Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello again, thanks for joining us on a new episode
of space That's My name is Andrew Dunkley, your host,
and it's good to have your company. And coming up
on this episode, we've got some fascinating stories as always,
and one is about a possible swarm of black holes
that might have been discovered in a rather well known
(00:21):
region of space too. I might add they thought there
was one, now they think there might be twenty thousand.
I'm not exaggerating. We're also going to look at the
Polaris Dawn mission. Now, by the time this podcast is released,
it may well have happened, but it might not, just
depends on technical issues. They're sitting on the platform at
(00:43):
the moment playing scrabble, waiting for things to get fixed
and the pufu valves to be unvalved and all that
sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
We also look at the New Horizons mission.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
It's eighteen years long now and nine years since it
did its I buy Pluto, but it's still working. What's
it working on?
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Darkness?
Speaker 1 (01:05):
That's all coming up on this episode of Space Nuts.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
Fifteen seconds in Channel ten nine ignition.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Squench Space Nuts or three.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
Two red ones Space Notes as then report it feels
good and joining us again to unravel all of that
and much much more is Professor Fred.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
What's an hello thread?
Speaker 4 (01:31):
Hello Andrew. Unraveling is our business. We're pretty good at
raveling as well, especially when it comes to things like
headphone leads and things of that sort.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Yes, I've got one of those stretchy ones.
Speaker 4 (01:45):
There you go it.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
It does a good job, except it keeps getting in
the wrong place and it's a bit annoying.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
But it can't go wireless.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
You can't go bluetooth through this panel I've got because
of the time delay. Just to make things difficult, So
you'll talk to me and I wan't hear it for
a second and a half, which is.
Speaker 2 (02:06):
Not you know, that's the deal.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
It might be going via the moon, could be from
you from your desktop to your headphones via the moon.
That would be more like two and a half seconds.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
Well, when I bought them, it said if you if
you choose to go bluetooth, you may discover that it
doesn't work the way you want it to. And that's
exactly what happens.
Speaker 4 (02:29):
Interesting, So it's not all bells and whistles, not all perfect.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
Tell you what else is in perfect? Well, the weather's
been perfect lately, but so's the hay fever.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
It's Jean ripping through.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
Us at the moment. My word, Yeah, yep, I'm a
terrible sufferer. And I thought it was just because of
where we lived. So when we went to England many
years ago and got off the plane, I wasn't even
off the Gangway or the skybridge or whatever call it,
and I was sneezing. I thought, oh no, I thought
I escaped all this by coming to the exact opposite
(03:05):
side of the planet. But no, it just got me.
So now I know it doesn't matter where I am.
I'm going to get hay for you if there's pollen
in the air. Quite so, I'd like someone to do
a study on why it develops later in life because
I never had it as a kid.
Speaker 4 (03:20):
No, I did, neither. Neither did Jeordie.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
As you know he loves to contribute, does Jeordie, Yes
he does.
Speaker 4 (03:29):
So, Yeah, the same thing happened to me, but mine
was a bit more obvious because I grew up in
the North of England and studied in Scotland and kind
of hung around the North of England for the first
twenty odd years of my life. And then moved to
the south where which is verdant and green and grassy,
and immediately got terrible hay fever. Yeah, which I now
(03:49):
know is an allergy to rye grass.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
What it will be for me too. There's a lot
of rye grass out here. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
So I haven't had it. I haven't been tested, but
I I'm making that assumption. Also allergic to cats. There
you go, grew up with a cat, never had a problem.
Now I can't, you know, I can no longer rub
my face in there, for which is so disappointing, So disappointing.
Speaker 4 (04:15):
Let's try rubbing your face in muscats fur it te
your eyes out.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Yeah, that's the other problem. That is the other problem
that may explain the itchy. Now let's get down to business.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
This story is interesting because it really changes the way
we're looking at one particular piece of space. And it's
an area where we thought there was an intermediate mass
black hole?
