9-9-25 - 6am - Immigration Around The World

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Your favorite judge here.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
You might have guessed Sparkles is at my birth name,
that would be Karen. I changed it when a hole's
like you made it into a meme. I've got your number.
I hear you wear kimonos.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
I bet I.

Speaker 2 (00:14):
Could go head to head with you in an un
wrestling competition. You'd be seeing plenty of Sparkles after that.
Your problem is you just want to date me the
closest you'll ever get to. That is my only fans account.

Speaker 3 (00:30):
Judge Sparkles Lives to be on the program Another Day,
Judge Sparkles, Judge Sparkles, Jay. If you heard the Top
of the hour news from ABC News, which I did
not made.

Speaker 4 (00:48):
Me turn my head, but it made Dragon turn his head.

Speaker 3 (00:51):
And interestingly, it's a story that I planned to do,
but I didn't plan to do it.

Speaker 4 (00:55):
This hour, and I still don't want to do at
this hour.

Speaker 3 (00:58):
But if you heard the Top of the hour news
and your head turned, well we'll address that probably in
the next hour, but not in this hour.

Speaker 5 (01:07):
I can't save it. It's going to record over itself,
and well, well.

Speaker 4 (01:11):
I bet I can find it in the ABC News call.

Speaker 5 (01:13):
I can probably put it over there.

Speaker 4 (01:15):
And do that. It's fine.

Speaker 5 (01:16):
I'll do like three extra steps for you, damn it.

Speaker 4 (01:20):
Three extra baby steps.

Speaker 5 (01:22):
Yeah, mouse click here and a program out there and inhumanity.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. If you need to
leave early today because you had two extra mask clicks,
you can do that. Maybe give you time to go home.
Take your ethics test whish.

Speaker 5 (01:37):
I took last night, the same one they've been given
to us for a decade.

Speaker 3 (01:40):
So it popped up in my inbox and I'm I'm
already kind of done for the evening, and I think,
you know what crap, I'll just do it right now.
But Brett barr is interviewing Associate Justice Amy kill me Barrett,
and I it's I've seen her. I saw her interviewed
by Nora O'Donnell on the CBS Sunday Morning program and

(02:02):
it was an excellent interview. I mean, she was just
not Nora o'donald. Justice Barrett was so calm, cool, collected, straightforward,
very clear, just I mean just wonderful. So when I
saw her pop up on Brett Baer, I wanted to
watch that interview and see what questions he had because

(02:23):
I thought he might be a little more pointed than
Nora would, because Noura's got an agenda and Brett Brad
just likes to ask tougher questions, not an agenda, just
tougher questions.

Speaker 4 (02:39):
But I'm thinking, I've already.

Speaker 3 (02:40):
Started this stupid ethics thing, so I turned the volume
down to where I can just hear the rumble, the
mumbo jumbo mumbo jumbo of the narrator like this show, right,
so that I can hear when it stops. That's when
I have to answer a question.

Speaker 5 (03:01):
That's when I hit the next event or I have.

Speaker 3 (03:03):
To or I have to or I have or I
have to hit the next event on the on my laptop.
So it's essentially we're doing exactly the same thing, except
you're listening to me, and I'm listening to somebody tell
me about ethics. So I'm going through it. It comes
to the first pause, and it is just a pause.
I got to get to the next page. But then

(03:24):
I get to the point where it asks the first question,
and I look and I realize it's the same. I
know you've told me this before, but until you experience
it yourself, like you're consciously thinking about it, you realize
this is the same question they've asked for at least

(03:45):
the past ten years.

Speaker 5 (03:46):
Sam and Martha worked for competing companies, and they're having dinner.

Speaker 3 (03:50):
They talk about how they should divide up the territories.
You take the north end, I'll take the south end.

Speaker 4 (03:55):
Is this you know?

Speaker 5 (03:56):
Where did they go wrong?

Speaker 4 (03:57):
Where did they go wrong in the first choices they
had lunch together? Exactly?

Speaker 5 (04:01):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (04:03):
Or the other one is you see Martha making copies
of some client presentation at the copy machine, and then
later when you ask her about it, she acts funny
as if she doesn't know what you're talking about. That
raises your suspicion. What should you do?

