July 22, 2025 • 30 mins
In June, the equity risk premium was negative for the first time since the early 2000s, indicating that stocks appear expensive relative to bonds and could yield mixed returns going forward. In this episode of Inside Active, host David Cohne, mutual fund and active management analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, along with co-host Michael Casper, US small-cap and sector strategist at BI, spoke with Wellington’s Don Kilbride and Peter Fisher, sub-advisers to Vanguard Dividend Growth (VDIGX) and Vanguard International Dividend Growth (VIDGX), about the importance of sustainable dividend growth. They discussed why a commitment to dividends signals confidence in future cash flows and why high dividend yields can sometimes signal unsustainable dividends. The podcast was recorded on June 12.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
Welcome to Inside Active podcast about active managers that goes
beyond sound bites and headlines and looks deeper into their processes, challenges,
and philosophies and security selection. I'm David Cohne, i lead
mutual fund and active research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Today my
co host is Michael casper Us, small cap and sector
strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, thank you for joining me today.
(00:37):
Thanks David, So, I want to ask you about equity valuations.
What is the relative appeal of stocks to bonds right now?
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Well, if you look at it on an earnings our
equity risk premium basis, the equity risk premium for stocks
is currently negative. That's the first time since the early
two thousands where that situation has existed. What this means
for forward returns for the S and P five hundred,
By the way, it is very mixed. Historically, There's been
two major stretches where the equity risk premium has been
(01:08):
negative October nineteen sixty eight through October nineteen seventy three.
In that period, stocks gained about one point one percent annually.
The second period, however, from September nineteen eighty through June
two thousand and two, there was an annualized about ten
percent return for that period. So it's a very mixed
situation for stocks. If you quintile or quartile sorry, the
(01:30):
equity risk premium. Right now, we're in the second quartel,
so the second lowest quartile of equity risk premium experiences
going back to the sixties. That means low single digit
returns for the S and P five hundred, So not bad,
but below average is how I would categorize it. By
the way, if you do remove the MiG seven from
the equity risk premium, you still get an overvalued situation
(01:52):
for the S and P five hundred, and if you
are to go down cap, So if you start looking
at the S and P six hundred, the small cap
index for the S and P, the equity risk premium
there is also similarly expensive to bond. So anyway slice
it right now stocks are looking a bit expensive to bonds.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Okay, great, I think we can hear from our guests today.
I'd like to welcome Wellington's Don Kilbright and Peter Fisher
to Inside Active. Don and Peter are subadvisors to funds
like the Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund ticker vg ig X
and the Vanguard International Dividend Growth Fund ticker v I
d g X, among others. Don Peter, thanks for joining us,
(02:33):
Thanks for having us.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
So before we dive into dividends, which is what we're
going to be talking about today, i'd love to just
get your thoughts, you know, on the question I posed
to Mike about just the appeal of stocks right now
compared to bonds.
Speaker 4 (02:47):
Maybe I'll start and Don can jump in as well.
I think valuations, you know, look relatively expensive. I think
what the data that Mike gave, you know, reflects that.
One of the things is when we think about forward
returns given high valuations, it's tempting to say, but we're
going to have a low single digit return, which I
think is what you would apply from your data.
Speaker 5 (03:03):
But it never actually works that way. You know.
Speaker 4 (03:05):
Usually it's the market's either up or in some cases,
or the market's expensive. It's either it can be down
quite a lot. So there's a lot of dispersion in
the returns that you can get. And it's periods like
this when valuations are highwood you can get really negative
market outcomes. The period you name, the late sixties, early
seventies was a really tough time, you know for markets
going into the to the lows in the early seventies.
So we just have to be aware that that's a
(03:27):
you know, an outcome that is within the range of
the probability distribution.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Great, that's a good point. And so you know, one
question I want to pose at the beginning before we
kind of dive into the strategy is with Don retiring,
how do you currently work together there? You know, is
that do you meet regularly to discuss the portfolios?
Speaker 4 (03:47):
We do, so we meet as a team and Don
is part of all those conversations. The thing that's changed
in the last years I became the lead manager for
the Dinner Growth Fund, but Don is very much still
a part of the conversation as part of the four
to get together and talk about the portfolio. So he
will be sorely missed when he leaves at the end
of the year by me, especially just we've been working
(04:07):
together for a long time and Don's great friend and mentor.
But the team is set up so that Don is
just one of those voices in the room and so
hopefully we'll.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Be fine with that and when he goes, it's great well,
let's actually talk about the dividend funds. What is the
process of finding companies? You know, what is a day
like for you?
Speaker 4 (04:25):
Yeah, so the different growth approach for us, you know,
different growth is our north star. We're always looking for
companies that can grow their dividends, and they're two key
parts of that. The first is does this business create
value internally by their own investments to make the business
more valuable over time. We think about that as the
value creation engine of the business. And the second piece
is does that business return capital in a sustainable and
(04:46):
growing way in the form of a growing dividend to shareholders.
We're looking for companies to have both of those things.
So that's always the thing that we're trying to get
our hands around. The dividend growth is the measure that
tells us that most accinctly. So when companies can grow
their dividends as stainably, it says to us that these
are businesses the compound value. They tend to be a
bit less risky than the average company in the market,
(05:07):
and so if we can find those companies, then they
have a good chance at outperforming the market and doing
it with lower risk than the broader market, So that's
kind of what we're after. So the day to day
for us is really about visiting with companies. We read
a lot, but we also spend a lot of time
talking and listening to management teams in our offices and
going to visit their headquarters as well, and that's a
(05:28):
big part of it putting together the mosaic, trying to
understand how is this company going to grow, how's the
industry structure that they're facing going to change, get better
or worse, and ultimately what is that going.
Speaker 5 (05:40):
To mean for the dividend growth of the business.
Speaker 4 (05:41):
We think about how fast going to grow the dividend,
Then we think about how risky is that, how uncertain
is that outcome? And then we think about what's the
price opportunity today for that company? And that sort of
drives what comes into the portfolio.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
Can I if I could add something, I couldn't say
it any better, but a little bit of history might
be helpful and call that the given in Growth Fund
was conceived by Vanguard and the mission at that time
when I took it over was to produce dividend income
to the fund shareholder at a rate that would in
sede inflation. By three, not knowing when inflation was going
(06:12):
to be. Infleation really has been quite low over that
period of time, but those were the marching orders, and
what has happened over time is we've recognized that that
journey produces an insight on stocks that Peter just walked
you through. So we started with this notion that this
was a mission based portfolio that was designed with a
very specific goal in mind, and it has evolved over
(06:34):
time and it has opened so many new doors for
us in terms of compounding. So what Peter just described
to you wasn't exactly where we started, but that's certainly
where we are.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
So you mentioned dipend growth being your north star, your
main metric that you look at. Do you look at yield?
Do you have a certain yield threshold that company has
to meet for you to purchase it? And are there
any other divnend related metrics that you used to isolate stocks.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
The only in criteria that we have is that the
company pay pay a dividend. We're not really concerned with
the current yield of the portfolio. That's varied over time,
and you know it's tending to be in then one
and a half two percent sort of range, you know,
looking longer term at the yield, But the yield itself
of any individual company isn't what we're really focused on.
