then was tough.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
That is what happened.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
Lucky for our team in HSI who I stand behind who.
Many people don't understand the Department's justice encompasses that they
did absolutely everything correct. If you look at these individuals'
Twitter accounts, they have been openly saying they are going
to go in. There is a reason these congress people
are standing out there running them up and running their
(06:35):
mouths as usual. But however, I will tell you this.
The mayor was inside, was told he was going to
be under arrest inside when he refused to leave, after
several obligations, several notifications that he should remove himself, chose
not to do so, and then replaced under arrest when
he walked out of the facility. So while I love
this scheme, the game and the tactics of these individuals
(06:59):
that are perfectly fine, and we're not touched. I will
say very clearly the mayor, we're not assaulted.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
She doesn't suffering fools. You go into a detention center
and you don't have the authority to do so, you're
just the mayor of Newark. I wonder if jed A
and the Mayor Newark are good buddies. I bet they're
good buddies. They're probably having coffee right. Well, let's see,
(07:28):
it's nine thirteen. They've probably gone back to bed. But now,
but yeah, the mayor fire's back. Mayor's really upset.
Speaker 7 (07:36):
Alina Habba, who just for people who may not be familiar,
she's President Trump's former attorney. She is now the interim
US attorney in New Jersey and yourself.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
I don't know why they have to make a big
deal about the fact that she used to be Trump's
personal attorney. Why what difference is that? It makes no
difference whatsoever.
Speaker 7 (07:53):
Hey, the way she puts what happened today is she
is accusing you of ignoring multiple warnings from Homeland Security
investigation to remove yourself and says that you chose to
quote disregard the law.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Is that true?
Speaker 7 (08:06):
Had there been warnings what had happened?
Speaker 8 (08:11):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Absolutely not. I mean, I mean we could, we could.
Speaker 9 (08:15):
The reality is Alena Hobbo wasn't there, the US attorney
wasn't there.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
She doesn't know, so she's relying on the information from
the people that she represents, which would be the Immigrations
and Customs enforcement officers what happened.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
I might add also parenthetically that we've got lots of
videotape of does y'allhoo going into the facility. Clearly that
is not the context of what happened.
Speaker 9 (08:40):
I was there for over an hour in that space,
and nobody ever told me to move.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
I was in there for over an hour.
Speaker 9 (08:46):
Not a single person, not an officer from ICE, not
any of.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
The security guards. Nobody told me to leave that place.
Speaker 9 (08:54):
Somebody from Homeland Security came in the end and began
to escalate the situation, and we wind up being where
we are today. And as frankly the extent of it,
I didn't go there to break any laws.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
I didn't break any laws.
Speaker 9 (09:08):
I was there as the mayor of the city exercising
my right and duty as an elected official, you know,
supporting our congress people.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Wait a minute, as mayor, you don't have any right
to go into a federal facility any more than I do.
Now I could request, Hey, i'd like to take it.
I'd like to take a tour of the facility out
here at Aurora. Okay, why, well, because you know I
(09:37):
do a radio program and i'd like to talk about
what I see. Okay, Well, we'll get you hooked up
with one of our public information officers and at a
time and places convenient for us, will make an appointment.
We'll come out and we'll show you around. That's how
you do it, and Mayor, that's how you should do
it too. But of course they're not going to do
that because they're going to make a scene. Of course
(09:58):
they don't like it because of Lima Law is the
President's former personal attorney, and now she's up to be
the US attorney and oh my gosh, all hell's breaking
loose now. On July one, after her one hundred and
twenty days as the interim, the President nominated Habbah for
Senate confirmation as New Jersey's US attorney, and if confirmed,
(10:21):
Hubba could have served permanently at the president pleasure of
the president, but neither Democrat senator you know, Spartacus, would
not support her. So during that interim time, the clock
ran out on her interim appointment and under an obscure law.
It is a law, but it is obscure. It's not
(10:44):
something that is regularly used. Twenty eight Usc. Five forty six,
paragraph D if you want to look it up. Twenty
eight Usc. Five forty six D. Federal judges in New
Jersey named her deputy, Desiree Grace, the acting US Attorney.
Acting US attorneys, who are career prosecutors that are usually
(11:08):
named for temporary promotions, do expect to return to their
line jobs at some point. So this deputy accepted the appointment.
But Trump still wants Habbah. So the Justice Department, as
one would expect, took up the boss's famous charge to
fight fight, fight, fight back. Attorney General Pambondi fired the
(11:31):
deputy US attorney, re hired Habba as a deputy, and
then promoted Hobba to acting US Attorney while the President's
team pulled her nomination paperwork. This is whether you agree
with this move or not, you have to admit that
it is a brilliant move because guess what, the the
(11:54):
Attorney General has the right to hire and fire all
of the US attorneys, including to deputies, or to reassign them,
so you can assign a new deputy US attorney. And
that's exactly well Pam Bondi did. It just happened to
be the person whose interim appointment ran out after one
hundred and twenty days and this Senate won't take up
(12:15):
her confirmation. So she named her Alena Haball, as the
deputy US Attorney for New Jersey, and then put her
in the place as the regular US attorney. Now Trump
still does want her, so they're going to end up
with a fight. Now. All the skeptics on the left
(12:38):
questioned her qualifications for the job. Of course they do,
because anybody has to get that it's going to go
to work for Trump, particularly if you were Trump's personal attorney. Now,
I would personally think that if this is someone that
Trump trusted in some of his criminal cases and some
of his civil matters, criminal matters, personal lawyer, I would
(13:04):
think that if Trump trusts her, then hey, then she's
fine for me. Now, ultimately, if Trump resubmits her nomination
for confirmation that will be a matter for the Senate
to determine. In the meantime, at least one criminal defendant
has challenged his indictment in court, claiming that Abbah lacks
(13:25):
the authority to serve as the acting US attorney. Now,
if all that sounds incredibly complex and convoluted, it is
even for lawyers. I find it incredibly complex and convoluted.
