October 2, 2024 • 30 mins
Debate winners and losers
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, it's Michael. Your morning show can be heard on
great radio stations across the country, like News Talk ninety
two point one and six hundred WREC in Memphis, Tennessee,
or thirteen hundred The Patriot in Tulsa, our Talk six
fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. We invite you to listen
live while you're getting ready in the morning, and to
take us along for the drive to work. But as
we always say, better late than never. Thanks for joining
(00:21):
us for the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Well two three, starting your morning off right, A.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
New way of talk, a new way of understanding well,
because we're in this to get it. This is your
morning show with Michael del Joonal.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Rise and Shine and good morning. I'm Michael del Journal.
This is your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your I Heart app. Welcome to Wednesday, the second
of October. So much to talk about. One hundred and
sixty people now reported dead as a result of Hurricane Helene.
Rescue teams continue to search for survivors in North Carolina.
President Biden scheduled to visit parts of western North Carolina today. Hey,
(01:00):
this is Buncom County. Authorities report the death toll has
risen to sixty in their county alone. It was in
total one hundred and eighty one rockets fired from Iran
at Israel, not through a proxy from Iran to Israel.
Now everybody waits to see if Benjamin Etna who responds
to Iran as he responded to first to Mosas and
(01:23):
then hes be a lot in the surrogates port strike
enters day two at about a billion dollars a day
of cost. And the big Veep debate was last night.
White House correspondent Your Morning Show contributor John Decker is
joining us, John, a civil substantive, an actual debate last night.
That was a different. Rarity was different.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
That was different. Yeah, I wish there were more of those,
just in terms of what we see in our political life.
But that was the last debate that we are likely
to see this election cycle. Was a good way to
go off in terms of being cordial and the two
candidates talking about policy, no personal attacks. You know, if
you were expecting talking over each other, which I was,
(02:07):
you were disappointed because you did not have that. You
saw these candidates let each other finish their thoughts, finish
their points. So this is the kind of debate. I
think most Americans, regardless of where you stand, typically want
to see and I think that the people at the
top of the ticket to learn something from JD.
Speaker 5 (02:26):
Vans and Jim Walls.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Well, I'll say it differently and more crudely, both outshine
the top of the ticket. I mean JD. Vance far
more outshine. Now that doesn't mean that JD. Vans could
get elected like Donald Trump or potentially, you know, Tim
Wallas could get elected as Kamala could, but they both
in terms of civility and substance and less reality TV.
(02:50):
I mean, if you were on the left, you were
loving the points the governor was making, and if you
were on the right, you were loving JD. Vance's points.
But the question is what about independent swing voters in
swing states? How did they perceive it? And I gave
the edge to JD there because he was right on
laser focus with the undecided women in swing states. I mean,
(03:14):
I'm yelling at the TV. Are you kidding me? The
unborn child has no right to life, liberty in a
pursuit of happiness. They're not even involved in this human right.
But then I thought, no, that would be the wrong
thing to do. The way JD Vance handled it, and
for Tim Walls, sometimes he talked more about Minnesota than
he did than he did Kamala Harris. But I thought
(03:35):
that the big silent knockout punch was the JD. Vans
kept referring to it as the Harris administration.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
It's not.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
I'm not even sure it's the Biden administration. But and
he went with it, and I think that's a big
mistake because that makes her the incumbent Donald Trump. The
turning of the page and the change, and then when
he phrased Donald Trump is not having a plan but
a record, I thought that was strong. I'm gonna give
the edge to JD. Vance.
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Okay, you know that's why debates are interesting, because they
are so subjective in terms of the way that you
view these two candidates. I will say this, I don't
get into that. I leave it to others to make
those determinations. And it's really fruitless and pointless to argue
with someone. If you were you do this, this is
your job. But for me, if I say who the
(04:22):
winner and the loser? Is that all being said? Michael
the smoother candidate. The smoother candidate was clearly JD. Vance,
you know, and I think that was pretty clear from
the start. It seemed to me like a governor wolves
was nervous from the start. He actually picked it up
and became one, particularly talking about certain subjects that I
(04:45):
think come natural to him. Reproductive rights was one of
those areas. Talking about healthcare another area in which he
felt comfortable. But overall, the smoother candidate up on that camp,
up on that debate stage for ninety minutes was JD.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Vance, who's been the consistent big loser and all these
debates the network's moderating them for CBS. I thought it
was interesting, you know, whenever I have one about a
minute and a half with you, right when I talk about
media bias, how do you do bias well? By the
stories you cover, the stories you don't, the angles you choose,
the angles you don't, the people you talk to, the
people you don't. Questions you ask, and quotes you use.
(05:19):
Questions you don't ask, and quotes you don't use. That's
kind of how it was last night. That was designed
just in the way the questions were laid out for undecided,
Democrat leaning voters in swing states. That's why the climate
was the second so much time spent on guns, democracy, abortion,
there was some time spent on the economy, a little
bit on the border, very little on Israel, and none
(05:43):
on Ukraine and none on the port strike. And then
you know, saying they weren't going to fact check, and
then jad Vance holds them to that and catches him
doing it. I don't know that CBS came off very
good last night.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
You know. Again, you know, I agree that you know,
if you're you say you're not going to fact check
and just don't fact you know, as as simple as that,
you know. And I think that calling the CBS moderators
out for that was appropriate because they had committed to that.
I talked about it, and I thought that that was
the same what did I think it? It was the
(06:17):
same manner in which DNN confronted and moderated their debate
that they had way back on June the twenty seventh.
But look, let's leave the moderators out of it. Let's
talk about the two candidates. And here's the bottom line,
the bottom line, and you'll be talking about this all morning, Michael.
Did it change the polls? Did it change the dynamics
(06:39):
of the race? And I think for me, I have
no problem saying this.
Speaker 5 (06:43):
No, it didn't.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
No, but it did change. It may changed the debate,
It may have changed the taste in people's mouth. Now
the last taste is smooth JD. Vance and not a
bad performance by Donald Trump. But like I said yesterday
to you, I think it's going to make those that
already planned to vote for Trump and Vance feel better
about their vote. And for those that are, you know,
voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walls, they probably feel
(07:06):
better about their vote. But that's it that. I don't
know that there's evidence that reached anybody else and change
anybody else's mind.
Speaker 4 (07:13):
Yeah, and that's the thing, you know, we'll find out
in the days ahead, you know. As you know, after
the debate between Paris and Trump on September the tenth,
no discernible bump for the vice president, even though I
felt she had a better performance than Donald Trump. You know,
it's interesting how the big question for some for both
of these campaigns, how do you break through? How do
(07:35):
you convince those undecided voters to break for you? They
have five weeks to figure it out, and we'll see
if they do it.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Yeah, civil substantive and an actual debate. Let's end on
that note. That was a nice, pleasant change. I hope
there's more of them in our future. As always my pleasure.
