September 17, 2024 • 60 mins
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to our channels on Rumble & Brighteon, and give us a “Like,” and PLEASE share this episode and this channel on your social media feed, and THANK YOU for your support!----------------------SPECIAL: This stuff works better than ANYTHING I've used! Nana Soma - https://iwantmyhealthback.com/hagmann- PLEASE click & definitely watch the videos at link. You'll thank me later.----------------------For complete information, please visit, bookmark, and share The Hagmann Report at our website: https://www.HagmannPI.com
TIPS: (Anonymity guaranteed):doug@hagmannreport.com | rt@hagmannpi.com
ON THE GO? SUBSCRIBE TO HAGMANN’S PODCAST:
iTunes:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hagmann-report/id631558915?uo=4Spotify: BANNED!iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-hagmann-report-30926499/Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/show/hagmann-report
FOLLOW HAGMANN AT:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/HagmannReportGab: https://gab.com/DougHagmannGettr: https://gettr.com/user/doughagmannTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@DougHagmann
TIPS: (Anonymity guaranteed):doug@hagmannreport.com | rt@hagmannpi.com
ON THE GO? SUBSCRIBE TO HAGMANN’S PODCAST:
iTunes:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hagmann-report/id631558915?uo=4Spotify: BANNED!iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-hagmann-report-30926499/Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/show/hagmann-report
FOLLOW HAGMANN AT:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/HagmannReportGab: https://gab.com/DougHagmannGettr: https://gettr.com/user/doughagmannTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@DougHagmann
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Coming to you from the Hagman Report dot Com studio
located in the Keystone States, birthplace of a mighty nation.
It's your host, Don hagman Man. Welcome to Hagman It
(00:22):
is a Hagman Report for today. It's Tuesday, September seventeenth,
twenty twenty four. I want to thank you all for
joining me. Thank you so much for your belief and
trust in this platform. You know, we've been around a
long time. I and, uh, twenty twenty two inside joke
there or twenty twenty two, I did say, twenty twenty four, right, yeah,
(00:45):
you do, okay, all right, Yeah. I had a the
other day. I was scheduled for some tests to be done,
medical tests to be done, and I had orders, paper orders,
nonetheless third bend, No, not that kind. And anyway, I
when I took my orders in, and you know, I
(01:07):
had to fast, I had to do all this stuff,
you know, And I handed the orders over and Ama
says she's looking through the things. She said, looks at
me and looks back down at the orders and says,
I can't take these. I'm thinking why not? And she said,
because they expired two years ago twenty they put the
(01:31):
wrong date in. So you know it's not just because
I'll tell you what I am, anti anti, I'm a luddite. Okay,
I don't like this. I don't like the computer stuff.
But you know, it would have been easy if they
could have said, hey, you know, just type something in
(01:52):
and send down to the doctor and doctor anyway, they
couldn't do that. So but see, I changed doctors because
I fired my last one and I'm going to a
doctor forty miles from where I sit because my other
doctor was a Potts because you know, hey, you gotta
have the vacs. You gotta do this. You got a
mask up. You got my current doctor, who's actually a
(02:15):
friend of mine I've known for twenty some years. He
said that all that was crap. That was a bunch
of bs. So he's one of us. But anyway, all right,
got a great show line up for you. It's just
me and Eric Detech today. Got some catching up to do.
But before I get into the program, I want to
talk about bio x four. H Yeah. Look, we live
(02:37):
in the most advanced era in human history. There's never
been there's never been more medical breakthroughs than there are
right now. So why are millions of Americans, and you
got to ask yourself, this more unhealthy and overweight than
they've ever been before. And if you look at the
ticket of RFK and Trump, you'll see this focus on
(03:00):
which is really refreshing if you can take it at
face value. So but moving on based on US Board
Certified Physician Expert nutrition is startra eaming Lee. One of
the main reasons that so many people are unhealthy and
overweight are three harmful foods three condum three, not one,
(03:22):
not two, but three harmful foods that are being passed
off as health foods all over the country. And I
got into this pretty heavy because I really wanted to
see if I talk about anything, I check it out first.
So I wanted to really get into this and see
what was going on. Because these foods can cause weight gain,
clog your digestion track, I'm telling you you could have
(03:43):
some problems there, deplete your energy, which is a big
thing these days, and wreck your skin. They're banned in
other countries. And I noticed something about my skin. I
checked off to aging, but my skin was kind of off.
You know, like if like Eric punches me, which he
(04:04):
does often, the skin would kind of react to that
in ways that I wouldn't expect, so I asked them
to stop hitting me. But I also focus on these
three harmful foods and looked at this video. But the
fact that they're still legal in the US, it's time
(04:25):
that someone really focused on what they are. No doctor
immediately does just that while explaining how the side effects
from these foods are wreaking havoc on us our health
millions of Americans. The great news is it's easy to
stop and reverse damage by learning which foods to avoid
and how to spot them. And since I've done that,
I've noticed the difference in my skin, and of course
(04:45):
I've lost weight and people know that, and I've got
more energy so to find out to find out these
three fake health foods. And I'm pausing there because you
think about this, and these are being pushed as health foods.
(05:08):
As healthy foods, you need to learn about this. Go
to three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen. That's three
harmful foods dot com slash hagmen, or just click on
the link in the description box below. And after years
of extensive study, doctor Lee put together this really great video.
It's a revealing videos totally free to the public, so
you never get doe by these foods again. So find
(05:30):
out all you need to regain control over your body
at three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen. Just click
on the description box below as well. And I want
to thank them for doing what they do so well,
partnering up with us and allowing us to be or
(05:52):
sponsoring this program three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen.
All Right, so it's just Eric and I and there's
a lot of things that we need to get into
that are important to you, to me, to the country,
and to the world at large. One of the first
(06:14):
things I want to start out with is this. It
was interesting because I had a guest on yesterday, and folks,
Terry Newishim is an awesome guy. If you haven't caught
yesterday's show, if you haven't spread it on social media,
if you haven't visited his website, and if you haven't
subscribed to his rumble channel, do so, please do so.
(06:35):
The guy is a fighter, he's a street fighter, he's
an amazing man, he's a cancer survivor. He's just an
amazing guy. And I'm glad to have gotten to known
him as well as I have. We need to take
the fight to the streets, and that's what he's doing.
This is a fight against that well good versus evil.
(06:57):
But I got taken to the woods. Should but at
least one comment or on our rumble channel. You didn't
cover the assassination on Monday or on Sunday that happened
to the assassination attempt on Sunday. You didn't cover that. I know,
I know, and it was it was deliberate because everyone
(07:19):
else was covering that specific topic. Here's what I want you.
There are so many different stories, you know, Okay, so,
and I'm glad you popped in here because isn't it interesting?
From like the moment it hits the wires or the
news too, I don't know a day or two later
(07:39):
how the news evolves, and it's difficult to really initially
to really make sense of what is taking place. I mean,
how many times that story change a lot? Right? I
mean it did that. Yeah. But here's what I don't
(08:01):
want to happen. I don't want the attempted assassination of
President Trump that took place on July thirteenth, twenty twenty four.
I don't want that to become memory. Hold. Now we
can talk about these attempts, and we have talked about
the attempt from July thirteenth, and you know, folks, we've
(08:22):
been tasked with investigating certain aspects of July thirteenth. And
I'm not going to give away any client information. I'm
not going to give away what we exactly what we've
been tasked with doing. But the fact is, shatter ops
save them. Hagman PI or Hagman Investcat Services Incorporated as
(08:44):
the lead in that investigation. We've been doing this. That's enough.
I mean, just understand, we've been working probably longer and
harder than any time in our history, specifically investigating initially
now beginning now forty seven day roughly forty eight days ago,
(09:06):
maybe closer to fifty days ago, since it was assigned
the Butler Pennsylvania assassination attempt. And because of the man power,
and this is important, Okay, I've been doing this thirty
seven years. Homage to Steve Quayle. Okay, I've been doing
(09:30):
what I've been doing for thirty seven years. Not as
a private investigator. I don't take domestic cases, never did.
Maybe I made a few exceptions. I think during my career,
but it's all been for Fortune one hundred, Fortune five
hundred companies, and it's all been for fraud or for
(09:50):
certain other insurance based investigations, including equivocal homicide investigations where
the man of death is in question. Was it a homicide,
suicide or accident? And that's that was that was a
big part of our uh of what we did cold
(10:15):
case homicides as well. I mean we're on record in
solving two cold case homicides finding evidence, not definitive proof
where the DA could could actually charge somebody, but certainly
identifying the person in a couple of cases who committed
(10:37):
the homicide. But the DA couldn't prosecute why because because
of the cold case nature, some of the a lot
of the evidence was destroyed or rendered useless for one
reason or another. Some of the witnesses have passed on.
You get the idea. But in total, those cases were solved,
(10:58):
doesn't mean they're they're off the books still open. It's
called cases, but we know who did them. I don't
want the events of July thirteenth, twenty twenty four to
be memory old. When news of the second assassination attempt
(11:19):
in sixty four days came over the wire on Sunday.
We all got together and we were discussing this in
the bigger format. Is there something else going on? Obviously
there is. We warned, I warned specifically, but we warned
collectively that the network, and there is a network out there.
(11:44):
I'm telling you right now, a network exists that outlives
Thomas Matthew Crooks, and we'll out or will continue performing
with the sidelining of the latest assass attempted assassin. The
(12:05):
people behind these attempts are not going to stop until
President Trump and all of the America First people are
dead or otherwise neutralized. We looked at a number of things.