Speaker 5 (04:21):
D spread rumors amongst your other.

Speaker 4 (04:23):
Colonaues, Yes, right, spread rumors, which.

Speaker 5 (04:26):
Is one of the options.

Speaker 4 (04:27):
Yeah, I know. So it's just like, oh my god.

Speaker 3 (04:30):
So anyway, and then you have to I don't know,
maybe this was in it before, but before you can
uh click that, you have completed it so that it's
in the record. So then the way I'll bug you
about it anymore, You now have to download a PDF
of the handbook.

Speaker 5 (04:51):
Oh the he because they used to give you like
a plaque or not a PLAQUEA a certificate certificate.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
Yeah, you know, you don't get you don't get that anymore. No,
now that it's a two button process. On the very
last page, the top button is click here to download
a pdf.

Speaker 4 (05:07):
Well I don't. I don't want a damn pdf.

Speaker 3 (05:09):
So I didn't, you know, But then I realized I
can't do the other one until I do the first.
It's you know, it's it's right out. But here's the
here's what you need to know. You click okay to
download the pdf. It opens up in a pop up
and there it is. But you don't have to download it.

Speaker 5 (05:26):
You can just will just close the pop up.

Speaker 4 (05:30):
Yeah, and then the grade out goes out and you
can get it out.

Speaker 3 (05:33):
So I want you to know that today's program will
be ethical, and then tomorrow we'll go back to being
uneth ethical again.

Speaker 4 (05:40):
Yeah. Well we'll go back to being unethical later.

Speaker 3 (05:44):
Uh. Matt Taibi, who is a leftist but a damn
good reporter. I don't agree with all of his reporting,
but sometimes I do. He observed that the United Kingdom,
as I kind of casually mentioned yesterday, has become a

(06:06):
censorship state. He writes this regarding the arrest that occurred
a few days ago. I actually I don't remember when
the rest occurred. I think I first. I conflate time
so badly. I forget whether I saw this over the
weekend or I saw it last week when I was
on vacation. But a guy by the name of Graham

(06:28):
Linum has been arrested in the United Kingdom for his tweets.
Here's what Matt Taybe writes. Quote the arrestogram Linum for
his tweet is one of many examples that showed the
country should not be treated as a free one. This

(06:50):
is the point I've been trying to make about the
UK for a long time.

Speaker 4 (06:53):
Now.

Speaker 3 (06:54):
The UK is being smothered in just a complete detigration
of what little free speech they had to begin with.
And now it's it's kind of flipped over completely. The
car has done several roles and has rolled over us
back in the ditch. And that's where the country is
right now. The British government has been tightening the screws

(07:16):
on free speech for decades, but it has reached a
new level of absurdity.

Speaker 4 (07:21):
And it's not just tweets.

Speaker 3 (07:23):
People are being punished for just peacefully marching, for petitioning
the government they're even being arrested for displaying the British
flag on my ex account. And I think this was
sometime last week. I saw someone that was challenging people

(07:46):
to take a photograph of you displaying the American flag
over your balcony or over your deck, or outside your
front porch, or you know, outside the window of your car,
or you know, some way somebody display your American.

Speaker 4 (08:00):
Flag, And I thought, what the hell is that all about?
What's that?

Speaker 3 (08:05):
Well, a person was arrested in the United Kingdom for
hanging the Union jack outside their flats upper level. No,
it wasn't didn't have anything to do with you know
what hoa rule. It didn't have anything to do with
you know, there's some law. It had to do with. Oh, no,

(08:26):
you're offending people in your neighborhood because they happen to
be from other countries. Well, it's not just the United
Kingdom either. France literally prosecuted their leading opposition figure. Germany's
doing its best to outlaw the ADF. They're the main
opposition party in Germany. And then did you know that

(08:49):
in Germany several of the ADF leading politicians have died
of suspicious deaths just before in Elefe. Hmmm, says a
little mafioso to me. Now, all of these countries are
supposed to be democratic republics. Yet while democracy, oh that

(09:12):
word address me crazy, may not mean that the people
get an unmediated fulfillment of every wish that they have,
and you're like a pure democracy, it should at least
mean that things that are heavily opposed by the populace
don't happen. And yet, think about this question, we should

