Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
And welcome. It is the Brett Winterbull Show. I've been
waiting twenty four hours to get back with you, and
it is great to be with you. It's actually the
twelve hours probably seven four, five, seven, eleven, ten, oh gosh.
Coming up later in the program, we'll have Dick Morris
joining us. He's going to give us some thoughts on
the different sort of things that are happening. By the way,
(00:37):
I don't know if you watched any of the debate
last night, that was the debate in New York City.
We've got commentary on that as well. But I love
I love when I see people who do not want
to face the reality of the world as it is.
(00:59):
And one of the things that I think is fascinating
is how suddenly everybody's upset about the takedown of the
East Wing over at the White House. We have audio
from twenty ten that we'll play later on in the
program where didn't seem to be a problem when the
(01:20):
immaculated one came in and took office. No problem right there.
But people are sitting back and they're saying things like this.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
Why don't we have unity? Why is there no unity?
Speaker 1 (01:36):
Unity? Is what we really need is it really what
we need. Can we be honest for a minute here,
do we need to be united? I don't think we
need to be united. I think we need to be
individuals pursuing our favorite sorts of remedies and things like that.
But let's talk about unity, because it's the catchphrase that
(01:57):
people that people want. Like you ask people and you say, hey,
so what do you mostly want? I want peace. I
want peace, and I want civility, and I want unity,
and I want all that sort of stuff. And that's fine,
it's a great thing to do, but it's not really
gonna work. Let's talk about unity, the sacred cow of
political rhetoric, the golden fleece of every inaugural address, the
(02:21):
duct tape that we slap on national wounds and hope
it holds. We're told time and time again that unity
is the goal, that if we could just come together,
everything would be fine. But here's the problem. Unity without
purpose is just conformity with better branding. Seriously, let's rewind
(02:46):
the tape. After the Civil War defeated, the Confederates called
for unity not to heal the nation, but to rewrite
the terms of surrender. They wanted reconstruction on their terms,
unity as a trojan horse for a white supremacy. That's
(03:07):
not healing, that's hijacking. Fast forward to Vietnam, the Malay massacre,
hundreds of civilians slaughtered. When the truth came out, unity
was invoked to shield the perpetrators. Don't divide the country,
they said, support the troops. I love the troops, but
if you've committed war crimes, you have to face justice.
(03:30):
But unity became a smoke screen for impunity. Even after
January the sixth, some voices called for unity, not accountability.
Now let's move on, they said. But the unity without
justice is just silence with a flag draped over it.
So let's ask ourselves something. When was America most united? Arguably?
(03:51):
I would say December the eighth, nineteen forty one, the
day after Pearl Harbor Congress voted four hundred and seventy
seven one to declare war. The country rallied, but unity
well then had a clear enemy, a clear goal, a
(04:12):
moral compass. And when was the last time? What was
the most the least united? We ever were? Eighteen sixty
one the Civil War, brother against brothers, state against state.
Unity shattered because the moral contradiction of slavery finally exploded.
(04:32):
But here's the twist. Disunity isn't always a flaw, It's
often a feature. The founders did not agree on everything.
They fought, They bickered, they compromised, and thank god they did,
because out of the disunity came checks and balances, the
(04:53):
Bill of Rights, a constitution that could evolve. Let's hear
from them unity, unity, united, we stand, Divided, we fall.
John Dickinson seventeen sixty eight. We must all hang together,
or assuredly, we will all hang separately. Benjamin Franklin, seventeen
seventy six. Now let's think about some of the disunity quotes.
(05:19):
The evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy.
You know who said that. Listen to this. This is
a very important thing for you people. The evils we
experience flow from the excess of democracy. You ever heard
of jerrymandering. That's Elbridge Jerry's comment, the father of jerrymandering.
(05:44):
I smell a rat, Patrick Henry. On the Constitution itself,
there were not combya moments. There were knife fights and
powdered wigs, and they made us stronger. Disunity made us
with more metal. So Brett you asked, isn't it up
(06:06):
to the American people? Damn right, it is. I got
a copy of the Constitution right here. Unity is not
handed down from a podium. It is built or rejected
by the citizens. We decide whether unity means progress or paralysis.
(06:29):
Let's not put a premium on unity. Let's put a
premium on another word, purpose, purpose, principle, truth, because unity
without those, it's just a group hug and a burning building.
(06:53):
So the next time someone says we need unity, if
only we had some unity, we just need to have unity,
ask them this question. They won't be able to answer.
Unity for what, unity for whom? You see, this is
(07:13):
the challenge of our time and what are we sacrificing
to get it? Because America isn't a choir. Do you
know what America is. It's a jazz band. We don't
need everyone singing in the same note. We need everyone
(07:36):
playing their part, listening, improvising, knowing when to solo and
knowing when to harmonize. That's not unity.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
That's not even a democracy.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
You know what it is. It's three hundred and fifty
deep million plus people voting for what's best for them.
The only place that You're ever gonna find that sort
of unanimity would be in China or the Soviet Union
(08:19):
or any other hellhole on planet Earth. Like I said,
we live on principle, we live on truth because unity
without those it's just a failure. Dudes Talk eleven, ten,
(08:51):
ninety nine to three WBT, It's the Brett Winterble Show.
We are certainly taking your phone calls. Seven oh four five,
seven oh eleven ten. Tarry families are suffering under the
Schumer shut down. Why are they doing this? You know again,
(09:11):
I would have thought that we would take care of
the people who do the most dangerous jobs in the
United States of America and beyond. The report is military
families left in limbo as the Schumer shut down rages on.
Military families have been living with uncertainty as the government
(09:33):
shut down rages on, with the healthcare system warning of
lapses in the ability to process or pay medical claims
and most recent permanent change of stations orders being frozen
in limbo. While President Donald Trump directed the Secretary of
War Pete Hexseth to ensure that service members received their
(09:57):
October fifteenth paychecks, remains uncertain whether they did or will
receive a paycheck on October the thirty first, without the
government reopening. Chuck Schumer wants to deny people in the
military their paychecks. Why does Chuck Schumer constantly bend to
(10:18):
the most reprobate causes in the world. Why does he
do this? Why does he want to bring more illegals in?
Why does he want to spend more money on illegals
but he doesn't want to protect the people in the military.
On top of salary uncertainty, other major issues like paying
for medical care and figuring out living situations after preparing
(10:42):
to follow PCs orders have risen for service members and
their families. Chuck Schumer is a filthy, lying scoundrel of
a politician. He's saying it's the fault of the administration.
It is not. Chuck is holding the money hostage. He's
(11:03):
holding the money hostage. Now he wants unity. He's begging
you for unity. He's telling you you have to be unified.
We are unified. We're unified in turning out Chuck Schumer
from the United States Senate period full stop, and along
with him, go ahead and grab and send out you know,
(11:24):
Adam Schiff, I mean, these folks are not doing a
single thing in any way, shape or form. The entire
reason why Chuck Schumer does not want to pay the
people who are in the troops is the fact that
he wants money for illegals, period, full stop. That's what
he wants. Hundreds of soldiers and their families are already
(11:44):
in the process of packing up their belongings and making
storage and shipping arrangements for things that they could not
bring with them when their orders were suspended because of
Chuck Schumer, who can't even cook. He can't even cook
a cheeseburger out putting raw, raw meat on cheese. This
guy's a freak. He's a circus. He's a circus freak.
(12:07):
He's freaky decky. That's all I can come up with.
Hundreds of soldiers and their families were already in the
process of packing up. Chuck Schumer shut that down. Chuck
Schumer refuses. Chuck Schumer doesn't care about the people in
the military. He's probably never even been to Fort Dix.
I mean, my gosh, what are we doing. We know
(12:28):
that these changes have already caused a significant amount of stress,
and we are very sorry for that, said Colonel Rachel Sullivan,
Commander of the US Army garrison in Hawaii. Why is
Chuck Schumer so hateful towards the people of the military.
Why is that the case? Why does he do that?
Because he cares more about virtue signaling than he does
(12:53):
the honorable, the honorable nature of serving in the military.
Chuck Schumer's never been in the military. Chuck Schumer went
right from college right to law school and then started,
you know, doing doing the things that he had to do.
Chuck Schumer does Chuck Schumer things. It's disgraceful. What is happening.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
Why is this happening? Why are we under such duress?
Speaker 1 (13:21):
No, but we need to be unified, unified, unified, No
kings unified. No, No, we don't. That's not the case.
This is unbelievable. You want to know who Chuck Schumer
cares about? Let me tell you about who Chuck Schumer
cares about. An illegal immigrant truck driver accused of causing
(13:44):
a fatal semi track semi truck crash in Indiana reportedly
owned companies that raped in taxpayer money before the crash.
