The assassination attempts are are connected and are related to the military-industrial complex revenue from Ukraine. Neither would-be assassin acted alone. For more information, please tune in to WCN-TV tonight for a live interview & Q & A where YOU can ask questions! Join the live studio audience here: https://wcntv.net/
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to our channels on Rumble & Brighteon, and give us a “Like,” and PLEASE share this episode and this channel on your social media feed, and THANK YOU for your support!----------------------SPECIAL: GET PREPARED NOW - THE WELLNESS COMPANYUse the above link (our affiliate link)----------------------For complete information, please visit, bookmark, and share The Hagmann Report at our website: https://www.HagmannPI.com
INFO/TIPS: (Anonymity guaranteed):doug@hagmannreport.com | rt@hagmannpi.com
ON THE GO? SUBSCRIBE TO HAGMANN’S PODCAST:
iTunes:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hagmann-report/id631558915?uo=4Spotify: BANNED!iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-hagmann-report-30926499/Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/show/hagmann-report
FOLLOW HAGMANN AT:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/HagmannReportGab: https://gab.com/DougHagmannGettr: https://gettr.com/user/doughagmannTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@DougHagmann
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to our channels on Rumble & Brighteon, and give us a “Like,” and PLEASE share this episode and this channel on your social media feed, and THANK YOU for your support!----------------------SPECIAL: GET PREPARED NOW - THE WELLNESS COMPANYUse the above link (our affiliate link)----------------------For complete information, please visit, bookmark, and share The Hagmann Report at our website: https://www.HagmannPI.com
INFO/TIPS: (Anonymity guaranteed):doug@hagmannreport.com | rt@hagmannpi.com
ON THE GO? SUBSCRIBE TO HAGMANN’S PODCAST:
iTunes:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hagmann-report/id631558915?uo=4Spotify: BANNED!iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-hagmann-report-30926499/Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/show/hagmann-report
FOLLOW HAGMANN AT:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/HagmannReportGab: https://gab.com/DougHagmannGettr: https://gettr.com/user/doughagmannTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@DougHagmann
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Coming to you from the Hagman Report dot Com studio
located in the Keystone States, birthplace of a mighty nation.
Gets your host, Doug Hagman. This is a Hagmann Report for today.
(00:24):
It's Tuesday, September twenty fourth, twenty twenty four. I want
to welcome everyone to the program today. We had an Originally,
originally we had the program scheduled with well, you know what.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I'm not going to.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Say who it is because we have rescheduled that for
next Tuesday. But it has to do with the JFK
assassination and the individual who fired from the Grassy Knoll.
That's all I'm going to say. But it was a fascinating,
a fascinating account, first person account, well first person through
(01:00):
someone very close to him talking about what happened on
that day in Dallas. So that's coming up next Tuesday.
A couple of things. Nonetheless, we've got a great program
lineup for you. I'm looking forward to that. But today,
great program line up for you. I'm gonna be talking
about the un what just happened and Americans are oblivious
(01:23):
to this except for some people who are paying attention
like you. And something about the FCCY what they have done,
some anomalies with respect to the investigations into the assassination
attempts of Donald Trump. Very important because this exposes certain
(01:47):
aspects of the deep state and what the real motivation
is here and the real intent, and laying out the
very fragile groundwork or the fragility of the time really
anytime between now and election day and thereafter, because this
(02:09):
is not going to stop. I'm actually going to be
citing from confidential documents that when I say confidential documents,
documents that we created that are confidential to the source.
But I want you folks to know exactly what's going on,
(02:31):
because if you don't, you're not going to understand the
bigger picture here. And the bigger picture is important, and
so we've got that going on. I also want to
remind people tonight at six pm Eastern time, folks will
be appearing on Wisconsin Christian News talking about that subject,
(02:53):
about the assassinations, our investigation into it, and it's been
very very extensive, very extensive. Others have our document some
of our documentation, and well, I'll just leave it right there.
You've heard some of this by bigger names than me.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Believe me.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
But the origin has come from just a fine team
of investigators, including people from Shadow Ups and save Them
of course here at Hagman PI. And that does include
the pink panther of them all, Eric, the tech pink panther.
(03:39):
What do you think I'm telling.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
You, the insulation guy.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
The insallation guy that has different meanings and all of
them apply.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Before we get to that, I just want to thank
you for supporting this platform. Without you, without your support,
we would be nowhere. And look, I've got to I've
got to say, supporters getting very tight, you know. I
I really, in my heart of hearts wonder if we
are going to be here in six months.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
I do that Now.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
There are gonna be some changes we're announce very very good,
exciting changes. But that's our last hurrah. I'm going to
tell you right now, that's our last hurrah. I'm sorry
going to Steve Quayle about this, and we're both on
kind of on the same page. You're on this, but
I'm not going to speak for him, but I'm just
saying that, Hey, you know what, you know, if people
(04:38):
want the news, if people want information that they cannot
get elsewhere, and they're not going to get elsewhere. Trust me,
because we do make the we make. We go out
and find the truth and deliver it. But if we
we can't do that without your help. And I'm going
to thank from the botto of my heart every single
(04:58):
person who is anything, I mean, even a kind note.
I read all of the mail. I can't answer all
of them. I read all of the mail. I read
your notes I write, and I thank you from thebom
my heart for those to those who do support us,
and we really appreciate that. And speaking about people who
support us, you know we do have a litany of
(05:20):
people corporate sponsors as well, including you know that this
is one thing that can help all of us. And
let me just get right into it. Three harmful foods
dot com slash hagmen. Three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen.
You know, we live in the again, the most advanced
era in human history, and there have really never before
(05:45):
been more medical breakthroughs than there are right now. So
why are millions of Americans more in healthy and overweight
than they've ever been? Ask yourself that question. Well, according
to the US Sports Certified Physician Expert Nutritionist, doctor Amy Lee.
One of the main reasons is three harmful foods that
are being passed off as health foods all over the country.
And wait until you hear this, because these foods can
(06:06):
cause weight gain, clog your diestive track, deplete your energy,
and wreck your skin. They're banned in other countries, yet shockingly,
they're still legal here in the US, and it's times
someone shine the light on what they are.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Well.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Doctor Amy Lee does just that while explaining how the
side effects from these foods are wreaking havoc on the
health of millions of Americans. And the great news is this,
it's easy to stop and reverse this damage by simply
learning wish foods so avoid and how to spot them.
And by doing so you can experience these or weight loss,
smooth digestion, vibrant energy. To find out these three fake
(06:42):
health foods, go to three Harmful Foods dot com slash hagmen.
Remember two ends on hagmen. That's three harmful foods dot
com slash hagmen, or just click on the link in
the description box below, And after years of extensive study,
doctor Lee had put together a very, very rev feeling
video totally free to you. The public so that you
(07:03):
never could do by these foods again. So find out
all you need to know by it and regain control
over your body. At three, that's the number three harmful
foods dot com slash hagmen or as I said, just
click on a link in the description box below. Please
do that. You're you're gonna be better off for it.
I'm telling you. It's it's really it's really something too.
(07:25):
You know, when you when you take a look at
what's going on with the well, with the FDA and
all of this stuff. Uh, you're you're gonna you're gonna
find out what's good for you and what isn't, not
through the lens of the f d A or of
these pseudo scientists, but really from the people who know
what's going on. All right, So let me let me
(07:49):
tackle the big subject first. And this is while everyone
was distracted by various other things, folks, that you and
just adopted this packed for the few, which lays the
foundation for this new globalist order. Now this is important
for people to understand because you and I we don't
(08:11):
have any say in this. This is via the Economic
Collapse blog, but it's posted on America First Report as well, well,
it does read that. Well, everyone was distracted. The global
elite got exactly what they wanted.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Just two days ago, just two days from right now,
the UN adopted the Pact for the Future, and the
mainstream media in the Western world almost entirely ignored what's
been happening. If you look at that, if you look
right there, you've got to read this article. The headlines
(08:55):
urged us to keep focusing on Harris and Trump and
all of the shiny trinkets that are all around us.
But the vast majority of the population they've never heard
about this. We had mentioned this earlier in earlier shows
that this was happening, and it's happened. The Packed for
(09:18):
the Future you can certainly in the at HAGMANPI dot com.
When you click on the link for today's show, the headline,
the title for todays show. Click on that and that'll
open up a box and I'll have all of the links.
This will be in that list of links. Now, the
(09:39):
text for this Packed for the Future, you've got to
read it. It's available online multiple locations. There is an
embedded link in this article for that, but hardly anyone
will ever read it. I'm telling you right now, because
it really it's it's almost boring, but it's telling. But
many of the most some important provisions are buried toward
(10:01):
the end of this fifty six page document. I went
through this document. I'm going to spare you in this
segment here of going through that. But everyone should take
the time to actually read this document because our leaders
just committed us to an extremely insidious globalist agenda that
(10:27):
literally covers just about every conceivable area of human activity
that's right without our consent. And I'll just say this,
and you can keep that up. We have to fight back.
We will fight back. I guarantee you this is going
to bring that fight to your door and to my door.
(10:47):
And I'm going to tell you right now this, among
other things, this is the last gasp of this globalist
takeover of our entire planet, of our lives. And this
is really by reading this fifty six page document that
(11:07):
what I got from it was America is in the
crosshairs of the U N and to take us down.
And we've been sold out too by many people, by
just about everybody in Congress as well as this faux
White House, who in the hell's running our country. We don't.
(11:28):
We don't really know. We know it's not potato head.
We know it's not mattress. Back, kamala, that's right, kamala.
Speaker 2 (11:38):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Those on the on the left watching this, I can
hear their heads pop. But you know that's fine. Once
the Pact for the Future was formally adopted. In fact,
you can show this. This was formerly posted on the
un official UN website.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
And this is about oh, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Halfway down this article, it's an embedded or indented quote.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Here.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
World leaders adopted a Pact for the Future that includes
a Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations.
There it is right there on your screen. Thank you,
Eric Deck. This Pact is the culmination of an inclusive,
(12:27):
years long process to adopt international cooperation to the realities
of today and the challenges of tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Thank god we.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Have been unburdened by the way of what has been, okay,
the most wide ranging international agreement in many years, covering
entirely new areas as well as issues on which agreement
has not been possible in decades. The Pact aims, above all,
to ensure that international institutions can deliver in the face
(12:59):
of a world that has changed dramatically since they were created.
