Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
In order to do it properly, we had to take
down the existing structure. The way it was shown, it
looked like we were touching the White House. We don't
touch the White House. That's a bridge at last bridge
going from the white House to the ballroom. Then you
get into the lobby of the ballroom, and then you
go into the Magnificent in the main room. And it's
something that has gotten incredible reviews.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
I don't understand the the reactions over this, I really don't.
I don't get the Left being so upset over this
that you know, everything is a mess, everything's in there.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
They're freaking out.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
They're acting like they're acting like somebody is taking down
the obelisk or they're that. I mean, I don't have
I don't what kind of compared to like the Jefferson
memorial or the Lincoln memorials something they act like that.
I don't get it. I just don't get the reaction.
If you know anything about you know that wing didn't
(01:00):
we talk. Did I get into the deep dive of
all of the additions. You guys don't care about the
deep dive of all of the additions, do you? I mean,
cause you understand that this is just all performative. It's
they're trying to find a way anything the left to
get the right agitated or to get their base agitated.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
They're like, well, look.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Here's Trump, like the literally destroying stuff, and if you
don't vote what he's going to destroy more things.
Speaker 3 (01:26):
I don't get it. But the whole.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
I think I saw the architectural renderings. I was looking
for the word the architectural renderings. It looks really nice.
The outside of it, it like matches. The rest of
the facade actually better. It's there's better drainage because there's
other things that are going into this that I don't
think people realize, like the drainage aspects of it, the
(01:55):
uh you know, the structural integrity, things of that nature.
Speaker 3 (01:59):
And it's I mean, it.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Looks so nice. It's you're getting a free ballroom for
crying out loud. You're getting a free ballroom. What is
not to love. I was talking to a friend of
mine yesterday. We don't agree on a lot. She didn't
like my comparison to or talking about Hillary Clinton and
all that stuff, because I was going after Hillary Clinton
for being so stupid about all of this, and the
(02:25):
whole point is that you're getting a free ballroom and
you don't. We're not having to pay for it, which
is nice. You're not having to pay for it. And
the inside, okay, the inside is going to be all
gold because it's trump.
Speaker 3 (02:37):
I don't know if I like all the gold though.
Speaker 2 (02:40):
I gotta be honest, although I'm a maximalist and I
think that more is more. So, like you know the
rule that that Coco Chanel. This is something all men,
all your wives know this. The rule that Coke Chanell
had is that when you are getting ready to go
out for the.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
Evening, if you're a lady and you.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Do a last look, like a fit check, right in
front of the mirror, you're supposed to take off one
of your accessories. So if you're wearing ear rings and
a necklace and rings and bracelets, you have to take off,
you know, either your earrings or you know whatever, you
got to take off one of them. And I just think, no,
put one back on, put another one back on. That's
(03:20):
what you gotta do. I don't know, I'm just maybe
I'm odd. I don't know, but that's just the way
that I look at stuff. So I think more is
more and I really want to get away with from
this whole thing that we can't I don't know can't
have if he wants all gold, to have all gold.
Welcome to the show, Dana Lash with you. We are
(03:43):
at the top of this third or first hour. I
almost say, I don't know what's happening.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
First hour. It's crazy.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
We have allergies in Texas, we have cedar in Texas.
It's going crazy. We're going to get into this with
the ballroom. We're going to get into the thing with
the ranchers. I'm going to talk a little bit more
about the situation with the Scotus thing and glock and
all of that stuff, because a lot of you had
questions about it, and I was trying not to be
(04:11):
really in the weeds with it because there's a lot there.
But we'll we'll talk about some of that. We'll get
into all of it. We got a lot to get into,
and we have some guests on today, so as we
move this whole situation. If I made if you just
indulge me for a moment with the ballroom, one of
(04:32):
my friends said, because I think who was it, I
can't remember the saying is somebody was talking about the
sanctity of the White House, like it's a church.
Speaker 4 (04:42):
You know.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
The Left, the same people that are upset with this ballroom.
These are the people who didn't say anything about the
church that was burned down, the Saint John's Church, which
is right across the Lafayette Square, and it's like right there,
right across the street from the White House. It's a
historic church, and you know, you drive past it and
(05:07):
anytime you go anywhere in DC, and they set it
on fire. The left it and all these people that
are complaining about the East Wing, you know what the
east Wing is. The East Wing was just some old
cramped office spaces.
Speaker 3 (05:22):
That's all it was. There's not like a lot.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
There was not a lot there. I don't know why
everybody's getting so it messed up about it. It's not part
of the historical structure. It's not part of anything. The
Left just needs something to bitch and moan about because
they need to agitate their base. They need to agitate
their base so bad in order to keep up the momentum.
They don't have anything to get excited about. What are
(05:45):
they gonna be excited about the shutdown? They don't have
anything to get excited about they don't have any, But
what policies have Democrats put forward that their.
Speaker 3 (05:52):
Voters could go It's really exciting, scye, wait to go
vote for that? None? None, they have none, They've they've
they're putting nothing forward.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
What do they have to get their people agitated and
excited over stupid stuff like this? This kind of stuff,
This is what I'm talking about.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
So I don't know.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
I'm just because this is like what the third day
that this has been one of the leading dramatic things,
and I'm so tired of it. I think that you
guys and me were all on the same page. I
am so tired of leftist drama, so tired of we're
leftist drama and including identity politics stuff on the right.
(06:32):
So just it's insane. I'm so damn tired of it.
We'll talk about some of that coming up.
Speaker 3 (06:37):
So this.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
Also, cyber one of the reasons I think why they're
keeping this thing with the White House going. And again,
it's a free ballroom. We're all getting a free ballroom.
You get a free ballroom. Kane, Merry Christmas, You've got
a free ballroom. My dude with gold with gold Okay,
one of you sent me. I got one piece of
hate mail about this out of all of the issues
that I get hate about, and I don't know why
(07:01):
I'm gonna save it.
Speaker 3 (07:02):
It kind of made me mad.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Someone was like, they were accusing me of having bad
taste because I didn't object to all the gold in
the Oval office. Again, I am a maximalist. I I
only accidentally dress postmodern because I can't dress myself. That's it,
that's can't can attest. It's purely accidental. I look like
adult chankabon a nightmare if I try to wear color.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
It's horrible.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
Nobody wants that. The nation doesn't need it, nor do
you cain yet.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
See yeah, ah so bad. So anyway my whole point.
Someone was like, you just have really bad taste if
you think all that gold. Shut up. More is more.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
We are maximalists here, tasteful, questionably maximalists. I don't do
the tiny house thing. I don't believe that you should
live in a box here. We're going to reconfigure this
outhouse and make it a look to shut up.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
It's a she shed. No, it's a prison. Uh, We're
not doing that.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
We don't do the all white ship let because I
just know kill me now, not gonna know the all
white like, here's your all white beige. Everything's beige. It's
all beige. Nobody wants that. Nobody wants beige everything. We're
just not into it. Uh, And I don't you know, Uh,
who is it? One of my friends was really into,
(08:24):
uh the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Oh gosh, what was it called? Shabby chic?
Speaker 2 (08:28):
I mean it has it's it's an aesthetic that's somewhat charming.
And I think it there's like a uh what do
I maybe nostalgic, but you're it's basically just like white crappy.
That's all it is. I mean, I don't mean to
be mean. If that's your style, you can make fun
of mine all you want to. I'm not going to
(08:49):
be offended. My whole point in saying this is that
I have no objection to all of the gold in
the White House because of that.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
Bring it on.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
Why shouldn't it look like VERSI? Why shouldn't it Why
shouldn't we have our nation's treasures showcased to rub in
the faces of all the despotic leaders of third I
can't say the word third world hell holes. See why
shouldn't we I'm all for that. Go ahead and do it,
so stop it.
Speaker 3 (09:20):
More is more.
Speaker 2 (09:21):
We got to get into this ranch war. I'm sure
you guys have been following this. This is what we
got on deck coming up after a headline. So the
ranch war, I don't know. I got lawlessness and disorder.
There's a lot of weeping and ashing of teeth over
this situation with Argentina because now it's being hailed as
a taxpayer bailout of Argentina that may go to forty
billion dollars. And this is something that Scott Bessen announced.
(09:44):
It was originally a twenty billion dollar bailout. And now
he's he's under the plane. He's exchanging our dollars for
Argentinian currency. And Trump has said that it's not going
to be very beneficial to Americans. We're going to talk
about it because a lot of people are very angry
about this. I get it, so we're gonna address it.
We'll get into it. Also, lawlessness and disorder. The illegal
(10:08):
alien who rammed federal agents. This is a crazy story
that I cannot believe is real, but it is.
Speaker 3 (10:14):
This story.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
This illegal immigrant he was in LA he was telling
other people about the ice rays. He rammed his vehicle
into an ice vehicle, and they gave him an award
like the city legit had his ceremony, and they gave
this dude an award. Have you ever gotten an award
from your city, Kane? You pay your stuff on time?
(10:35):
Did you ever get an award from your city?
Speaker 5 (10:37):
Never for that either.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
So if you immigrate illegally, not immigrant, If you break
into the country and illegally, you stay illegally, and you
continued to commit crimes, and then you tried to aid
and abt other people who came in illegally and continued
to commit felonious activity, and then you again and another
felonious activity, ram an ice vehicle with your illegally driven
(10:59):
vehicle because you know it's not straight legal whatever, then
you get an award. We'll talk about that. I just
a lot to discuss as we move our partners that
he'll bring you the programs. The folks at Ammo squared Gosh,
you remember how everybody was freaking out during the woo flu.
For Ammo, there was no Ammo anywhere and if you
could find it, it was super expensive.
Speaker 3 (11:21):
There were empty shelves of prices were sky high. The
regret was just awful.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
You don't want to ever allow yourself to be in
that position again. Amos Squared is the country's ammunition reserve.
It's a worry free solution to stockpiling your AMMO for
the future and avoid getting caught empty handed. They have
over seventy calibers. You can set your monthly budget, let
them curate your supply automatically, forget it, set it, forget it,
ship it when you need it. They have a secure,
climate controlled facility so your ammo's kept fresh and safe,
(11:48):
so you decide to get it delivered. There's no minimums,
no hidden fees, and you get free shipping on orders
over two point fifty. That's awesome, and it's great if
you want to try out new calibers or if you
just you know, want to top off some of your
training rounds. And you can even get alert that will
notify you if there's something you're looking for, if you
need to get you know, a certain kind or whatever
you can you can be alerted. But there's you know,
one hundreds over one hundred thousand members of this of
(12:09):
AMO Squared and they have thousands of five star reviews.
Your readiness is their mission. Visit ammosquared dot com for
a special offer and secure your AMMO supply for the future.
Speaker 3 (12:20):
Don't get caught without Ammo.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Visit ammosquare dot com and keep yourself fully stocked and
tell them that you heard it from the danishire.
Speaker 6 (12:26):
If you want to be wealthy, you have to have
a wealthy mindset. How walk away from easy money. Ignore
most of the headlines because ninety five percent of them
are garbage. Always continued to reinvest. Check out the Watchdog
on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get
your podcasts.
Speaker 5 (12:45):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quickfive.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
I feel like we've seen this movie and or some
aspect of it. A dinosaur egg was unearthed in perfect
condition after seventy million years. Not gonna lie. My first
thought was free pen. They said it's Argentinian. Paleontologists found
a perfectly preserved, seventy million year old dinosaur egg during
(13:15):
an excavation. They said it's a spectacular fine. They find
fossils all the time, They've never found an egg, and
they think that it could hold You think it could
hold genetic material. I feel like this is also a
Dave chappelle'skitt I'll have mine over easy, please, like it's
ball and when he did MTV Cribs and they had
like legit dinosaur eggs in the fridge. US car repossession
(13:38):
surge is more Americans default on auto loans. Finances are
getting tighter. Wall Street sounds the alarm over the strength
throughout the car lending markets. Experts worn of potential risks
for the wider economy. They said that they're being cautious,
but that they've got a lot of a lot of
money getting lost in this. Also, let's see real estate
(13:59):
boomed are going bust. It's called a market correction because
certain markets were just super hyper. I thought hyper saturated,
and I thought a lot of stuff was what am
I thinking.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
The value was exaggerated? That's that's kind of how I
look at it.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Can I don't think I'm wrong because you're familiar with
this industry, I really don't.
