November 25, 2025 • 17 mins
After a rare public comment on Taiwan from Japan’s new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, relations between the two nations are at a historic low — and Beijing is ramping up its economic retaliation.
On today’s Big Take Asia podcast, host Oanh Ha talks with Bloomberg’s James Mayger and Isabel Reynolds about the political calculation behind Takaichi’s move, the historical grievances fueling the dispute and the real economic risks facing Tokyo.
Read more: China Asks Airlines to Extend Japan Flight Cuts Until March 2026 - Bloomberg
Further listening: How APEC Become a Battleground for US-China Influence
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Tensions between Japan and China are escalating sharply over Taiwan
Biden risk. This diplomatic spat shows no signs afe cancy
of easing and this back and forth.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
Relations between China and Japan have never been easy, but
right now they're in the dumps.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
China had canceled this trilateral meeting between the culture ministers,
and in the meantime, Japan's Defense minister is saying that
Japan will plan to deploy some missiles from Yunaguni, which
is an island just one hundred kilometers to the east
of Taiwan, a very strategic location.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
The cause of all this tension are remarked by Japan's
new Prime Minister Sanai Takichi. In response to a question
in the parliament earlier this month, Takiichi linked Japan's security
with the territorial integrity of Taiwan.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Takaichi is probably the first prim start to actually explicitly
say that an attack on Taiwan could be an existential
crisis for Japan, which gives in the legal justification to
lean in militarily.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Japan and China have a long and tense history, often
marked by disputes over wartime grievances and territorial claims. But
James Mager, Bloomberg Senior reporter based in Beijing, and Isabelle Reynolds,
our Tokyo buer chief, say this dispute is different.
Speaker 4 (01:28):
Taiwan is the red line. There's a series of different
issues between Japan and China. Those are all important, but
when it revolves around Taiwan, there is no leeway in
the system for just accepting that maybe someone said something
and it wasn't a threat.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
That's right. I think what's happened is she said the
quiet part that aloud, the things that people would normally
only talk about and plan for behind the scenes. She's
publicly acknowledged that we have to think about that.
Speaker 3 (01:55):
Welcome to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.
Every week we take you inside some of the world's
biggest and most powerful economies in the markets, tycoons and
businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,
China and Japan clash again, but this time the point
of contention is Taiwan. We find out why Japan's new
(02:18):
Prime Minister has put Taiwan on the table and what
it could mean for both sides. Following Takeiichi's comments on Taiwan,
Beijing has stepped up its protest and retaliation. The Chinese
government has warned its citizens against traveling to Japan and
(02:40):
instructed its airlines to reduce the number of flights to
the country. Beijing's also suspended imports of Japanese seafood and
halted approvals for movies too. China's Foreign ministry has repeatedly
demanded Takichi retract her comments on Taiwan. Isabel says Takiichi
has refused used to do so, saying there was no
(03:02):
change to Tokyo's stance on how it would respond to
a major security crisis in the region.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
So what happened was on November seventh, in parliament, Takeichi
said that a conflict in which Beijing was trying to
take over Taiwan and was using armed force and was
using warships could potentially amount to an existential crisis for Japan.
And now that is significant because under Japan's pacifist constitution
(03:30):
and the laws it passed subsequently in twenty fifteen, an
existential crisis would allow Japan potentially to send in its
own military to the defense of a friendly nation.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
And is that a big shift in Japanese politics for
her to say that.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
There was a huge amount of discussion leading up to
the twenty to fifteen legislation. Everyone's been very careful not
to point out exactly what sort of situation where which
countries might be involved, were where Japan might send an
ex military. So to come out and say this very boldly,
very frankly, and not really mincing her words in any
(04:08):
way is a big step away from how Japan has
approached this issue in the past.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
So certainly other Japanese leaders have been known to stay
away from the issue of Taiwan.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
Yeah, that's absolutely true. They expressed friendliness towards it, but
they've had this formal set of words that they want
any conflict between the two sides to be resolved peacefully.