White House correspondent John Decker, and you'rer Morning show contributor.
Thank you for your time.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Thanks man.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
Let's look at where the polls have us now again,
granted these are all even this Trevalgerpole, I would assume
happened before the debate actually started let alone concluded, so
these would all be prior to the vice presidential debate.
And I'm with John, I don't expect a bump from this,
but this this will strike you. You know, we always
(08:16):
have our your morning show bookie from the sports book
chime in with the money line odds. Well, this probably
affected those greatly. Donald Trump is now leading Kamala Harris
forty seven to forty six percent. He has completely flipped Wisconsin. Now,
just that news alone, and by the way, that Senate
Race Baldwin's lead is down to just two. But let's
(08:38):
go to the the thing. If I flip Wisconsin red,
now this this gives Kamala Harris Michigan. Let's go ahead
and give her Pennsylvania too. While we're at it, let
me give her a Nevada. I'm at it, okay. So
was assuming that Donald Trump goes on to Wineer and
(09:00):
I believe he will goes on to win Georgia and
North Carolina, and I believe he will especially now. And
I give her Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada. Donald Trump still
wins two eighty five to two fifty three. And I
don't have to tell you in the latest Poul Donald
Trump is right there in Pennsylvania now, and if you
give in Pennsylvania, it's over three hundred and it's a landslide.
(09:23):
And if she doesn't hang on to her one point
lead in Nevada and he takes Nevada, it's three ten
to two twenty eight. This is major, this race. This
hiding Kamala Harrison Plain site has not worked. This Sugar
High will run an entire primary with Joe. Then we'll
(09:46):
dump them, We'll take all his delegates, give him to her,
We'll do a big theatrical performance at a convention, and
then we'll have a short field to run her. It
hasn't worked, and Wisconsin now is in Trump's by one point.
And I don't think anything last night changed that. North Carolina,
Trump's lead is now two. That was a Washington Post poll.
(10:11):
Emerson has it at one. Quinnipiac has Trump at one.
So one to two in North Carolina seems to be
the constant. And Georgia Trump's leads up to five. Now, um,
Michigan is down to two. Can you you know I
(10:32):
always resisted urges to do a twenty sixteen map versus
a twenty twenty map. Isn't it should I do the
old song? Isn't it ironic? Don't you think it really is?
Taking the shape of the twenty sixteen map, Michigan within two, Wisconsin,
he's now up one. Remember how Donald Trump underpolls down
(10:53):
two in Michigan could mean leaning by one. Pennsylvania, the
latest poll we got has Harris up three. I'd have
to get the real clear on all of them, because
I have won. Remington has Trump up one, a very
(11:14):
bizarre pole I've never heard of, has her up three. Emerson,
which I trust more than all of those, has it
a tie. I tend to lean towards tie, so I
mean again, remember when it comes to Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
These were all decided by very few votes in both elections.
Not only seem to be leading Trump's way. Arizona the
leaders up to three now fifty to forty seven. Nevada
(11:37):
was a shift yesterday we got a Revington an inside advantage,
and they all have. Donald Trump now up in Nevada
by one. So if we did today's poll where things stand,
just to give you the perspective, I'm gonna go ahead
and take Pennsylvania and make it a tie. I don't
(11:59):
think you're Pennsylvania for days anyway. There's North Carolina, there's Georgia, Nevada.
I'm gonna bring to a tie Donald Trump two eighty five,
Kamala Harris two twenty eight. I have a feeling in
twenty twenty four when it comes to waiting on Nevada
and Arizona, it will not be necessary, as it was
not necessary in twenty sixteen. So I kind of agree
(12:22):
with John. It was a nice, civil, substantive debate. I'm
not sure America wants that. I hope they do. I
don't think it's gonna have any impact. It does change
the taste in people's mouth. I can give you technical reasons,
nuanced reasons why JD did better and won and why
CBS lost and that's just death of journalism. Bottom line is,
(12:48):
there doesn't need to be a bump from this debate.
It's already slipping away from Kamala Harris. But what does
that matter unless we check in with the bookie. Do
we have our your more show from the sportsbook Bookie
with the latest odds.
Speaker 5 (13:03):
Here's your debate results.
Speaker 6 (13:05):
There was no way Walt should be vice president of anything,
and the betting odds reflected it.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
She is now even odds.
Speaker 6 (13:15):
Trump is a very tiny small favorite at plus one
zero two. The odds are reflecting how the debate went.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
This is your Morning Show with Michael del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
We're fighting a forefront war on understanding. This morning one,
we have about the death toll at one hundred and
sixty now nationwide reported with Hurricane Helene. The death toll
in bunkhom County alone now is approaching sixty. We had
a civil, actually substantive debate last night. I thought both
(13:50):
candidates outside the tops of their ticket. I'm not sure
it's going to move the numbers very much, but it
was a substantive debate last night. Surprisingly, lot more analysis
on that coming up. And then you had Iran fire
about one hundred and eighty one missiles at Israel. Now,
thanks thanks to the Iron Dome, thanks to David Sling,
thanks to Aero three system, and thanks to support of
(14:13):
US forces, none of those reach their target with any significance. Now,
what is majorly different about this is this is not
an Iranian surrogate doing their dirty work. This isn't the
who Thees, This isn't Hasbalah, this isn't Hamas. This is
Iran firing missiles from Iranian soil into Israel. You're going
to get a response to Iran now, not a surrogate.
(14:36):
And that's a big game changer, as Israel has a
right to secure its people and its way of life
and its sovereignty. And now we enter day two of
the big port strike that will probably cost us about
a billion dollars a day, but if it lingers for
weeks or months, massive disruption to the economy and arin
before we get to where everybody's going to college. Let's
(14:57):
talk up a little bit about what we did a
half hour ago. This is going to be significant. They're
wanting now a seventy seven percent increase in wages. What
they're really focused on is automation systems, because careful what
you ask for. Even if you get your seventy seven
percent pay increase, just like in Washington they got their
fifteen twenty dollars an hour minimum wage, for most they
(15:18):
lost their job.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
So, yeah, this is a tough one.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
To settle, and all of America is going to be
waiting and pay the price for this.
Speaker 7 (15:27):
Indeed, this is a big one and it's not going
to be settled anytime soon. The fact of the matter
is for every day that the ports are shut, it's
about a week to get everything back online. They want
seventy seven percent pay increases. That's the longshoreman and the
alliance that is representing the freight carriers, the big ships,
(15:47):
they offered fifty percent wage increases. Listen, they've had record years.
They can afford this, which is why they're offering it.
But what's interesting, what might be even more of a
sticking point is automation. I really really really don't want automation.
That seems like that's not they need to. They have
to if they want to compete on a global scale.
