Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Come, Michael, it's your boys, yourselves.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
We have a problem the significance of the passage of time.
So when you think about it, there is great significance
to the passage of time.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
You were listening to the situation with Michael Brown on
six thirty k H o W.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
Think of this moment as a moment that is about
great momentum.
Speaker 5 (00:37):
Here are zeros of engagement.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Text the word Mike, the three three one zero three
download the three to you my heart radio essentially with
Michael Brown and the Weekend with Michael Brown, and.
Speaker 6 (00:56):
We talk about the children of the community.
Speaker 5 (00:57):
Did you check the children of the community?
Speaker 7 (01:03):
And what talks that it wasn't for us, wasn't present
and following Michael x Facebook, Instagram.
Speaker 4 (01:12):
And the reason we like tom is it brings different
voices in on the air and oftentimes gives me something
to chase a squirrel and I'm like, you know the dogs.
I like to sit in the back yard and look
at squirrel. You know, look for the squirrel and I
time when I chase.
Speaker 8 (01:26):
I need to be able to get where you need
to go to do the work.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Absolutely, you can also see the various stories to the dragon.
Speaker 5 (01:36):
I just remember I just hated.
Speaker 4 (01:37):
It was like, I understand that the attempt at creativity
and you know.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
That, but oh my god, with your own, your.
Speaker 7 (01:50):
Own, I'm telling you.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
In my fine dear Michael and Dragon, gee, thanks thanks
for giving it to us. We could have we could
have solved all of that. All I heard was before,
just before the show up and started, was you know,
the rules are the rules I have.
Speaker 7 (02:15):
Oh oh we the entire station had not gotten a
talkback since nine thirty yesterday morning.
Speaker 5 (02:27):
Oh wow, that's interesting. Now that does make me.
Speaker 4 (02:30):
Wonder, however, if we don't have a glitch.
Speaker 7 (02:34):
No, no, you know we were talking about engineers earlier
several other stations, so you were seeing some talk, right,
Robin got a bunch, Brett got a bunch.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 7 (02:45):
Uh, the Clinger on BPI, he got a bunch. Kiefer
got a bunch.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Now usually they don't get any yeah, none to prevent
the cackle. Well all right, yeah, live and learn. The
rules are the rules.
Speaker 7 (03:02):
And you know, hate, we hate being the disciplinarians, but
you have to on occasion.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
Right, Sometimes you just sometimes you gotta tell the rugrats
what you gotta do. And the really sad part is
the first story that I wanted to do today is
part of my This may not seem like it's connected,
but I'd already decided this was the first story I
(03:29):
wanted to do when I heard it yesterday and then
coming in this morning, I had been listening to Brett
Bear's program on Sirius XM while I was in the
car running an errand, so I never had flipped it
back over to Fox Headlines. So when I got in
the car, that was you know, that insufferable Fox and Friends.
(03:52):
What do they call it? Their morning show, which by
the way, I didn't realize that, you know, the Nielsen's
are coming out and you know that's the number one
rated morning show. The networks are just like I mean,
there are millions of the years behind what Fox and
Friends is, which just shows goes to show you that
you know, you get it, put out a good product,
which we never have tried to do.
Speaker 5 (04:13):
But of course not, of course not.
Speaker 4 (04:16):
They were playing a sound bite which when I came
in this morning I desperately tried to find but I
cannot find it of.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
Mondami or Mondami I never can't.
Speaker 7 (04:28):
Remember with Jim A m right, so a mom.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
Donnie, Mom, Donnie zom Mondanmi. It sounds like it sounds
like a drug. Have you taken your zofram mondami today?
Where he was talking about the reason that he is
so popular right now is because he's talking about the
things that people care about, And I thought, immediately, what
(04:55):
is it that people care about? They care about their families,
their job? Do they care about their income, their security,
the job security?
Speaker 5 (05:03):
They know?
Speaker 7 (05:04):
They care about free staff?
Speaker 4 (05:06):
Well, and then that's exactly what he morphed into was
childcare groceries. But none of it in in terms of
what does my childcare cost, for example, But instead it
was how they, as the city of New York, can
provide childcare. And I thought, my god, how far off
(05:30):
the reservation has this country gone when you think that
municipal government. I know because here I am. You know,
I'm driving along the twenty five. I'm making the curve
around from four seventy to twenty five, and of course
the ruts and the you know, the concretes falling apart,
and it's just a piece of crap and it is,
(05:51):
you know, awful, And I'm thinking in Colorado, it's the
exact same thing we spend money on Wolf introductions. The
City of Denver is going to do a almost one billion,
nine hundred and fifty million dollar bond issue, which will include,
(06:12):
oh yeah, there'll be a few things in there that
you know, they'll throw in some parks or something to
make you know, because they want voters to vote for it,
so they have to put a little bit of money
in there. But then there was a headline that Denver
in fact, yes, here's the headline.
Speaker 7 (06:30):
I didn't understand this. Denver's in debt, so we're gonna
spend money.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
Denver's plan to get out of two hundred and fifty
million dollar budget deficit is to spend money on city
investment projects. Now, I want you to stop.
Speaker 5 (06:44):
Now.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Yes, sometimes you have to spend money to make money,
but you need to have the money, and sometimes you
need to go in debt.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
But the problem is this state is in debt.
Speaker 4 (06:54):
Because they're spending money on to go back to you know,
Zolfrime Mondanni, you're spending money on all the wrong things.
What do I want my government to do? Childcare? No, healthcare? No?
Do I want them to fix roads, provide police and
fire protection? Maybe build parks, yes, libraries no, you know,
(07:15):
I'm done with libraries. I don't think we ought to
be doing public libraries. And I know many of you
disagree with that, but you know, hey, you want a book,
maybe you start a private library, you know, or put
up one of those boxes in your neighborhood where you
have a free.
Speaker 5 (07:32):
Book exchange or something.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
But I just I just don't know that tax dollars
ought to be going to support those things. And by
the way, if you wanted to go to a library,
you know, you can actually go to for example, you
could probably go to the University of Denver or see
you and even though you're not a student, you could
probably get a library card and check out books from
you know, those schools that you know, well, I know
(07:58):
tax dollars are supporting them. A sore student, he's intuition.
So we just gone off the reservation where we're not
doing anything that is real anymore. We're not doing anything
that is of substance. And what I want to tie
that to is Jim Acosta. You remember Jim Acosta during
(08:19):
Trump one point zero, and Jim Acosta was a chief
White House correspondent for CNN, and he's an absolute ass.
Sorry to use the word that early in the morning.
But he's just an absolute ass. He's now facing, luckily
and surprisingly, a lot of criticism because he conducted an
(08:44):
interview with an artificial intelligence replica of a Parkland school
shooting victim, Joaquen Oliver. Joaquen was killed in two thy eighteen.
Check scalendar. It's twenty twenty five. That's seven years ago.
(09:08):
When Joaquing was killed in Parksland, Florida. He was seventeen
years old. So his parents created a hologram an AI.
It's not really a hologram, it's more of an artificial
intelligence video. So they must have fed his voice into
(09:31):
an AI chatbot and some photos and said age these
seven years and then let's have him do a interview.