And the kerfuffle over who has the power to appoint
US attorneys, however, is actually a question of constitutional importance.
The Hobbit scenario may play out across the country, across
(13:47):
the entire country, as all the Trump's entering US attorney appointments,
including those in d C, New York, and California, are
starting to be reviewed by the judiciary. Now why is
this important? Because US attorneys are the chief law enforcement
officers for the districts in which they serve. Habba is
(14:08):
essentially Trump's top cop. When it comes to federal cases
in New Jersey in which the United States happens to
be a party, whether it be civil or criminal, a
US attorney has tremendous authority vested by the Department of Justice.
A US attorney has the power to determine prosecution priorities,
(14:32):
prosecutorial discretion. They direct high profile cases, They manage the
relationships with other law enforcement leaders. They lead personnel. By
we've talked about how personnel's policy, right, Well, they lead
personnel because they hire, they fire, and they promote the
(14:53):
staff within that US Attorney's office. They serve as the
public face of the US Attorney's office, including with the
press and with the community that they represent. And in turn,
the Department of Justice is I know I'm being obvious,
here is a cabinet agency of the executive branch. So
the department will naturally pursue the priorities of the president,
(15:17):
whether that be illegal alien entry, human trafficking, white collar crime.
That is, unless a rogue prosecutor turns rebel. So the
president has a very deep interest in who leads the
ninety four US attorney across offices across the United States
and the territories. And by the way, because they are
(15:40):
Senate confirmed presidential appointees, they carry a presidential commission like
I've got two of them that you serve at the
pleasure of the president. The president decides one day, for
no reason at all, I just don't want you to
be in my US attorney anymore. Well, you turn into
your resignation. Promises made by Trump to the voters about
(16:03):
border control, protection from sexual predators, safeguarding American markets from
foreign bad actors. Those are promises that Trump has said
he's going to keep, and one of the ways that
you keep those promises is through your appointment of US attorneys.
So that brings us back to the question of so
who should appoint US attorneys? Should the top federal prosecutors
(16:26):
be appointed by the President, acting through the Justice Department,
which they serve, and which the Senate has the authority
to advise and consent to those appointments, Or should US
attorneys be named by federal judges, who, actually, when you
think about it, belong to an entirely separate branch of government.
(16:46):
That's Article three. Appointing the personnel in Article two seems
to be a little unconstitutional to me. A matter of policy,
the answer seems clear. The president has to have control
over the people executing the policies under the authority of
(17:07):
the departments for which he holds a responsibility. Every single
Cabinet agency, including the Department of Justice, answers to the
President and they should execute his policy making vision. Trump
and his team have identified a fight worth fighting, and
I think they deserve to win. You know, Federal just
don't have Federal just don't have any business appointing US
(17:29):
attorneys any more than they do US marshals or Assistant
attorney generals or any other member of the executive branch.
I cannot find and if anybody knows, if any I'd
like to know about it. But I can't find any
other comparable context in which excuse in which the Bench
has the power to appoint anyone to a separate branch
(17:50):
of government. I thought judges were supposed to be umpires,
not the players. But the law is unsettled at this point,
and until the new Jersey complaint, not once ever has
a litigant challenged the ability of the President to appoint
a temporary US attorney. So, unless Congress revisits the thinking
(18:11):
of legislation that created this chaos to begin with, Alina
Hobbastad is the US attorney, guess what may someday end
up being decided by the US spree Corps. It's just
another example of they will do anything to use the
courts to stop Trump anywhere they can it's getting absurd.
Speaker 10 (18:33):
Michael l for the US attorney being placed by Trump
and BONDI anything we can do to disrupt po the left,
I'm all for it.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Yeah, me too. And I think there was a story
I was going to do, but I'm not. Well, let
me just tell you what it was and then you
can go look it up yourself. But I forget where
see if it's still in my notes somewhere, the guy
goes to a baseball game and he's wearing a MAGA hat.
(19:08):
Where was that? We'll find my history. The reason I
found it interesting is because it shows here it is.
The guy's name was Michael Whitzel. He got kicked out
of a Saint Louis professional soccer game. He was wearing
a hat expressing support for Donald Trump. Now this is
(19:34):
after Trump won, so you can imagine how his supporters
would be treated. If he had lost. They probably would
let him wear the hat so they could have, you know,
thrown beer at him or smashed hot dogs on it
or something. Now, technically, here's why I decided not to
do the story, and here I am doing the story. Bizarre,
(19:57):
isn't it. Technically he's violation of the major League Soccer
Fan Code of Conduct. It says displaying signs, symbols, or
images for commercial purposes or for electioneering, campaigning, or advocating
for or against any candidate, political party, legislative issue, or
(20:21):
government action. So if you're just wearing make America Great Again,
hat is that electioneering? Is that campaigning or advocating for
against any candidate? I mean, I suppose you could stretch
it and say that it's certainly not advocating any particular
(20:41):
government action, specific government action. It's I guess it is
supporting a political party, it's not supporting any particular legislative issue.
And the reason I decided not to do this story
was I thought, you know, I'm tired of I told
(21:03):
Dragon this morning that some of this new stuff, I'm
just I'm really tired of it. It just seems to
be bizarre. So I'm Michael Whites, I mean, asked to
leave by the police, and says Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Policopter's got hell with a Begadil did not be a
bleat their any.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Of those fags over there. So so he's got all
of these he's got like three security guards around him,
and they're they're all trying to escort him out. It
is to make America great again hat, But he does.
And I'm going to stop it right here because I
think if I recall correctly, there's maybe maybe some language
in here that would get me in trouble. But interestingly,
(21:56):
in Saint Louis they have flags up, They've got the
Pride flag for example. Well, isn't that displaying a sign,
a symbol or an image for electioneering, campaigning or advocating
for against the Candida political party, legislative issue, government action?