A Fox News report on Thursday gave details about the suspect,
identified as Borko Stankovic, I'm saying that's that's his last name,
(14:05):
Stankovic Stankovic, Borko Stankovic, who was involved in a wreck
on October the fifteenth that left one person dead. PPP
records cataloged by Pro Publica show that two of Stankovic's companies,
Eclipse Trucking and ESD Team Incorporated, received a combined thirty
(14:29):
six two dollars in loans from the COVID nineteen era
funding programming set up business registration records. Records both Illinois
and Indiana show Stankovich owned both of the companies. This guy,
this guy was not supposed to be driving on the roads.
(14:50):
Illegal aliens have no business operating eighteen wheelers on American highways.
Borko Stankovich was driving a semi truck without a valid
marshal license when he swerved into oncoming traffic and struck
an Indiana man, who tragically died at the scene. Why
did Chuck Schumer allow that to happen? Why did Elizabeth
(15:11):
Warren allow this to happen? Why did any of these
people allow this to happen. Stankovich was on US Highway
twenty when traffic stopped due to a RAMS sprinter turning. However,
the suspect allegedly made a hard left turn and entered
opposite traffic, hitting a Subaru crosstech. The semi truck jackknifed
(15:35):
as a result and hit the RAMS sprinter, which was
pushed into a road sign. Jeffrey Eberley, an American fifty four,
who was driving the Subaru, died at the scene. Why
is Chuck Schumer allowing this to happen because they want
to protect illegals. They don't want to protect normal people.
I'm telling you this is what it is. Assistant Secretary
(15:57):
of the of DHS Trishia McLaughlin said this senseless tragedy
should never have happened and that this man would still
be alive today. But Stankovich has been in the country
illegally since the Obama Biden Obama administration. He came in
(16:20):
in twenty eleven and was never sent out. Huh. He
also has a history of violating the law, yet he
remained free to continue engaging in dangerous behavior that ultimately
resulted in the death of Jeffrey Eberly, an American who
had every right to be on our road. Illegal aliens
(16:43):
have no business operating. Eighteen wheelers or semi trucks on
America's highways. President Trump and Secretary Gnome are making the
roads safe again. Well, you gotta get a little bit
more action on that one. You gotta redouble this. This
is the problem. Chuck Schumer wants illegal immigrants in the country.
(17:05):
He likes the idea of them undercutting wages. He likes
the idea of, you know, looking like he's a super
solid guy. He's not. He's wrong. It's terrible. He's ignoring
the people in the military. He's ignoring the people who
are relying on snap. Chuck Schumer is shutting down the government.
And why must we have unity with Chuck Schumer? You
(17:27):
tell me, tell me why you want unity with Chuck Schumer.
He's another failed politician. I'm Brett Wittable and I agree
with that message. News Talk eleven ten now Ninem three
(17:50):
WBT welcoming back to the program. You know him from
his tremendous work breaking all the big stories that are
happening around Charlotte and beyond breaking. Brett Jensen joins us. Hello,
Brett Jensen, how.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
Are you just fine?
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Just fine? So I gotta I got a question for you,
because obviously the saga of of the the murder on
the light rail continues to move forward. We now know
that the federal government is getting involved with this via
(18:29):
the US Attorney's office, And I just wanted to get
a perspective from you on this, what this what this
poortends moving down the road, and how how they came
to this decision as far as you know, how did
this all come to pass?
Speaker 3 (18:47):
So yesterday was the two month anniversary of the murder
of Arena zeruitskap And on the light rail, and yesterday
on the two month anniversary, the official and formal indictment
from the federal government from US attorney from the US
Attorney of Western North Carolina, that's Russ Ferguson. They issued
(19:10):
the official indictment of basically, and I'm paraphrasing, but this
is the gist of it, committing murder on mass transit
and intimidation on mass transit, which is a felony because
it at these came about after nine to eleven saying okay, well,
I mean if you're killing someone on mass transit, that's
bad because people will not feel safe on mass transit
(19:33):
and people might not use mass transit. Thus, affecting the masses,
so they turned it into a felony. And so we
knew that this was going to happen because they had
a press conference, you know, six weeks ago saying that
they were going to indict, you know, to Carlos Brown,
(19:54):
and they were going to file charges. Well, the official
charges came down yesterday. All all of this while he
is going an evaluation by the state and by the
court systems to test his mental capacity and so, and
this testing of his mental capacity could last six months
because it's not like you're just going to go up
(20:15):
there see Brett Winnambo for three days and out you're
back in Charlotte. Like this could take a very long
process because he's not the only one up there, and
there are many many people up there that need their
mental health evaluated, and there's just not a lot of
doctors to do so or people that can do this.
(20:35):
So it will take a while. It will take a while.
But the other reason that this was filed was because
they're now going to possibly pursue the death penalty on
the federal charges, because the odds of there being a
death penalty on the state charges the local charges are
(20:58):
pretty small and you know it's I will tell you that.
You know, North Carolina just instituted, reinstituted the death penalty.
They never really took it away. And a lot of
people don't understand. They haven't committed an execution in North
Carolina to a prisoner in nineteen years. And the reason
was the company that was making all these materials, the
chemicals for the injections, the lethal injections. They started suing
(21:23):
SATs going, wait a minute, yes we make the chemicals,
but we never made the chemicals for this purpose. We
want you to cease and desist killing people with our
chemicals and mixing them.
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (21:33):
And these were tied up in litigations for years and
years and years, and South Carolina said, that's fine, we
will go back to other ways. We'll go back to
firing squad or gas chamber or electric chair or whatever.
And so now North Carolina has also done the same thing.
So the death penalty is back on the table statewide.
But the question is whether or not District Attorney Spencer
(21:54):
Merriwether will actually pursue the death penalty. And just in
case he doesn't, the federal system came in the US
Attorney's Office said yeah, we will do federal charges and
federal charges where we can seek the death penalty.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
So we went, you know, going back just a few
weeks ago, we had that moment in time where Josh Stein,
you know, was kind of waffling about whether or not
he was going to go along with this. Is that
one of the drivers here with the US Attorney's Office saying, listen,
(22:29):
he may not want to actually even do this. He
may He was very you know, reticent to take any
action against de Carlo at that stage of the game.
And so is that is this like an insurance policy
coming out of the FEDS.
Speaker 3 (22:44):
That was exactly what it was, because at the time
when they held the press conference six weeks ago, there
was basically no death penalty in place for the state
of North Carolina because of that other stuff being still
tied up in years of litigation and lawsuits. So at
the time when they made the announcement the DOJ six
weeks ago, this exact that's exactly what it was. Brett,
(23:05):
That's exactly what it was. It was a fail safe. Okay,
if this does not happen, we can at least do
it on our side and pursue that possibility on our side.
And so again, a lot of this will come down
whether or not he's deemed to be mentally competent or
knew what he was doing. And a lot of people
will use the audio from the light rail after he
(23:27):
stabbed the girl, you know, when he talked about it twice,
where he said on audio, I got that white girl,
I got that white girl, and they will use that
saying he knew what he was doing in the exact
moment in time. So yes, it is a backup. It
was basically a backup to ensure that he's not just
(23:47):
you know, spending the rest of his life in prison
or it gets out in seventeen years or whatever the
case may be. This was the backup plan going okay,
this is the fail safe if the first one fails.
We have this this backup in case.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
Okay. And then finally, I'd be remiss if I didn't
ask you this question. Obviously, it's it's a topic that's
that's swirling around here, and that's obviously the the busts
that took place earlier today, uh with with illegal gambling
and information getting out and things like that. Are you
surprised by any of this? Do you think we're gonna
is this is it going to expand over the course?
(24:24):
What what are your thoughts on that at this early junction, Well, we.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Knew about a couple. We knew the NBA was investigating
Terry Rogier when for the last you know, for the
last prolonged period of time, over allegations of wrongdoing for
that very specific game. We knew one person that was
charged and the indictment had already pled guilty to several
of the charges in that indictment, which I believe was
like one hundred page indictment. Uh, you know the things
(24:50):
with Chauncey Billups. He's listed on both counts. He's listed
with the charges for the illegal poker thing where poker
gambling ring as well as on the other side giving
information to people going, you know, so and so is
hurt today he's not playing today, you know, well in
advance and so there may be others. But I will
(25:10):
tell you this, like some of this, we already knew,
at least on a couple of the players. We already
knew that they were being investigated by the NBA, or
I should say by the federal by the federal government.
And one of them that had already pled guilty to
several of the charges.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
And so and so we'll obviously be following that. You'll
be following that as well. And what else you got
for the for the tonight.
