Polls show voters in battleground house districts still believe democrats are more focused on helping “other people than them.” Your Morning Show senior correspondent David Zanotti feels your tazes are high because your hard earned money is going to fraudulent NGO's
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Previously on your Morning show with Michael Del Choono.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Visiting with David Zonadi, our senior contributor. I want to
go through this poll with you and all the listeners. Now,
this is internal polling, so this isn't like somebody playing
the polling game. They're going to take a look at
what's happening among Democrats. And here's what it shows, and
a glimpse by the way the twenty twenty six midterms
(00:25):
to come and problems they may have. The Democrat Party,
its brand with its constituents is in really rough shake.
The Navigator poll showed, nearly two months into the Donald
Trump administration, a majority of voters in battleground house districts
(00:49):
still believe Democrats in Congress are more focused on helping
other people than them. This is the generic other people
than them. Among independent just twenty because you know, we
always got to keep track of the independence lean democrat,
just twenty seven percent believe Democrats are focused on helping them,
compared to fifty five percent who said they're more focused
(01:11):
on others who this proverbial other is could be trans
could be illegals, could be what have you. The polling
shared first with Politico is one of the first comprehensive
studies of voters in swing congressional districts since November of
twenty twenty four, and ahead of their caucus meetings in Leesburg, Virginia.
I'll let you guys crack jokes based on them, The
(01:33):
survey suggests the party has an enormous amount of work
to do if it's going to unite, if it's going
to pivot, if it's going to repair its messaging. It's
like today we've got the polling information. Less than twenty
percent think the mayor of Los Angeles has done a
good job. Okay, and that's earned. But are they going
to just replace her with a different name and a
(01:54):
different face, with the same worldview and policy views that
keep failing them. That's the definition of insanity. Let me
get to two quick highlights and then I'll let David
chime in. Just forty four percent of those polled said
they think Democrats respect work, while even fewer thirty nine
percent said the party values work. Only forty two percent
said Democrats share their values. Think of that wokeness dying
(02:18):
and they're the party of wokeness a majority. Meanwhile, fifty
six percent said, the Democrats are not looking out for
the working people. Remember they hung at all on the
soul of America and the working class. Only thirty nine
percent believe Democrats have the right priorities. Let me connect
the dots for you. We know in the past election,
(02:40):
what really allowed Donald Trump to win was the mandate
majority of America that thought we were heading in the
wrong direction. Well guess what now they think it's the
Democrats fault and they have the wrong priorities. This will
be interesting, David. I mean, I'm sure they're going to
fix a lot of this, but are they going to
(03:02):
fix it in words, in new faces, in new names,
and is anybody going to believe them this is some
pretty tough or rip it apart and tell me how
it none of this really matters. Well, I wish we.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Had Elon Muskin on this one because what he talked
about earlier, and you played on earlier a clip about
the fact that George Soros has hacked the system. It
may be finally that the reput that the Democrats that
they're polling are finally realizing that their party has been
completely hacked, completely co opted, completely replaced by Soros and
(03:33):
Podesta and it's basically a mob game now, and the
people who are regular Democrats, who actually have ideas and
have grown up in a tradition are completely left on
the outside the unions that they're working people. They're standing
out there with nowhere to go because it's all been
hacked by people who are using government to reward their friends,
(03:54):
to control more power and to get bigger pieces of
the federal budget. And everything that Dog is doing is
proving that to be absolutely true. Now suddenly they're realizing
they've been handled, they've been had.
Speaker 2 (04:08):
How is it they didn't notice They wanted Bernie and
their party gave him Hillary. They wanted Bernie and their
party gave him Biden. Then nobody wanted Biden, and they
took Biden's votes and gave them to Kama. It took
the Kamala, I think, to awaken them. Wait a minute,
this party isn't about us. The dawn of the entire
(04:29):
mob enterprise. John Podesta is still not being discussed in public.
Nobody knows where he is.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Go back and find out how many of these checks
the doges is now uncovering were basically steered across's desk.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
And I think you're gonna find he's the Auto Sign
Department of Education, the Auto Mind by the way, Yeah,
the Auto Mind and the Auto Sign Department of Education.