So you can you can do that. I suppose you
(22:17):
could have worn a Pride hat. What if you had
worn genes? What if you had worn denim and said
you were proud of your genes. It's just tyranny. It's
like we can't, we cannot as a society deal with
(22:39):
anything that goes against whatever our preconceived or our adopted
narrative is. You know, I told you I'm doing this
editorial which I've started for USA today, and when I
said the word narrative, it reminded me of that because
I somewhere on the editorial, which I'm not anywhere near finished,
(23:04):
I talk about how narratives get adopted and then our
brains adopt. You know, our brains focus on that narrative
or in air quotes a fact. We decide that, well,
that's the that's the fact. And despite whatever data, whatever
(23:24):
I can show you that would say that's not factual,
in our in some people's brains, you can't you can't
let go of it. So now we've reached the point
where in a soccer game where people wear baseball caps
of everything you can possibly imagine to get posed, how
about this. I know it's not electioneering, it's not campaigning
(23:47):
for against the Canada political party, legislative or government action,
but why is it that we could wear the appost
You know, I can go to a Rockies game and
if they're playing the Yankees, I wear a Yankee sat
and you know, somebody about somebody might boomy BFD. We've
become so intolerant that we just can't accept that somebody
(24:11):
might have different point of view. And that drives me
absolutely batty. Speaking to Jens, you know, the Sydney Sweeney
thing just continues. The outrage about that is over the top.
(24:36):
All these basement warriors on social media, they have exerted
more spewed them and energy than the average American would
ever find even imaginable all because so I did a
little digging and she's twenty seven years old. I had
asked Dragon last week. She's best known for starring in
a rom com with Glenn Powell, who, when I last checked,
(24:58):
was spared any sort of you know, antagonism. But we
are in a different age and if apparently, if you're
a woman, you're a fair game. Now think back to
the sixties or maybe even the fifties. If you'd appeared
in a commercial, if you were a really buxom, beautiful
(25:18):
female and you'd appeared in an advertisement for American eagle gens,
which didn't even exist, then the headline might have been
pretty young blonde wears denim genes to promote a product.
And we have been outraged that are pretty blonde was
promoting a product and oh look they're using such promoter product.
Well now we just expect if you're not using sex
(25:40):
to promoter product, we just didn't even care about it.
But now in twenty twenty five, Sidney Sweeney is less
a theest being a more a product in her own right.
She is the product, right, So in this carnival that
we live in a modern celebrity, where every gesture gets dissected,
every utterance gets wrecking, you know, weaponized, and then gets
(26:02):
repeated as ad nauseum. She's become a moving target now
if you're uninitiated in all this popular culture, she's the
dough eyed, lard breasted darling of euphoria and the white lotus.
I had asked Tamrabat, who who's sweeny?
Speaker 6 (26:21):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (26:21):
The white lotus? Oh oh, okay, I got it now,
wearing gens, I've got great genes, genes a harmless pun,
a cheeky wordplay to sell denim to the TikTok generation.
But no, we can't do that. Instead we got to
be outraged. There's even the outrage of Nazi propaganda eugenics endorsement.
(26:44):
I found that absolutely hilarious. Their logic such as you
could call it logic hinges on the word genes and
somehow that's supposed to evoke some sinister nod to genetic purity.
So if I, if I dare to talk about, you know,
often reference DNA, we have it in our American DNA.
What if I started using the word genes, we have it.
(27:06):
It's in Americans genes that we you know, criticize our government.
It's in our genes that we make fun of politicians.
It's in our genes that we do all of this stuff.
Oh my gosh, the backlash was so stupid. It wears
me down. Now, obviously this is not the first time
the outrage has been brought out into the open. Now,
(27:28):
I didn't realize it, but the more I started seeing
all this on my next timeline started digging into it, Well,
she has turned out. She's long been a lightning rod
for conservative feticization and progressive scorn. You know why because
she has large breasts and she isn't ashamed of exhibiting,
exhibiting them in low top blouses. She apparently appeared on
(27:52):
Saturday Night Live last year. She's promoted pieces in conservative magazines.
She one of these that you know, hailing a return
to real body positivity. Those on the right venerator are
someone whom their bedroom dwelling representatives can pen their hopes
(28:14):
and dreams upon, and the left simply detests her as
a symbol of all that is rotten about the country today.
It's this debacle is just another chapter in the culture war.
You got a young woman wearing a Parodenum jeans is
not so much reflection of her talent as it is
(28:36):
a roar schock test for the obsession of this society.
If two and a half decades later, you know, you
go back to Gwyneth Paltrow, who's been ritually humiliated by
the publication of a book called Gwyneth the Biology. When
(29:01):
Paltrow was Sweeney's age, she was subjected to a similar
degree of prurient fascination. She was the most talked about
actress of her generation. Amuse for Harvey Weinstein, an Oscar
winner for Shakespeare in Love, and objects of ridicule for
her tears on that night she's ridiculed for a famous
(29:22):
boyfriend's ben affle like Brad Pitt, What why Now? It's
just a continuation of the stupidity of our kind of
what is it popular culture that's all about celebrity? Oh
my gosh, can we just get to some real stuff?
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Good Monday morning, Michael and Dragon this year fair? You
jew You know, I was volunteering. You were talking about
Jewish family services. I was volunteering there at the food bank,
and I wore a drum hat, and I wore an
American flag jacket and They wouldn't let me volunteer because
(30:01):
of my hat, and didn't even give me a chance
to take it off. They just said, dunk, you can't volunteer.
Speaker 2 (30:07):
Or the American jacket that's messed up. That is messed up.
Somebody said, and this is a great comment, uh Gooba
number zero four three three, Michael. When I saw that
last night at that soccer field, the first thing I
thought was Trump. She go to one of those games
at that stadium wearing his Maga hat. What are they
(30:28):
going to do remove him? I'd love to see them
try to do that. That would be great. But I
want to I want to catch up on something about
the jeans because Dragon said something to me that. Maybe
go back and think about what I said about Gwyneth Paltrow.
