Canada's Reagan/Trump Ad, Pritzker Gets EXPOSED By Fox & VA Dems' Shady Plan

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The president in Republicans position has been clear and unchanged.
Pass a clean, non partisan funding bill to reopen the government,
and then we can talk about all of the partisan
issues that the Democrats wish to. If you're watching at home,
we urge you to call your Democrat senators and tell
them to put our country over their party and reopen

(00:21):
the government. Today, here in our new media seat, we
have Brittany Gibson of Axios.

Speaker 2 (00:25):
Brittany, why don't you start us off for our Q
and A today?

Speaker 3 (00:27):
Thank you for being here.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
All two questions. So Caroline Lovitt talking about the shutdown, which,
by the way, we're still it's Democrats shutdowns simply because
they won't agree to I'm so tired of this, kan
my gosh, I just want to eat myself off my roof.

Speaker 4 (00:44):
But it's what they hated was the big beautiful bill
that destroyed essentially their sieve of money for everything that
they wanted to do politically. They know now that if
they don't make this fight and hold the American people hostage,
the future the Daymocrat parties over.

Speaker 2 (01:01):
Well, yeah, I mean it's this is a bit you know.
I find it fascinating that they're not getting as much.
Think about this, they're not getting as much support as
I as they previously did. I mean, they're getting I'm
not talking about the press. When I'm talking about is
the public, because the public polling, the polling that I've seen,

(01:23):
I mean, it's a lot of it's like push pull nonsense,
where we have these individuals that you know why, What
push pulling means is that you're basically asking like, wow,
so you know, are you in support of the president
beating his wife? You know what I mean? It's a
very leading thing. Uh. But I really do think that
the people are not they're not buying into it because

(01:48):
I feel like people have followed things way closely lately.
Even you know, some of the independents that we always
talk about, maybe they're not always plus in, you know
what I mean. That's that's kind of I sort of
I feel like, does it feel that way? I had
somebody actually had a family member ask me this last

(02:09):
night and they said that they feel like there's more
how did they put it? They felt like there was
more tension. They were talking about this on Facebook, and
I thought it was a very interesting insight. They felt
like they felt that there was more tension, and that
there's so many things, so many stories and controversies that

(02:32):
are flying all around that they're trying to figure out
if it's just more corruption or if it's because they
think that because people maybe you're seeing more, which I
thought was interesting. The question was, Yeah, is there always
been this much transgression or are we just more hyper
aware and able to easily access the information? And my

(02:57):
point was that I think it's I think it's both.
I think it's both of those things. And I think
it's the hyper availability of social media that has really
made it to where you can, i mean, really find
out anything, but you can also be misled really easily
as well. Let's you know, I'm not going to say

(03:19):
anything about certain grandparents sharing AI videos thinking they're real.
I'm not going to do that, But you know, my
point stands, I think that that's what it is. And
so my point in bringing this up is I was
looking at now these aren't like the biggest polls, and
they're like likely voters, not registered voters, all this kind
of stuff. But my point in bringing it up is
that it really does seem as though the public is

(03:42):
not buying it. They're not buying it and they are
dissatisfied with the excuses that they're hearing from Democrats. And then, lastly,
I think that John Fetterman's reach extends far beyond what
any Democrats thought it would. I'm actually I'm pretty shocked

(04:07):
he has a bigger reach than AOC. Think about it.
She has a big mouth, and she's able to get
headlines and clickbait with her surrogates. But who's Fetterman reaching
out to? Is AOC reaching out to Republicans?

Speaker 5 (04:23):
No?

Speaker 2 (04:24):
Are there any Republicans listening to anything she says?

Speaker 5 (04:26):
No?

Speaker 2 (04:28):
Is she changing the minds of any independence No? But
look at Fetterman. Fetterman is not only convincing independence, but
he's also making leeway with Republicans who are who because
he's agreeing with the most common sense of their points.
That's the strategy Democrats should have if they were a

(04:49):
smart party. They put all their eggs and fetter I
can't believe him saying this, but they ought to. And
I think that has contributed to this as well, because
the public sees him as not being a zealot a
partisan zealot, and as a result, I think that his
thoughts have more weight because he looks like he's evaluating

(05:12):
things more fairly. Does it seem like a fair assessment, Kane,
because none of the polling and the polling that tries
to argue otherwise. I mean, there's only a couple and
it's so heavily overstampled, like this MSNBC stuff, and this
is some of the stuff I was looking at this morning.
Nobody believes it. And he's Republican's responsibility.

Speaker 4 (05:31):
He's one of those rare Democrats that actually represents all
of his constituents. It's an odd thing to see sometimes.

Speaker 2 (05:37):
I gotta tell you, I would be flipping terrified if
they decided to elevate him and recruit more candidates like him. Yeah,
I mean, wow, they're never going to do it. This
is actually something I can guarantee you that we can
talk about, and it's never going to happen because they're

(06:01):
so nuts. They're so nuts, it's never gonna happen. Can
you if they had like Zell Miller's and John Fetterman's
and who is some of the other Uh, I'm trying
to remember some of these other moderates. They had a
couple of moderates that ran in twenty twelve and that's
when they really finally ran the last of the moderates
out of their party. They did the whole thing about

(06:21):
you can't be in favor of you can't be pro
life and being the party. This is stuff that you know,
they've done for a long time. They've ran them out
along a long while ago. There was I saw a
headline also, how did we get here? A reality check
for Democrats like other Democrats going, please Democrats please now

(06:45):
speaking of I've got some really crazy news in Virginia.
We gotta look at Virginia. This is something else. They
are fighting over redistricting, right, They're fighting over redistricting and
they want to redraw the house maps. Okay, Dana, that's
a lot of states are doing that. Why is that

(07:05):
like a big deal right now? Because of their process?
Every state does things differently, right, They have different processes.
It's a you know, it's a thing. They have different
ways of doing things. Missouri has a different way like
Texas does. There's certain things that the governor's not allowed
to do without oversight in Texas that the governor would
be able to do in Missouri. It's just very So

(07:26):
here's the thing they are, This is came out in
the New York Times. It was confirmed. There were a
lot of there's a lot of talk about this yesterday.
Virginia Democrats are planning to redraw house maps and a
redistricting push.

Speaker 5 (07:38):
Now.

Speaker 2 (07:38):
They say that the move will give Democrats two or
three additional seats, and they're scrambling the last couple of
weeks to do this ahead of the November fourth election. Now,
why would you act? Why in the world that sounds
kind of weird, right, They got a lot of other
stuff going on right now. They've got elections, They've got
a gubernatorial election, they have all of this other stuff

(08:03):
going down. It's just kind of weird that this is
what they're choosing to do. Now. Well, there's a reason
why they're desperate, because the polling is in for Virginia
for Abigail Spanberger, for j Jones. The last minute session
that they're calling the process to this is that it

(08:25):
pulls Winsome Sears off the campaign trail. But there's more.
It not only pulls Winso Sears off the campaign trail.
The legal loophole that Virginia General Assembly members must follow
is that they cannot be charged with a crime while
in Session. Now, remember J Jones is under investigation. That's

(08:50):
what this is about. This is Virginia Democrats pulling a
Hail Mary for a last minute session to completely pull
Winso Seers as the lieutenant governor running for governor, off
the campaign trail and to protect J. Jones from investigations

(09:12):
into his improprieties. The text messages are the tip of
the iceberg. They not only refuse to condemn J. Jones,
who was recklessly driving, he could have killed someone. He's
the Attorney general nominee. His texts where he was fantasizing
about murdering, shooting in the head his political opponents and

(09:34):
murdering their children so that their mothers could watch them
die in front of them. Those were his words. I mean,
he actually was talking about quote cradling their dead children.
So they're protecting him. This is the whole point. The
special Session meeting is official and it starts at four
pm on Monday, So the gubernatorial election for Winsome Seers,

(10:00):
her campaigning is effectively over. J Jones is now shielded
for as long as they are in special Session. They
did not have to rush to withdraw this, and in fact,
originally they weren't even on that timeline. But now they're
rushing to not only expand additional seats, but they're trying

(10:23):
to protect j Jones, and they're trying to protect Abigail Spanberger,
and in essence, they're trying to really cheat a free
and fair election. This is election interference without exception. That's

(10:45):
exactly what this is. And so when some earl sears
will not be able to fund raise either. So when
I say she can't campaign, she can't do anything, She
can't raise money, she can't do anything last minute adviys,
you know a couple of weeks before an election are paramount.

(11:06):
Can you know how important they are? They're also very expensive.
Her hands are entirely tied now. Democrats by orchestrating this,
the whole reason they did it was to affect the election.
This is because Democrats are panicked. Spanberger has dropped in

(11:30):
the polls. Jay Jones is getting walloped right now in
the polling, and I don't know that. Here's the problem.
They're gambling though, because they could set up a major
backlash in other races for their House of Delegates later on.

(11:53):
They are flirting with a major backlash here. And it
is something else I tell you, wow. Chapter is that
entity that makes it easy. You hear about why you
get the whole Medicare enrollment season thing, and I'm not
even Medicare eligible, and I'm annoyed by all of the

(12:15):
commercials on it. You guys get some of you get
the mailers and the texts and all this stuff. Look,
I get it that you want to make sure that
your plan's good and that you don't lose coverage, because
it's very important Medicare plans can change every year. But
you still, even if you're happy with your plan, you
got to check what's coming for twenty twenty six. Chapter
is a partner that will work with you and make
sure you're not over pain and on average they save

(12:36):
people over one thousand dollars annually. They review every plan
across the country. Their advisors are salaried, they're not working
on commission. They advocate for you, not the insurance company.
And it just takes under twenty minutes to do it
into all of the emails and texts and all of it.
And if your current plan is still the best fit
in your set. If not, Chapter will help you switch.

(12:57):
No gimmicks, no pressure, just honest advice from experts who
know medicare inside and out. Dial pound two fifty and
say the words my medicare. It's too important, so don't
risk it. Work with Chapter A partner you can trust.
Dial pound two to fifty and say the words my medicare.

Speaker 4 (13:14):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (13:19):
Target has cut eighteen hundred corporate jobs in its first
round of major layoffs in a decade. This is a lot.
What are they gonna do because like Christmas season's like
isn't that like their busiest it's like their busiest season.
What are they gonna do? So they said that they
announced this yesterday. It's about eight percent of its corporate workforce.
But if it's corporate doesn't matter. First off, how do

(13:41):
you have that many corporate bombs? It's kind of crazy. Anyway,
I haven't been to Target and forever. They're trying to
get back to growth and they're poised to get a
new CEO in February. How many of you think that
a lot of this began when they started messing with
the men in women's bathrooms, Because that's actually one of

(14:02):
the reasons I didn't go back to Target. I've had
to go like one time in the past two years
because they had like a skin I get like mild eggs, muth.
They have like a skin thing that I needed over
the counter that I couldn't get anywhere else, and I'm
hann to go there.

Speaker 4 (14:15):
So if you look at their stocks and when it
actually dipped, it coincides with that time.

