June 18, 2025 • 35 mins
If you think “No Kings” movement has made its statement and over, you may want to think again. We ask senior contributor David Zanotti if this is the democrat party revealing its play for midterms and beyond, civil unrest in the name of saving democracy…again??
A new study is out on both the best and worst run cities in the United States. How does your town shape up? National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL has the findings.
White House Correspondent JON DECKER has the latest on the very tense situation in the Middle East.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
live five to eight am Central, six to nine Eastern
and great cities like Jackson, Mississippi, Akron, Ohio, or Columbus, Georgia.
We'd love to be a part of your morning routine
and we're grateful you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Now.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Enjoy the podcast two three, starting your morning off right.
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding
because we're intertigiven.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
This is your morning show with Michael deil Jordan.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Seven minutes after the hour.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
This is your day, Wednesday, June the eighteenth year of
Our Lord, twenty twenty five, and this is your morning show.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I'm Michael del Jornal honor to serve you.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Jeffrey got an eye on the sound controls RED keeping
an eye on the content. And if you're just waking up,
the US's warning Americans not to travel to Iran under
any circumstance that would be common sense. The US embassy
in Jerusalem is closing, and members of Congress on both
sides trying to make politics out of this, looking to
limit US involvement, although all indications are the President has
(01:01):
given around forty eight hours to surrender or else we
think the or else is our bombers taking out that
final centrifuge location that's about a half a mile underground
in Mount Fourdeaux. Our bunker busters could take those out.
That be a lot easier than Israel trying to do
it with precision and caving in the tunnels and or
(01:25):
getting in close to take them out. So does that
equal World War IIE? Does that equal terror attack in
other countries? Does that equal regime change? That can get
expensive and be even more dangerous. Well, that's what America
is fighting about. But Iran is not being allowed to
have nuclear weapons. Everybody's in agreement so far, no sign
of Russia intervening. They're allowing this to happen. Iran is isolated,
(01:48):
they've lost control of the sky. They don't have their surrogates,
the Houthis and the Hamas proxy terrorists to carry out
any kind of retaliatory track. They don't seem to have
any conventional weaponry left. Their program has been pushed back
greatly with this last bunker buster at Mount Fourdeaux that
(02:10):
would pretty much bring him back.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
To square one.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
So removing the threat without regime change or with regime change,
seems to be what lizahead. We'll talk more about that
coming up. Can't have your morning show without your voice.
Let's start with Gary.
Speaker 4 (02:25):
I would love to see anyone from the left go
to Disney World and start jumping all of the lines
to get to the front of all the lines in
the rides, and let them act surprised when they get
kicked out of Disney World. What do they expect? You
jump the line, you get kicked out. Sorry, that's the
way it works here in America.
Speaker 3 (02:43):
I love Russia. That's what you'd meet. Militant Mickey. He
turned the military of Disney against you.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
Get out of her, pal You've got to behave and
make your bed to it the resort Keith listening in Phoenix.
Speaker 5 (02:56):
I believe Yeah, the gil that they view didn't know
what Arnold how Arnold Schwartzeneger was going to answer that question.
Then they're even demmer than we all thought, because I've
heard Arnold Schwarzsteingers say those exact things before. And if
the Gales of the view were surprised by the response
they got, then they clearly didn't do their homework, and
(03:18):
their way dumber than any of us could have imagined.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
Well, obviously, great minds. Can you think alike?
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Because that's exactly what I said, Although it was brilliant
how Arnold handled the question Youngstown, Ohio.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Arnold better watch out. He'll be on the Democrats list
like Betterman.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
By the way, Fetterman one of the few outspoken opposing
any bill to limit Trump's power to carry out any airstrikes.
In this Joel will get the final sat I believe Joel's Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Isn't he? And Michael, this is Joel in Manchester, Tennessee.
All this whole thing about.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
No kings, if Joe Biden was a president.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
I'd rather have a king. I know there's a lot
of people to feel that way.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
Well, speaking of no kings, if you think the movement
has made its statement and now they're going to go away,
think again. CEO of the American Policy Roundtable, host of
the Public Square, heard on two hundred stations and our
senior contributor Davidsonaudius joining us. This has clearly revealed the
Democratic Party's played for the midterms and probably beyond again
civil rat unrest in the name of saving democracy. I
(04:19):
think we've seen this playbook before. No sooner were we
going to have this conversation, they've already announced more plans
for riots in July, so this is clearly their game plan.
They did it in twenty twenty, they're going to do
it again here in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 6 (04:32):
It's interesting, Michael, because they've now a boast of two
hundred and fifty organizations that are behind them. And what's
fascinating is if you look at the list that I
encourage everyone to go to no Kings dot org and
take a look at what they're doing. Now, if you
go to no Kings dot com, you're going to find
a conservative book that was written and published, which is
kind of interesting. So they didn't get that website, but
(04:52):
they're at no Kings dot org and it just look
at see the organizations that are listed.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
It's fascinating.
Speaker 6 (05:00):
I mean that when the pandemic came along, the American
Federation of Teachers were leading the parade to make certain
that schools stayed closed and our kids' educational experience was ruined,
and their motivation was fundamentally to protect their members from
getting infected by kids who couldn't get the disease. By
and large, for the most part, but they were not
worried about Kings.
Speaker 3 (05:20):
Then when the deep.
Speaker 6 (05:22):
State came forward through Fauci and the administrative state of
healthcare and shut down the world, they were fine with
government control then as long as they got to stay
home and collect paychecks. So the absurdity of it is significant,
but not the size they want us to believe that
(05:42):
their call that had twenty thousand people on it earlier
this week, that their cities, those seemed to them celebrate
the largest protests in American history. Listening to them frame
this against Donald Trump, it's a subject worth talking about.
We're talking about it this coming Thursday and Friday on
the Public Square, an important show where we break this
(06:03):
thing down in its many, many detailed parts.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
You notice I don't chime in shameless plug, No, because
they get more in depth.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
I encourage everyone.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
You can wait for the Public Square on your local
station on two hundred stations, or just go to the
Public Square dot com and you can catch episodes on demand.
But I encourage it because we get far more in depth.
They have more time.
Speaker 6 (06:23):
So what we've got in a situation where you are
exactly right, that we go back to Time magazine, We
go back to the campaign in which Donald Trump was defeated,
and we see the same strategy. But the thing about
it is that people who begin with violence in the
streets and bullying tactics such as this, they're following the
strategies of Lenin, They're following the strategies of Sololinski. They're
(06:47):
the party of the bullies who want to create anarchy.
And the reason they want to create anarchy chaos in
the streets is to stop the existing functioning of a constitutional.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
Electoral republic.
Speaker 6 (06:59):
And they want people to feel that the whole world's
falling apart and no kings will give you.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
But the polls show clearly the American people, and I
don't just mean the American people, I mean ninety something
percent of Republicans upwards of thirty five to fifty percent,
depending on exactly what question you ask of Democrats, and
they all you know, and the deciding vote of the
independence always upwards of fifty percent. They want the borders secured.
(07:27):
Nobody sees that as tyrannical. They see that as necessary
for a sovereign nation. They want those that have committed
crimes to be removed. When you start getting to people
that just broke into the country and are doing quote unquote,
and I do this with their quotes the jobs that
Americans don't want to do. Then it gets a little liffy.
But so far, nobody's buying the president is acting like
(07:47):
a king. No one's buying that the President is turning
the military against the American people only those who have
broken the law.
Speaker 3 (07:54):
Is it a.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Winnable because I still think their endgame is if they
can't win an election, they're still going to do insurrection.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
In other words, the.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Black Lives Matter Antifa, I say it that way, and
I struggle to say it that way because Antifa infiltrated
a lot of innocent Black Lives Matters twisted protesters. But
then some of the Black Lives Matter protesters were also
up to no good like Antifa.