As the Secretary General has said, we cannot create a
future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by
our grandparents. Well, you want to bet our grandparents had
more moral fiber, backbone and strength and courage and morality
(13:22):
and spirituality than anyone today, I would say, with a
few exceptions, writes economic class We look. Look, I don't
want to live in a new global order that includes
all people in all nations. Another page I should add
(13:43):
on the official UN website tells us that UN two
point zero is all about creating a modern UN family.
No efing, thank you. Halfway through the twenty thirty agenda,
the world is not on track to achieve a sustainable
development goals. Well that's good to me. It's not too
late to change course if we will rethink, refocus and recharge.
(14:06):
UN two point zero encapsulates the Secretary General's version or
vision of a modern UN family rejuvenated by a forward
thinking culture and empowered by cutting edge skills for the
twenty first century to two turbo charge our support to
people and planet. All right, yeah, you can read between
(14:30):
the lines there and look, you know where this is going.
We strive toward this vision with powerful fusion of innovation, data,
data comma, digital comma foresight, and behavioral science, the skills
and culture, a dynamic combination we call the quint Tent
of change.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
Don't you just love the way they phrase this.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
It's about evolution towards more agile, diverse, response, responsive and
impactful un organization. It sounds cozy, doesn't it.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah? Who wouldn't want to be part of that family? Right?
Am I? Right? Okay?
Speaker 1 (15:08):
So as it goes down, and this is an important
article because it kind of explains the gist of what's
happening here. Sustainable development goals, that's the big deal, Sustainable
development goals. Pretty soon, your gas stove, as in the side,
is going to come with a warning label similar to
(15:30):
that on the pack side of the Seria packs. I'm
telling you that's what's going to happen. Campfires, No, don't
even think about it. Fireplaces gone, gas cars gone. Your
way of life will be changed forever by this document,
by this agreement. And you and I had no say
(15:50):
in this, Well, yeah we do. Because when they come
for your stove, when they come for your car, when
they come for your guns, when they come for whatever. Okay,
we I guarantee we must fight. We must fight against this,
and I don't care what that would I don't care
what that fight looks like. But there will be a fight.
Maybe maybe we waited too long. Didn't we wait too long?
(16:15):
We could have avoided a fight had we stepped in earlier,
had people been paying attention about this, stepped in earlier.
But no, And this goes through the various issues. This
article goes through the various issues. All right, but just
think the Green Agenda meeting, the DEI Agenda and policy,
(16:42):
along with ESG everything progressive and globalist is really this.
This represents the next time that there is a major
global crisis, if there is one, whether it be war, pandemic, scandemic,
whatever it might be. Do you want the un running things, Well,
(17:04):
you're going to have it in telling you exactly you
what to do. That's what's going to happen through this agreement. Now,
the Economic Collapse Blog has written extensively about the pack
for the future. Michael Snyder has done so. He's got
(17:25):
a book out on Amazon. You can you can find
that as well. But don't do please, do not think
for a moment they're not going to play this card
today and in the future and take our rights away
from us in this fashion when we the people never
agreed to that. So, folks, I wanted to do alert
(17:48):
you to this because this is something virtually no one
is talking about, with a few exceptions, it is, in
fact something that we really need to pay attention to.
All right now, a couple of things with respect to
what's really happening today. I want to go to video five.
This is cut five in our show notes kind of
(18:09):
work around this. The major issue of today's show, and
the major issue of today's show is we have right
now an operative series of people entities, both sanctioned by
and associated with the Department of Defense, the Military industrial Complex,
(18:37):
the deep state apparatus that is out to kill President
Trump and to kill us and to change forever our
way of life. The globalists and deep state globalist they know,
they absolutely know they cannot win without cheating or without
(19:01):
engaging in some other method of removing the America First agenda.
Now who heads that up, of course, Donald Trump. But
there are elements to all of this, components to all
of this, because the intent here is to just like
(19:23):
it was in twenty twenty with that fraud election that
took place. Okay, they are attempting to do the same
thing again, but knowing that they cannot necessarily rip the
results of the election from the hands of President Trump,
(19:43):
who stands for the America First policy, who stands to say,
look this you impact, that's a bunch of bs with
the admitted with the regime, not with the regime that
we have today. They don't forget they planned on implementing
this back in twenty sixteen until such time as Donald
(20:03):
Trump won that election. Well they got smart in the
four years hints, and they were able to make sure
that didn't happen in twenty twenty. And look what we have.
We have this se now dementia, cognitively impaired, pedo sniff
hair sniffing, piece of crap, piece of garbage, and is
(20:26):
equally piece of garbage. Wife in the White House selling
the White House up along with this mattress back knee pads. Harris,
who hasn't who cannot articulate one policy note with respect
to what she will do. It's just absolutely mind just
(20:51):
mind blowing when you look at people who believe in
the lie of Harris in the lie of of of Biden,
in the lie of those people who are stenographers for
the deep state, for these puppets of industry, puppets of corporations,
(21:15):
puppets of this deep state. One of the things that
were that they are trying to convince us and one
of the talking points, and this again, this goes to
the main thrust of today's show, is that crime is down. Hey,
you know you hear this all over the place. Crime
is down. We talked about this before and I want
(21:38):
to slip this in here. It almost seems like a
non secutor, but it has everything to do with what's
taking place today. This has cut five in the show
notes where crime is not down. Well, if you look
at some of the statistics, and you can use this
with your with your boss, or with your coworkers, or
(22:01):
with your family. But the stats they're showing crime is down.
But why is that. Well, We've looked in this and
Julie Kelly has talked about this, and I've actually seen
this because I'm tapped into obviously because of our licensure. Licensure,
we have access to various databases, and these databases show
(22:25):
all sorts of things, whether it's violent, crime or regardless
of what it is, we have access to this information.
And it was a couple of years ago that we
noticed that certain things were missing from what once was there. Okay,
so I think about this, and I was talking with
(22:49):
another investigator about this, Susan Daniels. As a matter of fact,
we were talking about different things with our databases.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
She's license, she has.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Her own, and I've got my own, and some overlap
and some are independent of one another. But to that database,
to the very database, many things were extracted and have
been cut out of the information. This cut explains exactly
(23:21):
this this concept. So when you hear, for example, well
murders are down by fifteen percent, I'm just throwing that
number out there as an example. That's not true. And
you might say, well what, but look there's the stats.
Well listen and watch this and understand why it's not true.
(23:44):
Here it is cut five.
Speaker 3 (23:47):
The vast majority of police departments have not been, or
the majority haven't been reporting complete data to the FBI
in twenty twenty two. Well change the reporting system. In
twenty twenty one, and in twenty twenty two, for example,
thirty one percent of police departments didn't report any crime
(24:09):
data to the FBI. Another twenty four percent only partially
reported crime data to the FBI. And so you know,
we don't have.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
Let me just excuate, I mean not even complete, it's
not even near complete. If a third of the police
departments don't give you any numbers, any information, any reports
on crimes, whether there's small, medium, or large departments, how
do you amaze anything on that.
Speaker 3 (24:36):
Well, they try to guess what the missing data is.
But in twenty twenty two, for example, you had three
of the five largest cities in the country, their police
departments weren't reporting data. You'd had the New York, Los Angeles,
and Phoenix police departments were no longer reporting crime data
to the FBI. In twenty twenty three, Los Angeles and
(24:59):
New York, well still not reporting crime data to the FBI.
And so they don't put down zeros in there. They
try to guess what they think the missing numbers are
for all these different cities and police departments that they're missing.
But there are issues about how good of a job
that they're doing with that.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Yeah, so they're just guessing. Spin the wheel.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Think about this, You've got really roughly well, as he said,
thirty one percent of the police departments are not reporting
any crime status to the FBI. That was back in
twenty twenty one. The same thing really in twenty twenty three,
with twenty one roughly twenty one percent reporting parcel statistics,
(25:45):
some tossing in arbitrary numbers because those numbers represent also
funding to those various locations. Without getting too far into
the weeds here, it would be good to show, for example,
New York's crimes down and their policies are working, so
(26:06):
they receive additional federal funds supposedly earmarked for that continuation
of that plan, when in fact that number or that
money is diverted elsewhere. But the thing we noticed is
roughly half about half of the police departments, including some
of the largest departments the jurisdictions across the US, are
(26:28):
not reporting numbers, or the numbers that they're reporting are
so absolutely, so much lower than they actually are. It
creates this skewed number. Why do I mention this right
now because those people who erroneously believe that crime is down.
(26:50):
One of the communist goals, by the way of the
deep State, of these people that are engaged in this,
one of the goals is to hide the true crime
figures from the public, to give them, obviously a false
sense of security, saying also saying that our policies are working.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Now.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Part of that which this did not get into is
something called migrant crime. I realized that the word migrant
is really kind of not the word to use. But okay,
the illegal invaders that come into the country, there's a
special section that there should be, I should say, the
(27:34):
special section that shows that these illegal invaders, in addition
to engaging in the crime of coming here illegally, again
a crime by itself, are also creating additional crimes that
above and beyond what would be normally reported. And you
(27:57):
find out that they are responsible for a disproportionate of
violent crimes, including rape, robbery, and murder. Then the people
already here in the US here legally were born here.
So you and the true number getting associated with that,
(28:22):
the true number of the illegal invaders in this country,
it's not ten million, twelve million, it's not even twenty
one million. The true number is thirty five million. Think
about that for a second, thirty five million of legal
invaders in this country. Okay, hold all of that thought,
(28:46):
that information, So you have crime not being down. You've
got this thrusting of well going backwards. You've got this
thrusting of this un agenda down our throats, which allows
and is connected to this illegal invasion, because part of
this is being without the borders. And part of this
(29:10):
un compact is this socialization or more more appropriately, communization
of the US by striking it its soft underbelly. That
also includes attacking or or declaring war on the most
(29:34):
vulnerable among us, whether that be the elderly, as in
including the most vulnerable, the most productive among us, store owner,
shop owners, and who are feeling the brunt of this.
It's all of the above. So that's part of the
un agenda. And then our own institutions are falsifying the
(29:57):
reports about what is really taken place, which is being
mimicked by who, by the media, the stenographers of the
deep state. You get where I'm going with this now. Meanwhile, meanwhile,
you've got something else going on. And as much as
I dislike much of the politics of Robert F. Kennedy Junior,
(30:22):
I'm not on board with a lot of things. He says.
One thing he's spot on about is the is the
health of our nation. We are getting pummeled by every side.