Speaker 2 (14:21):
I'm just saying, I feel like they need to make
a play. And then all of the weird alphabet stuff
that they were doing. I don't think anybody's gone on there.
Magnolia seems to be at home in it. Let's see,
locals are leaving and permits are few. Malibu is having
a post fire identity crisis. They don't know what to do.
But they have wood frames that are white rising over

(14:42):
from the ashes of those crazy fires that now you
just have burned out lots in the Palisades and everywhere else.
But they said in Malibu, down the road it's really fleak.
There's just a lot of caution tape. There's a lot
of hollowed out shells. A lot of the houses I
are not graffiti tagged. And I mean it's been almost
a year and everything like frozen because it is impossible
to get permitted to do anything. In fact, listen to

(15:05):
this LA which handles most permits, they've only they've issued
barely over forty percent of permits upon the total of
applications received. And this is literally all rebuilding permits. None
of it's like new architect new nothing. It's just literally
rebuilding what was existing. And LA County has handled out
even less. It's under twenty six percent of the total

(15:27):
applications received, Malibu under two percent. They don't want to rebuild.
They're doing this on purpose, so people need to move.
Wall Street bonus is expected to hit record as bank
profits surge. Interesting, we'll come back to that. Also. Francis
Ford Coppola, who's one of my absolute favorite, says he's

(15:47):
broke and he's selling a custom one million dollar watch
after his Megalopolis debacle. You know what he did to Godfather.
No one can touch him. He is untouchable in my eyes.
Stick with us. More to com are partners that help
bring you the program. It's the folks over at Superbats.
You guys are familiar with human and their superbeats. What
makes them different is where it began Human was founded

(16:08):
out of the UTE Health Science Center, built on real
cardiovascular research around blood flow and nitric oxide, and unlike
other supplement brands, Human is science born and not just
science ish. Their products work and you can feel them working.
UT athletes have used super beats for over a decade,
calling it their cheat code for recovery and endurance, and
you can use it for the same reason to support
healthy blood pressure and circulation. Today, more than one hundred

(16:31):
and sixty college and pro teams use Human products, and
your favorite team probably does too. And if you've seen
the Human logo on the Longhorns field this football season,
that's more than a sponsorship. It's a signal from Human
and UT together leading the future of cardiovascular health for
athletes and for everyone. You can try superbeats, Hardshoose by
Human to choose a day can support healthy blood pressure,

(16:53):
blood flow and energy. Don't wait, pick up superbats at
your local Walmart and start supporting your cardiovascular health today.
On the road to betterhealth with.

Speaker 6 (17:01):
Human makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With
a data show podcast, You're on the go guide for
getting up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe
on YouTube, Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 7 (17:16):
And we stand ready to pick up on that progress
and build on that progress when the Americans are ready
to have those discussions, because it will be for the
benefit of workers in the United States, workers in Canada's,
and families in both of our countries. Now, what we

(17:37):
can control absolutely is how we build here at home.
That's the focus a budget twenty twenty five generational investment
here in Canada. And we can also control or at
least heavily influenced, is developing new partnerships and opportunities, including
I liked it.

Speaker 2 (17:55):
It was weird when they were sitting there, they had
such a great it seemed like they had all negativity
behind them. Came that was the Prime Minister Therab Canada.
Welcome back to the program, Dana Lashaty. The chat is
that rumble. Also the uh you can watch us do
the radio show Channel three forty seven Direct TV and

(18:16):
we have X and Facebook and all that. We're gonna
get back into the Virginia stuff as well. But the
Canadian thing. So it came out yesterday that there was
this I guess it's like a fake Reagan ad or
whatever that they aired that it was Ontario that aired

(18:37):
it correct and it upset potus. Do we even I
don't even think we. We probably can't even play the
ad because YouTube will ding us. We can't play anything
for you because YouTube fights everything and you have to
basically hire lawyers and go back and forth with YouTube,
and we can't afford that we can do it fire.

Speaker 4 (18:56):
They're very proud of the ad. I don't think they'd
have an issue with.

Speaker 2 (18:58):
It that they're Canadian. Yeah, they're polite like on the surface,
but some of them will cut you, you know, sorry,
go and play done. This is the ad.

Speaker 5 (19:07):
When someone says, let's impose tariffs on foreign imports, it
looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American
products and jobs, and sometimes for a short and vilid works,
but only for a short time. But over the long run,
such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer. High

(19:30):
tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the
triggering of fierce trade works. Then the worst happens. Market
shrink and collapse, businesses and industry shut down, and millions
of people lose their jobs. Throughout the world, there's a
growing realization that the weight of prosperity for all nations

(19:53):
is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition
for America's jobs and growth are at stake.

Speaker 2 (20:03):
So it was Ontario and there this is you know,
they're going back and forth over negotiations with regards to
what's you know, tariffs and all this other stuff. So
they released this ad and it angered Potus. Potus is
very upset about this. Let me pull up his statement
because he had a he ended the trade talks with

(20:23):
them over this and this was what just like last
night out of out of nowhere. I'm not going to
read the whole thing because it's huge, but he he
had well, there was a couple of things that he released.
He had a couple a few posts, but he halted
trade negotiations over this ad that used Reagan's voice to
oppose tariffs. This is the Ontario premier, Doug Ford. He's,

(20:47):
by the way, the brother of the other Ford guy
who looked like Chris Farley but wasn't. And he like
admittedly like dead drugs. He was like talking about how
he snorted coke and all this stuff. I just you know,
he's kind of like a wild, crazy dude. Anyway, doug
Ford said that the President would be would not be
too happy with the sixty second spot. He said that
earlier this week and he was correct, and Trump posted,

(21:11):
the Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has
fraudulently used an ad which is fake featuring Ronald Reagan
speaking negatively about tariffs. He said, they only did this
to interfere with the decision of the US Supreme Court
and other courts, and then CAPS locked it. Tariffs are
very important to the national security economy of the USA,
and based on their egregious behavior, he goes back to

(21:33):
caps all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated. And
the Reagan Foundation also hit back, and I think they
have every right to do that. They said that it misrepresented. Now,
I don't care if Ontario some people were making the
argument that Ontario had the right to use the portion
of the audio, et cetera, et cetera. That's whatever. I'm

(21:55):
not even going to get involved in that it was
and even the Reagan Foundations it was a misrepresentation of it.
And they said that they had learned that they had
created this ad and that it is an inaccurate representation
and it was his radio address to the nation on
free and fair trade, and that was back in April
of nineteen eighty seven, and it said it misrepresents it

(22:16):
and that they're reviewing their legal options. And then they
said you're encouraged to watch Reagan's unedited video on their
YouTube channel, and so Mark Carney and then the Canada
US Trade Minister said they're not going to comment. They'll
have more to say today. I haven't heard any of
them say anything yet. And the spokesperson for Ford said, well,

(22:39):
all it does is use this unedited excerpt from one
of his addresses, but was it presenting it in the
proper context? And they said that they the purpose of
them quoting Reagan is they were trying to recognize that
ultimately somebody pays the tariff and it's the consumer. Now
they're not entirely wrong about that. I'm not going to
sit here and blow smoke up every but He's backside.

(23:02):
All of this, though, is to see what happens when
this play runs, because we're still in the middle of
the play. Am I using correct terminal football terminology? Cane?
How does the correct right? Don't? I don' want to
hear from a single one of you people out there.
You're you're running a play and you're like in the
middle of the play being ran Steve's dying. Are you dying? Steve?

(23:23):
I'm so sorry? Is that right? Is that right? Did
you get it?

Speaker 8 (23:28):
I would I would say drive because you run a
lot of plays in a drive, so I'll go this drive.

Speaker 4 (23:34):
Uh, you just really broke her brain.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
So wait, it's you're sorry, man? Are you driving the
play or playing that drive?

Speaker 6 (23:45):
What?

Speaker 4 (23:46):
It's a drive downfield?

Speaker 5 (23:47):
Right?

Speaker 3 (23:48):
You run a play to drive downfield?

Speaker 2 (23:50):
Okay, okay, I just want to make sure I have
this correct. So we're in the middle of a drive. Yeah, okay,
all right, all right, right, so oh okay, good, I
got it. Learned something new today. But we're in the
middle of it. So I want to see how this
plays out, because it's all about equalizing these trade relationships

(24:12):
with all of these other entities, all these other sovereign
entities around the world. That's what it's about. So why
can't we And of course you have to have these
negotiations and we have to get these numbers nailed down,
and that's what we're doing. So I feel like a
lot of people are trying to rush that. Believe me,
I want to also because this is where, yes, some
consumers are getting hit with higher costs as a result

(24:32):
of that. I'm not going to lie to you. I'm
not going to lie to you for political advantage or clicks.
And the people who do you know, they're just doing
it because they want your eyeballs, but they don't really
care enough about your minds or hearts. So the point is, though,
that the purpose of the drive and all of that
being completed is for it to benefit everyone, including the

(24:53):
consumer and the United States at the end of it,
so that we have better trade deals that are permanent.
This is using tariffs is a is a tactic, and
it's not a permanent one, and it's to be short term.
That's the whole point. And I understand that argument. What
concerns me is when it drags out, and when these

(25:15):
negotiations drag out and it takes longer and longer and longer.
So now we have because we have already have double
digit tariffs and steel, aluminum, auto, lumber, copper, all of
that stuff, and he wants to renegotiate the US Mexico
Canada Free Trade agreement, but he said I'll be open
to abandon in it. I think that that's a leverage tactic

(25:35):
for him and the negotiations. So that is, this is
the purpose of it and the ad that they played.
Do you think it's enough Kane that I understand what
they're doing. Is it enough of an offense to be like, well,
we're not going to talk to you anymore.

Speaker 4 (25:57):
That's a good question. I mean that's also, as you know,
I guess subjective as well. I mean, if Trump believes
that Canada should just you know, essentially respect the idea
of what Trump's doing with tariffs, and he just is
like what they're clearly trying to spread lives about what
I'm doing here with tariffs. So you guys just ended,
you know, ended the talks. I mean, I think it's

(26:21):
reasonable from one perspective, but you know, I guess you
could say that maybe it might be a little over
the top.

Speaker 2 (26:27):
I mean, I look at it kind of both ways,
like it's over the top. Maybe I can understand that,
but also I can understand with I'm tired of Moss
and around with you. You know, I'm not going to
give you the colloquialism that my mom uses where you
need to act or do nothing. You can kind of
understand what I'm talking about there.

Speaker 5 (26:44):
But.

Speaker 2 (26:46):
I mean, will it work? Now? Here's the thing that's
that's different. You kind of have to have a different
approach with every one of these countries. Now, I don't
want anybody because we have some Canadian friends, and I'm
not trying to offend you. I'm really trying to offend
the progressives there that keepvoting for these unhinged people that
do these stupid things that anger allies. But whatever, you
have to be heavy handed with countries like Cutter very much.

(27:11):
So you got to be heavy handed with countries like Venezuela.
That's why he can say stuff like that, you know,
where he's like, yeah, well well you know, uh yeah,
well whatever. These boats, Yeah, and they're not going to
mess around or blank around with the United States Canada.
They seem very passive, aggressively polite, you know what I mean.

(27:34):
Are they brutes? I don't think they're brutish. I don't
think they're brutes in terms of being in brutality. Are
they passive aggressive? Oh totally yes they are. But I
don't know will that same tactic work because you know,
the people are very it's very You're talking about a
very different demographic than you are about an entity in

(27:56):
the Middle East or even Ukraine or even Show or
anybody else. Very different. So I don't know, it seems
like a universal kind of approach, and I don't know
if that's necessarily the approach that's going to get you
the return on the investment of that action as quickly
as you would like, if that makes sense. So I
don't know, uh, but whether or not they come back

(28:21):
to this, you know, I just think and I'm not
defending Canada, but does it's I mean, we jokingly say
that Canada's America's had. Do you think that angers though?

Speaker 5 (28:34):
So?

