Kamala’s Fox Fumble, Lip-Reading Obama and Biden & Victoria’s Secret Controversy

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
That's right. This is the Dana Show. My name is
Craig Collins, filling in. Thrilled to be with you d
Lash or Dana Lash Radio on Twitter, on x to
stay connected, to do her everything she's doing at Danaradio
dot com too. I'm Radio Craig ce on facebooker wherever.
If anybody wants to find me, I might as well
throw that out more often. Let's do this first. The

(00:21):
conversation between Brett Bear and Kamala Harris last night was amazing,
and it's actually amazing for two reasons. First, it was
incredible because going in a lot of people were skeptical
that Brett behar would hold the Vice president's feet quite
to the fire the way he did. Trump was one
of said people saying things in truth, social and other

(00:42):
platforms that Brettbear was soft. He certainly was not soft
last night, and he certainly was not an easy conversation
for Kamala Harris. The other thing that's fascinating to me
is how much mainstream legacy, left leaning whatever you want
to call it media traditional. Some people call it media
that's defending Harris, who did did a terrible job and
calling Brett Bear a bully, And that's hilarious to me

(01:05):
because that did not happen back in twenty twenty three,
when Brett Bhaer did the exact same thing, interrupt and
to his face, asked difficult questions to Donald Trump. Media
loved it. I was looking back at Twitter or x
back in twenty I think it was like mid twenty
twenty three when that interview happened, but I was looking
back at reactions to it, and people were praising Brett

(01:29):
Beher for saying stuff to Trump, like some of the
people who worked with you in your administration, and he
named names no longer support you. He said something about
Mike Pence specifically too. This is all stuff Bear said.
Trump's response at the time, I'd play the audio, but
I want to get the stuff that actually happened the
other night was that he hired good people and he
hired bad people, and he thought he did a pretty
good job ten to one and hiring the good instead

(01:51):
of the bad. But fascinating because I think even New
York Times, in its write up of this Harris Bear interview,
said that some of the things that Kamala Harris said
were things that the Fox New News audience had never
heard before, even though one said reference. The reference about
people who worked with Trump that don't support him was
something that Brett Baer actually said to Donald Trump. Anyway,

(02:13):
I digress. Let's go ahead and play several of these
minutes that seem incredibly important or valuable. Let's start right
at the top. This was one of the first questions
asked by Brett Baer that I think demonstrated to Harris,
who showed up fifteen to twenty minutes late for this conversation,
and her staff even waived to have it end while
it was still going on. But this demonstrated that it

(02:34):
was going to be an interesting evening for the two
of these people sitting down very close to each other,
pretending to be friendly but having a difficult chat.

Speaker 2 (02:42):
You know, voters tell polsters all over the country and
here in Pennsylvania that immigration is one of the key
issues that they're looking at this election, and specifically the
influx of illegal immigrants from more than one hundred and
fifty countries. How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your
administration has released into the country over the last three

(03:03):
and a half years.

Speaker 3 (03:04):
Well, I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration because
I agree with you. It is It is a topic
of discussion that people want to rightly have. Okay, and
you know what I'm going to talk about.

Speaker 1 (03:14):
Yeah, but you're just a number. Do you think it's
one million? You know what? I loved to you. By
the way, this is the opening conversation, and Harris actually said,
and I don't think she says it quite like that
another time during the whole interview, you know what I'm
going to say right now, meaning you know what my
talking points are in response to this conversation. I bet you.
Her team even told Brett Baer ask whatever questions you want,

(03:36):
but if you ask about immigration, this is what you're
going to be told, and he was trying to ignore
that in three.

Speaker 3 (03:40):
Million, Brett, let's just get to the point, okay. The
point is that we have a broken immigration system.

Speaker 4 (03:47):
We do that needs to be repaired.

Speaker 2 (03:49):
All land Security secretary said that eighty percent of apprehension.

Speaker 4 (03:53):
I'm not finished.

Speaker 1 (03:53):
Well let me finish. Why don't you let me finish?
Darn it. She went on to continue to talk about
all the things that he's not asking questions about, all
the things that aren't relevant to the fact that we've
gotten to as bad of a place as we've gotten.
And it's the democratic version of a discussion to say, well,
the system itself is broken, so we're going to break
it more. I guess their logic is they believe that

(04:16):
there's not enough fair ways for people to get into
the country legally, so let's just ignore all the rules
and see how that goes. And it's gone quite poorly.
Case in point is one of the follow up questions
Brett has still on this topic where he talks about
and gives names of people who died because they were
killed by people that shouldn't have been in this country.
That's something that their families are incredibly mad about, of course,

(04:38):
and heard about and blaming the Biden Harris campaign or
the Biden Harris administration for. And this was another really
difficult moment in the first few minutes of a chat
between Brett Behar and Kamala Harris, because the Vice President
has no interest discussing this and somehow wants to blame
it on Trump. It's almost as if before I hit
play on this audio, you can tell that her brain

(05:00):
was thinking, I have to blame this on Trump. I
have to blame this on Trump. So as the question
developed and it turned different ways. Harris seemed to really
struggle to figure out, Okay, how do I actually blame
the question on Trump based on how he asked it.

Speaker 2 (05:13):
Jocelyn Hungary, Rachel Morin, Laken Riley. They are young women
who were brutally assaulted and killed by some of the
men who were released at the beginning of the administration,
well before a negotiated bipartisan bill. Former President Clinton actually
referred to Lake and Riley Sunday campaigning for you, and
Georgia is saying, if those men had been properly vetted,

(05:34):
Lake and Riley probably would not have been killed. So
if it wouldn't have happened, this is well before any negotiation.
This is well before Donald Trump got involved in the politics.
This is a specific policy decision by your administration to
release these men into the country.

Speaker 4 (05:49):
So what I'm saying to you, do.

Speaker 2 (05:51):
You know those families really an apology?

Speaker 5 (05:54):
A look.

Speaker 1 (05:55):
I'll let her answer the question too, as Brett did,
but I do want to say that he prefaced this
on purpose with the please don't mention the bipartisan deal
to add more border patrol agents to the border. It
has nothing to do with the question I asked you,
which was the first few years when your administration was
actively harming the country via your border policies. Do you

(06:16):
regret that? Do you an o an apology to people
who actually lost loved ones because of some of the
individuals that were let into this country. Please do not
answer my question by talking about the bipartisan border bill
that materialized much later than these things happened. And what
does she do.

Speaker 3 (06:31):
Let me just say, first of all, those are tragic cases.

Speaker 4 (06:36):
There's no question about that. There is no question about that.

Speaker 3 (06:40):
And I can't imagine the pain that the families of
those victims have experienced.

Speaker 1 (06:48):
So I'm sorry.

Speaker 4 (06:48):
That should not have occurred.

Speaker 1 (06:50):
So I'm sorry.

Speaker 4 (06:51):
So that is true.

Speaker 1 (06:54):
I'm sorry. It is also true, didn't do it.

Speaker 3 (06:57):
The border of security had actually been passed nine months ago.

Speaker 1 (07:00):
This wouldn't have helped it all.

Speaker 3 (07:01):
Nine months that we would have had more border agents
at the border, more super.

Speaker 1 (07:07):
All right, so let me put you we keep going.
She's going to give the same answer you've heard before.
The bipartisan border bill was killed by Trump, and again
she says six or seven months ago. So let's put
yourself in the shoes of Brett Baar, at this point,
you've asked two questions, You've gotten two boilerplate philibuster whatever
you want to call them, talking points answers. You've tried

(07:27):
as best you could to preface your questions to prevent
said philibuster answers, and it didn't work. And so now
the conversation is going to get contentious. And again I
will just say one other thing out loud. This happened
when Brett Bher sat down with Donald Trump. This was
again a year ago. I'm tempted to play the audio,
but you don't need it. It's not the point. So
he's not being sexist, he's not being racist. Brett Bear

(07:50):
is not being mean and unfair and a toxic man
or whatever some people are saying he was for interrupting
the vice president because he did this to Trump. But
let's continue. There are so many moments where this conversation
got completely out of hand and broken, and actually there's
one really big one that I think a lot of
context is absolutely necessary for people to understand better. So

(08:13):
Brettbear goes down a path to talking about some of
the things that Democrats have said about Trump, including that
he is a threat to democracy that the societies we
know it will end, even the enemy from within, which
is a thing that Trump did say, but it's being
of course misunderstood by the left on purpose. They know
they're doing this on purpose to make it sound insanely

(08:35):
crazy and scary and akin to say the Nazis. So
let's go back and forth with this, because one of
the things I really enjoyed about this question and answer
was not actually what I'm going to play for you,
but the way it was reacted to in media and
the way that some people misrepresented the misrepresented thing to
begin with, to make it further look bad. But the

(08:56):
answer is terrible. Here we go.

Speaker 3 (08:59):
I'm sorry, with all due respect, that clip was not
what he has been saying about the enemy within a
terrible bird when he's speaking about the American people. That's
not what you just showed. As No, that's not what
you just showed. In all fairness and respect to you,
the question that we asked, he.

Speaker 4 (09:17):
Didn't show that. And here's the bottom line.

Speaker 3 (09:19):
He has repeated it many times, and you and I
both know that, and you and I both know that
he has talked about turning the American military on the
American people he has talked about going after people who
are engaged in peaceful protest.

Speaker 4 (09:34):
He has talked.

Speaker 3 (09:35):
About locking people up because they disagree with him. This
is a democracy and an inner democracy. The president of
the United States in the United States of.

Speaker 1 (09:45):
America, I can't help what you repeat stuff. The president
of the United States in the United States of America, willing.

Speaker 3 (09:52):
To be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock
people up for doing it.

Speaker 4 (09:58):
And this is what is quick.

Speaker 1 (10:00):
I'll stop right there. So the beginning part of that
discussion was that same talking point, the enemy from within.
And there's two things that matter, being fully transparent, not
trying to be, you know, overly one sided, and having
someone who's on the left throw the radio thinking, how
dare this guy who's filling in for data who's definitely
nowhere near as attractive as she is, or whatever stuff

(10:21):
people say about me when I fill in on the show.
I'm an idiot, I'm whatever. It's fine, it's true. It's
all true anyway, as you're getting mad. If you're someone
on the left listening, I will absolutely admit that Trump
did say enemy from within. This is a conversation he
had with a different Fox person just recently. But he
wasn't talking about the American people. And this is the

(10:41):
game that the politicians always play, pretending as though you
and they are the same. If someone threatens a politician,
they threatened you, you know who's next after they go
after me? They're going after you. No, they're not. No
one's coming for me. After they got Bob Menendez in
trouble for having gold bars in his pockets. On the list,

(11:01):
I'm very far down the list. Maybe higher up than
some because I get to fill in on these fancy shows,
but definitely not very high on the list. They're not
coming after you. Trump's not putting regular Americans in jail.
And if he got elected and did that, guess what,
the entire country would not like that. We'd be angry
about that. That wouldn't be something we'd allow to just happen.
But if you put politicians in jail who broke the

(11:23):
law and are used to having a set of standards
that are different than the rest of us, they're allowed
to do whatever they want and the rest of us
actually have to follow the rules, well that's fine. Actually,
many Americans would support the broken system that is our
government being upended and so I love that she goes
there and she calls the enemy from within the American people,
and the Trump wants to throw them in jail. I

(11:45):
think he actually said one of the enemies from within
was Adam Schiff, or a whole bunch of far left
politicians or politicians that pretended to be on the right
that are on the left Liz Cheney's of the world
who are actively hurting us, or the politicians who've opened
the border like Harris, that are hurting our country in
other ways. Those are the enemies from within according to Trump.
But unless I digress, what I think is so fascinating

(12:06):
about this is how angry it made Harris and how
she accused him of playing an out of context clip
that wasn't the clip she was talking about, when it
actually was an answer to this exact question that Trump
gave that day. So Brett Behaar chose to give the
most current version of Trump's defense that he possibly could,
and I thought it was fascinating. I thought it was fantastic.

(12:27):
All right, we'll take a break. We got a lot
to get to throughout the show today. We'll definitely talk
about some silly This conversation with Harris will certainly come
up again. A lot going on. This is the Dana Show,
Greg Collins Filling It.

Speaker 6 (12:39):
Life can take a toll on our bodies, there's no
way around it. And whether it's just sitting for hours
on end at your computer or if you're working a
physical job, over time, your body pays the price. There is, however,
an effective way to turn back the clock on pain.
Relief Factor developed by doctors. Relief Factor helps support your
body's response to inflammation and the difference. Instead of just

(13:00):
masking pain, Relief Factor helps eliminate it for good and
it's one hundred percent drug free. My husband Chris has
taken Relief Factor with incredible results. So if the pains
that come with living a full life are affecting you,
do as many others have done and turn back the
clock on pain with Relief Factor. Their three week quick
start is just nineteen ninety five. That's less than a

(13:20):
dollar a day, and when you feel good, it's amazing
how much more you get out of life. Visit relief
Factor dot com or call one eight hundred four Relief.
That's one eight hundred the number four relief. Try it
for only nineteen ninety five and turn back the clock
on pain with relief Factor, relief Factor dot com and.

