Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
He certainly walks the walk when he talks to the
talk talking about my co host Rob Kendall, who's actually
on vacation but still working today.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
There's no off switch on that man, although.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
He's not getting paid to do this. He said, if
you want to make fun of me for being a
complete loser, let people know who live in the town
of Brownsburg know that I'm spending my vacation trying to
take down the government. I met the mainstream McDonald's from
eleven until noon. He invites you to come discuss any
(00:34):
political gripes of your choosing.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
So this is happening right now. It's just after eleven o'clock.
Right now, Rob Kendall is at the McDonald's on Main
Street in Brownsburg asking you to stop by and come
see him. He is gathering petitions to turn Brownsburg from
a town into a city and also wants to discuss
any political gripes you might.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
Have because on Chris, miss Eve Eve, that's what you
want to do when you're out and about. Right now,
last minute, Aaron's done, You're you're on your way traveling
to grandmother's house or wherever you're headed. You know, wrap
up work stuff, at McDonald's and have a political argument
with Rob Kendall.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Well, and that's what Rob Kendall's doing. He's not buying
some last minute Christmas presents. He's not busy, you know,
caroling around the town of Brownsburg. He's busy trying to
get a petition signed and wanting to, you know, get
into political discussions with the public. And he's asking people
to do that. So go to the McDonald's on Main
(01:36):
Street in Brownsburg right now. Rob will be out there
until noon today for your political enjoyment.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
Some people have hobbies.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
This is Rob's hobby.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
That's it for This is what he does.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
That's what he says on the air too. This is
this is his hobby. So the Justice Department has released
nearly thirty thousand just additional pages of documents, all related
to Jeffrey Epstein. The files are now available on the
DOJ website. Some of the documents do reference Donald Trump,
including emails and flight logs, and they also reference Bill
(02:10):
Clinton and some of them are a little bit more
disturbing as more comes out.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Yeah, we talked earlier and again these are literally just
came out within the last half an hour. Forty five minutes,
and so we're all trying to go through them and
kind of pull out the most newsworthy things. We mentioned the.
Speaker 1 (02:25):
Letter Bizarre Epstein Nasty Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
That Epstein wrote to Larry Nasser and referenced Donald Trump
in that one. Yes, it turns out that Donald Trump
probably was on Epstein's jet a lot more than what
we had been led to believe until this point. And
in fairness, there's not one of the Epstein victims that
have come out and said Donald Trump has ever done
anything wrong in therect But this is all information that
we need to share. But this is the latest one
(02:51):
that I have found. So this was an email sent
by just A in quotes capital A at balmoorl And
I'll get into that a little bit more. A is
yeah exactly. And this was sent to Juse Maxwell and
it just says I'm up here at Balmoral summer camp
for the Royal family. Have you found me some new
(03:14):
inappropriate friends?
Speaker 1 (03:16):
Bros?
Speaker 2 (03:16):
Just disgusting. So the implication is is that this email
was sent by Prince Andrew Balmoral Castle, famous residence of
the British royal family. So again written by A at Balmoral,
I'm up here at Balmoral summer camp for the royal family.
Have you found me some new inappropriate friends?
Speaker 1 (03:38):
So the New York Post put out an article and
they said it's time to treat Bill Clinton like Prince
Andrew and banish him from public society. How many more
people are they going to put on that list that
should be banished from public society. Clinton's team urge full transparency.
They accuse the DOJ of selective releases, implying wrongdoing. Survivors
(04:01):
have been very critical of the DOJ for excessive reactions.
Trump has expressed frustration over these selective releases, saying that
photos and claims about others were unfairly highlighted. Here is
Donald Trump. Now, this was yesterday when he was talking
about the Trump Fleet, the battleships that he once built.
(04:22):
Of course, the reporters wanted to ask him about his
thoughts on the Epstein files. And here's what he said.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
And were you surprised by the number of photos of
Bill Clinton and the Epstein files?
Speaker 2 (04:33):
And can you commit to their full release by the
end of the year. Some of the victims were protesting
that too many of them were retacted.