Speaker 2 (28:35):
Do you think that they're with them their right to
kind of push back or is it because they used
Reagan to do it?

Speaker 5 (28:42):
Mm?

Speaker 4 (28:43):
Yeah, Look, I'm all about anybody trolling and doing whatever politically.
I just think that this is all part of a
larger plan. I just can't help to think this way,
because you know, Trump wants Canada to be State fifty one.
You know, they want that.

Speaker 2 (28:59):
I don't want their voters, he.

Speaker 4 (29:00):
Will he wants he would love that.

Speaker 2 (29:03):
And Trump has importing millions of progressive voters. Oh absolutely redacted,
I mean redacted or.

Speaker 4 (29:10):
Have millions of progressive voters here.

Speaker 2 (29:13):
So we're going to double it. We're gonna make it birth.

Speaker 4 (29:15):
We will be doubling.

Speaker 2 (29:17):
I don't want any of that maple syrup Marxism, but
it's it's Claire.

Speaker 4 (29:21):
Trump definitely is one of this, and he's called for
this in the past. Them being the fifty first state,
they already know that without the two hundred billion plus
that we were in the negative every year with Canada,
is essentially going to have to force them to do something.
And I think this might be part of that figure place.

Speaker 2 (29:38):
This is doug Ford cut seventeen. He likes it. He's
gonna keep doing it. He says it's the best ad
he's ever seen. Yeah, well I heard.

Speaker 9 (29:46):
I heard that the President heard her ad. Sure he
wasn't too happy, but it's real because it was coming
from the best president the country's ever seen, Ronald Reagan.
So it's it is. It's it's very effective. It's probably
one one of the best ads I've ever seen, and
it's coming from wrong with Reagan's voice, and it's going
to be focused right across the country. But also in

(30:09):
Republican held areas, because what I feel the Reagan Republicans
are going to be fighting with a MAGA group and
let's hope Reagan Republicans.

Speaker 2 (30:20):
Is there that much of a difference, though, why do
they keep trying to insist that there's that much of
a difference.

Speaker 4 (30:26):
I want that internal divide, they want it.

Speaker 2 (30:29):
I really don't think a lot of foreign politicians understand
what now. Is there a difference between Republicans and MAGA.
I think so, but I think it's more candidate focused
rather than party focus, And I think that's fair to say,
just like there's a difference between Conservatives and Republicans right like,
for instance, I do not consider myself a Republican, never

(30:50):
have because they are way too left for me. They're left,
they have been left for me on guns, they're left
for me on taxes. But I don't consider myself a libertarian.
I just I'm not a Joiner. I don't know, but
I vote Republican.

Speaker 5 (31:03):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (31:04):
We'll talk more about this because I feel like that
death that would seem like a sloppy sy op to
divide people. I don't think it's I don't know. We
got more on the way. As we rolled towards the
conclusion of this first hour, we've days of these United
States coming up. It is the folks over at Celtech
the KS seven Gen to shotgun. If you're in the
market for a shotgun, checkout Celtech's KS seven to generate

(31:25):
the second gen. It's packed with upgrade. You have a
five slot Picatini style accessory rail. You can add vertical
grips lights, keep it flush sleek with a cap if
you want. It's a smoother pump action so you have faster,
cleaner cycling plus enhanced durability. All the original advantages are there.
The ultra light weight, it just make you know, under
seven pounds, unloaded, compact bullpup design, maneuverability in tight spaces,

(31:47):
and pdextrous downwards shell ejection seven plus one capacity for
all of it. Great for home defense arrange days. It
works well for season shooters and first timers. MSRPs just
six thirty nine so it's super affordable, all accessible, well
within reach. Check it out. It's from Koltukweapons dot com
k E l t e C Weapons dot Com. It's
the KO seven Gen two. Tell them the Dana sent.

Speaker 6 (32:10):
You get the loadown on the latest news with the
side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Dana
Show podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 4 (32:23):
Like SAMs through the Holi Glass. So are the days
of the United States?

Speaker 8 (32:32):
Say the sounds.

Speaker 10 (32:36):
As a fair for.

Speaker 11 (32:45):
No King.

Speaker 2 (32:48):
Here's my song, It's about no Kings. I'm always with him.
Whenever I hear Bruce Springsteen play, I'm like he's either
constipated or he's having a stroke. It's never. Oh that's

(33:09):
a song. If you like Bruce Springsteen, I'm sorry that
you do, not that I have this opinion. Oh my gosh,
welcome back to the program. He said, I want to
if you couldn't, if you couldn't understand the springsteenism. He says,
I want to send this out as a prayer for
American and our unity. No Kings? What what king is there?

(33:36):
I mean, the fact that you can do this is
sort of indicative of their not being a king.

Speaker 4 (33:41):
Shows in England.

Speaker 2 (33:43):
Yeah go do yeah, go play that.

Speaker 5 (33:45):
Oh.

Speaker 2 (33:45):
Remember they had to change it. They couldn't even call
it a No King's rally in England. They had to
change it to no Tyrants so they didn't upset the monarchy,
the same thing every other country that has a monarchy.
They had to go, no, we're going to change it
to no tyrants. We do went to upset the actual king.
So they're just admitting that they could say no kings
in countries without kings. He's like the early He's like

(34:11):
the prototype for the Eddie Vedder singers. Can I just
sidebar for a moment? How horrible was it in the
nineties after? Like, look, I get a lot of people
like Pearl Jam. I don't dislike Pearl Jam, but I
do like, I do dislike the Eddie Vetter vocal affectation
that so many people try to copy. And then you
just had a bunch of an army of derivative male
vocalists that all were like Man and Bob, where all

(34:32):
of them were like that, Kane, You don't you were
in radio, you know, they were all like that for
like a period of five years. Yeah, it was so crazy, everybody,
All right, we got a whole second hour coming up.
Our friend Carol Roth will be joining us later as
well to take us to class on a lot of

(34:52):
the ranch wars, et cetera, et cetera. Stick with us.
It's our partners at help make it possible. It's the
folks over at AMMO Square. They have you covered for
all of your ammunition needs. It's a very worry free,
easy simple solution. You're collecting AMMO for the future and
you're avoid getting caught empty handed. Everybody remembers panic buying
of twenty twenty. Everything, all the shelves are empty ammal

(35:15):
prices like basically cost a kidney, and everybody regretted everything.
There's some bad people settled for some bad stuff. I remember.
You can choose from over seventy calibers, set your monthly
budget at Animal Squared, and then let them curate your
supply automatically, so you set up forget it, ship it
when you need it, and it's all stored in a secure,
climate controlled facility. It keeps your ammal fresh and safe

(35:35):
until you decide to get it delivered. There's no minimums,
no hidden fees. You get free shipping on orders over
two hundred and fifty dollars. Great if you're trying out
new calibers you want to top off some training rounds,
stay ready for whatever comes next, and you can join
over one hundred thousand members like me and a community
with thousands of five star reviews. My only regret is
that I didn't invent the business. Visit amosquare dot com.

(35:58):
Secure your AMMO supply for the future. Do not run
out when it counts. Stock up before training, restock after
it to stay ready. Amosquared dot com tell them Dana
sent you.

Speaker 11 (36:09):
Let's go back to twenty twenty when he said that
the election was stolen from it. It wasn't. And it
was Michael Flynn that told the president and he repeated
it that maybe they should just seize the ballot boxes
with the military. Maybe they should go to where the
ballot boxes and then they should count the votes themselves.

(36:30):
Here we are in twenty twenty five. He is becoming
more unpopular, he is likely to lose the twenty twenty
six elections, and he's sending troops into American cities and
particularly in blue states, in blue cities.

Speaker 2 (36:46):
What is he so? Wait? JB. Pritzker is accusing Potus
of sending in Check's notes the military to seize ballot
boxes at midterms. Umm, did we I feel like I
saw this before? I've seen this movie. I saw this

(37:09):
movie during twenty twenty one. Kine that's when I saw
this movie with the ballot boxes and all that stuff,
when you had the Biden administration and everybody else telling everybody.
This is telling states how to control their elections and
all of that, I mean, basically seizing them. I'm just saying,

(37:29):
I feel like we've seen this before. Kane, Welcome back
to the program. Dana Lash with you at the top
of this first hour. Go ahead, Well, here's what I say.

Speaker 4 (37:38):
I say, we count all the ballots. Do it just
paper wise. I mean, so Trump can't cheat.

Speaker 2 (37:46):
That's right, So Trump, so Trump can't cheat cheat, that's correct.
Let's just do Yeah, let's do paper ballots, and everybody's
to come and show their ID because we got to
show our IDs to make sure no one cheats for Trump. Right,
make sure you show those because you know people may
cheat for Trump Democrats. So you better let us have
the IDs. What I can't find a USB drive with

(38:09):
votes on them later, I can't do none of that.
We better make sure that signatures match on mailn's, you know,
so that we don't try to cheat for Trump. If
you don't do that, I'll totally cheat. We'll all cheat.
So you better make us have voter IDs. Otherwise we
are all going to cheat. I mean, I'm not saying definitively,
but we will, you know, just just saying I think

(38:32):
that makes sense. I like that idea. We'll do that.
So I voted yesterday. I early voted. I don't really
like to early vote. As much as I can, I
try to vote the day of. I'm doing it today
only because I'm very combative and I like to walk
past all of the leftists and be very theatrical about

(38:52):
going and casting my vote against their interests. I'm not
kidding you. That's why I like it, because that's when
they're all there, and then you got the news crews
there and all of that. That's I love that. So
that's why I usually like to do day of. But
there's a lot of we have our elections coming up, local, municipal,
and so I early voted yesterday, and you early voted
yesterday too. Came oh today, sorry today, there was no line.

(39:18):
And one of my favorite things, ever, is how the
people that work the polls, they're volunteers and they're so
excited to see you come vote, and it's so great.
I love the Goh thanks for coming to vote today.
And I don't know why they sound like their Minnesota
but in my voice, but you know what I mean.
They're very nice, like, oh, they're so happy. It's like
they've been waiting their whole lives for you to walk

(39:39):
through the door and cast your vote. They're so great.
And then when it's like somebody who's voting for the
first time at our polling place, they make a huge
deal of it, like, oh, we've got a first time voter,
first time voter, and it's like being at TGI Fridays.
And then you get flair, like first time voter sticker.
You know, you get the big sticker. I almost want

(39:59):
to line say I'm a first time voter so I
can get the big sticker. But it's really but they're
so sweet. The oh my goodness, there was no line
walked in, voted, and nobody votes. This is these are
the elections that really count. Look these elections, these local
immunionsipal elections. These are the ones where later on you
might be determining picking a Senate candidate based on, you know,

(40:23):
people who came up in this election. This is when
you when you make a vote against the batties. This
is where it really really counts and you got to watch.
So I went and voted, and there's only like one
person standing outside with a sign. I think the rest
of its will kick into gear for election day. But yeah,
I like going on the day of, so we really
need day I use paper ballots and day of and

(40:43):
then you know, have you know the military vote uh
with their absentee ballots things like that. I get. I
understand it sometimes with college kids and with with you know,
having mail in ballots for them. I understand that because
not everybody can get back. But I think it needs
to be very strict, very regulated, and there need to
be a lot of safeguards and more than just like

(41:04):
the signature matching and all of this stuff. I mean,
it just you know, should be tied to your driver's
license online or something to that effect, where you can
just go in through the I don't know, maybe the
portal something. But anyway, long story short, there was no
line the voting place yesterday. I got my sticker, got
my eye voted sticker. Do you save your sticker?