What we want to know is that the company is
really focused on paying the right amount of dividend for
(07:21):
their business and reinvesting the right amount in their business
for growth.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
You know.
Speaker 4 (07:25):
The worst thing that a company can do is pay
too high of a dividend, right because if there's money
they should be reinvesting to grow the business better. They
do that then give too much money back to the shareholders.
On the other side, we don't want companies to be
over investing in their business. We want them to be
you know, investing the right amount and giving us the
access that they have back. So the key thing for
us is what is the optimal amount for that company
(07:46):
and are they really thoughtful about coming to that number.
And then very importantly at the end of it for
us is can that dividend number grow over time?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
It's the dividend growth that we care about, you know,
not not the yield.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Today.
Speaker 4 (07:56):
Yield's great, glad to have that, but that's really you know,
a sidebar to the main thing, which is the dinner growth.
Speaker 6 (08:04):
And one point to add Remember that yield is evaluation metric,
only half of which the company can control, So it
can produce a lot of false positives and a lot
of false negatives. And to Peter's point, it is notable
because it's a value metric. But what we are have
been centrally focused on is at what rate can that
(08:27):
dividend grow? So they're meaningful things that we look at
in addition to what Peter said, where things like capability,
payout ratio, are you responsibly growing this dividend, free cash
flow growth.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
And so on.
Speaker 6 (08:38):
Yield is useful, but it can't produce false positives and
false negatives, and we just want to make sure we
don't anchor to it.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Yeah, let's dive into that last point a little bit more.
How do you really isolate companies that can grow their
dividends significantly? Is there a cash flow model behind it
or something like that.
Speaker 4 (08:56):
Sure, so we do model out the future that we
expect for companies. The key thing is does the business
itself create value? You know, is there something about this
business that allows them to generate high returns on capital
and excess of what they need to reinvest for growth?
And if they can do that make the business more
(09:16):
valuable every day by reinvesting in their business, and the
business becomes more valuable, and therefore there's more cash next
year to pay a higher DUTA.
Speaker 5 (09:23):
Than they do this year.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
So that ability to to you know, reinvest for growth
is the first and most important thing that we're looking at.
And then the second thing is it's helpful if the
payout ratio you know, has the opportunity to grow over
time as well.
Speaker 5 (09:37):
So we're very open to that.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
You know that they're voda scenario for us as a
company that has a really high return on capital, great
you know, moats and barriers to entry and the ability
to sustain the high return on capital and stuff to
invest in so they can grow the company at those
high returns and then they have excess cash to give
back to us along the way, and maybe there's some
scope for the payout you know, to go up somewhat.
That's the perfect scenario for us.
Speaker 6 (10:03):
The thing that I've become sort of moniolically focused on
over the years, in addition to some of the stuff
Peter just pointed out, is is there low amplitude in
your business? That is to say, is your business does
your business compound at a predictable rate over time, and
you don't have these moments of despair where your cash
flow can get compromised. So low amplitude of results, low
(10:23):
capital intensity, when they tend to go hand in hand,
are also things that we want to pay a lot
of attention to. It's all about to Peter's point, it
really is all about how well are you caring for
that value creating engine, because if it's not working, nothing
else works.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
So I wanted to kind of go back a little bit.
Don you had mentioned yield as a valuation metric, are
there other valuation metrics both of you consider, you know,
just in terms of when to enter or not necessarily trade,
but when you know, just in terms of the company
over the future.
Speaker 4 (11:00):
We'll look at a range of valuation measures. We'll use
traditional ones like pe or we prefer price to cash flow,
or you be a cash flow as a measure just
to capture the fact that different companies have different capital intensity.
We'll use more esoteric measures when necessary, and then we
do look at a discount of cash flow model just
to have, you know, another gut check on valuation. But
(11:22):
the first thing that we really we'll key on often
is just the price of something, And that sounds a
little bit simplistic, but if you think about it, the
businesses that we're investing in are tend to be pretty large,
stable companies.
Speaker 5 (11:35):
So if the price of the stock changes.
Speaker 4 (11:37):
Dramatically in a short period of time, it's very unlikely
that the value that business.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
Has actually changed that much.
Speaker 4 (11:42):
So just the share change in a stock price can
be a trigger for us to want to be interested
in it, and then we'll explore all all those measures.
But you know, valuation is the last thing that we do.
What we want to make sure we're doing is creating
a collection of companies that are going to compound value
steadily over time and grow their events seadily over time
and therefore hopefully outperformed slowly over time. When we find
(12:04):
those businesses, we can have pretty high confidence usually that
that's a company we want to have in our collection.
The thing that's a little more uncertained is, okay, well,
what's it worth? You know, I think it's very hard
to know within a narrow range what any company is worth.
Just having looked at valuations over time, as you have,
you've probably seen the same company trade for wildly different valuations,
(12:26):
So it's the most uncertain piece of all of it
for us. So what we want to do is make
sure we're getting the right companies in there, and then
we'll use valuation as the last piece to try to say, Okay,
you know, how do we size this relative to something else?
And I would put valuation sort of in three buckets.
I would say, there are times when valuation is your friend,
there are times in valuation is your enemy. And there's
(12:46):
a lot of time when you're sort of in the
middle and you think valuation is sort of neutral relative
to what I think it could be, and it shouldn't be.
Speaker 5 (12:53):
A primary driver of what we're doing.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
And so we use all those different valuation measures to
try to bucket things into one of those three capsgories
and try to as much as we can make valuation
our friend rather than our enemy. But except sometimes it's
going to be in the middle where it's not really
a main driver of the decision.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
Just to amplify what Peter said, the other subtlety in
all this is that in the fund itself, and Peter
will correct me if I'm wrong, but let's just say
on average turnover, something like ten percent give or take
implies a ten year holding period, which is in fact
the empirical data would suggest that we do hold things
for that long and longer. If you're going to own
(13:31):
something for ten years and you're going to allow time
to help you compound value, particularly with you've got to
give it in growth underneath it. There's not a lot
of information in a two year pe ratio. There's a
mismatch there. So we would have missed so much if
we had gotten frightened one way or the other by
valuation on a lot of the stocks that we've bonne
(13:51):
through time. So that disconnect is something that I think
Peter and I both have sort of ingrained in our
heads now.
Speaker 4 (13:59):
Some of the word stocks that we've ever owned were
some of the cheapest on traditional valuation measures, and a
lot of the best stocks we've owned were the most expensive,
and if we had gotten too fixated on the valuation,
it would have caused us to sell them. So we've learned,
as Don said, let's focus on finding the right businesses
and then valuation becomes the last piece, just to say, okay,
are we do we think we're comfortable owning it at
(14:21):
this valuation? There are rare times when evaluation becomes so
extreme that it becomes more of a driver of decision making.
Speaker 5 (14:28):
But those those moments are pretty rare.
Speaker 6 (14:32):
Remember, just to close the loop on yield, I think Michael,
you you met, you asked about yield earlier on that
you know, by and large, high yields tend to be attractive,
but they can also be a signal.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
So high yield were you to be.
Speaker 6 (14:45):
Sort of responsive to that might lead you to a
place where the market's telling you we don't think this
dividends sustainable, and that's why it's valued this highly. So again,
valuation is is, to Peter's point, is something that we
want to deal with at the end of the process,
not so much at the beginning.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Definitely makes sense. And do you consider other uses of capital?