We looked at and actually crafted a very extensive timeline
(12:27):
of Thomas Matthew Crooks back in July. I actually predated
the days. We actually predated the event by days, weeks, months,
and even more importantly, what happened afterwards. Now, think about that,
(12:48):
if the lone gunman assassin is dead, what are you
talking about afterwards? Well, without getting too much detail, you know,
there are ways you can track people who intersected with
the life of a person and then map out where
their presence might be. And you can read between the lines.
(13:13):
At any given time, people buy this information for marketing
purposes all the time exists out there, so you can
actually map out let's say, person A intersects with person
B on a routine basis, or even just coincidentally or
(13:34):
not coincidentally, but even just once or twice or three times. Well, okay,
what happens to if person as out of the picture.
What about B and C? Person's being C, what are
they doing right now? And who are they interacting with?
And you can see how you can build a case
from it. We've been connecting dots, and the dots are
(13:57):
creating a very troubling image of troubling relationships that appear
to exist at higher levels of government, higher levels of
different government agencies, the corporate media, and private entities. And
(14:17):
it's interesting because what we found, and I'm just going
to be flat out with you, the latter, the private entities,
some appear to have some Department of Defense military connections.
(14:38):
Now we found this out weeks prior, weeks prior to
this past Sunday. Let me say that again, the entities
that intersected during the days and weeks prior to July thirteenth,
(14:58):
twenty twenty four. The intersected with with Crooks have some
involvement with Department of Defense or businesses with military applications
within the Department of Defense. Were reported on that some
(15:18):
time ago. Sixty four days later, you have this moron,
this left wing nut job Ukrainian, Ukrainian face paint and
all that stuff, at times setting up an attempting to
(15:39):
kill the president again. We're attempting to shoot the president
again with the intent to kill him. Two attempts in
sixty four days. Now, as we openly concluded on this
program and privately to others, the attempts to end the
(16:00):
life of President Trump by assets of national and international
operatives will continue even beyond last Sunday. It's going to continue,
and it's going to continue well beyond the twenty twenty
four election. It's going to continue as long as the
movement of America First continues. The forces behind the attempts,
(16:26):
they must not only terminate President Donald Trump, but they
have to terminate the America First agenda. When we looked
at the Crooks timeline, there were inexplicable actions that existed
and are woven within the timeline of his life. This
(16:49):
pattern of life that can't be attributed to incompetence or
mistakes by the US Secret Service and other protective details,
other agencies, even within the Camp campaign itself. Listen to
what I'm saying to you, because words are important, right,
you know, when they're viewed in their totality, they can't
(17:11):
be explained away. But they do indicate both fore knowledge
of a potentially fatal event taking place in Butler on
the thirteenth day of July, and a continuing threat to
President Trump as a former president and most importantly as
a candidate for the current election. And these findings when
(17:35):
viewed through the lens of what happened on Sunday, they
become even more alarming. You've got to ask the question
with respect to the latest attempt. You've got to look
at a couple of things very seriously. The fact that
(17:57):
President Trump was going to go did go go on
this past Sunday. It was an OTR event. In other words,
it was the last minute OTR is off the record.
It was not on the record on the schedule for
that day. This was this was done really kind of
at the last moment. So at most maybe a dozen
(18:18):
people knew about his decision to play golf at that
location in West Palm Beach County or in Palm Beach
County last Sunday. Yet you have a guy, part time
guy living in North Carolina, living in Hawaii. You get
(18:42):
this guy that comes into this foreign area and lies
in wait for President Trump. How do you know he
was going to be there. We as an investigative firm,
and the investigators individually, as I said, we've we came
(19:05):
to this conclusion before this. But there is a problem
inside either the US Secret Service or within the close
circle of President Trump's people. They know that. They know that,
I guarantee you, they know that when you look at
(19:31):
the actions of the latest attempted assassin, what screams off
the page at you? Motive? Right, motive screams off the
page at you. A lot of times acts of violence,
crime that they don't have a motive this one does.
(19:59):
This is this guy and I was a rabid leftist,
is I shouldn't say it was? Is a rabid leftist,
a pro Ukrainian, pro war person who believed believes that
we should do everything to back Ukraine. In fact, this
(20:21):
Nimrod actually went over to Ukraine, was filmed over there
a couple of times and actually was in contact with
numerous media person's personalities both over in Europe as well
as here in America, and urging people to fight for Ukraine.
(20:42):
So the motive jumps off the page at you. The
motive is just his motive, screams. It was all about
Ukraine and the fact that President Trump would end the
war between Russia and Ukraine, which could have been accomplished
back last March, but the West, specifically the UK and
(21:05):
other countries in the West, said no, and under the
weak leadership of Potato, had Biden we folded as well,
that wouldn't happen with President Trump. What happens when the
Ukrainian war effort stops? What happens people stop getting rich
(21:28):
from weapons sales. Okay, so who's benefiting from weapons sales? Well,
it's the conglomerates, it's the military industrial complex, the usual
suspects there. But there's a lot of money that, as
I believe, Lindsey Graham said, you know the money or no,
(21:50):
I'm sorry, is not Schumer. Who's the other on the
other side, Turtle? What's his name? The senator? Oh, come on,
let's see, you know what I'm talking about the centory
or minority leader. The money doesn't stay over there, comes
(22:19):
back into the politician's pockets. That's really the bottom line.
So the motive here, once you take President Trump out
of the equation, they can get on with world War three.
Now I was talking with This was a number of
days ago, maybe seven, eight, nine, ten days ago. I
had a phone conversation I'm going to name drop here
(22:40):
with Jack Pisovic, and it was interesting the conversation we
had about a number of different things with respect to
Ukraine and some of the warmongers here in this country.
And then last Friday, again this is pre assassination attempt
now assassination ATTEP number two. He was talking about the
(23:00):
potential for World War three, as is everyone or should
be talking about that. The reason I bring that up
now is the fact that you cannot take out the
attempted assassinations plural, and you cannot separate them from what's
going on overseas the foreign policy of the US with
respect to Ukraine. You cannot. You cannot separate that. You
(23:22):
can't do it because there's big money involved here, big
money interests involved. My presentation that you'll see I believe
it's gonna be on the twenty seventh of September. Has
to do with October Surprise and my my with Paul Bagley,
(23:43):
pastor Paul Bagley October Surprise, make sure you sign up
for that. But from my position, the October Surprise that
we are about to expect is happening now, it has
been happening, and we'll continue to happen well beyond October.
We have to think bigger about current events. Remember the
(24:08):
people in charge, they want to kill us. They want
population control. They want to they want to create a
war for deep population. They want to create a war
so they can roll over the ashes. Getting back to
(24:35):
the assassination by Crux. As a matter of fact, the
anomalies there alone should give people pause. Now I've worked
I've worked this case far beyond I think any other
any other anything else but a homicide. I mean, I
worked this harder than any other case than I can. Remember,
(24:58):
that's the Butler case, and so do the members of
Shadow Ups and Save them and Eric Atteck and others.
But the anomalies associated with that particular event are plentiful.
(25:20):
And I'm not talking about Oh it wasn't crooks on
the roof or what it was, some Antifa individual. I'm
not going to name him, but you know I've gotten
I've gotten hate mail saying you're lying, it's this person
on the roof, You're a liar. I don't know what
to tell you. If if I can stand and look
(25:41):
at that very person that is being named as being
on the roof dead, and I can look in that
person's eyes and that person has life in his body, Uh, okay,
what do you say that talking to a corpse. I'm
(26:01):
talking about the anomalies now that are provable, that are verifiable,
that we can authenticate, and anymore, if you look at
a video, how can you be sure, for example, videos
has not been untouched or a photograph anymore these days,
you don't know what I mean. My goodness, I'm sure
(26:22):
somebody could have me saying something or doing something. Well,
you see it all the time on the internet where
the person's saying something he never said, she never said whatever.
It's all a deep fake. So that's why it's so
important not to rely on things like videos and pictures
(26:46):
on the internet. You've got to go the old shoe
leather approach. That's I grew up. I mean, I cut
my teeth on that. On that approach. You hit the ground,
you walk, you go to doors, you talk to people,
people that you know. You can't fake that. No, sure,
I'm sure with a mask or whatever, yeah you could.
(27:09):
But beyond that, don't rely on what you see on TV.
Don't rely on what you see on the internet, don't
rely on some of the social media postings. You can
go out. I mean, if that's what you're tasked to do,
charged to do, then you do it in that fashion. Yeah,
(27:31):
I got a couple of questions. I'm just gonna These
are well known, but I'm gonna toss these out because again,
I don't want people to forget about this. One of
the questions I had and I still have. It has
not been explained to me with any degree of at
least it might be with any with any kind of certainty.
(27:54):
CNN they go out to all kinds of rallies, their
rallies all the time. But what they do is that
on broadcasts them live, they'll be there and they'll show
cutaways during their normal programming. This time CNN broadcasts are
early live on network television. Now they do oftentimes broadcast
(28:16):
on their digital internet channels. But it's not it doesn't
make it to the network television station. This time it did.