Speaker 4 (04:39):
I know there are a lot of people that are
angry about all of the pictures of other people. You know,
but I think it's terrible. Look, I don't like the
I like Bill Clinton. I've always gotten along with Bill Clinton.
I've been nice to him, He's been nice to me.
We've always gotten along. Respect him. I hate to see
photos come out of him. But this is what the Democrats,
mostly Democrats up the bad Republicans are asking for, so
(05:02):
they give you their photos of me too. Everybody was
friendly with this guy, either friendly or not friendly.
Speaker 2 (05:07):
But then you know, he was around.
Speaker 4 (05:08):
He was all over Palm Beach and other places. The
head of Harvard was his best friends Larry Summers, and
Bill Clinton was a friend of his, but everybody was
I actually threw him out of mari A Lago. And
as I you know, as a person that was in
mara A Lago, I threw him out of mar A Lagos.
This is mar Alaga. It's the hottest place in I
think it's the hottest place in the world. But it's
(05:29):
the hottest place in Florida, and everybody would come here,
he'd come here. We actually threw him out. But no,
I don't like the pictures of Bill Clinton being shown.
I don't like the pictures of other people being shown.
I think it's a terrible thing. I think Bill Linton's
a big boy, he can handle it. But you probably
have pictures being exposed of other people that innocently met
(05:51):
Jeffrey Epstein years ago, many years ago, and they're you know,
highly respected bankers and lawyers and others.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
Okay, a couple things about what he said. You probably
have pictures of many people who met with Jeffrey Epstein
years ago. How many of them knew what he was
up to and didn't say anything. And he also said
that everybody was friendly with Jeffrey Epstein. That's not true.
You had an elite class that was friendly with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
You know what, That's a great point. I mean, there
was the story that came out about these elite journalists
that were hosting Jeffrey Epstein at holiday parties as late
as the you know, twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen, well
after his conviction. Look, this entire story is a pox
on everybody both sides, Republican and Democrat, that have been
in federal government and let these things sit out there
(06:40):
and allowed them to not be released to the public.
For decades, because some of this information goes back to
the early nineties.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
Yeah, well he was investigated in the late nineties and
New York and nothing happened and the story was completely buried.
And how awful would you feel if you were Pete
Hegseth or Marco Rubio standing next to him while he's
fielding these questions about Epstein, Like, these two guys are
not related to this story at all, yet they're standing
(07:07):
there at that press conference.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
But I think you bring up a great point. This
is this story's gross on every level. And one of
the most gross things about all of it is the
fact that these elites have been protecting themselves and protecting
other elites for decades now. And this is finally we're
getting at least a tiny glimpse of what that looked like.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
And at one point it sounded like Donald Trump was
getting a little frustrated with the reporters who were continuing
to ask about the Epstein files.
Speaker 4 (07:37):
And they'll end up because of guys like Massy, who's
a real lowlife whose falls are down to about nine percent.
By the way, the great state of Kentucky. If you
look at Kentucky Kentucky is such a great place, but
I don't know. They've got a couple of people in
there that are very strange in terms of leadership, and
Massy's a loser and he likes it, and that he
(07:59):
works with the Democrats. He's just being used by the
Democrats because what this whole thing is with Epstein is
a way of trying to deflect from the tremendous success
that the Republican Party has, Like, for instance, today we're
building the biggest ships in the world, most powerful ships
in the world, and they're asking me questions about Jeffrey Epstein.
I thought that was finished. I believe they gave over
(08:21):
one hundred thousand pages of documents and there is a
tremendous backlash. It's an interesting question because a lot of
people are very angry that pictures are being released of
other people that really had nothing to do with Epstein,
but they're in a picture with him because he was
at a party, and you ruin a reputation of somebody.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
So a lot of.
Speaker 4 (08:40):
People are very angry that this continues. A lot of
Republicans are angry because of the fact that it's just
used to deflect against a tremendous success. Look, we have
eighteen trus.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Okay. People are angry because of the way this was handled.
