April 21, 2025 • 16 mins
In a coastal corner of Australia, scientist Saul Griffith has been quietly working away on a plan to turn 500 households completely off fossil fuels. He hopes that what he achieves there can act as a blueprint for the rest of the country.
But for that to become a reality, the federal government would need to drastically increase their commitment to renewable energy.
Today, chief scientist at Rewiring Australia, Saul Griffith, on the electrification already underway – and what both sides of politics are promising for our energy future.
If you enjoy 7am, the best way you can support us is by making a contribution at 7ampodcast.com.au/support.
Socials: Stay in touch with us on Instagram
Guest: Chief scientist at Rewiring Australia Saul Griffith
Photo:
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Two five is a group of suburbs South Sydney in
the postcode two five one five and we wanted to
sort of fast forward a community to the future. We
are home to the first community led electrification pilot in Australia.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
We're going to help five hundred homes in the community
electrifying one our hot water.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
In a coastal corner of Australia. Scientist Saul Griffith has
been quietly working away on a plan to turn five
hundred households completely off fossil fuels.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
We can do this electrification which will both decarbonize us.
It should also lower our cost of energy and it
should be able to be all possible with small changes
to the local grid and then small changes to people's households.
Why would we do that?
Speaker 3 (00:46):
An electric home uses less energy, it's cheaper to run,
is healthier to live in and best of.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
All, if we do it together as a community, it's easier,
hopefully a little more fun, and.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
We can show the rest of Australia how we can
create our electric future today.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
And so we ran that project idea up the pole.
That Arena Australias Neural Energy Agency arguing for the importance
of this in terms of our national emissions and in
terms of helping households through this energy transition.
Speaker 4 (01:14):
The Albanezi government through Arena is supporting the Electrified two
five one five project with a grade of five point
four million dollars.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
And so we got enough money to provide a small
subsidy to a bunch of houses to electrify their stoves,
their water heaters, their space heaters. Trying to figure out
how to do this cheaper for all of the other
communities that they are going to follow, figure out how
to do it in fair and equitable way so that
we can have a justin fair transition.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
And he hopes that what he achieves there can act
as a blueprint for the rest of the country. But
for that to become a reality, the federal government and
industry would need to drastically increase their commitment.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Well, if we were really shooting for a one and
a half or two degree climate target, every Australian community
would be pretty much fully electrified by early twenty forties.
And so we know that if we do this it's
going to save the country trillions of dollars. So you know,
as well of us wanting to do it for climate reasons.
It's just a good idea for the country.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven am today,
chief scientist at Rewiring Australia. Saw Griffith on the electrification
already underway and what both sides of politics are promising
for our energy future. It's Tuesday, April twenty two, So
(02:41):
Saul zooming out, where would you say that we are
at in Australia right now in terms of households moving
away from energy generated by fossil fuels to living in
a clean electricity environment.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
We'd lead the world absolutely in terms of rooftop solar,
like thirty five forty percent of homes now I have
rooftop solar that probably will go all the way up
to eighty percent because it just keeps getting to be
cheaper and better economics. Cars we're not going as fast
as we could compared to say Norway, where honestly, by
the end of twenty twenty five nearly one hundred percent
of vehicles will be electric. We are in the middle
(03:17):
of the pack on heat pumps for water heating and
space eating. We go about fifty percent at electric cooking.
We're doing okay, not quite as good as Asia. So
we're doing well and we have this structural advantage now
cheap solar, but the long term savings overrunning them for
ten or fifteen years on much much cheaper energy is
where we save the money. So it's about getting that
(03:38):
upfront assistance and that argues for a government's role in
helping that.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
Let's talk about that a little more. I mean, there is,
as you say, this huge uptake in solar. I think
it's one in three Australian households that have solar panels now,
but it's not the same with batteries. It's one in
forty households that have a battery. So in that context,
how significant is anthony easiest promise to subsidize home batteries.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
A lot of.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
People won't remember it, but it was under a Howard
government where Howard first encouraged some rebates for solar and
some generous feed in tariffs. That was in the early
two thousands, and at that time solar was more expensive
than it was from the grid. But offering those incentives
it helped build an industry. It helped train the tradees
(04:25):
who do the installations, It helped bring the cost of
the product down and we're in the same place in
twenty twenty five with batteries as we were with solar
in say twenty ten, so almost competitive with the market.