(09:35):
further restrict and control illegal immigration? Do you disagree or agree?
In the United States and Canada, it is overwhelmingly agree
agreed that we should further restrict and control immigration in
the United States seventy five percent to twenty three percent,

(09:55):
Canada sixty two to thirty five percent. Then you go
South America, it's still predominantly in favor of further restriction
and control of illegal immigration. Venezuela, you know, apparently we're
at war with Venezuela, which we're gonna get too later
in the program seventy seven to twenty two percent, Chile

(10:16):
seventy four to twenty three, Bolivia seventy three to twenty two,
Brazil seventy two to twenty seven, Mexicos seventy one to
twenty five. Argentina, where Malaya is suffered a serious setback
in the election yesterday, sixty eight to twenty six, Peru
fifty one to thirty nine. Let's go over to Europe,
Italy eighty seven to zero, Spain seventy seven to eighteen,

(10:40):
Britain seventy five twenty two.

Speaker 4 (10:42):
Okay, that's not too bad.

Speaker 3 (10:44):
France sixty eight thirty one, Germany sixty six thirty three,
Sweden fifty three forty three, and it just goes on
and on and on and on. A Pew Global Attitude
Survey indicates that these numbers are not new numbers. These

(11:04):
these kind of overwhelming numbers around the world, including in
the United Kingdom, want greater immigration controls because of this
kind of worldwide migration going on of poor people, people
that are just looking for better opportunities, leaving craphole countries
or trying to go to less craphole countries. Because I

(11:27):
would like to say that we're not a craphole country,
but we're becoming a craphole country. So let's just say
that we're not quite as bad of a craphole country
as say, oh, I don't know, Uganda, or maybe the
Ivory Cohast, I don't know. This goes back to two
thousand and seven. A Pew Global Attitude survey from two

(11:47):
thousand and seven showed virtually the same thing that Germany, Spain,
and Sweden, Britain, Italy, France didn't mark all these European countries,
Denmark again being on the low end, but Germany, Spain, Sweden,
and Britain all being on the high end, meaning above
a majority more than well over fifty percent. One of

(12:08):
greater controls, fifty three percent of Australians think that immigration
is too high. So step back, you realize that we
have long standing and we have fairly significant opposition to
mass illegal immigration. And when you narrow, when you focus

(12:31):
in on these poll numbers and you look at Pew
or you look at the current poll numbers, it's really
focused on low skilled third world workers that politicians will
issue such a policy. You know, in light of all
that opposition, you would think that politicians would be in

(12:53):
line with the people that they represent, but instead politicians
have gone full bore in support of illegal immigration. Now
we've turned the tide in this country simply because we
have a Republican majority, not because democrats have changed the heart,

(13:14):
but because we've changed who controls believers of power, and
politicians have to a great degree acknowledge the depth of
the opposition by going to extraordinary links to suppress not

(13:36):
just the opposition, but even the expression of opposing views
or even of expressing traditional patriotism. In other words, a
lot of these European politicians know the numbers are that
people want greater controls on illegal immigration, yet they're going

(13:57):
exactly the opposite direction, which is, when you think about it,
that's the very sort of thing that a democratic, republican
form of government is supposed to prevent. But apparently politicians
and our institutions. And again I think this country is
the exception because Trump has come in and Trump has said, no,

(14:20):
we're not going to do this anymore. And we'll eventually
get to the Supreme Court decision about ice in California.
But it all ties in together. Both most politicians and
in particular I'm talking about the United Kingdom, have proven
unequal to the task of representing their people, and instead,

(14:43):
at least in the United States, they are representing.

Speaker 4 (14:46):
What the majority of the people want, but.

Speaker 3 (14:48):
The greater question that I have is why is that,
in a place like the United Kingdom, when people have
such opposition to illegal immigration, that politicians are going in
the opposite direction. The political classes, I'm speaking in generalities now,
not particularly about Trump, but the political classes in general,

(15:11):
not only of this country but of much of Western civilization,
had been all in in favor of this mass migration
and have basically colluded to ignore what the apparently what
us white trash people are opposed to. And I say
white trash because that's how British labor politician Dennis Jones

(15:34):
describes the working class girls who have been the victims
of all those Pakistani rape gangs in the United Kingdom.
He called the victims white girls, white British girls that
have been raped incessantly, and I don't mean individually incessantly,

(15:55):
because you know, they just moved from white girl to
white girl. Dennis Jones refers to the victims as white
trash and is in support of and says we should
have sympathy for the Pakistani rape grant gangs, and that
the UK should allow more of those Pakistanis into their country.