And I'm a big believer. And when somebody does something
out of the ordinary like this, you got to pay
attention to that. Why out of all the out of
(28:37):
all the events, why this, Why why this one? Well
the rumor was, who's going to announce his VP candidate? Well,
if you really paid attention, and I would suspect that
if you're a network news broadcaster, you have known that
was not going to happen that day. But people believe
that keep on believing, which you one. But this is
(29:01):
contrary to their normal procedures, even during an election cycle. Again,
just to be clear, CNN other networks are usually president
at such events, but they have generally used cutaways rather
than live streaming the entire event. Not in this case.
(29:22):
Why ask yourself why, and ask yourself what was the
basis for that decision and who made that decision. There's
a New York Times photographer also present. I'm not going
to give his name. In New York Times, by the way,
is very Look, they've got a reputation for fraudulent photographs,
(29:44):
fraudulent stories, Jason Blair ring a bell. If not, you
can research it on your own. There's a photographer there
ostensibly representing New York Times at filming the events in
a sweet position. Those are the pictures, by the way,
(30:05):
you saw President Trump with the blood running down his face,
and extremely good pictures. But his camera was set at
one eight thousands frames per second or eight thousand frames
per second. I'm not sure exactly sure how to use
(30:30):
that in a proper phrase, but the setting was its
Generally speaking, it's a reserved for high action events like NASCAR,
you know, the cars going around around high speed action.
What can be more high speed than than the hypersonic
bullets or even even a bullet that's a slower bullet
(30:54):
hitting a man's a person's skull. Do you realize if
you think back to the Zappruder film that was sold
by a Zuppruter, ABRAHAMS. A Pruter, and back then in
sixty three, there weren't a whole lot of video cameras
(31:16):
filming that event. There's one that still never surface, but
I digress. But the monetary value that such footage would
have at that speed, at that clarity, at that just
using that setting alone would be extremely significant. And I
listened to Michael jan and actually I've talked to Michael Yon.
(31:40):
You may not know who he is. If you do, great,
He's a combat correspondent, not a war not just a
war court, but a combat correspondent. He's out there filming,
I mean, the real stuff and using the best cameras
and equipment possible. He's like eight thousand francs per Man.
(32:01):
He said, no, no, that no, And unless you're filming
you know the face of the sun or you're looking
to I mean, no, that's not that's not normal. But
but if there was an event that involved action, that
(32:23):
would really capture the action, and its raw format would
allow would allow extremely incredible detail. As gross as that sounds.
But the other thing he said really really brought broke,
(32:44):
brought me to attention, and that's the fact that you
realize the value of such footage. If you took that
that footage, and let's say that bullet did connect, you
realize that that would be worth tens of millions of dollars.
(33:04):
At the same time that that footage was also being
transmitted directly to there, that photographer's home base, so that
that camera wasn't just a camera, it was a transmitting
device that was transmitting that footage in real time. Why
(33:27):
am I saying all this. I'm saying this because I
don't want those issues to be memory hold. I don't
want the issues of the abnormal procedures that took place
on the thirteenth of July by Beaver, by Butler, uh
(33:49):
and again not everyone, but some individuals by the US
Secret Service by HSI. I don't want people to forget
about this. And more importantly, I want people to take
that template and compare it to last Sunday. So to
(34:09):
the individual at least one who said, well, you n'tcover
any of the attempted assassination of President Trump yesterday, that's it.
I'm done watching you. Did you drop something asking her
to text? Okay? I just heard this. Is that you? Okay?
(34:33):
Hey lady, this student Doug you okay, Yeah, she's okay,
all right? Sorry about that offscreen drama apparently, don't. I
don't want to just touch the surface and not dig
into the real stuff that matters. And more videos being
(34:54):
found about that particular instance, just understand this. We have
to look at this, and we are looking at this
as not well, we are looking at them as individual,
standalone incidents, but we're looking at them as a whole,
(35:18):
as part of a whole. You've got two different events
sixty four days between July thirteenth and September fifteenth. You
look at them individually, but you also look at them
as a whole. What do they have in common? And
I said all of that to say this as well,
(35:45):
this is going They're going to continue to attempt to
kill President Trump. They've got no other choice. Well, they
have one other choice. And that's where that conversation I
mentioned earlier with Jacksby comes in. But the motive of
Thomas Mathew Christ who kill President Trump, seemingly appears to
elude officials. Oh we can't figure out why this kid
(36:06):
did it, Why this kid went up on the roof
to do it. Even the Bipartisan Congressional Task Force is
clueless to date. Now I'm gonna share something with you
the Bipartisan Congressional Task Force. I was in contact with
(36:29):
a member, a staffer of that Bipartisan Task Force. I'm
not going to give any names, wanted my information and said, look,
you know, come on, come on, give us the information
to help us out and I said, I'll do so
under with a number of conditions. With a few conditions.
(36:51):
I mean, I'm not a jerk. I'm just saying, look,
if you allow me as part of the team to
work towards the truth, but also give me the authority.
I've got the credentials, give me the authority perhaps subpoena
authority or some level of authority to work with you
(37:11):
that For example, if I say, look, I need these
records over here, that they can say no to me,
whoever I might be asking for, whatever records I might
be asking for, But then I've got power of a
subpoena or I've got power of a congressional law enforcement
status behind me. Now I can't do that. Can't do
(37:38):
that then? Really, so what if they say no, you
draft a strongly worded letter to them. Is that where
we're at with this? Well, you know that's really that's
all we can do at this point. Now, then that's
not acceptable to me. The congressional investigations that are being
(38:04):
conducted to date appear to be subservient to restrictions imposed
by the federal law enforcement agencies, including and especially the FBI,
who is taking control over these investigations. And you're trusting
the FBI, the same agency that attempted to frame President
Trump over Russia Gates. Are you kidding me? What is
(38:27):
wrong with you? And DHS, which oversees the Secret Service,
who has disallowed providing additional assets to President Trump? You wait,
you're subservient to their wishes and you say, come on,
but come on, but you can only work within this
(38:49):
small parameter. No, I don't think so. Thank you, but no,
thank you, because what I find will go directly the people,
as opposed to being filtered through some supposedly bipartisan task
force that may or may not have the truth in mind.
(39:12):
I look at what happened again. I'm not trying to
disparage anybody, but I do know a podcaster and Corey
Millsen and the other gentleman went to Butler, and of
course they were given the tour. Don't give me a tour,
let me lose, let me go where I want to go.
Don't give me a tour. Oh you can't. You can't
(39:32):
go over there because they're they're working, they're taking the
top of a AC unit off. You can't go over there. No,
I want to go over there. I won't get in
the way, but promise, I promise, but I want to
see what you're doing, and I want to know why
you're doing what you're doing. Well with that kind of
(39:56):
in my view, without that kind of intensity, we're not
going to solve any of this. In fact, I doubt
whether it's the intent to solve any of this. The
the other thing I want to say is when you
subject yourselves to the oversight of the FBI, DHS, the
(40:17):
US Secret Service, in your Congressional task force, you or
nothing but a mail cuckold to these agencies, the historical
president precedent that we've seen, the historical precedent of assets
within those agencies specifically engaged in complicit activity actions with
(40:40):
the actors involved in actual events. For example, what I'm
referring to in this case is think of the Whitmer
kidnapping plot. Whitmer kidnapping plot, What the hell was that?
That was a Keystone Cops set up from day one,
and the FBI was directly neck deep in in it.
(41:01):
Oh it Believe me, the FBI does not care for
what I'm saying. Ask me how I know, Don't ask
me how I know. So you have the Wittner kidnapping plot.
You have January sixth, the quote fed surrection, which I
(41:21):
agree with that title at the Capitol, Christopher Ray denying it, Well,
I don't know how many assets. We didn't have any
agents there. No, No, you have to ask the question properly,
how many assets, whether they were CIS or operational or
informational assets on the ground, did you have at the Capitol.
He wouldn't answer that question. I'll get back to you
on that. Hey, has anything happened despite all the bluster, No,
(41:48):
nothing has happened. This is what I'm telling you in
my view right now, this is my personal opinion. Prove
me wrong. Please, I want somebody from the Bipartisan Congressional
Task Force on the assassination attempt to Butler. I want
them to prove me wrong, prove me wrong that you
guys don't want the truth. Prove me wrong. And how
(42:12):
you can do that is you want our findings. I'm
more than happy to share them with you, but I'll
tell you what I'm just will work. But I want
to make sure that they're not put in the hole
somewhere covered over, you know, burnt ash put in a
hole covered over dug back up, reburnt put down. Now.
(42:33):
I want to make sure that the people you know
about the findings in closing the extensive investigation and research
we conducted by the Hangman Group, the pattern of a
larger plot involving elements within the federal government, including those
(42:55):
tasked with conducting oversight investigat the evidence of a bigger
plot is emerging. You know, once unthinkable. It appears that
the conflicts within these agencies and even those in positions
of oversight, are so great that the truth must be
(43:15):
kept from the public by the very individuals institutions charged
with exposing the truth. Look if if you're if you're
on the if you're taken, if you're taking kickbacks from
Ukraine and you have a pro pro Ukraine war suspect,
you know, ah, man, it doesn't look too good, right,
(43:38):
think of it in that fashion of the latest attempt.
But until until we expose those people that are involved
in this, and until not not just exposing, but prosecuting
(43:59):
by an independent body that has law enforcement authority given
to them, truly independent, this will keep happening. Attempts will
continue to be made until that is accomplished and the
(44:22):
operational networks existing within the framework of our government, the
corporate media and private entities working against American public interests.
