May 2, 2025 • 14 mins
It’s election day!
While Anthony Albanese’s campaign has been modest and predictable, Peter Dutton’s has been marked by missteps and backflips.
It seems the traits that powered Dutton’s rise are now holding him back.
Today, columnist and former adviser to two prime ministers, Sean Kelly, on the decisions that shaped both leaders – and what killed Peter Dutton’s campaign.
If you enjoy 7am, the best way you can support us is by making a contribution at 7ampodcast.com.au/support.
Socials: Stay in touch with us on Instagram
Guest: Columnist and former adviser to two prime ministers, Sean Kelly.
Photo: AAP Image/Pool
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I definitely did not anticipate Peter Dunnan's campaign being as
all over the place as it has been.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Sean Kelly has worked to elect two prime ministers. The
art of campaigning is in his DNA.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
There were, of course, signs of a lack of preparation.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Here is a dozen eggs, mister Dutton.
Speaker 1 (00:20):
Do you know how much they cost?
Speaker 3 (00:24):
About four dollars twenty No, you might.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Get there was a lack of policy out there in
the ether.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
Look, I think we've made a mistake in relation to
this policy seruh.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
And I think there had been certainly intimations of failures
around detail around costings before the campaign began.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
Where do you get this is a question where we
find inefficiency, David, And it's not something you can.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
Do from But the thing about a campaign is you
have a long time to prepare for it.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Sean says. Dunton's lack of preparation is a feature, not
a bug, and until now his loose approach has served
him well. He's been the person willing to speak his
mind without much thought, generate a headline and keep moving.
But now under the scrutiny of an election campaign, the
traits that powered his rise are working against him. From
(01:18):
Schwartz Media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven am today,
former advisor to Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard. Sean Kelly
on the campaign that was and the result to come.
It's election day, Sewan, thanks for joining me. You've been
(01:44):
watching as Peter Dutton's campaign has unraveled. But talk to
me about this final week. How do you think this
last leg has gone for him?
Speaker 1 (01:51):
As an old colleague of mine remarked me the other day,
it's like he's interrupting every mistake with another one. I
mean this last few days you've had around their visa
policy and working backpackers.
Speaker 3 (02:04):
What you just said, which is now good to have
it clear that you won't touch their working holiday visas.
We need a skilled workforce, David. But what the Labour
Party is essentially done is brought in yoga teachers instead
of construction workers.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
We've had Peter Dunn seeming to back away from earlier
suggestions that he revised the curriculum of the fear that
he had that school students were being indoctrinated. Now there
are going to be no changes to the curriculum.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
I support young Australians being able to think freely, being
able to assess what's before them, and not being told
and indoctrinated with something that is the agenda of others.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
There was an attack on the Guardian and the ABC
for being hate media, which was very Trumpian.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Forget about what you've been tied by the ABC and
the Guardian and the other hate media. Forget about that.
Listen to what you're hearing on them.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
But then Jane Hume tried to walk it back and
say it wasn't really a thing, but then Peter dudn't
doubled down on it the next day.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
I just think they're so biased, and many of them
just activists not journalists, that their position becomes counterproductive and
they're playing to a particular audience, to a Green voter.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You know, I wrote at the start of this week
Peter Duncan needed the last week of his campaign to
be strikingly different from the previous four. I have been
stunned by the extent to which it has continued the
tone of the previous four. I suppose I shouldn't be,
because of course, this is what happens in politics. People
get into habits they find it very difficult to break them.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
Tell me about the habits you've seen dunt in form
over his career and how they're playing that now.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
I think because of the way Peter Dutdan presents, people
tend to assume he's quite a disciplined guy. You know,
he has this the bearing of the policeman that he
once was. Often speaks in quite quiet and measured tones,
even if the topic that he's discussing is is one
that is one that sounds like it's provoking anger, and
I think that gives you a sense that is this
disciplined guy. Actually, the pattern in Peter Dudden's career going
(03:59):
back to quite early on, is it he's pretty loose. He's
pretty loose. In an interview, and I spoke to Lec Blaine,
who wrote a quarterly I Say about Peter Dunne, and
he made the point that the habits which helped Peter
Dudden rise in the Liberal Party, being able to make
kind of incendiary comments on right wing media, like a
(04:20):
media that was friendly to him, helped him now are
hurting him. If you look at things that have really
propelled Peter Dunnan through the party, it has been that
willingness to go just a little bit further than everybody else.