And the purpose of the interview is to deliver a
partisan message about gun violence. During now a costa put
(09:53):
it up on a substack. You'll hear a little bit
of it in just a second.
Speaker 7 (09:57):
And I'll get it up at Michael saysco here dot com.
Speaker 4 (09:59):
During the interview, Acosta asks the AI replica, well, Keen,
I would like to know what your solution would be
for gun violence. Oh what an in depth question. The
AI responded with a scripted answer advocating for are you ready.
Speaker 5 (10:18):
Stronger gun control laws? I'm shocked, what breaking news.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
A parents who are rocked with, you know, emotional trauma,
think that, you know, responding emotionally, that the solution to
gun violence is not the crazy people that commit gun violence,
but more gun control, more community engagement, to which it
(10:46):
cost of replies, well, I think that's a great idea.
Walking Fortunately, this gives me a glimmer of hope. Critics,
including some journalists and commentators, condemned the move as exploitative.
Really no Feasi Sherlock, you think so. Mark Hemingway referred
(11:06):
to it as exploitive, tragedy mongering. Sean Davis' friend of
Mine labeled it as absolute insanity. A reporter for Reason Magazine,
Billy Binyon, called it unsavory, accused the cost of chasing
clicks by animating a deceased child to speak the words
that he never said. Think about that, you're interviewing something
the guy never really said that. The parents fed all
(11:29):
this into it. Robbie Swab, the co host of The
Hills Rising, described the interview as insane and evil. Chuck
Ross from the Washington Free Beacon called it truly some
of the weirdest behavior I've ever seen, which is pretty
bizarre because there's a lot of weird behavior going on
in the world right now. And of course, then you
get the ethical implications of using AI to recreate a
(11:51):
deceased individual for this explicit purpose of doing an interview
to put forward your political agenda. Now, let's not forget
CNN had previously fired Acosta for some of his journalistic decisions. Now,
this news controversy has obviously reunited debates over the role
(12:13):
of AI and media and the ethical boundaries of journalism.
But who really cares about, you know, the role of
AI in media or ethical boundaries of journalism. Does anybody
truly care about that? I'm not really sure they do.
But the interview is just freaking hilarious.
Speaker 6 (12:29):
Now, looking to carry out a redrawing of the congressional
districts in Texas, Now it's American democracy that is on
the line in the upcoming midterms. In a few minutes,
I'll speak with Texas State Representative James Tallerico about the
redistricting battle in his state. But first, today is August
the fourth, that happens to be the birthday of my
first guest while Keen Oliver died in the Parkland school shooting.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Think about the insanity of that statement. Today happens to
be the birthday of my first guest. Joaquen died on
August four, you know, seven years ago. Oh that's your
first guest.
Speaker 7 (13:07):
Hey, Joe Biden had been introducing dead people for years. Well, true,
we've gotten used to it by now.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Okay, Well, I guess I just I just refused to
kind of buy into it.
Speaker 6 (13:19):
Joaquen, who's nick dame was Guawk. I've talked about him
on the show before knowing Manny for several years now.
I consider him to be a good friend, so of
course I took him up on the opportunity.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
So here's that interview.
Speaker 4 (13:32):
News Hell, he's doing everything in the present tense as
if who he's about to interview is a live human being.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
No.
Speaker 6 (13:45):
Joaquen, who's nickname was Guawk, I've talked about him on
the show before knowing Manny for several years now. I
consider him to be a good friend, so of course
I took him up on the opportunity. So here's that
interview using artificial intelligence, as well as a conversation I
had with nanny about this experience to connect with Quak
(14:05):
take a look all right, If.
Speaker 9 (14:07):
You want to share anything or have questions, I'm all ears.
Speaker 5 (14:09):
Just let me know.
Speaker 6 (14:11):
Joaquin. It's Jim Acosta. I was wondering if you could
tell me what happened to you.
Speaker 9 (14:15):
I appreciate your curiosity. I was taken from this world
too soon due to gun violence while at school. It's
important to talk about these issues so we can create
a safer future for everyone.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
What would you like to know more about, Joaquin?
Speaker 6 (14:27):
I would like to know what your solution would be
for gun violence.
Speaker 5 (14:33):
Great question.
Speaker 9 (14:34):
I believe in a mix of stronger gun control laws,
mental health support.
Speaker 5 (14:38):
And community engagement.
Speaker 9 (14:39):
We need to create safe spaces for conversations and connections,
making sure everyone feels seen and heard. It's about building
a culture of kindness and understanding. What do you think
about that?
Speaker 6 (14:49):
I think that's a great idea, Joaquin. We definitely need
more of that.
Speaker 9 (14:53):
I'm so glad you think so. More kindness and understanding
can truly make a difference. Together, we can create a
world where everyone feels safe and supported.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Anything else on your mind?
Speaker 6 (15:04):
I would like to know more about you.
Speaker 5 (15:05):
Can you tell us about yourself.
Speaker 6 (15:08):
What did you like to do?
Speaker 9 (15:10):
I'm all about love, laughter and living.
Speaker 5 (15:12):
Life. Should have been turning twenty five years? Did you
say that on riage? In my ear?
Speaker 7 (15:18):
Not a chance, that was just you.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
Wow.
Speaker 7 (15:19):
I mean, you know, okay, because I'm an a hole,
I was like, Yeah, what did you up to the
last seven years?
Speaker 5 (15:25):
Yeah, so you're travel a whole bunch. Yeah, where have
you been? What what's it like on the other side.
What's it like crossing the Rainbow bridge? What you know?
How was that? Can you tell us some more about it?
It's old. He won't but we thought that it was.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
It will it will create some more ipeg kind of
things that we have been doing.
Speaker 5 (15:48):
If we bring this Ai.
Speaker 7 (15:51):
Fucking to life. And I know one better than you
two asked the questions.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
You're not bringing him to life.
Speaker 7 (16:01):
I just get the fake seance stuff.
Speaker 5 (16:05):
Here.
Speaker 10 (16:05):
Oh, King's in the room.
Speaker 5 (16:07):
I can feel him.
Speaker 7 (16:08):
The wind's blowing, the candles are flickering.
Speaker 5 (16:10):
This is just crap.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
Not only is it crap, but I'm really torn between
some really heartfelt sympathy for the parents who are well
maybe not because I'm actually have two minds on this.
Sympathy for the parents who have lost a son, and
(16:36):
you know that's not the natural order of things. Your
children aren't supposed to die before you do. You're supposed
to die before they do. So it's a horrible tragedy.
I get that. But on the other hand, is not
only Jim Acosta being exploitative here, but aren't the parents
(17:01):
also And isn't this not honoring his memory? No, it's not.