People are angry because of the lack of accountability. People
are angry because of the lack of transparency. Think back
when they invited all of those influencers to the White
House and gave him all those binders, and they stood
out there smiling like, hey, look at us, We're so popular.
(09:13):
They picked us to release this information. But yet they
didn't release anything. There was nothing in those binders. This
whole process has been awful. And I understand that. You know,
if Donald Trump is innocent in all of this, he's
sick of talking about it. He's the one who brought
it up when he ran on it.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Yeah, and I keep going back to, you know, I
just read the you know quote from Prince Andrew. Elites
have been protecting Prince Andrew. Elites have been protecting all
of these other elites that have been to Jeffrey Epstein's
island that have been involved in this scandal. And it
took us decades and fighting like crazy and like just
(09:56):
short of a public uprising to just get base sick
information released on this. They have to pass a law well,
and nobody's really being held accountable yet we haven't even
gotten to that stage. Nobody's been prosecuted other than jose
Ane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. There are plenty of others
that probably should be. We can't even get to that
stage in this process yet because we can't even get
(10:19):
the basic information about what happened.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Yeah, okay, we need to talk about what the City
of Fort Wayne posted yesterday. Don't mind us just seeing
how it looks. And it's a picture of downtown Fort
Wayne with a football stadium in the middle with the
Chicago Bears logo on the roof.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
Yeah, I got to give it up to the City
of Fort and this is on the City of Fort
Wayne's official Twitter account. Got to give it up to
their communications team for putting that out. That was pretty funny.
I don't think anybody in the city of Fort Wayne
believes that the Chicago Bears will be building their stadium
there anytime soon, but still a pretty funny joke. And
I would recommend South Bend should do the same. Notre
Dame should offer up Notre Dame state for the Bears
(11:01):
to use. But the more and more we hear about
this story about the Bears potentially moving to northwest Indiana.
The more and more it seems like it might be
a possibility. We talked yesterday that there were survey crews
hired by the Bears organized legend allegedly hired by the
Bears organization to start taking soil samples around Wolf Lake
(11:21):
near Hammond, Indiana. So the more this has talked about,
the more and more it doesn't sound ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
You have to many people were asking what is the
C stand for? If it's actually going to be in
Fort Wayne, the Chicago Bears in Fort Wayne, Indiana. And
they also brought up the issue that downtown Fort Wayne
has parking limitations.
Speaker 2 (11:42):
That's all right, we can build a massive parking structure
and so all right, we can do underground parking like
they do at the current Soldier Field in Chicago.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Okay. So Indiana has been named a very special honor
and we'll talk about it coming up. It is ninety
three WYBC. Congratulations. The Washington Post has named Indiana State
of the Year. We're number one where number one? Where
number one?
Speaker 5 (12:09):
Oh boy.
Speaker 1 (12:10):
It was their inaugural State of the Year award. They've
never done it before. And they started with the Hoosiers
the great state of Indiana. State of India.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Is that because of the fabulous economic environment that we
have here, the low taxes that we have compared to
other states. No, it must be for those reasons. Is
it because of the wonderful sports culture that's been built
in the city of Indianapolis in the state of Indiana.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
Nope. The reason why Indiana was named State of the
Year by the Washington Post was because Indiana lawmakers rejected
President Trump's push for midday mid decade redistrict.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
This is such, This is Washington, the Washington Post being
the Washington Post. They find some state that rebuked Donald
Trump for whatever reason, doesn't matter, and that's that's the qualifier.
That's the criteria they used to declare Indiana the State
of the Year. This is disgusting for the Washington Post.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
They said that Indiana resisted intense pressure and threats, including
from the White House and the governor Mike Brown. So
imagine this, There's this first time award from you know, newspaper,
and you're like, you win, congratulations, Are you kidding me?
Indiana State of the Year? I really want to put
(13:28):
this in the State of the state of address. Oh no,
the reason why is because something that I was pushing failed.
Maybe I won't mention miss.
