8-7-25 - 8am - The District of Columbia and Canadian 'Justice'

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, Michael and Jagon.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
This is your favorite jew uber And Hey, I'm down
to go to Israel. I'm ready to go. I love Israel.
He got you a good day. He's what ready to go?
He's down, he means ready to go to Israel. Oh oh, okay,
if you and girl dad are going, he's going. Okay.

Speaker 3 (00:23):
Well, I was worried because of his illness that he
was saying I'm ready to go. Oh yeah, that's because
I was mumbling a little bit there to.

Speaker 2 (00:31):
I couldn't understand what he was. He's got time for
one more trip. Of course he does.

Speaker 3 (00:35):
Everybody's always got time for one more trip. I well,
let's start with this article one, Section eight, clause I
think seventeen. I'd have to count. I think it's Clause
seventeen of the United States Constitution says this these are

(01:00):
Let's go to Section eight. The Congress shall have power
to lay and collect taxes, duties, in posts and exercises,
to pay the debts and provide for the common defense
and general welfare of the United States. But all duties, imposts,
and excises shall be uniformed throughout the United States. Then
it starts to list the enumerate of powers, such as

(01:21):
to borrow money, to regulate commerce, to establish a uniform
rule of naturalization, rules on bankruptcies, to coin money, to
provide for the punishment of counterfeiting, to establish post offices,
to promote the progress of science and arts, blah blah blah,
blah blah blah blah. Then to exercise exclusive legislation in

(01:47):
all cases whatsoever over such district parentheses not exceeding ten
miles square closed pern as may, by session of particular
States and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of
the government of the United States. And to exercise like

(02:07):
authority over all places purchased by the consent of the
legislature of the state, in which the same shall be
for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful.

Speaker 2 (02:19):
Buildings, and blah blah blah. And it continues.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
Let me provide you some emphasis again, to exercise exclusive
legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district as may,
by the session of particular States, and by the acceptance
of Congress, become the seat of the government of the

(02:45):
United States. Hence we have the district of Columbia, the District.

Speaker 2 (02:54):
Of Columbia is. If you've never been to Washington, I'd
highly recommend that you go. Be aware of.

Speaker 3 (03:02):
The firearm laws before you think about taking your own
firearm for protection. But it is something that is it's
I started to say it is. It can be one
of the most beautiful cities in the world, and it

(03:24):
is so teeming with history that sometimes you get lost
in the large largeness, the magnificence of things like the
Lincoln Memorial. I'm not trying to kind of pooh pooh

(03:45):
the magnificence of the Lincoln Memorial, but it can be overwhelming.
The United States Capital, the Washington Monument, the White House itself,
the Jefferson Memorial, and then of course then all the
museum and then they're all and I'm only saying this,
I don't mean this pejoratively, but all the secondary monuments,

(04:08):
you know, the Vietnam Memorial, the Korean Memorial, the World
War Two Memorial, the FDR that, yes, the FDR Memorial, Yeah,
it's over there. You go to the Navy Memorial, you
go to Ardington National Cemetery, you go to Lee House,
you go to Mount Vernon. If you want to take

(04:28):
the bus or drive down south. You can go to
Mount Vernon when you start looking beyond just all of
the great things that you see in all the photographs
and start looking deep in. Or you go into the
National Archives and you depending on the time of day,
you may or may not be in a line, but

(04:50):
you walk up and you're looking at the original Declaration
of Independence, You're looking at the original US co Constitution.
It's all inspiring. It I get goosebumps thinking about it.
I had the fortunate ability to see all the nooks

(05:15):
and crannies of the White House in the US Capitol,
I had the honor of, because of continuity of government
and continuity of operations programs of doing the same in
the US Supreme Court Building, which that reminded me. Go
to the Library of Congress, just even if you don't

(05:39):
do anything, just go into the Library of Congress and
just stand in awe at the amount of material that
is in that building. If you do go sometime, be
sure and visit those giant monuments, the Capitol, the White House, Lincoln, Jefferson,
all of those, even the Vietnam Memorial, the World War

(06:06):
II Monument, the Korean Memorial, all of those. At night
are well, you will just breathtaking, absolutely breathtaking, and then
make sure you don't get mugged, and make sure you
don't get carjacked, and then make sure you don't wander