I know some dividend investors get frustrated with the company
that pours money back into the business and not returning
it to shareholders. And do you do you care about
buybacks and things like that, other uses of capital to
return money to shareholders.
Speaker 5 (15:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:18):
The first thing is for the business that you're looking at,
what is the right amount for them to invest? That's
the first question. If you're in a business with a
lot of growth opportunities. By all means you should be
investing all your money. We don't have any problem with that.
We may not invest in your company if you're not
paying a dividend because you're investing in all but that
may be the right answer for you.
Speaker 5 (15:35):
That's perfectly fine. So the first thing is are they being.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Thoughtful about how they're out they're figuring out what they
should be investing in, and are they doing that. That's
the first thing. In terms of In terms of shary purchase,
shary purchases are fine. We have no problem with the
shary purchase. But it's different than a dividend, and we
have to recognize that. You know, a dividend is a
commitment that you make to your shareholders. Typically in the US,
(15:58):
if you if you set a dividend, you never want
to cut that dividend. So if you think about what
that statement is to a management team, that's quite a
powerful statement. They're saying, we have enough confidence in the
future cashless streams of this business that we're really confident
we're never going to have to cut it. So there
has to be some confidence in the future in the
future earnings power of the company behind that, or they
wouldn't do it. A shary purchase. On the other hand,
(16:19):
you can flex those up and down as you want,
so it's a much weaker statement about your expectations for
the future. So there's nothing wrong with it. If you
have excess cash, by all means do a shary purchase.
But the dividend is a more powerful signal signal of
what's happening in the future. Because and this is to
get to something Don mentioned a minute ago, because a
(16:40):
dividend is a commitment. It says something about your business.
It says that there's a lower amplitude probably to your
future expectations, is a less risk in this company, and
so therefore we feel comfortable making this commitment if you pay.
If you do a shary purchase, you're not making that statement.
You know, it may be totally appropriate. Have a more
cyclical business, and you have to do it that way,
(17:02):
perfectly fine, but we just have to recognize it's a
slightly different thing.
Speaker 6 (17:07):
I've always thought about cheery purchase as something that amplifies
the good things.
Speaker 3 (17:12):
So there's a pecking order, right.
Speaker 6 (17:14):
We want you to invest in the machine, invest in
the business, great value. We want you to share that
with us through that commitment. To Peter's point of a
dividend and let's grow it over time, that's even better.
And if you want to buy some stock back at
the end of all that, that amplifies all the per
share metrics.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
I personally, I think Peter agrees.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
I would say that the data would suggest that cheery
purchases over time are not effective, They're not well done.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
The data supports that, I think. But if you're willing,
if you want to buy some.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
Shares back after we've done those first two things, to
Peter's point, go for it, because it's just going to
amplify all the per share stuff.
Speaker 4 (17:51):
To Don's point, think about when companies buymac shares, it's
when they have a lot of extra money lying around. Usually,
if you have extra money laying around, your business has
done well RECs and your stock prices up. So the
reality is you're going to tend to buy more shares
back when your stock is more expensive. You know, it's
rare that a company is able to stockpile cash and
use it when their stock is cheap.
Speaker 5 (18:10):
Usually they're buying stock at higher prices.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
So that's the reason why there's some slippage in that
in that number, it just makes you share your purchase
just slightly less appealing.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
So as a fund analyst, one of the things that
really interests me about portfolios is I guess sector positioning.
And so my question to you is the way your
sectors are allocated right now or just in general, is
that driven by the stocks themselves or do you kind
of do any type of sector targeting.
Speaker 4 (18:41):
We don't target sectors. We really build the portfolio, you know,
from the bottom up. We're looking for companies that have
the characteristics that we're looking for to grow their dividends,
and that leads us then to tend to have biases
and the sectors that we hold, and those biases are
pretty consistent.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
You know.
Speaker 4 (18:56):
If you think about what we want, we want steady,
consistent pounding of returns over time. That's going to lead
us to sectors that have relatively low amplitude. It's going
to lead us to sectors that generate lots of cash.
It's going to lead us to sectors that hopefully have
some growth, but probably not the highest growing sectors. And
it's going to lead us away from things that have
(19:16):
a lot of capital intensity, a lot of cyclicality or
a really high level of uncertainty of what they're doing.
So we've tended to have a lot of exposure to
things like healthcare, consumer staples. We've tended to be under
exposed to things like energy, which are cyclical and capital intensive.
Our banks as an area where we're typically very under exposed,
and we've tended to be unde exposed to technology, which
(19:37):
has been you know, obviously an area that's been really
attracted for investment over the last number of years. And
so we've had those structural differences in what we're doing,
you know, for a long time, and that tends to
be how we get there. It's important to think about
technology specifically. We do want every company the portfolio to
be paying a dividend, and there are a lot of
(19:58):
companies in technology that own and so that is that
is limited to some degree, our ability to invest to
the extent we might want to in the technology sector
over time. The good news for us is that's changing.
You know, You've seen several companies in the last year,
think of Meta Alphabet, Salesforce, dot Com or just three
that come to buyd that have initiated dividends. So those
(20:19):
are things that in the past we wouldn't have owned
because they didn't pay dividends, and now they do, so
in some sense, our opportunity sets increasing in technology, and
so that's an area where I think we can have
more exposure over time than we have historically.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Yeah, another thing I wanted to ask is do you
ever consider companies that reduce their dividends or are currently
not paying dividends but could be in the future.
Speaker 4 (20:40):
We definitely consider them, we have we we don't we
don't tend to buy them.
Speaker 5 (20:45):
I can't dine.
Speaker 4 (20:46):
Maybe you can think of an example where we've owned
one that didn't pay a dividend, But we do think
about it a.
Speaker 5 (20:50):
Lot, and sometimes we'll actually, you know, in our conversations
with them, you know, talk to them about it.
Speaker 4 (20:55):
And and I think our discipline so far has been
not to do that, not to buy item in anticipation
of starting a dividend, but not to say that we
couldn't ever do that. But it's unlikely that we that
we would. But we do have conversations with companies that
don't pay dividends where the metrics clearly support it, and
so we have a lot of questions for them about
why aren't you paying a dividend? And sometimes their answers
(21:17):
to those questions are good and sometimes they're pretty disappointing.
But until you've actually made that commitment to constrain yourself
in that way, you know, we've made the decision in
the past not not to step in front of that.
We have had cases though, and this happened during COVID
where a company, you know, cut its dividend think of
TJ tj X, because the environment was so extreme that
(21:40):
they needed to.
Speaker 5 (21:40):
It was the responsible thing for them to do.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
And we've continued to hold the company through that because
in our view they were going to reinstate the dividend.
They should pay a dividend, but it was the prudent
thing for them to do in that period of time
to not pay it. We totally understood that, and so
we'll sit through that in a way, you know, in
cases like that, but that's really rare.
Speaker 5 (22:00):
You might have other examples of that.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
Yeah, I go back in time.
Speaker 6 (22:05):
The only the only time that I can recall that
we owned a stock that cut the dividend in addition
to TJX, was back in the global financial crisis, and
that was JP Morgan which probably didn't need to do it,
but as you can recall, that was sort of a
team decision in order to calm the industry down.