The crimes we are seeing taking place overtly and with
greater frequency, as we have seen just within the last
couple of days, will continue. It does not give me,
(44:51):
It does not give me any kind of joy to
say that we've got a problem, but we have a
big problem. I would give up this platform tomorrow today,
right now, if we were able to, or if somebody
would take the mantle of leadership and really create a
(45:14):
very decisively independent and transparent investigation into all of this.
But it's not going to happen. It's not gonna happen.
It can't happen because you have too many people who
are involved in the money, in the power and being
(45:37):
being blackmailed by compromising issues. You have too many people. Sadly,
it's not gonna work. I hope that made sense to you.
I want to jump to this article next. This is
from JD. Vance and I know Glenn Beck. I think
(45:58):
today I had to be today on Glenbeck's on his program.
Refer to this particular article. This is at The Blaze,
The Blaze Media. JD. Evans another Trump assassination plot. Question mark.
The media's double standard strikes again. I want to put
(46:19):
a lot of blame on the media. I'm want to
put a lot of blame on what is taking place.
To say on the media, folks, please go to the
Blaze and bookmark this or or read print this out.
This is just a fantastic expose about where we're at today.
(46:45):
I'm going to read parts of it for the radio listeners.
This is at the Blaze again, the Blaze dot com,
and it's a call them by Jdevans. In the bold
print above the text, it says, how do you think
(47:06):
the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a
nineteen time Republican donor try to kill the Democratic Party's
candidate for president? The question answers itself, writes, vance Donald J.
Trump nearly lost his life again on Sunday. And now
this I'm opining here. Let me just introject something. This
(47:29):
has been so downplayed by the media. Oh, no shots
were fired by the by the intended to sell it,
by the attempt that er by the assassin would be assassed.
No shots were fired. This was this was described as
an incident. This was downplayed like January July thirteenth was
downplayed and continues to be downplayed by the media, by
(47:50):
the leftist scumbags. But let me read this because this
does incorporate another aspect of things, and that censorship, because
you know, we're being told to calm the rhetoric, calm
the violent rhetoric. Okay, really, it's us, right, because we
(48:12):
are the ones responsible. Now again, this is me, not
the article. We're the ones responsible for the bomb threats
in Springfield, Ohio. Had Donald Trump not talked about Springfield, Ohio,
there wouldn't be so many bomb threats. Well, when you
look at the bomb thrusts, turns out most of them
came from overseas and they were all hoaxes. But again
I digress. But Donald Trump nearly lost his life again
(48:34):
there on Sunday again. An armed gunman waited for him
in the bushes. He brought a GoPro camera to record it.
A Secret Service agent spotted the barrel of a gun
through the fence and fired at the gunman. The gunman fled,
he was caught, and now we slowly learn about him
and his motive. See this would not have been available
(48:56):
minutes after that assassination attempt. Okay, so President Trump is
my running mate again. This is by Vance and my friend,
but more importantly his a father and a grandfather to
people who love him very much. Folks, I want you
to think about the human element to this. I don't
care if you're right, left, black, blue, orange, gray. I
(49:20):
don't care what color you are right, I don't care
what creed you are. I just I don't if you
are a human being listening to the sound of my voice.
Think about this, Think about the humanity part of this.
Think about the people who love him, his grandkids, his kids,
and believe me, I know his children love him a lot.
(49:44):
I want him to have many more years with his family,
writes JD. Vance, and selfishly, I like many more of
my own or with my own. I admire President Trump
for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out
of control. It nearly got Representative Steve Skull and other
members of the House Republican Caucus killed on the Northern
Virginia baseball field a few years ago. Do you remember that, folks,
(50:09):
That was by a leftist with a gun shooting at
the right Republican baseball players. It nearly got Donald Trump
killed twice. But I want to say something about Sunday's News,
about how it illuminates the difference between a vigorous debate
and violent rhetoric. And this is really what's key here.
(50:30):
Here's what we know so far. I don't even want
to say her first name. Mattress back Harris. Communist Harris
has said that democracy is on the line in her
race against President Trump. The gunman agreed and used the
exact same phrase. He had a Biden Harris bumper sticker
on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's fight for
(50:52):
democracy and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia Ukraine War.
His name is Ryan Routh, and he donated nineteen times
the Democratic Party causes with and zero to Republican ones.
How do you think that how do you think the
Democrats and their media allies would respond if a naighteen
time Republican donor tried to kill the Democratic Parties candidate
(51:14):
for president? The question answers itself. For years, Harris's campaign
surrogates have said things like Trump has to be eliminated,
and how have their media allies responded to the second
assassination attempt against President Trump? In as many months. NBC
News they called the attempt at assassination a golf club incident.
(51:41):
The Los Angeles Times told us Trump targeted a golf club.
USA Today's top of the fold headline on Monday was
hope in America. What a garbage newspaper and the paper
publisher preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump brings
these assassination attempts on himself. How dare you? Have you
(52:05):
ever been shot at? Have you ever have you ever
been the target of a bullet? I think not. CNN's
Dana Bash, who bizarrely accused me of inciting the bomb threat.
This is Van's now writing said money that Harris campaign
rhetoric didn't motivate Ralph, even though he echoed that rhetoric explicitly.
(52:31):
The weekend new show on PBS perfectly illustrated the double
center of Harris and her media friends. After spending thirty
seconds on the second attempt on President Trump's life, the
show then focused on the real danger Trump and me.
According to the talking heads of PBS, we are personally
responsible for the bomb threats against residents of Springfield, Ohio.
Never mind that repeatedly condemned those threats. And subsequent reports
(52:55):
suggests that they came from a foreign country, not some
deranged Trump fan is the media suggested the double standard
is breathtaking and Donald Trump and I are, by their accounts,
directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why because
we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us
about their problems, about the problems in their town. Meanwhile,
(53:17):
Harris Allies called for Trump to be eliminated, as the
media publishers arguments that he deserved to be shot. That
seems like a double standard. At a deeper level, it
is entirely consistent. Considera Springfield. Citizens are telling us their problems.
Those include the undeniable truth of more car accidents, unaffordable housing,
(53:41):
eviction of residents, overcrowded hospitals, over stressed schools, arising rates
of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories, which
again many multiple people have spoken about, either either on
video or to me and my staff. Harris's strategy is
to ignore these people and their concerns. And I'm gonna
(54:04):
add something here. The media's strategy is to say, oh,
you're you're a bunch of conspiracy theorists like Channel fives,
Phil Williams, who called this platform a far right wing
conspiracy theorist podcast. I'll move on here. No matter how
(54:34):
much you hate these people, you cannot possibly hate them enough.
I'm gonna I'm gonna close with this paragraph on this
because I want to get this one one more thing here.
(54:59):
Towards the end of the article, rights Advance, this is
the difference between debate, even aggressive debate, and censorship. Well
right before that, the the the message is always the same.
Don't you dare express an opinion about the public affairs
of your nation? Just shut up. That That's that's Vance's
(55:19):
assessment of the left and of the media, the leftist stenographers. Again,
don't don't express an opinion about the public affairs of
your your own nation, your nation. Just shut up. This
is a difference, writes Vance, between debate and even aggressive debate,
and censorship. It's one thing to attack Harris for destroying
the country, and quite another to say that Donald Trump
(55:40):
should be eliminated. Yes, yes, that that nimrod of a
In Congress, Dan Goldman calls for his elimination. It's one
thing to criticize overheat rhetoric and another to say that
foreign president has invited an assassination on himself. It's one
thing to say that Trump's arguments about the election of
(56:02):
twenty twenty or wrong. It's another thing to attempt to
remove him from the ballot over it. It's one thing
to argue that pets are not in fact being eaten.
It's another thing to say that anyone who disagrees and
is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous descent, is
a great tradition of the US. Censorship is not for
(56:28):
the next seven weeks of this campaign. JD. Vans writes,
I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind.
I believe you have every right to criticize me and
Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue
things about us. But when I ask you to tone
down the rhetoric, it isn't about being nice. Americans have
(56:49):
every right to be mean, even if I don't like it,
or empty platitudes. Instead, I'm asking all of us to
reject censorship, reject the idea that you cannot control what
other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow
citizen citizens over silencing them, either through the powers of
(57:09):
big tech or through the media or through media, I'm sorry,
through moral blackmail. I think this will make our public
to debate much better. But there's something else. When you
reject censorship, you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you
will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. The reason is simple.
(57:30):
The logical censorship leads directly to one place. For there's
only one way to assure, or to one way, to
one sure way to silence a human being, permanently put
a bullet in his head shade events. I'll put the
link at hagmen pi dot com. I asked that you
please subscribe to this show, this program, and please subscribe
(57:57):
to this I'm sorry, what's that? Two minutes in, he's
giving me cues. Stop the hammering. I asked you please
subscribe to our show. We have many more things to
bring out. I'm going to tell you right now, a
lot of things to bring out. Tomorrow, I'm gonna be talking.
I believe with Dave Hodges, we have apparently had a
scheduling snaff who today with san Dieo, so that's why
(58:20):
he was not on tomorrow. I believe we are almost
with Dave Hoges is coming on and we're gonna be
talking about a number of different things, including especially the
threat that I didn't get to. The World War three threat.