Speaker 3 (08:22):
But that wasn't the endgame.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
That was the conditioning game for the insurrection they had
planned had Donald Trump won. Is no kings the new
conditioning game of good trouble, so that they paved the
way for an insurrection or ans or whomever goes on
to win.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
Because I think that's still their endgame.
Speaker 6 (08:42):
Well, the answer to your question is without apology and
with pay Let me read you directly from the front
page of their website. This is No Kings spot speaking now.
We're inspired by the three point five percent principle. It
only takes three point five percent of the population engaged
in sustained strategic protest against authoritarianism to achieve significant political change.
(09:06):
Everything we do from here on out is grounded in
three core commitments, staying in the fight, taking concrete action today,
and investing in the long term. In other words, of course,
protest is their methodology, and they get paid to do so.
So they have now become the vehicle where the billionaire's
club will come in. And this is the campaign beginning
of twenty twenty six and twenty twenty eight. And you
(09:27):
can't do what they did in the weekend without having
had hundreds of millions of dollars being flowing into the system.
These people get paid to create chaos. It's a part
of the regime. And understand something. When you're looking at
No Kings, you are looking at the Democrat.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
Party, look at the hard I'm going to interrupt and
say that what part because I think this is the
extreme left. I don't know where the fetter I don't
know beyond fetterman, who is establishment common sensical Democrat anymore.
Is this the socialist justice portion of the party. Is
this the overall party or is this the one area?
(10:06):
They both agree it's all over.
Speaker 6 (10:08):
Look at the two hundred and fifty organizations and the
reason they're all coming in and those who are silent
will be silent with the purposes because now the money
starts to flow and they all get paid.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
Let me give you an irony. We were looking at
the research and do you know what ethnicity is the strongest,
the highest rated, over eighty percent behind the president and
enforcement of border security and enforcement of deportation, Hispanics. In fact,
(10:38):
you get outside of Los Angeles where Hispanics are saying,
this is our land, we're taking it back, and they're
waving their flag and burning ours.
Speaker 3 (10:44):
But you get outside that. I was in Chicago.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
I'm at the train, the same train they're all getting
on with their signs to go protest. I was going
to the North Side, they were going.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
To the Loop.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
They were all older white people, yeah, predominantly old or white.
And the things I was overhearing this. One guy's going,
you know, I go, I get, you know, a DVD player.
I use it for ninety days and then I return it,
and then I go get another one that's not stealing,
(11:17):
that's taken advantage of the system, you know. I mean,
you couldn't believe what freeloaders and goofballs they were. But
I'm just noticing they're all older, and they're all white.
These are all people getting paid. These are all freeloaders.
Speaker 6 (11:33):
And even if some of the the on the street
people aren't getting paid, it's just their hobby or what
they do for fun. The organizers are the ones that
are are that are channeling millions.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Michael.
Speaker 6 (11:42):
This is the Democrat Party. This is the heartbeat of
the Democrat Party. It's the core. It's what Soros and
company hollowed out over the last twenty years and now
is filled with this kind of anarchy because that's what
they need.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
All right, Well, let me rephrase this in the form
of a question if last time and again the ultimate
play was insurrection. They were just conditioning you with VLM
and Antifa.
Speaker 3 (12:07):
It's your morning show with Michael del Journo.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
The President's given a forty eight hour warning to the
clerics in the Ayatola to surrender or else. We believe
the or else is us involvement and taking out that
final Mount Fordau half mile underground secured centrifuges to end
any threat of nuclear capability. Meanwhile, the US Embassy in
(12:33):
Jerusalem is closing, and members of Congress on both sides
of the Isle are looking to limit US involvement in
the Iran Israel conflict. We're visiting with David Zanati. If
you think No Kings is done, they've made their statement.
Nobody cared. It was a big flop. Think again. This
is the Democrat Party strategy for disruption once again. They're
going to use civil unrest in the name of saving democracy.
(12:56):
David and I has been breaking down the money and
the organizations that are be behind this. Their next plans
are in July. We've lived this before. I don't think it.
You know, they used more of lawfair in twenty twenty
four and it failed. This is the type of conditioning
they did with Black Lives Matter and Antifa, and that
was making all cops the bad guys. Now they're doing
(13:18):
the same thing with the president, the tyrant, the king
and the military over enforcing immigration law. But will it
work this time and what is the endgame? I believe
it's Ultimately, if they lose the election full out insurrection,
they'll create a civil war if they can't maintain their
power by stealing elections. You see it the same way.
Speaker 6 (13:37):
It's interesting, Michael, because nowhere in any of the rhetoric
of this movement, by their own definition, do you ever
hear anything about the Declaration of Independence. But by soliciting
the no King's terminology out there, what they're attempting to
do is to steal the idea of the declaration, especially
(13:59):
with the coming celebration at the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary.
That's the most dangerous thing that can happen to them
is for people to actually begin to read the Declaration
of Independence. That's the philosophical part of this, which runs
deep in the people who are paying for this. But
the secondary notion is this, this is all about defeating
whoever's running for president in twenty twenty eight. Their goal
(14:20):
is to so entangle Donald Trump that whoever comes next
from the Republican Party is to.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
Be a non trump Ism.
Speaker 6 (14:26):
Second, it'll be to shape that election by making him
so terribly controversial. Now, the play is this, if they
can pull off and win the House in twenty twenty six,
they'll go back to impeachment and prosecution and they'll freeze
everything for two years, and then that will be the
definition of the election.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
This is what they do.
Speaker 6 (14:44):
This is the party of anarchy that's attempting to move
to a party of totalitarianism. Remember, when you look at
the left, you always have to realize that whatever they're
projecting outward is actually what they're doing doing.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They're confessing, oh yeah, we saw that yesterday, so it
worked in twenty twenty, will remind everybody, And no Kings
is a much better name slogan, quite frankly logo. But
I don't know that it's twenty twenty anymore. And I'm
sharing this polling information when eighty percent of Hispanics are
(15:18):
behind the president and enforcing border security and deportation. You know,
it's a different country, and so I you know it's
a different.
Speaker 6 (15:28):
Country because we've been abused through COVID.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
Right, it's a different country because we've.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
Had a person in the presidency who was virtually unfunctional,
nonfunction In fifteen seconds, are they headed to victory or
just are they going to Is this going to lead
to the end of the Democrat Party or civil war. Well,
the civil war question is a good one. This is
how civil wars begin.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Yes it is. I'm executive chef George Harveil.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
My morning show is your morning show with Michael de Jorna.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Hey, it's Michael reminding you that your morning show can
be heard live each weekday morning five to eight Central,
six to nine Eastern in great cities like Nashville, Tennessee,
tu Below, Mississippi, and Sacramento, California. We'd love to be
a part of your morning routine and take the drive
to work with you, but better late than never. We're
grateful you're here now, enjoy the podcast. Want you to
know the US is warning Americans not to travel to Iran.
(16:27):
That would become insensical. The President has given forty eight
hours for Iran to surrender or else is the or
else regime changes?
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Everybody in the.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
Leftist media would like you to be afraid of or
is it US air involvement and using our bunker busters
to take out those remaining Centrifugeu's time will tell, and
that time is forty eight hours. Meanwhile, members of Congress
on both sides of the island looking to limit the
US involvement in the Iran Israeli conflict, though Fetterman, again
the only sensible Democrat left the guy wearing a hoodie
(16:58):
in sweatpants stance against that this is an airstrike, This
is not a declaration of war. And new studies out
both the best and the worst run cities in.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
The United States. This all comes down to the criteria.
Speaker 1 (17:13):
And I'm telling you probably the most in trouble inner
cities will be on the best list.
Speaker 3 (17:19):
But we'll find out.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
Your Morning show national correspondent Roy o'neilis here with where
are your Morning show cities stand in this?
Speaker 3 (17:26):
All right?
Speaker 1 (17:26):
What's the first, first and foremost? What's the criteria for this?
What makes best? What makes worst?