Speaker 3 (25:30):
So in studio with me tonight is David Longo, and
a lot of people won't know who that is, but
David Longo is essentially the guy that runs the all
the businesses downtown, like in terms of you know, the
the CCCP, the which is funny this you know, Charlotte
Center City Partners where all the businesses come together, the
(25:52):
part of this s grip. He essentially runs that, and
he's also very very important of making sure that the
crime is being stopped. He'd worked with all the local governments,
he worked with the state governments. So it's going to
be a very fascinating one hour because he's the guy
who has his finger on the Poltz and is the biggest,
one of the biggest movers and shakers in Charlotte.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
Great stuff. Mandatory listening starting tonight at of course six o'clock.
Thanks so much, Brett. We appreciate it and look forward
to hearing the program tonight.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Appreciate it, Brett, thanks a lot.
Speaker 1 (26:21):
You got it. That's breaking. Brett Jensen. I do think
you have to pump it up just a little bit.
Seven four five, seven eleven ten, News Talk eleven, ten,
(26:41):
ninety nine to three WBT. Okay, all right, I've heard.
I've heard what you guys were saying. I've heard it.
I know. Listen. I gotta some of you or may
not be familiar with this. We have a constituency of
people who listen to our program and they are absolutely
in love with James Carville. And I want to play
(27:02):
this clip from James Carvill. I'm not even gonna comment
on it. You tell me what you're hearing from this
particular character. This is James Carvill and a guy named
Al Hunt. Just listen to what James Carvill wants to
do to you. Other people, some other other people I
(27:23):
don't know. Cut number forty fired up.
Speaker 4 (27:27):
You know what we do with collaborators. And my fantasy
dream is that this nightmare ends in twenty twenty nine.
And I think we ought to have radical thing. I
think they all are to have the head shaven. They
should be put in the orange pajamas, and it should
be marched down Pennsylvania Avenue and the public should be
(27:49):
invited to spit out them. All of these collaborators should
be shaved, pajamined, and spit out. It's a moral judgment
if you bend the knee to a criminal tyrant, and
that's what he is. Understand he is a criminal. Thirty
(28:09):
four convictions would have been a lot more, okay if
they would have pursued it. He has a tyrant. He
has no use of democracy, he has no use of
the value of this country. And you are collaborating with this,
and it will bring eternal shame to your company.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Think about what Carville is saying. It's basically a solicitation
for people to get hurt. He is basically saying people
who work with the White House should be should be
I mean what they shave their heads, put them in
(28:54):
orange jumpsuits, and be invited to spit on them like
that is. That is a god who probably needs to
kind of just pack it up and not not spend
any more time, because if you do not have the
ability to moderate yourself in that degree. And look, you've
(29:15):
already seen people get assaulted outside of the White House.
You've already seen people assaulted back during the riot in
twenty twenty rand Paul was assaulted. Him and his wife
were assaulted walking down a street. James Carble knows exactly
what he's saying. I'll hunt sitting there, you know, just
kind of smugly, kind of you know, snickering with him.
(29:40):
Why would you why would you want to call people
and then encourage people to violently attack these people, which
is what he just did. This is a solicitation. This
is a solicitation in every possible way, and that's what
this guy's doing. But you know that's free speech. That's
(30:04):
I guess that's free speech. It's not my kind of
cup of tea for free speech. I mean, you know, look,
here's here's somebody who's on the exact same sort of
sort of corners as James Carville. Okay, this is cut
number thirty nine. Now I want you to I want
you to understand something here. This is a very disturbing clip.
(30:27):
This is a very disturbing clip. And uh, this is
cut number thirty nine. Please go.
Speaker 3 (30:33):
We all know who they are, whether they're in Israel,
Tel Aviv, in Washington and Germany and Europe.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
We all know them.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
We all know them.
Speaker 5 (30:42):
They need to be locked up, They need to be
taken out.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
They need to be vitualized to save children, to save children,
to say.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
We need to act now.
Speaker 6 (30:56):
Speaking up alone is not enough.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
It's two years old.
Speaker 6 (31:04):
We have been speaking up for two years now.
Speaker 5 (31:07):
It's time to escalate and to act and.
Speaker 1 (31:11):
To get the ers out, save the children. So that
is a Detroit based doctor named Nadal Jabor. He's obviously
calling for very negative consequences for Israel and the United States.
(31:31):
I mean, I'm thinking here in that clip, like he's
really probably only about two and a half feet away
from what Carvil's saying. Or Carvil's about two and a
half feet away from what that guy was saying. It's disgusting.
We don't settle our differences this way. Again, we don't
(31:52):
have to be unified. We don't have to be unified.
You can plot your own course. You can say, listen,
this is a policy that I like. That's a policy
that I don't like. This is way too much. It
is way too much. You've got people openly soliciting to
(32:12):
try to harm other people. And I gotta tell you
it's it's a it's a very very sad reality that
we're dealing with. In fact, I'm gonna I'm gonna let
you hear something really incredible when we get into this
next hour. So Peter Schweitzer and Glenn Beck had a conversation.
(32:35):
And Peter Schweitzer is a fascinating person. He's he's an
expert on riot inc all the stuff that goes on
where people start, you know, deciding they want to get
kinetic and they want to create all these sort of
sorts of situations. He's got, he's got a very interesting
breakdown of what's going to come next, because there is
(32:57):
a very specific timeline of what is going to happen
next in terms of the the back and forth between
the two sides that exist. Actually, I think it's probably
more like three sides, because I do think you have
a fifth column here in the United States, and I
think it's a very scary reality News Talk eleven ten
(33:38):
ninety nine to three WBT, Little Primus for you, prime
in you for the upcoming weekend, almost within eyesight seven
oh four five seven zero eleven ten. We we get,
we get feedback. People like to reach out to us
and if you want to if you want to challenge me,
if you want to talk to me, seven oh four
five seven oh eleven ten, and we we are taking
(34:01):
all comers. We always are. And uh, but you have
to be interesting, Okay. The only, the only parameter that
I have to ask you is you have to be interesting.
You have to be an interesting person. You have to
have a you know, an obvious not a week take.
You have to get you have to just come on
in and give us good stuff. That's all I ask for.
(34:21):
That's really it's it's like, really the easiest thing that
you could possibly do. I get these people, they call
in and they they they talk to Isaac, or they
talk to Lonnie, or they talk to Nick, and then
they try to just give them their point and then
they don't want to talk to me, or they don't
want to talk to you know, any of the other hosts.
I like it when people call. I like it when
(34:43):
people call that this is this is what I'm saying,
you know, I mean, I I think it's a phenomenal opportunity.
We have so few outlets where we're able to, you know,
really dive into some stuff. And I know people people
will use whatever excuses. Either was a guy who called
it a little while ago. He just was afraid to talk
(35:03):
to me, and I don't understand this. We're just having
a conversation on the radio. You might be right, I
might be right. We could both be right, we could
both be wrong. I mean, that's that's one of the
things we got to deal with here. Okay, So this
is out of Florida, Florida, Florida, checking in Brett. What
(35:24):
they have to do with Carville is what we have
done to all the Kirk mockers. Call them out, get
them fired from his teaching gig at LSU. He is
has been him and Slick Willy or from the same brood. Okay,
I'm okay with Carville being around. I just think the
(35:48):
stuff that he says is just it's not it's not
factual in any way, shape or form. Then we also
got this Carville mainstream left agree or you're dead. Well, no,
I don't think so. I think he's really he's just
really mad. Ralph is going to help me unpack this. Ralph,
(36:09):
welcome to the show. What are you thinking about James
Carville here, buddy?
Speaker 7 (36:13):
Well, you know, if you go back about seven or
eight months ago, he was railing on the liberal you know,
extremists on his party.
Speaker 8 (36:24):
Yes, I don't know what has changed at.
Speaker 7 (36:27):
Carville at some of the top Democratic donors that had
torn torn it down and get the line. But Mary
Mattlin needs to throw up at lose you on a
paper and just whack.
Speaker 9 (36:39):
Him on the head.
Speaker 7 (36:43):
No.
Speaker 1 (36:43):
Now, look, I think he just wants to be invited
on the shows. That's what I think it is. I
think he's just trying to be that guy, you know.
And and it's like you look at him and you go, okay, waiting,
hold on a second, this is this is this is
not this is not gonna work. So let me ask
you a question. Okay, if if the shoe was on
the other foot, and and you wanted to confront UH
(37:07):
Vice President Harris, would you use the kind of language
that he just dropped UH with with shaving heads and
and and orange jumpsuits and all this kind of stuff.
You wouldn't. You wouldn't be like that, Ralph, I wouldn't
be like that.
