Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Yesterday, Cassie Hunt of CNN asked one of the national
correspondents if a governor had a leg to stand on,
what's wrong with it? She was specifically asking about Governor
Greg Abbott of Texas, who is in a wheelchair. We
all know if the tables were turned, and this was
(00:22):
a right leading news organization saying that the left would
go ballistic.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Absolutely, absolutely, Dragon and I were just before we get
into some of the less serious things. I just happened
to catch the end of Pat Woodard's sports report about
the Rockies. They lost a close on it. They lost
the close one yesterday did the Cando Blue Jays twenty
(00:48):
to one? Right? And then that caused you to tell
me what the series was, and you came up with
the following numbers.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Let me pull that screen back up here, dude. Yes,
yesterday's game was twenty to one to the Blue Jays,
a squeaker tight one. I mean it was very close.
Previous Blue Jays Rockies game was a ten to four, okay,
a little bit more from the team.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
The previous game we got five runs so far games.
Speaker 3 (01:20):
The previous game to that in the series on Monday,
fifteen to one.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
Oh so we got six runs out of three games.
We got six runs, so an average of two runs
per game versus how many did they give up.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
Forty five forty five and so forty five to six.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Well that's interesting, Yeah, just five to six, you know
that much. And I als, you don't think that Momfords care.
I just don't think they care as long as as
long as they've got McGregor square, as long as they've
got you know, foot traffic down there, which you know,
(02:01):
I might go to a ball game, you know, if
a friend was in town, you know, if Andy, if
Andy called and said, hey, I'm going to be in
you know, I got some oral arguments in front of
the tenth Circuit. Let's go to a ball doing one afternoon.
You know, I might go do that. But for an
evening game, I'm not really sure I want to go
dodge the bullets to go to an evening game, but
I you know, because you know so, but I would go.
(02:22):
I would go so Andy and I could just sit
and watch the opposing team and we can sit and
have a conversation together about you know, politics or legal
stuff or whatever, and you know, drink some you know,
overpriced diet coke or whatever, because neither one of us
drink beer, so that that would be it. And who
gets a rat's ass? And I think that's what a
lot of people are doing. They're going to watch the
(02:42):
other teams and they're just going for the Ambia.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
Are they still on the interim manager or they they
picked a permanent one, because if they're if they're still
on the interim, I think you need to switch that
up again.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
I thought they had named but you know, again, I've
so we Wh's just so sad because I was so
you think back to when they were announced and then
you know, the first game played in what ninety three
or something, and I was so excited. And then I
got season tickets and I you know, I finally worked
my way down from you know, the nosebleed season tickets
(03:16):
all the way down to just off third base, right
below the overhang, I mean, just right inside the overhang
down below in the lower level, and it was just
so wonderful. And then, you know, and then just like
man and I don't want to leave town. Don't get
me wrong, I don't want to leave town. But ownership,
(03:41):
it's another example of you know, ownership and developing a
culture and developing, you know, the kind of expectation of quality.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
And it looks like Warren Schaffer's the new manager. It
doesn't say interim in front of his name, so I
thought so he took over at when the Rockies record
was seven and thirty four. The Rockies current record is
thirty and eighty four.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
Wow. Okay, and then one didn't Montford name his son
as the new president of the club or something.
Speaker 3 (04:16):
I think that was happening next year.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Oh is that going to happen next year? Okay? Yeah? Right,
all right, Well, so for those of us who love baseball,
look elsewhere, looks elsewhere. All right, let's get started. This
is the big news Wednesday afternoon. Wasn't really absurd at
(04:41):
all because it came in the form of a gigantic
new commitment by a leading US tech company by the
name of Apple Corporation. They've decided they're going to up
there planned five hundred billion dollars for new investments in
the in this country by another one hundred billion dollars.
(05:03):
Somebody on my ex timeline tweeted out breaking Donald Trump
just gave a shout out to Tim Cook and Scott
Dessent for this massive six hundred billion dollar Apple investment
in America, and again I voted for this. Well, hear
a few takeaways from it, because I'm hearing people already
(05:26):
beginning to minimize this. In fact, on the way in
the Fox headline was basically that Apple's making a six
hundred billion dollar commitment. Then they had a couple of
quotes from Kevin O'Leary who said, I think, quite astutely,
you can have two kinds of meetings with Donald Trump.