Right wing shock chocks have loved having him on. They
will say something to him and he is more than
(04:42):
happy to repeat it back to them, and that then
becomes the news. But that means that he often says
things which he hasn't really considered deeply, and you can
see that in this election. You know, he makes these
comments about what the Indonesian president had said when that
was absolutely not true, and suddenly it's consumed in a
new cycle over that for a couple of days. And
(05:03):
I think that also says something about the Liberal Party,
you know, is that tendency actually what the party should
be valuing, because depending on what happens tonight, arguably it
hasn't helped them that much in the end.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
So if we do what Peter Dutton has asked us
to do and think about the previous three years, I
would suggest he would say his crowning moment during that
past three years politically was the defeat of the referendum
and the campaign that he, along with others run to
defeat that referendum. So what lessons do you think he
took from that experience?
Speaker 1 (05:36):
Yeah, Look, I think the voice is so fascinating because
it was the biggest debate of this term and it
has a lot of substantive importance. Obviously, the overall verdict
has been that it hurt Anthony Albuneasy, that it gave
voters the perception that he was distracted by a cultural
issue at a time when he should have been focusing
(05:57):
on cost of living. But I think I think in hindsight,
what it really did was get Peter Dudden focused on
a cultural issue when he could have been focused on
cost of living, and when he could have been taking
the opportunity to broaden his image. Because the real difficulty
for Peter Dutden is that he since the very beginning
of his career has presented as a kind of strong man.
(06:20):
Now he obviously needed to soften that in various ways,
and I think with the Voice he instead leaned into
that image and that's all Australians heard from him for
a very long time, and he took from that that
that would work, that he could continue in that vein.
(06:41):
But the problem in taking that lesson from a referendum
is that we know that referendums don't succeed unless you
have bipartisan support. So Peter Dutton had pretty much doomed
the referendum from the moment he said no, the Coalition
is not going to support this. Everything he did after
that was really not that relevant. But I think he
probably convinced himself that he won that campaign by going
(07:02):
out there and campaigning and being a great campaigner, and
by leaning into the vibes and Australians were sick of workness.
And then Donald Trump came along and emphasized that view,
validated it in the eyes of meaning in the coalition,
and I suspect Peter Dutton and I think that meant
that they headed into this campaign in exactly the wrong position.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
After the break the gift Trump gave Albanezi Sean, we've
talked about Dutton, now let's talk about the Prime minister.
How would you raide his campaign?
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Really pretty good, nothing dramatically impressive. He's been pretty sharp.
He's been far on message than I think we've come
to expect from the Prime Minister over the past couple
of years. And that's been there since the start of
the year. Very early on in the year, I said
we were seeing a little bit of a new Anthony Albanesi.
He is much sharper and I think what's really interesting
(08:05):
about Labor and what I think has helped the Prime
Minister on the campaign trail is for various reasons, they
got out all of their policy well before the campaign.
He hasn't had to think on his feet in a way.
He's had to relentlessly prosecute the messages that Labor have
been prosecuting for the last three years.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
And do you think that the fact that Alberanze, given
the global events that have been happening around us, particularly
over the last hundred days, so that sort of steady,
non exciting type of leadership and campaigning has basically played
into his hands.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Well, and I think this is a really important fact.
You know, we can say because it is true that
Anthony Alberanesi has had a pretty good campaign, Peter Dudden
has had a disastrously bad campaign. But in the end,
there was one factor that shifted everything and it was
Donald Trump, and specifically with Donald Trump the tariffs, it
just unleashed a sense that the globe was in this
(09:05):
hugely uncertain time and that then I think drove people
back towards incumbents. We saw that, of course in Canada
in this last week specifically, I think it helped left
wing incumbents versus right wing insurgents like Peter Dudden. It
hurt a lot of right wing candidates, and I think
it definitely hurt Peter Dudden in this workmanlike approach that
(09:28):
Albaneze has taken to the prime minship, which I think
has been making a virtue of his weaknesses in some ways.
