What should be the message of the inaugural speech? We asked senior YMS contributor David Zanotti if a unity message was necessary or possible.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Previously on Your Morning Show with Michael Del Choono.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We're visiting with David Sonati, who is our senior contributor
here at Your Morning Show. We've been talking a lot
about all the different levels of hope and optimism the
American people have in the second term of Donald Trump,
and then in the midst of all that, we get
the breaking news that Joe Biden has last hour pardoned
Anthony Fauci, as well as January sixth Committee members including
(00:29):
Adam Schiff and Liz Cheneing, which begs the question, what
is next a pardon for Pfizer or his brother? All right,
I'll take your guesses starting now using the talk back
on your iHeartRadio app? What do you make of these
last second pardons? Very revealing and it points to what
we all ultimately talked about, the breach of trust with
the American people. It goes out with spades, the ace
(00:52):
of spades right on the way out the door.
Speaker 3 (00:54):
It's just it's embarrassing, it's shameful. I mean, it reminds
you of something from grade school that it's like kids
on the playground. You know, we got a big snowball
fight at Catholic school which was against the rules because
out in the parking lot, and so when you came in,
you know, the teachers couldn't know who was all throwing snowball.
So you'd all line you all up to say, show
me your hands, and if your hands were read and freezing,
(01:17):
you're done. It's the paddle for you. The beating ensued. Yes,
so how fast can you get your hands in your pockets?
And turned them from red and blue back to pig? Okay?
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Problematic? All right, well the first question the American people
should be asking, and Fauci was pardoned for what Now
Red said something off the air that I think is
really important. This could help Donald Trump because that's just
admitting guilt. Now you don't have to prove anything. You
just move on dot org. That's off to ready. So
what's the next parton Pfizer? Now we're talking.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
Yeah, you asked earlier, Michael, what was this really about?
Was it about her or him? And you know that
was the same question. I was replaying the video from
that you and I were together on election night in
twenty sixteen, the crowd of over five hundred people and
the response of people when we announced an hour and
a half before the networks that Donald Trump had won
the election was extraordinary, But it wasn't partisan. I know
(02:13):
that sounds almost impossible.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
It was.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
It was a sense of relief. Yeah, I will tell
you that Americans wake up today saying that we've got
a heckful lot of work to This country is still
a mess.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
That was a different time though, because Hillary was the book.
Hillary was the boogeyman. Then Donald Trump was portrayed as
the boogeyman. Now turns out most of America sees him
as an optimistic savior. So that interesting twist. But I
was talking about security. Frebraham Lincoln, very popular president, very
controversial president over the most divided the country's ever been assassinated.
(02:45):
John F. Kennedy, the passing of the torch to a
new generation, very antih this this part would have matched
up more with Eisenhower, but he was industrial military. He
was against that. He was against CIA. It led to
his death in Dallas. Ronald Reagan, very popular, very controversial. Uh,
(03:06):
he ended up with one or two assassination attempts.
Speaker 3 (03:09):
For Reagan, multiple attempts, so obviously one one one that
actually hit it.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
Yeah, And for Donald Trump, two attempts one that hit.
How concerned should America, the American people be with Donald
Trump's safety.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
I wish we didn't have to talk about this. It's
the most uncomfortable topic.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
It my greatest whorry.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
I think everybody's thinking about it every single day because
so much vitriol, so much hatred was spread over the
last well since two thousands sold.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But that aside, go back to JFK. What JFK meant
to the Military industrial complex, what he meant to the CIA,
wanting to splinter it into a thousand pieces, and he
was quietly doing doing it. Donald Trump has been loudly
talking about the swamp a lot.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
On twenty of his biggest hitters to help him. Yeah,
I mean this this man is he talked about it
in the first term.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
This term he could actually do it. How in dangerous?
Speaker 3 (04:02):
It is a disruptor and a highly motivated one as well.
And this is in vengeance.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
No, this is a disruptor, termed dismantler with the American
people supporting it.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Yeah, and so the question becomes, who's the patsy that
they will set up this time.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
I can't try to take him out. I can't remember
if if you can hear this or not. I think
if I do this, you can. If you can't tell
me immediately, but I want to play you this is
Donald Trump yesterday. It's one thing for us to say,
we hate talking about this, and we hate worrying about
(04:40):
this out loud. I think Donald Trump's aware of how
potentially a danger he is. This is him at his
rally yesterday.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
As the first step toward restoring transparency and accountability to government,
we will also reverse the overclassification of government documents, and
in the coming days, we are going to make public
mating records relating to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy,
his brother Robert Kennedy, as well as doctor Martin Luther
(05:10):
King Junior, and other topics are great public interest.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
So it's all going to be released on Why Why
would I bring up and play a clip of Donald
Trump saying He's going to release any documents and all
documents relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy,
as well as Martin Luther King Junior. We know from
the documents that have been released, thousands and thousands of documents,
(05:38):
but the ones that kind of just point blank connect
the dots have been redacted and not released, and when
they are, everybody kind of I'll never forget when they
asked Cash Patel and I can't remember if it was.