(16:08):
So continue with this one and getting to a place
where it's like remotely acceptable for the longshoreman, and for
the carriers it might be harder. And the longer disc
goes on, the more likely we're going to see snags
and supply chains, and then also possible inflationary pressures that
could happen because of this.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
So money, why is you're asking for a lot that
can get negotiated and worked out. In terms of automation,
You're asking for the impossible, and that is to get
the toothpaste back in the bottle. It's out, Genie's out.
I mean, I don't know. At some point, maybe they
can negotiate how it's phased in. Might be the reasonable
thing to do, but inevitable stands in the way of
that negotiation. All right, Well, here's some news for Harvard
(16:49):
and others. Kids are wanting to be in the South. Yeah,
I'm trying. I'm the only one that's I'm like a
salmon over here erin. I'm trying to get upstream, and
everybody else is wanting to get sold. I'm trying to
get away from the heat. But why the South?
Speaker 7 (17:03):
So it's a relative bargain compared to northeat public schools
and the private top schools in the South that you know,
Vanderbilt Duke. These have always been popular with Northerners, but
now you're seeing University of Tennessee, University, Mississippi, University of Alabama,
the public state schools in the South eighty four percent
increase in Northerners going to them over the past decade,
(17:26):
thirty percent increase alone from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty two.
The bargain is a big part of it. Southern schools
they charge about twenty nine thousand for out of state
both tuition and fees. It's about the same if you
go in state in a northern school. But beyond that,
they also are offering something different where it's like during
the pandemic, you saw a lot of social media with
(17:48):
kids Southern schools. They were partying on beaches and going
to tailgates, and there were spon trees and it was sunny,
and kids in the northeast.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
O their teams are competing for national championships, but a
good time and the weather is warm and they're not freezing.
Give me Syracuse University put me on the hill on
the snow. But this would be primarily driven though, I
would think by out of state affordability tuitions right, So, yeah,
doesn't that turn back to the north and say you
(18:17):
might want to take a look at your expenses.
Speaker 7 (18:20):
It does, but they're probably not going to. And the
fact of the matter is University of South Carolina, Like,
that's an example and Clemson, respectively, they've seen a six
hundred percent jump in northerners in the past twenty years,
Clemson a four hundred and fifty percent jump. But South
Carolina is particularly popular with New Yorkers, Like, there's like
pipeline from New York to South Carolina. Actually, it's funny.
(18:42):
I had several babysitters this summer that were home from school,
almost all of them. We live in Connecticut. I work
in New York. They were all going to Emery, which
was so interesting. I was like, I, that wasn't I
grew up in New York, I went to school in Connecticut,
and I just didn't even that wasn't on my lists,
not like a bad way or a good way. Oh
(19:02):
excuse me, not Emory Elon Elon, which I hadn't even
heard of. Emory's Elon. And I was like, oh, so
there's just a lot of You're seeing these different pipelines,
and you know that different guidance counsellors, have relationships with
different schools, and definitely more in the northeaster having relationships
with the big public schools.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Elin University, North Carolina. Get anybody young anywhere near Charleston
and they're ready to move to South Carolina. And of
course for a lot of them, their grandparents are already
in Florida, so we're seeing them my great South for universities.
So far, automation has not come up in this story.
All right, Aaron, appreciate you this, appreciate your reporting today.
(19:41):
Thank you so much. All Right, if you're just waking up.
We did have a debate last night, and I gotta
tell you it was civil, it was substantive. I got
this reaction from one listener. Ultimately jd. Vance came across
as the real deal and is at best in Alliance den.
That is interesting. Some people pointed this out. I'm not
(20:02):
a big fan of spin rooms because that's part of
the problem. What we have. People are living off spin
and not substance. People are you can call a sanctuary
a spin room. Two. Look, there's no replacement for you
seeking God personally, you hearing from God yourself, you studying
(20:23):
his word and getting ram a revelation for yourself. You
can't live off the regurgitation of others and their true
experience with God. That can feel like a spin room.
And what we need are Americans being dutiful citizens and
watching these things and deciding for themselves, not waiting till
the next day for somebody else to tell them what
happened and how to think. And jd Vance, this is
(20:47):
a guy that has made himself available in hundreds of interviews.
He'll go anywhere and talk to anyone. And I agree
with this particular writer. He's at his best in adverse
situations and that trained him well for last night. The
other side of the of the podium was Tim Walls,
who's only done one interview, and that was being the
(21:07):
emotional support animal for Kamala Harris in one of her
handful of interviews, and that came across last night. Yes,
Jade Bans is at his best when it is three
on one, and it was again with CBS last night.
This particular writer said, the man is smart, he's articulate,
he could think on his feet. He did exactly what
(21:28):
I thought he would do, win and present himself as
likable there's probably a lot of voters tonight scratching their
heads saying we were lied to about him. Look, there's
narratives and then there's reality. What scares me about about
America is sometimes it seems to care more about narratives
than it does actual reality. But the way he has
been positioned and portrayed does not match the way he
(21:52):
performed last night. I was watching Van Jones on CNN
after the debate. Oh, this was slick, This was pretend
this wasn't the real JD. Evans. That was his way
of explaining losing. Here's an example of what I thought
was a brilliant and great exchange. The left always likes
to bring up, you know, very economists. I think sixteen
(22:12):
of them were advisors to the Biden administration. And what
they say about one person's economic plan or the other.
Or how about the experts in what they told us
about COVID, whether it was masks or vaccinations or lock
in place or social distancing. Who are these experts? They're
(22:34):
right up there with they say. JD Evans challenged that
last night. I think this was an o while moment.
Speaker 5 (22:40):
What do you say trust the experts?
Speaker 8 (22:42):
But those same experts for forty years said that if
we shipped our manufacturing base off to China, we get
cheaper goods.
Speaker 5 (22:48):
They lied about that. They said if we shipped our industrial.
Speaker 8 (22:51):
Base off to other countries, to Mexico and elsewhere, it
would make the middle class stronger.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
They were wrong about that.
Speaker 8 (22:57):
They were wrong about the idea that if we made
Amica less self reliant, less productive in our own nation,
that it would somehow make us better off.
Speaker 5 (23:06):
And they were wrong about it.
Speaker 8 (23:07):
And for the first time in a generation, Donald Trump
had the wisdom and the courage to say, to that
bipartisan consensus, We're.
Speaker 5 (23:15):
Not doing it anymore.
Speaker 8 (23:16):
We're bringing American manufacturing back, We're unleashing American energy, We're
going to make more of our own stuff.
Speaker 5 (23:21):
And this isn't just an economic issue.
Speaker 8 (23:23):
And I've got three beautiful little kids at home, seven,
four and two, and I love them very much, and
I hope they're in bed right now. But look, so
many of the drugs, the pharmaceuticals that we put in
the bodies of our children are manufactured by nations that
hate us. This has to stop, and we're not going
to stop it by listening to experts. We're going to
stop it by listening to common sense wisdom, which is
what Donald Trump governed on.
