Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
There's talk eleven ten. I'm nine to three WBT. It's
the Brett Waterbull Show. It is great to be with you,
especially with the peace all breaking out. It's really wonderful
to see what it is that has happened so far.
And I want to encourage you to give us your thoughts,
your takes, all of the stuff that you're sort of
thinking about on this Columbus Day. Yes it is Columbus Day.
(00:39):
I'll talk about Columbus Day. Columbus Day is a hugely
important thing. When when they decided they were going to
bury Columbus Day, they made a huge mistake because Columbus
Day is just another way of saying Western civilization and
Western civilization is a real thing and has been for
almost two thousand years. Okay, the fact of the matter
(00:59):
is that's that's the deal. But I want you to
take a moment here and think about this. Can you
imagine if Biden had tried to do this deal? Could
you imagine if Joe Biden parachuted and babbling and stumbling
and tripping and bringing Hunter alongside to sell something, to
(01:24):
sell influence, to do whatever it is. Could you imagine
the chaotic nature with them parachuting into the conflict right now.
Of course you can, because it happened on Joe Biden's watch.
Joe Biden, mister tough guy, mister genius, mister I understand
(01:48):
more about cookies, I'm sorry, foreign policy than anybody else
in the whole world. You would have seen hunters selling
everything but the carpets and the carpets. See, there is
a reason why the United States of America is essential
(02:11):
because at our best, at our best, we are the
stabilization for the entire world. When people like Joe Biden
get into office, people who want to tell you that
they're tough and strong and know he's gonna stop me,
and I'm gonna do this. Joe Biden is responsible for
(02:35):
two things, the invasion of Ukraine and what happened, what
happened on October seventh, because Joe Biden never wanted to
actually do the hard work of relationship building. Now there
(02:56):
are people like Tish James and others to be indicted
at some point. There are people who don't want to
put in the hard work of building relationships. Donald Trump's
a builder. You might not like Donald Trump, but I'm
telling you right now, you know who loves Donald Trump.
(03:18):
Every one of these people who got released today, every
one of them on both sides, whether it was the
Israelis or whether it was the Hamas supporters, those two
groups have a distinctly different take in the world. But
(03:43):
for Donald Trump, he was able to leverage the deal
making and the stuff that you need to do to
make sure something is going to go right. With Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris and all of the folks in between,
(04:07):
these people have no idea what they're doing. Donald Trump
was able to get close to bb net and Yahoo
enough and say, this war is over. This war is over.
(04:27):
We have seen massive destruction. Ninety percent of Gaza's, you know,
wiped out. People have lost their lives, people have been murdered,
people have been killed, all of that sort of stuff.
And it took a builder to try to rebuild, not
the buildings but relationships. Joe Biden always wanted to talk
(04:50):
about how he mana take you behind the woodshed, I'll
beat you up, and behind the gym, I'm gonna do
all this other kind of stuff. I'm tough. I'm mean,
I'm tough. I'm really tough. I'm so tough. Ugh nachos?
Can I get some nachos? Joe Biden's not a tough guy.
Joe Biden's an operator, and a very poor operator. The
(05:15):
hardest thing to do when it comes to building something
is to get other people to believe in what you're
trying to do. See Donald Trump spent a whole lot
of invested goodwill when he went and cut the deal,
(05:37):
the ovrum Or or the Abraham Accords. That was a
seed that was put in the in the in the ground,
and then it built, and it bloomed, and it grew
and it became an important part of this. This became
the backbone of what Trump was trying to get done.
He doesn't want to see people killing each other. That's
(05:59):
a it's disgusting, it's sad, it's awful. He wants to
see things working, he wants to see things growing. He
wants to see people prosperous. There's no limitation to the
prosperity that you can get if you just go down
the right road. And the real problem with the war
world is everything gets destroyed and people hate each other forever.
(06:27):
President Trump was able to invest back then and stick
around when it was time to realize that Joe Biden
was failing our country and failing our world. And Donald
Trump took a bullet, and Donald Trump almost took another bullet,
(06:51):
and he decided he had to come back to save
the world. How many wars as Donald Trump started, has
he started? The thing is in my in my belief.
One of the hardest jobs you can possibly do is sell.
(07:12):
Selling is a very hard job. It can wipe you
out very, very quickly. This is a guy who gets
up in the morning and is selling. He's selling America.
Not in the nasty kind of way, but he's selling
the image of America. He's selling the goodness of America.
He talks all the time about what a great country
(07:34):
we have and how great we are. And the reason
why we know that is because you see it. Maga
make America great again. You could also say making arab
great again. You know, when you think about that part
(07:55):
of the world, a whole lot of people abandoned it.
They didn't think anything could come of it. They didn't
think any of this would be successful. They did not
know what they had. His potential and it took a
president from the United States, a former Democrat who became
(08:15):
a Republican, who saw the importance of building, building, building,
building back better. Joe Biden couldn't build back better because
he didn't how to build. There is a difference, ladies
and gentlemen. There is a difference. You should walk around
with your head held high and feel proud that our
(08:37):
president of the United States, whether the voted form or not,
he's still your president. He's still your president. Should be
happy that the killing, at least for this period of time,
has gone away and the building is beginning.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Welcome to humanity. This is our one.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Dews Talk eleventh and ninety nine three WBT Brettwinter Bowl Show.
Battles over Columbus Day aren't really about Christopher Columbus at all.
They are about whether America should exist. Columbus's journey carried
thousands of years of wisdom, philosophy, reason and culture across
(09:24):
the Atlantic into the Americas, paving the way for the
ultimate triumph Western civilization less than three centuries later. On
July fourth, seventeen seventy six. This is a piece by
Daniel McCarthy via RealClearPolitics dot com. President Donald Trump says
(09:46):
in his Columbus Day proclamation. Yet that's why the holiday
has so many enemies. Unlike progressive movements of decades past,
today's ideological left doesn't particularly want to lay claim to
America's heritage. Even the Communist Party USA once made an
(10:06):
effort to brand its radical creed as twenty twentieth century Americanism.
Karl Marx himself saw the spread of the bourgeois civilization
as inevitable and even necessary for creating the conditions for
(10:27):
the worldwide class revolution, meaning communism, meaning filthy, disgusting, awful communism.
That civilization is what opponents of Columbus Day reject. Columbus
extended the horizons of Western civilization, which is what the
holiday in his name recognizes. Yes, it's Italian Americans who
(10:47):
are especially proud of Columbus, Son of Italy and the
seafaring Republic of Genoa in particular, But this isn't just
an ethnic holiday, one whose ancestors weren't already in this
hemisphere when Columbus arrived. Owes the heroic explorer a debta gratitude. What. Yes,
(11:10):
By forging permanent ties between the Americas and the wider world,
wider wider world, Columbus made our lives and way of
life possible. He opened the way not only for European
and Christians like himself, but ultimately for people of every
(11:31):
land and religion to seek freedom, safety, and opportunity in
a new world without the class constraints of the ancient
hatreds of the old world. That's the important thing about this.