(16:18):
That's how they think about things. So having decided very conveniently, obviously,
that anybody's supposed to their agenda is racist and evil.
They found it easy to ignore these numbers that I
just told you, to ignore the public's reluctance to get
robbed and raped and beat up and you know, fed
drugs and take away jobs and everything else. They just

(16:40):
they just don't care. It's it's almost instinctual. It's it's
it's an instinct, and it's a progressive instinct in dismissing
the opposition, and it's it's it's not just in English
speaking countries. I think it's it's all around the world.

(17:02):
It's again the Sherwin Williams draping the entire world. I'll
give you an example. Talking about the Yellow vest movement,
French geographer Christopher Gooley observes, immediately the protesters were denounced
as xenophobes, anti semites, and homophobes. The elites present themselves

(17:23):
as anti fascists and anti racist, but that's merely a
way of defending their class interests. It is the only
argument they can muster to defend their status. But it
is not working anymore. When I read that quote, I
thought to myself that pretty much sums up the thinking
that you see with Mamdani, for example, he is it's

(17:48):
not really about what it is about socialism, obviously in communism,
but in his mind it is the stereotypical idea that
they're going to impose equity, make everybody else equal. We're
going to cause class division so we can keep everybody

(18:09):
down here below us fighting, while the elites like Zoefram
can sit up here and just be above it all
and they have none of the rules apply to them.

Speaker 4 (18:21):
But it is a class struggle.

Speaker 3 (18:24):
Yeah, it's an immigration struggle, it's a mass migration struggle,
but I think large it's truly it is truly a
class struggle, and it's good versus evil.

Speaker 6 (18:34):
Michael Lamore, I learned from your show about the UK
and how twisted it is. More it makes me never
want to go back there. I mean, these politicians basically
saying that it's okay, it's for a little Pakistani there
or whatever, you know, and taking away people's free speech.

Speaker 4 (18:56):
It's terrible.

Speaker 6 (18:57):
It's almost worse than the criminals themselves.

Speaker 3 (19:02):
I think it is worse than the criminals themselves because
it's an absolute betrayal of the social compact that Western
civilization has the Western democracies have between the people and
the government. We agree to these governments, and remember that

(19:25):
this is also the home of the Magna Carta, one
of the very founding basis for you know, our constitution,
and the reason I use the United Kingdom so much
is because it is it is our motherland. And while
we fight a revolution, because everything that King George was
doing to, you know, trample on the rights, the natural

(19:49):
rights of the citizens of the colonies. For me, Great
Britain represents the canary in the coal mine, as opposed
to Germany, for example, with its really kind of storied history,

(20:11):
considering everything with World War One, the Kaiser, World War
Two and Hitler, everything to do with France and its
socialist nightmare that's it's imposed on its people, or.

Speaker 4 (20:27):
Even the.

Speaker 3 (20:30):
Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, all the all of the Nordic countries.
The United Kingdom stands alone in our heritage, our relationship,
our what I thought were our similar standards, are similar beliefs,

(20:51):
and it's just gone off the deep end. So it
is for me a canary in the coal mine. Just Australia,
although I don't talk about austral quite as much Australia
is the same way. Canada, to a certain degree is
the same way. In fact, I would put it in
that order. United Kingdom, Australia, Canada are great examples for

(21:14):
us to watch and learn. And I know it's easy
for us. I could talk only about what goes on
in this country and be flashing the warning signs. But
sometimes I think it's best to step back and look
at Oh, it's too close to us. We can't believe
it's happening to us. But we look elsewhere and we

(21:36):
see countries that we think to ourselves, well, we're.

Speaker 4 (21:40):
All the same.

Speaker 3 (21:41):
Generally speaking, we're all part of again, what I would
consider to be Western civilization. We have a lot of
the same standards and beliefs in terms of natural law,
natural rights. We have a belief in a representation, you know,
whether it's a parliamentary system or ours, you know, a
republican system. Nonetheless, it is a based on democratic principles.