(06:29):
off and get off on the Green Line and end
up in a part in DC Southeast that although that's
kind of changing and really kind of modernizing with the
Nats playing down there and a lot of new development
and everything, it's not nearly as bad as it used
to be. But I remember one time getting on the
Green Line and missing a stop, and I'd meant to

(06:52):
go to to the Marine barracks and missed a stop
and ended upright. I think I'll go right back and
get back down on the metro and go back the
opposite direction. It's just a wonderful place, but it is
turning into a crime ridden crab holes city because it

(07:14):
is run by the Democrats. And Congress decided to grant
the district over which Congress has, as I said, exclusive legislature,
they could exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over
the seat of government. The United States Congress can write

(07:35):
all the ordinances, they can determine all the laws by
which the District of Columbia is a governed You don't
need a mayor. You don't need a police chief, you
don't need a city council, you don't need any.

Speaker 2 (07:49):
Of that stuff.

Speaker 3 (07:50):
Congress could set up a committee and they they could.
They could hire a city manager. They could hire you
know whomever to you know, actually run the operations. They
could hire a police chief. That police chief could be
given the delegated the authority to hire a police department,
the same with the fire department. You could do all
of that. Congress could do all of that, and they

(08:11):
could be held accountable. They alone would be held accountable,
and they alone could be held accountable, but by the
rest of us in the country, because if they don't
manage d C correctly. For example, right now, if d
C is completely overrun with crime, which we'll get to
in just a second, if DC is truly overrun with crime,

(08:33):
I can't vote Mayor Bowser out of office. I have
no voting authority over the city council. I don't have
any saying who the police chief or the fire chief is.
I have none of that because Congress has advocated their
authority to the DC Council by granting them home rule. Authority. Well,

(08:54):
they can take that away too. Trump mentioned this yesterday
in the meeting with Tim Cook.

Speaker 1 (09:02):
You see, are you considering taking over the DC police
on an option on it?

Speaker 2 (09:07):
We're considering now are She actually asked a two part question.

Speaker 3 (09:12):
She started out talking about federalizing, which I don't know
whether she really meant Congress taking over it, resending home
rule and doing that, But then she swerved into are
you thinking about taking over the police department and using
the National Guard? Two entirely separate issus hearing it?

Speaker 4 (09:29):
Yeah, because the crime is ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
I could show you a chart comparing.

Speaker 4 (09:35):
DC to other locations and you're not going to want
to see what it looks like.

Speaker 5 (09:39):
Who was just up on television actually that we're.

Speaker 2 (09:41):
Showing it now.

Speaker 5 (09:43):
We want to have a great safe capital, and we're
going to have it, and that includes cleanliness and includes
other things. We have a capital that's very unsafe. You know,
we just almost lost the young man, a beautiful, handsome
guy that cut the hell knocked out of him the
before last, and.

Speaker 2 (10:03):
I'm gonna call him now. We wanted to give him
a little recovery time.

Speaker 4 (10:08):
We just put a.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
Call into him.

Speaker 4 (10:09):
They're calling back a little while, but he went through
a bad situation, to put it mildly, and there's too
much of it. We're gonna we're going to do something
about it. So whether you call it federalized or what.

Speaker 5 (10:23):
And that also includes the graffiti that you see, the
papers all over the place, the roads that are in
bed shape, the medians that are falling down, the median
in between roads that's falling down.

Speaker 3 (10:34):
Waite cragging jo miss. Is he talking about DC? Is
he talking about Denver?

Speaker 2 (10:39):
Why not?

Speaker 1 (10:40):
Both?

Speaker 3 (10:41):
Yeah, because it sounds when he starts yesterday, I'm coming
down the twenty five and I'm noticing once again, if
you ever venture into the center lane median, expect to
get a tire blown out or to you know, have
the side of your car smashed up.

Speaker 2 (11:01):
With all the debris and crap. We're going to beautify
this city.

Speaker 4 (11:04):
We're going to make it beautiful, and uh, what a
shame the.

Speaker 5 (11:10):
Rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings.

Speaker 2 (11:12):
And everything else. We're not gonna let it.

Speaker 5 (11:15):
And that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very
quickly too.

Speaker 1 (11:19):
Do you want.

Speaker 2 (11:19):
Harvards to look at overturning the DC home will last
We're going to look at that. In fact, they are.