So Gwyneth Paltrow what two and a half decades ago,
(30:49):
so twenty twenty five years ago or so, she gets
ridiculed for crying when she wins that Oscar. She gets
ridiculed for having famous boyfriends. Wait, wait, wait a minute.
So now the successors to this outrage come for Sidney Sweeney.
(31:11):
Why because it's become acceptable to sneer. I want you
to think about this what I'm about to say, is
it now acceptable to sneer at a beautiful woman of
a certain age, because in some sense she deserves to
be sneered at. And we have to be aware that
in this sharp, cold age of Instagram, if you use
(31:32):
your looks to advertise a product, that's going to lead
to you being ridiculed and belittled. Well, Gwyneth had it
before her. Sweeney has it now, somebody will have it
after Sweeney. But before Gwyneth we had who who do
we have? Dragon brookshields here? And what did she do?
Speaker 3 (31:54):
She did a very similar ad back in nineteen eighty nineteen.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
Eighty, so, by my calculations, that's forty five years ago.
Sure is so? Here we are again. There is nothing
new under the sun.
Speaker 7 (32:08):
The secret of.
Speaker 8 (32:08):
Life lies hidden in the genetic code, genes.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
I'm sorry, the genetic code. Oh my god, she's a Nazi.
She's clearly a white supremacist. It gets worse, okay.
Speaker 8 (32:25):
Started characteristics of an individual and passing on these characteristics
to succeeding generations. Occasionally, certain conditions produce a structural change
in the gene, which we'll bring about the process of evolution.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
This may occur in one or more of the following ways.
Speaker 8 (32:45):
Firstly by selective mating, in which is single gene type
proof superior and transmitting its genes to future generations. Secondly
by gene drift, in which certain genes may fade away
all other genes persist, And finally by natural selection, which
filters out those genes better equipped than others to endure
(33:08):
in the environment. This may result in the origin of
an entirely new species, which brings us to Calvins, and
the survival of the fittest calvin.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
Wow, there you go. Wow. One, nothing new under the sun. Two.
I don't I mean nineteen eighty I would obviously be
aware of Brookshields, and I would be watching television between
law school classes or studying or whatever. And I'm thinking,
(33:41):
I don't remember any First, I don't remember anything, which
doesn't really mean anything. But I don't remember anything about it.
But if I did see it, it shows how fleeting
and how stupid it is that forty five years later
we're repeating the same thing over again, just a different brand.
I assume was she getting dressed or undressed? She was
(34:03):
getting dressed.
Speaker 3 (34:03):
She was putting on a pair of genes was a
kind of rolling around and flexing in them, showing that
there's you know, movement in the jeams in their companies.
Speaker 2 (34:11):
She have to kind of pull them up over her
cute little butch or did she have to do that? Yeah? Wow?
Speaker 3 (34:19):
Post a video to Michael says, go here dot com
for anybody that hadn't seen it and might want to
watch Brooke Shieldz put on a pair of blue Well,
actually that's.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
What I want to do. During the break, I'm gonna
go watch it because I don't recall the commercial, and
now I want to see it. See if I remember
the commercial at all, which I probably don't. It may
it may bring bring back in memory, but it also
tells me that we still haven't learned what a real
Nazi is. We we still don't know what a real
Nazi is. In a way, maybe maybe the Nazis are
(34:53):
those that impose tyranny, and you can't go to a
A Jew can't go to a food bank because they're
where bring a mega hat, A volunteer ball a volunteer right.
A volunteer can't go to a food bank because where
in where where's the Nazi? In that story I did,
I could find a Nazi in every story.
The Door with Michael gown, don't.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Turn it down. That's opinion, stores to lie. I'm all
in for a while.
Speaker 3 (00:08):
Ride a grouse, cut the.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Mic in hand, Come about us on across the land?
Which way start right now? You may lean and let's
break it down.
Speaker 4 (00:29):
You're listening to the Situation with Michael Brown on six
point thirty kh ow. Here are the rules of engagement.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Text the word Mike to three three one oh three.
Download the free to you iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Be sure to favorite two shows, The Situation with Michael
Brown and The Weekend with Michael Brown. Touch the little
red microphone button and leave a talkback message if you like.
You can follow Mike on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram, as
well as stream the program live. Download the listen to
a compilation of different talkbacks, and see the various stories
(01:05):
and photos that Dragon posts.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
If you can visit Michael Cells Girls dot com.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
What was that against?
Speaker 2 (01:12):
Sweetheart? Michael cellsgirlsal dot com. It's fantastic, check it out.
It's all yours Michael and Dragon. Michael.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
If you go out to Walmart, you're gonna see Big
Bird and Cookie Monster on a whole bunch of book
bags and lunchboxes. And then if you go to toy Aisle,
you're going to see a bunch of other Sesame Street
characters for sale. And TBS is getting a licensing fee
for each and every one of those things. So I
really don't think they need an extra ten percent from
the federal government.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
See, it's just jerks. It's jerks like that. They don't
understand that. Think about the poor children that need to
connect what they get at Walmart with what they see
on television, and then you know that's pretty much extent
of their education anyway, right there, Just Walmart and PBS
(02:04):
and give an American citizen. The second coming of President
Trump Trump two point zero has brought a obviously a
very really invigorated commander in chief, and he's asserting I think,
legitimate executive authority. Some would argue broad authority, others would
(02:28):
argue overly broad authority over the executive branch, and that
in turn is re igniting a debate over how much
power the president has over his own subordinates, including the
US attorneys. I do I fight, although this is a
little different. It seems like every time we get a
(02:49):
new president and he asks for or gets or without
even asking, gets the resignation of all the US attorneys
across the country. There's always this perfect there's always this
big hullabaloo about, oh my god, he's firing in all
the US attorneys. He's trying to control the judiciary. He's
trying to control the executive branch. He's trying to control
you know, lawyers, he's trying to control. Yes, those US
(03:14):
attorneys are appointed by the President with the advice and
consent of the United States Senate. By the way, Judge
jen Perira Piro from Fox News used to be a
prosecutor and a judge up in Westchester County in New York.