(05:48):
You could have like a Tim Cook meeting where you
get patted on the back and praises and it's a
really good meeting. Or you could have a Voltimore Zelensky
meeting where it melts down in front of the entire
world and you go slinking away back to your country
with your tail between your legs. And I did, I
(06:09):
didn't check my Apple stock. But apparently they added some
additional value to their to their to their value yesterday,
just based on that meeting alone. And of course the
proof is in the pudding, and we got to make
certain or we you know, we got to see what
they want to do. But just to give you a
(06:30):
little perspective about it, think about the scale of a
six hundred billion dollar commitment Exon Mobile. Exon Mobile, you know,
the big, evil, giant oil company. They're twenty twenty five
capital budget, capital budget, not they're out, but they're capital budget.
Because this is a capital expenditure by Apple. So I'm
(06:52):
going to make Apples to apples, no pun intended. I'm
going to compare Orange just orangees. How about that Exon
mobiles capital budget for this year is twenty eight billion dollars.
Apple's committing six hundred billion dollars over four years, one
hundred and fifty billion dollars per year. Apples plans exceed
(07:15):
the capital budgets of Exxon, Chevron, Shell, BP, Equinor, and
Total Energies all combined, and it is even close. So
in that kind of comparison, those are stunning numbers. That's
the first point i'd make. The second point I'd make
is this with four hundred and fifty thousand supplier jobs
(07:39):
twenty thousand new direct hires planned, this economic impact could
could touch every single state. Next Apples planned, They've got
a new program called American Manufacturing Program is going to
(08:00):
core components like in the case of yesterday iPhone and
watch glass rare earth magnets silicon chip production back to
the United States. That doesn't mean your iPhone that you buy,
if you buy a new new iPhone coming out, it
doesn't mean it's going to be fully wholly manufactured in
the United States. But many of the highly technical components
(08:26):
will be. They may be shipped to China or Vietnam
for assembly, but the manufacturing of the high tech components
is going to occur in this company, in this country.
Those are very high paying jobs, so don't poo poo this.
The major partners in this announcement include Corning obviously Corning Glass,
(08:49):
TSMC Arizona. You know, the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation is
opening a couple of fabs in in the one of
the Phoenix suburbs, huge investment there. So the M four
and soon to be the M five whatever. You know,
that Apple silicon is going to be whatever the next
iteration of it is going to be, probably will be
(09:11):
manufactured in the United States down in Arizona by TSMC,
Texas Instruments, MP Materials. All of that combined creates a
complete domestic chip and component ecosystem, all of which will
be based in the United States. Now, don't get me wrong.
Apple's move is without any dat or reaction to Trump's
(09:33):
tariff strategy, whose latest element is one hundred percent tariff
on four of made ships and semiconductors. So companies doing
business in the United States can either source those critical
components domestically or they can bear the cost of it.
Apple looked at it and said, you know, so, Apple,
what are the three or you know it varies, but
three or four trillion dollars in in capitalization, so they
(09:57):
can six hundred billion dollars. Okay, yeah, well, this take
some pocket change, and let's manufacture some of our highly
technical components in the United States and avoid the tariffs. Now,
the critics will correctly say that the tech companies are
going to pass any higher costs on to consumers in
the form of higher retail prices, all of the other
(10:20):
factors being equal, Yes, those components would go up in price,
probably regardless where they were being manufactured, because these are
highly technical components that require a high degree of skill,
rare earth minerals, all of the things that it takes
to put the stupid glass on your iPhone or your watch.
(10:44):
But here's the deal. All other factors won't be equal now,
because once a big market player like Apple moves to
build one hundred percent US supply change, then that means competitors,
and probably one of the main competitors, Apple, Samsung, LG
all the others, they're gonna have a little choice but
(11:05):
to follow suit or guess what, that just pure simple economics.
They'll end up surrendering some of their market share to Apple.
And everybody's always fighting and grappling for market share, so
they're going to do the same thing that Apple is
going to do. This is the ripple effect of Tim
Cook and going and again. I saw the announcement yesterday.