Speaker 7 (17:31):
Yeah, the folks over at WALLEHUBB looked at the quality
of city services provided and then compare that to the
total budget per capita in order to generate this and
the city services where everything from policing to education to
pollution control.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
In order to get these different rankings.
Speaker 7 (17:47):
Provo Utah came out top of the list, Mampa, Idaho
was second, Manchester, New Hampshire was third, Boise fourth, and
Nashvi in New Hampshire.
Speaker 3 (17:57):
Fit.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
Now, I will stop and say I've never met anybody,
And first of all, they got to change that AstroTurf.
I cannot watch smurf football. I'm blue, But I've never
met Rory. Anybody who has lived in Boise. They didn't
say it was the greatest place they ever lived. But
other than that, the other name's kind of surprising. Right,
all right, what are the worst? And I had never
heard of Nampa, Idaho until I did the story of Year.
(18:20):
So that's why I picked. That's why I chose Boise
to talk about. All Right, what's on the worst list?
Worst end of things? I think deep blue.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
Let's see, we've got out of one hundred and forty
eight that were ranked here, La was one thirty nine.
We have New York, New York at one forty five,
and dead last at one forty eight San Francisco.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
So those that are minoring in majors and majoring in
miners get on the worst list. You know, this is
really kind of a snapshot of something very troubling, and
that is the inner city urban rot. I mean, these
cities get any worse, it's gonna start looking like Escape
from La. I Escape from New York with Kurt Russell.
Movies I mean, they're just getting out of control in
(19:04):
this kind of part of it. Yeah, some of this
I should know.
Speaker 7 (19:06):
So some of the quality of the services provided ranks
are higher, and they're dragged down.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
By the cost of those services.
Speaker 7 (19:16):
So it's not necessarily that it's bad terrible. Okay, Okay,
First of all, San Francisco bottom of the barrel both categories.
But some of the other ones down there are dragged
down because places like New York it's so expensive to
hire people to do these jobs.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
Right, because of the cost of living and the taxation
rates too.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
All right, so I got any highlights of your morning
show cities.
Speaker 7 (19:37):
Let's see, Nashville comes in there at number one oh
six on the list, Knoxville way up at number forty
in the survey, Memphis is ninety four.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
I want to get city in California cities in our list,
Oklahoma City ranks number twelve on the survey.
Speaker 7 (19:54):
Tulsa comes in number fifty two, so that's a pretty
good Saint Louis one twenty two.
Speaker 1 (20:01):
I don't get the Tulsa one. I can tell you
it was very impressive with Oklahoma City. Now, you know,
it looks a little like development on the surface of Mars,
but you know, because very flat.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
But they've done a terrific job.
Speaker 1 (20:11):
In Oklahoma City, and Norman has really done a terrific
job and revitalized. I was in Norman to visit University Oklahoma,
my son jos Belmont over that. But I could tell
you I would live in Norman, Oklahoma. It was really
really nice. What about Ohio? Anywhere you're in Ohio?
Speaker 7 (20:26):
In there, Cleveland, nact a few places in there in Ohio.
And let me see, Cleveland showed up at one thirty three.
Akron comes in at number eighty eight on their survey,
Toledo one sixteen.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
Hmmm, that's getting low, all right, And what do we
take from this?
Speaker 3 (20:46):
Stom did I tell you? Since? Did I tell you?
Cincinnati one oh three, Dayton one fourteen?
Speaker 1 (20:51):
Ah, I'm surprised at some of these, but again, most
people in Cincinnati probably don't live in would this be
Cincinnati proper? Like the city limits? Like even Nashville. You know,
most of us don't live in Nashville that live in Nashville.
All right, Well, that's the best in the worst cities
based on that criteria. Great reporting all day, Rory, Thank
you so much. We'll talk again tomorrow. John Decker coming
(21:12):
up in a few minutes to talk about the latest
on the situation in the Middle East. We were talking
about No Kings with david Sonadi. There's two big questions.
One this strategy, how will it work in the midterm
versus the presidential how will it work in a primary
versus a general And ultimately does this lead to a
civil war or the end of the Democratic Party? Please
(21:35):
no roosters need to chime in. I have predicted the
end of the party by the end of the decade.
That's really the interesting take in our overtime I want
to look at. So you've been studying the money behind this,
the organizations behind this, the game plan behind this.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
It worked in twenty twenty coming out of COVID.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
We're wiser from COVID, and it's on a hill of immigration,
which is reasonable border security and deportation of dangers people
doesn't seem like a hill to win on. So my
guess is this is going to play very well for
AOC and the far left Justice Democrats in a primary,
not well in a general election, and certainly probably far
(22:14):
more vulnerable. I'll chime in on ending this party once
and for all versus accomplishing a civil war.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
But what do you.
Speaker 1 (22:22):
Say from studying it, Oh, you must have hit mute
because you didn't want to talk.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
You didn't need to do that.
Speaker 6 (22:29):
Sorry, I just didn't want to anyhow, It plays well,
Michael in twenty twenty six for them.
Speaker 3 (22:35):
It builds the momentum in a hurry, and they need
it fast because they need turnout. They do. They need turnout,
and they need to win a number of House seats.
Speaker 6 (22:44):
If they win a half dozen House seats that they
don't have right now, they're back in control in the House.
And since the Senate's run by the Club of one hundred,
which knows no party but its own self service, there
is that they will shut down anything else that Donald
Trump can effectively do and then give them so fighting
space for twenty twenty ye.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
I never argue with you, because I'm dealing with instinct
and discernment and you're dealing with master's degrees. But I
would like to throw a wrinkle into your argument, and
that is when I look at the polling, most reasonable Democrats,
and over the majority of Democrats are for border security,
our for enforcement of laws, even if it means using
(23:23):
National Guard, meaning in a primary, this plays well with
the Socialist Democrat candidates that will be funded by David
Hog and others. Anyway, not that they'll farewell in the generals.
So all they're doing is building on the only early
strength they have, which is the early voters that would
have elected Bernie Sanders twice versus their party as a whole.
Speaker 3 (23:47):
I'm kind of with the Red on this.
Speaker 1 (23:49):
I think strategically this will look really good in a primary,
but it's not going to set them up in the
general where they want to be well.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
The key for them is to win in the awful
Let's consider.
Speaker 6 (24:00):
If you will, the AWFU election of twenty twenty six
as a primary, because yes, it's a national vote on Congress,
but there are no national candidates running, so they get
the advantage of being able to leverage smaller numbers, and
they're excellent and far better than the Republicans at fielding candidates.
They only need to win six to shut down the momentum,
(24:22):
and that's the first thing.
Speaker 3 (24:23):
They have to do. To turn the momentum, They've got
to first stop the momentum. So that's what this is.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Well, they got to create energy, because energy creates turnout.
I get that, but if a majority of their party
is thinking more like Fetterman, is this the way to
do it? So I guess what you're saying is, and
I don't necessarily disagree that works for a primary, fails
miserably in a general. Probably applies more to the presidential
race in the midterm.
Speaker 6 (24:48):
Yeah, And so they know what they're doing and they're
very good at it. Now the question you have to
ask is how do you survive this? And what we're
finding is I always you know, I bring pen to today's
program simply this. When these folks are giving their lectures,
I don't care whether it's on the view or whether
it's around the table for the Fourth of July celebration.
(25:10):
Best answer I can do is I hand people a
pen and say, here, you are for no kings. You
are for a new form of civil government in America.
Here's a pen. Write it down, Tell me what it is.
Name it it's democracy. Okay, Then write down what democracy is,
write down how you plan to get there. And the
answer is always the same it's been for twenty years.
They have no answer. They are not for anything. They
(25:32):
are actually simply against what we have and the biggest difference,
Michael is to be America requires a commitment to self government.
That's the thing they hate the most, the adolescence of well.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Because it as the book you're writing with John Quincy
Adams probably covers, it's all together impossible to self governed
if you're not a moral people. And they're restraint and
you look at the cot moral relative is but not
necessarily moral people.