Speaker 4 (41:25):
Came I typically don't.

Speaker 2 (41:29):
I regret not saving mine like a book at Star.

Speaker 4 (41:32):
Yeah, it'd be nice like the old days when you
used to collect stamps and stuff. Yeah, remember those days.

Speaker 2 (41:37):
Some of the kids who weren't there in the early nineties,
they don't understand the book its. So that was an
elementary school thing where you had the Pizza Hut book
at program literally book it, and you the person who
read the most books, got a pizza party at the
end of the semester. Wasn't it like by like by
the personal It.

Speaker 4 (41:54):
Was a personal pan pizza.

Speaker 2 (41:55):
You'd get for that, but you would but if you
if you won the most in your grade, you got
a pizza.

Speaker 4 (42:00):
Oh yeah, see I never saw that growing up for me.
I think my kids got involved in that, but I
think I totally did already.

Speaker 2 (42:07):
Got There is nothing some of you out there like me.
You're negative.

Speaker 5 (42:13):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (42:13):
Some people respond to negative or like criticism and that
motivates them. I don't even care about it. It just
rolls off me and the positive reinforcement though. I'm very
much like Trump in that way, like very i am
exactly like Trump. What am I talking? I am exactly
like Trump in that way. That's where it was like
we recognized each other. Positive reinforcement all the way. I

(42:35):
totally respond to that. But if you're negative I'm like,
you're a bot anyway. But my whole point is that
the book A program was that optic. You had that
optic satisfaction. Every book you write, you got a star
on the chart. And I wanted to have the most stars.
I am a box checker, I'm the star. And a
lot of you out there like that. You know what
I mean, right, You want the sticker, you want the whatever.

(42:57):
Oh my gosh. When I would get like an a
on a page and my teacher wouldn't just put like
a sticker on it, it would be the scratch and
sniff sticker, Caine. The one scent that brings me back
to elementary school is the scratch and sniff root beer sticker.
And y'all know what I'm talking about. What there was
no scent on earth that can match that the scratch

(43:21):
and sniff root beer sticker. And when I got that,
it was, oh oh man, I wanted to save it.
I ended up I did get I got a I
did get a pizza party one year because I had
the most books that semester. And then the next semester,
I remember, I ended up getting the flu and it
knocked me out of first place, and I was just
I was livid, and I was really trying to like

(43:43):
rack it up. But I was like two stars behind,
two books behind, isn't that crazy? So I lost at
the other one, but I loved that book at program.
I even still have the button. I kept that button
I were to wear it one day. I kept the
button that I got with it. It's I literally have
it in my jewelry box.

Speaker 4 (43:59):
But I remember of my kids thinking and felt like
currency in their hands when they had that little you
got that little coupon for the free pizza because of
the Yeah, it's like money.

Speaker 2 (44:09):
It's like the golden ticket from Willy Wonka. Man got
the Golden ticket, all right. So a few other things
to uh to hit on here, let me pull up
my run down because I totally lost it. Oh so
Graham Platner, by the way, can we just revisit this

(44:29):
because there's some updates. You know, he used to be,
well not used to be he I said that he
became a communist and he worked with one of these
gun groups that arms and works with Antifa. So he
had the Nazi tattoo on his chest and he covered
it up with a bad dog. Well then it looked

(44:51):
like he had another tattoo on his arm and uh,
at first the picture that came out that it was,
it said the it was only a partial view of it,
and it said nineteen nineteen. And everyone's like, well, can
we talk about that other Nazi tattoo because isn't that
like the numerical thing for SS so and apparently that's yeah,

(45:15):
so he he it ended up being like a trail
crew thing. But you can't blame people for questioning the
prominence of it, considering the first one was legitia Nazi tattoo.
He did this video where he said, oh, I didn't
realize it was. But people that he knew and was
friends with they all assert that he would brag about

(45:40):
this is my this is my Nazi tattoo or what
do they call it, this is my totein cop and
that it was apparently corroborated by other individuals. They said
that people who socialized with him when he was living
in Washington a decade ago, that he specifically acknowledged that
it was a totin copath said symbol that the SS

(46:02):
adopted and those were the ones that patrolled the They
later patrolled the concentration camps in World War two, and
they were telling the press like, oh, yeah, he would
come out and say, yeah, this is my tote cough,
and he would say in acute little way, huh wait.
But those are the people that always say we're the Nazis,

(46:23):
but they have I mean, so I believe that. And
because there were several people that came forward and they
were like, no, he knew what it was.

Speaker 4 (46:29):
Yeah, exactly. He had staff who actually his campaign manager
or political director, resigned last week over her objection to
whatever comments he was putting on on Reddit, and then
later put out a Facebook post that said Graham has
an anti Semitic tattoo on his chest. Yeah, and explains
all of it.

Speaker 2 (46:48):
He apparently offered he was trying to pay off his
campaign chief. He offered them fifteen thousand dollars to sign
in NDIA. I think that was this one. She declined,
and she she was the one who resigned, so he
tried paying her off. He offered her fifteen thousand dollars
to sign an NDA, and she wasn't going to sign
the NDA, so they had he had a new campaign manager.

(47:10):
They got a new campaign manager this week and he
brought in like an in house attorney. By the way,
the house he brought in a firm called Spruce Street Consulting,
which apparently also has worked with Zoron Mamdani. Interesting, Now,
this is separate from all of the social media stuff

(47:33):
that he had because he would run his mouth on
social media all the time. I mean, he promoted super
violent stuff online before, on Reddit and elsewhere. There are
a lot of screenshots of this stuff. You know, he'd
talked about Well, the way he told it CNN was

(47:53):
that he was just messing around on the internet, that's all.
But I don't know some of the posts he was
in the socialist the socialist subreddit called socialist ra it's
the Socialist Reddit or Rifle Association. Oh, by the way,
they're different from the Socialist Rifle Association. They're totally two

(48:14):
totally different types of D bags. Right, one is a
capital D and D bag and now there's the lowercase
D and D bag. And so he said that he agreed.
First off, he said that people should be willing, that
people should talking about the on the workers because he
talks about workers party and all that, and they should
force I guess the people that they are submitting them

(48:36):
into quote abject slavery. He has a bunch of stuff.
I'm not even going to read all of it, and
some of it I can't even read on error because
of the language. But I mean it is he talked
about urinating on the graves of republic Well, that was
Jones of Republican opponents, and apparently he was supportive of him.
There's a lot of stuff out there that he has said.
And regardless of whether he said it in twenty eighteen

(48:57):
or now, what it does is it establishes a pattern
of behavior and that's enough. That should be enough for disqualification.
I mean, the guy is there. I mean, this is
like what the second dude running for office now on
the East coast that's completely unhinged. Jay Jones and then Platner.
I mean, this is crazy. We got a lot more
on the way as we roll towards headlines already in

(49:20):
this third hour, good grief, as we move our partners
that help bring you the program. It's our friends over
at All Family Pharmacy, where you can go and get
your everyday medications. You can get your ivermectin, your hydroxy chloroquin,
your mementozol. You're in ad plus whatever it is. That
you need, they have it, and all the stuff that
you would need for like sinus infections, tamil flu I mean,

(49:40):
they got everything. And it's easy because all you do
is you go online, you fill out a form of
what you need, a doctor reviews it and then your
medications are sent to you within two to four days.
But if you need it in a pinch, it can
be overnighted to you. It's very very easy. I've had
that done before. And everything that they use, all of
these medications are made in the USA with USA precursors,

(50:00):
So it's not you're not getting anything from China, You're
not get anything from India, You're not getting anything from
South America. It is all us A precursors manufacturing. And
you can stock up today at Allfamilypharmacy dot com slash Dana.
If you use code Dana ten, you can get ten
percent off. So visit All Familypharmacy dot com slash Dana

(50:20):
code Dana ten for ten percent off.

Speaker 4 (50:23):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's quick.

Speaker 2 (50:28):
Five sad news. Soft Cell's day Ball dead at age
sixty six. His bandmate reveals that he's been ill for
a while, he was announced. It was announced that he
died this morning or actually yesterday evening. His music partner
in the other half of the group, Mark Allman, had
posted on Facebook that he went peacefully in his sleep.
No cause of death was given other than he was

(50:49):
dealing with an illness. We I mean, we just saw
them like a month and a half ago Soft Cell
in Dallas. They were fantastic. So man, is that that
seems especially because people are living like in their nineties now,
that seems way. Yeah, it seems like it's like a
beebie anymore. That makes like people in their twenties like fetuses.

(51:11):
All right, so teen a teen uses social media to
drive business at this pharmacy's soda fountain. I haven't seen
a soda fountain like like where they run at old school.
When I was a little kid where my family was
from in the Ozarks, they had a pharmacy and it

(51:32):
was old school and it was on an old timy
main street and I used to go in. There was
a little kid with my grandma which you would have
to pick up medicine because you get your medicine there,
and then they had it was weird. It's like a CVS,
but like with a lunch counter and I would literally
get like a milkshake or like a root ear float
or something there. And they had the hats and they
did the whole thing. It was very interesting. So apparently,

(51:54):
h Yeah, this dude, he drives all of his business
at this pharmacy. It's in Canada, but are not Canada.
Sits in Iowa, Ottawama. I totally said that wrong. Don't
send me hate mail. But he's worked there since he
was twelve, and he used to deliver medication and then
he took over the soda fountain's operations and he drives
like he gets tons of business just from social media.

(52:15):
Good for him, look at it. Let's see a Kent
police dog helps corner a domestic violence suspect after a
motorcycle chase. That's a very good boy police. They arrested
a man who had assaulted a woman. He tried to
escape on motorcycle, but he was no match for the
canine who Canine officer Flesher and his police dog Gambit.

(52:40):
They tracked him and found him and Gambit quickly apprehended him.
So he should get like lots of treats and extra pets,
and a lot of people are going to gigs, festivals,
and clubs alone. I've never done that, Steve. Have you
ever gone to a concert by yourself? Okay, we got
to talk about that, all right. We got a lot
more on the way. Stick with US. America's top water

(53:00):
is a cocktail of heavy metals and toxins, the result
of Corodi pipes that we should have replaced decades ago.
Let me just ask anybody in Flint, Michigan. You got lead,
heavy metals, rust, basically liquid poison right out the tap.
So when I tried cove Pure on my counter, it
was so easy, no plumber, no drilling. You just plug
it in and pick your water temperature on the touch screen.

(53:23):
And honestly, it actually tastes like water, not like death.
So that's why I use the Core water purifier to
keep my family safe. Unlike the government, Copire actually does
its job. Lead in your water doesn't stop at a
gross taste, can actually cause a host of serious medical issues.
But yeah, sure, go ahead, trust the city with your

(53:43):
kid's health. I mean, what could go wrong. Copier's clear
Wave of technology removes up to ninety nine point nine
percent of contaminants so don't wait for the government to
help take back control of your family's health and finally
drink water the way that it was meant to be.
Visit cove peer dot com slash data for two hundred
dollars off. That's copeer dot com slash data.

Speaker 6 (54:06):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a data show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 3 (54:18):
Oh Mary, thanks Kall.

Speaker 12 (54:19):
You two put construction questions if I can't. You mentioned
any construction project comes with changes. The President had initially
said that this project wouldn't interfere with or touch the
current structure. Now he says to do this properly, he
realized that the East wing had to be demolished. This
is the people's house, and why not inform the public
of that change. And when it was decided that the
East wing would have.