Jack Pisobacas was all over that last Friday with Alex
Jones on Info Wars. I would urge you to I
(58:40):
was gonna play a couple of excerpts, so we didn't
get the chance because I was long winded, but I
asked you to please please tune into that broadcast. The
link will be at Hagman PI dot com. It's the
broadcast from September thirteenth where he talks about US poking
the bear, the Russian bear, and the fact that hey,
(59:02):
you know we could watch World War three. Buy these
people and folks again. You cannot extract the agenda of
the war bongers, of these people who want to create
war from the attempts against Donald Trump. You cannot. There
cannot be an extraction. All of this is, all of
(59:22):
this is linked together because the very same people who
want war in Ukraine, who want world war, who want
to eliminate millions billions actually of people, are the very
same people who are organizing attempts against President Trump, and
they're going to continue. They will continue. Thanks for your
Bleef for trust in this leader. Comment at rumble bride
(59:44):
on tell me we should think. God bless you, Thank
you for your support. Without your support, we wouldn't be here.
We're barely here now. God bless you.
Coming to you from the Hagman Report dot Com studio
located in the Keystone States, birthplace of a mighty nation.
It's your host, Don hagman Man. Welcome to Hagman It
(00:22):
is a Hagman Report for today. It's Tuesday, September seventeenth,
twenty twenty four. I want to thank you all for
joining me. Thank you so much for your belief and
trust in this platform. You know, we've been around a
long time. I and, uh, twenty twenty two inside joke
there or twenty twenty two, I did say, twenty twenty four, right, yeah,
(00:45):
you do, okay, all right, Yeah. I had a the
other day. I was scheduled for some tests to be done,
medical tests to be done, and I had orders, paper orders,
nonetheless third bend, No, not that kind. And anyway, I
when I took my orders in, and you know, I
(01:07):
had to fast, I had to do all this stuff,
you know, And I handed the orders over and Ama
says she's looking through the things. She said, looks at
me and looks back down at the orders and says,
I can't take these. I'm thinking why not? And she said,
because they expired two years ago twenty they put the
(01:31):
wrong date in. So you know it's not just because
I'll tell you what I am, anti anti, I'm a luddite. Okay,
I don't like this. I don't like the computer stuff.
But you know, it would have been easy if they
could have said, hey, you know, just type something in
(01:52):
and send down to the doctor and doctor anyway, they
couldn't do that. So but see, I changed doctors because
I fired my last one and I'm going to a
doctor forty miles from where I sit because my other
doctor was a Potts because you know, hey, you gotta
have the vacs. You gotta do this. You got a
mask up. You got my current doctor, who's actually a
(02:15):
friend of mine I've known for twenty some years. He
said that all that was crap. That was a bunch
of bs. So he's one of us. But anyway, all right,
got a great show line up for you. It's just
me and Eric Detech today. Got some catching up to do.
But before I get into the program, I want to
talk about bio x four. H Yeah. Look, we live
(02:37):
in the most advanced era in human history. There's never
been there's never been more medical breakthroughs than there are
right now. So why are millions of Americans, and you
got to ask yourself, this more unhealthy and overweight than
they've ever been before. And if you look at the
ticket of RFK and Trump, you'll see this focus on
(03:00):
which is really refreshing if you can take it at
face value. So but moving on based on US Board
Certified Physician Expert nutrition is startra eaming Lee. One of
the main reasons that so many people are unhealthy and
overweight are three harmful foods three condum three, not one,
(03:22):
not two, but three harmful foods that are being passed
off as health foods all over the country. And I
got into this pretty heavy because I really wanted to
see if I talk about anything, I check it out first.
So I wanted to really get into this and see
what was going on. Because these foods can cause weight gain,
clog your digestion track, I'm telling you you could have
(03:43):
some problems there, deplete your energy, which is a big
thing these days, and wreck your skin. They're banned in
other countries. And I noticed something about my skin. I
checked off to aging, but my skin was kind of off.
You know, like if like Eric punches me, which he
(04:04):
does often, the skin would kind of react to that
in ways that I wouldn't expect, so I asked them
to stop hitting me. But I also focus on these
three harmful foods and looked at this video. But the
fact that they're still legal in the US, it's time
(04:25):
that someone really focused on what they are. No doctor
immediately does just that while explaining how the side effects
from these foods are wreaking havoc on us our health
millions of Americans. The great news is it's easy to
stop and reverse damage by learning which foods to avoid
and how to spot them. And since I've done that,
I've noticed the difference in my skin, and of course
(04:45):
I've lost weight and people know that, and I've got
more energy so to find out to find out these
three fake health foods. And I'm pausing there because you
think about this, and these are being pushed as health foods.
(05:08):
As healthy foods, you need to learn about this. Go
to three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen. That's three
harmful foods dot com slash hagmen, or just click on
the link in the description box below. And after years
of extensive study, doctor Lee put together this really great video.
It's a revealing videos totally free to the public, so
you never get doe by these foods again. So find
(05:30):
out all you need to regain control over your body
at three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen. Just click
on the description box below as well. And I want
to thank them for doing what they do so well,
partnering up with us and allowing us to be or
(05:52):
sponsoring this program three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen.
All Right, so it's just Eric and I and there's
a lot of things that we need to get into
that are important to you, to me, to the country,
and to the world at large. One of the first
(06:14):
things I want to start out with is this. It
was interesting because I had a guest on yesterday, and folks,
Terry Newishim is an awesome guy. If you haven't caught
yesterday's show, if you haven't spread it on social media,
if you haven't visited his website, and if you haven't
subscribed to his rumble channel, do so, please do so.
(06:35):
The guy is a fighter, he's a street fighter, he's
an amazing man, he's a cancer survivor. He's just an
amazing guy. And I'm glad to have gotten to known
him as well as I have. We need to take
the fight to the streets, and that's what he's doing.
This is a fight against that well good versus evil.
(06:57):
But I got taken to the woods. Should but at
least one comment or on our rumble channel. You didn't
cover the assassination on Monday or on Sunday that happened
to the assassination attempt on Sunday. You didn't cover that. I know,
I know, and it was it was deliberate because everyone
(07:19):
else was covering that specific topic. Here's what I want you.
There are so many different stories, you know, Okay, so,
and I'm glad you popped in here because isn't it interesting?
From like the moment it hits the wires or the
news too, I don't know a day or two later
(07:39):
how the news evolves, and it's difficult to really initially
to really make sense of what is taking place. I mean,
how many times that story change a lot? Right? I
mean it did that. Yeah. But here's what I don't
(08:01):
want to happen. I don't want the attempted assassination of
President Trump that took place on July thirteenth, twenty twenty four.
I don't want that to become memory. Hold. Now we
can talk about these attempts, and we have talked about
the attempt from July thirteenth, and you know, folks, we've
(08:22):
been tasked with investigating certain aspects of July thirteenth. And
I'm not going to give away any client information. I'm
not going to give away what we exactly what we've
been tasked with doing. But the fact is, shatter ops
save them. Hagman PI or Hagman Investcat Services Incorporated as
(08:44):
the lead in that investigation. We've been doing this. That's enough.
I mean, just understand, we've been working probably longer and
harder than any time in our history, specifically investigating initially
now beginning now forty seven day roughly forty eight days ago,
(09:06):
maybe closer to fifty days ago, since it was assigned
the Butler Pennsylvania assassination attempt. And because of the man power,
and this is important, Okay, I've been doing this thirty
seven years. Homage to Steve Quayle. Okay, I've been doing
(09:30):
what I've been doing for thirty seven years. Not as
a private investigator. I don't take domestic cases, never did.
Maybe I made a few exceptions. I think during my career,
but it's all been for Fortune one hundred, Fortune five
hundred companies, and it's all been for fraud or for
(09:50):
certain other insurance based investigations, including equivocal homicide investigations where
the man of death is in question. Was it a homicide,
suicide or accident? And that's that was that was a
big part of our uh of what we did cold
(10:15):
case homicides as well. I mean we're on record in
solving two cold case homicides finding evidence, not definitive proof
where the DA could could actually charge somebody, but certainly
identifying the person in a couple of cases who committed
(10:37):
the homicide. But the DA couldn't prosecute why because because
of the cold case nature, some of the a lot
of the evidence was destroyed or rendered useless for one
reason or another. Some of the witnesses have passed on.
You get the idea. But in total, those cases were solved,
(10:58):
doesn't mean they're they're off the books still open. It's
called cases, but we know who did them. I don't
want the events of July thirteenth, twenty twenty four to
be memory old. When news of the second assassination attempt
(11:19):
in sixty four days came over the wire on Sunday.
We all got together and we were discussing this in
the bigger format. Is there something else going on? Obviously
there is. We warned, I warned specifically, but we warned
collectively that the network, and there is a network out there.
(11:44):
I'm telling you right now, a network exists that outlives
Thomas Matthew Crooks, and we'll out or will continue performing
with the sidelining of the latest assass attempted assassin. The
(12:05):
people behind these attempts are not going to stop until
President Trump and all of the America First people are
dead or otherwise neutralized. We looked at a number of things.
We looked at and actually crafted a very extensive timeline
(12:27):
of Thomas Matthew Crooks back in July. I actually predated
the days. We actually predated the event by days, weeks, months,
and even more importantly, what happened afterwards. Now, think about that,
(12:48):
if the lone gunman assassin is dead, what are you
talking about afterwards? Well, without getting too much detail, you know,
there are ways you can track people who intersected with
the life of a person and then map out where
their presence might be. And you can read between the lines.
(13:13):
At any given time, people buy this information for marketing
purposes all the time exists out there, so you can
actually map out let's say, person A intersects with person
B on a routine basis, or even just coincidentally or
(13:34):
not coincidentally, but even just once or twice or three times. Well, okay,
what happens to if person as out of the picture.