So these incentives will help build capacity to install them,
it will help the electricity distribution companies figure out how
to absorb them into the grid, and it will bring
(04:48):
down the cost for every future battery. So by the
time this program has run its course, as is the
case with solar today, the batteries will make total economic
sense and so it looks like good policy, I suppose.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
So we're talking a lot about what individuals and what
households can do and the ways in which those options
might be cheaper, while obviously also coming with the advantage
of being better for the environment. But what proportion of
emissions in Australia actually come from household use?
Speaker 1 (05:18):
So in terms of how significant our household emissions in Australia,
I think, first it's worth understanding sixty percent of our
emissions are in support of our domestic economy. So that's
burning gas in Australia to cook a meal, it's burning petrol,
and Australia drive a car burning coal in Australia to
use electricity use in Australia. But about forty percent of
(05:39):
our emissions is dedicated to things that ultimately we ship
overseas as part of our trade. So that's using diesel
to mind coal or diesel to extract gas and then
we send that overseas, and so those emissions happen overseas.
So anyway, of the sixty percent of our emissions which
are domestic, about forty two percent of those are from
(06:02):
the cars in our households and the appliances in our households,
and then another thirty percent of our emissions is our
cars used in small business and commercially, and in our
buildings used for small businesses and commercial activity including schools
and churches and surf clubs. They go under the commercial sector.
(06:22):
So seventy percent of our domestic emissions can be addressed
with technologies that are available today, solar batteries, electric vehicles,
electric appliances. I'm a strong proponent that we should be
doing the things that work economically and work for emissions
reductions right now, and that's where they are. And if
we do that this decade, then we buy ourselves enough
time for the remaining pieces of the industrial decarbonization puzzle
(06:45):
to come into focus and to become economically viable. But
the reality is we're a big export nation. That's where
the very large contribution from industrial emissions happens in Australia
is from from the diesel. It's used to pull the
coal out of the ground and the natural gas out
of the ground and send it off to Asian and
(07:06):
European markets. So we need to be, if not first
in top runner in the field in all of these
big export industries that use huge amounts of energy. But
we're not spending enough money on the research on the
new processes. We're not really thinking outside the box, and
that's because the industry is a slow moving and heavy
(07:27):
hitting lobbyist.
Speaker 3 (07:30):
Coming up after the break, what does global leadership actually
look like when it comes to facing the climate crisis.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
Hi, I'm Daniel James. Seven AM tells stories that need
to be told. Our journalism is founded on trust and
independence and now we're increasing our coverage. Every Saturday until
the election will bring you an extra episode to break
down the biggest political moments of the week. If you
enjoy seven AM, the best way you can support us
is by making a contribution at seven am podcast dot
(08:01):
com dot a slash support. Thanks for listening and supporting
our work.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
So in terms of sort of political will, do you
see either Dutton or Albanezi's approach as we get closer
to this election and the promises that have been made
as I suppose being up to meeting the challenge.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Well, the headline the Future Made in Australia is pretty good,
you know. The one challenge with Australia is we seem
to very much like underwriting the existing market players as
opposed to supporting disruptive innovation. So in theory we should
all like Future Made in Australia. But if it's large
hand oubts to the existing industries to go slow, that's
not going to be as good as funding the young,
(08:44):
hungry entrepreneurs who want to completely replace those industries with
a better industry. So I'd like to see that happening.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Under the coalition. Energy will become affordable and reliable.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
Again using Dutton really hasn't said anything about industrial policy
and terms of energy policy. Nuclear that is almost certainly
going to be publicly unpopular, isn't going to get in
the ground until twenty forty, doesn't solve any real problems
that the Australian grid has.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
We will join the other nineteen top economies in the
world in adopting proven zero missions nuclear power. This is
one of the most visionary and necessary policies put forward
in our country's history.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
I mean, there's some good work. The brag Inquiry on
the economics household electrication, which came from Liberals, pointed to
the fact that this is good for the country and
it's going to save people money. So there's a little
bit to celebrate in all teams, But no big industrial
vision for the nation from Dunton.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
And the only way to drive down power prices quickly
is to ramp up domestic gas production and tonight I
announce our national Gas Plan.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
But you know what we need is genuine political leadership
as well as policy. We haven't really seen leading from
the top on climate under this labor government. Chris Bam
has been good, but the nation would like to hear
it from the boss.