I think if I can tell you this, if Donald
Trump solves this war, he's gonna get a Nobel peace pride.
We're gonna avoid World War three for a while anyway
at least, and you know, we're gonna have peace and
kids will stop dying. That's a great thing. If he
(05:07):
solves this tariff war, we get an even playing field
and the economy starts growing. That's a great thing. They're
not going to have much to move on to other
than this gutting of the Department of Education. So is
this promise made, promise kept? Or is this, oh my gosh,
this tyrant is now destroying education. How did we educate
(05:27):
our children, prepare them for the workforce, prepare them for citizenry,
prepare them for higher education prior to nineteen seventy nine,
and now suddenly we can't do it? Yeah, gee whiz.
Speaker 3 (05:37):
For all those years as a republic, we managed to
do it without the federal government dictating, controlling, and setting
all the terms. And that's now, of course, you listen
to the unions. They'll say, oh, no, education is all
local control. Well, if it's all local control, what are
you worried about if the Department of Education ceases to exist,
we don't need a Washington Library on education. Federal funding
that comes down back, And first off, it's all of
(05:58):
our tax dollars, the parents' tax dollars too. Of the
kids that are in school, those dollars all go to Washington,
d C. By the time they get back to the classroom.
What's left to.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Pay for houses and condominiums and people living in Washington,
d C. Benefiting their life and their agenda, but none
of us getting to our kids in the classroom. Average, well,
how many computers we can buy with this money? Average
school district across the country.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
As far as the percentage of federal funding that comes
in for public education is seven percent, and that is
largely involved in programs like free launchers and stuff like that.
It's not an impactful reality, but it is a regulatory reality,
and it is problematic in that regard, and it's just
a tremendous waste of money.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
It's a tremendous waste of money. Can America connect the
dots that this isn't about destroying education. It's about destroying
bureaucracy and meddling from Washington that's too far away from
the kids and too inefficient. Can they connect those dots?
I hope. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
We didn't even have government involvement in schools at all
until the twentieth century.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
What do you make of this bishop and the end money?
So she's she's lectured, it's our story of the day.
So you guys, remember Bishop Booty. Is it Booty or Buddy?
I don't know. I don't know either's in that one,
but it's inauguration day. Buddy, it's Buddy. And she starts,
you know, chastising the president on his immigration views and
(07:18):
how he plans to enforce immigration laws. Was very uncomfortable.
I said, he's a better man than me. I would
have got up and walked out, But I mean the
way Vance was talking to his wife, the family members
were looking at it. This is a very uncomfortable moment.
And that's where the narrative of kids are going to
go to school and they're going to come home from
school and their parents are going to be gone, you know,
not not human traffickers, drug traffickers, fentanyl peddlers, not rapist murderers.
(07:42):
That's what we're deporting, No innocent parents, and then their
kids are going to be stranded. I mean, just a
ridiculous notion. Then you find out her NGO got fifty
three million dollars in twenty twenty three, and I don't
want to be, you know, upsetting my Catholic listeners, but
you know, Catholic Charities is great at bringing immigrant immigrants
and then losing track of them. But this is fifty
(08:05):
three million dollars, and then they did twice as many
in twenty twenty four. We don't have the numbers in
twenty twenty four, but if she got fifty three, it's
presumable she may have gotten a hundred million in twenty
twenty four. Now you got one hundred and fifty million
dollars of hypocrisy chastising the president as her robe is
lined with cash. I mean, that's conflict of interest for sure,
(08:25):
that's hypocrisy for sure. But I mean, you just can't
make this stuff up. Well, the sad thing about that
story is it's true. In another area.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Most of those kids that are coming home from school
that their parents aren't there aren't because they've been taken
away and sent out of the country. Most of the
kids that come home in America day and their parents
aren't there are their parents aren't there because they're working
two jobs to pay for the taxes to cover the
fraud and corruption.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
The dog is trying to uncover.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
Miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot, and
will miss you. It's your Morning Show with Michael del Cherno.