He was able to punch through and get opportunity for
people around the world. Fourteen ninety two, same your Columbus
(11:57):
sailed the uncharted Atlantic, his Spanish royal patrons banished Jews
from their land. Yet because of Columbus's discoveries, Jews would
one day find a haven half a world away from
the prosecutions that they endured elsewhere. Columbus didn't introduce slavery
(12:17):
to the Americas. The natives already had that evil institution
before Europeans came. He did, however, set in motion the
end of the New world's own characteristic horrors, such as
the Aztec's human sacrifices and the cannibalism that was doubt
(12:38):
in the Caribs. Columbus deserves no blame for the disease
that devastated native populations. Sooner or later. These peoples, with
no immunity to infections which most of the human race
had contended with for generations would have suffered the same
tragic fate from contact with the outside world. Eventually, somebody
(13:02):
was going to cross by the way, was going to
cross the ocean. The Black Death that ravaged medieval Europe
came from abroad as well with contact with Asia. Only
in the modern world, as a result of Western science
and medicine, is humanity free to travel and trade with
(13:24):
little fear of pestilence following, and when new diseases like
COVID do spread around the globe, the resources of civilization
that Columbus helped to spread are able to meet the threat.
Columbus Day does not mean it's a Saint's day. Like
(13:47):
our nation our founding fathers, Columbus was flawed, and his
reputation bears the stains of his age's evils, including slavery.
But like them, Columbus was an exemplar of much of
the best in our character. He was the first and
in many ways an archetypical American, an enterprising immigrant who
(14:12):
risked everything for a new hope, who not only set
out to improve his family's lot in life, he understood
this as a work as a service to God. He
was our first pioneer. He's been honored in the United
States since the late eighteenth century, when New York City's
Society of Tammany, also known as the Colombian Order, began
(14:38):
celebrating his October birthday. The federal holiday is more recent,
with Congress first asking Franklin Roosevelt to proclaim a day
for Columbus in the nineteen thirties, and the statutory holiday
was established in nineteen seventy one. But it's the pitched
opposition to Columbus that's novel. Mayor Eric Adams has had
(15:04):
to urge New York States Landmarks Preservation Commission to grant
protected status to the Admiral's statues so that Zoran Mandami
can tear them down if he becomes the mayor. But
you're not going to erase Columbus on Goofy college campuses
(15:26):
and in the state capitals Across the country. Left wing
activists call for replacing Columbus Day with an Indigenous People's Day. Well,
what are the indigenous people? Who are the indigenous people?
That just seems to be something that is, in my thoughts,
a generic thing. Who are we celebrating? Why are we
(15:48):
not celebrating all of the different people who have been
here instead of Indigenous People's Day. That to me feels antiseptic,
and it feels anti anti. It just feels like an
anti position to take to just grab bag it. When
we have so many people with so many different backgrounds,
(16:10):
that's what should be celebrated, the melting pot of everybody
coming together here. Columbus Day celebrates the birthday of Western
civilization as something not confined only to Europe. But here's
the thing. For all the people who hate the notion
of Columbus Day, who hate the notion of Western civilization,
(16:33):
you'll never erase it because it's happened, and we all know,
and even you know, and you can just scream into
your pillow, but the reality is it's not going anywhere.
(16:58):
News ninety nine three WBT Brett Waterbow Show, Good to
Be with You, seven oh four, five, seven oh eleven ten.
Looking at some of these some of these big stories
that are out there moving, there is a a guy
by the name of David Sacks. Okay, David Sacks. There
(17:18):
is a whole new assault coming when it comes to AI,
and it is something that you have got to pay
close attention to because when you have progressives wanting to
to really screw up the country, this is this is
one of the things that they're going to do to
wreck the country. And I know you're saying, wait a bite,
(17:39):
hold on a minute, what do you mean wreck the country? Well,
David Sacks says Democrats are plotting to control AI by
unleashing woke laws across America. He did an interview yesterday
and he breaks this thing down. I'm just gonna I'm
gonna let it roll. You're gonna be able to hear
(18:00):
what he's talking about. But I got to tell you something,
if it's Colorado and California, that is a toxic brew.
And so listen to David Sachs about how they're going
to stop you from using Aire's.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
Gonna give you some stats on this regulatory frenzy that
that's happening. So all fifty states have introduced AI bills.
In twenty twenty five. There's been over a thousand bills
in state legislatures. One hundred and eighteen AI laws have
already been passed across the fifty states. The red state
proposals for AI in general have a lighter touch in
(18:39):
the blue states, but everyone just seems to be motivated
by the imperative to do something on AI, even though
no one's really sure what that's something should be exactly,
and there's no real agreement on like what all these
AI regulations are supposed to do, so they're just making
things up.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
The risks are I'm trying to get so specifical question.
Speaker 3 (18:57):
Well, it's going to fish the point about California. So look, California,
they've kind of gotten to this point where now it's
about reporting on all.
Speaker 4 (19:04):
These safety risks.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
And if this is all it was, then it would
just be basically a bunch of red tape and it
wouldn't be so bad. The problem is that you've got
to multiply this by fifty states, so you've got fifty
different states, each with their own reporting regime, which is
going to be a trap for startups. They've all got
to figure this out about what they're supposed to report on,
what the deadlines are, who to report to. I mean,
(19:27):
this is like very European style regulations. Actually maybe even
worse than the EU, because the EU tried to basically
harmonize to get to one authority. We're going to have
fifty they're going to have one. But the other problem
is that this is just the Campbell's knows them to
the tent. So even in California, Scott Wiener, who's the
legislator who did SB ten forty seven, now he did this,
He's got a block of legislators and they have seventeen
(19:48):
more AI regulation bills that they want to pass. So
this is just the beginning. And if you want to
see where this is going, okay, look at Colorado. And
we should talk about this Colorado bill because this has
already been passed into law. It's called SB twenty four
Dash two five Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It was
passed all the way in May of twenty twenty four,
(20:10):
so it was one of the first to pass even
though they didn't really know what they were trying to regulate.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
No one's quite sure how to implement it.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
But what the law does is it bans something they
call algorithmic discrimination, okay, and algorithmic discrimination is defined as
unlawful differential treatment or dispert impact based on protected characteristics,
So things like age, raise, sex, disability, if any of
(20:37):
those factors drive an AI decision and it results in
a disparate impact. Then both the developer of the AI
model and the deployer, which means basically the business that's
using it, can be in violation of this law and
they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
Let me give you a practical applications.
Speaker 3 (20:56):
So let's say that you got someone like a mortgage
loan office or who's reviewing applications. Okay, and let's say
they don't even discuss race there, it's not on the form. Okay,
They're just using race neutral criteria like a credit rating
or financial holdings something like that. If the result of
their decision nevertheless had a disperate impact on a particular
(21:18):
protected group its citizens could be found to be discriminatory.
And moreover, the developer of that model could be liable
even though their model just gave an answer that, under
the circumstances, was truthful. The only way that I see
for model developers to comply with this law is to
build in a new DEI layer into the models to
(21:40):
basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have
a disperate impact on protected groups.
Speaker 4 (21:48):
So we're back to WOKI again, and I think that's
all the points.
Speaker 3 (21:52):
That's the whole point of this Colorado law.
Speaker 1 (21:56):
So all fifty states have interest to these bills. But
there are there are bills that are in effect right
now that are particularly onerous. California and Colorado the two
most progressive states in the entire country, and they they
(22:16):
are looking to try to clamp down on anything that
you want to use, whether in business or privately. So
it's another, it's another. And with a guy like Scott Wiener,
by the way, in California, look up Scott Wiener. Just
look him up, you could wiki him, you can look
(22:37):
at him. This is a guy who is not anybody
that I would want to do business with. And he's
a state senator in California. Says about all you need
to know from San Francisco. And this guy, this guy
is is not ready for prime time. But he's very
dangerous with what he's trying to do. Because what they're
(22:59):
trying to do is they're trying to strangle the baby
in the in the in the crib before we have
a flourishing AI sort of approach. And so as a
consequence of that, they don't want you to be able
to search information that isn't curated already. Uh. For for
anything else. Right, So you know, uh, when when you
(23:24):
think about you know, stuff like AI Atlas and all
that sort of stuff that we talk about three A
three I A uh that that stuff is well, it
could be factual, but it might not be fair if
people don't understand what this all means. And again, if
you want to look up Scott Scott Wiener, go ahead,
(23:45):
be my guest. I don't recommend it. You'll be shocked.