Speaker 6 (25:59):
They're more relativists, and they're the organizations of no restraint,
of blaming the government, of not taking personal responsibility. It's
a very adolescent movement. What they're hoping for us that
we all stay teenagers who never get out of high school.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
David Sanadi is the CEO of the American Policy Roundtable.
He is the host of The Public Square. I encourage
you they go in depth on a lot of this.
You can get it on demand at the public square
dot com. Final question, if their real play is insurrection?
If their real play is civil war? And I believe
it was in twenty twenty, they just shocked themselves installed
election and Biden won.
Speaker 3 (26:35):
Is the endplay civil war? Well, this is the play
that happens, you know.
Speaker 6 (26:40):
If they bait the United States government by attacking federal
facilities as they are prone to do in this process,
or attacking federal agents.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
It is a.
Speaker 6 (26:50):
Requirement of the federal government to defend its people who
work for the federal government.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
They're playing with fire. They're not far away from fort.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
David Zanadi has always what a pleasure. Hopefully we'll have
you back, maybe on Friday or tomorrow or later in
the week.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
Could be.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
His pen is always waving and ready. Great great work
on explaining no kings the money, who's behind it? And
trust me, they're not going away. In fact, they'll be
back as early as next month. David, thank you so much,
and I encourage people to hear more at the public
Square dot com. Now I'm wondering if you've ever heard
of karaluma. It's an edible cactus from India known for
(27:31):
its natural way of suppressing appetite. It's just one of
the single key ingredients and the breakthrough weight loss supplement
called Lean. If you're aiming for bold summer weight loss
and injections are not for you, Lean may be your answer.
It's been a great answer for me, feeling great, slow
(27:52):
steady weight loss. Doctors behind Leans say it's the closest
they've ever come to replacing the benefits of popular injections
without needles. Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar levels. A
lot of you are battling A one C levels. It
controls appetite and craving, but it doesn't stop there.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
It's rare.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Natural ingredients are also formulated to help your body burn
fat by converting it into energy. And the best part,
no needles, just results. Now all of this and all
of these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or
prevent any disease, and is not a substitute or an
alternative for care from a healthcare provider. But I'm using
(28:33):
it and it does work. It kills the yo yo,
lose weight, gain it all back, slow, steady results. And
I want to get you started with twenty percent off.
Use promo code yms twenty yms your Morning Show twenty
for twenty percent off. Use the promo code YMS twenty
at takelean dot com. That's takelean dot com promo code
(28:53):
Yms twenty.
Speaker 3 (28:55):
This is your Morning Show with Michael del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Already made the comment he's not sure where Nampa is
very sure of where it is.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
It's where she is.
Speaker 8 (29:08):
Nampa is about a forty minute drive from Boise, so
it's kind of a bedroom community of Boise proper, and
it is a great place to live.
Speaker 3 (29:19):
But we're full up. So I'll y'all in LA and
Bay area and so on. You can stay there. Thanks.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
First of all, how insulting Mary that I'm not welcome
to live in your town. Secondly, boy, can I relate?
I used to do that all the time about Nashville.
I used to tell my listeners stop inviting people to visit,
and if they do visit, take him to a bad
part of town or something. I mean, because we had
people moving here. What was the rate at one point?
Was it one hundred thousand a year or a month? It
(29:52):
was insane? How I mean Nashville has literally doubled. I
think it was a year on the In the fifteen years,
I think one hundred thousand a year.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
We're moving here. It does.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
It gets ridiculous. Stay where you're at and fix it.
That's the alternative. If you're just waking up. The US
is warning Americans not to travel to Iran. That seems
like a no brainer. Meanwhile, the US embassy in Jerusalem
is closing. Members of Congress are fighting over US involvement
in this conflict, and the President has given a forty
eight hour warning to the Ayatola and his clerics surrender
(30:21):
or else. The or else seems to be US military
aircraft delivering bunker busters. I don't know that anybody's end
goal necessarily is regime change, although that will lie heavily
in the hands of the Ayatola as to whether or
not he complies and whether or not the people turn
against him. But let's turn to White House correspondent John Decker,
who is joining us with the very latest done the
(30:42):
tensions in the Middle East. Whatever's going to happen, it
appears is going to happen in the next forty eight hours, Right.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
John, I think that's right.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
You know, the President spent much of yesterday meeting with
his national security team in the Situation Room. More of
those meetings will.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
Take place today.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Besides the President's remarks when he was coming back from
the G seven in Canada, we did not see her
hear from the President yesterday, and the only opportunity that
we'll see or hear from the President today potentially is
if they open up to the press the swearing in
of the America's new ambassador to France that will happen
in the Oval Office in the one o'clock hour today,
(31:20):
and that would be an opportunity, of course, to ask
the President his current thinking about the potential for US
military action in Iran.
Speaker 3 (31:28):
In the meantime, the.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Conflict continues between Israel and Iran, and Israel has been
quite successful and essentially shutting down the air defense systems
that Iran has in their country.
Speaker 1 (31:39):
So, boy, I can hear your voice before you even
say it, so please don't bother. I don't speculate, Michael,
but everyone's speculating as to what the President and his
national security team were weighing yesterday. Any inkling whatsoever other
than waiting, I would think it's I'm sure the concern
(31:59):
is we're not interested necessarily in regime change. We don't
want to get into nation building, but we want to
finish the job of kicking back their nuclear capabilities to
day one, and that involves to some degree Mount Fourdeaux,
because that's the main area where the centrifuges are. You've
taken out a lot of their delivery systems. You've taken
(32:20):
a lot of their enrichment plants. Now you want to
take out those centrifuges. There's a hard way to do
it on ground. For Israel, we control the air but
not the ground, so those soldiers will be vulnerable. You
could their air defense or their air systems could cave
in the tunnels, but only our bunker busters could take
them out. That's got to be what they're weighing.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
Right, Well, yeah, that's one of the things that the
President and his team are weighing.
Speaker 3 (32:44):
What they're not weighing is putting American boots on the ground.
Speaker 2 (32:47):
I can tell you that that is not a consideration.
And I think that what they're also weighing is, you know,
and that's the reason why the President speaks as often
as he does with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin net YAHUO
is to get a damage control report, damage assessment report,
I should say, in terms of what Israel has managed
(33:07):
to do on their own over the course of the
past few days, and whether or not, given the success
that Israel has had, whether it's necessary to have US
military involvement in this conflict.
Speaker 1 (33:19):
Well, we did get the announcement from the Defense Secretary
hegset that they were sending defense support to Israel. Part
of that was refueling. Refueling could point to our bombers
on a long journey delivering a bunker buster. But I
guess we're all going to find out in the next
forty eight hours. John great reporting. As always, we'll talk
(33:39):
again tomorrow. In conclusion, I encourage people to go back
and listen to the first hour or we kind of
just had a one on one together. You know about
your fears imagined versus realistic, because your body doesn't know
the difference between something really bad happening that you're imagining
or if it was really happening. And as I said,
stress kill you more than a cigarette or a double cheeseburger.
(34:03):
So what is a real fear and what is not?
If you're afraid of World War three? I think Russia
standing down and allowing this not a peep from China
North Korea is a sign that World War three is
not necessarily on the brink of happening. Their retaliatory strikes
through proxy terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Houthis. They've
(34:26):
been beaten down by the US and Israel prior to this,
and the President had some pretty good meetings in the
Middle East with Saudi Arabia, Cutter and others, and they're
standing down. So we don't see the Muslim world uniting.
So we don't see thing biblical happening in terms of
Russia and China joining in end of the world, World
War III doesn't. But ending this threat and taking out
these final centrifugeons I think are very much on the table,
(34:47):
and I think regime change is more in the hands
of the people of Iran. And then don't forget how
it all started with Jimmy Carter meddling with the Shaw
which created the first Dietola and the Islamic Republic that
we're now disarming. So if you want to hear that,
it'll be in the podcast. It'll be up in about
an hour. And also we had a great conversation with
David Sinati if you missed it, on who the no Kings.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
Really are and what they're really up to. We're all
in this together. This is your Morning Show with Michael
ndheld Jo
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
live five to eight am Central, six to nine Eastern
and great cities like Jackson, Mississippi, Akron, Ohio, or Columbus, Georgia.