Speaker 2 (04:41):
Was it? Now they think it's not. It's not a
black hole.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
It's a multi faceted number of black holes in possibly
the tens of thousands. This is quite extraordinary.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
It is it's a story that I mean, we've been
following the intermediate mass black called story for quite some time,
and just to fill in the details for anybody new
to the issue, we find we commonly find what we
call stellar mass black holes, black holes with the massive
you know, up to twenty stars, up to twenty sons,
(05:17):
and we commonly find super massive black holes, which are
sometimes twenty billion times the mass of the song. But
there doesn't seem to be anything in between. The intermediate
mass black holes have been elusive, and one place we
think we might find them is in the center of
these really spectacular gigantic star clusters that we call globular
(05:40):
clusters because they're globular in shape. That name was given
to them by William Hershall a couple hundred years ago
or more. And we have by we, I mean the
world of astronomy has basically been hunting for intermediate black
holes in the centers of some globular clusters, and with
(06:02):
sort of varying degrees of success in the sense that
some of these findings are more certain than others. But
one that we covered recently was a finding that yeah,
we were pretty sure about for a while, and that
is the globular cluster Omiga centaury it's the biggest of them.
Our Milky Way Galaxi's retinue of globular clusters one hundred
(06:24):
and sixty or two hundred of them, and this one
is the biggest of them. Distance of seventeen thousand light
years as the crow flies in the constellation of Centaurus,
which is why it's called Umiga Centaury, and visible just
about to the naked eye. In fact, it's this time
of the year where we start seeing it quite well
(06:46):
from here in the southern hemisphere. It's a deep south
object invisible from the southern hemisphere. So what's the story. Well, scientists,
in fact European scientists who were using i think something
like twenty years worth of images from the Hubble Space
telescope which allowed them to plot the motions of stars
(07:10):
within Omega Centaury, and in particular they let them map
the motions of stars near its center, which seem to
have quite high velocities and which are symptomatic of something
massive around which they're orbiting. So you've got stars with
(07:32):
high velocities. In particular, the kind of velocities that were
being talked about. I think they're in the region of
three four, five, six kilometers per second thereabouts, if I
remember rightly, those velocities. If there wasn't something massive of
the middle would be enough to catapult them out of
the globular cluster and they belong gone, they'd be interstellar,
(07:55):
you know, the interstellar stars if I put it that way,
stars between the stars, but more there will be within
the halo of our galaxy, which is where the globular
clusters lie, the halo being that sort of spherical shell
of all stars and globular clusters. So that was the
(08:18):
story as we reported it. The evidence that there's possibly
something like a twenty thousand solar mass black hole the
middle of Omega centaury.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
Yeah, and we were really.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Excited by that because I think we'd only just sort
of concluded that there aren't any and then we've found one.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
Yes, that's right, And then now we haven't. We've unfound it.
We've an't found it because another group of scientists, using
similar data I think they've basically analyzed the same data set,
have suggested that the motions of the stars do not
(08:58):
tie down that central mass as being a single object.
They're what they're saying is that it's like it could
equally and that's perhaps the best way to phrase it. It
could equally be a large cluster of much smaller objects.
It's there's still black holes because you can't see anything
of them. There's no there's nothing massive visible there in
(09:22):
any of the wavelengths. But we can tell by the
motions of the stars that there is something there. And
so what they are suggesting is that it's not a
single lots a single intermediate black intermediate mass black hole.
It's not that it is more likely or as likely,
if I can put it that way, to be something
(09:43):
between ten or twenty thousand stellar mass black holes. In
other words, the smaller variety, right, And you know, that's
the bottom line. And the group that's suggesting this, one
of the team members of Francesca Calori from the French
National Center for Scientific Research, says, the possibility of an
(10:07):
intermediate mass black hole in Obena Centaury still exists. Our
analysis does not rule out an intermediate mass black hole,
but rather sets a limit on its mass, predicting an
upper limit of six thousand solar masses, which is less
than what the earlier team estimated. And so they, yes,
(10:28):
they're trying to work out what that discrepancy is but yes,
the you know that the later paper, the new research
Calori etel. Is saying it might not be a single object.
It could be you know, lots of lots of smaller objects.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
Yeah, and that's been backed up by another gentleman at
Leiden Observatory I think, who agrees, even though he wasn't
part of the study, agrees it's probably a multitude of
stellar mass black holes rather than an intermediate mess black hole.