Speaker 4 (04:27):
And I think on that it is important to note
that people outside the government, or people who used to
be ministers or MPs like Takh before she became the
Prime Minister, has said similar things. What's really different here
is that the Prime Minister, in her official capacity in
parliament made these comments, and I think part of The
reaction from China was they were expecting her to do
(04:49):
something like this. They did know that she had these
views because she has expressed them in the past, and
I think for them it was their expectations or their
fears about what she would do as prime minister were
confirmed and then they reacted to that. So it really
is what you can say as a private citizen, what
you can say as a very minor MP, and what
you can say as the Prime minister tend to be different.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
And of course we know that Takyishi made history last
month when she was sworn in as a country's first
woman prime minister. She's barely unpacked her bags right in
the PM's office. To your point, why pick this fight now?
Speaker 1 (05:24):
I think there are some doubts about whether she said
this on purpose. She is very new to the job
and she's talked about how she only gets two to
four hours of sleep at night, so I mean, you know,
maybe she was sleep deprived and felt corded into it.
And I don't forget this was not something she came
in and read out as a prepared statement. This was
part of a long session of being grilled by an
opposition MP about what exactly would constitute an existential crisis,
(05:47):
and at the end of it, she came up with this.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
How did her comments land in Japan.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
It's been a very mixed reaction. I mean, we've seen
a lot of public commentators sort of on both sides saying,
of course she should not have said that, you should
have withdrawn it, and the opposition urged her to withdraw
those comments. But Herst's public support rate is still enormously high.
It's probably the highest for any prime minister in more
than two decades. And if you look at the opinion polls,
they're also a bit mixed, as you would probably expect.
Speaker 4 (06:14):
And I think that's also an interesting point that what
she's saying isn't unexpected for people in Japan. There has
been this debate now since twenty fifteen or a decade
on what would happen if China did try to invade Taiwan.
Japan is right next door. Obviously Japan is going to
be affected by that. If nothing else. There are thousands
of Japanese citizens in Taiwan who would need to be
(06:35):
helped in some way, assisted out of Taiwan, evacuated, and
so there's a public recognition that this is a very
important question and the government will have to do something
or decide to do something if there is a war
in the Strait. You know, it's not like this came
out of nowhere, and Japanese people have never thought about this.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Now we know the two leaders, President she Jinmping and
the Prime ministers in Aataki Uchi just shook hands about
a month ago at the APEX summit in South Korea.
Are there any warning signs that anyone saw.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
Then that meaning went pretty well? I was there at
the venue, not having the meeting itself, but everyone I
spoke to you afterwards, the Japanese side, they seem to
think the meeting had gone pretty well and there any
real hiccup or wrinklin That was Takachi sound tweeted that
she had met the Taiwanese representative to APEX, and the
Chinese reacted to that quite badly, so they said she
was flaunting it and hyping it up on Twitter, which
(07:25):
kind of speaks to how I what I said earlier
that they were primed for her to do something that
they see is being provocative, and when she did that,
I think they were like, we knew it. She's exactly
what we thought she was going to be, and now
we have to react.
Speaker 3 (07:40):
And what's interesting, though, is the reaction. Even if they
were expecting that at some point she would say these things,
the reaction from Beijing hasn't been your standard diplomatic speak
at all. Right, it's gotten actually quite hostile and personal,
including a rather shocking post from China's consule general there
in Osaka, Isabelle. I wonder if you can tell us
about that and what the reaction to that was.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
Yeah, So the concert general in Osaka, Shuri Jian. Forgive
my Chinese, I don't speak at all. So the very
day after this debate in parliament, he started posting messages
on x on Twitter saying things about the dirty neck
that sticks in where it's not wanted, will we sliced
off with no hesitation. He's known for that kind of rhetoric,
so it wasn't all that surprising from him, and he
(08:23):
did delete it, but by that time it had already
been reported by the Japanese media, and of course there
was a complete Twitter storm about it, and it seemed
as though it was only after that the mainline government
in Beijing started to really weigh in and follow his
lead as to how they should deal with this issue.