I think it was Joe Rogan that might have been
interviewing him or maybe No, I think it was Tucker Carlsoner, No,
it was Glenn Beck. I think it was Glenn Beck. Anyway,
(06:00):
they were talking about the assassinate assassination of jfk And
of course Cash Ptel has read all these documents. Cash
Pateel knows exactly what happened to John F. Kennedy, and
when pressed on it, he wouldn't tell Glenn, but he
looked at Glenn and said, Glenn, there's nothing you're going
to find out that you haven't already figured out. And
(06:21):
I can't think of a more clever way to say it.
I think everybody's already figured out. It wasn't Oswald alone,
and Oswald couldn't have done it without a lot of cooperation.
But there's a lot of people that have gone even
further and said, wait a minute, you don't go to Russia,
you don't go to the Soviet Union unless you're a
spy in special ops, and you don't get back in
(06:42):
without any questions unless you're a spy or special ops.
And maybe he was, in fact just a patsy. But
the dots that haven't been connected yet is if elements
within the government played a role in killing their own president.
And I got curious yesterday watching this because I just
did a list and he didn't throw in Lincoln, but
(07:04):
he throw in RFK JFK. He didn't throw in Reagan
or Lincoln, but then he threw in Martin Luther King.
Is this Donald Trump letting people know and perhaps securing
himself by letting them know that the government may have
taken out people in the past in order to protect
himself in the future.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
Yeah, and in a court of law, the operative argument
is going to be pleased to find the government at
this stage in the game. We could just as easily
say that the progressive media cartel is primarily responsible for
ginning up such terror on the part of weak minded
people that they might actually believe that attacking this administration
(07:44):
physically would be patriotic.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
Or more the media. Joe Biden said it, Kamala Harris
said it, They've all said he was a monster, he
was the boogeyman, He was the Pabach. He was a
threat to democracy, He was a tyrant, he was a
dictators matter, yet they matter. But with jfk it wasn't
really a cuckoo fran and Ali or you know, because
(08:10):
the question was was it Cuba after the Bay of Pigs?
Was it Cuba after the Cuban missile crisis? Was at
the Soviet Union by way of Cuba? Was at the
mafia because he was sleeping with Giancanna's girlfriend? Was it
all of the above? But I don't know that anybody
operatively walked around and said the CIA killed John F. Kennedy.
Speaker 3 (08:30):
Well, i'll tell you John F. Kennedy his book Profiles
and Courage, which I just picked up the other day
because I'm doing research on John Quincy Adams for a
project that we're on too right now. John Quincy Adams,
when you look at the disruptors, I call him free
agents who became presidents. Clearly George Washington and John Adams
were free agents that there were no political parties. They
refused to participate in parties. It wasn't until we got
(08:52):
to Jefferson that everything went down the drain. Well, then
you go Jefferson, Madison and Monroe, and things are in
the toilet of political partisan politics. And John quinn s
Adams comes out and gets elected and does it inaugural
speech saying I'm done with parties. We're all done with parties,
and notoh of this, Let's go back to being American.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
You left that one layer, which is when progressivism was
birthed with Wilson. Then it was resurrected with Obama, carried
out again through through Biden, through Podesta, the same agent.
But that's when progressivism took over the Democrat Party. Now
you have really a four party system, trump Ism, Establishment,
Republican establishment Democrat, and progressive justice Democrats. But they both
(09:32):
seem to be I did a fascinating poll and while
the Republicans look healthier than the Democrats, and the Democrats
look like they better change completely or they're dead forever.
That's what the polling shows. I mean, the amount of
Democrats who think they completely need to change is remarkable,
and it's over sixty five percent. But you know, the
same kind of trend is there for the Republicans. When
(09:53):
I said a while ago, everybody thought I was nuts.
One or both parties will be gone by the end
of the decade. We were halfway through the decade, and
one looks like it might be leaving if it doesn't
change dramatically.