Speaker 7 (13:40):
Now all of the news you would probably miss. It's
time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (13:45):
That's right, let's do a real quick quick five if
we can. Five topics that I'm only going to get
to very briefly. A couple things or pieces of audio
that went viral that I thought were hilarious. The first
one was a woman, a woman excuse me, who's very
upset because her turkey leg acre to her, is made
out of ham. It's not actually made out of ham,
but she went viral for complaining about it. Here's part
of that audio.

Speaker 8 (14:05):
Turkey legs as ham, turkey legs as haam.

Speaker 4 (14:09):
The world is a lie.

Speaker 8 (14:10):
Everything we ever knew was a lie.

Speaker 1 (14:12):
A lot.

Speaker 8 (14:12):
I was watching a TikTok. This girl said they was
at the fair. They got turkey leg the turkey legs
tasted like ham. They went back to the dude and
was like, hey, why does this turkey leg taste like ham?
He was like, it is ham. We just call him
turkey legs. What do you want us to say?

Speaker 4 (14:28):
Pig leg?

Speaker 3 (14:29):
Mind blown?

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Her mind is blown? And yeah, I call it a
pig leg. If it's made out of ham. But by
the way, the way that turkey legs are made makes
them taste sort of like ham. But according to a
lot of people who know about turkey legs, they're not ham.
That's it. I guess I can't do the rest of
the the five here, or you know what, Actually I
could do one more. I got another one. Let's do
this one. Seventy one year old woman who's a pull

(14:50):
dancer as a fitness thing. Her name is Mary. She's
not actually someone who does that other thing professionally. She
said this recently.

Speaker 9 (14:57):
A friend of mine said, well, I'm taking pole down
a couple.

Speaker 4 (15:00):
That sounds fun.

Speaker 9 (15:01):
The bug had bit me and I.

Speaker 4 (15:04):
Had to do this.

Speaker 9 (15:05):
I just had to do it. And I always say,
if you're going to try it, don't just do one time,
because you'll come away the first time and say, oh,
I'm sure I didn't know how muscles there. You can't
be a wet noodle and be on the pole.

Speaker 1 (15:17):
I think you have. I gotta stop it. That is
the quote of the day. Seventy one year old woman
saying you can't be a wet noodle and be on
the pole. That has got to be true. And certainly
the darkest phrase that any father would never want his
daughter to utter in any situation whatsoever. I love this,
and I actually even love how I was interacting earlier
this week with a buddy of mine about how good
this seventy one year old woman looks. Mary is her name.

(15:40):
She's not bad looking, which probably is a thing that
winds up happening if you find out a grandma went
viral for pole dancing, and then you're impressed that it
apparently is a pretty good fitness workout. If it were
my family member, grandmother or something, I would beg them
daily not to do this, to go jog in the
park like the typical person of that age, does you know,

(16:00):
do it a little bit faster than normal, because then
all my friends won't constantly make fun of me for
having a grandma on a stripper pull. But again, she's
just doing it for fitness, that's all that is. But
I love that piece of audio.

Speaker 9 (16:10):
Two.

Speaker 1 (16:11):
I'm in trouble with somebody, I just know I am.
I got a couple other pieces of audio, but I'm
going to save those. I do like this as far
as other quick five things. The smallest hill you're willing
to die on. What is it? What's the topic? One
person said, being called a girl when she's over the
age of eighteen, So she's a woman. Darn it. How
dare anybody use the term girl to describe her? Number
two on the list from BuzzFeed and Reddit Nickelback being

(16:35):
a great band. Some people want to die in that hill.
A whole lot of other people don't. Yes, they have hits. Yes,
the hits are catchy. Are they a very talented musical group? Well,
you got to define talent. I don't think they're the
kind of musical group that I would have put up
on the Mount rushmore of you know, songwriting. But yes,
they have the hits. That's fine too. One last one

(16:56):
grease too is better than grease. Some people would be
mad about that. Quick break a lot more. Craig Collins
filling in on the Dana Show on Deck here.

Speaker 6 (17:03):
We got a lot on, we got a lot coming up.
We're here in Richmond at our affiliate and we are
we got an event tonight and like I said, we'll
be talking more about it.

Speaker 4 (17:12):
I'll be I'll have.

Speaker 6 (17:13):
It up on Instagram and I'm sure Facebook and all
that as well. But we're here in Richmond. We are
live from WRVA here our affiliate and as we move
our partners it he'll bring you free radio as we
roll towards headlines. You don't have to pay subscription fee
and we're thankful for these folks. Tax Network USA. You
guys know how I feel about the government. Theft agent,
I mean the IRS. The IRS now emboldened with eighty

(17:37):
eight thousand new agents. Deadlines pasted October fifteenth, and if
you haven't organized your documents, if you hadn't submitted estimated payments,
the IRS could be knocking on your door. Don't let them.

Speaker 1 (17:49):
Catch you off guard.

Speaker 6 (17:52):
Schedule a complimentary consultation called one eight hundred and nine
five eight one thousand, or visit TNUSA dot com slash
dana talk with member of their expert team. They have
skilled professionals dedicated to securing the best resolution for your
tax issues and whether you owe ten thousand or ten million,
regardless of whether it's for personal or business. They have
the tools and experience to handle any situation and flexible

(18:15):
assistance whether you're able to pay her on a fixed income.
Tax Network USA provides tailored solutions to help you resolve
your tax burdens effectively. Hopefully you didnt miss the October
fifteenth deadline. Visit tanusa dot com slash Dana or call
one eight hundred nine five eight one thousand for a
free consultation. They'll guide you through a few simple questions
to determine how much you can save. TNUSA dot com
slash Dana one hundred ninety five eight one thousand.

Speaker 10 (18:37):
Who is the Department of Home Win Security supposed to help?
MAJORCIS is saying FEMA's running out of money, But this
past year we spent twenty four billion in Ukraine, eleven
billion in Israel, and billions more to smaller nations. Who
are their real priorities? Check out the Watchdog on Wall
Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 11 (18:56):
Subscribe to The Dana Show podcast because who says you
can't make fun of people? Was staying informed on your
own personal time? Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you
get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (19:06):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Greg Collins,
filling in Thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
places to find Dana DirecTV Channel three forty seven, all
via the First TV YouTube, Brumble, Facebook, Dlash, and Dana
Lash Radio or places on Twitter on x let's do this.
Donald Trump sat down for an interview the same day
that Kamala Harris sat down for her interview with Fox News.

(19:29):
All over media, people were saying, it's amazing, Kamala Harris
is going into the lions den. She's going to fight
off the wolves or whatever it is, they said, because
she had to deal with Brett Baer. But Trump went
and sat down with Bloomberg News, which is no fan
of his, and had a conversation in which he was
asked a bunch of times about January sixth. That was
one of many things that was asked about him. He

(19:50):
also did this, though, which is probably a moment that
went viral for a lot of people who don't have
Trump arrangement syndrome because it's hilarious. Here we go, he said.

Speaker 12 (19:58):
Trump. At the moment, there was a ta called the
Trump trade in the markets. Do you know what that is?
The Trump trade is very simple. People are betting that
your policies they're going to drive up debt, they're going
to drive up inflation, so they're going to drive up
inflation interest rates. Are the investors wrong?

Speaker 9 (20:14):
Yeah?

Speaker 13 (20:15):
I had four years, no inflation, inflation.

Speaker 12 (20:19):
But that was that was when you had much.

Speaker 13 (20:21):
I had four years. It's better than that. And Biden,
who has no idea where the hell he is. Okay,
Biden went two years with no inflation because he inherited
from me. And then they started spending money like drunken salers.
They spent so much money. It was so ridiculous the
money they were spending. They were spending on the green

(20:41):
new scam, A green new scam, the green new Deal.
You know, it was conceived of by AOC plus three.
She never even studied the environment in college. She went
to a nice college. She came out. She just said,
the green new scam. She just named all these things.

Speaker 12 (20:59):
But the markets are looking at the fact you are
making all these promises. Latest one was car loans. You're
flooding the thing with giving giveaways. But I was actually
quite kind to you. I use seven trillion the upper estimate.

Speaker 1 (21:14):
I was quite kind to you. I said, seven trillion.
How dare we go with a number like that?

Speaker 12 (21:18):
Fifteen trillion? People like a Wall Street journal who's hardly
a communist organization, but you know they have criticized you
on this as well. You are running up enormous debt.

Speaker 4 (21:27):
What is the Wall Street Journal? Now I'm meeting with
them tomorrow. What is the Wall Street Journal?

Speaker 3 (21:30):
That they've been wrong about everything?

Speaker 4 (21:31):
So have you? By the way, you're trying to turn this.
You're trying to turn this.

Speaker 12 (21:37):
You're trying to turn You're trying to turn this into
diff There.

Speaker 9 (21:40):
Are a business people.

Speaker 4 (21:42):
You're wrong, You've been wrong, You've been wrong.

Speaker 1 (21:44):
Here I'll jump in now. You know what I think
is really interesting about this? If Trump or name the
conservative politician I know everybody says that it's it's Project
twenty twenty five, and how horrible and terrible that is.
Actually gets a little bit of what they want, which
is not necessarcessarily akin to Project twenty twenty five, but
it's reducing the size of our government and the cost

(22:05):
of our government, getting rid of unnecessary things, which might
include say the Department of Education. To some I might
be one that could agree with that, depending on what
actually comes in to help do whatever they need to
do to have much less of a hand in how
we educate people and allowing schools to have a larger
stake in control of those kind of things. But nonetheless,

(22:27):
if we got rid of a lot of the bureaucracy
that's corrupt and crap in Washington, and a lot of
them is spending and terrible other things that happened. We
actually would be able to be able to afford a
lot of the stuff that Trump is promising. So whether
or not that occurs, I know a whole lot of
people always offer to spend less as the government, but
what does that actually mean to each politician and to
someone like Trump or people that are within that part

(22:51):
of his party. It means more extreme versions of cost
cutting in the government than other people mean. And of
course the people on the other side are up in
arms about that. That's their jobs, that's their livelihoods. No
more Hunter Biden making business deals that make no sense
and should be considered crimes than enrich him and the
rest of his family. That's the thing that shouldn't happen anymore,
and something that I think would be a cost to

(23:16):
or excuse me, a benefit to get rid of so
that it doesn't cost as much to implement a lot
of Trump's plans, getting rid of a lot of the
overspend that is our government, which we all would agree on,
depending on how exactly I guess they present the issue
to us because you can be convinced that they're going
after your pocketbook. On the reality is they don't care
about that, at least Trump doesn't. The Democrats certainly do.

(23:38):
There's a lot of ways they want to collect more
taxes from you. But I just found this amazing that
Trump sat down had an interview and a conversation the
same day as Harris that was equally hostile, and no
one's talking about it, and they actually are saying the
exact opposite of Trump. He's not willing to sit down
with the sixty Minutes of the world or anyone else
in the world. He did it. He just went to

(23:59):
a different place and he's been on sixty minutes before.
All right, let's play this. This is interesting to me.
This is a viral video of students in I think
this is I know it's in California, but I think
it's like grade school, seventh, eighth grade and maybe some
early high school. Not necessarily old enough to actually vote.
But it's just an exercise they're doing in school that

(24:20):
has made some parents very mad. And you'll be able
to tell why very quickly here. But this is insane.

Speaker 3 (24:27):
Do you guys think this is normal for them to
bring politics into school.

Speaker 14 (24:31):
And if they vote for other than California.

Speaker 15 (24:34):
By the way, but if you vote for Kamala Harris,
then you're going to get a pizza party.

Speaker 1 (24:37):
But if you vote for Donald J. Trump, apparently you
are excluded from the pizza party.

Speaker 6 (24:43):
My teacher was screaming at a saying, the other class
is voting Trump, so they don't get to use the
piper patches, not the school supplies for the girls.

Speaker 5 (24:51):
They don't get to use the computers and chargers.

Speaker 12 (24:54):
Or what to call it, the scrunchies, dre and.

Speaker 4 (25:00):
Stuff like that.

Speaker 5 (25:01):
Okay, so you guys don't get to use the stuff,
It's okay.

Speaker 3 (25:03):
And then what was it about the pizza party that
we don't get the.

Speaker 6 (25:08):
Pizza party because only the kids have Only our class
that voted Camal gets to ease a pizza party.

Speaker 1 (25:18):
But so, okay. I love something about this audio. I
can't get over how much I love it. It's the
fact that the little kid mispronounces Kamala Harris's name, not
because that's a political thing and some people do it
or whatever. That's how little she understands politics. She's like,
if we vote for the one, we don't get a
pizza party. If we vote for the other one, we
get a pizza party. We don't understand, we're just being
told that's how that works, the ideology that exists. And honestly,

(25:41):
like in California that thinks they're going to be okay
with this, that oh, it's fine, we send these kids home.
All the parents are going to agree with us because
we're a deep blue state and there can't be anybody
that has a problem with this. This is nuts, and
this happens all over the place. And then you have
teachers that go on television and say, I would never
try to shape the opinion of your child. I would
never do anything to make them believe or think something

(26:01):
that they don't already believe or think. I'm gonna let
the parents raise their kids. How dare anybody be up
in arms about what we're doing to indoctrinate students in schools.
And then you see this video or you see a
video like it, or all the other things going on,
and actually know what it reminded me of another thing?
And I do I love this audio. It goes viral
often one of the biggest reasons that actually goes viral.