Speaker 4 (11:08):
That's correct. And actually there's an old friend of mine
who was also commenting on this, Jerry Gilmore, who I've
known now for forty years. He's a very big name
in the University of Cambridge. He is a key. We
actually came to the UK to work at the Role
Observatory in Edinburgh, where I was working. We became good
(11:29):
friends and still are. Jerry, he wasn't involved with the
study either, and he thinks that stellar mass black holes
are likely to be common in comparison with intermediate mass
black call. So I think he's a favor. He's favoring
(11:52):
the idea that the latest research, the idea that this
is perhaps a whole lot of smaller black holes rather
than one big one, and as you say, there's there's
comments from Leiden Observatory Simon Porte Year's art if I'm pronouncing.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
That right, you know you did better than I would have.
Speaker 4 (12:14):
Finds the potential discovery of an intermediate blass glass black
hole super exciting, but suggests that the evidence isn't quite
there yet. So I think the opinion of the astronomical
community is let's wait and see what future measurements bring out.
It doesn't look as though we've nailed down the Omiga
(12:35):
centaury intermediate black mass black hole yet, and it may
not be there at all.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
That's it though.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
How unusual is it to find between ten and twenty
thousand stellar mass black holes in a globular cluster.
Speaker 4 (12:51):
Yeah, that in itself I think is interesting. If you could,
you know, if you could independently verify that these are
singular objects rather than one big object, I think you
have another new discovery on your hands. So what you're
talking about here is going to be the remnants of
dead stars, And what you're talking about with an intermediate
(13:12):
mass black hole is the remnant of what might have
become a super massive black hole if that globular cluster
had not been torn to shreds by getting mixed up
with our Milky Way galaxy the gravitational pull. Because we
think the globular clusters are the central nuclears of galaxies
(13:32):
that have been basically demolished by gravitational interaction with our own.
And so that's why people are looking for intermediate mass
black holes inside globular clusters. Because the thinking is, if
you've got something that you know, under normal circumstances would
eventually grow into a super massive black hole by the
(13:53):
time the universe is thirty point eight billion years old,
which is its current age, if you have that structure,
but then you stop the evolution process because you tear
the galaxy to pieces because it interacts, it gets basically
sucked into the Milky Way galaxy. What you're going to
be left is is something you know, it's like a
(14:14):
wanna be supermassive black hole, which is why it's a
good place to look for intermediate mass black holes, ones
that didn't quite make it.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
So if it turns out it's not an intermediate mess
black hole, does that mean we still haven't found any
or were there are other candidates?
Speaker 4 (14:31):
There are other candidates. As I recall, I would like
to pin down without looking them up as to what
they are. But there are other candidates, so it isn't
just this one, but this one, you know, Omega Centauri
is the biggest and most spectacular lobby of the cluster
in the sky. As I said, it's visible to the
naked eye. It looks terrific. Even with a pair of binoculars.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
It looks good.
Speaker 4 (14:50):
You can tell it's something different from the stars around it.
Through a larger telescope, it looks sensational because you can
see all the individual stars resolved in it.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
This is a new problem, Fred, what's that? Well, if
it is.
Speaker 1 (15:03):
Stellamass black holes they've found, and there are ten to
twenty thousand of them, which is what they're suggesting, the
world will have to come up with a collective noun
for black holes because there isn't one. It will, ah, right,
there isn't one. Surprised, Yeah, I was too, But I've
found a couple of articles which state, no, there isn't.
(15:25):
There's a collective noun for asteroids, it's a belt of asteroids, which, yeah,
it's a good one, but there is no collective noun
that I'm.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Aware of for black holes.
Speaker 4 (15:36):
Maybe a space, not of black holes like that. Yeah,
I was going to say nothingness.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Yes, there isn't. There isn't nothingness. There isn't. It's a
little bit of a problem, but it's not the biggest
problem with fights. But yeah, I was surprised there wasn't one.
Speaker 4 (15:57):
Me too, Yeah, IM surprised. Also.
Speaker 1 (15:59):
Anyway, the jury is still out. Could be one, could
be the others.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
We're not sure. We're not sure yet.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
But if you want to read up on that, it's
a great article in Sky and Telescope dot org. This
is Space Nuts Andrew Dunkley with Professor Fred.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
What's a.
Speaker 4 (16:20):
Okay? We take all forces of being with.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Their Space Nuts now Fred to the Polaris Dawn mission.