Speaker 2 (13:38):
Imagine having that conversation in the governor's office. Hey, you're right,
the Washington Post named the state of the year. No kidding,
that's awesome. We should put out a.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
Post, right, is it because of my economic agenda?
Speaker 2 (13:49):
Let's get a press ready, let's get a press release,
let's put it out on social media. It's because we
did not pass redistricting, the signature thing that you wanted
to accomplished in a special session.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
So they did cite a few other reasons. Also laughable
property tax cuts, they said, also the education policy, the
removal of income limits for school vouchers, and also charter
school and zoning changes. Laws made it easier to start
charter schools. So who's going to win next year.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
State of the Year State of the air. Well, apparently
all we have to do is find something that Donald
Trump wants and tell him to stick it, and will
get State of the Year for twenty twenty second year.
Speaker 1 (14:36):
Make it a dynasty. This is generational State of the Year,
that's what this is. The House House Minority leader was
very critical of the designation as well. Okay, so you've
got the top stories that shaped Indianapolis in twenty twenty
(14:57):
five year in review.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Shall we do it please?
Speaker 1 (15:00):
Okay, you've got all the top story read district.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
Yeah, they had a conversation with the Washington Post apparently.
Speaker 1 (15:10):
Also coming in at number two property tax reforms again
something we just mentioned.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
Another things that nobody wanted in the recap so far
Number one.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Oh no, we wanted property tax reform. The lawmakers didn't
want that, your local governments didn't want.
Speaker 2 (15:27):
That, and we got a bill that nobody is happy with.
Speaker 1 (15:30):
They also say IPS overhaul is another top story in
Indianapolis for the past year. How about the Indianapolis Colts Morning,
the passing of Jim Mersey.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
It was a big story, his daughter's taking.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
Over the leadership. You also have IU controversies. You had
the board of trustees shift them being appointed now by
the governor. You also had the lawsuit over the student newspaper.
And you also had IU football being the number one
football team in the country.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
But this is supposed to be in Indianapolis, the top
stories of Indianapolis, And that's all right, will best question?
Speaker 1 (16:07):
Look, Bloomington is.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
Like a far suburb of Indianapolis. We'll count it all right.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
Another big story out of Indy Joe hawk Sett scrutiny
over him, calls for his resignation over the handling of
the sexual harassment allegations. Of course, he remains in office,
and the twenty seven mayole race expected to focus on
the culture within the city hall.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Now I'm surprised, probably the one story after redistricting that
garnered Indianapolis the most national news not on that list,
and that's the Mark Sanchez story. Oh no, certainly that's not.
I mean, there's no real big long term impact, positive
or negative. It's really kind of an indivior for him
individual story. It's a big story, but man, I mean
(16:53):
that was huge national news for weeks. And I'm sure
his court date keeps getting pushed back, but I mean,
this is going to be illegal process that will probably
play out for a little while and then certainly bring
Indianapolis to the spotlight again. But the Mark Sanchez story
was a huge story in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
Another big story that they're saying comes out of Indianapolis
this year is the Indigo Purple line. And finally sports
injuries on Oh.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
The Indigo, purple line, purple line, that's like a top
story in Indianapolis for twenty twenty seves.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Well, it's come on, do you know how many days
I complain about Washington being torn up on my way
to work because of that? The construction alone has affected
the city. What they've done, ripping up all the roads
to make it happen to.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
People in this city and the organizations in this city
that keep pushing this public transit that nobody is virtually
nobody is asking for and nobody is using and claiming
like it's some great thing that we're accomplishing here in
this town.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
Finally, sports injuries Tyrese Haliburton's achilles tear also Caitlin Clark.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Yep and kept her out for the season. Those are
big stories, yeah and valid.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
H Okay. So we also have Americans' top concerns for
the coming year for twenty twenty six.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Let me guess somehow, economy, unaffordable cost of living. They've
wrecked that all up into one tion.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Yesh. Yeah, many Americans remaining focus on the price of groceries, housing,
and just overall general expenses. Approximately twenty percent of adults
want government action on housing costs another top concern going
into next year healthcare costs. About forty percent of adults
(18:41):
cited healthcare as a top priority.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
That is going to be that that's going to that
is end up. I'm going to make a prediction that'll
end up be in the number one story of twenty
twenty six or healthcare possibly because everybody's.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
You want to, you want to, you want to bet
the government's going to shut down again in January.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Oh, you got to give me odds on that. I mean,
it's almost a certainty that the government it's going to
shut down again in January. I would need minimum ten
to one odds on that bet. But I'll take it.
