June 18, 2024 • 33 mins
Debate rules are set, all to favor Biden, but will they??
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show has heard live
from five to eight am Central, six to nine am Eastern,
three to six am Pacific on great radio stations like
News Radio eleven ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk
five point fifty k FYI, and Phoenix, Arizona coming soon
to Freedom one oh four seven in Washington, d C.
We'd love to have you join us live in the morning,
(00:20):
even take us along on the drive to work, but
better late than never. Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Well two three starting your morning off right, A new way.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
Of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Well, because we're in the stupid this is your morning
show with Michael dell Chum.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Thank you Mike McCann seven minutes after the hour, and
welcome to Tuesday, June the eighteenth. You're of our Lord,
twenty twenty four. I am Michael del Journal and this
is your morning show. Well, we got a show. A
little shout out to our listeners at Talk Radio eleven
ninety and Dallas Fort Worth. It's time to show the
Mavericks their way off the stay age and to the
lonesome valley. You gotta go to the lonesome The Boston
(01:06):
Celtics once again alone on top of the mountain. The
Celtics take down the Mavericks one oh six to eighty eight,
winning Game five of the NBA Finals and clinching their
eighteenth championship. That gives them one more. I don't know
he hits that big note at the end. I've never
heard this song play this long. Let me usually play
you that much. I couldn't resist. They surpassed the Lakers.
You know, we talked about how can the Mavericks continue
(01:29):
to win with two stars against five and the answer
is no. Kyrie Irving only fifteen points last night. Luka Doncik,
who's playing, hurt twenty eight points. We talked about how
they need to get about thirty a piece to be
able to stay with them. Had they, they'd still lost
by two. But that shows you important the two headed
guard monster is for the Mavericks, and it came up
(01:50):
short on the road against the Celtics. Now, tonight the
NHL has Game five. Let's see if it goes the
same way as the NBA, with Florida picking up a
win at home and hoisting the cup. Tonight that'll be
seven o'clock on ABC. All right, The debate rules are set.
Biden and Trump both agreed to them. We're inside ten days.
How will the rules impact the debate? We often use
(02:12):
this expression, you can't win an election with a good
debate performance, but you can lose one with a really
bad debate performance. And then what happens if both are bad?
Republican analysts and consultant Chris Walker joins us.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Good morning, Chris, Good morning, brother Michael, welcome back.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
It's good to be back from vacation, rested, ready to go.
All right, So you're gonna be in a quiet studio
just for those that don't know the rules. There'll be
no live studio audience. Now, this isn't just, I don't
think to create the nostalgic feel of Nixon Kennedy. Some
might say it was to keep distractions for Joe in check.
But the rules are the rules, and they could backfire
(02:50):
on Joe as much as they could on Trump. They're
going to turn the microphones off when the other isn't talking,
so there's no talking over each other. One of the
biggest problems that prevents us from having a good debate
in the last several decades has been we don't have
real moderators. We have the left when they host trying
to aid their candidate, the right when they host trying
(03:11):
to aid their candidate, and moderators making it about them,
and nobody ever makes it about us, the viewers and
Just and by the way, I wish they would ask
them the same questions so we could compare the answers.
So I don't know how much this is going to solve,
but it's going to be different enough for us to
analyze it. And who do you think it favors?
Speaker 4 (03:31):
Oh, I mean, the rules favor Biden, except for the
fact that I thought it was interesting yesterday that there
were some leaks that they're trying to get changed the
rules so he can sit and stand on a podium.
Obviously they're worried about, you know, Biden's standing for two,
you know, for for an hour or two, you know,
behind a podium, and Just and I don't I don't
blame them. I mean, you know, you just see these
(03:51):
videos of him being let off by Obama.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
You know it just it looks bad.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
But I don't want to play into the expectations game.
We've lost that before on stating and other things. We
need to assume that he'll he'll be fine. So when
you look about the rules and you look at the
overall kind of plan, there's a reason why Biden's team
went out and agreed to it quickly, and then Trump
agreed to it as well. The rules favor Biden tremendously,
But I think Trump can overcome all of them, irrespective
(04:19):
of the you know, the cards being stacked against him
a little bit.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Have you noticed Donald Trump is different when he sits
down one on one than he is when he's like
hosting a rally or if you put a large studio
studio audience, he'll start playing to the audience. You're just like,
everything they've done that is backfired. Is it possible that
what they've created because it's necessary for Joe might create
(04:45):
something in Donald Trump that's better for Donald Trump than
the normal Donald Trump. Because I'll tell you, deep down,
here's the part about Donald Trump that's a fraud. He
really is a good he has a good heart. He's
a very compassionate person towards others. It may cause him
to be a Donald Trump two point Oh, that's even
more effective. I mean, I don't think we're going to
(05:07):
see him as much on the attack and far more
probably conversational and focused on the issues and results and
directional change. That would benefit him.
Speaker 3 (05:19):
I think it would.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
I think you're going to see him go after Biden
pretty handily though, because it again we talked about this
a lot. When this election is about Biden, you know
Somerump's going to win. So in general, it's an opportunity
to go the contrast, to be able to say, look like,
you're persecuting people for you know, kind of highlighting you know,
(05:41):
mutilation of children, You're prosecuting your political opponents, You're running
a corrupt government here, and you know it's worth.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
Highlighting all that.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
And I think in a little bit of righteous anger
there would benefit him in the sense that that's the
same feeling that a lot of the population has now,
you know, kind of famdling that in a health the
way and in a positive way. I absolutely think he
can do that because the stakes are really high. There's
only two of these and if you know, if Biden
performs really poorly, which is entirely possible, you know, the
(06:12):
stakes of the game can totally change.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
So I mean, I think this is this is a.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
Big moment for Trump, and I one thing we know
about him is that he rises to the moment of
a big platform in a big stage, and I don't
see this being any different this time.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
So what are the areas that Donald Trump should exploit
the most? What are the areas of greatest vulnerability to
Joe Biden?
Speaker 3 (06:34):
His record?
Speaker 5 (06:35):
I think if Trump goes after the age thing and
the you know, the he can't he can't walk off
the stage independently thing, I just it's not going to
play well because.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Biden can easily bat that back one on one and
say here, I am right now, ask me anything you want.
So I think that's kind of a little bit of
a you know, bait and switch there. Focus on his record,
focus on his fat as president every time time. The
perfect metaphor of the behind an administration is this gaz
appear where you spend three hundred and twenty million dollars
and has never been operative. And you know, you contrast
(07:08):
that with what our country can do over d day
eighty years and co and.
Speaker 3 (07:11):
You go, Okay, where have we gone wrong?
Speaker 4 (07:13):
That is the righteous anger that so many voters in
America feel and why Trump's in the lead in a
lot of these polls, and that's why those are the
types of things every example of Biden's failure, Afghanistan, the economy, inflation,
you know, gaz of foreign conflicts. All of the world
has been weaker because of Biden's leadership. And those are
the types of things that Trump needs to highlight.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Republican analyst consultant Chris Walker joining us a debate coming
up in less than was it nine days from now,
and it'll be new rules. We don't know whe there's
going to be sitting or standing, but they will not
be allowed to have any There's only two breaks in
the ninety minutes, and no consultants can come and brief them.
During the breaks. They'll be standing alone in a quiet
(07:54):
studio with just CNN moderators. Do you think the one
who focuses and talks to us at home versus talks
to its opponent will be the one with the great advantage?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Honestly know, I think I think if you're talking to.