Speaker 5 (23:44):
Senator tim Up, Governor Walls, can you address that. I mean,
voters say they trust Donald Trump on the economy more.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
If you're listening tonight and you want billionaires to get
tacks cuts, you heard what the numbers were.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
Look, I'm a union guy on this.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
I'm not a guy who wanted to ship things overseas,
but I understand that. Look, we produce soybeans and corn.
We need to have fair trading partners. That's something that
we believe in. I think the thing that most concerns
me on this is is Donald Trump was the guy
who created the largest trade deficit in American history with China.
So the rhetoric is good. Much of what the senator
(24:19):
said right there. I'm in agreement with him on this.
I watched it happen too. I watched it to my
communities and we talked about that. But we had people
undercutting the right to collectively bargain.
Speaker 5 (24:29):
We had right to work. States made it more difficult.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
We had companies that were willing to ship it over
and we saw people profit that. Folks that are venture
capital in some cases putting money into companies that were overseas.
We're in agreement that we bring those home. The issue
is Donald Trump is talking about it. Kamala Harris has
a record two hundred and fifty thousand more manufacturing jobs
just in out of the IRA.
Speaker 5 (24:50):
May's fond of that. Yes, so I appreciate that.
Speaker 8 (24:53):
So if you notice what Governor Waltz just did is
he said, first of all, Donald Trump has to listen
to the experts. And then when he anowed coledge of
the experts screwed up, he said, well, Donald Trump didn't
do nearly as good.
Speaker 5 (25:03):
Of a job as this, that's a general than he did.
Speaker 8 (25:06):
So what Tim Woltz is doing, and I honestly, Tim,
I think you got a tough job here, because you've
got to play whack a mole. You've got to pretend
that Donald Trump didn't deliver rising take home pay.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Which of course he did.
Speaker 8 (25:16):
You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver lower inflation,
which of course he did. And then you simultaneously got
to defend Kamala Harris's atrocious economic record, which has made gas,
groceries and housing unaffordable fair American citizens. I was raised
by a woman who would sometimes go into medical debt
so that she could put food on the table in
our household. I know what it's like to not be
(25:39):
able to afford the things that you need to afford.
We can do so much better to all of you watching.
We can get back to an America that's affordable again.
We just got to get back to common sense economic principle.
Speaker 1 (25:50):
If you really wanted to turn the page, if you
really wanted to hand things over to the next generation.
I really can't get there on the left. I try.
Some people say Governor Shapiro from Pennsylvania, I don't obviously
have a lot in common with him in worldview or
(26:11):
policy view. Same could be said for the Governor of
Maryland as well. I guess that would be their future.
But it's tough to top Marco Rubio and JD. Vance.
And that's how smooth he was last night. Now listen,
I'm gonna make this point. I don't want anybody to
miss it. The biggest knockout blow of the night that
no one even sensed, and especially Tim Walls, was how
(26:34):
he kept positioning it as the Harris administration. You know,
kind of what the left does with we're a democracy.
We're a democracy when we're not. Our founding fathers weren't
interested in democracy. Democracy always leads to anarchy or dictatorship.
That's why they weren't interested. We're a constitutional republic. We
are a government of laws where the people are in
(26:55):
charge and empowered as king. That's a big difference. But
what JD did brilliantly was he kept referring to it
as the Harris administration. It's not as the Biden administration,
and Walls never corrected him, and it gave the sense
it could even be subliminal for some swing voters in
swing states that if you really want change, well you
(27:19):
have a proven memory of four years ago of somebody
who did it once and can do it again. And
the change artist is Donald Trump, the more of the
same as Kamala Harris, and he let him get away
with it and walked into it. It was the knockout
punch nobody saw throne. And that gets everybody thinking about rent, mortgage, groceries,
(27:41):
gas jobs, job in security, stagnant wages. I can play
clip after clip, and they both had good moments. They
were both far more civil and substantive than the top
of the ticket debate the problem for the Democrats, says,
nobody's interested in debating again. I don't know if this
(28:03):
changes the election, but it certainly changes the taste in
people's mouth after a very bad performance by Donald Trump.
And I thought it was kind of a nasty, but
a much more workman like better performance by Kamala Harris
that did not take place last night. So CBS the
big loser, the voters the big winner if they choose civil, substantive,
(28:25):
honest conversation and debate and differences. When two candidates have
you scratching your head, say, I gotta go research this more.
That's a good debate. That's America. The rest is reality
show in nonsense, and I suspect and I fear America
likes the nonsense better.
Speaker 7 (28:47):
I tell you.
Speaker 6 (28:47):
This is Mike the Baptist in Cotton Down, Tennessee.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
My morning show is your morning show with Michaelville Journal.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
This is your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your iHeartRadio app. By the way, if you're listening
on the Eye radiop there's a talkback button. Who do
you think won the debate? My deep down suspicion is
if you were already voting for Trump. Vance, you're feeling
better about that vote. I suspect there are probably a
lot of people who had planned to vote for Kamala
(29:15):
Harris and Tim Walls, and they're feeling better about their vote.
But we don't know. Are there any undecided voters in
swing states, in swing precincts and districts of swing states
that last night might have swayed them. Doubtful.
Speaker 5 (29:30):
But JD.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
Vance did keep it focused on Donald Trump. I thought
it was brilliant how he said, Donald Trump doesn't have
a plan. Donald Trump has a record. He was president.
He wasn't a boogeyman, he wasn't a tyrant. He did,
in the end leave peacefully transferring power. But before he
left he managed COVID and before that made America great again.
(29:52):
And he'll do it again. He'll secure the borders, he'll
restore the economy and fair trade. I thought that was brilliant.
I talked about the silent punch, but he got He
kept referring to it as the Harris administration, and Walls
didn't correct him. That made her the incumbent and the
owner of all these problems and Donald Trump the solution.
I thought that was brilliant, But who won. That's in
the eye of the beholder. And unfortunately in America most
(30:13):
didn't watch. They'll be spun and told who won. And
that's made One hundred and sixty people are now reported
dead due to Hurricane Helene. In Bunkhom County alone. That
death toll is reaching near sixty as search and recovery continues.
The President plans to visit the area today. One hundred
and eighty one rockets fired by Iran from Iranian soil
(30:34):
at Israel Now thanks to the Iron Dome, thanks to
the EAR three system, thanks to David Sling, thanks to
some US forces in the region, most were stopped. But
you can expect a retaliation, not against Amas or Hezbolah,
but Iran because that's who bombed.
Speaker 5 (30:48):
We're all in this together.