We're being pummeled by this invasion, We're being pummeled by
the crime, we're being pummeled by well, just a number
(30:44):
of different things, and we are being told by the
media everything is fine. I just want people to know
that this is not These are not independent issues that
we're talking about, although they can be looked upon independently,
but what they really are are part of the same
(31:06):
They're spokes of the same wheel. All right now, RFK
does this is cut for RFK Junior breaks down what's
taking place right now with the jabs and with the foods,
and with the mr and A into our food supply,
into our so called vaccination schedule. It takes eighty, like
(31:31):
you heard yesterday, it takes eighty I think eighty injections
these vaccines for a child to be enrolled in elementary
school eighty when in nineteen eighty five, I think it
was three, maybe four or five at the most, But
that all change in eighty six, really eighty six through
(31:54):
eighty nine. And RFK talks about this, but this again
is an act of war that's embraced by the UN,
It's propelled by the UN, It's and down through the
United Nations, into our National Institutes of Health, through inn
(32:16):
ai A D through the CEC, through the FDA. They
have been weaponized. So you've this, this health has been
weaponized by these Again yesterday's show really laid this out.
But this has been weaponized against us because they don't
(32:40):
want when I say they, I'm talking about these movers
and shakers, they don't want us reproducing. They don't want
our children to have children. They want to replace the
people here in the United States with the third World
detrius that they're importing. And if those words are offensive,
(33:00):
too bad. That's what it is. But listen to this again.
You can think about this as an independent silo among
many farms, so to speak, or you can look as
part of the process. But listen to what RFK says
about the early days of vaccinations when they the true
(33:23):
definition of vaccinations, autism and CDC studies.
Speaker 2 (33:28):
This is cut for here.
Speaker 5 (33:29):
It is so you know, there's a number of things
that happened in nineteen eighty nine, but it's those disease,
All these autoimmune disease suddenly appeared. I never knew anybody
with juvenile diabetes when I was a kid, a typical
pediatrician would he one case of juvenile diabetes in his
career Today one out of every three kids who walks
(33:51):
through his office door. Has it something that happened? Why
isn't anybody talking about this? Rheumatoid Arthur right has suddenly exploded, lupis?
All these autoimmune diseases, you know, groans disease, these exotic
diseases nobody ever heard of when I was a kid.
Now they're everywhere. And so you have allergic diseases, you
(34:12):
have neurological disease, and automiune diseases, and OBC suddenly appear
around nineteen eighty nine, and so there's a number of
things that could be blamed for it. Well, the CDC thought,
in maybe the vaccine schedule, let's check. So they looked
at the They looked at one vaccine, which the appatitis
(34:33):
B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it
in the first thirty days, and then they looked at
kids who had not gotten it in thirty days, in
other words, kids who got it later or didn't get
it at all. And they compared these two groups, and
among the kids who got it in the first thirty days, there.
Speaker 6 (34:54):
Was a.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
Uh, I think it was a ten thousand percent increase
risk or for a later subsequent if you got in
the first thirty days. Wow, they immediately knew what was
causing it.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
I know it was.
Speaker 5 (35:17):
It was eleven point three five. So it's eleven hundred
and thirty five percent increase risk. And so they knew immediately.
It's called a relative risk of eleven point three five.
If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed.
This was eleven point thirty five. The link between cigarettes,
(35:41):
smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for twenty years
and getting along cancer is a relative risk of ten.
Speaker 2 (35:47):
This was eleven point free out of five. Shit, they
knew well what it was. And then.
Speaker 5 (35:53):
They had an emergency meeting that they called, and they
didn't want to do it on CDC campus because they
thought it would be acceptable to freedom of information requests.
So they did it in a very in this remote
retreat center called Simpson Wood, which is at a Methodist
retreat center on the wooded banks of the Schadowhoochee River
(36:17):
in a remote part of Georgia, and they had all
of the big panjereums from the vaccine industry, from the
pharmaceutical industry, from the universities are the ones who test
the vaccines, from NIA, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization,
and the European Medicals Agency. And they all got together
for two days to talk about this study. The first
(36:41):
day they're all and somebody made a transcript of it,
and that transcript was given to me and I published
excerpts from it. But the first day they're all talking about,
oh my god, you know, the lawyers are going to
come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof.
(37:02):
You know, there's no way to argue with this. This
is real science. We can't and you know, what are
we going to do? The second day, these men talking
about how to hide it from the American public.
Speaker 2 (37:14):
Man, okay, you can kind right, I wish these things.
Speaker 1 (37:16):
You get the point, right, then you can watch the
entire clip HAGMANPI dot com. You get the point. So again,
this is another method of attack, much like the China virus,
much like and that is kind of a misnomer because
you have people like Fauci, You've got people like Dazak,
(37:37):
Peter Dazik, Ralph Barrick involved in Francis Collins. Of course,
involved in the creation or assisting in the creation thereby
involved in the creation of the stars COVID two or
what we known and what is known as COVID. So
you've got this weaponization of viruses, You've got this this
(38:01):
weaponization of childhood immunizations. You've got schools refusing to accept
children into the schools without these immunizations. The reason I'm
bringing all of this up, these are all data points
around the epicenter of what I'm talking about today's program,
and the epicenter is to kill the America. First agenda,
(38:24):
to take away your abilities to number one, speak out,
number two protect against it. And thirdly, they want you
dead before you have a chance to do either. All right,
another silo, if you will, or another tactic that we
all face. I've faced personally, and I'm sure at some
(38:48):
point you may perhaps, But another tactic, and for sure
Donald Trump has faced this is lawfare. Because if there's
always a fabric that's in a book by James Files
Pamela ray Files primary target. One thing that is always
(39:11):
the case, and I believe this truly is before they
exterminate you, if you are a person of prominence, influence,
or whatever, they must they must ruin your character in
a way, nullify you, make you a pariah, and then
of course they'll take you up. This is what is
(39:31):
happening with President Trump, and this is what will be
happening to each one of us on different levels and scales.
But this is a video one. This is perhaps one
of the best, and I would share this with everybody
I know. This is one of the best summations in
(39:53):
reply to a journalist by Megan Kelly. This is one
of the best summations of the law fare cases against
President Trump. Pay very close attention to this because this
is Megan Kelly, who is a lawyer herself. Like her
or don't like her, I don't care. Wipe she wipes
the floor with this guy, I mean with this guy.
(40:13):
In terms of lawfare, all of this is lawfair. This
is another component, another scope spoke in the wheel that
leads directly to this deep state dominance that the the
final gasp of this cadre of entities and individuals who
(40:34):
want to take us out. Watch this. This has cut
one masterclass from Meghan Kelly.
Speaker 6 (40:42):
We look at the five cases, you know, six months
from now, a year from now. Let's assume all five
of them go to trial. He's guilty of free so far?
Speaker 7 (40:49):
What do you what do you mean he's guilty of
three so far? What do you mean? I'm conected to free? Sorry,
what do you mean? Know? He hasn't belly Egen Harrell
was that was not a conviction. That was case. But yes,
that's what I'm talking about, so that, But it's a
big difference.
Speaker 2 (41:03):
It's still he was convicted.
Speaker 6 (41:05):
He was guilty, and that he has in me. Yeah,
and the Trump organization they're guilty there.
Speaker 7 (41:14):
And was still civil libel, yes, of course.
Speaker 6 (41:17):
But these are the cases we're talking about. And then
a third one you.
Speaker 7 (41:20):
Know the lawyer, right, yeah, of course.
Speaker 6 (41:21):
In the third one, I'm just talking about the five cases. Yes,
some are civil obviously, and and some some are not.
Speaker 2 (41:27):
Some are criminals.
Speaker 4 (41:28):
But if we look at.
Speaker 7 (41:29):
Three, now you're walking you back.
Speaker 6 (41:31):
I'm not walking about there's three in which he.
Speaker 7 (41:33):
Was you should walk it back, Okay, mean.
Speaker 6 (41:35):
Here five Three of them he's either guilty or you
got a bad result.
Speaker 7 (41:40):
Yeah, I got a bad result. There are two more.
Speaker 6 (41:42):
If he is found guilty of those two more, megan
and five of five he had a bad result. Way
to frame it will will you chalk all five up
in your mind to five different jurisdictions, five different prosecutors,
five different juries, and or Joy all conspiring to get
him one? Okay, yes, that's all I wanted to hear
(42:06):
your answer.
Speaker 7 (42:07):
Joy five or five? I mean Egan Carroll.
Speaker 8 (42:11):
They changed the laws so that she could bring a
civil lawsuit against him, and she did. New York jury
New York went eighty seven percent for Joe Biden.
Speaker 7 (42:18):
That the fix was in right from the start.
Speaker 8 (42:20):
The fraud trial that Letitia James brought against him has
never been brought.
Speaker 7 (42:23):
There's no victims. The banks who were involved said, we
didn't lose a penny. What are we doing here? We
weren't damaged.
Speaker 8 (42:28):
Nobody was complaining except James, who ran for office saying
I will get him.
Speaker 7 (42:33):
Then you have Alvin Bragg, who's a George.
Speaker 8 (42:34):
Soros funded prosecutor who doesn't like to prosecute any crime
in New York City, where I live for seventeen years,
except if your name is Donald Trump. Let's go down
to Georgia where Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade couldn't keep
their libidos in check long enough to actually bring this
case against Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (42:48):
It's a repeat of what was.
Speaker 8 (42:50):
Happening in January sixth up in the case with Judge
chuck In, who loathes Trump and is sentenced almost every
j six defendant to way more jail time than their
counterparts would get. Those are falling up part because of
presidential immunity, which was handed down by the Supreme Court
who said you cannot bring a criminal case against sitting
president for any official act. Those cases have been gutted.
Also a Supreme Court ruling saying the same on Jauary
(43:12):
sixth defendants in general. And that leaves us with Florida
and the documents, and Trump has torn that apart because
Jacksmith wasn't properly appointed and isn't the right council.
Speaker 7 (43:21):
But there are other issues.
Speaker 8 (43:22):
They haven't even gotten to presidential immunity there, and so
that one's going nowhere as well. And by the way,
they're going to peel it up to the eleven Circuit
circuit right out. The eleventh Circuit is conservative, and thank god,
so is the current Supreme Court.
Speaker 7 (43:33):
They're not going to tolerate that nonsense.