Speaker 3 (22:24):
We'd like to think.
Speaker 6 (22:25):
That our process is thorough and deep enough that we
can spot these clouds on the horizon before before they
they are on top of us. So we've been pretty
successful at side stepping potential dividend cuts. To Peter's point,
TJX was a it was proven, it was very well telegraphed.
The game plan post COVID was very well telegraphed, so
(22:49):
we had deep confidence that they were going to get
back on the horse as it related to dividends. But
generally our approach has helped us avoid those on the
rare occasion that they that they seem to be.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
On the horizon.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
So another question, I was pretty curious that, you know,
with the strategy, if you could talk about, you know,
like one specific success story, like you know, it doesn't
have to be a current holding, because I know you
probably can't talk about that anyway, but if you think
of the past, you know, is there a company that
you bought and it just worked out really really well?
Speaker 4 (23:25):
You sure I can come with a few, don do
you want to do, you have one in mind you
want to start with.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
I would have started with t j X, So I'll
set that aside. Here's one.
Speaker 6 (23:35):
And this is going to be boring, but I think
it's really reflective of who we are and what we do.
And it's and and and the time we purchased it
was highly controversial, and it's Microsoft, and I'm sure it's
hard for you to imagine there was a ton of
controversy for a dibdend growth investor with Microsoft, but there
really was when we initially purchased it.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
I'm going to get my daates wrong.
Speaker 6 (23:56):
But back right around when the Nokia acquisition and then
was written off and you had the CEO transition, we uh,
we had this idea that when when Nokia was when
the when the Nokia right off was announced, I think
Peter it was something like six or seven billion dollars
and the stock was down substantially, and this sort of
(24:18):
gripped the market with great fear because they were not
anywhere in.
Speaker 5 (24:22):
Mobile and this attempt to get into mobile.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
Wasn't going to work out, and they're a they're an
on prem company, and the cloud was going to all
this sort of magic was happening, all all this controversy
was happening, And what we concluded was that a seven
billion dollar right right off which would have been which
which was screening as a disaster at a company that
probably had I don't remember the number, but probably fifty
billion dollars of net cash in the balance sheet, It
(24:47):
had a monopoly in the enterprise that was not going away,
and most importantly for us, a magical balance sheet with
a history and commitment of dividend growth.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
That it was one of the these moments.
Speaker 6 (25:00):
Where we were trying to figure out what it is
and not what it was and what it would be.
And so that has been an extraordinarily good stock for
us over long periods of time.
Speaker 3 (25:09):
It is really the gold standard for what we do.
Speaker 6 (25:12):
But it was a moment in time where you just
had to look at a company through a very special lens,
and divedend growth is a very special lens, and if
you had done that, you would have had a wonderful
journey and we have.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
So that's one that I think is indicative of what
we do.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
Yeah, I was going to come to Microsoft as well,
and I think people sometimes ask you're buying these companies
that are well known by the market, Why do you
have opportunities to buy them at valuations that allow you
to perform? And it's surprising, but it happens. The market
gets a narrative in its mind that turns out to
be sort of simplistic or wrong. And if you focus
on the fundamental metrics of the business and you look
(25:51):
at what they actually do, you realize that there's value
there that maybe the market doesn't see. So even these
I mean, it's not like Microsoft was some undiscovered company, right,
I call these you know, this is things sitting in
plain sight. Right, this is these are things that should
be obvious to everyone. But the market gets a story
in its head and gets it gets frightened away. You know,
Microsoft has capabilities and the way that they're embedded in
(26:16):
all of our organizations is so powerful that they're able
to encourage us to use the next generation of each
iteration that they come up with. It's just incredibly powerful.
I mean, if you think back, for example, to what
happened during COVID, we were all at home and I
remember we were using Zoom, we were using WebEx and
(26:37):
now and I don't know where you are in your
organization but in our organization we use teams.
Speaker 5 (26:40):
Now why is that.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
It's because we have Microsoft products all over our data
center and they work really well with teams. And Teams
wasn't as good of a product as WebEx and Zoom,
but they got better and better and better, and next
thing you know, our it people came to us and said, hey,
you're using teams like that. That's what Microsoft is able
to do over and over again. So when you have
a period of time when people are fixated on the
(27:02):
fact that they had the surface which is terrible relative
to the iPad, they were missing the underlying power of
that company.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
And what do you think the biggest macro risks to
your style are upcoming in you know, the next year
or two.
Speaker 4 (27:17):
Our style should be very resilient to most sort of
market environments. I think that the challenge for us is
we buy companies that are steady compounders of value, and
that means that the amplitude around our portfolio is lower
than it is for the broad market. So the periods
of time when we tend to do worse versus the
market is when the market's really really strong, when animal
(27:39):
spirits are running wild.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
You you don't want to own.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
This sort of stodgy approach, right, You want to own
the stuff that you can tell your friends and neighbors
about and you're generating really high return. So the challenging
periods for us on a relative basis versus the market
are the periods of time and the market's doing great.
I think about you know what we do as being
like we're like the steady station wagon Volvo that you're
(28:02):
driving with the all weather tires on it. You know,
when the when the when it's really sunny outside, you
want to drive the flashy red convertible. Our job is
to have a memory, right to remember that market has
cycles and when it's when it's summertime, we know that
it's going to be winter again, and we want to
build this portfolio to be resilient in all of those environments. Uh,
(28:23):
And we need to remember that and and stay.
Speaker 5 (28:25):
True to that.
Speaker 4 (28:25):
So so from a from arella standpoint, the periods of time
when we're going to look most dodgy and just interesting
to people is when it's summertime and people forget that
there's a winner around the corner.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
Ad I'd add three macro things that might spook people,
and these are perceived risks I think having observed this
for twenty years now, so rates are always something that
people uh will focus on when they see diven end fund.
So a higher rate environment makes you know, other instruments
more attractive, and so people I think will feel less
(29:00):
positive about.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
The kinds of companies that we that we invest in.
Speaker 6 (29:04):
Tax policy on dividends always rears its head, not always,
but periodically rears its head. If tax treatment for dividend
income becomes more onerous, that has that will have the
perceived a perceived negative.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Impact on the companies we own.
Speaker 6 (29:19):
But what we've discovered through time is that tax policy,
at least at the company level, has almost zero impact
on dimenend policy.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
So if you're a.
Speaker 6 (29:28):
Reliable dividend grow it's a very clear part of your
capital allocation strategy. Taxes rarely, if ever enter into your
calculus when you're forming dimenend policy.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
So there'll be these perceived I think risks.
Speaker 6 (29:41):
From a macro perspective, rates and taxes would be the
two biggest, But what we've noticed over time is that
it really doesn't impact the companies or the portfolio. To
Peter's point, where I forget what you said, a Volvo,
but we're Volvough and there's a lot of history to
back that.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Know, not the company Volvo, but the car. Right, We're
like the ugly station wagon with the all weather tires
that it's not exciting, but it works for you in every.
Speaker 5 (30:11):
Season, makes sense.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
This is a great conversation. I wanted to thank you
Don and Peter, and also Don, I wanted to congratulate
you on your retirement later this year. Thank you so much, Mike.
