'Who is Government' with Michael Lewis

Barry speaks with author and financial journalist Michael Lewis. Michael has written countless New York Times bestsellers including Flash Boys and Going Infinite. His book The Big Short was turned into an Oscar-winning film, alongside his Oscar-nominated books-turned film The Blind Side and Moneyball. On this episode, Barry and Michael breakdown the ins and outs of government and his latest book Who is Government: The Untold Story of Public Service.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in
Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.

Speaker 2 (00:16):
This week on the podcast what can I say? Every
time I am afforded an opportunity to sit down with
Michael Lewis, it's just delightful. He's such a fascinating character.
The people and ideas he writes about are absolutely fascinating.

(00:37):
His new book, he has this just absolutely insane way
of seeing around a corner. I asked him, how come
every time you find yourself covering the subject, six months
later it blows up and it's in the headlines. He's
done it with The Big Shorty, a big short that
was mostly after the fact, But he did it with Flashboys,

(00:59):
and he did it with Moneyball, and he certainly did
it with Going Infinite, and now he's doing it again
with Who Is Government. We talk a little bit about
the Elon Musk and Doge, but we mostly talk about
these nameless, faithless civil servants who dedicate their career to

(01:21):
providing a service to the American taxpayer, and whether it's
saving lives in coal mines, or stopping cybercrime or keeping
the food supply safe. The book is just filled with
all these stories and it's absolutely a nonpartisan. It's not
a left right thing. It's Hey, there are certain things

(01:41):
that only government can do. The private sector is in
building the Interstate Highway System on NASA. In fact, when
you see private sector services in these spaces, it's because
they've built on top of the seminal work the government
has done that. No one would undertake these projects that
are billions of dollars and take decades. The ROI just

(02:04):
is too far, too long, too expensive. The book is fascinating.
Michael's fascinating. If you're listening this far into the intro,
it's because you know this is going to be delightful,
with no further ado. My discussion with Michael Lewis about
his new book, Who Is Government. Michael Lewis, I don't
have to welcome you. Let's just jump right into this

(02:27):
and we'll start with your prior book, The Fifth Risk,
which is really the predecessor to Who Is Government. Tell
us about that earlier book on presidential transitions.

Speaker 3 (02:39):
Trump had just been elected for the first time and
he had fired his transition team, and I didn't I
learned all this after the fact, but outgoing presidents are
required by law to prepare a transition, and so the
Obama administration had deputed one thousand people inside the government
to prepare where the best course ever given on how

(03:02):
the government works, and not just the White House, right
the Department Energy and all those other places. And Trump
had fired the mechanism for getting the briefings. He fired
all five hundred and fifty people and told Chris Christy
that he didn't need to know because he could figure
out everything he needed to know in an hour about
how the federal government worked. When I saw this, I thought,
it's like a great comic premise. I'm going to get

(03:24):
to roll around the government and get the briefings, and
the reader will be on the joke that we know
more about the government than the president does because they
haven't bothered to learn. And so I and it was
just sort of like where you start and I and
they're two things. Where I started, and what kind of
the spirit in which I did it. The spirit was

(03:45):
go to places that no one has any idea what
they do. Like most I mean, I'm surround I'm in Berkeley,
I'm surrounded by people who talk about politics all the
time and just want to inflict their political opinions on
me constantly. But if I ask them, what is the
Department of Commerce? Do they have no.

Speaker 2 (04:02):
Idea to do commerce? Right? Yeah, some business something.

Speaker 3 (04:07):
What they do is weather, you know, but it would
never mind. Uh. And but I didn't know that. So
I just thought, I'm going to go to the places
that that are most opaque to the American people, and
so I picked. I picked the Department of Agriculture, Commerce,
and Energy, and thinking like, if I can make these
swing on the page, I can make anything swing on
the page. And Energy, but I started with Energy because

(04:28):
it was so great. He had appointed Rick Perry, former
Governor of Texas, to be the Secretary of Energy. And
Rick Perry had called for the elimination of the Department
of Energy when he was round for president, like all
this waste and fraud and the government, we're gonna get
rid of whole departments. In one of them's department Energy,
and now he's supposed to run it. He found out
quickly what I found out when I walked in and

(04:49):
got the briefings that oh, they run the nuclear stockpile. Oh, oh,
they gave the loan that created Tesla. You know, Oh, oh,
this like this one thing after another in it, and
he had to backtrack in his hearing and saying, oh,
I didn't mean that, you know, really we need the
department energy and so so anyway, I don't want to
go too long about this, but to say that I

(05:10):
wrote these things in vanity fair long form narrative journalism.
I stapled them together into the book The Fifth Risk.
It sold half a million copies.

Speaker 2 (05:19):
That's a lot for a finance book, right, and people
don't understand.

Speaker 3 (05:23):
It's a lot for a book. This was an indication,
this was market testing. This was an indication to me that,
oh my god, people really do actually want to know
that there is these stories interest me. But it's not
just me. So I had in the back of that
in the back of my mind over the last few years,
because I had this other takeaway from The Fifth Risk,

(05:44):
and it was although I'd written a lot about what
these place has done, it was like a travel They
were like travel pieces. It wasn't till the very end
in the paperback where I did a deep dive on
a single character, on a single bureaucrat, and he was
and I had picked him his name kind of out
of a jar it was. The material was literary, the
material was just epic. It was so good. I thought, Man,

(06:07):
I want to come back and just do more of that,
like grab people out of the government and just receive
right about a person I'm going to get. At some point,
it's gonna the accusation is going to arise. And it
always does, like, oh, this is just Michael Lewis making
it up, or this is Michael Lewis with his own
view or whatever. And uh so I thought, grab a
bunch of other writers and and I do it with them,

(06:29):
drop them in, parachute them in wherever they want to go,
and have them write stories so that you can see
just how rich and interesting a place this is. And
that's what that's that idea is what led to who
is Government?

Speaker 2 (06:41):
So I have to point out what an incredible knack
you have for finding yourself in the right place at
the right moment in history. You did it with FTX
and Sam Bankman Freed in the Pure Luck. Okay, So
so now you write a book about the transition in

(07:03):
the first Trump administration, and lots of things you write
about in the fifth risk turn out to be very
prescient for how the administration in many different ways. I
don't want to make a blanket statement about them, but
in specific area, specific policies kind of drop the ball
and bad things happen. But the thing that's so fascinating

(07:26):
is this book about all these different government agencies and
the really amazing work these people do comes out right
into the doze elimination of we're going to close the
Department of Education. We're going to fire all these people,
whether we have the authority or not. Your timing is
really exquisite. Twice so you can tell me this is

(07:49):
dumb luck four times in a row.

Speaker 3 (07:51):
All right, let me try so kinda, but let me.

Speaker 2 (07:56):
Let me at a certain point. I know you're fairly humble,
and it's not a false humility, but at a certain
point us readers of your work have to say, hey,
this guy really sees around a corner, finds an area
before anyone else has any inkling. Big things are going
on there, and by the time we realize it, he

(08:16):
already has the full story out in paperback.