Speaker 4 (11:25):
The lawyers are already studying it.

Speaker 2 (11:27):
We have to run DC.

Speaker 5 (11:29):
This has to be the best run place in the country,
not the worst run place in the country.

Speaker 2 (11:34):
And it has so much potential.

Speaker 4 (11:37):
And we're going to take care of it.

Speaker 2 (11:38):
You're gonna be you to be safe.

Speaker 5 (11:40):
You go to be safe walking down streets, and you're
not gonna get mugged.

Speaker 2 (11:45):
I mean, I hope they do.

Speaker 3 (11:47):
I really do want to see accountability restored, and I
don't want first Obviously you could tell by my comments,
I'm adamantly opposed to DC statehood. They do not deserve
two US senators, even one US member of the House.
They don't deserve statehood whatsoever. That is the federal that

(12:08):
is the District of Columbia, that is the federal seat
of the federal government and Congress, and the founding fathers
specifically gave Congress authority over that. So the whole idea
of statehood is a non starter with me. Congress, fix
your own house. But I was curious about because a

(12:31):
friend of mine on x had posted something about how
bad DC was, and he was like, Oh, really, you
wanna see bad, why don't you come to Memphis. So
the District of Columbia had ninety nine has had ninety

(12:54):
nine homicide so far in twenty twenty five as of
yesterday when I did this search, that's down about twelve
percent from last year. Now, all of that represents eight
significant decline. DC still ranks in the top ten for
total murders nationwide relative to city size. Saint Louis, Missouri. Memphis,

(13:16):
Tennessee historically alternated as a city with the highest murders
per capita and raw numbers among large US cities. Now,
the major city rankings shift year to year because you know,
due to both homicide and population trends and economic factors,
ongoing community policing initiatives, all you know, make those rankings change.

(13:39):
But I wanted to know what are the numbers of
murders for each of those cities that are in the
top ten. Memphis, Tennessee ninety seven murders as of May nineteen. Now,
what I was searching for was the total number of
murders as of August six, yesterday when I was doing

(14:03):
this show prep. But what I got returned to me
were the number of murders up to the date of
the last murder or the last homicide, so Tennessee number one,
number one, not DC tenant, Memphis ninety seven as of
May nineteen, Saint Louis number two, with seventy eight as

(14:27):
of August six. Then you get Detroit coming in at
number three, with about one hundred and eighty eight projected
for this year twenty two hundred and three last year.
I couldn't find any stats about the actual number for
this year, just a projected number of one eighty eight,

(14:48):
but still ranks number three. Number four Baltimore thirty nine
homicides as of April. Now the pace is a record
low so far, but still number four in the country.
On five Cleveland eighteen in the first quarter eight as
of January twenty second, so the way I figure that

(15:11):
is twenty six in Cleveland puts it at number five.
Kansas City number six ninety eight reported as of early August,
now Leans sixty six as of June twenty nine, coming
in at number eight. Washington d C ninety nine as

(15:32):
of August six. Number nine Oakland not directly reported in
any twenty twenty five data I could find, but Oakland
does typically rank high, but a specific number for twenty
twenty five I couldn't find it any sort of recent summaries,
and then number ten kind of shocked me. Little Rock

(15:52):
again not directly reported in twenty twenty five day. The
Little Rock's annual homicide figures are usually somewhere in the
forty to sixty range, but I couldn't find any updated for.

Speaker 2 (16:02):
Twenty five Now.

Speaker 3 (16:04):
Those are numbers based on police reports crime city bulletins,
all current as this summer. Now, cities might report slightly
different totals based on, you know, the status of an
investigation or updates says they are conducting a homicide investigation.
Oakland and Little Rock were included in the recent Top

(16:24):
ten Violent city list, but up to the minute, homicide
tallies for this year weren't available in the leading crime
trackers for those two cities as of August sixth.

Speaker 2 (16:38):
DC is not the worst.