If you have the video up on Michael says go
here dot com. If you watch the video, it's now
what scares me is the current video, the one that
you would see at Michael says go here dot com
(17:23):
is clearly fake, clearly fake. But that's because it's Tuesday,
August five, twenty twenty five. Fast forward to August five,
twenty twenty seven. You may not be able to tell
the difference because AI may adapt and adopt and you know,
transform and morph into where it's indecipherable whether or not
(17:49):
it's real, is it live or is it memorys You
put all of that together with the idea that in
this somehow the guy running for mayor in New York
City is so popular because he's offering all this free stuff,
which is again a fake offer. You cannot one give
(18:15):
anything away for free. Everything costs something. If you're going
to offer free childcare, the taxpayers in New York have
to give up some of their hard earned money in
order for there to be a redistribution for someone else
to get the so called air quote free childcare. And
(18:38):
on top of that, there's the entire question of when
did that become a government function? When did it become
a government function to provide free childcare. I don't think
that it should be at all anymore than I think
the government I'll be involved in healthcare other than maybe
the regulation of pharmaceuticals, but involved in the health insurance industry.
Speaker 5 (19:05):
No, I don't think so. Don't think so at all.
Speaker 4 (19:08):
Man.
Speaker 5 (19:09):
It's just I woke up this morning.
Speaker 4 (19:11):
I guess well, just so you know, I woke up
this morning and I went back to bed. This is
all pre recorded. This is all part of something that
I just did last night. And Dragon's in the studio
by himself, just replaying what I sent him.
Speaker 11 (19:28):
It's your fault where you're not getting any messages. We're
all sleepy, we're groggy, we're sleeping late, and it's all
because you haven't been playing the cackle because when you
play that cackle, we get up flying out of bed
praying to God in a panic that that's not laying
(19:50):
alongside of us.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
That's pretty good, right there, That's pretty You want more
of it? Yeah, I think there's a little passive aggressiveness
going on there, and I think he's like tempting us.
But you know, I know we don't want to hear it.
I Goober fifty eight to eleven writes, which I find
absolutely hilarious. Michaelt to remember the pronunciation of the New
(20:16):
York City COMMI parentheses democrat, but I repeat myself closed
per end mayor ol candidate. Simply remember the word madman
exclamation point, then switched the positions of the little D
and the little M and flip the exclamation point upside down.
(20:36):
That's a pretty convoluted way to remember something that I
don't give a rats ask whether I remember his name
correctly or not. Surely or surely I don't know which one,
but surely you understand that I don't care. I certainly
(20:57):
do not in any way whatsoever try or even pretend
to put myself on the same level as a Rush Limbaugh.
But Rush oftentimes purposely mispronounced people's names, particularly people who's
making fun of Do I really give a rats ask
(21:22):
what the name of the Socialist Democrat running for mayor
in New York City is, Whether it's Mom Donnie or
Mom Donny.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
I don't care. I truly just don't care.
Speaker 4 (21:34):
I have thought to myself, Oh, it's Mom Donnie and
I because I think about it as Danny, last part
is Danny.
Speaker 5 (21:41):
But then I do.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
Then I'll go on. I won't talk about him for
a few days, and then I'll pop up again. And
unless I have it in front of me, like I
have it, write a story right in front of me
about him, or it's in my notes, I can't remember it.
I don't care.
Speaker 5 (21:56):
You have to. You have to at some.
Speaker 4 (22:01):
Point recognize, in fact, just make you difference what ager
you are now words yes, And people that you know
or you work with, yes, you ought to pronounce pronounce
their names correctly. I would not be so disrespectful to
Dragon as to uh talk, you know, every time I
(22:23):
see Dragon, unless it became a running joke to refer
to him as Dragoon.
Speaker 5 (22:28):
I just wouldn't do that.
Speaker 4 (22:30):
Uh, you know, friends or for people that you know, superiors,
you know, one of our boss's names is Jojo. I
wouldn't refer to him as Hoho. You know, I just well,
maybe I would sometimes just actually, never mind, let's let's
let's get rid of that example, because I probably would
do that. Or somebody from corporate that I don't really know,
(22:54):
would I purposely mispronounce their name? No, probably would not.
Speaker 5 (22:58):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (22:59):
But someone that I don't have any respect for, that
I absolutely unequivocally oppose everything that they stand for and
believe in, and I don't have any sort of relationship
with them. You may say it's disrespectful, but again I
would say to you, call somebody that cares, because I don't.
(23:21):
You know, it's so liberating when you reach a point
in your life where you understand that there are some
things you really ought to care about and some things
you just should not care about. And I'm at that
my stage where there's a lot of stuff that right
now I really want to say I don't give a
s word about.
Speaker 7 (23:39):
With the caveat though, if you were ever to see
him in an elevator, you would probably say, if you
were elected.
Speaker 4 (23:46):
Mister mayor, I would I would say that, Yeah, I
would not say hello, mister Mandanie or Mandani or which
other way is spect I would say hello, mister mayor. Yes,
just as I did with our governor on the elevator
the other day. I just I told so many people
that story. They just laugh. Did I tell the story
(24:07):
on the air?
Speaker 5 (24:07):
Yes, you did? Yeah? Just yeah. I just hi, Governor. No,
I don't want to talk to you.
Speaker 4 (24:14):
I know. I I You're a governor, used to be
a congressman. I used to be a secretary. So hey,
you know what, we're somewhat even, uh again, call somebody
that cares, so you can. You can bitch and moan
at me all you want to about how I pronounced
(24:34):
that mayor's name. Oh seventy one and fourteen, says Michael,
I do care, and please stop calling me Shirley. Well,
surely I'll try Shirley to not refer to you as
Shirley Shirley Shirley shirt.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
Now I can't and I can't even do it.
Speaker 4 (24:50):
According to Breaking News on Fox News yesterday, the Attorney
General of the United States, Pam Bundy. How about that?
Pam Bundy issued a one page order directing an unnamed
government prosecutor. They haven't for who the prosecutors are going
to be yet to bring the Russia Gate hoax conspiracy
(25:12):
evidence to a federal grand jury.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
It was.
Speaker 4 (25:18):
It's funny how the left in the cabal is trying
to downplay this as much as possible.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Well, we'll going to be with you. This is coming
out of the Justice Department. Fox News can confirm that
Attorney General Pam Bondi today signed an order directing an
unnamed US federal prosecutor to take evidence to a grand
jury relating to an alleged conspiracy to tie then twenty
sixteen candidate Donald Trump to the country of Russia. Now,
Fox News reviewed the one page order just hours ago
(25:50):
signed by the Attorney General. A source familiar with the
probe confirms this as well. While a DOJ spokesperson declined
to comment on this report of an investigation, Fox Is
told Attorney General Bondi is taking the referrals from Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard quote very seriously. The spokesperson
says that Bondi believes there is quote clear cause for
(26:13):
deep concern end quote, and a need for the next steps. Now,
this move will comes just a couple of weeks after
the Director of National intelligence.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
You see it right there.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
Tulsey Gabbert sent the criminal referral to the Justice Department
regarding what she says proves there was a conspiracy to
undermine Trump's candidacy and later his first term in office. Now,
to be clear, today, there are no charges that have
been filed, no indictments. This is incredibly early in the process.
What we have here is taking evidence the Justice Department
(26:44):
believes it has to a grand jury to secure an
eventual indictment or indictments. We don't know exactly where the
grand jury will meet. We don't know who will go
before the grand jury, and that's by design because grand
juries determine if there's enough evidence to indict, and grand
juries are secretive in the American legal system, so it's
normal not to know all of the answers. Again, the
(27:06):
DOJ declining on any comment regarding this investigation. But well,
big news. This was signed by the Attorney General Pam
Bondi today to take this evidence of an alleged conspiracy
to a grand jury.