Speaker 3 (14:19):
I feel like that's that's you know, Yeah.
Speaker 5 (14:21):
We're going to see a correction and then when the
price has come down, you'll start seeing the demand code
exactly exactly.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
So I don't think that that's anything necessarily to freak
out over Netflix their ceo on the Warner Brother Discovery
biot rumors, they said they have no interest in owning
legacy media networks.
Speaker 7 (14:38):
Huh.
Speaker 3 (14:39):
Interesting.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Also, Luigi Mangione, you know the guy who stabbed the
healthcare ceo and a broad morning light or sorry I
shot him?
Speaker 3 (14:47):
Yes? Sorry?
Speaker 2 (14:48):
Well the reason why I said, because I'm looking at
the story about how he got beaten up and almost
stabbed by lady boys in Thailand. He got ruffed up
by a group of dudes dressed as women during a
wild night out in Thailand. Some of the lady boys
try to attack their one of them had a knife.
Just interesting facts that come out. We have a lot
more on the way.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
Stick with US.
Speaker 2 (15:05):
America's top water is a cocktail of heavy metals and toxins,
the result of Corodi pipes that we should have replaced
decades ago. Let me just ask anybody in Flint, Michigan.
You got lead, heavy metals, rust, basically liquid poison right
out the tap. So when I tried Cove Pure on
my counter, it was so easy, no plumber, no drilling,
You just plug it in and pick your water temperature
(15:28):
on the touch screen, and honestly, it actually tastes like water,
not like death. So that's why I use the Cove
Pure water purifier to keep my family safe. Unlike the government,
Copire actually does its job. Lead in your water doesn't
stop at a gross taste can actually cause a host
of serious medical issues. But yeah, sure, go ahead, trust
(15:49):
the city with your kid's health. I mean, what could
go wrong. Copier's clear Wave of technology removes up to
ninety nine point nine percent of contaminants. So don't wait
for the government to help take back control of your
family's health and finally drink water the way that it
was meant to be. Visit covepere dot com slash data
for two one hundred dollars off. That's Cove Pure dot
(16:11):
com slash.
Speaker 8 (16:12):
Data makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With
a Dana Show podcast, You're on the go guide for
getting up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe
on YouTube, Apple or your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 9 (16:26):
Yeah, well, I mean the question is, bottom line, these
are drug boats. If people want to stop seeing drug
boats blow up, stop sending drugs to the United States.
Speaker 10 (16:34):
Doesn't matter it's in the United States.
Speaker 9 (16:35):
Well, these are all on international waters.
Speaker 7 (16:37):
The boat in the United States or well, that's a
different MANU.
Speaker 9 (16:40):
Now you're talking about a law enforcement matter. In this
particular case, there are people traveling on international waters headed
towards the United States with hostilities in mind, which includes
flooding our country with dangerous, deadly drugs, and they're going
to be stopped. And that's what's happening. And in the
case last week you saw there was a submarine. It
was a submarine. It was a submersible. That's a drug boat.
Speaker 7 (16:59):
All the way through.
Speaker 9 (16:59):
We know what these boats are, the President just said it.
We track them from the very beginning. We know who's
on them, who they are, where they're coming from, what
they have on them. And you know, if you're running
drug boats, you're and you're in grave danger.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
I mean, are we. Yeah, I'm again I offer this
to you. Like, am I supposed to be upset over this?
Speaker 3 (17:20):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
I don't like cartels, I don't like I think we've
we've gone too easy on all this stuff.
Speaker 3 (17:25):
Personally, I don't like to spin that Oh my gosh,
there could be Americans on these drug boats.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
And no, no, I don't think so. Really, I don't
think that's there hasn't been. And also stop running drugs.
This is a this isn't This is asymmetrical warfare, and
people have got to stop the people who are trying
to tell you to prosecute this stuff. The olden ways.
I don't even whatever those ways are. I don't even
know what that would be. I mean, the olden ways
is TCB right, But you're basically arguing with us and
(17:54):
telling us, well, you know, everyone has to put on
brightly colored coats and go stand in a field, in
a line, and whoever shoots the most twins.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
That's not what we're doing, No sars, No, ma'am's welcome
back to the program. Dane Lash with you the chats
at Rumble. You can watch us do the radio program
over at Channel three forty seven Direct TV. And don't
forget substack, chapter and verse. Lots of good stuff up there.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
You guys had a lot to read last night that
I sent you for the newsletter for this morning. So
I and I'm totally fine with continuing to go after
these venezuela and drug boats that are going in international
waters coming into the United States and then pushing fentanyl
and you know, killing and getting our citizenry addicted to opioids.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
That's a form of warfare.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Just like the algorithmic manipulation of platforms like TikTok by China,
that's that's also that's asymmetrical warfare. All of this is
it's just it's trying to it's soft asymmetrical warfare.
Speaker 3 (19:01):
Period. That's exactly what it is.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
People have got to start realizing this, just in the
same way that Islamism. This is a religious war that
Republicans and Democrats in the United States have always looked
at as a political issue to be solved.
Speaker 3 (19:15):
You've got to start looking at things realistically.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
We're not going to get anywhere by coddling cartels in Venezuela.
Speaker 3 (19:22):
I mean, that's all there is to it.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
All there is to it, So I don't This is
not like Barack Obama droning actual Americans overseas, which he
did people who were American citizens. The dudes on the
boats are not American citizens. They are known confirmed cartel members. Look,
if I can get cameras around my property that can
(19:47):
zoom into your car at midnight when you just so
much as pass my property and you can't even see
where you know me and I can zoom in and
look at the brand of cigarette that you are smoking
in your vehicle at Mida night just by going past
my property. You damn sure that we have the capability
of actually looking at these individuals in these boats and
and confirming what we have already triple confirmed that they
(20:10):
are not Americans.
Speaker 3 (20:13):
That's That's one of the things.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
I don't even know why that's even up for debate,
because can you imagine just look at it like this,
if Trump had had had blown up a boat and
there were Americans on it, Oh my gosh, that's all
you would hear from Democrats. They didn't peach him again.
Holy crap, they didn't peach him again. They would and
you know what, can you know that's right.
Speaker 5 (20:29):
Even though they excused it when Obama did it with drones.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
But yeah, yeah, and by the way, I'm not joking
about the cameras. I literally can't zoom into your car.
I can tell you exactly what's on like your car display.
I can tell you like if you're holding a zin,
I can tell like everything.
Speaker 5 (20:43):
When Caine vapes, Yeah, hey, you weren't supposed to you
see that?
Speaker 3 (20:51):
Good God, I'm like Santa. But I don't give president.
I just offer beatings. And I'm kidding.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
So we're Santa ever oh Man, all right, So the
what else do I mean? I wake up every morning
and this is what I think. Like, what else am
I supposed to get mad at?
Speaker 3 (21:10):
Today?
Speaker 2 (21:11):
The left is like were we should be mad because
Ice is arresting illegal aliens who continue to commit crimes?
Am am I supposed to be mad over that? I mean,
I can't believe I'm saying these words again, We're saying
these way too much.
Speaker 3 (21:25):
Hold on, pulled up? Where's this audio? SoundBite audio? This
is cut eight one. I mean, he's not wrong here, listen.
Speaker 7 (21:35):
I mean it's heartbreaking.
Speaker 11 (21:36):
I mean, as a as a father with three children,
if if someone had done that to one of my children,
it's just how devastating.
Speaker 7 (21:44):
I mean, this is what I'm saying.
Speaker 11 (21:45):
I will never understand why it's controversial to round up
and deport all of the criminals here in an in
our nation right right now. And I'm proud to just
agree that we need to secure our border. I don't
know why these other kinds of things, and if they
want to, you know, run me out of the party
for these kind of views.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
I mean, that's really there. It's up to them. But
I'm working. I know.
Speaker 3 (22:11):
He's not wrong, not wrong. What is the objection party?
Speaker 2 (22:18):
They're trying to go at him, They're trying to get
a primary challenger to get him out of office. Do
you think okay? Because I had someone who asked me this. Uh,
they were asking me if they think if I think
that Fetterman would ever flip and become a Republican. I
think he would become an independent. But I don't think
he would become a Republican because on tax issues, on
(22:42):
fiscal issues, he's still pretty Democrat. This is what's weird
about the shift. And I don't even think it's accurate
for me to describe it that way. Shift in ideologies.
So this is what's weird about the reset of the
Democrat part the Democrat Party. You would have progressive liberals.
(23:05):
Liberal used to not be a bad word. Liberal was
how you would describe Tokeville. Only morons would use the
word liberal to describe someone who really wanted to actually
preserve the Constitution and individual rights. It wasn't until progressives
hijacked it. Because there it wasn't until they hijacked it
and then tried to use it, and then Reagan's like, oh,
(23:27):
you want to play that game, I'm going to poison
the word.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
And so during the eighties it got.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Poisoned and nobody wanted and then liberals decided to really
become progressives.
Speaker 3 (23:37):
That's why that shift started.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
But the thing is that, I mean, even when you
play and I could sit here and drown you in
audio for the next like two and a half hours,
if you play these soundbites from Hillary Clinton, from Joe Biden,
even I mean, if you listen to some of the
stuff old dead Teddy Kennedy used to say, I mean
good night, and played it today, you would like they
(24:01):
would they would be tard and feathered because they sound
almost like more conservative than moderate Republicans. There used to
not be that much daylight. It used to really be
about in the beginning, federal power and the fiscal policy.
The social stuff didn't start creeping in until like the sixties.
(24:25):
It wasn't about social engineering. It was about how much
And that's really ultimately one of the big things that
separated the founders is how much power should be centralized
at the federal level, how much power should be relegated
to the states, and then arguing over the incorporation which
of natural rights, which is a whole other issue. So
(24:48):
this my point is that there used to not be
that much daylight. It was all fiscal and then the
centralized power how much at the federal level, and then
things shifted. We've gone from you know, ask not what
your country can do for you, but what you can
do for your country. And Democrats actually be in favor
(25:11):
of tax cuts, which is Kennitty's policy. Two, we can't
define women, and we should be able to tax sixty
take sixty percent of your income. Oh, also we should
be able to shut down the government and determine when
you can and cannot go to work and how you
educate your kids. And we should be able to force
people to stay in their homes and force people to
(25:32):
force women to change in bathrooms with men, force girls
to play on men's athletic teams. And also there should
be no wealthy people except for us. That's now, that's
their policy now. And what's weird is all of these
people who have not changed their people, like fettermen, who
are still they think they're still being Democrats, and in
(25:54):
a way they're more honestly being Democrat than most identified
self identified Democrats are. They've stayed in the middle, They've
stayed where they are, and everyone else just slid off
into the gutter.
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Join us down here, we all float down here. So
that's that's it's weird.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
So I don't think that he would ever be a
Republican long way around answering that question. But I do
think he would be an independent. Whether or not he
would actually he would be an independent who would probably
have to caucus with Democrats because they got to pick
somebody to caucus with.
Speaker 3 (26:29):
It's just a weird, weird thing.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
It's and he gets it. I don't think that he's
I don't think that other people do necessarily. This is
cut tin. This is State Rep. Jlanda Jones. Oh, this
is a you know, talking about cooling down the rhetoric.
She's a Texas Democrat and uh well listen to this.
(26:59):
This is what she had to say.
Speaker 12 (27:01):
No, it absolutely doesn't work out from the hood. Okay,
so when a bully comes, like, if there are no rules,
you literally have to figure it out. So Donald Trump
has changed things, and people trying to do what's always
been done is not going to work. And I think
that's why Democrats are losing black people. That's why they're
losing poor people, because poor people all they want is
(27:23):
for us to fight. So if you hit me in
my face, I'm not gonna punch you back in your face.
Speaker 3 (27:28):
I'm gonna go across your neck.
Speaker 12 (27:30):
Because we can go back and forth fighting each other's faces.
You've got to hit hard enough where they won't come back.
And so yeah, for the same way, I went to
New York and spoke with Governor Kathy Hockele and said,
if they're going to try to wipe us out in Texas,
we need to wipe out every Republican in New York.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
I just don't take the badass costplay from people who
are so sensitive that they react emotionally like this.