Speaker 3 (08:20):
I love how much more credit you give me than
I deserve.

Speaker 2 (08:23):
How are you saying it's luck? I don't believe it.

Speaker 3 (08:25):
So if I were trying to explain me how if
I was trying to give myself some credit for the
serendipity of my book publication dates, I guess what I'd
say is that the best way to predict the future
is just observed very closely the present. So it's close

(08:47):
observation of what's going on at a moment. And it's
also the other thing is being interested in the thing
you're interested in rather than the thing everybody's talking about.
And so nobody is talking about this, but it's interesting thing.
That's that's good because it means that it's going to
be fresh and different. And I guess it maybe it's
true that when I'm closely observing something I'm really interested in,

(09:11):
that the world is not all that interested in that
some of those things end up being the future, and
that that's true, and so that's but it isn't like,
you know, you know, all kinds of people who make
a decent living on the lecture servant circuit being able
to pretending to be able to tell the future, pretending.

Speaker 2 (09:26):
You were written.

Speaker 3 (09:27):
I've just gotten how not to invest. And I assume
I will find in this book a chapter about false prognostication.
We know that you know the future. It's too complicated.
So all you could tell is the present really well.
And if you tell the present really well and you're
not just defaulting to what everybody's talking about in the moment,

(09:49):
you will get the future sometimes.

Speaker 2 (09:51):
Huh. I love that now.

Speaker 3 (09:53):
It's similar to It's similar to investing. I bet right.
It's like, Oh, this company really interests me. Why isn't
any Boddy here? Why isn't anybody investing in it? But
I'm really interested in it. That's like a great sign
that you're interested in nobody else has figured it out yet.
And that's the that's a great sign with writing too.

Speaker 2 (10:11):
So something interests you. What I find fascinating is you
end up kind of embedding yourself in unfamiliar places and
fields that you haven't necessarily studied before.

Speaker 3 (10:24):
I don't know anything about it.

Speaker 2 (10:25):
Right like you like? So, by the way, that is
a sign of a of a curious intellect. Hey, I
don't know anything about this. I'm going deep down the
rabbit hole learn. But a lot of these things are
kind of big institutions that don't trust outsiders, that don't
trust the media or authors. How do you win these

(10:49):
people over? I mean, you know twenty twenty is Michael
Lewis's well known guy. And maybe you have an ability
to gain the trust of people now, but you've been
doing this your whole career. How do you win the
trust and how do you get close to people who
are skeptical and reserved and holding the public in arms distance.

Speaker 3 (11:13):
So we've seen you've seen how Elon Musk has approached
government employees over the last sixty days with hostility and
malice and condescension, and that it's the opposite of the
way to approach someone if you actually want to learn.
So I don't have a perfect answer to this, but
I'll say a couple of things that I think help me.
One is I'm usually just genuinely curious, Like I really

(11:35):
have some questions I want to answer. Why are you
winning baseball games? You know, like, explain it to me.
How did you figure out to short the market in
two thousand and seven? How did you figure out how
to stop coal mine rules from falling in on the
heads of coal miners? Like I just like, it's like
something has happened here and you know the answer, and
I genuinely want to know the answer. People respond to

(11:58):
genuine curiosity, which is different from I have a theory
and I want you to sort of dance inside my theory,
which is like I've sat in a room and I
decided there's a story here. This is the story. I'm
just going to gather some quotes to fill in the story.
Nothing I've done this any good. Is that it's always
like just a glimmer of an interest and I just

(12:21):
want to know. And so it creates a natural learning environment.
That's one. Two. Don't be boring, like if if it's
if it's tedious for me to show up, like that's bad,
and which you want almost the opposite. It's like I
hope he comes because I learned something last time just
from the questions he asked, and he adds value in
some other way, like he brings good sandwiches or whatever.

(12:44):
So no, it's so it's like you want to create
an incentive system, right, people respond to incentives you want
to create. You want to make them want you there.
It's not not just not want you there, it's like
want you there. So that's that's a second sort of prerequisite.
And thed is I try to make it clear what
I'm thinking when I'm thinking it and so I'm not

(13:06):
hiding like myself from the person I'm writing about. I'm
letting them get to know me a little bit. If
I'm letting them bouncing theories off them and listening to
respond and object or whatever, and so that they don't
they aren't shocked. They're often shocked when they read the
book because they're surprised what I've decided is important and

(13:28):
what isn't. They're sometimes shocked by the way I see
them or describe them, a little shocked, but they aren't
shocked by like what I'm interested in. They don't have
a feeling I'm being sneaky, so that all those help
I think, and I say this that people I write

(13:48):
about they often are really interesting people with really interesting stories.
And while they may not think of themselves and usually
don't think of themselves as characters, they're very aware they're
in the middle of something interesting. That's why they're doing it.
So they can understand why I'm so interested, Like, yeah,
I get it. I get why you have all of
a sudden gotten interested in local public health, says Charity Dean,

(14:11):
because it's broken and that's why we're not responding well
with this. You know, it's like, or I get why
Sam bgmanfreed. He understood I thought of him as weird,
Like you are a weirdo moving through the world with
a very weird view of the world, and you're seeking
to impose this sort of abstract idea about how to

(14:32):
live on the world around you, and I just want
to watch it. And he's like, yeah, I get that.
I know I'm weird. I know what's happening is weird,
and I understand why you're amused by it. Go ahead,
watch you know that? So that it has to be
an honest relationship, right, it just has to be an
honest relationship.

Speaker 2 (14:52):
So I'm curious. You've delved into baseball, into football, into
high frequency trading, psychology, now government. What what's been the
biggest surprise that you found in all these areas, Like
you're delving into things that interest you, But what what
really sticks out in any of your books where you say, huh,

(15:14):
didn't see that coming? Not counting SBF getting buss.

Speaker 3 (15:18):
Are you took away the easy one?

Speaker 2 (15:19):
Right? That's how I know I did that on purpose?
That's the obvious one. Although as as I was reading
that book, your book going infinite, like like there are
all sorts of little signposts along the way. I'm sure
a lot of that's just hindsight biased. But as you
were writing those chapters that hadn't yet happened, but as

(15:41):
you're reading it, it's like, oh, this.

Speaker 3 (15:42):
Can't be good.

Speaker 2 (15:43):
You know, all these little little it's like a fault
line with an earthquake. All these little pressures are building
up along the book. I don't know if that's intentional.

Speaker 3 (15:52):
Oh, totally intentional. I didn't start writing it until it
all blew up.

Speaker 2 (15:55):
Oh you didn't, all right, So yeah, it's intention But
that was an obvious one. What what like? I didn't
see that coming.