(26:22):
Is because this is a core voting block for Democrats
that Harris should be struggling with more than she's actually
struggling with them. And I like this edit of it too,
but I'll add more context after I play it. This
is part of the BRT Bear Kamala interview in which
she said or she was very offended by him, insinuating

(26:43):
that she would think that Trump supporters are idiots because
she said the Trump's dangerous and horrible, and you know,
no one could vote for him or support him, and
yet Brett behar counters with a whole lot of people
are voting for him. Why do you think that is?

Speaker 12 (26:55):
I hear.

Speaker 1 (26:55):
Let's play a little bit more.

Speaker 2 (26:56):
Of that stupid.

Speaker 4 (27:01):
I would never say that about the American people.

Speaker 1 (27:03):
Right, Let's do a flashback to twenty fourteen when you
said this on a stage.

Speaker 3 (27:08):
What else do we know about this population? Eighteenth through
twenty four They are stupid?

Speaker 1 (27:14):
I love that cut of it because it's just so simple.
She would never say anyone stupid, but in fact she
did call people stupid. Here, I'll give you a little
more of that actual discussion.

Speaker 3 (27:22):
Lash and it's a specific phase of life. Remember, age
is more than a chronological fact. What else do we
know about this population eighteenth through twenty four? They are stupid,
That is why we put them in dormitories and they
have a resident assistant.

Speaker 4 (27:41):
They make really bad decision.

Speaker 1 (27:44):
Yeah, and including maybe voting for you if people do that.
You know what she's actually talking about. There the context
of the entirety of that often used viral clip of
Kamala Harris from twenty fourteen, in which she's a you know,
powerful person in California, yet someone who's on the track
to stealing a presidential nomination. She's talking about lowering the

(28:06):
penalty and punishment in California for drug dealers that are
in that age group eighteen to twenty four, because she says,
they're not as smart as people later in life, so
we shouldn't punish them the same way we punish an
older person who commits a similar crime. That is stupid,
that's insane, She said. She doesn't want to kick people
onto a track of being in and out of jail

(28:28):
for their entire lives. So you lower the punishment, So
you tell them they're getting away with something, and they're
getting away with it in a way that they wouldn't
normally be able to prevent themselves from going to jail
because of their age, and you hope they understand how
lucky they are. That's not going to teach anybody anything.
We know that that doesn't teach anybody anything. We've seen
it a ton of times, including in California, with those

(28:50):
kind of laws. They don't make people more successful. They
make people more willing to break the laws sooner in
life and then wind up doing it later in life
as well, because they're not afraid of the consequences because
they think they will be mitigated. They'll be little, they'll
be you know, nonexistent. It actually is very similar. I
don't know if I'll play the audio, and I probably
can take another break. I'm ranting about this a lot,

(29:12):
but before I do, I'll say this. There's a guy
that went viral just after the Brent Bear or actually
was the Charlemagne the God Kamala Harris interview in which
he was saying that he was wrongfully convicted while she
was the district attorney in California. He wound up winning
millions of dollars from California because of said wrongful conviction.

(29:33):
But he also vividly remembers being in the courtroom the
day of the sentencing and watching Harris laugh as he
got multiple years in jail, some of which he had
to serve before proving he was innocent, and getting a
crap ton of money to get out of jail. But
what he said that was really interesting to me in
this long viral video that people have focused on the
other part I just told you about, is that he

(29:54):
expected to maybe have an easier time in court than
the hard time he had because the person who was
the district attorney technically going after him was his race.
He because I didn't know much about her, but she
was supposed to be a black woman who was raised
in Oakland, and I thought, Okay, maybe this will be
better for me than if it were someone else in
that position. And it was marketedly worse than anybody else

(30:17):
he could have expected. And the way in which she
even seemed to take joy in the punishment doled out
to him, and she said, that's something. Excuse me. The
person talking about this said, that's something that deserves to
be talked about in certain circles when Harris is making
promises to certain, say, demographic groups, And I just found
all of that interesting because if you break the law,

(30:39):
you're going to get in trouble. If you don't break
the law, you can hope that they find out that
you don't and hopefully you wind up being, you know, acquitted,
and horrible to go to jail when you don't deserve
to be punished, But interesting that some of us might think,
in the back of her head, wait, does the race
of this person benefit me in my path through the courtroom?
And how bad that is. You shouldn't want the favoritism

(31:03):
of a certain situation anymore than you want the negative
treatment of another situation. And so it's just sort of
amazing to watch that also play itself out as far
as a conversation there and an expectation that wound up
going wrong. And I guess to get back to it
real quick before I break that California classroom thing where
students are coming home being told if you vote for Trump,
you get punished, and if you vote for Harris you

(31:24):
get a pizza party. I bet you A whole bunch
of those teachers did not expect this to go viral,
even though it obviously should and did, because they thought
that none of the people that they were sending this
home to would be upset with it, so they wouldn't
talk about it. They'd just keep that secret amongst themselves.
And they didn't, and I'm very happy about that. All right, Well,
take a break. We'll get to some lighter and sillier

(31:45):
things in just a bit. This is Greg Collins filling
in on the Danish show. Check her out everywhere all
over the place, a Twitter, Facebook, what have you and
direct tv A channel three forty seven, A quick breaking,
A lot more coming up.

Speaker 6 (31:57):
Our partners over at ready Wise. Ready Wise is ready
even if you aren't. Ready Wise is always prepared, because
they understand it's more important, it's now than ever to
take charge of your own safety and well being. You
got a lot of stuff, I mean, good grief. We
saw a lot of the natural disasters and numerous states
and people that are grappling with these dire situations. You know,

(32:18):
one of the last things that you won't have to
worry about is making sure that you have sustenance to
live off of, that you are nourished and your family
is fed and safe. This is where ready wise comes in. They,
I mean, it's just you know, the chain of command
for your food US ingredients packed the US plants sent
up from that plant. It's comfort in a crisis and beyond.
You can have hot, comforting meals even in tough times.

(32:39):
It's great for emergencies, even if you just want like camping.
You can just need to take it with you to
do that. They have free and fast shipping on most orders.
Seventy two hour Food kit right Now is buy one,
get one hundred dollars in value for fifty bucks. Two
boxes twelve pouches of premium survival food. You get the
breakfast entrees, drinks all of it, and eight you get
eight servings. You get all of your appropriate calories, all

(32:59):
the protein year, twenty percent of daily carbs, all of
it to keep you powered and going in any kind
of situation. Twenty five years shelf life as well. Visit
readywiss dot com and use promo code Danta twenty at
check out for twenty percent off of your entire purchase.
That's readywis dot com Promo code Danta twenty for twenty
percent off.

Speaker 11 (33:17):
Not Able to catch all three hours of the Dana Show,
subscribe to the full podcast and get news and laughs
delivered in short, easy to digest episodes ideal for your
busy lifestyle on YouTube, Apple or wherever you gets your podcast.

Speaker 1 (33:31):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in, thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff out there to talk about. Jd Vance is funny
on social media. He made a joke about how Donald
Trump will stop the abomination that is a recently viral
version of ice cream chili flavored ice cream. He said
both he and Donald Trump, he and Donald Trump will
take it down, which I loved, and a lot of

(33:53):
people reacted to it. Some took it seriously and told
him to stay out of the ice cream world, which
is hilarious. I don't know why company make this terrible stuff,
but they do, and chili flavored ice cream does. It
just doesn't seem like something anyone needed or wanted or desired,
and yet there it will be. But darn it, that's freedom, baby,
and I'm sure that Jada Vance actually does support that.

(34:13):
Another thing I saw I thought this was interesting. At
a Jersey, a woman sounds like a pretty young woman
based on the audio that I'm gonna play, was very upset.
She passed a restaurant she misunderstood the flag of said
restaurant and thought that, hey, I can be antisemitic. That's
allowed now in twenty twenty four. So she pulled down
a flag that she thought was in Israeli flag, and

(34:35):
she yelled at the restaurant for being a pro genocide.
And then she found out some stuff that made her
feel really dumb, even though she was already dumb to
a lot of us for the things she said had
she been accurate about the type of flag she was attacking.
But here we go, I'm taking this down.

Speaker 4 (34:49):
They can't do that.

Speaker 8 (34:51):
I don't stay for this, yes, Genna side, I don't
support it.

Speaker 4 (34:54):
This is not okay.

Speaker 12 (34:55):
This is greaky.

Speaker 4 (34:56):
Who this?

Speaker 12 (34:57):
This is greaky?

Speaker 16 (34:58):
What Ricky?

Speaker 1 (35:00):
I know it's Israel?

Speaker 4 (35:02):
My bad.

Speaker 1 (35:03):
I'm so happy. My favorite part is who is this
that she says is she's actually tearing down the flag.
Talk about a level of arrogance and stupidity mixed together
for many people who say that, hey, I know things
and I'm upset about things in the world today and
you barely know anything, and the dude is just sitting
there like, WHOA, what's why are people anti the Greek flag?

(35:25):
Why are you upset with me in Greece.

Speaker 4 (35:27):
Oh so party, This is not okay?

Speaker 1 (35:29):
Now this is freaky.

Speaker 3 (35:30):
Who's this? Now?

Speaker 12 (35:31):
This is greaky?

Speaker 14 (35:32):
What greaky?

Speaker 17 (35:34):
I know?

Speaker 1 (35:35):
This Israel bad, my bad. I didn't mean to throw
your flag in the ground and stomp it and yell
let you I'm gonna put it up here and then
just go away. Why even put this on online either?
I think that this woman posted it herself where she
said she got confused. This is it's so stupid. Society
as we know it is in so many ways just
broken and needs to be fixed, and this is one

(35:55):
of said ways. Although I guess I have good news.
If I want to play one last piece of audio
before we take a break. There is a bathroom in
this country, in Utah that has won the title of
best public restroom in the world, or at least in America.
Here we go.

Speaker 10 (36:09):
Honestly, anytime I have to go to a gas station
for whatever reason, especially being an Amazon worker, I have
to use like facilities, I always come to Mavericks and
I usually come to this one because it's really claimed.

Speaker 16 (36:19):
So down the street where I work right now, there's
the outhouses, but they're hot, stinky and I'm even covered
in whatever have you and stuff wife on whatever what
is behind him. So it is nice to have, you know,
just four minutes down the road, be able to stop
line have an experience a seed.

Speaker 14 (36:33):
We base it on a criteria of cleanliness, visual appeal, functionality, innovation,
and unique design elements.

Speaker 1 (36:40):
I don't know what kind of pet chop that second
guy was in, but that was confusing, and I do
love the fact that the manager of the company that
picked the best restroom in America had all those different criteria.
It's not just is it clean, which for ninety nine
percent of Americans is the only thing that matters. We
only care about cleanliness if we're going into a restroom
that you know is not within our home. But it's
also the ambiance, the decorations, the lack of I guess

(37:03):
names and phone numbers scrolled on walls, or maybe you
need some of those, depending on who you are and
what you're looking for. But that's hilarious. Congratulations to Mavericks
Gas Station in Utah for winning a very prestigious award.
I imagine there will be some kind of giant ceremony.
I imagine, you know, celebrities will host it. I'm looking
forward to all that. All right, quick break a lot more.
Creig Collins filling in on the Dana Show.

Speaker 6 (37:25):
New partners to the program. We've talked about them before.
Burner gun. It's a great option to have if you
want more options for self defense, especially if you're going
in an area where they have magical gun free zone
signs that empower criminals and just put victims at a disadvantage.
The Burner, if you're unfamiliar with it, it shoots chemical
irritant projectiles that can disable threats like fifty feet away.

(37:47):
When you compare to a stun gun. You got one
or two shots with a stun gun. You got five
rounds with the burner, and the burna SD is the
most popular model. That's the one that most people seem
to be buying. I've got a couple of friends that
have purchased them. One lives in DS, one lives in
literally in Manhattan, and they work in law and in media.
So they got to be able to have a way
to protect themselves because even though they have their licenses

(38:09):
to carry in those states, you can't carry hardly anywhere.
And the cool thing with burnegun is it doesn't give
a rats backside about your gun free zone signs, and
it's legal in all fifty states, no background check. It
can be shipped right to your door, so there's no question.
To learn more about the burnagun b y r Inna,
visit Burna dot com slash Danta for ten percent off
your purchase. That's Burner dot com slash Dana for ten

(38:31):
percent off.

Speaker 1 (38:33):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
stuff to talk about. Find Danta everywhere, Dana Radio dot com,
a dlash a Dana lash Radio on X on Twitter
are great ways to stay connected to everything going on
with her radio. Craig. See if you want to find
me for some reason, let's do this. And that's on
all the social media platforms too. My following is nothing
compared to hers, just a warning going in, let's do this.