Speaker 3 (16:43):
I only point that out because we get these reports
in the news constantly. You know, so a murder happens
in Denver and suddenly Denver is the crime capital of
the world, or you know, we have done a Chicago.
I'm reporting a long time, but there'll be a shootout
on the South side of Chicago and then suddenly Chicago

(17:05):
jumps to the top of the news. Well, what happened
is a member of the Doge team. He goes by
Big Cajonies, but they call it something else, which I'm
not sure is appropriate for er or not. They use
it on cable TV, but I'll exercise discretion. Young kid, girlfriend, partner,

(17:26):
whomever it is. They try to hijack her car. He
shoves her in the car, shuts the door, beats off
the people, He gets beat to a pulpits in the hospital,
and that gets the attention of the national media, and
now all the focus is on crime in DC. Okay,
that's fine, but let's put it in perspective and let's
do something else. If you want to clean it up,

(17:49):
I mean literally physically clean it up and reduce the crime,
resend home rule, and Congress take it over.

Speaker 1 (18:00):
Say Michael, I just wanted to note that something has
to be really really really really really poorly run for
it to be improved by Congress taking it over. The
thought just makes my head want to explode.

Speaker 3 (18:16):
Well, let's be realistic about how they would run it.
The five hundred and thirty five members of Congress would
not run the district of Columbia. They would hire people
to do that, which you know, that's maybe that's a
difference without a distinction, without a difference, or maybe even
a difference without a distinction. But nonetheless I think it

(18:40):
is slightly different. No, I do not want five hundred
and thirty five members of Congress running DC, but I
think leaving because again, it's not a state, it's not
a city, it's not a municipality. It's it is the
seat of the federal government. And I think it's we've

(19:01):
lost sight of that. We've lost sight of that because
quite frankly, it's it's really larger than it needs to be.
You know, Virginia, Virginia gave up a lot of its
geography to form the district when it was you know,
a square, and then they took some of that back. Well,

(19:24):
you could do the same thing in Maryland also, you
could take some of that back because a lot of
that is residential commercial. All you really need is I'd
have to look at a map, but I could draw
a map of where most of the federal office buildings are,
and you could narrow it down even smaller and just

(19:45):
make that and then turn all the rest of it
over to you know, give it back to Bethesda, Maryland.
Give it back to I'm trying to think over on
the eastern part of the city. Give it whatever that
would be over there. I can't think of the municipalities.
But give it back to them, and then narrow it

(20:06):
down even further, and then hire some professionals to come
in and manage the district. Have its own police force,
have its own fire department, which it already does. So
those costs are already fixed, they're already in there. But
management of it, oversight of it would go right back
to Congress because they're not doing the way Congress looks

(20:28):
at it now is the problem. Hey, we grant you
home rule, so we've wiped our hands of it. We
want nothing more to do with it. And so now
if it truly is the seat of the federal government,
I have no influence over that. I can call Michael Bennett,
as if he would listen to anything I said. Anyway.

(20:48):
I could call Senator Bennett and bitch and moan about
how bad the district is and ask him to do
some things, and of course he would just say thank
you for your interest, you know, and send me a
nice letter and hang up, And that would be the
end of it, and nothing would happen. I can't go
vote against Michael. I mean I could, and I would
certainly would vote against Michael Bennett. Even if you know

(21:09):
Tarzan was running, I go vote against Michael Bennett, or
you know, if Jane was running, or you know the
chimpanzee that was along with them, I'd vote for the Temple.

Speaker 2 (21:17):
I would Bennett regardless.

Speaker 3 (21:22):
My vote against Bennett has nothing to do I mean,
I have nothing to do with DC. They it's a
home rule city, yeah, because you gave it to them.
I want some accountability. I want to be able to
hold my congressman accountable, for my senator accountable for what's
going on in d C. And you can't do that
right now. But it is ironic that here I am

(21:45):
asking for Congress to take something over, because you're right,
it's got to be really bad. It was January of
twenty twenty two. That's when the first wave of truckers
in that Freedom convoid. You remember this from COVID. We're
going back to COVID right now. They arrived in Ottawa

(22:07):
on a Friday night. They had traveled all across Canada.
They were protesting the vaccine mandates. They were fighting all
of then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's little castro's tyrannical COVID restrictions,
and they in Canada was doing that while the rest
of the world had started to at least recognize that,
m maybe we need to just let this stuff go,

(22:32):
that maybe COVID is, oh you know, it's a it's
a virus like any other virus. But no, Canada's liberal
government clamped down with vaccine passports, lockdowns, mass mandates. I mean,
it was pretty bad. So the truckers arrived determined to fight.
The truckers explained that the supply chain has been in