News Talk eleven ninety nine three WBT. It is the
Bretwitodable show. Our telephone number seven four five seven zero
(24:09):
eleven ten. And if you want to opine, you can
certainly reach out to us on the lines, or you
can reach out to us over at the text line
WBT text line driven by Liberty Buick GMC. It is
good to be with you here today, but this bit
of sad news coming across in the in the last
(24:33):
hour or so, the CEO of Lending Tree, CEO and
chairman Doug lebdeb died yesterday in an accident. The CEO
of a major financial company based in Charlotte was killed
(24:54):
in an ATV accident over the weekend, lending Tree confirmed
in a news release Monday, that its chairman CEO, Doug Lebda,
died on Sunday, October twelfth. Lebda founded the Lending Tree
in nineteen ninety six and will be succeeded as CEO
(25:18):
by COO and President Scott Peerry, with Steve Azonian set
to take over as the Chairman of the board. Doug
was a visionary leader whose relentless drive, innovation, and passion
transformed the financial services landscape, touching the lives of millions
(25:41):
of consumers, Lending Tree said in a statement. Doug dedicated
himself to building a company rooted in consumer empowerment, championing
a mission to simplify financial decisions in fostering economic opportunity
for all. The company gives consumers tools to find the
(26:04):
best offers on loans, credit cards, insurance, and more. Lending
Trees headquarters are on Vantage Park Drive, on the edge
of uptown Charlotte and the South End neighborhood. Certainly, keep
his family and the folks who were working there as
(26:25):
well in their prayers, in your prayers. In that regard,
it's very, very sad to see this, this happen seven four, five, seven,
zero eleven ten. Let's go back to yesterday And one
(26:46):
of the things that I thought was quite interesting in
yesterday's information was the back and forth between jd Vance
and George Stephanopolis. So jd Vance is trying to do
an interview with George Stephanopolis, and George Stephanopolis wants to
keep talking about Tom Holman and some kind of a
(27:10):
bribe that was offered or whatever that was. And I
got to tell you jd Vance was not happy. He
was not happy, and he was not going for this.
And here's cut number one. Please go.
Speaker 5 (27:22):
I don't know what tape you're referring to, George. I
saw media reports that Tom Holman accepted a bribe. There's
no evidence of that. And here's George, why fewer and
fewer people watch your program and why you're losing credibility
because you're talking for now five minutes with the Vice
President of the United States about this story regarding Tom
holm and a story that I've read about, but I
(27:43):
don't even know the video that.
Speaker 4 (27:44):
You're talking about.
Speaker 5 (27:45):
Meanwhile, low income women can't get food because the Democrats
and Chuck Schumer have shut down the government. Right now,
we're trying to figure out how to pay our troops
because Chuck Schumer has shut down the government. You were
focused on a bogus story. You're insinuating criminal wrongdoing against
a guy who has done nothing wrong, instead of focusing
on the fact that our country is struggling because our
(28:07):
government's shut down. Let's talk about the real issues, George.
I think the American people would benefit much more from
that than from you going down some weird left wing
rabbit hole where the facts clearly show that Tom Holman
didn't engage in any criminal wrongdoing.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
It's interesting because I think there are people who are
trying to run conventional kind of slam stories, but they're
not in touch with the things that everybody else is
talking about. Like, for example, President Trump said earlier today
to Iran, we are ready when you are. And that
(28:41):
doesn't mean they're going to go to war. It means,
if you want to be a part of a new
Middle East, we are ready when you are ready to
be a part of this. And if you see what
has happened, transparing transpiring over the last few hours, the
last six seven hours, you have to acknowledge that you
(29:02):
have a huge contingent of people in that part of
the world who want to try to make the Middle
East a more stable, prosperous, prosperous area. And when you
go when you see at Charmel Shaikh, which is where
there were meeting at the at the aftermath of the
(29:26):
meeting with the bb NET and Yahoo, you have to
understand that they are looking to do things to have
these folks not at war with each other twenty four seven,
three sixty five. Now Stephanopolis could have talked about that.
He could have said, oh, you know what, very interesting
we're seeing all these countries coming together. He wants to
(29:47):
talk about Tom Homan. He wants to talk about Tom Homan.
What is Tom Holman? Who cares? Has Tom Homan being indicted?
Speaker 6 (29:57):
No?
Speaker 1 (29:58):
Is somebody taken a bribe? I don't I don't know.
And that's what jd. Vance is saying. You look, you're
talking to the Vice president of the United States. Why
are you Why are you going for the low hanging
fruit there? You know, it's I understand, I get it.
You got to try to, you know, keep everybody ginned up.
But the fact of the matter is this is this
is a very unusual circumstance where you've got the President
(30:21):
of the United States with all of these people, including
including foes, like actual foes, people who actually hate other
people there in that room and they're having a conversation.
I mean that that thing is unbelievable. And you have
(30:42):
MSNBC and you've got CNN. CNN I would give I
would give CNN like a B minus for for coverage
they they did. They did their best to try to
kind of poke the bear a little bit, but I
think that they're actually reporting on it and to be
honest and to be fair. Uh, watching all the channels
this morning, you know, going from the earliest part of
(31:03):
the day to the latest part of the day. You know,
I got to tell you something right now, it's very
important to understand. Even MSNBC was talking about this transformative
sort of approach that's happening. And I think it's because
you have all these people who are now ready to say, Okay,
you know what we've seen, all the warfare, we've seen,
all the viciousness, we've seen, all of this, what would
it look like if we decided we wanted to rebuild
(31:25):
stuff instead of destroying stuff? Coming up in the at
the beginning of this next hour, I want to share
with you just a couple of clips, not a whole bunch,
just literally a couple of clips that I thought were
very very interesting about how this is all going to
come to pass. But you have these people who just
(31:47):
want to play the run of the mill, regular kind
of weird politics, stuff that's designed to inflame. And I
got to tell you, seeing the way Trump was welcomed,
seeing how these other countries around the world, I mean,
my gosh, it's really incredible when you look at this,
(32:10):
because I think they understand that this is a much
bigger reveal in some ways, and it's not a perfect analog,
but I do believe in some ways we are seeing
sort of a second coming of the Wall coming down
at the end of the Cold War. And I have
(32:31):
a number of thoughts on this, especially what the strategy
is here. I think there is a cogent strategy that
is designed to fundamentally change a lot of what we've
expected for a long time and wait to see how
this next thing is going to come to pass. And
(32:51):
I do believe, I do believe that you are going
to see a substantial remake of the world order itself.
I think this is this is a very interesting time
to be alive, and it may be the final time
that we ever get to see something that's being handled
(33:12):
in this particular way. That was as News Talk eleven ten,
not a nine to three WBT hour number two underway.
Great to be with you, Great to spend time with you.