Speaker 3 (16:01):
All right. So here's one from this book. This is
illustrating a general point. And the general point is the
difference between what you imagine a story is and what's
going on in the world. What you're what's going on
here when you're just doing through abstract kind of speculation,
compared to when you go out and report and learn
and collide with the world, And how much more interesting

(16:24):
the world ends up being than you imagine, even when
you imagine it being interesting. So the first story in
this book, Christopher Mark, how do I find it? I
find it because I get a list of nominees for
Civil Service Awards. It's like six hundred people on this list.
How do you pick one of them? It's all these
names and descriptions of things they've done. Joe Blow with

(16:44):
the FBI has broken up a child porn ring, but
doesn't say aything about Joe Blow. I get to a
name on the list. It says, Chris Mark solve the
problem of coal mine ruse falling in on the heads
of coal miners, which killed fifty thousand coal miners in
the last century. A former coal miner, it says, all right.
Sitting at my desk, I'm thinking, man, there's a story,

(17:07):
and IDY think I know what the story is. I
think the story is all right. This guy probably grew
up in West Virginia, former coal miner. He's there's gotta
been some personal if it's killing all these coal miners,
and he got out of the coal mine to fix it.
A friend, a relative, someone got killed by a coal mine.
He that it was like there's a movie in this
kind of I already had it into my head, but
then I call him up. I find him. He lives

(17:29):
in Pittsburgh. He knows who I am, because he's read Moneyball.
He's like, why the hell you calling me? Like it
was just bizarre, Like he took me a while to
believe it was me. And I said, I just like
I saw this line on a list. He didn't even
know he'd been nominated for a prize, so it was
especially weird. And I said, I said, like, I just
just give me the five minute summer of your story.

(17:50):
And he says the first thing A's mouth is, I
grew up in Princeton, New Jersey, and my dad was
a professor at the university. I thought, oh, there goes
my story.

Speaker 2 (17:59):
Right, so much of presumptionswhe for the movie, right, well,
but hold on.

Speaker 3 (18:05):
In the next ten minutes, he tells me this he
had been a radical in the sixties as a little kid,
radically I started calling throwing around words like bourgeois at
his father said that he was like, didn't want to
join the ruling class, didn't want to go to Harvard,
which he could have, and leaves high school early to
go join the working class, much to his father's chagrin.

(18:27):
Like his father really upset. His father is a famous guy,
I mean in his world. Robert Mark, Robert Mark, was
a civil engineer who took technology he used to like
stress test fighter planes for the Air Force and nuclear
reactors for Princeton. He took it and used it to
figure out to stress test Gothic cathedrals. He built little

(18:48):
models of like sharks and rim and he could show
what was holding the roof up basically, and he could
also show why it might collapse and where it was weak.
And so he actually taught all architectural historians how the
medieval builders had built the Gothic cathedrals. And there's actually
documentaries about him in this so anyway, that's his dad.

(19:08):
Chris rebels against his dad, not gonna have anything to
do with your way of life, not having to do
anything with you, ends up working in an auto factory,
in a ups plant, and finally in a coal mine
in West Virginia. He ends up with like his fellow
Young Radicals, nineteen years old, working in a coal mine.
The Young Radicals last like a day because it's so awful.
Chris actually likes the working in the coal mine, He's

(19:31):
interested in it, but it's incredibly dangerous. He almost is
killed twice by falling roofs. Eventually figures I could get
out of this and figure out how to stop this.
He goes back to Penn State, gets his degree. Then
he's got his own intellectual journey, right. This is which
I don't get into. While I'm talking to him in
this first phone call, he says, it took, you know,

(19:52):
took thirty years, but I figured out how to keep
the roofs of coal mines from falling on the heads
of coal miners. And I say, oh, so you tell
me get your dad who was figuring out how the
rooms of goth The cathedrals didn't fall down, and you
just do the same thing underground. You figure out like
how to keep the roof of a coal mine up.
And he in the first twenty minutes, he's pissed at me.
He says, I have nothing to do with my dad.

(20:14):
It has nothing whatsoever to do with what my father did.
And I thought, oh my god, this is even better
than I thought. It's a father son's story, and the
son thinks he's rebelling against his father, and in fact
he goes and sort of lives out a different version
of his father's life. And what's wild about the story.

(20:35):
So I have that thought, and when I start to
get to know him. It takes a while before he
says to me, like days of spending time with him, Oh,
and my dad and I finally kind of collaborated. I
said what, and he says, yeah, yeah. The government called
my father because they thought the National Cathedral in Washington
was falling down. And I don't know that National Cathedral

(20:55):
in Washington was built over a centuries tilted. They what
happen was they built insufficient foundation for what they redesigned
on top of it. And the father is brought into like, oh, Jesus,
can you tell us how to keep this thing from falling?
And the father gets there and realizes the problems underground,
and so he has to call his son, and together

(21:16):
they write a paper explaining why it's not going to
you know, how it's all working and why it's probably
not going to fall down. But it's beautiful. It's absolutely beautiful,
like an amazing story, and it was so different from
what my feeble imagination had dreamed of. And this happens
over and over and over and over.

Speaker 2 (21:39):
You know the most amazing thing about that chapter And
we'll talk about the book in more detail in a
few minutes. You kind of buried the lead in your discussion.
He is studying this problem for thirty years, like this
isn't like he keeps coming back to it. This is
three decades of his life, and he eventually figures it out.

(22:03):
Issues like a set of guidelines to coal companies and
every engineer and every safety person in every coal mine
that now becomes the standard. Plus the government makes it
a regulatory requirement. And it wasn't that. Oh, the free
market figured this out. But for the regulations, we would
still be having all these coal mine collapses.

Speaker 3 (22:25):
What's wildly cool about Christopher Mark is it not only
does he do all this, he becomes the historian of
his own subject. He becomes and he writes these papers
explaining why coal mine safety was so poor, and he
finds the whole world in this very narrow subject. And
there's a moment that's actually really interesting where he shows

(22:49):
that the technology had been created to actually just prevent
a lot of the disasters. And the coal mine industry was.

Speaker 2 (22:58):
Talking about the ceiling, the roof bolts the boats.

Speaker 3 (23:03):
You bolt the roof to itself. It's not intuitive like
when they first started doing it, the miners like, what
the hell, how you going to bolt the roof to itself,
but you both you drill. Essentially you're attaching more less
unstable rock to deeper, more stable rock, and you anchor
it in what's in the mountain above it. But I mean,

(23:24):
this is a long time ago. This is invented fifty
sixty years ago or whatever. But instead of using the
technology properly, like in a way that really prevents reduces
roof falls, the industry uses it to make it cheaper,
to make it just as safe as it's always been,
meaning not safe. So they maintain the same level of mortality,

(23:46):
like the same level of risk. It's just less cost
and just reducing the cost of what they're doing to
hold the roof up. And so what they've done, and
it's because it's because the industry was so competitive that
nobody could take this step of making the extra expense
of making the mind really safe. And they had acclimated
the working guys in West Virginia mainly, but the coal

(24:09):
miners who work everywhere in the country to this level
of risk, so they were just used to it. It
was really interesting that the market. You would think, if
you were sitting in a room alone thinking about it,
you think, oh, some coal mine company is going to
make their mind safer, and that's going to make it
easier to tract workers less expense because the roof is

(24:30):
not falling in as much. But no, that's not what happened.
You're familiar with.

