Violence, Funding Fear And More On The Brett Winterble Show

Tune in here to this Thursday's edition of the Brett Winterble Show! 

Brett kicks off the program by talking about the recent gun violence in Dallas and the broader issue of rising unrest in American cities. He frames the situation as part of a growing insurgency, arguing that loosely organized groups like Antifa, though not technically insurgents, are contributing to a destabilizing climate.

Later, Brett explores how historical examples of insurgencies and domestic extremism relate to current events, drawing comparisons to both left-wing violence in the 1960s and Civil War-era uprisings. He emphasizes the role of foreign funding, NGOs, and ideological networks in supporting radical movements and discusses methods typically used in counterinsurgency efforts—ranging from surveillance and legal action to community engagement. While acknowledging that a full-scale civil war is unlikely, he warns of continued destabilization unless action is taken

Listen here for all of this and more on The Brett Winterble Show!

For more from Brett Winterble check out his YouTube channel.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:16):
He's talk eleven, ten ninety three WVT Brett Winter Bull Show.
Wonderful to be here with you guys, spending time with
you breaking down all the big stories that are out there. So,
according to the United States Attorney, the gunshots that were
fired yesterday, he sprayed a bunch of bullets. The shooter's
gun was legally purchased last month. All this sort of

(00:37):
stuff is going on, and it's a shame to see
that it has gone to a place where there is
violence that is happening in America's big cities. This is
happening in a lot of different locations. This one is Dallas,
and it's because you have a group of people who
have been ordered, I think, to go out and to

(00:59):
foment an insurgency. And I think that's actually what the technology,
what the technical term is for what it is that
we're seeing happening. This is an insurgency. And I understand
that President Trump is going after Antifa. I understand that
he's saying that it's a terrorist organization. All that sort
of stuff are those are specific technical terms that need

(01:22):
to be utilized inside the way this sort of stuff happens.
So I'm going to go with the idea that there
is an insurgency in the United States. I do believe
we have an insurgency in the United States, and in
the same way that we've seen it in a variety
of other locations. Right We've seen insurgencies take place in

(01:44):
the Middle East. We've seen insurgencies take place in Afghanistan.
We've seen insurgencies take place in Europe. We've seen insurgencies
take place in America on American soil. This is a
This is a fact, and it's something that I think
we need to get our heads around. And for anybody
who doesn't know what an insurgency is, it's an attempt

(02:07):
to foment violence and to try to overthrow the government
of the United States. Now, it can be like three
dummies in a field someplace who decide they want to
be an insurgency can also be fifty thousand, one hundred
thousand people that are banding together to try to overthrow
the United States of America. So how do we stop this?

(02:31):
Because I do believe that the murder of Charlie Kirk
he was a victim of an insurgency. I do think
what we saw in Dallas that was a victim of
an insurgency. And these are folks that are engaging in
very sophisticated ways, in very sophisticated trainings, and they're being funded, right,

(02:54):
So that's what we have to do. So, like, let's
take this apart piece by piece for people who don't
know what an insurgency is. It's basically, if you read
the RAND Corporation, you can get a pretty good idea
of this. It's the most effective counterinsurgency called coin combining
military precision, political legitimacy, and community engagement. That's what you

(03:16):
do when you're trying to stop an insurgency. Okay, when
you're trying to stop an insurgency, you need to do
all of those things all at the same time. So
what you need to do if you want to stop
an insurgency in the United States, you have to undermine
the insurgents support. You have to cut off access to resources,
safe havens, and popular backing. There are ways that you

(03:39):
can do that. There are ways that you can do
it that are really really horrible, false flag operations things
like that. If that's what you wanted to do, you
could easily do that. But I don't think that that's
what's going to happen, Strengthen local governance, build trust in
the government through the reforms and anti corruption efforts, etc.
Use high quality sources, balance its force and persuasion, empower

(04:02):
local police and judiciary. Well, Brent, that doesn't sound like
anything that would happen in the United States of America. No,
you're right, that's absolutely true. It's absolutely true. But we
have had insurgencies in the United States. We have you
know how the Democratic Party was responsible for institutional slavery

(04:23):
and how they went about doing their business when they
decided that they were going to murder Abraham Lincoln and
Ensewared and the folks who were who were out there,
you guys remember that, right. So the stock and trade
of the Democratic Party, in addition to the ku Klux Klan,
was actually to break off from the United States of America.

(04:44):
That's why you had the Civil War. That's why you
had the Civil War. And so the Civil War between
eighteen sixty one and eighteen sixty five was a rebellion,
not a classic insurgency. I would argue it was probably
the second insurgency in the country because you had the
insurgency going on with Francis Marion and all the stuff
that went on with the American Revolution, the Reconstruction error resistance,

(05:10):
including the rise of the Ku Klux Klan, had insurgent characteristics,
and eventually that organization was basically broken up, but it
was supported very strongly by Democrats. I mean, all you
have to do is go to go to Woodrow Wilson
h and the fact that you know he was screening

(05:33):
all of these sorts of movies back in the day.
Domestic extremist groups have occasionally used insurgent tactics, but none
have sustained territorial control or popular legitimacy. The reason why
they didn't do that is because you had like something
in the in the form of Bill Ayres, who was
a well known terrorist organization person who was working with

(05:58):
the underground, right with the with the underground during the
Vietnam War. You also saw that there were bombings during
the nineteen sixties. You also saw something else that was
very important about all this as well, which was anybody
know what I'm going to say, which was the assassinations
of Martin Luther King, the assassinations of Malcolm X, the

(06:22):
assassinations of RFK and JFK, the assassinations the attempted assassinations
of Gerald Ford that all came out of the left.
That was all left wing terrorism that was going on
in that regard. The reason why you don't see a
whole lot of this kind of stuff is because, well,

(06:43):
everything has kind of gone underground, but it's also at
the same time gone into a very specific region of
how this stuff is handled. And it's the Internet. It's
all the stuff that people are now using in different ways.
But that doesn't mean that they're not terrorists. So how
do we counter insurgents? Well, if you're using the military,
you want to do targeted raids and intelligence led operations.

(07:06):
If you want to do something about the political side,
well you have to get right out in there and
persuade people to avoid those sorts of people. If you
want to know about how it is you fix this
in the community, well, community outreach, education, economic support, and
then of course you've got psychological things, counter narratives, amnesty programs,
and then legal prosecution and surveillance and civil protections. Now

(07:32):
the big question people are asking is is Antifa an insurgency.
Technically it's not. There is no head of the party,
head of the body. This is something that just goes
on and on and on and on, typically in blue cities.
It's a loosely organized protest movement. It is not a
unified armed rebellion, which makes this thing even more difficult.

(07:55):
It lacks territorial control, a centralized command, or a coherent
political platform. But I do know that inside the walls
of government they are being surveiled because everybody's being surveiled.
If you buy an airline ticket, you're being surveiled. If
you get on a bus, you're being surveiled. The only

(08:15):
pace you're not being surveiled is the is the the
rail here unfortunately, and we need that, We need them
to be surveiled. Most actions are episodic and symbolic. They're
not really trying to build out a punching bag war

(08:36):
sort of a thing. So what are we going to do?
I'm gonna tell you what we're gonna do, straight ahead.
I I all right talk eleven ten ninety nine three WBT.

(09:02):
It's the Brettwinerbull Show. It's good to be with you.
So I'm just I'm sick and tired of hearing you
know the whole the civil War is gonna break out again. No,
it's not the reason why it's not gonna happen again
is because people are too busy to have a civil war.
What's gonna happen is we're gonna We're gonna end up

(09:22):
kind of suffering in some ways by these leftists who
are trying to destroy all that is healthy and lovely
and good in the world. Okay, so here, here's what
we've got here. And and that was hyperbole. Don't get
all nuts, don't freak out. I'm just trying to explain
to people. Try to keep it even keeled, right, even keeled,

(09:45):
or maybe if you're a if you're a if you're
a fan of Eddie Vedder, we're gonna be even flow here. Okay,
how about that? All right? So this does look like
it's sort of like an insurgency, right You have these
organizations that are being very well funded, and I believe
from what I've been reading, this is funding that is

(10:06):
coming from around the world. Oh, what are you kidding me?
We've got people from around the world funding the insurgency
in the United States right now? Of course, what do
you think, who do you think is funding it? Nobody's
got any money here in the United States. They got
to go with the foreign governments. I am willing to bet.