Speaker 3 (30:50):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Openheld Juno
Hi, it's Michael. Your morning show can be heard on
great radio stations across the country, like News Talk ninety
two point one and six hundred WREC in Memphis, Tennessee,
or thirteen hundred The Patriot in Tulsa, our Talk six
fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. We invite you to listen
live while you're getting ready in the morning, and to
take us along for the drive to work. But as
we always say, better late than never. Thanks for joining
(00:21):
us for the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Well two three, starting your morning off right, A.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
New way of talk, a new way of understanding well,
because we're in this to get it. This is your
morning show with Michael del Joonal.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Rise and Shine and good morning. I'm Michael del Journal.
This is your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your I Heart app. Welcome to Wednesday, the second
of October. So much to talk about. One hundred and
sixty people now reported dead as a result of Hurricane Helene.
Rescue teams continue to search for survivors in North Carolina.
President Biden scheduled to visit parts of western North Carolina today. Hey,
(01:00):
this is Buncom County. Authorities report the death toll has
risen to sixty in their county alone. It was in
total one hundred and eighty one rockets fired from Iran
at Israel, not through a proxy from Iran to Israel.
Now everybody waits to see if Benjamin Etna who responds
to Iran as he responded to first to Mosas and
(01:23):
then hes be a lot in the surrogates port strike
enters day two at about a billion dollars a day
of cost. And the big Veep debate was last night.
White House correspondent Your Morning Show contributor John Decker is
joining us, John, a civil substantive, an actual debate last night.
That was a different. Rarity was different.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
That was different. Yeah, I wish there were more of those,
just in terms of what we see in our political life.
But that was the last debate that we are likely
to see this election cycle. Was a good way to
go off in terms of being cordial and the two
candidates talking about policy, no personal attacks. You know, if
you were expecting talking over each other, which I was,
(02:07):
you were disappointed because you did not have that. You
saw these candidates let each other finish their thoughts, finish
their points. So this is the kind of debate. I
think most Americans, regardless of where you stand, typically want
to see and I think that the people at the
top of the ticket to learn something from JD.
Speaker 5 (02:26):
Vans and Jim Walls.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Well, I'll say it differently and more crudely, both outshine
the top of the ticket. I mean JD. Vance far
more outshine. Now that doesn't mean that JD. Vans could
get elected like Donald Trump or potentially, you know, Tim
Wallas could get elected as Kamala could, but they both
in terms of civility and substance and less reality TV.
(02:50):
I mean, if you were on the left, you were
loving the points the governor was making, and if you
were on the right, you were loving JD. Vance's points.
But the question is what about independent swing voters in
swing states? How did they perceive it? And I gave
the edge to JD there because he was right on
laser focus with the undecided women in swing states. I mean,
(03:14):
I'm yelling at the TV. Are you kidding me? The
unborn child has no right to life, liberty in a
pursuit of happiness. They're not even involved in this human right.
But then I thought, no, that would be the wrong
thing to do. The way JD Vance handled it, and
for Tim Walls, sometimes he talked more about Minnesota than
he did than he did Kamala Harris. But I thought
(03:35):
that the big silent knockout punch was the JD. Vans
kept referring to it as the Harris administration.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
It's not.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
I'm not even sure it's the Biden administration. But and
he went with it, and I think that's a big
mistake because that makes her the incumbent Donald Trump. The
turning of the page and the change, and then when
he phrased Donald Trump is not having a plan but
a record, I thought that was strong. I'm gonna give
the edge to JD. Vance.
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Okay, you know that's why debates are interesting, because they
are so subjective in terms of the way that you
view these two candidates. I will say this, I don't
get into that. I leave it to others to make
those determinations. And it's really fruitless and pointless to argue
with someone. If you were you do this, this is
your job. But for me, if I say who the
(04:22):
winner and the loser? Is that all being said? Michael
the smoother candidate. The smoother candidate was clearly JD. Vance,
you know, and I think that was pretty clear from
the start. It seemed to me like a governor wolves
was nervous from the start. He actually picked it up
and became one, particularly talking about certain subjects that I
(04:45):
think come natural to him. Reproductive rights was one of
those areas. Talking about healthcare another area in which he
felt comfortable. But overall, the smoother candidate up on that camp,
up on that debate stage for ninety minutes was JD.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Vance, who's been the consistent big loser and all these
debates the network's moderating them for CBS. I thought it
was interesting, you know, whenever I have one about a
minute and a half with you, right when I talk about
media bias, how do you do bias well? By the
stories you cover, the stories you don't, the angles you choose,
the angles you don't, the people you talk to, the
people you don't. Questions you ask, and quotes you use.
(05:19):
Questions you don't ask, and quotes you don't use. That's
kind of how it was last night. That was designed
just in the way the questions were laid out for undecided,
Democrat leaning voters in swing states. That's why the climate
was the second so much time spent on guns, democracy, abortion,
there was some time spent on the economy, a little
bit on the border, very little on Israel, and none
(05:43):
on Ukraine and none on the port strike. And then
you know, saying they weren't going to fact check, and
then jad Vance holds them to that and catches him
doing it. I don't know that CBS came off very
good last night.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
You know. Again, you know, I agree that you know,
if you're you say you're not going to fact check
and just don't fact you know, as as simple as that,
you know. And I think that calling the CBS moderators
out for that was appropriate because they had committed to that.
I talked about it, and I thought that that was
the same what did I think it? It was the
(06:17):
same manner in which DNN confronted and moderated their debate
that they had way back on June the twenty seventh.
But look, let's leave the moderators out of it. Let's
talk about the two candidates. And here's the bottom line,
the bottom line, and you'll be talking about this all morning, Michael.
Did it change the polls? Did it change the dynamics
(06:39):
of the race? And I think for me, I have
no problem saying this.
Speaker 5 (06:43):
No, it didn't.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
No, but it did change. It may changed the debate,
It may have changed the taste in people's mouth. Now
the last taste is smooth JD. Vance and not a
bad performance by Donald Trump. But like I said yesterday
to you, I think it's going to make those that
already planned to vote for Trump and Vance feel better
about their vote. And for those that are, you know,
voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walls, they probably feel
(07:06):
better about their vote. But that's it that. I don't
know that there's evidence that reached anybody else and change
anybody else's mind.
Speaker 4 (07:13):
Yeah, and that's the thing, you know, we'll find out
in the days ahead, you know. As you know, after
the debate between Paris and Trump on September the tenth,
no discernible bump for the vice president, even though I
felt she had a better performance than Donald Trump. You know,
it's interesting how the big question for some for both
of these campaigns, how do you break through? How do
(07:35):
you convince those undecided voters to break for you? They
have five weeks to figure it out, and we'll see
if they do it.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Yeah, civil substantive and an actual debate. Let's end on
that note. That was a nice, pleasant change. I hope
there's more of them in our future. As always my pleasure.