She's she was confirmed I think Friday evening sometime as
(03:37):
the new US attorney for the District of Columbia, which
I find fascinating because if if you wanted to be
a US attorney, there are a couple of jurisdictions that
you would probably want to be in if you really
want to have the opportunities, opportunity to really have some
big cases. And one would be obviously any of the
(03:59):
ones in the District of New York, but also maybe
in Cook County, Illinois, maybe Los Angeles, Texas, and the
District of Columbia because that gives you jurisdiction over the
federal government. Yes, anyway. At present, the current battle is
(04:26):
focused on one US attorney in particular. On way back
in March twenty four, the President named Elena Habbah, his
former personal attorney, the interim US attorney for the District
of New Jersey. But here's the catch. Interim US attorneys
can only serve for one hundred twenty days. Now. On
(04:48):
July one, the President nominated Habba for Senate confirmation as
New Jersey's US attorney. If confirmed, Habbah could have served
permanently at the pleasure of the President. Neither of her
home state senators, both Democrats, support her. I wonder why
(05:10):
they don't support her. Could it be because, well, this
is her appearing on Fox News in which they're discussing
the potential arrest of a mayor for, you know, busting
into an ice detention facility.
Speaker 5 (05:30):
So, Alena, you heard their descriptions of what happened. They
said that the mayor was outside the fence and that
he was taken away by twenty armed individuals, and that
they were all intimidated by federal officials on this property.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
What do you say, I'm going to say the truth
and correct them. I'm sorry that you're trying to politic this.
Let me they're very clear, You're right. Congress people have
the right to investigate, and re allowed them. In number one.
Number two, the mayor was actually inside the facility, was warned,
was asked to leave several times more than once, refused
to leave, was put under arrest inside the facility, walked
(06:10):
out when he was told he was under arrest, and
then was tough.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
That is what happened.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
Lucky for our team in HSI who I stand behind who.
Many people don't understand the Department's justice encompasses that they
did absolutely everything correct. If you look at these individuals'
Twitter accounts, they have been openly saying they are going
to go in. There is a reason these congress people
are standing out there running them up and running their
(06:35):
mouths as usual. But however, I will tell you this.
The mayor was inside, was told he was going to
be under arrest inside when he refused to leave, after
several obligations, several notifications that he should remove himself, chose
not to do so, and then replaced under arrest when
he walked out of the facility. So while I love
this scheme, the game and the tactics of these individuals
(06:59):
that are perfectly fine, and we're not touched. I will
say very clearly the mayor, we're not assaulted.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
She doesn't suffering fools. You go into a detention center
and you don't have the authority to do so, you're
just the mayor of Newark. I wonder if jed A
and the Mayor Newark are good buddies. I bet they're
good buddies. They're probably having coffee right. Well, let's see,
(07:28):
it's nine thirteen. They've probably gone back to bed. But now,
but yeah, the mayor fire's back. Mayor's really upset.
Speaker 7 (07:36):
Alina Habba, who just for people who may not be familiar,
she's President Trump's former attorney. She is now the interim
US attorney in New Jersey and yourself.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
I don't know why they have to make a big
deal about the fact that she used to be Trump's
personal attorney. Why what difference is that? It makes no
difference whatsoever.
Speaker 7 (07:53):
Hey, the way she puts what happened today is she
is accusing you of ignoring multiple warnings from Homeland Security
investigation to remove yourself and says that you chose to
quote disregard the law.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Is that true?
Speaker 7 (08:06):
Had there been warnings what had happened?
Speaker 8 (08:11):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Absolutely not. I mean, I mean we could, we could.
Speaker 9 (08:15):
The reality is Alena Hobbo wasn't there, the US attorney
wasn't there.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
She doesn't know, so she's relying on the information from
the people that she represents, which would be the Immigrations
and Customs enforcement officers what happened.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
I might add also parenthetically that we've got lots of
videotape of does y'allhoo going into the facility. Clearly that
is not the context of what happened.
Speaker 9 (08:40):
I was there for over an hour in that space,
and nobody ever told me to move.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
I was in there for over an hour.
Speaker 9 (08:46):
Not a single person, not an officer from ICE, not
any of.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
The security guards. Nobody told me to leave that place.
Speaker 9 (08:54):
Somebody from Homeland Security came in the end and began
to escalate the situation, and we wind up being where
we are today. And as frankly the extent of it,
I didn't go there to break any laws.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
I didn't break any laws.
Speaker 9 (09:08):
I was there as the mayor of the city exercising
my right and duty as an elected official, you know,
supporting our congress people.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Wait a minute, as mayor, you don't have any right
to go into a federal facility any more than I do.
Now I could request, Hey, i'd like to take it.
I'd like to take a tour of the facility out
here at Aurora. Okay, why, well, because you know I
(09:37):
do a radio program and i'd like to talk about
what I see. Okay, Well, we'll get you hooked up
with one of our public information officers and at a
time and places convenient for us, will make an appointment.
We'll come out and we'll show you around. That's how
you do it, and Mayor, that's how you should do
it too. But of course they're not going to do
that because they're going to make a scene. Of course
(09:58):
they don't like it because of Lima Law is the
President's former personal attorney, and now she's up to be
the US attorney and oh my gosh, all hell's breaking
loose now. On July one, after her one hundred and
twenty days as the interim, the President nominated Habbah for
Senate confirmation as New Jersey's US attorney, and if confirmed,
(10:21):
Hubba could have served permanently at the president pleasure of
the president, but neither Democrat senator you know, Spartacus, would
not support her. So during that interim time, the clock
ran out on her interim appointment and under an obscure law.