Speaker 3 (10:03):
Well, Senator Rand Paul was echoing those sentiments last week
when he was talking about establishment Republicans in the Senate,
basically saying, well, we're not watching and what we need
to watch out for is there are establishment Republicans. They
are institutionalists, he said. They are more interested in protecting
their power than seeing America healthy. Those are the biggest
(10:24):
danger that now threatens this new administration.
Speaker 2 (10:26):
Loosing moments on this inauguration. David David Zonatti, all right,
so the American people are optimistic, enthusiastic, They're behind their
new president taking office. They're very specific from the economy
to the border to foreign policy about what they want done.
He has the window and the amount of support to
do a number of things very quickly. Does he what
(10:49):
is a reasonable expectation for Donald Trump's second first one
hundred days?
Speaker 3 (10:53):
And he gets one, Well, I'd like to be the
most optimistic person to make everyone go away singing happy days.
Here again, by the way, very very embarrassed about that.
But Senator Ran Paul I think said it right. The
biggest danger now is the institutionalists and in the Republican
institutionalists in the Senate. Those are the people we have
to watch right now. Mitch McConnell's gone, but his wing
(11:16):
of the party isn't gone.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Yeah, what can he reasonably get done? What can people
have a lot.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Of fun the next forty eight hours with executive orders
and he will shake some things up. And then the
next thing becomes how far can his how far can
the people that he's put in place set the priorities
right and move in administrative reform at the same time
he's going for Congress. We've got six months. We have
six months to find out porter an economy though, that's
(11:42):
where you can be. He can six months, he's got two.
He's got a full two years. If the institutionalists take
him out on his agenda in the first six months,
it's going to be a lonely three years.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Last current ball, he throws at us a last second
pardon of Fauci Liz Cheney shift in the January sixth
commit What does that reveal to the American people? And
is his brother coming yet? I can't believe he hasn't
partned his brother yet? Well, and all that's left.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
As we talked about during the break Red set it again,
will he pardon himself on the way out the door?
Speaker 2 (12:14):
I forgot about that one. David's naughty be back again tomorrow,
I'm almost certain, and we'll discuss. I think the biggest
question mark is the speech, the inaugural address. Is it
a unity message, is it a trust message? Was it
the right message delivered the right way? How does this
whole thing kick off? We'll review what we previewed today tomorrow. David,
(12:36):
thank you so much for your.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
Time, miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot,
and we'll miss you. It's your Morning Show with Michael
del Churno
Previously on Your Morning Show with Michael Del Choono.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We're visiting with David Sonati, who is our senior contributor
here at Your Morning Show. We've been talking a lot
about all the different levels of hope and optimism the
American people have in the second term of Donald Trump,
and then in the midst of all that, we get
the breaking news that Joe Biden has last hour pardoned
Anthony Fauci, as well as January sixth Committee members including
(00:29):
Adam Schiff and Liz Cheneing, which begs the question, what
is next a pardon for Pfizer or his brother? All right,
I'll take your guesses starting now using the talk back
on your iHeartRadio app? What do you make of these
last second pardons? Very revealing and it points to what
we all ultimately talked about, the breach of trust with
the American people. It goes out with spades, the ace
(00:52):
of spades right on the way out the door.
Speaker 3 (00:54):
It's just it's embarrassing, it's shameful. I mean, it reminds
you of something from grade school that it's like kids
on the playground. You know, we got a big snowball
fight at Catholic school which was against the rules because
out in the parking lot, and so when you came in,
you know, the teachers couldn't know who was all throwing snowball.
So you'd all line you all up to say, show
me your hands, and if your hands were read and freezing,
(01:17):
you're done. It's the paddle for you. The beating ensued. Yes,
so how fast can you get your hands in your pockets?
And turned them from red and blue back to pig? Okay?
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Problematic? All right, well the first question the American people
should be asking, and Fauci was pardoned for what Now
Red said something off the air that I think is
really important. This could help Donald Trump because that's just
admitting guilt. Now you don't have to prove anything. You
just move on dot org. That's off to ready. So
what's the next parton Pfizer? Now we're talking.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
Yeah, you asked earlier, Michael, what was this really about?
Was it about her or him? And you know that
was the same question. I was replaying the video from
that you and I were together on election night in
twenty sixteen, the crowd of over five hundred people and
the response of people when we announced an hour and
a half before the networks that Donald Trump had won
the election was extraordinary, But it wasn't partisan. I know
(02:13):
that sounds almost impossible.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
It was.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
It was a sense of relief. Yeah, I will tell
you that Americans wake up today saying that we've got
a heckful lot of work to This country is still
a mess.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
That was a different time though, because Hillary was the book.