(33:36):
I like this time that we get to spend together,
especially with you. Yet you know who you are. It's
great to be with you. Okay, we just unearthed. We
just unearthed something that I mean, my gosh, who knew
that Stephanopolis? Who knew that Stephanopolis was such a pain,
(33:59):
was such a pain. He went after he went after
jd Vance over the weekend because jd Vance didn't want
to talk about or didn't care about, and alleged Tom
Holman bribe, which like he hasn't been indicted, he hasn't
gone to jail, he hasn't done any of that sort
of stuff. But we also know that this is not
(34:19):
the first time with Stephanopolis and jd Vance And I
really like me some jd Vance. I'm not gonna lie
to you. I mean it, it's true. And I only
want to play this clip because I want you guys
to understand that this is a guy and I could
say this as a person. We're probably in the same
height mode, like between in terms of our altitude, me
(34:44):
and me and Steffie. But I'm way cooler and nicer
than Steffie. Stephie's got a chip on his shoulder, and
I think it's because he's got short man syndrome. I
don't have short man syndrome. I actually like being a
little bit shorter because it's easy to escape when being chased.
Every tall people are really you know, it's a hard
way to go. I can go in and out. I
(35:06):
can zig and zag at the same time. So you
know what I'm all about. I'm all about being fun size.
I don't care, not gonna hurt my feelings. Stephie can't
Stephanopolis can't take it. Steffie can't take it. Stephie. You know,
he's like I went and spent time wrestling. I went
(35:28):
and wrestled, and I went to Harvard and all these
exclusive schools. Good on you, Good on you. You know what.
Listen to this trying to trip up jd Vance, Fire
it away bye.
Speaker 7 (35:44):
By legitimate Supreme Court rulings, doesn't it.
Speaker 6 (35:48):
The Constitution says that the Supreme Court can make rulings.
But if the Supreme Court and look, I hope that
they would not do this.
Speaker 1 (35:56):
But if the Supreme Court.
Speaker 6 (35:57):
Said that President of the United States can't fire a JY,
that would.
Speaker 4 (36:01):
Be an illegitimate ruling.
Speaker 6 (36:02):
And the president has to have Article two prerogative under
the Constitution to actually run the military as he sees fit.
This is just basic constitutional legitimacy. You're talking about a
hypothetical where the Supreme Court tries to run the military.
I don't think that's gonna happen, George, but of course
if it did, the president would have to respond to it.
There are multiple examples throughout American history of the president
(36:24):
doing just that. You didn't say military in your answer,
and you've made it very clear you believe the president
can defy the Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (36:30):
Senator, thanks for your.
Speaker 1 (36:31):
Time this morning.
Speaker 6 (36:31):
No no, no, no, Djors up next, We'll be right there.
Speaker 1 (36:34):
You see what he does. He does. He hangs up.
He hangs up on jd Vance because this guy's got
short he's got short tempers. His short temper is awful.
He can't stand it when you give him an answer,
so he just like hangs up. So, oh, yeah, you
know what, Yeah, you know what. You don't know anything.
(36:55):
I'm hanging up on you.
Speaker 7 (36:56):
Now.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
This is why there are three people, three people in
the country, high profile people in the country, that when
they approach people, people pretend to take a phone call
so they don't have to talk to them. Stephanopolis, Chuck
Schumer and You're gonna be shocked. You're gonna be shocked. Pritzker, Pritzker, JB. Pritzker.
(37:29):
People pretend to take a call that they don't even
have so that they don't have to have their baby
baby baby back ribs. This is this is it. It's
a fact, all right, not even honestly, not even any
Twosome Newsom is that annoying, like Newsome's wacko. But these guys,
(37:53):
these guys, Chuck Schumer, Stephie and baby Backs, they they
they pretend to take phone calls if you're walking towards you,
I know, it's hard to believe that, right, anybody else
do that? Brett? Yeah, sure me. I will fake a
phone call. I will fake a call. I've done it.
(38:16):
I've done it, especially when Schumer's trying to talk to me.
I mean, when Schumer's approaching me and I say to him,
how did you why did you? How come you decided
to put cheese on raw hamburgers. How do you think
(38:37):
that that's supposed to cook? That is not good and
you're going to create a smoke event and it's gonna
be burning cheese. That smells so bad when the smoke
event happens. Everybody's done this. Everybody understands this. You cheese
it last when the meat is hot. If you got
hot meat, you gotta then put the cheese on the
(38:59):
hot meat. That's what you do. You don't put cold
meat and cheese on. It doesn't work. You know how
many people make that mistake. I'll tell you it's it's
not a way to go. You know how many people
make the mistake of putting shrimp on the barbie but
(39:21):
not but not skewering them. They just lay them on
there and then they fall in and they flash up
and all that kind of I need to I need
to teach Chuck Schumer and Pritzker and Stephanopolis how you
cook like a man. And I'm telling you that's what
(39:44):
he They need, this knowledge. They don't have this knowledge,
do you know. I mean, is it me or is
it them? It's them? These people are impossible to deal with.
These leftists. They think that everything is just a honky dory.
It is not honkey dory. This is no good. Can't
(40:05):
do it, not now, not ever, no way. Why don't
you sit your butt down? Seven oh four five seven
zero eleven ten seven four five seven zero eleven ten.
I want to play another clip. This has nothing to
do with what we just talked about except for this
one thing. Cut number four. Please go.
Speaker 2 (40:26):
It is just such a hallmark of tyrannical, autocratic dictatorship
societies that the uh they use the prosecutorial Department as
a political weapon. It is a disgrace and every American,
I don't care if you're a Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative,
moderate people should be forcefully rising up against this forcefully.
Speaker 1 (40:50):
Who do you want forcefully? You want to?
Speaker 4 (40:52):
Are you?
Speaker 1 (40:53):
Are you calling for another one of those you hear
me gorsicch You're gonna reap the whirlwind. This guy is
like he's he's you know what he is. He's like
a he's like a guy trying to conjure up violence.
And I'll tell you, I'll tell you. You give me a
raw burger with melted cheese on top, and you will
(41:16):
you will see my angst. My angst will be Visual
News Talk eleven ten, a nine to three WBT. Gavin
(41:37):
Newsom has just signed a bill launching reparations agency there
in the state of California. Details to follow with a uh,
I guess with a framework at some point. But let
me take you over to Europe. That's right, Europe. Switzerland
follows UK advances plans for digital I. D Oh, yeah,
(42:01):
you knew this was the case. You knew this was
going to happen. This is Look, this is why Europe
is dying and why America is thriving. In a national referendum,
voters backed the Federal Act on Electronic Identification Services by
just fifty point four percent. That means that people don't
(42:21):
want it. Okay, yeah, that's very clear to me. It
marks the second time in four years that the issue
has gone to a vote. The slim margin highlights the
country's continued division over government backed digital ID initiatives. And
this is coming out of Switzerland, right, Switzerland, the Swiss model.
(42:44):
Unlike some European counter parts, Switzerland's digital ID program will
be issued exclusively by the government, provided free of charge,
and kept strictly voluntary. How about all the illegals. No,
I bet they're not going to sign up. I bet
the illegal is not going to sign up. It's gonna
(43:06):
be the people that are just like regular people. They're
gonna be like, oh great, I guess I'll do it.
Otherwise they're gonna cut back my benefits. Officials stress that
personal data will remain on individual smartphones rather than on
a centralized government or commercial database. That way, you're you're fine,
You're cool. It's just gonna be on your phone. It's
not going to be anywhere where it's stored, anywhere where
(43:27):
anybody knows where it's stored. Nobody's going to really even
know where it's stored. It's fine, it's okay, it's totally safe.
Just like the shot. Well what what are you laughing at?
Because I said, just like the shot speaking a witch
speaking a witch? Can I can I depart this for
just one quick second? I need cutting number six because
(43:50):
you're talking about, uh, they taking the shot, taking the shot?
Are you kidding me? Cutting number six?