(22:04):
Whether we have a monarchy or not a monarchy, we
still believe that we should have representatives that should represent
our will. There's another reason I use the United Kingdom. Granted,
the BBC is a is state media. It's an example

(22:26):
of how the cabal drives this kind of an agenda.
The BBC, for example, right now is facing backlash because
of a controversial post accusing an anti illegal immigration group
called Stop the Boats. It's a campaign that's trying to
eliminate as much as they can of all the illegal immigration.

(22:47):
They call it migration there coming into their country. They
accused that group of racism. It was published during life
coverage of England's soccer victory over Andorra the livea they
was titled quote no sign of racist post and it

(23:09):
stated thankfully there's no sign of the quote stop the
Boat's closed quote flags that were being offered to supporters outside.
Having a scan around the stadium now I can't see
any now. A spokesman for the BBC says that the draft,
that the post was a draft and it was accidentally

(23:31):
published before going through editorial checks.

Speaker 4 (23:34):
Well, of course that's what they're going to say.

Speaker 3 (23:37):
The spokesman says it was identified and removed immediately. But
the critics across the pond say that it's an absolute
sign of the BBC's institutional bias.

Speaker 4 (23:52):
Now.

Speaker 3 (23:53):
Notably, BBC is funded through a compulsory license fee enforced
through criminal finds back by the threat of imprisonment and
therefore legally required to be politically impartial. Really, Lee Anderson,
who's a member of Parliament and the chief whip for
Nigel Faraj's Reform Party, says, you know, the BBC ought

(24:15):
to stick to the day job rather than trying to
stoke up more division. Sound familiar. Let's see what CNN
is doing right now. Oh, White House doubles down on
Trump lawsuit over Wall Street Journals reporting. Oh my gosh,
the birthday letter to Epstein. Let's go back to the BBC.

(24:36):
My point is we got the same kind of division
being stirred up here too. It's just over here on
the left side. It's kind of interesting since to my
left and Foxes to my right in the studio the
director of the defund the BBC. They actually have a
group that's trying to defund the BBC. I love it.

(24:56):
Her name is Rebecca Ryan. She defended the public's right
to oppose illegal immigration without being branded racist. Now I
find that quote in the story hilarious simply because, oh,
Rebecca Ryan, director of defund the BBC, defended the public's

(25:17):
right to oppose illegal immigration without being branded racist, No,
Feezy Sherlock. Really, you ought to be able to say
something without being branded or racist. Yeah, I think so.
If you're opposed to illegal immigration, that's not racist. That's
believing in the rule of law. That's believing in your

(25:38):
nation's sovereignty. And being opposed to illegal immigration does not
mean that you're opposed to legal immigration. I am adamantly
opposed to illegal immigration, and I one thousand percent support
legal immigration anyway, this woman says, quote, wanting secure borders

(26:00):
and fairness for taxpayers has nothing to do with skin color.
It's about law, order and common sense. Earlier this year,
the BBC was found to have breached their own editorial
guidelines more than one thousand, five hundred times in just

(26:21):
a few weeks while they were covering Israel's war against Hamas.
In July, a BBC documentary called Gaza How to Survive
a War Zone got pulled. It got buried after it
was revealed that the main interviewee, a thirteen year old boy,

(26:43):
was the son of a senior Hamas official, something that
the BBC did not disclose to their viewers. Wait a minute,
so the main interviewee about Gaza How to Survive a
war zone, the main subject a thirteen year old boy.
First of all, why is I guess I can see

(27:06):
I've not seen this because it's been bolts, I haven't
seen it. But if you're going to do a documentary
about how to survive a warzone, maybe a thirteen year
old boy might be a pretty good subject to interview,
Like how do you carry on a normal life as
a thirteen year old boy when you know the world's
crumbling around you? That actually might be pretty interesting. But

(27:28):
considering that he's the son of a senior Hamas official
might be a little pertinent to what that thirteen year
old has been told to say when he's being interviewed
by the BBC. This whole hostility to conservative viewpoints in
the United Kingdom is deeply entrenched, even in soccer. The