(38:57):
The Brent Beher Kamala Harris conversation is going to be
covered a lot by certain types of media, and then
it's going to be ignored a lot by a lot
of other media outside of them, saying that they think
it was mean or they think it was hostile or
way to go Kambala for going into an environment that
was going to be tough on her and dealing with
it now. First, the lowering of the bar to that
level for someone who wants to be president of the

(39:18):
United States is horrible for us. The fact that the
left wants her to win for two reasons. The first
one they wanted to win is because Trump is a horrible,
terrible individual. According to them, they essentially want to trip
the other person in the race and then win a
race alone and act like that's some kind of victory.
They're the hollow version of a win if they even

(39:39):
get there. The second reason is they say, it's a
whole bunch of historical stuff. You gotta have a woman
be president at some point. You gotta have somebody that's
whatever ethnicity she says she is on a given day.
Those things all have to happen. And I'll be honest
about that part. I don't hate, and you don't hate.
I doubt anyone hates the idea that someone comes along
who's the right person for the job that winds up

(40:01):
being female or black. I know Obama's already broken part
of that barrier. Any of this stuff I don't care
at all what your race, your sex, any of it is.
I just want you to be best suited for the job.
And the big thing that Brett Bear's interview demonstrated the
other night is she is terribly suited for it, like
horribly so as far as the ability to lead or

(40:21):
deal with anything that would be the typical pressures of
being the president. Let's prove this to you a few
different ways. This was probably the most painful night of
the entire twenty six twenty eight minutes whatever they sat
down for, in which a very significant and simple fact
was presented to Harris and she about brain exploded trying

(40:43):
to respond to it.

Speaker 3 (40:44):
Frederick that people are frankly exhausted of Brett more than
sever ourself.

Speaker 2 (40:48):
People to tell the country is on the wrong track.
They say the country is on the wrong track. If
it's on the wrong track, that track follows three and
a half years of you being vice president and as
in Biden being president. That is what they're saying, seventy
nine percent of them. Why are they saying that? If
you're turning the page, You've been in office for three

(41:09):
and a half years.

Speaker 3 (41:10):
And Donald Trump has been running for office.

Speaker 4 (41:14):
You've been the personal helme on the office.

Speaker 1 (41:16):
How dare you, sir, how dare you blame me for
being in charge of stuff when I was in charge
of stuff because that other guy who was not in
charge of stuff, he wanted to be in charge of stuff,
and so he was trying to get the job that
I have. And it's his fault for trying to get
this job that he did better than us when he
was in there. I mean, this is insane kind of
stuff that I don't understand how anyone can walk away

(41:38):
from this thinking that she did a good job. And
yet some people are saying that as far as changes
she'd make or things she'd do different than Biden, a
lot of mainstream media is telling you that she distanced herself.
She drew her biggest and clearest version of how she's
going to govern and be totally separate of the person

(41:58):
she's currently the vice president for.

Speaker 2 (42:01):
It's interesting you said turn the page man and vice president.
You were asked on two different shows last week, what
if anything, you would do differently than President Biden. Here's
what you said.

Speaker 9 (42:09):
Would you have done something differently than President Biden during
the past four years?

Speaker 3 (42:15):
There is not a thing that comes to mind in
terms of and I've been a part of most of
the decisions that have had impact.

Speaker 2 (42:23):
Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be
and what would stay the same?

Speaker 3 (42:30):
Sure, well, I mean I'm obviously not Joe Biden, and
so that would be one change in terms of But
also I think it's important to say with you know,
twenty eight days ago, I'm not Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (42:43):
So you're not Joe Biden. You're not Donald Trump. But
nothing comes to mind that you would do differently.

Speaker 3 (42:49):
Let me be very clear, my presidency will not be
a continuation of Joe Biden's presidency.

Speaker 1 (42:54):
By the way, when she paused for that second and said,
let me be very clear, I thought she was about
to get like a different version of unhinged mad that
she got a few times in this and it reminded
me of a clip from a movie. So real quick.
What I was actually expecting Kamala Harris to say was you.

Speaker 4 (43:11):
Shut your mouth when you're talking to me.

Speaker 1 (43:12):
That's what I thought she was gonna say. And that's
from the wedding crashers. That is not what she said.
Let's get back to the actual answer itself. As she
continues to describe what she'll do different Like.

Speaker 3 (43:21):
Every new president that comes in to office, I will
bring my life experiences, my professional experiences, and fresh and
new ideas. I represent a new generation of leadership. I,
for example, am someone who has not spent the majority
of my career in Washington, DC.

Speaker 1 (43:40):
I invite you are radically to the left, according to
a tremendous amount of people have been radically to the
left for a long time. You know, one of my
favorite actual versions of that part of the discussion. And
I'll give her credit for doing this. When Kamala Harris
has been saying certain things about how even a John

(44:01):
McCain would support her, or you think that she's be
a better choice than Donald Trump, it was Megan McCain
that came out and said, look, leave my dad out
of this. Who's been passed away. He's been dead since
twenty eighteen. Weird that Democrats want to keep bringing him
up as the you know, paragon of what Republicans should
be and what they're not any longer. But more importantly,

(44:23):
what Megan McCain said is if you really keep testing
us here, I'll tell you what he actually said about
Kamala Harris and you're not going to like it. Essentially,
I think she threatened to spill the tea, as the
kids would say. And what I think is a fascinating
about that is, Yes, Harris is so far left that
so many individuals criticized her resoundingly, Even ones that now
like Liz Cheney, stand next to her called her Nazi

(44:47):
versions of being a left leaning fascist. That's how far
to a certain side of the aisle she is. So
when Harris says out loud like I'm not a career politician,
it might actually be better for some of us if
she had spent more time in Washington, and because she
might be a tad less radical, not that that would
actually help us. It would still be terrible, just the
degree of terrible might change a bit. And one last thing,

(45:08):
I know I've been playing a lot from this conversation
between Harris and Brett. Barrett's just they covered a lot
of ground, did it very a short amount of time,
and Brett pushed back harder than some expected him to.
Others did not expect it to be, you know, anything
other than what it was. And a lot of like
really good exchanges that are probably going to get buried
by many many forms of media today, but this was

(45:31):
a pushback on Okay, you're not radical, you were radical.
You're saying all of your opinions have changed, even though
you also tell us that nothing of your opinions has changed,
your priorities, your belief system, it's all still the same.
But you kind of made a decision that questions every
single part of that a pretty big decision. Do you
remember what it was immigration?

Speaker 2 (45:52):
You supported allowing immigrants in the country illegally to apply
for driver's license, to qualify for free tuition at universities,
be enrolled in free healthcare. Do you still support those things?

Speaker 3 (46:04):
Listen, that was five years ago, and I'm very clear
that I will follow the law. I have make that
statement over and over again, and as Vice President of
the United States, that's exactly what I've done, not to
mention before.

Speaker 2 (46:15):
If that's the case, you chose a running mate, Tim Walls,
governor of Minnesota, who signed those very things into state law.
So do you support that?

Speaker 1 (46:24):
Amazing?

Speaker 3 (46:26):
We are very clear that I am very clear, as
is Tim Walls, that we must support and enforce federal law,
and that is exactly what we will do.

Speaker 1 (46:37):
You didn't answer the question twice, Madam President, Madam Vice President,
you didn't do it. The first time I asked you,
you said that you're obviously against all of it, and
then I pointed out that you appointed someone who's probably
going to whisper in your ear occasionally. Hey, we should
do all that stuff that you want to do, and
then I already did, at least at a state level.
And your response again is, but we're not going to
do it because it's currently the law that we can't,

(47:01):
even though I thought the whole point of trying to
get in positions of power in Washington and other places
was to change what the rules are, and that you'd
very much want to change them to be something else.
It's insane that we ever accept that from any politician
as an answer to a question, what do you think
of this? Well, it's the law. I wish it wasn't,
but it is. So that's what we're going to have
to deal with. And by the way, anyone that might

(47:21):
yell at their radio, and not that I think many
people are going to do that in response to what
I said, My brain thought of it that when Trump
says that he's okay with abortion being a statewide issue,
you might think that's the same thing as Harris saying
that I'm not going to do anything to try to
do these radical ideas I have. But Trump actually says
he agrees with it. He thinks that the states should

(47:41):
have control of that issue, so it's something that individually
they will manage and not something that he would ever
put a federal ban on, or of course, go back
to the opposite way and try to reinstate Roe versus Wade,
which is something the Democrats say. That's a different position
to say, you know what, it's not part of my
job anymore to have an opinion on that or to
really barrel toward that, as opposed to well, it could

(48:04):
be my job, but I promise it won't be, because
we're not going to try to make it something that
we have happened during my administration. It's just it's ridiculous
for the second option to be one that anyone ever believes.
There's one last thing I want to play actually, which
is not that interview. It is something else. Trump has
gone on a lot of different media places of the

(48:24):
last few days. Like I said earlier in the show,
Bloomberg News interviewed him and they were not exactly nice.
He does a lot of interviews with people who do
not like him, it does a lot of interviews with
people who are fans of his. He won another podcast,
the PbD Podcast, in which he was talking to the
host of that show and having a conversation about Ukraine.
And this has gone viral, which probably is something that

(48:46):
Patrick Bette David is very happy about, the guy who
host said show. It's certainly gone viral because I think
it's being used out of context. But I want to
play some of it, and I'm even playing the clip
from a left leaning source and then tell you what
I think he was actually trying to say, or what
he actually did say compared to what media is going
to tell you he said. But here we go.

Speaker 13 (49:05):
I think Zelenski is one of the greatest salesman I've
ever seen. Every time he comes in, we give him
one hundred billion dollars. Who else got that kind of
money in history has never been And that doesn't mean
I don't want to help him, because I feel very
badly for those people. But he should never have let
that war start. That the war is a loser. Ukraine, remember,

(49:28):
is not Ukraine anymore. Every city almost is knocked down
to the ground. All those beautiful golden domes are laying
on their side, smashed to smitherings. There's no city. You
go into the city and every building is demolished. It
looks like a demolition crew went through. They've been hit
by missiles. This should have been settled before it started.

(49:50):
It would have been so easy. If we had a
president with half a brain, it would have been easy
to settle. And I'm not you know, everyone saying, oh, oh,
this is terrible. He's blaming Biden. Well, I do largely
blame by him. If you watch his words. His words
were the exact opposite of what he should have been saying.

Speaker 1 (50:10):
Yeah, and in some ways Biden might have attempted and
or instigated, according to Trump, the inevitable war between Russia
and Ukraine. Now, the way people are receiving this discussion
from Trump, by the way, the way that they're talking
about it now is to say that Trump was blaming Zelinsky,
that when Russia invaded Ukraine, that that's a moment where Zelensky,
I guess, sort of surrendered immediately or something of that effect.

(50:32):
That's not what Trump is saying. Trump is picturing himself
or anyone that's not as weak as the democratic leadership
that was in charge being in charge leveraging that relationship
to potentially prevent the escalation of disagreements between Russia and
Ukraine into a conflict, and part of the thing that
will inevitably happen. This is the part that's going to

(50:54):
be hard to swallow for some out there in the world.
And certainly you feel horrible for the way in which
so much of Ukraine has been decimated, and maybe even
a little worried about how much the United States might
intend to spend to try to help Ukraine rebuild. But
the only way this conflict really ends Russia's military is
just too strong for Ukraine, and Ukraine does not have

(51:15):
support beyond giving people or people giving them equipment and
weapons of war. They won't be able to fight a
endless war with Russia. It will not end well, and
it already hasn't gone well for Ukraine, so they will
wind up giving up territory in the contested areas like
the Donbas region that were part of the beginnings of
this conflict and had some agreement happened. And I guess

(51:38):
this is where Trump is envisioning he could have created
one that would have given in somewhere there anyway, but
solidified the risk to Ukraine moving forward. Even if it's
something as significant as joining NATO, there might have been
avenues to prevent the war entirely, which would have been
better for the Ukrainian side of the conflict, because how

(52:00):
much has been taken and how much has been destroyed,
and how likely that is to be the end result
of this. And that's why Ukraine keeps saying everywhere they
are and by the way, it actually makes sense for
them to say this. I don't think it's the right thing,
but it makes sense why they're saying it, that they
won't do that, that they will fight to the last man,
because how can you tell Ukraine that they won or
that they prevented Russia from taking them if Russia actually

(52:23):
winds up getting something in some sort of peace agreement.
But if they don't do that, this war will never end.
And never ending wars is something that Trump is not
a fan of, and a lot of people are not
a fan of, even if sometimes some military industrial complex
aspects of it make a whole lot of people behind
the scenes fans of never ending war after never ending
war all Right, quick break a lot more Craig Collins

(52:43):
filling in on The Dana Show.