Speaker 2 (43:56):
Go?
Speaker 1 (43:57):
Why do you think you have some many problems and
that's going on today?
Speaker 8 (44:01):
You know, I want to look at it, and you know,
I you know, they controlled the game. You know, on
both sides, and you got to give them credit for that.
We knew they were physical football team. We weren't surprised
by that, but they were able to run it and
we weren't.
Speaker 4 (44:15):
And you know, this is a thank you.
Speaker 8 (44:17):
This is a game where you know, you gotta win
the line of scrimmage.
Speaker 1 (44:21):
That's Brian Schottenheimer. He took the shot. He took the shot,
and he lost. He lost like a baby. He lost
like a baby to the Panthers. And you gotta you
gotta salute the Panthers. Now cut number five, please, Dave
Canalis winning over the Cowboys because shot didn't care, Shot
(44:42):
doesn't doesn't really get dialed in or upset. Go ahead,
cut five.
Speaker 9 (44:46):
So proud of this group that just continues to fight
and scratch and claw and just get it done. And uh,
the end of the day, it's what do you do
with the last possession and the defense? You know, gave
up some yards and you know, Dak Prescott, George Pickens
had a great day. Gotta give the Cowboys a lot
of credit.
Speaker 1 (45:02):
No, you don't give them no credit. Fire everyone in
the organization. I would rather I'm not kidding. I will
take any juco anywhere in the country and put them
with the Dallas Cowboys logo on their head, and they
will perform better than what Dallas does, period full stop.
(45:26):
And I say this as a long suffering Cowboy fan
who I don't even care about anymore. I mean, I'm
going all the way. I go all the way back
to Craig Morton. Yeah, you don't know who that is.
Some of you do. John Stewart knows, But the fact
of the matter is, I mean, come on, sorry, I
(45:47):
intercepted myself in this conversation. So they want you to
start being willing to get yourself all set up with
the Swiss model. And I don't mean the Swiss model, like, hey, hey,
bring me the Swiss model. They mean now, we're just
gonna go ahead and stress. All the personal data will
(46:07):
remain on individual smartphones rather than on a centralized government
or commercial database. So you're totally good. It's all good.
Take the shot. Physical ID cards will continue to be valid,
and officials have pitched the measure as a matter of
convenience rather than surveillance. We're just making it easy for
(46:30):
you to get around and get your shopping done and
all that sort of stuff. Come on, what are you
worried about. Don't be worried about that. What's the worst
that could happen? Everything? Everything? I mean, you know, when
you just sit back here and you look at this,
I just sit back here and say, holy cow, people
(46:54):
are really willing to surrender their security. Why do they
do that. I know who can fix this. I know
exactly the person that can come in and fix this.
And you can tell me. You can tell me if
you disagree. But I think I think we've got a
great pathway forward. You know, Mark Kelly. Mark Kelly is
(47:17):
a he was he was an astronaut, he did fly
combat missions, and he is also the Senator from Arizona.
And he was asked a very interesting question about who
you looking at for the next presidential election? Cut number
two please go.
Speaker 5 (47:37):
Do you think that Kamala Harris would be a strong
candidate in twenty twenty eight candidate?
Speaker 10 (47:42):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (47:42):
Absolutely, yeah, I mean she was, she was a nominee
last time.
Speaker 4 (47:45):
I think you would encourage her. I think she would
be incredibly strong.
Speaker 1 (47:50):
Incredibly strong, cogent, smart, tactical, all of this good stuff.
She would be able to get right down to the
bottom of all of these issues, especially but not the
least of which is a piece in the Middle East. Yeah,
I think I think she could do it. So I
(48:20):
just got a message from stan Stan wanted to my
thoughts on this thing. El Salvador President Bukelli compares UK
digital id to book of revelations Mark of the Beast,
and he wants to know my opinion on that. I think.
I think any restraint on freedom and liberty can be
(48:44):
used for so much evil? Are you kidding me? It's
unbelievable what we've got going on, and we should never
bend the knee to these bureaucrats who are only Look,
let's be honest about buick. Okay, bureaucracy exists. We understand that. Okay,
there are people who have decided to be part of
(49:06):
the bureaucracy and that's that's what they want to do.
But the fact of the matter is none of those
bureaucrats have any more power over you than I have
over you or you have over me. Right, you guys
have a job to do. In Washington, DC. You got
the job to do. In Raleigh, you got the job
to do. And Charlotte, you got the job to do.
(49:27):
In Columbia, you got the job all these places, right,
but you're not more powerful than me or us or
anybody else. You do your fill out your paperwork, you
do all your stuff. You get all that stuff squared away. Look,
I equate in many ways. I'll just be honest. H
(49:50):
Oo ways exist, and the hoays can come to your
house and say, hey, you gotta you gotta clean this,
you gotta cut this tree down, you gotta do this,
this and that. Fine, okay, okay, But at the end
of the day, Right at the end of the day,
if I see you walking down the street, I'm gonna
say hello, Hi, Hi, Bob, Hi, Steve, Hi Linda, how
(50:14):
you doing, how's it going. Who are you jacking up
this week? You know, stuff like that. That's your job. Okay.
If that's what your job is, that's what your job is.
That's fine. But you don't. You're not like controlling us.
Pureaucrats aren't controlled. We are born free people. We are
born free people. And the fact of the matter is,
(50:36):
you got a lot of people that appoint themselves lord
high executioner. You know what I'm saying. They're like, Oh,
I'm gonna tell you what you've got to do. I'm
gonna show you what you've got to do. Yeah, you
know you. You can't do this, you can't do that. No,
this is this is the problem. Okay, this is the problem.
You have a bunch of people that run around that
(50:57):
have some modicum of power, Okay, who have some modicum
of power, who then try to build out their fiefdom.
Let me give you an example, the myth of falling crime,
why Americans don't trust the numbers. Now I could replace
(51:19):
some of these words here and I could say the
myth of falling crime, why Americans don't trust the cops,
or do trust the cops or whatever. Every election season,
mayors and governors step before the cameras to boast that
crime is down. Charts are waived, statistics are cited, and
(51:43):
carefully crafted talking points deployed to assure anxious citizens that
their streets are safer than ever. Yet when you leave
the press conference and walk the sidewalks of Baltimore, sh Cago,
or Los Angeles, the reality feels far different. The gap
(52:07):
between official numbers and the lived experience is wide enough
to swallow public trust whole. The reason for this disconnect
is simple. Most crime never gets reported in the first place.
The Baltimore Sun recently highlighted what criminologists have known for decades.
(52:27):
About half of all crime in America isn't captured in
police data. Burglaries are only reported forty five percent of
the time, simple assaults thirty seven percent, sexual assaults a
shameful twenty one percent. Think about that for a moment.
Nearly four out of five sexual assaults never reached the
(52:52):
official record. Yet politicians still spin a story that safeties
and proving why aren't Americans calling the cops? Well, for many,
it's because they don't believe the system will deliver justice.
Victims of property crimes often assume police won't recover stolen items.
(53:14):
Domestic violence survivors fear financial ruin if their abuser is arrested.