I'm always up for some action. I'm always up for
gambling on what the government's going to do. Sure, I'll
take some my action on that.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
Adult age forty five to fifty nine are especially worried
about health care costs and those surging prices. Another top
concern for twenty six immigration. Democrats concern have increased from
thirty two percent to forty percent. Republicans concern has declined
(19:31):
from seventy percent to sixty percent.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
And I think that whether you're a Democrat or Republican.
When you say my concern is immigration, you probably mean
completely different things. Because if you're a conservative, my concern
for immigration is we've got too many illegal immigrants here.
If I'm a Demo, if I'm a liberal, my concern
for immigration is ice doing raids and removing the legal
immigrants from the country.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
Another concern for many people public confidence and government. Well,
if you had any at all, that's what's the biggest shocker. Right.
Sixty six percent said they are slightly or not at
all confident, and that is up from last year where
it said at fifty eight percent.
Speaker 2 (20:11):
Sixty seven percent. Is that what you said? Sixty six
sixty six percent? That seems low. That means that there
are roughly thirty four percent of the population that has
an incredible amount of confidence in governmental organizations. Seems high
to me.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
All right, this is the Kennel and Casey Show. It's
ninety three WYBC. The Federal Communications Commission has announced a
ban on the sale of new foreign made drones. This
includes a lot of Chinese brands, and they have cited
national security risks. So Congress passed a defense bill last
year and it directed a review of Chinese drones and
(20:51):
the FCC's review found that all foreign made drones and
critical components pose unacceptable risks to the United States. Secure.
Of course, there are a couple of exemptions to that,
and those are drones that are used by the Pentagon
or DHS, so you are not allowed to have a drone.
(21:12):
But if it's the government, they can use Chinese made drones.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Rules for the not for me. And you know, some
people are surprised they hear the FCC, and they always
think it's always talked about when it comes to regulation
of broadcast radio and broadcast television and content on there.
But the FCC regulates any sort of radio frequency and
those are obviously used in all remote controlled drones. So
that's why the FCC is involved in this process right now.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
They say that there's a lot of large events coming up,
for example, the World Cup and the America two fifty celebrations,
also the twenty eight Los Angeles Olympics, and all of
these heightened concerns about drones being used by criminals or
terrorists or any hostile actor is the reasoning behind the
(21:59):
ban on this. So I want you to get out
the world's smallest violin.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Okay, hold on let me get it out of its case.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
Oh look, it's so small, got it.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
It's easy to carry.
Speaker 1 (22:11):
Are you ready to play it?
Speaker 2 (22:12):
I'm ready to play it.
Speaker 1 (22:13):
Okay, here you go. I want you to play a
symphony for Hunter Biden Island. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (22:21):
I was ready for Jim to start playing a violin.
I was so ready for it.
Speaker 2 (22:27):
Let's do the clip. First, play the.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
Clip, and then you'll understand why he's going to play
this for Hunter Biden.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
Litigation sucks.
Speaker 5 (22:35):
I've been Look, I've been tied up in criminal and
civil and in courts, and you know, I mean like
I got you know, I don't know fourteen fifteen million
dollars in debt that I have no idea that if
I have, you know, I mean millions of dollars in
(22:55):
debt that you know, nobody's right to the rescue for
Hunter Biden. My dad, you know, entered the presidency, is
the first man to ever take the office. And he
left the presidency the you know, not poorest. I mean,
which he's fine, but you know, like he has no
we have no generational wealth. I don't have any, you know,
despite what these guys say, like there's no billions of
(23:18):
dollars buried underneath my dad's house in Delaware.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
How's my violin imitation.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
For the big guy go?