Speaker 3 (28:00):
Hot mess.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
And when you're over emotional, that's weakness. You're weak because
your brain is too small. You're allowing your emotions to
run rushshot over everything that you do and dictate your
next move. That makes you predictable, it makes you easy
to manipulate. So it's really hard to sit here and
take the badass cosplay from someone who gets so emotional
(28:22):
like that that they can't figure out any other way.
To disagree other than violence and making Oh I'm going
to say stuff about next, because I know that that's
going to inflame the right. I just feel sorry for
weak ass women like this who try to act so hard,
but they're so overly emotional and sensitive. That is a
leftist hallmark. Leftists are ruled by emotions. Leftists are easily
(28:46):
triggered and easily manipulated, and they are so predictable. Some
one of the reasons why they always devolve to violence
because they're not smart enough to actually make a substantive argument.
She's she's upset over redistricting, but yet she can't explain why.
So she's going to sit here and run her mouth
and talk about cutting people's necks and all this other stuff. Well,
(29:09):
that's great, while you're in your emotional hot mess moment.
Do you think you can posit and maybe give us,
I don't know, some actual and actual proposal if you
disagree so much with the redistricting, which is long overdue
in this state.
Speaker 3 (29:23):
No, she can't.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
That's pathetic. I mean, that's idiocracy personified what you just
saw on that clip. We have a lot more on
the way. We got days of these United States coming
up and more. We have a lot more on the way.
We got headlines coming up as we move. Our partners
that help bring you the program. It's our friends at
All Family Pharmacy. All Family Pharmacy has a lot of
stuff that you I mean, all of your emergency medications,
(29:47):
your day to day medications, things like your ivermectin and
the hydroxy chloroquin in the whole nine yards. And you
can make your order get it in two to four days,
but if you need it overnight, they can do that
as well, in a pinch if you need something, and
I've told you about my experience with that.
Speaker 3 (30:05):
Before, especially with strep throat.
Speaker 2 (30:07):
The other thing is all their stuff is made here
in the USA, So you're not getting you know, Communist
Chinese party antibiotics or medicines, You're not getting any of that.
You're getting stuff that all the precursors everything you SA
made and everything that you can think of. Some of
the stuff I can't even pronounce. I'm not even gonna try.
N ad plus methylne blue. They got that. They got tamilflu.
(30:27):
By the way, you need to stock up on that ahead.
Speaker 3 (30:29):
Of flu season. That's always helpful. The men bendozol.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
Everything stock up today at All Familypharmacy dot com slash data.
It's always good to be proactive, you know. You go there,
you fill out what you want, a doctor looks it over,
you get the prescription, and everything's sent right to your doors,
accessible to everybody. Don't wait until you're knocked down by
flu virus, bacteria, or whatever. Visit All Family Pharmacy dot
com slash data and use code Dana ten for ten
percent off.
Speaker 8 (30:54):
Get the load down on the latest news with the
side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Data
Show podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 5 (31:06):
Like SAMs through.
Speaker 7 (31:07):
The al Glass.
Speaker 5 (31:08):
So are the days of the United States.
Speaker 13 (31:11):
Individuals such as Chauncey Billups, Damon Jones, and Terry Rozier
were taken into custody today former current NBA players and coaches.
What you don't know is that this is an illegal
gambling operation and sports rigging operation that spanned the course
of years. The FBI led a coordinative takedown across eleven
(31:31):
states to arrest over thirty individuals today responsible for this case,
which is very much ongoing. Not only did we crack
into the fraud that these perpetrators committed on the grand
stage of the NBA. But we also entered and executed
a system of justice against Lakasanoshra to include the Bonano, Gambino,
(31:56):
Genevesi and Luchase crime families.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
Oh so when I first saw the story and this
has to do with the Trailblazer's coach and the I
was reading it and I'm like, what do you mean
illegal gambling? Because that was how it was originally put
like illegal. I'm like what that could mean a number
of things. He could be a hole in some anxiety's house.
Speaker 3 (32:14):
But apparently, uh, it's a lot more than that.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
I mean, you got some of the major families involved
in this. You got the Bananos that in Avesay, the
l Casey, the Gambino families are all involved in it.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
Uh. They said, I'm dying.
Speaker 2 (32:33):
I said that, Uh, it's apparently a big Oh, it
was a big operation that.
Speaker 3 (32:39):
Was happening here. You know, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
I you know, I look at this and uh they
said it was a rig poker scheme. I'm reading some
of the some of the documents on it. How much
money do you think they were dealing with?
Speaker 5 (32:53):
With us man, I don't even think you can accurately
quantify it yet. I mean, how deep did this go?
He said? It's been going on for eleven years or
more so, over eleven years, probably a lot of damn money.
Speaker 3 (33:07):
Do you want to hear a very unpopular opinion?
Speaker 5 (33:09):
Sure?
Speaker 2 (33:11):
Am I supposed to be angrier over this than the legal,
legalized racketeering of my federal government with the taxation scheme.
I just can't get mad over stuff like this when
we've got the irs.
Speaker 5 (33:22):
Yeah, if you've never bet on a game, or if
you've never.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
I've never gambled. I've played slot machines one time in
my life, and I had one quarter and I won
five dollars and that was it.
Speaker 5 (33:32):
Steve, how long have I been telling you that I
think the NBA's rigged and the NFL's.
Speaker 3 (33:35):
Rigged since I got hired at this job.
Speaker 5 (33:38):
Yes, yeah, exactly. It's been pretty obvious to something.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
So wait a minute, all of the games? Do you
think that that you're explain this to me? Because I
don't follow it like y'all do, right.
Speaker 5 (33:49):
And I don't have proof that all of the games
were manipulated, But when you have different points spreads and
you're like, all right, this team will win by three
and a half, you know whatever, and then all of
a sudd sudden, the last seconds of the game, it's
magic that they lose by less than that or slightly
more than that, depending on which way the betting surges went. Yeah,
(34:10):
it kind of after a while gets like this is obvious.
Speaker 3 (34:15):
I mean it's bread and circuses.
Speaker 2 (34:16):
Is anybody surprised, No, you're going to that Bred and
circuses are going to be manipulated.
Speaker 5 (34:21):
Like what were you saying, Steve? Oh yeah, I mean
player props are the problem.
Speaker 3 (34:27):
You should have just been on spreads, not players.
Speaker 7 (34:30):
Right.
Speaker 3 (34:30):
Well, there you go. We have a lot more on
the way. Second hour coming up.
Speaker 2 (34:34):
Don't go anywhere because we got to talk about identity politics.
More on that coming up. We have more to come
folks as we wrap up this hour. Third hour on
the way as we do so, we got a hat
tip to people who make it possible. Chapter is that
entity that makes it easy. You hear about while you
get the whole Medicare enrollment season thing and I'm not
(34:54):
even Medicare eligible, and I'm annoyed by all of the
the the commercials on it. You guys get some of
you get the mailers and the texts and all this stuff. Look,
I get it that you want to make sure that
your plan's good and that you don't lose coverage, because
it's very important Medicare. Plans can change every year. But
you still, even if you're happy with your plan, you
got to check what's coming for twenty twenty six.
Speaker 3 (35:13):
Chapter is a.
Speaker 2 (35:14):
Partner that will work with you make sure you're not
over pain and on average they save people over one
thousand dollars annually. They review every plan across the country.
Their advisors are salaried, they're not working on commission. They
advocate for you, not the insurance company, and it just
takes under twenty minutes to do it into all of
the emails and texts and all of it. And if
(35:36):
your current plan is still the best fit in your set.
If not, Chapter will help you switch. No gimmicks, no pressure,
just honest advice from experts who know Medicare inside and out.
Dial pound two to fifty and say the words, my Medicare.
It's too important, so don't risk it. Work with Chapter,
a partner you can trust. Dial pound two to fifty
and say the words my medicare.
Speaker 4 (35:57):
As a mother of black children, I know that are
not given the presumption of innocence and the presumption of youth.
She's calling the police and saying they're trying to steal
her car, and they're eleven years old, they don't know
how to drive. And so for me, what was interesting
was I have had to be in the position where
I have gone to my local police department because I
know my son is going to be training for the
(36:17):
Junior Olympics running around the neighborhood in an all white neighborhood,
and I have brought him to the police and said,
he belongs to me, this is my son, Do not
harass him, do not stop him.
Speaker 3 (36:27):
I feel like this is ridiculous first off.
Speaker 2 (36:30):
And by the way, if you want to know, I mean,
because she lives in Manhattan, who have been who is
the party that's been in control this entire time that's
fomented these policies.
Speaker 3 (36:38):
Oh, that would be Democrats. It'd be the exact people
that she votes for.
Speaker 2 (36:41):
That's Sunny Houston on the view who was descended from
slave owners. By the way, Oh you to know that, Yeah,
take that as an intersectional box to check.
Speaker 3 (36:53):
It well. Was she literally can't.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
I mean she did the whole what show was that
where they looked, Yeah, she literally came from slave she
her family owns. Yeah, so she's more like the Klan
than the you or I came.
Speaker 3 (37:06):
Look at that.
Speaker 2 (37:07):
Welcome back to the program, Dana lash with you. We're
at We're at the top of the second hour. Our
friends set Dylan from the Babylon B'll be joining us
at the bottom of this hour, and we got a
lot of stuff to discuss. But that's the identity politics
stuff that she's getting into. I gotta tell you, I
can't stand identity politics. We've been talking about this for
(37:28):
a little bit, the identity politics being a Marxist creation
and really started it was introduced, started being introduced back
in like the really it began in the sixties to
college campuses all across the United States. If you listened
to the show last week, we were talking a little
bit about the history of critical race theory, which came
from that same you know, Frankfurt school. Marxism came from
(37:51):
the same spot. You have the the competing variables of
economic status as well as race, and that's where intersectionality,
that is where DEI All of that came out of
critical race theory, which was really promoted heavily by Marxist
academics in the United States at American universities, and one
(38:12):
of the leaders of that was Derek Bell. I was
first talking about this. In fact, I had to talk
about the video of him hugging Barack Obama before Andrew
Breitbart right when he had passed away on CNN and
point out to everyone that this is look, what's coming
is very bad. This is critical race theory. It's being mainstreamed,
et cetera. And this is what you see with the
left when they talk about intersectionality. For instance, if you
(38:37):
have two candidates, two candidates who are going for the
same position, say that they're both black female candidates. You
have a black female candidate who's married and his kids,
and she's going for this very high pain position, and
you have another black female candidate.
Speaker 3 (38:51):
He's going for the high paining position.
Speaker 2 (38:53):
But she's also maybe she's trans or alphabet something and xyz.
She has one more intersectional box than the just plano
other candidates. So that means that in DEI world, she's
advanced to that position not because of merit, but because
of these you know, self created intersectional checklist variables. That's
(39:17):
what all of that is, and it all comes from
critical race theory, and that's where you get the substitute
of equity for equality. And as you know, equity, in
order for things to be equitable, you actually have to
incorporate discrimination for equitable outcomes. Whereas equality is about equal
access to opportunity. Equity is the guarantee of equal result.
(39:42):
That means you have to enforce discrimination at the opportunity level.
So that's all from CRT, critical race theory, and the
left has been using this to browbeat the right for forever.
I mean, we've seen this when I first got heavily
involved in politics. H I think it was in college
(40:02):
and all of my family I told everybody I never met.
I didn't meet a Republican until the day I went
to college. I'm not kidding. I literally grew up in
a bubble of Democrats. And when I went to college
and got educated and started learning more about the world
and wasn't as narrow minded and didn't live in a
leftist bubble, then I started actually, like, we know what,
I never believed in this. I was never against guns,
(40:24):
and I was never pro abortion, and I was never
all of this stuff, So why the hell am identifying
as this? This is like some sort of heritage political
ideology that'svoisted upon me. And so started learning about more things,
and I've noticed that the DEI stuff came into play
when it seemed like Democrats were losing the plot. Then
all of a sudden, they introduced all of these other
(40:46):
things that their leftist street team could get behind. And
that's when you started seeing, well, someone's more special than
you because of these race based things, which actually is
racism being used, but the leftist two doomed to realize it.