Speaker 4 (08:18):
Voters at a debate, you're missing the point of who
you're talking to. You're debating your opponent, You're not debating
the American people. And it's it's kind of like Dick
Durbin when he goes on the Senate and like speaks
to the c SPAN camera and it's like, that's not
who you're talking to, you know. My my general sense
is focus on your focus on the issues. You know,
(08:38):
if you try to appeal to the audience, the only
way you really do that is in the final statement
or something like that. But my sense would be, you know,
concentrate all of your energy on your opponent, on the questions,
your conversation in the room.
Speaker 3 (08:52):
You'll be effective if you're trying.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
To bring the audience into it in a way that
that's kind of unnatural.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I think it is an It kind of is.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
A trough, all right. So here's an interesting angle, and
this is this is kind of on the Biden camp.
They're the ones that set these rules, and part of
those rules were not allowing RFK Junior to be a
part of these debates. Interesting because these are the kind
of things that a year from now we'll look back
and will try to analyze and figure out, you know,
(09:20):
what their meaning was. Well, let's try to do it
in real time. So we know this about twenty twenty four.
Already Donald Trump benefited not being in any of the
primary debates, and he secured the nomination very early and
as quickly as you could humanly possibly secure it, and
that was not being a part of any of the debates.
(09:41):
He was the big winner. What's to suggest RFK couldn't potentially,
if this theme continues, be the big winner for not
being In other words, what if both look old, what
if both look angry? Does the guy not allowed to
be there end up winning by not being there?
Speaker 3 (10:00):
I think absolutely true.
Speaker 4 (10:01):
Yes, you know, if I were an RFK, I'd be
booking myself on every cable channel, you know, immediately after
the debate to talk about it.
Speaker 3 (10:11):
You know, as I'd be trying to get on as many.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
Stations as possible to discuss you know, I'm not fully
convinced he still may not get on. I mean, I
know there's again that the that that istacked against him.
But you know, he's talking about his polling. He's got
he's on the ballot in most of the states. I mean,
the fundraising is there, so I mean he's met most
of the metrics, or as close to hers, at least
(10:34):
he's saying he is. I mean, I guess that has
to be independently verified, but you know, my sense is
it's not completely outside of the possibility.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
That he gets on.
Speaker 4 (10:42):
But yes, if he is not on and neither one
has a particularly good night, it could bet at him.
I just I don't want to sound homeless year, but
I just my sense is Trump is just really going
to overperform in this one. I don't I'm not wish
casting here. I just I think he is ready and
focused and Biden is an easy target. And it just
(11:03):
it to me seems like even with the with the
CNN and people trying to help Biden, trying to have
a good night.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
It's just my sense of what's going to happen.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
Yeah, and the great irony is Joe Biden is prime.
This was his strength. He might plagiariyes in the process,
but I mean he was always great at spirited debate,
but decades have passed. In debates in general, we say
avoid any really bad moment and try to create one
or two great moments. The master at that was Ronald Reagan.
(11:34):
I don't I don't anticipate Donald Trump having any bad moments,
and I think all indications are he can create a
couple of really good moments for Joe Biden. Clearly, you
want to avoid any really bad moments, and that means
cognitively impaired looking moments. Because as much as the Israel problem,
border problem, inflation problem, economy problem, and his record is
(11:57):
a problem, the biggest thing everybody's looking at, whether they're left,
center or right, is this guy's too old to be president,
and anything that betrays him that way, I think is
going to be devastating.
Speaker 3 (12:08):
That's right. And again, I mean we saw this and
stated the union.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
Everyone kind of thought that he wouldn't be able to
be up to the moment, and they, you know, whatever
cocktail had put him on, you know, kept him lucid
for for a two hours plus, and you know, I
just I don't think we can we can anticipate him,
you know, having one of those senior moments. For lack
of a better word, My sense is again Trump is
(12:33):
sharper and stronger, not in terms of just kind of
the optics of it, but just in terms of the
discussion and the understanding and the and the you know,
aggressiveness of policy and righteousness of the cause.
Speaker 3 (12:45):
I mean, we just know that Biden is a failure
as president. Trump sees that.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
You know, one of the things about Trump, and he
talked about his compassion, fine and he truly is patriotic,
is like loving this country and seeing what's happening. I
think he's he's angry about it and being able to
project in a positive way, and a debate is going
to serve him really well, because most normal people look
at the direction of this country and say, this is
not what we want.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
And all you have to do is clarify that very.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
Strongly in a debate and let the Biden defend his record,
which he can't. And that's just that is the mix
for a win if you're Trump.
Speaker 1 (13:20):
I don't know if it's a conspiracy theory or a narrative.
One is that it's not really Joe Biden, it's somebody
wearing a CIA mask. Well, would they go find somebody
just as cognitively impaired and old to do that. That
wouldn't make sense to me. But one narrative that I
do kind of buy into is I don't think it's
a done deal and I can't prove it's true, but
if he has a disastrous debate performance, we might see
(13:42):
a change at the top of the ticket. Do you
buy into that?
Speaker 4 (13:47):
I mean, I know I'd want to sound unseerious in
believing that.
Speaker 3 (13:51):
But yes, absolutely, I too. They have to be thinking
about it.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
I mean, you're sitting at thirty seven percent approval rating.
You know, everything's baked into the case, the perception on
foreign policy, the perception on the economy, the perception on
the border, the perception on his age and cognitive ability.
I mean, unless your play is get everybody to focus
on the presidency, and you steal the control of the
(14:15):
house in the Senate, and that's your play, and we'll
deal with the presidency four years later, you got if
you really care about the presidency, you would have to consider,
you know, getting somebody else, and I would guess it
would be Gavin Newsom. This is your Morning Show with
Michael del Chono. Extreme heat forecasted for Chicago, Saint Louis, Detroit, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh,
(14:39):
New York, Boston, other locations. It's a zone of high
pressure that the Washington Post is calling a heat dome,
and it's intensified by the human caused climate change. If
you're at risk, try this new tool to protect yourself.
And then they go to another one of the third links stories. Again.
I grew up in Chicago in the seventies and I
(15:01):
can tell you we had ninety degree weather, we had
one hundred degree days and we didn't have air conditioners.
I never remember it was it was hot. It happened,
and that was the time when they were calling it,
you know, global cooling. We thought we were heading into
an ice age right back in the seventies. So, yeah,
(15:22):
this is all going to be neard. Is it going
to be hot? Yes? For Saint Louis by the way,
today eighty seven is you're high. Your one hundred degree
days are next week, So I don't know. Look, it's hot,
but it's also June eighteenth. Meanwhile, with the President reportedly
prepping and executive order granting temporary amnesty for hundreds of
thousands of illegals, these are those and spouses from ten
(15:43):
years ago. Again, these are political gestures from a presidency
that is playing to polls. Hi, it's Michael. Your morning
show can be heard live on great radio stations across
the country like wilm and w DOV and Wilmington and Dover, Delaware.
Gst AM seven twenty the Voice in Middle Georgia. We're
(16:03):
going to need some blankets. Coming soon to news radio
six fifty k e NI Anchorage, Alaska, we'd love to
be a part of your morning routine. Now enjoy the
podcast Tuesday, June eighteenth, twenty twenty four. Thanks for waking
up with your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your iHeart app on Michael del Joner This week,
a special welcome and a hello to all the WMQ
News Talk eight eighty and one oh six point three listeners.