Speaker 6 (52:44):
In today's fast paced world, the mental load on families
has become significantly heavier, particularly because everybody navigates new schedules
and a lot of responsibilities, and with an increasing array
of activities and work commitments and school related tasks to
manage often and feel like juggling is a constant act.
Life three sixty makes it easy to keep track of

(53:05):
everybody without the constant back and forth. It's like helicopter
parenting without helicoptering. Life three sixty has real time location sharing,
so you can track your kids when they're driving to
school or hanging out. You kind of get an update
on their safety without aggravating them. You get custom alerts
when they arrive or leave locations, and it can provide
insights into their driving habits your teenagers for added safety. Plus,

(53:27):
there's also a built in group chat feature that simplifies
coordinating schedules and plans. All of the features of Life
three sixty are awesome and completely practical in today's world,
especially the emergency contacts. Also, customizing those contacts gives you
peace of mind and then you know that everyone in
the family understands how to use these emergency features and

(53:47):
can get help if they need it. Coordinate the chaos
and simplify family life with Life three sixty. Visit Life
three sixty dot com or download the app today and
use code data to get one month of the Gold
package for free. That's Life six co Dana and.

Speaker 7 (54:03):
Now all of the news you would probably miss. It's
time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (54:08):
We're going to do this rapid fire. Craig Collins, filling
in Bill Clinton, called Ethel Kennedy the cats me out
in a recent bizarre appearance and a eulogy at her funeral.
He also said that Ethel Kennedy, excuse me, used to
hit on him all the time. That's Bill Clinton in
the world we live in right now. That's strange, sad news.

(54:28):
Former One Direction star Liam Payne died I guess the
other day. There is some confusion as to what exactly happened.
Some are saying that he fell, and then some reporting
coming out of Argentina is saying that maybe he did
not fall, but chose to exit a three third story
building in order to take his own life. We will

(54:51):
see what the actual end result of that is but
that's a story that's certainly grabbing a lot of people
on social media. I don't have an appreciation for the
music per se, but figured out at least passed that
on in this segment fake AI history photos cloud are passed.
There's a whole bunch of fake, artificially created versions of
people who never even met, talking together or doing certain things.

(55:11):
It's causing a lot of concern as to how you
could tie say, one individual to another individual incorrectly or inappropriately.
That's out there. And then also chronic stress has been
linked to worsening cases of cancer and illness, specifically colo
rectal cancer. So another reason to distress yourself any way
you can whenever you can. Good luck to anybody out there.

(55:32):
That's a rapid five. This is Creig Gollin's filling in
on the Data Show.

Speaker 6 (55:36):
It's the only Christian conservative cell phone service that is
out there, and you can get free activation using code
data and they have a reliable nationwide coverage on all
three major networks. So you're getting the best service in
your area and you're not funding the Left. And if
you're tired of supporting companies that don't share your values

(55:56):
and even like work against your values. You need to
make the switch to Patriot Mobile today. They've got plans
tailored for everybody, businesses, families of all sizes, singles, dinks, whatever,
whatever your jam is, they got you cover. You can
keep your phone, keep your number, upgrade. The choice is
yours and they have one hundred percent US based customer
service team. They make it easy to switch. Visit Patriotmobile

(56:17):
dot com slash Dana or call it nine seventy two
Patriot get a free month when you use offer code data.
That's Patriotmobile dot com slash Danta ninety seven two Patriot
Free activation using code data and get your free month
today using offer code data.

Speaker 11 (56:34):
The Danas Show podcast You're fast, funny and informative news
companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (56:44):
This is The Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
stuff out there to talk about. You can find data everywhere.
A dash a Dana Lash radio on x on Twitter
one of the best ways to stay connected. She's active
there all the time. So former President Barack Obama and
former president feels like the appropriate thing to call him
even now, Joe Biden, he's still technically in that job

(57:08):
he probably shouldn't be. And also I don't think anyone's
listening to him anymore. But nonetheless, they were having a
conversation the other day and a lot of people wound
up very interested in what they were saying. This was
at the Ethel Kennedy Memorial service in Washington, DC, and
a couple lip readers put up funny versions of fake things.
Some I can't play, some I could play on the air,

(57:30):
but I strongly suggest you go look into some of those.
But I guess a couple of professionals who do this
sort of thing for a living, I believe that they
crack the code and have the real version of what
was being said. You take this with whatever grain of
salt you want. I don't have a secret recording. I
don't have an audio tape that proves these are in
fact the words somebody's speaking. But to me, when I
get the transcript and then look at the faces, it

(57:51):
seems to match. So that's the best they can do
to tell you if this is accurate or not. But
Here's what some believe was being said. First, Biden said
to Obama, and they seem very friendly as they were
standing next to each other, She's not as strong as me.
And so then Obama looks at Biden and says, you're right. Essentially,
he goes, that's true. I know. Then he adds we

(58:15):
have time, which feels very ominous. I have no idea
what that means. We have time, to which Biden says, yeah,
we will get it in time. And again, what the
hell are you talking about? What could potentially change in
this world? Some aren't totally sure that they were even
talking about Kamala Harris. I don't know if you believe
those people who say that or not. They could absolutely

(58:37):
be totally wrong about what they're saying. But nonetheless, if
you still have time time to make sure that Trump
goes to jail, I have a buddy of mine. Call
him a conspiracy theorist if you want, I think some
people do. He laughs at those people when they say it,
but he very much believes that Harris won't be the candidate.
And where barely weaks away from the election. I just

(59:00):
can't see any version of them trying to change the
on paper candidate for this election to anyone else, and
not dealing with a ridiculous amount of lawsuits and things
that make it utterly impossible to even get another name
on a ballot. But when you say something like that,
and again I'm not really sure that they're actually saying
what the lip readers say they're saying, it makes it
feel like they think they could do something, which is terrifying,

(59:23):
I think, and a lot of other things. Because Harris
just took this job from Biden on the twenty first.
The only thing that Biden might think it means is hey,
I could swing back in there, why not, which would
be hilarious. By the way. I would actually find that
deeply amusing if Biden were somehow capable of being reconsidered

(59:43):
as the candidate. Because you just lose, you're probably going
to lose either way. But no one else even wants this.
I think. The biggest reason I'll just say this before
I move on from this topic that Harris is actually
the candidate on the Democratic side of the aisle is
because no one else even wanted to try to defeat
Trump this time around, with so little time into the

(01:00:05):
election itself. I don't think any of the other people,
whatever they were on the short list of names, the
Kevin Newsom's of the world, who are terrible decisions in
general and probably won't actually be strong candidates four years
from now. They'd rather have an entire time to run
their own race than to try to do it this way. Also,
of course, the money was a huge component. If it
wasn't Harris, no one else could have taken all the

(01:00:28):
dollars that were already donated to Biden and use them.
And Harris might not even be allowed to do it,
according to many legal experts. But she doesn't care if
she's doing that anyway. But nonetheless, I do think that
there's a tremendous demonstration of just how little other people
wanted to usurp Biden that are not named Kamala Harris,
and she's the only one that seemed interested in it,
and now things are going terrible for her, especially after

(01:00:49):
the conversation with Brett Bhaer, which we'll get to more
audio of that in just a little bit. There's one
other thing that does get talked about a lot, and
I can't help but want to add context to this discussion.
I think this is CNN is one of the places
that is talking about it, people who would get deported,
all the other things that would be a negative as

(01:01:10):
far as this is concerned, and there's there's a really
worrisome version of a conversation here. I promise I'm not
trying to be woke, but you feel like the side
of the aisle that claims they are woke would actually
have a problem with their own messaging on this topic,
which he can now do because of the Supreme Court.
And he's going to take on these countries that screw
American workers. That's the plan.

Speaker 11 (01:01:29):
And oh, by the way, he's gonna he's going he's
going to down on immigration to the benefit of American works.

Speaker 14 (01:01:34):
He's going to deport He's going to deport twenty million people,
the people who pick your crops, the people who process
your meat, the people who you know, uh, care for
your grandmother, the people who serve all sorts of critical
functions in this country. Yeah, he's going.

Speaker 1 (01:01:52):
He's going to deport them. They're going to get kicked
out because they're the only ones willing to get paid
absolute terrible money to do these things. Like how elite
does that have to sound? In all honesty and I'm
not trying to be woke, I promise to you I'm not.
I just I'm sometimes dumbfounded by the narratives or the
arguments that are made on certain sides of both political aisles,
and then the way in which it seems to fly

(01:02:13):
in the face of everything you've ever said before or
would say five minutes later. If I change the subject
of the topic but leave the basic of the conversation
the same. Who's going to pick your crops? Who's going
to take care of grandma? If you deport people who
are here illegally someone who can do it legally and
get paid a actual wage for it, that should be
the woke position and not the opposite. But that definitely

(01:02:36):
went viral today as something insane that a person said,
and there's a lot of insane stuff that a lot
of people are saying. It makes you also just sit
there and wonder, like I'm saying this honestly, and I
know this might be as basic of a take as
you're going to get out there, but it deserves to
continue to be said because I don't know if enough
people are still saying this, but it seems as though

(01:02:59):
we're going to get this weird cyclical constant version of
groundhog Day arguments, where the people look at who they're
arguing against and decide that they can't agree on anything
as opposed to what the discussion is about. I feel
like if I went blazing into a conversation against a
bunch of hardcore far left liberal individuals but set all

(01:03:20):
of their talking points to them, they'd be so confused
by that. If they knew who I was or what
you know, publicly positions I stand on that they'd argue
my positions back to me because they knew they couldn't
agree with me. I think that's all it is. Honestly,
when you see support in certain demographics for Trump, a
black man is one of the ones that gets talked
about the most. The amount of rejection of the idea

(01:03:42):
that this could even be possible that anyone could actually
support Trump who is of a certain demographic or anything
else is part of the most amazing. We refuse the
narrative that's being presented to us, even though it's clearly
being presented to us as facts. We're going to deny it,
deny it, deny it because we just don't like these things.

(01:04:03):
We don't like what's being said. We don't like what
people are telling us. That is beyond terrifying as a thing.
It's the kind of thing that I think the longer
it goes and the more it's been going on for,
the more people even forget what the point of the
discussion itself is. Like, you stop even knowing why you're arguing.

(01:04:23):
You're just arguing because you've been told that you hate
the other side and the things that they think more
than you've even been told what your side actually thinks
about stuff, which is well terrible and honestly, I've been
thinking about this a bit over the last couple of days.
I don't know if this is the most valuable path
to go, especially filling in on someone else's show, someone

(01:04:44):
as famous and popular as Dana Lash. But part of
me I just wishes that you could give a you know,
unlimited soapbox out of some of the individuals that are
saying I'm this position, and I feel this way, and
I felt this way my whole life, and now finally
I'm deciding to change my opinion and switch to the

(01:05:06):
other side of the political aisle. I'm going to vote
conservative when I've been voting a Democrat for so so long,
and it's because of all the failures that have been
going on, it's all the ridiculousness that's been going on,
and then not have that person be attacked the way
that the Left attacks their own when these sort of
things occur, which to me is sort of the most
amazing side product of this discussion too. And I'm not

(01:05:29):
sure that I'm truly making sense because again, as I said,
you'd probably need like several different ways to visit this
conversation with people who are inside of something I'm not
in and say things, you know, through their own experience
that I don't have about how terrible stuff is. I
know I have some clips, at least, let's play some

(01:05:50):
of those. I have a couple of these. These are
just guys on social media viral, not influencers per se,
but they're just people. They happen to be black guys
that are probably in that age group that people are
saying Harris is struggling the most with guys in their
twenties to maybe early forties that don't really want to
support Harris, that are saying they're pretty offended, not just

(01:06:13):
by how Harris has been treating them, by saying, if
you don't vote for me, you're an idiot. But also,
people like Barack Obama have been referring to the idea
that there might be young black men who choose to
support Trump over their candidate. Here's one of those things
that went viral.

Speaker 15 (01:06:29):
Democrats and unleashed Barack Obama into the while to shameless
black men for not supporting Kamala Harris to despite the
fact that she's yet to unveil any policies that represent
our interests. Why is it okay that everybody gets to
come out here and shame this one demographic of people
for how we vote or how we question where our
vote goes. But if it was a white politician shaming

(01:06:53):
other white man for not voting based on identity politics,
y'all will call him racist. Why is it okay for
Barack Obama, Kamala Harrison, all these other people they supposedly
look like me. It's not Bob's it okay for them
to get on TV and shame me. It's not not
voting for them simply because they look like me.