(10:30):
I'm willing to bet that at a minimum, the people
who are funding these sort of ideological networks, the state sponsorship,
the illicit economies, those are all the ways you get
money to flood it into these people. So it's cash,
maybe it might be it might be some bitcoin in

(10:52):
there somewhere. So the common funding sources would be the
usual suspects. Iran, Russia, Pakistan, They've historically backed insurgent groups
for strategical leverage. Drug trafficking very popular to raise money,
Taliban farc trend de arragua. Right, you've got these groups

(11:16):
that are that are are dealing that kind of stuff.
Then you've got smuggling and extortion, right, black markets, kidnapping
for ransom, taxing local populations. And then you go into
these neighborhoods who might be feeling left out, and you
go to the diaspora donations. Right, ethnic or religious communities

(11:38):
abroad sometimes will fund insurgents out of a loyalty or
out of aggrievance. Now it's not a secret that Europe
has changed a whole lot, and places like New York City,
Los Angeles, Chicago, Minneapolis, they have also changed a whole lot.
And that happens pretty much, you know, on a regular basis,

(12:00):
people move in, people move out, and then here is
the circle you want to have on the sheet, NGOs
and charities because if you go back in time to
the Obama administration, and I'm not I'm not slagging Obama.
I'm not going after Obama. But I'm just gonna point
something out to you. If you go back to, uh,
to the Obama administration, back when they that first flow,

(12:23):
that first insane flow of people started coming up into
the United States. Uh, there were all these organizations that
were being funded. Uh. They would they would house them
in churches and things like that. But what they would
do is they would go out and they would they
would get money from the big, bad evil people that

(12:45):
you know by name that I will not say, uh,
and they would say things like yeah, no, no, we're
gonna We're gonna. Yeah, We're with the Sinfrontetras organization. We're
taking all these people up to Chicago. Has Bola receives
funding from Iran. They also run businesses and charities globally.
Isis they used oils smuggling back in the day antiquity

(13:07):
sales that's why they were stealing all that stuff when
they were raiding over in Syria and then extortion to
build their war chest. But when you get to the
Antifa thing here, Okay, this is where we end up
with a difficult sort of connection that can be made.
Because the president wants to say that Antifa is behind
all of these attacks. I don't believe that it's exclusively Antifa.

(13:31):
Maybe Antifa is doing some stuff, but I think that
there are actual, real bad dudes who are behind killing
guys like Charlie Kirk and other people like that. I
think that that is happening. Antifas not centralized. So you
just go buy a black T shirt, you go get

(13:51):
yourself a crowbar, and then you start pounding a cop
on a corner, right, Or you go break a window,
or you do that sort of stuff, or you beat
up old people or children, or you beat up conservatives. Right.
It's something they're trying to drive people out of the
public sphere. So what are the funding channels that they've got.

(14:12):
Antifa International they provide bail and legal defense and tactical
gear for activists, weapons, et cetera. It raises money via Patreon,
fund Raser or Razor Action Network merchandise sales. There's a
lot of people that want to walk around with shirts
that say kill fascists. I don't know if these people

(14:34):
ever define who the fascists are that they're wanting to kill.
International Anti Fascist Defense Fund. They've got lots of money
and twenty two countries are part of that. Is this
all publicly known stuff? I mean this is you could
read articles about this. The Torch Network, a US based
coalition that directly supports Antifa International for donations, and then

(14:56):
the worst of the worst, right the lawyers that get
in there and they try to help them out and
get them out and all that sort of stuff. There
has to be a strategic insight, though, if you want
to try to fix this, if you're building, if you're
building for this, if you're looking at this, how do

(15:17):
you stop any of this? Well, I'll tell you, and
I'll tell you straight ahead. News Talk eleven to ten, nine,

(15:38):
nine to three WBK. How about a little business news
for you. Tech companies have raised one hundred and fifty
seven billion dollars so far this year in public US
bond markets. That is up seventy percent from what they
issued in the same period last year. According to Bloomberg,

(16:00):
this is Lisa Bramowitz talking about this. Big tech firms
have huge cash flows but also a pretty heavy cap
X need over the next five to ten years. You
want to know something that's absolutely incredible. If you look
at let's say, twenty twenty, twenty twenty, not the not

(16:21):
the old TV show twenty twenty, I'm talking about twenty
twenty of the year when we had when we got
hammered by COVID. Uh, you had almost two hundred billion dollars.
When Trump was president, you had almost two hundred billion
dollars in that money coming into the economy. Twenty twenty
one dropped down one hundred and fifty billion. Then when
Joe Biden came into office, it was flaccid and terrible

(16:45):
and awful. It was it was seventy five billion, sixty billion,
It was seventy billion, and then and then in twenty
twenty five, now we're one hundred and fifty seven billion.
What is it? There's something about it. So Joe Biden
just he's just very slow. It's just it's not working.

(17:07):
Didn't work, It did not work. But the point is
we've got stuff happening here. The economy is doing well.
The problem is a guy called Chuck Schumer. Oh, Chuck Schumer,
Holy cow, Chuck Schumer. He wants to shut the government down.

(17:27):
Raise your hand if you want the government to be
shut down. I mean, I think all of us want
the government to be shut down. But you know what
I'm saying. You understand what I'm talking about. You're picking
up what I'm dropping. Right. We are having to prepare
for the Schumer shutdown. Do you know what he wants?
Does anybody know what Chuck Schumer wants? I know what

(17:49):
Chuck Schumer wants because he said what he wants. He
wants you to give him one point seven trillion dollar
that he can spend one point seven trillion dollars. See,
he doesn't understand that we're no longer in that business.

(18:09):
I have this I have this vision in my head.
I have this vision because the President of the United
States and JD. Vans that's the vice President. For people
who don't know, they're gonna sit down with Chuck Schumer,
and here is what I want. I had a nice
conversation earlier today with David Bossi over at Citizens United

(18:29):
and what I want to see happen, and I think
there's a chance that this can happen. All right, I
want I want President Trump and jd Vance to put
Schumer in a chair in the in the Oval office.

(18:50):
Do you know where I'm going? Okay, Isaac does not
know where I'm going. So I want them to sit
Chuck Schumer in the chair. You can put Hakeem Jeffreys
off Kai kind of to the side because he's in
the house. Schumer's the guy that's holding up everything. Okay,
do you remember this phrase? Have you ever heard this

(19:11):
phrase before? You don't have the cards. You don't have
the cards. Look, you don't have the cards. Don't you understand?
Aren't you? Are you ungrateful? You don't have the cards.
We have the cards. You don't have the cards. You
don't have any cards. What I want you to do
is to go and get me some one point seven
trillion dollars so that I can give it to Chuck Schumer.

(19:34):
That's what I need.

Speaker 2 (19:35):
No.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
See, I'm not making fun of Zelenski anymore, because Zelenski's
one savage Right now, he's making those Ruskies nervous. He's
getting it done. Things are happening. You got drones of plenty,
you got all this kind of stuff. But I want
Donald Trump and JD. Vance to bring the cameras in

(19:56):
and look at Chuck Schumer, that sad Sacks sitting in
the chair, and I want him to say, Chuck, you
don't have the cards. I'm not giving you one point
seven trillion dollars. We're not giving people money like that anymore.
It's not how it goes anymore. That's not what's gonna happen.
I want them to give him the Zelenski treatment because

(20:16):
Chuck Schumer will sit there. I don't know if you
ever noticed Chuck Schumer. I try not to, but I
do look at him when he's on TV. Chuck Schumer.
I watched him once upon a time go into the office,
the Oval Office. I think it was twenty nineteen, twenty twenty,
when they were threatened to shut stuff down, and Chuck

(20:38):
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi went in there to try to
like talk to the president. President ate their lunch. He
he ate their lunch, I mean one hundred percent. So
what I want to see is I want to see
a revision. I want to see the reprise of what
happened when Zelenski came in and they were all yelling

(21:00):
at him because Chuck Schumer is only known for one thing,
not knowing what he wants. He doesn't know what he wants.
He does not know how to make cheeseburgers on the grill.
He doesn't. He doesn't do any of that stuff at all.
It's just this is this is such an annoying thing.
And the more he gets frustrated, the further down his
face his glasses go. I watched him one time. It

(21:23):
started on on the on the on the the cook
of his of his uh you know, of his nose,
and then it went down further, and then it went
to the upper lip, and then by the end of
the of the back and forth it was it was
basically just being held up. It was. It was amazing.
I mean it was amazing. He is he is one
of the greatest prop comics of all time. He just

(21:45):
comes out he says things that don't make any sense.
We had that clip yesterday, didn't we have that clip yesterday?
I think we had that clip yesterday or the day
before when he said I'm willing to meet Donald Trump
even on the golf course, and that joke flattened. It
just didn't do anything for him. So what you're gonna
need to do. You need to prepare now, okay, and

(22:05):
I want everybody in the sound of my voice to
prepare now. And what you have to do is, if
it looks like it's gonna be a shutdown, get ready,
because President Trump's got something up his sleeve. Do you
know what he's got up his sleeve? Oh boy, I
can't wait to tell you what he's got up his sleeve.
He's got a plan. He has got a plan, and
it's going to actually be so much worse for Schumer

(22:29):
and Hakeem Jeffreys than anything that has happened before. Because ah,
sometimes you care and then sometimes you don't have many
to give sort of President Trump's got it. Do you
have that clip? Give me that clip, Go right ahead.