Speaker 4 (10:03):
Thirty three percent renewable energy on the day we came
to office, forty six percent in the last quarter of
last year, and renewables are set to overtake coal as
the largest source of our electricity this year. That's good progress,
but there's more to do, much more to do.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
The Independence and Greens are pushing the right things, but
we just need to all of it needs to go
so much faster than any politician is really conceiving of
if we're going to have any hope of keeping the
world under two degrees warming.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
In his Budget reply speech, Peter Dutton said that he
would end labors rewiring the Nation Renewable Energy Focused Fund
the nineteen point five billion dollar one in favor of gas,
coal and nuclear. So can you just tell me a
bit about how that money is currently spent and what
would happen if Dunton was to get in and it
(10:55):
was cut.
Speaker 1 (10:56):
Rewiring the Nation was twenty billion dollars earmarked for big
transmission to move electricity long distance across Australia. My understanding
is because the transmission companies get paid to build the
wise that they've already allocated the great majority of that
twenty billion dollars. It's already out the door. So I
think Dutton's it's an empty promise. I don't think he
(11:16):
can claw it back at this point. We also understand
that one billion of that twenty got reallocated from rewiring
the nation towards the HUE, which was the Home Energy
Upgrade Fund to do household electrication and similar things. So
maybe they could call that back. That would be a
bad idea. It would be politically unpopular because it's helping
(11:37):
households do things that make their cost a living lower.
So feels like an empty threat to me.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
Okay. And just finally, as as back on the idea
of leadership, you know, we hear a lot about the
importance of global leadership when we're talking about climate change,
But what type of leadership do you think is actually
likely to influence schoolbal change.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Well, the influence that really works is when you prove
by example that this is a better way to live.
This is the point of the two five to one
to five project. And you know, it's pretty cool. We're
oversubscribed on households who want to join. It's the I
swim in my local swim pool every morning and there's
somebody's asking me questions about this or that or the other,
and it's sort of you can see it catching on
(12:23):
and being a sort of good idea for the community.
So that kind of leadership showing that it can work
showing that it improves the economics for community, showing it
on the global stage that helps everyone move along. Similarly,
I have a friend in New Zealand, Mike Casey. He
runs the world's first all electric cherry farm. He electrified
his frost fans, he bought the first two electric tractors
(12:45):
in the Southern Hemisphere, put giant amount of solar on
his barn, and because of the nature of the electricity
tariffs in New Zealand, he's able to I think he's
saving forty to seventy thousand dollars a year on his
cost of energy because electricity is so much cheaper than
diesel to do the same thing. He's earning an extra
twenty or thirty thousand dollars a year selling his excess
(13:07):
solar electricity back into the grid. And honestly, that's a
story that could be true for most Australian farmers. There's
a huge opportunity in using our existing agricultural rooftops that's
barns and sheds, putting solar on those, connecting those into
the grid, fixing the regulatory and the electricity market rules
so that the farmers get paid the same price as
(13:29):
the other generators and then you would have I think
you'd have a big change in the politics of electrification
in the regions.
Speaker 3 (13:37):
You know.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
So I look to the Coalition, I look to Done
and like, there's a huge opportunity to help your people
get on with this energy transition in a way that
benefits them economically. So we've got a lot to boast
in Australia because agricultural electrication for all but the largest
combine harvesters is now a sensible, lower cost way to
(13:59):
run farm, all electric households, lowest way to run your household,
all electric cars, cheapest cars to run. So the economics
is good. It's going to improve health outcomes. These machines
are cheaper and easier to maintain because they've got fewer
moving parts. Like, there's just a lot of winning to
be had, and leadership is showing that winning happening in
(14:20):
practice helping communities. I think with some creativity, our politicians
could be speaking to a whole bunch of different constituencies
in Australia on how this is going to be economically
and culturally and health wise.
Speaker 3 (14:35):
Good for you, So thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Thank you very much.
Speaker 3 (14:52):
Also in the news, today, a Peter Dutton led government
would pilot a national register for child sex offenders. The
Coalition has announced twelvemonth pilot program would allow parents to
apply to police for information about whether an individual who
interacts with their children is a convicted sex offender. It's
part of the seven hundred and fifty million dollar package
called Operation Safer Communities revealed over the easter break. The
(15:15):
plan includes a tightening of border security and safety laws
and extra funding for police. The Coalition is expected to
focus on issues including national security, crime and defense in
the lead up to the election on May three, and
Anthony Abernesi has labeled Russia's attempts for a military presence
in Indonesia as propaganda, as Moscow's ambassador to Indonesia said,
(15:36):
Australia has no cards to play. As the Coalition continues
to demand a briefing on the national security issue that
has dominated the past week of the election debate, Senior
Labour figures have mocked the request, with Anthony Albenzi saying
he's waiting for a briefing on who faked the moon
landing and Labour Front bencher Murray Watt comparing the coalition's
request to ask for a briefing on the Lochness Monster
(16:00):
be joins. This is seven a m. Thanks for listening.