Speaker 1 (01:07:11):
Yeah, it's not okay. It's not okay at all. It
shouldn't be okay. And they shouldn't be doing that. I
don't know that people would be up in arms. That's
the one thing I was also contemplating about playing that audio,
by the way he feels they would be if it
was a white politician telling people to vote based on
identity politics. I know that people of the opposite party,
whatever party it is that we're saying that, would be
up in arms. But I don't know. The rules in

(01:07:31):
today's society basically means you can take any amount of
shots you want at white men. That's okay, that's allowed.
They deserve it. Something to that effect, I think I've
been told before. But nonetheless, the overall message that he's
giving there is tremendously powerful. That he feels that to
be told to vote just based on his race for
someone who is the same race as him is the worst,

(01:07:54):
least convincing and most upsetting argument he could hear from
his own political side of the eye. And so obviously
a lot of people will agree with him and agree
on that position and hope that he, you know, doesn't
wind up getting silenced by people in his own life
who treat them like crap for saying the quiet part
out loud that so many people say out loud, But anyway,

(01:08:16):
I just do think and I'm sure there's you know,
all kinds of opportunities to have these conversations. But there's
a lot of social media platforms out there that don't
silence just everyday individuals who are putting out really great
versions of their own reaction as just one off things
you can probably find that go viral saying similar stuff.
And it also convinces me that the war against TikTok,

(01:08:39):
which for a while I actually believe made sense. You know,
if China is stealing a bunch of information and learning
things about us, not just with the Chinese spy balloons,
but with access to social media information, that's not good.
That's bad for us. But when Trump came out against
silencing TikTok because it would embolden the facebooks of the world,
who were more likely to silence certain types of conversation,

(01:09:00):
it convinces you even more and than when this stuff
goes viral on those platforms that all, right, they do
all have value, especially elon buying x or Twitter, because
you get to see more opinions. You don't get to
be convinced by all of them, but seeing them is
something that we used to not be afraid of at
all in this country. All right, quick break, A lot
more coming up. Craig Collin's filling in on the Dana Show.

Speaker 6 (01:09:21):
Black Rifle of Coffee. See, I don't need a robot
making my coffee. I don't need to roll about doing
any of that stuff. I just need good coffee.

Speaker 1 (01:09:29):
Clearly.

Speaker 6 (01:09:30):
I've had a lot today. I've had maybe one more
cup than I normally do. I had the Silencer Smooth today,
by the way, that I believe is part of the
it is.

Speaker 1 (01:09:38):
It's part of the.

Speaker 6 (01:09:40):
Complete Mission Fuelkit Variety Sampler, So if you love coffee,
you can get their sampler kit. It's a lineup of
their classic Black Rifle Coffee Company blends. So you get
four ounce bags of like all my favorites, AK forty
seven Espresso that beyond Black, that just black, the Silence
Are Smooth, which I had a lot of today. Every
flavor is amazing. It comes in this cool blue box.
It's a great g for people who like coffee. Now

(01:10:01):
it's available exclusively in ground texture. You can get all
of these, all of these blends in a whole being
k cup ready to drink, like pretty much like whichever
medium you would like, and you can join the coffee Club.
You choose your roast, your frequency of shipment, and it
shows up to your front porch with free shipping. So
you're saving money, you're saving time, and you're never going
to run out of coffee. It is a veteran owned

(01:10:22):
coffee company. They employ veterans and active duty and they're
all about pain. Given props to American culture and our
military as well. You need to experience outstanding flavor andoroma
at Black Rifle Coffee dot Com. Order yourself the complete
Mission Fuelkit Variety Sampler. Get twenty percent off with code
data twenty percent off. Coddana at Black Rifle Coffee dot Com.

Speaker 1 (01:10:47):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida Man. Amen, Florida Man. A several different amazing
Florida Man stories out. There was Craig Collins filling in
for Dana on The Dana Show. A twelve foot alligator
was removed from somebody's backyard in Cape Coral, Florida after

(01:11:08):
the hurricane wreaked all kinds of havoc in the area
and honestly sent a lot of gators, a lot of
places they're not usually going to go. There was video
footage caught that was sent into a local television news
station in Cape Coral Fort Myers, Florida area, a Wink News,
in which they showed the way they removed the gator
from the backyard. They tied a rope around its neck,

(01:11:28):
tied the other end of the rope around a pickup truck,
and just slowly drove it out of the backyard. I
love the comments on this post on social media on
Twitter from the Wink News people, because a lot of
the comments are like, man, I feel so bad for
this alligator. You can tell that he doesn't want to leave,
as one of the comments. Other people saying this is
the way that you got to do this. Some people

(01:11:50):
thanking Ron DeSantis, who didn't seem to be involved in this,
but that's hilarious to do too. But so many different
reactions and ways to guests represent what is somewhat typical
life in Florida. By the way, this isn't a part
of the segment, but it can be. I'm moving to Florida.
I actually live in the Midwest right now, and I'll
be moving to Florida in the next week. And a

(01:12:10):
half or so, and so I hope to not find
the gator in my backyard anytime soon. I got family there.
I don't think I've ever heard a story about his
finding stuff, so I think that I'll be in a
gator liss area. But you ever know another story that
I love, also somewhat tied to the hurricanes in Florida,
a guy got arrested because he tried to steal a
generator off of a stop light that was obviously without

(01:12:33):
power and it was being provided by said generator. Cops
came to his house because workers in the area noticed
what he was doing, told him, you're not allowed to
take that. He didn't seem to really care about their advice,
but eventually he left. They got his license plate. Cop
showed up at his house and they just had questions
for this Florida man first, and he had terrible Florida
man answers. Here we go, Hey, yeah you do it good?

Speaker 10 (01:12:56):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:12:56):
Can you said about for us?

Speaker 1 (01:12:58):
I'm fixing dinner right now. My first thing that I'm
a fan of is that the cops asked him to
step outside. He obviously knows based on the level of
uh stress. He sounds like he has in his voice
that he's in trouble, and he goes rather not step outside.
I'm making dinner. I'm very busy.

Speaker 4 (01:13:13):
What's going on.

Speaker 14 (01:13:15):
You're just being detained.

Speaker 12 (01:13:16):
But some people who might have witnessed you doing some
things that we should have done. Okay, there's a generator
on six seventy four.

Speaker 1 (01:13:22):
Yeah, I saw I was had no rock on it
and had no name on it, so I was, yeah,
I love that. As far as an answer goes from
this guy, that is not something that makes things more legal. Uh,
you saw a generator on the street tied to a
stoplight that wouldn't work when you unplugged it, and you
notice no name on it. He's treating the generator outside

(01:13:45):
of his community or within his community, like most people
treat food inside their you know, office refrigerator. It's like,
I didn't see a name. I thought this was anybody's generator.
So I wanted to slowly unplug it and then find
a way to move it to my house. And I
thought that was fine, And then when the workers came
up and told me it wasn't, and I tried to
ignore them, they told me again it wasn't, and then

(01:14:06):
eventually I went home. I never thought I'd be arrested
for this, sir. It's an easy mistake. Obviously, everybody makes
one that's so great there's no name on it. Is
something that I hope more people say right when they're
getting arrested, and I imagine they actually do one. Last one.
I like this too. A guy was arrested in Port
Saint Lucie and Florida. Apparently he pointed a flamethrower at police.

(01:14:29):
He didn't use it, thank god. I intimidated them for sure.
Brandishing a flamethrower, that's a crime that's going to get
you in trouble, more so when it's toward police. But
the Florida thing about it is why did he have
a flamethrower? It didn't seem relevant to anything he was doing.
He seemed to back up in whatever video is out
there with this story out there and pick up a
flame thrower and then say he was going to do

(01:14:50):
some stuff with it and then realize they'd be terrible,
and he backed down and he got arrested. But that's
an intense interaction. I've actually often said, this is a quote,
you can quote me on it. That's something that would
make me much more disturbed if I ever were to
have been a cop, I was when someone chooses randomly
to get naked, well in the middle of getting arrested.
I don't like the people who want to get naked.

(01:15:11):
I don't know what's going on in their brains. I
don't want to be around that situation when you're in
trouble outdoors and you think that that's going to enhance
the situation and not make it much worse. I think
flamethrower is the only thing I might be more intimidated
than full on nudity halfway through the rest. But both
are bad. Neither are good. Don't be those people, all right,
quick break? A lot more coming up. Craig Collins filling

(01:15:32):
in on The Dana Show. This is the Dana Show.
My name is Craig Collins, filling in. Thrilled to be
with you. Lots of stuff to talk about. Dana is
back on Monday. The Dana Show can be found everywhere
First TV Channel three forty seven on Direct TV and
also DLASH or LASH Radio are two great places to
find her online. All right, let's do this first. I

(01:15:54):
thought this was interesting and I don't have as hot
of a take as maybe I should have on this topic.
Although I am, I am, and I think a lot
of people are annoyed that this sort of thing becomes
such a common talking point in the world of news media.
Victoria's Secret had its fashion show return this week. I
think it happened on Tuesday, and apparently two of the
models were transgender models. I didn't watch the show, so

(01:16:16):
I can't tell you if I was aware or unaware
when I saw it. I'm not trying to be mean,
just being honest. If you watch in the fashion show
and you see some models that don't look the same
as you're used to, you might notice that. I don't know.
I have no idea. I haven't even seen photos of
these people, have just seen all over social media the
prevalence of this discussion, and so I guess what I'm

(01:16:36):
saying is I'm annoyed and maybe even partly annoyed on
their behalf. I have no idea if they're annoyed or not.
So I guess I'd be told that I'm not allowed
to feel that way for somebody else, but that this
is even like a part of the conversation, because in
all honesty, if you're someone that wants to be a model,
and you've done certain things to yourself to look as

(01:16:57):
good as you can in that world. I don't know
if you want to sell this point. I don't know.
I have no idea. I'm out of the loop. I'm
out of touch on this. I just know it becomes
such a common talking point and such a ridiculous, you know,
a political thing for all of us to debate, and
it's something that eventually changes how many people think you're
allowed to parent your own children, that someone else is
allowed to parent your children if they can prove you're

(01:17:18):
hateful somehow or some way, even if everything you feel
has nothing to do with hate whatsoever, just protecting your
kids from harming themselves. But nonetheless, as I say all this,
I just couldn't get over the amount of places that
are talking about that. And I wonder if that's positive
or negative. For even the victorious Secret Fashion Show, which
went on hiatus for being not woke and mean and stuff,

(01:17:40):
and then came back, I think a little bit, but
didn't do very well because the models were not traditional
well not necessarily a transgender. And now there's transgender models
and they're proud of it. But I don't know how
many people actually watch this. I have no context for it,
but I just saw it and I thought it was
interesting that it's all over news. There's this obsession with
talking about some of these things as if you're outing

(01:18:01):
someone for being hateful, if their actual response to the
story is, Oh, I don't care. I don't know why
that's hateful. By the way, I don't think anyone will
ever be able to convince me or get me to
understand why not caring about something means that I hate somebody,
because I thought that, you know, lack of having that
in my brain at all was more a reflection of
what my day to day life is like and me

(01:18:23):
not being worried or the opposite about you. But that's
my own genuine reaction to it. The reason I even
bring that up, though, is it somewhat pivots into a
conversation about a political thing going on. So Kamala Harris
last night did this long interview. It should have been
even longer, but it didn't last as long as it
should have lasted. With Brett bhar Many of the topics

(01:18:46):
that came up focused on things that probably aren't at
the top of people's minds when it comes to your
actual day to day life, although Brett Baer did a
much better job than anyone else who interviews Kamala Harris
at bringing some of those things in issues and things
that a lot of Americans are thinking about. One of
the discussions, though, focused on a ad, a political ad

(01:19:08):
that the Trump team is running. I'll play it for
you because it's tied to a lot of these issues
that people do still talk about, and especially parents do
talk about when they're worried about their kids. The impressionableness
of a child, a willingness of a kid in today's
society to think that there's something wrong with you if
there's nothing about you that's you know, unique, I don't
know how to say that different, nothing about you that

(01:19:29):
is apart from what you know a lot of other
kids are saying and doing or feel. I'm in the
right body, I'm the right person. You know, I have
these pronouns. Whatever that is that's now frowned upon in society,
at least from a generational standpoint, in some strange ways,
it makes you boring and then also maybe worse things.

(01:19:51):
But because of that, maybe this is such a significant
conversation to so many, But here's how it came up
last night in the conversation between Brett Bhaer and Kamala Harris.

Speaker 2 (01:20:00):
This particular one from the Trump campaign has gotten a
lot of attention.

Speaker 11 (01:20:04):
Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners, surgery for prisoners.

Speaker 3 (01:20:10):
For prisoners, every transgender inmate in the prison system would
have access.

Speaker 2 (01:20:19):
So are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars
to help prison inmates or detain the illegal aliens to
transition to another gender?

Speaker 4 (01:20:26):
I will follow the law.

Speaker 3 (01:20:29):
And it's a law that Donald Trump actually followed you're
probably familiar with. Now it's a public report, so now administration.

Speaker 1 (01:20:38):
The hold on, let's get that exactly right, Madam Vice President,
if you don't mind. And I wish that there'd been
more jumping in right away to that. So the actual
truth and this is not coming from me, and what
I think the truth is. This is something you can
easily look up and find in your own Even the
New York Times has appropriately reported on this. Yes, when
Trump was in office, there were people in prison that

(01:20:58):
requested a transition from one sex to another, and Trump's
administration added a caveat to what would be allowed legally
because I guess in the courts they decided that it
would be legal for someone who could prove that it
was medically important that they were transitioned from one sex

(01:21:21):
to another sex. It's a very weird, complicated thing. Trump's
administration added the word it had to be medically necessary.
It had to be something that they thought without it,
the person would die or the person would be in
jeopardy in some sort of way. And so I imagine,
and it never actually happened. While Trump was in office,
people were trying to get these surgeries performed, but they

(01:21:43):
were delayed because they were being fought in courtrooms. But
essentially the word necessary became the forefront of the discussion.
I hate doing this history lesson. It probably isn't going
to be important to a whole lot of Americans, but
it's essentially absolutely accurate. According to The New York Times,
and the first such operation to occur where an inmate
used tax dollars to change their sex was in twenty

(01:22:04):
twenty two, after Trump was long out of office, so
any other impact he could have had on that issue
the first time around didn't actually occur until he was
already no longer in power. So Harris is lying to
you when she says that Trump followed this because his
administration actually made it more difficult and demonstrated that it
had to be proven a certain way in a courtroom,

(01:22:27):
and then inevitably lost a court case. A years after,
as I said, he was no longer the president's a
little bit.