We'd love to be a part of your morning routine
and we're grateful you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Now.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Enjoy the podcast two three, starting your morning off right.
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding
because we're intertigiven.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
This is your morning show with Michael deil Jordan.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Seven minutes after the hour.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
This is your day, Wednesday, June the eighteenth year of
Our Lord, twenty twenty five, and this is your morning show.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
I'm Michael del Jornal honor to serve you.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Jeffrey got an eye on the sound controls RED keeping
an eye on the content. And if you're just waking up,
the US's warning Americans not to travel to Iran under
any circumstance that would be common sense. The US embassy
in Jerusalem is closing, and members of Congress on both
sides trying to make politics out of this, looking to
limit US involvement, although all indications are the President has
(01:01):
given around forty eight hours to surrender or else we
think the or else is our bombers taking out that
final centrifuge location that's about a half a mile underground
in Mount Fourdeaux. Our bunker busters could take those out.
That be a lot easier than Israel trying to do
it with precision and caving in the tunnels and or
(01:25):
getting in close to take them out. So does that
equal World War IIE? Does that equal terror attack in
other countries? Does that equal regime change? That can get
expensive and be even more dangerous. Well, that's what America
is fighting about. But Iran is not being allowed to
have nuclear weapons. Everybody's in agreement so far, no sign
of Russia intervening. They're allowing this to happen. Iran is isolated,
(01:48):
they've lost control of the sky. They don't have their surrogates,
the Houthis and the Hamas proxy terrorists to carry out
any kind of retaliatory track. They don't seem to have
any conventional weaponry left. Their program has been pushed back
greatly with this last bunker buster at Mount Fourdeaux that
(02:10):
would pretty much bring him back.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
To square one.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
So removing the threat without regime change or with regime change,
seems to be what lizahead. We'll talk more about that
coming up. Can't have your morning show without your voice.
Let's start with Gary.
Speaker 4 (02:25):
I would love to see anyone from the left go
to Disney World and start jumping all of the lines
to get to the front of all the lines in
the rides, and let them act surprised when they get
kicked out of Disney World. What do they expect? You
jump the line, you get kicked out. Sorry, that's the
way it works here in America.
Speaker 3 (02:43):
I love Russia. That's what you'd meet. Militant Mickey. He
turned the military of Disney against you.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
Get out of her, pal You've got to behave and
make your bed to it the resort Keith listening in Phoenix.
Speaker 5 (02:56):
I believe Yeah, the gil that they view didn't know
what Arnold how Arnold Schwartzeneger was going to answer that question.
Then they're even demmer than we all thought, because I've
heard Arnold Schwarzsteingers say those exact things before. And if
the Gales of the view were surprised by the response
they got, then they clearly didn't do their homework, and
(03:18):
their way dumber than any of us could have imagined.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
Well, obviously, great minds. Can you think alike?
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Because that's exactly what I said, Although it was brilliant
how Arnold handled the question Youngstown, Ohio.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Arnold better watch out. He'll be on the Democrats list
like Betterman.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
By the way, Fetterman one of the few outspoken opposing
any bill to limit Trump's power to carry out any airstrikes.
In this Joel will get the final sat I believe Joel's Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Isn't he? And Michael, this is Joel in Manchester, Tennessee.
All this whole thing about.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
No kings, if Joe Biden was a president.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
I'd rather have a king. I know there's a lot
of people to feel that way.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
Well, speaking of no kings, if you think the movement
has made its statement and now they're going to go away,
think again. CEO of the American Policy Roundtable, host of
the Public Square, heard on two hundred stations and our
senior contributor Davidsonaudius joining us. This has clearly revealed the
Democratic Party's played for the midterms and probably beyond again
civil rat unrest in the name of saving democracy. I
(04:19):
think we've seen this playbook before. No sooner were we
going to have this conversation, they've already announced more plans
for riots in July, so this is clearly their game plan.
They did it in twenty twenty, they're going to do
it again here in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 6 (04:32):
It's interesting, Michael, because they've now a boast of two
hundred and fifty organizations that are behind them. And what's
fascinating is if you look at the list that I
encourage everyone to go to no Kings dot org and
take a look at what they're doing. Now, if you
go to no Kings dot com, you're going to find
a conservative book that was written and published, which is
kind of interesting. So they didn't get that website, but
(04:52):
they're at no Kings dot org and it just look
at see the organizations that are listed.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
It's fascinating.
Speaker 6 (05:00):
I mean that when the pandemic came along, the American
Federation of Teachers were leading the parade to make certain
that schools stayed closed and our kids' educational experience was ruined,
and their motivation was fundamentally to protect their members from
getting infected by kids who couldn't get the disease. By
and large, for the most part, but they were not
worried about Kings.
Speaker 3 (05:20):
Then when the deep.
Speaker 6 (05:22):
State came forward through Fauci and the administrative state of
healthcare and shut down the world, they were fine with
government control then as long as they got to stay
home and collect paychecks. So the absurdity of it is significant,
but not the size they want us to believe that
(05:42):
their call that had twenty thousand people on it earlier
this week, that their cities, those seemed to them celebrate
the largest protests in American history. Listening to them frame
this against Donald Trump, it's a subject worth talking about.
We're talking about it this coming Thursday and Friday on
the Public Square, an important show where we break this
(06:03):
thing down in its many, many detailed parts.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
You notice I don't chime in shameless plug, No, because
they get more in depth.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
I encourage everyone.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
You can wait for the Public Square on your local
station on two hundred stations, or just go to the
Public Square dot com and you can catch episodes on demand.
But I encourage it because we get far more in depth.
They have more time.
Speaker 6 (06:23):
So what we've got in a situation where you are
exactly right, that we go back to Time magazine, We
go back to the campaign in which Donald Trump was defeated,
and we see the same strategy. But the thing about
it is that people who begin with violence in the
streets and bullying tactics such as this, they're following the
strategies of Lenin, They're following the strategies of Sololinski. They're
(06:47):
the party of the bullies who want to create anarchy.
And the reason they want to create anarchy chaos in
the streets is to stop the existing functioning of a constitutional.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
Electoral republic.
Speaker 6 (06:59):
And they want people to feel that the whole world's
falling apart and no kings will give you.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
But the polls show clearly the American people, and I
don't just mean the American people, I mean ninety something
percent of Republicans upwards of thirty five to fifty percent,
depending on exactly what question you ask of Democrats, and
they all you know, and the deciding vote of the
independence always upwards of fifty percent. They want the borders secured.
(07:27):
Nobody sees that as tyrannical. They see that as necessary
for a sovereign nation. They want those that have committed
crimes to be removed. When you start getting to people
that just broke into the country and are doing quote unquote,
and I do this with their quotes the jobs that
Americans don't want to do. Then it gets a little liffy.
But so far, nobody's buying the president is acting like
(07:47):
a king. No one's buying that the President is turning
the military against the American people only those who have
broken the law.
Speaker 3 (07:54):
Is it a.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Winnable because I still think their endgame is if they
can't win an election, they're still going to do insurrection.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
In other words, the.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Black Lives Matter Antifa, I say it that way, and
I struggle to say it that way because Antifa infiltrated
a lot of innocent Black Lives Matters twisted protesters. But
then some of the Black Lives Matter protesters were also
up to no good like Antifa.
Speaker 3 (08:22):
But that wasn't the endgame.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
That was the conditioning game for the insurrection they had
planned had Donald Trump won. Is no kings the new
conditioning game of good trouble, so that they paved the
way for an insurrection or ans or whomever goes on
to win.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
Because I think that's still their endgame.
Speaker 6 (08:42):
Well, the answer to your question is without apology and
with pay Let me read you directly from the front
page of their website. This is No Kings spot speaking now.