Speaker 2 (24:33):
You're familiar with the Peltzman effect. Does that ring a bell?

Speaker 3 (24:36):
No, tell me what it is?

Speaker 2 (24:37):
Soo, Sam Peltzman, And this is in twenty forty my
next book. Sam Peltzman's a guy who studies seat belts
and air bags and abs and all that stuff, and
what turns out to happen is exactly what happened with
the coal mine. Oh, as soon as you get a
seat belt and an air bag, you're driving. Oh, this

(25:00):
car feels solid and safe. So I could drive a
little faster. And so we have all the safety equipment
that keeps getting built into cars, and yet the fatality
rates don't drop. It's not that we're all going to
just do fifty five and with that much safer, all
this great crumple zones and lane detection and all these things.

(25:21):
They make us complacent and comfortable, and so we drive faster,
and the fatality rates are the same. So you can
either maintain the same behavior and have the fatality rate drop,
or like drivers and coal mine companies, you could have
the same fatality rate but with a whole lot more

(25:43):
speed and or coal mining. It's a fascinating psycholophal Then.

Speaker 3 (25:47):
What is I want you to apply that effect to investing?
What's the aversion of the the Peltzman effect.

Speaker 2 (25:55):
I think what it really is about is the broader
picture is unintended consequences. You think, when the seat belt
laws are passed, the result will be we'll have fewer
deaths and safer vehicles. But instead the actual unintended consequence
is that people dress drive faster. So from investing perspective,

(26:19):
you know, Paul Volker famously said there have been no
other than the ATM, there's been no innovations in finance,
But there actually have been between ETFs and online trading,
and now trading is free, and I in the book,
I go through a whole long list and what ends
up happening, and now you have the gamification of robinhood.

(26:42):
So instead of making things cheaper and easier and faster
for investors, we're still encouraging, or at least the industry
is encouraging many of our own worst instincts and of
course the outcomes. Instead of saying, hey, I could buy
an ETF and buy the whole market for three BIPs
and it costs me nothing to trade and wow, isn't

(27:04):
that great? Instead of doing that, a lot of people say, oh,
I could day trade. I could you know, jump in
and out of Nvidia. This is a this is great.
It is the airbags, abs and seatbelts of investing. And
instead of taking the win, we just keep pushing our risk.
Aversion slides up with the lack of friction.

Speaker 3 (27:25):
That the greater the illusion of safety we create in
the markets, the more people, the more recklessly the people.

Speaker 2 (27:31):
Behave, especially if you're in the midst of a bull market. Yeah,
because at that point, hey, markets only go up, that's
all they do. So I say this to you all
the time and you push back, But I got to
bring it up again. All of the characters in the
book are very Michael Lewis. They're all outsiders, they're quirky,

(27:54):
they're pushing against the grain because they've discovered some great
out of consensus. True, you've disagreed with that description before.
Has this book changed your mind? Because it's even the
chapters you didn't write are still Michael Lewis characters.

Speaker 3 (28:11):
All right, so I want you to all right, I'm
going to push back again. These writers who did this
with me are some of my favorite writers on the planet.

Speaker 2 (28:20):
And they are all excellent.

Speaker 3 (28:22):
So only just name them so people know. It's Dave Eggers,
Geraldine Brooks, cam Al Bell, Casey Sepp, Sarah val and
John Lanchester. So John Lanchester English writer, and they all
have they were I picked them one because they're all fun,
two because they're all able to kind of go in
and find stories that other people don't see. And three
their voices are so different from each other. I thought

(28:43):
they'd find very different things. John Lanchester, he doesn't find
a person. He finds the Consumer Price Index. The whole
chapter about I just found riveting about what the United
States does to count things. And then the United States
government is like the greatest counting mechanism in the world.
And then it's that it's the one democracy where counting was.

(29:04):
It was it was built into the constitution. You couldn't
distribute power unless you had a census to count where
the population was. And he says as example, he and
how complicated this is and how much you know how
much expertise is deployed within the government to do it well.
He explains over many pages how the consumer Price Index
is put together. So right there, there you go. There

(29:27):
is something that I that is not a Michael Lewis character.

Speaker 2 (29:31):
That's the exception that proves the rule. And I'm gonna
I'm gonna put this back.

Speaker 3 (29:34):
Exceptions don't prove rules. Just so you know, exception when
that that expression means it tests the rule, okay, And
so that I just tested your rule. So you gave
me again.

Speaker 2 (29:46):
You gave me the one chapter that wasn't a Michael
michael Lewis character. So the conversation we just had about
Christopher Mark and the coal mines, Oh my god, how
is he not a total Michael Lewis Right, next chapter
and you didn't write this. I think this was Casey
Seff's chapter about Ronald Walters and the National Cemetery Administration.

Speaker 3 (30:08):
For this is a little bit of a cheap because
Casey asked me if I had anything back them on
the cut she had She said, we said, do you
have anything on the cutting room floor from the fifth risk?
And I had all this stuff on the cutting room
floor because there was so much stuff, and I said,
you know, there is this dude who wouldn't take my calls,
like I couldn't get him really, Oh yeah, no, it
was it was like they didn't want to and I

(30:31):
of course was going through communications as officials, and they
don't never respond properly. But his name was Ron Walters.
And what I knew was this that they're inside the
Veterans Administration. There's something called the there's a function, the
management of the National Cemeteries where we bury our war dead,
we bury our veterans. It is a sacred duty of

(30:53):
the society. And that this that, like all the functions
of the all the different ages and sees, this place
has its customer satisfaction measured by survey and that when
Ron Walter came into the job of running the National Cemeteries,
it had very mediocre customer satisfaction. I don't know why.

(31:14):
I don't know what was going on. I don't know
anything in the story. Casey wrote the story, but that
over a couple of decades he took the place from
being kind of mediocre to having the highest customer satisfaction
of any institution in America, private or public. That includes Costco, Walmart, FedEx.

(31:34):
He somehow figured out the problem, and no one knew
he was. He didn't advertise himself. If he had done
this in business, he'd be like on the cover of
business magazines and giving lectures for money on the lecture circuit,
you know that. But he he was just a faceless
bureaucrat who would figure something out. And I said to
Casey go, I'd write about him, And for whatever reason,

(31:55):
he took her call and she and she she walks
us through his story.

Speaker 2 (32:03):
First of all, that that chapter made me cry. Number one.
It's incredibly touching, and it makes you proud to be
an American. It really I know that's corny, but it
really does. But all right, so that's a cheat.

Speaker 3 (32:18):
Let me so the next one, Dave, it's probably Dave Eggers.
Dave Eggers, and he goes and finds the people in
Nasau who looking for little green men in deep outer.

Speaker 2 (32:27):
Space, oh searchers.

Speaker 3 (32:28):
Yeah, all right, so maybe not a little green men,
they're looking for life out of it.