Speaker 3 (01:22:32):
More surgeries were available to on a medical necessity basis
to people in the federal prison system. And I think, frankly,
that ad from the Trump campaign is a little bit
of like throwing stones when you're live in a glasshouse.

Speaker 2 (01:22:48):
The Trump haids say that he never advocated for that
prison policy, and no gender transition.

Speaker 4 (01:22:54):
Responsible for what happened in your administration.

Speaker 2 (01:22:57):
Yeah, no surgeries happened in this pregnancy position. Would you
still advocate?

Speaker 15 (01:23:01):
I love it.

Speaker 1 (01:23:01):
I love it so much. When she's shaking her head
and saying it's in black and white, how dare you?
And he goes, well, it actually didn't happen during his adminstration.
Even if they were fighting in courtrooms, it didn't occur
during the time he was in office, which feels like
a petty thing to argue about because his position now
and her position now couldn't be clearer, and they disagree
with each.

Speaker 2 (01:23:19):
Other for using task payo of dollars for gender reassignments.

Speaker 4 (01:23:22):
I will follow the law just as I would say
he did.

Speaker 2 (01:23:26):
You would have to say, as president, like I.

Speaker 4 (01:23:28):
Said, I think it's real. He spent twenty million dollars
on those apps.

Speaker 3 (01:23:32):
Okay, trying to create a sense of fear in the voters.

Speaker 1 (01:23:35):
But you've spent billions of dollars or at least one
hundreds of millions of dollars of the billion whatever it
is you raised to try to paint Trump as a horrible,
terrible person. So it's weird to complain about the money
that's spent on this sort of thing. But one last
part of it, and I love this so much. When
you say I'm not going to take any sort of
active role in any of these things, I'm not. I'm
not going to be involved. It's not going to be something.

(01:23:57):
I'll just follow the law. I'll just let those people decide.
One of two things winds up being true. You are
putting out loud into the world how weak you are,
how incredibly weak you are actually, and how willing you
are to not be the one who's in charge in
our country and not actually govern it well being elected
to do exactly that. And then the other issue you

(01:24:17):
have with that sort of thing, especially with people who
have a track record like the one that Harris has,
is how obviously untrue it's going to wind up being
shortly after you get into office. There's a extreme difference
to me from the people who say, you know what,
I have no path to change this rule, as opposed
to the people who say I have no interest in
changing this rule. The no interest is different, and even

(01:24:41):
more so if you actually say that you do agree
or disagree with something, it's quite a bit different than
saying you have to follow the law, as if you
can't try to change the law by being in the
role you're in. But nonetheless, I just thought it was
really interesting and one of several conversations that seemed designed
in a way in which Brett Beher was act trying
to get to the heart of the issue and discuss

(01:25:02):
the actual differences between the two people, and the goal,
it seemed for Democrats was to get the SoundBite or
she's nice and Trump is a mean jerk, or whatever
else it is. I one more moment from that, because
it was a really significant interview, even if it won't
get played as much as it should be played. There
were several struggle points for Harris, but none were probably

(01:25:23):
more powerful, at least to most Americans, than this one.

Speaker 3 (01:25:28):
Frederick that people are frankly exhausted of Brett more than
our sopecty to.

Speaker 2 (01:25:32):
Tell the country is on the wrong track. They say
the country is on the wrong track. If it's on
the wrong track, that track follows three and a half
years of you being vice president and President Biden being president.
That is what they're saying, seventy nine percent of them.
Why are they saying that If you're turning the page,
You've been in office for three and a half years.

Speaker 3 (01:25:54):
And Donald Trump has been running for office. The person
home off You and I both know what I'm talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:26:02):
You and I both know what I'm actually don't know
what are you talking about?

Speaker 3 (01:26:05):
What I'm talking I know what you're talking about. Said
over the last decade, people have but listen, over the
last decade, it is clear to me and certainly the
Republicans who are on stage, the former chief of staff
to the President Donald Trump, former defense secretaries.

Speaker 1 (01:26:26):
That he's evil, that he's you know, the joker and
we need a batman to come and take him out
or something like that, or that he still wields influence
and power. I don't know what you're gonna say. Well,
actually I don't what she's gonna say, but I don't
care essentially what I'll say in reaction to all of that.
And how hilarious it is to try to blame Trump
when you're actually the person in the White House right now?
Is how you know weak Beyond anything else. It makes

(01:26:49):
you seem if it were actually not a talking point.
It is a talking point. It is complete crap. But
it's amazing to think that if Democrats got what they
wanted out of that, and you believed that the real
reason that they didn't do more to fix certain issues
is that Trump wielded too much power without being in
the office of president, then you couldn't walk away from
that conversation saying anything to yourself other than well, then

(01:27:11):
why don't we elect the guy who's actually in charge?
If he's going to be in charge, if he's not
in office, or if he is in office, might as
well put him back in office. That way, at least
we know what's going on in the forefront. As opposed
to in the background, and you're telling us that. Now,
granted I don't actually think what she's saying is true,
but if I took it at face value, that's the
only way I'd be able to receive it. Is that
you're telling me that you're the boss of my company,

(01:27:33):
but that the number two guy, a guy that doesn't
even work here, is actually in charge. Well, we might
as well bring him in and make him the boss.
Then if you can't be the boss, because at least
we have somebody that's here with us telling us what's
going on, and we know what their role is. All right,
I got to take a break. A little more coming
up after this, Craig Collins filling in on the Dana Show.

Speaker 7 (01:27:52):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (01:27:58):
That's right, it's the Quick five. Let's get through some
of these these are pretty great. A student was punished
for using AI to write a paper in school. Now
his parents are suing the school, saying that they violated
his civil rights, the civil rights to cheat on stuff.
This happened in Massachusetts. The student or the parents of
the student are claiming that they deserve a whole bunch

(01:28:20):
of money. Dale and Jennifer are their names. They're raising
their kid to be horrible. I don't know how to
say that different. They're raising their kid to be someone
who never thinks that any consequences are theirs. By the way,
the kid also got a C plus on the paper
didn't even get NEF for something that they plagiarized from
the internet. From AI, their grade was docked, but their
grade was not completely destroyed, and they're a National merit

(01:28:41):
scholar according to the story. Who knows how often they've
been cheating though, who knows how much of those you know,
how many of those scores they've gotten before actually legitimate
and not you know, chat GPTs credits. But nonetheless, the
parents want to show the kid that doing bad things
has absolutely no consequences, So good luck to them. Another
story out there that I saw that I thought was interesting.

(01:29:03):
Walking in short bursts is actually better for you and
can burn more calories and do good stuff compared to
longer durations of walking at the same speed. So if
you just get up from your chair while at your
job and walk around every so often, you're actually going
to do better than if you show up at the
park after work and do a longer walk according to
science according to the Internet, which is something I'll immediately

(01:29:25):
tell the missus the next time she asked me to
go somewhere and do a longer form version of aerobic workout.
You know what, Actually, the short forms I wind up
helping out a lot. We've got to stick to those
and not do the longer form things. Another story out
there that I kind of liked, well, I just thought
it was weird. Blood vessels are being grown in labs
now and some of the scientists behind doing this or

(01:29:46):
saying that it's like having spare parts for people. So
eventually you might be able to swing into your local
version of a Walmart store that's just spare parts for
humans and buy whatever things you need and have them
implanted in your body. I don't know if it'll happen
exactly like that. That's the future. Iron Vision probably isn't good.
It probably won't be great for a lot of us,
although apparently it's helping and it's even been effective at

(01:30:09):
dealing with injuries that Ukrainian soldiers are dealing with this
according to the Wall Street Journal, so they're proud of it.
I just feel creeped out by spare parts for people.
As a quote that some scientists somewhere gave to news
media that they were proud of, They're like, yeah, we're
growing the spare parts. Can't wait for this to become
a bigger deal. And then also I saw this as
far as a quick five topic. A series of earthquakes

(01:30:31):
in southern California has made people very worried about the
big one coming at some point. Maybe that's because of
some of the other weather stuff that's happened of Florida,
seeing a couple of hurricanes, for example. But luckily these
things are not as tied together as people say they are,
so the fear of quote unquote the big one might
not have any level of additional value to it as

(01:30:52):
far as the scientists or anyone else is concerned. We
shall see. I guess the smaller quakes have made people worried.
I made people ask that question quite a bit, especially
on social media. Finally, one last super quick one. A
giant runaway pumpkin, an inflatable pumpkin a Halloween decoration stop
traffic in Cleveland, Ohio for a while. There's a viral

(01:31:13):
video online of a massive pumpkin that is not real,
making everybody slam on the brakes and then wait for
someone to clear it. I don't know why I found
that funny, but I just did to check that one
out too. All right, quick.

Speaker 11 (01:31:23):
Break, Subscribe to the Dana Show podcast because who says
you can't make fun of people while staying informed on
your own personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever
you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:31:36):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Greg Collins,
filling in. Find Dana Lash all over. You can find
her on First TV, on direct TV. You can find
her on iHeart, tune in, all the Stuff, Apple podcasts
and also d lash or Dana Lash Radio on Twitter
on x are great ways to stay connected to her too,

(01:31:57):
and Dana Lash dot com or Dana radio dot com
as well. All Right, Tucker Carlson did a great interview,
sit down interview where he was and honestly, that's all
he does. I don't think he does a lot of
on the road stuff. But a conversation about just how
bad things could be for liberal mentality, I guess is
probably the right way to say it. If Donald Trump

(01:32:19):
doesn't indeed win reelection, something that a whole lot of
Pulls and other things are saying is actually likely. I
know for a while they were claiming it wasn't, but
a lot of those numbers seem to have leaned back
toward Trump recently. You should still vote whoever you want
to win. You should not go ahead and decide to neglect,
to throw that part of the process there, as Trump says,
actually to his supporters, make it impossible for them to cheat.

(01:32:41):
As I like that as a narrative in and of itself,
But I want to play part of this because I
just thought it was really interesting with a political analyst
and Tucker Carlson, the guy's name is Mark Halperin discussing
what they believe will happen or could happen once Trump
gets re elected, as far as the slow breakdown of
lack of acceptance maybe or belief or something for those

(01:33:03):
who take in the rhetoric that Trump is a danger
to democracy or whatever else they say.

Speaker 5 (01:33:10):
Here we go say this not flippantly. I think it
will be the cause of the greatest mental health crisis
in the history of the country.

Speaker 4 (01:33:17):
I don't.

Speaker 5 (01:33:18):
I think tens of millions of people will question their
connection to the nation, their connection to other human beings,
their connection to their vision of what their future for
them and their children could be like. And I think
that will be require an enormous amount of access to
mental health professionals. I think it'll lead to trauma in

(01:33:42):
the workplace. I think there'll be some degree of one
hundred percent serious, one hundred percent serious. I think they'll be.

Speaker 1 (01:33:50):
One hundred percent serious. I love the Tucker's first real
reaction forty five seconds into this answer to what's going
to happen if Trump gets re elected? Is mental health crisis,
a need for or access to mental health professionals, fights
in workplaces, all kinds of things. It's like, are you
honestly saying this out loud? And the answer is yeah,
you know people like this. I know people like this.

(01:34:11):
Not people like the guests, but people that he's describing
that would seem to mentally be incapable of accepting the
idea that Trump could be re elected to the office
of president because they believe all the things they're told
in media, all the things that at one point Trump's
running mate even believed about him when he would call
him a Nazi, as is often brought up in liberal media,

(01:34:33):
trying to take shots at Trump today, but has come
around to believe that, Oh yeah, that's not the case
at all. And the whole first time Trump was in office,
none of the fear mongering things they said then, like
that we would end up in a nuclear war, actually occurred.
So I guess there's a chance that those things don't
happen a second time around. But I thought this was
really fascinating. They're not done, They're just getting into it.

Speaker 5 (01:34:50):
Alcoholism, they'll be broken marriages, double what. Yeah, they think
he's the worst person possible to be president, and having
won by the hand of Jim Comey and Fluke in
twenty sixteen and then performed in office for four years
and denied who won the election last time in January sixth,

(01:35:10):
the fact that under a fair election, America chows by
the rules pre agreed to Donald Trump again. I think
it will cause the biggest mental health crisis in the
history of America. And I don't think it will be
kind of a passing thing that by pauperation will be fine.
I think it will be sustained and unprecedented and hideous
long possible. I don't think the country's ready for it.