What about B and C? Person's being C, what are
they doing right now? And who are they interacting with?
And you can see how you can build a case
from it. We've been connecting dots, and the dots are
(13:57):
creating a very troubling image of troubling relationships that appear
to exist at higher levels of government, higher levels of
different government agencies, the corporate media, and private entities. And
(14:17):
it's interesting because what we found, and I'm just going
to be flat out with you, the latter, the private entities,
some appear to have some Department of Defense military connections.
(14:38):
Now we found this out weeks prior, weeks prior to
this past Sunday. Let me say that again, the entities
that intersected during the days and weeks prior to July thirteenth,
(14:58):
twenty twenty four. The intersected with with Crooks have some
involvement with Department of Defense or businesses with military applications
within the Department of Defense. Were reported on that some
(15:18):
time ago. Sixty four days later, you have this moron,
this left wing nut job Ukrainian, Ukrainian face paint and
all that stuff, at times setting up an attempting to
(15:39):
kill the president again. We're attempting to shoot the president
again with the intent to kill him. Two attempts in
sixty four days. Now, as we openly concluded on this
program and privately to others, the attempts to end the
(16:00):
life of President Trump by assets of national and international
operatives will continue even beyond last Sunday. It's going to continue,
and it's going to continue well beyond the twenty twenty
four election. It's going to continue as long as the
movement of America First continues. The forces behind the attempts,
(16:26):
they must not only terminate President Donald Trump, but they
have to terminate the America First agenda. When we looked
at the Crooks timeline, there were inexplicable actions that existed
and are woven within the timeline of his life. This
(16:49):
pattern of life that can't be attributed to incompetence or
mistakes by the US Secret Service and other protective details,
other agencies, even within the Camp campaign itself. Listen to
what I'm saying to you, because words are important, right,
you know, when they're viewed in their totality, they can't
(17:11):
be explained away. But they do indicate both fore knowledge
of a potentially fatal event taking place in Butler on
the thirteenth day of July, and a continuing threat to
President Trump as a former president and most importantly as
a candidate for the current election. And these findings when
(17:35):
viewed through the lens of what happened on Sunday, they
become even more alarming. You've got to ask the question
with respect to the latest attempt. You've got to look
at a couple of things very seriously. The fact that
(17:57):
President Trump was going to go did go go on
this past Sunday. It was an OTR event. In other words,
it was the last minute OTR is off the record.
It was not on the record on the schedule for
that day. This was this was done really kind of
at the last moment. So at most maybe a dozen
(18:18):
people knew about his decision to play golf at that
location in West Palm Beach County or in Palm Beach
County last Sunday. Yet you have a guy, part time
guy living in North Carolina, living in Hawaii. You get
(18:42):
this guy that comes into this foreign area and lies
in wait for President Trump. How do you know he
was going to be there. We as an investigative firm,
and the investigators individually, as I said, we've we came
(19:05):
to this conclusion before this. But there is a problem
inside either the US Secret Service or within the close
circle of President Trump's people. They know that. They know that,
I guarantee you, they know that when you look at
(19:31):
the actions of the latest attempted assassin, what screams off
the page at you? Motive? Right, motive screams off the
page at you. A lot of times acts of violence,
crime that they don't have a motive this one does.
(19:59):
This is this guy and I was a rabid leftist,
is I shouldn't say it was? Is a rabid leftist,
a pro Ukrainian, pro war person who believed believes that
we should do everything to back Ukraine. In fact, this
(20:21):
Nimrod actually went over to Ukraine, was filmed over there
a couple of times and actually was in contact with
numerous media person's personalities both over in Europe as well
as here in America, and urging people to fight for Ukraine.
(20:42):
So the motive jumps off the page at you. The
motive is just his motive, screams. It was all about
Ukraine and the fact that President Trump would end the
war between Russia and Ukraine, which could have been accomplished
back last March, but the West, specifically the UK and
(21:05):
other countries in the West, said no, and under the
weak leadership of Potato, had Biden we folded as well,
that wouldn't happen with President Trump. What happens when the
Ukrainian war effort stops? What happens people stop getting rich
(21:28):
from weapons sales. Okay, so who's benefiting from weapons sales? Well,
it's the conglomerates, it's the military industrial complex, the usual
suspects there. But there's a lot of money that, as
I believe, Lindsey Graham said, you know the money or no,
(21:50):
I'm sorry, is not Schumer. Who's the other on the
other side, Turtle? What's his name? The senator? Oh, come on,
let's see, you know what I'm talking about the centory
or minority leader. The money doesn't stay over there, comes
(22:19):
back into the politician's pockets. That's really the bottom line.
So the motive here, once you take President Trump out
of the equation, they can get on with world War three.
Now I was talking with This was a number of
days ago, maybe seven, eight, nine, ten days ago. I
had a phone conversation I'm going to name drop here
(22:40):
with Jack Pisovic, and it was interesting the conversation we
had about a number of different things with respect to
Ukraine and some of the warmongers here in this country.
And then last Friday, again this is pre assassination attempt
now assassination ATTEP number two. He was talking about the
(23:00):
potential for World War three, as is everyone or should
be talking about that. The reason I bring that up
now is the fact that you cannot take out the
attempted assassinations plural, and you cannot separate them from what's
going on overseas the foreign policy of the US with
respect to Ukraine. You cannot. You cannot separate that. You
(23:22):
can't do it because there's big money involved here, big
money interests involved. My presentation that you'll see I believe
it's gonna be on the twenty seventh of September. Has
to do with October Surprise and my my with Paul Bagley,
(23:43):
pastor Paul Bagley October Surprise, make sure you sign up
for that. But from my position, the October Surprise that
we are about to expect is happening now, it has
been happening, and we'll continue to happen well beyond October.
We have to think bigger about current events. Remember the
(24:08):
people in charge, they want to kill us. They want
population control. They want to they want to create a
war for deep population. They want to create a war
so they can roll over the ashes. Getting back to
(24:35):
the assassination by Crux. As a matter of fact, the
anomalies there alone should give people pause. Now I've worked
I've worked this case far beyond I think any other
any other anything else but a homicide. I mean, I
worked this harder than any other case than I can. Remember,
(24:58):
that's the Butler case, and so do the members of
Shadow Ups and Save them and Eric Atteck and others.
But the anomalies associated with that particular event are plentiful.
(25:20):
And I'm not talking about Oh it wasn't crooks on
the roof or what it was, some Antifa individual. I'm
not going to name him, but you know I've gotten
I've gotten hate mail saying you're lying, it's this person
on the roof, You're a liar. I don't know what
to tell you. If if I can stand and look
(25:41):
at that very person that is being named as being
on the roof dead, and I can look in that
person's eyes and that person has life in his body, Uh, okay,
what do you say that talking to a corpse. I'm
(26:01):
talking about the anomalies now that are provable, that are verifiable,
that we can authenticate, and anymore, if you look at
a video, how can you be sure, for example, videos
has not been untouched or a photograph anymore these days,
you don't know what I mean. My goodness, I'm sure
(26:22):
somebody could have me saying something or doing something. Well,
you see it all the time on the internet where
the person's saying something he never said, she never said whatever.
It's all a deep fake. So that's why it's so
important not to rely on things like videos and pictures
(26:46):
on the internet. You've got to go the old shoe
leather approach. That's I grew up. I mean, I cut
my teeth on that. On that approach. You hit the ground,
you walk, you go to doors, you talk to people,
people that you know. You can't fake that. No, sure,
I'm sure with a mask or whatever, yeah you could.
(27:09):
But beyond that, don't rely on what you see on TV.
Don't rely on what you see on the internet, don't
rely on some of the social media postings. You can
go out. I mean, if that's what you're tasked to do,
charged to do, then you do it in that fashion. Yeah,
(27:31):
I got a couple of questions. I'm just gonna These
are well known, but I'm gonna toss these out because again,
I don't want people to forget about this. One of
the questions I had and I still have. It has
not been explained to me with any degree of at
least it might be with any with any kind of certainty.
(27:54):
CNN they go out to all kinds of rallies, their
rallies all the time. But what they do is that
on broadcasts them live, they'll be there and they'll show
cutaways during their normal programming. This time CNN broadcasts are
early live on network television. Now they do oftentimes broadcast
(28:16):
on their digital internet channels. But it's not it doesn't
make it to the network television station. This time it did.
And I'm a big believer. And when somebody does something
out of the ordinary like this, you got to pay
attention to that. Why out of all the out of
(28:37):
all the events, why this, Why why this one? Well
the rumor was, who's going to announce his VP candidate? Well,
if you really paid attention, and I would suspect that
if you're a network news broadcaster, you have known that
was not going to happen that day. But people believe
that keep on believing, which you one. But this is
(29:01):
contrary to their normal procedures, even during an election cycle. Again,
just to be clear, CNN other networks are usually president
at such events, but they have generally used cutaways rather
than live streaming the entire event. Not in this case.
(29:22):
Why ask yourself why, and ask yourself what was the
basis for that decision and who made that decision. There's
a New York Times photographer also present. I'm not going
to give his name. In New York Times, by the way,
is very Look, they've got a reputation for fraudulent photographs,
(29:44):
fraudulent stories, Jason Blair ring a bell. If not, you
can research it on your own. There's a photographer there
ostensibly representing New York Times at filming the events in
a sweet position. Those are the pictures, by the way,
(30:05):
you saw President Trump with the blood running down his face,
and extremely good pictures. But his camera was set at
one eight thousands frames per second or eight thousand frames
per second. I'm not sure exactly sure how to use
(30:30):
that in a proper phrase, but the setting was its
Generally speaking, it's a reserved for high action events like NASCAR,
you know, the cars going around around high speed action.