Immigrants worry that calling nine to one one might lead
to a knock at the door from the Immigration and
Customs enforcement officers. In cities like Baltimore, there's a deeply
rooted stigma against snitching that makes reporting crimes socially dangerous,
(53:42):
and for those who simply distrust the police, staying silent
feels safer than engaging. Here's the political problem. Declining report
reported crime becomes the official narrative, but citizens' fear of
crime continues to climb gallup. Recently noted Americans are near
(54:07):
record highs in expressing concerns about violent crime. This is
not paranoia. It's the rational conclusion of people who judge
their safety not by government reports, but what they see
in their neighborhoods, what they hear from their friends. The
(54:28):
anecdote of Julian and Kristen Mack, attacked in Baltimore by
a group of teenagers, is telling they never called police
because they feared the children might be shot. Another former
Homeland Security Department official recounted being assaulted in a DC
(54:49):
coffee shop but choosing not to report it because he
believed nothing meaningful would happen to the mentally ill attacker.
When even former law enforcement officers don't bother reporting a crime,
the legitimacy of the systems in question. So what happens next.
(55:10):
Officials trumpet lower homicides or robberies as proof of progress.
They cut ribbons on new commutiny initiatives and point to
data driven policing as evidence of reform. But residents quietly
(55:31):
arm themselves, avoid walking alone at night, and lose faith
in institutions meant to protect them. A society where people
stop trusting guardians of order is a society that is
drifting towards vigilantism. This is not just a policing issue,
It's a governance issue. A political class, eager to tout
(55:55):
success selectively leans on crime statistics that do not rep reality. Meanwhile,
communities drowning in fear feel gas lid that disconnect breeds cynicism, disengagement,
and eventually rage. If one reason why law and order
(56:15):
rhetoric resonates so powerfully in American politics. People know something's wrong,
even if officials deny it. You have that right here
in Charlotte. You have this right here in Charlotte with
Arena and other people who are losing their lives. Two
murders today, two murders today that we've been reporting on.
(56:36):
You want to know what the actual outcome of this is.
Here's the actual outcome. People who are mugged, raped, shot, harmed,
all that sort of stuff. The average American is going
to say, you know what, to heck with it. I'm
just gonna leave town, and I'm gonna take my business
and I'm gonna take my spending and I'm gonna take
(56:58):
my stuff and I'm just gonna go someplace else, and
you guys can just stay here and walk and wait
in it. See, that's the problem, that's the fundamental problem.
People are surrendering too quickly, but they have no opportunity
to do anything else. Do you want your loved ones
(57:19):
to be harmed? Do you want your loved ones to
be killed? No? And no. So there's a lot of
people who will sit back and say, you know what,
when the lease is up, We're gonna go someplace else,
someplace safer. News Talk eleven ten, not a nine to
(57:55):
three WBT. All right, So I've got I've got a
thought on what I think President Trump is trying to accomplish. Obviously,
he wants to see these countries prosper and you know,
be in the circle of trust with us and all
that sort of stuff. Right, That makes you know, complete
(58:16):
sense in so many ways. But there's something else that's
going on here. There is something else that I think
we ought to we ought to start to think about. What.
What I think this president is trying to do is
(58:36):
to remake in total the relationships between us and the
countries that we are doing business with. Now, people who
trade with each other tend not to go to war
(58:58):
with each other. So when we have a president or
or anybody who's in office in that job, right, you
want to see America being stronger. You want to see
all of this sort of stuff that's happening. I think
(59:19):
that what President Trump did today with with these countries,
at least like twenty countries. I think what he's trying
to do is I think he's trying to create the
the next NATO style relationship. But in the Middle East, Now,
(59:44):
why would he want to do that? So if he
was successful, he's got all of these people, they're they're
they're they're using a number of different terms for why
they they want to do these things. They're they're they're
talking about the you know, to get to the piece,
there needs to be peace. We need to have a
Department of Peace, that kind of stuff, right, And so
(01:00:09):
I believe that he's trying to work in the Middle
East with people who he has relationships with, but who
is he not inviting in with. So you think about
the Middle East, okay, and then go further east and
(01:00:35):
what have you seen. You've seen him talking to the
Azerbaijani's right. He's been talking to Pakistan and India. I
think this president wants to have an entire swath of territory,
not that we're in charge of, but countries that trade
(01:00:57):
with each other with an eye tour word's freezing out
Vladimir Putin and Shi Jinping. If he builds this, this coalition,
this coalition of trade, this coalition of of of wealth,
(01:01:18):
and we're the game that's in town. We're the biggest
game that's in town, and you ultimately get to a
place where as you saw just in the last forty
five minutes ago, Donald Trump is saying to the Iranians,
you guys want a piece of this, Come and be
a part of this. You guys don't have to be
you don't have to be left behind, you don't have
(01:01:40):
to do any of this other sort of stuff. You
can come and be a part of this and be
prosperous as well. Just we just need you to not
be murdering people. We need you to not be doing
stuff with with with you know, jihad movements and things
like that. When you when you think about this, I
(01:02:00):
think this is about trying to cage the Russians and
buy a lesser scope. China. I think China wants to
trade with us, but I think China understands they are
They're not on the com anymore. They are the people
who are going to be starting to get knocked back
(01:02:22):
because you have to have relationships that are going to
be fru you know, a lot of fruition, all of
that sort of stuff. You're trying to get different things
put together. If you want to go out there and
you want to make war, you can make war. But
what the heck? Why what is the upside to war?
Look at what President Trump has done to Maduro Maduro Maduro.
(01:02:51):
He's not long for this world. I will guarantee it.
He is not long for this world. And the one
thing that would break wide open is if you were
able to push Maduro to a point where he's gone
or dead or whatever, and that Machada, who is the
(01:03:16):
Nobel Prize winner this year, takes up the mantle of Venezuela.
What you would stick it greatly to Cuba, to North
Korea and to Vladimir Putin. All roads run to prosperity.
Speaker 9 (01:03:53):
Yeah, I get it.
Speaker 11 (01:03:54):
You have always under its ad always coming and last
and bring it up the mass knowing of you in
avate being, give you shock gum bass to kick in
the ass of Barnide.
Speaker 1 (01:04:06):
Fox News Talk eleven ten, nine of nine to three
WBT hour number three underway. It is great to be
with you. The most effective way to stop state sponsored
terrorism is through a coordinated strategy that combines international pressure, intelligence, cooperation,
and financial disruption and community based prevention. That is how
(01:04:30):
you stop wars like what we have just seen for
the last couple of years. Think about this for a moment.
International pressure and sanctions hugely important, diplomatic isolation and targeted
sanctions against regimes that support terrorism, YEP. That can deter
state sponsorship by raising the political and economic costs. You're
(01:04:54):
seeing this happen right now when you take a look
at what's going on in Venezuela, and you're see that
they are taking it very very hard in terms of
getting their weaponry out, getting their narcotics out, all of
that sort of stuff. And now the big hand of
(01:05:16):
Trump is being utilized in the Middle East and we
start to look at places that we can potentially ice out.
Now it's not nice, it's not wonderful, it's not great,
but it's how you have to handle yourself. Do you
want to go to war in Venezuela? Do you want
(01:05:36):
to go to war in Cuba? Do you want to
go to war in any of these places? No, you don't.
But our market economy is something that is desirous. There's
a reason why countries who trade with each other do
not go to war with each other. But the reality
(01:05:59):
is to get into that marketplace, you have to be
a reasonable actor. So if you go back and you
look at all of the people who have joined in
on this remake there in the Middle East, you can
only come to a very very specific conclusion. Number One,
(01:06:21):
Donald Trump put the hard work in so that these
leaders around the region wanted to be a part of it.
They believed, for whatever reason, that he was going to
be the guy that they could work with, that they
could talk to, that they could that they could deal
with in all of these different sort of scenarios. Right,
(01:06:42):
So what do you have. You have Cutter, you have UAE,
you have Oman, you have the country of Egypt, you
have all of these setups, You even have Lebanon. You
have a number of these different sort of things that
(01:07:02):
are going to come to pass. So why should we
go to war when the people in the region don't
want to go to war. I mean, look what you're
looking at with the with the efforts that are happening
with the people in Hamasa stand for lack of a
(01:07:26):
better word, you're seeing that they are exhausted, they are tired.