So long story short, we've been seeing it in politics.
Speaker 3 (41:03):
We saw it. You know, this is how crazy it gets.
Speaker 2 (41:05):
Back in twenty sixteen, if you remember when Hillary Clinton
was running against Donald Trump, people were literally saying that
Trump voters were racist because they didn't vote for the
old white woman. I mean, you guys, remember this. That's
how crazy the CRT stuff got. It's wild. And now
here we are, you know, twenty twenty five, and the
(41:26):
left is still clinging to it. They're still clinging to it,
especially when you talk about redistricting for voting, redistricting for
voting in Texas, for instance. This is redistricting is something
that happens, you know, every I mean, they look at
this stuff every three years anyway, and they base things
off the census and we're simply going by the numbers
(41:47):
and by like the actual counties and et cetera, et cetera.
And they're trying to say that all of that is racist.
Speaker 3 (41:52):
It's de crt that's all. This is.
Speaker 2 (41:55):
My fear is that the right is going to start
I don't want the right to start incorporating this. And
I've had I'm going to put it like this. I'm
not old school. I'm just not over emotional. I don't
like this idea on the right that you've got to
become like the left in order to beat the left.
That's very anti sun Zu. That means that you're surrendering
(42:21):
who you are and you become the thing that you
want to beat.
Speaker 3 (42:25):
That is the ultimate win.
Speaker 2 (42:27):
That's why when I am engaging with people, unless they're
super nasty, you know, what is the point of engaging
with them if it's not to persuade them to join
you in your side of reason and logic. That's the
one less person you have to fight and it's also
one person that you have another person to fight against
the things that you're standing against. And so this idea
(42:49):
that you have to become like the left to beat
the left, that's something a leftist would say. That's like
Satan going, well, you got to become Satanic to beat me?
Speaker 3 (43:01):
Well, I expect that.
Speaker 2 (43:02):
From the devil. I mean, Jesus even said you can't
be lukewarm, did he not. I mean, if we're going
to adhere to the gospels and say christis King and
all this stuff, you know, just FYI. So I say
this because you know, I've had disagreements with some folks
before over this sort of thing, and disagreements are good.
I reject this theory that you cannot have civilized debate
(43:23):
on the right or the left. Well, the left, they're incapable.
I don't want to be like the left and not
be able to have civilized debate and even disagree with
some people that I might vote with on ninety or
ninety nine percent of the things right or even agree
with on most things. A healthy, intelligent, emotionally stable, mature
(43:46):
movement should be able to tolerate and handle civilized dissent.
That is a hallmark of this republic. Our founders did it.
I mean, sure, you can get heated and all of
that other stuff. But what I can't stand is when
I see disagreement maliciously misrepresented as an attack for loss
(44:14):
of being able to properly and unemotionally refute it. I
can't stand that. I just feel like people are too
damned sensitive and too emotionally triggered for civilized debate if
they think every descent is an attack. An attack is
having a terrorist throw a rocket at you while you're
(44:35):
trying to eat an MRI in the desert.
Speaker 3 (44:38):
Right.
Speaker 2 (44:39):
An attack is what happened at Hamid Karzai International Airport
in Kabble. An attack is Fallujah. An attack is nine
to eleven. An attack is what we saw at Pearl Harbor.
That is an attack. Someone civilly disagreeing with you is
not an attack. And if you think otherwise, you are
(45:01):
a female copulatory organ. You're too sensitive, too hyper emotional
for reasoned debate. And you know who else shares that
hallmark the left. The left does that the left can't
tolerate dissent. The left purports that every single disagreement is
an attack. The left thinks that if you disagree with
(45:26):
the woman, it's because you're sexist. The left says that
if you disagree with the black person, it's because you're racist,
and I see elements of the right trying to incorporate
that as well, when they're way smarter and way better
than to devolve to that level. I had a bit
of a disagreement on social media this morning. It's not
(45:48):
enough to make anything out. I don't live my life
online and arguing with Briando's all damn day. You know,
I'd rather hang out with you guys, and then, you know,
do what I got to do. I'm getting ready for
this debate coming up in November. Got a lot of
stuff that's going on, you know, family, all that, So
I don't see everybody are I just think if you're
spending all your day online arguing with everybody, then stop.
(46:10):
But people on our side, especially some people who are
trying to be thought leaders and shepherds, need to get
a grip, calm down. I appreciate the dudes and the
ladies who don't do that. I feel like it's becoming
rarer and rarer when I come across them. I almost
(46:30):
think we should have metals minted to hand them at
this point because it's becoming so rare. But I don't
think again that you adopt the attitude and behavior of
the left in order to beat the left. And I
just think that if the conservative movement is so weak
that it can't handle dissent, we deserve to be destroyed
(46:51):
as the sensitive, easy manipulated losers that we are. I
just feel like that's that's the way it is, because
that's what that behavior makes us.
Speaker 3 (47:06):
It's crazy, And I think.
Speaker 2 (47:09):
Some of this came from I don't know, like, what
do you think some of this came from cane, like
the Nazi stuff?
Speaker 3 (47:13):
What did it come from?
Speaker 5 (47:14):
What do you mean? The division tactics?
Speaker 2 (47:17):
I think I feel like the right is some people
on the right are being baited into this psyopy division
completely and they don't see it.
Speaker 5 (47:25):
You pointed to it earlier in all of our past
discussions about how crazy we believe the left is. It's
because their emotions are not in check, and because of that,
they're easily manipulated. And it doesn't matter if they're manipulated
by lies or the truth does not matter it's been lies,
but they will react in the same way. So all
(47:47):
it does is create division. It's easy to fool someone.
The hard thing is to convince them they've been fooled.
Speaker 2 (47:53):
I had someone someone that I know of but I
don't know them personally, and they were saying that on
social media that you know, they feel like they got
to adopt some of the left's.
Speaker 3 (48:05):
Tactics, and that's what it is. Just be honest about it.
Speaker 2 (48:08):
Because after Charlie Kirk was shot and they had to
deal with threats, and I'll tell you we you know,
Charlie was also a friend and we all watched him nationwide.
I mean a lot of people felt also like he
was a friend and they saw him get shot in
the throat.
Speaker 3 (48:19):
I have had to move.
Speaker 2 (48:21):
I've had to move because I had somebody I had
a left to said hey to me, fly halfway across
the country and try to bust in the windows of
my living room. I had people driving around my house
taking photos and posting it online and threatening me.
Speaker 3 (48:32):
My gosh.
Speaker 2 (48:32):
We had people that tried to hack all my social accounts,
my email. We had to have twenty four to seven security.
I had to have security at my kids' school. I
watched leftist shoot cops in front of a building downtown
at a BLM rally the night I was supposed to
go down there for a Fox hit, I watched parts
of my hometown burn. The point is this, everybody has
seen some stuff. Never allow your opposition to manipulate you
(48:58):
into becoming like them. I'm not changed who I am
or what I believe in the hard stuff. I mean
things like, oh, well is this policy? Is this energy policy?
Do you change your mind on that? I mean, those
are variables and things can shift, and that's you know whatever.
Speaker 3 (49:16):
But you can't give up.
Speaker 2 (49:18):
You can't allow your soul to be molded by the
people you're fighting against. And you should be able to
gently correct someone on your side with that fact without
them devolving into a hyperbolic, emotional mess. And if that
is unavoidable for their character, then maybe they're not the
(49:40):
right kind of warrior for this job. And I don't
give a rats ass if that hurts anybody's feelings, because
at this point I like you all, but I don't
care about making friends, and I don't care about being
invited to the parties, and I don't care about being
on the stage and making the speech. I don't care.
I got a lot of other stuff got going on.
(50:01):
But I do care about the health of the movement,
and I care about the soul of the nation, and
I do care about a lot of the people that
are trying to do really good things in this So
when someone says do not allow yourself to be manipulated,
the correct and strong response isn't to devolve into the
behavior of an over emotional leftist woman. It's to maybe say, Okay,
(50:25):
this person isn't coming from an origin of malice. Maybe
there's something to this. And again, if you can't, then
maybe this debate isn't for you.
Speaker 3 (50:34):
It's the folks over Webroot.
Speaker 2 (50:36):
You want to make sure that you're surfing whenever you're online,
doing anything, even checking mail anymore. You want to make
sure that you're protected because it's so sophisticated to rob
you blind. It really actually is not as difficult as
you think. And people they're getting better and better at it,
these criminal networks, these scammers, so Webroote, they have Webroot
total protection.
Speaker 3 (50:54):
This is a safer way to live digitally.
Speaker 2 (50:57):
And you really need to think about this, because I
un sure stuff gets out there you're so well, I mean,
unless you're like proactively trying to prevent it. Once it's
out there on the dark web, it's really hard to
close at Pandora's box. This is where Webroot Total Protection
is effective because they have an all in one plan
that you can get for individuals or your entire family.
(51:17):
Think about your parents. You know your parents have when
every email it's sent, regardless of whether or not the
attachments save God love them. But there's a built in firewall.
They have network monitoring, they have real time anti virus
that a program that can block emerging threats like all
the malware, ransomware, fishing, all of that stuff. But they
also have a million dollars in expense reimbursement for identity
theft and advanced dark web monitoring as well, plus financial
(51:41):
alerts included. You can protect a number of devices, you
can secure VP and encryption so no one's looking over
your shoulder at whatever you're doing online. And you get
twenty four to seven US based customer support for fast
identity restoration. Nobody else covers that much, not even close.
So get sixty percent off of Webroot Total Protection at
(52:01):
webroot dot com. Slash Dana the only way to get
it sixty percent is through webroot dot com slash Dana.
Speaker 3 (52:08):
If a better safer digital life with webroot.
Speaker 5 (52:12):
And now all of the news, you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quick five Guess what.
Speaker 2 (52:19):
An European media study says that AI is not a
reliable source of news today, and duh, this is I
do not use AI, and I am not inclined to.
You still have to double and triple check everything. I've
seen other people who do. And I always can tell
(52:41):
when someone sends me something that's like AI because there's
always something off about it. It doesn't it doesn't measure
on fact. It crawls for what pops up in terms
of search results. And by the way, who still controls
all of that?
Speaker 3 (52:53):
The left there you go.
Speaker 2 (52:55):
Let's see smartbeds flipped out during the Amazon scoutage, the
web service outage. I didn't know that, like the smartbeds
freaked out. Even dude, we are all way too connect
that if your beds freak out.
Speaker 3 (53:08):
We got a lot more on the way.
Speaker 2 (53:09):
But we also have CEO of the Babylon Bee joining
us next stick with us. I think it's smart to
diversify your what you have as defensive tools and I've
told you guys a million times, I carry all the time.
I have a zero issue with using lethal force to
protect myself for a loved one. But I also realize
that there are certain situations that we all by nature
(53:29):
of being adults and having to do what we got
to do in life, find ourselves in where we are
disarmed by municipal or private property restrictions. And so in
that instance, you definitely still need something that you can
use to defend yourself. And this is where the Burno
gun comes in. It shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can
deter threats from up to fifty feet away. Now maybe
you think I'm good, I'm carrying a stun gun, but
(53:51):
that's like one or two shots. This thing, the CL,
and that's the one I would suggest to you stands
for compact launcher. The Burner CL has a fifteen round
shot capacity city per cartridge. There's no recoil, none, easy
target acquisition. So if you want to be able to
protect yourself, but you're in a place where you're disarmed
really from doing so, this is where the burnagun comes
(54:11):
in because it doesn't care about gun free zone signs.
It doesn't answer them. Not a gun right doesn't answer
to them. There's no background check, there's no fees, there's
no nothing. They can send it right to your door.
This is a great idea for college students who are
under the age of twenty one but still have to
be on their own to go to school. You can
find it by r in a burna dot com slash data.
It's the cl the compact launcher, very small, it's like
(54:34):
the size of a phone. By r in a burna
dot com slash data ready when.