What can be more high speed than than the hypersonic
bullets or even even a bullet that's a slower bullet
(30:54):
hitting a man's a person's skull. Do you realize if
you think back to the Zappruder film that was sold
by a Zuppruter, ABRAHAMS. A Pruter, and back then in
sixty three, there weren't a whole lot of video cameras
(31:16):
filming that event. There's one that still never surface, but
I digress. But the monetary value that such footage would
have at that speed, at that clarity, at that just
using that setting alone would be extremely significant. And I
listened to Michael jan and actually I've talked to Michael Yon.
(31:40):
You may not know who he is. If you do, great,
He's a combat correspondent, not a war not just a
war court, but a combat correspondent. He's out there filming,
I mean, the real stuff and using the best cameras
and equipment possible. He's like eight thousand francs per Man.
(32:01):
He said, no, no, that no, And unless you're filming
you know the face of the sun or you're looking
to I mean, no, that's not that's not normal. But
but if there was an event that involved action, that
(32:23):
would really capture the action, and its raw format would
allow would allow extremely incredible detail. As gross as that sounds.
But the other thing he said really really brought broke,
(32:44):
brought me to attention, and that's the fact that you
realize the value of such footage. If you took that
that footage, and let's say that bullet did connect, you
realize that that would be worth tens of millions of dollars.
(33:04):
At the same time that that footage was also being
transmitted directly to there, that photographer's home base, so that
that camera wasn't just a camera, it was a transmitting
device that was transmitting that footage in real time. Why
(33:27):
am I saying all this. I'm saying this because I
don't want those issues to be memory hold. I don't
want the issues of the abnormal procedures that took place
on the thirteenth of July by Beaver, by Butler, uh
(33:49):
and again not everyone, but some individuals by the US
Secret Service by HSI. I don't want people to forget
about this. And more importantly, I want people to take
that template and compare it to last Sunday. So to
(34:09):
the individual at least one who said, well, you n'tcover
any of the attempted assassination of President Trump yesterday, that's it.
I'm done watching you. Did you drop something asking her
to text? Okay? I just heard this. Is that you? Okay?
(34:33):
Hey lady, this student Doug you okay, Yeah, she's okay,
all right? Sorry about that offscreen drama apparently, don't. I
don't want to just touch the surface and not dig
into the real stuff that matters. And more videos being
(34:54):
found about that particular instance, just understand this. We have
to look at this, and we are looking at this
as not well, we are looking at them as individual,
standalone incidents, but we're looking at them as a whole,
(35:18):
as part of a whole. You've got two different events
sixty four days between July thirteenth and September fifteenth. You
look at them individually, but you also look at them
as a whole. What do they have in common? And
I said all of that to say this as well,
(35:45):
this is going They're going to continue to attempt to
kill President Trump. They've got no other choice. Well, they
have one other choice. And that's where that conversation I
mentioned earlier with Jacksby comes in. But the motive of
Thomas Mathew Christ who kill President Trump, seemingly appears to
elude officials. Oh we can't figure out why this kid
(36:06):
did it, Why this kid went up on the roof
to do it. Even the Bipartisan Congressional Task Force is
clueless to date. Now I'm gonna share something with you
the Bipartisan Congressional Task Force. I was in contact with
(36:29):
a member, a staffer of that Bipartisan Task Force. I'm
not going to give any names, wanted my information and said, look,
you know, come on, come on, give us the information
to help us out and I said, I'll do so
under with a number of conditions. With a few conditions.
(36:51):
I mean, I'm not a jerk. I'm just saying, look,
if you allow me as part of the team to
work towards the truth, but also give me the authority.
I've got the credentials, give me the authority perhaps subpoena
authority or some level of authority to work with you
(37:11):
that For example, if I say, look, I need these
records over here, that they can say no to me,
whoever I might be asking for, whatever records I might
be asking for, But then I've got power of a
subpoena or I've got power of a congressional law enforcement
status behind me. Now I can't do that. Can't do
(37:38):
that then? Really, so what if they say no, you
draft a strongly worded letter to them. Is that where
we're at with this? Well, you know that's really that's
all we can do at this point. Now, then that's
not acceptable to me. The congressional investigations that are being
(38:04):
conducted to date appear to be subservient to restrictions imposed
by the federal law enforcement agencies, including and especially the FBI,
who is taking control over these investigations. And you're trusting
the FBI, the same agency that attempted to frame President
Trump over Russia Gates. Are you kidding me? What is
(38:27):
wrong with you? And DHS, which oversees the Secret Service,
who has disallowed providing additional assets to President Trump? You wait,
you're subservient to their wishes and you say, come on,
but come on, but you can only work within this
(38:49):
small parameter. No, I don't think so. Thank you, but no,
thank you, because what I find will go directly the people,
as opposed to being filtered through some supposedly bipartisan task
force that may or may not have the truth in mind.
(39:12):
I look at what happened again. I'm not trying to
disparage anybody, but I do know a podcaster and Corey
Millsen and the other gentleman went to Butler, and of
course they were given the tour. Don't give me a tour,
let me lose, let me go where I want to go.
Don't give me a tour. Oh you can't. You can't
(39:32):
go over there because they're they're working, they're taking the
top of a AC unit off. You can't go over there. No,
I want to go over there. I won't get in
the way, but promise, I promise, but I want to
see what you're doing, and I want to know why
you're doing what you're doing. Well with that kind of
(39:56):
in my view, without that kind of intensity, we're not
going to solve any of this. In fact, I doubt
whether it's the intent to solve any of this. The
the other thing I want to say is when you
subject yourselves to the oversight of the FBI, DHS, the
(40:17):
US Secret Service, in your Congressional task force, you or
nothing but a mail cuckold to these agencies, the historical
president precedent that we've seen, the historical precedent of assets
within those agencies specifically engaged in complicit activity actions with
(40:40):
the actors involved in actual events. For example, what I'm
referring to in this case is think of the Whitmer
kidnapping plot. Whitmer kidnapping plot, What the hell was that?
That was a Keystone Cops set up from day one,
and the FBI was directly neck deep in in it.
(41:01):
Oh it Believe me, the FBI does not care for
what I'm saying. Ask me how I know, Don't ask
me how I know. So you have the Wittner kidnapping plot.
You have January sixth, the quote fed surrection, which I
(41:21):
agree with that title at the Capitol, Christopher Ray denying it, Well,
I don't know how many assets. We didn't have any
agents there. No, No, you have to ask the question properly,
how many assets, whether they were CIS or operational or
informational assets on the ground, did you have at the Capitol.
He wouldn't answer that question. I'll get back to you
on that. Hey, has anything happened despite all the bluster, No,
(41:48):
nothing has happened. This is what I'm telling you in
my view right now, this is my personal opinion. Prove
me wrong. Please, I want somebody from the Bipartisan Congressional
Task Force on the assassination attempt to Butler. I want
them to prove me wrong, prove me wrong that you
guys don't want the truth. Prove me wrong. And how
(42:12):
you can do that is you want our findings. I'm
more than happy to share them with you, but I'll
tell you what I'm just will work. But I want
to make sure that they're not put in the hole
somewhere covered over, you know, burnt ash put in a
hole covered over dug back up, reburnt put down. Now.
(42:33):
I want to make sure that the people you know
about the findings in closing the extensive investigation and research
we conducted by the Hangman Group, the pattern of a
larger plot involving elements within the federal government, including those
(42:55):
tasked with conducting oversight investigat the evidence of a bigger
plot is emerging. You know, once unthinkable. It appears that
the conflicts within these agencies and even those in positions
of oversight, are so great that the truth must be
(43:15):
kept from the public by the very individuals institutions charged
with exposing the truth. Look if if you're if you're
on the if you're taken, if you're taking kickbacks from
Ukraine and you have a pro pro Ukraine war suspect,
you know, ah, man, it doesn't look too good, right,
(43:38):
think of it in that fashion of the latest attempt.
But until until we expose those people that are involved
in this, and until not not just exposing, but prosecuting
(43:59):
by an independent body that has law enforcement authority given
to them, truly independent, this will keep happening. Attempts will
continue to be made until that is accomplished and the
(44:22):
operational networks existing within the framework of our government, the
corporate media and private entities working against American public interests.
The crimes we are seeing taking place overtly and with
greater frequency, as we have seen just within the last
couple of days, will continue. It does not give me,
(44:51):
It does not give me any kind of joy to
say that we've got a problem, but we have a
big problem. I would give up this platform tomorrow today,
right now, if we were able to, or if somebody
would take the mantle of leadership and really create a
(45:14):
very decisively independent and transparent investigation into all of this.
But it's not going to happen. It's not gonna happen.
It can't happen because you have too many people who
are involved in the money, in the power and being
(45:37):
being blackmailed by compromising issues. You have too many people. Sadly,
it's not gonna work. I hope that made sense to you.
I want to jump to this article next. This is
from JD. Vance and I know Glenn Beck. I think
(45:58):
today I had to be today on Glenbeck's on his program.
Refer to this particular article. This is at The Blaze,
The Blaze Media. JD. Evans another Trump assassination plot. Question mark.