Speaker 2 (22:52):
We'll even come to the golf course.

Speaker 1 (22:56):
A what's wrong with him? If I was you know what,
if I was President Trump, I'd invite Chuck Schumer to
the golf course and I'd say, we're gonna take nineteen
nineteen holes. You win whatever you win, You're gonna win
that amount of money and make it like ten million

(23:20):
for each of the wins that Chuck Schumer gets and
just bring him out there be like, come on, buddy,
will you go to the golf course. We'll even come
to the golf course. News Talk eleven ten, not a
nine three WB. Take just imagine Chuck Schumer, a King, Jeffries,

(23:43):
maybe Nancy Pelosi. They all make their way to go
to the White House. They want to sit down. They
want to sit down. They want to talk to the
President of the United States. They want to talk to
jd Vance, they want to talk to Marco Rubio. Everybody
else is in the room and in walks in walks
Chuck Schumer to sit down, to try to say to
the president, dictate terms to the president, and and it
goes something like this, very good, it's very strong influence.

(24:07):
You're right now, not in a very good position. You've
allowed you to be in a pretty bad position, to
be right about the word beginning of the war. Not
in a good position. You don't have the cards right
now with us. You start having right now, you do.
You're gambling with the lives and millions of people. See,

(24:27):
you're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World
War three. That that's what the President's going to do
to Chuck Schumer. I'm serious, He's going to do that
to Chuck Schumer. But they're not playing card. They're not
playing they're playing cards for money. Because Chuck Schumer wants
one point seven trillion dollars, Where is he going to

(24:49):
get it? Where does he get the six trillion to
one point seven trillion dollars? I mean, I just I'm
just sitting back here and I'm like, going, what the heck?
What is going on with this guy? He thinks he
can call the tune. There is no tune to be called.
And here's the problem. Here's the problem. And ladies and gentlemen,

(25:10):
I know sometimes you might get a little bit nervous
when people are talking about, Okay, maybe there's gonna be
a government shutdown, so let me help you, let me
help you, help you right here? Okay, this is going
to make you understand how important this fight is between
Trump and Schumer. All right, So there's a memo that

(25:30):
was shared with agencies on Wednesday by the Office of
Management and Budget, and they are saying that if the
discretionary funding laps on October the first, and no alternative
sources available, what's going to happen is the OMB. Office
of the OMB has told the agencies to get ready

(25:51):
for permanent reductions, meaning they will cut people and they're
not going to bring them back. President Trump has said, Okay,
if Schumer wants to play, it's not chicken. It's just
it's a suicidal mission that he's going on. He is
going to have to be responsible for the people that
lose their jobs. Now, this is very important. I have

(26:16):
to underline this in a big way because you're going
to start to hear the panic police going on all
these different cable channels. But I want to say something here.
I want Isaac, I want you to to flag this
for future because I know somebody will call and will
say that this is not true. No, this is true.
Listen to this, folks. According to Politico, core services including

(26:44):
very important. Please understand what I'm saying, Social Security, Medicare, veterans' benefits,
military operations, law enforcement, immigration enforcement, and air track control
will continue regardless of any shutdown. Those people are still

(27:07):
gonna get their money, They're still gonna get the stuff
that they need. All of that. They're gonna try to
tell you that shut the government down, and it's really terrible. No,
Chuck Schumer is demanding ransom. He wants one point seven
trillion dollars in ransom. So when they come around and
they tell you the old people are dying, they're dying

(27:30):
because there's no food. They have food, they have everything
they need, it's Chuck Schumer who wants to try to
hist the bank and say, give me one point seven
trillion dollars. Do you trust Chuck Schumer with one point
seven trillion dollars? This is Politico talking about this. This

(27:50):
is Politiko. So what's gonna happen is if Schumer decides
he's gonna pull the trigger and he's going to blast
all of those people. Those people are gonna get are
gonna get furloughed, they're gonna get sent down the line.
They're gonna get sent down the line. And Chuck Schumer
has how many cards? Does he have cards? Does Chuck

(28:12):
Schumer have cards? I don't think he's got any cards.
I don't think he's got any cards. I don't think
he's If he does this deal with Trump, he can
start to get cards. He can start to get the cards.
You don't have the cards right now. I mean you could,
but but he could get the cards at another point.
You don't have the cards right now, that's not what's happening.
And Chuck, you didn't even wear a suit. Come in

(28:33):
with a suit. What are you doing? Why are you
wearing a turtleneck? Come on, now, this is crazy. We
don't need this, this is this is amazing. I've got
something else for you though, even better, What could possibly
be even better than what I just told you so
far in this hour? Oh? Anybody in here, anybody in

(28:59):
this audience. Did any of you watch the Charlie Kirk memorial?
You did? Many of you in this audience watched it.
It was streamed, It was in a variety of locations
where you could see it. You could see it on Fox,
can see it on news Max, you can see it
on Breitbart. All of that, there was a person who

(29:19):
showed up that wasn't expected to show up. Anybody know
who that was? Do you know who it was? Well,
for those of you who may not remember, there is
a man. There is a man who is familiar to
many people who voted for Donald Trump. Elon Musk. So

(29:45):
this happened next? Oh, oh, you guys don't know You
guys don't know about the Elon Musk thing that's happening. Oh,
there's an Elon Musk thing that's happening. No, no, for real,
like a real Elon Musk thing that's happening. And it's
a fascinating thing that's about to occur. As the lightning

(30:10):
strikes in one spot, people who do not have vision
run to the spot over and over again where the
lightning struck. You have to keep your eyes open to
see where the lightning is going to strike next. I'm
going to tell you in the beginning of this next
hour where the lightning is going to strike next. And

(30:34):
it is beautiful News Talk eleven, ten ninety nine to

(30:55):
three WBT. It is great to be with Thank you.
Seven oh four five seven zero eleven ten. Hour number
two underway and we've got something new. We've got something
new and interesting and this is what it is. You
ready for this? I hope you're ready. Elon Musk is

(31:18):
coming back into the fold. Elon Musk is back at
the White House. But he's not doing the thing that
you think he might be doing. He's not doing the
thing like that. He's doing something different. He's doing something
absolutely incredible and it's going to be ridiculous. Trump administration reunites.

(31:44):
Oh no, why did my sound come up here? I
have sound coming up here? How did that happen? Oh
I can't.

Speaker 2 (31:50):
I got rid of it.

Speaker 1 (31:51):
There we go. Trump administration reunites with Elon Musk in
pursuit of AI dominance. Oh suddenly, suddenly he's quiet. He
doesn't want to talk about it. Once upon a time,
Isaac hated the AI. Now he's now he's all about

(32:15):
the AI. Now, come on now. Trump administration reunites with
Elon Musk in pursuit of AI dominance to benefit the country. WHOA, So,
what's gonna happen? Here's what's gonna happen. The Trump administration
agency that manages the government's real estate holdings, procurement, and

(32:37):
technology services is now partnering with Elon Musk's x AI
in a move that it says will cost effectively streamline
federal workflow. He's going to cut all of the fat
out of the federal stuff that's going on there. The

(32:58):
General Services Administration an aka GSA announced on Thursday that
federal agencies will now have access to GROCK four and
GROCK four fast as part of an agreement with XAI.
Valid until March of twenty twenty seven, that Musk says

(33:21):
will make government drive innovation in government. XAI has the
most powerful AI computing and the most capable AI models
in the world. They're now using this. They're going to
use this. They are using this so that folks can

(33:41):
get stuff done. AI is now unlocked for every federal agency,
empowering the US government to innovate faster and accomplish its
mission more quickly. He's very excited about what this looks like.
Josh Greenbaum, a Federal Acquisition Survey Commissioner at the General
Services Administration, explained in a press release that the new

(34:05):
widespread access to AI models is an essential tool not
just in fulfilling Trump's promise to the United States that
we will win the AI race, but also for building
the efficient, accountable government that taxpayers deserve. Do you remember
the bad old days when Musk came in and they

(34:28):
started going through all the two hundred and fifty year
old people that were still getting checks. Do you guys remember.
I mean, in some ways this is like a walk
towards a walk around memory lane, right, because we're talking
about you don't have the cards. Chuck Schumer now we're
doing AI over here. Nobody's able to keep up with
the with all of this stuff that's happening because there's

(34:51):
a lot of innovation that's happening here in real time,
and real time is an important thing to understand. You know.
You get these people that go, yeah, you know, we're
gonna fix this. We're planning on having the new systems
put in in thirteen years. No, you need it a
week from yesterday. Okay, you need to have that going

(35:11):
in that regard. They're trying to make this a much
different sort of way. And the beautiful thing about this is,
and it's very important to understand this, the beautiful thing
about this is once this gets embedded in the systems,
Gavin Newsom's not gonna go and rip the stuff out.