And this is a very exciting mission. It may well
have lifted off since the release of this particular podcast,
because we're working a bit ahead at the moment, because
I've got to take a trip and we need to
get a whole bunch of episodes in the can. So
(16:44):
they say so, yes, this particular mission may well have
lifted up at the moment.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
As we speak.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
They have some technical issues and they're stuck on the
ground and they're all getting pretty tired of scrabble, but
could be monopoly, could be monopoly, could just be who
know who knows or drafts. Yes, oh gosh, getting desperate.
But this is an exciting mission for several reasons. There'll
(17:12):
be some major firsts that will be achieved. And yeah,
they're doing things a little bit differently, and they're planning
a space walk, which will be the first private space
walk I believe, privately conducted. There's so much that it's
exciting about this mission, Fred.
Speaker 4 (17:31):
Yeah, there is, and you're right. It's partly technical issues,
partly the weather in fact that's been holding them up
the splash down, So yes, exactly, it's not so much about.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
Getting off but getting back on the planet.
Speaker 4 (17:46):
Indeed, what's exciting about it, Well, it is going to be.
It may even be the first crude mission that is
going into a polar orbit around the Earth.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (18:00):
I think that is correct. So it's an orbital direction
that hasn't been explored before with crewed space launches. It's
also not going anywhere. It is not going to the
International Space Station, as you wouldn't be able to if
you were in a port polar orbit because you need
(18:22):
an orbit very similar to the International Space Station if
that's where you're going. And that means that the time
that the crew will be on board, and I'm actually
not sure how long it is planned to be, but
they are that they're going to be in the spacecraft
for the whole time, except when they make the first
(18:45):
privately operated extra vehicular activity, because what they have to
do then is climb out of the SpaceX crew Dragon capsule.
Two of the members of the crew. There are before
people in the crew of Polarist Polarist doorm two of
(19:06):
each gender, and they will two of them will climb
out of the capsule for the first private space walk.
And what that means is you've got to let this.
You've got to let space into your capsule. You've got
to vent all the air out of it. So everybody
has to wear their spacesuit.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
Super scary. It's super scary opening the front door because
they have airlocks in other spacecraft and the International Space Station.
This one, you open the lid and space. You're in
space before you even get out.
Speaker 4 (19:40):
Yes, that's right.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
So you've got to vent, haveaven you and then space
it first. And then I mean, I'm sure there will
be a very you know, it will be a pretty.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
Careful venting, just to make sure everything's solding together before
you let all the air out.
Speaker 2 (19:59):
Yeah, it's not like the fish tank, that's.
Speaker 4 (20:01):
For sure, although if you find fish floating around it,
you might be anyway. It's yes, So it really is interesting.
And the fact that they're not visiting this space station
or going anywhere near it means they have to be
pretty secure in their plans for this mission because all
(20:24):
the supplies for the crew, food, water, oxygen, everything that
all has to ride with them in their crew dragon capsule.
And so it's a very very demanding, you know, highly
demanding scenario. It's five days the mission.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
Just too Yes, add to what I was saying, I
just looked at up myself.
Speaker 4 (20:50):
And the other thing that they'll do is they'll go
further from Earth than any human since Apollo seventeen back
in nineteen ten, because their orbits is very elliptical. It's
you know, an elongated orbit which will be close to
Earth and it's Perry g the closest point, but a
(21:12):
long way off at Apergee. I am not sure what
the target Apogee is, but it is more than we've
ever done before in terms of you know, a mission
of this kind.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
So what's holding it up?
Speaker 4 (21:26):
Well, as I mentioned earlier, the weather, and as you said, yes,
it's the weather at the landing site, but also the
fact that within the last forty eight hours, certainly if
not twenty four hours as we are recording, Falcon nine
has been grounded. The Falcon nine launch vehicle that will
they will use has been grounded by the Federal Aviation
(21:49):
Authority due to a failed booster landing attempt, I think
on Wednesday this past week. So it's you know, this
is basically a risk minimization procedure. As soon as anything
goes wrong that booster, the Falcon nine, the whole Falcon
(22:13):
nine fleet is grounded until you know what the problem was. Yeah,
I think one of the interesting things I think I
read a little while ago that booster that failed. I
think it was its twenty third mission, so it'd been
used twenty three times. Now, originally they said they'd only
reused them ten times, then it went to twenty times.
(22:35):
Suspect now it's aimed at thirty times, but maybe twenty
three is as far as it goes.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
Yeah, we'll stop at fifteen, just to be safe, by
the sad that's right.