It was also born out of a sense that politics
had become too volatile in recent years. He used that
term conflict fatigue, and I think that is some form
of anticipation of the environment in which this campaign has
(09:51):
ended up taking place. It was essentially alban Esy seeing
that there was a lot of uncertainty in the electoral
landscape and that voters would end up gravitating towards somebody
who was just a little bit quiet, who had brought
the tone of politics to a calmer place, and that
is what has ended up helping him enormously these last
five weeks.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
So if you think about Anthony Albanese's Prime ministership to date,
what will you remember about it?
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Look, I have this theory about politics. It's a bit
of a loose theory, but I call it the rule
of three and it's what three things can you remember
from the last term of government, and if two out
of the three things you remember are positive, then that
government is likely to be reelected. I'm not sure what
you do remember from this term. Perhaps in later years
(10:37):
you will remember the government in the end defeating inflation.
You know, inflation seemed like a really negative thing for
most of this term. I think it probably ends up
seeming like a positive achievement of the Albanese government. The
voice ends up being seen as a failure obviously, though
perhaps you can surmise a future where people think, well,
(10:57):
at least Albanzi was brave for attempting it, for listening
to the requestsive indigenous people, and I really struggle to
get to a third. And look, this is the thing
about Urbanezi. He has been very explicit from very early
on that his approach is to go gradually, is to
not get people off side, It is to not pick
fights and to build change over time. But then there
(11:21):
are also long building crises, and I think this is
the place Australia finds itself in at the moment. We
have education standards which have been declining for a long time.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
Now we have a.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
School system, which, rather than shrinking inequality between students, widens
the learning gap between students. We have a healthcare system
which is struggling to get enough GPS, which we know
bulk building has been under pressure. We have age care
in trouble, we have childcare standards in trouble. Across the
entire life cycle, our standard of living in this country
(11:55):
is facing huge threats. Now those are often slow building crises,
doesn't make them less like crisis. And I think in
a way, the test of this government is going to
end up being has it acted dramatically enough fast enough
to turn those problems around by the time it has
(12:16):
to hand over power to somebody else.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
And finally, seawn Y knew this question was coming, who
is going to win and why? I'll add on top
of that, what do you expect the new parliament to
look like?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Broadly, Look, I really don't know. I really don't know.
First up, any election can go anyway. Things can always
shift in ways that people don't expect. People keep pointing
back towards twenty nineteen and the fact that Bill Shorten
unexpectedly lost. I suspect that this is not like that
for the simple reason the polls were shifting back towards
(12:49):
the Coalition for a very long time before that election.
The final polls didn't pick up the extent of that,
but the trend was there. In this election, the trend
has been towards Labor. I think it would take something
really out of the box for Peter Dudden to win tonight,
but of course it's possible. It will be fascinating if
(13:10):
Labor do end up in minority. We see the Teals
trying to prove that they can win in an environment
without Scott Morrison and actually have an agenda of their
own that is not just an absence of what the
Coalition is doing. And we have the Greens really trying
to be the party of renters, shifting a little bit
further towards economic issues and away from their traditional ground
(13:30):
of climate environment issues. So whatever the actual result is tonight,
each of the parties is behaving in very very different
ways than what we are used to and of course
the Teals in that environment are still pretty new, So
I think whatever happens tonight, we will see a new
landscape because some of those experiments will continue to go
(13:50):
forward if they're being successful, and the failed ones, you know,
those parties will have to go back to the drawing board.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
Saw never a dull moment. Thanks for coming in and
speaking of it.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Thanks for having me.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Seven Am is a daily show from Schwartz Media and
a Saturday paper. It's made by Atticus Basto, Shane Anderson,
Christen Gate, Eric Jensen, Ruby Jones, Sarah mcphe, Travis Evans,
Sultan Facho and me Daniel James. Our theme music is
by Ned Beckley and Josh Hogan of Envelope Bordeo and Tonight,
(14:35):
I'm heading to the Labor Party's Election Night party and
I'll have a full report for you first thing in
the morning. See you then,
I definitely did not anticipate Peter Dunnan's campaign being as
all over the place as it has been.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Sean Kelly has worked to elect two prime ministers. The
art of campaigning is in his DNA.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
There were, of course, signs of a lack of preparation.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Here is a dozen eggs, mister Dutton.