(16:26):
And Oh, Claire, Wisconsin, we celebrate you. We toast you
with a curd Good morning. Say hello to for those
of you know Claire. To our White House correspondent, Attorney
John Decker. The US Supreme Court has a number of
cases that they're reviewing, including some that might impact the
twenty twenty four election. Good morning, John, Hey, good morning
(16:47):
to you.
Speaker 3 (16:47):
Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
Which ones do you want to start with?
Speaker 6 (16:52):
Well, I think the most prominent one is the case
involving what Donald Trump claims and what his lawyers claim
is that he is app salute immunity from criminal prosecution.
That claim has not been accepted by the lower courts,
by the district Court, by the d C Circuit Court
of Appeals. It's been rejected unanimously by the d C
(17:14):
Circuit Court of Appeals, but now it's up to the
Supreme Court. They will make a decision on this particular
matter by the end of this month, and it could
have an impact on twenty twenty four because potentially, if
the Supreme Court rules with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals,
it could potentially give a narrow window for Jack Smith
the Special Council to schedule to proceed with his election
(17:38):
interference case against Donald Trump right here in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
All right, So that and we expected that early on
maybe to be one of the first reviews that they released.
Speaker 6 (17:49):
Do you still well, I expect it by the end
of the month. You can never predict with the Supreme Court.
Anybody that does so is foolish. So certainly by the
end of June. That's one case that could impact twenty
twenty four. And let me tell you about two other
cases that could impact twenty twenty four. One has to
do with the Supreme Court deciding what happens when pregnant
(18:11):
women show up to the hospital with medical emergencies in
states that have strict bans on abortion. We saw how
abortion really energized Democratic voters in the midterm elections, and
the way the Supreme Court rules on this particular case
has the potential to energize Democratic voters ahead of the
November presidential election. And then the other case that I'm
(18:33):
following has to do with the Second Amendment, the guns
for domestic abusers. It's a significant Second Amendment case. The
justices must weigh the constitutionality of a federal law that
bars people who are the subject of domestic violence restraining
orders from possessing guns. So those three cases I think
(18:53):
really have the potential to impact in some small way
of the results of the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Yeah, I guess it's kind of, you know, in some
small way, because perception, the old expression is perception is reality,
and it seems like perception is the only reality left.
And it just seems like everybody's positions on these two
candidates and on these issues are so baked into the cake,
you wonder I would think out of all of them, though,
the immunity one, and not just for Donald Trump, but
(19:24):
for all presidents moving forward. Right, Well, that's right.
Speaker 6 (19:27):
The Supreme Court has to factor in how their decisions
weigh not only presently but also far into the future.
Brett Kavanaugh expressed that point of view always in oral
arguments for that particular case. And you know, that's one
of the things that Supreme Court justices do wagh is
the fact that their decisions are weigh on generations of Americans,
(19:50):
not just you know what the here and now is,
and not just for Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1 (19:56):
All right, closing moments. By the way, John Decker is
a Supreme Court bar attorney in additioning to be a
White House correspondent, So it brings a lot of credibility
to this subject. Take us back to the pregnancy the issue.
What's at the root of that case, as my memory recalls,
does this have to do with forcing Was this the
(20:18):
one that has to do with forcing pro life physicians
to deal with pregnancy terminations? Or am I confusing it
with another?
Speaker 6 (20:26):
Well, you're confusing it with another. The one that you're
referring to was already decided by the Supreme Court. And
what the Supreme Court decided in that particular case, unanimous decision,
was that the petitioners in the case, a group of
anti abortion doctors, did not have standing to bring the case,
that they did not rule specifically on the merits of
(20:46):
this case. This particular case that I'm referring to has
to do with an Idaho law that bar's doctors from
performing abortions. Left the mother's life as at risk, but
it makes no exception if she would suffer long term
health consequence. I say so, this will place abortion access
on the forefront again of you know, voters' minds, just
(21:08):
as we're getting ready to deal with the November election.
Speaker 3 (21:12):
So that's the reason why I.
Speaker 6 (21:13):
Think it's an important case to follow and see how
it decides. By the end of this month is when
we'll get a decision on that particular abortion case.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
And by the way, end of the month is two weeks,
so this is going to come top of the my news.
Great work as always. John Decker, White House correspondent, an attorney,
Thanks for joining us. All right, yeah, I you know,
I'm no different than you. I don't have any crystal
ball that you have. I can tell you that no
(21:42):
matter how the ruling goes, because can't you hear the
narratives now, even if the Supreme Court stands by the
president's immunity claims, the left will just do the narrative
of see this is what happens mc donald Trump's tax
a court. So the one thing I do know is
no matter what the Supreme Court rules, the attack will
(22:04):
be on the Supreme Court. Now this is interesting to
me from this perspective. We just went through a decade
where we abandon God, we abandon absolute truth. We don't
trust anybody. Remember when it was just attorneys we didn't trust.
Now we don't trust politicians, we don't trust the CDC,
(22:28):
the World Health Organization, we don't trust the media. We
don't trust anybody. And it was like for a decade
there was no God, but there was the Supreme Court.
But then the Supreme Court dares to do what anyone
dares to do, because if you go against the Democrat
Party or any of the Democrat Party candidates or any
(22:51):
of the Democrat Party movements, you're against democracy and they'll
demonize you and they will turn on you. Well this
is they always had the Supreme Court in their back pocket,
like they're the meeting in their back pocket. Well now
they don't anymore. So the only thing that's really interesting,
big picture to me, is a Supreme Court go the
same way as everything else. You cross the movement of
(23:17):
the administrative state, because that's the one thing that gets
lost in daily conversations. We went from being a constitutional
representative republic government of laws to anything goes. Then anything
goes went from republican a republic to a democracy, and
(23:38):
then democracy quickly became the Democrat Party, its platform and candidates.
So now if you oppose any of that, you're an
enemy of the state, You're an enemy of democracy. That's
the game they played, and that weapon will even point
at the Supreme Court. So either way, this is going
to be narrativevized. I mean, I agree these are three
(24:00):
big cases, and I agree that the Supreme Court has
to look. I mean, look, we have three branches of
government for a reason. By intent, the People's House should
make the laws. The Senate should protect states. The president
should just execute be the CEO of the executive branch,
(24:29):
the chief administrator, with the Supreme Court's there to make
sure no laws are made outside of the intent and
spirit of the Declaration of Independence and the actual blueprint
for its execution, the Constitution. Now, when they don't take
(24:54):
their political cues, well, they'll get attacked for being a
stacked bias court. Supreme Court's got a rule on immunity,
or how does any president lead? Or what Pandora's boxes
open to previous presidents. So I agree there are three cases.
I don't agree they're going to have any influence on
(25:18):
this election any more than I think Donald Trump's convictions
are going to have any influence on this election.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
I'm executive chef George Harbell.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
My morning show is your Morning Show with Michael Bill
Joran if you're just waking up. US Surgeon General wants
social media have the same warning labels when it comes
to young users that we used to put on the
side of cigarette packs. Natalie Migliori has more.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Doctor Vveck Murphy used his New York Times essay to
call on Congress.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
To require a tobacco style warning label for social media platforms.
He admitted a warning label alone will not make social
media safe for kids in their mental health.