(35:31):
President Gavin Newsom's not gonna do it. President boot Edge
Edge Edge is not gonna go and do it. It's
not gonna become all the Harris going in there and
pulling that stuff out, because this is like, this is
all good stuff. This is the stuff that you need
that's gonna get you to be more efficient. You don't
have to worry about any of the stuff I eh

(35:52):
okays anybody got a quarter, I gotta I gotta make
a I gotta make a copy. Nobody does that using technology.
You're using people who are, you know, knowledgeable in these
events and the way this stuff is going. But at
the same time, you've got all this other stuff that's happening,
including but not limited to the stuff that's happening with

(36:13):
running down these terrorists that are trying to wreck our country. Now,
I'm just wondering, I'm just supposing. I'm just wondering, what
sort of approach could they also utilize when it comes
to try to start tracking the bad folk, the people

(36:35):
who are trying to make the country less safe. If
you've got those guys in position and they're ready to
be able to pull that kind of stuff, that's a big,
big deal. You're taking this technology and you're making this
something very very different than it would have been in
the past, in the future, and all that sort of stuff.

(36:57):
You're actually seeing where the next moves are going to be. Remember,
the President said, he vowed that they were going to
be the people who were going to be on top
of that technology, that we were going to be the
ones that were going to be pushing for that technology.
And we were going to be using that technology in

(37:18):
a very wholesome way. Here's the other problem. In that
speech that he gave at the United Nations a couple
of days ago, he was talking all about how you
can't even get air conditioning in Europe now because the
energy is too expensive. We are blowing everything up in
terms of energy. We're building Elon Musk and those guys,

(37:39):
they're doing many reactors, they're doing all this stuff that's
happening now, and we're going to be absolutely energy independent.
We already are, but it's going to be even bigger
because we have to be able to fund and find
and push and get the energy for all of this
stuff that's going on here. It's going to be a

(37:59):
remarkable I think at some point we're going to be
net exporters of energy to other countries that that want
to be a part of this. My gosh, the Canadians,
you know, they're they're they're they're slogging trying to get
enough energy. Same thing in Mexico, same thing in Europe.
Same thing. And we're the we're the people that are

(38:22):
setting the tune and setting the tone, which is what
you want.

Speaker 3 (38:33):
Hey, mom said, will you move, make you swastle, make
you groo.

Speaker 1 (38:53):
News Talk eleven ten nine three WBT, name that way Money.
Good to be with you. Let's jump out and take
some calls. I want to talk to some people. I'm
all about the people and welcome to the program. What's
on your mind today, Anne.

Speaker 4 (39:12):
I'm wondering what happened to Nancy.

Speaker 1 (39:14):
She's disappeared, hasn't she? Well, you know she she she's
still I think she's still dabbling in the markets a
little bit. You know, she's but she's not. But she
doesn't really have any Uh, she doesn't have any real
power at this stage in the game, right because you've
got Hakeem Jefferies running the operation. So what do you think?
What do you think she's up to? And what do

(39:35):
you think she's Uh, she's she's scheming for I'm thinking
that she might be getting another face job or.

Speaker 4 (39:44):
Or if or maybe she's ill.

Speaker 5 (39:46):
No, I don't, I mean, how long can you go?

Speaker 1 (39:49):
Well? I saw her, I saw her. I saw her
someplace in a couple not in person, but on on
a on an event a couple of days ago. And
I think she's I think she know what, Look, she's
probably got she probably doesn't have any place else to go,
so she's probably just hanging out in DC because now
it's safe baby eating. I remember she had those two

(40:10):
giant frigate refrigerators and it was like super expensive ice cream,
and oh my my lord.

Speaker 4 (40:16):
You're proud of it.

Speaker 1 (40:17):
Well, you know what I think is going on. I
think because President Trump made DC safe, everybody's hanging out
in DC now they're not going back home. That's that's
what I think is happening. That's a great that's a
great take, though.

Speaker 2 (40:28):
Anne.

Speaker 1 (40:28):
I appreciate you calling on the show today. I like
you too. Thank you very much. Robert, Welcome to the program, Robert.

Speaker 2 (40:38):
Hey, Brett, you bring it every night.

Speaker 1 (40:40):
Dog, Thank you, man. I appreciate that very very much.
What's on your mind?

Speaker 2 (40:44):
Yes, sir, what's your laying down? I'm picking up alright?
Ey I I heard you suggest that maybe maybe the
president and maybe the vice president, and just to put
a third person in there. Who I thought about, maybe
Mike Johnson, because Mike Johnson always knows the details, he
knows all the players. Let's just have them go at

(41:07):
it with three Democrat principles, as you said, Mike Shumor Jeffries.
And then in the spirit of the Ryder Cup, which
is going to be of course the team competition this weekend,
maybe bring in AOC is the third on their side.
Oh yes, it would be huge. I mean for anybody

(41:28):
who's a political person, that would just be like the
super Bowl. But Brett, as you know, the the Democrats
and and their and their their voters, uh, they like
to talk about these days about we will fighters, uh
we and and I just really think Brett that if
it came down to to that, to that that little

(41:53):
potential contest, I'm not sure that those three Democrats would
would would engage in it because I'm not I'm just
not sure they have the guts or the brains to
really have at it with with those three g O
P principles.

Speaker 1 (42:10):
So so you're using, you're utilizing something that that has
been lost to the to the history, uh for a
period of time. And it's the old move where where
you don't really want to fight the guy, but you
tell your friends to hold you back, hold me back,
hold me back. I'm going to get this guy, and
you're just relying on them holding you back. You don't
really want to get in the fight. You just want
to look like you're trying to work hard to get

(42:31):
in the fight.

Speaker 2 (42:34):
Right. Well, I uh, I mean AOC, she's she's charismatic,
but I don't I don't think she knows the issue
is well enough. No, Schumer is a nice enough guy.
No teams A team's kind of a fighter. But uh,
But of course j D when he's sitting there across
from Aird one as he was today, he is always ready,

(42:58):
and Trump's always ready and Johnson. Johnson just knows all
the minutia. So it was great to see. And but
I just I don't think the Democrats would would would
would go for it.

Speaker 1 (43:13):
Well, listen, We're gonna have to see what happens, because
I do think the White House is ready for this,
ready to try to do everything that they can to
try to push back on this. And the idea of
one point five or one point seven trillion dollars getting
put in there, that is that is something that that's
a problem. And there is a huge part of this

(43:34):
that people are not really focusing on, and that is
the fact that we we allowed Joe Biden and Vice
President and President Obama to do those three hundred and
fifty billion dollars sweeteners to knock the cost down to
be able to continue the Obamacare set up. And then

(43:54):
they never they never finished the job in any other
sort of way, so that that price is just going
to be a exploding coming coming do at any moment.
Great stuff from you there, Robert. I appreciate you calling
in on the program today. You always you always give
us great, great, great perspectives, and that that's what what
I really love about talking to the to the people here.