(11:29):
I saw a report on the announcement, and I have
yet to understand what it was that the little something
that they put in a twenty four carrot gold base.
It looked like a clear silicon disc of some sort
engraved to Trump. Gave it to me as a gift,
and I thought, well, okay, well whatever they did, twenty
(11:49):
four carrot gold because Trump loves gold. But here's the
key thing to understand. I think this is more than
just a shift in policy. This is is actually an
industrial strategy which the private sector is buying into in
order to create the desired results, and it has to
(12:11):
happen fast to avoid major economic displacement which could bring
it all crashing down in the twenty twenty eight elections.
So tiny right here is everything, and I freely admit
there are significant challenges that exist which could delay the process.
So that leads to the big questions will the other
(12:33):
tech giants follow Apple's lead or bear the cost of
the tariffs? Now, early indicators reported in the Wall Street
Journal and other places are that many are already following
the Apple plan, is evidenced by the massive built out of,
for example, all the AI data centers and all the
other domestic tech expansions that are already underway in the country. Now,
(12:57):
I know that some people are looking at the economy
and going, well, it's not really working out very well
for me. But once this gets rolling and then all
think about TSMC. Starlucks, for example, which is the Taiwan
National Airline, has started direct flights between Phoenix Sky Harbor
(13:20):
and Taipei, and they're doing that because there is so
much going on between the two countries between specifically Phoenix
and Taipei, where TSMC is headquartered, that there are literally
Taiwanese communities sprouting up in Arizona, Taiwanese grocery stores, Taiwanese restaurants,
(13:45):
everything that you can possibly imagine. Well, that means all
of those workers that are coming from Taiwan that will
end up here, those are going to create jobs because
they have to buy groceries, they're gonna have to go
out to eat, They're going to be buying cars, They're
going to be doing things. So all of that spin
off will eventually start having an effect on the economy
writ large. Now, another question I have is will the
(14:11):
MAGA base rebel when they see most of the white
collar jobs going to In case a TSMC could be
H one B VISA holders out of say type A,
it could become a very noticeable flood given the failure
of it's kind of our fault, the failure of our
(14:33):
education system to produce some adequate flow of the needed
qualified workers. Well, well, you know, and it's stereo, it's stereotyping.
But if you if you look at Asia, what do
they focus on science and math? Stem they focus all
of that. What do we focus on the story that
(14:55):
was in the news, that headlined the news yesterday in
Colorado was the number of disciplinary problems and the number
of teachers injured in Colorado public schools. So our focus
is on preventing violence in schools, while in ASI of
the focuses on uh yeah, sit down and learn your math,
(15:15):
learn your science, learn your engineering, learn all of this.
At some point we're going to wake up and recognize
that fundamentally we have to change the public education system
in this country. But there's another question. Will Apple and
the other tech giants be able to build their needed
infrastructure on schedule because we have an increasing shortage of
(15:38):
blue collar workers in almost every relevant trade. You can't
build without builders. You can't have plumbing without plumbers. You
can't have electricity with electricians. You can't have masonry without bricklayers.
You can't have any of this stuff without the tradesmen.
That's why Mike Rose out there, you know, touting all
of the things that we need to do in terms
(15:59):
of trade schools. If you've got a kid, don't don't
you know my parents and now I'm glad they did. Now,
my parents were both they didn't have college degrees, but
they both had trade skills. You know. Was dad was
a commercial printer, he had a trade and he spent
(16:21):
his entire life doing that, But for me it had
to be a college education. Well maybe that's not necessarily
true anymore. Bottom line, this is a big deal for
the country, and I think it's one of the biggest
deals ever. But let's move on. Uh, let's go over
to the Department of Justice for a moment. Now. We're
gonna do a little more in depth on this later.
(16:43):
But I don't think there's any more evidence of how
much things are changing at the Department of Justice than
the Civil Rights Division now led by And if you
don't follow her, she and I follow each other on
actually got to go follow her. Her meat Dylan from
San Francisco. She released a two minute clip laying out
(17:08):
her rapidly forming agenda and some of the actions that
she's taken to restore equal justice under the law for
every American rather than just for the chosen few. And
I haven't timed this very well. I want you to
hear it, but it's two minutes long and I've only
got a minute to do. So the point is we
(17:30):
can we can sit here and focus solely on what
the cabal tells us about what's going on. Inside the Beltway.