(27:49):
Rangers football club was charged with racism by the Union
of European Football Associations back in March after fans displayed
a Now remember the football club was charged with racism
when fans, not the team, but when fans displayed a
banner during a Europa League match that read quote keep

(28:14):
woke foreign ideologies out defend Europe. That's racist, woke foreign ideologies.
I guess if that's racist according to the Union of
European Football Associations, then I must be a racist because

(28:34):
I want to keep woke foreign ideologies out. I want
to defend North America. I you know, I'll even come
to the defense of Canada and may go keep woke
foreign ideologies out of your countries. This is the insanity
that's going on in the world right now. And yes,

(28:55):
it's really easy. I could, day after day after day
after day give you exactamples after examples after examples of
the same kind of bull crap going on in this country.
But every once in a while, what we ought to
do is look across the pond and realize that the
United Kingdom, the home of the Magna Carta, is in demise.

(29:17):
But for Trump stopping the tide of progressivism that's been
going on since Woodrow Wilson, or at least trying to
stop it as much as he can. I'd say we
were going down the crap or two, and which we
kind of are, except I think we've slowed it down.

Speaker 1 (29:33):
We should all be praying that the avage democrat in
our nation wakes up very quickly, otherwise we are going
to turn into what the UK and other countries in
Europe look like. I just heard that New York City
mayor candidate Mamdami is for abolishing the gang database by

(29:59):
the New York Police Department.

Speaker 4 (30:01):
Great. Yeah, the guys in that job.

Speaker 3 (30:06):
But I think there is good news, So let me
spend three minutes telling you about good news. All these loud,
subsidized voices and the censorship all made the debate one sided,
and that kind of started to go away when all
the US AID money vanished. So the NNGO started losing

(30:28):
their money. Elon must buys X and we get a
rededication of X at least as a global free speech
organ So the old ways aren't working as well. I
I had lunched downtown with somebody yesterday and I was
watching as they were tearing down the old Channel seven

(30:53):
Channel seven news building. They're tearing that whole block down,
and this friend asked me, why are they tearing him down?
I said, well, you know, one time that was that
whole building was nothing but ABC seven news, the local affiliate,
and now they've downsized. You know, the Denver Post has
moved out of their building. You know, they've rented it
to to Mikey Johnston, the legacy media. The cabal is

(31:21):
showing signs of cracked. Now it's not completely gone, don't
get me wrong, but it's showing changes. And I know
that's a small win, but it's not enough. There need
to be lessons taught, generational lessons that will keep future
ruling classes from trying us again anytime soon.

Speaker 5 (31:46):
You know.

Speaker 3 (31:47):
If not, we might end up with firing squads, truth
and reconciliation commissions. But it's going to take more than
just ordinary election defeats, however rushing they might be. I'm
not sure what it is going to take, but we've
got to somehow take back control of education, for example.

(32:10):
And it's not true just in England and Europe. It's
true here in the United States, it's true everywhere. It's
not enough to just beat somebody in the political process.
The one of bees that personify a totalitarian state need
to be rooted out and destroyed. And you can interpret

(32:31):
destroy however you want to. I'm not out calling for
the you know, some sort of military revolution to annihilate
all of them, but they needed that ideology needs to
be destroyed, and generations behind us need to be taught
that look, we've been there before, your great great grandfathers

(32:52):
have been I'm talking about those other generations of my grandfathers,
you know, World War One and World War Two. They
need to be taught that those generations fought for these ideas,
and these ideas are what makes us free. And I
know it's easy in this country to be complacent, but

(33:13):
this battle is not anywhere over all.

Speaker 5 (33:16):
Think.

Speaker 3 (33:16):
I think it's changing, and I think it's changing for
the better. But I guarante an tell you that you
look at what's going on in Chicago or New York.
You look at Gavin Newsom, you look at the mayor
of Chicago, the whole mayoral election process in New York.

Speaker 4 (33:34):
Oh, they're still breathing and fighting.

Speaker 3 (33:36):
And you look at some of the poll numbers that well,
Drudge Report had a headline at least yesterday about how
support for capitalism is at a new love. Well, that's
because we're not educating people and we've allowed capitalism to
morph into the crony capitalism