We're inspired by the three point five percent principle. It
only takes three point five percent of the population engaged
in sustained strategic protest against authoritarianism to achieve significant political change.
(09:06):
Everything we do from here on out is grounded in
three core commitments, staying in the fight, taking concrete action today,
and investing in the long term. In other words, of course,
protest is their methodology, and they get paid to do so.
So they have now become the vehicle where the billionaire's
club will come in. And this is the campaign beginning
of twenty twenty six and twenty twenty eight. And you
(09:27):
can't do what they did in the weekend without having
had hundreds of millions of dollars being flowing into the system.
These people get paid to create chaos. It's a part
of the regime. And understand something. When you're looking at
No Kings, you are looking at the Democrat.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
Party, look at the hard I'm going to interrupt and
say that what part because I think this is the
extreme left. I don't know where the fetter I don't
know beyond fetterman, who is establishment common sensical Democrat anymore.
Is this the socialist justice portion of the party. Is
this the overall party or is this the one area?
(10:06):
They both agree it's all over.
Speaker 6 (10:08):
Look at the two hundred and fifty organizations and the
reason they're all coming in and those who are silent
will be silent with the purposes because now the money
starts to flow and they all get paid.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
Let me give you an irony. We were looking at
the research and do you know what ethnicity is the strongest,
the highest rated, over eighty percent behind the president and
enforcement of border security and enforcement of deportation, Hispanics. In fact,
(10:38):
you get outside of Los Angeles where Hispanics are saying,
this is our land, we're taking it back, and they're
waving their flag and burning ours.
Speaker 3 (10:44):
But you get outside that. I was in Chicago.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
I'm at the train, the same train they're all getting
on with their signs to go protest. I was going
to the North Side, they were going.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
To the Loop.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
They were all older white people, yeah, predominantly old or white.
And the things I was overhearing this. One guy's going,
you know, I go, I get, you know, a DVD player.
I use it for ninety days and then I return it,
and then I go get another one that's not stealing,
(11:17):
that's taken advantage of the system, you know. I mean,
you couldn't believe what freeloaders and goofballs they were. But
I'm just noticing they're all older, and they're all white.
These are all people getting paid. These are all freeloaders.
Speaker 6 (11:33):
And even if some of the the on the street
people aren't getting paid, it's just their hobby or what
they do for fun. The organizers are the ones that
are are that are channeling millions.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Michael.
Speaker 6 (11:42):
This is the Democrat Party. This is the heartbeat of
the Democrat Party. It's the core. It's what Soros and
company hollowed out over the last twenty years and now
is filled with this kind of anarchy because that's what
they need.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
All right, Well, let me rephrase this in the form
of a question if last time and again the ultimate
play was insurrection. They were just conditioning you with VLM
and Antifa.
Speaker 3 (12:07):
It's your morning show with Michael del Journo.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
The President's given a forty eight hour warning to the
clerics in the Ayatola to surrender or else. We believe
the or else is us involvement and taking out that
final Mount Fordau half mile underground secured centrifuges to end
any threat of nuclear capability. Meanwhile, the US Embassy in
(12:33):
Jerusalem is closing, and members of Congress on both sides
of the Isle are looking to limit US involvement in
the Iran Israel conflict. We're visiting with David Zanati. If
you think No Kings is done, they've made their statement.
Nobody cared. It was a big flop. Think again. This
is the Democrat Party strategy for disruption once again. They're
going to use civil unrest in the name of saving democracy.
(12:56):
David and I has been breaking down the money and
the organizations that are be behind this. Their next plans
are in July. We've lived this before. I don't think it.
You know, they used more of lawfair in twenty twenty
four and it failed. This is the type of conditioning
they did with Black Lives Matter and Antifa, and that
was making all cops the bad guys. Now they're doing
(13:18):
the same thing with the president, the tyrant, the king
and the military over enforcing immigration law. But will it
work this time and what is the endgame? I believe
it's Ultimately, if they lose the election full out insurrection,
they'll create a civil war if they can't maintain their
power by stealing elections. You see it the same way.
Speaker 6 (13:37):
It's interesting, Michael, because nowhere in any of the rhetoric
of this movement, by their own definition, do you ever
hear anything about the Declaration of Independence. But by soliciting
the no King's terminology out there, what they're attempting to
do is to steal the idea of the declaration, especially
(13:59):
with the coming celebration at the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary.
That's the most dangerous thing that can happen to them
is for people to actually begin to read the Declaration
of Independence. That's the philosophical part of this, which runs
deep in the people who are paying for this. But
the secondary notion is this, this is all about defeating
whoever's running for president in twenty twenty eight. Their goal
(14:20):
is to so entangle Donald Trump that whoever comes next
from the Republican Party is to.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
Be a non trump Ism.
Speaker 6 (14:26):
Second, it'll be to shape that election by making him
so terribly controversial. Now, the play is this, if they
can pull off and win the House in twenty twenty six,
they'll go back to impeachment and prosecution and they'll freeze
everything for two years, and then that will be the
definition of the election.
Speaker 3 (14:44):
This is what they do.
Speaker 6 (14:44):
This is the party of anarchy that's attempting to move
to a party of totalitarianism. Remember, when you look at
the left, you always have to realize that whatever they're
projecting outward is actually what they're doing doing.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They're confessing, oh yeah, we saw that yesterday, so it
worked in twenty twenty, will remind everybody, And no Kings
is a much better name slogan, quite frankly logo. But
I don't know that it's twenty twenty anymore. And I'm
sharing this polling information when eighty percent of Hispanics are
(15:18):
behind the president and enforcing border security and deportation. You know,
it's a different country, and so I you know it's
a different.
Speaker 6 (15:28):
Country because we've been abused through COVID.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
Right, it's a different country because we've.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
Had a person in the presidency who was virtually unfunctional,
nonfunction In fifteen seconds, are they headed to victory or
just are they going to Is this going to lead
to the end of the Democrat Party or civil war. Well,
the civil war question is a good one. This is
how civil wars begin.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Yes it is. I'm executive chef George Harveil.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
My morning show is your morning show with Michael de Jorna.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Hey, it's Michael reminding you that your morning show can
be heard live each weekday morning five to eight Central,
six to nine Eastern in great cities like Nashville, Tennessee,
tu Below, Mississippi, and Sacramento, California. We'd love to be
a part of your morning routine and take the drive
to work with you, but better late than never. We're
grateful you're here now, enjoy the podcast. Want you to
know the US is warning Americans not to travel to Iran.
(16:27):
That would become insensical. The President has given forty eight
hours for Iran to surrender or else is the or
else regime changes?
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Everybody in the.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
Leftist media would like you to be afraid of or
is it US air involvement and using our bunker busters
to take out those remaining Centrifugeu's time will tell, and
that time is forty eight hours. Meanwhile, members of Congress
on both sides of the island looking to limit the
US involvement in the Iran Israeli conflict, though Fetterman, again
the only sensible Democrat left the guy wearing a hoodie
(16:58):
in sweatpants stance against that this is an airstrike, This
is not a declaration of war. And new studies out
both the best and the worst run cities in.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
The United States. This all comes down to the criteria.
Speaker 1 (17:13):
And I'm telling you probably the most in trouble inner
cities will be on the best list.
Speaker 3 (17:19):
But we'll find out.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
Your Morning show national correspondent Roy o'neilis here with where
are your Morning show cities stand in this?
Speaker 3 (17:26):
All right?
Speaker 1 (17:26):
What's the first, first and foremost? What's the criteria for this?
What makes best? What makes worst?
Speaker 7 (17:31):
Yeah, the folks over at WALLEHUBB looked at the quality
of city services provided and then compare that to the
total budget per capita in order to generate this and
the city services where everything from policing to education to
pollution control.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
In order to get these different rankings.
Speaker 7 (17:47):
Provo Utah came out top of the list, Mampa, Idaho
was second, Manchester, New Hampshire was third, Boise fourth, and
Nashvi in New Hampshire.