Speaker 7 (25:53):
New Yorkers agree.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
I think he should.
Speaker 1 (25:56):
Mostly it's the parents to have some monitor Also, I
think want LABLFT, but I don't think it would work.
Speaker 2 (26:03):
It comes as recent studies showed teams spend nearly five
hours every day on social media platforms like YouTube, TikTok,
and Instagram.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I'm not a Limigniori NBC News Radio. One of the
kids that really need to do is to turn off
of the phone and at cost have a little sauce.
With a heat wave of gripping much of the nation
this week, experts are warning people who take certain medications
need to be extra careful. Tammy Triheel has the shale.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Those include medicines for high blood pressure, allergies, and mental health. Diuretics,
which help the body produce more urine, can lead to
dehydration and extreme heat. Beta blockers can impede the body's
ability to regulate temperature, while certain antipsychotics can affect the
ability to produce sweat. I'm Tammy Triheo.
Speaker 1 (26:46):
One thing we know is a majority of Americans think
we have a border crisis, and I doubt they're going
to like the news that President Biden is prepping an
executive order to grant temporary amnesty for hundreds of thousands
of illegal immigrants, and it could be announced as soon
as today. Mark Mayfield report.
Speaker 8 (27:00):
Reports saying the White House is sent to launch a
so called Parole and Place plan for illegal immigrants spouses
of US citizens. The plan protects them from deportation, grants
them a work permit, and could also provide a pathway
to citizenship.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
I'm Mark Mayfield, while the White House is disputing the
characterization of a video that critics say showed the President
having to be let off the stage by Barack Obama.
They're just close friends. Chris Caashio has the story.
Speaker 7 (27:25):
Some commentators say the video, taken at a fundraiser in
California over the weekend, shows Biden freezing up before former
President Obama grabs his wrist and leads him off stage.
White House spokesperson Kareein John Pierre says all the video
shows is two good friends walking off stage.
Speaker 1 (27:42):
She went on to say she.
Speaker 7 (27:43):
Believes videos showing Biden in a bad light are deep fakes.
I'm Chris Garangio.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
Last night, Roory O'Neills. Boston Celtics once again secured an
NBA Final championship teeth and history, surpassing the Los Angeles
Lakers with the most titles in league history with their
one oh six eighty eight win over the Dallas Mavericks.
Sorry Talk radio eleven ninety fans in Dallas, the MAVs lose.
(28:13):
Rory Celtics win. Did I do that? Just like you
worded it very well.
Speaker 9 (28:16):
I'd also add the Celtics coach went to the same
high school that I went to.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
You're kidding, I didn't know that. I mean, look, at
the end of the day, the perform I mean, Jason
Tatum was outstanding. I think he had nine assists in
the first half. I don't have to tell you that
he wanted to have thirty one points, eleven assassin eight rebounds.
But again, you know, the Mavericks were trying to win
with two and the Celtics had at least seven that
(28:44):
they could. They could pop trays, drive, make amazing layups up.
They were so far and away the best team in
the NBA. And then all.
Speaker 9 (28:54):
Happening on six seventeen six one seven being the Boston
area code.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
It was all meant to me. I didn't You're just
filled with Celtic tidball.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
I am filled with a lot of something and maybe
the best half court logo on wood in the NBA.
Speaker 9 (29:09):
All right, let's talk about the Republican one final Notice
it's all three leaf shamrocks, not four leaf clovers.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Just that's an Irish thing. Pay attention to.
Speaker 9 (29:19):
That's the trinity, right right, So look for clovers, not shamrocks.
Speaker 1 (29:27):
Not clovers.
Speaker 3 (29:28):
All right, So the R and c.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
They start in a month. Yeah, and Donald Trump. You know,
this is traditional timing. So for Donald Trump, he's not
waiting any extra long. It's just different because I guess
Donald Trump is really not a challenger as much as
he's a former president, so it's like having two incumbents.
But this is the final piece of the puzzle that's missing,
and everybody's anticipating it. And I would suspect that he
(29:51):
is going to make his announcement about a week or
maybe shortly before that, but about a week before the convention.
And the names of the names, I think we got
a fee of who the top five names are. But
what are your thoughts? I would agree with that.
Speaker 9 (30:05):
You know, the top three on Politico are all US
Senators jd Vance, Tim Scott.
Speaker 1 (30:10):
And Marco Rubio.
Speaker 9 (30:12):
I don't think Marco Rubio is a real contender, This
is my opinion. I personally think he's vying for Secretary
of State. I don't think he really wants to be
VP because he and Donald Trump also disagree on quite
a bit except for foreign policy issues. And I think
Doug Bergham is the dark horse here who's coming out
of nowhere, I think and starting to take the lead.
I think what we're seeing though, is are you picking
(30:33):
someone for what happens on November fifth or what happens
on January twentieth.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
I think they're two different kinds of people. Yeah, And
you know, the other thing is this big picture question,
which is what becomes of trump Ism in the Republican Party.
And by the way, John Decker, your colleague and mine,
he actually his pick is Donald Trump Junior A And
(31:00):
you know John doesn't make crazy picks, you know, but
that would be really prioritizing trump ISM's future. Telsey Gabbard
brings something to the table. I mean, who better to
prosecute that, because it's not a Joe Biden problem, just
like it wasn't a Barack Obama problem from a Republican standpoint,
It's a Democrat policy problem. And Telsea Gabbart could prosecute
(31:22):
that that party has changed so much she has left
the party. That would be great. What about a vek Ramaswami,
who's done such a great job. We know he's always
been the spokesperson for Donald Trump. I think a lot
of people still think Ron DeSantis might be the future
of trump Ism in four years. Do you play for
the future of trump Ism. Do you play for a
heartbeat away? Do you play for a key state? There's
(31:44):
a lot of moving parts here, right, and then I'm
also curious.
Speaker 9 (31:47):
You know, you said the announcement will likely come the
week before the convention that starts on July seventeenth or eighteenth,
But I think that that's also going to be when
he's sentenced in New York. So does he make the
announce spen to you know, pivot the headlines and change
the subject after the sentencing and try to you know,
take the funder out of that announcement.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
That could be a factor as well. Yeah, you know,
I've seen the movie Game Change and what they thought
they were achieving when they picked Sarah Palin. I don't
know that Donald Trump needs a game changer at the
bottom of the ticket. Is there a bad choice he
could make? I guess. You know, if we all agreed
(32:28):
that Christy GNOME's out for shooting her dog, yeah, pretty much.
I mean, she shot herself by shooting her dog.
Speaker 9 (32:37):
But you knew that Donald Trump's ego sort of gets
in the way a bit here too. I don't think
he wants anyone on the bottom of the ticket who
would you know, take more of the spotlight outshine them.
I think that's the big knock against JD. Vans is
that you know JD. Vans may argue the Trump case
better than Trump can.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
I am still rooting for Telsea Gabbard or a Vek Ramaswami,
But if I had to make a pick today, I
think it's Doug Burgenergen.
Speaker 9 (33:02):
I think the two get along so well. I would
agree he reminds me of Mike Pence in that exactly.
I'm just going to say, yes, sir, I'm not confrontational.
I'm going to fade into the woodwork. I'm gonna I'm
Homer Simpson backing into the hedges h after the election day,
just sort of just falling in line.