(22:54):
shambles for well over a year because of various provincial
governments in Canada imposing draconian and illiberal restrictions on business
activity and the entire Canadian economy. As soon as our
list of demands have been met and the government reopens
the country and abandons these digital passports and mandates the
way the United Kingdom has just done, we will do
our absolute best to ensure the supply chain returns to

(23:16):
its normal operations as quickly as possible. And then they
got jailed, they got debanked, they got their credit cards canceled,
they got their fuel cut off, but most importantly, they
got jailed. Well long last, all of the drawn out

(23:42):
legal proceedings against the organizers of the freeding convoy are
starting to come to a conclusion. The leader of the
Conservative Party should have been the prime minister. That's one
thing I'll blame Trump for the leader of the Conservative Party.
Pierre Paulaver posted on x recently, Let's get this straight.

(24:04):
While rampant violet offenders are released hours after the most
recent charges and anti Semitic rioters vandalized businesses, terrorized daycares,
and block traffic without consequences, the crown went seven years
prison time for the charge of mischief for Leech and Barber,
two of the organizers. How is this justice, he asked.

(24:29):
Other members of the Canadian Parliament called the sentencing demands
excessive vindicti, stating that this is political vengeance, not actual justice.

Speaker 2 (24:40):
So what's going on?

Speaker 3 (24:42):
So one of the organizers, Tamra Lich, she has no
prior convictions, she committed no violence, she didn't damage any property,
she's five foot nothing. She's been subjected to leg shackles,
solitary confinement, has already been held in jail for forty
nine days. The other organizer, Chris Barber. He's a family man,

(25:06):
has two kids, owns a small trucking company. He got
an eight year jail sentence. The Crown wanted to the
government wanted to confiscate his truck, his chief means of
his livelihood. He has effectually nicknamed his rig Big Red.
Nobody accused Barbara of threatening anybody, in citing any violence,

(25:30):
or damaging any property. Indeed, all the side degree that
both Barber and Lytch consistently called for protesters to be
peaceful during those protests, to be respectful of the cops,
to cooperate it arrested. They also agree that Barbara worked
with the cops when he arrived in Ottawa to park

(25:50):
the trucks in designated areas. They were tempting as best
they could to keep all the emergency lanes free, and
they were coordinating with the to coordinate the relocation of
the trucks and the vehicles with the POPO. Now, even
as the government concedes that they led the convoy to

(26:11):
Ottawa legally and with good intentions, that begs the question, well,
then at what point did it become what was perfectly
legal protesting turn into a crime worthy of seven to
eight years in jail, apparently when it became an inconvenience
to the people that live in Ottawa. They were bitching

(26:35):
about noise and traffic obstructions downtown, to which the organizer said,
hold the line, because that's what they were doing. You're protesting.
They were trying to disrupt commerce, just like their business
had been disrupted because of what the government had done.
They wanted to show the public what had been done

(26:56):
to them. So then they got a court order the
government did to ban the honking. The organizer told them
to follow the injunction to not honk unless your trucks
were getting swarmed or broken into by riot police, and
then to honk, And he said, honk not to disrupt

(27:20):
the residents, but to alert the others that they're raiding
and breaking into your trucks. So that got even extra
to year in jail. Pettiness, clearly pettiness. Now in the service,
this is really all about civil liberties right and balancing
the right to protest with somebody else's right to enjoy
their property. But actually in Canada it's worse because it's

(27:41):
about the government twisting every which way to avoid their
own accountability for what they did during COVID, These Canadians
were either ignored by the politicians in the media or
they ended up being demonized as the typical epetemph you know, racist, misogynists,

(28:02):
people that should be excluded from society, that should be
separated from their own families. They got kicked out of school, university,
got fired from their jobs. They were subject to all
the intimidation and docting by journalists and politicians who suggest
they should even have to pay extra taxes and of
course should get jailed. The truckers didn't sit there blocking

(28:25):
traffic and honking horns for the joy of it. They
did so because every other mode of public expression had
been barred and those they represented were prohibited from protesting
in any way whatsoever. Now interestingly, now, eventually some citizens

(28:46):
in Ottawah got tired of the congestion and the parking
and you know, the crowds. But initially there was an
outpouring of public support that accompanied the truckers as they
made their way across the provinces, I mean from the
east and the west. Oh, they got solid support. And yes,

(29:06):
I admit, residents in Ottawa were inconvenienced, but the prosecutors
took a step further. Oh, they weren't just inconvenience. They
residents have psychological scars. I'd like to see the evidence
for that.