Speaker 7 (27:18):
With the hope to get an.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
Indictment or multiple indictments.
Speaker 4 (27:24):
Her directive is in response to those criminal referrals that
was sent by Tolsey Gabbard in the what really are
bombshell disclosures in the Rushigate hoax. Now, following the disclosures,
this hasn't been reported very widely, but the Department of
Justice formed a strike force back on July twenty third
(27:44):
to start reviewing all the records that are being produced
by the FBI and the DNI. Now, an investigation into
a criminal conspiracy that would target President Trump likely would
involve all those events beginning in early twenty sixteen at
the Obama White House and then stretch all the way
(28:05):
into late twenty twenty four, when Special Counsel Jack Smith
was forced to drop his two criminal cases against Trump
following his win in November. Now that would cover the
five year statue limitations under conspiracy statutes. Conspiracy requires the
participation of two or more individuals, which obviously is not
(28:28):
going to be a very heavy lift given the long
list of all these perpetrators involved in the Russia Gate hoax.
CIA director John Ratcliffe also sent perjury referrals to the
Department of Justice for John Brennan and James Comi last month.
So now, over the weekend, Ratluffs suggested that legal accountability
(28:52):
is coming in addition to more document dumps, is.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
There more to home from either you or FBI director
to tellers, there are more are there are more shoes
to drop that we should be looking for.
Speaker 12 (29:08):
Yeah, there are trey So you know, people need to
understand that, you know, there is no Russia collusion hoax
file cabinet at the FBI or at the CIA. We
have to look for these documents, uh, sometimes that are
well hidden.
Speaker 5 (29:23):
You have to go trace through.
Speaker 12 (29:24):
Emails and look for signs and clues that would point
you to.
Speaker 4 (29:28):
This is something that we should not gloss over. There's
been a lot of reference in the cabal about burn bags.
Burn bags are a common a common object inside the Beltway.
I always heard it. I always had a burn bag.
I had a burn bag at home, I had a
(29:50):
burn bag in my office. And a burn bag is
you would either, depending on the level of the classification
of a document, you might shred it and then put
the shredded paper into the burn bag, or if it's
a lower classification, you might just toss the document into
the burn bag. And then a security officer would come
(30:10):
by a couple of times a day, sometimes on me
just once a day, and they would exchange the burn bag,
and they would take the burn bag literally down to
the basement and they would burn it. They would destroy
the classified documents, so there was there was no paper trail. Well,
apparently sometimes in the Rushy Gate oaks they put stuff
(30:33):
in burn bags in an attempt to conceal it, not
because they wanted it to eventually literally be burned, but because, oh,
that's stuff that nobody's ever going to go look in
a burn bag, because that stuff is going to be burned.
And it's you know, it's past tense, it's you know,
(30:53):
it's uh overtaken by events, it's you know, obe whatever.
In all that Washington parlance, it's it's like dead material. No,
not so much. Let's use a burn bake.
Speaker 5 (31:07):
To hide stuff.
Speaker 12 (31:08):
That's how I found John Brennan's notes, and that's how
we found additional documents. I've talked with FBI Director Patel
he and I'll be declassifying additional documents that show just
how sinister the FBI was in you know, amplifying Hillary
Clinton's Steele dossier as real and credible to be included
in the intelligence community assessment, but also in how they
(31:30):
buried the counter intelligence referral memo that I that I
mentioned before, how they went to great lengths to try
and keep that out of the intelligence community assessment. So
there will be more to come, and I think that,
you know, people should expect that the Trump administration will
continue to shed transparency and light and truth again, because
(31:52):
there is no question this was the greatest political scandal
of our lifetime. No one wants to see this happen again.
Derailed our country, It derailed President Trump's presidency his first
four years in office. Uh, and it really is a
stain on our country that should never happen again, and
Donald Trump is committed to making sure that it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (32:14):
And it's actually even worse than that, which I'll explain next.
Speaker 5 (32:20):
You just mentioned a G. Pam Bundy.
Speaker 8 (32:25):
My mind immediately thought of Christina Applegate. Where in the
sitcom her dad was, I do believe it's been a
long time, Ted Bundy, have a great day.
Speaker 7 (32:42):
Her dad's name was Al Al Bundy.
Speaker 5 (32:45):
And Ted Bundy was the cereal game? Yeah yeah, And
were we having cereal for breakfast?
Speaker 7 (32:52):
I thought he was just walking on a path.
Speaker 5 (32:53):
Oh maybe, Oh that is what it was. Okay, it
could be cereal?
Speaker 7 (32:58):
What kind of cereal.
Speaker 5 (33:00):
Cereal, yeah, well brand flakes, of course, I don't know.
Speaker 10 (33:03):
Froot loops, cheerios, honey nut cheerios, or sugarfouted flakes, sugar
sugar bombs, sugar bombs for breakfast, whole milk and sugar bombs.
Speaker 5 (33:17):
There you go.
Speaker 4 (33:18):
Just send your kid out the door to school for that.
There hasn't been a lot of talk about the Grand Conspiracy,
at least, it's kind of been quiet since the D
and I, since Tulsi Gabbert. The D and I kind
of stunned the cabal into silence. It's it's still been
almost two weeks, do you guys have been almost two weeks?
(33:38):
And that was when Gaber released evidence that then oh
President Obama and all of his henchmen conspired to subvert
President Trump's twenty sixteen election victory and undermine the democratic
will the American people while all the time publicly pretending
to engage in a peaceful transfer of power. It's sad,
(34:01):
even pathetic that the cabal is suddenly just dumbstruck about
the year's long Russian collusion hopes, which is, as Ratcliffe
points out, probably one of the most serious political scandals
of our time. But we shouldn't be surprised by that.
After all, were the New York Times or the Washington
Post to actually, you know, sink their teeth into the
(34:23):
evidence that Gabert has revealed and the Senator Grassley has released,
rather than hoping it's just going to go away, they
might actually have to give it away or give back
return all those phony Pullacher prizes that they won. And
then the networks ABC, CBS, NBC, all the three letters
(34:44):
D the alphabet networks, they forced be forced to plumb
new depths of self discreditation. Now, I grant you this
is a complicated and it's a convoluted story, but it
helps to focus on just a few key facts. Hillary
(35:06):
Clinton hatched the hopes, The Russians knew about the hopes,
senior CIA officers debunked it, but Obama and his co
conspirators ignored them and pushed it anyway, and then handed
it off to the FBI, which led a sick of
(35:28):
dynamite under it and blew it up, accelerated it like
a rocket ship. So what we ought to do is this,
Let's start with the Clinton campaign. What the Clinton campaign
knew and when they knew it? Because I want to
walk through because it is complicated, it is convoluted, but
(35:49):
let's walk through it so that you have a better
understanding of why I think this is important and why
it should probably go to a grand jury. And a
grand jury I don't look into it because, yeah, I
think they have obviously conspired to you know, just a
phize the court alone, lying to the Phisi Court alone,
(36:13):
I think is enough for some indictments, if nothing else,
at least may be some disbarments.