Two five is a group of suburbs South Sydney in
the postcode two five one five and we wanted to
sort of fast forward a community to the future. We
are home to the first community led electrification pilot in Australia.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
We're going to help five hundred homes in the community
electrifying one our hot water.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
In a coastal corner of Australia. Scientist Saul Griffith has
been quietly working away on a plan to turn five
hundred households completely off fossil fuels.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
We can do this electrification which will both decarbonize us.
It should also lower our cost of energy and it
should be able to be all possible with small changes
to the local grid and then small changes to people's households.
Why would we do that?
Speaker 3 (00:46):
An electric home uses less energy, it's cheaper to run,
is healthier to live in and best of.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
All, if we do it together as a community, it's easier,
hopefully a little more fun, and.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
We can show the rest of Australia how we can
create our electric future today.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
And so we ran that project idea up the pole.
That Arena Australias Neural Energy Agency arguing for the importance
of this in terms of our national emissions and in
terms of helping households through this energy transition.
Speaker 4 (01:14):
The Albanezi government through Arena is supporting the Electrified two
five one five project with a grade of five point
four million dollars.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
And so we got enough money to provide a small
subsidy to a bunch of houses to electrify their stoves,
their water heaters, their space heaters. Trying to figure out
how to do this cheaper for all of the other
communities that they are going to follow, figure out how
to do it in fair and equitable way so that
we can have a justin fair transition.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
And he hopes that what he achieves there can act
as a blueprint for the rest of the country. But
for that to become a reality, the federal government and
industry would need to drastically increase their commitment.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Well, if we were really shooting for a one and
a half or two degree climate target, every Australian community
would be pretty much fully electrified by early twenty forties.
And so we know that if we do this it's
going to save the country trillions of dollars. So you know,
as well of us wanting to do it for climate reasons.
It's just a good idea for the country.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven am today,
chief scientist at Rewiring Australia. Saw Griffith on the electrification
already underway and what both sides of politics are promising
for our energy future. It's Tuesday, April twenty two, So
(02:41):
Saul zooming out, where would you say that we are
at in Australia right now in terms of households moving
away from energy generated by fossil fuels to living in
a clean electricity environment.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
We'd lead the world absolutely in terms of rooftop solar,
like thirty five forty percent of homes now I have
rooftop solar that probably will go all the way up
to eighty percent because it just keeps getting to be
cheaper and better economics. Cars we're not going as fast
as we could compared to say Norway, where honestly, by
the end of twenty twenty five nearly one hundred percent
of vehicles will be electric. We are in the middle
(03:17):
of the pack on heat pumps for water heating and
space eating. We go about fifty percent at electric cooking.
We're doing okay, not quite as good as Asia. So
we're doing well and we have this structural advantage now
cheap solar, but the long term savings overrunning them for
ten or fifteen years on much much cheaper energy is
where we save the money. So it's about getting that
(03:38):
upfront assistance and that argues for a government's role in
helping that.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
Let's talk about that a little more. I mean, there is,
as you say, this huge uptake in solar. I think
it's one in three Australian households that have solar panels now,
but it's not the same with batteries. It's one in
forty households that have a battery. So in that context,
how significant is anthony easiest promise to subsidize home batteries.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
A lot of.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
People won't remember it, but it was under a Howard
government where Howard first encouraged some rebates for solar and
some generous feed in tariffs. That was in the early
two thousands, and at that time solar was more expensive
than it was from the grid. But offering those incentives
it helped build an industry. It helped train the tradees
(04:25):
who do the installations, It helped bring the cost of
the product down and we're in the same place in
twenty twenty five with batteries as we were with solar
in say twenty ten, so almost competitive with the market.
So these incentives will help build capacity to install them,
it will help the electricity distribution companies figure out how
to absorb them into the grid, and it will bring
(04:48):
down the cost for every future battery. So by the
time this program has run its course, as is the
case with solar today, the batteries will make total economic
sense and so it looks like good policy, I suppose.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
So we're talking a lot about what individuals and what
households can do and the ways in which those options
might be cheaper, while obviously also coming with the advantage
of being better for the environment. But what proportion of
emissions in Australia actually come from household use?