Thank you for joining me as my cost today. Yeah,
thank you all. Thank you for listening. If you liked
the episode, please subscribe and leave a review. Also, if
you'd like to see more of our research, go to
(30:34):
the Terminal BI Fund go and BI stocks go Until
our next episode, this is David Cole with the inside Act.
Welcome to Inside Active podcast about active managers that goes
beyond sound bites and headlines and looks deeper into their processes, challenges,
and philosophies and security selection. I'm David Cohne, i lead
mutual fund and active research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Today my
co host is Michael casper Us, small cap and sector
strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, thank you for joining me today.
(00:37):
Thanks David, So, I want to ask you about equity valuations.
What is the relative appeal of stocks to bonds right now?
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Well, if you look at it on an earnings our
equity risk premium basis, the equity risk premium for stocks
is currently negative. That's the first time since the early
two thousands where that situation has existed. What this means
for forward returns for the S and P five hundred,
By the way, it is very mixed. Historically, There's been
two major stretches where the equity risk premium has been
(01:08):
negative October nineteen sixty eight through October nineteen seventy three.
In that period, stocks gained about one point one percent annually.
The second period, however, from September nineteen eighty through June
two thousand and two, there was an annualized about ten
percent return for that period. So it's a very mixed
situation for stocks. If you quintile or quartile sorry, the
(01:30):
equity risk premium. Right now, we're in the second quartel,
so the second lowest quartile of equity risk premium experiences
going back to the sixties. That means low single digit
returns for the S and P five hundred, So not bad,
but below average is how I would categorize it. By
the way, if you do remove the MiG seven from
the equity risk premium, you still get an overvalued situation
(01:52):
for the S and P five hundred, and if you
are to go down cap, So if you start looking
at the S and P six hundred, the small cap
index for the S and P, the equity risk premium
there is also similarly expensive to bond. So anyway slice
it right now stocks are looking a bit expensive to bonds.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Okay, great, I think we can hear from our guests today.
I'd like to welcome Wellington's Don Kilbright and Peter Fisher
to Inside Active. Don and Peter are subadvisors to funds
like the Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund ticker vg ig X
and the Vanguard International Dividend Growth Fund ticker v I
d g X, among others. Don Peter, thanks for joining us,
(02:33):
Thanks for having us.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
So before we dive into dividends, which is what we're
going to be talking about today, i'd love to just
get your thoughts, you know, on the question I posed
to Mike about just the appeal of stocks right now
compared to bonds.
Speaker 4 (02:47):
Maybe I'll start and Don can jump in as well.
I think valuations, you know, look relatively expensive. I think
what the data that Mike gave, you know, reflects that.
One of the things is when we think about forward
returns given high valuations, it's tempting to say, but we're
going to have a low single digit return, which I
think is what you would apply from your data.
Speaker 5 (03:03):
But it never actually works that way. You know.
Speaker 4 (03:05):
Usually it's the market's either up or in some cases,
or the market's expensive. It's either it can be down
quite a lot. So there's a lot of dispersion in
the returns that you can get. And it's periods like
this when valuations are highwood you can get really negative
market outcomes. The period you name, the late sixties, early
seventies was a really tough time, you know for markets
going into the to the lows in the early seventies.
So we just have to be aware that that's a
(03:27):
you know, an outcome that is within the range of
the probability distribution.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Great, that's a good point. And so you know, one
question I want to pose at the beginning before we
kind of dive into the strategy is with Don retiring,
how do you currently work together there? You know, is
that do you meet regularly to discuss the portfolios?
Speaker 4 (03:47):
We do, so we meet as a team and Don
is part of all those conversations. The thing that's changed
in the last years I became the lead manager for
the Dinner Growth Fund, but Don is very much still
a part of the conversation as part of the four
to get together and talk about the portfolio. So he
will be sorely missed when he leaves at the end
of the year by me, especially just we've been working
(04:07):
together for a long time and Don's great friend and mentor.
But the team is set up so that Don is
just one of those voices in the room and so
hopefully we'll.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Be fine with that and when he goes, it's great well,
let's actually talk about the dividend funds. What is the
process of finding companies? You know, what is a day
like for you?
Speaker 4 (04:25):
Yeah, so the different growth approach for us, you know,
different growth is our north star. We're always looking for
companies that can grow their dividends, and they're two key
parts of that. The first is does this business create
value internally by their own investments to make the business
more valuable over time. We think about that as the
value creation engine of the business. And the second piece
is does that business return capital in a sustainable and
(04:46):
growing way in the form of a growing dividend to shareholders.
We're looking for companies to have both of those things.
So that's always the thing that we're trying to get
our hands around. The dividend growth is the measure that
tells us that most accinctly. So when companies can grow
their dividends as stainably, it says to us that these
are businesses the compound value. They tend to be a
bit less risky than the average company in the market,
(05:07):
and so if we can find those companies, then they
have a good chance at outperforming the market and doing
it with lower risk than the broader market, So that's
kind of what we're after. So the day to day
for us is really about visiting with companies. We read
a lot, but we also spend a lot of time
talking and listening to management teams in our offices and
going to visit their headquarters as well, and that's a
(05:28):
big part of it putting together the mosaic, trying to
understand how is this company going to grow, how's the
industry structure that they're facing going to change, get better
or worse, and ultimately what is that going.
Speaker 5 (05:40):
To mean for the dividend growth of the business.
Speaker 4 (05:41):
We think about how fast going to grow the dividend,
Then we think about how risky is that, how uncertain
is that outcome? And then we think about what's the
price opportunity today for that company? And that sort of
drives what comes into the portfolio.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
Can I if I could add something, I couldn't say
it any better, but a little bit of history might
be helpful and call that the given in Growth Fund
was conceived by Vanguard and the mission at that time
when I took it over was to produce dividend income
to the fund shareholder at a rate that would in
sede inflation. By three, not knowing when inflation was going
(06:12):
to be. Infleation really has been quite low over that
period of time, but those were the marching orders, and
what has happened over time is we've recognized that that
journey produces an insight on stocks that Peter just walked
you through. So we started with this notion that this
was a mission based portfolio that was designed with a
very specific goal in mind, and it has evolved over
(06:34):
time and it has opened so many new doors for
us in terms of compounding. So what Peter just described
to you wasn't exactly where we started, but that's certainly
where we are.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
So you mentioned dipend growth being your north star, your
main metric that you look at. Do you look at yield?
Do you have a certain yield threshold that company has
to meet for you to purchase it? And are there
any other divnend related metrics that you used to isolate stocks.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
The only in criteria that we have is that the
company pay pay a dividend. We're not really concerned with
the current yield of the portfolio. That's varied over time,
and you know it's tending to be in then one
and a half two percent sort of range, you know,
looking longer term at the yield, But the yield itself
of any individual company isn't what we're really focused on.
What we want to know is that the company is
really focused on paying the right amount of dividend for
(07:21):
their business and reinvesting the right amount in their business
for growth.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
You know.
Speaker 4 (07:25):
The worst thing that a company can do is pay
too high of a dividend, right because if there's money
they should be reinvesting to grow the business better. They
do that then give too much money back to the shareholders.