Come, Michael, it's your boys, yourselves.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
We have a problem the significance of the passage of time.
So when you think about it, there is great significance
to the passage of time.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
You were listening to the situation with Michael Brown on
six thirty k H o W.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
Think of this moment as a moment that is about
great momentum.
Speaker 5 (00:37):
Here are zeros of engagement.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Text the word Mike, the three three one zero three
download the three to you my heart radio essentially with
Michael Brown and the Weekend with Michael Brown, and.
Speaker 6 (00:56):
We talk about the children of the community.
Speaker 5 (00:57):
Did you check the children of the community?
Speaker 7 (01:03):
And what talks that it wasn't for us, wasn't present
and following Michael x Facebook, Instagram.
Speaker 4 (01:12):
And the reason we like tom is it brings different
voices in on the air and oftentimes gives me something
to chase a squirrel and I'm like, you know the dogs.
I like to sit in the back yard and look
at squirrel. You know, look for the squirrel and I
time when I chase.
Speaker 8 (01:26):
I need to be able to get where you need
to go to do the work.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Absolutely, you can also see the various stories to the dragon.
Speaker 5 (01:36):
I just remember I just hated.
Speaker 4 (01:37):
It was like, I understand that the attempt at creativity
and you know.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
That, but oh my god, with your own, your.
Speaker 7 (01:50):
Own, I'm telling you.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
In my fine dear Michael and Dragon, gee, thanks thanks
for giving it to us. We could have we could
have solved all of that. All I heard was before,
just before the show up and started, was you know,
the rules are the rules I have.
Speaker 7 (02:15):
Oh oh we the entire station had not gotten a
talkback since nine thirty yesterday morning.
Speaker 5 (02:27):
Oh wow, that's interesting. Now that does make me.
Speaker 4 (02:30):
Wonder, however, if we don't have a glitch.
Speaker 7 (02:34):
No, no, you know we were talking about engineers earlier
several other stations, so you were seeing some talk, right,
Robin got a bunch, Brett got a bunch.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 7 (02:45):
Uh, the Clinger on BPI, he got a bunch. Kiefer
got a bunch.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Now usually they don't get any yeah, none to prevent
the cackle. Well all right, yeah, live and learn. The
rules are the rules.
Speaker 7 (03:02):
And you know, hate, we hate being the disciplinarians, but
you have to on occasion.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
Right, Sometimes you just sometimes you gotta tell the rugrats
what you gotta do. And the really sad part is
the first story that I wanted to do today is
part of my This may not seem like it's connected,
but I'd already decided this was the first story I
(03:29):
wanted to do when I heard it yesterday and then
coming in this morning, I had been listening to Brett
Bear's program on Sirius XM while I was in the
car running an errand, so I never had flipped it
back over to Fox Headlines. So when I got in
the car, that was you know, that insufferable Fox and Friends.
(03:52):
What do they call it? Their morning show, which by
the way, I didn't realize that, you know, the Nielsen's
are coming out and you know that's the number one
rated morning show. The networks are just like I mean,
there are millions of the years behind what Fox and
Friends is, which just shows goes to show you that
you know, you get it, put out a good product,
which we never have tried to do.
Speaker 5 (04:13):
But of course not, of course not.
Speaker 4 (04:16):
They were playing a sound bite which when I came
in this morning I desperately tried to find but I
cannot find it of.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
Mondami or Mondami I never can't.
Speaker 7 (04:28):
Remember with Jim A m right, so a mom.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
Donnie, Mom, Donnie zom Mondanmi. It sounds like it sounds
like a drug. Have you taken your zofram mondami today?
Where he was talking about the reason that he is
so popular right now is because he's talking about the
things that people care about, And I thought, immediately, what
(04:55):
is it that people care about? They care about their families,
their job? Do they care about their income, their security,
the job security?
Speaker 5 (05:03):
They know?
Speaker 7 (05:04):
They care about free staff?
Speaker 4 (05:06):
Well, and then that's exactly what he morphed into was
childcare groceries. But none of it in in terms of
what does my childcare cost, for example, But instead it
was how they, as the city of New York, can
provide childcare. And I thought, my god, how far off
(05:30):
the reservation has this country gone when you think that
municipal government. I know because here I am. You know,
I'm driving along the twenty five. I'm making the curve
around from four seventy to twenty five, and of course
the ruts and the you know, the concretes falling apart,
and it's just a piece of crap and it is,
(05:51):
you know, awful, And I'm thinking in Colorado, it's the
exact same thing we spend money on Wolf introductions. The
City of Denver is going to do a almost one billion,
nine hundred and fifty million dollar bond issue, which will include,
(06:12):
oh yeah, there'll be a few things in there that
you know, they'll throw in some parks or something to
make you know, because they want voters to vote for it,
so they have to put a little bit of money
in there. But then there was a headline that Denver
in fact, yes, here's the headline.
Speaker 7 (06:30):
I didn't understand this. Denver's in debt, so we're gonna
spend money.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
Denver's plan to get out of two hundred and fifty
million dollar budget deficit is to spend money on city
investment projects. Now, I want you to stop.
Speaker 5 (06:44):
Now.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Yes, sometimes you have to spend money to make money,
but you need to have the money, and sometimes you
need to go in debt.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
But the problem is this state is in debt.
Speaker 4 (06:54):
Because they're spending money on to go back to you know,
Zolfrime Mondanni, you're spending money on all the wrong things.
What do I want my government to do? Childcare? No, healthcare? No?
Do I want them to fix roads, provide police and
fire protection? Maybe build parks, yes, libraries no, you know,
(07:15):
I'm done with libraries. I don't think we ought to
be doing public libraries. And I know many of you
disagree with that, but you know, hey, you want a book,
maybe you start a private library, you know, or put
up one of those boxes in your neighborhood where you
have a free.
Speaker 5 (07:32):
Book exchange or something.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
But I just I just don't know that tax dollars
ought to be going to support those things. And by
the way, if you wanted to go to a library,
you know, you can actually go to for example, you
could probably go to the University of Denver or see
you and even though you're not a student, you could
probably get a library card and check out books from
you know, those schools that you know, well, I know
(07:58):
tax dollars are supporting them. A sore student, he's intuition.
So we just gone off the reservation where we're not
doing anything that is real anymore. We're not doing anything
that is of substance. And what I want to tie
that to is Jim Acosta. You remember Jim Acosta during
(08:19):
Trump one point zero, and Jim Acosta was a chief
White House correspondent for CNN, and he's an absolute ass.
Sorry to use the word that early in the morning.
But he's just an absolute ass. He's now facing, luckily
and surprisingly, a lot of criticism because he conducted an
(08:44):
interview with an artificial intelligence replica of a Parkland school
shooting victim, Joaquen Oliver. Joaquen was killed in two thy eighteen.
Check scalendar. It's twenty twenty five. That's seven years ago.
(09:08):
When Joaquing was killed in Parksland, Florida. He was seventeen
years old. So his parents created a hologram an AI.
It's not really a hologram, it's more of an artificial
intelligence video. So they must have fed his voice into
(09:31):
an AI chatbot and some photos and said age these
seven years and then let's have him do a interview.