Speaker 1 (43:35):
Let me ask you both, So you've got lawfare as
a tactic, as the weaponization of our legal system against
people like you and I, but specifically against Donald Trump.
And that clip the fact that the deep state denizens
are getting very very well, they're battle wounded. Now they're
(43:59):
searching for other methods to shut us down, to kill
us essentially, and to change the entire complexion of the US.
I also bring into and I didn't put this in
the show notes, but I also want to mention this
breaking today from yesterday I believe it was, or maybe
(44:21):
it was from an early morning hearing the FCC just
fast tracked George soros purchase of over two hundred and
twenty radio stations before November's election. Radio stations here in
the US. These stations reach over one hundred and sixty
(44:42):
five million Americans. Now, this has never been done before.
You have the FCC composed of three Democrats, two Republicans.
The vote to approve this was on party lines, all right,
and you have essentially right now, a consolidation of communications.
(45:04):
This is another way, another spoke on the wheel that
the deep State, that the people who the non elected
bureaucrats are attempting to take over our nation. I toss
that in here because it's extremely important for people to
understand the information that is getting to your neighbor, your friend.
People who are not watching this podcast or broadcasts like
(45:26):
this are not getting this information. What they're getting is
this stenographic transcript of what the players want them to know.
And that's it, period. And this is why. So you've
got to take a look at the FCC, which along
(45:47):
with the DOJ, has been weaponized again. I'm kind of
drilling down into the epicenter of what I want to
talk about, what this episode is all about. All right,
now we have the I guess the bottom line here
(46:08):
is they've got to take all of us out. They've
got to take away the America First agenda, to make
America great again agenda. And they're trying to do this
from the top down and the bottom up. From the
bottom up, you still have j six defendants rotting in jail.
They're political prisoners. You still have organizations like Sedition Hunters,
(46:32):
which is based overseas that is working to provide the
Department of Justice with information about people such as yours
truly and others and saying, hey, we're part of this
conspiracy to overthrow the government. When none of that is true. Okay,
so what do we have here with respect to taking
(46:54):
out President Trump. We have seen in the last again
the dying grasp, the death grip to get rid of America. First,
the person behind it is Donald Trump. Okay, So what
has happened lately? You had two incidents that can be
clearly more than two, but two specific assassination attempts. You
(47:19):
also had possible chemical, biological, even a radiological event take
place in Tucson. I believe it was Tucson two Sundays ago.
But with respect to the latest assassination attempt, Jesse Waters
talks about this. This is let's see here, this is
(47:41):
cut too, and nobody except Jesse Waters can actually do
this now. The lead here is not the fact that
President Trump came closer to dying because there was a
a the gun was chambered with a live round. That's
not the The lead comes after that. Let's play cut too,
(48:04):
and I'll explain.
Speaker 9 (48:07):
It was closer to death on September fifteenth than we thought.
In a new federal court filing, we learned that Ruth
had been staking out Trump at mar A Lago and
at his golf course for weeks. Even more chilling investigators
who sacked the sniper's nest found the rifle with the
scratched off serial number had a bullet in the chamber.
And when the FEDS caught Ruth, they found two sets
(48:30):
of license plates and six cell phones in his car,
one of which googled an escape route from Palm Beach
to Mexico. So why did Ruth have so many phones
and where do he get the fake plates? We're also
learning about a strange box the fed's claim that Ruth
gave to a mysterious civilian witness months before he tried
(48:52):
to take out Trump. The FEDS say this box contained
four cell phones, ammo tools, metal matis, and some pipe
and a series of handwritten letters. The FBI released a
photo of what they say is the first page of
Ruth's letter. The FBI says this witness took a picture
(49:13):
of the first page of the letter and sent it
to the FBI three days after Ruth was assassinated. And
the FBI is using this picture from a mysterious witness
of a letter that we don't even know if they
have custody of in a federal court filing. So in
this purported letter, the FBI says Ruth was motivated to
(49:34):
kill Trump because he believed the former president was unfit
and destructive to America's moral fabric. Does that sound familiar.
Speaker 5 (49:45):
The American people with the side whether Donald Trumps assault
on our democracy on January sixth makes him unfit for
public office.
Speaker 7 (49:52):
I've been saying for now all over a year. He
is not fit to serve.
Speaker 3 (49:58):
Donald Trump is not fit to be the job what
presents be the commander in chief, and he.
Speaker 4 (50:02):
Literally is putting to the test this invisible moral fabric.
Speaker 9 (50:07):
Ruth's letter purportedly says that he failed to assassinate Donald
Trump and that he was offering one hundred and fifty
thousand dollars to anyone who could finish the job. So
the Biden administration just released the assassin's manifesto that put
one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty on Trump's head
and called him unfit to serve, the same language Biden's used.
(50:30):
The FBI wouldn't release the Nashville trans School shooter's manifesto
because they said at the time they didn't want to
inspire more violence. But they published this guy's manifesto, And
why they only cherry pick the first page? What else
is in these letters, law enforcement tells us publishing Ruth's
letter is basically giving the public a blueprint for the
(50:51):
next assassination. And who the hell is this mysterious witness?
Is he in custody? He sounds like a co conspirator?
And what kind of witness you know? You get a
box from someone and you don't open it. Was he
following instructions and then he didn't give it to the
FEDS until three days after the assassination attempt? And why
(51:12):
is Ruth writing letters assuming he didn't finish the job.
And does the FBI even have custody of this letter
or did they just take a screen grab from a
mysterious witness and submit it to the court.
Speaker 1 (51:25):
It's not just the FBI, it's the Department of Justice. Folks,
tune in to night to Wisconsin Christian News TV, go
to Wisconsin Christiannews dot com and I'll be appearing there
with Rob Pew. And I believe the way this is
set up is it's you can chime in, you can
(51:47):
be part of the audience via zoom, and you can
certainly ask questions. But I do know things about this
that have not been reported yet, and I intend to
disclose them on Wisconsin Christian News tonight at six pm
Eastern time. Now, having said all of that, if we
(52:07):
go to page two in the show notes, this is
conservative Treehouse. This is about that specific letter. And there
are so many problems with this, but one of the
things I've seen is there are similarities between what happened
in Florida and with what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania. You've
(52:28):
got to take away and folks, I'm not trying to
disparage any well meaning citizen journalists out there. You've got
to take away some of the white noise that chattered
the unauthenticated information, okay about what is really going on,
and to drill down into the truth. But this Conservative
tree House writes, Look, the DJ releases this letter written
(52:51):
by Trump's attempted assassin, promising the bay one hundred and
fifty grand for someone else to finished a job. This
was written allegedly long before this attempt took place. What
is wrong with this picture? And why don't we have
the Trani festo tranny Festo of the Nashville of the
the transgender shooter Nashville when we but we have this?
Speaker 2 (53:20):
What is this?
Speaker 1 (53:21):
What is the point of releasing this the rights to
the Sundance on Conservative Traios. The Department Justice released a
letter purportedly written by Ryan Wesley Ruth, the man accusing
accused of attempting to assassinate form President Trump on September
fifteenth in Florida. Now, this is part of a court filing.
(53:42):
If you dig into the court filing, which we won't
do today, you can see where this letter fits within
the DOJ filing. And no matter how you look at this,
this is nothing more, at least in my view, than
an attempt to place this bounty on the head of
President Trump by Merrick Garland himself along with Christopher Ray.
(54:08):
There's no other reason to release this in the manner
in which they did, Okay, So that the alleged genesis
of this letter comes from, as Waters said, somebody received
a box from Ruth saying hold on to this box
it had. It was a box of his belongings after
(54:29):
the failed assassination. Reportedly, this friend opened the box, discovered
this letter and took a picture of it and sent
it to the FBI, which was the actual That picture
was from that individual who took a picture of it
and sent it to the FBI. It wasn't because the
FBI had possession of the letter, which in and of itself, no,
(54:55):
it hurts my head to think about this. If you
make this part of a Department of Justice filing against
this ruth character. Now immediately people notice how the Department
Justice would never normally publish a letter or a manifesto
that would stimulate the mentally unstable, which this does. However,
(55:17):
when it comes to Donald Trump, all bets are off.
The DOJFBI customary defense moves are thrown out. Remember, Donald
Trump is their target, never the victim. And I'm telling
you this and repeating what Conservatory House said. If the
Department Justice wanted did not want someone to follow up
(55:38):
on the bunny from this guy, they wouldn't release it.
After all, it's dangerous. And there's another question. How did
this guy who couldn't even keep up on child support
payments afford his house in Hawaii and have the ability
to offer one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty? How
(56:00):
did he assemble that for the head of President Trump.
There's a picture within that article that that that portrays
President Trump. The important thing to know about an assassination
or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot,
but who paid for the bullet.
Speaker 2 (56:19):
That is exactly right.
Speaker 1 (56:23):
Now, Okay, keep that, read that article and even dig
down into the indictment itself. One more video. This is
one of five, and you've heard and seen this before,
but this plays into again the nugget that's involved here.
You know what I'm going to leave that. You can
(56:44):
watch that on your own. That's cut three in the
show notes. But here is my the ultimate, my closing thought.
We were tasked with looking into the Butler assassination, creating
a pattern of life of Thomas Crooks. That that's what
we were doing. That happened, of course, on July thirteenth,
two thousand and four. Because such events don't normally happen
(57:08):
in the vacuum, we felt compelled to add elements to
what has been described as a second assassination attempt that
with the Ruth character that occurred sixty four days later,
on fifteen September twenty twenty four. Investigators infused that information
and data from the latest attempt and have been researching
and investigating both events. Listen to me carefully what I'm
(57:29):
saying here. Our method and manner of investigation have been
both have been to treat both instances as independent from
one another, however, noting possible overlaps in both witness accounts
and geolocation data, that's what we've been doing. We've done
this to cast a wide net, pulling information that admittedly
(57:53):
primarily but potentially are common to both events. In addition
to investigating both events, we also took into account the
nineteenth September twenty twenty four announcement by Representative Gates that
there are currently five assassination known assassination teams in the US,
two or three of which are reportedly foreigned to domestic
(58:15):
of course, out to kill President Donald Trump. Think about
that letter, but also think about the fact that the
DOJFBI they know about these teams. Right, If you know
about them, where is the proactivity with respect of those teams?
If they are known, there should be some proaction there. Okay,
Now it should be noted that we have taken steps
(58:36):
to avoid creating patterns where none exist, as opposed to
identifying where they do exist. This labor intensive process is ongoing,
but our findings are disturbing, and I will say this.