Speaker 7 (37:20):
Right, that is correct? And you know what that almost sounds, uh,
something out of what a Mattress or Nazi would say.
Speaker 1 (37:31):
You know, I'm not you know.
Speaker 7 (37:33):
They're using the same thing. And this is a trouble
with Democrats. You got to call him out on it.
Speaker 10 (37:39):
You know, you just got to.
Speaker 7 (37:40):
Call him out of they used the same thing that
they're guilty of choosing the conservatives on the longest time,
everybody has just stood up and took it. And you
know what, there's a lot of the sol majority people
out there.
Speaker 8 (37:57):
We've had it enough. It is and everything.
Speaker 7 (38:01):
We're not gonna take it.
Speaker 1 (38:03):
Yeah. That look, that's that's a really good, good, good take.
I'm glad you called in, Ralph, Thank you very much
for the phone call. It's always uh, it's always a
pleasure when Ralph calls in. Okay, so now we got
Now we've got somebody else who just parachuted into the conversation.
It's one of Isaac's the top he's a top two,
top three guy for Isaac. And that is Robert. Robert
(38:28):
checking and saying, the caller just needs to bring it. Oh,
the caller that was afraid to talk to me, the
caller just needs to bring it. It's not as easy
as it may seem. Robert with a very with a
very nice uh emoji, with a smile. He brings it
every text. He brings it every text. Let me tell you,
(38:51):
I'm one of these days, and I'm serious it'll be
sooner rather than later. I am going to I'm going
to for the first time in my entire career, I'm
going to put down on paper the top fifteen callers
(39:12):
of this program. We're gonna have ranking. We're gonna have ranking.
It's gonna be fifteen, fifteen and out. That's it. I
can't go twenty, I can't go twenty five. I can't
go fifty two. We're gonna go fifteen. And what we
will do before we do it, what we will do
is we will give people appropriate exposure. And these are
(39:38):
gonna be the people that are gonna be that are
We're gonna make the ranking happen, and I will I
will find some maybe I'll get like some sort of
a wood burning kind of a pencil, and we'll put
this thing right up in here. Man, I look, there
is as Isaac can tell you, I have nothing that
I have put up in this in this studio. I
(40:00):
got a voteIn a rule right here. I got a
sticker over here. We had we had I don't know
whatever happened to the to the other one that was
over there. You know they were they were doing like
fantasy football. That thing lasted for about a minute and
a half. I am gonna claim territory under the clock,
and that's where the winnabal fifteen will will reside. And
(40:24):
and if you touch it, if you touch it with
anything but reverence, we're gonna have We're gonna have a
pow wow. We're gonna have a meeting. We're gonna have
a get to, We're gonna have a get to go to.
That's it right there. You know what we might do.
I'm doing this in real time because I like doing
things in real time. I'm thinking we might actually have
(40:47):
people vote, vote and then and then we'll have to
We'll see how how people bring Jim, do not call me,
not yet. It's not today, Jim, it's not today, Jim him.
I can hear, I can hear. I hear that. I
hear that phone, the old the old phone, the old
phone where you put your finger and he goes sounds
(41:11):
like a sprinkler head.
Speaker 11 (41:18):
When not gonna taca, we ain't gonna taken.
Speaker 1 (41:29):
News talk eleven ten nine three b bt. Okay. I
got people now jostling for the positions we can't. I'm
not I'm not accepting any of the the jostling has
got to be it's going it's gotta be organic. It's
got to be an organic. Uh, comer, look at it,
all this sort of stuff. But here, let's see what
do we got here? All right? We get uh, all right,
(41:50):
coming down the pipeline, Carve uh Carver, Brazil and the
Little Greek Yogurt are all dedicated lifetime members of their
for their D team. Oh okay, okay, okay, okay, I
get what. I don't know what the little yogurt? What's
the little Greek yogurt? I don't know what that is.
(42:10):
That's that's weird, all right. I don't know who the
top fifteen winner will be, but I know who's the favorite. Hint,
it's not Mike, our genius so thoughtful and nuanced lawyer
he will be. He might be in contention. You gotta
be careful right there, Robert, right and high in the saddle.
(42:32):
Now and then you got let's see what else do
we got? Uh?
Speaker 7 (42:36):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (42:36):
Bowen Beth mentioned on Good Morning BT of a caller
wall of fame. Well, okay, that's a caller wall of fame.
I'm talking about my See this will be this won't
be by hall of fame. This one's gonna be like
the Prolific. It's gonna be like the Prolific eighteen or
the Prolific fifteen, and then we're gonna have the notorious ten.
(43:01):
There are we have notorious calls. I I get notorious
calls from people, and I love the notorious calls. I mean, really,
it look in all honesty. I actually you could actually
use that as a song. You could use you could
use Duran durand Notorious Man, just because it's all when
when they fire that song up, it just goes notorious. No.
(43:25):
But we're gonna save that though, for the for for
when we get the notorious people. There's a lot of
notorious people that check in here. You want you want
me to give you a notorious person, I'll give you. No,
I'll give you one right off the right off the right,
off the top. Yankee Joe. Yankee Joe's a little notorious.
He's notorious, he's he's I think Yankee Joe is work.
(43:47):
Yes see, that's what we're gonna have. That's what we're
gonna use. We're gonna use that for the that's it
right there, notorious. I think, uh, I think Yankee Joe.
I've not heard from Yankee Joe in a couple of days.
I'm wondering if he's trying to if he's going and
knocking on doors in New York City, because that's you know,
he was from New York and I'm wondering if he's looking.
(44:07):
Speaking of which, we haven't done any of this sound
from the debate last night, and it's worth it's worth hearing.
There was some good stuff that came out last night.
And then I will I promise you, I'm gonna give
you the Peter Schweitzer, but let me just give you
just like one little little taste here. Okay, this is
one little taste of the debate last night. Here is Cuomo.
(44:29):
This is cut forty eight. This is cut forty eight.
I hate, I hate, I hate Cuomo, but I gotta
I gotta admit he really takes Mandami to the to
the shed, cut number forty eight. Go.
Speaker 11 (44:44):
I understand, I understand. My friend doesn't really understand government.
The governor doesn't build housing in New York City.
Speaker 1 (44:52):
No, no, legally, there are jurisdictions.
Speaker 11 (44:55):
The governor doesn't pick up trash, he doesn't run the
fire department. That's what the mayor does. The mayor bills housing,
the state allocates funding for localities, and I allocated more
funding for housing than any governor in the history of
the State.
Speaker 1 (45:08):
Of New York. All Right, I did things.
Speaker 11 (45:11):
You have never had a job, You've never accomplished anything.
There's no reason to believe you have any merit or qualification.
Speaker 1 (45:18):
For eight and a half million lives.
Speaker 11 (45:20):
You don't know how to run a government, you don't
know how to handle an emergency, and you've literally never
proposed a bill on anything that you're not talking about.
In your campaign, you had the worst attendance record in
the Assembly, and you gave yourselves the highest raised in
the United States of America. You went from one hundred
and ten thousand to one hundred and forty thousand dollars,
and then you never showed up for work and you
(45:42):
missed eighty percent of the votes.
Speaker 1 (45:43):
Shame on, you got e gotty man. That was unbelievable. Now,
I don't want to say that Zorhan Mundami is not smart,
but listen to this. This is how you're going to
fix the problems in New York City. Okay, cut number
(46:06):
forty seven. Zorhaanmandami, he knows if you need a cop
or not cut number forty seven go. What my opponents
are clinging to is the past, because that's all that
they know. What I am proposing is something that will
address the needs of New Yorkers in the present. We
speak and hear from.
Speaker 5 (46:26):
New Yorkers across the five boroughs who outline how the
mental health crisis is one of the major challenges in
this city.
Speaker 1 (46:31):
And yet what we have in our.
Speaker 5 (46:32):
City is asking those same police officers who are being
asked to respond to shootings, respond to murders, to also
respond to these calls. I trust the dispatchers who would
be receiving these calls to make the determination as to
whether there was any indication of violence. If there is
no indication of a threat of violence, then we would
set the mental health experts and providers to respond to
those same incidents.
Speaker 1 (46:51):
So you have an emotionally disturbed person, you have somebody
coming into your house, they're smashing up all of your stuff,
they're robing your house, in your apartment, whatever it is,
and you're gonna call a phone number and they're gonna say, well, now,
it doesn't sound like you need a police officer to
come and help you out. It sounds like you need
a social worker to come and help you out? Are
(47:13):
you like, are you kidding me? Just see here, here's
here's the litmus test. The litmus test here is is shocking.
Imagine the crimes that are happening here in Charlotte right
like violent crimes. We had what do we have? We
had four or five people murdered last weekend, horrible, We
(47:33):
had a child shot. All this terrible stuff going on. Now.