On the other side, we don't want companies to be
over investing in their business. We want them to be
you know, investing the right amount and giving us the
access that they have back. So the key thing for
us is what is the optimal amount for that company
(07:46):
and are they really thoughtful about coming to that number.
And then very importantly at the end of it for
us is can that dividend number grow over time?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
It's the dividend growth that we care about, you know,
not not the yield.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Today.
Speaker 4 (07:56):
Yield's great, glad to have that, but that's really you know,
a sidebar to the main thing, which is the dinner growth.
Speaker 6 (08:04):
And one point to add Remember that yield is evaluation metric,
only half of which the company can control, So it
can produce a lot of false positives and a lot
of false negatives. And to Peter's point, it is notable
because it's a value metric. But what we are have
been centrally focused on is at what rate can that
(08:27):
dividend grow? So they're meaningful things that we look at
in addition to what Peter said, where things like capability,
payout ratio, are you responsibly growing this dividend, free cash
flow growth.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
And so on.
Speaker 6 (08:38):
Yield is useful, but it can't produce false positives and
false negatives, and we just want to make sure we
don't anchor to it.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Yeah, let's dive into that last point a little bit more.
How do you really isolate companies that can grow their
dividends significantly? Is there a cash flow model behind it
or something like that.
Speaker 4 (08:56):
Sure, so we do model out the future that we
expect for companies. The key thing is does the business
itself create value? You know, is there something about this
business that allows them to generate high returns on capital
and excess of what they need to reinvest for growth?
And if they can do that make the business more
(09:16):
valuable every day by reinvesting in their business, and the
business becomes more valuable, and therefore there's more cash next
year to pay a higher DUTA.
Speaker 5 (09:23):
Than they do this year.
Speaker 4 (09:24):
So that ability to to you know, reinvest for growth
is the first and most important thing that we're looking at.
And then the second thing is it's helpful if the
payout ratio you know, has the opportunity to grow over
time as well.
Speaker 5 (09:37):
So we're very open to that.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
You know that they're voda scenario for us as a
company that has a really high return on capital, great
you know, moats and barriers to entry and the ability
to sustain the high return on capital and stuff to
invest in so they can grow the company at those
high returns and then they have excess cash to give
back to us along the way, and maybe there's some
scope for the payout you know, to go up somewhat.
That's the perfect scenario for us.
Speaker 6 (10:03):
The thing that I've become sort of moniolically focused on
over the years, in addition to some of the stuff
Peter just pointed out, is is there low amplitude in
your business? That is to say, is your business does
your business compound at a predictable rate over time, and
you don't have these moments of despair where your cash
flow can get compromised. So low amplitude of results, low
(10:23):
capital intensity, when they tend to go hand in hand,
are also things that we want to pay a lot
of attention to. It's all about to Peter's point, it
really is all about how well are you caring for
that value creating engine, because if it's not working, nothing
else works.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
So I wanted to kind of go back a little bit.
Don you had mentioned yield as a valuation metric, are
there other valuation metrics both of you consider, you know,
just in terms of when to enter or not necessarily trade,
but when you know, just in terms of the company
over the future.
Speaker 4 (11:00):
We'll look at a range of valuation measures. We'll use
traditional ones like pe or we prefer price to cash flow,
or you be a cash flow as a measure just
to capture the fact that different companies have different capital intensity.
We'll use more esoteric measures when necessary, and then we
do look at a discount of cash flow model just
to have, you know, another gut check on valuation. But
(11:22):
the first thing that we really we'll key on often
is just the price of something, And that sounds a
little bit simplistic, but if you think about it, the
businesses that we're investing in are tend to be pretty large,
stable companies.
Speaker 5 (11:35):
So if the price of the stock changes.
Speaker 4 (11:37):
Dramatically in a short period of time, it's very unlikely
that the value that business.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
Has actually changed that much.
Speaker 4 (11:42):
So just the share change in a stock price can
be a trigger for us to want to be interested
in it, and then we'll explore all all those measures.
But you know, valuation is the last thing that we do.
What we want to make sure we're doing is creating
a collection of companies that are going to compound value
steadily over time and grow their events seadily over time
and therefore hopefully outperformed slowly over time. When we find
(12:04):
those businesses, we can have pretty high confidence usually that
that's a company we want to have in our collection.
The thing that's a little more uncertained is, okay, well,
what's it worth? You know, I think it's very hard
to know within a narrow range what any company is worth.
Just having looked at valuations over time, as you have,
you've probably seen the same company trade for wildly different valuations,
(12:26):
So it's the most uncertain piece of all of it
for us. So what we want to do is make
sure we're getting the right companies in there, and then
we'll use valuation as the last piece to try to say, Okay,
you know, how do we size this relative to something else?
And I would put valuation sort of in three buckets.
I would say, there are times when valuation is your friend,
there are times in valuation is your enemy. And there's
(12:46):
a lot of time when you're sort of in the
middle and you think valuation is sort of neutral relative
to what I think it could be, and it shouldn't be.
Speaker 5 (12:53):
A primary driver of what we're doing.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
And so we use all those different valuation measures to
try to bucket things into one of those three capsgories
and try to as much as we can make valuation
our friend rather than our enemy. But except sometimes it's
going to be in the middle where it's not really
a main driver of the decision.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
Just to amplify what Peter said, the other subtlety in
all this is that in the fund itself, and Peter
will correct me if I'm wrong, but let's just say
on average turnover, something like ten percent give or take
implies a ten year holding period, which is in fact
the empirical data would suggest that we do hold things
for that long and longer. If you're going to own
(13:31):
something for ten years and you're going to allow time
to help you compound value, particularly with you've got to
give it in growth underneath it. There's not a lot
of information in a two year pe ratio. There's a
mismatch there. So we would have missed so much if
we had gotten frightened one way or the other by
valuation on a lot of the stocks that we've bonne
(13:51):
through time. So that disconnect is something that I think
Peter and I both have sort of ingrained in our
heads now.
Speaker 4 (13:59):
Some of the word stocks that we've ever owned were
some of the cheapest on traditional valuation measures, and a
lot of the best stocks we've owned were the most expensive,
and if we had gotten too fixated on the valuation,
it would have caused us to sell them. So we've learned,
as Don said, let's focus on finding the right businesses
and then valuation becomes the last piece, just to say, okay,
are we do we think we're comfortable owning it at
(14:21):
this valuation? There are rare times when evaluation becomes so
extreme that it becomes more of a driver of decision making.
Speaker 5 (14:28):
But those those moments are pretty rare.
Speaker 6 (14:32):
Remember, just to close the loop on yield, I think Michael,
you you met, you asked about yield earlier on that
you know, by and large, high yields tend to be attractive,
but they can also be a signal.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
So high yield were you to be.
Speaker 6 (14:45):
Sort of responsive to that might lead you to a
place where the market's telling you we don't think this
dividends sustainable, and that's why it's valued this highly. So again,
valuation is is, to Peter's point, is something that we
want to deal with at the end of the process,
not so much at the beginning.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Definitely makes sense. And do you consider other uses of capital?
I know some dividend investors get frustrated with the company
that pours money back into the business and not returning
it to shareholders. And do you do you care about
buybacks and things like that, other uses of capital to
return money to shareholders.