Speaker 2 (32:32):
Well, and the fascinating thing is we're going to clearly
find the first line I highlighted in all likelihood in
the next twenty five years we'll find evidence of life
on another planet. I want to say this because I'm
not a scientist and I don't work in media relations, Vanessa.
What he's talking initially about is not intelligent star trek,
star wars life. But hey, there's hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen everywhere.

(32:57):
Those are the fundamental building blocks. And we'll find some
bacteria somewhere.

Speaker 3 (33:03):
You know what they're gonna find. They're going to find
the Peltsman effect. You're gonna find somewhere way out there.
They're gonna someone will have discovered the Peltzman effect. But
the yes, so Dave, so, how Dave? So, Dave is
working with these characters? I thought Dave I told Dave this, Uh,
just the other day that Dave when he announced he

(33:24):
was doing Nasau and these people who were doing this
incredibly cool work at the Jet Propulsion Lab in California.
Geraldine Brooks, another the writer, said, Yep, Dave is way
too talented to do this. This is such an easy
thing to make interesting. He needs to pick something that's
harder to write about. That this was. She thought he
was cheating, that it was just like, of course, everybody's

(33:46):
gonna love to read about this and Geraldine said to him,
said to me, to say to him, if he does that,
I'm going to find the most repulsive government worker to
write about. I'm going to go into the IRS, the
most hated, loathed branch of the government, and I'm gonna
write about the IRS. So she did that in response
to Dave's piece. And she does do that so that
I wouldn't. I mean, Dave has more Those characters are

(34:10):
not characters I would have naturally sought out. They are characters.
So as he puts it, he was like, he has
no scientific aptitude. He like he stopped doing math and
science when he was like seven years old. He's a
poet at heart. So he finds it riveting when when
scientists can make comprehensible to him complicated stuff they're doing.

(34:30):
And he had found these people and they could explain
in a way, he could explain how they were doing
what they were doing. And it is riveting.

Speaker 2 (34:38):
But but it's also very Michael Lewis, these are quirky.
You know, these are very quirky characters.

Speaker 3 (34:44):
All Right, I'm gonna push back.

Speaker 2 (34:46):
I'm right, But before you push back, you just brought
up Geraldine Brooke Brooks and the cyber sleuth in the IRS.
Here's a guy who's an accountant, teaching classes in Brazilian
jiu jitsu and like like becoming a ninth level black
Like that is not your run of the mill. I
need your papers to get your taxes filed.

Speaker 3 (35:07):
No, he'd he works in the cyber crime division of
the I R S and has collected billions of dollars
for the government busting up cyber crime rings. Jared Coopman
his name. And here's here's a kicker for you. His unit,
which is like a huge profit maker. They I mean,
they cost nothing and they generate billions. Has been gutted

(35:28):
by Doge in any case, but this is before it
was gutted. Geraldine found this dude. I don't know how
she found him. Actually she just went off. She said,
I'm going in the IRS and I'm coming out with
a story. And so she went into the IRS and
found him and and called me. You know, it's funny
she did call me, So this is not pushing back
on you. When she was done with the story, she

(35:50):
had to go back to a novel she was writing
kind of thing, and she said, this is such your
kind of story. She said, there's there's all this stuff
behind it. You really need to look into it, like
it might be a book for you. So she had
the thought she'd run into a story that I might
have written, and that might be true there. But here's
what I'm going to. Let me say this. Maybe I'm

(36:12):
so jazzed by our federal government because when you walk
into these places, they're all these really curious characters doing
really curious things, and you haven't heard of them, and
you might not think they're important until you do. And
they are characters in the best sense. They don't think
of themselves as characters. They just like they are who

(36:33):
they are, and they can be kind of shockingly interesting
without realizing how interesting they are, and that the stuff
they're doing is breathtakingly important, like existential risk level of importance.
So yes, I'm interested in that. And they're all over
the government. And I think that if you said you
have to spend the rest of your career wandering this

(36:54):
institution writing about these people, I could pull it off.
That I could. I I could. I could use it
as a launch pad for every other book I ever wrote.
If I had to.

Speaker 2 (37:05):
You mentioned dosee. One of the things that comes up
in the book in her chapter is these guys that
are literally saving tens of billions of dollars in cyber fraud.
They're paytops out at like one hundred and thirty thousand
dollars something crazy, Like any one of them could go
to a Wall Street bank and ten x their salary.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (37:26):
Like, stop and think about how insane that is. And
we got to cut those jobs and.

Speaker 3 (37:30):
Then we don't. Yeah that you fire them, and not
only that, you insult them before you fire them, give
me a list of the five things you did last week.
You know. It's just it's obscene what's going on right now.
And that's one of that that would be a place
where you would dramatize some of the obscenity. Yeah. So
I don't think there's a character in the book that
couldn't be paid a whole lot more money outside of

(37:51):
the federal government. And this is another thing. I think
this is between the lines of the book. But all
these people are much more interested in mission than money,
and this is hard for Wall Street people to get
their minds around sometimes. But I don't think entirely there
are a lot of Wall Street people who really get
the joy of mission. And these are people who are
taking pay cuts because they want to do this thing.

(38:12):
And nobody says this in any of the chapters, but
I think all of the chapters say this. All these
people have found the secret to a meaningful life. They've
all they None of these people on their deathbeds are
going to look up and say, well, I wish I
wish I'd gone to Goldman, you know that I wish
I'd made a whole lot of money. That they all

(38:33):
full feel like they did what they were supposed to do,
and that that's kind of cool.

Speaker 2 (38:38):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (38:39):
There is this thing going on how to lead your
life right through it, right through the whole book. And
I and as a moment when I'm talking to Chris Mark,
who I mean, one of the reasons I find it
hard to report Chris Mark, the coal mine guy, is
that you know, he won't stay in the Ritz, They'll
stay in the hampton In. So I got to stay
in the hampton In. You know, you know, he wants

(38:59):
to sit in the back of the plane, so I
got to sit in the back of the plane. And
so you know it's like that I have, you know,
a standard of comfort. I've gotten used to that he
finds like immoral, maybe too strong a word, but like unnecessary.
And at one point he said to me, and I
put it in the book because he has decided to
live a life that's materially modest but spiritually rich. He

(39:22):
said to me. We taught our kids there there are
two ways to be rich. One is to make a
lot of money, and the other one is to not
need very much. And I just thought, wow, you know,
it's interesting.

Speaker 2 (39:32):
Say what you will about the luxury quality of the
Hampton end. It ain't a coal mine if you spent
and he spends a year or two working in a
coal mine. Wait, I'm above ground on clean sheets, with
air conditioning and heat.

Speaker 3 (39:46):
And a peloton. Now, I couldn't believe it. There's a
peloton in there.

Speaker 2 (39:52):
By the way. When I first saw this title, I
picked up the book and I'm like, huh, I wonder
if Michael is going to get a little partisan. This
is one of those things that could really red state
blue state. But there's none of that. This is all
about you pay taxes and here's what the government does
to serve you. Whether you're the family of a deceased

(40:15):
veteran or relying on weather forecasts, or stopping cybercrime, or
you know, on and on it goes. These are really broad,
non partisan topics. Did did it ever enter your mind? Oh,
someone's gonna accuse me. Oh that that punk Berkeley rider
is really a libtard and we really don't care what

(40:38):
he has to say. Did that ever enter your mind
as you were putting this together?