I'm sorry, but if you pick up the phone and
call nine one one and say, hey, I need a
you know, someone just shot my kid, somebody just shot
my neighbor, somebody just shot me. Can you can you
police come over? Well, is it really that important or
(47:57):
do you just kind of need a social worker to
come over? Like? First of all, first of all, the idea,
the idea that you would say, oh yeah, we just
need a we need a social worker. So what is
the social worker gonna do. He's gonna show up, or
she's gonna show up, or they them are gonna show
(48:18):
up and you're gonna have a situation. Where are they
wearing tactical vests? Do they have any sort of you
got a stun gun so you could put somebody down,
if they're if they're getting violent. I mean, this guy
is so not ready for prime time. He's not even
ready for late night. He's not even ready for Jimmy
(48:40):
Kimmel Knight. He's not ready for any of this kind
of stuff. And that is the problem. This is this
city that he wants to govern is the most complex
city pretty much on the face of the earth. I
mean London, sure, Rome, Yes, Los Angeles, New York, I
(49:05):
mean New York, Chicago, Los Angeles. I mean those are
all pretty much on par with each other. But what
the heck this guy, this is the first job he's
ever had, This only job he's ever had. Makeup you
(49:30):
all mind.
Speaker 11 (49:34):
This time to walk with me?
Speaker 1 (49:38):
Seven four five, seven eleven ten News Talk eleven ten,
not a nine three WBT. I'm gonna take a call late.
Welcome to the program. Jim in San Diego. Jim, how
are you?
Speaker 9 (49:51):
Thank you?
Speaker 10 (49:51):
Thank you for having me on again.
Speaker 1 (49:53):
It's good to have you. It's good to have you here.
Speaker 9 (49:54):
You tell people not to call, it's like telling somebody
not to look. What did they do? What's the first
thing they do?
Speaker 1 (50:02):
I don't know. What do they do.
Speaker 9 (50:05):
When you tell someone don't look, and then they look
and they look at you.
Speaker 1 (50:09):
Wait wait, wait, wait, hold on, hold on, hold on.
I want you to stay where you are. It's not
going to count against your time. Okay. I want you
to hear this. This is cut forty five, Cut forty
five from the debate last night. I love Curtis Leeway.
He's a good friend of mine. He's not going to win.
It's a shame. I wish he would cut number forty five.
Go for it, Isaac. I've heard the.
Speaker 11 (50:30):
Both of them again, fighting like kids in this schoolyard.
Speaker 1 (50:33):
Or on.
Speaker 3 (50:34):
Your resume could fit on a cocktail napkin, and.
Speaker 12 (50:38):
Andrew, your failures could fill a public school library in.
Speaker 1 (50:44):
New York City. There you go, Jim, what are you
thinking about this?
Speaker 9 (50:50):
He has a lot of impact. But the whole time
I was listening and watching it, the one thing that
kept going through my mind that I had a couple
of weeks ago and I called it in GOT a
few weeks ago. You've got to know the difference between
reasons that sound good and good sound reasoning, and slot
(51:14):
Sleeway was absolutely spot on with the sound reasoning. Yes,
doesn't have a resume, he's has a number of failures.
It's everything that he does. The one thing that MUNDHAMI
does is if he's not speaking, he will just stand
(51:35):
there and smile. And I want to tell you the
reason why he does that.
Speaker 1 (51:39):
Okay, go ahead, Okay.
Speaker 9 (51:42):
They did market research and the women that are the
twenty five to fifty year old single mothers that live
and make up his main constituency in New York, they
did the market research and they said, what is the
one thing that you like most about this was all
and they said most of them said his smile. So
(52:05):
he's told not to say anything when he don't try
to fight back, don't take up other people's times, just
smile and then answer when it's your turn. So and
he again, remember that he is just giving you reasons
that sound good and nothing else.
Speaker 1 (52:25):
That's a that's an absolutely phenomenal analysis there, Jim. And
in all seriousness, that is that is exactly right. They
asked him about a couple of different positions. He he
refused to answer. He said, I'm just focusing on getting
the election, uh completed, et cetera, et cetera. This guy,
(52:47):
this guy is he I think he's I think he's
dangerous personally. But but you know, I don't live in
New York, so you know, they're just going to have
to figure out how how they're going to handle it.
But this, this guy is, this guy has got he's
he's some kind of you know, some kind of a guy.
And uh, these these folks are are are going to
(53:08):
buy into it. And I and I worry, I genuinely
worry about the people of New York City in this regard.
Speaker 9 (53:16):
Well, uh, there's another one too to watch out for.
It's the same cut of cloth, and that's this guy,
the mayor here, Todd Gloria. He makes things sound so good.
He is a gas lighter stordinaire and you will see
him on the national stage very soon. Unfortunately.
Speaker 1 (53:34):
Yeah, there's a lot of people. Look, there's a lot
of people that are that are starting to emerge. Nancy
Pelosi is is probably not going to run again, and
and the person that's going to fill that one is
is just a horrifying uh replacement. So, uh, great stuff. Jim,
you you've you've you've given us a great start towards
the uh towards the list. And thank you so much
(53:56):
for being there today.
Speaker 10 (53:58):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (53:59):
Hey, Yeah, that was good stuff from Jim. That was
really good stuff from Jim. That was super duper stuff
from Jim. All right, let's do this. I promised it.
Let's do it. Peter Schweitzer Glenn Beck on Riot Inc.
And how all of these cities are starting to fall
cut number forty three.
Speaker 12 (54:19):
Please, over a quarter of a billion dollars. I assume
that's not just for this, that's to fund the whole thing.
And what's still yet to come an astounding number. How
how clearly can we trace it to the actual movement itself,
(54:42):
the ground operation?
Speaker 13 (54:45):
Yeah, So what that spreadsheet shows is that let's say
something like the Tides Foundation gives twenty million dollars to
an organization that could be for general funds, that could
be for anything. But if that organization is playing an
active central role in these protests, they are included in
the database.
Speaker 1 (55:04):
And the problem, Glenn is, you know, is money is fungible.
Speaker 13 (55:07):
So you could have a Ford Foundation, for example, funding
an organization on something to let's say, get out the vote,
but that money can.
Speaker 1 (55:16):
Be used also for protests.
Speaker 13 (55:18):
And I think the way that we need to understand
this is it's not just about the No Kings movement
they are creating and have created an infrastructure to create
social disintegration or social destabilization in the United States. Many
of the same groups behind No Kings are the same
(55:39):
organizations that were engaged in more violent protests during the
Black Lives Matter protests in twenty twenty or when in
October of twenty three when Hamas brutally attacked Israel and
all the protesters came out in favor of Palestine.
Speaker 1 (55:56):
It's many of those same organizations.
Speaker 13 (55:59):
That's why we have sort of jokingly but only half jokingly,
called this riot incorporated because they have an infrastructure for
social destabilization. It includes the group on that list where
it does not include Glen are the foreign entities that
are also involved in this movement in places like China
and Iran, et cetera.
Speaker 12 (56:21):
I mean, it is stunning, Peter that I mean, that's
a lot of money, you know, three hundred million dollars.
That's a good sized company, and it's amazing to me
that that kind of money can be swimming in our
streets and nobody really understands it.
Speaker 1 (56:41):
Ezra Leven understands it. We played it yesterday. Cut number
thirty six from yesterday go They are going to.
Speaker 14 (56:47):
Be big protest stages, just like we saw on Saturday.
That's true, but in between those days, there's going to
be regime overreach. And I think that Jimmy Kimmel Disney
ABC News example is an excellent case in point of
how people power can be applied not just against this
administration in the White House, not just against Congress, but
against the pillars of democracy, media institutions, businesses, universities that
(57:12):
are getting pressured by this regime. In the Disney case,
what we saw was the regime applied pressure, the institution buckled,
the people responded in force, and then that institution saw
that changed course and democracy set up a little bit stiffer.
We are a little bit stronger in that moment. There
are going to be more instances exactly like that. So
(57:33):
I think, using our combined economic power in a rapid response,
they do this, we do that is necessary for creating
the conditions of defiance all across the country. So we've
launched something den I'd called the No Kings Alliance, which
is an alliance of all of these groups working together
all around the country in an effort to produce that
(57:56):
kind of rapid response we need to change the conditions
on the brown because.
Speaker 1 (58:01):
Oh, who's that James Carville Cut forty.
Speaker 4 (58:06):
You know what we do would collaborators, right, And my
fantasy dream is that this nightmare ends in twenty twenty nine.