White House correspondent John Decker, and you'rer Morning show contributor.
Thank you for your time.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Thanks man.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
Let's look at where the polls have us now again,
granted these are all even this Trevalgerpole, I would assume
happened before the debate actually started let alone concluded, so
these would all be prior to the vice presidential debate.
And I'm with John, I don't expect a bump from this,
but this this will strike you. You know, we always
(08:16):
have our your morning show bookie from the sports book
chime in with the money line odds. Well, this probably
affected those greatly. Donald Trump is now leading Kamala Harris
forty seven to forty six percent. He has completely flipped Wisconsin. Now,
just that news alone, and by the way, that Senate
Race Baldwin's lead is down to just two. But let's
(08:38):
go to the the thing. If I flip Wisconsin red,
now this this gives Kamala Harris Michigan. Let's go ahead
and give her Pennsylvania too. While we're at it, let
me give her a Nevada. I'm at it, okay. So
was assuming that Donald Trump goes on to Wineer and
(09:00):
I believe he will goes on to win Georgia and
North Carolina, and I believe he will especially now. And
I give her Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada. Donald Trump still
wins two eighty five to two fifty three. And I
don't have to tell you in the latest Poul Donald
Trump is right there in Pennsylvania now, and if you
give in Pennsylvania, it's over three hundred and it's a landslide.
(09:23):
And if she doesn't hang on to her one point
lead in Nevada and he takes Nevada, it's three ten
to two twenty eight. This is major, this race. This
hiding Kamala Harrison Plain site has not worked. This Sugar
High will run an entire primary with Joe. Then we'll
(09:46):
dump them, We'll take all his delegates, give him to her,
We'll do a big theatrical performance at a convention, and
then we'll have a short field to run her. It
hasn't worked, and Wisconsin now is in Trump's by one point.
And I don't think anything last night changed that. North Carolina,
Trump's lead is now two. That was a Washington Post poll.
(10:11):
Emerson has it at one. Quinnipiac has Trump at one.
So one to two in North Carolina seems to be
the constant. And Georgia Trump's leads up to five. Now, um,
Michigan is down to two. Can you you know I
(10:32):
always resisted urges to do a twenty sixteen map versus
a twenty twenty map. Isn't it should I do the
old song? Isn't it ironic? Don't you think it really is?
Taking the shape of the twenty sixteen map, Michigan within two, Wisconsin,
he's now up one. Remember how Donald Trump underpolls down
(10:53):
two in Michigan could mean leaning by one. Pennsylvania, the
latest poll we got has Harris up three. I'd have
to get the real clear on all of them, because
I have won. Remington has Trump up one, a very
(11:14):
bizarre pole I've never heard of, has her up three. Emerson,
which I trust more than all of those, has it
a tie. I tend to lean towards tie, so I
mean again, remember when it comes to Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
These were all decided by very few votes in both elections.
Not only seem to be leading Trump's way. Arizona the
leaders up to three now fifty to forty seven. Nevada
(11:37):
was a shift yesterday we got a Revington an inside advantage,
and they all have. Donald Trump now up in Nevada
by one. So if we did today's poll where things stand,
just to give you the perspective, I'm gonna go ahead
and take Pennsylvania and make it a tie. I don't
(11:59):
think you're Pennsylvania for days anyway. There's North Carolina, there's Georgia, Nevada.
I'm gonna bring to a tie Donald Trump two eighty five,
Kamala Harris two twenty eight. I have a feeling in
twenty twenty four when it comes to waiting on Nevada
and Arizona, it will not be necessary, as it was
not necessary in twenty sixteen. So I kind of agree
(12:22):
with John. It was a nice, civil, substantive debate. I'm
not sure America wants that. I hope they do. I
don't think it's gonna have any impact. It does change
the taste in people's mouth. I can give you technical reasons,
nuanced reasons why JD did better and won and why
CBS lost and that's just death of journalism. Bottom line is,
(12:48):
there doesn't need to be a bump from this debate.
It's already slipping away from Kamala Harris. But what does
that matter unless we check in with the bookie. Do
we have our your more show from the sportsbook Bookie
with the latest odds.
Speaker 5 (13:03):
Here's your debate results.
Speaker 6 (13:05):
There was no way Walt should be vice president of anything,
and the betting odds reflected it.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
She is now even odds.
Speaker 6 (13:15):
Trump is a very tiny small favorite at plus one
zero two. The odds are reflecting how the debate went.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
This is your Morning Show with Michael del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
We're fighting a forefront war on understanding. This morning one,
we have about the death toll at one hundred and
sixty now nationwide reported with Hurricane Helene. The death toll
in bunkhom County alone now is approaching sixty. We had
a civil, actually substantive debate last night. I thought both
(13:50):
candidates outside the tops of their ticket. I'm not sure
it's going to move the numbers very much, but it
was a substantive debate last night. Surprisingly, lot more analysis
on that coming up. And then you had Iran fire
about one hundred and eighty one missiles at Israel. Now,
thanks thanks to the Iron Dome, thanks to David Sling,
thanks to Aero three system, and thanks to support of
(14:13):
US forces, none of those reach their target with any significance. Now,
what is majorly different about this is this is not
an Iranian surrogate doing their dirty work. This isn't the
who Thees, This isn't Hasbalah, this isn't Hamas. This is
Iran firing missiles from Iranian soil into Israel. You're going
to get a response to Iran now, not a surrogate.
(14:36):
And that's a big game changer, as Israel has a
right to secure its people and its way of life
and its sovereignty. And now we enter day two of
the big port strike that will probably cost us about
a billion dollars a day, but if it lingers for
weeks or months, massive disruption to the economy and arin
before we get to where everybody's going to college. Let's
(14:57):
talk up a little bit about what we did a
half hour ago. This is going to be significant. They're
wanting now a seventy seven percent increase in wages. What
they're really focused on is automation systems, because careful what
you ask for. Even if you get your seventy seven
percent pay increase, just like in Washington they got their
fifteen twenty dollars an hour minimum wage, for most they
(15:18):
lost their job.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
So, yeah, this is a tough one.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
To settle, and all of America is going to be
waiting and pay the price for this.
Speaker 7 (15:27):
Indeed, this is a big one and it's not going
to be settled anytime soon. The fact of the matter
is for every day that the ports are shut, it's
about a week to get everything back online. They want
seventy seven percent pay increases. That's the longshoreman and the
alliance that is representing the freight carriers, the big ships,
(15:47):
they offered fifty percent wage increases. Listen, they've had record years.
They can afford this, which is why they're offering it.
But what's interesting, what might be even more of a
sticking point is automation. I really really really don't want automation.
That seems like that's not they need to. They have
to if they want to compete on a global scale.