Speaker 3 (40:41):
Of course, I mean it was, It was top of mind,
but in a way, I mean because it has happened
already and it will happen that you It is a
feature of our society right now that everything gets quickly politicized,
and you're either you're either in tribe or tribe tribe b.
You're either you're either an Ole miss rebel or Alabama
Crimson Tide player. You know, it's it's you're you're on

(41:03):
one team or the other. That people need to need
to see you that way, especially the people who are
most absorbed with the politics. And if you write anything,
the challenge is the assumptions, prejudices, bigotry of one side
or the other. They're going to try to dismiss it
by just saying you're a member of the other tribe.

(41:26):
So I can't you just can't do anything about that
except try to come at the material pure of heart
and open to mind. You know, it's like, these are
stories that are true stories. You can maintain your prejudice
and bigotry and whatever you think of federal workers. You
know you could if you want to preserve that stereotype
in your head. Fine, but you've got to acknowledge the

(41:48):
truth of the stories, Like, Okay, all federal workers are wasteful.
Where do you put Chris Mark? Then he just he'es
saving thousands of lives of working classmen based Uh, what
do you do with that? So what do you do
with this and that and the other thing? I mean,
there's so many of these stories.

Speaker 2 (42:06):
So on and on.

Speaker 3 (42:08):
It, So it's almost I'd say it's I think this
is true that to the extent you succeed in really
threatening either sides prejudices, you're going to elicit a violent reaction.
And so I expected the book, given the current moment
where Elon Muskindoz is trying to basically fire all these people, uh,

(42:33):
that it would elicit a violent reaction. And I've stayed
off social media. I don't know exactly how much of
the violent reaction has happened. Uh, but I've gotten whispers
of it, like and and it's funny. I think it's
funny to find myself. I do live in Berkeley, and
people love to bring that up when they're trying to
classify me. But in Berkeley, i'd be a Republican, you know,

(42:54):
I mean, I mean that's not hard.

Speaker 2 (42:55):
But you originally from red I grew.

Speaker 3 (42:57):
Up in New Orleans. I'm like a kid who I'm
like a kid who played sports and didn't think about
politics and and like voted for Reagan once and like
John McCain was a close friend. And it's like the
idea that I'm like, oh, firmly, this lefty person is insane.
It's just insane. I mean it's and it's it's a

(43:17):
tell for me when people try to shove me into
that box, because it means they're not dealing with the story.
And it happens from the other side, the blind side.
There's the whole the crazy left has taken the blind
side story is like, oh, Michael's like a racist who's
told a white savior story.

Speaker 2 (43:35):
Seriously, I've read all about that.

Speaker 3 (43:38):
Listen, No, it's amazing.

Speaker 2 (43:39):
How many times have you and I just got to
be like our eighth tenth interview, I have lost track
when I'm prepping stuff and I have my research assistant
go out, hey, find me something I haven't we haven't
talked about in these previous eight conversations. Well, you know,
the pushback to the blind Side is the whole story
is fake and and here's the litigation and he's the depositions,

(44:01):
and I'm like, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm not buying into this.
This is this is clearly someone has a grudge.

Speaker 3 (44:09):
Yeah, but so but but I mean, the New York
Times ran a cover story like a year. It's like
trying to trying to sort of I don't know exactly
what it was trying to do, but it is between
the lines, was trying to say, like the story. Now,
now looking back on it, we can say the story
was false in some way. No one who was there
at the time disapproved of the stories. When the book

(44:32):
came out, Michael Lor himself loved the book. All everywhere
around him said this like true, great true story. You know,
there was never it's been. It got reinterpreted at High Woke.
It got reinterpreted as a condescending story about a young
black boy, which is not what it was.

Speaker 2 (44:48):
You're, by the way, being generous to the people who
have changed. Your friend, Malcolm Gladwell would clearly call it
revisionist history, because oh, we gonna We're going to rethink
this in light of current moras.

Speaker 3 (45:04):
And but that's all flipped again. So it's it's it's gonna,
it's gonna make it come. It's there's this, there was
a revolution to counter revolution and the counter counter revolution.
It's it's. But my point is that that I have
had my work filtered through people's bizarre, perverted political prisms,
and uh.

Speaker 2 (45:25):
It happened last book Going It.

Speaker 3 (45:27):
Gets it gets distorted, My views get misrepresented to the
extent I have views that mostly it's not an expression
of you. It's a telling of a story that I'm doing.
And I've had it from both sides, and it's not
pleasant from either side. And this one it was really
clear the side it's where the blow blow back is
gonna come is from the from the right. Now here's

(45:48):
it's funny. I have a little suspicion. I feel like
a little uncomfortable at at preaching to the converted at
cheap applause. I'm now finding myself on stages with this book,
and of course the audience is all kind of on
its side. The audience is all often liberal people, federal workers,

(46:08):
and you know, I have them at hello, and I
don't particularly like that. I mean, it's better than having
if I don't even hate you. But I want people
to just like the story, like judge it by the
quality of the thing, rather than judge it by whether
it confirms your prejudices. Uh. And that that's and it's
just increasingly this is coming that's changed in my my

(46:31):
literary career, in my life. It's getting harder and harder
to pierce people's prejudices that they're so they come in
so armored with some opinion that's very half baked that
they have possibly even uttered themselves on social media, so
that they've they've sort of like they're anchored in it
and they don't want to they don'tant to even think

(46:51):
about anything different than what they've said. Uh. And so
you're you've got this, You've got an army of kind
of prejudice readers that you that you have to deal
with it. It's just louder than it's ever been and
makes it hard to get the story told.

Speaker 2 (47:07):
What's really ironic is that a lot of the people
who are the beneficiaries of a lot of the government
work coal mine. Most obvious is they're in red states,
and so there's a little there's a little bit of
craziness with that. But let's talk about the process of
the book. The eight or nine chapters you write, the

(47:30):
first one, you write, the last one, and then the
middle six are the six writers you mention, I don't
really think of you as an editor. I think of
you as a writer. What was that like, having not
only to edit this but edit friends.

Speaker 3 (47:46):
What I did was talk them into doing it. I
recruited them and I talked to them about what stories
that they might write. But after that I left everything
to David Shipley, who.

Speaker 2 (47:59):
Oh sure I know David.