And I think we ought to have radical thing. I
think they all are to have their head shaven. They
should be put in the orange pajamas and it should
be marched down Pennsylvania Avenue and the public should be
(58:28):
invited to spit out them.
Speaker 1 (58:31):
That's the answer from James Carville, a once great strategist.
News Talk eleven ten, nine of nine to three WBT
(58:52):
Brett Winnable Show. There's so much stuff we could talk about.
Let's do this. So has it been established that everybody
is freaking out because President Trump knocked down the East
Wing to make the new building that's gonna happen right there, right,
everybody's kind of familiar with this. A lot of people
(59:14):
are very upset about it. I'm gonna take you back
the way back machine. This is cut number forty two,
and I want you to hear something. And this is
gonna be great, AMMO for you guys. When people start
getting in your face about all this terrible stuff. That's
going on. This is from twenty ten when Barack Obama's president,
(59:36):
Joe Biden was vice president, and they decided to redo
big parts of the White House cut forty two. Sounds
like they're building another wing to the White House.
Speaker 12 (59:48):
But we appreciate you keeping you.
Speaker 6 (59:49):
Could imagine to today it's gonna happen for the next
two years. All the banging, the jackhammering, the dust, the confusion,
the noise of all places to do construction is happening
right here the front lawn of the White House. It's
a four year renovation project estimated costs three hundred and
seventy six million dollars.
Speaker 1 (01:00:12):
What what three hundred and seventy six million dollars. Those
would be taxpayer dollars probably, But this one that is
being refurbished is being done by companies that are donating
to the effort to have a better setup where future
(01:00:33):
presidents will be able to invite guests from around the
world and they will not have to be under the
auspices of a tent. You know, you know, when you
go to the White House and you have these fancy dinners,
they erect tents, tents. There's not enough room in that area.
(01:00:57):
But this is going to be a permanent installation of
the ability to go and do those sorts of things.
By the way, that happens to be Suzanne Malveau. Does
anybody know the significance of Suzanne Malveaux. She's a very
serious reporter. I don't know what she's doing now. I
(01:01:19):
don't know if she's still affiliated with CNN, but she
was in a relationship with somebody who has been heard
about for the last couple of weeks. Do you know
who that is? Suzanne Malveaux had a relationship with KJP. Yep,
(01:01:45):
you look it up. You can look it up. That
was That was This is from twenty ten. That was
a long time ago, by the way, And so that
is that is one of the that is one of
the stories that we are That is one of the
stories that we are seeing that is happening over there.
So that's that's the that's the big storyline. That's everything
(01:02:06):
that's happening right here. By the way. I don't know
exactly where this location is. I'm doing this all in
real time. A massive police presence in West Charlotte, we
believe it is probably it looks like it's down the
street from us. Perhaps we're gonna try to see what's
going on here. Uh so there may be see yeah,
(01:02:31):
I don't. It looks like there's some kind of an
activity that that is happening here. Breaking news medic two
shot in northwest Charlotte now on North Hoskins and Brookshire Boulevard.
So there's a couple of things that have been popping
up here. Now. Uh suddenly that that that is one
of the things that's happening. Stan, Welcome to the program.
(01:02:51):
What's on your mind? Stanyhy Bratt?
Speaker 8 (01:02:54):
I want to tell you about a It was came
a call that's not so I mean, it's just about
live This is a quick all of them. But it
was a Reddit post about stamp and tbt pond not
going out. Yes, And at first they were all like,
you know, all these mag of people have just called
us all and not have this potent As you went
(01:03:16):
through the post and he got into it like the
next day, other than that would come in to change
to how they were going to.
Speaker 9 (01:03:23):
Mitigate, and all of a sudden they.
Speaker 8 (01:03:25):
Were talking about like I want to take a part
time job. I might have to go eat rice and beans.
I kind of think we did growing up.
Speaker 10 (01:03:33):
Well, this is what you did to make into me.
Speaker 1 (01:03:35):
Well, yes, yes, that is that that is that that
is that is true. And uh, the the sticking point
with this is the notion of not having the stuff
for the people to get the things that they need.
(01:04:05):
News Talk eleven, ten, ninety nine to three WBT. It
is the Brettwoodable Show seven oh four five seven zero
eleven ten. All right. One of the issues that people
are talking about as it relates to the shutdown is
(01:04:27):
obviously the issue dealing with people who are in the
country illegally, all right, illegal immigration. And there's a tremendous
piece over at the American Thinker that I think is
right on spot here with a number of these points
that they're making a hidden tax what Americans are really
(01:04:50):
paying for illegal immigration. Now, let me just I'm going
to put a caveat upfront in this regard. I don't
believe that we should treat people in an inhumane way. Okay.
I think everybody's got the dignity of life. All of
(01:05:13):
that is very important, Okay, but we also do not
need to be the people who are supplying everybody's need
for one hundred and eighty million people who want to
try to come into the United States, because if we bleed,
(01:05:33):
we will bleed out eventually. That's a problem here. So
again I am I am very conscious of treating people
with dignity, treating people properly, not hurting people unnecessarily, or
any of that sort of stuff. But this exercise is
a very important thing to think about. The entire exercise
(01:05:56):
is a thought experiment, an attempt to look at illegal
immage through the lens of simplicity. Regardless of whether the
numbers are distorted, underinflated, or politically manipulated, the point remains.
The cost to the US taxpayer is enormous. Imagine all
(01:06:18):
of the money that is being spent to remove felons
and people who should be sent out of the country.
Imagine how much expense we are paying for. And that
is on top of all of the Biden babies. That
was the people who came in twenty twenty five million
(01:06:38):
people coming into the country. Joe Biden was paying for
him on the front end, and now we are having
to deal with this on the back end. It's not
a partisan rant, it's a segmented breakdown of a quiet crisis. Okay,
so let's start with the numbers. Conservative estimates suggest that
(01:07:04):
there are over twenty million illegal immigrants currently residing in
the United States. Twenty million. Now, consider what it costs
to support a family of four in America. This is
a vitally important explanation, all right, You want to support
(01:07:28):
a family of four in the United States. Between housing, healthcare, education, food,
and transportation, the average annual cost for one group ranges
from eighty five thousand to one hundred thousand dollars a year.
(01:07:52):
Even if illegal immigrant households receive only a fraction of
these services, the cumulative cost is staggering. According to recent data,
the federal government spends roughly one hundred and fifty billion
(01:08:14):
dollars annually on illegal immigration net of tax contributions. State
and local governments add another one hundred and forty to
one hundred and eighty billion dollars. So right now, in
one year, we are carrying three hundred and thirty billion
(01:08:36):
dollars per year, which many believe, by the way, is
much higher than that. They think it's closer to five
hundred billion or higher. Divide that number by US taxpayers.
This is where it gets really important for you to understand.
(01:08:57):
Divide that number by the US taxpayers. So you have
one hundred and fifty million people who are paying taxes,
and you get a hidden tax of twenty two hundred
per person or forty four hundred per family. That's conservative.
If the true population of illegal immigrants is closer to
(01:09:20):
twenty five or thirty million, the cost per family could
exceed six thousand dollars annually. Do you have six thousand
dollars that you can just reach into your pocket and
grab right now. Probably not. That's not money spent on
your children's schools, your roads, your healthcare, your retirement. It's
(01:09:44):
a siphoning of resources from the United States to subsidize
a system that rewards law breaking and punishes accountability. You know,
it's it's it's crazy. Some argue that illegal immigrants pay
(01:10:05):
taxes that may in part be true through payroll deductions,
sales taxes, and even property taxes indirectly, but this argument
misses the deeper point. Every job held by someone unlawfully
present is a job not held by a citizen or
(01:10:25):
legal resident, right, So you have illegals who are taking
our jobs. You have illegal immigrants who claim that they're
paying taxes, but are they paying taxes. I don't know.
I'm not seeing their bottom line. That displaced American now
unemployed or underemployed, may rely on public assistance, Medicaid, snap
(01:10:50):
housing subsidies, funding by the same taxpayers who are told
that illegal immigrants, illegal aliens are contributing. The net effect
is not neutral. It is fiscal and moral deficit. Now
add on the cost to repatriate them out of our country.
(01:11:16):
We are funding both sides of the equation. We are
providing everything they want, everything they need, and then when
we go to deport them, we are funding everything they've got,
everything they need, police court costs. Just think about all
(01:11:43):
the stuff that goes on here. America is an incredibly
generous country, incredibly absolutely incredible to a fault. But who
do you want to have, Who do you want to
have where you want to take the money out of
(01:12:06):
your pocket? Six thousand dollars, seven thousand dollars, twelve thousand dollars?