(16:08):
So continue with this one and getting to a place
where it's like remotely acceptable for the longshoreman, and for
the carriers it might be harder. And the longer disc
goes on, the more likely we're going to see snags
and supply chains, and then also possible inflationary pressures that
could happen because of this.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
So money, why is you're asking for a lot that
can get negotiated and worked out. In terms of automation,
You're asking for the impossible, and that is to get
the toothpaste back in the bottle. It's out, Genie's out.
I mean, I don't know. At some point, maybe they
can negotiate how it's phased in. Might be the reasonable
thing to do, but inevitable stands in the way of
that negotiation. All right, Well, here's some news for Harvard
(16:49):
and others. Kids are wanting to be in the South. Yeah,
I'm trying. I'm the only one that's I'm like a
salmon over here erin. I'm trying to get upstream, and
everybody else is wanting to get sold. I'm trying to
get away from the heat. But why the South?
Speaker 7 (17:03):
So it's a relative bargain compared to northeat public schools
and the private top schools in the South that you know,
Vanderbilt Duke. These have always been popular with Northerners, but
now you're seeing University of Tennessee, University, Mississippi, University of Alabama,
the public state schools in the South eighty four percent
increase in Northerners going to them over the past decade,
(17:26):
thirty percent increase alone from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty two.
The bargain is a big part of it. Southern schools
they charge about twenty nine thousand for out of state
both tuition and fees. It's about the same if you
go in state in a northern school. But beyond that,
they also are offering something different where it's like during
the pandemic, you saw a lot of social media with
(17:48):
kids Southern schools. They were partying on beaches and going
to tailgates, and there were spon trees and it was sunny,
and kids in the northeast.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
O their teams are competing for national championships, but a
good time and the weather is warm and they're not freezing.
Give me Syracuse University put me on the hill on
the snow. But this would be primarily driven though, I
would think by out of state affordability tuitions right, So, yeah,
doesn't that turn back to the north and say you
(18:17):
might want to take a look at your expenses.
Speaker 7 (18:20):
It does, but they're probably not going to. And the
fact of the matter is University of South Carolina, Like,
that's an example and Clemson, respectively, they've seen a six
hundred percent jump in northerners in the past twenty years,
Clemson a four hundred and fifty percent jump. But South
Carolina is particularly popular with New Yorkers, Like, there's like
pipeline from New York to South Carolina. Actually, it's funny.
(18:42):
I had several babysitters this summer that were home from school,
almost all of them. We live in Connecticut. I work
in New York. They were all going to Emery, which
was so interesting. I was like, I, that wasn't I
grew up in New York, I went to school in Connecticut,
and I just didn't even that wasn't on my lists,
not like a bad way or a good way. Oh
(19:02):
excuse me, not Emory Elon Elon, which I hadn't even
heard of. Emory's Elon. And I was like, oh, so
there's just a lot of You're seeing these different pipelines,
and you know that different guidance counsellors, have relationships with
different schools, and definitely more in the northeaster having relationships
with the big public schools.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Elin University, North Carolina. Get anybody young anywhere near Charleston
and they're ready to move to South Carolina. And of
course for a lot of them, their grandparents are already
in Florida, so we're seeing them my great South for universities.
So far, automation has not come up in this story.
All right, Aaron, appreciate you this, appreciate your reporting today.
(19:41):
Thank you so much. All Right, if you're just waking up.
We did have a debate last night, and I gotta
tell you it was civil, it was substantive. I got
this reaction from one listener. Ultimately jd. Vance came across
as the real deal and is at best in Alliance den.
That is interesting. Some people pointed this out. I'm not
(20:02):
a big fan of spin rooms because that's part of
the problem. What we have. People are living off spin
and not substance. People are you can call a sanctuary
a spin room. Two. Look, there's no replacement for you
seeking God personally, you hearing from God yourself, you studying
(20:23):
his word and getting ram a revelation for yourself. You
can't live off the regurgitation of others and their true
experience with God. That can feel like a spin room.
And what we need are Americans being dutiful citizens and
watching these things and deciding for themselves, not waiting till
the next day for somebody else to tell them what
happened and how to think. And jd Vance, this is
(20:47):
a guy that has made himself available in hundreds of interviews.
He'll go anywhere and talk to anyone. And I agree
with this particular writer. He's at his best in adverse
situations and that trained him well for last night. The
other side of the of the podium was Tim Walls,
who's only done one interview, and that was being the
(21:07):
emotional support animal for Kamala Harris in one of her
handful of interviews, and that came across last night. Yes,
Jade Bans is at his best when it is three
on one, and it was again with CBS last night.
This particular writer said, the man is smart, he's articulate,
he could think on his feet. He did exactly what
(21:28):
I thought he would do, win and present himself as
likable there's probably a lot of voters tonight scratching their
heads saying we were lied to about him. Look, there's
narratives and then there's reality. What scares me about about
America is sometimes it seems to care more about narratives
than it does actual reality. But the way he has
been positioned and portrayed does not match the way he
(21:52):
performed last night. I was watching Van Jones on CNN
after the debate. Oh, this was slick, This was pretend
this wasn't the real JD. Evans. That was his way
of explaining losing. Here's an example of what I thought
was a brilliant and great exchange. The left always likes
to bring up, you know, very economists. I think sixteen
(22:12):
of them were advisors to the Biden administration. And what
they say about one person's economic plan or the other.
Or how about the experts in what they told us
about COVID, whether it was masks or vaccinations or lock
in place or social distancing. Who are these experts? They're
(22:34):
right up there with they say. JD Evans challenged that
last night. I think this was an o while moment.
Speaker 5 (22:40):
What do you say trust the experts?
Speaker 8 (22:42):
But those same experts for forty years said that if
we shipped our manufacturing base off to China, we get
cheaper goods.
Speaker 5 (22:48):
They lied about that. They said if we shipped our industrial.
Speaker 8 (22:51):
Base off to other countries, to Mexico and elsewhere, it
would make the middle class stronger.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
They were wrong about that.
Speaker 8 (22:57):
They were wrong about the idea that if we made
Amica less self reliant, less productive in our own nation,
that it would somehow make us better off.
Speaker 5 (23:06):
And they were wrong about it.
Speaker 8 (23:07):
And for the first time in a generation, Donald Trump
had the wisdom and the courage to say, to that
bipartisan consensus, We're.
Speaker 5 (23:15):
Not doing it anymore.
Speaker 8 (23:16):
We're bringing American manufacturing back, We're unleashing American energy, We're
going to make more of our own stuff.
Speaker 5 (23:21):
And this isn't just an economic issue.
Speaker 8 (23:23):
And I've got three beautiful little kids at home, seven,
four and two, and I love them very much, and
I hope they're in bed right now. But look, so
many of the drugs, the pharmaceuticals that we put in
the bodies of our children are manufactured by nations that
hate us. This has to stop, and we're not going
to stop it by listening to experts. We're going to
stop it by listening to common sense wisdom, which is
what Donald Trump governed on.