Speaker 1 (00:20):
Do you know how much they cost?
Speaker 3 (00:24):
About four dollars twenty No, you might.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Get there was a lack of policy out there in
the ether.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
Look, I think we've made a mistake in relation to
this policy seruh.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
And I think there had been certainly intimations of failures
around detail around costings before the campaign began.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
Where do you get this is a question where we
find inefficiency, David, And it's not something you can.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
Do from But the thing about a campaign is you
have a long time to prepare for it.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Sean says. Dunton's lack of preparation is a feature, not
a bug, and until now his loose approach has served
him well. He's been the person willing to speak his
mind without much thought, generate a headline and keep moving.
But now under the scrutiny of an election campaign, the
traits that powered his rise are working against him. From
(01:18):
Schwartz Media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven am today,
former advisor to Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard. Sean Kelly
on the campaign that was and the result to come.
It's election day, Sewan, thanks for joining me. You've been
(01:44):
watching as Peter Dutton's campaign has unraveled. But talk to
me about this final week. How do you think this
last leg has gone for him?
Speaker 1 (01:51):
As an old colleague of mine remarked me the other day,
it's like he's interrupting every mistake with another one. I
mean this last few days you've had around their visa
policy and working backpackers.
Speaker 3 (02:04):
What you just said, which is now good to have
it clear that you won't touch their working holiday visas.
We need a skilled workforce, David. But what the Labour
Party is essentially done is brought in yoga teachers instead
of construction workers.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
We've had Peter Dunn seeming to back away from earlier
suggestions that he revised the curriculum of the fear that
he had that school students were being indoctrinated. Now there
are going to be no changes to the curriculum.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
I support young Australians being able to think freely, being
able to assess what's before them, and not being told
and indoctrinated with something that is the agenda of others.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
There was an attack on the Guardian and the ABC
for being hate media, which was very Trumpian.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Forget about what you've been tied by the ABC and
the Guardian and the other hate media. Forget about that.
Listen to what you're hearing on them.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
But then Jane Hume tried to walk it back and
say it wasn't really a thing, but then Peter dudn't
doubled down on it the next day.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
I just think they're so biased, and many of them
just activists not journalists, that their position becomes counterproductive and
they're playing to a particular audience, to a Green voter.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You know, I wrote at the start of this week
Peter Duncan needed the last week of his campaign to
be strikingly different from the previous four. I have been
stunned by the extent to which it has continued the
tone of the previous four. I suppose I shouldn't be,
because of course, this is what happens in politics. People
get into habits they find it very difficult to break them.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
Tell me about the habits you've seen dunt in form
over his career and how they're playing that now.
Speaker 1 (03:35):
I think because of the way Peter Dutdan presents, people
tend to assume he's quite a disciplined guy. You know,
he has this the bearing of the policeman that he
once was. Often speaks in quite quiet and measured tones,
even if the topic that he's discussing is is one
that is one that sounds like it's provoking anger, and
I think that gives you a sense that is this
disciplined guy. Actually, the pattern in Peter Dudden's career going
(03:59):
back to quite early on, is it he's pretty loose. He's
pretty loose. In an interview, and I spoke to Lec Blaine,
who wrote a quarterly I Say about Peter Dunne, and
he made the point that the habits which helped Peter
Dudden rise in the Liberal Party, being able to make
kind of incendiary comments on right wing media, like a
(04:20):
media that was friendly to him, helped him now are
hurting him. If you look at things that have really
propelled Peter Dunnan through the party, it has been that
willingness to go just a little bit further than everybody else.