Speaker 1 (54:40):
To be demolished, look again, with any construction project, changes come,
and we have informed all of you.

Speaker 3 (54:46):
We've been keeping you apprized of this project.

Speaker 1 (54:48):
We've shown you the renderings and if you look at
the renderings, it's very clear the East wing was going
to be modernized instead.

Speaker 3 (54:54):
In fact, I said that in.

Speaker 1 (54:56):
The briefing when we initially introduced this plan to all
of you, to the public, well again the President. The
plans changed when the President heard council from the architects
and the construction companies who said that in order for
this East Wing to be modern and beautiful for many
many years to comfort, to be a truly strong and
stable structure, this phase one that we're now in was necessary.

(55:19):
And the President wants to do right by the people's House,
and so that's exactly what he's doing. It's going to
be again, like I said, much more stable, strong, secure,
and more beautiful than ever once it's complete.

Speaker 4 (55:31):
Percy's offices.

Speaker 2 (55:32):
The Social Secretary cog in the HM the list of people,
and that was Caroline Levitt, who is going back and forth.
There was an ABC reporter about this. I mean, I remember,
I do remember. They said that there was a in
the beginning that depending on what they found when they
got into the initial demolition of the outside, the little

(55:55):
car park outside, they were waiting to see whether or
not they would have to do more take down more
of the structure than just that. And then apparently when
they get in there. When they got in there, considering
when the east wing was built, it was like what

(56:16):
the forties and then they did other renovations in the fifties.
They actually that was like back when they used asbestos,
and the asbestos for this Literally we pulled this up
because I had this last night. There's like a whole
advocacy group for it. In terms of construction. They said

(56:39):
that there were concerns because it's over the east wing
with it back when it was originally built, in the
later editions of it, that was apparently at the height
of the use of asbestos in construction, and that I mean,
so that required apparently them to do more because they

(57:02):
needed to get you know, they had to do testing asbestos.
They had and I'm actually, by the way, Lorraine just
posted literally what I had in front of me right now,
because they had a whole abatement that they had it
was EPA OSHA and also they were working with Clark
Construction in ae COM with worker protection and all of

(57:24):
that as a result, and so they had to actually
do more to get to get some of that other
material out. And then by the time they got at
that point, they said, you know what, why don't we
just reinforce this and use this. And so it ended
up being actually easier to do it the way that
they're doing it than not. And we do know a
little bit about construction. But because my husband worked in construction,
he rehabilited, He rehabbed a city block in downtown Saint Louis,

(57:48):
it was a major project, and built this amazing studio
in condos. So we know about construction. I mean we
lived it. And they had a hole. They went through
this whole exact same thing too, because there was in
the building when they were rehabbing it and all of that.
So I know the process of it, and it's a
it's a big process, and sometimes when you get to
a certain point, you're like, Okay, it's just better to

(58:09):
just go all the way instead of go through this.

Speaker 5 (58:14):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (58:15):
For the lack of a better way to put it,
the whole abatement of this, it's just easier. And so
that ultimately, and I remember when they said they said,
they never said that there wasn't a possibility. They just
said that it could happen, but they need to see
when they get in there what they find, and then

(58:35):
they'll go from there. So it's not like I just
I just rejected the argument that everybody was kept in
the dark about it. The people that are the other
people that are funding it. I mean, we're getting it's
the people's house, and we're getting a free ballroom. So
let me just go through the names. ALTA Group, Amazon, Apple,
Booz Allen Hamilton, Caterpillar, Coinbase, Comcast, j Pepe and Amelia Now,

(59:00):
hard Rock International, Google, HP like EID Martin, metap Platforms,
Micron Technology, Microsoft Next, Extra Energy, Planetier Technologies, Ripple Reynolds,
American Team Mobile, tel America, Union Pacific, Growl World, Real Road,
Adelson Family Foundation, Stefanie Brody, the Betty Wold Johnson Foundation,

(59:23):
Charles and Marissa Saskarilla, Edward and Sherry Glazer, Harold Ham,
Benjamin Leon Jr. The Lutnik Family, the Laura and Isaac
Pearlmutter Foundation, Steven A. Schwarzman, Konstantin Sokolov, Kelly Leffler and
Jeff Sprecker, Paolo Tiremani, Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, they were

(59:44):
Facebook as interesting. H. Those are all the people and
entities that have been donating to this. So where is
this because that was the other accusation that xpair of
dollars have been going towards this, and the project has

(01:00:06):
been in the works for a long time. So this
is I mean New York Post published the list of
all of the other donors. Hakeem Jeffreys, we played that
audio for you yesterday. He said, Oh, we're gonna have
an investigation. We're going to get to the bottom of
all the people involved in this. Well for what purpose?

Speaker 7 (01:00:29):
For what?

Speaker 2 (01:00:32):
Because they to send them a thank you card for
a free ball room. I was asking a friend of
mine that was in the White House press pool and
does all this stuff. It This actually is needed because
it is true that the East Room cannot could not

(01:00:54):
They can't accommodate more. They can barely accommodate two hundred
people definitely cannot accommodate more than two hundred, and depending
on the event, and you know, like if you're like
all the stuff that's going on in there, you may
not be able to get two hundred. So what they
used to have to do is and what they still
have to do right now, is they would have to

(01:01:16):
erect a giant tent on the south lawn and hold
the events in the tent at the South Lawn, And
one of my friends was saying, gosh, it was awful
when it would rain, and you know, they didn't like
being a member of the press and having their like
minded and having to cover this if it was like cold,
if it's rainy, it's just you know, it's not the
most ideal situation. So when they had a state dinner,

(01:01:42):
when the last state dinner that they so when they
had a huge state dinner, I think this was like
maybe back in when was this when they had the
president and first Lady of Kenya. They had to go outside.
They had to have their event outside. So imagine you
have to put a tent on the lawn and everybody
goes outside to eat. And yeah, you can have space,
heaters and all of that, but is it the most comfortable?

(01:02:03):
Is it the best? So and they've been doing I mean,
this is you know, been happening for a while. There's
a lot of drawbacks, especially when there's an issue with
the weather. They have issues with bathroom facilities because you
got to make shift stuff when you have a tent
on the lawn. This is actually something I do agree with,

(01:02:23):
and I'm very particular about taxpayer dollars. This isn't even
taxpayer dollars. It's all privately funded. See the other stuff
that other previous presidents added. I would say maybe with
the exception of the creation of the East Wing originally,
everything else has been for presidential use. The Clinton's added
a music room that the other presidents have added, bowling alleys,
and pools. Gerald Ford added a pool. He wanted an

(01:02:45):
outdoor pool, not just a lap pool, but a pool
that he could swim in. You had Obama put in
a basketball court, you had others put in tennis courts,
all kinds of stuff. I mean, a lot of the
stuff that they put in previously was stuff for their
own personal youth. This is something that's actually going to
be used functionally for the White House. And because it

(01:03:06):
can be a mess. And my friend was saying, because
my friend has had to cover these events before, and
my friend was saying that it's kind of a mess,
especially if it's raining, when you have inclement weather, and
it also kind of some people have said that it

(01:03:28):
people think that they're going to a state dinner at
the White House and then they realize they're not even
going into the White House. They're going to attend outside,
and it is very expensive to get the kitchen stuff
out there and set up the kitchen, and then they

(01:03:49):
have to redo and basically put down turf every time
they do one of these events. Also does where's Marine
one land? Because Marine one always lands on South lawnppens
when you've got a big event and it's out there
on the south lawn and you got to help, you
can't where that's where Marine one lands, so and when
the tent is up, marine one can't land. And the

(01:04:10):
State Dining Room, if you look at going inside of
the State Dining Room that maybe I think they said
as like one hundred and twenty hundred and thirty guests
state dinners. When you have leaders that come in there,
that's a lot more than that. And they actually were
charged they made space. They were trying to make space
even during Reagan's era in that east wing, and the

(01:04:31):
east wing is a lot of unused offices and a
lot of space that's actually not even entirely useful. So
the bathroom situation, that's a whole other thing. And they
can make it look really pretty out there, but you're
outside in a tent and everybody knows it, and you
have to walk outside to get into the tent and
they put the carpet down and all that stuff. But
you guys, know, ladies, you know how it is. It's

(01:04:53):
not the best. You got wind, breeze, humidity, everything else
out there. All these people go to this event to
look nice for it, and then they go out there
and you're out there in the humidity, you're out there
in the weather. The bathroom situation is abysmal. It's a
mess no matter how you do it. So I actually
think that this is a good move to so that

(01:05:15):
way you can actually have a proper state dinner and
the White House can hold these events and a lot
of the other rooms in the White House, I mean,
they're at capacity as it is, and always have been originally.
So why are people why is this such a huge issue.
It's privately funded. Everybody who's donated to it has been

(01:05:37):
made public. You know how much has been donated. The
President has also donated his own money. It is something
that is going to be utilized pretty heavily for all
events at the White House, so they don't have to
move out antiques and historical artifacts from other rooms to

(01:05:59):
accommodate people when they're trying to, you know, get as
many people in to these other rooms for state events.
So I have zero issue with us that I don't
see one negative Kane. I do not see a single
drawback from any of us. I don't know. Yeah, my friend,

(01:06:19):
who by the way, is very can be very antagonistic
towards government spending and even private donations because she always
thinks they're trying to buy favor, which is you know,
which is true. It was like this has been so
so needed for so long that it is actually like
one of the best things. Like this, forget about the

(01:06:40):
rose garden. This is the thing that's needed. So I
get that. I get that. And he also put up
the flagpole too. But this is going to this is
going to be used by you know, future administrations for years.
It is so needed, so needed. We have more on
the way. We've got Florida, man coming up. I always
believe in care. I have no problem throwing lead down

(01:07:02):
range towards anybody that poses a threat to me or
my safety, my family safety, et cetera. To that end, though,
I also realize you got to diversify your weapons array.
One of the ways you can do that is with
a burn A gun. This is I think especially for
those college students that are under the age of twenty one.
They can go overseas and carry full auto and defense
of their country, but they can't carry in defense of
their selves over here while they're living alone, going to college.

(01:07:24):
It's asinine. But here we are. So this is where
I would suggest a Burna SD or their newer one,
the compact Launcher. Burn A gun shoots chemical air dene
projectiles that canddure threats from up to fifty feet away.
And unlike ordinary stun guns, this thing is a fifteen
round shot capacity per cartridge, whereas stunt guns have like
maybe one or two rounds. It is super compact. There's

(01:07:45):
no recoil, easy target acquisition, and you have a lot
of options because it's legal in all fifty states. There's
no background checks, there's no permits. They sit it right
to your front door, so it's accessible for everyone. Always
give yourself a chance. You carry different calibers, you carry blades.
There's no reason why you shouldn't diversify when you are
restricted municipally or with private property restrictions. It's byr in

(01:08:07):
a dot com slash Dana. It's the burna cl b
yr inna dot com slash Dana.

Speaker 4 (01:08:15):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida.

Speaker 5 (01:08:23):
Man.