Speaker 8 (54:39):
You are keep your finger on the pulse with a
Dana Show podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever
you want, straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever
you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2 (54:53):
Little Tory Amoscornflake Girl, which I thought was very apropos
for the intro to the segment Welcome back Dana Lash
with you and listen Coast to Coast channel through forty
seven direct TVs where you can watch us do the
radio program. Also the chats at Rumble. We've got good
stuff at Facebook and X. Let me just throw this
out and then we're going to go right to our guest.
I think that there is a massive sciot that is
(55:13):
being conducted on the right. I think that the thirsty
clout chasers and I think that the weaker members than
newer members of the right, who didn't check their progressive
ideologies at the door of the big Tent when they joined,
are all susceptible to it, and as a result, we
have seen.
Speaker 3 (55:28):
A division errupt. Now.
Speaker 2 (55:30):
I tend to think that the division maybe not it's
not as bad yet as it can be as we're
seeing on the left, but it will be if it
goes unchecked. And this is something that this movement has
seen before during the Reagan years. This movement has seen
this sort of ideological division, and it's something that I
(55:50):
saw play out this morning, and I've seen it play
out with a number of my friends. And it's getting
a little crazy, and we're going to kind of dive
into that and some other things with my friend and
guest as you know him, CEO Babylon b Seth Dylon
at Seth Dylon on X and he just had to
deal with a crazy, really crazy security story where a
(56:12):
guy was making death threats against him and was threatening
to kill him and his family.
Speaker 3 (56:16):
Guy lived in Florida.
Speaker 2 (56:17):
They found out who he is and then the Age
of Florida announced that they were notified of the threats
and they got an arrest warrant and they charged this guy,
Nicholas Ray of Spring, Texas, with extortion, written threats to kill,
an unlawfully use of a two way communication device, and
he was apparently motivated by this divide on the right.
(56:38):
Seth joins us now via video. It's good to see you,
my friend, and I'm glad you're safe.
Speaker 14 (56:42):
Good to see you too, and so am I. But yeah,
thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2 (56:46):
What's happening, sir? I know, I don't even know where
to start. I was like thinking about how we were
going to even begin this discussion, and it's honestly not
something that I ever thought that we would have to
talk about on the right. Maybe that was me being naive,
but I you know, it just it's kind of shocking.
Speaker 3 (57:01):
Tell us what's happening.
Speaker 14 (57:04):
Well, in this particular case, this, I mean, this really
goes back to Charlie's murder. That's where a lot of
this started. I mean, there's some of it goes back
before that obviously, but where I get drawn into this is, uh,
the origin of that is with Charlie's murder. You know,
he was He was with me and a bunch of
(57:24):
other people in the Hamptons back in August. This is
about a month before he was killed. And there were
a lot of conspiracies floating around about, uh, you know,
where Charlie was in his position on Israel and how
much pressure was being applied to him by the donors
and what happened there in the Hamptons, and then some conspiracies,
you know, about what happened there were circulating, you know,
(57:46):
Canas Owens of course being at the forefront of propagating
those and and painting me as someone who was, you know,
a malicious and bad actor who was applying you know,
pressure to Charlie, trying to blackmail him. I was supposedly
involved in some meeting involving him and Bill Ackman and
BBNET and yeah, who was on the phone offering him
one hundred and fifty million dollars and to get back
(58:08):
on board with his support of Israel. And he turned
that down, and then guess what, he winds up dead,
you know. So there's like this crazy conspiracy that I
was caught up into, and a lot of people bought it.
A lot of people believed it. Everybody is eager to
believe that Israel and the Jews are behind everything, right, well,
not everybody, but you know, the people who are susceptible
to this stuff, who who are you know, having this
(58:30):
shoved down their throats all of the time. They buy
into it. And so there was a lot of negative sentiment,
and that's putting it mildly of course, about me, because
of this. You know, I was, I was someone who
was actually personally friends with Charlie. I was at this
event at his invitation. It wasn't anything like it was characterized,
but that's where the negative attention came from. And so
(58:51):
for several weeks, you know, there was just what happened
in the hand and Seth, you know, like why did
you blackmail your friend? Seth? What kind of friend are you?
Speaker 7 (58:59):
Seth?
Speaker 14 (59:00):
And so I was getting a lot of this stuff,
and then it started to you know, of course, we
started to see some more aggressive things coming out with
in this particular case, Nicholas Ray actually saying that he
wanted to kill me because of my involvement in Charlie's death.
And so these are false, defamatory statements that were made
for the malicious purpose of doing harm to my reputation
(59:22):
and putting a target on my back, and people got
the message obviously, so that's how we ended up here.
But I'm very grateful, let me just say before I
throw it back to you, very grateful for the prompt
and serious response that Florida Law Enforcement had. The AG
took it very seriously, his office took it very seriously,
and of course the Prosecutor's office, you know, and seeking
(59:43):
that arrest warn't as soon as possible, getting the subpoena
as they needed before they could do that. So I'm
grateful to them for having our backs. And it wasn't
just me, by the way, I don't don't want to
just make it sound like he was targeting me individually.
It was several other people were involved in this, and
so nasty stuff, very nasty stuff, that is.
Speaker 2 (01:00:03):
And you're right, James Uthmeier, his AG of Florida did
a swift and great job at mitigating this and getting
this guy, because I mean, what the guy was doing,
I mean, this is what we talk about when I
think a lot of this, you know, is maybe bot driven,
but a lot of it's not.
Speaker 3 (01:00:21):
And you know, like what we talk about with the left.
Speaker 2 (01:00:23):
You know, there's only so many times that people can
call Trump a Nazi and a fascist and all this
stuff before somebody out there who's super susceptible to this
picks up on it and does something.
Speaker 14 (01:00:34):
It's one thing to talk about somebody accurately, like what
they've actually said and done, and report truthfully on what
they've actually said and done. It's quite another thing to
caricature them, to put words in their mouth that they
didn't say, to portray them as being Hitler or a
Nazi or something when they couldn't They couldn't be further
than the truth than the truth. For someone like Trump
and his and his supporters of the MAGA coalition, those
(01:00:57):
those types of smears do have very negative consequences. Now
to if someone's not actually calling for violence, then they're
not responsible for whatever violence somebody does, but they are
responsible for planting the seeds where there's fertile ground for
that kind of radical reaction. And so I don't know
why you would do that. Why would you want to
do that unless you're just an evil and malicious person.
(01:01:18):
But you know, people keep asking me how I'm doing it.
I'm like, well, you know, I lost my friend and
then I was accused of playing a role in his murder,
and now a lot of my other friends are covering
for the people who are responsible for those accusations. So
I don't really know how to explain how I'm doing
right now. And this is a very unusual situation in
my life. I've never experienced anything like this before. I
(01:01:40):
don't wish it on anybody.
Speaker 3 (01:01:41):
What's weird to me.
Speaker 2 (01:01:42):
And we're talking with Seth dellan CEO of the Babylon
b about all this is that, you know, I understand
if people want to have a disagreement with, like, you know,
the Israeli government, but I feel like a lot of
the people who are saying that but doing something different
couldn't even tell you how they're parliament of structure. They
can't tell you the difference between Herzog and et and Yahoo.
They have no idea out, you know, the lay of
the land, so to speak, over there, And it feels
(01:02:03):
like a veneer for what it really is, which is
just anti Semitism. And it's a bunch of people on
not a bunch, but some people on the right who
are playing into the identity politics of the left and
that's a leftist thing. Do you think that some of
this is maybe the consequence of, you know, it's great
to have a coalition or a big tent, but there's
(01:02:24):
certain things that are just persona non grata in a
coalition and using identity politics like the left ought to
be one of them.
Speaker 3 (01:02:32):
Is some of this a failure to enforce.
Speaker 14 (01:02:34):
That, Oh, certainly. I just wrote about this in the
Free Press, by the way, talking about the foolishness of
the no enemies to the right principle. I think it's
just it's it's it's not just foolish, it's immoral, you know,
to not draw lines, to not be willing to say,
(01:02:55):
you know, there are certain people that you won't lock
arms with. A lot of these things, these are things
that were the right. There was a lot more moral
clarity on the right several years ago, where the alt
right or you know, this white supremacist kind of like
equal but opposite reaction to like the leftist antifa thugs,
like everybody kind of saw that as being this really fringe,
(01:03:17):
really nasty thing that we didn't want any part of,
and we distinguished between ourselves and them. We're like they
keep calling Trump, you know, and his supporters Nazis and
Hitler and whatever. Like, We're not like that. There may
be people like that on the fringe far right, but
we're not like them. We would distinguish. Now, now there
are calls to join with them and to bring them
into the movement and make them part of the movement,
and no one so far has explained to me, first
(01:03:38):
of all, how that's morally justified, but also how is
it politically expedient? How does it help us? How could
it do anything but hurt us to bring people who
are collectivists. Yeah, they engage in these race based grievance things.
They're supremacists, they are They're just filled with bigotry and hatred.
They have authoritarian impulses. They're collectivists like you. All these
(01:04:00):
things up and it's like, how could we possibly benefit
from having them in the conservative movement? That doesn't make
any sense. You know, this is a real reckoning for
conservatives to decide what is our identity? What is a conservative?
That's the next question that we need to be asking me.
We had that question about what was a woman, Now
we need to have it about what is a conservative.
Speaker 2 (01:04:17):
I that's a good point, and what happened to the
left when they decided to mainstream the radicals, the street
team that they used to as an agitated variable to
get out the vote.
Speaker 14 (01:04:26):
I mean, that's a great cautionary tale, right, because it
wasn't just that they tolerated their extremists. I think, you know,
including them in their broad coalition was a mistake. But
they didn't just include them. They gave them the reins,
and so you ended up at the situation where, of course, yes,
they did accrue a lot of cultural and institutional power
(01:04:47):
with very radical ideas that they were trying to enforce
on all of us from the top down. But they
pushed too far. Of course, they went so radical that
reasonable people, you know, we started to see the erosion
of parental right, We started to see kids being exposed
not just to inappropriate materials in their schools, but also
this harmful gender ideology that was leading them down a
(01:05:08):
path of destruction and despair and cutting off healthy body
parts and all of it. It went so crazy, so
far beyond the realm of what's even possible to satirize,
that there was natural backlash to that. Reasonable people had
only so much tolerance for that kind of absurdity, and
I think they'll only have so much tolerance for the
(01:05:28):
kind of bigotry and authoritarianism that's creeping into the right wing.
And so I think it's only prudent from a political
standpoint if you're just looking at it pragmatically, it's prudent
to draw those lines. But it's also the right thing
to do. Let's not lose sight of that. It's the
right thing to do to say, look, this is wrong.
You know, Glorifying Hitler isn't good, and we shouldn't be
(01:05:51):
welcoming those people. We should be condemning them, and no
one should have to ask us to We should be
willingly doing that.
Speaker 2 (01:05:56):
What do you say to people who argue, well, you know,
conservatism is ever been implemented. That's like the coordinated response
from some of these people. And my thought is that
one of the reasons that I I'll caucus with Republicans
but I don't consider myself a party member is because
they're too left for me. I don't think conservative principles
have ever been implemented fully. Christian conservative principles have never
been implemented at the federal level by the GOP. And
(01:06:18):
that's kind of my take on it. What is your
thought on that?
Speaker 14 (01:06:21):
Well, I also I wasn't sure where you were going
with that, But I also hear a lot well, conservatism.
Are you trying to say it conservatism has failed? That's
the objection.
Speaker 3 (01:06:30):
Yeah, that's what the that's what their argument is.
Speaker 2 (01:06:32):
I'm like, you have to implement it or try to
before you can say it's failed.
Speaker 14 (01:06:35):
Well, yes, you're You're not wrong. I agree with you there,
but it also it's not the case that right now
conservatives are losing. I wouldn't I wouldn't concede that. I
do think that conservatives did fail to conserve some things
they should have conserved. I think there were a lot
of people who were too squishy, a lot of people
who were too willing to compromise, that didn't stand their
ground on some of these issues, and so we lost
(01:06:56):
a lot of ground because we didn't fight as aggressively
as we should have on some those issues. That's certainly
a problem, But I think that, like I was saying,
the backlash that was generated by the left's overreach has
resulted in some serious and legitimate wins for the right
for conservatism, and you know, a return of sanity a
return of valuing the truth, reality, staying firmly planted in
(01:07:19):
reality and what's good, objectively good and true. We've seen
a lot of victories along those lines. I was just
saying the other day, you know, there's a joke I
used to tell about how we're so disadvantaged in this fight.