Speaker 5 (15:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:18):
The first thing is for the business that you're looking at,
what is the right amount for them to invest? That's
the first question. If you're in a business with a
lot of growth opportunities. By all means you should be
investing all your money. We don't have any problem with that.
We may not invest in your company if you're not
paying a dividend because you're investing in all but that
may be the right answer for you.
Speaker 5 (15:35):
That's perfectly fine. So the first thing is are they being.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Thoughtful about how they're out they're figuring out what they
should be investing in, and are they doing that. That's
the first thing. In terms of In terms of shary purchase,
shary purchases are fine. We have no problem with the
shary purchase. But it's different than a dividend, and we
have to recognize that. You know, a dividend is a
commitment that you make to your shareholders. Typically in the US,
(15:58):
if you if you set a dividend, you never want
to cut that dividend. So if you think about what
that statement is to a management team, that's quite a
powerful statement. They're saying, we have enough confidence in the
future cashless streams of this business that we're really confident
we're never going to have to cut it. So there
has to be some confidence in the future in the
future earnings power of the company behind that, or they
wouldn't do it. A shary purchase. On the other hand,
(16:19):
you can flex those up and down as you want,
so it's a much weaker statement about your expectations for
the future. So there's nothing wrong with it. If you
have excess cash, by all means do a shary purchase.
But the dividend is a more powerful signal signal of
what's happening in the future. Because and this is to
get to something Don mentioned a minute ago, because a
(16:40):
dividend is a commitment. It says something about your business.
It says that there's a lower amplitude probably to your
future expectations, is a less risk in this company, and
so therefore we feel comfortable making this commitment if you pay.
If you do a shary purchase, you're not making that statement.
You know, it may be totally appropriate. Have a more
cyclical business, and you have to do it that way,
(17:02):
perfectly fine, but we just have to recognize it's a
slightly different thing.
Speaker 6 (17:07):
I've always thought about cheery purchase as something that amplifies
the good things.
Speaker 3 (17:12):
So there's a pecking order, right.
Speaker 6 (17:14):
We want you to invest in the machine, invest in
the business, great value. We want you to share that
with us through that commitment. To Peter's point of a
dividend and let's grow it over time, that's even better.
And if you want to buy some stock back at
the end of all that, that amplifies all the per
share metrics.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
I personally, I think Peter agrees.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
I would say that the data would suggest that cheery
purchases over time are not effective, They're not well done.
Speaker 3 (17:38):
The data supports that, I think. But if you're willing,
if you want to buy some.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
Shares back after we've done those first two things, to
Peter's point, go for it, because it's just going to
amplify all the per share stuff.
Speaker 4 (17:51):
To Don's point, think about when companies buymac shares, it's
when they have a lot of extra money lying around. Usually,
if you have extra money laying around, your business has
done well RECs and your stock prices up. So the
reality is you're going to tend to buy more shares
back when your stock is more expensive. You know, it's
rare that a company is able to stockpile cash and
use it when their stock is cheap.
Speaker 5 (18:10):
Usually they're buying stock at higher prices.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
So that's the reason why there's some slippage in that
in that number, it just makes you share your purchase
just slightly less appealing.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
So as a fund analyst, one of the things that
really interests me about portfolios is I guess sector positioning.
And so my question to you is the way your
sectors are allocated right now or just in general, is
that driven by the stocks themselves or do you kind
of do any type of sector targeting.
Speaker 4 (18:41):
We don't target sectors. We really build the portfolio, you know,
from the bottom up. We're looking for companies that have
the characteristics that we're looking for to grow their dividends,
and that leads us then to tend to have biases
and the sectors that we hold, and those biases are
pretty consistent.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
You know.
Speaker 4 (18:56):
If you think about what we want, we want steady,
consistent pounding of returns over time. That's going to lead
us to sectors that have relatively low amplitude. It's going
to lead us to sectors that generate lots of cash.
It's going to lead us to sectors that hopefully have
some growth, but probably not the highest growing sectors. And
it's going to lead us away from things that have
(19:16):
a lot of capital intensity, a lot of cyclicality or
a really high level of uncertainty of what they're doing.
So we've tended to have a lot of exposure to
things like healthcare, consumer staples. We've tended to be under
exposed to things like energy, which are cyclical and capital intensive.
Our banks as an area where we're typically very under exposed,
and we've tended to be unde exposed to technology, which
(19:37):
has been you know, obviously an area that's been really
attracted for investment over the last number of years. And
so we've had those structural differences in what we're doing,
you know, for a long time, and that tends to
be how we get there. It's important to think about
technology specifically. We do want every company the portfolio to
be paying a dividend, and there are a lot of
(19:58):
companies in technology that own and so that is that
is limited to some degree, our ability to invest to
the extent we might want to in the technology sector
over time. The good news for us is that's changing.
You know, You've seen several companies in the last year,
think of Meta Alphabet, Salesforce, dot Com or just three
that come to buyd that have initiated dividends. So those
(20:19):
are things that in the past we wouldn't have owned
because they didn't pay dividends, and now they do, so
in some sense, our opportunity sets increasing in technology, and
so that's an area where I think we can have
more exposure over time than we have historically.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Yeah, another thing I wanted to ask is do you
ever consider companies that reduce their dividends or are currently
not paying dividends but could be in the future.
Speaker 4 (20:40):
We definitely consider them, we have we we don't we
don't tend to buy them.
Speaker 5 (20:45):
I can't dine.
Speaker 4 (20:46):
Maybe you can think of an example where we've owned
one that didn't pay a dividend, But we do think
about it a.
Speaker 5 (20:50):
Lot, and sometimes we'll actually, you know, in our conversations
with them, you know, talk to them about it.
Speaker 4 (20:55):
And and I think our discipline so far has been
not to do that, not to buy item in anticipation
of starting a dividend, but not to say that we
couldn't ever do that. But it's unlikely that we that
we would. But we do have conversations with companies that
don't pay dividends where the metrics clearly support it, and
so we have a lot of questions for them about
why aren't you paying a dividend? And sometimes their answers
(21:17):
to those questions are good and sometimes they're pretty disappointing.
But until you've actually made that commitment to constrain yourself
in that way, you know, we've made the decision in
the past not not to step in front of that.
We have had cases though, and this happened during COVID
where a company, you know, cut its dividend think of
TJ tj X, because the environment was so extreme that
(21:40):
they needed to.
Speaker 5 (21:40):
It was the responsible thing for them to do.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
And we've continued to hold the company through that because
in our view they were going to reinstate the dividend.
They should pay a dividend, but it was the prudent
thing for them to do in that period of time
to not pay it. We totally understood that, and so
we'll sit through that in a way, you know, in
cases like that, but that's really rare.
Speaker 5 (22:00):
You might have other examples of that.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
Yeah, I go back in time.
Speaker 6 (22:05):
The only the only time that I can recall that
we owned a stock that cut the dividend in addition
to TJX, was back in the global financial crisis, and
that was JP Morgan which probably didn't need to do it,
but as you can recall, that was sort of a
team decision in order to calm the industry down.
Speaker 3 (22:24):
We'd like to think.
Speaker 6 (22:25):
That our process is thorough and deep enough that we
can spot these clouds on the horizon before before they
they are on top of us. So we've been pretty
successful at side stepping potential dividend cuts. To Peter's point,
TJX was a it was proven, it was very well telegraphed.