Our updated tactical approach to our initial assignment continues with
these important potentially related editions introduced as discribe now. As
(59:02):
we asserted initially and continue today. Our initial reporting of this,
which was early in the month, reiterated and as reiterated
in additional reports, our findings into, for example, the pattern
of life of Thomas Matthew Crooks, aged twenty, strongly indicate
that he did not act alone. There are similarities that
(59:26):
overlap between Crooks and Ruth, and I'm telling you right now,
with the profiles of each, although they're starkly different, other
similarities exist where they should not. It is here that
our finding indicates that at least one active network and
support of support as previously outline, corresponds with gates recent disclosure. Folks,
(59:49):
I'm telling you right now, the threat is not over.
Speaker 2 (59:51):
It's there.
Speaker 1 (59:53):
The next forty days seventy six days after that are
going to be the most important days in this time period.
Speaker 2 (59:59):
God bless
Coming to you from the Hagman Report dot Com studio
located in the Keystone States, birthplace of a mighty nation.
Gets your host, Doug Hagman. This is a Hagmann Report for today.
(00:24):
It's Tuesday, September twenty fourth, twenty twenty four. I want
to welcome everyone to the program today. We had an Originally,
originally we had the program scheduled with well, you know what.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I'm not going to.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Say who it is because we have rescheduled that for
next Tuesday. But it has to do with the JFK
assassination and the individual who fired from the Grassy Knoll.
That's all I'm going to say. But it was a fascinating,
a fascinating account, first person account, well first person through
(01:00):
someone very close to him talking about what happened on
that day in Dallas. So that's coming up next Tuesday.
A couple of things. Nonetheless, we've got a great program
lineup for you. I'm looking forward to that. But today,
great program line up for you. I'm gonna be talking
about the un what just happened and Americans are oblivious
(01:23):
to this except for some people who are paying attention
like you. And something about the FCCY what they have done,
some anomalies with respect to the investigations into the assassination
attempts of Donald Trump. Very important because this exposes certain
(01:47):
aspects of the deep state and what the real motivation
is here and the real intent, and laying out the
very fragile groundwork or the fragility of the time really
anytime between now and election day and thereafter, because this
(02:09):
is not going to stop. I'm actually going to be
citing from confidential documents that when I say confidential documents,
documents that we created that are confidential to the source.
But I want you folks to know exactly what's going on,
(02:31):
because if you don't, you're not going to understand the
bigger picture here. And the bigger picture is important, and
so we've got that going on. I also want to
remind people tonight at six pm Eastern time, folks will
be appearing on Wisconsin Christian News talking about that subject,
(02:53):
about the assassinations, our investigation into it, and it's been
very very extensive, very extensive. Others have our document some
of our documentation, and well, I'll just leave it right there.
You've heard some of this by bigger names than me.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Believe me.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
But the origin has come from just a fine team
of investigators, including people from Shadow Ups and save Them
of course here at Hagman PI. And that does include
the pink panther of them all, Eric, the tech pink panther.
(03:39):
What do you think I'm telling.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
You, the insulation guy.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
The insallation guy that has different meanings and all of
them apply.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
Before we get to that, I just want to thank
you for supporting this platform. Without you, without your support,
we would be nowhere. And look, I've got to I've
got to say, supporters getting very tight, you know. I
I really, in my heart of hearts wonder if we
are going to be here in six months.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
I do that Now.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
There are gonna be some changes we're announce very very good,
exciting changes. But that's our last hurrah. I'm going to
tell you right now, that's our last hurrah. I'm sorry
going to Steve Quayle about this, and we're both on
kind of on the same page. You're on this, but
I'm not going to speak for him, but I'm just
saying that, Hey, you know what, you know, if people
(04:38):
want the news, if people want information that they cannot
get elsewhere, and they're not going to get elsewhere. Trust me,
because we do make the we make. We go out
and find the truth and deliver it. But if we
we can't do that without your help. And I'm going
to thank from the botto of my heart every single
(04:58):
person who is anything, I mean, even a kind note.
I read all of the mail. I can't answer all
of them. I read all of the mail. I read
your notes I write, and I thank you from thebom
my heart for those to those who do support us,
and we really appreciate that. And speaking about people who
support us, you know we do have a litany of
(05:20):
people corporate sponsors as well, including you know that this
is one thing that can help all of us. And
let me just get right into it. Three harmful foods
dot com slash hagmen. Three harmful foods dot com slash hagmen.
You know, we live in the again, the most advanced
era in human history, and there have really never before
(05:45):
been more medical breakthroughs than there are right now. So
why are millions of Americans more in healthy and overweight
than they've ever been? Ask yourself that question. Well, according
to the US Sports Certified Physician Expert Nutritionist, doctor Amy Lee.
One of the main reasons is three harmful foods that
are being passed off as health foods all over the country.
And wait until you hear this, because these foods can
(06:06):
cause weight gain, clog your diestive track, deplete your energy,
and wreck your skin. They're banned in other countries, yet shockingly,
they're still legal here in the US, and it's times
someone shine the light on what they are.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Well.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Doctor Amy Lee does just that while explaining how the
side effects from these foods are wreaking havoc on the
health of millions of Americans. And the great news is this,
it's easy to stop and reverse this damage by simply
learning wish foods so avoid and how to spot them.
And by doing so you can experience these or weight loss,
smooth digestion, vibrant energy. To find out these three fake
(06:42):
health foods, go to three Harmful Foods dot com slash hagmen.
Remember two ends on hagmen. That's three harmful foods dot
com slash hagmen, or just click on the link in
the description box below, And after years of extensive study,
doctor Lee had put together a very, very rev feeling
video totally free to you. The public so that you
(07:03):
never could do by these foods again. So find out
all you need to know by it and regain control
over your body. At three, that's the number three harmful
foods dot com slash hagmen or as I said, just
click on a link in the description box below. Please
do that. You're you're gonna be better off for it.
I'm telling you. It's it's really it's really something too.
(07:25):
You know, when you when you take a look at
what's going on with the well, with the FDA and
all of this stuff. Uh, you're you're gonna you're gonna
find out what's good for you and what isn't, not
through the lens of the f d A or of
these pseudo scientists, but really from the people who know
what's going on. All right, So let me let me
(07:49):
tackle the big subject first. And this is while everyone
was distracted by various other things, folks, that you and
just adopted this packed for the few, which lays the
foundation for this new globalist order. Now this is important
for people to understand because you and I we don't
(08:11):
have any say in this. This is via the Economic
Collapse blog, but it's posted on America First Report as well, well,
it does read that. Well, everyone was distracted. The global
elite got exactly what they wanted.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Just two days ago, just two days from right now,
the UN adopted the Pact for the Future, and the
mainstream media in the Western world almost entirely ignored what's
been happening. If you look at that, if you look
right there, you've got to read this article. The headlines
(08:55):
urged us to keep focusing on Harris and Trump and
all of the shiny trinkets that are all around us.
But the vast majority of the population they've never heard
about this. We had mentioned this earlier in earlier shows
that this was happening, and it's happened. The Packed for
(09:18):
the Future you can certainly in the at HAGMANPI dot com.
When you click on the link for today's show, the headline,
the title for todays show. Click on that and that'll
open up a box and I'll have all of the links.
This will be in that list of links. Now, the
(09:39):
text for this Packed for the Future, you've got to
read it. It's available online multiple locations. There is an
embedded link in this article for that, but hardly anyone
will ever read it. I'm telling you right now, because
it really it's it's almost boring, but it's telling. But
many of the most some important provisions are buried toward
(10:01):
the end of this fifty six page document. I went
through this document. I'm going to spare you in this
segment here of going through that. But everyone should take
the time to actually read this document because our leaders
just committed us to an extremely insidious globalist agenda that
(10:27):
literally covers just about every conceivable area of human activity
that's right without our consent. And I'll just say this,
and you can keep that up. We have to fight back.
We will fight back. I guarantee you this is going
to bring that fight to your door and to my door.
(10:47):
And I'm going to tell you right now this, among
other things, this is the last gasp of this globalist
takeover of our entire planet, of our lives. And this
is really by reading this fifty six page document that
(11:07):
what I got from it was America is in the
crosshairs of the U N and to take us down.
And we've been sold out too by many people, by
just about everybody in Congress as well as this faux
White House, who in the hell's running our country. We don't.
(11:28):
We don't really know. We know it's not potato head.
We know it's not mattress. Back, kamala, that's right, kamala.
Speaker 2 (11:38):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Those on the on the left watching this, I can
hear their heads pop. But you know that's fine. Once
the Pact for the Future was formally adopted. In fact,
you can show this. This was formerly posted on the
un official UN website.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
And this is about oh, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Halfway down this article, it's an embedded or indented quote.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Here.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
World leaders adopted a Pact for the Future that includes
a Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations.
There it is right there on your screen. Thank you,
Eric Deck. This Pact is the culmination of an inclusive,
(12:27):
years long process to adopt international cooperation to the realities
of today and the challenges of tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Thank god we.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Have been unburdened by the way of what has been, okay,
the most wide ranging international agreement in many years, covering
entirely new areas as well as issues on which agreement
has not been possible in decades. The Pact aims, above all,
to ensure that international institutions can deliver in the face
(12:59):
of a world that has changed dramatically since they were created.
As the Secretary General has said, we cannot create a
future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by
our grandparents. Well, you want to bet our grandparents had
more moral fiber, backbone and strength and courage and morality
(13:22):
and spirituality than anyone today, I would say, with a
few exceptions, writes economic class We look. Look, I don't
want to live in a new global order that includes
all people in all nations. Another page I should add
(13:43):
on the official UN website tells us that UN two
point zero is all about creating a modern UN family.
No efing, thank you. Halfway through the twenty thirty agenda,
the world is not on track to achieve a sustainable
development goals. Well that's good to me. It's not too
late to change course if we will rethink, refocus and recharge.
(14:06):
UN two point zero encapsulates the Secretary General's version or
vision of a modern UN family rejuvenated by a forward
thinking culture and empowered by cutting edge skills for the
twenty first century to two turbo charge our support to
people and planet. All right, yeah, you can read between
(14:30):
the lines there and look, you know where this is going.