Speaker 2 (23:30):
They spent it all? Well, I'll tell I'll tell you.
I think where all Hunter Biden's money went to. We
saw in the photographs hookers and cocaine. Allegedly. Yeah, this
is a guy that got allegedly allegedly got millions, allegedly
got paid millions for sitting on the board of Ukrainian company,
had people paying allegedly up to half a million dollars
(23:50):
for a single piece of crappy artwork from Hunter Biden,
and the guy sitting here trying to cry, poor mouth.
I can't imagine one person in this country feeling sorry
for Hunter Biden. The guy had an affair with his
dead brother's widow and got her addicted to crack cocaine. Allegedly,
there's zero sympathy anywhere for Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
Well, he's got fifteen million dollars in debt and he
has no idea how he's going to be able to
pay it off.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Okay, Apparently if I were you, I'd get to painting,
because that's the easiest way for you to make some money.
Apparently you are a very hot commodity in the art world,
where people are paying half a million dollars for a
single piece of artwork. I'd get some rushes and some
paints and a bunch of canvas and start cranking those out.
You could probably be done with that debt by January first.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
So what he was getting half a million per painting?
There were some instances where he see a million in debt.
So that's thirty paintings, thirty canvases.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
Let's go just throw some slop up on a canvas
and get it out there in the marketplace. You're in
such demand. He's the darling of the art industry. Apparently
easy to fix that.
Speaker 1 (24:57):
Yes, So did you see that One in six Americans
in a relationship have a backup plan. About sixteen percent
of your backup plan, Well, about sixteen percent of Americans
that are in relationships admit that there's someone they'd leave
their current partner for if that other person showed any
(25:17):
romantic interest.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
One in six seems like a lot. That seems like
a ton.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Men are more likely than women to have a plan.
Speaker 6 (25:26):
Does this include hall passes?
Speaker 1 (25:28):
Ah, there it is. You got a list, Kylon.
Speaker 6 (25:31):
I don't, but I hear plenty of people talk about him. Okay,
no I have one.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Oh please page? Who is it?
Speaker 6 (25:38):
Reggaejeon page? He was the Bridgerston star that blew up.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Yeah, yeah, I know who you're talking about. He looks
good in tails, hot top hat and tails.
Speaker 6 (25:49):
Oh yeah, fairy ChIL dream comes from Oh.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
I just go very handsome gentleman.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
Yeah he's dreamy. Twenty percent of people that are in
relationships don't consider their current partner their soulmate, with women
slightly more likely than men to feel this way, and
millennials are most likely to believe in the soulmate concept.
You're the one.
Speaker 2 (26:13):
They were sold on Disney Princess movies their entire lives problem.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Huh so. Psychologists say that noting someone's attractiveness is normal biology,
but comparing your partner to a fantasy person Kylon may
signal that something is missing in your relationship, like excitement
or playfulness or romance.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
Okay, so here, who's the guy for you?
Speaker 1 (26:40):
I get only get one?
Speaker 2 (26:41):
You get one? Ryland got one, you get one.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
I had one. Guy. Now, I'm not gonna be ridiculous
and say Brad Pitt because he's kind of ikey to
me now, I used to think he was attractive. And
Johnny Depp used to be on that list, but he's
way ikey now. And then Bradley Cooper I think just
got engaged, didn't he.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
So that removes it. So he's off the list. So
it's got to be a single guy for you. No, no, no, no,
I'm considering everyone.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
You know who I'm gonna put on that listing on
the list may surprise you. Jason Bateman, Oh.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
No, I hey, chicks like a guy that can make
him laugh.
Speaker 1 (27:21):
Yeah, he's funny and I don't know if you've seen
the latest pictures of him. I think it was on
Vanity Fair. I mean, yeah, I could be wrong.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Yeah, I would not have guessed that.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Yeah, but he's he's he's looking a little more refined,
a little older, his hair is a little longer. And yeah, and.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
He was he was in the TV show Ozarks. He
was a tough guy that got stuffed on.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
He's not one of these big muscular dudes like so, yeah,
it's a mind thing, not a physical thing.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
I love all the videos I see on social Are
you feeling about that? Yeah, I'm totally fine. It's all good.