Speaker 3 (17:57):
Fit.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
Now, I will stop and say I've never met anybody,
And first of all, they got to change that AstroTurf.
I cannot watch smurf football. I'm blue, But I've never
met Rory. Anybody who has lived in Boise. They didn't
say it was the greatest place they ever lived. But
other than that, the other name's kind of surprising. Right,
all right, what are the worst? And I had never
heard of Nampa, Idaho until I did the story of Year.
(18:20):
So that's why I picked. That's why I chose Boise
to talk about. All Right, what's on the worst list?
Worst end of things? I think deep blue.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
Let's see, we've got out of one hundred and forty
eight that were ranked here, La was one thirty nine.
We have New York, New York at one forty five,
and dead last at one forty eight San Francisco.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
So those that are minoring in majors and majoring in
miners get on the worst list. You know, this is
really kind of a snapshot of something very troubling, and
that is the inner city urban rot. I mean, these
cities get any worse, it's gonna start looking like Escape
from La. I Escape from New York with Kurt Russell.
Movies I mean, they're just getting out of control in
(19:04):
this kind of part of it. Yeah, some of this
I should know.
Speaker 7 (19:06):
So some of the quality of the services provided ranks
are higher, and they're dragged down.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
By the cost of those services.
Speaker 7 (19:16):
So it's not necessarily that it's bad terrible. Okay, Okay,
First of all, San Francisco bottom of the barrel both categories.
But some of the other ones down there are dragged
down because places like New York it's so expensive to
hire people to do these jobs.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
Right, because of the cost of living and the taxation
rates too.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
All right, so I got any highlights of your morning
show cities.
Speaker 7 (19:37):
Let's see, Nashville comes in there at number one oh
six on the list, Knoxville way up at number forty
in the survey, Memphis is ninety four.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
I want to get city in California cities in our list,
Oklahoma City ranks number twelve on the survey.
Speaker 7 (19:54):
Tulsa comes in number fifty two, so that's a pretty
good Saint Louis one twenty two.
Speaker 1 (20:01):
I don't get the Tulsa one. I can tell you
it was very impressive with Oklahoma City. Now, you know,
it looks a little like development on the surface of Mars,
but you know, because very flat.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
But they've done a terrific job.
Speaker 1 (20:11):
In Oklahoma City, and Norman has really done a terrific
job and revitalized. I was in Norman to visit University Oklahoma,
my son jos Belmont over that. But I could tell
you I would live in Norman, Oklahoma. It was really
really nice. What about Ohio? Anywhere you're in Ohio?
Speaker 7 (20:26):
In there, Cleveland, nact a few places in there in Ohio.
And let me see, Cleveland showed up at one thirty three.
Akron comes in at number eighty eight on their survey,
Toledo one sixteen.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
Hmmm, that's getting low, all right, And what do we
take from this?
Speaker 3 (20:46):
Stom did I tell you? Since? Did I tell you?
Cincinnati one oh three, Dayton one fourteen?
Speaker 1 (20:51):
Ah, I'm surprised at some of these, but again, most
people in Cincinnati probably don't live in would this be
Cincinnati proper? Like the city limits? Like even Nashville. You know,
most of us don't live in Nashville that live in Nashville.
All right, Well, that's the best in the worst cities
based on that criteria. Great reporting all day, Rory, Thank
you so much. We'll talk again tomorrow. John Decker coming
(21:12):
up in a few minutes to talk about the latest
on the situation in the Middle East. We were talking
about No Kings with david Sonadi. There's two big questions.
One this strategy, how will it work in the midterm
versus the presidential how will it work in a primary
versus a general And ultimately does this lead to a
civil war or the end of the Democratic Party? Please
(21:35):
no roosters need to chime in. I have predicted the
end of the party by the end of the decade.
That's really the interesting take in our overtime I want
to look at. So you've been studying the money behind this,
the organizations behind this, the game plan behind this.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
It worked in twenty twenty coming out of COVID.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
We're wiser from COVID, and it's on a hill of immigration,
which is reasonable border security and deportation of dangers people
doesn't seem like a hill to win on. So my
guess is this is going to play very well for
AOC and the far left Justice Democrats in a primary,
not well in a general election, and certainly probably far
(22:14):
more vulnerable. I'll chime in on ending this party once
and for all versus accomplishing a civil war.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
But what do you.
Speaker 1 (22:22):
Say from studying it, Oh, you must have hit mute
because you didn't want to talk.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
You didn't need to do that.
Speaker 6 (22:29):
Sorry, I just didn't want to anyhow, It plays well,
Michael in twenty twenty six for them.
Speaker 3 (22:35):
It builds the momentum in a hurry, and they need
it fast because they need turnout. They do. They need turnout,
and they need to win a number of House seats.
Speaker 6 (22:44):
If they win a half dozen House seats that they
don't have right now, they're back in control in the House.
And since the Senate's run by the Club of one hundred,
which knows no party but its own self service, there
is that they will shut down anything else that Donald
Trump can effectively do and then give them so fighting
space for twenty twenty ye.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
I never argue with you, because I'm dealing with instinct
and discernment and you're dealing with master's degrees. But I
would like to throw a wrinkle into your argument, and
that is when I look at the polling, most reasonable Democrats,
and over the majority of Democrats are for border security,
our for enforcement of laws, even if it means using
(23:23):
National Guard, meaning in a primary, this plays well with
the Socialist Democrat candidates that will be funded by David
Hog and others. Anyway, not that they'll farewell in the generals.
So all they're doing is building on the only early
strength they have, which is the early voters that would
have elected Bernie Sanders twice versus their party as a whole.
Speaker 3 (23:47):
I'm kind of with the Red on this.
Speaker 1 (23:49):
I think strategically this will look really good in a primary,
but it's not going to set them up in the
general where they want to be well.
Speaker 3 (23:56):
The key for them is to win in the awful
Let's consider.
Speaker 6 (24:00):
If you will, the AWFU election of twenty twenty six
as a primary, because yes, it's a national vote on Congress,
but there are no national candidates running, so they get
the advantage of being able to leverage smaller numbers, and
they're excellent and far better than the Republicans at fielding candidates.
They only need to win six to shut down the momentum,
(24:22):
and that's the first thing.
Speaker 3 (24:23):
They have to do. To turn the momentum, They've got
to first stop the momentum. So that's what this is.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Well, they got to create energy, because energy creates turnout.
I get that, but if a majority of their party
is thinking more like Fetterman, is this the way to
do it? So I guess what you're saying is, and
I don't necessarily disagree that works for a primary, fails
miserably in a general. Probably applies more to the presidential
race in the midterm.
Speaker 6 (24:48):
Yeah, And so they know what they're doing and they're
very good at it. Now the question you have to
ask is how do you survive this? And what we're
finding is I always you know, I bring pen to today's
program simply this. When these folks are giving their lectures,
I don't care whether it's on the view or whether
it's around the table for the Fourth of July celebration.
(25:10):
Best answer I can do is I hand people a
pen and say, here, you are for no kings. You
are for a new form of civil government in America.
Here's a pen. Write it down, Tell me what it is.
Name it it's democracy. Okay, Then write down what democracy is,
write down how you plan to get there. And the
answer is always the same it's been for twenty years.
They have no answer. They are not for anything. They
(25:32):
are actually simply against what we have and the biggest difference,
Michael is to be America requires a commitment to self government.
That's the thing they hate the most, the adolescence of well.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Because it as the book you're writing with John Quincy
Adams probably covers, it's all together impossible to self governed
if you're not a moral people. And they're restraint and
you look at the cot moral relative is but not
necessarily moral people.
Speaker 6 (25:59):
They're more relativists, and they're the organizations of no restraint,
of blaming the government, of not taking personal responsibility. It's
a very adolescent movement. What they're hoping for us that
we all stay teenagers who never get out of high school.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
David Sanadi is the CEO of the American Policy Roundtable.