Speaker 2 (01:08:26):
I like the people who hide their drugs and bags
that say no drugs, and then whenever they're stopped and
they get searched, they say, no, there's no drugs in here.
Look at the bag that says no drugs. This guy
tried this with his house. So a man with a
no drugs allowed sign on his house was charged with trafficking.
Highland's County Sheriff's office said they arrested John Moss, seventy

(01:08:49):
six years old. Not old people are Kane hates old
people hearing. He says old people aren't innocent. Over there
are hearing. They said that there was literally a plaque,
not just like a handwritten sign, like a professionally done
sign that said quote absolutely no drugs allowed on the
premises they served to search worn on the home. Oh man,

(01:09:09):
this guy was trafficking oxy cotton stuff. I can't pronounce
morphine meth. He had a lot of myth all kinds
of stuff. So he was a baddie. But he's he's
in jail, multiple kinds of drug trafficking and no bond.
That's what I'm like. Did he put that sign up?
Do you think with the purpose of the cops showing

(01:09:30):
up with a warrant, going, oh wait, the sign says
no drugs allowed. We can't you know there's no drugs here. Yeah,
I might as well go home. It's all done, guys.
We don't have to worry anymore. It's all done. I'm
just you know, I'm wondering, all right. Also, a Florida
a woman mistakes of Florida man for her Uber and
he kidnaps her. You gotta be careful man. Uber drivers.

(01:09:54):
They they at like thirty million trips per day worldwide.
Usually there's an issue. But this Florida woman mistook a
silver suv for an Uber. She got into the vehicle,
and then when she realized she was in the wrong car,
the driver would not let her out. And now the
Sheriff's office down there was looking for a man in
his thirties in connection with her attempted kidnapping and kissing

(01:10:18):
me Florida, and of course she misidentified the man. She
thought the silver suv was her Uber and the driver
was sitting there smoking dope at the time, offered her
a ride. She got in and they went, and then
he wouldn't let her out. He began making looted and
appropriate comments. She demanded that he let her out. He
would not. She began panicking, screaming, and tried to get
out of the car to escape. He sped up, so

(01:10:40):
she'd tried to open the door. He sped up, which
threw her off balance and she fell out of the
car while it was moving. She was able to take
a picture of the suv and send the picture and
a described demand of the police. But wow, I mean,
always check those license plates, y'all. Always check them and

(01:11:01):
then ask your driver's name. Don't ask if you're an uber.
Don't ask them if they're an uber, ask them for
the name of the driver, Like, are you you know whatever?
Are you Stan? Are you Joe?

Speaker 4 (01:11:10):
Are you If someone gets in my car accidentally, I'm
not going to try and kidnap them, I'm going to
tell him to get the hell out. I don't know
what this guy was doing.

Speaker 2 (01:11:18):
Well he's not. It's also like, who sits there in
idols and your door's unlocked. I don't ever do that.
I have got I mean my doors is locked, then
I don't unlock them until the person is their hand
their handle on the door. I just I don't know.
It's crazy. Let's see. Last, but not least, the Florida

(01:11:38):
man was arrested after his after toddlers were pictured with guns,
beer and dope. Yeah, Taylor knoop or noop. I don't
know if Florida was arrested because apparently he uh there were.
He was charged with child neglect. The children were placed
with relatives. He's the dad, and he apparently had all
these photographs of his babies like actual like two years

(01:12:00):
and like nine month olds with guns and beer and drugs. Wow,
he got way way in trouble with that. We got
a lot more on the way. Stick with us. Third
hour next, I there's a lot to discuss as we
move our partners that he'll bring you the program. It's
our friends over at Patriot Mobile. It's the only Christian

(01:12:20):
conservative cell phone service in the nation. And you need
to switch because they make it so easy. It takes
minutes to do, and it takes minutes to do, and
you can you don't even have to go to the store.
You don't even have to go to the store. You
can stay in your home, you can stay in your office,
whatever it is, whatever's easiest. They'll accommodate you. They have

(01:12:42):
a great US based customer service team that will get
you like all screwed away, all fitted up in minutes.
You got nationwide coverage that you can trust. They have
access to all three major US networks. You don't compromise
on quality for your values. You get unlimited data plans.
Here's the big thing. You're painless because they have plans

(01:13:03):
that can are tailored to everybody. But in addition to that,
you're not having your money go towards the things that
you vote against every time you're at the ballot box.
We're in early elections here right now or early voting sorry.
And Patriot Mobile, I know for fact, has help out
with a lot of these very conservative voter minded issues
that are on the ballot. They really work on your behalf,

(01:13:23):
so your money isn't working against you. And if you
get rid of your Netflix subscription because you don't like
the ideals, but you haven't done it with your mobile service,
you might as well go get ten Netflix subscriptions, because
what you're paying for your cell phone service, the Netflix
stuff is a drop in the bucket compared to that.
So you need to make the switch today at Patriot Mobile.
Visit Patriot mobile dot com slash data and get a
free month of service when you use promo Code Data.

(01:13:45):
Veterans and first responders get fifteen percent off of their
bills every month. Patriot Mobile dot Com slash Data a
nine to seven to two Patriot Promo Code Data.

Speaker 6 (01:13:55):
Well, they're doing everything by the book.

Speaker 13 (01:13:57):
Why does Chicago have the highest rate of all the
big cities.

Speaker 11 (01:14:02):
Well, we are not in the top thirty in terms
of our murder rate and murder rate. Our murder rate
has been cut in half over the last four years,
and every year it's gone down by double digits. And
if you look at all of the violent crime over
the last four.

Speaker 13 (01:14:16):
Years, they've all gone down a US cities seventeen point
forty seven per one hundred thousand populations. Chicago's number one
over Philadelphia, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Phoenix, Los Angeles.

Speaker 9 (01:14:27):
New York, and San Diego.

Speaker 11 (01:14:28):
What I'm explaining to you as you're talking about violent crime, look,
you can pull statistics up.

Speaker 5 (01:14:33):
These are murders.

Speaker 11 (01:14:34):
I'm explaining to you that our murder rate has been
cut in half. And very importantly, Brett, and you've got
to hear this, very importantly, we've been doing the things
that are necessary to bring crime down, right. We've invested
in community violence, interruption, we've invested in police.

Speaker 2 (01:14:50):
No they haven't. Actually, in fact, they're the clearance for
these cases have dropped dramatically as well, meaning you know,
going after prosecuting, solving the felonious, you know, felony crimes,
et cetera. That's JB. Pritzker who is on with Brett Baer,
And it's hysterical because JB. Pritzker is going, well, yeah,

(01:15:11):
like we cut crime, we don't nothing's wrong anymore. And
Brett bear Is like, yeah, well, here are the receipts,
and you're number one in terms of homicide. Your your tops.
And Pritzker's like, well, that's just a lie. You know,
we don't care about your receipts. It's a lie. We
cut it in half, it's cut in half, but you're
still number one. You cut it in half, but you're

(01:15:35):
still number one. Imagine if you hadn't reduced anything, right,
it's insane. These people are insane. But this is this
is that was his excuse. They I think he's very
far removed from the reality that happens on his streets
every single day, every single day. But I actually, I

(01:15:59):
mean they're and a half and still number one. Why
why is the murder rate the highest of all time?
We're not in the chop thirty. Yeah, but here's the map,
and then here is the all of the crime data
as it's tabulated by your actual law enforcement agencies. And
he's like, you can put up all the statistics you want.
We've cut our murder rate in half. You're still number one. Lunchbox,

(01:16:22):
you're number one. You cut it in half, you claim,
and you're still number one. Jeez, I would have not
have gone past that. I don't get met at Bredbearer
because he did. You have to realize that, especially with
some producers and you know, some of the big wigs
with network news, they don't want you to stay on

(01:16:44):
that topic forever because they don't think it's good television.
They want you to get past it. It's like when
you know fighters are kind of like hugging it out
when they're resting in the ring. It's like sort of
that's how they view it. So I get I get it,
but I wouldn't let him go. I would have just
stayed on him, like, wait, we can't go. I mean
they're still number one. They are number one in terms

(01:17:06):
of murder rate, murder and shootings, murder, shootings, all crime,
violent crime, whatever, they're number one. I and they I
even with now, I will say they do have a reduction.
They had a reduction with us some violent crime. Do
you know how they had a reduction with violent crime?

(01:17:27):
You just it's crazy. But if you don't report it,
then it's wild. It goes away. Is that wild? If
you if a crime happens, then you don't report it.
Did the crime happen? That's their whole mo, that's their
whole thing with us. So they've done that in California.

(01:17:50):
I mean they've had since when Pritzker became governor. In
the city of Chicago, I mean since twenty nineteen, you've
had over four thousand people shot and killed. It's all
like gang activity, drugs and gangs, drugs and gangs, drugs
and gangs. Now a lot of people say, Saint Louis, Oh, well,
Saint Louis Is. Actually, well, we'll hold up, hold up,

(01:18:10):
that's our hometown. I take exception to that. Yes, Saint
Louis has a butt ton of crime. That's an actual
quantifiable measurement. By the way, it has a ton of crime.
But the reason that Saint Louis City ranks number one
is because Saint Louis City is not incorporated into the county.
That's why. So they look at number of crimes per

(01:18:30):
you know, per person, adjusted to the population, and so
it looks incredibly high. Now it's very high. It's definitely
the top five, but it's not number one because of
the only staying grace is it's not incorporated. It's very
weird how the city and the county are set up.
The city has its own government, its own everything, county
has its own government. It's on everything. It's very odd, cane,
isn't it. And it's it's difficult to explain.

Speaker 4 (01:18:51):
That to people who don't gah that The downtown numbers
as far as people living downtown Saint Louis have dropped
dramatically thanks to Democrat policies, unfortunately, and so as a result,
the percentages are larger. That's the reason.

Speaker 2 (01:19:05):
Yeah, that's it, that's why. But Chicago number one murder
rate and he's when he was saying that it was
dropped in half. I mean it's not actually dropped in half.
He only reduced it. I mean by I mean, I wouldn't.
I would think, like doing the math, I think it's
like barely eleven percent. He's like, oh, we cut in half.
It's not. He's trying to imply that he cut homicide

(01:19:26):
by fifty percent. He didn't, And then he's trying to
act like it's part of the decrease is because better policing.
They've actually have have hindered policing efforts, and they declassified
a lot of crimes and they just don't report things.
Their their clearance for these felonies is like abysmal. I
mean it's not Detroit's, which is at fifteen percent, but

(01:19:49):
it's like in the twenty something percent.

Speaker 10 (01:19:51):
And this.

Speaker 2 (01:19:55):
Idea that that is some big win for him. Can
you do you imagine? No, you're still number one in murder. Yeah,
but we cut in half.

Speaker 5 (01:20:04):
So what up?

Speaker 2 (01:20:06):
You're number one in murder. That's not a do you
need to get past You be number one right now.
You're number one in murder. Oh my gosh, it's still
pretty bad. I I don't know, I mean, what is
it like seventeen, isn't it? I was looking at the rate.
This is a per one hundred thousand. Isn't it like

(01:20:27):
seventeen something like that? Yeah, over seventeen. Oh yeah, it
is over seventeen. I'm looking at oohoo, really bad guys.

Speaker 4 (01:20:36):
And the latest budget they've actually asked the Chicago Police
Department to come up with ninety eight million in cuts.

Speaker 2 (01:20:44):
What because they're spending so much on their policing efforts.
King They're they're spending so much on their policing and
that is a true story. They wanted a ninety eight million.
They're having a city budget crisis in Chicago. How is
that possible? I'm just so confused. How was that possible
that they would have that. I mean, it's everything's doing great.