It is a law, but it is obscure. It's not
(10:44):
something that is regularly used. Twenty eight Usc. Five forty six,
paragraph D if you want to look it up. Twenty
eight Usc. Five forty six D. Federal judges in New
Jersey named her deputy, Desiree Grace, the acting US Attorney.
Acting US attorneys, who are career prosecutors that are usually
(11:08):
named for temporary promotions, do expect to return to their
line jobs at some point. So this deputy accepted the appointment.
But Trump still wants Habbah. So the Justice Department, as
one would expect, took up the boss's famous charge to
fight fight, fight, fight back. Attorney General Pambondi fired the
(11:31):
deputy US attorney, re hired Habba as a deputy, and
then promoted Hobba to acting US Attorney while the President's
team pulled her nomination paperwork. This is whether you agree
with this move or not, you have to admit that
it is a brilliant move because guess what, the the
(11:54):
Attorney General has the right to hire and fire all
of the US attorneys, including to deputies, or to reassign them,
so you can assign a new deputy US attorney. And
that's exactly well Pam Bondi did. It just happened to
be the person whose interim appointment ran out after one
hundred and twenty days and this Senate won't take up
(12:15):
her confirmation. So she named her Alena Haball, as the
deputy US Attorney for New Jersey, and then put her
in the place as the regular US attorney. Now Trump
still does want her, so they're going to end up
with a fight. Now. All the skeptics on the left
(12:38):
questioned her qualifications for the job. Of course they do,
because anybody has to get that it's going to go
to work for Trump, particularly if you were Trump's personal attorney. Now,
I would personally think that if this is someone that
Trump trusted in some of his criminal cases and some
of his civil matters, criminal matters, personal lawyer, I would
(13:04):
think that if Trump trusts her, then hey, then she's
fine for me. Now, ultimately, if Trump resubmits her nomination
for confirmation that will be a matter for the Senate
to determine. In the meantime, at least one criminal defendant
has challenged his indictment in court, claiming that Abbah lacks
(13:25):
the authority to serve as the acting US attorney. Now,
if all that sounds incredibly complex and convoluted, it is
even for lawyers. I find it incredibly complex and convoluted.
And the kerfuffle over who has the power to appoint
US attorneys, however, is actually a question of constitutional importance.
The Hobbit scenario may play out across the country, across
(13:47):
the entire country, as all the Trump's entering US attorney appointments,
including those in d C, New York, and California, are
starting to be reviewed by the judiciary. Now why is
this important? Because US attorneys are the chief law enforcement
officers for the districts in which they serve. Habba is
(14:08):
essentially Trump's top cop. When it comes to federal cases
in New Jersey in which the United States happens to
be a party, whether it be civil or criminal, a
US attorney has tremendous authority vested by the Department of Justice.
A US attorney has the power to determine prosecution priorities,
(14:32):
prosecutorial discretion. They direct high profile cases, They manage the
relationships with other law enforcement leaders. They lead personnel. By
we've talked about how personnel's policy, right, Well, they lead
personnel because they hire, they fire, and they promote the
(14:53):
staff within that US Attorney's office. They serve as the
public face of the US Attorney's office, including with the
press and with the community that they represent. And in turn,
the Department of Justice is I know I'm being obvious,
here is a cabinet agency of the executive branch. So
the department will naturally pursue the priorities of the president,
(15:17):
whether that be illegal alien entry, human trafficking, white collar crime.
That is, unless a rogue prosecutor turns rebel. So the
president has a very deep interest in who leads the
ninety four US attorney across offices across the United States
and the territories. And by the way, because they are
(15:40):
Senate confirmed presidential appointees, they carry a presidential commission like
I've got two of them that you serve at the
pleasure of the president. The president decides one day, for
no reason at all, I just don't want you to
be in my US attorney anymore. Well, you turn into
your resignation. Promises made by Trump to the voters about
(16:03):
border control, protection from sexual predators, safeguarding American markets from
foreign bad actors. Those are promises that Trump has said
he's going to keep, and one of the ways that
you keep those promises is through your appointment of US attorneys.
So that brings us back to the question of so
who should appoint US attorneys? Should the top federal prosecutors
(16:26):
be appointed by the President, acting through the Justice Department,
which they serve, and which the Senate has the authority
to advise and consent to those appointments, Or should US
attorneys be named by federal judges, who, actually, when you
think about it, belong to an entirely separate branch of government.
(16:46):
That's Article three. Appointing the personnel in Article two seems
to be a little unconstitutional to me. A matter of policy,
the answer seems clear. The president has to have control
over the people executing the policies under the authority of
(17:07):
the departments for which he holds a responsibility. Every single
Cabinet agency, including the Department of Justice, answers to the
President and they should execute his policy making vision. Trump
and his team have identified a fight worth fighting, and
I think they deserve to win. You know, Federal just
don't have Federal just don't have any business appointing US
(17:29):
attorneys any more than they do US marshals or Assistant
attorney generals or any other member of the executive branch.
I cannot find and if anybody knows, if any I'd
like to know about it. But I can't find any
other comparable context in which excuse in which the Bench
has the power to appoint anyone to a separate branch
(17:50):
of government. I thought judges were supposed to be umpires,
not the players. But the law is unsettled at this point,
and until the new Jersey complaint, not once ever has
a litigant challenged the ability of the President to appoint
a temporary US attorney. So, unless Congress revisits the thinking
(18:11):
of legislation that created this chaos to begin with, Alina
Hobbastad is the US attorney, guess what may someday end
up being decided by the US spree Corps. It's just
another example of they will do anything to use the
courts to stop Trump anywhere they can it's getting absurd.