Speaker 3 (08:41):
And what do you think that indicates? Does China then
take this threat quite seriously?
Speaker 4 (08:47):
Taiwan is the red line when it revolves around Taiwan.
There is no leeway in the system for just accepting
that maybe someone said something and it wasn't a threat.
They have to react the way they think about Taiwan
that it is and they will get it back, and
everyone is trying to keep them from getting it. Means
that they have to react and stamp down on these
things immediately, Otherwise if they don't, then six months later
(09:09):
someone else's They think someone else is going to get
bright ideas about saying something else about Taiwan. And there
may also be a calculation that Tokayi sign Is knew
she's weak. She doesn't have a majority in either house
of parliament. The last couple of prime ministers haven't lasted
that long. There may be an expectation that she's not
going to last, and it may will be that kind
of thinking as driving the Chinese reaction to Tokhan as well,
(09:32):
that if we push, then she'll be gone and we'll
have someone less hawkish.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
To deal with that sounds very likely to me as well.
I mean, whether she actually is weak or not, that
remains to be seen. Obviously, her position at the moment
isn't all that strong, but some people say she could
call an election pretty soon. She's got massive public support,
and she could even manage to grab back a majority
for her LDP on its own without any coalition partners
if her support rate stays how it is. And honestly,
(09:58):
the things that China's saying, it's hard to say right
now because the economic effects have not filtered through yet,
but just that kind of rhetoric I think is much
more likely to add to support for Takeitu than the
other way around.
Speaker 3 (10:14):
After the break the historical beefs between China and Japan,
and how the legacy of World War two underpins the
current tensions between Beijing and Tokyo, I wonder if we
(10:37):
can step back a little and James, you kind of
preface this a little before us, but I wonder if
we can talk a little bit about the historical beefs
between the two countries, because that obviously underpins perhaps a
lot of the reactions on both sides. What are the
old scabs, the old wounds in this relationship that might
be now being bloodied right now.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
Obviously, the biggest issue between Johanna and China is left
over from World War Two. And by World War two,
I mean not ninety thirty nine to ninety forty five.
The Chinese definition of World War two, or they're fight
against the Japanese now is nineteen thirty one to ninety
forty five. Because Japan was a colonial power. Japan held Korea,
Japan held Taiwan, Japan took over a large chunk of
(11:19):
northern China, and then they gradually took more and more,
and then they've invaded Shanghai and Nanjing and southern China
in ninety thirty seven. And so that history of being
invaded by Japan over decades and millions and millions of
Chinese people being killed by the Japanese or dying because
of the effects of those wars at that conflict. So
(11:40):
there's this resentment and hatred because of the events of
that period to ninety forty five. And then there is
this belief that Japan is now trying to not take
back Taiwan as a colony, but it's trying to separate
Taiwan from its rightful place on the mainland, and also
this idea that the Japanese government, the Japanese people haven't
really repented sincerely on their actions during those various conflicts,
(12:03):
and so all that is bound together. It can be
incredibly angry, resentful attitude towards Japan. The historical question at
this story of a match live and it's made much
worse with the Chinese because of this. Status of Taiwan
is still very much contested.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah, and Isabelle I wonder how does Japan see this?
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Even within Japan, this is a hugely divisive issue. I
think going back to when ties were restored in nineteen
seventy two, from there on, Japan contributed huge amounts of
aid and there was lots of technological transfer, and I
think the feeling behind that for a lot of people
was we want to try and make up for the
things that we did wrong in the past. But there's
also a part of the population who feels like there
(12:44):
was nothing wrong. We waged a war. All countries wage wars.
We shouldn't be single alert for criticism just because we lost.