How many of you want to just go ahead and
hand that over to somebody who came into this country,
who who may be a felon, who may be a rapist,
who may be a murderer, or maybe you know, just
a regular person who just wants to get the hook up.
Why should we do that? Name me a place where
(01:12:26):
we can go around the world and just suddenly set
up shop without getting our butts kicked. We are being
held to a standard that is impossible, impossible. The very
first thing yesterday that the Japanese Prime minister did the
(01:12:47):
first order of business yesterday in Japan. She's female. Do
you know what she did? The first order of business
was to begin sending people back to their countries because
she doesn't want to bear that cost. Why should anybody
(01:13:08):
have to bear that cost? Why not the country of
origin bearing that cost for those people? How about we
do it that way?
Speaker 3 (01:13:29):
You know?
Speaker 11 (01:13:29):
To day this toy is a night nice divides a day.
Speaker 1 (01:13:34):
Try to run, try to hide to the other side,
to the other except it's gonna cost you a lot
of money to break on through to the other side.
You can't even send them back. They gotta come here.
We can't go there. Why can't I go there? I
want to go there?
Speaker 7 (01:13:53):
All right?
Speaker 1 (01:13:54):
Robert, welcome to the program. What's on your mind? Robert?
Speaker 10 (01:13:58):
Listen? I got a question. Why do you say illegal land?
My grant?
Speaker 1 (01:14:02):
Have you been?
Speaker 10 (01:14:02):
Is that some sort of policy of the station.
Speaker 1 (01:14:06):
Why why would you say that, Well, the correct.
Speaker 10 (01:14:10):
Term and this is a government term and it's correct
illegal alien.
Speaker 1 (01:14:13):
Yeah, no, I used, I used to.
Speaker 10 (01:14:15):
Arrive and assimilates and learns the language and the culture
and takes on its few land. Yeah for going, it's
you know, previous uh existence on another confident.
Speaker 1 (01:14:25):
Well that way, that that's actually citizenship. That what you're
what you're laying out of citizenship.
Speaker 10 (01:14:29):
But go ahead, No, it isn't. Yes, No, you can
have a green card and never become a citizen and
say hear your whole life and learn language.
Speaker 1 (01:14:35):
Right, So why do you do that? I'm not. I
don't do anything.
Speaker 10 (01:14:39):
You call them I legal immigrance.
Speaker 1 (01:14:41):
Why I said, I call him illegal?
Speaker 10 (01:14:43):
It really makes my skin crawl. That's all I want
you to know.
Speaker 1 (01:14:46):
Hey, Robert, Hey, Robert, that's weak. Let me tell you
something I said. I said five different ways on that
last segment, and you're just you're just gonna come with that,
like seriously, why why are part of it? No? No, I
called I said illegal aliens were No. No, you know what, Robert,
(01:15:06):
here's the deal, here's the deal. What did he hang
up on me? Is this guy hanging out. Okay, good,
So so where did where did you? Where did you?
Where did you grow up?
Speaker 10 (01:15:16):
I grew up in South Georgia.
Speaker 1 (01:15:17):
You grew up in South Georgia. Okay, great. When's the
last time you went to the to the Mexican border?
Speaker 10 (01:15:24):
I went to Cancun last fall.
Speaker 1 (01:15:25):
Oh okay, And so what did you see in Cancun? No, no, where?
What did you see when you went into Cancun? Uh?
Speaker 10 (01:15:37):
Object? Poverty?
Speaker 1 (01:15:39):
Okay, So how did you feel about that?
Speaker 10 (01:15:43):
Well?
Speaker 1 (01:15:44):
I understand no, no, no, no, I'm I'm answering. I'm asking
the questions. What what bill it?
Speaker 15 (01:15:50):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (01:15:50):
How did you feel about seeing those people?
Speaker 10 (01:15:53):
I hated it that they wouldn't rise up against their
government that has suppressed them all those years of centuries.
Speaker 1 (01:15:59):
Okay, So what did you Why did you go? Why
did you go? Why did you go to Cancun?
Speaker 10 (01:16:07):
For expensive cigars and cheap women?
Speaker 3 (01:16:10):
So?
Speaker 1 (01:16:11):
Yeah, you're you're you're yeah, you're clever, man. I totally
get it. But why would you go to a place.
Speaker 10 (01:16:17):
In the politically correct term? That's all I'm asking.
Speaker 1 (01:16:20):
No, no, no, no, no, I'm not I'm not going to
let you go. I'm not going to let you go
this easily. I'm not going to let you go this
easily because you're insulting. You're trying to insult my show,
and I think I think that you No, no, I
want you no, I want you to marinate in this here. Okay,
because I didn't say the I didn't say a particular
word that you didn't like. You you want to you
want to cause a problem, So like, let's have it out.
(01:16:41):
Go ahead. So why did you go over there? You
went over to Cancun for what.
Speaker 10 (01:16:47):
Uh for vacation?
Speaker 1 (01:16:49):
For vacation. Okay, that's a trick question.
Speaker 10 (01:16:51):
I mean, come on, why did people go to Kankun.
Speaker 1 (01:16:53):
I've never I've never gone to Kancun. I wouldn't go
to Kankun. I think it's too dangerous over there. But
you went down there, right, you went down there.
Speaker 10 (01:17:02):
Yes, it's it's it's very dangerous.
Speaker 1 (01:17:04):
Okay, you know what, Here's here's the thing, here's the thing. Okay,
I'll see you later, man, You see right now, Robert,
you're done, dude, you're done. You don't want to have
a conversation. You want to you want to try to
be mister wise guy. Right, you're mister wise guy, I
go down to Cankun. All right, well that's great. You
go down to Cancun. And what did you go to
(01:17:26):
ghankuon for? You told us why you went down there.
Here's the deal, and I'm gonna I'm gonna offer this
up to you. Okay, okay, Robert, go do a podcast,
Go do fifty podcasts, Go do one hundred podcasts, Go
and do five hundred podcasts, and then let me pick
(01:17:50):
out one word that you say and make you defend
that because I, in the last segment spent the time,
I spent the time in that regard and I said
illegal alien, illegal immigrant. I wanted to cover all my bases,
(01:18:12):
but Robert only took one word from the conversation. And
I'm sorry, but that's not how it's got to be.
The way it's got to be is a discussion, a conversation.
Not everybody who's coming into the country should be in
this country, but not everybody who comes into this country
is an enemy. And that's the problem that you don't see. Okay,
(01:18:36):
you went down there to go kick it with women
and booze and whatever you wanted to do, and that's
totally fine, and that's totally great, and it's wonderful. But
the fact of the matter is the fact of the
matter is you went down there, you spent your money.
You didn't really want to talk about it because I
asked you twice, and so I'm just like sitting back
(01:18:57):
and I'm saying, how come Robert's so upset? You went
and had a great time. You grew up in South Georgia.
That's all I got to learn about you. But it's okay,
that's all right. The reality is, these are all human beings.
It doesn't mean that they should not be treated with respect.
(01:19:23):
It means that we should try to figure out a
way in which we can get along. I grew up
on the border. I used to go into Mexico. I
went into Mexico a hundred times, I'm sure, over the
course of my life. But I came back to the
United States, and I had friends who lived in Mexico
(01:19:44):
who would come into the United States and go to
school at a religious school, and then they would go
home at night. They're not the enemy. I'm not the enemy.
That's it. If that one word sets you off, I
have no power over that. News Talk eleven, ten ninety
(01:20:15):
nine to three WBT Brett Witterbull Show. Welcoming to the
program somebody whose work I've admired for a very long time.
He is Dick Morris, and he is joining us now
here today in Charlotte. Mister Morris, it's great to have
you on the program with me.
Speaker 16 (01:20:30):
Well, it's good to be here. It's great. Thank you
for having me.
Speaker 1 (01:20:32):
Oh, it's our pleasure. One of the things that I'm
very curious about is the book that you've been working on,
and it is the real Charlie Kirk. I understand that
you had a great relationship with him when it came
to trying to win the election in twenty twenty four.
(01:20:54):
Can you flesh that out for the audience? All?
Speaker 16 (01:20:57):
Yeah, He and I worked closely together during the twenty
four election on the under thirty vote. Trump got ten
points more of the under thirty vote in twenty four
than he got twenty ten points. We went from to
thirty six percent of the under thirty vote to forty
(01:21:18):
six percent, and that was a big, big factor in
Trump's wins. And I'm proud to work closely with Charlie
to done that, particularly in pushing his agenda that was
not compromising but was explained to people how the Christian
movement and politics interfaced in a really important way.
Speaker 1 (01:21:42):
One of the things that I think is fascinating is
the notion of mobilization via the faith and the ability
for him to make these connections with young people and
the ability to have that sort of patience. What was
your reaction to to seeing him when he would be
(01:22:03):
working with the with his peers.