But they're going to pick and choose, for example, the
other head which Michael D. Brown. Did you catch it?
(17:54):
I got it? Thank you. I really don't give a crap.
That's just mood I'm in today. Wow, it's not even Friday,
not even that's right, it's not even Friday. Uh. I
don't really, I really don't care what he thinks about.
He's all upset because he thinks that Trump is out
going to campaign for Clomo or for Eric Adams, and
(18:18):
he thinks that's wrong. Well, President's campaign for people. All
the time, people get involved in presidents, congressman, senators, they
all get involved in all these other elections. Why shouldn't Trump. Michael,
Let's be honest, missus.
Speaker 3 (18:34):
Redbeard has no interesting going on a trip with me,
neither is Dragon.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
So it's gonna have to be you.
Speaker 1 (18:40):
If I can get my security manager to give me
a thumbs up, let's go to Israel.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
I'm for it.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
You know.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
We had a accounting Zach who came to me because
her they're Jewish, and her son wanted to make a
pilgrimage to Israel. This has been maybe six months or
so ago, and I assured her that it was perfectly
(19:10):
safe to go, and you know, typical parents, they were
really worried about it. I think the son was maybe
sixteen seventeen years old, and I said, you know, he's
going to be fine. He's going to be with a group,
and they will take extraordinary care with that group. And
of course he went uneventful, got to see a lot
(19:32):
of his heritage and you know, learned a lot about
his you know, the country and everything, and came back
and they were extatic that he went, I would go tomorrow.
So if you went, buy me an airplane ticket and go. Now,
I need business class at a minimum. So let's do it.
(19:52):
Let's head out back to her meat Dylan. So she
you know that she she was a civil rights lawyer
and San Francisco and she does she does yeoman's work
around the country. Well, she was picked ahead the DOJ
Civil Rights Division, and yesterday she released just a short
two minute video about what she's accomplishing. It's it's actually amazing.
Speaker 4 (20:20):
Our constitutional duty is to protect the right to vote
for all Americans. Sixty years ago, Congress passed the Voting
Rights Act of nineteen sixty five to confront the brutal
reality that too many Americans were being denied their rightful
access to the ballot. The Voting Rights Act came at
a critical time in our nation's history and was the
(20:40):
catalyst of necessary change. This landmark law removed barriers to voting.
It outlawed poll taxes and literacy tests, and gave the
federal government the tools to stop discriminatory barriers at the
ballot box. Today, under the leadership of President Trump and
Attorney General Pam Bondi, this Civil Division is continuing to
(21:01):
protect equal and transparent ballot access with vigilance and resolve.
We are investigating violations of federal voting laws. We're ensuring
that all fifty states have and continue to have clean
voter rolls. Weird.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Oh wait a minute, I thought that was racist. I
thought that cleaning up the voter rolls. You know, people
have moved out of state, people who have died, people
who have you know, not voted. You know, you're supposed
to automatically be taken off the rolls, depending on state law,
if you haven't voted an x number of elections, and
you should be purged from the rolls, and state should
(21:38):
clean up those voter rolls because anybody who's on the
voter rolls who's not qualified to vote in any particular state,
that's an opening for fraud. But that's racist. If you
want to go out and try to clean up the
voting rolls, well, that's becisely what she's doing. She's purging
and making sure that states clean up their voter rolls
(22:00):
in order to protect the civil rights of those of
us we legitimately have a right to vote.
Speaker 4 (22:04):
Good for for investigating violations of federal voting laws. We're
ensuring that all fifty states have and continue to have
clean voter roles. We are challenging efforts to suppress or
dilute the vote. We are attacking illegal race based cherrymandering,
and we are protecting ballot access for all Americans. We
(22:25):
have sued jurisdictions such as North Carolina for not registering
voters properly by first verifying their eligibility. We have notified
Texas of grave concerns about congressional districts drawn with racial motivations,
and we are suing other jurisdictions where there is evidence
of ineligible voters on their voter rolls. Our job is
(22:48):
to make it easier to vote and harder to cheat.
On this anniversary, we honor the Voting Rights Act not
just by remembering it, but by enforcing it for all Americans.