But I think nowadays, to be honest, people are not
looking so much at history in Japan. They're just thinking
we have this giant economic and military might right next
door to us, How are we going to manage to
sort of get along with them getting the economic benefits?
(13:07):
However we can without fooling under their sort of influence
too far.
Speaker 3 (13:12):
Now it is about this back comes at a time
when Japan's economy is WOBBLI. We've seen GDP shrink, the
yen is weak, there's persistent inflation. China issued a travel
advisory warning its citizens not to travel to Japan. Is
there a risk there to the Japanese economy?
Speaker 1 (13:28):
To a certain extent, there certainly is. Chinese people make
up a quarter of visitors to Japan at least so
far this year, and that's just really started to recover
in the last year or two from the pandemic period,
So yes, that could be quite damaging. On the other hand,
there have been a lot of complaints in Tapan about
over tourism and about poor manners on the part of
(13:48):
Chinese tourists in particular, so that might not damage take
support rates in particular.
Speaker 4 (13:54):
And also tourism is an important source of foreign currency
revenue for the country, but a slight reduction in tourist
revenue isn't going to be as damaging as the risk
or the possibility of Japanese companies in China being targeted
or seeing boycotts. Japanese car companies still have billions of
dollars of investments here. Other Japanese companies have billions and
(14:14):
billions of dollars of investment here, seven to eleven, Uniclo Family, Panasonic,
Canon Fujitsu. You know, these are huge companies that do
a lot of revenue here. And if you start to
see real consumer boycotts, if you start to see businesses
pulling back from doing business with Japanese companies, then the
hit to Japan Inc. Could be substantial. While tourism is
(14:37):
very vivid in your face, the bigger thread is going
to be if this goes on for a long time
and Toyota sales in China crater even more than they've
already been falling. They're already falling because of competition from
Chinese companies. If those crater, then the effect of that
is going to be quite big for Japan's economy and
for those companies.
Speaker 3 (14:55):
James, what's been the public mood in China over this?
Speaker 4 (14:58):
Obviously the press and the government reactions is one thing.
But I think the thing that sticks out for me
so far at least, is there hasn't really been a
public reaction. Japanese restaurants are still full, and unlike previous times.
I was speaking to someone who's lived here for more
than twenty years, and they were saying, in two thousand
and five or in twenty ten, you saw Japanese restaurants
putting up signs in that windows saying where are in
(15:18):
by Chinese people? This is a Chinese restaurant. We just
sell Japanese food, and I haven't seen any sign of
that yet.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
President Donald Trump has now entered the conversation as well,
speaking directly with both she and Takeichi. This week, Trump
and she held the first talk since agreeing to a
tariff truce, and Trump's readout of the phone call, they
discussed trade and Russia's war in Ukraine, but he made
no mention of Taiwan. Meanwhile, China's Foreign Ministry says she
(15:48):
told Trump on the call that Taiwan's return to China
is essential a cornerstone of the post World War two
international order. Hours after that conversation wrapped, spoke with Takeichi.
She said the US president reached out to reaffirm ties
with Tokyo and said she could call him any time.
The back to back calls show the US is tricky
(16:10):
balancing act managing tensions between a key US ally and
its biggest rival for most Japanese people, Though Isabelle says
they'd rather move past this issue altogether, I.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Think from the japan side, they will just continue making
these very sort of low key and modest but steady
efforts to try and smooth things over.
Speaker 4 (16:31):
I do think it matters how well Takaichi San does
in any election that she calls. There's talk that election
might happen in January next year, and if that happens,
as she does win a majority, especially if she wins
a majority with her own party, that puts her in
a really good position to be the prime minister for
three years or more. And so if she can show
that she has domestic political stability or there is domestic stability,
(16:54):
she has domestic political strength, and couple that with not
saying things like this again or being vague when you
need to be vague, and that continued low key kind
of work by diplomats. Maybe over time there can be
an improvement in this, but I think if I don't
see any prospects of real improvement or change this year.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
This is The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm wanha.