(44:16):
There's an interesting story coming out of Central Park in
New York City, and this is a remarkable thing. It's
I mean remarkable is not overly used in this story.
Meet the escaped parakeet that is now hanging out with

(44:36):
wild sparrows in Central Park. How about that? So you've
got an escaped parakeet who is who is hanging out
with wild sparrows in Central Park and there's a concern
about this parakeet. The parakeet has kind of gone native

(44:56):
with these with these other wild sparrows, and they're afraid
that with winter approaching, with winter approaching, you're gonna have
a problem. Turns out, I mean, it escaped parakeet joined
a flock of sparrows and has been living free in
the wilds of Central Park for the past month, but

(45:17):
the bright Green Birdie only has a few short weeks
before the incoming cold weather threatens her life. Birders are
desperately trying to capture the parakeet, and they're trying to
do that. And I got to tell you, I mean,
it's remarkable when you think about this, I mean, for

(45:39):
its own safety so it doesn't have a face, and
New York winter conditions and all this sort of stuff.
I've got some ideas, I've got some feelings, I've got
some thoughts. She's become a sparrow. She was once just
a parakeet, and she's now become a sparrow. I don't
know if that's about transsort of birding literally, but she

(46:04):
doesn't know what's coming. She just doesn't know. You know
what this means, ladies and gentlemen. It means only one thing.
When you sit down and you listen to a great
band like this and you think about the bird, I
guess it turns out it is a bird that you

(46:26):
can change. News Tug eleven to ten nine and nine

(46:47):
three WBT Brett Witerable show, Good to Be with you. Okay,
we got we got feedback when we were talking about
the bird that could that could not change, but it
has changed, uh into a from a parakeet into another
kind of a bird. We got a comment here that said,
I would be more afraid of that parakeet. That they're
going to teach the other birds to talk and to

(47:08):
start a revolution planet of the birds. Very possible, very
very possible. You know a lot of people, you know
I'm I'm somebody who loves pretty much all animals. I
like all the animals pretty much. There's some that I
don't like. I wouldn't do anything to them, like like
snakes and stuff. I'm not a snake's guy, never been

(47:29):
a snake's guy. Don't want to be a snakes guy.
I think the most exotic thing that I would want
to have, if I was ever going to have as
a companion or a pet, I would have a monkey.
Yeah that you can teach them things. They can iron
your they can iron your shirts, they can there's a
lot of stuff that they can do. And then they
get mad, rip your face off. They don't wait there,
they're not You feed them and they're nice. If there,

(47:51):
If you what do you. What do you think I'm getting.
I'm getting like a giant, like a giant, like King
Kong in my house. No, a little, a little like
a spider monkey. They're poisonous. Those aren't poisonous? Oh? Oh,
spider musk, spider monkey. Yeah, I'm saying, I like I like,
I like spider Man. My grandfather had two monkeys in
World War two. What, Yeah, for real, that's I'm not

(48:15):
I'm not making that up. He had He had two monkeys,
had a mother monkey and a daughter monkey. And the
reason why he had it he was stationed in India
in World War two right over the side of right
right over the line from Burma the China Burma India territory.
And so the reason why he had a monkey, he

(48:36):
had two monkeys was if they ever had a bug out,
he had purchased them. If they ever had a bug out.
He knew that whatever the monkeys could eat, he could
eat if if you had to like live off the land,
they were not gonna eat poison. They were not going
to do something like that, which I think is kind
of cool. This is the coolest story I've ever heard.

(48:58):
I know, I you know what I think, I think
I can get the picture. I have a picture of
him with them. I got to. I'll show it to
you sometimes, or maybe I won't because you know, it's
kind of it's personal. See, oh these things. It was
two monkeys, but then he was but at the end
of the war he had to leave them. What yeah, well, yeah,
he had to leave them. You couldn't take it. Are
you gonna take them? And she gets citizenship after all that.

(49:18):
You know, they were they were I guess they were released.
They were released out back to they were they were
wild originally, but but he tamed them and that stuff.
So you know, that's what you get. What kind of
monkeys were they? Know? I No, not gorillas, you be
ripping up the entire camp. No babboons. No, it's not

(49:41):
like I mean like that stuff. But but but my
point is, I like, I'm I'm I'm very pro animal.
I like animals. I like animals more than people sometimes
most sometimes some of the times.

Speaker 4 (49:55):
I do.

Speaker 1 (49:55):
I mean, it depends, all right, And this is my
way of pivoting over here. And I want to I
want to, you know, I don't want to keep everything
like to too hot and hot and bothered and crazy
and stuff like that. But I sent Isaac a message
earlier today and he didn't answer me back. Isaac. Isaac
did not Yeah, Isaac didn't mention. He didn't answer me back.

(50:20):
I'm officially alarmed, not because Isaac. I think Isaac is
probably as afraid as I am at this stage of
the game. I don't like what I'm starting to see
here with the uh yes, of course you know who
it is. Say it with me, Say you like it? Uh,
three eye at Lis, three I at lis. Did you

(50:43):
read the article that I sent? Did you read it?
I clicked on it. Okay, this is beginning to really
freak me out. A major anomaly as interstellar object three
eye at Liss. They're saying this thing, whatever this thing is,

(51:05):
because some people think it's an object. Some people think
it's I think it's a it's a something else. Okay.
They think it's a potentially a craft. It might be
a craft, it might be something coming out of space,
it might be something like that. Three I at Lias
has been measured. We have the technology to measure three

(51:29):
I at lists and apparently three I at Liss is
measured to be over thirty three billion tons. That's supposedly
how big this thing is. That is supposedly the size
of this measuring the objects non gravitational acceleration. The team

(51:54):
believes they found something something anomalous. Did you see how
big this thing is? This thing is measured to be
over thirty three billion tons. They don't know if it's
a craft or a thing that's just out there banging
around just for reference. Is there anything we can point

(52:15):
to is thirty three billion tons? Yeah? Probably, I bet you.
I mean, I bet there's stuff on the Earth that. Yeah,
like every person in own it, but not the people.
But I'm saying, but like maybe like Greenland, it could
be Greenland. It plays as much as Greenland. No, I'm guessing,
I mean it could. It could be, you know, it
could be. I mean, California might weigh that much. I mean,

(52:40):
I don't know. A new study attempted to pin down
the properties of the interstellar comet three I Atlas, finding
it anonymous, noise, I'm sorry, anomalossly massive at thirty three
billion tons. That's tons, that's not thirty three billion pounds.

(53:04):
On July first, astronomers spotted an object moving through the
Solar System at nearly twice the velocity of previous interstellar visitors.
The object, which was confirmed to be an interstellar comet
with its own dusty coma or comma, and suspected to
be far larger than the previous two, with a then

(53:27):
estimated nucleus the rocky part of the comet excluding its coma,
of about five point six kilometers in size, which would
be about three and a half miles in size. It's
three and a half miles across, So you could, just

(53:48):
to put things in perspective for Isaac, you could go
out and you could you could run cross country, an
entire cross country trek. Sizing comets comments, I'm sorry. Sizing
comets is tricky business. It's tricky. He's not here today,

(54:09):
primarily because to do so, you need to distinguish the
comet from the coma. As comets approach the Sun in
their orbit and heat up, they outgas. That happens to
me sometimes when I eat too much, losing gas, and
later when they are even closer to the Sun dust

(54:30):
which forms their distinctive trail or coma comma. This outgassing
ask acts like a thruster because the gas is coming
out and it's going like that that's the exact official
sound in space can complicate the measurements, but it can

(54:50):
also provide key clues. In a new paper which has
not yet been peer reviewed. Okay, so this could be nonsense.
From Harvard's Richard Kloedi and Avi Ube and Peter Verrez,
the team looked at the data compiled by the Minor
Planet Center. That's why they're saying it's a planet. That's

(55:11):
why they're saying it's a planet. Remember the two days ago,
three days ago, we were tebout. We were saying, this
thing is possibly a plan it coming our way. Do
we have the cards for this? Do we have the cards? Okay,
hypothetical open question for the audience, I'm dead serious about this, Okay,

(55:35):
for real, this is a real question. I want you
guys to answer for me. Let's say we find out
this thing is coming and we know it's like it's
definitely coming and it's probably not going to be friendly
or any of that sort of stuff. Does that in
any way, shape or form. Seriously, do we end up
with our globe getting all together there on the same

(56:01):
page and fighting for the planet, Like, do we get China, Russia, Pakistan,
all the bad people all the bad sort of things.
And do we get like a massive army that gets
together because it's like, hey, this is it, let's go,
or do we get sold out by some of these tricksters.