Hillary was the boogeyman. Then Donald Trump was portrayed as
the boogeyman. Now turns out most of America sees him
as an optimistic savior. So that interesting twist. But I
was talking about security. Frebraham Lincoln, very popular president, very
controversial president over the most divided the country's ever been assassinated.
(02:45):
John F. Kennedy, the passing of the torch to a
new generation, very antih this this part would have matched
up more with Eisenhower, but he was industrial military. He
was against that. He was against CIA. It led to
his death in Dallas. Ronald Reagan, very popular, very controversial. Uh,
(03:06):
he ended up with one or two assassination attempts.
Speaker 3 (03:09):
For Reagan, multiple attempts, so obviously one one one that
actually hit it.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
Yeah, And for Donald Trump, two attempts one that hit.
How concerned should America, the American people be with Donald
Trump's safety.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
I wish we didn't have to talk about this. It's
the most uncomfortable topic.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
It my greatest whorry.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
I think everybody's thinking about it every single day because
so much vitriol, so much hatred was spread over the
last well since two thousands sold.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But that aside, go back to JFK. What JFK meant
to the Military industrial complex, what he meant to the CIA,
wanting to splinter it into a thousand pieces, and he
was quietly doing doing it. Donald Trump has been loudly
talking about the swamp a lot.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
On twenty of his biggest hitters to help him. Yeah,
I mean this this man is he talked about it
in the first term.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
This term he could actually do it. How in dangerous?
Speaker 3 (04:02):
It is a disruptor and a highly motivated one as well.
And this is in vengeance.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
No, this is a disruptor, termed dismantler with the American
people supporting it.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Yeah, and so the question becomes, who's the patsy that
they will set up this time.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
I can't try to take him out. I can't remember
if if you can hear this or not. I think
if I do this, you can. If you can't tell
me immediately, but I want to play you this is
Donald Trump yesterday. It's one thing for us to say,
we hate talking about this, and we hate worrying about
(04:40):
this out loud. I think Donald Trump's aware of how
potentially a danger he is. This is him at his
rally yesterday.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
As the first step toward restoring transparency and accountability to government,
we will also reverse the overclassification of government documents, and
in the coming days, we are going to make public
mating records relating to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy,
his brother Robert Kennedy, as well as doctor Martin Luther
(05:10):
King Junior, and other topics are great public interest.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
So it's all going to be released on Why Why
would I bring up and play a clip of Donald
Trump saying He's going to release any documents and all
documents relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy,
as well as Martin Luther King Junior. We know from
the documents that have been released, thousands and thousands of documents,
(05:38):
but the ones that kind of just point blank connect
the dots have been redacted and not released, and when
they are, everybody kind of I'll never forget when they
asked Cash Patel and I can't remember if it was.
I think it was Joe Rogan that might have been
interviewing him or maybe No, I think it was Tucker Carlsoner, No,
it was Glenn Beck. I think it was Glenn Beck. Anyway,
(06:00):
they were talking about the assassinate assassination of jfk And
of course Cash Ptel has read all these documents. Cash
Pateel knows exactly what happened to John F. Kennedy, and
when pressed on it, he wouldn't tell Glenn, but he
looked at Glenn and said, Glenn, there's nothing you're going
to find out that you haven't already figured out. And
(06:21):
I can't think of a more clever way to say it.
I think everybody's already figured out. It wasn't Oswald alone,
and Oswald couldn't have done it without a lot of cooperation.
But there's a lot of people that have gone even
further and said, wait a minute, you don't go to Russia,
you don't go to the Soviet Union unless you're a
spy in special ops, and you don't get back in
(06:42):
without any questions unless you're a spy or special ops.
And maybe he was, in fact just a patsy. But
the dots that haven't been connected yet is if elements
within the government played a role in killing their own president.
And I got curious yesterday watching this because I just
did a list and he didn't throw in Lincoln, but
(07:04):
he throw in RFK JFK. He didn't throw in Reagan
or Lincoln, but then he threw in Martin Luther King.
Is this Donald Trump letting people know and perhaps securing
himself by letting them know that the government may have
taken out people in the past in order to protect
himself in the future.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
Yeah, and in a court of law, the operative argument
is going to be pleased to find the government at
this stage in the game. We could just as easily
say that the progressive media cartel is primarily responsible for
ginning up such terror on the part of weak minded
people that they might actually believe that attacking this administration
(07:44):
physically would be patriotic.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
Or more the media. Joe Biden said it, Kamala Harris
said it, They've all said he was a monster, he
was the boogeyman, He was the Pabach. He was a
threat to democracy, He was a tyrant, he was a
dictators matter, yet they matter. But with jfk it wasn't
really a cuckoo fran and Ali or you know, because
(08:10):
the question was was it Cuba after the Bay of Pigs?