It's like being a woman who's just jumped into the
pool with Lea Thomas. You know, he's the tall one
with the testicles, and so this is like a joke
I used to tell about how disadvantage we are. Well,
that's no, that joke is old now because Leah Thomas
(01:07:41):
has had those title strip, those records taken away. Like
we were solving these problems, we're pushing back on these things,
and so conservatives, I think, are in advance and the
far left, progressive left is in retreat in the culture
and in the courts. And so we are winning a
lot right now. And it's just bizarre to me to
be having conversation about how the extreme lengths we're going
(01:08:03):
to need to go to in order to in order
to win, you know, but win in scare quotes, because
I think we're already winning, you know, like, why would
we need to abandon the constitution, go post constitutional and
adopt all of these radical ideas, or.
Speaker 2 (01:08:17):
Adopt identity politics because we've been betting without it.
Speaker 14 (01:08:21):
Yeah, and how is that winning? When you become like
the left? How are you defeating the left?
Speaker 3 (01:08:24):
Yeah? So my last question for you, and this is
kind of a.
Speaker 14 (01:08:26):
Hard I mean, explain it to me like I'm Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (01:08:28):
I don't know, or or Hunter Biden, although he might
understand it better. So I don't know how this shakes
out because I know that when everything happened during like
the Reagan years, I think maybe I was I don't
think I was alive then, or if I was, I
was maybe like one years old. I don't have that
lived memory of it. I just know what I read that,
(01:08:49):
you know, that sort of aspect of the right was
sort of drummed out. I don't know how that looks currently.
I don't know how this this dissonance is handled.
Speaker 3 (01:08:59):
And where are where we go from here?
Speaker 2 (01:09:01):
Or how you can even convince people who are adopting,
you know, beliefs like this, how you how they're persuadable
to even come away from that your thought?
Speaker 3 (01:09:12):
Uh?
Speaker 14 (01:09:12):
You mean like the people that have bought into some
of this stuff and uh.
Speaker 2 (01:09:16):
And are promoting it and perpetuating it, and you know
are like quote unquote influencers or who freak out when
you mildly correct them on social media.
Speaker 14 (01:09:24):
Yeah, well the influence. So there's two problems. There's the
there's the young people who are so susceptible to it,
and there's there's the people who are pushing it, the
young people who are super receptive to it. And then
the cowards in the movement who are you know, trying
not to do anything about it and trying not to
confront it head on like they should, like they would
have several years ago. You know, there's there's this popular
(01:09:47):
idea right now that what's really what's really needed, what's
really needed more than anything, is unity. We can't have
this infighting. It's a problem, and I think it's I
think it's it's suicidal. Ultimately, it's protecting us. Yeah, it's
only going to help the left, it's not going to
you know, like, I don't think that a lot of
these people actually endorse the ideas, the radical ideas, but
(01:10:10):
they've they for some reason, have decided that it's necessary
for us to have unity. With the people that have
these ideas. And again, like I said, I haven't heard
a good argument for why that would be. I haven't
heard it. There's certainly no good moral argument for it.
But I haven't even heard a good political argument for it.
Speaker 2 (01:10:24):
Yeah, you've taken a beating, and I appreciate you with
your consistency, and you've been you know, a good ally
and a good friend. And so we're praying for your
safety and I'm glad that you guys are safe. And
you know, the offer still stands if you want to
come and get John wicked out, you know, come on
over the Dallas.
Speaker 14 (01:10:40):
I want to do that. We'll have to work that out.
We'll find a spawn on the schedule that works to
do this right.
Speaker 2 (01:10:44):
We will seth Dylan CEO Babylon B. You can find
him on ex sky Blush and my friend good to
talk with you.
Speaker 14 (01:10:49):
We'll talk to you too.
Speaker 3 (01:10:50):
Thank you, of course, folks.
Speaker 2 (01:10:51):
Over at super Beach, you guys are very familiar with
super beats. Human was formed out of the ut Health
Science Center and built on real cardiovascular research around blood
flow and nitric oxide, and unlike other supplement brands, Human
is science born and not just science ish, the products
work and you can feel them working. UT athletes have
used superbats for over a decade, calling it their cheat
(01:11:13):
code for recovery and endurance, and you can use it
for the same reason to support healthy blood pressure and circulation. Today,
more than one hundred and sixty college and proteins use
human products, So your favorite team probably does too. And
if you've seen the human logo on the Longhorns field
this football season, that's more than a sponsorship. It's a
signal from human and UT together leading the future of
(01:11:36):
cardiovascular health for athletes and for everyone. Try the superbeats
are choose by human to choose support healthy blood pressure,
blood flow, and energy with clinically studied ingredients proven to
be nearly twice as effective as diet and exercise alone.
Pick up super beats at your local Walmart and start
supporting your cardiovascular health today. Get on the road to
(01:11:59):
better health with super beats from human.
Speaker 5 (01:12:04):
It's his laugh mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida.
Speaker 3 (01:12:12):
Man, all right.
Speaker 2 (01:12:13):
So a knife wielding Florida man allegedly threatened to eat
his neighbor's dog over a trespassing dispute. So not unlike
what you see from certain people on social media. A
Florida man he allegedly threatened to eat his neighbor's dog
and stabbed the woman for calling the cops on him
during a hostile property dispute. By the way, he looks
like if Richard May had a brother that was soaked
(01:12:36):
in meth for like forty eight hours. First, the guy's
name is Minor Catledge. He confronted his neighbor as she
walked her dog, and he said he would eat her
dog if she got on his property. And then it
went back and forth, and he approached her with a
knife and began to threaten her, and the.
Speaker 3 (01:12:57):
Police came third hour. Next.
Speaker 2 (01:13:00):
All Family Pharmacy is a family owned business dedicated to
helping you get the medications that you need when you
need them the most. With over two hundred essential medications,
including antibiotics, antivirals, ivermectin, emergency kits, and so much more,
they have you covered for everything from daily prescriptions to
even biohacking support. Right now, they've lowered prices on ivermectin
and menbindozol by up to twenty five percent, starting at
(01:13:21):
just two dollars a capsule. Plus save an extra ten
percent using code data ten. Each order includes a doctor's prescription,
so there's no hassle or a middleman. And as flu
season approaches, now's the time to stock your medicine cabinet
with essentials like tamilflu antibiotics, and vitamins to help keep
you and your family healthy. And beyond basics, All Family
Pharmacy offers biohacking products like nad plus, methylene blue, all
(01:13:43):
kinds of stuff to boost energy, focus, immunity, the whole
nine yards. Visit Allfamilypharmacy dot Com, slash data and use
code data ten to save ten percent today.
Speaker 3 (01:13:52):
Don't wait.
Speaker 2 (01:13:53):
Be ready for flu season with All Family Pharmacy. That's
All Familypharmacy dot Com, slash data and use code data ten.
Speaker 15 (01:14:00):
Molly's point, I mean this is something that a lot
of Democrats are grappling with right now. So they've nominated
when two of the last three elections for presidency lost
both there are some who say, well, we can't do
that again, the stakes are too high. But of course
that does fall into the same misogester trap.
Speaker 3 (01:14:16):
The countries have no problem electing women. Okay, that was
this morning on Morning Joe.
Speaker 2 (01:14:30):
Yes, the Virginia gubernatorial Democrat candidate, Abigail Spanberger. And they're
saying that the reason that she's struggling is because it's
not doesn't have anything to do with the fact that
she wants to tax you all to death, or she's
anti Second Amendment, or she has horrible policy ideas. It's
because you don't like her because she's a girl.
Speaker 5 (01:14:53):
What's wins?
Speaker 3 (01:14:55):
I am so done with us.
Speaker 2 (01:14:57):
We kin now, I know you're not a biologist.
Speaker 3 (01:15:05):
No, but can you please, sir, confirm.
Speaker 2 (01:15:09):
The sex of the Republican nominee for governor that is
running against Democrat Abigail Spamburger the best.
Speaker 5 (01:15:20):
Of my knowledge, win, some earl sears is a woman.
Speaker 2 (01:15:23):
Oh oh, by the way, let's play the intersectional game
because the left loves this. So let's look, guys know
like if you guys know, this works, like you tally
up every one of these little things has nothing to
do with merit. Right, So Abigail Spanburger is a woman. Okay,
my left, this is my right. So you're you guys
(01:15:43):
are looking at house house right. Uhberg is a woman.
So that's the according to the left. That's one check.
But so is win some earl sears, Abigail Spanburger is
a white woman, whin some earl sears is a black
woman Abigail Spambergers or Virginia and win some earl seiars
(01:16:04):
is an immigrant oh my gosh, three to one and intersectionality,
so by the left zone measure. When some earl seers wins,
but see this is their inconsistency, they're like, well it
doesn't count. Why because she's a Republican. So they just
take all those three away and then that's it. That's
how they do this. That's that's their math, that's the
(01:16:26):
that's the progressive math with all of this.
Speaker 5 (01:16:28):
So how many points of intersectionality get deleted because you're
a Republican? Is it all the points?
Speaker 7 (01:16:33):
Is it?
Speaker 5 (01:16:33):
Does it negate all the points you get being republican?
Speaker 14 (01:16:37):
Uh?
Speaker 5 (01:16:38):
Apparently yeah, because what if, like, man, can you imagine
whin some earl sears, like we're like maybe mixed race
and had a couple of different races she.
Speaker 2 (01:16:46):
Could we could add maybe yeah, like another one on
or what if she was like trans oh man, But
then it doesn't matter because if she's she's a Republican.
So the left is like, nope, new rule. It's like
it's like, uh, what am I thinking of? What's the
card game?
Speaker 3 (01:17:01):
Uh no no no no no no no.
Speaker 2 (01:17:04):
The card game where Uno it's like playing Uno. It's
like playing spicy Uno. Right, no, no, no new rule.
Everybody's got to be silent when somebody drops a six
no no, no, new role. You know, it's like that's
what they're doing, new role. It doesn't matter if they're
a Republican. So you have Mika who is very soft skinned.
(01:17:28):
Dare I dare I talk about them because the one
time I talked about them on air and somehow they
lost their minds and spent fifteen minutes I could like
actually not a disagree with me, but actually attacking me
on their program. I mean, you're on television every morning.
People are going to disagree with you. But she says, well, it's,
you know, because they're sexist. Other countries have no problem
electing women. Well, Japan just elected its first prime minister
(01:17:51):
who just happened to be a woman. But they elected
her because she's qualified, not because she's a woman. The
same reason that Margaret Thatcher ascended to become Prime Minister
of Britain.
Speaker 3 (01:18:00):
And it's because she was qualified. She just happened to
be a woman, not because she was a woman. Democrats
are arguing that, well, you have to vote for someone
because they're a woman, but only if they're Democrat. That's it.
Speaker 2 (01:18:13):
That's how this works with them. What a disservice. And
you know by I mean it should be on merit.
Do you realize the disservice that you do to women
by demanding that you elevate someone just because they're a
woman and not because their merit. They have their merited
to be elevated. You're actually pushing out women who are
(01:18:33):
working on like meritocracy and who may one day ascend
and may one day be worth the vote, but they're
going to be constantly pummeled down and underestimated because of
the idiotic no you have to do this because they're
a woman rule that the left practices. No, people are
struggling with her because she's a horrible candidate. She's a problematic,
(01:18:54):
horrible candidate with horrible ideas ideas that if you actually
took them to their full conclusion and would be disastrous
for the state of Virginia, the Commonwealth. It would be disastrous.
That's the whole thing. I get so tired of this.
It is so unbelievably sexist. To say that people are
against her because.
Speaker 3 (01:19:14):
She's a sexist.
Speaker 2 (01:19:15):
That's a sexist that's sexism. Sorry, but women get a
lot of handouts in politics. You said, people can act
like it's an old boys club all they want to.
But if you don't know how to roll with it
and manage it, then maybe it's intimidating. But women get
a lot of especially. I mean, look at Kamala Harra.