We strive toward this vision with powerful fusion of innovation, data,
data comma, digital comma foresight, and behavioral science, the skills
and culture, a dynamic combination we call the quint Tent
of change.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
Don't you just love the way they phrase this.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
It's about evolution towards more agile, diverse, response, responsive and
impactful un organization. It sounds cozy, doesn't it.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah? Who wouldn't want to be part of that family? Right?
Am I? Right? Okay?
Speaker 1 (15:08):
So as it goes down, and this is an important
article because it kind of explains the gist of what's
happening here. Sustainable development goals, that's the big deal, Sustainable
development goals. Pretty soon, your gas stove, as in the side,
is going to come with a warning label similar to
(15:30):
that on the pack side of the Seria packs. I'm
telling you that's what's going to happen. Campfires, No, don't
even think about it. Fireplaces gone, gas cars gone. Your
way of life will be changed forever by this document,
by this agreement. And you and I had no say
(15:50):
in this, Well, yeah we do. Because when they come
for your stove, when they come for your car, when
they come for your guns, when they come for whatever. Okay,
we I guarantee we must fight. We must fight against this,
and I don't care what that would I don't care
what that fight looks like. But there will be a fight.
Maybe maybe we waited too long. Didn't we wait too long?
(16:15):
We could have avoided a fight had we stepped in earlier,
had people been paying attention about this, stepped in earlier.
But no, And this goes through the various issues. This
article goes through the various issues. All right, but just
think the Green Agenda meeting, the DEI Agenda and policy,
(16:42):
along with ESG everything progressive and globalist is really this.
This represents the next time that there is a major
global crisis, if there is one, whether it be war, pandemic, scandemic,
whatever it might be. Do you want the un running things, Well,
(17:04):
you're going to have it in telling you exactly you
what to do. That's what's going to happen through this agreement. Now,
the Economic Collapse Blog has written extensively about the pack
for the future. Michael Snyder has done so. He's got
(17:25):
a book out on Amazon. You can you can find
that as well. But don't do please, do not think
for a moment they're not going to play this card
today and in the future and take our rights away
from us in this fashion when we the people never
agreed to that. So, folks, I wanted to do alert
(17:48):
you to this because this is something virtually no one
is talking about, with a few exceptions, it is, in
fact something that we really need to pay attention to.
All right now, a couple of things with respect to
what's really happening today. I want to go to video five.
This is cut five in our show notes kind of
(18:09):
work around this. The major issue of today's show, and
the major issue of today's show is we have right
now an operative series of people entities, both sanctioned by
and associated with the Department of Defense, the Military industrial Complex,
(18:37):
the deep state apparatus that is out to kill President
Trump and to kill us and to change forever our
way of life. The globalists and deep state globalist they know,
they absolutely know they cannot win without cheating or without
(19:01):
engaging in some other method of removing the America First agenda.
Now who heads that up, of course, Donald Trump. But
there are elements to all of this, components to all
of this, because the intent here is to just like
(19:23):
it was in twenty twenty with that fraud election that
took place. Okay, they are attempting to do the same
thing again, but knowing that they cannot necessarily rip the
results of the election from the hands of President Trump,
(19:43):
who stands for the America First policy, who stands to say,
look this you impact, that's a bunch of bs with
the admitted with the regime, not with the regime that
we have today. They don't forget they planned on implementing
this back in twenty sixteen until such time as Donald
(20:03):
Trump won that election. Well they got smart in the
four years hints, and they were able to make sure
that didn't happen in twenty twenty. And look what we have.
We have this se now dementia, cognitively impaired, pedo sniff
hair sniffing, piece of crap, piece of garbage, and is
(20:26):
equally piece of garbage. Wife in the White House selling
the White House up along with this mattress back knee pads. Harris,
who hasn't who cannot articulate one policy note with respect
to what she will do. It's just absolutely mind just
(20:51):
mind blowing when you look at people who believe in
the lie of Harris in the lie of of of Biden,
in the lie of those people who are stenographers for
the deep state, for these puppets of industry, puppets of corporations,
(21:15):
puppets of this deep state. One of the things that
were that they are trying to convince us and one
of the talking points, and this again, this goes to
the main thrust of today's show, is that crime is down. Hey,
you know you hear this all over the place. Crime
is down. We talked about this before and I want
(21:38):
to slip this in here. It almost seems like a
non secutor, but it has everything to do with what's
taking place today. This has cut five in the show
notes where crime is not down. Well, if you look
at some of the statistics, and you can use this
with your with your boss, or with your coworkers, or
(22:01):
with your family. But the stats they're showing crime is down.
But why is that. Well, We've looked in this and
Julie Kelly has talked about this, and I've actually seen
this because I'm tapped into obviously because of our licensure. Licensure,
we have access to various databases, and these databases show
(22:25):
all sorts of things, whether it's violent, crime or regardless
of what it is, we have access to this information.
And it was a couple of years ago that we
noticed that certain things were missing from what once was there. Okay,
so I think about this, and I was talking with
(22:49):
another investigator about this, Susan Daniels. As a matter of fact,
we were talking about different things with our databases.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
She's license, she has.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Her own, and I've got my own, and some overlap
and some are independent of one another. But to that database,
to the very database, many things were extracted and have
been cut out of the information. This cut explains exactly
(23:21):
this this concept. So when you hear, for example, well
murders are down by fifteen percent, I'm just throwing that
number out there as an example. That's not true. And
you might say, well what, but look there's the stats.
Well listen and watch this and understand why it's not true.
(23:44):
Here it is cut five.
Speaker 3 (23:47):
The vast majority of police departments have not been, or
the majority haven't been reporting complete data to the FBI
in twenty twenty two. Well change the reporting system. In
twenty twenty one, and in twenty twenty two, for example,
thirty one percent of police departments didn't report any crime
(24:09):
data to the FBI. Another twenty four percent only partially
reported crime data to the FBI. And so you know,
we don't have.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
Let me just excuate, I mean not even complete, it's
not even near complete. If a third of the police
departments don't give you any numbers, any information, any reports
on crimes, whether there's small, medium, or large departments, how
do you amaze anything on that.
Speaker 3 (24:36):
Well, they try to guess what the missing data is.
But in twenty twenty two, for example, you had three
of the five largest cities in the country, their police
departments weren't reporting data. You'd had the New York, Los Angeles,
and Phoenix police departments were no longer reporting crime data
to the FBI. In twenty twenty three, Los Angeles and
(24:59):
New York, well still not reporting crime data to the FBI.
And so they don't put down zeros in there. They
try to guess what they think the missing numbers are
for all these different cities and police departments that they're missing.
But there are issues about how good of a job
that they're doing with that.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Yeah, so they're just guessing. Spin the wheel.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Think about this, You've got really roughly well, as he said,
thirty one percent of the police departments are not reporting
any crime status to the FBI. That was back in
twenty twenty one. The same thing really in twenty twenty three,
with twenty one roughly twenty one percent reporting parcel statistics,
(25:45):
some tossing in arbitrary numbers because those numbers represent also
funding to those various locations. Without getting too far into
the weeds here, it would be good to show, for example,
New York's crimes down and their policies are working, so
(26:06):
they receive additional federal funds supposedly earmarked for that continuation
of that plan, when in fact that number or that
money is diverted elsewhere. But the thing we noticed is
roughly half about half of the police departments, including some
of the largest departments the jurisdictions across the US, are
(26:28):
not reporting numbers, or the numbers that they're reporting are
so absolutely, so much lower than they actually are. It
creates this skewed number. Why do I mention this right
now because those people who erroneously believe that crime is down.
(26:50):
One of the communist goals, by the way of the
deep State, of these people that are engaged in this,
one of the goals is to hide the true crime
figures from the public, to give them, obviously a false
sense of security, saying also saying that our policies are working.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Now.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Part of that which this did not get into is
something called migrant crime. I realized that the word migrant
is really kind of not the word to use. But okay,
the illegal invaders that come into the country, there's a
special section that there should be, I should say, the
(27:34):
special section that shows that these illegal invaders, in addition
to engaging in the crime of coming here illegally, again
a crime by itself, are also creating additional crimes that
above and beyond what would be normally reported. And you
(27:57):
find out that they are responsible for a disproportionate of
violent crimes, including rape, robbery, and murder. Then the people
already here in the US here legally were born here.
So you and the true number getting associated with that,
(28:22):
the true number of the illegal invaders in this country,
it's not ten million, twelve million, it's not even twenty
one million. The true number is thirty five million. Think
about that for a second, thirty five million of legal
invaders in this country. Okay, hold all of that thought,
(28:46):
that information, So you have crime not being down. You've
got this thrusting of well going backwards. You've got this
thrusting of this un agenda down our throats, which allows
and is connected to this illegal invasion, because part of
this is being without the borders. And part of this
(29:10):
un compact is this socialization or more more appropriately, communization
of the US by striking it its soft underbelly. That
also includes attacking or or declaring war on the most
(29:34):
vulnerable among us, whether that be the elderly, as in
including the most vulnerable, the most productive among us, store owner,
shop owners, and who are feeling the brunt of this.
It's all of the above. So that's part of the
un agenda. And then our own institutions are falsifying the
(29:57):
reports about what is really taken place, which is being
mimicked by who, by the media, the stenographers of the
deep state. You get where I'm going with this now. Meanwhile, meanwhile,
you've got something else going on. And as much as
I dislike much of the politics of Robert F. Kennedy Junior,
(30:22):
I'm not on board with a lot of things. He says.
One thing he's spot on about is the is the
health of our nation. We are getting pummeled by every side.
We're being pummeled by this invasion, We're being pummeled by
the crime, we're being pummeled by well, just a number
(30:44):
of different things, and we are being told by the
media everything is fine. I just want people to know
that this is not These are not independent issues that
we're talking about, although they can be looked upon independently,
but what they really are are part of the same
(31:06):
They're spokes of the same wheel. All right now, RFK
does this is cut for RFK Junior breaks down what's
taking place right now with the jabs and with the foods,
and with the mr and A into our food supply,
into our so called vaccination schedule. It takes eighty, like
(31:31):
you heard yesterday, it takes eighty I think eighty injections
these vaccines for a child to be enrolled in elementary
school eighty when in nineteen eighty five, I think it
was three, maybe four or five at the most, But
that all change in eighty six, really eighty six through
(31:54):
eighty nine. And RFK talks about this, but this again
is an act of war that's embraced by the UN,
It's propelled by the UN, It's and down through the
United Nations, into our National Institutes of Health, through inn
(32:16):
ai A D through the CEC, through the FDA. They
have been weaponized. So you've this, this health has been
weaponized by these Again yesterday's show really laid this out.