To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access
to all of Bloomberg dot Com, subscribe today at Bloomberg
dot com slash podcast Offer. If you liked the episode,
make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia
wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find
the show. Thanks for listening and see you next time.
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Tensions between Japan and China are escalating sharply over Taiwan
Biden risk. This diplomatic spat shows no signs afe cancy
of easing and this back and forth.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
Relations between China and Japan have never been easy, but
right now they're in the dumps.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
China had canceled this trilateral meeting between the culture ministers,
and in the meantime, Japan's Defense minister is saying that
Japan will plan to deploy some missiles from Yunaguni, which
is an island just one hundred kilometers to the east
of Taiwan, a very strategic location.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
The cause of all this tension are remarked by Japan's
new Prime Minister Sanai Takichi. In response to a question
in the parliament earlier this month, Takiichi linked Japan's security
with the territorial integrity of Taiwan.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Takaichi is probably the first prim start to actually explicitly
say that an attack on Taiwan could be an existential
crisis for Japan, which gives in the legal justification to
lean in militarily.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Japan and China have a long and tense history, often
marked by disputes over wartime grievances and territorial claims. But
James Mager, Bloomberg Senior reporter based in Beijing, and Isabelle Reynolds,
our Tokyo buer chief, say this dispute is different.
Speaker 4 (01:28):
Taiwan is the red line. There's a series of different
issues between Japan and China. Those are all important, but
when it revolves around Taiwan, there is no leeway in
the system for just accepting that maybe someone said something
and it wasn't a threat.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
That's right. I think what's happened is she said the
quiet part that aloud, the things that people would normally
only talk about and plan for behind the scenes. She's
publicly acknowledged that we have to think about that.
Speaker 3 (01:55):
Welcome to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.
Every week we take you inside some of the world's
biggest and most powerful economies in the markets, tycoons and
businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,
China and Japan clash again, but this time the point
of contention is Taiwan. We find out why Japan's new
(02:18):
Prime Minister has put Taiwan on the table and what
it could mean for both sides. Following Takeiichi's comments on Taiwan,
Beijing has stepped up its protest and retaliation. The Chinese
government has warned its citizens against traveling to Japan and
(02:40):
instructed its airlines to reduce the number of flights to
the country. Beijing's also suspended imports of Japanese seafood and
halted approvals for movies too. China's Foreign ministry has repeatedly
demanded Takichi retract her comments on Taiwan. Isabel says Takiichi
has refused used to do so, saying there was no
(03:02):
change to Tokyo's stance on how it would respond to
a major security crisis in the region.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
So what happened was on November seventh, in parliament, Takeichi
said that a conflict in which Beijing was trying to
take over Taiwan and was using armed force and was
using warships could potentially amount to an existential crisis for Japan.
And now that is significant because under Japan's pacifist constitution
(03:30):
and the laws it passed subsequently in twenty fifteen, an
existential crisis would allow Japan potentially to send in its
own military to the defense of a friendly nation.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
And is that a big shift in Japanese politics for
her to say that.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
There was a huge amount of discussion leading up to
the twenty to fifteen legislation. Everyone's been very careful not
to point out exactly what sort of situation where which
countries might be involved, were where Japan might send an
ex military. So to come out and say this very boldly,
very frankly, and not really mincing her words in any
(04:08):
way is a big step away from how Japan has
approached this issue in the past.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
So certainly other Japanese leaders have been known to stay
away from the issue of Taiwan.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
Yeah, that's absolutely true. They expressed friendliness towards it, but
they've had this formal set of words that they want
any conflict between the two sides to be resolved peacefully.