Right wing shock chocks have loved having him on. They
will say something to him and he is more than
(04:42):
happy to repeat it back to them, and that then
becomes the news. But that means that he often says
things which he hasn't really considered deeply, and you can
see that in this election. You know, he makes these
comments about what the Indonesian president had said when that
was absolutely not true, and suddenly it's consumed in a
new cycle over that for a couple of days. And
(05:03):
I think that also says something about the Liberal Party,
you know, is that tendency actually what the party should
be valuing, because depending on what happens tonight, arguably it
hasn't helped them that much in the end.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
So if we do what Peter Dutton has asked us
to do and think about the previous three years, I
would suggest he would say his crowning moment during that
past three years politically was the defeat of the referendum
and the campaign that he, along with others run to
defeat that referendum. So what lessons do you think he
took from that experience?
Speaker 1 (05:36):
Yeah, Look, I think the voice is so fascinating because
it was the biggest debate of this term and it
has a lot of substantive importance. Obviously, the overall verdict
has been that it hurt Anthony Albuneasy, that it gave
voters the perception that he was distracted by a cultural
issue at a time when he should have been focusing
(05:57):
on cost of living. But I think I think in hindsight,
what it really did was get Peter Dudden focused on
a cultural issue when he could have been focused on
cost of living, and when he could have been taking
the opportunity to broaden his image. Because the real difficulty
for Peter Dutden is that he since the very beginning
of his career has presented as a kind of strong man.
(06:20):
Now he obviously needed to soften that in various ways,
and I think with the Voice he instead leaned into
that image and that's all Australians heard from him for
a very long time, and he took from that that
that would work, that he could continue in that vein.
(06:41):
But the problem in taking that lesson from a referendum
is that we know that referendums don't succeed unless you
have bipartisan support. So Peter Dutton had pretty much doomed
the referendum from the moment he said no, the Coalition
is not going to support this. Everything he did after
that was really not that relevant. But I think he
probably convinced himself that he won that campaign by going
(07:02):
out there and campaigning and being a great campaigner, and
by leaning into the vibes and Australians were sick of workness.
And then Donald Trump came along and emphasized that view,
validated it in the eyes of meaning in the coalition,
and I suspect Peter Dutton and I think that meant
that they headed into this campaign in exactly the wrong position.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
After the break the gift Trump gave Albanezi Sean, we've
talked about Dutton, now let's talk about the Prime minister.
How would you raide his campaign?
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Really pretty good, nothing dramatically impressive. He's been pretty sharp.
He's been far on message than I think we've come
to expect from the Prime Minister over the past couple
of years. And that's been there since the start of
the year. Very early on in the year, I said
we were seeing a little bit of a new Anthony Albanesi.
He is much sharper and I think what's really interesting
(08:05):
about Labor and what I think has helped the Prime
Minister on the campaign trail is for various reasons, they
got out all of their policy well before the campaign.
He hasn't had to think on his feet in a way.
He's had to relentlessly prosecute the messages that Labor have
been prosecuting for the last three years.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
And do you think that the fact that Alberanze, given
the global events that have been happening around us, particularly
over the last hundred days, so that sort of steady,
non exciting type of leadership and campaigning has basically played
into his hands.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Well, and I think this is a really important fact.
You know, we can say because it is true that
Anthony Alberanesi has had a pretty good campaign, Peter Dudden
has had a disastrously bad campaign. But in the end,
there was one factor that shifted everything and it was
Donald Trump, and specifically with Donald Trump the tariffs, it
just unleashed a sense that the globe was in this
(09:05):
hugely uncertain time and that then I think drove people
back towards incumbents. We saw that, of course in Canada
in this last week specifically, I think it helped left
wing incumbents versus right wing insurgents like Peter Dudden. It
hurt a lot of right wing candidates, and I think
it definitely hurt Peter Dudden in this workmanlike approach that
(09:28):
Albaneze has taken to the prime minship, which I think
has been making a virtue of his weaknesses in some ways.