Ninety percent of their infrastructure is gone. Earlier today I
sent a message to somebody saying, you understand that right
now you've got people who are now hunting Hamas fighters,
and these are other folks there on the ground who
(01:07:49):
are not anything to do with the United States of
America or any of our allies. This is the idea
that they've got now to go and try to wipe
out Hamas on their own own basis. But the reality
is you're going to see a whole lot of changes
in this picture, because at some point you're going to
see people coming out saying, wait a minute, I don't
(01:08:11):
want to have a war here. I don't want to
get blown up, I don't want to get killed. I
want us to be able to build our houses, live
with our neighbors, all of that sort of stuff. The
reality of warfare is this, It sucks. You don't want
to spend time or money waging war in close quarters
(01:08:36):
like this. And so what's going to happen now is
the pressure campaign. The next move that's gonna come is
going to be draining the money away from Hamas. Hamas
will fade down out and will be gone by the
time you get to a place where the Iranians who
are there, who are their biggest benefactors, You're gonna see
(01:08:58):
the Iranians not wanting to play this game anymore because
the street in Iran is going to rise up. All
of these people are going to be rising up. And so,
with all of that put together in mind, what's the
upshot to having a civil war? It's not there's nothing
(01:09:18):
there in that regard. We've seen how many people have
lost their lives. We've seen the people the twenty hostages
who came out earlier today. And what did we see
this evening? You started to see the repatriated bodies of
those who were killed that Hamas was still clinging to.
(01:09:41):
This pressure campaign is being incredibly efficient over the course
of a couple of days, and you're seeing actual results.
Now here's what happens next. President Trump has said, we're
looking at the historic dawn of a new Middle East.
That is true, but the work has got to be
(01:10:03):
put in there. You have got to be able to
work with these people so that they don't suddenly turn
around and say, forget it. We're better off with the radicals,
We're better off with the suicide bombers, We're better off
with all that sort of stuff, which means which means
the UN Security Council, NATO regional alliances are all key
(01:10:28):
roles for legitimizing and ending these measures, disrupting terror, financing,
intel sharing with counter terrorism stuff, anti terrorism assistance programs,
and community based prevention programs to stop these people from
getting radicalized. This moment in time is going to be
(01:10:48):
historic because they have seen enough warfare on the ground
in Gaza. There is no appetite for that warfare to
continue because that warfare has destroyed Gaza in ways that
we will never be able to understand. So now is
(01:11:10):
the time to say, all right, pass the hat, help
these people out, get them set up, let them rebuild,
and pursue the most noble peace that we possibly can.
I don't mean peace as in what we can take
from them, I mean peace in terms of tranquility. This
(01:11:34):
is what the look is going to be. And Trump,
God bless him, he went and he met with all
of these people and got them all buying in. All
the people have to do is accept the aid and
look for a better day. It's going to be a
(01:11:56):
hard slog, but it's the only way that you're going
to get these people to decide that they want to deradicalize.
News Talk eleven ten that a nine to three WBT
(01:12:17):
Brett Waterble Show. Good to be with you, seven oh
four five seven eleven ten. All right, so let's uh,
let's listen to some of the back and forth. Uh,
I mean, we haven't really played much of this. Give
me cut number eight. This is President Trump speaking in
the Kanesset in Israel earlier today.
Speaker 12 (01:12:39):
Cutting, I let you also convey my tremendous appreciation for
all of the nations of the Arab and Muslim world
that came together to press Samas to set the hostages
free and to send them home.
Speaker 1 (01:12:55):
We had a lot of help.
Speaker 10 (01:12:55):
We had a lot of help from a lot of
people that you wouldn't suspect, and I want to say
thank them very much for the It's an incredible triumph
for Israel in the world to have all of these
nations working together as partners in peace, and it's pretty
unusual for you to see that, but it happened in
this case.
Speaker 4 (01:13:15):
This was a very unusual point.
Speaker 1 (01:13:17):
In time, a brilliant point in time.
Speaker 10 (01:13:20):
Generations from now, this will be remembered as the moment
that everything began to change and change very much for
the better. Like the USA right now, it will be
the golden age of Israel and the golden age of
the Middle East. It's going to work together.
Speaker 2 (01:13:41):
You know.
Speaker 1 (01:13:43):
I envy the opportunity that people are going to have
and get their lives together like this. This is a
very important sort of thing, right Like I'm looking. I'm
looking at Greg Guttfeld and over the weekend, nude cyclists
(01:14:05):
joined anti ice folks and they they rode their bikes
and then they laid on the ground in the filth,
butt naked. I mean that that's remarkable, isn't that? Like
that's a phenomenal thing. How was your weekend? I got
butt naked and I wallowed in the filth on the ground,
(01:14:27):
Then that must just like that's gotta be That's gotta
be something so special, so special that you would want
to go and spend your time laying on the on
the slop on the ground with no clothing on. My gosh,
what'd you do this weekend? Not naked? Naked on the ground?
(01:14:49):
Naked on the ground. What is that? Is that some
kind of a band? No, no, no, I just laid
naked on the ground with a bicycle on top of
me and somebody's eating fondue off my head and this
kind of stuff. I mean, my gosh, what the heck
is that? No, that's what's going on. The Left has
gone completely bonkers because they don't know what to grab onto. Now,
(01:15:10):
I'll tell you what they were grabbing onto. You want
to know what these people were grabbing onto. Here's what
they were grabbing ont. They're grabbing on to the riot,
I'm sorry, it's not a riot. Potential riot. Maybe a
potential riot coming up on the eighteenth. Did you know
five days from now, we have Yeah, we have the
(01:15:30):
No Kings rally out there. And the rumor is that
Little Chuck Schumer as opposed to Big Chuck Schumer, Lil
Chuck Schumer, is going to then call the end of
the shutdown because he's trying to show the power they
have in holding back. Now, imagine this, So he's getting
(01:15:52):
ready to go marching around with people with pirate hats
and whatever else wearing, and they're telling people no kings,
no kings, no kings. You know, it's it's interesting because
President Trump's actually trying to get peace in the Middle East,
to get people sheltered, helped all that sort of stuff.
(01:16:15):
And all little Chuck Schumer's gotten and and and Rakim
Jefferies got is this idea of, hey, we're gonna we're
just gonna hold it up until after we have our rally.
And you know, the rally is gonna be like just
a lot of f words and cursing and stuff like that,
and they're gonna be yelling and screaming and doing all
this crazy stuff. But let me tell you there is
(01:16:37):
a person called Mickey Cheryl. Do you know who Mickey
Cheryl is. Mickey Cheryl wants to be the governor of
New Jersey. And we found a story that's very interesting.
Democrat gubernatorial nominee facing heat for taking donations for the
(01:17:00):
CCCCP linked tycoon as disqualifying. New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate
Mickey Cheryl is facing criticism after a businessman linked to
the Chinese Communist Party made multiple donations totaling tens of
(01:17:21):
thousands of dollars to her campaign. Now this this is
a very interesting name, and I'm going to read it
with all due respect. Pin Ni No, I didn't say
Pinknee like a no. Pin Ni might be pin nine.