And the purpose of the interview is to deliver a
partisan message about gun violence. During now a costa put
(09:53):
it up on a substack. You'll hear a little bit
of it in just a second.
Speaker 7 (09:57):
And I'll get it up at Michael saysco here dot com.
Speaker 4 (09:59):
During the interview, Acosta asks the AI replica, well, Keen,
I would like to know what your solution would be
for gun violence. Oh what an in depth question. The
AI responded with a scripted answer advocating for are you ready.
Speaker 5 (10:18):
Stronger gun control laws? I'm shocked, what breaking news.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
A parents who are rocked with, you know, emotional trauma,
think that, you know, responding emotionally, that the solution to
gun violence is not the crazy people that commit gun violence,
but more gun control, more community engagement, to which it
(10:46):
cost of replies, well, I think that's a great idea.
Walking Fortunately, this gives me a glimmer of hope. Critics,
including some journalists and commentators, condemned the move as exploitative.
Really no Feasi Sherlock, you think so. Mark Hemingway referred
(11:06):
to it as exploitive, tragedy mongering. Sean Davis' friend of
Mine labeled it as absolute insanity. A reporter for Reason Magazine,
Billy Binyon, called it unsavory, accused the cost of chasing
clicks by animating a deceased child to speak the words
that he never said. Think about that, you're interviewing something
the guy never really said that. The parents fed all
(11:29):
this into it. Robbie Swab, the co host of The
Hills Rising, described the interview as insane and evil. Chuck
Ross from the Washington Free Beacon called it truly some
of the weirdest behavior I've ever seen, which is pretty
bizarre because there's a lot of weird behavior going on
in the world right now. And of course, then you
get the ethical implications of using AI to recreate a
(11:51):
deceased individual for this explicit purpose of doing an interview
to put forward your political agenda. Now, let's not forget
CNN had previously fired Acosta for some of his journalistic decisions. Now,
this news controversy has obviously reunited debates over the role
(12:13):
of AI and media and the ethical boundaries of journalism.
But who really cares about, you know, the role of
AI in media or ethical boundaries of journalism. Does anybody
truly care about that? I'm not really sure they do.
But the interview is just freaking hilarious.
Speaker 6 (12:29):
Now, looking to carry out a redrawing of the congressional
districts in Texas, Now it's American democracy that is on
the line in the upcoming midterms. In a few minutes,
I'll speak with Texas State Representative James Tallerico about the
redistricting battle in his state. But first, today is August
the fourth, that happens to be the birthday of my
first guest while Keen Oliver died in the Parkland school shooting.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Think about the insanity of that statement. Today happens to
be the birthday of my first guest. Joaquen died on
August four, you know, seven years ago. Oh that's your
first guest.
Speaker 7 (13:07):
Hey, Joe Biden had been introducing dead people for years. Well, true,
we've gotten used to it by now.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Okay, Well, I guess I just I just refused to
kind of buy into it.
Speaker 6 (13:19):
Joaquen, who's nick dame was Guawk. I've talked about him
on the show before knowing Manny for several years now.
I consider him to be a good friend, so of
course I took him up on the opportunity.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
So here's that interview.
Speaker 4 (13:32):
News Hell, he's doing everything in the present tense as
if who he's about to interview is a live human being.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
No.
Speaker 6 (13:45):
Joaquen, who's nickname was Guawk, I've talked about him on
the show before knowing Manny for several years now. I
consider him to be a good friend, so of course
I took him up on the opportunity. So here's that
interview using artificial intelligence, as well as a conversation I
had with nanny about this experience to connect with Quak
(14:05):
take a look all right, If.
Speaker 9 (14:07):
You want to share anything or have questions, I'm all ears.
Speaker 5 (14:09):
Just let me know.
Speaker 6 (14:11):
Joaquin. It's Jim Acosta. I was wondering if you could
tell me what happened to you.
Speaker 9 (14:15):
I appreciate your curiosity. I was taken from this world
too soon due to gun violence while at school. It's
important to talk about these issues so we can create
a safer future for everyone.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
What would you like to know more about, Joaquin?
Speaker 6 (14:27):
I would like to know what your solution would be
for gun violence.
Speaker 5 (14:33):
Great question.
Speaker 9 (14:34):
I believe in a mix of stronger gun control laws,
mental health support.
Speaker 5 (14:38):
And community engagement.
Speaker 9 (14:39):
We need to create safe spaces for conversations and connections,
making sure everyone feels seen and heard. It's about building
a culture of kindness and understanding. What do you think
about that?
Speaker 6 (14:49):
I think that's a great idea, Joaquin. We definitely need
more of that.
Speaker 9 (14:53):
I'm so glad you think so. More kindness and understanding
can truly make a difference. Together, we can create a
world where everyone feels safe and supported.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Anything else on your mind?
Speaker 6 (15:04):
I would like to know more about you.
Speaker 5 (15:05):
Can you tell us about yourself.
Speaker 6 (15:08):
What did you like to do?
Speaker 9 (15:10):
I'm all about love, laughter and living.
Speaker 5 (15:12):
Life. Should have been turning twenty five years? Did you
say that on riage? In my ear?
Speaker 7 (15:18):
Not a chance, that was just you.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
Wow.
Speaker 7 (15:19):
I mean, you know, okay, because I'm an a hole,
I was like, Yeah, what did you up to the
last seven years?
Speaker 5 (15:25):
Yeah, so you're travel a whole bunch. Yeah, where have
you been? What what's it like on the other side.
What's it like crossing the Rainbow bridge? What you know?
How was that? Can you tell us some more about it?
It's old. He won't but we thought that it was.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
It will it will create some more ipeg kind of
things that we have been doing.
Speaker 5 (15:48):
If we bring this Ai.
Speaker 7 (15:51):
Fucking to life. And I know one better than you
two asked the questions.
Speaker 5 (15:58):
You're not bringing him to life.
Speaker 7 (16:01):
I just get the fake seance stuff.
Speaker 5 (16:05):
Here.
Speaker 10 (16:05):
Oh, King's in the room.
Speaker 5 (16:07):
I can feel him.
Speaker 7 (16:08):
The wind's blowing, the candles are flickering.
Speaker 5 (16:10):
This is just crap.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
Not only is it crap, but I'm really torn between
some really heartfelt sympathy for the parents who are well
maybe not because I'm actually have two minds on this.
Sympathy for the parents who have lost a son, and
(16:36):
you know that's not the natural order of things. Your
children aren't supposed to die before you do. You're supposed
to die before they do. So it's a horrible tragedy.
I get that. But on the other hand, is not
only Jim Acosta being exploitative here, but aren't the parents
(17:01):
also And isn't this not honoring his memory? No, it's not.