It was also born out of a sense that politics
had become too volatile in recent years. He used that
term conflict fatigue, and I think that is some form
of anticipation of the environment in which this campaign has
(09:51):
ended up taking place. It was essentially alban Esy seeing
that there was a lot of uncertainty in the electoral
landscape and that voters would end up gravitating towards somebody
who was just a little bit quiet, who had brought
the tone of politics to a calmer place, and that
is what has ended up helping him enormously these last
five weeks.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
So if you think about Anthony Albanese's Prime ministership to date,
what will you remember about it?
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Look, I have this theory about politics. It's a bit
of a loose theory, but I call it the rule
of three and it's what three things can you remember
from the last term of government, and if two out
of the three things you remember are positive, then that
government is likely to be reelected. I'm not sure what
you do remember from this term. Perhaps in later years
(10:37):
you will remember the government in the end defeating inflation.
You know, inflation seemed like a really negative thing for
most of this term. I think it probably ends up
seeming like a positive achievement of the Albanese government. The
voice ends up being seen as a failure obviously, though
perhaps you can surmise a future where people think, well,
(10:57):
at least Albanzi was brave for attempting it, for listening
to the requestsive indigenous people, and I really struggle to
get to a third. And look, this is the thing
about Urbanezi. He has been very explicit from very early
on that his approach is to go gradually, is to
not get people off side, It is to not pick
fights and to build change over time. But then there
(11:21):
are also long building crises, and I think this is
the place Australia finds itself in at the moment. We
have education standards which have been declining for a long time.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
Now we have a.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
School system, which, rather than shrinking inequality between students, widens
the learning gap between students. We have a healthcare system
which is struggling to get enough GPS, which we know
bulk building has been under pressure. We have age care
in trouble, we have childcare standards in trouble. Across the
entire life cycle, our standard of living in this country
(11:55):
is facing huge threats. Now those are often slow building crises,
doesn't make them less like crisis. And I think in
a way, the test of this government is going to
end up being has it acted dramatically enough fast enough
to turn those problems around by the time it has
(12:16):
to hand over power to somebody else.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
And finally, seawn Y knew this question was coming, who
is going to win and why? I'll add on top
of that, what do you expect the new parliament to
look like?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Broadly, Look, I really don't know. I really don't know.
First up, any election can go anyway. Things can always
shift in ways that people don't expect. People keep pointing
back towards twenty nineteen and the fact that Bill Shorten
unexpectedly lost. I suspect that this is not like that
for the simple reason the polls were shifting back towards
(12:49):
the Coalition for a very long time before that election.
The final polls didn't pick up the extent of that,
but the trend was there. In this election, the trend
has been towards Labor. I think it would take something
really out of the box for Peter Dudden to win tonight,
but of course it's possible. It will be fascinating if
(13:10):
Labor do end up in minority. We see the Teals
trying to prove that they can win in an environment
without Scott Morrison and actually have an agenda of their
own that is not just an absence of what the
Coalition is doing. And we have the Greens really trying
to be the party of renters, shifting a little bit
further towards economic issues and away from their traditional ground
(13:30):
of climate environment issues. So whatever the actual result is tonight,
each of the parties is behaving in very very different
ways than what we are used to and of course
the Teals in that environment are still pretty new, So
I think whatever happens tonight, we will see a new
landscape because some of those experiments will continue to go
(13:50):
forward if they're being successful, and the failed ones, you know,
those parties will have to go back to the drawing board.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
Saw never a dull moment. Thanks for coming in and
speaking of it.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Thanks for having me.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Seven Am is a daily show from Schwartz Media and
a Saturday paper. It's made by Atticus Basto, Shane Anderson,
Christen Gate, Eric Jensen, Ruby Jones, Sarah mcphe, Travis Evans,
Sultan Facho and me Daniel James. Our theme music is
by Ned Beckley and Josh Hogan of Envelope Bordeo and Tonight,
(14:35):
I'm heading to the Labor Party's Election Night party and
I'll have a full report for you first thing in
the morning. See you then,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.