Speaker 3 (48:00):
And and who's former Bloomberg editor and so so I
didn't have to do any of the line and I
didn't touch anybody's pieces. I kept I kept great distance
from that, and most of them didn't need that. A
couple couple did I do. I have often engaged with
other writers and having them bounce their stories off me

(48:21):
and talk about how they might do it. Do it
so that that's easy for me and fun. And all
these writers were kind of spoiled for choice. It wasn't
like throwing up their hands and saying, what am I
going to write about? I don't have a story. It
was more should I do A or B or C?
So that that book was fun, really fun. I can't
tell you how easy this thing was. I mean, it's
it's it's it's surprising. I thought when I involved, I

(48:44):
was a little trepidacious about involving other writers because they're
all neurotic, you know that you never know what you know,
it's hurting cats, you never know what they're going to
do or they're going to show or uh. And everybody
hit their marks and we're kind of Nobody was trub
they were all They all did what they were supposed
to do and and and I did you know? That

(49:06):
was the other thing, you know, The moment, the gut
check moment for me was I got them all riled up.
Are they going to be these great stories? Go do it?
And then I realized, oh, I got to write something.
And finding my I thought, oh, it's going to be
tough for me to like rise to this occasion again.
And I found I think these are two of the
more interesting long form narrative stories I have ever written.

Speaker 2 (49:29):
And they are and that's saying something.

Speaker 3 (49:31):
It is saying. I mean, I've had some great material.
I think the material I'm always good as my material, right,
I can't make I can't put in with God left.

Speaker 2 (49:39):
Out, agreed and disagree.

Speaker 3 (49:41):
Oh it's true, though, It's true. If you I really,
if I have boring, really bad material, it wouldn't be
very good. But this case, the ingredients were there for
excellent meals and uh, and it just they turned out beautifully.
I'm just really proud of them, you know.

Speaker 2 (49:56):
I love that feeling of like I don't know how
this is gonna when you start, I'm intrigued by this.
I don't know where it's going to go. And then
when you're done, it's like, oh, this turned out like
I thought this was a good idea, and hey, this
turned out even better than unexpected. It really is a
lovely sensation.

Speaker 3 (50:13):
As it is, it is a completely lovely sensation. And
the whole book, when I look back on it, it
feels like the whole group was in a flow state,
that the whole group, everybody, nobody over nobody ever thought it.
People just went and did what they did. They played
their best game and I did too, and so it

(50:34):
was it was really gratifying. And it's had the response
to it. I mean, of course now with what's going on,
but you know, most of them appeared in the Washington
Post over running up to the election, and the response
was just I remember the letter after the first one,
the woman who adds the the comment section said, I've
never seen anything like this. Really, yes, I mean it

(50:57):
was just just exploded. And this is all before Trump's elected.
And now the thing's all together in one piece, in
one place in the the you know, there's this deconstruction
of the government going on. It sits in the middle
of the conversation. I mean, it's like it that the
world is smiling upon this work. There's no question, there

(51:19):
is no question.

Speaker 2 (51:20):
It could not possibly be more timely. I know I
only have you for a limited amount of time. There's
two questions I have to ask, one sports related and
the obvious question I always feel like I have to
ask you, is, Hey, what's the cause? You recall the
dinner with a bunch of people talking about SBF. So

(51:43):
I got to ask you, what's the next? Michael Lewis
story that's going to be told? What story haven't you told?
What subject? Haven't you touched that you're eager to attack?

Speaker 3 (51:54):
Well, I kind of have a rule, and the rule
is I don't. I don't really like to talk about it.
I know it takes the energy out of it.

Speaker 2 (52:01):
Oh really, that's why I thought you just didn't want
to reveal.

Speaker 3 (52:05):
No. No, it's like you're getting you're sort of getting
the response before you've done the work, and it's it's
sort of it's it's nice to build the tension just
in yourself. But having said that, I don't have it's
not I mean, I just finished this and I don't
I don't have a book I'm writing now. I'll tell

(52:26):
you what things that interests me? Okay, I think what
Elon Musk and Doge is doing is unbelievably interesting, Like
it's it is a tornado ripping through the culture. And
I think that that daily journalism does a really good
job of telling you just what kind of just happened
on the surface. It doesn't go below, and that there

(52:47):
is there's that that's worth paying close attention to. Another
thing that really interests me is the commercialization of youth
sports of college and college sports especially uh, the the
way this radical free agency has come to college sports
and you've got fifteen year old quarterbacks who have got
two million dollar name, image and likeness deals and that

(53:10):
that that it's an environment, it's just been upended. And
it interests me on the like who wins, who loses,
who succeeds, who can coach in this environment, who can
lead in this environment? I'm interesting in college sports and
a third area and I don't really want to get
in this too much, but grief. You know, I lost

(53:30):
a child four years ago and I'm starting to find
the words to describe that experience. And I don't think
it's a book, but I don't know, but these but
I mean, if you were here, Barry, in my office,
I have like, you know, fifty folders here of stuff that's,
you know, at least in the back of my mind
that might lead somewhere. And you never know what's going

(53:53):
to spark it. You never I really never know what's
gonna It's gonna the call I'm going to get, or
the person I'm going to meet, or the thing I'm
going to read where I think, oh, that's it, that's
where I need to go, and it happens very quickly.
I mean it's like slow, slow, slow, slow slow, and
then ooh, there we go, and I'm in.

Speaker 2 (54:13):
The gradually then all at once. You're quoting Hemingway, there
we go.

Speaker 3 (54:17):
That's how it feels. It feels gradually then all at once,
and I'm in the gradual phase right now.

Speaker 2 (54:22):
Huh. That's really interesting. I'm going to come back to
sports in a minute, but I got to ask. So,
given all these files, and given how this book was
so different than prior books, and then Going Infinite was
so different than Flashboys, and on and on it goes,
I'm curious about what's your writing routine like and how

(54:44):
has it evolved over time? Like I am intimately familiar
with the Liar's Poker story, which I just love that
whole thing. We've talked about that many times. But from
kind of writing at night getting home from Salomon Brothers
to being a full time author, how has your process changed.

Speaker 3 (55:04):
I had to shift when kids start. When we started
having kids, instead of a really late night life, it
became a really I became a morning writer. I may
go back. Our son, our youngest, is a senior in
high school and the mini is out of the house.
I would not be surprised if I revert to nocturnal beast.
It's my that's my natural state. But the process. The

(55:27):
one thing I've noticed that's changed in my process is
a deeper and deeper appreciation of the importance of the
character of the subjects. That that I the premonition is
that it was. It was for me. It was a
sort of a breaking it was. It was a marking
point because I thought, I do want to write about

(55:48):
this thing that's happening the COVID, but I want to
do it. I want to I want to put the
characters first. And I almost cast it that I went looking.
I worried about the story less than I worried about
the people I was writing about. I put the and
and the same with SBF. It was like, this guy
is I don't know what's going to happen, but it's
he's interesting. Like there's a thing to do here because

(56:10):
this person is so interesting, the person will create the story.
And I've tilted that direction. I mean there was always there.

Speaker 2 (56:18):
I was.

Speaker 3 (56:19):
I've always been writing about curious characters. But I've gotten
more adamant. I've got to be more certain about the
character before I start Moneyball. I started with the idea
kind of it was. Uh, it was like how they
win a baseball games and oh my god, it's inefficient,
Oh my god, analytics blah blah blah. But it doesn't
work unless Billy Bean is a really good character. But

(56:39):
I didn't. I didn't discover how good a character he
was for months. He kept himself hidden for a while.
And I think I now have to feel more confident
in the character before I start.