Speaker 4 (22:43):
Yeah, certainly if it was a human space flight, I
think you would want to make sure that you were
using a pretty new, pretty new booster orcket to get
you up there.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Indeed, and I believed, I'll be doing about forty experiments
you might have already said that, which will all test
everything from human spaceflight research to micro gravity.
Speaker 4 (23:06):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
And I'll be using brand new space.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
Suits to do the spacewalk and do and they'll be
I guess they'll be testing those, and let's hope they go, oh,
hang on, this thing doesn't.
Speaker 4 (23:17):
Work before they've been the spacecraft.
Speaker 2 (23:22):
I'll be taking that back to Low's.
Speaker 4 (23:24):
Ye.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
Sorry for your overseas listeners, that's a mental store so
that you know, automatically becomes sexist because half the crew
is female.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
Sorry about that.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
Keep on keep on digging, Andrew, You'll be Yeah, I
can't see I can't see out of the hole anymore.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
It's a black hole, very deep one. It's a stellar
mass black hole.
Speaker 4 (23:47):
Stellar mass black hole.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
That's right at the moment, fast approaching intermediate mass.
Speaker 4 (23:52):
Yes. Also that swear that.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
That's where it is right below me and above me
and around me. Yeah, but let's hope all goes well,
and by the time people hear this, they're up and
around the planet in an elongated polar orbit and doing
some wonderful work.
Speaker 4 (24:12):
We'll see how it all transpires. Fingers crossed.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
This is the Space and That's Podcast with Andrew Dunkley
and Professor Fred Watson.
Speaker 4 (24:23):
Broad Piacemuts.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Now Fred to our final story, and this one takes
us a long, long way out of the Solar System.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
This is our story.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
We've been following well since it's exciting flyby of Pluto.
It's the New Horizons spacecraft. But since it successfully executed
its primary mission, it's been sent off to do a
few other things, and one of those things was to
(24:56):
examine darkness. This sounds this sounds sinister, This sounds like
the plot of horror movie.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
But it's not.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
It's a very interesting question which they think they might
have answered.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
Yes, that's right, and I think you and I have
been talking about New Horizons since its launch eighteen years
ago because we used to talk on ABC Radio, didn't
we did? All the Space That's program came into being,
So New Horizons, yes, fly by Pluto in was it
July I think twenty fifteen? Fly by our It used
(25:34):
to be called Ultimate Tully, and it's now called Arakoth,
a small kayper belt object which it flew by probably
about three or four years ago. Now it's quite a
while ago. In fact, it's longer than that, because the
fly by was at Christmas and this object looked like
a snowman until we realized it's actually two pancakes joined
(25:55):
together rather than two balls joined together. Anyway, it is
now seven point three billion kilometers from Earth, a long
way away, not as far as our old friend Voyager one,
but still still a long way out. The difference though,
between New Horizons and Voyager one is that New Horizons
has telescopes on board. Yeah, of course we used to
(26:18):
scan Pluto and care on Pluto's main moon and some
of the other moons as well. But what they've been
able to do, though, is to make measurements of the
blackness of the night sky. And hear you saying, wait
a minute, black is black? Well, it's not really, and
(26:40):
why should you want to do that from seven point
three billion kilometers away from Earth. The answer is that
the Solar system is very dusty, and that dust concentrates
towards the center of the Solar system, so you know
what we see as meteors. Shooting stars are a measure
of the dust that is around us in the vicinity.
(27:03):
That dust scatters light, and we can actually see that
in the form of the what's called the zodiacal light,
which is a glow on the horizon eastern and western
horizon after sunset and before sunrise. What you're seeing there
is light scattered from dust in the inner Solar system.
It's an olor of light quite spectacularly. You need a
(27:25):
dark sky to see it. I've seen it many times
from our dark sky sights here in Australia, but I
only ever saw it once in the UK, and that
was in a particularly dark part of the UK. It
was quite see a long time ago as well. Anyway,
So the Inner Solar system is very dusty. That dust
scatters light, and that means that if you want to
make a measurement of just how bright, how intrinsically bright,
(27:47):
the night sky is, you've got to get away from
the inner Solar system, and that's where New Horizons is.