(56:23):
I wonder about that. I wonder about that. All right.
We got a lot of commentary, a lot of commentary happening,
especially from the people who have opinions on this, on

(56:44):
this thing that's going out there, out out out in
the outer space realms and all that sort of stuff.
So Isaac, let's see. Let me I gotta I got
a comment that came uh, that came your way, Isaac. Isaac,
tell him it would weigh as much as calif It
wouldn't weigh as much just California, because remember, they're all
pretty much light out there. Gotcha? All right? What else

(57:08):
have we got coming in here? Richard? I like Richard's take.
Richard's sake, he says, world peace. Nah, I'm just gonna
drink the good bourbon and smoke the cigars I'm saving.
Be careful, be careful if you're smoking those cigars, they
might be able to track you. Don't you want to
put up a fight a little bit here? I'm thinking
that's what we do. Now. If we only had monkeys,

(57:29):
we only had my grandfather's monkeys from nineteen forty two
or nineteen forty five, that would be wonderful because they
would be able to tell us what we could eat. Unfortunately,
I have a feeling that maybe the space aliens would
eating the monkeys. I don't know. Um, isn't it weightless?
Was a question that came in here. Is there weight
in space? Well? I mean, I guess it has to

(57:52):
be in space, right that the stuff is moving around.
I think gravity. I don't know. That's a tough one.
This is why I do talk radio. I don't don't
I don't get the science. I don't believe in the science.
I mean, I do believe in the science, but I'm
just not gonna try to mess up a bunch of people. This.
This is somebody who did some math for us. Okay,

(58:14):
this thing that's out there in space that's coming towards us,
it's three hundred and thirty thousand times heavier than the
United States heaviest ship. That I don't like at all.
I don't like that at all. It's entirely possible that
these people are just taking a tour that they're just

(58:34):
going through the neighborhood and seeing what's up. Maybe they're like, hey,
are those people still alive over there? They haven't answered
us in a whole long time. That's that's what I'm
just kind of wondering about that.

Speaker 4 (58:46):
All right.

Speaker 1 (58:47):
Other news, other stories that are out there. The economy
of the United States is on fire. It's on fire.
Three point eight percent growth rate being reported earlier today.
But bad news. Did you see the Starbucks bad news?

(59:08):
Anybody see this? They're closing stores And I did this
read earlier today. I was reading through this Starbucks is
going to close stores and layoff employees in restructuring. So
CNN had the story. There's a number of other ones

(59:31):
that are out there as well. And let me let
me just tell you there's a quote from this article
that I think is telling Okay, Now, try try to
figure out what they're saying in corporate speak without saying
what they're saying in corporate speak. Okay. The Seattle based

(59:52):
Giant Coffee a coffee giant, did not provide a list
of closing locations. However, the company will have about eighteen thousand,
three hundred coffee shops when its fiscal year closes at
the end of the month. That is down from eighteen thousand,
seven hundred and thirty four locations. So basically, if we

(01:00:14):
do the math, you're talking about uh seven hundred minus
three hundred. So yeah, so they're they're they're they're dropping
about four hundred locations. Now, I remember that you got
you got all kinds of different locations, right, So you've
got the kiosks, you've got it in hotels, you've got
it in restaurants, You've got all that kind of stuff.

(01:00:35):
But but the progressives they love to kind of gloss
this over here. The specialty chain will close specific locations
where quote were unable to create the physical environment our
customers and partners expect or where we don't see a

(01:01:00):
path to financial performance. You know what that is? That
is code. That is code for Yeah, there's these cities,
and there's a lot of dangerous cities, and there's a
lot of people that don't want to go into the
market there to get their coffee because they're going to

(01:01:22):
get harassed by homeless people or people out of their minds,
or maybe they're going to get murdered, or maybe they're
just nobody's going in there. Anymore because of the bathrooms.
Maybe it's it's a very very specific thing. Yeah, where
we can't create the physical environment that our customers and

(01:01:46):
partners expect. Save the cities, lock them up. News Talk

(01:02:10):
eleven ten, not a nine to three WBT Brett Waterble Show.
Great to be with you, seven oh four five seven
eleven ten. So the Dallas shooter that we heard about yesterday,
the Dallas shooter sought to terrorize ice workers. That's what
this guy wanted to do. He wanted to go and

(01:02:31):
scare the ice workers. Quote. I want to cause terror,
the gunman behind Wednesday's deadly attack on a Dallas ice
immigration facility allegedly wrote in a note. According to authorities,
the twenty nine year old gunman who took his own

(01:02:52):
life also acted alone and had extensively planned Wednesday's deadly attack.
According to just Department and FBI officials who briefed the
media Thursday afternoon, that's today, as you know, officials identified
the shooter as Joshua John Jahn. In the days leading

(01:03:15):
up to the attack, he researched Department of Homeland Security
facilities and the fatal shooting of a conservative activist in
Charlie Kirk ahead of the shooting. FBI Director Cash Pattel
said separately in social media early Wednesday morning, John fired
at the ice building and at a van, indiscriminately, hitting

(01:03:39):
and killing one detainee and critically injuring two others. Okay,
so it's been established now that he was that this person.

Speaker 6 (01:03:54):
Was a.

Speaker 1 (01:03:57):
Was a killer, and he was obviously a racist killer
because he murdered a person, likely from another country. And
so this is a person who is a racist, because
why would you shoot into the van when there's a

(01:04:19):
very strong likelihood that that person would be in there
would be in the van, there would be detainees in
the van. So I think we understand now that this
person was likely one of those people who dislikes other
human beings. One of those hospitalized was a Mexican national,

(01:04:40):
according to Mexico's Foreign Ministry DHS said the suspect died
of a self inflicted gunshot wound. Since the shooting, investigators
have executed searches at his home, his room, and multiple
other locations in Fairview, Tech, where the shooter was from,

(01:05:02):
and in Durant, Oklahoma. According to Nancy Larson, the acting
US Attorney for the Northern District of Texas. Agents found
a collection of notes from him saying, yes, it was
just me. He's a racist. I mean, that's really what

(01:05:24):
it would be, because there's no reason why you would
ever fire into an ICE van when there's a great
likelihood that there are people from around the world who
are coming in here. And this person didn't have any
respect for anybody but himself. I guess this is what
we have to understand. Agents found a collection of notes

(01:05:46):
stating explicitly, yes, it was just me. These notes also
included a game plan of the attack and specific target areas.
He wrote hateful messages against ICE employees. I'm willing to
argue that the ICE employees that he was hating sending
hateful messages to were likely probably people of color, calling

(01:06:13):
them people showing up to collect a dirty paycheck. That's
what he had to say about this. Well, he killed
innocent people. He murdered innocent people, people who have been wounded,
people who have been hurt in this regard. Additionally, John's

(01:06:38):
apparent goal was to create maximum damage against ICE personnel
and property and not to hurt detainees. Well, you blew
it there, dude. Your racism came out, Like what do
these guys think. Okay, go to Texas, go to New Mexico,
go to Arizona, go to cal California, go to the border.

(01:07:02):
Who do you think is working when it comes to ICE?
Hispanic people, people who are first generation Americans who have
come in to UH to work a job that they
believe in. That that's the thing that's going on here.
If you don't, did you think you were just gonna

(01:07:24):
shoot like white landists, like just white people? Is that
what this guy thought. I think this guy thought he
was just gonna shoot white people. He shot people of color.
I can get I can guarantee it that the people
who were hit by these rounds were done because this
person had an issue. He hoped his actions would terrorize

(01:07:49):
ICE employees. See this is this guy's not smart. This
guy had just zero brain power because he's in the
state of Texas, he's at an ICE facility. You don't
think you're gonna hurt people of color? That is pathetic.
That is a pathetic. Take of course you are. There's

(01:08:09):
a likelihood that they might be UH from anywhere in
the world. What are you doing? I gotta tell you,
I feel like when people go out and do these
sorts of things, I think it's time to start like
repoeing their parents' houses, taking their property, all of that sort.
I like what went on in Utah. Those those people,

(01:08:32):
they need to we need to just you know, sorry,
you guys raised you guys raised a terrible person who
murdered an innocent person who was just giving a speech
and talking to people. Sorry, we're gonna have to shut
you down. We're shutting you down. You gotta go find
someplace else to live. That this, this, this can no
longer happen. There has to be some incentive to stop
these spree killers from doing this sort of stuff, like

(01:08:55):
how do you do it? How do you how do
you get through this? How do you do that? Is
you know, he's trying to be like, I'm a lone
guy who's going out there. I'm gonna I'm gonna stick
it to the man. Yay, you stuck it to a
couple of people that ended up getting shot. But he

(01:09:16):
didn't think that far ahead. You look at his haircut,
you get a look at this this character, or better yet,
don't he's best to be forgotten to history. Really despicable,
These these people These people do not understand how the
border works. Everybody should be forced to go down and

(01:09:37):
see how the border functions. It's it's it's one of
the most important things you could probably see, so that
people would understand exactly what's going on. And you know
what you want to do. You need to go across
the border. Don't don't just stay in Texas or New
Mexico or Arizona or California. Go across the border and
talk to the folks that are securing the border on

(01:09:58):
the other side and and ask them about how how
dangerous the job is. These are not the After Lake
and Riley. Everything changed, and you know, darn well it
did because nobody wanted to talk about Lake and Riley.
And now now she is being avenged for all the

(01:10:19):
stuff that happened. News Talk eleven three WBT, it's the

(01:10:41):
Brett Waterbull Show. Great to be with you. Ah, some
stuff that's very interesting that that's out there.