Speaker 17 (01:35:33):
So mental health crises often manifest in violence.

Speaker 5 (01:35:37):
Yeah, I think there'll be some violence. I think they'll be.

Speaker 1 (01:35:40):
Look, I'll stop it there. You might think that all
this is a radical and crazy, and even Tucker is
someone who often gets all those labels added to him,
reacting to some of this with disbelief that he has
a guest, granted, a guest who's on Newsmax saying the
things that he's saying. But you can't help but think
that there are a people like I'll just I'll make
it a pertional experience, an anecdote, if you will, or

(01:36:02):
whatever you want to call this. In my own life,
there have been several times where, based on what I
do for a living I'm a broadcaster, not just here
but other places, there have been people that wind up
having friction with me that makes no sense to me.
I don't know them, I don't talk to them. And
when I do have a reason to eventually communicate with people,

(01:36:23):
maybe it's people I work with or something else, I
usually I'm already at a tremendous disadvantage because of what
I say politically, how I discuss certain topics, and it
makes it almost impossible to work with some of these individuals.
One of the most famous versions of this in my
own life. I'm not famous to anybody but me and
some friends and maybe people who listen to some of
my regular broadcast stuff that I do was when I

(01:36:46):
was working at a radio station and the news director
of the place I was working at came in because
I was filling in on a show I didn't usually
work on. She said to me, right before we started
going on air, she knew what my political stances on
certain things were. And this is right at the beginning
of the pandemic, by the way, so what she said
she thought was way worse than what it actually probably

(01:37:08):
would feel like today if someone said it. But her
sentiment was, hey, by the way, before we start going here,
just so you know, if you say anything positive about Trump,
if I ever were to get COVID, I would find
the nearest Trump rally so I could kill as many
Trump supporters as possible. She might not have said it
quite that clearly, but that was exactly the thing she said,
that she would take it to a rally to hurt people.

(01:37:30):
And then she looked at me and she said, all right,
so let's get going, and like the weirdest passive, aggressive
smile took over this person's face. That just one instance.
I've had tremendous other ones like that, where a salesperson
or someone else struggles to be able to work with
you when you're sitting there thinking why we barely talk,
we barely exchange anything at all, and then you do
get frustrated or upset or mad at some point because

(01:37:52):
it's unfair. The way that things have been happening are unfair,
and Trump feels that way for sure, with the way
he's been treated. And I think a lot of trumps
supporters and a lot of office spaces, or maybe a
lot of groups of friends feel that way, or just
conservatives who wouldn't even call themselves, you know, maga, republican
or whatever the disparaging word is, but it would just
call themselves people who would rather vote for Trump than

(01:38:13):
vote for Harris and then wind up getting as attacked
as anyone else. There would be a moment where, if
Trump wins again, all of those versions of potential conflict
could overwhelm a lot of individuals in ways that I
think could be harmful. As Marcus saying on Tucker's show,
I don't know if it'll get to the extreme that
it could get to. But there are a lot of

(01:38:34):
people who just feel as though your fellow man's the enemy,
when your fellow man is not the enemy. I'll say
one other thing about the times I've had conflicts with
people in my own personal life based on politics, I
don't actually hold any ill will to this day on
any of those individuals because I don't think any of
it was about me and them. I don't care. They
seem like nice enough people. I usually these are people
who are you know, parents, or friends, or you know,

(01:38:58):
something else. With a lot of people I know and respect,
I don't have any issue. It's at times caused challenges
to certain aspects of my own personal life, but nonetheless,
like when you get removed from those things, you don't
hold any ill will because what's the point in doing that.
It wasn't even really about you, It's about something else.
And I think that's the scariest part of political rhetoric

(01:39:19):
in today's society is the amount of people who identify
it so strongly now that you don't want to hate
the politician that you disagree with. That was more normal.
That's like at a sporting event when you're booing the
team you don't like, but now you actually want to
physically boo and attack all the people in the stands
that cheer for the other team. I'm a Yankee fan.

(01:39:40):
The Yankees are going to be playing baseball again tonight,
and I very hope they win again and get one
game closer. There are two games away from the World Series.
And I know that sometimes people punch each other and
beat each other up because of sports teams, but it's
few and far between. It's something that happens very rarely
in our society. And yet the passion that some people
might have for politics and the belief they have that

(01:40:02):
what happens in the world of politics has a stronger
impact in your life than sports does, because well darn it,
they're right about that. It does. It causes these issues
to be crazier. It just insane. And again my favorite
version of an example of this, and this is so
you know, minute compared to legal cases challenging Donald Trump
and trying to throw them in jail and anything anyone

(01:40:23):
else would experience in this world. But the biggest thing
I can say in response to all of this, like
the thing that matters a most to me about this
discussion is how I hope at the end of all
of it, when they're years removed from any version of Oh,
I didn't like that guy because he said political stuff
that I didn't like that they look back and go,
you know, I probably overreacted there. I probably overreacted here.

(01:40:44):
I probably went too far there. I don't know that
we will, but I think that would be very cathartic.
That would bring us a lot of healing or whatever
of woke words I want to use to talk about it,
to get us back to a place where you don't
see your fellow man as the enemy because they're not.
They're not the enemy, especially some when you barely know,
you barely communicate with, you barely even understand anything of

(01:41:06):
For you to say or do things that actively harm
them seems to make no sense. And I don't know
what it is you're actually fighting with. It's actually you know,
there's one other example of this that I love that
I can play that has nothing to do with anything
in my life for anyone else's life, but it is
a crazy woman. So I guess I'll end it on
this moment. This younger I think twenty something, I was

(01:41:28):
walking through Jersey. I've played this audio already in the
show today. She sees a flag above a restaurant, believes
the flag to be Israel's flag, and so she rips
it down, puts the social media video camera on herself,
So she tapes herself damaging something of a that she
doesn't known from some business and yelling at them about
how it stands for genocide. Now, outside of the fact

(01:41:50):
that that's anti Semitic and wrong and a lot of
people would disagree with it in general, it also wasn't
the Israeli flag, which makes it even worse when she
asked to inevitably apologize. But what I'm trying to say,
and how I'm trying to tie these topics together, is
that to me, this anger, this rage, this insanity coming
out of a complete stranger that's never been to your restaurant,

(01:42:10):
has no idea like anything about your restaurant, but wants
to rip the flag down because they think that it
stands for something that they think they don't like. Even
though I don't know how well she even understands the
issue that she's claiming to understand as well she does,
it just shows us how you reposition this anger on
stuff that you think you're entitled to be angry about
because society has told you, Hey, you're allowed to be

(01:42:31):
angry about this, when the reality is I bet you
she's angry about something else in her life. I don't
know if she had a breakup with a boyfriend, I
don't know if a parent treated her poorly, she's having
difficulties with family or friends, But it feels like that's
more likely to be the situation or some sort of
challenge she's dealing with in her own life. Maybe she
just lost a job that has nothing to do with her.
Anger being placed on this something that it seems like

(01:42:51):
it doesn't tie to her at all. But here I'll
play the audio just an example. But I think we
see so much of that in the world, and I
think that's so well represented in what Tucker's get is saying.
Could happen when Trump gets back in for the side
that sees him as the evil enemy that they're told
he is.

Speaker 4 (01:43:09):
I'm taking this down. I don't I can't do that.

Speaker 3 (01:43:12):
I don't stay for this.

Speaker 1 (01:43:13):
There's genoside. I don't support it.

Speaker 8 (01:43:15):
This is not okay, this is greaky.

Speaker 12 (01:43:18):
Who's this? This is greeky? What greaky. Yeah, oh, I
know it's Israel.

Speaker 1 (01:43:25):
I'm such a fan of that that she's like, what
are they gonna do. I'm gonna tear this down. I'm
gonna throw it on the ground. I'm gonna take it
down because they're terrible and they're supporting Israel, a genocidal country,
which is all insane rhetoric and talking points and not
true and just stuff that she's yelling. And then she
finds out it's a Greek flag and she apologizes to
the people and puts it back up. What an idiot,
What a moron? First and secondly, what a scary way

(01:43:47):
in which you believe you can wield your anger in
something that you'll be supported by society on. So I'm
allowed to be mad here. So I'm gonna be mad,
even if I don't know anything about the people I'm
mad at or know anything about who they are as individuals, which,
as I said again not to repeat, it is happening
a lot in our society. All right, quick break a
lot more as Craig Collins filling in on the Data.

Speaker 11 (01:44:07):
Show On the Go and need a quick news fix
with a fun twist. Follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for
bite size and formative episodes, perfect for your busy schedule
on Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:44:20):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins.
Filling in Dana is back on Monday. A d Lash,
Dana Lash Radio or places. You can find her on
x on Twitter, at Danaradio dot com, channel channel three
forty seven, First TV, all kinds of places, so all
over the place finder. She's very, very successful and talented.
All right, before I get out of here, first, I

(01:44:41):
thought it was weird that Jerry Seinfeld popped up last
night to do an intro to the Mets game. The
Yankees and Mets both play today, so that'll be interesting
to see where those series go. But again, the Mets game,
for some reason yesterday involved Seinfeld. I know he's a
famous Mets fan, but a little bit of what that sounded.

Speaker 17 (01:45:01):
Like postseason baseball, if your team is in it, it's
two different sports. Really, home games and awakening at home.
You want insane screaming, jumping, dancing, pushing, punching away. You
want to quiet it.

Speaker 10 (01:45:16):
Well, bounce back when put up.

Speaker 3 (01:45:18):
Mets in game too.

Speaker 1 (01:45:20):
A Dodger game is glamorous.

Speaker 17 (01:45:21):
Everyone looks so good. We love our Mets no matter what.
The Mets are all we have. They know it, and
we know it, and yes we also know we're not
that physically attractive. And now Game three of the National
League Championship, Sei.

Speaker 1 (01:45:39):
I do like that he said that the Mets fans
are not that terribly attractive. You do have something else there, Jerry.
Anybody in New York and cheer for the Yankees, the
appropriate team to cheer for, my favorite baseball team since
I was a little kid growing up in Jersey who
didn't know what a payroll was. For anyone that gets
mad whenever I say that, I just quickly before we
get out of here. A couple other things. Over a
month in the negotiations Boeing and the Machinist Union have stalled.

(01:46:02):
So apparently the negotiations are a lot like the Boeing
aircrafts themselves. They have issues. They stall. Hopefully doors aren't
flying off places about. This could be bad. This could
be an issue, especially if they're, you know, continuing to
make Boeing airplanes the way they've been making them so far.
That feels like more bad than good. But I thought
that was an interesting quick story out there in the world.

(01:46:22):
Another one I saw there is a lawsuit that's going
to start in San Jose, California. It is against Los Gatos,
a restaurant that serves apparently way too spicy of food.
The lawsuit was real, It was brought on by people.
They claim that this is the part that really got me.
The dragon ball appetizer at Los Gato's Thai restaurant was

(01:46:46):
so spicy it burned an individual internally, and she asked
to go to court now to get rewarded for whatever
the problem is. A dragon ball Z or dragon Ball
a cartoon show I watched as a kid growing up.
Is Helenely getting dragged in all this. It's unfair to them.
They're probably not happy about it. But also in the
simple question, a one that deserves to be asked. If

(01:47:07):
you don't like spicy food, if you think it's going
to be horrible for you, don't order it, don't puy it,
don't try a whole lot of it, Eat very very
tiny amounts of it, and see if you can handle it.
As opposed to this, she's the only person who's brought
the lawsuit. That's why I'm saying that I don't necessarily
believe that the food was too spicy for human consumption.

(01:47:28):
I think it might have just been too spicy for her,
but who knows. I will say she's trying to prove
permanent injury, and she said she is forever damaged by
the experience, both physically and mentally. She's going to be
afraid of a spicy food and maybe Goku and Figeta
for the rest of her life, which makes me very
sad because it's a pretty decent cartoon show. At least
it was when I was a kid. I think it

(01:47:49):
still holds up now. I know they've got movies and
stuff that have come out. I haven't seen any of that.
Mostly the reason I haven't seen that, I'm just going
to do a tangent before I get out of here
real quick is I couldn't bear to bring my wife
with me to those of movies, and I can't go
to them alone. You know, the comic book Superhero. I
love the real life Marvel movies. I still go to
those and drag the misses along, But the comic book

(01:48:09):
Superhero movies that are cartoons, I can't do it. Man,
I'm almost forty years old. I can't make the misses
go and I can't try to do it on my
own and respect myself with the I don't blame you
if you do, I'm just saying I can't. All right,
I'm out of here. I'll be back tomorrow, Dana. We'll
be back on Monday. This is the Danish Show. My
name is Craig. Craig Collins filling in. I got my
name wrong.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Breakfast Club

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Kamala’s Fox Fumble, Lip-Reading Obama and Biden & Victoria’s Secret Controversy

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Breakfast Club

All Episodes

Kamala’s Fox Fumble, Lip-Reading Obama and Biden & Victoria’s Secret Controversy

Stuff You Should Know