(01:21:08):
If you listen to JB. Pritzker, it's kittens and sunshine
up there. Everything's so good. They have all this time
on their hands to go after Ice. Now, the Chicago
Police Superintendent Larry Snelling was saying, guys, public safety is
going to be it greatly impacted if you cut ninety

(01:21:28):
eight million dollars out of our budget. Because they have
budget definitely they they keep spending or sorry, ninety two million.
They keep spending like crazy. They've they've spent on entitlements
and on illegal aliens, that's what. And then they spend
it on busting people up to go and fight with Ice.
Speaking of which, this is cut. I'm looking at what

(01:21:52):
cut this is because they had a fight with Ice
in Chicago. They keep having these these situations where you
have the ICE agents. I think it is cut nine.
We have a million cuts. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So this
is a security guard. There's a news crew that is

(01:22:12):
This is actually in California, but this we there was
video that we had just the other day of them
again attacking a facility in Chicago. This is in California,
which is just like, I mean, Los Angeles is the
same as Chicago. They were attacked during an anti ICE protest.
Watch kept asking me where I was going and slipping
in front of me.

Speaker 8 (01:22:32):
You identify yourself as a Trump supporter or supporting ICE
or I have support.

Speaker 2 (01:22:38):
Okay, that makes no sense to me. I'm sorry myself.

Speaker 11 (01:22:43):
You need you need us to call somebody, and you
should report this.

Speaker 5 (01:22:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:22:48):
He got bunched in the face and battered and he's
the security guard who was just there with a news cart.
He was hired to work to a company, a news crew,
and he was attacked by the protesters at an anti
ice protest in California. So, I mean, I don't know,
I get why we're having all these This is the
reason why we're sending National Guard in is to protect

(01:23:10):
these facilities and protect these agents. And that's the way
it is, man. So you know, the debate that I
have to do, I have to do a Second Amendment
debate where I'm going to be debating Alan Derschwitz in
Chicago of all cities, on gun control. Actually the question is,
and I'm not going to give anything away, it's about

(01:23:30):
the Second Amendment in safety, which I think is kind
of a leading premise already. But that's we'll have more
at the time. We'll have more later. But Chicago's interesting
because Chicago is also one of those cities that's fought
against a glock and we've talked a little bit about that.
Because they're discontinuing these models and they're switching, they're basically,

(01:23:56):
let me put it Layman's terms, the courts are bullying
a company to alter their product because the criminals that
they will not arrest, won't stop doing illegal things with
them and to them. I think that makes sense. That's it.
That's it. That's that's the explanation. In California Ab. Eleven

(01:24:17):
twenty seven, there's a ban, the glock sales ban, that's
gonna I mean, that's about to become law. They pass
that in twenty twenty two after they had the shooting
that was in Sacramento. And remember the individual that was
behind that. This was a guy who had been in
prison and he was let out six years early because

(01:24:38):
they had passed Prop. Fifty seven. Again, this is all
restorative justice nonsense. So they let this criminal out six
years early. And of course that criminal, who was already
ineligible by way of his previous convicted felonious activity, got
a glock, and you can't modify, you can't put these
switches in it. That's already there's already federal law that

(01:24:58):
bars that. So he illegally against existing federal law and
against existing state long in California. Modified it modified something
that he was already ineligible to possess. And then he
went on a shooting spree, a gang shooting spree, to
kill a bunch of his rivals, and now all the
people in California, law abiding gun owners who own blocks

(01:25:22):
are going to be banned from purchasing them because the
California justice system failed the innocence. California let this guy
out six years early after they already had given him
a very light sentence, and then what does he do.
He immediately goes and previously and goes and continues to
commit more felonious activity. I'm going to tell you, the

(01:25:45):
people who are going to murder are not going to
be deterred from a low level gun law. They don't care.
They don't care, and a lot of them they get
him tossed anyway. Wow, Gavin Newso because this legislature, he
could veto it. But the legislature I don't think has

(01:26:08):
overridden to veto since like eighty in the eighties early eighties.
So we got some issues here. That's ultimately why that
happened in California. In Chicago, it's not any different. It's
the same situation in Chicago because they were there were
suing Glock for the same reason. You have people who

(01:26:29):
are ineligible to carry an inanimate object and then they
illegally modify because illegally because it's already against federal law
the inanimate object, and then they use it in more
felonious in the commission more felonies, and then the law
button gun owners are the ones who get punished. That's
the story of the glock thing. That's the glock. So

(01:26:51):
that's the story of it, just asinine. We have more
on the way as we roll towards the bottom of
this hour, and then Carol Roth will be joining us
later as we move our partners that help bring you
the program. It's the folks over at Relief Factor. If
you want relief from everyday aches and pains, you need
to check out Relief Factor. This is one hundred percent

(01:27:12):
drug free. It's a way to target inflammation that can
keep you from doing the exercise that you need and
enjoy the things that you love freely and with maximum mobility.
It's a as I said, one hundred percent drug free,
research based formula all created to support healthy response to inflammation,
decrease discomfort from exercise, every day living, and it really

(01:27:35):
helps to maintain healthy joints and muscles, so it promotes
better movement and less pain over time. Try Relief Factors
three week Quick Start for just nineteen ninety five. That's
only ninety five cents a day. It's less than a
cup of coffee. Don't wait. Visit reliefactor dot com or
call eight hundred and four Relief to get your three
week quick Start today for just nineteen ninety five. Support
your body with natural anti inflammatory power and see if

(01:27:56):
for relief factor is right for you.

Speaker 4 (01:27:58):
And now all of the new as you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (01:28:04):
So a doc was a I do not want to
Oh my gosh. So okay, if you guys had to
get not saying that you would, but if you had
to get private part surgery, would you go to visit
a doc who did it from the back of his
nineteen ninety Toyota corolla. What No, Just are you sure?

(01:28:26):
I mean I get that. Yeah, people have done weird
stuff with butt injections. I don't know. So this doctor
was arrested. He was performing illegal male copulatory organ operations
literally out of his nineteen ninety Toyota Corolla. Yeah, his
name is Pattayamulin. He's the shady surgeon there. It's an

(01:28:50):
on the goo genital enhancement. It's what he's doing and
it was in Bangkok, and there's a video of him
legit doing it in Bangkok, and it was in a
beaten up I mean nineteen ninety Toyota Corolla. And then
sometimes the customers would report him to the police. I
guess they were unhappy.

Speaker 10 (01:29:08):
But he.

Speaker 2 (01:29:10):
Pearl. I don't know what pearl implantation is. I am
not googling that. And apparently, I mean they were literally
going under the knife in his gracet aand parked on
the side of a road. Yeah. Yeah, and he did not, guys,
he didn't even sterilize anything. Oh my gosh, he goes,

(01:29:32):
I've been doing this for about a year. I don't
know what a pearl implant is, but he charges for it.
Oh oh, circumcisions and then the enlargement injections they en
Oh my gosh, it's like filler for your willer. I
don't know the erection. Oh my gosh. Okay, I don't

(01:29:53):
even understand what this is, rectal oxygen delivery. They're trying
to make butt breathing a thing. I swear to you, guys,
this is It's a Nobel research. Nobel Prize research because
many animals break through their backside or are capable of it.
I don't know. This seems so stupid. What a weird
collection of headlines. Cqcumbers apparently do great. That's great. That

(01:30:15):
doesn't mean I want to because a cqucumber does. I'm
not even going anywhere. There's like drawings I'm not I
cannot do that. I cannot do this headline. I feel
like Casey Kasem. I can't go to a dead dog
out of an uptempo song. I can't go talk to
Carol Roth about matth and talking about this stick with us.

Speaker 6 (01:30:33):
Brighten up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show
podcast where every update comes with a little dash of
not so serious on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 2 (01:30:45):
So I think at this.

Speaker 8 (01:30:47):
Point we should all be all in on what's happening.
I mean, we had four years of a lot of
mischief and sluggish economy and everything else, and a lot
of fake money. So we have to we have to
deal with a little bit of pain to have some gain, right,
and I think we're going to have to just do that.
I think you know this, This shrimper guy was interesting

(01:31:09):
to me. I loved hearing that because our industry is
the same. We have the lowest beef herd that we've
had since nineteen fifty and that is because so many
people have gotten out of the industry over the years.
And if we would have had this fair trade and
our marketing would have been better when we could have
exported more of our beef, I don't think we would

(01:31:31):
have lost all these farmers and ranchers, and that's going
to take some time to rebuild.

Speaker 2 (01:31:36):
And this is something that Potus talked about. He had
put out I guess there was a tweet what was
reposted on x from his truth social account where he
was getting into the ranchers and he wanted a little
he wanted some more credit for what he's been doing
to help the ranching industry. But this gets into this
currency swap with Argentina and Can and I have been
talking about this at length on break all throughout this week.

(01:31:58):
Because my perspective, and again I'm not an economist, this
is why we bring on experts like my next guest
that we're going to get into because I'm immediately looking
at a currency swap and I'm thinking, is this is
this alone? Heaven forbid? Is this a bailout to libertarian
Malai what and I And then I know you're already
looking at stop with the stop it. I'm asking the

(01:32:21):
questions I know. So we're like, you know who we
need to bring on to explain all of this to us,
Like we're three Carol Roth, who's like way smarter than
at this than all of us, and she's got great
hair to boot on top of it. And you guys
know our very good friend Carol. She's absolutely lovely and
she is a recovering investment banker, entrepreneur, TV punet, New

(01:32:42):
York Times bestselling author, and make sure you check out
her newsletter at Carolroth dot com slash news. Carol, it
is so good to see you. I'm sure you're about
ready to pull your hair out at all of the
questions like the ones that I just asked, because I
know what I know and I know what I don't,
and I know it's not exactly a bailout, but it
really seems like, so clarify this for us. What are

(01:33:03):
we doing? What is this currency swap with Argentina?

Speaker 3 (01:33:06):
Okay, first of all, if you would have told me
ten years ago that I would be in the media
explaining currency swaps with Argentina, I go, there's no way,
but this is where we are today, Dana, so I
will do my best. A currency swap is something that
happens on a pretty regular basis. It's when we want
to affect change, maybe somebody's currency struggling. We're trying to

(01:33:29):
create a situation where we don't have a global financial crisis. Typically,
central banks will have the swap line available where they
trade currencies and then trade them back at some fixed
price in the future. This is a little bit different
with what's going on in Argentina because we're not doing
it through our central bank, the Federal Reserve. We're doing

(01:33:51):
it through the treasury through something called the EESF, the
Exchange Stabilization Fund. And we're not doing it with a
country that's more stable that we usually do it with.
We're doing with it with a country that you know,
has some some bigger issues with their their financial footing.
Now there is a political reason, but that political reason

(01:34:14):
has a real reason behind it. So if you're hearing
some of the other media, you're saying, Okay, there's a
big election that's coming up in a few days in Argentina,
and we're doing this to support Malay's government, and you know,
in a sense that is very true. But we're not
doing it because we love Malay's hair, although we do.
We're a big fan of big hair, you know. To

(01:34:36):
be nice, We're doing it to protect our interests. So
this is not about Malay so much. It's not about
you know, Argentina. This is about China, bottom line. This
is about China, and it is about the fact that
Argentina holds a ton of resources, including lithium. They're one

(01:34:57):
of the top lithium deposits in the higher world, as
well as some rare earth elements that we need to
produce things like products for our defense and the like,
and these are things that China is trying to move
in on. And so what we're doing is we're trying
to get China out of Argentina, frankly out of Latin

(01:35:21):
America in a broader sense, shore up access to these
very important elements and commodities that we need access to.
And so the price of doing it is doing this
currency swap, which again Treasury is doing. They're not they
don't have to get Congress's approval, they don't need to
get J. Powell on board, and this is something that

(01:35:41):
they do from time to time where they go rogue
and Scott Besen goes, I'm smarter than you guys.