I love the videos I see on social media when
you see couples talking about this, it's like, who'd be
your hall past, your one person, and the woman's always like, oh,
to be brad Pitt or you know, Bradley Cooper. And
then they turned to the guy and he's like your.
Speaker 1 (28:10):
Sister, too real, your friend Stacy.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
Yeah, that's always I.
Speaker 1 (28:18):
Was very age appropriate with uh, with him with my choice.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Uh huh.
Speaker 1 (28:24):
That's a warning for you to be age appropriate. To
be you can't wait to be age appropriate. Don't say
a name. Okay, do you have one? Okay, he's not
saying a name. That's all I need to know. Yuck.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
Don't get me that. I'm younger than you are, so
what is age but what is age appropriate for me
is different than what is age appropriate for you? Four years, five,
five years?
Speaker 1 (28:55):
Kylin. You didn't know that, did you.
Speaker 6 (28:57):
I wouldn't have guessed it.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Yeah, right, because I look good.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
That's because I look so young.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Did you see Notre Dame USC They're not going to
play each other until what is it, twenty thirty?
Speaker 2 (29:10):
Maybe in twenty thirty. This is a big deal for
Notre Dame fans, as I certainly am one, so Notre Dame.
In USC, it is called the longest intersectional rivalry in
college football history. That means the two teams aren't in
the same conference but play each other every year. And look,
it's been great. It's been a huge rivalry for years,
(29:31):
and USC basically just threw all of that rivalry into
tradition in the toilet and said that we're done with
all of this. It's been playing.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Each other since nineteen forty six.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
It's an embarrassment really for USC. And here's what I
think the problem is on this is this is being
driven a lot by their coach, Lincoln Riley, who is
not from southern California. He's not a USC guy. They
hired him from Oklahoma. He's looking at how he can
adjust things for their USC's benefit in the short term.
The USC getting their butts kicked by every year by
(30:02):
Notre Dame not good for his team. And he's catching
a lot of flak for this because there are people
that are true USC diehards that have been part of
that program, or even alumni from that school that are
very very upset with Lincoln Riley and all of this.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Well, they're also saying that because it's the timing late
season games. It affects their college football playoff rankings, and
because Notre Dame is independent, they have more flexibility in
scheduling unlike USC.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
But in the history, Notre Dame's already made adjustments to
the schedule. So years ago, USC did not want to
be playing a late season game in Chile South Bend,
and so they adjusted the schedule so every other year
it's home and home for you Notre Dame in USC.
When the games are in South Bend, the games are
much earlier in the year, usually in September or October.
When the games are at USC Southern California, it's always
(30:52):
Thanksgiving weekend, so you don't have to worry about the
weather as much. Notre Dame made that adjustment for the
weather years and years ago. Two USC's benefit now us
he is coming back against it. No good enough else
what else you're gonna give us, Notre Dame. This is
I mean, this college football is changing dramatically and very
very quickly, and this is just another aspect of it,
(31:13):
and it's unfortunate. It's a great tradition. Hopefully they can
get it back there again. But this really hurts USC
a lot more than it hurts Notre Dame. Who else
is USC's rival other than Notre Dame. You can sit here,
it's maybe UL Ucla, but UCLA's got a terrible program.
How many rivals Notre Dame have all Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Indiana, USC.
(31:35):
I mean, there's probably a dozen teams that you could
say Navy easily, that you could say Notre Dame has
a right college, huge one with Boston College. This is
about USC's only rivalry, and they're kissing it goodbye.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Keishawn Johnson had something to say about it, Man, you.
Speaker 3 (31:52):
Know what I've heard it off, I've seen it all.