The game plan post COVID was very well telegraphed, so
(22:49):
we had deep confidence that they were going to get
back on the horse as it related to dividends. But
generally our approach has helped us avoid those on the
rare occasion that they that they seem to be.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
On the horizon.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
So another question, I was pretty curious that, you know,
with the strategy, if you could talk about, you know,
like one specific success story, like you know, it doesn't
have to be a current holding, because I know you
probably can't talk about that anyway, but if you think
of the past, you know, is there a company that
you bought and it just worked out really really well?
Speaker 4 (23:25):
You sure I can come with a few, don do
you want to do, you have one in mind you
want to start with.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
I would have started with t j X, So I'll
set that aside. Here's one.
Speaker 6 (23:35):
And this is going to be boring, but I think
it's really reflective of who we are and what we do.
And it's and and and the time we purchased it
was highly controversial, and it's Microsoft, and I'm sure it's
hard for you to imagine there was a ton of
controversy for a dibdend growth investor with Microsoft, but there
really was when we initially purchased it.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
I'm going to get my daates wrong.
Speaker 6 (23:56):
But back right around when the Nokia acquisition and then
was written off and you had the CEO transition, we uh,
we had this idea that when when Nokia was when
the when the Nokia right off was announced, I think
Peter it was something like six or seven billion dollars
and the stock was down substantially, and this sort of
(24:18):
gripped the market with great fear because they were not
anywhere in.
Speaker 5 (24:22):
Mobile and this attempt to get into mobile.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
Wasn't going to work out, and they're a they're an
on prem company, and the cloud was going to all
this sort of magic was happening, all all this controversy
was happening, And what we concluded was that a seven
billion dollar right right off which would have been which
which was screening as a disaster at a company that
probably had I don't remember the number, but probably fifty
billion dollars of net cash in the balance sheet, It
(24:47):
had a monopoly in the enterprise that was not going away,
and most importantly for us, a magical balance sheet with
a history and commitment of dividend growth.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
That it was one of the these moments.
Speaker 6 (25:00):
Where we were trying to figure out what it is
and not what it was and what it would be.
And so that has been an extraordinarily good stock for
us over long periods of time.
Speaker 3 (25:09):
It is really the gold standard for what we do.
Speaker 6 (25:12):
But it was a moment in time where you just
had to look at a company through a very special lens,
and divedend growth is a very special lens, and if
you had done that, you would have had a wonderful
journey and we have.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
So that's one that I think is indicative of what
we do.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
Yeah, I was going to come to Microsoft as well,
and I think people sometimes ask you're buying these companies
that are well known by the market, Why do you
have opportunities to buy them at valuations that allow you
to perform? And it's surprising, but it happens. The market
gets a narrative in its mind that turns out to
be sort of simplistic or wrong. And if you focus
on the fundamental metrics of the business and you look
(25:51):
at what they actually do, you realize that there's value
there that maybe the market doesn't see. So even these
I mean, it's not like Microsoft was some undiscovered company, right,
I call these you know, this is things sitting in
plain sight. Right, this is these are things that should
be obvious to everyone. But the market gets a story
in its head and gets it gets frightened away. You know,
Microsoft has capabilities and the way that they're embedded in
(26:16):
all of our organizations is so powerful that they're able
to encourage us to use the next generation of each
iteration that they come up with. It's just incredibly powerful.
I mean, if you think back, for example, to what
happened during COVID, we were all at home and I
remember we were using Zoom, we were using WebEx and
(26:37):
now and I don't know where you are in your
organization but in our organization we use teams.
Speaker 5 (26:40):
Now why is that.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
It's because we have Microsoft products all over our data
center and they work really well with teams. And Teams
wasn't as good of a product as WebEx and Zoom,
but they got better and better and better, and next
thing you know, our it people came to us and said, hey,
you're using teams like that. That's what Microsoft is able
to do over and over again. So when you have
a period of time when people are fixated on the
(27:02):
fact that they had the surface which is terrible relative
to the iPad, they were missing the underlying power of
that company.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
And what do you think the biggest macro risks to
your style are upcoming in you know, the next year
or two.
Speaker 4 (27:17):
Our style should be very resilient to most sort of
market environments. I think that the challenge for us is
we buy companies that are steady compounders of value, and
that means that the amplitude around our portfolio is lower
than it is for the broad market. So the periods
of time when we tend to do worse versus the
market is when the market's really really strong, when animal
(27:39):
spirits are running wild.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
You you don't want to own.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
This sort of stodgy approach, right, You want to own
the stuff that you can tell your friends and neighbors
about and you're generating really high return. So the challenging
periods for us on a relative basis versus the market
are the periods of time and the market's doing great.
I think about you know what we do as being
like we're like the steady station wagon Volvo that you're
(28:02):
driving with the all weather tires on it. You know,
when the when the when it's really sunny outside, you
want to drive the flashy red convertible. Our job is
to have a memory, right to remember that market has
cycles and when it's when it's summertime, we know that
it's going to be winter again, and we want to
build this portfolio to be resilient in all of those environments. Uh,
(28:23):
And we need to remember that and and stay.
Speaker 5 (28:25):
True to that.
Speaker 4 (28:25):
So so from a from arella standpoint, the periods of time
when we're going to look most dodgy and just interesting
to people is when it's summertime and people forget that
there's a winner around the corner.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
Ad I'd add three macro things that might spook people,
and these are perceived risks I think having observed this
for twenty years now, so rates are always something that
people uh will focus on when they see diven end fund.
So a higher rate environment makes you know, other instruments
more attractive, and so people I think will feel less
(29:00):
positive about.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
The kinds of companies that we that we invest in.
Speaker 6 (29:04):
Tax policy on dividends always rears its head, not always,
but periodically rears its head. If tax treatment for dividend
income becomes more onerous, that has that will have the
perceived a perceived negative.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Impact on the companies we own.
Speaker 6 (29:19):
But what we've discovered through time is that tax policy,
at least at the company level, has almost zero impact
on dimenend policy.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
So if you're a.
Speaker 6 (29:28):
Reliable dividend grow it's a very clear part of your
capital allocation strategy. Taxes rarely, if ever enter into your
calculus when you're forming dimenend policy.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
So there'll be these perceived I think risks.
Speaker 6 (29:41):
From a macro perspective, rates and taxes would be the
two biggest, But what we've noticed over time is that
it really doesn't impact the companies or the portfolio. To
Peter's point, where I forget what you said, a Volvo,
but we're Volvough and there's a lot of history to
back that.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Know, not the company Volvo, but the car. Right, We're
like the ugly station wagon with the all weather tires
that it's not exciting, but it works for you in every.
Speaker 5 (30:11):
Season, makes sense.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
This is a great conversation. I wanted to thank you
Don and Peter, and also Don, I wanted to congratulate
you on your retirement later this year. Thank you so much, Mike.
Thank you for joining me as my cost today. Yeah,
thank you all. Thank you for listening. If you liked
the episode, please subscribe and leave a review. Also, if
you'd like to see more of our research, go to
(30:34):
the Terminal BI Fund go and BI stocks go Until
our next episode, this is David Cole with the inside Act.
Host
Gina Martin Adams
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com