So what they've done is they've measured what they're calling
the cosmic optic called background. We talk a lot on
space Nuts about the cosmic microwave background radiation, and this
(28:09):
is the background to the night sky in microwaves, which
we recognize as having been caused by the Big Bank.
We're still seeing the flash of the Big Bang. The
cosmic optical background, though, is basically a background haze of
light that comes from all the galaxies that have ever
(28:33):
existed over the lifetime of the universe.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (28:37):
And so this light is the light of galaxies. Turns
out to be just the right brightness. I mean, it's
been measured. The blackness of the night sky has been
measured by New Horizons. The answer they get is exactly
what you predict from what we assume is the known
(28:58):
number of galaxies in the universe, which is in the
region of two trillion if I remember ran So really
quite a nice piece of work complemented on by New
Horizons principal investigator Alan Stern and an no friend of
this program. He says, this newly published work is an
(29:22):
important contribution to fundamental cosmology and really something that could
only be done with the far away spacecraft like New Horizons.
And it shows that our current extended mission is making
important scientific contributions far beyond the original intent of this
planetary mission designed to make the first close spacecraft explorations
of Pluto and Copper Belt objects. So there you go.
(29:44):
It's got the impromato of the Boss of New Horizons,
Alan Stern. And it's a really interesting result that, you know,
the amount of light in the universe adds up with
the number of galaxies that we think it.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
And yet and yet we shouldn't be surprised because where
else could the light have come from?
Speaker 4 (30:07):
Well that's right, except that the one of the scientists
who's involved with this work has basically raised that question,
could it come from something we haven't thought of yet?
And so the fact that it it, you know, everything
(30:28):
adds up suggests that there isn't anything that we haven't
thought of yet, although you can bet your life that
one day we'll be surprised that there's something else going on.
But yeah, you know, it's at the moment we think
these that these all add up the amount of light
that's exactly what you'd expect from the number of galaxies
(30:50):
we assume the universe contains from galaxy counts.
Speaker 1 (30:53):
In fact, I know one source they haven't considered the
laser beams shooting from my wife's eyes.
Speaker 2 (30:59):
When she is angry with me.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
That's that's one light source that hasn't been factored in.
Speaker 4 (31:06):
You're dead keen on getting into halls today. I'm not
going to go there at all, I think.
Speaker 2 (31:14):
No, I wish I hadn't.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
That pretty exciting stuff for new Horizons will continue on
its journey doing more scientific studies, imaging the Kuiper Belt
and the outer heliosphere and making observations from a vantage
point that.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
No, it's unique.
Speaker 1 (31:39):
It's the only spacecraft in the position to be able
to do anything like this. Even James Webb and Hubble
can't do the kinds of things that you Horizons is achieving.
So that's, uh, we'll be talking about again, I think, Fred.
Speaker 4 (31:54):
Yeah, sure, it might.
Speaker 1 (31:56):
Take a while, has still got a long way to go.
Speaker 4 (31:58):
Yes, that's right. It's it's one of the five space
craft leaving the Solar System. Yeah, but I think it's
the best equipped to do to make observations like this.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
Indeed, all right, that story available at fizz dot org
phy s dot org if you want to check it
all out. And that brings us to the end of
the show. Just a reminder too, if you would like
to visit our website, you can do that at Space
Nuts podcast dot com or space space Nuts dot io.
You can visit the shop or you can send us questions.
(32:32):
You can get the daily news feed through Astronomy Daily.
You can even support us through the support space Nuts button.
Here you are and yeah, there's all sorts of things
to see and do on our page Space nuts podcast
dot com or spacenuts dot io.
Speaker 2 (32:50):
And if you're a.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
Social media follower and you watch or listen to us
on YouTube, don't forget to hit the subscribe button down below.
Thank you as always, Fred, it's been a great pleasure.
Speaker 4 (33:03):
Yes, it's been a pleasure for me too. And that's
long long mate, continue. Not many people say that to me.
Thank you, especially today. Thank you Fred, don't worries see
you soon, see yea Professor Fred Wartson, a storm at large.
And thanks to Hue in the studio and from me
Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your company. We'll catch you soon
on another episode of Space Nuts.
Speaker 2 (33:25):
Bye bye.
Speaker 1 (33:27):
You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast available at
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast player.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
You can also stream on demand at bytes dot com.
Speaker 4 (33:41):
This has been another quality podcast production from Nights dot
com