Speaker 1 (05:18):
So in terms of how significant our household emissions in Australia,
I think, first it's worth understanding sixty percent of our
emissions are in support of our domestic economy. So that's
burning gas in Australia to cook a meal, it's burning petrol,
and Australia drive a car burning coal in Australia to
use electricity use in Australia. But about forty percent of
(05:39):
our emissions is dedicated to things that ultimately we ship
overseas as part of our trade. So that's using diesel
to mind coal or diesel to extract gas and then
we send that overseas, and so those emissions happen overseas.
So anyway, of the sixty percent of our emissions which
are domestic, about forty two percent of those are from
(06:02):
the cars in our households and the appliances in our households,
and then another thirty percent of our emissions is our
cars used in small business and commercially, and in our
buildings used for small businesses and commercial activity including schools
and churches and surf clubs. They go under the commercial sector.
(06:22):
So seventy percent of our domestic emissions can be addressed
with technologies that are available today, solar batteries, electric vehicles,
electric appliances. I'm a strong proponent that we should be
doing the things that work economically and work for emissions
reductions right now, and that's where they are. And if
we do that this decade, then we buy ourselves enough
time for the remaining pieces of the industrial decarbonization puzzle
(06:45):
to come into focus and to become economically viable. But
the reality is we're a big export nation. That's where
the very large contribution from industrial emissions happens in Australia
is from from the diesel. It's used to pull the
coal out of the ground and the natural gas out
of the ground and send it off to Asian and
(07:06):
European markets. So we need to be, if not first
in top runner in the field in all of these
big export industries that use huge amounts of energy. But
we're not spending enough money on the research on the
new processes. We're not really thinking outside the box, and
that's because the industry is a slow moving and heavy
(07:27):
hitting lobbyist.
Speaker 3 (07:30):
Coming up after the break, what does global leadership actually
look like when it comes to facing the climate crisis.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
Hi, I'm Daniel James. Seven AM tells stories that need
to be told. Our journalism is founded on trust and
independence and now we're increasing our coverage. Every Saturday until
the election will bring you an extra episode to break
down the biggest political moments of the week. If you
enjoy seven AM, the best way you can support us
is by making a contribution at seven am podcast dot
(08:01):
com dot a slash support. Thanks for listening and supporting
our work.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
So in terms of sort of political will, do you
see either Dutton or Albanezi's approach as we get closer
to this election and the promises that have been made
as I suppose being up to meeting the challenge.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Well, the headline the Future Made in Australia is pretty good,
you know. The one challenge with Australia is we seem
to very much like underwriting the existing market players as
opposed to supporting disruptive innovation. So in theory we should
all like Future Made in Australia. But if it's large
hand oubts to the existing industries to go slow, that's
not going to be as good as funding the young,
(08:44):
hungry entrepreneurs who want to completely replace those industries with
a better industry. So I'd like to see that happening.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Under the coalition. Energy will become affordable and reliable.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
Again using Dutton really hasn't said anything about industrial policy
and terms of energy policy. Nuclear that is almost certainly
going to be publicly unpopular, isn't going to get in
the ground until twenty forty, doesn't solve any real problems
that the Australian grid has.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
We will join the other nineteen top economies in the
world in adopting proven zero missions nuclear power. This is
one of the most visionary and necessary policies put forward
in our country's history.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
I mean, there's some good work. The brag Inquiry on
the economics household electrication, which came from Liberals, pointed to
the fact that this is good for the country and
it's going to save people money. So there's a little
bit to celebrate in all teams, But no big industrial
vision for the nation from Dunton.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
And the only way to drive down power prices quickly
is to ramp up domestic gas production and tonight I
announce our national Gas Plan.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
But you know what we need is genuine political leadership
as well as policy. We haven't really seen leading from
the top on climate under this labor government. Chris Bam
has been good, but the nation would like to hear
it from the boss.
Speaker 4 (10:03):
Thirty three percent renewable energy on the day we came
to office, forty six percent in the last quarter of
last year, and renewables are set to overtake coal as
the largest source of our electricity this year. That's good progress,
but there's more to do, much more to do.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
The Independence and Greens are pushing the right things, but
we just need to all of it needs to go
so much faster than any politician is really conceiving of
if we're going to have any hope of keeping the
world under two degrees warming.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
In his Budget reply speech, Peter Dutton said that he
would end labors rewiring the Nation Renewable Energy Focused Fund
the nineteen point five billion dollar one in favor of gas,
coal and nuclear. So can you just tell me a
bit about how that money is currently spent and what
would happen if Dunton was to get in and it
(10:55):
was cut.