She was coronated for crying out loud. She's been appointed
(01:19:36):
to everything. She didn't campaign. She can't campaign. I mean,
it's a given. Hillary Clinton tried this stuff too. She
thought she could be coronated, and then when Democrats were like, yeah,
but we don't like you, you're kind of bitchy. Then
she had to actually work for it. She was mad
and said, I'm not going to do this. That's why
she never went up to Michigan, she never went over
(01:19:56):
it anywhere. She was mad that she actually had to
work for it. She wanted to be a political welfare queen.
That's the truth of the matter. How sad is that
it gets? Really, I just get so frustrated with us
as I'm sure you do as well. Let's play a
cut eleven please. So in Los Angeles, speaking of Kamala Harris, California.
(01:20:18):
In LA, there was this teacher who came out. You know,
they had their no Kings thing, right, Your king's laughing
so hard. They had their no Kings rally. And this
Los Angeles high school teacher they call him an anti
ice spokesman. I'm just like reading the thing that they
(01:20:39):
sent out about it. He's an anti He's a high
school history teacher, probably not very good. He serves as
a spokesperson for a local anti ice activist group. But
they're not organized. How dare you say they're organized? But
here's our spokesperson.
Speaker 7 (01:20:54):
Don't forget where you're standing.
Speaker 5 (01:20:56):
This is south central Los Angeles.
Speaker 7 (01:20:59):
Wow, they are not.
Speaker 3 (01:21:03):
They are not.
Speaker 15 (01:21:05):
The only ones with guns in this city.
Speaker 7 (01:21:07):
They're not the only ones that. Don't forget that.
Speaker 6 (01:21:10):
And I don't say that because we're calling for violence.
Speaker 14 (01:21:13):
I'm saying that because the people have every right to
defend themselves against masked, unidentified gun men.
Speaker 2 (01:21:20):
So the community doesn't have the right to defend their
sovereign territory against unknown people that are coming in from
the southern border.
Speaker 3 (01:21:28):
Do you realize how unbelievably ironic that is?
Speaker 2 (01:21:30):
And don't sit here and tell me that, oh, well,
well you've got guns, but it's not a call to violence.
Speaker 3 (01:21:34):
Shut up.
Speaker 2 (01:21:35):
That's the intimation, and you know it is. Don't be
an intellectual coward. Have the balls to see your statement
all the way through, you coward. I can't stay when
people do that. Don't bring it up then if you
because otherwise that's what you're that's what you're intimating.
Speaker 3 (01:21:48):
That's exactly it.
Speaker 2 (01:21:49):
By the way, you can see that you have guns
all all you want to, but hell knows y'all can't shoot,
so you know y'all don't train. So what good is it?
So insane? This is so ass and we could do
without all of this stupidity. Here's the problem. Come in
legally and if you don't like the way that our
immigration system is structured, then asked the party that you
have been enslaved to vote for for however many decades,
(01:22:12):
why even when they had a super majority for the
first part of Barack Obama's first term until special elections,
why they didn't do anything to remedy that despite all
of their talk in the election leading up to it.
Why didn't they do anything?
Speaker 3 (01:22:27):
Why?
Speaker 2 (01:22:28):
Great question, isn't it same people that were like, oh, no,
it was Trump that put kids in cages, but they
were ignoring the fact that it was actually a policy
that was created under Obama Biden. Because the deluge at
the southern border was so great and the Floor's amendment
was allowing the rent of kid policies to be exploited
by the cartels, that they had to make sure that
kids were protected, and so instead of stopping the deluge,
they ended up putting people in cages so they could
(01:22:49):
evaluate the kids inscene.
Speaker 3 (01:22:51):
So asinine.
Speaker 2 (01:22:53):
This is south central Los Angeles. Legally, I probably not
in legal possession. But the irony of being like, how
dare these people we don't know enforce the law. We
wanted to sneak into the country and be undetected. How
dare you arrest people undetected?
Speaker 3 (01:23:09):
Wait?
Speaker 2 (01:23:09):
What suddenly you're being met with I mean, it's kind
of specious to say it, but you're suddenly met with
the same tactic, and now you've.
Speaker 3 (01:23:17):
Got a problem. Cry harder, follow the law or get out.
That's just the way it is.
Speaker 2 (01:23:23):
I can't imagine going do you realize the audacity of
going to another country and being like you conform to me,
Like me going to Italy. It's time to put pineapple
on your pizza.
Speaker 3 (01:23:37):
Do it now? There is such a thing as alfredo
sauce and white with cream. Do it now? Like they
would be like, what toasted ravioli is a real thing?
Do it now?
Speaker 2 (01:23:48):
They would not abide. Can you imagine or going to
I mean, name something, name something. I mean, It's like,
I this is crazy. It's like going to Mexico and
being like you will recognize taco bell as real Mexican
food or else, like, who is you doing this? Go
(01:24:10):
into somebody else's country and trying to order people around?
Speaker 3 (01:24:12):
Good night, stop.
Speaker 2 (01:24:16):
Just demand that people come in legally, legally. So they
had the new Man dude, the debate. I caught some
of it with the Mandanni and Cuomo. I guess Cela
is just going to stay in.
Speaker 3 (01:24:36):
Sliwa.
Speaker 2 (01:24:37):
He's going to stay in. I talked to him like
years ago on radio. He seemed like a nice guy.
But I don't understand. I can you imagine. I just
can't imagine having to choose if I was a voter
between communist light and Islamist communist. That's the choice, the
guy who killed old people or the guy who probably
will kill people, the guy who's who campaigns with an
(01:25:01):
unindicted nine to eleven co conspirator, or the guy who
kills all your grandparents. I mean, that's the choice in
New York right now. This is insane. It's yeah, for one,
just give you a little taste of how people had
to watch this.
Speaker 3 (01:25:20):
This is so bad.
Speaker 2 (01:25:22):
This is cut fourteen. They're talking about building affordable housing.
Speaker 10 (01:25:25):
Listen to this, and my critiques of the politics of
the past is right here on the stage. You can
see in Andrew Cuomo, someone who had ten years to
deliver on so much of what he's spoken about. He
says that taking five years to build affordable housing is
the sign of an incompetent government. By his own words,
(01:25:47):
that means he must have led an incompetent government. That
is what we are seeing, because that is the record
that is actually on offer.
Speaker 7 (01:25:58):
I understand, my friend doesn't really understand government.
Speaker 14 (01:26:03):
The governor doesn't build housing in New York City.
Speaker 7 (01:26:07):
No, legally, there are jurisdictions.
Speaker 2 (01:26:11):
Mm, yeah, affordable housing. Well, it doesn't matter how affordable
you build your housing when your tax structure is so
punitive that no one can afford it anyway.
Speaker 5 (01:26:28):
And he wants two more percent.
Speaker 3 (01:26:31):
Oh yeah, oh yeah, way more.
Speaker 2 (01:26:33):
I can't even They're going to lose so many people
when he wins, and it's when New York is done.
I haven't been back to Manhattan since the first week
of COVID, haven't been back, and I don't have any
desire to go back. I like a lot of I mean,
(01:26:55):
there's some the conservative New Yorkers I like because they
have to be real, tough as nails people conser does
that live in Manhattan. I don't even know how you live.
I don't even know how you live. God love you.
Speaker 3 (01:27:06):
I love them.
Speaker 2 (01:27:06):
I exclude them from all of this. But man, I can't.
Upstate is where nor the normies live, But I can't.
It's just gotten so different. I'm even I saw the difference.
I saw it changing, even like having to go up
there for.
Speaker 3 (01:27:20):
Work, I don't. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:27:22):
Man once a beautiful city, and look how far we
have a lot more on the way. We've got headlines
coming up. And then I got a couple of crazier
things for you as well. It's our friends over at
Patriot Mobile. It's the only Christian conservative cell phone service
in the nation. And you need to switch because they
(01:27:43):
make it so easy. It takes minutes to do, and
it takes minutes to do, and you can you.
Speaker 3 (01:27:48):
Don't even have to go to the store. You don't
even have to go to the store.
Speaker 2 (01:27:51):
You can you can stay in your home, you can
stay in your office, whatever it is, whatever's easiest. They'll
accommodate you. They have a great US based customer service
team that will get you all screwed away, all fitted
up in minutes. You got nationwide coverage that you can trust.
They have access to all three major US networks. You
don't compromise on quality for your values. You get unlimited
(01:28:14):
data plans. Look, here's the big thing. You're painless because
they have plans that can are tailored to everybody. But
in addition to that, you're not having your money go
towards the things that you vote against every time you're
at the ballot box. We're in early elections here right now,
or early voting sorry, and Patriot Mobile, I know for fact,
has help out with a lot of these very conservative
voter minded issues that are on the ballot they really
(01:28:37):
work on your behalf, so your money isn't working against you.
And if you get rid of your Netflix subscription because
you don't like the ideals, but you haven't done it
with your mobile service, you might as well go get
ten Netflix subscriptions because what you're paying for your cell
phone service, the Netflix stuff is a drop in the
bucket compared to that. So you need to make the
switch today at Patriot Mobile. Visit Patriotmobile dot com slash
(01:28:57):
data and get a free month of service when you
use promo code da. Veterans and first responders get fifteen
percent off of their bills every month. Patriot Mobile dot
com slash data at ninety seven two Patriot promo code Dana.
Speaker 5 (01:29:11):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.
Speaker 2 (01:29:16):
Okay, I didn't get to this story yesterday, and I
desperately needed to because it's a wild one for all
of you horror fans. A corner canceled a safe family
Halloween party because something nasty. There was a controversy over
the corpses riding in the walls.
Speaker 3 (01:29:35):
I'm not even kidding.
Speaker 2 (01:29:36):
Twenty four rotting corpses that were found in the previous
corners mortuary.
Speaker 3 (01:29:42):
Oh my god.
Speaker 2 (01:29:43):
So it was Pablo County Corner, Brian Cotter. They he
owned a mortuary home with his brother and they were
gonna have a little family Halloween party, but then they
discovered literally twenty four decomposing bodies behind a hidden door,
and they were like, oh my god, we got to
cancel it. We were going to have a safe, family
friendly but there's some dead bodies.
Speaker 3 (01:30:04):
Here we got to deal with. So bye. It's terrifying.
Speaker 2 (01:30:10):
A man dies after a burial vault fell on him.
What is up with all the funeral home stuff at
a Dallas funeral home?
Speaker 3 (01:30:17):
Oh my gosh, one of those big ol' things. It
fell on him.
Speaker 2 (01:30:21):
Dallas Fire Department had they responded to a call and
the vault is you know, the vessel that is usually
concrete and it protects the casket and all that stuff.
He was pinned down from the waist and they were
able to lift it using a hydraulic spreader and free him.
Speaker 3 (01:30:37):
He was immediately taken.
Speaker 2 (01:30:38):
To the hospital, obviously serious lower injuries enough that he
did not survive. That's horrible, warble warrible, and an Australian
man was charged with stealing La boo boos worth more
than five thousand dollars. I can't even believe people are
doing this. These look like the old man Chi cheese
five thousand dollars. The man is in major trouble stealing
la booboos. I can't even believe that that's worth that much.
(01:31:00):
With us, as we move our partners that he'll bring
you the program. It's our friends over at relief Factor.
A lot of people need relief Factor because they're all
inflamed and emotional. So maybe they should start taking relief
Factor to help the aches and pains that they that
they cause everybody else, so.
Speaker 3 (01:31:16):
No look for real.
Speaker 2 (01:31:17):
Relief Factor is a one hundred percent drug free way
to manage everyday aches and pains that are really brought
on by not dealing properly with inflammation. You know, relief
Factor helps support your body's natural inflammatory response, and that's
what causes the aches and the soreness after workouts, stiffness,
(01:31:37):
and discomfort. It doesn't matter what decade of life, if
you're in if you're you know, hitting the gym hard
and heavy in your twenties, or if you're like in
your seventies and you know, maybe you know everything, all
your all your past activities are catching up with you.
This is something that works for everyone. It incorporates for us,
viatral curcumen, turmeric and all kinds of ingredients that help
(01:31:57):
maintain healthy joints and muscles and also so helped decrease
discomfort after exercising daily activities. Tri Really Factors three week
quick start for just nineteen ninety five. That's only ninety
five cents a day. It's less than a cup of coffee.