But this has been weaponized against us because they don't
(32:40):
want when I say they, I'm talking about these movers
and shakers, they don't want us reproducing. They don't want
our children to have children. They want to replace the
people here in the United States with the third World
detrius that they're importing. And if those words are offensive,
(33:00):
too bad. That's what it is. But listen to this again.
You can think about this as an independent silo among
many farms, so to speak, or you can look as
part of the process. But listen to what RFK says
about the early days of vaccinations when they the true
(33:23):
definition of vaccinations, autism and CDC studies.
Speaker 2 (33:28):
This is cut for here.
Speaker 5 (33:29):
It is so you know, there's a number of things
that happened in nineteen eighty nine, but it's those disease,
All these autoimmune disease suddenly appeared. I never knew anybody
with juvenile diabetes when I was a kid, a typical
pediatrician would he one case of juvenile diabetes in his
career Today one out of every three kids who walks
(33:51):
through his office door. Has it something that happened? Why
isn't anybody talking about this? Rheumatoid Arthur right has suddenly exploded, lupis?
All these autoimmune diseases, you know, groans disease, these exotic
diseases nobody ever heard of when I was a kid.
Now they're everywhere. And so you have allergic diseases, you
(34:12):
have neurological disease, and automiune diseases, and OBC suddenly appear
around nineteen eighty nine, and so there's a number of
things that could be blamed for it. Well, the CDC thought,
in maybe the vaccine schedule, let's check. So they looked
at the They looked at one vaccine, which the appatitis
(34:33):
B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it
in the first thirty days, and then they looked at
kids who had not gotten it in thirty days, in
other words, kids who got it later or didn't get
it at all. And they compared these two groups, and
among the kids who got it in the first thirty days, there.
Speaker 6 (34:54):
Was a.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
Uh, I think it was a ten thousand percent increase
risk or for a later subsequent if you got in
the first thirty days. Wow, they immediately knew what was
causing it.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
I know it was.
Speaker 5 (35:17):
It was eleven point three five. So it's eleven hundred
and thirty five percent increase risk. And so they knew immediately.
It's called a relative risk of eleven point three five.
If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed.
This was eleven point thirty five. The link between cigarettes,
(35:41):
smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for twenty years
and getting along cancer is a relative risk of ten.
Speaker 2 (35:47):
This was eleven point free out of five. Shit, they
knew well what it was. And then.
Speaker 5 (35:53):
They had an emergency meeting that they called, and they
didn't want to do it on CDC campus because they
thought it would be acceptable to freedom of information requests.
So they did it in a very in this remote
retreat center called Simpson Wood, which is at a Methodist
retreat center on the wooded banks of the Schadowhoochee River
(36:17):
in a remote part of Georgia, and they had all
of the big panjereums from the vaccine industry, from the
pharmaceutical industry, from the universities are the ones who test
the vaccines, from NIA, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization,
and the European Medicals Agency. And they all got together
for two days to talk about this study. The first
(36:41):
day they're all and somebody made a transcript of it,
and that transcript was given to me and I published
excerpts from it. But the first day they're all talking about,
oh my god, you know, the lawyers are going to
come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof.
(37:02):
You know, there's no way to argue with this. This
is real science. We can't and you know, what are
we going to do? The second day, these men talking
about how to hide it from the American public.
Speaker 2 (37:14):
Man, okay, you can kind right, I wish these things.
Speaker 1 (37:16):
You get the point, right, then you can watch the
entire clip HAGMANPI dot com. You get the point. So again,
this is another method of attack, much like the China virus,
much like and that is kind of a misnomer because
you have people like Fauci, You've got people like Dazak,
(37:37):
Peter Dazik, Ralph Barrick involved in Francis Collins. Of course,
involved in the creation or assisting in the creation thereby
involved in the creation of the stars COVID two or
what we known and what is known as COVID. So
you've got this weaponization of viruses, You've got this this
(38:01):
weaponization of childhood immunizations. You've got schools refusing to accept
children into the schools without these immunizations. The reason I'm
bringing all of this up, these are all data points
around the epicenter of what I'm talking about today's program,
and the epicenter is to kill the America. First agenda,
(38:24):
to take away your abilities to number one, speak out,
number two protect against it. And thirdly, they want you
dead before you have a chance to do either. All right,
another silo, if you will, or another tactic that we
all face. I've faced personally, and I'm sure at some
(38:48):
point you may perhaps, But another tactic, and for sure
Donald Trump has faced this is lawfare. Because if there's
always a fabric that's in a book by James Files
Pamela ray Files primary target. One thing that is always
(39:11):
the case, and I believe this truly is before they
exterminate you, if you are a person of prominence, influence,
or whatever, they must they must ruin your character in
a way, nullify you, make you a pariah, and then
of course they'll take you up. This is what is
(39:31):
happening with President Trump, and this is what will be
happening to each one of us on different levels and scales.
But this is a video one. This is perhaps one
of the best, and I would share this with everybody
I know. This is one of the best summations in
(39:53):
reply to a journalist by Megan Kelly. This is one
of the best summations of the law fare cases against
President Trump. Pay very close attention to this because this
is Megan Kelly, who is a lawyer herself. Like her
or don't like her, I don't care. Wipe she wipes
the floor with this guy, I mean with this guy.
(40:13):
In terms of lawfare, all of this is lawfair. This
is another component, another scope spoke in the wheel that
leads directly to this deep state dominance that the the
final gasp of this cadre of entities and individuals who
(40:34):
want to take us out. Watch this. This has cut
one masterclass from Meghan Kelly.
Speaker 6 (40:42):
We look at the five cases, you know, six months
from now, a year from now. Let's assume all five
of them go to trial. He's guilty of free so far?
Speaker 7 (40:49):
What do you what do you mean he's guilty of
three so far? What do you mean? I'm conected to free? Sorry,
what do you mean? Know? He hasn't belly Egen Harrell
was that was not a conviction. That was case. But yes,
that's what I'm talking about, so that, But it's a
big difference.
Speaker 2 (41:03):
It's still he was convicted.
Speaker 6 (41:05):
He was guilty, and that he has in me. Yeah,
and the Trump organization they're guilty there.
Speaker 7 (41:14):
And was still civil libel, yes, of course.
Speaker 6 (41:17):
But these are the cases we're talking about. And then
a third one you.
Speaker 7 (41:20):
Know the lawyer, right, yeah, of course.
Speaker 6 (41:21):
In the third one, I'm just talking about the five cases. Yes,
some are civil obviously, and and some some are not.
Speaker 2 (41:27):
Some are criminals.
Speaker 4 (41:28):
But if we look at.
Speaker 7 (41:29):
Three, now you're walking you back.
Speaker 6 (41:31):
I'm not walking about there's three in which he.
Speaker 7 (41:33):
Was you should walk it back, Okay, mean.
Speaker 6 (41:35):
Here five Three of them he's either guilty or you
got a bad result.
Speaker 7 (41:40):
Yeah, I got a bad result. There are two more.
Speaker 6 (41:42):
If he is found guilty of those two more, megan
and five of five he had a bad result. Way
to frame it will will you chalk all five up
in your mind to five different jurisdictions, five different prosecutors,
five different juries, and or Joy all conspiring to get
him one? Okay, yes, that's all I wanted to hear
(42:06):
your answer.
Speaker 7 (42:07):
Joy five or five? I mean Egan Carroll.
Speaker 8 (42:11):
They changed the laws so that she could bring a
civil lawsuit against him, and she did. New York jury
New York went eighty seven percent for Joe Biden.
Speaker 7 (42:18):
That the fix was in right from the start.
Speaker 8 (42:20):
The fraud trial that Letitia James brought against him has
never been brought.
Speaker 7 (42:23):
There's no victims. The banks who were involved said, we
didn't lose a penny. What are we doing here? We
weren't damaged.
Speaker 8 (42:28):
Nobody was complaining except James, who ran for office saying
I will get him.
Speaker 7 (42:33):
Then you have Alvin Bragg, who's a George.
Speaker 8 (42:34):
Soros funded prosecutor who doesn't like to prosecute any crime
in New York City, where I live for seventeen years,
except if your name is Donald Trump. Let's go down
to Georgia where Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade couldn't keep
their libidos in check long enough to actually bring this
case against Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (42:48):
It's a repeat of what was.
Speaker 8 (42:50):
Happening in January sixth up in the case with Judge
chuck In, who loathes Trump and is sentenced almost every
j six defendant to way more jail time than their
counterparts would get. Those are falling up part because of
presidential immunity, which was handed down by the Supreme Court
who said you cannot bring a criminal case against sitting
president for any official act. Those cases have been gutted.
Also a Supreme Court ruling saying the same on Jauary
(43:12):
sixth defendants in general. And that leaves us with Florida
and the documents, and Trump has torn that apart because
Jacksmith wasn't properly appointed and isn't the right council.
Speaker 7 (43:21):
But there are other issues.
Speaker 8 (43:22):
They haven't even gotten to presidential immunity there, and so
that one's going nowhere as well. And by the way,
they're going to peel it up to the eleven Circuit
circuit right out. The eleventh Circuit is conservative, and thank god,
so is the current Supreme Court.
Speaker 7 (43:33):
They're not going to tolerate that nonsense.
Speaker 1 (43:35):
Let me ask you both, So you've got lawfare as
a tactic, as the weaponization of our legal system against
people like you and I, but specifically against Donald Trump.
And that clip the fact that the deep state denizens
are getting very very well, they're battle wounded. Now they're
(43:59):
searching for other methods to shut us down, to kill
us essentially, and to change the entire complexion of the US.
I also bring into and I didn't put this in
the show notes, but I also want to mention this
breaking today from yesterday I believe it was, or maybe
(44:21):
it was from an early morning hearing the FCC just
fast tracked George soros purchase of over two hundred and
twenty radio stations before November's election. Radio stations here in
the US. These stations reach over one hundred and sixty
(44:42):
five million Americans. Now, this has never been done before.
You have the FCC composed of three Democrats, two Republicans.
The vote to approve this was on party lines, all right,
and you have essentially right now, a consolidation of communications.
(45:04):
This is another way, another spoke on the wheel that
the deep State, that the people who the non elected
bureaucrats are attempting to take over our nation. I toss
that in here because it's extremely important for people to
understand the information that is getting to your neighbor, your friend.