I can't believe what I just heard. But I just
heard that we're not playing Notre Dame. I think the
series is getting ready to end, like in the next
year or so. Here's what I'm gonna say, Man, I
don't know what the f is going on in our
athletic department. Okay, we got people in there that are
(32:12):
not Trojans, that don't know anything about being a trojan
running our athletic department. We got a head coach that
knows nothing about being a trojan.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
See, why don't we just.
Speaker 3 (32:24):
Not play football.
Speaker 2 (32:25):
How about that?
Speaker 1 (32:26):
You know who he sounds like. He sounds like conservatives
who were very mad at their fellow Republicans for not redistricting.
Speaker 2 (32:35):
Right, Because that's Keishawn Johnson. He is an alumni of USC,
played college football at USC, went on to have a
Hall of Fame career in the NFL. And he's calling
out his own, you know, college and team and saying,
you guys are screwing this up and you better fix it.
Speaker 1 (32:48):
This is the Kendall and Case Show. It's ninety three
WIBC top toys of twenty twenty five. They all highlight creativity, coding,
and emotional learning. I've never heard of half of these
toys and so beyond or out of that demo when
the toy hunt is on.
Speaker 2 (33:08):
Yeah, we're well beyond the toy buying stage of our lives.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
My robotic pet coating Chameleon.
Speaker 2 (33:15):
It's a lot of words.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Yeah, it's a programmable robotic chameleon with color changing and
interactive play modes. You also have loops Lab music creation
system that does not sound very fun. That does not
sound like that's that's not a cabbage patch kids.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
Hey kids, are you ready to learn?
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Are you ready? For the loops Lab music creation systems. Hey,
let's kids mix music genres easily for hands on creativity. Okay,
you've got the Loubooboo figures.
Speaker 2 (33:51):
No, those are big. Okay, those are big. I've heard
of those. Those are like big in the collectibles world
kind of like they're like that. I don't want to
call them the new Beanie babies, but they're the new
Beanie babies.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
But that's what they are, exactly collectible furry toys that
can be paired with accessories. Okay, you've got Lego. Finally,
something I understands. Legos are the list.
Speaker 2 (34:11):
Where's PlayStation? Where's Xbox? Where's the new Call of Duty game?
Speaker 1 (34:15):
No, No, you've got Legos. That's that's about it. So
Jason Kelsey he he kicked off things last night at
the Monday Night football game.
Speaker 2 (34:25):
Yes, former NFL player, brother to Travis Kelcey, future brother
in Lawda Taylor Swift.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
He had a little side quest. He was playing the
part of Santa Claus last night.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
So this was at Lucas Oil Stadium last night, right
before Monday Night football. Jason Kelsey part of the Monday
Night Football studio crew. It was a lot of fun
dancing with Blue and a drum corps there on the
field at the Lucas Oil Stadium.
Speaker 1 (35:13):
Lift. It was something at the end, I didn't quite
understand it what he was saying.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
It was a Merry Christmas or something along, something about
some elf or something like elf on a shelf or no,
what's the ELF's name in the movie elf, El, Rudy some.
I can't believe. I can't remember that that's what he
was referencing.
Speaker 1 (35:31):
Talking about Will Ferrell's character.
Speaker 2 (35:32):
Yes, yes, yes, there was a guy dress.
Speaker 6 (35:34):
Yeah, we got buddy here, buddy elf.
Speaker 2 (35:36):
That's what it had. We got out.
Speaker 1 (35:39):
Thank you, Kyle.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
We got buddy the elf here. He's referencing a guy
that was.
Speaker 1 (35:42):
Dressed up like an I was driving me crazy when
I couldn't figure out what he had said. I knew
it was something about the elf. So America's Top New
Year's Resolutions for twenty six number one on the list
lose weight to exercise more. Yeah, of course it is
all right. That's going to do it for us until
the New Year. Kylin, Thank you, Merry Christmas, Jim, thank
(36:03):
you for coming in for the past.
Speaker 2 (36:04):
Happy to Doe and a half. I am excited for
the new year.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
And we wish you a merry Christmas, a happy New Year,
and thank you so much for being here. This has
been the Kendall and Casey Show. It's ninety three WIBC.