(01:17:46):
The founder of Wang Shang America Corporation, donated sixty thousand
dollars to the One Giant Leap super pack backing Cheryl's
campaign in the form of two checks, not one checks,
two checks, in addition to giving fifty eight hundred dollars
(01:18:09):
individual max donation directly to Cheryl's campaign this summer. Political
campaigns in the United States are only permitted to accept
money from American citizens or permanent legal residents, and in
addition to pins status being unclear, questions have been raised.
(01:18:33):
Big questions have been raised. Big, big questions have been
raised about whether or not the ethics of accepting money
from individuals linked to the Chinese Communist Party. Quote the
donor pin Knee has an extensive history of assessing the
(01:18:55):
CCPs political warfare and influence operations upon the United States
and generally aligning with the carrying out of party commands.
What what is that? Pinnee Pennee? Is that you Pennee Pineye,
(01:19:19):
Pinnee pin Nie Penny, Penny, Penny for your thoughts, Penny
for your thoughts? What? I don't know? His Wang Xiang
Group posthumously awarded the company's founder, Lou guang Qui Luke
(01:19:42):
gwang Qui, the title of National Outstanding Communist Party Member.
You know how hard it is to get that award.
You gotta do a lot of stuff to get the
official National Outstanding Communist Party Member. I'm sure Mickey Cheryl
is very happy, ecstatic even for being able to run
(01:20:06):
in that sort of group of people, such August people,
such August people, even in September seven, O four five,
seven eleventh and Pinnee, we hardly knew Ye News Talk
(01:20:39):
eleven ten, not a n I'm three WBT Brett winter bowllshow.
Great to be with you. Let me jump out and
talk to is somebody very very enthused and excited, Michael,
Welcome to the program, Michael, Michael.
Speaker 7 (01:20:58):
Yeah, are you doing that show? Twenty year Navy?
Speaker 1 (01:21:01):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (01:21:01):
Here, I just want to say that, go Trump, baby,
But it's happened around front of our eyes. You know,
if you take the Muslim population around the whole world,
how many countries they have conquered, and how England and
France now is happening, and it's tribe for our eyes,
and I just can't believe nobody really wants to talk
(01:21:23):
about it.
Speaker 1 (01:21:23):
Well, I mean, look, Donald Trump just spent uh spent
a couple of days here working with people who are
from the Muslim world, who are are are working to
try to you know, establish stability and and all of
this other sort of stuff. There. There is nothing inherently
wrong with with trying to get peace. And I think
(01:21:46):
if you have to make peace, and you have to
make peace with people who you may not want to
make peace with, I mean that then that that's that's
the challenge. And so I understand that. And so I
think that I think that I don't I don't have
a I don't have an issue with with present and
Trump doing the sort of stuff that he's doing. I
think he's been very effective so far.
Speaker 7 (01:22:04):
No, I love But I'm just talking about England and France,
how they've let so many well.
Speaker 1 (01:22:09):
You know why, you know why they did that, right,
because because they they they decided that they wanted to
bring people back in from the former colonies, and that's
what they did. They you know, this is this is
why you don't want to be part of a colony
kind of a mentality. You want to have a country
that's got an identity, and the United States certainly does
(01:22:30):
have a very strong identity. And I do think, I
do think that that's something that's important. So, I mean, look,
the reality is, we we have people who migrate to
the United States legally. We have people who come into
the country who are coming in illegally. Obviously, the people
(01:22:50):
we want are people who are coming in legally, and
that's that's that's the essential nature of things. But but
what happened over in Europe is something that is a
very long scale. Okay, there's a very long scale from
that from that position, because you have people out there
(01:23:13):
who decided they were going to come into the UK
or France. And the problem with this is, right, the
problem with this is you you get these people and
they don't want to assimilate. You can bring whoever you
want into the country, right as long as they're coming
(01:23:35):
in legally and they've got paperwork and we know who
they are and they get background checked and all that
sort of stuff. But when you have those kinds of
folks coming in and they're not assimilating, meaning they're staying
only in their own enclaves, they don't they don't spend
time becoming Americans or becoming Brits, or becoming Frenchmen or
(01:23:57):
any of that sort of stuff. That's the challenge. Like
once upon a time, okay, this is this is one
of the things that's so fascinating. You know, once upon
a time you had the Foreign Legion. The Foreign Legion
was an institution that was set up by France who
who came out and they said, look, if you are
(01:24:20):
willing to go and fight for France in different battle
stations around the world wherever their their territory was, and
you are willing to spend X amount of time to
do that, you will get French citizenship. In fact, once
upon a time, and I don't know if this is
(01:24:41):
still the case, Americans could go over to France and
they could say, I want to fight for France and
I want to be part of the Foreign Legion, and
basically you're you're you're trying to get to a place
where you get your you get a French passport and
(01:25:01):
you can do all the sort of stuff that you
want to do down the line. Now, that is something
that I've always thought that was a challenge, but it
was also I thought very interesting the notion of the FFL,
the French Foreign Legion. Now they used to post those
guys to really horrible places like you're you're out in
(01:25:22):
the middle of the desert, You're you're out in a
in a hostile territory, uh, defending the French possessions or
the French uh, you know, sort of national fights and
things like that. That's a hard that's a hard life.
That's a hard life because they're going to deploy you
guys first, but at the end of your time, you're
(01:25:44):
going to be able to get a passport and you can.
You know, people have heard this a million times, you know.
They they would people who would commit a crime, would
would go and sneak into France and say, hey, I
want to I want to join the FFL. Now, the
FFL fighters, by the way, are are very strong fighters.
These these these are guys who are are very serious.
(01:26:06):
These are not guys that are playing games. These are
not like mercenaries, uh, you know, just out for for
a jaunt. But that that's how you used to you know,
you used to be able to do that, and that
would get you to assimilation. That would get you to
assimilation in a big way, and and you would be
able to figure out, you know that that that you're
(01:26:27):
gonna be a different person when you come back, or
you'll be the same person. But you're just you're just
gonna have better paperwork, so you're gonna be able to,
you know, live in France, and you're gonna make some money,
and you're gonna do your things and and all that,
all that sort of stuff. But you know, I think
it's it's it's not lost on me. The idea of
of our country, the thing you would not necessarily really
(01:26:50):
want to have as a permanent military would be would
be that idea of of of people who are coming
in to fight in a scenary sort of way. Right,
People over over time have thought about a lot of
ways that you can handle this kind of stuff where
you say, okay, you know what, yeah, well we'll bring
(01:27:13):
you into the United States. We're gonna make you learn
how to you know, become assimilated in the United States.
But but we've never really done like a foreign legion
thing in that way, not the way the French had.
And if you're just doing it for a job, like
(01:27:33):
if you're just doing the work to fight and do
all that sort of stuff, are you really trying to
become a person who's French. And by the way, you
have to learn you have to be able to speak French.
You can't just like be walking around and being like, oh, yeah,
you know what, Hey, this is all really great. I
don't have to speak anything. I just do whatever I want.
(01:27:55):
They give me free food, they give me free lodging,
they give me all this sort of stuff. No, you
got to work. I've always felt that the United States
of America, when it comes to people who want to
emigrate to the United States of America, I would I
would put a higher priority on people who have specific
(01:28:17):
skills and or people who are willing to do skills
that other people don't want to do. And then you
can you can kind of like, you know, give them
a little bit of a of a boost. Yeah. No,
that's that's another way you can go. And one of
the places where you can go, by the way, is
(01:28:37):
you can go out into the field and you can
pick beyond meat. It grows right there. It's just it's
growing huge Huger Hugest Coming up next, Chad Adams. I'm
Brett Wooderbal News Talk eleven ten not i