Speaker 2 (56:49):
Huh. And and you know, I'm thinking in the top
off the top of my head. So you have Billy Bean, right,
and then work you like bradcatching on at at I ea, uh,
Danny Kahneman, you just keep working your way through each
of the books, to say nothing of Michael Barry. Every

(57:11):
book leads to one of these characters leads to this again,
this Michael Lewis character who's quirky and thoughtful and discovers
a great out of consensus truth and uses it to
either affect change or challenge the status quo. I think

(57:32):
that shines through this certainly. SBF was that guy hold
aside the fraud and the end of money and all
that stuff, same sort of character. And what I'm hearing
from you is that you've become even though the stories
are always fascinating and amazing, they seem to become more
and more character driven as you've what's.

Speaker 3 (57:55):
You It's true, It's true, like your theory of my
I don't know how you explained how Liar's Poker fits
into it, for example.

Speaker 2 (58:05):
Freshman Attempt and you're still get by the way. I
when you had the anniversary of that book and I
literally picked it up having not read it for twenty
five years, and I reread it. I'm like, oh, good writer,
shows potential. Not quite Michael Lewis yet, but you could
see and did you just a compliment? Oh it comes

(58:30):
through like, oh, I see exactly how all these little things,
like all the seeds of Michael Lewis are planted throughout
Liar's Poker, and then it just blossoms in every subsequent book.
So the first your first book was like, all right,
this is real. Oh he's a first time author. This
is a really good book for first time author. But

(58:52):
that author wasn't a fully formed Michael Lewis. Nor how
old were you thirty something twenty?

Speaker 3 (59:00):
I wrote it when I was twenty six.

Speaker 2 (59:01):
Okay, so a twenty six year old Michael Lewis is
certainly should never be expected to be a thirty forty
fifty sixty something Michael Lewis, seasoned, wizened and just having
lived life. So and I say, I want you to
understand I'm saying that as I don't.

Speaker 3 (59:19):
No, I had to reread it when I did the
audio book, reread it.

Speaker 2 (59:23):
How bizarre is doing an audio book? By the way,
is it not the craziest thing you've ever done?

Speaker 3 (59:28):
It's it's when I going back to something I wrote
thirty something years ago that was weird and it was
unselling because I wanted to fix all this.

Speaker 2 (59:38):
Stuff, you know, right, you want to hit it as.

Speaker 3 (59:40):
Your yeah yeah things. I didn't even notice at the time.
It's just like appalling to me, right, But doing my
own audio books, as I mostly do now, it's the
one thing I always noticed is how much how you
read it differently, how you see it differently. When you're
reading it aloud, you see stuff that you wouldn't you

(01:00:01):
don't see when you just read when you're doing it
on the page, And that you shouldn't let a book
out the door without having read it aloud.

Speaker 2 (01:00:09):
I had an editor who used to say to me,
you should take your columns and read them out loud,
and you'll have a totally different feeling for it. Plus
you discover half your vocabulary are things that you have
never spoken out loud and don't know how to pronounce
because you've only read them and written them.

Speaker 3 (01:00:29):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:00:30):
Hapittualization. It took me like ten minutes to get that
word iterative because I've only read and written them. How
often you get to say capitalization and you always mangle
it because you're so it's really fine, all right, So
I only have you for a few moments left. I
got to throw you a curveball. Since you've written about baseball,

(01:00:50):
you've written about little league coaching, you've written about football,
even you've written about basketball and Darryl Morey, which, by
the way, there's a book in basketball. Although maybe it's
too late because Steph Curry and Lebron James are already
towards the back part of their career. But I have
to ask what sports do you watch? What are your teams?

(01:01:12):
Who do you root for? And we're recording this just
as March Madness has already destroyed all the brackets.

Speaker 3 (01:01:20):
I had Drake. I had Drake over Oh yes, really,
yeah I did. I didn't have a knee state, but
I came close. I thought about it, and then I
thought Clemson is going to bounce from losing the Duke.
And I was wrong about that. Uh my bracket looks
great except for that. It's right now, it's intact, except
for the McNee steak game. I watched college basketball. I

(01:01:44):
watch it more like everybody else during March Madness. I
watch playoff baseball. I watched the Cubs. I watched the
You're not you Chicago guy. Nope, but Nico Horner. Nico
Horner is their second baseman. And Nico was in high
school with Quinn, my daughter and Quinn. And when Quinn,
Quinn was a pictuer on the softball team and Nico

(01:02:05):
was pitcher on the baseball team, and the off season,
Nico and his English teacher father and me and Quinn
would be out there, the only ones out there working out.
And so I got to Nico a little bit, and
he's a He's this unbelievable kid, just a great kid.
And so he has led me to become a Cubs fan,
and it's actually a fun team. They they they're in

(01:02:26):
field before games. This is something I might they get.
They sit in a circle and they pick a different
person and everybody has to say something nice about it. Exactly.
It's a completely different model of how you like collaborate.
But you know, for for guys in sports. But so
I watched that. I watch some w n B A

(01:02:49):
I watch the NBA. The Warriors are my team and
have been. I mean, we've been so blessed. Kerr is
a magician, and I think Curry has been I mean
the whole thing has just been magical to watch. And
the A's used to be my team, but they've left me.
And football I watch obsessively. So football. I watched more

(01:03:11):
college and and NFL football than anything. And my team
in the in the NFL is the Saints, which is
we've had our ups and downs, but I never you
know that New Orleans has never left me and U
And in college football, I don't really have I like

(01:03:32):
the old Miss Rebels. I got very attached when Michael
Ore was there. I traveled around with that team. But
I don't have one team in basketball. The team that
I like college basketball I don't know why because I
didn't go there. I'm a duke basketball at it. It's
like you jump one way or the other. With duke,
you either hate him or love them.

Speaker 2 (01:03:50):
Well. Their coach was so beloved for so many years.

Speaker 3 (01:03:53):
And they new coach will be too. I think Shire
is fabulous, So I think it's a different he's He's
managing a different environment, but clearly has the ability to
do it.

Speaker 2 (01:04:04):
Michael, as always, every time we have one of these conversations,
they're They're delightful, and I'm going to just announce here
anyone who wants to come listen to Michael discussed not
just this book, but his whole career April seventh at
the Gene Rimsky Theater in Port Washington. It's gonna be
a lot of fun. I get to pepper Mike with

(01:04:25):
all sorts of questions that we haven't gotten to here.
We have been speaking with Michael Lewis. His new book
is Who Is Government? The Untold Story of Public Service.
If you enjoy this conversation, well be sure and check
out any of the previous five hundred conversations we've had
over the past eleven years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify,

(01:04:50):
Bloomberg dot com, YouTube, wherever you find your favorite podcasts.
I would be remiss if I do not thank the
Crack team that helps put these conversations together each week.
Sarah Livesey is my audio engineer. Anna Luke is my producer.
Jean Russo is my researcher. I'm Barry Ritolts. You've been

(01:05:10):
listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.