Speaker 1 (33:18):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael Enheld. Join now,
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show has heard live
from five to eight am Central, six to nine am Eastern,
three to six am Pacific on great radio stations like
News Radio eleven ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk
five point fifty k FYI, and Phoenix, Arizona coming soon
to Freedom one oh four seven in Washington, d C.
We'd love to have you join us live in the morning,
(00:20):
even take us along on the drive to work, but
better late than never. Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Well two three starting your morning off right, A new way.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
Of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Well, because we're in the stupid this is your morning
show with Michael dell Chum.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Thank you Mike McCann seven minutes after the hour, and
welcome to Tuesday, June the eighteenth. You're of our Lord,
twenty twenty four. I am Michael del Journal and this
is your morning show. Well, we got a show. A
little shout out to our listeners at Talk Radio eleven
ninety and Dallas Fort Worth. It's time to show the
Mavericks their way off the stay age and to the
lonesome valley. You gotta go to the lonesome The Boston
(01:06):
Celtics once again alone on top of the mountain. The
Celtics take down the Mavericks one oh six to eighty eight,
winning Game five of the NBA Finals and clinching their
eighteenth championship. That gives them one more. I don't know
he hits that big note at the end. I've never
heard this song play this long. Let me usually play
you that much. I couldn't resist. They surpassed the Lakers.
You know, we talked about how can the Mavericks continue
(01:29):
to win with two stars against five and the answer
is no. Kyrie Irving only fifteen points last night. Luka Doncik,
who's playing, hurt twenty eight points. We talked about how
they need to get about thirty a piece to be
able to stay with them. Had they, they'd still lost
by two. But that shows you important the two headed
guard monster is for the Mavericks, and it came up
(01:50):
short on the road against the Celtics. Now, tonight the
NHL has Game five. Let's see if it goes the
same way as the NBA, with Florida picking up a
win at home and hoisting the cup. Tonight that'll be
seven o'clock on ABC. All right, The debate rules are set.
Biden and Trump both agreed to them. We're inside ten days.
How will the rules impact the debate? We often use
(02:12):
this expression, you can't win an election with a good
debate performance, but you can lose one with a really
bad debate performance. And then what happens if both are bad?
Republican analysts and consultant Chris Walker joins us.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Good morning, Chris, Good morning, brother Michael, welcome back.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
It's good to be back from vacation, rested, ready to go.
All right, So you're gonna be in a quiet studio
just for those that don't know the rules. There'll be
no live studio audience. Now, this isn't just, I don't
think to create the nostalgic feel of Nixon Kennedy. Some
might say it was to keep distractions for Joe in check.
But the rules are the rules, and they could backfire
(02:50):
on Joe as much as they could on Trump. They're
going to turn the microphones off when the other isn't talking,
so there's no talking over each other. One of the
biggest problems that prevents us from having a good debate
in the last several decades has been we don't have
real moderators. We have the left when they host trying
to aid their candidate, the right when they host trying
(03:11):
to aid their candidate, and moderators making it about them,
and nobody ever makes it about us, the viewers and
Just and by the way, I wish they would ask
them the same questions so we could compare the answers.
So I don't know how much this is going to solve,
but it's going to be different enough for us to
analyze it. And who do you think it favors?
Speaker 4 (03:31):
Oh, I mean, the rules favor Biden, except for the
fact that I thought it was interesting yesterday that there
were some leaks that they're trying to get changed the
rules so he can sit and stand on a podium.
Obviously they're worried about, you know, Biden's standing for two,
you know, for for an hour or two, you know,
behind a podium, and Just and I don't I don't
blame them. I mean, you know, you just see these
(03:51):
videos of him being let off by Obama.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
You know it just it looks bad.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
But I don't want to play into the expectations game.
We've lost that before on stating and other things. We
need to assume that he'll he'll be fine. So when
you look about the rules and you look at the
overall kind of plan, there's a reason why Biden's team
went out and agreed to it quickly, and then Trump
agreed to it as well. The rules favor Biden tremendously,
But I think Trump can overcome all of them, irrespective
(04:19):
of the you know, the cards being stacked against him
a little bit.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Have you noticed Donald Trump is different when he sits
down one on one than he is when he's like
hosting a rally or if you put a large studio
studio audience, he'll start playing to the audience. You're just like,
everything they've done that is backfired. Is it possible that
what they've created because it's necessary for Joe might create
(04:45):
something in Donald Trump that's better for Donald Trump than
the normal Donald Trump. Because I'll tell you, deep down,
here's the part about Donald Trump that's a fraud. He
really is a good he has a good heart. He's
a very compassionate person towards others. It may cause him
to be a Donald Trump two point Oh, that's even
more effective. I mean, I don't think we're going to
(05:07):
see him as much on the attack and far more
probably conversational and focused on the issues and results and
directional change. That would benefit him.
Speaker 3 (05:19):
I think it would.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
I think you're going to see him go after Biden
pretty handily though, because it again we talked about this
a lot. When this election is about Biden, you know
Somerump's going to win. So in general, it's an opportunity
to go the contrast, to be able to say, look like,
you're persecuting people for you know, kind of highlighting you know,
(05:41):
mutilation of children, You're prosecuting your political opponents, You're running
a corrupt government here, and you know it's worth.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
Highlighting all that.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
And I think in a little bit of righteous anger
there would benefit him in the sense that that's the
same feeling that a lot of the population has now,
you know, kind of famdling that in a health the
way and in a positive way. I absolutely think he
can do that because the stakes are really high. There's
only two of these and if you know, if Biden
performs really poorly, which is entirely possible, you know, the
(06:12):
stakes of the game can totally change.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
So I mean, I think this is this is a.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
Big moment for Trump, and I one thing we know
about him is that he rises to the moment of
a big platform in a big stage, and I don't
see this being any different this time.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
So what are the areas that Donald Trump should exploit
the most? What are the areas of greatest vulnerability to
Joe Biden?
Speaker 3 (06:34):
His record?
Speaker 5 (06:35):
I think if Trump goes after the age thing and
the you know, the he can't he can't walk off
the stage independently thing, I just it's not going to
play well because.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Biden can easily bat that back one on one and
say here, I am right now, ask me anything you want.
So I think that's kind of a little bit of
a you know, bait and switch there. Focus on his record,
focus on his fat as president every time time. The
perfect metaphor of the behind an administration is this gaz
appear where you spend three hundred and twenty million dollars
and has never been operative. And you know, you contrast
(07:08):
that with what our country can do over d day
eighty years and co and.
Speaker 3 (07:11):
You go, Okay, where have we gone wrong?
Speaker 4 (07:13):
That is the righteous anger that so many voters in
America feel and why Trump's in the lead in a
lot of these polls, and that's why those are the
types of things every example of Biden's failure, Afghanistan, the economy, inflation,
you know, gaz of foreign conflicts. All of the world
has been weaker because of Biden's leadership. And those are
the types of things that Trump needs to highlight.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Republican analyst consultant Chris Walker joining us a debate coming
up in less than was it nine days from now,
and it'll be new rules. We don't know whe there's
going to be sitting or standing, but they will not
be allowed to have any There's only two breaks in
the ninety minutes, and no consultants can come and brief them.
During the breaks. They'll be standing alone in a quiet
(07:54):
studio with just CNN moderators. Do you think the one
who focuses and talks to us at home versus talks
to its opponent will be the one with the great advantage?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Honestly know, I think I think if you're talking to.