Speaker 2 (01:10:48):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:10:48):
There is a guy who is the Katari Prime Minister, Okay,
the Katari Prime Minister, and he is going all in
on efforting peace in the Middle East. And he says,
he says, in this regard, I think it's a I
think it's interesting exclusive Katari Prime Minister Donald Trump is

(01:11:13):
the only one in the world who can achieve peace
in Gaza. All Right, I'm a little cynical about this,
but I understand why this Katari Prime minister is saying this.
He thinks that this is a guy who can walk
between the dangerous sort of challenges that we're dealing with.

(01:11:34):
Katari Prime Minister Mohammed ben Al drac Rockman Ben just
Sim Alfani told Breitbart News exclusively in an interview on
the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly that the
entire Arab world is looking to President Donald Trump as
the only one who can help bring peace to Gaza. Quote.

(01:11:58):
This is this is the Katari Prime minister. I believe
that the meeting with the Arab and Muslim leaders that
took place with President Trump was a very important meeting,
Alfani told Breitbart News exclusively. It was very important during
the United Nations General Assembly. Basically the main purpose of

(01:12:20):
that is to highlight for the President the danger for
the region and that we need to put a stop
to what Israel is doing. Basically, it's not only jeopardizing
the security of the region, it's jeopardizing even US interests
in the region and jeopardizing the partnerships that the US

(01:12:41):
has built throughout the decades in the region. So he's
basically saying, we don't want you working with We don't
want you working with net and Yahoo the way you're
working with him. Obviously, the President's going to make his
own decision, he's going to do his own thing. All
of that sort of stuff is happening. But the reality
is when you look at the the way the attack

(01:13:04):
occurred on October the seventh, and you look at the
attack that took place in Ukraine, there are differences in
terms of the types of the attack, but this on
both sides has just become something that's untenable. It's just
the body count is massive on on both sides, and

(01:13:26):
and there's there's no real close way to get through
any of this sort of stuff, right. I do think
it's interesting though, that you're you're not seeing, you're really
not seeing protests on television in the Middle East where
they're hating America and burning our flags. I mean, when's
the last one that you saw them doing that? Have

(01:13:48):
you seen that on tea? I haven't seen that on
TV for a really long time. It used to be
you know, it used to be down down USA, and
it used to be we're going to burn the flag
and we hate Americans. Get out all this kind of stuff.
Hostages would be taken. It is. It is a very
different sort of setup that they've that that they have

(01:14:09):
now looked at. Alfani sat for a half hour conversation
with Brip part News at the Katari Permanent Mission to
the United Nations. Now Cutter, Cutter is a country that
is doing good things in terms of the neighborhood. I

(01:14:29):
believe that these people want to get this stuff done
because if you get this stuff done, you're going to
start trading. Trading is what's key. Trade has been the
hallmark of the Middle East for five thousand years. You know,
you have to go and get stuff, you sell stuff,
you trade stuff. And you know, historically in the Western

(01:14:52):
model of of of what we had in the wake
of World War World War two as opposed to World
War One, countries that araid with each other typically don't
go to war with each other. That that's that's a
that's an ironclad sort of thing. The United States and
and China. We trade, We're not shooting at each other.

(01:15:15):
We trade with Japan, We're not shooting at each other. Germany, France, Europe,
the Middle East. You think about these places, these places,
these are this is about commerce, This is about protecting
your future in that in that regard. But here's the problem.

(01:15:39):
The thing that got everybody upset overall was the was
the raid that was run on Cutter. Uh couple what
last week, two weeks ago, and you have a situation
where Donald Trump's got a really good relationship with the
cut with the Cutteries and and the other nations that

(01:15:59):
are there. There really aren't any trouble makers per se.
And in fact, the President wants to try to broker
a deal where you can actually get Iran to come
around and not be a malign actor in that regard.
He wants to see people trade. But when the Israelis
went in and struck there and Cutter and look, they

(01:16:20):
have to make their own decisions, they're making their own
strategic decisions, right. But then the question then becomes, okay,
so who's it more productive for the United States or
for Israel. You have to remember, and this is the
the most important thing when it comes to diplomacy. The
most important thing is do you want peace. It's the

(01:16:44):
only question that you really have to have answered. Do
you want peace? Do you want war? If you want war,
you can have as much war as you want. You
want peace? Are you actually ready to make peace? Are
you ready to do this? Because at the end of
the day, what's going to have to happen here is
I think you're gonna have to You're gonna have to
figure out a way to make Hamasue go away before

(01:17:08):
the piece comes. I have no idea how they would
do it. Dudes talk eleven ten nine and I'm three

(01:17:35):
WBT Brett Waterboll Show. Good to be all right? I
want to I want to do some sound here? Can
I do some sound? Do I have any sound at all? Isaac?
Do I have any sound? I know I have sound.
We have good sound. I'm gonna play you a clip.
I'm not gonna comment on it. I'm just gonna let
it breathe, which is good because everybody needs to breathe
once in a while. But there's a a clip, and

(01:17:59):
we're gonna we're gonna we're going to workshop this. Okay, Isaac,
get ready for this. We're going to workshop this. I
want Chris Murphy, Chris Murphy, the senator from Connecticut. You're
familiar with him. He's a guy that a little bit
of a gadfly. I think I think he wants to
probably run for the presidency. I'm not a big fan,

(01:18:22):
but everybody's got to have a job. So here we go.
This is Chris Murphy letter.

Speaker 6 (01:18:31):
I guess the question is, will this new US attorney
dare bring a case that has no future?

Speaker 5 (01:18:39):
I think we have to understand what the underlying point
is here. Yes, Donald Trump probably wants his enemies in jail,
but what he also wants is to harass his enemies
to the point where a lot of people decide to
just stand out.

Speaker 6 (01:18:52):
So even if it's tossed out by a grand jury
or a judge throws it out, mission accomplish. Just like
a New York Times case get thrown out. He's harassed.

Speaker 5 (01:19:02):
It's massively expensive to go through go through this. If
you're James comeye or Letitia James, and you know, he
sees what's happening in the corporate community already, folks just
deciding to sit on the sidelines. A similar thing is
happening with democratic donors. A lot of folks who you
know used to play in politics, have decided to just
step back because they don't want to be in Trump's crosshairs.

(01:19:23):
So you know, the point here, sure is to get
a few of his political adversaries in jail. But the
real point is is a tried and true tactic of
despots all over the country, all over the world, which
is to just harass and intimidate their political oppositions so
that people decide to stay indoors. Protesters don't show up,
candidates don't run. That's how democracies die.

Speaker 1 (01:19:45):
Do you believe that for a minute? You cannot possibly
believe that for a minute. Hold on, I'm going to
mention some names. Let me know when I strike oil.
Fanny Willis, Fanny Willis, Latsia James. What about the attorney

(01:20:17):
who took Donald Trump by creating a fake charge in
the city of New York to go in front of
a judge, Judge Mrshawan, whose daughter was working for the
Biden campaign. Fannie Willis Latsia James, what are you doing?

(01:20:40):
What are you doing? And then who was the guy
that they brought in from Europe? Do you remember the
guy who was coming in to prosecute Donald Trump from Europe?
You remember that guy. He went into the He went
into Mara Lago and put his hands inside the most
prime places in the lingerie of the First Lady of

(01:21:06):
the United States. Does anybody remember that? And he got bounced.
He got bounced. So wait a minute, Donald Trump, Joe
Biden tried to put him in jail like four different ways.
And Chris Murphy's like, this is how democracies die. This

(01:21:27):
is how a democracy dies because people don't donate any
money and then they're trying to put people in jail.
And this is so horrible. Who came up with the idea? First?
Joe Biden was responsible. He signed off on the raid.
Who Merrick Garland? Does anybody remember any of this stuff

(01:21:50):
that these guys? I mean, look, if I were the
president of the United States, Okay, if I was the president,
I would feel very badly for the country if I
was the president. But if I was the president of
the United States, I would just run a straight shop.
I'd be like, you know what, We're gonna work on
the economy, We're gonna make the military strong, We're gonna
do good things. This is gonna be how we're gonna

(01:22:12):
handle all this kind of stuff. I really wouldn't have
any time like to go and get even with somebody
because they they crossed me the wrong way. Success is
always the best. Success is always the best sort of
thing that you can enjoy because it's you building success.
I'm not a tear down guy. I'm a build up guy.