Speaker 4 (04:27):
And I think on that it is important to note
that people outside the government, or people who used to
be ministers or MPs like Takh before she became the
Prime Minister, has said similar things. What's really different here
is that the Prime Minister, in her official capacity in
parliament made these comments, and I think part of The
reaction from China was they were expecting her to do
(04:49):
something like this. They did know that she had these
views because she has expressed them in the past, and
I think for them it was their expectations or their
fears about what she would do as prime minister were
confirmed and then they reacted to that. So it really
is what you can say as a private citizen, what
you can say as a very minor MP, and what
you can say as the Prime minister tend to be different.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
And of course we know that Takyishi made history last
month when she was sworn in as a country's first
woman prime minister. She's barely unpacked her bags right in
the PM's office. To your point, why pick this fight now?
Speaker 1 (05:24):
I think there are some doubts about whether she said
this on purpose. She is very new to the job
and she's talked about how she only gets two to
four hours of sleep at night, so I mean, you know,
maybe she was sleep deprived and felt corded into it.
And I don't forget this was not something she came
in and read out as a prepared statement. This was
part of a long session of being grilled by an
opposition MP about what exactly would constitute an existential crisis,
(05:47):
and at the end of it, she came up with this.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
How did her comments land in Japan.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
It's been a very mixed reaction. I mean, we've seen
a lot of public commentators sort of on both sides saying,
of course she should not have said that, you should
have withdrawn it, and the opposition urged her to withdraw
those comments. But Herst's public support rate is still enormously high.
It's probably the highest for any prime minister in more
than two decades. And if you look at the opinion polls,
they're also a bit mixed, as you would probably expect.
Speaker 4 (06:14):
And I think that's also an interesting point that what
she's saying isn't unexpected for people in Japan. There has
been this debate now since twenty fifteen or a decade
on what would happen if China did try to invade Taiwan.
Japan is right next door. Obviously Japan is going to
be affected by that. If nothing else. There are thousands
of Japanese citizens in Taiwan who would need to be
(06:35):
helped in some way, assisted out of Taiwan, evacuated, and
so there's a public recognition that this is a very
important question and the government will have to do something
or decide to do something if there is a war
in the Strait. You know, it's not like this came
out of nowhere, and Japanese people have never thought about this.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Now we know the two leaders, President she Jinmping and
the Prime ministers in Aataki Uchi just shook hands about
a month ago at the APEX summit in South Korea.
Are there any warning signs that anyone saw.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
Then that meaning went pretty well? I was there at
the venue, not having the meeting itself, but everyone I
spoke to you afterwards, the Japanese side, they seem to
think the meeting had gone pretty well and there any
real hiccup or wrinklin That was Takachi sound tweeted that
she had met the Taiwanese representative to APEX, and the
Chinese reacted to that quite badly, so they said she
was flaunting it and hyping it up on Twitter, which
(07:25):
kind of speaks to how I what I said earlier
that they were primed for her to do something that
they see is being provocative, and when she did that,
I think they were like, we knew it. She's exactly
what we thought she was going to be, and now
we have to react.
Speaker 3 (07:40):
And what's interesting, though, is the reaction. Even if they
were expecting that at some point she would say these things,
the reaction from Beijing hasn't been your standard diplomatic speak
at all. Right, it's gotten actually quite hostile and personal,
including a rather shocking post from China's consule general there
in Osaka, Isabelle. I wonder if you can tell us
about that and what the reaction to that was.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
Yeah, So the concert general in Osaka, Shuri Jian. Forgive
my Chinese, I don't speak at all. So the very
day after this debate in parliament, he started posting messages
on x on Twitter saying things about the dirty neck
that sticks in where it's not wanted, will we sliced
off with no hesitation. He's known for that kind of rhetoric,
so it wasn't all that surprising from him, and he
(08:23):
did delete it, but by that time it had already
been reported by the Japanese media, and of course there
was a complete Twitter storm about it, and it seemed
as though it was only after that the mainline government
in Beijing started to really weigh in and follow his
lead as to how they should deal with this issue.