Speaker 5 (23:44):
Senator tim Up, Governor Walls, can you address that. I mean,
voters say they trust Donald Trump on the economy more.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
If you're listening tonight and you want billionaires to get
tacks cuts, you heard what the numbers were.
Speaker 1 (23:56):
Look, I'm a union guy on this.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
I'm not a guy who wanted to ship things overseas,
but I understand that. Look, we produce soybeans and corn.
We need to have fair trading partners. That's something that
we believe in. I think the thing that most concerns
me on this is is Donald Trump was the guy
who created the largest trade deficit in American history with China.
So the rhetoric is good. Much of what the senator
(24:19):
said right there. I'm in agreement with him on this.
I watched it happen too. I watched it to my
communities and we talked about that. But we had people
undercutting the right to collectively bargain.
Speaker 5 (24:29):
We had right to work. States made it more difficult.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
We had companies that were willing to ship it over
and we saw people profit that. Folks that are venture
capital in some cases putting money into companies that were overseas.
We're in agreement that we bring those home. The issue
is Donald Trump is talking about it. Kamala Harris has
a record two hundred and fifty thousand more manufacturing jobs
just in out of the IRA.
Speaker 5 (24:50):
May's fond of that. Yes, so I appreciate that.
Speaker 8 (24:53):
So if you notice what Governor Waltz just did is
he said, first of all, Donald Trump has to listen
to the experts. And then when he anowed coledge of
the experts screwed up, he said, well, Donald Trump didn't
do nearly as good.
Speaker 5 (25:03):
Of a job as this, that's a general than he did.
Speaker 8 (25:06):
So what Tim Woltz is doing, and I honestly, Tim,
I think you got a tough job here, because you've
got to play whack a mole. You've got to pretend
that Donald Trump didn't deliver rising take home pay.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Which of course he did.
Speaker 8 (25:16):
You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver lower inflation,
which of course he did. And then you simultaneously got
to defend Kamala Harris's atrocious economic record, which has made gas,
groceries and housing unaffordable fair American citizens. I was raised
by a woman who would sometimes go into medical debt
so that she could put food on the table in
our household. I know what it's like to not be
(25:39):
able to afford the things that you need to afford.
We can do so much better to all of you watching.
We can get back to an America that's affordable again.
We just got to get back to common sense economic principle.
Speaker 1 (25:50):
If you really wanted to turn the page, if you
really wanted to hand things over to the next generation.
I really can't get there on the left. I try.
Some people say Governor Shapiro from Pennsylvania, I don't obviously
have a lot in common with him in worldview or
(26:11):
policy view. Same could be said for the Governor of
Maryland as well. I guess that would be their future.
But it's tough to top Marco Rubio and JD. Vance.
And that's how smooth he was last night. Now listen,
I'm gonna make this point. I don't want anybody to
miss it. The biggest knockout blow of the night that
no one even sensed, and especially Tim Walls, was how
(26:34):
he kept positioning it as the Harris administration. You know,
kind of what the left does with we're a democracy.
We're a democracy when we're not. Our founding fathers weren't
interested in democracy. Democracy always leads to anarchy or dictatorship.
That's why they weren't interested. We're a constitutional republic. We
are a government of laws where the people are in
(26:55):
charge and empowered as king. That's a big difference. But
what JD did brilliantly was he kept referring to it
as the Harris administration. It's not as the Biden administration,
and Walls never corrected him, and it gave the sense
it could even be subliminal for some swing voters in
swing states that if you really want change, well you
(27:19):
have a proven memory of four years ago of somebody
who did it once and can do it again. And
the change artist is Donald Trump, the more of the
same as Kamala Harris, and he let him get away
with it and walked into it. It was the knockout
punch nobody saw throne. And that gets everybody thinking about rent, mortgage, groceries,
(27:41):
gas jobs, job in security, stagnant wages. I can play
clip after clip, and they both had good moments. They
were both far more civil and substantive than the top
of the ticket debate the problem for the Democrats, says,
nobody's interested in debating again. I don't know if this
(28:03):
changes the election, but it certainly changes the taste in
people's mouth after a very bad performance by Donald Trump.
And I thought it was kind of a nasty, but
a much more workman like better performance by Kamala Harris
that did not take place last night. So CBS the
big loser, the voters the big winner if they choose civil, substantive,
(28:25):
honest conversation and debate and differences. When two candidates have
you scratching your head, say, I gotta go research this more.
That's a good debate. That's America. The rest is reality
show in nonsense, and I suspect and I fear America
likes the nonsense better.
Speaker 7 (28:47):
I tell you.
Speaker 6 (28:47):
This is Mike the Baptist in Cotton Down, Tennessee.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
My morning show is your morning show with Michaelville Journal.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
This is your morning show on the Aaron streaming live
on your iHeartRadio app. By the way, if you're listening
on the Eye radiop there's a talkback button. Who do
you think won the debate? My deep down suspicion is
if you were already voting for Trump. Vance, you're feeling
better about that vote. I suspect there are probably a
lot of people who had planned to vote for Kamala
(29:15):
Harris and Tim Walls, and they're feeling better about their vote.
But we don't know. Are there any undecided voters in
swing states, in swing precincts and districts of swing states
that last night might have swayed them. Doubtful.
Speaker 5 (29:30):
But JD.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
Vance did keep it focused on Donald Trump. I thought
it was brilliant how he said, Donald Trump doesn't have
a plan. Donald Trump has a record. He was president.
He wasn't a boogeyman, he wasn't a tyrant. He did,
in the end leave peacefully transferring power. But before he
left he managed COVID and before that made America great again.
(29:52):
And he'll do it again. He'll secure the borders, he'll
restore the economy and fair trade. I thought that was brilliant.
I talked about the silent punch, but he got He
kept referring to it as the Harris administration, and Walls
didn't correct him. That made her the incumbent and the
owner of all these problems and Donald Trump the solution.
I thought that was brilliant, But who won. That's in
the eye of the beholder. And unfortunately in America most
(30:13):
didn't watch. They'll be spun and told who won. And
that's made One hundred and sixty people are now reported
dead due to Hurricane Helene. In Bunkhom County alone. That
death toll is reaching near sixty as search and recovery continues.
The President plans to visit the area today. One hundred
and eighty one rockets fired by Iran from Iranian soil
(30:34):
at Israel Now thanks to the Iron Dome, thanks to
the EAR three system, thanks to David Sling, thanks to
some US forces in the region, most were stopped. But
you can expect a retaliation, not against Amas or Hezbolah,
but Iran because that's who bombed.
Speaker 5 (30:48):
We're all in this together.
Speaker 3 (30:50):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Openheld Juno
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.