The media's double standard strikes again. I want to put
(46:19):
a lot of blame on the media. I'm want to
put a lot of blame on what is taking place.
To say on the media, folks, please go to the
Blaze and bookmark this or or read print this out.
This is just a fantastic expose about where we're at today.
(46:45):
I'm going to read parts of it for the radio listeners.
This is at the Blaze again, the Blaze dot com,
and it's a call them by Jdevans. In the bold
print above the text, it says, how do you think
(47:06):
the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a
nineteen time Republican donor try to kill the Democratic Party's
candidate for president? The question answers itself, writes, vance Donald J.
Trump nearly lost his life again on Sunday. And now
this I'm opining here. Let me just introject something. This
(47:29):
has been so downplayed by the media. Oh, no shots
were fired by the by the intended to sell it,
by the attempt that er by the assassin would be assassed.
No shots were fired. This was this was described as
an incident. This was downplayed like January July thirteenth was
downplayed and continues to be downplayed by the media, by
(47:50):
the leftist scumbags. But let me read this because this
does incorporate another aspect of things, and that censorship, because
you know, we're being told to calm the rhetoric, calm
the violent rhetoric. Okay, really, it's us, right, because we
(48:12):
are the ones responsible. Now again, this is me, not
the article. We're the ones responsible for the bomb threats
in Springfield, Ohio. Had Donald Trump not talked about Springfield, Ohio,
there wouldn't be so many bomb threats. Well, when you
look at the bomb thrusts, turns out most of them
came from overseas and they were all hoaxes. But again
I digress. But Donald Trump nearly lost his life again
(48:34):
there on Sunday again. An armed gunman waited for him
in the bushes. He brought a GoPro camera to record it.
A Secret Service agent spotted the barrel of a gun
through the fence and fired at the gunman. The gunman fled,
he was caught, and now we slowly learn about him
and his motive. See this would not have been available
(48:56):
minutes after that assassination attempt. Okay, so President Trump is
my running mate again. This is by Vance and my friend,
but more importantly his a father and a grandfather to
people who love him very much. Folks, I want you
to think about the human element to this. I don't
care if you're right, left, black, blue, orange, gray. I
(49:20):
don't care what color you are right, I don't care
what creed you are. I just I don't if you
are a human being listening to the sound of my voice.
Think about this, Think about the humanity part of this.
Think about the people who love him, his grandkids, his kids,
and believe me, I know his children love him a lot.
(49:44):
I want him to have many more years with his family,
writes JD. Vance, and selfishly, I like many more of
my own or with my own. I admire President Trump
for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out
of control. It nearly got Representative Steve Skull and other
members of the House Republican Caucus killed on the Northern
Virginia baseball field a few years ago. Do you remember that, folks,
(50:09):
That was by a leftist with a gun shooting at
the right Republican baseball players. It nearly got Donald Trump
killed twice. But I want to say something about Sunday's News,
about how it illuminates the difference between a vigorous debate
and violent rhetoric. And this is really what's key here.
(50:30):
Here's what we know so far. I don't even want
to say her first name. Mattress back Harris. Communist Harris
has said that democracy is on the line in her
race against President Trump. The gunman agreed and used the
exact same phrase. He had a Biden Harris bumper sticker
on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's fight for
(50:52):
democracy and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia Ukraine War.
His name is Ryan Routh, and he donated nineteen times
the Democratic Party causes with and zero to Republican ones.
How do you think that how do you think the
Democrats and their media allies would respond if a naighteen
time Republican donor tried to kill the Democratic Parties candidate
(51:14):
for president? The question answers itself. For years, Harris's campaign
surrogates have said things like Trump has to be eliminated,
and how have their media allies responded to the second
assassination attempt against President Trump? In as many months. NBC
News they called the attempt at assassination a golf club incident.
(51:41):
The Los Angeles Times told us Trump targeted a golf club.
USA Today's top of the fold headline on Monday was
hope in America. What a garbage newspaper and the paper
publisher preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump brings
these assassination attempts on himself. How dare you? Have you
(52:05):
ever been shot at? Have you ever have you ever
been the target of a bullet? I think not. CNN's
Dana Bash, who bizarrely accused me of inciting the bomb threat.
This is Van's now writing said money that Harris campaign
rhetoric didn't motivate Ralph, even though he echoed that rhetoric explicitly.
(52:31):
The weekend new show on PBS perfectly illustrated the double
center of Harris and her media friends. After spending thirty
seconds on the second attempt on President Trump's life, the
show then focused on the real danger Trump and me.
According to the talking heads of PBS, we are personally
responsible for the bomb threats against residents of Springfield, Ohio.
Never mind that repeatedly condemned those threats. And subsequent reports
(52:55):
suggests that they came from a foreign country, not some
deranged Trump fan is the media suggested the double standard
is breathtaking and Donald Trump and I are, by their accounts,
directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why because
we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us
about their problems, about the problems in their town. Meanwhile,
(53:17):
Harris Allies called for Trump to be eliminated, as the
media publishers arguments that he deserved to be shot. That
seems like a double standard. At a deeper level, it
is entirely consistent. Considera Springfield. Citizens are telling us their problems.
Those include the undeniable truth of more car accidents, unaffordable housing,
(53:41):
eviction of residents, overcrowded hospitals, over stressed schools, arising rates
of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories, which
again many multiple people have spoken about, either either on
video or to me and my staff. Harris's strategy is
to ignore these people and their concerns. And I'm gonna
(54:04):
add something here. The media's strategy is to say, oh,
you're you're a bunch of conspiracy theorists like Channel fives,
Phil Williams, who called this platform a far right wing
conspiracy theorist podcast. I'll move on here. No matter how
(54:34):
much you hate these people, you cannot possibly hate them enough.
I'm gonna I'm gonna close with this paragraph on this
because I want to get this one one more thing here.
(54:59):
Towards the end of the article, rights Advance, this is
the difference between debate, even aggressive debate, and censorship. Well
right before that, the the the message is always the same.
Don't you dare express an opinion about the public affairs
of your nation? Just shut up. That That's that's Vance's
(55:19):
assessment of the left and of the media, the leftist stenographers. Again,
don't don't express an opinion about the public affairs of
your your own nation, your nation. Just shut up. This
is a difference, writes Vance, between debate and even aggressive debate,
and censorship. It's one thing to attack Harris for destroying
the country, and quite another to say that Donald Trump
(55:40):
should be eliminated. Yes, yes, that that nimrod of a
In Congress, Dan Goldman calls for his elimination. It's one
thing to criticize overheat rhetoric and another to say that
foreign president has invited an assassination on himself. It's one
thing to say that Trump's arguments about the election of
(56:02):
twenty twenty or wrong. It's another thing to attempt to
remove him from the ballot over it. It's one thing
to argue that pets are not in fact being eaten.
It's another thing to say that anyone who disagrees and
is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous descent, is
a great tradition of the US. Censorship is not for
(56:28):
the next seven weeks of this campaign. JD. Vans writes,
I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind.
I believe you have every right to criticize me and
Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue
things about us. But when I ask you to tone
down the rhetoric, it isn't about being nice. Americans have
(56:49):
every right to be mean, even if I don't like it,
or empty platitudes. Instead, I'm asking all of us to
reject censorship, reject the idea that you cannot control what
other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow
citizen citizens over silencing them, either through the powers of
(57:09):
big tech or through the media or through media, I'm sorry,
through moral blackmail. I think this will make our public
to debate much better. But there's something else. When you
reject censorship, you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you
will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. The reason is simple.
(57:30):
The logical censorship leads directly to one place. For there's
only one way to assure, or to one way, to
one sure way to silence a human being, permanently put
a bullet in his head shade events. I'll put the
link at hagmen pi dot com. I asked that you
please subscribe to this show, this program, and please subscribe
(57:57):
to this I'm sorry, what's that? Two minutes in, he's
giving me cues. Stop the hammering. I asked you please
subscribe to our show. We have many more things to
bring out. I'm going to tell you right now, a
lot of things to bring out. Tomorrow, I'm gonna be talking.
I believe with Dave Hodges, we have apparently had a
scheduling snaff who today with san Dieo, so that's why
(58:20):
he was not on tomorrow. I believe we are almost
with Dave Hoges is coming on and we're gonna be
talking about a number of different things, including especially the
threat that I didn't get to. The World War three threat.
Jack Pisobacas was all over that last Friday with Alex
Jones on Info Wars. I would urge you to I
(58:40):
was gonna play a couple of excerpts, so we didn't
get the chance because I was long winded, but I
asked you to please please tune into that broadcast. The
link will be at Hagman PI dot com. It's the
broadcast from September thirteenth where he talks about US poking
the bear, the Russian bear, and the fact that hey,
(59:02):
you know we could watch World War three. Buy these
people and folks again. You cannot extract the agenda of
the war bongers, of these people who want to create
war from the attempts against Donald Trump. You cannot. There
cannot be an extraction. All of this is, all of
(59:22):
this is linked together because the very same people who
want war in Ukraine, who want world war, who want
to eliminate millions billions actually of people, are the very
same people who are organizing attempts against President Trump, and
they're going to continue. They will continue. Thanks for your
Bleef for trust in this leader. Comment at rumble bride
(59:44):
on tell me we should think. God bless you, Thank
you for your support. Without your support, we wouldn't be here.
We're barely here now. God bless you.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!