Speaker 10 (18:33):
Michael l for the US attorney being placed by Trump
and BONDI anything we can do to disrupt po the left,
I'm all for it.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Yeah, me too. And I think there was a story
I was going to do, but I'm not. Well, let
me just tell you what it was and then you
can go look it up yourself. But I forget where
see if it's still in my notes somewhere, the guy
goes to a baseball game and he's wearing a MAGA hat.
(19:08):
Where was that? We'll find my history. The reason I
found it interesting is because it shows here it is.
The guy's name was Michael Whitzel. He got kicked out
of a Saint Louis professional soccer game. He was wearing
a hat expressing support for Donald Trump. Now this is
(19:34):
after Trump won, so you can imagine how his supporters
would be treated. If he had lost. They probably would
let him wear the hat so they could have, you know,
thrown beer at him or smashed hot dogs on it
or something. Now, technically, here's why I decided not to
do the story, and here I am doing the story. Bizarre,
(19:57):
isn't it. Technically he's violation of the major League Soccer
Fan Code of Conduct. It says displaying signs, symbols, or
images for commercial purposes or for electioneering, campaigning, or advocating
for or against any candidate, political party, legislative issue, or
(20:21):
government action. So if you're just wearing make America Great Again,
hat is that electioneering? Is that campaigning or advocating for
against any candidate? I mean, I suppose you could stretch
it and say that it's certainly not advocating any particular
(20:41):
government action, specific government action. It's I guess it is
supporting a political party, it's not supporting any particular legislative issue.
And the reason I decided not to do this story
was I thought, you know, I'm tired of I told
(21:03):
Dragon this morning that some of this new stuff, I'm
just I'm really tired of it. It just seems to
be bizarre. So I'm Michael Whites, I mean, asked to
leave by the police, and says Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Policopter's got hell with a Begadil did not be a
bleat their any.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Of those fags over there. So so he's got all
of these he's got like three security guards around him,
and they're they're all trying to escort him out. It
is to make America great again hat, But he does.
And I'm going to stop it right here because I
think if I recall correctly, there's maybe maybe some language
in here that would get me in trouble. But interestingly,
(21:56):
in Saint Louis they have flags up, They've got the
Pride flag for example. Well, isn't that displaying a sign,
a symbol or an image for electioneering, campaigning or advocating
for against the Candida political party, legislative issue, government action?
So you can you can do that. I suppose you
(22:17):
could have worn a Pride hat. What if you had
worn genes? What if you had worn denim and said
you were proud of your genes. It's just tyranny. It's
like we can't, we cannot as a society deal with
(22:39):
anything that goes against whatever our preconceived or our adopted
narrative is. You know, I told you I'm doing this
editorial which I've started for USA today, and when I
said the word narrative, it reminded me of that because
I somewhere on the editorial, which I'm not anywhere near finished,
(23:04):
I talk about how narratives get adopted and then our
brains adopt. You know, our brains focus on that narrative
or in air quotes a fact. We decide that, well,
that's the that's the fact. And despite whatever data, whatever
(23:24):
I can show you that would say that's not factual,
in our in some people's brains, you can't you can't
let go of it. So now we've reached the point
where in a soccer game where people wear baseball caps
of everything you can possibly imagine to get posed, how
about this. I know it's not electioneering, it's not campaigning
(23:47):
for against the Canada political party, legislative or government action,
but why is it that we could wear the appost
You know, I can go to a Rockies game and
if they're playing the Yankees, I wear a Yankee sat
and you know, somebody about somebody might boomy BFD. We've
become so intolerant that we just can't accept that somebody
(24:11):
might have different point of view. And that drives me
absolutely batty. Speaking to Jens, you know, the Sydney Sweeney
thing just continues. The outrage about that is over the top.
(24:36):
All these basement warriors on social media, they have exerted
more spewed them and energy than the average American would
ever find even imaginable all because so I did a
little digging and she's twenty seven years old. I had
asked Dragon last week. She's best known for starring in
a rom com with Glenn Powell, who, when I last checked,
(24:58):
was spared any sort of you know, antagonism. But we
are in a different age and if apparently, if you're
a woman, you're a fair game. Now think back to
the sixties or maybe even the fifties. If you'd appeared
in a commercial, if you were a really buxom, beautiful
(25:18):
female and you'd appeared in an advertisement for American eagle gens,
which didn't even exist, then the headline might have been
pretty young blonde wears denim genes to promote a product.
And we have been outraged that are pretty blonde was
promoting a product and oh look they're using such promoter product.
Well now we just expect if you're not using sex
(25:40):
to promoter product, we just didn't even care about it.
But now in twenty twenty five, Sidney Sweeney is less
a theest being a more a product in her own right.
She is the product, right, So in this carnival that
we live in a modern celebrity, where every gesture gets dissected,
every utterance gets wrecking, you know, weaponized, and then gets
(26:02):
repeated as ad nauseum. She's become a moving target now
if you're uninitiated in all this popular culture, she's the
dough eyed, lard breasted darling of euphoria and the white lotus.
I had asked Tamrabat, who who's sweeny?
Speaker 6 (26:21):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (26:21):
The white lotus? Oh oh, okay, I got it now,
wearing gens, I've got great genes, genes a harmless pun,
a cheeky wordplay to sell denim to the TikTok generation.
But no, we can't do that. Instead we got to
be outraged. There's even the outrage of Nazi propaganda eugenics endorsement.
(26:44):
I found that absolutely hilarious. Their logic such as you
could call it logic hinges on the word genes and
somehow that's supposed to evoke some sinister nod to genetic purity.
So if I, if I dare to talk about, you know,
often reference DNA, we have it in our American DNA.
What if I started using the word genes, we have it.
(27:06):
It's in Americans genes that we you know, criticize our government.
It's in our genes that we make fun of politicians.
It's in our genes that we do all of this stuff.