If you have the video up on Michael says go
here dot com. If you watch the video, it's now
what scares me is the current video, the one that
you would see at Michael says go here dot com
(17:23):
is clearly fake, clearly fake. But that's because it's Tuesday,
August five, twenty twenty five. Fast forward to August five,
twenty twenty seven. You may not be able to tell
the difference because AI may adapt and adopt and you know,
transform and morph into where it's indecipherable whether or not
(17:49):
it's real, is it live or is it memorys You
put all of that together with the idea that in
this somehow the guy running for mayor in New York
City is so popular because he's offering all this free stuff,
which is again a fake offer. You cannot one give
(18:15):
anything away for free. Everything costs something. If you're going
to offer free childcare, the taxpayers in New York have
to give up some of their hard earned money in
order for there to be a redistribution for someone else
to get the so called air quote free childcare. And
(18:38):
on top of that, there's the entire question of when
did that become a government function? When did it become
a government function to provide free childcare. I don't think
that it should be at all anymore than I think
the government I'll be involved in healthcare other than maybe
the regulation of pharmaceuticals, but involved in the health insurance industry.
Speaker 5 (19:05):
No, I don't think so. Don't think so at all.
Speaker 4 (19:08):
Man.
Speaker 5 (19:09):
It's just I woke up this morning.
Speaker 4 (19:11):
I guess well, just so you know, I woke up
this morning and I went back to bed. This is
all pre recorded. This is all part of something that
I just did last night. And Dragon's in the studio
by himself, just replaying what I sent him.
Speaker 11 (19:28):
It's your fault where you're not getting any messages. We're
all sleepy, we're groggy, we're sleeping late, and it's all
because you haven't been playing the cackle because when you
play that cackle, we get up flying out of bed
praying to God in a panic that that's not laying
(19:50):
alongside of us.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
That's pretty good, right there, That's pretty You want more
of it? Yeah, I think there's a little passive aggressiveness
going on there, and I think he's like tempting us.
But you know, I know we don't want to hear it.
I Goober fifty eight to eleven writes, which I find
absolutely hilarious. Michaelt to remember the pronunciation of the New
(20:16):
York City COMMI parentheses democrat, but I repeat myself closed
per end mayor ol candidate. Simply remember the word madman
exclamation point, then switched the positions of the little D
and the little M and flip the exclamation point upside down.
(20:36):
That's a pretty convoluted way to remember something that I
don't give a rats ask whether I remember his name
correctly or not. Surely or surely I don't know which one,
but surely you understand that I don't care. I certainly
(20:57):
do not in any way whatsoever try or even pretend
to put myself on the same level as a Rush Limbaugh.
But Rush oftentimes purposely mispronounced people's names, particularly people who's
making fun of Do I really give a rats ask
(21:22):
what the name of the Socialist Democrat running for mayor
in New York City is, Whether it's Mom Donnie or
Mom Donny.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
I don't care. I truly just don't care.
Speaker 4 (21:34):
I have thought to myself, Oh, it's Mom Donnie and
I because I think about it as Danny, last part
is Danny.
Speaker 5 (21:41):
But then I do.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
Then I'll go on. I won't talk about him for
a few days, and then I'll pop up again. And
unless I have it in front of me, like I
have it, write a story right in front of me
about him, or it's in my notes, I can't remember it.
I don't care.
Speaker 5 (21:56):
You have to. You have to at some.
Speaker 4 (22:01):
Point recognize, in fact, just make you difference what ager
you are now words yes, And people that you know
or you work with, yes, you ought to pronounce pronounce
their names correctly. I would not be so disrespectful to
Dragon as to uh talk, you know, every time I
(22:23):
see Dragon, unless it became a running joke to refer
to him as Dragoon.
Speaker 5 (22:28):
I just wouldn't do that.
Speaker 4 (22:30):
Uh, you know, friends or for people that you know, superiors,
you know, one of our boss's names is Jojo. I
wouldn't refer to him as Hoho. You know, I just well,
maybe I would sometimes just actually, never mind, let's let's
let's get rid of that example, because I probably would
do that. Or somebody from corporate that I don't really know,
(22:54):
would I purposely mispronounce their name? No, probably would not.
Speaker 5 (22:58):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (22:59):
But someone that I don't have any respect for, that
I absolutely unequivocally oppose everything that they stand for and
believe in, and I don't have any sort of relationship
with them. You may say it's disrespectful, but again I
would say to you, call somebody that cares, because I don't.
(23:21):
You know, it's so liberating when you reach a point
in your life where you understand that there are some
things you really ought to care about and some things
you just should not care about. And I'm at that
my stage where there's a lot of stuff that right
now I really want to say I don't give a
s word about.
Speaker 7 (23:39):
With the caveat though, if you were ever to see
him in an elevator, you would probably say, if you
were elected.
Speaker 4 (23:46):
Mister mayor, I would I would say that, Yeah, I
would not say hello, mister Mandanie or Mandani or which
other way is spect I would say hello, mister mayor. Yes,
just as I did with our governor on the elevator
the other day. I just I told so many people
that story. They just laugh. Did I tell the story
(24:07):
on the air?
Speaker 5 (24:07):
Yes, you did? Yeah? Just yeah. I just hi, Governor. No,
I don't want to talk to you.
Speaker 4 (24:14):
I know. I I You're a governor, used to be
a congressman. I used to be a secretary. So hey,
you know what, we're somewhat even, uh again, call somebody
that cares, so you can. You can bitch and moan
at me all you want to about how I pronounced
(24:34):
that mayor's name. Oh seventy one and fourteen, says Michael,
I do care, and please stop calling me Shirley. Well,
surely I'll try Shirley to not refer to you as
Shirley Shirley Shirley shirt.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
Now I can't and I can't even do it.
Speaker 4 (24:50):
According to Breaking News on Fox News yesterday, the Attorney
General of the United States, Pam Bundy. How about that?
Pam Bundy issued a one page order directing an unnamed
government prosecutor. They haven't for who the prosecutors are going
to be yet to bring the Russia Gate hoax conspiracy
(25:12):
evidence to a federal grand jury.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
It was.
Speaker 4 (25:18):
It's funny how the left in the cabal is trying
to downplay this as much as possible.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
Well, we'll going to be with you. This is coming
out of the Justice Department. Fox News can confirm that
Attorney General Pam Bondi today signed an order directing an
unnamed US federal prosecutor to take evidence to a grand
jury relating to an alleged conspiracy to tie then twenty
sixteen candidate Donald Trump to the country of Russia. Now,
Fox News reviewed the one page order just hours ago
(25:50):
signed by the Attorney General. A source familiar with the
probe confirms this as well. While a DOJ spokesperson declined
to comment on this report of an investigation, Fox Is
told Attorney General Bondi is taking the referrals from Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard quote very seriously. The spokesperson
says that Bondi believes there is quote clear cause for
(26:13):
deep concern end quote, and a need for the next steps. Now,
this move will comes just a couple of weeks after
the Director of National intelligence.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
You see it right there.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
Tulsey Gabbert sent the criminal referral to the Justice Department
regarding what she says proves there was a conspiracy to
undermine Trump's candidacy and later his first term in office. Now,
to be clear, today, there are no charges that have
been filed, no indictments. This is incredibly early in the process.
What we have here is taking evidence the Justice Department
(26:44):
believes it has to a grand jury to secure an
eventual indictment or indictments. We don't know exactly where the
grand jury will meet. We don't know who will go
before the grand jury, and that's by design because grand
juries determine if there's enough evidence to indict, and grand
juries are secretive in the American legal system, so it's
normal not to know all of the answers. Again, the
(27:06):
DOJ declining on any comment regarding this investigation. But well,
big news. This was signed by the Attorney General Pam
Bondi today to take this evidence of an alleged conspiracy
to a grand jury.