Speaker 3 (08:41):
And what do you think that indicates? Does China then
take this threat quite seriously?
Speaker 4 (08:47):
Taiwan is the red line when it revolves around Taiwan.
There is no leeway in the system for just accepting
that maybe someone said something and it wasn't a threat.
They have to react the way they think about Taiwan
that it is and they will get it back, and
everyone is trying to keep them from getting it. Means
that they have to react and stamp down on these
things immediately, Otherwise if they don't, then six months later
(09:09):
someone else's They think someone else is going to get
bright ideas about saying something else about Taiwan. And there
may also be a calculation that Tokayi sign Is knew
she's weak. She doesn't have a majority in either house
of parliament. The last couple of prime ministers haven't lasted
that long. There may be an expectation that she's not
going to last, and it may will be that kind
of thinking as driving the Chinese reaction to Tokhan as well,
(09:32):
that if we push, then she'll be gone and we'll
have someone less hawkish.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
To deal with that sounds very likely to me as well.
I mean, whether she actually is weak or not, that
remains to be seen. Obviously, her position at the moment
isn't all that strong, but some people say she could
call an election pretty soon. She's got massive public support,
and she could even manage to grab back a majority
for her LDP on its own without any coalition partners
if her support rate stays how it is. And honestly,
(09:58):
the things that China's saying, it's hard to say right
now because the economic effects have not filtered through yet,
but just that kind of rhetoric I think is much
more likely to add to support for Takeitu than the
other way around.
Speaker 3 (10:14):
After the break the historical beefs between China and Japan,
and how the legacy of World War two underpins the
current tensions between Beijing and Tokyo, I wonder if we
(10:37):
can step back a little and James, you kind of
preface this a little before us, but I wonder if
we can talk a little bit about the historical beefs
between the two countries, because that obviously underpins perhaps a
lot of the reactions on both sides. What are the
old scabs, the old wounds in this relationship that might
be now being bloodied right now.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
Obviously, the biggest issue between Johanna and China is left
over from World War Two. And by World War two,
I mean not ninety thirty nine to ninety forty five.
The Chinese definition of World War two, or they're fight
against the Japanese now is nineteen thirty one to ninety
forty five. Because Japan was a colonial power. Japan held Korea,
Japan held Taiwan, Japan took over a large chunk of
(11:19):
northern China, and then they gradually took more and more,
and then they've invaded Shanghai and Nanjing and southern China
in ninety thirty seven. And so that history of being
invaded by Japan over decades and millions and millions of
Chinese people being killed by the Japanese or dying because
of the effects of those wars at that conflict. So
(11:40):
there's this resentment and hatred because of the events of
that period to ninety forty five. And then there is
this belief that Japan is now trying to not take
back Taiwan as a colony, but it's trying to separate
Taiwan from its rightful place on the mainland, and also
this idea that the Japanese government, the Japanese people haven't
really repented sincerely on their actions during those various conflicts,
(12:03):
and so all that is bound together. It can be
incredibly angry, resentful attitude towards Japan. The historical question at
this story of a match live and it's made much
worse with the Chinese because of this. Status of Taiwan
is still very much contested.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah, and Isabelle I wonder how does Japan see this?
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Even within Japan, this is a hugely divisive issue. I
think going back to when ties were restored in nineteen
seventy two, from there on, Japan contributed huge amounts of
aid and there was lots of technological transfer, and I
think the feeling behind that for a lot of people
was we want to try and make up for the
things that we did wrong in the past. But there's
also a part of the population who feels like there
(12:44):
was nothing wrong. We waged a war. All countries wage wars.
We shouldn't be single alert for criticism just because we lost.
But I think nowadays, to be honest, people are not
looking so much at history in Japan. They're just thinking
we have this giant economic and military might right next
door to us, How are we going to manage to
sort of get along with them getting the economic benefits?
(13:07):
However we can without fooling under their sort of influence
too far.