Speaker 2 (01:35:46):
We have to do this for the broader agenda. That
is a great explainer and she did it in like
three minutes, not even three minutes. That's why Carol Roth
is the best. If you guys are just joining us
because that because we're I was looking at all of
this and they're because I know Trump was looking at
bringing in additional beef imports and it's all about you know,
ranching and beef and little lost in This is the

(01:36:07):
toll hold that China has been trying to get, not
just in Argentina, but also you know, South America, Central America,
and they are you're right, loaded with those resources, so
they can't be too happy about this. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:36:21):
So basically, China's had something called the Belton Road Initiative
and they have deployed their capital to other countries. They
have made loans, they have made investments because they want
to have access to regular infrastructure, they want to have
access to digital infrastructure, and they want to have every
country and the world beholden to them. Because they saw

(01:36:42):
what was happening in the United States, and they decided
to make a move knowing that our financial foundation was
quite broken, and they've been doing that, you know, in
their own neighborhood, and now they're coming over our hemisphere.
And they've been doing that for a while. And it
is really at the point in time where we have
smart people who are going this is a national security risk.

(01:37:05):
This threatens our economy, This threatens our ability to defend ourselves.
So think of this, you know, whether it's you know,
importing the beef from Argentina, it really has nothing to
do with the fact that there's a shortage. It has
everything to do with sweetening this deal so that Argentina
will get on board from blocking China from making a
bigger move, a bigger investment in that country and having

(01:37:27):
that toe hold. So this is our own version of
doing a little bit of this belt and Road. And
I think as the global financial order starts to shift,
we may see it where China basically dominates its hemisphere
and then we try to have that toe hold in
our hemisphere. And I think that's one of the things
that the Trump administration very wisely, by the way, and

(01:37:49):
you know that I'm not a fan of every one
of their policies, but very wisely in this case is
doing and setting us up for the future and hopefully,
because you know, we go in for your cycles here,
four years from now, we will have an administration that
continues with this policy because this is a long term
threat to our country and we do need to shore

(01:38:10):
this up. So that's what it's all about. There's a
lot of noise about it. It's not about beef. It's
not about you know, a bailout is not about anything else.
It's about securing America's future by having these strong allies,
having access to resources and not letting China take over
the world. So if you don't want to speak Mandarin
in the future, this is a good thing.

Speaker 2 (01:38:28):
I love that explanation. First off, pravo Carol Roth. This
is why, this is why she does what she does.
That's you know, our heads I head a head of
hats off because that then that makes sense with this
other stuff that I was seeing all of like the
swarm of these headlines that I've been going after. Malay
go go oh, he's got a bailout. He got a
bail out from IMF. This is another This is just
basically debt. But it's not unless it turns active from

(01:38:52):
what I understand the whole policy, but that they're really
trying to go at him because he's such an ally
of the US. Now that makes sense when I see
the swarm of these headlines that are attacking him and
calling him a fake libertarian.

Speaker 3 (01:39:06):
Yeah, and you also have to again go back to
the fact that this is being done kind of off
of the traditional books. This is thises ESF Exchange Stabilization
Fund that is used and it's been used you know
throughout history. When we had the Plaza Cord where they
we needed to strengthen the Japanese yet and weekend the dollar.

(01:39:26):
That is what was used, was this particular fund when
we had to bail out Southeast Asia a couple of
decades ago. Because it doesn't require congressional approval, it doesn't
require the FED to get on board, it's something that
Treasury can take to enact policy that is deeper, that
is more long term, that deals with these kinds of things.
So if we have a situation where Malay's government is

(01:39:49):
weakened and he you know, there's no longer this ally
ship with the United States, and you get more people
who want to go deeper with China. Again, that's going
to be really bad for us. So is you know,
is the in effect trying to help suay that election. Absolutely,
But it's because of this long term relationship that we
want to strike, and it's because we're trying to protect

(01:40:11):
our own national security.

Speaker 2 (01:40:12):
It's asymmetrical warfare in the financial sector, that's really what
it is. I mean, that's that's.

Speaker 3 (01:40:17):
That's such a great that's such a nice little wrapper
that you've created there.

Speaker 2 (01:40:20):
Well, it's only because you set it up, Carol. Let's
say you just set it up and I just I
just hit the ball. That's it. So this now, is
Congress going to take this might be a dumb question
because we're talking about Congress. Are they going to take
the opportunity to say, oh, well, now that we're doing
these maybe maybe we can reduce some of these regulations
and some of this oversight that we have that drive
up the cost of farming and ranching domestically. I mean,

(01:40:43):
it would be great if they could do that.

Speaker 3 (01:40:45):
Well, that's a that's a great thing. So if we
kind of take this this other piece aside and we
talk about the issues that are affecting our ranchers and
the other people of farmers, people who are producing our food.
There are so many insane barriers and regulations that make
it more costly and more difficult for them to do business.
And if you want them to not only be able

(01:41:07):
to feed everybody in America, but maybe do more exporting
to the world, the easiest way to do that is
to reduce these regulations. I mean, there are so many
things that I hear people want to buy something from
their cousin's farm in a different state and they can't
because of some silly law. That is the way, you know,

(01:41:27):
forget about the tariffs and the imports and whatnot. We
can deal with this issue at home and just make
it easier to do business, which again makes all of
the sense in the world. Now, do I have a
lot of faith that Congress is going to go, Yeah,
that makes sense. We should definitely do things so that
we can continue to grow our economy and shore up
our food supply. They've never proven that they have any

(01:41:50):
level of common sense to do that. But everybody that
is listening has a voice and has the ability to
call their congressmen, their representatives and to tell them that
these kinds of things are important. And if you get
like twenty people to all call the same day, they
think it's a hair on fire problem because nobody actually
calls them about anything, and all of a sudden they

(01:42:11):
get twenty calls. This becomes an issue. So we need
again to put pressure. We've spoke so many protests in
this country about absolute nonsense, but the things that are important,
things like supporting the people who feed us and reducing
barriers and letting small businesses get back to work. You know,
this is how we continue to have growth in this country.

(01:42:33):
This is how we continue to have prosperity. It makes
all the sense in the world. It's an easy thing
to do. We just need the political will and that
starts with our own voices.

Speaker 2 (01:42:43):
Absolutely, and there it is our good friend Carol Roth.
You can find her, get her newsletter. You can find
her online on x but make sure you go to
Carolroth dot com, slash news and at Carol js Roth
across all platforms. Carol. Always so good to see you,
and thank you so much for brilliantly putting this so easy,
so easy to understand. We appreciate you well.

Speaker 3 (01:43:02):
We're going to do our own currency swap one of
these days, Dana. Yeah, I'll take I'll take custody of
one of your sweaters. I'll give you some money in advance,
and we'll just you know, kind of move them back
and forth.

Speaker 2 (01:43:13):
Perfect that they're all black. But that's yeah, that way,
it's all your vibe too, So it's it's why we
get along. So well, that's why we get along, Carol.

Speaker 10 (01:43:19):
Good to see you, great, have a great weekod Subscribe
to the Dana Show podcast because who says you can't
make fun of people while staying informed on your own
personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get
your podcast.

Speaker 2 (01:43:32):
This is video of a trans player on a high
school volleyball team spiking against the other girls. None of
the other girls can do that, but that one can
because she has balls. That's why, like, let me just
hit this ball. That's what it is. That's what just happened.

(01:43:53):
Now you have two California high school girls that are
sitting out of their volleyball game cut thirty four due
to a dude being on their team. Watch. They're not
playing or sitting there. They don't want to play against
the dude. They don't want to play against the dude,
because there's a dude out there. I wouldn't want to

(01:44:13):
get hit in the head by that dude, would you
as a woman?

Speaker 5 (01:44:16):
No?

Speaker 2 (01:44:18):
I mean he's like their height in the air because
he's a man. That's that's why having a man on
women's sports teams is so insane. We're going to look back,
hopefully on this point in our culture and be like,
the hell was happening? Well yeah, but I mean maybe
some of the people in the future that support it

(01:44:39):
us are going to look back and go what in
the world, Like, what were we doing.

Speaker 4 (01:44:42):
I've seen the point online which is hilarious where it's like, oh,
you just want to put trans athletes in I'm going
to bet on the trans athlete boxer. I mean, like
he could totally just.

Speaker 2 (01:44:55):
Take everything back. No, I take everything back. No, I
like this.

Speaker 4 (01:44:58):
Now the FBI is all over this.

Speaker 2 (01:45:00):
No, no, it's ah. They said it's totally a Steve
you that's legit. Now, if the dude is going to
be the saying a boxing match against the chicken, you're betting,
it's not illegal to make a bet.

Speaker 4 (01:45:11):
True.

Speaker 2 (01:45:12):
There's no trains athletes and professional sports for a reason.
Right now, I mean just saying it's like having like
I mean, women can't compete at the same level in
men's league. So it's like you would have to get
like a literal sasquatch to go then and play in
the men's league. You know, like an actual bigfoot just
shave it and then put it on the men's team.

(01:45:33):
And you know he can't he can't really verbalize beyond
some you know, chirping and howling. But it's a dude.
I think we just found a way to make a
lot of money gambling. No, I'm all for this now.
I'm going to start gambling and sports. I will bet
on the men against the women in this and the

(01:45:53):
sports leagues. I think that's a good bet to take.
I take that bet.

Speaker 4 (01:45:57):
Yeah, I mean, imagine all the Olympic sports.

Speaker 2 (01:46:02):
I don't need know special glasses. By the way, following
the NBA betting story is exhausting. All of the things
these people did to cheat at gambling. I am exhausted.
I have never wanted to win anything so bad that
I would go through that extent. Like they have special
glasses to see the guards, special glasses every It's like

(01:46:27):
James Bond, look at this, you can see everything. It's
like James Bond, this is insane. You can see all
of it. They got it all marks, you'd wear them glass.
No one wait, if you're sitting at a poker table
and you're wearing sunglasses, no one else is gonna go.

Speaker 4 (01:46:45):
No, that's kind of a common thing. Well, you're playing poker.
You don't want people to see your eyes, and you
don't want to give those tells that normal people give.

Speaker 2 (01:46:53):
I gotta do is just hold those emotions. I could
just sit there and stare. I wouldn't have no idea.
What do I have not? I have a horrible hand.
All right, today's stupidity came all right, Well, and this
is cut eleven.

Speaker 4 (01:47:05):
This is actress Jennifer Well should not making much sense here.

Speaker 2 (01:47:09):
Listening to this.

Speaker 14 (01:47:10):
You know, I mean like Stephen Miller is a white supremacist.
I mean he is, and he's basically running the White House.
They keep Trump busy with his decorating projects. He's got
building the arch now he's got his.

Speaker 2 (01:47:23):
And it is this woman so sad, real.

Speaker 14 (01:47:26):
Anti semis true white supremacist like Stephen Miller. And even
though he's Jewish, she's like a Nazi jew.

Speaker 2 (01:47:33):
Oh for the love. I had to google her. She
is an interior designer.

Speaker 6 (01:47:38):
Why is she on?

Speaker 2 (01:47:39):
Who cares about her opinions on politics? By the way,
like you know, have your injector be more precise. Have
a great weekend.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Canada's Reagan/Trump Ad, Pritzker Gets EXPOSED By Fox & VA Dems' Shady Plan

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

All Episodes

Canada's Reagan/Trump Ad, Pritzker Gets EXPOSED By Fox & VA Dems' Shady Plan

Stuff You Should Know