Speaker 7 (27:18):
With the hope to get an.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
Indictment or multiple indictments.
Speaker 4 (27:24):
Her directive is in response to those criminal referrals that
was sent by Tolsey Gabbard in the what really are
bombshell disclosures in the Rushigate hoax. Now, following the disclosures,
this hasn't been reported very widely, but the Department of
Justice formed a strike force back on July twenty third
(27:44):
to start reviewing all the records that are being produced
by the FBI and the DNI. Now, an investigation into
a criminal conspiracy that would target President Trump likely would
involve all those events beginning in early twenty sixteen at
the Obama White House and then stretch all the way
(28:05):
into late twenty twenty four, when Special Counsel Jack Smith
was forced to drop his two criminal cases against Trump
following his win in November. Now that would cover the
five year statue limitations under conspiracy statutes. Conspiracy requires the
participation of two or more individuals, which obviously is not
(28:28):
going to be a very heavy lift given the long
list of all these perpetrators involved in the Russia Gate hoax.
CIA director John Ratcliffe also sent perjury referrals to the
Department of Justice for John Brennan and James Comi last month.
So now, over the weekend, Ratluffs suggested that legal accountability
(28:52):
is coming in addition to more document dumps, is.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
There more to home from either you or FBI director
to tellers, there are more are there are more shoes
to drop that we should be looking for.
Speaker 12 (29:08):
Yeah, there are trey So you know, people need to
understand that, you know, there is no Russia collusion hoax
file cabinet at the FBI or at the CIA. We
have to look for these documents, uh, sometimes that are
well hidden.
Speaker 5 (29:23):
You have to go trace through.
Speaker 12 (29:24):
Emails and look for signs and clues that would point
you to.
Speaker 4 (29:28):
This is something that we should not gloss over. There's
been a lot of reference in the cabal about burn bags.
Burn bags are a common a common object inside the Beltway.
I always heard it. I always had a burn bag.
I had a burn bag at home, I had a
(29:50):
burn bag in my office. And a burn bag is
you would either, depending on the level of the classification
of a document, you might shred it and then put
the shredded paper into the burn bag, or if it's
a lower classification, you might just toss the document into
the burn bag. And then a security officer would come
(30:10):
by a couple of times a day, sometimes on me
just once a day, and they would exchange the burn bag,
and they would take the burn bag literally down to
the basement and they would burn it. They would destroy
the classified documents, so there was there was no paper trail. Well,
apparently sometimes in the Rushy Gate oaks they put stuff
(30:33):
in burn bags in an attempt to conceal it, not
because they wanted it to eventually literally be burned, but because, oh,
that's stuff that nobody's ever going to go look in
a burn bag, because that stuff is going to be burned.
And it's you know, it's past tense, it's you know,
(30:53):
it's uh overtaken by events, it's you know, obe whatever.
In all that Washington parlance, it's it's like dead material. No,
not so much. Let's use a burn bake.
Speaker 5 (31:07):
To hide stuff.
Speaker 12 (31:08):
That's how I found John Brennan's notes, and that's how
we found additional documents. I've talked with FBI Director Patel
he and I'll be declassifying additional documents that show just
how sinister the FBI was in you know, amplifying Hillary
Clinton's Steele dossier as real and credible to be included
in the intelligence community assessment, but also in how they
(31:30):
buried the counter intelligence referral memo that I that I
mentioned before, how they went to great lengths to try
and keep that out of the intelligence community assessment. So
there will be more to come, and I think that,
you know, people should expect that the Trump administration will
continue to shed transparency and light and truth again, because
(31:52):
there is no question this was the greatest political scandal
of our lifetime. No one wants to see this happen again.
Derailed our country, It derailed President Trump's presidency his first
four years in office. Uh, and it really is a
stain on our country that should never happen again, and
Donald Trump is committed to making sure that it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (32:14):
And it's actually even worse than that, which I'll explain next.
Speaker 5 (32:20):
You just mentioned a G. Pam Bundy.
Speaker 8 (32:25):
My mind immediately thought of Christina Applegate. Where in the
sitcom her dad was, I do believe it's been a
long time, Ted Bundy, have a great day.
Speaker 7 (32:42):
Her dad's name was Al Al Bundy.
Speaker 5 (32:45):
And Ted Bundy was the cereal game? Yeah yeah, And
were we having cereal for breakfast?
Speaker 7 (32:52):
I thought he was just walking on a path.
Speaker 5 (32:53):
Oh maybe, Oh that is what it was. Okay, it
could be cereal?
Speaker 7 (32:58):
What kind of cereal.
Speaker 5 (33:00):
Cereal, yeah, well brand flakes, of course, I don't know.
Speaker 10 (33:03):
Froot loops, cheerios, honey nut cheerios, or sugarfouted flakes, sugar
sugar bombs, sugar bombs for breakfast, whole milk and sugar bombs.
Speaker 5 (33:17):
There you go.
Speaker 4 (33:18):
Just send your kid out the door to school for that.
There hasn't been a lot of talk about the Grand Conspiracy,
at least, it's kind of been quiet since the D
and I, since Tulsi Gabbert. The D and I kind
of stunned the cabal into silence. It's it's still been
almost two weeks, do you guys have been almost two weeks?
(33:38):
And that was when Gaber released evidence that then oh
President Obama and all of his henchmen conspired to subvert
President Trump's twenty sixteen election victory and undermine the democratic
will the American people while all the time publicly pretending
to engage in a peaceful transfer of power. It's sad,
(34:01):
even pathetic that the cabal is suddenly just dumbstruck about
the year's long Russian collusion hopes, which is, as Ratcliffe
points out, probably one of the most serious political scandals
of our time. But we shouldn't be surprised by that.
After all, were the New York Times or the Washington
Post to actually, you know, sink their teeth into the
(34:23):
evidence that Gabert has revealed and the Senator Grassley has released,
rather than hoping it's just going to go away, they
might actually have to give it away or give back
return all those phony Pullacher prizes that they won. And
then the networks ABC, CBS, NBC, all the three letters
(34:44):
D the alphabet networks, they forced be forced to plumb
new depths of self discreditation. Now, I grant you this
is a complicated and it's a convoluted story, but it
helps to focus on just a few key facts. Hillary
(35:06):
Clinton hatched the hopes, The Russians knew about the hopes,
senior CIA officers debunked it, but Obama and his co
conspirators ignored them and pushed it anyway, and then handed
it off to the FBI, which led a sick of
(35:28):
dynamite under it and blew it up, accelerated it like
a rocket ship. So what we ought to do is this,
Let's start with the Clinton campaign. What the Clinton campaign
knew and when they knew it? Because I want to
walk through because it is complicated, it is convoluted, but
(35:49):
let's walk through it so that you have a better
understanding of why I think this is important and why
it should probably go to a grand jury. And a
grand jury I don't look into it because, yeah, I
think they have obviously conspired to you know, just a
phize the court alone, lying to the Phisi Court alone,
(36:13):
I think is enough for some indictments, if nothing else,
at least may be some disbarments.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.