Speaker 4 (08:18):
Voters at a debate, you're missing the point of who
you're talking to. You're debating your opponent, You're not debating
the American people. And it's it's kind of like Dick
Durbin when he goes on the Senate and like speaks
to the c SPAN camera and it's like, that's not
who you're talking to, you know. My my general sense
is focus on your focus on the issues. You know,
(08:38):
if you try to appeal to the audience, the only
way you really do that is in the final statement
or something like that. But my sense would be, you know,
concentrate all of your energy on your opponent, on the questions,
your conversation in the room.
Speaker 3 (08:52):
You'll be effective if you're trying.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
To bring the audience into it in a way that
that's kind of unnatural.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
I think it is an It kind of is.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
A trough, all right. So here's an interesting angle, and
this is this is kind of on the Biden camp.
They're the ones that set these rules, and part of
those rules were not allowing RFK Junior to be a
part of these debates. Interesting because these are the kind
of things that a year from now we'll look back
and will try to analyze and figure out, you know,
(09:20):
what their meaning was. Well, let's try to do it
in real time. So we know this about twenty twenty four.
Already Donald Trump benefited not being in any of the
primary debates, and he secured the nomination very early and
as quickly as you could humanly possibly secure it, and
that was not being a part of any of the debates.
(09:41):
He was the big winner. What's to suggest RFK couldn't potentially,
if this theme continues, be the big winner for not
being In other words, what if both look old, what
if both look angry? Does the guy not allowed to
be there end up winning by not being there?
Speaker 3 (10:00):
I think absolutely true.
Speaker 4 (10:01):
Yes, you know, if I were an RFK, I'd be
booking myself on every cable channel, you know, immediately after
the debate to talk about it.
Speaker 3 (10:11):
You know, as I'd be trying to get on as many.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
Stations as possible to discuss you know, I'm not fully
convinced he still may not get on. I mean, I
know there's again that the that that istacked against him.
But you know, he's talking about his polling. He's got
he's on the ballot in most of the states. I mean,
the fundraising is there, so I mean he's met most
of the metrics, or as close to hers, at least
(10:34):
he's saying he is. I mean, I guess that has
to be independently verified, but you know, my sense is
it's not completely outside of the possibility.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
That he gets on.
Speaker 4 (10:42):
But yes, if he is not on and neither one
has a particularly good night, it could bet at him.
I just I don't want to sound homeless year, but
I just my sense is Trump is just really going
to overperform in this one. I don't I'm not wish
casting here. I just I think he is ready and
focused and Biden is an easy target. And it just
(11:03):
it to me seems like even with the with the
CNN and people trying to help Biden, trying to have
a good night.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
It's just my sense of what's going to happen.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
Yeah, and the great irony is Joe Biden is prime.
This was his strength. He might plagiariyes in the process,
but I mean he was always great at spirited debate,
but decades have passed. In debates in general, we say
avoid any really bad moment and try to create one
or two great moments. The master at that was Ronald Reagan.
(11:34):
I don't I don't anticipate Donald Trump having any bad moments,
and I think all indications are he can create a
couple of really good moments for Joe Biden. Clearly, you
want to avoid any really bad moments, and that means
cognitively impaired looking moments. Because as much as the Israel problem,
border problem, inflation problem, economy problem, and his record is
(11:57):
a problem, the biggest thing everybody's looking at, whether they're left,
center or right, is this guy's too old to be president,
and anything that betrays him that way, I think is
going to be devastating.
Speaker 3 (12:08):
That's right. And again, I mean we saw this and
stated the union.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
Everyone kind of thought that he wouldn't be able to
be up to the moment, and they, you know, whatever
cocktail had put him on, you know, kept him lucid
for for a two hours plus, and you know, I
just I don't think we can we can anticipate him,
you know, having one of those senior moments. For lack
of a better word, My sense is again Trump is
(12:33):
sharper and stronger, not in terms of just kind of
the optics of it, but just in terms of the
discussion and the understanding and the and the you know,
aggressiveness of policy and righteousness of the cause.
Speaker 3 (12:45):
I mean, we just know that Biden is a failure
as president. Trump sees that.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
You know, one of the things about Trump, and he
talked about his compassion, fine and he truly is patriotic,
is like loving this country and seeing what's happening. I
think he's he's angry about it and being able to
project in a positive way, and a debate is going
to serve him really well, because most normal people look
at the direction of this country and say, this is
not what we want.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
And all you have to do is clarify that very.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
Strongly in a debate and let the Biden defend his record,
which he can't. And that's just that is the mix
for a win if you're Trump.
Speaker 1 (13:20):
I don't know if it's a conspiracy theory or a narrative.
One is that it's not really Joe Biden, it's somebody
wearing a CIA mask. Well, would they go find somebody
just as cognitively impaired and old to do that. That
wouldn't make sense to me. But one narrative that I
do kind of buy into is I don't think it's
a done deal and I can't prove it's true, but
if he has a disastrous debate performance, we might see
(13:42):
a change at the top of the ticket. Do you
buy into that?
Speaker 4 (13:47):
I mean, I know I'd want to sound unseerious in
believing that.
Speaker 3 (13:51):
But yes, absolutely, I too. They have to be thinking
about it.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
I mean, you're sitting at thirty seven percent approval rating.
You know, everything's baked into the case, the perception on
foreign policy, the perception on the economy, the perception on
the border, the perception on his age and cognitive ability.
I mean, unless your play is get everybody to focus
on the presidency, and you steal the control of the
(14:15):
house in the Senate, and that's your play, and we'll
deal with the presidency four years later, you got if
you really care about the presidency, you would have to consider,
you know, getting somebody else, and I would guess it
would be Gavin Newsom. This is your Morning Show with
Michael del Chono. Extreme heat forecasted for Chicago, Saint Louis, Detroit, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh,
(14:39):
New York, Boston, other locations. It's a zone of high
pressure that the Washington Post is calling a heat dome,
and it's intensified by the human caused climate change. If
you're at risk, try this new tool to protect yourself.
And then they go to another one of the third links stories. Again.
I grew up in Chicago in the seventies and I
(15:01):
can tell you we had ninety degree weather, we had
one hundred degree days and we didn't have air conditioners.
I never remember it was it was hot. It happened,
and that was the time when they were calling it,
you know, global cooling. We thought we were heading into
an ice age right back in the seventies. So, yeah,
(15:22):
this is all going to be neard. Is it going
to be hot? Yes? For Saint Louis by the way,
today eighty seven is you're high. Your one hundred degree
days are next week, So I don't know. Look, it's hot,
but it's also June eighteenth. Meanwhile, with the President reportedly
prepping and executive order granting temporary amnesty for hundreds of
thousands of illegals, these are those and spouses from ten
(15:43):
years ago. Again, these are political gestures from a presidency
that is playing to polls. Hi, it's Michael. Your morning
show can be heard live on great radio stations across
the country like wilm and w DOV and Wilmington and Dover, Delaware.
Gst AM seven twenty the Voice in Middle Georgia. We're
(16:03):
going to need some blankets. Coming soon to news radio
six fifty k e NI Anchorage, Alaska, we'd love to
be a part of your morning routine. Now enjoy the
podcast Tuesday, June eighteenth, twenty twenty four. Thanks for waking
up with your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your iHeart app on Michael del Joner This week,
a special welcome and a hello to all the WMQ
News Talk eight eighty and one oh six point three listeners.