Speaker 3 (01:32:09):
Don't wait.
Speaker 2 (01:32:09):
Visit Reliefactor dot com or call eight hundred and the
number four Relief and get your three week quick start
today only for only nineteen ninety five. Support your body
with natural anti inflammatory power and see if Relief Factor
is right for you. A transgender swimmer was banned for
five years. Anna caulledus and was stripped of all competition
(01:32:33):
results because he wouldn't take a gender verification test. He's
forty seven years old. He goes by the name of Hannah.
He says it's not medically necessary. I don't know what
tipped people off that he was not a woman. I mean,
you could throw the photo up there one if you want.
I mean, I just I don't.
Speaker 3 (01:32:53):
Know what tipped people off.
Speaker 2 (01:32:57):
He said that chromosomal tests are invasive and expensive procedures,
and he's he says, his inferior, his insurance won't do it.
It's not medically necessary. I mean, what tipped everybody off?
Speaker 1 (01:33:12):
What?
Speaker 3 (01:33:12):
Why did people start thinking that he wasn't a woman?
Speaker 7 (01:33:18):
The direction.
Speaker 5 (01:33:20):
I would have gone on a limb here. I don't
think a test is needed.
Speaker 3 (01:33:24):
I mean, what what tipped people off? You don't think
that's that's him right there?
Speaker 5 (01:33:33):
Yeah, him, that's the big tip off for me.
Speaker 3 (01:33:35):
He really wanted to compete in women's.
Speaker 2 (01:33:43):
So the gender verification, it's part of the World Aquatics
investigation into his eligibility.
Speaker 8 (01:33:51):
Now.
Speaker 2 (01:33:51):
Ken Paxson, who's the Texas ag he was the one
who kickstarted all of this. They looked at the US
Masters swimming earlier this year. I mean, there's a lot
of a lot of photos of him out there.
Speaker 3 (01:34:03):
He's a big lady. You know, he's uh. He said that.
Speaker 2 (01:34:14):
He said this was his uh listener, I try to
spend this, he says, I'm happy, and U I understand
and accept the consequences, he said, because he was also
suspended for five years, and he said that's the price
I have to pay to protect my most intimate medical information.
I'm happy to pay that price for myself and for
(01:34:34):
all women who don't want to undergo invasive testing. You know,
there's there's ways that aren't invasive. You know, just drop
trou and let us see.
Speaker 3 (01:34:47):
I mean, yeah, we even need that.
Speaker 5 (01:34:52):
We don't even need that.
Speaker 2 (01:34:53):
I mean again, if you just look at him, you
might be confused. But he uh, and of course he
was dominant in every race. Shocker, shocking. I know, who would.
Speaker 3 (01:35:08):
Have thought it?
Speaker 2 (01:35:10):
Just this is this, by the way, is DEI this,
All of the stuff stems from CRT. All of this
is a Marxist like cultural thing. That's where this all
comes from. Now, if you thought that was crazy, if
you thought that was nuts, which it was, then you're
really gonna like this one. So you know this story,
(01:35:34):
it's a story of an illegal alien Mexican national named
Carlos Porias Uh forty four of South Los Angeles. He
was arrested. I'm looking at his rap sheet here. He
got charged with assault on a federal officer and then
he tried to escape arrest, and then one agent responded.
Speaker 3 (01:35:54):
He ended up getting shot in the elbow.
Speaker 2 (01:35:56):
So why was he Well, he has been he entered
illegally and has been living illegally and apparently doing some
other stuff. So I saw him driving his gray Toyota camera.
They surrounded him and then they approached and gave him
orders to exit the cards submit to arrest.
Speaker 3 (01:36:15):
He refused.
Speaker 2 (01:36:17):
He drove the camera forward and back and was knocking
into the law enforcement vehicles. He refused to comply, and
then he drove it more aggressively towards one another law
enforcement vehicle, and they said that his driving was so
aggressive that it escalated to the point that large what's
(01:36:37):
in the affidavit, large plumes of smoke formed around the camera,
and that was caused by the spinning of the car's tires.
There was debris because he was apparently so aggressive, like
he was like throwing rubber off his tires in all directions.
Speaker 3 (01:36:50):
Some of the agents got hit by it. That's and so.
Speaker 2 (01:36:56):
What ended up happening is they were trying to dislodge
the camera because he ran in between two other vehicles.
At one point, a federal agent was forced to open
fire because the guy was trying to use his vehicle
at that point as a murder weapon and they he
could be jailed for up to eight years if he's convicted.
Speaker 3 (01:37:17):
But here's the kicker.
Speaker 2 (01:37:19):
The Los Angeles City Council hailed him as a quote
pillar of our community, and they gave him an award.
He was honored and presented with a framed award, certificate
of recognition, and they had a big thing and they
(01:37:40):
gave it to him. They had photos of them awarding him.
This I am without words, Cain.
Speaker 5 (01:37:52):
I mean, it just is another check on the list
of proof that Democrats care way more about eminals and
illegals than they do the American citizen.
Speaker 2 (01:38:02):
Here's a question, So when do we as citizens get
the privilege of ignoring whatever laws we want to.
Speaker 5 (01:38:08):
Ignore, let alone be awarded for it.
Speaker 2 (01:38:13):
Because I have some I have some that I don't
I don't want to follow. Yeah, and then we could
get awards for it. Can you imagine? So I want
to not also follow laws and get an award for
not following the law. There's there are probably like veterans
in laws. Well, there are veterans in Los Angeles who
never got an award, and they're probably drug addicted and
left on the sidewalk.
Speaker 3 (01:38:34):
But this guy, he gets a framed award.
Speaker 2 (01:38:37):
Look at it's got the If you're watching the Simulcasa
has the seal everything on Ilo. He's got the littles
all framed. You know, they probably gave him the frame
to he get the whole thing. Had it all pro done?
Is that not something that's the guy? So he gets
celebrated and awarded, and we wonder why we have such
a problem with lawlessness and disorder right now. What's more so,
(01:39:00):
one of our listeners on social goes by polygirl in
Hennepin County, this is kind of wild. Felony burglary is
now a citation offense, no arrest, no booking, that's what
it is. And this is in Minnesota, Hennepen County.
Speaker 3 (01:39:22):
Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 7 (01:39:25):
So.
Speaker 2 (01:39:27):
A felony in Hennepin County, Minnesota is now just a ticket.
Speaker 3 (01:39:32):
You only get a ticket. That's a new thing.
Speaker 2 (01:39:34):
That's an ad that's kind of like what they were
doing in California, right, So they've changed them, and they
there's paperwork that shows that these are all being downgraded.
Bloomington City Attorney like, for instance, third degree burglary, interests,
public buildings, steals, and that's just a citation. Now there's
(01:39:55):
no arrest, there's no anything. It's a felony, but now
they're not even prosecuting it as such. You know a
lot of these clearance rates for a lot of these
liberal cities, And by clearance rates, I mean you know
where you have these felonious activities and whether you get
an arrest or you have somebody go to trial that
(01:40:16):
counts as whether or not you're clearing that case.
Speaker 3 (01:40:18):
They have dropped so low.
Speaker 2 (01:40:20):
I think in Detroit it's like fifteen percent of the
cases that they deal with. Actually, I mean it's staggering.
It is staggering the structure the judicial system and this
restorative justice. There are so many studies that dance around it,
but they don't want to actually confirm that that's what's
(01:40:40):
really driving so much of this stuff. It is I've
never seen anything like this. I mean, this is it's wild.
But this is the part of the issue as it
pertains to the criminal justice system. You have these prosecutors
that are just issuing wrist slaps and judges that are
showing wrist slaps, and they think that that somehow is
(01:41:03):
going to be better in mitigating crime than just enforcing
the law, like, for instance, the Glock thing, which we
will be talking about more, where they're trying to force
Glock to redesign their firearms because the criminals will commit
a felony by installing a switch in it, which anything
is modifiable, no matter what, and it's not. What gets
(01:41:26):
me is like you got I mean for kren outline,
you know who the criminals are, you know who the
people are doing it. Instead of arresting them, they're making
Glock literally redesign their guns. It's like making vehicles redesign
or automobile manufacturers redesign their vehicles because people are stealing them.
You're going to blame the product and act like the
(01:41:49):
attractiveness and the covetness of it is the problem and
not the law breaking. That's where we are gonna get
more vigilanteism. If this keeps up, that's a guarantee.
Speaker 8 (01:42:05):
On the go and need a quick news fixed with
a fun twist, follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite size,
in formative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on Apple
or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 16 (01:42:18):
My kids have not eaten five days, and it's the
taxpayers responsibility to take care.
Speaker 3 (01:42:23):
Of my kids.
Speaker 14 (01:42:25):
Trump not cut no food stamps out.
Speaker 7 (01:42:28):
If you're poor, don't have kids.
Speaker 3 (01:42:29):
Okay, if you're struggling, don't have kids. Don't bring more in.
Speaker 14 (01:42:33):
If you already have them.
Speaker 8 (01:42:34):
That's another situation.
Speaker 3 (01:42:35):
If you don't have them, don't bring any in. And
if you have two, don't go having another one.
Speaker 5 (01:42:41):
If you have one, don't go having two more.
Speaker 16 (01:42:43):
So they say two million is getting cut off these
months for a scamp. I'm about to go find out
if I'm in inn number in that ratio. It's in
day five and I have not received no food stamps.
My disability text is on hold.
Speaker 3 (01:43:01):
My cash benefits is not coming no more. They're still pending.
I it is the.
Speaker 16 (01:43:06):
Tax payer's job to pay for my kids.
Speaker 3 (01:43:09):
Okay, that's not true. That's not true. Actually, I mean
it's just a program that exists. Yeah, it's a program
that exists.
Speaker 2 (01:43:23):
And wow, I mean I feel like if you have
an expensive phone and you can record yourself and you
can do all this stuff, and you are otherwise healthy
and you can go out and do work, I don't
think that you need to be like permanently on food stamps.
Speaker 3 (01:43:37):
I just don't think that's.
Speaker 5 (01:43:42):
Part of The problem is that in high schools, nothing
in regards to fiscal responsibility or any sort of financial
education happens before you graduate high school. So all these
people are financially illiterate them unless their parents have done
their job when they graduate high school. And this is
(01:44:02):
what we're seeing.
Speaker 2 (01:44:04):
I you know, again, I was raised by for a
significant portion of my life by a single mom who
didn't go on government benefits, and you know, worked two
jobs in order to make meet. So I don't believe
that it's impossible to I just know it's no one's
responsibility to take care of your family but yourself. That's
(01:44:26):
why it's good to you know, have have ambition and
and to value merit and all of those things. This
is and a lot of these people, sorry they're young
and healthy, get a job.
Speaker 5 (01:44:38):
This also points to how important self reliance is because
once you put your reliance in something else and that
something else fails, now what do you have? And that's
interesting exactly what's happening.
Speaker 2 (01:44:48):
That's and that's a good point because it's that's the
government's mo is to divorce you from that self reliance. Tomorrow,
we're gonna we're gonna get into this issue with the
ranching and some of the Argentinian money, and I you know,
all of these things, and I get what the administration
(01:45:10):
is doing, but I also think nothing that they do
is going to be successful unless we deal with the
regulations on ranchers and farming here domestically. And we're going
to dive into some of that tomorrow. In the meantime
today in stupidity.
Speaker 5 (01:45:20):
All right, all that suffering that you just saw just
a couple of minutes ago right here is designed by
the Democrats, and unfortunately they said it out loud for
you to hear. Listen to this.
Speaker 17 (01:45:32):
I mean, shutdowns are terrible, and of course there will
be you know, families that are going to suffer. We
take that responsibility very seriously suffering, but it is one
of the few leverage times we have.
Speaker 5 (01:45:48):
Oh there it is. So they want to leverage your suffering,
your emotions then will hopefully push in the direction they
want you politically.
Speaker 2 (01:45:57):
That's so sad, that's but they admitted it. So when
they show you who they are, believe, then that does
it for us today. I hope you guys have a
great rest of your evening. Find us on substick, chapter
and verse YouTube Facebook, Like and subscribe.
Speaker 3 (01:46:08):
Back with you tomorrow