And that's my promise to you.
Speaker 2 (23:01):
Good for you. I mean, that's really good. Here's the deal.
If you can do away with race based congressional districting,
you can do a wight the Democrat Party as a
significant force in national politics. With the Supreme Court prepared
to rule on race based districting, and Dylan working the
(23:21):
other end of the problem on the other end of
the street at the Department of Justice, that is an
existential threat to the Democrat Party. Now taken together with
all the other developments over the past six plus months,
Dylan's program is going after the mother load of the
Democrat election, the voter fraud machine, because just think about
(23:43):
this without usaid as the mother load for all the
money laundering schemes. You know, get illegals, register, provide illegals with,
you know, all sorts of legal representations, you know, all
of that. Act Blue Now maybe you're not familiar with
(24:04):
Act Blue. Act Blue is the gigantic umbrella fundraising organization
for Democrats. They've engaged in outright fraud they've done things like, oh,
let's go buy gift cards, and then we'll distribute those
and have them use those gift cards as contributions in
(24:27):
order to avoid the campaign contribution limits. And then if
we and I'll get to the census in just a minute,
if we don't have illegal aliens voting and estimated two
to four million voted in the last election, non citizens,
(24:48):
illegal aliens voting in our elections. And Democrats think that's okay.
Our meat Dylan does not think that's okay. You eliminate
those two to four million votes. You take away the well,
first of all, we've already shut down the border. You
take away the end Sunday of like, oh, you know,
motor of voter registration. Oh, you went a driver's license.
(25:10):
Guess what, we're registered to vote Democrat too. Yeah, it's
very it's great without millions of debt or otherwise ineligible
voters on the voter rolls, without mandated widespread mail in voting.
And I know that a lot of people in this state,
Republicans and Conservatives, love mail in voting. I will never
I shouldn't say never. I can never see myself ever
(25:35):
capitulating to Okay, I think mail in balloting is a
great thing. I think it's horrible. I think it, once
again is another example of how we we kind of
denigrate our civic responsibility, that voting is something special, voting
is something you know. You think about all of these
third world craphole countries where they've gone to vote and
(25:56):
you know, they dip their finger in you know, some
purple ink or something, and they probably show their ink
stained finger because they voted. They took the time to
actually go line up and go vote. Yeah, we're too lazy,
a bunch of fat ass Americans that think what we
ought to do is just be able to sit at
the kitchen table and oh honey, here, i'm too tired,
(26:17):
feell this ballot, that ballot out for me, or have
some workers come around to you know, go to a
bunch of assisted living places and help them, or steal
the ballots they're left on the you know, the mailboxes
in apartment complexes. It's just absolutely absurd our voting system.
And I think you ought to go get off your ass,
go stand in line and go vote. Hoop, But my
(26:40):
glives take off work. Oh my boss won't give me
time to Okay, well, you know, maybe you get off
work at five, you got to seven o'clock to go vote,
and if you need more time, they go to your
state legislature and ask them to extend the time to
eight o'clock or nine o'clock.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
I don't share, as my family used to be a
business owner. At least my mother owned the subways. You
have to give that.
Speaker 2 (26:59):
It's a law right. You have to give them time
to go vote. I'm scared us, So that's not an excuse.
It's not an excuse. And now, potentially anyway, without race
based jerry mandering, the Democrats may never win another election.
I know that's a pipe dream, but we're on that path.
(27:21):
All of those elements that I just listed are the
only factors that have allowed them to remain competitive at
the national level for more than fifty years now. So
isn't that glorious? I mean, I really think that's that's
simply amazing. And speaking of elections, there's a there's a
shift happening in Oh. Before I leave that, though, I
(27:44):
thought the other thing that Harmeat did was pretty brilliant.