(16:26):
And Oh, Claire, Wisconsin, we celebrate you. We toast you
with a curd Good morning. Say hello to for those
of you know Claire. To our White House correspondent, Attorney
John Decker. The US Supreme Court has a number of
cases that they're reviewing, including some that might impact the
twenty twenty four election. Good morning, John, Hey, good morning
(16:47):
to you.
Speaker 3 (16:47):
Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
Which ones do you want to start with?
Speaker 6 (16:52):
Well, I think the most prominent one is the case
involving what Donald Trump claims and what his lawyers claim
is that he is app salute immunity from criminal prosecution.
That claim has not been accepted by the lower courts,
by the district Court, by the d C Circuit Court
of Appeals. It's been rejected unanimously by the d C
(17:14):
Circuit Court of Appeals, but now it's up to the
Supreme Court. They will make a decision on this particular
matter by the end of this month, and it could
have an impact on twenty twenty four because potentially, if
the Supreme Court rules with the DC Circuit Court of Appeals,
it could potentially give a narrow window for Jack Smith
the Special Council to schedule to proceed with his election
(17:38):
interference case against Donald Trump right here in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
All right, So that and we expected that early on
maybe to be one of the first reviews that they released.
Speaker 6 (17:49):
Do you still well, I expect it by the end
of the month. You can never predict with the Supreme Court.
Anybody that does so is foolish. So certainly by the
end of June. That's one case that could impact twenty
twenty four. And let me tell you about two other
cases that could impact twenty twenty four. One has to
do with the Supreme Court deciding what happens when pregnant
(18:11):
women show up to the hospital with medical emergencies in
states that have strict bans on abortion. We saw how
abortion really energized Democratic voters in the midterm elections, and
the way the Supreme Court rules on this particular case
has the potential to energize Democratic voters ahead of the
November presidential election. And then the other case that I'm
(18:33):
following has to do with the Second Amendment, the guns
for domestic abusers. It's a significant Second Amendment case. The
justices must weigh the constitutionality of a federal law that
bars people who are the subject of domestic violence restraining
orders from possessing guns. So those three cases I think
(18:53):
really have the potential to impact in some small way
of the results of the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Yeah, I guess it's kind of, you know, in some
small way, because perception, the old expression is perception is reality,
and it seems like perception is the only reality left.
And it just seems like everybody's positions on these two
candidates and on these issues are so baked into the cake,
you wonder I would think out of all of them, though,
the immunity one, and not just for Donald Trump, but
(19:24):
for all presidents moving forward. Right, Well, that's right.
Speaker 6 (19:27):
The Supreme Court has to factor in how their decisions
weigh not only presently but also far into the future.
Brett Kavanaugh expressed that point of view always in oral
arguments for that particular case. And you know, that's one
of the things that Supreme Court justices do wagh is
the fact that their decisions are weigh on generations of Americans,
(19:50):
not just you know what the here and now is,
and not just for Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1 (19:56):
All right, closing moments. By the way, John Decker is
a Supreme Court bar attorney in additioning to be a
White House correspondent, So it brings a lot of credibility
to this subject. Take us back to the pregnancy the issue.
What's at the root of that case, as my memory recalls,
does this have to do with forcing Was this the
(20:18):
one that has to do with forcing pro life physicians
to deal with pregnancy terminations? Or am I confusing it
with another?
Speaker 6 (20:26):
Well, you're confusing it with another. The one that you're
referring to was already decided by the Supreme Court. And
what the Supreme Court decided in that particular case, unanimous decision,
was that the petitioners in the case, a group of
anti abortion doctors, did not have standing to bring the case,
that they did not rule specifically on the merits of
(20:46):
this case. This particular case that I'm referring to has
to do with an Idaho law that bar's doctors from
performing abortions. Left the mother's life as at risk, but
it makes no exception if she would suffer long term
health consequence. I say so, this will place abortion access
on the forefront again of you know, voters' minds, just
(21:08):
as we're getting ready to deal with the November election.
Speaker 3 (21:12):
So that's the reason why I.
Speaker 6 (21:13):
Think it's an important case to follow and see how
it decides. By the end of this month is when
we'll get a decision on that particular abortion case.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
And by the way, end of the month is two weeks,
so this is going to come top of the my news.
Great work as always. John Decker, White House correspondent, an attorney,
Thanks for joining us. All right, yeah, I you know,
I'm no different than you. I don't have any crystal
ball that you have. I can tell you that no
(21:42):
matter how the ruling goes, because can't you hear the
narratives now, even if the Supreme Court stands by the
president's immunity claims, the left will just do the narrative
of see this is what happens mc donald Trump's tax
a court. So the one thing I do know is
no matter what the Supreme Court rules, the attack will
(22:04):
be on the Supreme Court. Now this is interesting to
me from this perspective. We just went through a decade
where we abandon God, we abandon absolute truth. We don't
trust anybody. Remember when it was just attorneys we didn't trust.
Now we don't trust politicians, we don't trust the CDC,
(22:28):
the World Health Organization, we don't trust the media. We
don't trust anybody. And it was like for a decade
there was no God, but there was the Supreme Court.
But then the Supreme Court dares to do what anyone
dares to do, because if you go against the Democrat
Party or any of the Democrat Party candidates or any
(22:51):
of the Democrat Party movements, you're against democracy and they'll
demonize you and they will turn on you. Well this
is they always had the Supreme Court in their back pocket,
like they're the meeting in their back pocket. Well now
they don't anymore. So the only thing that's really interesting,
big picture to me, is a Supreme Court go the
same way as everything else. You cross the movement of
(23:17):
the administrative state, because that's the one thing that gets
lost in daily conversations. We went from being a constitutional
representative republic government of laws to anything goes. Then anything
goes went from republican a republic to a democracy, and
(23:38):
then democracy quickly became the Democrat Party, its platform and candidates.
So now if you oppose any of that, you're an
enemy of the state, You're an enemy of democracy. That's
the game they played, and that weapon will even point
at the Supreme Court. So either way, this is going
to be narrativevized. I mean, I agree these are three
(24:00):
big cases, and I agree that the Supreme Court has
to look. I mean, look, we have three branches of
government for a reason. By intent, the People's House should
make the laws. The Senate should protect states. The president
should just execute be the CEO of the executive branch,
(24:29):
the chief administrator, with the Supreme Court's there to make
sure no laws are made outside of the intent and
spirit of the Declaration of Independence and the actual blueprint
for its execution, the Constitution. Now, when they don't take
(24:54):
their political cues, well, they'll get attacked for being a
stacked bias court. Supreme Court's got a rule on immunity,
or how does any president lead? Or what Pandora's boxes
open to previous presidents. So I agree there are three cases.
I don't agree they're going to have any influence on
(25:18):
this election any more than I think Donald Trump's convictions
are going to have any influence on this election.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
I'm executive chef George Harbell.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
My morning show is your Morning Show with Michael Bill
Joran if you're just waking up. US Surgeon General wants
social media have the same warning labels when it comes
to young users that we used to put on the
side of cigarette packs. Natalie Migliori has more.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Doctor Vveck Murphy used his New York Times essay to
call on Congress.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
To require a tobacco style warning label for social media platforms.
He admitted a warning label alone will not make social
media safe for kids in their mental health.