Speaker 3 (13:12):
Now it is about this back comes at a time
when Japan's economy is WOBBLI. We've seen GDP shrink, the
yen is weak, there's persistent inflation. China issued a travel
advisory warning its citizens not to travel to Japan. Is
there a risk there to the Japanese economy?
Speaker 1 (13:28):
To a certain extent, there certainly is. Chinese people make
up a quarter of visitors to Japan at least so
far this year, and that's just really started to recover
in the last year or two from the pandemic period,
So yes, that could be quite damaging. On the other hand,
there have been a lot of complaints in Tapan about
over tourism and about poor manners on the part of
(13:48):
Chinese tourists in particular, so that might not damage take
support rates in particular.
Speaker 4 (13:54):
And also tourism is an important source of foreign currency
revenue for the country, but a slight reduction in tourist
revenue isn't going to be as damaging as the risk
or the possibility of Japanese companies in China being targeted
or seeing boycotts. Japanese car companies still have billions of
dollars of investments here. Other Japanese companies have billions and
(14:14):
billions of dollars of investment here, seven to eleven, Uniclo Family, Panasonic,
Canon Fujitsu. You know, these are huge companies that do
a lot of revenue here. And if you start to
see real consumer boycotts, if you start to see businesses
pulling back from doing business with Japanese companies, then the
hit to Japan Inc. Could be substantial. While tourism is
(14:37):
very vivid in your face, the bigger thread is going
to be if this goes on for a long time
and Toyota sales in China crater even more than they've
already been falling. They're already falling because of competition from
Chinese companies. If those crater, then the effect of that
is going to be quite big for Japan's economy and
for those companies.
Speaker 3 (14:55):
James, what's been the public mood in China over this?
Speaker 4 (14:58):
Obviously the press and the government reactions is one thing.
But I think the thing that sticks out for me
so far at least, is there hasn't really been a
public reaction. Japanese restaurants are still full, and unlike previous times.
I was speaking to someone who's lived here for more
than twenty years, and they were saying, in two thousand
and five or in twenty ten, you saw Japanese restaurants
putting up signs in that windows saying where are in
(15:18):
by Chinese people? This is a Chinese restaurant. We just
sell Japanese food, and I haven't seen any sign of
that yet.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
President Donald Trump has now entered the conversation as well,
speaking directly with both she and Takeichi. This week, Trump
and she held the first talk since agreeing to a
tariff truce, and Trump's readout of the phone call, they
discussed trade and Russia's war in Ukraine, but he made
no mention of Taiwan. Meanwhile, China's Foreign Ministry says she
(15:48):
told Trump on the call that Taiwan's return to China
is essential a cornerstone of the post World War two
international order. Hours after that conversation wrapped, spoke with Takeichi.
She said the US president reached out to reaffirm ties
with Tokyo and said she could call him any time.
The back to back calls show the US is tricky
(16:10):
balancing act managing tensions between a key US ally and
its biggest rival for most Japanese people, Though Isabelle says
they'd rather move past this issue altogether, I.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Think from the japan side, they will just continue making
these very sort of low key and modest but steady
efforts to try and smooth things over.
Speaker 4 (16:31):
I do think it matters how well Takaichi San does
in any election that she calls. There's talk that election
might happen in January next year, and if that happens,
as she does win a majority, especially if she wins
a majority with her own party, that puts her in
a really good position to be the prime minister for
three years or more. And so if she can show
that she has domestic political stability or there is domestic stability,
(16:54):
she has domestic political strength, and couple that with not
saying things like this again or being vague when you
need to be vague, and that continued low key kind
of work by diplomats. Maybe over time there can be
an improvement in this, but I think if I don't
see any prospects of real improvement or change this year.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
This is The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm wanha.
To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access
to all of Bloomberg dot Com, subscribe today at Bloomberg
dot com slash podcast Offer. If you liked the episode,
make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia
wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find
the show. Thanks for listening and see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.