Speaker 16 (01:22:05):
Well, he refused to be goaded into conflict and into
verbal war, and instead he took everybody at faith as
good faith and then spoke with him rationally about the
issues surrounding you and h and was just refreshing to
watch that. But I'm particularly concerned about how he died.
(01:22:26):
Uh and uh and and the and the the circumstances
that led to it. Sure, I think that the left
vitified him with the trans community.
Speaker 7 (01:22:39):
Uh.
Speaker 16 (01:22:39):
They found and they've found a group of people who
want to be want to be or as transsexual and
told them that the Christian right was fascists, was enazi,
was blocking their ability to exist and terrified them about
the power of the rat of the right and as
(01:23:01):
a Christian right, And it did that deliberately, I think,
to create an atmosphere among transsexuals that their very survival
was sick and that led to the decisions that demented
horrible assassin to kill Charlie Kirk. And I think that
(01:23:22):
when you set back and you look at it, the
only way in which Charlie Kirk tried to hurt the
transsexual community was simply telling them they can't participate in
men's in women's sports, and there was no admission quarters,
there was no discrimination, there was no prohibition against their practices.
(01:23:43):
He simply tried to stop them from invading women's sports,
and for that sin he was killed. And I think
that really what happened here was that the left needed
to create almost a strike force, if you will, transsexuals
who were enraged by the supposed it's discrimination they faced
(01:24:08):
at the hands of the Christian right, and it gimmed
them up to the protest to a point where they
actually committed murder. And I think that that trend is
going on in the country today, and I think it's
very very disturbing.
Speaker 1 (01:24:23):
Can you can can you flesh out the issues that
we're that we're seeing right now? Obviously, we just had
the No King's stuff that went on over the weekend,
by and large seemed to be you know, folks who
were just going out there and marching around and you know,
trying to show their unhappiness with Donald Trump. But but
(01:24:44):
are you concerned that this is going to magnify as
we get into twenty twenty six and beyond, Well, I.
Speaker 16 (01:24:51):
Don't know if it will magnify as a political issue.
We have to realize we're dealing here with a very
very fringe left wing group, but the but the the
left wing movement, the Democratic Party basically decided to tell
the trans community your very existence is at stake. They
(01:25:15):
are they're coming for you, and they're going to stop
you from living the lifestyle you want to live. And
there was enough truth in that that mobilized a lot
of these transsexuals into very violent activities and led to
Charlie Clok's assassinations. And I'm concerned that that process is continuing.
(01:25:36):
In fact, the Less used transsexuals as a hit squad
against the Christian right and by making them fantasize about
tremendous curbs to their livery that never were proposed, were
never happening, but they ascribed to Charlie Kirk into others
(01:25:57):
and motivated, demented people who insecure about their own sexuality
in this place to go out and buy a rifle
and murderer.
Speaker 1 (01:26:06):
Wow. Dick Morris, the real Charlie Kirk is the book.
It's it's always great to get your thoughts on these things,
if you'd indulge me in the last couple of moments here,
what has you? What has you more concerned? Mandami potentially
winning in New York or or Chuck Schumer and the
(01:26:29):
radicals there on the Democratic platform, Uh, leaving this government
shut down? What? What? What scares you more? Well?
Speaker 16 (01:26:38):
I'm seeing the government shutdown really as a Washington, DC
area problem. There are lots of people affected through out
the country, but it's basically a very localized industry because
government complex has become so focused on DC. So I
just think Schumer is going through a partisan's great largely
(01:27:01):
motivated by his desire to keep being the Democratic leader
and his worry that he appeared reasonable and settled everything
he would lose his leadership. But the Momdammi candidacy is
very different. It's a group of people who are completely
deluded about history and are willingly putting in power the
(01:27:25):
very people who were behind not just the World Trade
Center bombing of nineteen ninety three, but arguably the nine
to eleven attacks, and I'm very, very concerned about that.
I've been pushing voters to consider the third option, which
is Andrews, which is Curtis Leewa, who is the Republican.
(01:27:49):
The problem is that voters in New York City can't
stand Andrew Cuomo, and they've got a case. During the pandemic,
she made twelve thousand people leave hospitals where they were
safe and going to nursing homes where they were unsafe
and where they caught COVID and then they died and
he covered them up. He wouldn't testify, wouldn't accurately release
(01:28:13):
the count people who were dead. And I think that
but the stream that New Yorkers simply were not tolerate,
and in the course of it, they see a choice
between Man Dammy and Cromo, and they don't want a
horse in either of those races. So they are urging
them to consider Chris Sleewa, Curs Sleewad, who is the
(01:28:35):
Republican candidate who's moved in the polling up from about
nine percent of the vote to from ten percent the
vote to nineteen percent, you know, to away race, and
I think if people understand the dilimits they're facing, I
think that he has a good chance.
Speaker 1 (01:28:53):
Dick Morris, it's always a pleasure to speak with you.
I appreciate the time. The book is the real Charlie Kirk,
thank you so much for spending time was I'd love
to catch up with you again, so sir, thank you,
my pleasure.
Speaker 15 (01:29:04):
Absolutely, she calls me.
Speaker 11 (01:29:19):
Laughing with a favorite mask, Garstones.
Speaker 1 (01:29:24):
I'm coming too fast, there's talk eleven ten nine three WBT.
Thank you so much for joining us here today, and
thank you to Dick Morris for coming by. Lots of
stuff going on out there as we're breaking down the stories.
Everything will be fair game between now and the end
of the hour. Seven oh four five seven eleven ten uh.
(01:29:48):
One of the one of the things that just amazes me,
and this is something that has nothing to do with
necessarily with politics or anything like that, but when we
when we discover things that we didn't know, it's one
of the greatest things that we can do. And I
know it sounds like a vague sort of a take,
(01:30:10):
but just just follow me on this, okay, because I
think this is one of the things that's that's important.
And we have these these great chances to do incredible things,
all right, we have the access to create anything we
(01:30:32):
want to create. Now, if you really think about this
for a second, there really is no limit in the
United States of America. Like there's no limit at all.
And when we think about the fights that we have,
I'm not talking about like riot fights or anything like that,
but I'm talking about the skirmish lines. And maybe you
(01:30:52):
notice this too. The skirmish lines are basically the same
thing over and over and over and over and over again.
And that's a problem. It's a problem because we are
dealing with these same issues and we fight over the
same postage stamp. In that regard, I feel like what
(01:31:15):
Charlie Kirk was able to do was to expand expand
the ability to bring new people in. See, we tend
to do this thing where they say, hey, so are
what are you? Are you a Republican or are you
a Democrat? Are you an independent? What do you do?
(01:31:37):
Who are you?
Speaker 3 (01:31:38):
What is this?
Speaker 1 (01:31:39):
The only way you're going to really win people over,
I think, is to talk to them and try to
figure out where the pins are where they can connect, right,
so you can say something like, hey, so what do
you you know, what do you do for a living?
(01:32:00):
What are you doing? You gotta build this stuff. You
got to build up that sort of a relationship. Here's
here's the crazy thing. Charlie Kirk was able to do
that because he would listen to people. And you heard
that from Dick Morris. Mandami is a guy who's been programmed.
He's just been programmed to not answer certain questions. He's
(01:32:22):
just he's one of those people. People on the left
are very good at programming people. Kamala Harris, Joe Biden.
You can just you just you just tell them what
they have to talk about on that given day. I
like free thinkers. I like people who, on one account,
(01:32:43):
they want to see the country be strong. But there
are innovations that we can all do at the same time.
The most important part of the innovation conversation should be,
in my mind, innovating new ways to persuade people to
come to your line of thinking. I think that's an
important thing. You're never going to get somebody to believe
(01:33:06):
what you believe by beating them over the head or
browbeating them or yelling at him, or any of those
sorts of things. I look at these people in our
country who have absolutely no desire to see the country
(01:33:30):
succeed under Donald Trump. I do think that they want
to see the country succeed under somebody else that's not
Donald Trump, and there's not also JD. Vance. But I
also am old enough to remember on nine to eleven,
when we got hit so brutally hard and we suddenly
(01:33:55):
found out what it's like when we get attacked as
a tree. Everybody was saying that George Bush stole the election,
George Bush was hitler, George Bush was evil, and then
when you had the attack that took place on nine
to eleven, suddenly the stakes changed. I want to not
(01:34:17):
have to go through the catastrophe of the stakes. I
want to have the ability to persuade against the backdrop
of peace. That's all I want. Thanks to Isaac Anna
and Pam Breaking with Brett Jensen's next New Stock eleven
to ten, nine nine three