Previously on your Morning show with Michael Del Choono.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Visiting with David Zonadi, our senior contributor. I want to
go through this poll with you and all the listeners. Now,
this is internal polling, so this isn't like somebody playing
the polling game. They're going to take a look at
what's happening among Democrats. And here's what it shows, and
a glimpse by the way the twenty twenty six midterms
(00:25):
to come and problems they may have. The Democrat Party,
its brand with its constituents is in really rough shake.
The Navigator poll showed, nearly two months into the Donald
Trump administration, a majority of voters in battleground house districts
(00:49):
still believe Democrats in Congress are more focused on helping
other people than them. This is the generic other people
than them. Among independent just twenty because you know, we
always got to keep track of the independence lean democrat,
just twenty seven percent believe Democrats are focused on helping them,
compared to fifty five percent who said they're more focused
(01:11):
on others who this proverbial other is could be trans
could be illegals, could be what have you. The polling
shared first with Politico is one of the first comprehensive
studies of voters in swing congressional districts since November of
twenty twenty four, and ahead of their caucus meetings in Leesburg, Virginia.
I'll let you guys crack jokes based on them, The
(01:33):
survey suggests the party has an enormous amount of work
to do if it's going to unite, if it's going
to pivot, if it's going to repair its messaging. It's
like today we've got the polling information. Less than twenty
percent think the mayor of Los Angeles has done a
good job. Okay, and that's earned. But are they going
to just replace her with a different name and a
(01:54):
different face, with the same worldview and policy views that
keep failing them. That's the definition of insanity. Let me
get to two quick highlights and then I'll let David
chime in. Just forty four percent of those polled said
they think Democrats respect work, while even fewer thirty nine
percent said the party values work. Only forty two percent
said Democrats share their values. Think of that wokeness dying
(02:18):
and they're the party of wokeness a majority. Meanwhile, fifty
six percent said, the Democrats are not looking out for
the working people. Remember they hung at all on the
soul of America and the working class. Only thirty nine
percent believe Democrats have the right priorities. Let me connect
the dots for you. We know in the past election,
(02:40):
what really allowed Donald Trump to win was the mandate
majority of America that thought we were heading in the
wrong direction. Well guess what now they think it's the
Democrats fault and they have the wrong priorities. This will
be interesting, David. I mean, I'm sure they're going to
fix a lot of this, but are they going to
(03:02):
fix it in words, in new faces, in new names,
and is anybody going to believe them this is some
pretty tough or rip it apart and tell me how
it none of this really matters. Well, I wish we.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
Had Elon Muskin on this one because what he talked
about earlier, and you played on earlier a clip about
the fact that George Soros has hacked the system. It
may be finally that the reput that the Democrats that
they're polling are finally realizing that their party has been
completely hacked, completely co opted, completely replaced by Soros and
(03:33):
Podesta and it's basically a mob game now, and the
people who are regular Democrats, who actually have ideas and
have grown up in a tradition are completely left on
the outside the unions that they're working people. They're standing
out there with nowhere to go because it's all been
hacked by people who are using government to reward their friends,
(03:54):
to control more power and to get bigger pieces of
the federal budget. And everything that Dog is doing is
proving that to be absolutely true. Now suddenly they're realizing
they've been handled, they've been had.
Speaker 2 (04:08):
How is it they didn't notice They wanted Bernie and
their party gave him Hillary. They wanted Bernie and their
party gave him Biden. Then nobody wanted Biden, and they
took Biden's votes and gave them to Kama. It took
the Kamala, I think, to awaken them. Wait a minute,
this party isn't about us. The dawn of the entire
(04:29):
mob enterprise. John Podesta is still not being discussed in public.
Nobody knows where he is.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Go back and find out how many of these checks
the doges is now uncovering were basically steered across's desk.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
And I think you're gonna find he's the Auto Sign
Department of Education, the Auto Mind by the way, Yeah,
the Auto Mind and the Auto Sign Department of Education.