People who are not watching this podcast or broadcasts like
(45:26):
this are not getting this information. What they're getting is
this stenographic transcript of what the players want them to know.
And that's it, period. And this is why. So you've
got to take a look at the FCC, which along
(45:47):
with the DOJ, has been weaponized again. I'm kind of
drilling down into the epicenter of what I want to
talk about, what this episode is all about. All right,
now we have the I guess the bottom line here
(46:08):
is they've got to take all of us out. They've
got to take away the America First agenda, to make
America great again agenda. And they're trying to do this
from the top down and the bottom up. From the
bottom up, you still have j six defendants rotting in jail.
They're political prisoners. You still have organizations like Sedition Hunters,
(46:32):
which is based overseas that is working to provide the
Department of Justice with information about people such as yours
truly and others and saying, hey, we're part of this
conspiracy to overthrow the government. When none of that is true. Okay,
so what do we have here with respect to taking
(46:54):
out President Trump. We have seen in the last again
the dying grasp, the death grip to get rid of America. First,
the person behind it is Donald Trump. Okay, So what
has happened lately? You had two incidents that can be
clearly more than two, but two specific assassination attempts. You
(47:19):
also had possible chemical, biological, even a radiological event take
place in Tucson. I believe it was Tucson two Sundays ago.
But with respect to the latest assassination attempt, Jesse Waters
talks about this. This is let's see here, this is
(47:41):
cut too, and nobody except Jesse Waters can actually do
this now. The lead here is not the fact that
President Trump came closer to dying because there was a
a the gun was chambered with a live round. That's
not the The lead comes after that. Let's play cut too,
(48:04):
and I'll explain.
Speaker 9 (48:07):
It was closer to death on September fifteenth than we thought.
In a new federal court filing, we learned that Ruth
had been staking out Trump at mar A Lago and
at his golf course for weeks. Even more chilling investigators
who sacked the sniper's nest found the rifle with the
scratched off serial number had a bullet in the chamber.
And when the FEDS caught Ruth, they found two sets
(48:30):
of license plates and six cell phones in his car,
one of which googled an escape route from Palm Beach
to Mexico. So why did Ruth have so many phones
and where do he get the fake plates? We're also
learning about a strange box the fed's claim that Ruth
gave to a mysterious civilian witness months before he tried
(48:52):
to take out Trump. The FEDS say this box contained
four cell phones, ammo tools, metal matis, and some pipe
and a series of handwritten letters. The FBI released a
photo of what they say is the first page of
Ruth's letter. The FBI says this witness took a picture
(49:13):
of the first page of the letter and sent it
to the FBI three days after Ruth was assassinated. And
the FBI is using this picture from a mysterious witness
of a letter that we don't even know if they
have custody of in a federal court filing. So in
this purported letter, the FBI says Ruth was motivated to
(49:34):
kill Trump because he believed the former president was unfit
and destructive to America's moral fabric. Does that sound familiar.
Speaker 5 (49:45):
The American people with the side whether Donald Trumps assault
on our democracy on January sixth makes him unfit for
public office.
Speaker 7 (49:52):
I've been saying for now all over a year. He
is not fit to serve.
Speaker 3 (49:58):
Donald Trump is not fit to be the job what
presents be the commander in chief, and he.
Speaker 4 (50:02):
Literally is putting to the test this invisible moral fabric.
Speaker 9 (50:07):
Ruth's letter purportedly says that he failed to assassinate Donald
Trump and that he was offering one hundred and fifty
thousand dollars to anyone who could finish the job. So
the Biden administration just released the assassin's manifesto that put
one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty on Trump's head
and called him unfit to serve, the same language Biden's used.
(50:30):
The FBI wouldn't release the Nashville trans School shooter's manifesto
because they said at the time they didn't want to
inspire more violence. But they published this guy's manifesto, And
why they only cherry pick the first page? What else
is in these letters, law enforcement tells us publishing Ruth's
letter is basically giving the public a blueprint for the
(50:51):
next assassination. And who the hell is this mysterious witness?
Is he in custody? He sounds like a co conspirator?
And what kind of witness you know? You get a
box from someone and you don't open it. Was he
following instructions and then he didn't give it to the
FEDS until three days after the assassination attempt? And why
(51:12):
is Ruth writing letters assuming he didn't finish the job.
And does the FBI even have custody of this letter
or did they just take a screen grab from a
mysterious witness and submit it to the court.
Speaker 1 (51:25):
It's not just the FBI, it's the Department of Justice. Folks,
tune in to night to Wisconsin Christian News TV, go
to Wisconsin Christiannews dot com and I'll be appearing there
with Rob Pew. And I believe the way this is
set up is it's you can chime in, you can
(51:47):
be part of the audience via zoom, and you can
certainly ask questions. But I do know things about this
that have not been reported yet, and I intend to
disclose them on Wisconsin Christian News tonight at six pm
Eastern time. Now, having said all of that, if we
(52:07):
go to page two in the show notes, this is
conservative Treehouse. This is about that specific letter. And there
are so many problems with this, but one of the
things I've seen is there are similarities between what happened
in Florida and with what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania. You've
(52:28):
got to take away and folks, I'm not trying to
disparage any well meaning citizen journalists out there. You've got
to take away some of the white noise that chattered
the unauthenticated information, okay about what is really going on,
and to drill down into the truth. But this Conservative
tree House writes, Look, the DJ releases this letter written
(52:51):
by Trump's attempted assassin, promising the bay one hundred and
fifty grand for someone else to finished a job. This
was written allegedly long before this attempt took place. What
is wrong with this picture? And why don't we have
the Trani festo tranny Festo of the Nashville of the
the transgender shooter Nashville when we but we have this?
Speaker 2 (53:20):
What is this?
Speaker 1 (53:21):
What is the point of releasing this the rights to
the Sundance on Conservative Traios. The Department Justice released a
letter purportedly written by Ryan Wesley Ruth, the man accusing
accused of attempting to assassinate form President Trump on September
fifteenth in Florida. Now, this is part of a court filing.
(53:42):
If you dig into the court filing, which we won't
do today, you can see where this letter fits within
the DOJ filing. And no matter how you look at this,
this is nothing more, at least in my view, than
an attempt to place this bounty on the head of
President Trump by Merrick Garland himself along with Christopher Ray.
(54:08):
There's no other reason to release this in the manner
in which they did, Okay, So that the alleged genesis
of this letter comes from, as Waters said, somebody received
a box from Ruth saying hold on to this box
it had. It was a box of his belongings after
(54:29):
the failed assassination. Reportedly, this friend opened the box, discovered
this letter and took a picture of it and sent
it to the FBI, which was the actual That picture
was from that individual who took a picture of it
and sent it to the FBI. It wasn't because the
FBI had possession of the letter, which in and of itself, no,
(54:55):
it hurts my head to think about this. If you
make this part of a Department of Justice filing against
this ruth character. Now immediately people notice how the Department
Justice would never normally publish a letter or a manifesto
that would stimulate the mentally unstable, which this does. However,
(55:17):
when it comes to Donald Trump, all bets are off.
The DOJFBI customary defense moves are thrown out. Remember, Donald
Trump is their target, never the victim. And I'm telling
you this and repeating what Conservatory House said. If the
Department Justice wanted did not want someone to follow up
(55:38):
on the bunny from this guy, they wouldn't release it.
After all, it's dangerous. And there's another question. How did
this guy who couldn't even keep up on child support
payments afford his house in Hawaii and have the ability
to offer one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty? How
(56:00):
did he assemble that for the head of President Trump.
There's a picture within that article that that that portrays
President Trump. The important thing to know about an assassination
or an attempted assassination is not who fired the shot,
but who paid for the bullet.
Speaker 2 (56:19):
That is exactly right.
Speaker 1 (56:23):
Now, Okay, keep that, read that article and even dig
down into the indictment itself. One more video. This is
one of five, and you've heard and seen this before,
but this plays into again the nugget that's involved here.
You know what I'm going to leave that. You can
(56:44):
watch that on your own. That's cut three in the
show notes. But here is my the ultimate, my closing thought.
We were tasked with looking into the Butler assassination, creating
a pattern of life of Thomas Crooks. That that's what
we were doing. That happened, of course, on July thirteenth,
two thousand and four. Because such events don't normally happen
(57:08):
in the vacuum, we felt compelled to add elements to
what has been described as a second assassination attempt that
with the Ruth character that occurred sixty four days later,
on fifteen September twenty twenty four. Investigators infused that information
and data from the latest attempt and have been researching
and investigating both events. Listen to me carefully what I'm
(57:29):
saying here. Our method and manner of investigation have been
both have been to treat both instances as independent from
one another, however, noting possible overlaps in both witness accounts
and geolocation data, that's what we've been doing. We've done
this to cast a wide net, pulling information that admittedly
(57:53):
primarily but potentially are common to both events. In addition
to investigating both events, we also took into account the
nineteenth September twenty twenty four announcement by Representative Gates that
there are currently five assassination known assassination teams in the US,
two or three of which are reportedly foreigned to domestic
(58:15):
of course, out to kill President Donald Trump. Think about
that letter, but also think about the fact that the
DOJFBI they know about these teams. Right, If you know
about them, where is the proactivity with respect of those teams?
If they are known, there should be some proaction there. Okay,
Now it should be noted that we have taken steps
(58:36):
to avoid creating patterns where none exist, as opposed to
identifying where they do exist. This labor intensive process is ongoing,
but our findings are disturbing, and I will say this.
Our updated tactical approach to our initial assignment continues with
these important potentially related editions introduced as discribe now. As
(59:02):
we asserted initially and continue today. Our initial reporting of this,
which was early in the month, reiterated and as reiterated
in additional reports, our findings into, for example, the pattern
of life of Thomas Matthew Crooks, aged twenty, strongly indicate
that he did not act alone. There are similarities that
(59:26):
overlap between Crooks and Ruth, and I'm telling you right now,
with the profiles of each, although they're starkly different, other
similarities exist where they should not. It is here that
our finding indicates that at least one active network and
support of support as previously outline, corresponds with gates recent disclosure. Folks,
(59:49):
I'm telling you right now, the threat is not over.
Speaker 2 (59:51):
It's there.
Speaker 1 (59:53):
The next forty days seventy six days after that are
going to be the most important days in this time period.
Speaker 2 (59:59):
God bless
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!