Speaker 2 (29:24):
Now.

Speaker 3 (29:24):
They persisted in their protest because the government refused to
engage it chose instead the government did to arrest their
leaders and then they invoked an Emergencies Act illegitimately as
a federal court ruled in Canada just last year. And
then they cleared the streets by force. And now the

(29:44):
government wants Barber's truck and criminal record. They want him
to have a criminal record, and that would prevent him
from earning his living by hauling freights in freight across
the Canadian border into the United States. They went to
five foot Grandmother, a model of good citizenry. They went
up behind bars for seven years. But most importantly, they

(30:08):
want them silenced. They want them to shut up. So
this drape of tyranny that I talk about, it still
goes on in Canada, and it's still going on because
of something that happened over three years ago.

Speaker 2 (30:25):
COVID.

Speaker 6 (30:27):
Never ever forget Michael, These Canadian truckers being put in
jail for years. Reminds me of something down here, the
j six people who were basically just there doing not
much but sight seeing and hanging out and getting thrown.

Speaker 2 (30:44):
In jail for years. This is truly injustice. This is
this is terrible. Yeah, it is.

Speaker 3 (30:52):
And there's a lot of injustice in the world, and
I like to catch it in terms of there really
is a lot of tyranny going on in the world,
and we need to fight back against that tyranny every
opportunity that we have there is I mean, I hadn't
planned to talk about this, but with the whole special

(31:13):
session of the Colorado Pollop Bureau getting ready to start,
what I think is it next Thursday. Whatever they're starting
next week, they're already blaming changes in federal tax rules
tax laws. But we know that they were predicting a
budget shortfall long before the one big beautiful bill got passed.

(31:37):
And we also know that just as the state is
suffering a budget shortfall, so is for example, the city
and County of Denver. There's been a huge increase in
property tax revenues because of the increased valuation of properties,
but there's been a decrease in sales tax revenue and
income tax revenue because of why because of job losses

(31:59):
and because of PEP or just not spending any money,
and particularly in downtown Denver. They're not going into downtown
Denver because well, it's a crap old place to go.
So what are they going to do? Well, I would
just warn you to watch for and be careful of
any attempts to repeal the taxpayer Bill of Rights. They

(32:22):
have a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Whenever you
do things. For example, in the Michael Brown minute this morning,
I used the example of funding all of the Now
this is both true at the state level and the
municipal level. Of all the money we spend on illegal
aliens that's not just a city in county, a Denver issue,

(32:45):
or a Lakewood issue, or a Westminster issue, or a
Highland Granch issue, or a Lone Tree issue or even
a Sterling issue. That is a statewide issue. That's at
the state level also, or things like okay, states, you
can go expand medical if you want to, we're not
gonna guarante the feder saying we're not going to tell
you you're always going to have that money available. But

(33:05):
what does color Battle do? Oh, they expand Medicaid to
include transgender surgeries for miners. Why should taxpayers be funding that.
They shouldn't be funding that at all. I don't think
we should be funding anything for illegal aliens. You choose
to come here illegally, you sneak across the border, Well,

(33:29):
sucks to be you. But you know, what are you
gonna do? Well if you decide that the only way
you can feed yourself or house yourself is to go
become a squatter or become a gang member and go,
you know, rob and pillage everywhere, well, then we're going
to arrest your ass and then hopefully send you back
to your country or send you to a country that
will hold you in prison somewhere. I don't want to

(33:50):
hold you in prison here because you know, I don't
want to pay for that.

Speaker 2 (33:53):
But we do.

Speaker 3 (33:55):
We do all that stupid stuff. So when the legislature
get when the pulp Bureau gets together, and they start
talking about all these things, you're gonna have to watch
it like a hawk, because they'll try to do everything
they can do a viscerate table. They'll try to you know,
does police want to get to zero income tax?

Speaker 2 (34:12):
Yeah? But will he really know

Speaker 3 (34:16):
They're they're coming for your pocket books, and that is
a form of tyranny.