I think if I can tell you this, if Donald
Trump solves this war, he's gonna get a Nobel peace pride.
We're gonna avoid World War three for a while anyway
at least, and you know, we're gonna have peace and
kids will stop dying. That's a great thing. If he
(05:07):
solves this tariff war, we get an even playing field
and the economy starts growing. That's a great thing. They're
not going to have much to move on to other
than this gutting of the Department of Education. So is
this promise made, promise kept? Or is this, oh my gosh,
this tyrant is now destroying education. How did we educate
(05:27):
our children, prepare them for the workforce, prepare them for citizenry,
prepare them for higher education prior to nineteen seventy nine,
and now suddenly we can't do it? Yeah, gee whiz.
Speaker 3 (05:37):
For all those years as a republic, we managed to
do it without the federal government dictating, controlling, and setting
all the terms. And that's now, of course, you listen
to the unions. They'll say, oh, no, education is all
local control. Well, if it's all local control, what are
you worried about if the Department of Education ceases to exist,
we don't need a Washington Library on education. Federal funding
that comes down back, And first off, it's all of
(05:58):
our tax dollars, the parents' tax dollars too. Of the
kids that are in school, those dollars all go to Washington,
d C. By the time they get back to the classroom.
What's left to.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Pay for houses and condominiums and people living in Washington,
d C. Benefiting their life and their agenda, but none
of us getting to our kids in the classroom. Average, well,
how many computers we can buy with this money? Average
school district across the country.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
As far as the percentage of federal funding that comes
in for public education is seven percent, and that is
largely involved in programs like free launchers and stuff like that.
It's not an impactful reality, but it is a regulatory reality,
and it is problematic in that regard, and it's just
a tremendous waste of money.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
It's a tremendous waste of money. Can America connect the
dots that this isn't about destroying education. It's about destroying
bureaucracy and meddling from Washington that's too far away from
the kids and too inefficient. Can they connect those dots?
I hope. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
We didn't even have government involvement in schools at all
until the twentieth century.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
What do you make of this bishop and the end money?
So she's she's lectured, it's our story of the day.
So you guys, remember Bishop Booty. Is it Booty or Buddy?
I don't know. I don't know either's in that one,
but it's inauguration day. Buddy, it's Buddy. And she starts,
you know, chastising the president on his immigration views and
(07:18):
how he plans to enforce immigration laws. Was very uncomfortable.
I said, he's a better man than me. I would
have got up and walked out, But I mean the
way Vance was talking to his wife, the family members
were looking at it. This is a very uncomfortable moment.
And that's where the narrative of kids are going to
go to school and they're going to come home from
school and their parents are going to be gone, you know,
not not human traffickers, drug traffickers, fentanyl peddlers, not rapist murderers.
(07:42):
That's what we're deporting, No innocent parents, and then their
kids are going to be stranded. I mean, just a
ridiculous notion. Then you find out her NGO got fifty
three million dollars in twenty twenty three, and I don't
want to be, you know, upsetting my Catholic listeners, but
you know, Catholic Charities is great at bringing immigrant immigrants
and then losing track of them. But this is fifty
(08:05):
three million dollars, and then they did twice as many
in twenty twenty four. We don't have the numbers in
twenty twenty four, but if she got fifty three, it's
presumable she may have gotten a hundred million in twenty
twenty four. Now you got one hundred and fifty million
dollars of hypocrisy chastising the president as her robe is
lined with cash. I mean, that's conflict of interest for sure,
(08:25):
that's hypocrisy for sure. But I mean, you just can't
make this stuff up. Well, the sad thing about that
story is it's true. In another area.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Most of those kids that are coming home from school
that their parents aren't there aren't because they've been taken
away and sent out of the country. Most of the
kids that come home in America day and their parents
aren't there are their parents aren't there because they're working
two jobs to pay for the taxes to cover the
fraud and corruption.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
The dog is trying to uncover.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
Miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot, and
will miss you. It's your Morning Show with Michael del Cherno.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.