(01:22:34):
But man, this guy's got some nerve some I mean,
I could I can document all of these cases that
that went in that direction. It was despicable. It was
absolutely despicable. Donald Trump, they I mean, what do we

(01:22:58):
got them of his protection once upon a time. I mean,
all of this stuff that happened is absolutely bunkers. And
it's like what happened in the first term, what happened
with Shiff. Shiff should be bounced from the Senate. He

(01:23:18):
lied under oath. There you got a list of at
least fifty co conspirators that we're trying to overthrow the
government of Trump in that period of time, including by
the way, mister Shell's mister Shell's laying on a beach.
I mean, this is this is rich. This is very

(01:23:42):
very rich. Holy cow, you sit there and you say,
wait a minute, how do you do this doesn't make
any sense? I mean it just does not make any
sense at all, but it makes total sense at the
exact same time him. Give me cut number three, Megan Kelly. This,

(01:24:07):
this is somebody who's working really hard to try to
get through to a person who does not want to
listen to her take. And I want you guys to
hear this. It's it's it's revelatory all as well. Megan
Kelly schools a radical at a college campus. Cut three.

Speaker 4 (01:24:28):
Oh, why you support a president whose contributes to the
rhetoric that got your friend Charlie killed? We saw his
rally recently said I hate my enemies.

Speaker 1 (01:24:37):
He is.

Speaker 4 (01:24:39):
Stephen Miller said similar things. How can you support him
when he contributed to what got Charlie killed?

Speaker 3 (01:24:47):
Assumes facts not in evidence.

Speaker 4 (01:24:49):
What you said is not true. Seventy of political violence
is committed by Republicans.

Speaker 1 (01:24:54):
Okay, hook it up.

Speaker 4 (01:24:55):
That's not the OJ just pulled itj D. OJ just
pulled it for their website. DJ just pulled the study
from the website because they're delusional.

Speaker 3 (01:25:03):
That's not true, because it up once you.

Speaker 4 (01:25:07):
Hold it from their website, once.

Speaker 3 (01:25:08):
You pull the crazies out of there. It is overwhelmingly
left wing violence.

Speaker 4 (01:25:12):
Google it we have had every single Google it right.

Speaker 3 (01:25:16):
Now, you know this is this is how we get here.
So first of all, let me take on the first
part of the premise of your question, that it was
President Trump's rhetoric that led to an assassin killing our
friend Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 4 (01:25:28):
That's a blatant lie.

Speaker 3 (01:25:30):
It's a defamatory blaspheam, and it's inappropriate in the setting.

Speaker 4 (01:25:34):
That's not what I said.

Speaker 1 (01:25:34):
We know, yes it is.

Speaker 4 (01:25:35):
No, I said he contributed to the political He contributed
to the political atmosphere the the.

Speaker 3 (01:25:42):
Well, then you have no postion. Then your point is
utterly empty. Contributing to the atmosphere the present guy was.
Let's just make clear. Let's just make clear this guy
was motivated by leftist ideology. We know it from the
bullet casings, we know it from the Utah governor, we
know it from.

Speaker 1 (01:25:56):
His own count Yes we do.

Speaker 4 (01:25:59):
Let's be really on that.

Speaker 1 (01:26:00):
Even if that's true.

Speaker 4 (01:26:01):
So then you're saying, because let's say this guy's left us,
even if that's true, does that make it okay for
the sitting president of the United States to incite violence
against liberals.

Speaker 3 (01:26:10):
The President of the United States has not accepted violence
against liberals. The President of the United States made a
joke at the Charlie Kirkin memorial which was funny and
self deprecating. It was on the heels of Erica kirk
saying she in an extraordinary moment forgave her husband's killing.
Let me finish, and then President Trump got up and

(01:26:31):
making a joke playing off of what Erica said. He said,
we disagree.

Speaker 1 (01:26:36):
I need to do better.

Speaker 3 (01:26:37):
Eric is going to try to convince me, but I'm
in a different place. And that's completely normal for a
politician to be thinking about his political fights. And by
the way, Trump has every right to loathe his enemies.
They tried to put him in jail for the rest
of his life, they tried to convany they tried to
put his a family in jail. They tried to kill him.

Speaker 1 (01:26:55):
Criminals.

Speaker 3 (01:26:58):
Hy wait, wait, okay, now you go.

Speaker 4 (01:27:01):
Thank you for your time.

Speaker 1 (01:27:03):
There you go. Do Note that he said that Donald
Trump was a Trump was a criminal, and then he
didn't stand for the convictions that he had. News Talk

(01:27:28):
eleven ten and I'm three WBT Brett water Bowl Show
final segment. We've got breaking Brett Jensen coming up next.
As we get ready for all the other stuff that
you're going to be hearing all the way up. You
got Brett Jensen breaking Brett Jensen. Then you've got TJ.
Ritchie doing a great job, and all the other stuff

(01:27:49):
that's going on here at the same time. Do you
believe do you think? Do you believe? Do you think
that there is going to be a government shutdown? I
I think it's more likely than not, because if you
have all of these different sort of levers in front

(01:28:09):
of you, and your mission is to try to exert
as much as you possibly can with the small sort
of number that you have, don't you have to actually
go out there and try to do that. Well, it's
hard to know because Speaker Johnson has flipped the script

(01:28:30):
on dem leaders with staunch warning against a government shutdown.
Republicans and Democrats are continuing to trade blows ahead of
a potential government shutdown next week, with both sides indicating
that neither is willing to budge from the position on

(01:28:52):
the federal funding issue. Again, remember what I said in
the beginning of the show, and you can find it
over at zero Hedge. There is an article posted there
that says all the essential stuff that has to get paid,
social Security, people in the military, law enforcement, all that

(01:29:13):
sort of stuff that has to happen. Social Security recipients,
they are going to continue to get protected. And what
the administration is saying, through President Trump and through people
on the demo on the Republican side, is that we're
paying for all the stuff. Everything's going to get paid for.

(01:29:34):
It's all going to be paid for. The money's not
going to disappear. It's all stuff that's important. What we
don't want is to have a whole bunch of other
stuff that's in the mix. And so the strategy here
and this is what we're gonna have to look closely
at and to and all that sort of stuff is okay.
So if the government is going to shut down, but

(01:29:56):
those other elements, right, meaning social Security, military, pay all
the stuff that you really need done, air traffic control,
you name it. What's the hand that Schumer and Jeffries
has coming back the other way? So in this piece

(01:30:17):
from Mike Johnson or this quote from Mike Johnson, Speaker
Johnson released a memo earlier this week highlighting past year's
comments by Senate Democrats warning of the pitfalls of a
government shutdown. House Republicans acted responsibly last week to keep
the government open with a clean short term continuing resolution.

(01:30:40):
Johnson's memo said Senate Democrats, who used to warn that
shutdowns would hurt seniors, veterans, and working families, are now
threatening to force one unless one less Congress repeals the

(01:31:03):
working family tax cut, restores the taxpayer funded healthcare for
illegal aliens, and sends a half a billion dollars to
leftist news outlets, among the other partisan spending demands. So
what they're pointing at in this one is they're pointing
at the NPR stuff, the PBS stuff, all that sort

(01:31:26):
of stuff that's out there. That's what the money is
supposed to go to, if you're Chuck Schumer. The rest
of the memo is a features list of Democrat comments,
continuing and beginning with then majority leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat
New York warning on September sixteenth, twenty twenty four, if

(01:31:49):
the government shuts down, it will be average Americans who
suffer the most. But now Chuck Schumer wants to do it.
At the time, the Democrat control old Senate was negotiating
with the House GOP majority under the President Joe Biden.
To avert a government shutdown. That standoff ended with Biden

(01:32:13):
signing a short term extension of the previous fiscal year's
government funding levels on September the twenty sixth, twenty twenty four.
That stuff is all still in effect, Like we haven't
even gotten to regular order here yet. This is the problem,
and this is why people are getting mad. Johnson's memo

(01:32:34):
also referenced comments by Bernie Sanders. The truth is that shuffling,
I'm sorry. The truth is that shutting down the government
is a serious and dangerous action that we must do
everything impossible to prevent. Yeah, but again, all the essential

(01:32:55):
stuff is getting paid for, it's getting funded. It's the
one point set having trillion dollars that Chuck Schumer wants
as hostage money. I don't think it's gonna work. Coming
up next breaking with Brett Jensen and then TJ. Ritchie.
I'm Brett Witterbull. We'll talk to you again tomorrow. News
Talk eleven ten niney nine three wbtwo