Oh my gosh, the backlash was so stupid. It wears
me down. Now, obviously this is not the first time
the outrage has been brought out into the open. Now,
(27:28):
I didn't realize it, but the more I started seeing
all this on my next timeline started digging into it, Well,
she has turned out. She's long been a lightning rod
for conservative feticization and progressive scorn. You know why because
she has large breasts and she isn't ashamed of exhibiting,
exhibiting them in low top blouses. She apparently appeared on
(27:52):
Saturday Night Live last year. She's promoted pieces in conservative magazines.
She one of these that you know, hailing a return
to real body positivity. Those on the right venerator are
someone whom their bedroom dwelling representatives can pen their hopes
(28:14):
and dreams upon, and the left simply detests her as
a symbol of all that is rotten about the country today.
It's this debacle is just another chapter in the culture war.
You got a young woman wearing a Parodenum jeans is
not so much reflection of her talent as it is
(28:36):
a roar schock test for the obsession of this society.
If two and a half decades later, you know, you
go back to Gwyneth Paltrow, who's been ritually humiliated by
the publication of a book called Gwyneth the Biology. When
(29:01):
Paltrow was Sweeney's age, she was subjected to a similar
degree of prurient fascination. She was the most talked about
actress of her generation. Amuse for Harvey Weinstein, an Oscar
winner for Shakespeare in Love, and objects of ridicule for
her tears on that night she's ridiculed for a famous
(29:22):
boyfriend's ben affle like Brad Pitt, What why Now? It's
just a continuation of the stupidity of our kind of
what is it popular culture that's all about celebrity? Oh
my gosh, can we just get to some real stuff?
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Good Monday morning, Michael and Dragon this year fair? You
jew You know, I was volunteering. You were talking about
Jewish family services. I was volunteering there at the food bank,
and I wore a drum hat, and I wore an
American flag jacket and They wouldn't let me volunteer because
(30:01):
of my hat, and didn't even give me a chance
to take it off. They just said, dunk, you can't volunteer.
Speaker 2 (30:07):
Or the American jacket that's messed up. That is messed up.
Somebody said, and this is a great comment, uh Gooba
number zero four three three, Michael. When I saw that
last night at that soccer field, the first thing I
thought was Trump. She go to one of those games
at that stadium wearing his Maga hat. What are they
(30:28):
going to do remove him? I'd love to see them
try to do that. That would be great. But I
want to I want to catch up on something about
the jeans because Dragon said something to me that. Maybe
go back and think about what I said about Gwyneth Paltrow.
So Gwyneth Paltrow what two and a half decades ago,
(30:49):
so twenty twenty five years ago or so, she gets
ridiculed for crying when she wins that Oscar. She gets
ridiculed for having famous boyfriends. Wait, wait, wait a minute.
So now the successors to this outrage come for Sidney Sweeney.
(31:11):
Why because it's become acceptable to sneer. I want you
to think about this what I'm about to say, is
it now acceptable to sneer at a beautiful woman of
a certain age, because in some sense she deserves to
be sneered at. And we have to be aware that
in this sharp, cold age of Instagram, if you use
(31:32):
your looks to advertise a product, that's going to lead
to you being ridiculed and belittled. Well, Gwyneth had it
before her. Sweeney has it now, somebody will have it
after Sweeney. But before Gwyneth we had who who do
we have? Dragon brookshields here? And what did she do?
Speaker 3 (31:54):
She did a very similar ad back in nineteen eighty nineteen.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
Eighty, so, by my calculations, that's forty five years ago.
Sure is so? Here we are again. There is nothing
new under the sun.
Speaker 7 (32:08):
The secret of.
Speaker 8 (32:08):
Life lies hidden in the genetic code, genes.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
I'm sorry, the genetic code. Oh my god, she's a Nazi.
She's clearly a white supremacist. It gets worse, okay.
Speaker 8 (32:25):
Started characteristics of an individual and passing on these characteristics
to succeeding generations. Occasionally, certain conditions produce a structural change
in the gene, which we'll bring about the process of evolution.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
This may occur in one or more of the following ways.
Speaker 8 (32:45):
Firstly by selective mating, in which is single gene type
proof superior and transmitting its genes to future generations. Secondly
by gene drift, in which certain genes may fade away
all other genes persist, And finally by natural selection, which
filters out those genes better equipped than others to endure
(33:08):
in the environment. This may result in the origin of
an entirely new species, which brings us to Calvins, and
the survival of the fittest calvin.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
Wow, there you go. Wow. One, nothing new under the sun. Two.
I don't I mean nineteen eighty I would obviously be
aware of Brookshields, and I would be watching television between
law school classes or studying or whatever. And I'm thinking,
(33:41):
I don't remember any First, I don't remember anything, which
doesn't really mean anything. But I don't remember anything about it.
But if I did see it, it shows how fleeting
and how stupid it is that forty five years later
we're repeating the same thing over again, just a different brand.
I assume was she getting dressed or undressed? She was
(34:03):
getting dressed.
Speaker 3 (34:03):
She was putting on a pair of genes was a
kind of rolling around and flexing in them, showing that
there's you know, movement in the jeams in their companies.
Speaker 2 (34:11):
She have to kind of pull them up over her
cute little butch or did she have to do that? Yeah? Wow?
Speaker 3 (34:19):
Post a video to Michael says, go here dot com
for anybody that hadn't seen it and might want to
watch Brooke Shieldz put on a pair of blue Well,
actually that's.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
What I want to do. During the break, I'm gonna
go watch it because I don't recall the commercial, and
now I want to see it. See if I remember
the commercial at all, which I probably don't. It may
it may bring bring back in memory, but it also
tells me that we still haven't learned what a real
Nazi is. We we still don't know what a real
Nazi is. In a way, maybe maybe the Nazis are
(34:53):
those that impose tyranny, and you can't go to a
A Jew can't go to a food bank because they're
where bring a mega hat, A volunteer ball a volunteer right.
A volunteer can't go to a food bank because where
in where where's the Nazi? In that story I did,
I could find a Nazi in every story.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.