Speaker 1 (10:56):
Rewiring the Nation was twenty billion dollars earmarked for big
transmission to move electricity long distance across Australia. My understanding
is because the transmission companies get paid to build the
wise that they've already allocated the great majority of that
twenty billion dollars. It's already out the door. So I
think Dutton's it's an empty promise. I don't think he
(11:16):
can claw it back at this point. We also understand
that one billion of that twenty got reallocated from rewiring
the nation towards the HUE, which was the Home Energy
Upgrade Fund to do household electrication and similar things. So
maybe they could call that back. That would be a
bad idea. It would be politically unpopular because it's helping
(11:37):
households do things that make their cost a living lower.
So feels like an empty threat to me.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
Okay. And just finally, as as back on the idea
of leadership, you know, we hear a lot about the
importance of global leadership when we're talking about climate change,
But what type of leadership do you think is actually
likely to influence schoolbal change.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Well, the influence that really works is when you prove
by example that this is a better way to live.
This is the point of the two five to one
to five project. And you know, it's pretty cool. We're
oversubscribed on households who want to join. It's the I
swim in my local swim pool every morning and there's
somebody's asking me questions about this or that or the other,
and it's sort of you can see it catching on
(12:23):
and being a sort of good idea for the community.
So that kind of leadership showing that it can work
showing that it improves the economics for community, showing it
on the global stage that helps everyone move along. Similarly,
I have a friend in New Zealand, Mike Casey. He
runs the world's first all electric cherry farm. He electrified
his frost fans, he bought the first two electric tractors
(12:45):
in the Southern Hemisphere, put giant amount of solar on
his barn, and because of the nature of the electricity
tariffs in New Zealand, he's able to I think he's
saving forty to seventy thousand dollars a year on his
cost of energy because electricity is so much cheaper than
diesel to do the same thing. He's earning an extra
twenty or thirty thousand dollars a year selling his excess
(13:07):
solar electricity back into the grid. And honestly, that's a
story that could be true for most Australian farmers. There's
a huge opportunity in using our existing agricultural rooftops that's
barns and sheds, putting solar on those, connecting those into
the grid, fixing the regulatory and the electricity market rules
so that the farmers get paid the same price as
(13:29):
the other generators and then you would have I think
you'd have a big change in the politics of electrification
in the regions.
Speaker 3 (13:37):
You know.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
So I look to the Coalition, I look to Done
and like, there's a huge opportunity to help your people
get on with this energy transition in a way that
benefits them economically. So we've got a lot to boast
in Australia because agricultural electrication for all but the largest
combine harvesters is now a sensible, lower cost way to
(13:59):
run farm, all electric households, lowest way to run your household,
all electric cars, cheapest cars to run. So the economics
is good. It's going to improve health outcomes. These machines
are cheaper and easier to maintain because they've got fewer
moving parts. Like, there's just a lot of winning to
be had, and leadership is showing that winning happening in
(14:20):
practice helping communities. I think with some creativity, our politicians
could be speaking to a whole bunch of different constituencies
in Australia on how this is going to be economically
and culturally and health wise.
Speaker 3 (14:35):
Good for you, So thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Thank you very much.
Speaker 3 (14:52):
Also in the news, today, a Peter Dutton led government
would pilot a national register for child sex offenders. The
Coalition has announced twelvemonth pilot program would allow parents to
apply to police for information about whether an individual who
interacts with their children is a convicted sex offender. It's
part of the seven hundred and fifty million dollar package
called Operation Safer Communities revealed over the easter break. The
(15:15):
plan includes a tightening of border security and safety laws
and extra funding for police. The Coalition is expected to
focus on issues including national security, crime and defense in
the lead up to the election on May three, and
Anthony Abernesi has labeled Russia's attempts for a military presence
in Indonesia as propaganda, as Moscow's ambassador to Indonesia said,
(15:36):
Australia has no cards to play. As the Coalition continues
to demand a briefing on the national security issue that
has dominated the past week of the election debate, Senior
Labour figures have mocked the request, with Anthony Albenzi saying
he's waiting for a briefing on who faked the moon
landing and Labour Front bencher Murray Watt comparing the coalition's
request to ask for a briefing on the Lochness Monster
(16:00):
be joins. This is seven a m. Thanks for listening.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.