Speaker 7 (25:53):
New Yorkers agree.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
I think he should.
Speaker 1 (25:56):
Mostly it's the parents to have some monitor Also, I
think want LABLFT, but I don't think it would work.
Speaker 2 (26:03):
It comes as recent studies showed teams spend nearly five
hours every day on social media platforms like YouTube, TikTok,
and Instagram.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I'm not a Limigniori NBC News Radio. One of the
kids that really need to do is to turn off
of the phone and at cost have a little sauce.
With a heat wave of gripping much of the nation
this week, experts are warning people who take certain medications
need to be extra careful. Tammy Triheel has the shale.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Those include medicines for high blood pressure, allergies, and mental health. Diuretics,
which help the body produce more urine, can lead to
dehydration and extreme heat. Beta blockers can impede the body's
ability to regulate temperature, while certain antipsychotics can affect the
ability to produce sweat. I'm Tammy Triheo.
Speaker 1 (26:46):
One thing we know is a majority of Americans think
we have a border crisis, and I doubt they're going
to like the news that President Biden is prepping an
executive order to grant temporary amnesty for hundreds of thousands
of illegal immigrants, and it could be announced as soon
as today. Mark Mayfield report.
Speaker 8 (27:00):
Reports saying the White House is sent to launch a
so called Parole and Place plan for illegal immigrants spouses
of US citizens. The plan protects them from deportation, grants
them a work permit, and could also provide a pathway
to citizenship.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
I'm Mark Mayfield, while the White House is disputing the
characterization of a video that critics say showed the President
having to be let off the stage by Barack Obama.
They're just close friends. Chris Caashio has the story.
Speaker 7 (27:25):
Some commentators say the video, taken at a fundraiser in
California over the weekend, shows Biden freezing up before former
President Obama grabs his wrist and leads him off stage.
White House spokesperson Kareein John Pierre says all the video
shows is two good friends walking off stage.
Speaker 1 (27:42):
She went on to say she.
Speaker 7 (27:43):
Believes videos showing Biden in a bad light are deep fakes.
I'm Chris Garangio.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
Last night, Roory O'Neills. Boston Celtics once again secured an
NBA Final championship teeth and history, surpassing the Los Angeles
Lakers with the most titles in league history with their
one oh six eighty eight win over the Dallas Mavericks.
Sorry Talk radio eleven ninety fans in Dallas, the MAVs lose.
(28:13):
Rory Celtics win. Did I do that? Just like you
worded it very well.
Speaker 9 (28:16):
I'd also add the Celtics coach went to the same
high school that I went to.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
You're kidding, I didn't know that. I mean, look, at
the end of the day, the perform I mean, Jason
Tatum was outstanding. I think he had nine assists in
the first half. I don't have to tell you that
he wanted to have thirty one points, eleven assassin eight rebounds.
But again, you know, the Mavericks were trying to win
with two and the Celtics had at least seven that
(28:44):
they could. They could pop trays, drive, make amazing layups up.
They were so far and away the best team in
the NBA. And then all.
Speaker 9 (28:54):
Happening on six seventeen six one seven being the Boston
area code.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
It was all meant to me. I didn't You're just
filled with Celtic tidball.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
I am filled with a lot of something and maybe
the best half court logo on wood in the NBA.
Speaker 9 (29:09):
All right, let's talk about the Republican one final Notice
it's all three leaf shamrocks, not four leaf clovers.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Just that's an Irish thing. Pay attention to.
Speaker 9 (29:19):
That's the trinity, right right, So look for clovers, not shamrocks.
Speaker 1 (29:27):
Not clovers.
Speaker 3 (29:28):
All right, So the R and c.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
They start in a month. Yeah, and Donald Trump. You know,
this is traditional timing. So for Donald Trump, he's not
waiting any extra long. It's just different because I guess
Donald Trump is really not a challenger as much as
he's a former president, so it's like having two incumbents.
But this is the final piece of the puzzle that's missing,
and everybody's anticipating it. And I would suspect that he
(29:51):
is going to make his announcement about a week or
maybe shortly before that, but about a week before the convention.
And the names of the names, I think we got
a fee of who the top five names are. But
what are your thoughts? I would agree with that.
Speaker 9 (30:05):
You know, the top three on Politico are all US
Senators jd Vance, Tim Scott.
Speaker 1 (30:10):
And Marco Rubio.
Speaker 9 (30:12):
I don't think Marco Rubio is a real contender, This
is my opinion. I personally think he's vying for Secretary
of State. I don't think he really wants to be
VP because he and Donald Trump also disagree on quite
a bit except for foreign policy issues. And I think
Doug Bergham is the dark horse here who's coming out
of nowhere, I think and starting to take the lead.
I think what we're seeing though, is are you picking
(30:33):
someone for what happens on November fifth or what happens
on January twentieth.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
I think they're two different kinds of people. Yeah, And
you know, the other thing is this big picture question,
which is what becomes of trump Ism in the Republican Party.
And by the way, John Decker, your colleague and mine,
he actually his pick is Donald Trump Junior A And
(31:00):
you know John doesn't make crazy picks, you know, but
that would be really prioritizing trump ISM's future. Telsey Gabbard
brings something to the table. I mean, who better to
prosecute that, because it's not a Joe Biden problem, just
like it wasn't a Barack Obama problem from a Republican standpoint,
It's a Democrat policy problem. And Telsea Gabbart could prosecute
(31:22):
that that party has changed so much she has left
the party. That would be great. What about a vek Ramaswami,
who's done such a great job. We know he's always
been the spokesperson for Donald Trump. I think a lot
of people still think Ron DeSantis might be the future
of trump Ism in four years. Do you play for
the future of trump Ism. Do you play for a
heartbeat away? Do you play for a key state? There's
(31:44):
a lot of moving parts here, right, and then I'm
also curious.
Speaker 9 (31:47):
You know, you said the announcement will likely come the
week before the convention that starts on July seventeenth or eighteenth,
But I think that that's also going to be when
he's sentenced in New York. So does he make the
announce spen to you know, pivot the headlines and change
the subject after the sentencing and try to you know,
take the funder out of that announcement.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
That could be a factor as well. Yeah, you know,
I've seen the movie Game Change and what they thought
they were achieving when they picked Sarah Palin. I don't
know that Donald Trump needs a game changer at the
bottom of the ticket. Is there a bad choice he
could make? I guess. You know, if we all agreed
(32:28):
that Christy GNOME's out for shooting her dog, yeah, pretty much.
I mean, she shot herself by shooting her dog.
Speaker 9 (32:37):
But you knew that Donald Trump's ego sort of gets
in the way a bit here too. I don't think
he wants anyone on the bottom of the ticket who
would you know, take more of the spotlight outshine them.
I think that's the big knock against JD. Vans is
that you know JD. Vans may argue the Trump case
better than Trump can.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
I am still rooting for Telsea Gabbard or a Vek Ramaswami,
But if I had to make a pick today, I
think it's Doug Burgenergen.
Speaker 9 (33:02):
I think the two get along so well. I would
agree he reminds me of Mike Pence in that exactly.
I'm just going to say, yes, sir, I'm not confrontational.
I'm going to fade into the woodwork. I'm gonna I'm
Homer Simpson backing into the hedges h after the election day,
just sort of just falling in line.
Speaker 1 (33:18):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael Enheld. Join now,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.