He is the host of The Public Square. I encourage
you they go in depth on a lot of this.
You can get it on demand at the public square
dot com. Final question, if their real play is insurrection?
If their real play is civil war? And I believe
it was in twenty twenty, they just shocked themselves installed
election and Biden won.
Speaker 3 (26:35):
Is the endplay civil war? Well, this is the play
that happens, you know.
Speaker 6 (26:40):
If they bait the United States government by attacking federal
facilities as they are prone to do in this process,
or attacking federal agents.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
It is a.
Speaker 6 (26:50):
Requirement of the federal government to defend its people who
work for the federal government.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
They're playing with fire. They're not far away from fort.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
David Zanadi has always what a pleasure. Hopefully we'll have
you back, maybe on Friday or tomorrow or later in
the week.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
Could be.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
His pen is always waving and ready. Great great work
on explaining no kings the money, who's behind it? And
trust me, they're not going away. In fact, they'll be
back as early as next month. David, thank you so much,
and I encourage people to hear more at the public
Square dot com. Now I'm wondering if you've ever heard
of karaluma. It's an edible cactus from India known for
(27:31):
its natural way of suppressing appetite. It's just one of
the single key ingredients and the breakthrough weight loss supplement
called Lean. If you're aiming for bold summer weight loss
and injections are not for you, Lean may be your answer.
It's been a great answer for me, feeling great, slow
(27:52):
steady weight loss. Doctors behind Leans say it's the closest
they've ever come to replacing the benefits of popular injections
without needles. Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar levels. A
lot of you are battling A one C levels. It
controls appetite and craving, but it doesn't stop there.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
It's rare.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Natural ingredients are also formulated to help your body burn
fat by converting it into energy. And the best part,
no needles, just results. Now all of this and all
of these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or
prevent any disease, and is not a substitute or an
alternative for care from a healthcare provider. But I'm using
(28:33):
it and it does work. It kills the yo yo,
lose weight, gain it all back, slow, steady results. And
I want to get you started with twenty percent off.
Use promo code yms twenty yms your Morning Show twenty
for twenty percent off. Use the promo code YMS twenty
at takelean dot com. That's takelean dot com promo code
(28:53):
Yms twenty.
Speaker 3 (28:55):
This is your Morning Show with Michael del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Already made the comment he's not sure where Nampa is
very sure of where it is.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
It's where she is.
Speaker 8 (29:08):
Nampa is about a forty minute drive from Boise, so
it's kind of a bedroom community of Boise proper, and
it is a great place to live.
Speaker 3 (29:19):
But we're full up. So I'll y'all in LA and
Bay area and so on. You can stay there. Thanks.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
First of all, how insulting Mary that I'm not welcome
to live in your town. Secondly, boy, can I relate?
I used to do that all the time about Nashville.
I used to tell my listeners stop inviting people to visit,
and if they do visit, take him to a bad
part of town or something. I mean, because we had
people moving here. What was the rate at one point?
Was it one hundred thousand a year or a month? It
(29:52):
was insane? How I mean Nashville has literally doubled. I
think it was a year on the In the fifteen years,
I think one hundred thousand a year.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
We're moving here. It does.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
It gets ridiculous. Stay where you're at and fix it.
That's the alternative. If you're just waking up. The US
is warning Americans not to travel to Iran. That seems
like a no brainer. Meanwhile, the US embassy in Jerusalem
is closing. Members of Congress are fighting over US involvement
in this conflict, and the President has given a forty
eight hour warning to the Ayatola and his clerics surrender
(30:21):
or else. The or else seems to be US military
aircraft delivering bunker busters. I don't know that anybody's end
goal necessarily is regime change, although that will lie heavily
in the hands of the Ayatola as to whether or
not he complies and whether or not the people turn
against him. But let's turn to White House correspondent John Decker,
who is joining us with the very latest done the
(30:42):
tensions in the Middle East. Whatever's going to happen, it
appears is going to happen in the next forty eight hours, Right.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
John, I think that's right.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
You know, the President spent much of yesterday meeting with
his national security team in the Situation Room. More of
those meetings will.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
Take place today.
Speaker 2 (30:58):
Besides the President's remarks when he was coming back from
the G seven in Canada, we did not see her
hear from the President yesterday, and the only opportunity that
we'll see or hear from the President today potentially is
if they open up to the press the swearing in
of the America's new ambassador to France that will happen
in the Oval Office in the one o'clock hour today,
(31:20):
and that would be an opportunity, of course, to ask
the President his current thinking about the potential for US
military action in Iran.
Speaker 3 (31:28):
In the meantime, the.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Conflict continues between Israel and Iran, and Israel has been
quite successful and essentially shutting down the air defense systems
that Iran has in their country.
Speaker 1 (31:39):
So, boy, I can hear your voice before you even
say it, so please don't bother. I don't speculate, Michael,
but everyone's speculating as to what the President and his
national security team were weighing yesterday. Any inkling whatsoever other
than waiting, I would think it's I'm sure the concern
(31:59):
is we're not interested necessarily in regime change. We don't
want to get into nation building, but we want to
finish the job of kicking back their nuclear capabilities to
day one, and that involves to some degree Mount Fourdeaux,
because that's the main area where the centrifuges are. You've
taken out a lot of their delivery systems. You've taken
(32:20):
a lot of their enrichment plants. Now you want to
take out those centrifuges. There's a hard way to do
it on ground. For Israel, we control the air but
not the ground, so those soldiers will be vulnerable. You
could their air defense or their air systems could cave
in the tunnels, but only our bunker busters could take
them out. That's got to be what they're weighing.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
Right, Well, yeah, that's one of the things that the
President and his team are weighing.
Speaker 3 (32:44):
What they're not weighing is putting American boots on the ground.
Speaker 2 (32:47):
I can tell you that that is not a consideration.
And I think that what they're also weighing is, you know,
and that's the reason why the President speaks as often
as he does with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin net YAHUO
is to get a damage control report, damage assessment report,
I should say, in terms of what Israel has managed
(33:07):
to do on their own over the course of the
past few days, and whether or not, given the success
that Israel has had, whether it's necessary to have US
military involvement in this conflict.
Speaker 1 (33:19):
Well, we did get the announcement from the Defense Secretary
hegset that they were sending defense support to Israel. Part
of that was refueling. Refueling could point to our bombers
on a long journey delivering a bunker buster. But I
guess we're all going to find out in the next
forty eight hours. John great reporting. As always, we'll talk
(33:39):
again tomorrow. In conclusion, I encourage people to go back
and listen to the first hour or we kind of
just had a one on one together. You know about
your fears imagined versus realistic, because your body doesn't know
the difference between something really bad happening that you're imagining
or if it was really happening. And as I said,
stress kill you more than a cigarette or a double cheeseburger.
(34:03):
So what is a real fear and what is not?
If you're afraid of World War three? I think Russia
standing down and allowing this not a peep from China
North Korea is a sign that World War three is
not necessarily on the brink of happening. Their retaliatory strikes
through proxy terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Houthis. They've
(34:26):
been beaten down by the US and Israel prior to this,
and the President had some pretty good meetings in the
Middle East with Saudi Arabia, Cutter and others, and they're
standing down. So we don't see the Muslim world uniting.
So we don't see thing biblical happening in terms of
Russia and China joining in end of the world, World
War III doesn't. But ending this threat and taking out
these final centrifugeons I think are very much on the table,
(34:47):
and I think regime change is more in the hands
of the people of Iran. And then don't forget how
it all started with Jimmy Carter meddling with the Shaw
which created the first Dietola and the Islamic Republic that
we're now disarming. So if you want to hear that,
it'll be in the podcast. It'll be up in about
an hour. And also we had a great conversation with
David Sinati if you missed it, on who the no Kings.
Speaker 3 (35:08):
Really are and what they're really up to. We're all
in this together. This is your Morning Show with Michael
ndheld Jo
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.