Was it Cuba after the Cuban missile crisis? Was at
the Soviet Union by way of Cuba? Was at the
mafia because he was sleeping with Giancanna's girlfriend? Was it
all of the above? But I don't know that anybody
operatively walked around and said the CIA killed John F. Kennedy.
Speaker 3 (08:30):
Well, i'll tell you John F. Kennedy his book Profiles
and Courage, which I just picked up the other day
because I'm doing research on John Quincy Adams for a
project that we're on too right now. John Quincy Adams,
when you look at the disruptors, I call him free
agents who became presidents. Clearly George Washington and John Adams
were free agents that there were no political parties. They
refused to participate in parties. It wasn't until we got
(08:52):
to Jefferson that everything went down the drain. Well, then
you go Jefferson, Madison and Monroe, and things are in
the toilet of political partisan politics. And John quinn s
Adams comes out and gets elected and does it inaugural
speech saying I'm done with parties. We're all done with parties,
and notoh of this, Let's go back to being American.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
You left that one layer, which is when progressivism was
birthed with Wilson. Then it was resurrected with Obama, carried
out again through through Biden, through Podesta, the same agent.
But that's when progressivism took over the Democrat Party. Now
you have really a four party system, trump Ism, Establishment,
Republican establishment Democrat, and progressive justice Democrats. But they both
(09:32):
seem to be I did a fascinating poll and while
the Republicans look healthier than the Democrats, and the Democrats
look like they better change completely or they're dead forever.
That's what the polling shows. I mean, the amount of
Democrats who think they completely need to change is remarkable,
and it's over sixty five percent. But you know, the
same kind of trend is there for the Republicans. When
(09:53):
I said a while ago, everybody thought I was nuts.
One or both parties will be gone by the end
of the decade. We were halfway through the decade, and
one looks like it might be leaving if it doesn't
change dramatically.
Speaker 3 (10:03):
Well, Senator Rand Paul was echoing those sentiments last week
when he was talking about establishment Republicans in the Senate,
basically saying, well, we're not watching and what we need
to watch out for is there are establishment Republicans. They
are institutionalists, he said. They are more interested in protecting
their power than seeing America healthy. Those are the biggest
(10:24):
danger that now threatens this new administration.
Speaker 2 (10:26):
Loosing moments on this inauguration. David David Zonatti, all right,
so the American people are optimistic, enthusiastic, They're behind their
new president taking office. They're very specific from the economy
to the border to foreign policy about what they want done.
He has the window and the amount of support to
do a number of things very quickly. Does he what
(10:49):
is a reasonable expectation for Donald Trump's second first one
hundred days?
Speaker 3 (10:53):
And he gets one, Well, I'd like to be the
most optimistic person to make everyone go away singing happy days.
Here again, by the way, very very embarrassed about that.
But Senator Ran Paul I think said it right. The
biggest danger now is the institutionalists and in the Republican
institutionalists in the Senate. Those are the people we have
to watch right now. Mitch McConnell's gone, but his wing
(11:16):
of the party isn't gone.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Yeah, what can he reasonably get done? What can people
have a lot.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Of fun the next forty eight hours with executive orders
and he will shake some things up. And then the
next thing becomes how far can his how far can
the people that he's put in place set the priorities
right and move in administrative reform at the same time
he's going for Congress. We've got six months. We have
six months to find out porter an economy though, that's
(11:42):
where you can be. He can six months, he's got two.
He's got a full two years. If the institutionalists take
him out on his agenda in the first six months,
it's going to be a lonely three years.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Last current ball, he throws at us a last second
pardon of Fauci Liz Cheney shift in the January sixth
commit What does that reveal to the American people? And
is his brother coming yet? I can't believe he hasn't
partned his brother yet? Well, and all that's left.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
As we talked about during the break Red set it again,
will he pardon himself on the way out the door?
Speaker 2 (12:14):
I forgot about that one. David's naughty be back again tomorrow,
I'm almost certain, and we'll discuss. I think the biggest
question mark is the speech, the inaugural address. Is it
a unity message, is it a trust message? Was it
the right message delivered the right way? How does this
whole thing kick off? We'll review what we previewed today tomorrow. David,
(12:36):
thank you so much for your.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
Time, miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot,
and we'll miss you. It's your Morning Show with Michael
del Churno
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.