She pointed out that, oh, yeah, we're going after North Carolina, Oh,
a red state. We're going after Texas, oh, a red
state for race based districting yes which we talked about
what's going on in Texas yesterday. We'll talk a little
(28:06):
bit more about Texas today because I casually mentioned something
yesterday about how, for example, Massachusetts nine congressional districts, Trump
got some forty percent of the vote in Massachusetts without
any Republican congressman whatsoever. Now, if Massachusetts and Illinois and
(28:26):
some other states have jerry mandered their congressional districts such
that Democrats, I mean that Republicans cannot win. They still
get you know, thirty or forty percent of the vote,
but they cannot win. There's nothing less for these Democrats
to do. You've jerry mandered one hundred percent in favor
of Democrats. Well that's going away. And then yesterday Marshall
(28:51):
black Senator Marshall Blackburn from Tennessee announced that because Andy Basheer,
the governor in Tennessee, is now term limited, that she's
going to make a for the job of governor, which,
you know, Marshall Blackburn, Okay, I kind of like hers.
I think she's kind of crazy sometimes, but also she's Okay,
it'd be fine at least she's Republican, right, interesting, Timbershett
(29:14):
is thinking about running in marsh running from Marshall Blackburn's seat.
It's all musical chairs because you know what Andy Bisher
will do. The governor, the Democrat governor, he will run
for senator. You know, once they get in, it's just like, oh,
I just got to keep moving on up, just like
the Jeffersons. They just got to keep moving on up.
Speaker 5 (29:37):
Michael, what the fuck's going on? Don't you have any
concern for the delicate sensibilities of your listeners. You need
to clean up your act.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Agreed, that was a very unusual talkbackcent.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
Yeah, yeah, no idea what you're talking about? At for
twenty two Mountain Time this morning, six twenty two Eastern
is the guy ever sleep? Donald Trump posted this, I
have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work
on a new and highly accurate census based on modern
(30:19):
day facts and figures, and importantly using the results and
information gain from the presidential election of twenty twenty four.
And then in all caps, well not all caps, but
mostly all caps, people who are in our country illegally.
He will not be counted in the census. Thank you
for your attention to this matter. I love this what's
(30:43):
in now with all of this, thank you for your
attention to this matter. At the end of all this
posts on X and truth social now most of you,
I hope will understand that excluding illegal aliens from the
census count would result in a shift of numerous congressional
seats from blue states like California, Illinois, New York, Massachusetts
(31:05):
to red states like oh Well, Florida, Ohio, Tennessee, Alabama, Texas.
Perhaps as many as a dozen seats could be in
play here by simply doing that. Now, if Trump's play
here can survive in the federal courts, it would be,
in a word, in Trump's words, huge, it would be huge.
(31:26):
Here's how I think he needs to play this. I
don't think well. I think he can tell them don't
count illegals in the census for purposes of congressional apportionment,
you know, assigning the four hundred and thirty five members
of Congress to the fifty states, dividing them up proportionally,
(31:49):
so I would instruct the Department of Commerce or you know,
tell them you don't have the instruct necessarily, but tell
you know, go to the secretary and say, listen, why
don't we divide the census up this year. Let's have
a two part census. You know you have well, we
already have a two part census. We have the short
(32:10):
form and the long form. Some of us only get
the short form. Do you do you remember this? Some
of us only get the short form, and it varies.
You never know which form you're going to get, and
then some get the long form, and then you get
a visit by somebody. Well how about this, how about
we have a short form and a long form, but
(32:32):
on every one we ask whether or not you are
a citizen of the United States of America. Now, I
don't know how. I guess the only way we can
verify that is because I don't know whether it's I
don't think there's any signature line on the census where
you have to say, you know, all the foregoing is
(32:54):
true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Uh,
and you know I say all these things fact under
penalty of perjury. I don't think that's on the census.
But we could least ask and find out, you know,
identify yourself as you know a citizen, and then we
could do the count separately. Okay, for all of those
(33:19):
that we're going you know, we're going to do a
count for purposes of apportioning the four hundred and thirty
five members of Congress, plus you know, obviously all the
people in the state for state Senate seats and state
House seats. But we're only going to count those who
are US citizens. Now for the count of just who's
in the country, will count everybody. In fact, i'd like
(33:42):
to see that number. I'd like to see the number
of everybody in the country, whether they're here legally or not,
because then we might actually get somewhat of an accurate
number of citizens versus non citizens. Because if I ask
you how many illegal aliens are in the country, the
number ranges anywhere from twenty four to forty eight million people.
(34:05):
Nobody really knows, So let's ask and find out in
the senses, that's all I got